首页 > 最新文献

Thinking Skills and Creativity最新文献

英文 中文
Exploring secondary school teachers' creativity in differentiated instruction (DI) practices across Indonesian EFL classrooms 探索中学教师在印尼英语语言(EFL)课堂上进行分层教学(DI)实践的创造性
IF 3.7 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101620

The emergence of social, technological, and other aspects of life leads to increasing complexity in EFL instruction, requiring teachers to modify their instructions and accommodate students' learning needs through differentiated instruction (DI). DI requires that teachers diversify their instruction to optimize it. However, many teachers regard DI as challenging, requiring advanced teaching skills and creative thinking. Thus, this qualitative study aimed to investigate how teachers express their creativity in DI education and which areas of creativity need to be addressed. The data was collected by observing teaching performances and interviews with six Indonesian EFL secondary school instructors. The DI-Quest instrument was used for observation, and the English Language Teaching Creativity Scale (ELT-CS) was used to build the interview guide. The findings revealed diverse types of creativity in five dimensions: motivation, originality and elaboration, brainstorming, fluency and flexibility, and press and materials. However, teachers experienced difficulties articulating the creative aspect of autonomy in DI classrooms. Some pedagogical implications are addressed, particularly in teacher professional development programs.

社会、科技和生活等各方面的发展导致英语教学越来越复杂,这就要求教师通过分层教学(Differentiated instruction,DI)来修改教学内容,满足学生的学习需求。DI 要求教师多样化教学,以优化教学。然而,许多教师认为分层教学具有挑战性,需要高超的教学技能和创造性思维。因此,本定性研究旨在调查教师如何在 DI 教育中表达他们的创造力,以及哪些方面的创造力需要解决。研究通过观察教学表演和采访六位印度尼西亚 EFL 中学教师收集数据。观察使用了 DI-Quest 工具,访谈指南则使用了英语语言教学创造力量表(ELT-CS)。研究结果显示,教师在五个维度上具有不同类型的创造力:动机、独创性和阐述、头脑风暴、流畅性和灵活性以及新闻和材料。然而,教师在表达 DI 课堂中自主性的创造性方面遇到了困难。研究还探讨了一些教学意义,特别是在教师专业发展计划中的意义。
{"title":"Exploring secondary school teachers' creativity in differentiated instruction (DI) practices across Indonesian EFL classrooms","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101620","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101620","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The emergence of social, technological, and other aspects of life leads to increasing complexity in EFL instruction, requiring teachers to modify their instructions and accommodate students' learning needs through differentiated instruction (DI). DI requires that teachers diversify their instruction to optimize it. However, many teachers regard DI as challenging, requiring advanced teaching skills and creative thinking. Thus, this qualitative study aimed to investigate how teachers express their creativity in DI education and which areas of creativity need to be addressed. The data was collected by observing teaching performances and interviews with six Indonesian EFL secondary school instructors. The DI-Quest instrument was used for observation, and the English Language Teaching Creativity Scale (ELT-CS) was used to build the interview guide. The findings revealed diverse types of creativity in five dimensions: motivation, originality and elaboration, brainstorming, fluency and flexibility, and press and materials. However, teachers experienced difficulties articulating the creative aspect of autonomy in DI classrooms. Some pedagogical implications are addressed, particularly in teacher professional development programs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141985746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Implementing a proposed framework for enhancing critical thinking skills in synthesizing AI-generated texts 在合成人工智能生成的文本时实施提高批判性思维能力的拟议框架
IF 3.7 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101619

Since the development of open and low-cost generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), the higher education community has witnessed high use of AI-generated texts in scholarly research and academic assignments, attracting ongoing debate about whether such practices constitute cheating. While scholars argue that integrating GenAI tools can enhance productivity, critics raise concerns about the negative effect of such integration on critical thinking (CrT). This study therefore proposed a framework for enhancing students’ CrT skills in synthesizing AI-generated information. The proposed framework is underpinned by various theoretical foundations, encompassing five interconnected step-wise phases (familiarizing, conceptualizing, inquiring, evaluating, and synthesizing). The study was conducted under two separate experiments. The first experiment (Study 1) validated the effectiveness of the proposed framework, providing CrT training to 179 postgraduate students. In the second study (n = 125), additional experiments were undertaken to confirm the effectiveness of the framework in different contexts. An experimental procedure involving pretest and posttest design was implemented wherein participants were randomly allocated to one of three groups: experimental group 1 (exposed to our framework), experimental group 2 (exposed to an alternative self-regulated learning framework), and a control group (exposed to a non-structured framework). Results from Study 1 revealed that the framework enhances students’ CrT skills to synthesize AI-generated texts. However, these CrT skills manifested through various rigorous training aimed at reinforcing learning. While the proposed framework holds considerable value in cultivating CrT skills, significant differences arise across various personality traits. In Study 2, the framework proved to be effective in different contexts. However, it did not make a difference, particularly in its capacity to enhance students’ self-regulated learning compared to other frameworks. We discussed the implications of the findings and recommended it to educators seeking to prepare students for the challenges of the AI-driven knowledge economy.

自从开放且低成本的生成式人工智能(GenAI)发展以来,高等教育界见证了人工智能生成的文本在学术研究和学术作业中的大量使用,引起了关于这种做法是否构成作弊的持续辩论。虽然学者们认为整合 GenAI 工具可以提高生产率,但批评者担心这种整合会对批判性思维(CrT)产生负面影响。因此,本研究提出了一个框架,以提高学生在综合人工智能生成的信息时的批判性思维能力。该框架以各种理论为基础,包括五个相互关联的阶段(熟悉、概念化、探究、评估和综合)。研究通过两个独立的实验进行。第一个实验(研究 1)验证了建议框架的有效性,为 179 名研究生提供了 CrT 培训。在第二项研究(n = 125)中,还进行了其他实验,以确认该框架在不同情况下的有效性。实验采用前测和后测设计,参与者被随机分配到三组中的一组:实验组 1(接触我们的框架)、实验组 2(接触另一种自我调节学习框架)和对照组(接触非结构化框架)。研究 1 的结果显示,该框架提高了学生合成人工智能生成文本的 CrT 技能。然而,这些CRT技能是通过各种旨在强化学习的严格训练体现出来的。虽然所提出的框架在培养学生的综合技能方面具有相当大的价值,但不同性格特征的学生在这方面存在显著差异。在研究 2 中,事实证明该框架在不同的情境下都是有效的。然而,与其他框架相比,该框架在提高学生自我调节学习的能力方面并没有什么不同。我们讨论了研究结果的意义,并将其推荐给教育工作者,以帮助学生做好准备,迎接人工智能驱动的知识经济的挑战。
{"title":"Implementing a proposed framework for enhancing critical thinking skills in synthesizing AI-generated texts","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101619","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101619","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Since the development of open and low-cost generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), the higher education community has witnessed high use of AI-generated texts in scholarly research and academic assignments, attracting ongoing debate about whether such practices constitute cheating. While scholars argue that integrating GenAI tools can enhance productivity, critics raise concerns about the negative effect of such integration on critical thinking (CrT). This study therefore proposed a framework for enhancing students’ CrT skills in synthesizing AI-generated information. The proposed framework is underpinned by various theoretical foundations, encompassing five interconnected step-wise phases (familiarizing, conceptualizing, inquiring, evaluating, and synthesizing). The study was conducted under two separate experiments. The first experiment (Study 1) validated the effectiveness of the proposed framework, providing CrT training to 179 postgraduate students. In the second study (<em>n</em> = 125), additional experiments were undertaken to confirm the effectiveness of the framework in different contexts. An experimental procedure involving pretest and posttest design was implemented wherein participants were randomly allocated to one of three groups: experimental group 1 (exposed to our framework), experimental group 2 (exposed to an alternative self-regulated learning framework), and a control group (exposed to a non-structured framework). Results from Study 1 revealed that the framework enhances students’ CrT skills to synthesize AI-generated texts. However, these CrT skills manifested through various rigorous training aimed at reinforcing learning. While the proposed framework holds considerable value in cultivating CrT skills, significant differences arise across various personality traits. In Study 2, the framework proved to be effective in different contexts. However, it did not make a difference, particularly in its capacity to enhance students’ self-regulated learning compared to other frameworks. We discussed the implications of the findings and recommended it to educators seeking to prepare students for the challenges of the AI-driven knowledge economy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141954019","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gamification and problem-based learning (PBL): Development of creativity in the teaching-learning process of mathematics in university students 游戏化和基于问题的学习(PBL):在大学生数学教学过程中培养创造力
IF 3.7 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101614

This study aims to determine whether the combination of techniques such as gamification along with problem-based learning (PBL) can significantly enhance the problem-solving abilities of university students and their academic performance compared to those who do not receive this educational approach. An experimental design was employed, incorporating the administration of tests, data collection, non-participant observation directed at teachers, and a survey administered to students. The study was conducted with 42 students in the treatment group and 37 students in the control group. As a result of the analysis, it was identified that the combination of gamification and PBL significantly improves the problem-solving capabilities of the treatment group, as well as the average grades. This suggests that these techniques can increase the engagement, motivation, and academic performance of university students in the context of mathematics. This holds significant implications for the design of educational programs and underscores the importance of integrating innovative approaches in teaching to foster holistic student development. It is recommended that educational programs and teachers consider the implementation of techniques that promote active student participation and the integration of technological resources to enhance the teaching and learning process of mathematics in university students.

本研究旨在确定游戏化等技术与基于问题的学习(PBL)相结合,能否显著提高大学生解决问题的能力,以及与未接受这种教育方法的学生相比,他们的学习成绩。研究采用了实验设计,包括测试、数据收集、针对教师的非参与观察以及针对学生的调查。研究中,治疗组有 42 名学生,对照组有 37 名学生。分析结果表明,游戏化和 PBL 的结合大大提高了治疗组学生解决问题的能力以及平均成绩。这表明,在数学教学中,这些技术可以提高大学生的参与度、积极性和学习成绩。这对教育计划的设计具有重要意义,并强调了将创新方法融入教学以促进学生全面发展的重要性。建议教育项目和教师考虑实施促进学生积极参与和整合科技资源的技术,以加强大学生的数学教学和学习过程。
{"title":"Gamification and problem-based learning (PBL): Development of creativity in the teaching-learning process of mathematics in university students","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101614","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101614","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aims to determine whether the combination of techniques such as gamification along with problem-based learning (PBL) can significantly enhance the problem-solving abilities of university students and their academic performance compared to those who do not receive this educational approach. An experimental design was employed, incorporating the administration of tests, data collection, non-participant observation directed at teachers, and a survey administered to students. The study was conducted with 42 students in the treatment group and 37 students in the control group. As a result of the analysis, it was identified that the combination of gamification and PBL significantly improves the problem-solving capabilities of the treatment group, as well as the average grades. This suggests that these techniques can increase the engagement, motivation, and academic performance of university students in the context of mathematics. This holds significant implications for the design of educational programs and underscores the importance of integrating innovative approaches in teaching to foster holistic student development. It is recommended that educational programs and teachers consider the implementation of techniques that promote active student participation and the integration of technological resources to enhance the teaching and learning process of mathematics in university students.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142048831","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Design-based learning in higher education: Its effects on students’ motivation, creativity and design skills 高等教育中以设计为基础的学习:对学生学习动机、创造力和设计技能的影响
IF 3.7 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101621

In art and design education, the roles of motivation and creative performance in design skills hold immense significance for design students. As such, the teachers’ instructional strategies are crucial. Among these strategies, design-based learning (DBL) is one of the important instructional processes that integrates design principles, problem-solving skills, and creative thinking to engage students in hands-on, authentic learning experiences. This study aimed to investigate the effects of DBL on the motivation, creativity, and design skills of students in art and design education. Pre- and post-test experimental research was conducted on 207 participants who specialize in art and design education at Kazan Federal University and the Kazan State Institute of Culture. Employing non-probability sampling, they were assigned to an experimental (treatment using DBL; 105 students) and a control (traditional instruction; 102 students) group. The findings demonstrated that the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group, while no significant interaction was observed between groups and sexes in the development of motivation, creativity, and design skills. Moreover, achievement motivation was found to significantly influence creative performance and design skills. This research serves as a valuable resource for educators and researchers, as it offers insights into fostering the creative performance of students within the field of art and design education.

在艺术设计教育中,设计技能中的学习动机和创造性表现对设计专业的学生意义重大。因此,教师的教学策略至关重要。在这些策略中,基于设计的学习(DBL)是重要的教学过程之一,它整合了设计原理、解决问题的技能和创造性思维,让学生参与到实践和真实的学习体验中。本研究旨在探讨 DBL 对艺术设计教育专业学生的学习动机、创造力和设计技能的影响。对喀山联邦大学和喀山国立文化学院艺术与设计教育专业的 207 名参与者进行了前测和后测实验研究。通过非概率抽样,他们被分配到实验组(使用 DBL 的治疗方法;105 名学生)和对照组(传统教学;102 名学生)。研究结果表明,实验组的成绩明显优于对照组,而在动机、创造力和设计技能的发展方面,没有观察到组间和性别间的显著交互作用。此外,研究还发现成就动机对创造性表现和设计技能有明显影响。这项研究为教育工作者和研究人员提供了宝贵的资源,因为它为在艺术与设计教育领域培养学生的创造性表现提供了真知灼见。
{"title":"Design-based learning in higher education: Its effects on students’ motivation, creativity and design skills","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101621","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101621","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In art and design education, the roles of motivation and creative performance in design skills hold immense significance for design students. As such, the teachers’ instructional strategies are crucial. Among these strategies, design-based learning (DBL) is one of the important instructional processes that integrates design principles, problem-solving skills, and creative thinking to engage students in hands-on, authentic learning experiences. This study aimed to investigate the effects of DBL on the motivation, creativity, and design skills of students in art and design education. Pre- and post-test experimental research was conducted on 207 participants who specialize in art and design education at Kazan Federal University and the Kazan State Institute of Culture. Employing non-probability sampling, they were assigned to an experimental (treatment using DBL; 105 students) and a control (traditional instruction; 102 students) group. The findings demonstrated that the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group, while no significant interaction was observed between groups and sexes in the development of motivation, creativity, and design skills. Moreover, achievement motivation was found to significantly influence creative performance and design skills. This research serves as a valuable resource for educators and researchers, as it offers insights into fostering the creative performance of students within the field of art and design education.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187124001597/pdfft?md5=938be14aad781f63f018f9116837aeaf&pid=1-s2.0-S1871187124001597-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141979470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Executive functions and divergent thinking in young adults: Evidence from individual differences and cognitive training studies 青少年的执行功能和发散思维:来自个体差异和认知训练研究的证据
IF 3.7 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101610

The interplay between executive functions and divergent thinking remains a debated question in creativity research. To address this issue, two studies were conducted from different perspectives. The first study explored which of the executive functioning components—namely working memory, inhibition, and shifting—predicted divergent thinking. A sample of 203 college students performed a battery of tasks assessing divergent thinking, executive functions, and related cognitive variables (fluid intelligence, verbal fluency, and processing speed). After statistically controlling for these variables, only working memory emerged as a significant predictor of creativity scores in the Alternative Uses Task, while inhibition and shifting did not. In the second study, a cognitive training approach was employed to further elucidate the potential efficacy of working memory training in fostering divergent thinking. The results found that the experimental group, which received a 15-day dual n-back task training, demonstrated greater improvements in the creativity score of the Alternative Uses Task compared to the control group, suggesting a transfer effect from working memory training to divergent thinking. This research underscores the plasticity of divergent thinking and highlights a plausible avenue for enhancing creativity through targeted cognitive training.

在创造力研究中,执行功能与发散思维之间的相互作用仍然是一个备受争议的问题。为了解决这个问题,我们从不同的角度进行了两项研究。第一项研究探讨了执行功能的哪些组成部分(即工作记忆、抑制和转移)可以预测发散思维。203 名大学生样本完成了一系列任务,评估发散思维、执行功能和相关认知变量(流体智力、语言流畅性和处理速度)。在对这些变量进行统计控制后,只有工作记忆能显著预测 "替代性用途任务 "中的创造力得分,而抑制和转移则不能。在第二项研究中,我们采用了一种认知训练方法来进一步阐明工作记忆训练在培养发散思维方面的潜在功效。结果发现,与对照组相比,实验组在接受了为期15天的双n-back任务训练后,在 "替代性用途任务 "中的创造力得分有了更大的提高,这表明工作记忆训练对发散思维产生了迁移效应。这项研究强调了发散思维的可塑性,为通过有针对性的认知训练提高创造力提供了一条可行的途径。
{"title":"Executive functions and divergent thinking in young adults: Evidence from individual differences and cognitive training studies","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101610","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101610","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The interplay between executive functions and divergent thinking remains a debated question in creativity research. To address this issue, two studies were conducted from different perspectives. The first study explored which of the executive functioning components—namely working memory, inhibition, and shifting—predicted divergent thinking. A sample of 203 college students performed a battery of tasks assessing divergent thinking, executive functions, and related cognitive variables (fluid intelligence, verbal fluency, and processing speed). After statistically controlling for these variables, only working memory emerged as a significant predictor of creativity scores in the Alternative Uses Task, while inhibition and shifting did not. In the second study, a cognitive training approach was employed to further elucidate the potential efficacy of working memory training in fostering divergent thinking. The results found that the experimental group, which received a 15-day dual n-back task training, demonstrated greater improvements in the creativity score of the Alternative Uses Task compared to the control group, suggesting a transfer effect from working memory training to divergent thinking. This research underscores the plasticity of divergent thinking and highlights a plausible avenue for enhancing creativity through targeted cognitive training.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142012852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Developing critical thinking test for adolescents: A validity and reliability study from the Czech Republic 开发青少年批判性思维测试:捷克共和国的有效性和可靠性研究
IF 3.7 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101613

This article presents a comprehensive validation study of a Critical Thinking Test (CTT) conducted among Czech adolescents in 2023. It offers valuable insights into the psychometric properties, correlations, and predictors associated with analytical, evaluative and inferential abilities of critical thinking. While there are tools available for measuring critical thinking, they tend to be lengthy and inaccessible in the Czech language. Our study seeks to address this gap by developing a concise and effective tool that students can complete within a single class period. Our study is based on a large sample of Czech adolescents in their first year of secondary school (N = 9,495), which allows us to apply Item Response Theory (IRT), which is the best method for validation. The results showed that the abbreviated 33-item version of the CTT is a reliable and valid instrument that measures three distinct abilities (analysis, evaluation, and inference) that are highly correlated. Limitations and implications for the use of the instrument are discussed.

本文介绍了 2023 年在捷克青少年中开展的批判性思维测试 (CTT) 综合验证研究。它就批判性思维的分析、评价和推理能力的心理测量特性、相关性和预测因素提供了有价值的见解。虽然有一些工具可用于测量批判性思维,但这些工具往往比较冗长,而且无法用捷克语进行测量。我们的研究旨在通过开发一种简洁有效的工具,让学生在一节课的时间内就能完成,从而弥补这一不足。我们的研究基于捷克中学一年级青少年的大量样本(=9,495),这使我们能够应用项目反应理论(IRT),这是验证的最佳方法。结果表明,缩略版的 33 个项目的 CTT 是一个可靠有效的工具,可以测量三种不同的能力(分析、评价和推理),而且这三种能力高度相关。本文讨论了该工具使用的局限性和影响。
{"title":"Developing critical thinking test for adolescents: A validity and reliability study from the Czech Republic","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101613","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101613","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article presents a comprehensive validation study of a Critical Thinking Test (CTT) conducted among Czech adolescents in 2023. It offers valuable insights into the psychometric properties, correlations, and predictors associated with analytical, evaluative and inferential abilities of critical thinking. While there are tools available for measuring critical thinking, they tend to be lengthy and inaccessible in the Czech language. Our study seeks to address this gap by developing a concise and effective tool that students can complete within a single class period. Our study is based on a large sample of Czech adolescents in their first year of secondary school (<em>N</em> = 9,495), which allows us to apply Item Response Theory (IRT), which is the best method for validation. The results showed that the abbreviated 33-item version of the CTT is a reliable and valid instrument that measures three distinct abilities (analysis, evaluation, and inference) that are highly correlated. Limitations and implications for the use of the instrument are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141942031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Student-generated questions: An exploration of an instructional strategy with young children 学生提出的问题:对幼儿教学策略的探索
IF 3.7 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101608

Student-generated questions enhance deeper learning and empower active participation and critical thinking. Researchers have extensively explored teacher questions, but a notable gap persists in how to teach young children to ask questions effectively. This mixed-methods pilot study examined the impact of teaching questioning skills using the Question Formulation Technique (QFT) in an early childhood summer program for children from under-resourced areas. Pre-post oral language assessment scores from 33 children were analyzed to determine the impact of the QFT. Results reveal that using this method, teachers can effectively guide young students to ask more and better questions. Students involved in the research exhibited a substantial increase in the number of questions posed. They demonstrated a qualitative improvement in their approach to questioning, significantly increasing the number of wonderment questions (high-level questions). Conclusions indicate that using the QFT in early childhood classrooms can encourage young children to generate questions. Based on these findings, the authors conclude that teaching learners to ask meaningful questions can enhance their engagement, comprehension, and overall academic performance in diverse populations.

学生提出的问题能促进更深入的学习,增强积极参与和批判性思维的能力。研究人员对教师提问进行了广泛的探讨,但在如何有效地教幼儿提问方面仍存在明显的差距。这项混合方法试点研究考察了在一项针对资源匮乏地区儿童的幼儿暑期项目中使用提问技巧(QFT)教授提问技能的影响。研究分析了 33 名儿童的前后期口语评估分数,以确定 QFT 的影响。结果显示,使用这种方法,教师可以有效地引导小学生提出更多更好的问题。参与研究的学生提出的问题数量大幅增加。他们的提问方式有了质的飞跃,奇思妙想问题(高层次问题)的数量显著增加。结论表明,在幼儿课堂上使用 QFT 可以鼓励幼儿提出问题。基于这些研究结果,作者得出结论,教学习者提出有意义的问题可以提高他们的参与度、理解力和不同人群的整体学习成绩。
{"title":"Student-generated questions: An exploration of an instructional strategy with young children","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101608","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101608","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Student-generated questions enhance deeper learning and empower active participation and critical thinking. Researchers have extensively explored teacher questions, but a notable gap persists in how to teach young children to ask questions effectively. This mixed-methods pilot study examined the impact of teaching questioning skills using the Question Formulation Technique (QFT) in an early childhood summer program for children from under-resourced areas. Pre-post oral language assessment scores from 33 children were analyzed to determine the impact of the QFT. Results reveal that using this method, teachers can effectively guide young students to ask more and better questions. Students involved in the research exhibited a substantial increase in the number of questions posed. They demonstrated a qualitative improvement in their approach to questioning, significantly increasing the number of wonderment questions (high-level questions). Conclusions indicate that using the QFT in early childhood classrooms can encourage young children to generate questions. Based on these findings, the authors conclude that teaching learners to ask meaningful questions can enhance their engagement, comprehension, and overall academic performance in diverse populations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141942161","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Towards a stance de-centring model for the foreign language classroom: Training 21st-century agents of change 建立外语课堂的去中心化立场模式:培养 21 世纪的变革推动者
IF 3.7 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101603

The present paper describes a new, theoretically grounded model for stance de-centring that advocates for enhancing foreign language learners’ intercultural awareness, sensitivity, and behaviours. This model embraces both three levels of stance de-centring: epistemic, emotional and effective, and three dimensions of intercultural competence: cognitive, affective and conative. Epistemic, emotional, and effective stance de-centring is carried out at the cognitive, affective and conative intercultural dimensions to raise foreign language learners’ intercultural awareness, develop their intercultural sensitivity, and activate their intercultural behaviours. Each intercultural dimension comprised within the model is rigorously examined, highlighting the importance of nurturing skills in critical thinking, empathy, and behavioural adaptability to counter ethnocentrism through stance de-centring. Practical examples illustrating the successful implementation of the stance de-centring model within the foreign language classroom are also presented. These examples elucidate the practical application and potential impact of the model, offering insights into fostering inclusive environments and preparing foreign language learners to navigate diverse cultural landscapes as future agents of change.

本文介绍了一种新的、有理论基础的立场去中心化模式,主张提高外语学习者的跨文化意识、敏感性和行为。该模式包括三个层次的立场去中心化:认识、情感和有效,以及跨文化能力的三个维度:认知、情感和内涵。在认知、情感和内涵三个跨文化维度上进行认识、情感和有效的立场去中心化,以提高外语学习者的跨文化意识,培养他们的跨文化敏感性,激活他们的跨文化行为。对该模式所包含的每个跨文化维度都进行了严格审查,强调了培养批判性思维、移情能力和行为适应能力的重要性,以通过立场去中心化来抵制种族中心主义。此外,还介绍了在外语课堂上成功实施立场去中心化模式的实例。这些实例阐明了该模式的实际应用和潜在影响,为营造包容性环境和培养外语学习者作为未来变革的推动者驾驭多元文化环境提供了真知灼见。
{"title":"Towards a stance de-centring model for the foreign language classroom: Training 21st-century agents of change","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101603","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101603","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present paper describes a new, theoretically grounded model for stance de-centring that advocates for enhancing foreign language learners’ intercultural awareness, sensitivity, and behaviours. This model embraces both three levels of stance de-centring: epistemic, emotional and effective, and three dimensions of intercultural competence: cognitive, affective and conative. Epistemic, emotional, and effective stance de-centring is carried out at the cognitive, affective and conative intercultural dimensions to raise foreign language learners’ intercultural awareness, develop their intercultural sensitivity, and activate their intercultural behaviours. Each intercultural dimension comprised within the model is rigorously examined, highlighting the importance of nurturing skills in critical thinking, empathy, and behavioural adaptability to counter ethnocentrism through stance de-centring. Practical examples illustrating the successful implementation of the stance de-centring model within the foreign language classroom are also presented. These examples elucidate the practical application and potential impact of the model, offering insights into fostering inclusive environments and preparing foreign language learners to navigate diverse cultural landscapes as future agents of change.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187118712400141X/pdfft?md5=073f501f0bdb7e0afc719ba35c889027&pid=1-s2.0-S187118712400141X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142167397","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Unveiling the efficacy of ChatGPT in evaluating critical thinking skills through peer feedback analysis: Leveraging existing classification criteria 通过同行反馈分析,揭示 ChatGPT 在评价批判性思维能力方面的功效:利用现有的分类标准
IF 3.7 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101607

This study investigates the potential of using ChatGPT, a large language model, to assess students' critical thinking in online peer feedback. With the rapid development of technology, big language models, such as ChatGPT, have made significant progress in natural language processing in recent years and have good potential for application in teaching evaluation and feedback. However, can generative AI help educational practitioners in teaching and learning? How to accurately assess students' critical thinking using generative AI remains a challenging task. This study investigates whether ChatGPT can effectively evaluate critical thinking using established coding systems. By comparing the consistency and accuracy of manual coding with ChatGPT coding in online peer feedback texts, it clarifies how ChatGPT processes online peer feedback data and conducts assessments. Through a comprehensive analysis employing various metrics including precision, recall, F1 score, and a confusion matrix, we assess ChatGPT's performance. Additionally, we group students and analyze how ChatGPT's assessments relate to their critical thinking levels. Our findings suggest that the ChatGPT demonstrated some ability to assess higher dimensions of critical thinking, but showed limitations in assessing the more granular secondary dimensions under the higher dimensions of critical thinking. However for this kind of granular assessment will more accurately capture the level of learning critical thinking. Surprisingly, ChatGPT's evaluations are not influenced by students' critical thinking levels. This study underscores ChatGPT's potential in automating critical thinking assessment at scale, alleviating the burden on educators and enhancing understanding of critical thinking in peer feedback.

本研究探讨了在在线同伴反馈中使用大语言模型 ChatGPT 评估学生批判性思维的潜力。随着技术的飞速发展,以 ChatGPT 为代表的大语言模型近年来在自然语言处理领域取得了长足的进步,在教学评价和反馈中具有良好的应用潜力。然而,生成式人工智能能否帮助教育从业者开展教学工作?如何利用生成式人工智能准确评估学生的批判性思维仍是一项具有挑战性的任务。本研究探讨了 ChatGPT 是否能利用已有的编码系统有效评估批判性思维。通过比较在线同伴反馈文本中人工编码与 ChatGPT 编码的一致性和准确性,本研究阐明了 ChatGPT 如何处理在线同伴反馈数据并进行评估。通过使用精确度、召回率、F1 分数和混淆矩阵等各种指标进行综合分析,我们评估了 ChatGPT 的性能。此外,我们还对学生进行了分组,并分析了 ChatGPT 的评估与学生批判性思维水平之间的关系。我们的研究结果表明,ChatGPT 在评估批判性思维的较高维度方面表现出了一定的能力,但在评估批判性思维较高维度下更细化的次要维度方面表现出了局限性。不过,这种细化评估能更准确地反映批判性思维的学习水平。令人惊讶的是,ChatGPT 的评价并不受学生批判性思维水平的影响。这项研究强调了 ChatGPT 在批判性思维大规模自动化评估方面的潜力,减轻了教育工作者的负担,并在同伴反馈中加深了对批判性思维的理解。
{"title":"Unveiling the efficacy of ChatGPT in evaluating critical thinking skills through peer feedback analysis: Leveraging existing classification criteria","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101607","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101607","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the potential of using ChatGPT, a large language model, to assess students' critical thinking in online peer feedback. With the rapid development of technology, big language models, such as ChatGPT, have made significant progress in natural language processing in recent years and have good potential for application in teaching evaluation and feedback. However, can generative AI help educational practitioners in teaching and learning? How to accurately assess students' critical thinking using generative AI remains a challenging task. This study investigates whether ChatGPT can effectively evaluate critical thinking using established coding systems. By comparing the consistency and accuracy of manual coding with ChatGPT coding in online peer feedback texts, it clarifies how ChatGPT processes online peer feedback data and conducts assessments. Through a comprehensive analysis employing various metrics including precision, recall, F1 score, and a confusion matrix, we assess ChatGPT's performance. Additionally, we group students and analyze how ChatGPT's assessments relate to their critical thinking levels. Our findings suggest that the ChatGPT demonstrated some ability to assess higher dimensions of critical thinking, but showed limitations in assessing the more granular secondary dimensions under the higher dimensions of critical thinking. However for this kind of granular assessment will more accurately capture the level of learning critical thinking. Surprisingly, ChatGPT's evaluations are not influenced by students' critical thinking levels. This study underscores ChatGPT's potential in automating critical thinking assessment at scale, alleviating the burden on educators and enhancing understanding of critical thinking in peer feedback.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141942027","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Open and closed-ended problem solving in humans and AI: The influence of question asking complexity 人类和人工智能的开放式和封闭式问题解决:提问复杂性的影响
IF 3.7 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101598

Question-asking, an underexplored aspect of creativity, is integral to creative problem-solving and information-seeking. Previous research reveals that lower creativity correlates with asking simpler, closed questions, while higher creativity correlates with complex, open-ended inquiries. The present study explores the relation between question asking complexity and problem-solving tasks involving open- and close-ended thinking and how these abilities generalize and compare to AI. In Study 1, participants (N = 89) completed the alternative questions task (AQT), a close-ended riddles task (Stumpers), and the alternate uses task (AUT), a creativity measure. Our results show AQT question complexity wasn't correlated with stumpers performance, although it correlated with AUT originality (r = .3). In Study 2, participants (N = 100) completed the AQT, AUT, and open-ended creative problem-solving (CPS) task. CPS responses were evaluated for originality and quality. A positive correlation was observed between CPS quality and AQT complexity (r = .29) and originality (r = .34). In study 3, AI agents (N = 100) completed the AQT, AUT, stumpers, and CPS tasks. Like humans, AI's AQT originality and complexity were related with open, but not closed problem-solving. AI questions were also significantly more creative and complex, it solved more stumpers and gave higher quality CPS solutions. Surprisingly, human and AI CPS originality didn't differ. We find significant links between question complexity and open—but not closed-ended—problem-solving in humans, which generalize to AI. Our results highlight the significance of complex and creative question-asking in everyday life and as an integral part of our problem-solving toolkit.

提问是创造力中一个未被充分探索的方面,是创造性地解决问题和寻找信息不可或缺的因素。以往的研究表明,创造力较低与提出较简单的封闭式问题有关,而创造力较高与提出复杂的开放式问题有关。本研究探讨了提问的复杂性与涉及开放式和封闭式思维的问题解决任务之间的关系,以及这些能力与人工智能的通用性和比较。在研究 1 中,参与者(89 人)完成了替代性问题任务(AQT)、封闭式谜语任务(Stumpers)和替代性使用任务(AUT)(一种创造力测量方法)。研究结果表明,AQT 问题的复杂程度与谜语任务的成绩无关,但与 AUT 的独创性有关(r = 0.3)。在研究 2 中,参与者(N = 100)完成了 AQT、AUT 和开放式创造性问题解决(CPS)任务。对 CPS 回答的原创性和质量进行了评估。CPS 质量与 AQT 复杂性(r = 0.29)和原创性(r = 0.34)之间呈正相关。在研究 3 中,人工智能代理(N = 100)完成了 AQT、AUT、stumpers 和 CPS 任务。与人类一样,人工智能的 AQT 独创性和复杂性与开放式问题解决有关,但与封闭式问题解决无关。人工智能的问题也明显更具创造性和复杂性,它能解决更多的难题,并给出更高质量的 CPS 解决方案。令人惊讶的是,人类和人工智能的 CPS 独创性并无差异。我们发现人类问题的复杂性与开放式问题(而非封闭式问题)的解决之间存在重要联系,这一点也适用于人工智能。我们的研究结果凸显了复杂和创造性提问在日常生活中的重要性,也是我们解决问题工具包中不可或缺的一部分。
{"title":"Open and closed-ended problem solving in humans and AI: The influence of question asking complexity","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101598","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101598","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Question-asking, an underexplored aspect of creativity, is integral to creative problem-solving and information-seeking. Previous research reveals that lower creativity correlates with asking simpler, closed questions, while higher creativity correlates with complex, open-ended inquiries. The present study explores the relation between question asking complexity and problem-solving tasks involving open- and close-ended thinking and how these abilities generalize and compare to AI. In Study 1, participants (N = 89) completed the alternative questions task (AQT), a close-ended riddles task (Stumpers), and the alternate uses task (AUT), a creativity measure. Our results show AQT question complexity wasn't correlated with stumpers performance, although it correlated with AUT originality (r = .3). In Study 2, participants (N = 100) completed the AQT, AUT, and open-ended creative problem-solving (CPS) task. CPS responses were evaluated for originality and quality. A positive correlation was observed between CPS quality and AQT complexity (r = .29) and originality (r = .34). In study 3, AI agents (N = 100) completed the AQT, AUT, stumpers, and CPS tasks. Like humans, AI's AQT originality and complexity were related with open, but not closed problem-solving. AI questions were also significantly more creative and complex, it solved more stumpers and gave higher quality CPS solutions. Surprisingly, human and AI CPS originality didn't differ. We find significant links between question complexity and open—but not closed-ended—problem-solving in humans, which generalize to AI. Our results highlight the significance of complex and creative question-asking in everyday life and as an integral part of our problem-solving toolkit.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141942035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1