Pub Date : 2020-12-16DOI: 10.1080/14036096.2020.1864080
S. Parkinson
It is now more than a decade since the target of ending homelessness, most notability via a Housing First approach, entered the policy vernacular and then enacted through various plans and strategi...
{"title":"Ending Homelessness? The Contrasting Experiences of Denmark, Finland and Ireland","authors":"S. Parkinson","doi":"10.1080/14036096.2020.1864080","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2020.1864080","url":null,"abstract":"It is now more than a decade since the target of ending homelessness, most notability via a Housing First approach, entered the policy vernacular and then enacted through various plans and strategi...","PeriodicalId":47433,"journal":{"name":"Housing Theory & Society","volume":"39 1","pages":"120 - 122"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2020-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14036096.2020.1864080","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49300840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-16DOI: 10.1080/14036096.2020.1853224
S. Worton
ABSTRACT Housing First is an evidence-based intervention designed to house individuals who are chronically homeless and are experiencing serious mental illness. The cross-sector collaboration required to provide person-centred supports to this population has resulted in increased understanding of Housing First as a whole systems response. Housing First implementation acts as a catalyst for systems change, yet research on how this change occurs is limited. This study examined the role of regional networks in advancing systems change through Housing First. A qualitative, multiple case study was conducted to examine two multi-city networks established by community leaders in the Canadian homelessness sector. Data collection activities included document analysis, interviews (n = 10), and two follow-up focus groups. Thematic analyses were conducted for each network, followed by a cross-case analysis. Findings indicate that engaging in a multi-city network increases leaders’ collective capacity to create conditions for change and to advance and sustain systems-level changes.
{"title":"Understanding the role of networks in building capacity for systems change: A case study of two Canadian networks implementing Housing First","authors":"S. Worton","doi":"10.1080/14036096.2020.1853224","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2020.1853224","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Housing First is an evidence-based intervention designed to house individuals who are chronically homeless and are experiencing serious mental illness. The cross-sector collaboration required to provide person-centred supports to this population has resulted in increased understanding of Housing First as a whole systems response. Housing First implementation acts as a catalyst for systems change, yet research on how this change occurs is limited. This study examined the role of regional networks in advancing systems change through Housing First. A qualitative, multiple case study was conducted to examine two multi-city networks established by community leaders in the Canadian homelessness sector. Data collection activities included document analysis, interviews (n = 10), and two follow-up focus groups. Thematic analyses were conducted for each network, followed by a cross-case analysis. Findings indicate that engaging in a multi-city network increases leaders’ collective capacity to create conditions for change and to advance and sustain systems-level changes.","PeriodicalId":47433,"journal":{"name":"Housing Theory & Society","volume":"38 1","pages":"650 - 668"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2020-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14036096.2020.1853224","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43674156","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-04DOI: 10.1080/14036096.2020.1846611
J. Doling, R. Arundel
ABSTRACT The aim of this paper is to examine the increasing use of the home as a workplace and establish its significance for housing studies. Firstly, the article sketches its historical growth founded in technological and business model changes. Using cross-country datasets, it identifies variations across the EU in the scale and characteristics of home working, which by 2015 was the practice for about 1 in 6 EU workers, a ratio that has been greatly boosted by responses to the coronavirus pandemic. Secondly, the article considers the implications of increasing home working for housing studies. This is illustrated through a consideration of influences on our understanding of housing demand, particularly in terms of housing form and location. Further, we consider consequences for other areas of theory on the meaning of home, boundaries between public and private realms, and gender perspectives on the division of domestic work and space.
{"title":"The Home as Workplace: A Challenge for Housing Research","authors":"J. Doling, R. Arundel","doi":"10.1080/14036096.2020.1846611","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2020.1846611","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The aim of this paper is to examine the increasing use of the home as a workplace and establish its significance for housing studies. Firstly, the article sketches its historical growth founded in technological and business model changes. Using cross-country datasets, it identifies variations across the EU in the scale and characteristics of home working, which by 2015 was the practice for about 1 in 6 EU workers, a ratio that has been greatly boosted by responses to the coronavirus pandemic. Secondly, the article considers the implications of increasing home working for housing studies. This is illustrated through a consideration of influences on our understanding of housing demand, particularly in terms of housing form and location. Further, we consider consequences for other areas of theory on the meaning of home, boundaries between public and private realms, and gender perspectives on the division of domestic work and space.","PeriodicalId":47433,"journal":{"name":"Housing Theory & Society","volume":"39 1","pages":"1 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2020-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14036096.2020.1846611","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45848807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-11-26DOI: 10.1080/14036096.2020.1846610
Manuel B. Aalbers, C. Hochstenbach, J. Bosma, Rodrigo Fernandez
ABSTRACT The private rental sector (PRS) is making a surprising comeback. A central argument in our paper is that we see the rise of PRS and the associated stagnation of homeownership as springing from the contradictions inherent to financialized homeowner societies. Rather than a feature of either mature or late homeowner societies, contradictions of the promotion of homeownership through the expansion of mortgage markets paved the way for a revival of the PRS. Our case is the Netherlands, but our argument has a wider remit. We sketch the dominant trends in Dutch housing policy and present an overview of the rise of PRS and Buy-To-Let in Dutch cities. We identify how housing policies and realities have driven a shift from a debt-driven to a wealth-driven model of financialization, in which the demand for PRS as an investment class and as a place to live has become central.
{"title":"The Death and Life of Private Landlordism: How Financialized Homeownership Gave Birth to the Buy-To-Let Market","authors":"Manuel B. Aalbers, C. Hochstenbach, J. Bosma, Rodrigo Fernandez","doi":"10.1080/14036096.2020.1846610","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2020.1846610","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The private rental sector (PRS) is making a surprising comeback. A central argument in our paper is that we see the rise of PRS and the associated stagnation of homeownership as springing from the contradictions inherent to financialized homeowner societies. Rather than a feature of either mature or late homeowner societies, contradictions of the promotion of homeownership through the expansion of mortgage markets paved the way for a revival of the PRS. Our case is the Netherlands, but our argument has a wider remit. We sketch the dominant trends in Dutch housing policy and present an overview of the rise of PRS and Buy-To-Let in Dutch cities. We identify how housing policies and realities have driven a shift from a debt-driven to a wealth-driven model of financialization, in which the demand for PRS as an investment class and as a place to live has become central.","PeriodicalId":47433,"journal":{"name":"Housing Theory & Society","volume":"38 1","pages":"541 - 563"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2020-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14036096.2020.1846610","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47305854","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-11-23DOI: 10.1080/14036096.2020.1844795
A. Emami, Sheyda Sadeghlou
ABSTRACT The present study aims at reviewing Residential Satisfaction (RS) from both theoretical and empirical points of view. Various theories from different fields underpin RS and empirical studies on RS also indicate different determinants; however, there is a paucity of research on reviewing RS studies, identifying the roots of its theories and categorizing RS empirical studies into core determinants. Therefore, the main research questions are: which theories support RS and what are RS determinants and indicators? To answer these questions, valid RS-related studies were extracted using the search strategy and after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 107 studies were selected for the final review. Besides, the findings of RS studies were structured into four determinants, namely urban policy and planning, design principles, social milieu and residents’ attributes. This review provides fresh insights into RS interdisciplinary aspects and the concept of residential dissatisfaction, and offers useful suggestions for future research.
{"title":"Residential Satisfaction: A Narrative Literature Review Towards Identification of Core Determinants and Indicators","authors":"A. Emami, Sheyda Sadeghlou","doi":"10.1080/14036096.2020.1844795","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2020.1844795","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The present study aims at reviewing Residential Satisfaction (RS) from both theoretical and empirical points of view. Various theories from different fields underpin RS and empirical studies on RS also indicate different determinants; however, there is a paucity of research on reviewing RS studies, identifying the roots of its theories and categorizing RS empirical studies into core determinants. Therefore, the main research questions are: which theories support RS and what are RS determinants and indicators? To answer these questions, valid RS-related studies were extracted using the search strategy and after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 107 studies were selected for the final review. Besides, the findings of RS studies were structured into four determinants, namely urban policy and planning, design principles, social milieu and residents’ attributes. This review provides fresh insights into RS interdisciplinary aspects and the concept of residential dissatisfaction, and offers useful suggestions for future research.","PeriodicalId":47433,"journal":{"name":"Housing Theory & Society","volume":"38 1","pages":"512 - 540"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2020-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14036096.2020.1844795","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46457787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-30DOI: 10.1080/14036096.2020.1838944
Kirsi Juhila, S. Holmberg, Doris Lydahl, C. Hall
ABSTRACT The study contributes to discursive and interactional housing and home studies by analysing home visit conversations with clients who need support with their housing and living in the community. It focuses on the ways in which professionals comment on clients’ home environments. The data, which consist of 20 audio-recorded home visits in Mobile Support directed at mental health and substance abuse rehabilitees, are analysed by applying the Foucauldian concepts of practices, normalization and inspecting gaze, Goffman’s idea on face-work and the ethnomethodologically oriented research on the meanings of spaces in interactions. Five ways of using inspecting gaze are identified: pointing out, criticizing, giving advice, displaying concern and complimenting. The study provides a critical reflective basis for assessing the “soft” use of interactional power in clients’ homes at a time when the provision of services in private home spaces is on the increase.
{"title":"Observing and Commenting on Clients’ Home Environments in Mobile Support Home Visit Interactions: Institutional Gaze, Normalization and Face-work","authors":"Kirsi Juhila, S. Holmberg, Doris Lydahl, C. Hall","doi":"10.1080/14036096.2020.1838944","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2020.1838944","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The study contributes to discursive and interactional housing and home studies by analysing home visit conversations with clients who need support with their housing and living in the community. It focuses on the ways in which professionals comment on clients’ home environments. The data, which consist of 20 audio-recorded home visits in Mobile Support directed at mental health and substance abuse rehabilitees, are analysed by applying the Foucauldian concepts of practices, normalization and inspecting gaze, Goffman’s idea on face-work and the ethnomethodologically oriented research on the meanings of spaces in interactions. Five ways of using inspecting gaze are identified: pointing out, criticizing, giving advice, displaying concern and complimenting. The study provides a critical reflective basis for assessing the “soft” use of interactional power in clients’ homes at a time when the provision of services in private home spaces is on the increase.","PeriodicalId":47433,"journal":{"name":"Housing Theory & Society","volume":"56 12","pages":"82 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2020-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14036096.2020.1838944","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41248200","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-19DOI: 10.1080/14036096.2020.1827626
Hannu Ruonavaara
In this Focus article issue of Housing, Theory and Society, Mark Stephens presents acareful reconstruction of the late Jim Kemeny’s very influential theory of housing regimes together with an empir...
{"title":"Rethinking Jim Kemeny’s Theory of Housing Regimes","authors":"Hannu Ruonavaara","doi":"10.1080/14036096.2020.1827626","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2020.1827626","url":null,"abstract":"In this Focus article issue of Housing, Theory and Society, Mark Stephens presents acareful reconstruction of the late Jim Kemeny’s very influential theory of housing regimes together with an empir...","PeriodicalId":47433,"journal":{"name":"Housing Theory & Society","volume":"37 1","pages":"519 - 520"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2020-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14036096.2020.1827626","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"60239553","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-13DOI: 10.1080/14036096.2020.1833080
S. Roberts, M. Satsangi
ABSTRACT The “bad landlord” is an important stereotype in political debate. This paper applies Foucault’s analysis of historical change in the relation between economics and government, to examine the changing use of this stereotype the UK since the nineteenth century. We trace how this development reflects changes in the nature of government over this period. An analysis of debates on landlordism in the post-devolution Scottish Parliament demonstrates how the stereotype is used in the context of devolved government.
{"title":"“The Bad Landlord”: Origins and Significance in Contemporary Housing Policy and Practice","authors":"S. Roberts, M. Satsangi","doi":"10.1080/14036096.2020.1833080","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2020.1833080","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The “bad landlord” is an important stereotype in political debate. This paper applies Foucault’s analysis of historical change in the relation between economics and government, to examine the changing use of this stereotype the UK since the nineteenth century. We trace how this development reflects changes in the nature of government over this period. An analysis of debates on landlordism in the post-devolution Scottish Parliament demonstrates how the stereotype is used in the context of devolved government.","PeriodicalId":47433,"journal":{"name":"Housing Theory & Society","volume":"38 1","pages":"496 - 511"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2020-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14036096.2020.1833080","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41537090","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-12DOI: 10.1080/14036096.2020.1816572
M. Elsinga
ABSTRACT This contribution is a reflection on the critical analysis of Mark Stephens of the theoretical work on housing systems by Jim Kemeny. It concludes that the analysis of Stephens is a great incentive to continue the debate on housing and welfare started by Kemeny. The core of the review is that Stephens focusses on the so-called maturation of social rental housing as a replacement of government subsidies: can non-profit housing compete with commercial housing under smart conditions for social sustainability? Stephens is right that this maturation thesis does not hold and he provides convincing evidence for this. However, Stephens contribution neglects an important part of Kemeny’s work: the link between housing and more in particular the role of home ownership in welfare states. Here is work to be done! This contribution concludes with emphasizing the link between housing and welfare systems and its underlying ideologies. Rules of the games such as laws for social rental housing are important, but even more important than laws are day to day beliefs among citizens and professionals of what is right and wrong in housing practice. In other words it needs further research to explore the role of housing in practice of populism and COVID19. How do underlying housing ideologies play a role in current practice and how do and can they change policies and practices in housing in different continents?
{"title":"About Housing Systems and Underlying Ideologies","authors":"M. Elsinga","doi":"10.1080/14036096.2020.1816572","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2020.1816572","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This contribution is a reflection on the critical analysis of Mark Stephens of the theoretical work on housing systems by Jim Kemeny. It concludes that the analysis of Stephens is a great incentive to continue the debate on housing and welfare started by Kemeny. The core of the review is that Stephens focusses on the so-called maturation of social rental housing as a replacement of government subsidies: can non-profit housing compete with commercial housing under smart conditions for social sustainability? Stephens is right that this maturation thesis does not hold and he provides convincing evidence for this. However, Stephens contribution neglects an important part of Kemeny’s work: the link between housing and more in particular the role of home ownership in welfare states. Here is work to be done! This contribution concludes with emphasizing the link between housing and welfare systems and its underlying ideologies. Rules of the games such as laws for social rental housing are important, but even more important than laws are day to day beliefs among citizens and professionals of what is right and wrong in housing practice. In other words it needs further research to explore the role of housing in practice of populism and COVID19. How do underlying housing ideologies play a role in current practice and how do and can they change policies and practices in housing in different continents?","PeriodicalId":47433,"journal":{"name":"Housing Theory & Society","volume":"37 1","pages":"557 - 561"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2020-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14036096.2020.1816572","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41547580","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-12DOI: 10.1080/14036096.2020.1816573
M. Stephens
ABSTRACT In this article I respond to commentators’ observations relating to my Focus Article, “How housing systems are changing and why”, and propose a multi-layered housing regime framework. I argue that the institutions of housing system are naturally located in the middle-range, and fall into three distinct spheres of production, consumption and exchange. These spheres interaction with the “wider welfare regime” which represents the institutions of the labour market, taxation and social security. They have distinctive distributional tendencies and set the “boundaries of possibility” of the social rented sector’s role. Sitting above these middle-range institutions are macro-level drivers including macro-economic policy and the relatively new phenomenon of “really big finance” implied by unconventional monetary policies adopted by many central banks. Beneath the middle-range institutions lie regional and metropolitan markets where institutional variations and market pressures may produce intra-regime variation of outcomes.
{"title":"Towards a Multi-layered Housing Regime Framework: Responses to Commentators","authors":"M. Stephens","doi":"10.1080/14036096.2020.1816573","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2020.1816573","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this article I respond to commentators’ observations relating to my Focus Article, “How housing systems are changing and why”, and propose a multi-layered housing regime framework. I argue that the institutions of housing system are naturally located in the middle-range, and fall into three distinct spheres of production, consumption and exchange. These spheres interaction with the “wider welfare regime” which represents the institutions of the labour market, taxation and social security. They have distinctive distributional tendencies and set the “boundaries of possibility” of the social rented sector’s role. Sitting above these middle-range institutions are macro-level drivers including macro-economic policy and the relatively new phenomenon of “really big finance” implied by unconventional monetary policies adopted by many central banks. Beneath the middle-range institutions lie regional and metropolitan markets where institutional variations and market pressures may produce intra-regime variation of outcomes.","PeriodicalId":47433,"journal":{"name":"Housing Theory & Society","volume":"37 1","pages":"584 - 596"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2020-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14036096.2020.1816573","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46451783","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：