Pub Date : 2023-12-08DOI: 10.1080/03057240.2023.2287397
Melissa Cain
How do teachers prepare their students for living in an increasingly fractured and inward-looking world? With the rise of populism and authoritarianism, one might argue that the ability to consider...
{"title":"‘Those moments are ineffable’. How creativity experienced through the Arts promotes empathy and compassion","authors":"Melissa Cain","doi":"10.1080/03057240.2023.2287397","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2023.2287397","url":null,"abstract":"How do teachers prepare their students for living in an increasingly fractured and inward-looking world? With the rise of populism and authoritarianism, one might argue that the ability to consider...","PeriodicalId":47410,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Moral Education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138562318","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-04DOI: 10.1080/03057240.2023.2284098
Joanna G. Fagan, Katrina Henley, Shalet Punnoose, Adam P. McGuire
Previous studies suggest that witnessing virtuous acts triggers moral elevation—feeling inspired and motivated to imitate the virtue. However, there is a gap in understanding differences in elevati...
{"title":"Can exposure to specific acts of compassion and courage elicit moral elevation and related motives?","authors":"Joanna G. Fagan, Katrina Henley, Shalet Punnoose, Adam P. McGuire","doi":"10.1080/03057240.2023.2284098","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2023.2284098","url":null,"abstract":"Previous studies suggest that witnessing virtuous acts triggers moral elevation—feeling inspired and motivated to imitate the virtue. However, there is a gap in understanding differences in elevati...","PeriodicalId":47410,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Moral Education","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138545113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-14DOI: 10.1080/03057240.2023.2268300
Anne Colby, Nhat Quang Le, Heather Malin
ABSTRACTThe present study tracked stability and change in college students’ aspirations, as expressed in survey open text entries at two time points three years apart. Interviews with a subset of respondents provided descriptive accounts of their experiences of moral/civic learning connected with their college experiences. Participants (n=640) were drawn from 11 U.S. colleges and universities. Surveys were conducted in winter 2018-2019 and fall 2021. Fifty-four survey respondents participated in hour-long interviews in spring 2021. Most survey respondents’ aspirations were stable over 3 years, with most focusing on contribution beyond-the-self, fulfillment and preparation for vocations. Only a small percentage focused on financial goals or credentialing. Aspirations to contribute beyond-the-self were expressed even more frequently in interviews. When asked to describe what they had learned in courses and extracurricular activities and in their relationships with peers and adults, interviewees described learning relating to ethics and virtue, social justice and civic issues.KEYWORDS: Purposefulfillmentcollege studentsgoals AcknowledgmentsWe are grateful to Lillian Wolfe for her excellent help with interview coding and to Lisa Staton for her valuable contributions to many aspects of the project.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. For the sake of simplicity, this study used a dichotomous designation for purpose, as coded from interview material. In taking this approach, we do not mean to imply that the purpose construct is best understood as dichotomous, treating purpose as fully present or entirely absent. The larger study of purpose development in college, of which this study is a part, includes a survey measure of purpose as a continuous variable and also analyses that identify four developmentally distinct purpose statuses described by Malin (Citation2022) as dabbling, dreaming, drifting, and full purpose. In our current analyses, which focus primarily on college students’ goals and experiences of moral/civic learning, the four purpose statuses are reduced to two categories, designating the presence or absence of full purpose. Findings using the continuous measure and the 4-category purpose status designations are reported elsewhere (Malin, Citation2022; Malin, et al., Citationunder review).Additional informationFundingThis research was funded by the Mellon Foundation [grant number 31700630].Notes on contributorsAnne ColbyAnne Colby is Adjunct Professor of Education at Stanford University. Previously, she was director of the Murray Research Center at Harvard University and Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Colby is the author of nine books, including The Power of Ideals; Educating Citizens; and Rethinking Undergraduate Business Education, which won AAC&U’s Frederick Hess Award. She also received the Association for Moral Education’s Kuhmerker Award a
摘要本研究对大学生愿望的稳定性和变化进行了跟踪调查,并在间隔三年的两个时间点进行了调查。对一部分受访者的访谈提供了他们与大学经历相关的道德/公民学习经历的描述性描述。参与者(n=640)来自美国11所高校。调查于2018-2019年冬季和2021年秋季进行。54名受访者在2021年春季参加了长达一小时的采访。大多数受访者的抱负在3年内保持稳定,最关注的是超越自我的贡献、成就感和为职业做准备。只有一小部分人关注财务目标或证书。在采访中,人们甚至更频繁地表达了对超越自我做出贡献的愿望。当被要求描述他们在课程和课外活动以及与同龄人和成年人的关系中学到了什么时,受访者描述了与道德和美德、社会正义和公民问题有关的学习。致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。为了简单起见,本研究使用了一个二分法的名称为目的,从采访材料编码。在采用这种方法时,我们并不是要暗示,最好将目的结构理解为二分法,将目的视为完全存在或完全不存在。本研究是大学目标发展的较大研究的一部分,该研究包括将目标作为一个连续变量的调查测量,并分析确定了Malin (Citation2022)所描述的四种不同的发展目标状态,即涉猎、梦想、漂泊和完全目标。在我们目前的分析中,主要关注大学生的道德/公民学习目标和经验,四种目的状态被简化为两类,指定存在或不存在充分的目的。使用连续测量和4类目的状态指定的结果在其他地方报告(Malin, Citation2022;Malin等人,引文审查中)。本研究由梅隆基金会资助[授权号31700630]。作者简介安妮·科尔比,斯坦福大学教育学兼职教授。此前,她曾担任哈佛大学默里研究中心主任和卡内基教学促进基金会高级学者。科尔比是九本书的作者,包括《理想的力量》;公民教育;以及《反思本科商业教育》,该书获得了AAC&U的弗雷德里克·赫斯奖。她还获得了道德教育协会的库默克奖,并因研究老年人的目的而被评为2017年老龄化影响者。她拥有麦吉尔大学学士学位和哥伦比亚大学博士学位。Nhat Quang Le是斯坦福大学教育研究生院的研究助理。他在帕洛阿尔托大学(Palo Alto University)获得心理学和社会行为学士学位,在圣何塞州立大学(San Jose State University)获得实验心理学硕士学位。Heather Malin是斯坦福大学青少年研究中心的主任。她的工作重点是年轻人如何发展目标,以及将这一研究应用于教育实践。她是《目的性教学:让学生为有意义的生活做好准备》一书的作者,也是许多关于青年目标的文章的作者。她拥有萨拉劳伦斯学院的学士学位,哥伦比亚大学教师学院的硕士学位和教学证书,以及斯坦福大学的教育学博士学位。
{"title":"Enduring aspirations and moral learning: A longitudinal study of U.S. College students","authors":"Anne Colby, Nhat Quang Le, Heather Malin","doi":"10.1080/03057240.2023.2268300","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2023.2268300","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe present study tracked stability and change in college students’ aspirations, as expressed in survey open text entries at two time points three years apart. Interviews with a subset of respondents provided descriptive accounts of their experiences of moral/civic learning connected with their college experiences. Participants (n=640) were drawn from 11 U.S. colleges and universities. Surveys were conducted in winter 2018-2019 and fall 2021. Fifty-four survey respondents participated in hour-long interviews in spring 2021. Most survey respondents’ aspirations were stable over 3 years, with most focusing on contribution beyond-the-self, fulfillment and preparation for vocations. Only a small percentage focused on financial goals or credentialing. Aspirations to contribute beyond-the-self were expressed even more frequently in interviews. When asked to describe what they had learned in courses and extracurricular activities and in their relationships with peers and adults, interviewees described learning relating to ethics and virtue, social justice and civic issues.KEYWORDS: Purposefulfillmentcollege studentsgoals AcknowledgmentsWe are grateful to Lillian Wolfe for her excellent help with interview coding and to Lisa Staton for her valuable contributions to many aspects of the project.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. For the sake of simplicity, this study used a dichotomous designation for purpose, as coded from interview material. In taking this approach, we do not mean to imply that the purpose construct is best understood as dichotomous, treating purpose as fully present or entirely absent. The larger study of purpose development in college, of which this study is a part, includes a survey measure of purpose as a continuous variable and also analyses that identify four developmentally distinct purpose statuses described by Malin (Citation2022) as dabbling, dreaming, drifting, and full purpose. In our current analyses, which focus primarily on college students’ goals and experiences of moral/civic learning, the four purpose statuses are reduced to two categories, designating the presence or absence of full purpose. Findings using the continuous measure and the 4-category purpose status designations are reported elsewhere (Malin, Citation2022; Malin, et al., Citationunder review).Additional informationFundingThis research was funded by the Mellon Foundation [grant number 31700630].Notes on contributorsAnne ColbyAnne Colby is Adjunct Professor of Education at Stanford University. Previously, she was director of the Murray Research Center at Harvard University and Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Colby is the author of nine books, including The Power of Ideals; Educating Citizens; and Rethinking Undergraduate Business Education, which won AAC&U’s Frederick Hess Award. She also received the Association for Moral Education’s Kuhmerker Award a","PeriodicalId":47410,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Moral Education","volume":"37 17","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134954445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-13DOI: 10.1080/03057240.2023.2275543
Susana Frisancho, Jorge Villalba, Enrique Delgado, Joseph Medrano
ABSTRACTSeveral research studies acknowledge the pedagogical and ethical potential of cinema, as well as its utility for moral education. With this in mind and utilizing a mixed-method approach, this paper presents the qualitative changes in cognitive complexity and moral reasoning observed in a group of Amazonian indigenous adults after their participation in an intercultural moral education program using film discussions. Participants were nine Shipibo-Konibo, Awajún and Asháninka peoples, with formal education, and familiar with cinema, from the Amazonian region of Ucayali, Peru. To assess cognitive complexity, the McDaniel and Lawrence scale was employed, while moral reasoning was evaluated using the Heinz dilemma. Qualitative content analysis revealed a development in cognitive complexity and moral reasoning among certain participants. The results are discussed with an emphasis on aspects of the program that can be replicated when working with Amazonian indigenous peoples.KEYWORDS: Moral reasoningcognitive complexitycinemaAmazonian indigenous peoples Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis research was funded by Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú under [grant number 2019-3-0005].Notes on contributorsSusana FrisanchoSusana Frisancho PhD. in Developmental Psychology from Fordham University, New York. M.A. in Psychology and B.A. in Educational Psychology from Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Full Professor of the Psychology Department of the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Coordinator of the Research Group on Cognition, Learning and Development of the Psychology Department of the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Her research includes topics such as moral and cognitive development of Amazonian indigenous people, the teaching of citizenship and moral education in school.Jorge VillalbaJorge Villalba Garcés holds a degree in Educational Psychology from the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PUCP) and is a member of the Research Group on Cognition, Learning and Development of the Psychology Department of the same university. Her research focuses on cognitive and moral development, as well as the relationship between psychology of moral development and moral philosophy.Enrique DelgadoEnrique Delgado Doctor in Philosophy and Master in Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy (Universidad Complutense de Madrid). Degree in Psychology and professor at the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Member of the Research Group on Cognition, Learning and Development. His research interests include moral education, indigenous peoples, gender and psychoanalysis.Joseph MedranoJoseph Medrano Psychology graduate from Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú with research interests in learning, moral development and motivation.
一些研究承认电影的教学和伦理潜力,以及它在道德教育中的作用。考虑到这一点,本文采用混合方法,介绍了一群亚马逊土著成年人在参加了一个利用电影讨论的跨文化道德教育项目后,在认知复杂性和道德推理方面观察到的质的变化。参与者是来自秘鲁乌卡亚利亚马逊地区的9名Shipibo-Konibo, Awajún和Asháninka民族,受过正规教育,熟悉电影。为了评估认知复杂性,研究人员使用了麦克丹尼尔和劳伦斯量表,而道德推理则使用亨氏困境来评估。定性内容分析揭示了某些参与者在认知复杂性和道德推理方面的发展。对结果进行了讨论,重点是在与亚马逊土著人民合作时可以复制的项目方面。关键词:道德推理认知复杂性电影亚马逊原住民披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。本研究由Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú资助,资助号为2019-3-0005。作者简介susana Frisancho博士。纽约福特汉姆大学发展心理学博士。Pontificia university (Católica del Perú)心理学硕士和教育心理学学士学位。教廷大学心理学系正教授Católica del Perú。教廷大学心理学系认知、学习和发展研究小组协调员Católica del Perú。她的研究课题包括亚马逊土著居民的道德和认知发展,公民教育和学校道德教育。Jorge Villalba garcsams拥有Pontificia university Católica del Perú (PUCP)的教育心理学学位,也是该大学心理学系认知、学习和发展研究小组的成员。她的研究重点是认知与道德发展,以及道德发展心理学与道德哲学的关系。恩里克·德尔加多哲学博士和精神分析心理治疗硕士(马德里康普顿斯大学)。教廷大学(Católica del Perú)心理学学位和教授。认知、学习与发展研究小组成员。他的研究兴趣包括道德教育、土著民族、性别和精神分析。Joseph Medrano毕业于Pontificia university Católica del Perú心理学专业,主要研究方向为学习、道德发展和动机。
{"title":"Using cinema to enhance moral reasoning and cognitive complexity of Amazonian indigenous leaders","authors":"Susana Frisancho, Jorge Villalba, Enrique Delgado, Joseph Medrano","doi":"10.1080/03057240.2023.2275543","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2023.2275543","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTSeveral research studies acknowledge the pedagogical and ethical potential of cinema, as well as its utility for moral education. With this in mind and utilizing a mixed-method approach, this paper presents the qualitative changes in cognitive complexity and moral reasoning observed in a group of Amazonian indigenous adults after their participation in an intercultural moral education program using film discussions. Participants were nine Shipibo-Konibo, Awajún and Asháninka peoples, with formal education, and familiar with cinema, from the Amazonian region of Ucayali, Peru. To assess cognitive complexity, the McDaniel and Lawrence scale was employed, while moral reasoning was evaluated using the Heinz dilemma. Qualitative content analysis revealed a development in cognitive complexity and moral reasoning among certain participants. The results are discussed with an emphasis on aspects of the program that can be replicated when working with Amazonian indigenous peoples.KEYWORDS: Moral reasoningcognitive complexitycinemaAmazonian indigenous peoples Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis research was funded by Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú under [grant number 2019-3-0005].Notes on contributorsSusana FrisanchoSusana Frisancho PhD. in Developmental Psychology from Fordham University, New York. M.A. in Psychology and B.A. in Educational Psychology from Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Full Professor of the Psychology Department of the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Coordinator of the Research Group on Cognition, Learning and Development of the Psychology Department of the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Her research includes topics such as moral and cognitive development of Amazonian indigenous people, the teaching of citizenship and moral education in school.Jorge VillalbaJorge Villalba Garcés holds a degree in Educational Psychology from the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PUCP) and is a member of the Research Group on Cognition, Learning and Development of the Psychology Department of the same university. Her research focuses on cognitive and moral development, as well as the relationship between psychology of moral development and moral philosophy.Enrique DelgadoEnrique Delgado Doctor in Philosophy and Master in Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy (Universidad Complutense de Madrid). Degree in Psychology and professor at the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Member of the Research Group on Cognition, Learning and Development. His research interests include moral education, indigenous peoples, gender and psychoanalysis.Joseph MedranoJoseph Medrano Psychology graduate from Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú with research interests in learning, moral development and motivation.","PeriodicalId":47410,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Moral Education","volume":"15 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136347576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-07DOI: 10.1080/03057240.2023.2268298
Jason M. Stephens, Tricia Bertram Gallant
Most secondary and postsecondary institutions take a behavioral approach in dealing with student cheating—punishing those caught with grade reductions and/or suspensions. While some form of punishment may be necessary, it is not sufficient. As an instantiation of negative morality, academic misconduct offers an opportunity for moral education. The present investigation builds on the literature related to developmental approaches in responding to academic misconduct. It does so by describing theoretical underpinnings and instructional design of a developmental approach (Intervention), as well as results from a quasi-experimental study of its effects on moral sensitivity. Participants (N = 798) included university students who had been found responsible for academic misconduct and completed the Intervention. As hypothesized, participants not only reported greater attentiveness to moral issues after completing the Intervention, they also demonstrated greater awareness of the moral values related to academic misconduct. The implications and limitations of these findings are discussed.
{"title":"Enhancing moral sensitivity in the aftermath of academic misconduct: Results from a quasi-experimental field study","authors":"Jason M. Stephens, Tricia Bertram Gallant","doi":"10.1080/03057240.2023.2268298","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2023.2268298","url":null,"abstract":"Most secondary and postsecondary institutions take a behavioral approach in dealing with student cheating—punishing those caught with grade reductions and/or suspensions. While some form of punishment may be necessary, it is not sufficient. As an instantiation of negative morality, academic misconduct offers an opportunity for moral education. The present investigation builds on the literature related to developmental approaches in responding to academic misconduct. It does so by describing theoretical underpinnings and instructional design of a developmental approach (Intervention), as well as results from a quasi-experimental study of its effects on moral sensitivity. Participants (N = 798) included university students who had been found responsible for academic misconduct and completed the Intervention. As hypothesized, participants not only reported greater attentiveness to moral issues after completing the Intervention, they also demonstrated greater awareness of the moral values related to academic misconduct. The implications and limitations of these findings are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47410,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Moral Education","volume":"4 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135479837","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-27DOI: 10.1080/03057240.2023.2260957
Jasmine B.-Y. Sim, Philip H.-H. Tham
ABSTRACTAmidst global uncertainty, character education has become increasingly important. Yet, academic discourse surrounding the field remains obfuscated. This paper has two aims: First, to provide a broad toolkit to demystify the field of character education, consisting of (i) a basic conceptual GPS for terms like ‘virtue’, ‘character’, ‘morals’ and ‘character education’; and (ii) a lay-of-the-land overview of character education approaches. Second, equipped with this toolkit, we analyse Singapore’s Character and Citizenship Education (CCE) syllabi of 2014 and 2021. Situated within a ‘survivalist’ rhetoric and communitarian tradition, CCE is characterised as a pragmatic, nation-centric amalgamation of various approaches, striving towards a society-oriented goal of maintaining social harmony and cohesion. We identify several tensions in the CCE syllabi, such as its integration of character education and citizenship education, philosophical foundations, curricular content and pedagogical approaches. We argue that elements of neo-Aristotelian virtue ethics offer theoretical scaffolding to address some of these tensions.KEYWORDS: Aristotelian virtues ethicscharacter educationcitizenship educationmoral educationSingapore Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsJasmine B.-Y. SimJasmine B.-Y. Sim is an Associate Professor in the Policy, Curriculum and Leadership Academic Group and the Singapore Centre for Character and Citizenship Education in the National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University. She researches in civics and citizenship education, character education, social studies education and school-based curriculum development.Philip H.-H. ThamPhilip H.-H. Tham is an undergraduate student in the Dual Degree programme between Sciences Po Paris and Columbia University, USA majoring in political science and cognitive science. He is currently in his third year of undergraduate studies in Columbia University.
摘要在全球不确定的形势下,品格教育显得越来越重要。然而,围绕该领域的学术论述仍然模糊不清。本文有两个目的:第一,提供一个广泛的工具来揭开品格教育领域的神秘面纱,包括(i)对“美德”、“品格”、“道德”和“品格教育”等术语的基本概念定位;(ii)素质教育方法的概况。其次,我们分析了新加坡2014年和2021年的品格与公民教育(CCE)教学大纲。在“生存主义”的修辞和社区主义传统中,CCE的特点是务实的,以国家为中心的各种方法的融合,努力实现以社会为导向的目标,保持社会和谐与凝聚力。我们在CCE教学大纲中发现了一些紧张关系,比如它对品格教育和公民教育、哲学基础、课程内容和教学方法的整合。我们认为,新亚里士多德美德伦理学的要素为解决这些矛盾提供了理论框架。关键词:亚里士多德美德伦理品格教育公民教育道德教育新加坡披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。其他资料投稿人说明jasmine b - y。SimJasmine B.-Y。他是南洋理工大学国立教育学院政策、课程与领导力学术小组和新加坡品格与公民教育中心的副教授。她的研究领域包括公民教育、品格教育、社会研究教育和校本课程发展。菲利普·h。ThamPhilip h。他是巴黎政治学院与美国哥伦比亚大学合办的双学位课程的本科生,主修政治学和认知科学。他目前在哥伦比亚大学读本科三年级。
{"title":"Demystifying character education for the Singapore context","authors":"Jasmine B.-Y. Sim, Philip H.-H. Tham","doi":"10.1080/03057240.2023.2260957","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2023.2260957","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTAmidst global uncertainty, character education has become increasingly important. Yet, academic discourse surrounding the field remains obfuscated. This paper has two aims: First, to provide a broad toolkit to demystify the field of character education, consisting of (i) a basic conceptual GPS for terms like ‘virtue’, ‘character’, ‘morals’ and ‘character education’; and (ii) a lay-of-the-land overview of character education approaches. Second, equipped with this toolkit, we analyse Singapore’s Character and Citizenship Education (CCE) syllabi of 2014 and 2021. Situated within a ‘survivalist’ rhetoric and communitarian tradition, CCE is characterised as a pragmatic, nation-centric amalgamation of various approaches, striving towards a society-oriented goal of maintaining social harmony and cohesion. We identify several tensions in the CCE syllabi, such as its integration of character education and citizenship education, philosophical foundations, curricular content and pedagogical approaches. We argue that elements of neo-Aristotelian virtue ethics offer theoretical scaffolding to address some of these tensions.KEYWORDS: Aristotelian virtues ethicscharacter educationcitizenship educationmoral educationSingapore Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsJasmine B.-Y. SimJasmine B.-Y. Sim is an Associate Professor in the Policy, Curriculum and Leadership Academic Group and the Singapore Centre for Character and Citizenship Education in the National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University. She researches in civics and citizenship education, character education, social studies education and school-based curriculum development.Philip H.-H. ThamPhilip H.-H. Tham is an undergraduate student in the Dual Degree programme between Sciences Po Paris and Columbia University, USA majoring in political science and cognitive science. He is currently in his third year of undergraduate studies in Columbia University.","PeriodicalId":47410,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Moral Education","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135536392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-26DOI: 10.1080/03057240.2023.2258288
Zhenzhou Zhao, John Chi-Kin Lee
Although research conducted worldwide has pinpointed the importance of the cultivation of worldviews in citizenship education, little is known of how worldviews are constructed in the civics curriculum. In this study, we adopted a comparative historical approach to examine how China’s civics curriculum has interpreted the meaning of life for young citizens during the transformation of the country from an empire into a nation-state. The data were drawn from 210 school textbooks published between 1902 and 2020. Four historical periods were delineated: the late Qing and Republican era, the Maoist era, the Deng Xiaoping era, and the current Xi Jinping administration. The findings demonstrated the trends and changes that took place while the ideal of citizenship and citizenship education took root, driving the modernisation of Chinese society. Through this study, we contribute to the theoretical discussions on enriching civics curriculum development from a humanist perspective.
{"title":"The meaning of life in China’s civics curriculum: A comparative historical study on worldview construction","authors":"Zhenzhou Zhao, John Chi-Kin Lee","doi":"10.1080/03057240.2023.2258288","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2023.2258288","url":null,"abstract":"Although research conducted worldwide has pinpointed the importance of the cultivation of worldviews in citizenship education, little is known of how worldviews are constructed in the civics curriculum. In this study, we adopted a comparative historical approach to examine how China’s civics curriculum has interpreted the meaning of life for young citizens during the transformation of the country from an empire into a nation-state. The data were drawn from 210 school textbooks published between 1902 and 2020. Four historical periods were delineated: the late Qing and Republican era, the Maoist era, the Deng Xiaoping era, and the current Xi Jinping administration. The findings demonstrated the trends and changes that took place while the ideal of citizenship and citizenship education took root, driving the modernisation of Chinese society. Through this study, we contribute to the theoretical discussions on enriching civics curriculum development from a humanist perspective.","PeriodicalId":47410,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Moral Education","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134887181","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-21DOI: 10.1080/03057240.2023.2258290
Mark Gregory Harrison, Ji Ying, Fei Yan, Liz Jackson
ABSTRACTGratitude has recently received increasing scholarly attention as a moral value and virtue important for individual and social functioning and therefore worth cultivating in schools. However, previous research has often been based on experiences in western societies, while moral values and moral cultivation are understood in different ways across cultural contexts. This exploratory qualitative study examines teachers’ conceptions of gratitude and their experiences of cultivating gratitude in schools in mainland China. Based on semi-structured interviews, the findings highlight Chinese teachers’ culturally distinctive conceptions of gratitude and its cultivation, namely its role in developing relationships and maintaining social harmony, and the importance of acts of reciprocity. This empirical study develops a more substantive cross-cultural understanding of the nature of gratitude and practices of moral cultivation in schools.KEYWORDS: Gratitudeteachersconceptionsmoral cultivationChina Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the Education University of Hong Kong Dean’s Start-up Research Grant project ‘Gratitude and Humility in Education, East Meets West’ [RG49/2020-2021 R]; Education University of Hong Kong Dean’s Start-up project ‘A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Gratitude in Education’ [04599].Notes on contributorsMark Gregory HarrisonMark Harrison is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Counselling and Psychology at Hong Kong Shue Yan University. He previously worked in international schools for many years, where he held several positions of senior leadership.Ji YingJi Ying is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Educational Policy and Leadership, the Education University of Hong Kong. Her research focuses on education in intercultural and comparative contexts.Fei YanFei Yan is a Senior Research Assistant at the Education University of Hong Kong. His research focuses on citizenship and moral education.Liz JacksonLiz Jackson is Professor of Education at the Education University of Hong Kong. She is also Fellow and Past President of the Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia and former Director of the Comparative Education Research Centre at the University of Hong Kong.
{"title":"Teachers’ conceptions of gratitude and its cultivation in schools in China","authors":"Mark Gregory Harrison, Ji Ying, Fei Yan, Liz Jackson","doi":"10.1080/03057240.2023.2258290","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2023.2258290","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTGratitude has recently received increasing scholarly attention as a moral value and virtue important for individual and social functioning and therefore worth cultivating in schools. However, previous research has often been based on experiences in western societies, while moral values and moral cultivation are understood in different ways across cultural contexts. This exploratory qualitative study examines teachers’ conceptions of gratitude and their experiences of cultivating gratitude in schools in mainland China. Based on semi-structured interviews, the findings highlight Chinese teachers’ culturally distinctive conceptions of gratitude and its cultivation, namely its role in developing relationships and maintaining social harmony, and the importance of acts of reciprocity. This empirical study develops a more substantive cross-cultural understanding of the nature of gratitude and practices of moral cultivation in schools.KEYWORDS: Gratitudeteachersconceptionsmoral cultivationChina Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the Education University of Hong Kong Dean’s Start-up Research Grant project ‘Gratitude and Humility in Education, East Meets West’ [RG49/2020-2021 R]; Education University of Hong Kong Dean’s Start-up project ‘A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Gratitude in Education’ [04599].Notes on contributorsMark Gregory HarrisonMark Harrison is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Counselling and Psychology at Hong Kong Shue Yan University. He previously worked in international schools for many years, where he held several positions of senior leadership.Ji YingJi Ying is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Educational Policy and Leadership, the Education University of Hong Kong. Her research focuses on education in intercultural and comparative contexts.Fei YanFei Yan is a Senior Research Assistant at the Education University of Hong Kong. His research focuses on citizenship and moral education.Liz JacksonLiz Jackson is Professor of Education at the Education University of Hong Kong. She is also Fellow and Past President of the Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia and former Director of the Comparative Education Research Centre at the University of Hong Kong.","PeriodicalId":47410,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Moral Education","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136152910","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-19DOI: 10.1080/03057240.2023.2254510
Juan P. Dabdoub, Daniela Salgado, Aurora Bernal, Marvin W. Berkowitz, Aitor R. Salaverría
This paper presents two leadership training programs focused on redesigning schools to promote student character development and advocates for their suitability to promote character education in diverse cultural contexts. This is especially relevant for researchers, practitioners, and policy makers who are searching for replicable interventions to promote character development in schools, particularly in those countries where the character education movement has not arrived yet. It begins with the theoretical framework that lays the groundwork for these kinds of leadership programs. Second, it describes the PRIMED Institute in Character Education (PICE) and the virtual/video-based Leadership Academy in Character Education (vLACE) programs. Finally, it presents seven arguments in favor of these programs responding to the needs of schools in many different countries.
{"title":"Redesigning schools for effective character education through leadership: The case of PRIMED Institute and vLACE","authors":"Juan P. Dabdoub, Daniela Salgado, Aurora Bernal, Marvin W. Berkowitz, Aitor R. Salaverría","doi":"10.1080/03057240.2023.2254510","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2023.2254510","url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents two leadership training programs focused on redesigning schools to promote student character development and advocates for their suitability to promote character education in diverse cultural contexts. This is especially relevant for researchers, practitioners, and policy makers who are searching for replicable interventions to promote character development in schools, particularly in those countries where the character education movement has not arrived yet. It begins with the theoretical framework that lays the groundwork for these kinds of leadership programs. Second, it describes the PRIMED Institute in Character Education (PICE) and the virtual/video-based Leadership Academy in Character Education (vLACE) programs. Finally, it presents seven arguments in favor of these programs responding to the needs of schools in many different countries.","PeriodicalId":47410,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Moral Education","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135014887","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-19DOI: 10.1080/03057240.2023.2255754
Suzanne S. Choo, Deborah Chua
ABSTRACTIn an age of hyper-globalization, ethical criticism has become vital in tackling the bombardment of information across networked societies. This paper begins by exploring the historical emergence of ethical criticism, its dominant approaches (relational, analytical and historical), and potential for character education. Next, we focus on character education in Singapore. Utilizing a comparative case study analysis, we compared older and recent character education syllabi and applied ethical criticism as an analytical lens. Findings show a discernible shift from moral adaptation to some evidence of ethical criticism where more emphasis is placed on the relational and less on analytical and historical aspects. We then examine the opportunities and tensions for ethical criticism in Singapore’s character education programme. These tensions arise from the simultaneous objectives of empowering citizens to handle the challenges of multicultural engagements alongside the limits placed on critical-ethical thinking when applied to analyzing politics and systemic structures of power.KEYWORDS: Character educationethical criticismpoststructuralismvalues educationSingapore Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University [OER 08/21 SCSL].Notes on contributorsSuzanne S. ChooSuzanne S. Choo is Associate Professor at the English Language and Literature Academic Group at the National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Her research has been published in Harvard Educational Review, Reading Research Quarterly, British Journal of Educational Studies, Research in the Teaching of English, among others. Her research is in the areas of global and cosmopolitan education, ethical criticism, and literature pedagogy.Deborah ChuaDeborah Chua is Research Fellow at National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Deborah has published in Journal of Linguistics, Language and Cognition, and English Language and Linguistics, among others.
在一个高度全球化的时代,伦理批评在应对网络社会的信息轰炸方面变得至关重要。本文首先探讨了伦理批评的历史出现,它的主要方法(关系的,分析的和历史的),以及品格教育的潜力。接下来,我们关注新加坡的品格教育。利用比较案例研究分析,我们比较了旧的和最近的品格教育教学大纲,并应用伦理批评作为分析镜头。研究结果显示,从道德适应到一些道德批评证据的明显转变,更多地强调关系,而较少强调分析和历史方面。然后,我们研究了新加坡品格教育计划中伦理批评的机会和紧张关系。这些紧张关系源于赋予公民处理多元文化接触挑战的同时目标,以及在分析政治和权力系统结构时对批判性伦理思维的限制。关键词:品格教育伦理批评后结构主义价值观教育新加坡披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。本研究得到南洋理工大学国立教育研究所的支持[OER 08/21 SCSL]。作者简介suzanne S. Choo,新加坡南洋理工大学国立教育学院英语语言文学学术小组副教授。她的研究成果发表在《哈佛教育评论》、《阅读研究季刊》、《英国教育研究杂志》、《英语教学研究》等刊物上。她的研究领域包括全球和世界性教育、伦理批评和文学教育学。Deborah Chua,新加坡南洋理工大学国立教育研究院研究员。曾在《语言学杂志》、《语言与认知》、《英语语言与语言学》等刊物上发表文章。
{"title":"From moral adaptation to ethical criticism: Analyzing developments in Singapore’s character education programme","authors":"Suzanne S. Choo, Deborah Chua","doi":"10.1080/03057240.2023.2255754","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2023.2255754","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIn an age of hyper-globalization, ethical criticism has become vital in tackling the bombardment of information across networked societies. This paper begins by exploring the historical emergence of ethical criticism, its dominant approaches (relational, analytical and historical), and potential for character education. Next, we focus on character education in Singapore. Utilizing a comparative case study analysis, we compared older and recent character education syllabi and applied ethical criticism as an analytical lens. Findings show a discernible shift from moral adaptation to some evidence of ethical criticism where more emphasis is placed on the relational and less on analytical and historical aspects. We then examine the opportunities and tensions for ethical criticism in Singapore’s character education programme. These tensions arise from the simultaneous objectives of empowering citizens to handle the challenges of multicultural engagements alongside the limits placed on critical-ethical thinking when applied to analyzing politics and systemic structures of power.KEYWORDS: Character educationethical criticismpoststructuralismvalues educationSingapore Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University [OER 08/21 SCSL].Notes on contributorsSuzanne S. ChooSuzanne S. Choo is Associate Professor at the English Language and Literature Academic Group at the National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Her research has been published in Harvard Educational Review, Reading Research Quarterly, British Journal of Educational Studies, Research in the Teaching of English, among others. Her research is in the areas of global and cosmopolitan education, ethical criticism, and literature pedagogy.Deborah ChuaDeborah Chua is Research Fellow at National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Deborah has published in Journal of Linguistics, Language and Cognition, and English Language and Linguistics, among others.","PeriodicalId":47410,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Moral Education","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135060645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}