Pub Date : 2024-04-29eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20242023203en
Joana Carolina Martins Simões, Denny Marcos Garcia, Francisco Veríssimo De Mello-Filho, Claudia Maria De Felício, Luciana Vitaliano Voi Trawitzki
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate three-dimensional facial soft tissue dimensions, maximum bite force (MBF), and occlusal contact area in patients with DFD. In addition, we analyzed the relationship between MBF and the three-dimensional facial measurements.
Methods: Thirty-two patients with skeletal Class III DFD and 20 patients with Class II DFD underwent a soft tissue evaluation using surface laser scanning, as well as MBF and occlusal contact area assessments. The DFD groups were compared with each other and with 25 healthy subjects.
Results: Significant morphological differences were found in the transversal, vertical, and anteroposterior dimensions between Class II DFD and Class III DFD. Both DFD groups presented an increased linear distance of chin height, which was strongly related with decreased MBF magnitude. The DFD groups exhibited lower MBF and occlusal contact area, with no significant differences between Class II and Class III DFD.
Conclusion: The presence of DFD affected 3D measurements of facial soft tissue, causing variations beyond normal limits, lower MBF, and occlusal contact area in both Class II and Class III DFD patients. The vertical dimension might have influenced the lower MBF magnitude in the studied skeletal deformities.
目的:本研究旨在调查 DFD 患者的面部软组织三维尺寸、最大咬合力(MBF)和咬合接触面积。此外,我们还分析了 MBF 与面部三维测量值之间的关系:32 名骨骼 III 级 DFD 患者和 20 名 II 级 DFD 患者接受了表面激光扫描软组织评估以及 MBF 和咬合接触面积评估。DFD 组之间以及 DFD 组与 25 名健康人进行了比较:结果:II 类 DFD 和 III 类 DFD 在横向、纵向和前向尺寸上存在明显的形态差异。两个 DFD 组的颏高线性距离都有所增加,这与 MBF 幅值的减少密切相关。DFD 组的 MBF 和咬合接触面积较低,II 类和 III 类 DFD 之间无显著差异:结论:DFD 的存在影响了面部软组织的三维测量,导致 II 类和 III 类 DFD 患者的变化超出正常范围,MBF 和咬合接触面积降低。在研究的骨骼畸形患者中,垂直维度可能影响了较低的 MBF 幅值。
{"title":"Relationship between bite force, occlusal contact area, and three-dimensional facial soft tissue in dentofacial deformities.","authors":"Joana Carolina Martins Simões, Denny Marcos Garcia, Francisco Veríssimo De Mello-Filho, Claudia Maria De Felício, Luciana Vitaliano Voi Trawitzki","doi":"10.1590/2317-1782/20242023203en","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20242023203en","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to investigate three-dimensional facial soft tissue dimensions, maximum bite force (MBF), and occlusal contact area in patients with DFD. In addition, we analyzed the relationship between MBF and the three-dimensional facial measurements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-two patients with skeletal Class III DFD and 20 patients with Class II DFD underwent a soft tissue evaluation using surface laser scanning, as well as MBF and occlusal contact area assessments. The DFD groups were compared with each other and with 25 healthy subjects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant morphological differences were found in the transversal, vertical, and anteroposterior dimensions between Class II DFD and Class III DFD. Both DFD groups presented an increased linear distance of chin height, which was strongly related with decreased MBF magnitude. The DFD groups exhibited lower MBF and occlusal contact area, with no significant differences between Class II and Class III DFD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presence of DFD affected 3D measurements of facial soft tissue, causing variations beyond normal limits, lower MBF, and occlusal contact area in both Class II and Class III DFD patients. The vertical dimension might have influenced the lower MBF magnitude in the studied skeletal deformities.</p>","PeriodicalId":46547,"journal":{"name":"CoDAS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11065403/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140870327","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-29eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20242023159en
Febha Varghese, Sudhin Karuppali
Purpose: The overuse of screen-based devices results in developmental problems in children. Parents are an integral part of the children's language development. The present study explores the parental perspectives on the impact of screen time on the language skills of typically developing school-going children using a developed questionnaire.
Methods: 192 parents of typically developing children between 6 and 10 years of age participated in the study. Phase 1 of the study included the development of a questionnaire targeting the impact of screen devices on language development. The questionnaire was converted into an online survey and was circulated among the parents in Phase 2. Descriptive statistics were performed on the retrieved data and a chi-square test was done to determine the association between the use of screen devices across all language parameters.
Results: Parents reported television and smartphones to be the most used type of device, with a large proportion of children using screen-based devices for 1-2 hours per day. Most parents reported children prefer watching screens mainly for entertainment purposes, occasionally under supervision, without depending on them as potential rewards. The impact of screen-based devices on language skills has been discussed under the semantics, syntax, and pragmatic aspects of language.
Conclusion: The findings of this study will help identify the existing trends in the usage of screen-based devices by children, thereby identifying potential contributing factors towards language delays. This information will also benefit in parental counselling during the interventional planning of children with language delays.
{"title":"Parental perspectives on the impact of screen time on the language skills of typically developing Indian children.","authors":"Febha Varghese, Sudhin Karuppali","doi":"10.1590/2317-1782/20242023159en","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20242023159en","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The overuse of screen-based devices results in developmental problems in children. Parents are an integral part of the children's language development. The present study explores the parental perspectives on the impact of screen time on the language skills of typically developing school-going children using a developed questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>192 parents of typically developing children between 6 and 10 years of age participated in the study. Phase 1 of the study included the development of a questionnaire targeting the impact of screen devices on language development. The questionnaire was converted into an online survey and was circulated among the parents in Phase 2. Descriptive statistics were performed on the retrieved data and a chi-square test was done to determine the association between the use of screen devices across all language parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Parents reported television and smartphones to be the most used type of device, with a large proportion of children using screen-based devices for 1-2 hours per day. Most parents reported children prefer watching screens mainly for entertainment purposes, occasionally under supervision, without depending on them as potential rewards. The impact of screen-based devices on language skills has been discussed under the semantics, syntax, and pragmatic aspects of language.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study will help identify the existing trends in the usage of screen-based devices by children, thereby identifying potential contributing factors towards language delays. This information will also benefit in parental counselling during the interventional planning of children with language delays.</p>","PeriodicalId":46547,"journal":{"name":"CoDAS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11065402/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140855541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: The Awake Breathing Pattern Assessment (ABPA) is a prototypical clinical grid recently designed through an international consensus of Speech and Language Pathologists (SLPs) to categorize the awake and habitual breathing pattern during the orofacial myofunctional assessment. This cross-sectional study aims to explore the psychometric properties of the ABPA in a preschool population.
Methods: 133 children from 2;11 to 6 years old were assessed with the ABPA. The percentage of time spent breathing through the mouth was objectively measured by a CO2 sensor and used as a baseline measurement. We first performed a multivariate Latent Profile Analysis based on the CO2 measurement and a parental questionnaire to define the number of categories that best characterize the breathing pattern. Subsequently, we assessed the intra- and inter-rater reliability, internal consistency criterion validity, construct validity and sensitivity and specificity.
Results: The awake breathing pattern can best be described by two groups: nasal and mouth breathing. The ABPA, initially designed in three groups, was adjusted accordingly. This final version showed excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability. There was a significant correlation between the ABPA and the CO2 measurement. The ABPA showed a fair sensitivity and a good specificity.
Conclusion: The reference tool based on CO2 data was used in children for the first time and was found to be reliable. The ABPA is a suitable tool for SLPs to confirm the diagnosis of mouth breathing in preschool children if more sensitive screening tools, like parental questionnaires, are used beforehand.
{"title":"Towards a better diagnosis of mouth breathing: validity and reliability of a protocol for assessing the awake breathing pattern in preschool children.","authors":"Morgane Warnier, Léonor Piron, Dominique Morsomme, Christelle Maillart","doi":"10.1590/2317-1782/20242022330en","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20242022330en","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Awake Breathing Pattern Assessment (ABPA) is a prototypical clinical grid recently designed through an international consensus of Speech and Language Pathologists (SLPs) to categorize the awake and habitual breathing pattern during the orofacial myofunctional assessment. This cross-sectional study aims to explore the psychometric properties of the ABPA in a preschool population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>133 children from 2;11 to 6 years old were assessed with the ABPA. The percentage of time spent breathing through the mouth was objectively measured by a CO2 sensor and used as a baseline measurement. We first performed a multivariate Latent Profile Analysis based on the CO2 measurement and a parental questionnaire to define the number of categories that best characterize the breathing pattern. Subsequently, we assessed the intra- and inter-rater reliability, internal consistency criterion validity, construct validity and sensitivity and specificity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The awake breathing pattern can best be described by two groups: nasal and mouth breathing. The ABPA, initially designed in three groups, was adjusted accordingly. This final version showed excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability. There was a significant correlation between the ABPA and the CO2 measurement. The ABPA showed a fair sensitivity and a good specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The reference tool based on CO2 data was used in children for the first time and was found to be reliable. The ABPA is a suitable tool for SLPs to confirm the diagnosis of mouth breathing in preschool children if more sensitive screening tools, like parental questionnaires, are used beforehand.</p>","PeriodicalId":46547,"journal":{"name":"CoDAS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11065404/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140871860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-26eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232023048pt
Ana Karina Lima Buriti, Cyntia Barbosa Laureano Luiz, Laís Rocha de Barros Oliveira, Italo Capraro Suriano, Daniela Gil
Purpose: To correlate behavioral assessment results of central auditory processing and the self-perception questionnaire after acoustically controlled auditory training.
Methods: The study assessed 10 individuals with a mean age of 44.5 years who had suffered mild traumatic brain injury. They underwent behavioral assessment of central auditory processing and answered the Formal Auditory Training self-perception questionnaire after the therapeutic intervention - whose questions address auditory perception, understanding orders, request to repeat statements, occurrence of misunderstandings, attention span, auditory performance in noisy environments, telephone communication, and self-esteem. Patients were asked to indicate the frequency with which the listed behaviors occurred.
Results: Figure-ground, sequential memory for sounds, and temporal processing correlated with improvement in following instructions, fewer requests to repeat statements, increased attention span, improved communication, and understanding on the phone and when watching TV.
Conclusion: Auditory closure, figure-ground, and temporal processing had improved in the assessment after the acoustically controlled auditory training, and there were fewer auditory behavior complaints.
{"title":"Central auditory processing and self-perception questionnaire after acoustically controlled auditory training in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Ana Karina Lima Buriti, Cyntia Barbosa Laureano Luiz, Laís Rocha de Barros Oliveira, Italo Capraro Suriano, Daniela Gil","doi":"10.1590/2317-1782/20232023048pt","DOIUrl":"10.1590/2317-1782/20232023048pt","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To correlate behavioral assessment results of central auditory processing and the self-perception questionnaire after acoustically controlled auditory training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study assessed 10 individuals with a mean age of 44.5 years who had suffered mild traumatic brain injury. They underwent behavioral assessment of central auditory processing and answered the Formal Auditory Training self-perception questionnaire after the therapeutic intervention - whose questions address auditory perception, understanding orders, request to repeat statements, occurrence of misunderstandings, attention span, auditory performance in noisy environments, telephone communication, and self-esteem. Patients were asked to indicate the frequency with which the listed behaviors occurred.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Figure-ground, sequential memory for sounds, and temporal processing correlated with improvement in following instructions, fewer requests to repeat statements, increased attention span, improved communication, and understanding on the phone and when watching TV.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Auditory closure, figure-ground, and temporal processing had improved in the assessment after the acoustically controlled auditory training, and there were fewer auditory behavior complaints.</p>","PeriodicalId":46547,"journal":{"name":"CoDAS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11086975/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140858481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-15eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232023175
Jônatas do Nascimento Alves, Anna Alice Figueiredo de Almeida, Rosiane Yamasaki, Leonardo Wanderley Lopes
Purpose: To assess the influence of the listener experience, measurement scales and the type of speech task on the auditory-perceptual evaluation of the overall severity (OS) of voice deviation and the predominant type of voice (rough, breathy or strain).
Methods: 22 listeners, divided into four groups participated in the study: speech-language pathologist specialized in voice (SLP-V), SLP non specialized in voice (SLP-NV), graduate students with auditory-perceptual analysis training (GS-T), and graduate students without auditory-perceptual analysis training (GS-U). The subjects rated the OS of voice deviation and the predominant type of voice of 44 voices by visual analog scale (VAS) and the numerical scale (score "G" from GRBAS), corresponding to six speech tasks such as sustained vowel /a/ and /ɛ/, sentences, number counting, running speech, and all five previous tasks together.
Results: Sentences obtained the best interrater reliability in each group, using both VAS and GRBAS. SLP-NV group demonstrated the best interrater reliability in OS judgment in different speech tasks using VAS or GRBAS. Sustained vowel (/a/ and /ɛ/) and running speech obtained the best interrater reliability among the groups of listeners in judging the predominant vocal quality. GS-T group got the best result of interrater reliability in judging the predominant vocal quality.
Conclusion: The time of experience in the auditory-perceptual judgment of the voice, the type of training to which they were submitted, and the type of speech task influence the reliability of the auditory-perceptual evaluation of vocal quality.
目的:评估听者经验、测量量表和语音任务类型对嗓音偏差总体严重程度(OS)和主要嗓音类型(粗糙、喘息或紧张)的听觉感知评估的影响。方法:22 名听者分为四组参与研究:专门从事嗓音研究的语言病理学家(SLP-V)、非专门从事嗓音研究的语言病理学家(SLP-NV)、受过听觉知觉分析训练的研究生(GS-T)和未受过听觉知觉分析训练的研究生(GS-U)。受试者根据持续元音/a/和/ɛ/、句子、数数、跑步讲话等六项言语任务以及前五项任务,通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)和数字量表(GRBAS中的 "G "分)对44种语音偏差的操作系统和主要语音类型进行评分:使用 VAS 和 GRBAS,句子在各组中都获得了最好的互测信度。在使用 VAS 或 GRBAS 进行的不同语音任务中,SLP-NV 组在操作系统判断方面表现出最佳的互测信度。在各组听者中,持续元音(/a/ 和 /ɛ/)和跑步语音在判断主要发音质量方面的互测信度最佳。GS-T组在判断主音音质方面获得了最佳的听者间信度结果:结论:嗓音听觉判断的经验时间、所接受的培训类型以及语音任务类型都会影响嗓音听觉判断的可靠性。
{"title":"The influence of listener experience, measurement scale and speech task on the reliability of auditory-perceptual evaluation of vocal quality.","authors":"Jônatas do Nascimento Alves, Anna Alice Figueiredo de Almeida, Rosiane Yamasaki, Leonardo Wanderley Lopes","doi":"10.1590/2317-1782/20232023175","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20232023175","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the influence of the listener experience, measurement scales and the type of speech task on the auditory-perceptual evaluation of the overall severity (OS) of voice deviation and the predominant type of voice (rough, breathy or strain).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>22 listeners, divided into four groups participated in the study: speech-language pathologist specialized in voice (SLP-V), SLP non specialized in voice (SLP-NV), graduate students with auditory-perceptual analysis training (GS-T), and graduate students without auditory-perceptual analysis training (GS-U). The subjects rated the OS of voice deviation and the predominant type of voice of 44 voices by visual analog scale (VAS) and the numerical scale (score \"G\" from GRBAS), corresponding to six speech tasks such as sustained vowel /a/ and /ɛ/, sentences, number counting, running speech, and all five previous tasks together.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sentences obtained the best interrater reliability in each group, using both VAS and GRBAS. SLP-NV group demonstrated the best interrater reliability in OS judgment in different speech tasks using VAS or GRBAS. Sustained vowel (/a/ and /ɛ/) and running speech obtained the best interrater reliability among the groups of listeners in judging the predominant vocal quality. GS-T group got the best result of interrater reliability in judging the predominant vocal quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The time of experience in the auditory-perceptual judgment of the voice, the type of training to which they were submitted, and the type of speech task influence the reliability of the auditory-perceptual evaluation of vocal quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":46547,"journal":{"name":"CoDAS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11065405/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140858741","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-15eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232022323pt
Yasmim Carvalho Telson, Renata Maria Moreira Moraes Furlan, Rafael Augusto Magalhães Ferreira, Matheus Pereira Porto, Andréa Rodrigues Motta
Purpose: To present a method for analyzing breathing modes with infrared thermography.
Methods: This exploratory cross-sectional study used 38 thermal images of inspiration and expiration with nasal breathing and simulated mouth breathing in four nasal breathers without respiratory complaints. Three different data selection forms (line, rectangle, and ellipse) were used to extract the minimum, mean, and maximum temperatures of the regions of interest (nose and mouth) using the FLIR Tools® software.
Results: Among the three selection forms, there was greater temperature variability obtained with the line, revealing limitations in this measurement. There were no differences between the rectangle and ellipse values, showing that both selection forms present similar temperature extraction results. The comparison results between nose and mouth temperatures during inspiration and expiration indicated a statistically significant difference between all measurements, except for mean inspiration temperatures with the rectangle and ellipse. The breathing mode can be distinguished in both inspiration and expiration when using mean mouth temperatures with the rectangle and ellipse.
Conclusion: Breathing modes should be assessed based on mean mouth temperatures during inspiration, using the ellipse.
{"title":"Breathing mode assessment with thermography: a pilot study.","authors":"Yasmim Carvalho Telson, Renata Maria Moreira Moraes Furlan, Rafael Augusto Magalhães Ferreira, Matheus Pereira Porto, Andréa Rodrigues Motta","doi":"10.1590/2317-1782/20232022323pt","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20232022323pt","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To present a method for analyzing breathing modes with infrared thermography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This exploratory cross-sectional study used 38 thermal images of inspiration and expiration with nasal breathing and simulated mouth breathing in four nasal breathers without respiratory complaints. Three different data selection forms (line, rectangle, and ellipse) were used to extract the minimum, mean, and maximum temperatures of the regions of interest (nose and mouth) using the FLIR Tools® software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the three selection forms, there was greater temperature variability obtained with the line, revealing limitations in this measurement. There were no differences between the rectangle and ellipse values, showing that both selection forms present similar temperature extraction results. The comparison results between nose and mouth temperatures during inspiration and expiration indicated a statistically significant difference between all measurements, except for mean inspiration temperatures with the rectangle and ellipse. The breathing mode can be distinguished in both inspiration and expiration when using mean mouth temperatures with the rectangle and ellipse.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Breathing modes should be assessed based on mean mouth temperatures during inspiration, using the ellipse.</p>","PeriodicalId":46547,"journal":{"name":"CoDAS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042686/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140871766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-08eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232023093pt
Lidiéli Dalla Costa, Ana Valéria de Almeida Vaucher, Maristela Julio Costa
Purpose: To investigate the reliability of the Word-with-Noise Test in a group of normal-hearing adults.
Methods: Forty-five normal-hearing adult subjects participated in the research. The interval between the first and second assessment was 14 to 28 days, performed during the same time of the day and by the same evaluator. The comparison analysis between the test and the retest was performed considering the general result of the ears, totaling 90 ears evaluated. The inferential analysis included the comparison of the situations in the first and second assessment using the Wilcoxon Test, calculation, and interpretation of the Intraclass Correlation Index.
Results: There was a statistically significant difference between the test and retest performances. The intraclass correlation coefficients obtained were indicative of good reliability (r=0.759; p<0.001) for the monosyllabic stimulus and moderate reliability (r=0.631; p<0.001) for the disyllabic stimulus.
Conclusion: The Word-with-Noise Test demonstrated satisfactory reliability for both the monosyllabic and disyllabic stimuli.
{"title":"The word-with-noise test: test-retest reliability in normal-hearing adults.","authors":"Lidiéli Dalla Costa, Ana Valéria de Almeida Vaucher, Maristela Julio Costa","doi":"10.1590/2317-1782/20232023093pt","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20232023093pt","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the reliability of the Word-with-Noise Test in a group of normal-hearing adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-five normal-hearing adult subjects participated in the research. The interval between the first and second assessment was 14 to 28 days, performed during the same time of the day and by the same evaluator. The comparison analysis between the test and the retest was performed considering the general result of the ears, totaling 90 ears evaluated. The inferential analysis included the comparison of the situations in the first and second assessment using the Wilcoxon Test, calculation, and interpretation of the Intraclass Correlation Index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a statistically significant difference between the test and retest performances. The intraclass correlation coefficients obtained were indicative of good reliability (r=0.759; p<0.001) for the monosyllabic stimulus and moderate reliability (r=0.631; p<0.001) for the disyllabic stimulus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Word-with-Noise Test demonstrated satisfactory reliability for both the monosyllabic and disyllabic stimuli.</p>","PeriodicalId":46547,"journal":{"name":"CoDAS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042685/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140854134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: To seek evidence of validity and reliability for the Compressed Speech Test with Figures.
Methods: The study was subdivided into three stages: construct validation, criteria and reliability. All participants were aged between 6:00 and 8:11. For the construct, Compressed Speech with Figures and the gold standard Adapted Compressed Speech test were applied to children with typical phonological development. For criterion analysis, Compressed Speech with Figures was applied in two groups, with typical (G1) and atypical (G2) phonological development. Finally, the application protocols underwent analysis by two Speech Therapists, with experience in the area of Central Auditory Processing, seeking to obtain an inter-evaluator reliability analysis.
Results: The correlation test indicated an almost perfect construct (correlation 0.843 for the right ear and 0.823 for the left ear). In the criterion analysis, it was noticed that both groups presented satisfactory results (G1 = 99.6 to 100%; G2 = 96 to 96.5%). The reliability analysis demonstrated that the protocol is easy to analyze, as both professionals presented unanimous responses.
Conclusion: It was possible to obtain evidence of validity and reliability for the Compressed Speech with Figures instrument. The construct analysis showed that the instrument measures the same variable as the gold standard test, with an almost perfect correlation. In the criterion analysis, both groups presented similar performance, demonstrating that the instrument does not seem to differentiate populations with and without mild phonological disorder. The inter-evaluator reliability analysis demonstrated that the protocol is easy to analyze and score.
{"title":"Evidence of validity and reliability of the Compressed Speech Test with Figures.","authors":"Taissane Rodrigues Sanguebuche, Karina Carlesso Pagliarin, Bruna Pias Peixe, Denis Altieri de Oliveira Moraes, Michele Vargas Garcia","doi":"10.1590/2317-1782/20232023065pt","DOIUrl":"10.1590/2317-1782/20232023065pt","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To seek evidence of validity and reliability for the Compressed Speech Test with Figures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was subdivided into three stages: construct validation, criteria and reliability. All participants were aged between 6:00 and 8:11. For the construct, Compressed Speech with Figures and the gold standard Adapted Compressed Speech test were applied to children with typical phonological development. For criterion analysis, Compressed Speech with Figures was applied in two groups, with typical (G1) and atypical (G2) phonological development. Finally, the application protocols underwent analysis by two Speech Therapists, with experience in the area of Central Auditory Processing, seeking to obtain an inter-evaluator reliability analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The correlation test indicated an almost perfect construct (correlation 0.843 for the right ear and 0.823 for the left ear). In the criterion analysis, it was noticed that both groups presented satisfactory results (G1 = 99.6 to 100%; G2 = 96 to 96.5%). The reliability analysis demonstrated that the protocol is easy to analyze, as both professionals presented unanimous responses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was possible to obtain evidence of validity and reliability for the Compressed Speech with Figures instrument. The construct analysis showed that the instrument measures the same variable as the gold standard test, with an almost perfect correlation. In the criterion analysis, both groups presented similar performance, demonstrating that the instrument does not seem to differentiate populations with and without mild phonological disorder. The inter-evaluator reliability analysis demonstrated that the protocol is easy to analyze and score.</p>","PeriodicalId":46547,"journal":{"name":"CoDAS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10984583/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140307313","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-25DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232023065en
Taissane Rodrigues Sanguebuche, Karina Carlesso Pagliarin, Bruna Pias Peixe, D. A. O. Moraes, Michele Vargas Garcia
ABSTRACT Purpose To seek evidence of validity and reliability for the Compressed Speech Test with Figures. Methods The study was subdivided into three stages: construct validation, criteria and reliability. All participants were aged between 6:00 and 8:11. For the construct, Compressed Speech with Figures and the gold standard Adapted Compressed Speech test were applied to children with typical phonological development. For criterion analysis, Compressed Speech with Figures was applied in two groups, with typical (G1) and atypical (G2) phonological development. Finally, the application protocols underwent analysis by two Speech Therapists, with experience in the area of Central Auditory Processing, seeking to obtain an inter-evaluator reliability analysis. Results The correlation test indicated an almost perfect construct (correlation 0.843 for the right ear and 0.823 for the left ear). In the criterion analysis, it was noticed that both groups presented satisfactory results (G1 = 99.6 to 100%; G2 = 96 to 96.5%). The reliability analysis demonstrated that the protocol is easy to analyze, as both professionals presented unanimous responses. Conclusion It was possible to obtain evidence of validity and reliability for the Compressed Speech with Figures instrument. The construct analysis showed that the instrument measures the same variable as the gold standard test, with an almost perfect correlation. In the criterion analysis, both groups presented similar performance, demonstrating that the instrument does not seem to differentiate populations with and without mild phonological disorder. The inter-evaluator reliability analysis demonstrated that the protocol is easy to analyze and score.
ABSTRACT Purpose To seek evidence of validity and reliability for the Compressed Speech Test with Figures.方法 研究分为三个阶段:结构验证、标准和可靠性。所有参与者的年龄均在 6:00 至 8:11 之间。在构式验证方面,"有图形的压缩语音 "和金标准 "改编压缩语音 "测试适用于语音发育典型的儿童。在标准分析中,"压缩数字语音 "被应用于两组儿童,分别是语音发育典型(G1)和非典型(G2)儿童。最后,由两名在中央听觉处理领域有经验的语言治疗师对应用方案进行分析,以获得评估者之间的可靠性分析。结果 相关性测试表明,测试结果几乎完美(右耳相关性为 0.843,左耳相关性为 0.823)。在标准分析中,两组结果均令人满意(G1=99.6%-100%;G2=96%-96.5%)。信度分析表明,该方案易于分析,因为两位专业人员都给出了一致的答复。结论 有图有真相压缩语音工具的有效性和可靠性得到了证明。构造分析表明,该工具测量的变量与黄金标准测试相同,几乎完全相关。在标准分析中,两组人的表现相似,这表明该工具似乎并不能区分患有和未患有轻度语音障碍的人群。评估者之间的信度分析表明,该方案易于分析和评分。
{"title":"Evidence of validity and reliability of the Compressed Speech Test with Figures","authors":"Taissane Rodrigues Sanguebuche, Karina Carlesso Pagliarin, Bruna Pias Peixe, D. A. O. Moraes, Michele Vargas Garcia","doi":"10.1590/2317-1782/20232023065en","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20232023065en","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Purpose To seek evidence of validity and reliability for the Compressed Speech Test with Figures. Methods The study was subdivided into three stages: construct validation, criteria and reliability. All participants were aged between 6:00 and 8:11. For the construct, Compressed Speech with Figures and the gold standard Adapted Compressed Speech test were applied to children with typical phonological development. For criterion analysis, Compressed Speech with Figures was applied in two groups, with typical (G1) and atypical (G2) phonological development. Finally, the application protocols underwent analysis by two Speech Therapists, with experience in the area of Central Auditory Processing, seeking to obtain an inter-evaluator reliability analysis. Results The correlation test indicated an almost perfect construct (correlation 0.843 for the right ear and 0.823 for the left ear). In the criterion analysis, it was noticed that both groups presented satisfactory results (G1 = 99.6 to 100%; G2 = 96 to 96.5%). The reliability analysis demonstrated that the protocol is easy to analyze, as both professionals presented unanimous responses. Conclusion It was possible to obtain evidence of validity and reliability for the Compressed Speech with Figures instrument. The construct analysis showed that the instrument measures the same variable as the gold standard test, with an almost perfect correlation. In the criterion analysis, both groups presented similar performance, demonstrating that the instrument does not seem to differentiate populations with and without mild phonological disorder. The inter-evaluator reliability analysis demonstrated that the protocol is easy to analyze and score.","PeriodicalId":46547,"journal":{"name":"CoDAS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140382440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}