首页 > 最新文献

Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology最新文献

英文 中文
Speech-to-text intervention to support text production for students with intellectual disabilities. 为智障学生提供 "语音到文本 "干预,以支持文本制作。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-22 DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2024.2381785
Christina Sand, Idor Svensson, Staffan Nilsson, Heidi Selenius, Linda Fälth

Aim: Writing is a multifaceted skill involving planning, transcription, and revision that is challenging for students with intellectual disabilities. Some studies have examined reading abilities. However, there needs to be more research on writing proficiency in this population. Especially concerning writing with the assistance of technologies such as speech-to-text (STT). To contribute to filling the research gap, this study aimed to investigate whether tailored speech-to-text interventions enhance text production for students with intellectual disabilities.

Methods: The research utilised a single-subject design involving the participation of four students (three girls and one boy) aged 10-13 years with mild intellectual disabilities in a rural municipality in Sweden.

Results: The results of this study revealed significant improvement post-intervention for all four students in word, sentence and text qualities.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that STT offers a valuable tool for students with intellectual disabilities struggling with handwriting, providing new opportunities for self-expression. Pedagogical implications are discussed.

目的:写作是一项涉及计划、抄写和修改的多方面技能,对智障学生来说具有挑战性。一些研究已经考察了阅读能力。然而,还需要对这一群体的写作能力进行更多的研究。尤其是关于借助语音转文字(STT)等技术进行写作的研究。为了填补这一研究空白,本研究旨在调查量身定制的语音到文本干预是否能提高智障学生的文本写作能力:研究采用单个受试者设计,瑞典一个农村市镇的四名 10-13 岁轻度智障学生(三名女生和一名男生)参与了研究:研究结果表明,干预后所有四名学生在单词、句子和文本质量方面均有明显改善:研究结果表明,STT 为在手写方面有困难的智障学生提供了一种有价值的工具,为他们提供了自我表达的新机会。本文还讨论了其教学意义。
{"title":"Speech-to-text intervention to support text production for students with intellectual disabilities.","authors":"Christina Sand, Idor Svensson, Staffan Nilsson, Heidi Selenius, Linda Fälth","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2381785","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2381785","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Writing is a multifaceted skill involving planning, transcription, and revision that is challenging for students with intellectual disabilities. Some studies have examined reading abilities. However, there needs to be more research on writing proficiency in this population. Especially concerning writing with the assistance of technologies such as speech-to-text (STT). To contribute to filling the research gap, this study aimed to investigate whether tailored speech-to-text interventions enhance text production for students with intellectual disabilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research utilised a single-subject design involving the participation of four students (three girls and one boy) aged 10-13 years with mild intellectual disabilities in a rural municipality in Sweden.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of this study revealed significant improvement post-intervention for all four students in word, sentence and text qualities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that STT offers a valuable tool for students with intellectual disabilities struggling with handwriting, providing new opportunities for self-expression. Pedagogical implications are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"408-415"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141735412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association between wearable device usage and engagement of strength activity among people with and without disabilities. 残疾人和非残疾人使用可穿戴设备与从事力量活动之间的关系。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-29 DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2024.2373299
Willie Leung, Lu Shi, King Fok, Nicole Fiscella, Ming-Chih Sung

There is a lack of literature examining the engagement in strength activities of people with disabilities (PWD) using and not using wearable devices. The objectives of the current study were to determine the prevalence of strength activity engagement among wearable device users with disabilities, and to compare strength activity engagement between wearable device users and non-users with and without disabilities. Wearable device users and non-users with and without disabilities from eight states of the CDC's 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance were included in the analysis. Linear regression was used to examine the association between wearable device use and disability status and the interaction term for frequency of strength activity per week, while logistic regression was used to determine the association between the two variables and the interaction term for strength activity engagement and meeting strength activity guidelines. 7055 wearable device users and non-users with and without disabilities were included in the analysis. No interaction effects were found between wearable device use and disability status. In unadjusted logistic regressions, wearable device users were more likely to engage in strength activity (OR = 1.16, 95% CI [1.16, 2.20]) and meet strength activity guidelines (OR = 1.50, 95% CI [1.07, 2.09]), whereas PWDs were less likely to engage in strength activity (OR = 0.57, 95% CI [0.44, 0.75]) and meet strength activity guidelines (OR = 0.72, 95% CI [0.53, 0.98]). The use of wearable devices could lead to engagement in strength activity. However, further research is needed to determine its effectiveness in PWD.

目前缺乏研究使用和未使用可穿戴设备的残疾人参与力量活动情况的文献。本研究的目的是确定可穿戴设备残障用户参与力量活动的普遍程度,并比较可穿戴设备残障用户和非残障用户参与力量活动的情况。来自美国疾病预防控制中心 2017 年行为风险因素监测八个州的可穿戴设备用户和非用户(有残疾和无残疾)被纳入分析范围。线性回归用于考察可穿戴设备的使用与残疾状况之间的关联以及每周力量活动频率的交互项,而逻辑回归则用于确定这两个变量之间的关联以及力量活动参与和满足力量活动指南的交互项。共有 7055 名可穿戴设备用户和非用户(包括残疾和非残疾)参与了分析。在可穿戴设备的使用和残疾状况之间没有发现交互效应。在未经调整的逻辑回归中,可穿戴设备使用者更有可能参与力量活动(OR = 1.16,95% CI [1.16,2.20])并符合力量活动指南(OR = 1.50,95% CI [1.07,2.09]),而残疾人参与力量活动(OR = 0.57,95% CI [0.44,0.75])并符合力量活动指南(OR = 0.72,95% CI [0.53,0.98])的可能性较低。可穿戴设备的使用可促进力量活动的参与。然而,还需要进一步的研究来确定其对残疾人的有效性。
{"title":"Association between wearable device usage and engagement of strength activity among people with and without disabilities.","authors":"Willie Leung, Lu Shi, King Fok, Nicole Fiscella, Ming-Chih Sung","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2373299","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2373299","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a lack of literature examining the engagement in strength activities of people with disabilities (PWD) using and not using wearable devices. The objectives of the current study were to determine the prevalence of strength activity engagement among wearable device users with disabilities, and to compare strength activity engagement between wearable device users and non-users with and without disabilities. Wearable device users and non-users with and without disabilities from eight states of the CDC's 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance were included in the analysis. Linear regression was used to examine the association between wearable device use and disability status and the interaction term for frequency of strength activity per week, while logistic regression was used to determine the association between the two variables and the interaction term for strength activity engagement and meeting strength activity guidelines. 7055 wearable device users and non-users with and without disabilities were included in the analysis. No interaction effects were found between wearable device use and disability status. In unadjusted logistic regressions, wearable device users were more likely to engage in strength activity (OR = 1.16, 95% CI [1.16, 2.20]) and meet strength activity guidelines (OR = 1.50, 95% CI [1.07, 2.09]), whereas PWDs were less likely to engage in strength activity (OR = 0.57, 95% CI [0.44, 0.75]) and meet strength activity guidelines (OR = 0.72, 95% CI [0.53, 0.98]). The use of wearable devices could lead to engagement in strength activity. However, further research is needed to determine its effectiveness in PWD.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"461-467"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141471598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A user-inspired mobility experience of the future: a qualitative investigation. 受用户启发的未来交通体验:定性调查。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2024.2373303
Joseph Peters, Michael Chen, Kathryn Huang, Marissa Siero, Jeannette Elliot, Adam Bleakney, Elizabeth Hsiao-Wecksler, Deana McDonagh

Wheelchair users (WCUs) face additional challenges than non-WCU to multi-tasking (i.e. open doors, cook, use a cell-phone) while navigating their environments. While assistive devices have attempted to provide WCUs with mobility solutions that enable multi-tasking capabilities, current devices have been developed without the input of end-users and have proven to be non-usable. More balanced approaches that integrate the end-users' voices may improve current assistive technology usability trends. This study sought to empathically understand the lived experience of WCUs, their needs towards a mobility device, and their perceptions towards hands-free mobility. Full-time WCUs and care providers participated in semi-structured interviews examining wheelchair use and perceptions towards current and future mobility devices. Thematic analysis was used to analyze interview data. 9 WCUs (aged 32.1 ± 7.0 years; wheelchair experience 17.9 ± 11.6 years) and five care providers (years caring for WCU 3.75 ± 0.96 years) participated in the study. The most common disability type was spinal cord injury (WCUs: n = 3; care providers: n = 3). Qualitative analysis revealed four key themes: (1) Current wheelchair usage, (2) WCU and care provider perspectives, (3) Future wheelchair, and (4) Hands-free wheelchair. Accordingly, participants desire bespoke, light-weight mobility devices that can through tight spaces, access uneven terrain, and free the hands during navigation. This study provides meaningful insight into the needs of WCUs and care providers that assistive technology innovators can use to develop more usable assistive technologies. Amongst study participants, the concept of a hands-free mobility device appears to be usable and desirable.

与非轮椅使用者相比,轮椅使用者(WCU)面临着更多的挑战,他们需要在环境中同时处理多项任务(如开门、做饭、使用手机)。虽然辅助设备一直在尝试为残疾人轮椅使用者提供可实现多任务处理能力的移动解决方案,但目前的设备在开发过程中并未考虑最终用户的意见,而且已被证明无法使用。整合最终用户意见的更为平衡的方法可能会改善目前辅助技术的可用性趋势。本研究试图以感同身受的方式了解失能者护理人员的生活经历、他们对移动设备的需求以及他们对免提移动设备的看法。全职残疾人护理人员和护理服务提供者参与了半结构式访谈,调查轮椅的使用情况以及对当前和未来移动设备的看法。访谈数据采用主题分析法进行分析。9 名残疾人轮椅使用者(年龄为 32.1 ± 7.0 岁;使用轮椅的经验为 17.9 ± 11.6 年)和 5 名护理提供者(护理残疾人轮椅使用者的年数为 3.75 ± 0.96 年)参与了研究。最常见的残疾类型是脊髓损伤(护理单位:n = 3;护理提供者:n = 3)。定性分析揭示了四个关键主题:(1) 当前轮椅使用情况,(2) WCU 和护理提供者的观点,(3) 未来轮椅,以及 (4) 免提轮椅。因此,参与者希望定制的、轻便的移动设备能够穿过狭小的空间、到达不平坦的地形,并在导航过程中解放双手。这项研究为了解残疾人护理单位和护理提供者的需求提供了有意义的见解,辅助技术创新者可以利用这些见解开发出更多可用的辅助技术。在参与研究的人员中,免提移动设备的概念似乎是可用和可取的。
{"title":"A user-inspired mobility experience of the future: a qualitative investigation.","authors":"Joseph Peters, Michael Chen, Kathryn Huang, Marissa Siero, Jeannette Elliot, Adam Bleakney, Elizabeth Hsiao-Wecksler, Deana McDonagh","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2373303","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2373303","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wheelchair users (WCUs) face additional challenges than non-WCU to multi-tasking (i.e. open doors, cook, use a cell-phone) while navigating their environments. While assistive devices have attempted to provide WCUs with mobility solutions that enable multi-tasking capabilities, current devices have been developed without the input of end-users and have proven to be non-usable. More balanced approaches that integrate the end-users' voices may improve current assistive technology usability trends. This study sought to empathically understand the lived experience of WCUs, their needs towards a mobility device, and their perceptions towards hands-free mobility. Full-time WCUs and care providers participated in semi-structured interviews examining wheelchair use and perceptions towards current and future mobility devices. Thematic analysis was used to analyze interview data. 9 WCUs (aged 32.1 ± 7.0 years; wheelchair experience 17.9 ± 11.6 years) and five care providers (years caring for WCU 3.75 ± 0.96 years) participated in the study. The most common disability type was spinal cord injury (WCUs: <i>n</i> = 3; care providers: <i>n</i> = 3). Qualitative analysis revealed four key themes: (1) Current wheelchair usage, (2) WCU and care provider perspectives, (3) Future wheelchair, and (4) Hands-free wheelchair. Accordingly, participants desire bespoke, light-weight mobility devices that can through tight spaces, access uneven terrain, and free the hands during navigation. This study provides meaningful insight into the needs of WCUs and care providers that assistive technology innovators can use to develop more usable assistive technologies. Amongst study participants, the concept of a hands-free mobility device appears to be usable and desirable.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"360-369"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141493878","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A study on the formative usability testing for modular powered wheelchair. 模块化电动轮椅的形成性可用性测试研究。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-04 DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2024.2372310
Jin Hong Kim, Yu Ri Kim, Mi Hyang Han, Soul Han, Eun Hye Jeon, Eun Young Hwang, Jae Won Yang, Seon Yeong Lee, Gangpyo Lee

The increasing prevalence of mobility impairments underscores the urgent need for accessible and affordable mobility aids. To overcome the mobility limitations of people with disabilities, there is an increasing need for the development of lightweight and portable powered wheelchairs that can be easily loaded. This study aimed to perform an early health technology assessment and a formative usability evaluation on a modular (detachable) powered wheelchair. It aimed to gauge device satisfaction among users, pinpoint areas for improvement, and detect any unforeseen errors to inform future development. Engaging 16 participants, including powered wheelchair users, healthcare professionals, and caregivers, the research evaluated the wheelchair's functionality in various scenarios, emphasizing safety, effectiveness, and convenience. Statistical analyses of task performance and satisfaction surveys highlighted that, while powered wheelchair users successfully completed tasks focusing on driving and power control, healthcare professionals and caregivers encountered difficulties with the wheelchair's assembly and disassembly. Despite general positivity, the surveys indicated mixed satisfaction levels regarding safety, validity, and convenience, with specific issues related to frame durability, seat comfort, and control mechanisms. These findings suggest that refining the wheelchair's design and addressing user concerns could significantly enhance satisfaction and mobility services. Future efforts will include a thorough review of an advanced prototype and further satisfaction assessments.

行动不便的人越来越多,这凸显了对无障碍且经济实惠的助行器具的迫切需求。为了克服残疾人的行动限制,人们越来越需要开发轻便、易于装载的便携式电动轮椅。本研究旨在对模块化(可拆卸)电动轮椅进行早期健康技术评估和形成性可用性评价。其目的是衡量用户对设备的满意度,找出需要改进的地方,并发现任何不可预见的错误,为今后的开发提供参考。这项研究吸引了包括电动轮椅用户、医疗保健专业人员和护理人员在内的 16 名参与者参与,对轮椅在各种场景下的功能进行了评估,强调了安全性、有效性和便利性。对任务执行情况和满意度调查的统计分析表明,虽然电动轮椅使用者成功完成了以驾驶和动力控制为重点的任务,但医护人员和护理人员在组装和拆卸轮椅时遇到了困难。尽管总体上是积极的,但调查显示,对安全性、有效性和便利性的满意度参差不齐,具体问题涉及轮椅框架的耐用性、座椅的舒适性和控制机制。这些调查结果表明,改进轮椅的设计和解决用户关心的问题可以大大提高满意度和移动服务。未来的工作将包括对先进的原型进行全面审查和进一步的满意度评估。
{"title":"A study on the formative usability testing for modular powered wheelchair.","authors":"Jin Hong Kim, Yu Ri Kim, Mi Hyang Han, Soul Han, Eun Hye Jeon, Eun Young Hwang, Jae Won Yang, Seon Yeong Lee, Gangpyo Lee","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2372310","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2372310","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The increasing prevalence of mobility impairments underscores the urgent need for accessible and affordable mobility aids. To overcome the mobility limitations of people with disabilities, there is an increasing need for the development of lightweight and portable powered wheelchairs that can be easily loaded. This study aimed to perform an early health technology assessment and a formative usability evaluation on a modular (detachable) powered wheelchair. It aimed to gauge device satisfaction among users, pinpoint areas for improvement, and detect any unforeseen errors to inform future development. Engaging 16 participants, including powered wheelchair users, healthcare professionals, and caregivers, the research evaluated the wheelchair's functionality in various scenarios, emphasizing safety, effectiveness, and convenience. Statistical analyses of task performance and satisfaction surveys highlighted that, while powered wheelchair users successfully completed tasks focusing on driving and power control, healthcare professionals and caregivers encountered difficulties with the wheelchair's assembly and disassembly. Despite general positivity, the surveys indicated mixed satisfaction levels regarding safety, validity, and convenience, with specific issues related to frame durability, seat comfort, and control mechanisms. These findings suggest that refining the wheelchair's design and addressing user concerns could significantly enhance satisfaction and mobility services. Future efforts will include a thorough review of an advanced prototype and further satisfaction assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"452-460"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141535573","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring the quality of participation and strategies to support meaningful engagement in an adapted paddleboard program among individuals with disabilities. 探索残疾人参与适应性桨板项目的质量和支持有意义参与的策略。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-26 DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2024.2382279
Jade Berthiaume, Béatrice Ouellet, Mariève Labbé, Margaux Hebinck, Maxime Robert, Mireille Descarreaux, Pascale Martineau, Krista L Best

Aim: Adapted paddleboard provides an outdoor leisure-time physical activities (LTPA) opportunity with many health benefits (e.g., physical activity, reduced stress, social engagement). However, nearly 50% of individuals with disabilities do not participate in any LTPA. Quality of LTPA participation influences sustainable adherence, while optimizing participant experiences. An adapted paddleboard program is offered in Quebec City, for adults with physical disabilities, but little is known about how participants perceive their quality of participation. This study aimed to describe individuals with disabilities' perceived quality of participation in the adapted paddleboard program, and to explore their suggestions of strategies to support meaningful engagement in the program.

Methods: An ethnographic mixed-methods design was conducted, consisting of participant observations during the 13-week program and semi-structured interviews based on the Quality Parasport Participation Framework (QPPF). Measure of Experiential Aspects of Participation (MeEAP) questionnaire were collected. A mixed approach of data analysis was used for qualitative data and descriptive statistics were conducted for quantitative data.

Results: Nine participants (8F) with various disabilities (42±15 years old) participated in the study. Emergent dimensions of quality of participation included belongingness and autonomy. Facilitators to participation were identified, such as autonomy support through volunteers and provision of adaptive equipment. Barriers to participation included water access and level of individual challenge. Suggested strategies to improve engagement included water access closer to parking and multiple groups for variable skill levels.

Conclusions: Participants expressed high-quality of participation in adapted paddleboarding. The study allows the development of knowledge about conditions that enhance the experience of participating in outdoor LTPA.

目的:适应性桨板提供了一个户外休闲体育活动(LTPA)的机会,对健康有很多益处(如体育活动、减轻压力、社交参与)。然而,近 50% 的残疾人没有参加任何 LTPA。在优化参与者体验的同时,LTPA 的参与质量也会影响持续坚持的程度。魁北克市为肢体残疾的成年人提供了一项适应性桨板计划,但人们对参与者如何看待他们的参与质量知之甚少。本研究旨在描述残疾人对参与适应性桨板项目质量的看法,并探讨他们对支持有意义地参与该项目策略的建议:研究采用人种学混合方法设计,包括在为期 13 周的项目中对参与者进行观察,以及根据优质桨板运动参与框架(QPPF)进行半结构化访谈。此外,还收集了 "参与体验"(MeEAP)问卷。定性数据采用混合数据分析方法,定量数据采用描述性统计方法:九名不同残疾程度(42±15 岁)的参与者(8 名女性)参与了研究。参与质量的新维度包括归属感和自主性。研究发现了参与的促进因素,如通过志愿者提供的自主支持和提供的适应性设备。参与的障碍包括水的获取和个人挑战水平。为提高参与度而建议的策略包括在靠近停车场的地方提供水源以及针对不同技能水平的多个小组:参与者对参与适应性桨板运动表示出很高的质量。通过这项研究,我们可以了解到在哪些条件下可以提高参与户外长距离划桨运动的体验。
{"title":"Exploring the quality of participation and strategies to support meaningful engagement in an adapted paddleboard program among individuals with disabilities.","authors":"Jade Berthiaume, Béatrice Ouellet, Mariève Labbé, Margaux Hebinck, Maxime Robert, Mireille Descarreaux, Pascale Martineau, Krista L Best","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2382279","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2382279","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Adapted paddleboard provides an outdoor leisure-time physical activities (LTPA) opportunity with many health benefits (e.g., physical activity, reduced stress, social engagement). However, nearly 50% of individuals with disabilities do not participate in any LTPA. Quality of LTPA participation influences sustainable adherence, while optimizing participant experiences. An adapted paddleboard program is offered in Quebec City, for adults with physical disabilities, but little is known about how participants perceive their quality of participation. This study aimed to describe individuals with disabilities' perceived quality of participation in the adapted paddleboard program, and to explore their suggestions of strategies to support meaningful engagement in the program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An ethnographic mixed-methods design was conducted, consisting of participant observations during the 13-week program and semi-structured interviews based on the Quality Parasport Participation Framework (QPPF). Measure of Experiential Aspects of Participation (MeEAP) questionnaire were collected. A mixed approach of data analysis was used for qualitative data and descriptive statistics were conducted for quantitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine participants (8F) with various disabilities (42±15 years old) participated in the study. Emergent dimensions of quality of participation included belongingness and autonomy. Facilitators to participation were identified, such as autonomy support through volunteers and provision of adaptive equipment. Barriers to participation included water access and level of individual challenge. Suggested strategies to improve engagement included water access closer to parking and multiple groups for variable skill levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants expressed high-quality of participation in adapted paddleboarding. The study allows the development of knowledge about conditions that enhance the experience of participating in outdoor LTPA.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"416-422"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141761689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Marginalized voices: a qualitative exploration of multilevel environmental barriers to assistive technology use among hispanics. 被边缘化的声音:对西班牙裔使用辅助技术的多层次环境障碍的定性探索。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-19 DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2024.2392852
Angélica M Martínez Pérez, Fabricio E Balcazar, Elsa M Orellano-Colón

Purpose: Assistive technology (AT) can increase or maintain the quality of life and overall well-being of people with disabilities. Nevertheless, access to AT is limited among Hispanics with disabilities in the United States (U.S.). AT research representing the experiences of Hispanics is limited, potentially leading to disparities in AT use. Moreover, poor inclusion of Hispanics neglects the needs of this population, resulting in discrepancies in research, practice, and policy related to AT. To address these limitations, this study aimed to identify and explore multilevel environmental barriers to AT use among a sample of Hispanics in the U.S.

Methods: This was a descriptive qualitative research design study guided by the Social Ecological Model framework using in-depth interviews to collect data. Nine Hispanic individuals with disabilities and their caregivers who received AT services at the University of Illinois at Chicago Assistive Technology Unit outpatient clinic were interviewed. Data was analyzed using a qualitative thematic analysis approach.

Results: Barriers to AT use were found to exist in all levels of the Social Ecological Model. The most common barriers to AT use were identified in the community domain, which was related to the lack of AT information, and in the societal domain, which was related to sociocultural norms and the availability of AT funding, policies, and regulations.

Conclusions: The participants' lived experiences and perspectives underscored that environmental barriers to AT use are not isolated occurrences; rather, systemic attitudes permeate across all levels of the Social Ecological Model.

目的:辅助技术(AT)可以提高或维持残疾人的生活质量和整体福祉。然而,在美国,西班牙裔残疾人获得辅助技术的机会有限。代表西班牙裔残疾人经历的辅助器具研究十分有限,这可能会导致他们在使用辅助器具方面的差异。此外,对拉美裔的忽略也忽视了这一群体的需求,导致与辅助器具相关的研究、实践和政策出现偏差。为了解决这些局限性,本研究旨在确定并探讨美国西班牙裔样本中使用辅助器具的多层次环境障碍:本研究是一项描述性定性研究设计,以社会生态模型框架为指导,采用深入访谈的方式收集数据。研究人员采访了在伊利诺伊大学芝加哥分校辅助技术部门诊接受辅助技术服务的九名西班牙裔残疾人及其照顾者。采用定性主题分析方法对数据进行了分析:结果发现,使用辅助器具的障碍存在于社会生态模型的各个层面。使用辅助器具最常见的障碍出现在社区领域和社会领域,前者与缺乏辅助器具信息有关,后者则与社会文化规范以及辅助器具资金、政策和法规的可用性有关:结论:参与者的生活经历和观点强调,使用辅助器具的环境障碍并不是孤立存在的;相反,系统性的态度渗透到社会生态模型的各个层面。
{"title":"Marginalized voices: a qualitative exploration of multilevel environmental barriers to assistive technology use among hispanics.","authors":"Angélica M Martínez Pérez, Fabricio E Balcazar, Elsa M Orellano-Colón","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2392852","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2392852","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Assistive technology (AT) can increase or maintain the quality of life and overall well-being of people with disabilities. Nevertheless, access to AT is limited among Hispanics with disabilities in the United States (U.S.). AT research representing the experiences of Hispanics is limited, potentially leading to disparities in AT use. Moreover, poor inclusion of Hispanics neglects the needs of this population, resulting in discrepancies in research, practice, and policy related to AT. To address these limitations, this study aimed to identify and explore multilevel environmental barriers to AT use among a sample of Hispanics in the U.S.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a descriptive qualitative research design study guided by the Social Ecological Model framework using in-depth interviews to collect data. Nine Hispanic individuals with disabilities and their caregivers who received AT services at the University of Illinois at Chicago Assistive Technology Unit outpatient clinic were interviewed. Data was analyzed using a qualitative thematic analysis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Barriers to AT use were found to exist in all levels of the Social Ecological Model. The most common barriers to AT use were identified in the community domain, which was related to the lack of AT information, and in the societal domain, which was related to sociocultural norms and the availability of AT funding, policies, and regulations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The participants' lived experiences and perspectives underscored that environmental barriers to AT use are not isolated occurrences; rather, systemic attitudes permeate across all levels of the Social Ecological Model.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"476-487"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142001024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Smart speakers and skill use: what do we know? 智能扬声器和技能使用:我们知道些什么?
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-08 DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2024.2387801
Paola Esquivel, Kayden Gill, Cheng-Shiu Chung, Dan Ding, Julie Faieta

Personal smart technologies are becoming increasingly interwoven into everyday life, yet the usability and usefulness for some of these off-the-shelf technologies for persons with disabilities has yet to be determined. Smart speakers with both their native and downloadable functionalities (skills) have great potential to support individuals with disabilities through communication functionalities, smart home integrations, and more. However, the potential for usefulness does not always translate to how something is actually perceived or used in the real-world. Therefore, the objective of this qualitative study was to gather insight from individuals with disabilities on their experiences with smart speakers and smart speaker skills. Participant feedback highlighted several primary themes: (1) external factors that might influence extent of, and advancement in smart speaker use, (2) Smart speaker use barriers, (3) Smart speaker use facilitators, and (4) Smart speaker uses specific to individuals with disabilities. Continued research and development is needed to help ensure that commercially available technologies are designed with universal design principles that will ensure accessibility for all potential users.

个人智能技术正越来越多地融入日常生活,但其中一些现成技术对残疾人的可用性和实用性仍有待确定。智能扬声器的原生功能和可下载功能(技能)在通过通信功能、智能家居集成等为残疾人提供支持方面具有巨大的潜力。然而,实用性的潜力并不总能转化为现实世界中的实际感知或使用情况。因此,本定性研究的目的是收集残障人士对智能扬声器和智能扬声器技能的使用经验。参与者的反馈意见突出了几个主要的主题:(1)可能影响智能扬声器使用程度和进步的外部因素;(2)智能扬声器使用障碍;(3)智能扬声器使用促进因素;以及(4)智能扬声器对残障人士的特殊用途。需要继续进行研究和开发,以帮助确保商用技术的设计符合通用设计原则,从而确保所有潜在用户的无障碍使用。
{"title":"Smart speakers and skill use: what do we know?","authors":"Paola Esquivel, Kayden Gill, Cheng-Shiu Chung, Dan Ding, Julie Faieta","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2387801","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2387801","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Personal smart technologies are becoming increasingly interwoven into everyday life, yet the usability and usefulness for some of these off-the-shelf technologies for persons with disabilities has yet to be determined. Smart speakers with both their native and downloadable functionalities (skills) have great potential to support individuals with disabilities through communication functionalities, smart home integrations, and more. However, the potential for usefulness does not always translate to how something is actually perceived or used in the real-world. Therefore, the objective of this qualitative study was to gather insight from individuals with disabilities on their experiences with smart speakers and smart speaker skills. Participant feedback highlighted several primary themes: (1) external factors that might influence extent of, and advancement in smart speaker use, (2) Smart speaker use barriers, (3) Smart speaker use facilitators, and (4) Smart speaker uses specific to individuals with disabilities. Continued research and development is needed to help ensure that commercially available technologies are designed with universal design principles that will ensure accessibility for all potential users.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"488-497"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141903212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects on tissue oxygenation in the gluteal region with a smart pressure redistribution wheelchair cushion compared to a pressure relief manoeuvre. 智能压力再分布轮椅坐垫与压力释放动作相比对臀部组织氧合的影响。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-18 DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2024.2391976
Sandra Arias-Guzman, Kasey Call, James J Laskin, Craig Oberg, Susan Jellum, Marianne Russon, Evan Call

Objective: The study examines the effects of the air-bladder offloading mode of a smart pressure redistribution wheelchair cushion on tissue oxygenation in the gluteal tissue of non-disabled participants. The hypothesis is that the cushion's offloading mode, which involves sequentially deflating its five air-bladders one at a time for a specific duration, would improve tissue oxygenation during sitting.

Methods: Two procedures were conducted. The first compared the cushion's offloads to a loaded control (LC) with the cushion on static mode, and the second compared the cushion's offloading mode to a standard manual offload performed by the participant. Three trials of each procedure were performed in randomized order. Tissue oxygenation was continuously monitored with three oxygenation parameters analysed: oxygen saturation (SO2), oxygenated haemoglobin (OxyHb), and deoxygenated haemoglobin (DeoxyHb). Data recordings were segmented in each step of the offloading sequence for analysis. A paired t-test was performed for comparisons with significance considered at α = 0.05. Ten healthy adults participated in the study.

Impact: Results showed that as the air bladders deflated over time, the three evaluated parameters changed, affecting oxygenation even when other tissue areas were offloaded. The results indicated that the cushion's sacral offload had the greatest impact on improving tissue oxygenation among the five air-bladders in all ten subjects (p < 0.05). Furthermore, SO2 during the cushion's offload in the sacral region was similar to a manual offload. The study results suggest that the cushion could benefit tissue oxygenation, especially for individuals unable to change positions independently. Further research is needed to determine its effectiveness for wheelchair users.

研究目的本研究探讨了智能压力再分布轮椅坐垫的气囊卸载模式对非残疾参与者臀部组织氧合的影响。假设该坐垫的卸载模式(即在特定时间内依次将五个气囊逐个放气)将改善坐姿时的组织氧合:方法:我们进行了两项研究。第一个程序将坐垫的卸载与坐垫处于静态模式的加载对照组(LC)进行比较,第二个程序将坐垫的卸载模式与参与者进行的标准手动卸载进行比较。每个程序按随机顺序进行三次试验。对组织氧合进行连续监测,分析三个氧合参数:血氧饱和度(SO2)、氧合血红蛋白(OxyHb)和脱氧血红蛋白(DeoxyHb)。数据记录在卸载序列的每个步骤中进行分段分析。比较采用配对 t 检验,显著性为 α = 0.05。十名健康成年人参与了研究:结果表明,随着时间的推移,气囊放气时,三个评估参数会发生变化,甚至在其他组织区域卸载时也会影响氧合。结果表明,在所有 10 名受试者的 5 个气囊中,气垫的骶骨卸载对改善组织氧合的影响最大(p2),气垫在骶骨区域的卸载与手动卸载相似。研究结果表明,气垫可有益于组织氧合,特别是对于无法独立改变体位的人。要确定其对轮椅使用者的有效性,还需要进一步的研究。
{"title":"Effects on tissue oxygenation in the gluteal region with a smart pressure redistribution wheelchair cushion compared to a pressure relief manoeuvre.","authors":"Sandra Arias-Guzman, Kasey Call, James J Laskin, Craig Oberg, Susan Jellum, Marianne Russon, Evan Call","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2391976","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2391976","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study examines the effects of the air-bladder offloading mode of a smart pressure redistribution wheelchair cushion on tissue oxygenation in the gluteal tissue of non-disabled participants. The hypothesis is that the cushion's offloading mode, which involves sequentially deflating its five air-bladders one at a time for a specific duration, would improve tissue oxygenation during sitting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two procedures were conducted. The first compared the cushion's offloads to a loaded control (LC) with the cushion on static mode, and the second compared the cushion's offloading mode to a standard manual offload performed by the participant. Three trials of each procedure were performed in randomized order. Tissue oxygenation was continuously monitored with three oxygenation parameters analysed: oxygen saturation (SO<sub>2</sub>), oxygenated haemoglobin (OxyHb), and deoxygenated haemoglobin (DeoxyHb). Data recordings were segmented in each step of the offloading sequence for analysis. A paired t-test was performed for comparisons with significance considered at α = 0.05. Ten healthy adults participated in the study.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Results showed that as the air bladders deflated over time, the three evaluated parameters changed, affecting oxygenation even when other tissue areas were offloaded. The results indicated that the cushion's sacral offload had the greatest impact on improving tissue oxygenation among the five air-bladders in all ten subjects (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Furthermore, SO<sub>2</sub> during the cushion's offload in the sacral region was similar to a manual offload. The study results suggest that the cushion could benefit tissue oxygenation, especially for individuals unable to change positions independently. Further research is needed to determine its effectiveness for wheelchair users.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"468-475"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142001023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The freedom to run: developing an autonomous robot matching the needs of visually impaired citizens to technology opportunities. 自由奔跑:开发自主机器人,将视力受损公民的需求与技术机会相匹配。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-04 DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2024.2374454
Marcello Farina, Emanuele Lettieri, Tecla Filippi, Francesca Zoccarato, Paolo Perego, Andrea Di Francesco, Giovanni Toletti

Purpose: Visual impairment poses significant challenges in daily life, especially when navigating unfamiliar environments, resulting in inequalities and reduced quality of life. This study aimed to gain an in-depth understanding of the needs and perspectives of visually impaired people in sports-related contexts through surveys and focus groups, and to understand whether their needs are being met by current technological solutions.

Materials and methods: To accomplish this, opinions gathered from focus groups and interviews were compared to the technological solutions found in the literature. Since many unmet needs were identified, participants from associations and organizations were asked to identify key characteristics for the development of a robot guide. The results underscored the paramount importance of an easy-to-use guide that offers accurate and personalized assistance. Participants expressed a strong desire for advanced features such as object recognition and navigation in complex environments, as well as adaptability to the user's speed while providing the necessary safety features to ensure a high level of autonomy.

Results: This research serves as a bridge between technological advances and the needs of the visually impaired, contributing to a more accessible and inclusive society. By addressing the unique challenges faced by the visually impaired individuals and tailoring technology to meet their needs, this study takes a significant step toward reducing disparities and improving the independence and quality of life for this community.

Conclusions: As technology continues to advance, it has the potential to be a powerful tool in breaking down barriers and fostering a world where everyone, regardless of their visual ability, can navigate the world with confidence and ease.

目的:视力障碍给日常生活带来了巨大挑战,尤其是在陌生环境中穿行时,导致不平等和生活质量下降。本研究旨在通过调查和焦点小组深入了解视障人士在体育相关环境中的需求和观点,并了解当前的技术解决方案是否满足了他们的需求:为此,我们将从焦点小组和访谈中收集到的意见与文献中的技术解决方案进行了比较。由于发现了许多未得到满足的需求,因此要求来自协会和组织的参与者确定开发机器人指南的关键特征。结果表明,易于使用并能提供准确和个性化帮助的指南至关重要。参与者强烈希望机器人具有先进的功能,如在复杂环境中识别物体和导航,并能适应用户的速度,同时提供必要的安全功能以确保高度自主:这项研究在技术进步和视障人士的需求之间架起了一座桥梁,为建设一个更无障碍、更具包容性的社会做出了贡献。通过解决视障人士面临的独特挑战,并根据他们的需求量身定制技术,这项研究在缩小差距、提高视障人士的独立性和生活质量方面迈出了重要一步:随着技术的不断进步,它有可能成为一种强大的工具,打破障碍,创造一个人人都能自信、轻松地浏览世界的世界,无论其视觉能力如何。
{"title":"The freedom to run: developing an autonomous robot matching the needs of visually impaired citizens to technology opportunities.","authors":"Marcello Farina, Emanuele Lettieri, Tecla Filippi, Francesca Zoccarato, Paolo Perego, Andrea Di Francesco, Giovanni Toletti","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2374454","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2374454","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Visual impairment poses significant challenges in daily life, especially when navigating unfamiliar environments, resulting in inequalities and reduced quality of life. This study aimed to gain an in-depth understanding of the needs and perspectives of visually impaired people in sports-related contexts through surveys and focus groups, and to understand whether their needs are being met by current technological solutions.</p><p><p><b>Materials and methods:</b> To accomplish this, opinions gathered from focus groups and interviews were compared to the technological solutions found in the literature. Since many unmet needs were identified, participants from associations and organizations were asked to identify key characteristics for the development of a robot guide. The results underscored the paramount importance of an easy-to-use guide that offers accurate and personalized assistance. Participants expressed a strong desire for advanced features such as object recognition and navigation in complex environments, as well as adaptability to the user's speed while providing the necessary safety features to ensure a high level of autonomy.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> This research serves as a bridge between technological advances and the needs of the visually impaired, contributing to a more accessible and inclusive society. By addressing the unique challenges faced by the visually impaired individuals and tailoring technology to meet their needs, this study takes a significant step toward reducing disparities and improving the independence and quality of life for this community.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> As technology continues to advance, it has the potential to be a powerful tool in breaking down barriers and fostering a world where everyone, regardless of their visual ability, can navigate the world with confidence and ease.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"370-380"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141499313","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The positioning information that should be provided to caregivers of adults with a physical disability on supply of custom-contoured seating, a Delphi study. 德尔菲研究:在提供定制轮廓座椅时应向肢体残疾成人的照顾者提供的定位信息。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-22 DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2024.2382287
Ruth Hanley, Johnny Collett

Purpose: This research aims to identify information that is important to provide on supply of custom-contoured seating. The way this information would be best communicated is also of interest. A two-round e-Delphi study was utilised to explore consensus. A panel of stakeholders from Ireland including experts in positioning clients in custom-contoured seating and caregivers were recruited. The first round consisted of open-ended questions and was analysed using thematic analysis. The second round employed a rating technique and 7-point Likert scale. Consensus was set a priori at 70% agreement. The way information should be communicated and by whom was rated in order of preference.

Materials and methods: Fifteen participants were recruited, nine clinicians and four caregivers. Fifty-two statements under six themes (transfers = 10, positioning = 22, pressure care = 4, general use = 4, post-supply follow-up = 8, functional activity = 4) were generated in round 1 by 13/15 participants. Round 2 was completed by 10/15. 49/52 statements reached consensus and were deemed important. The ways information should be communicated and by whom was identified. Caregivers want individualised information whereas clinicians preferred a more generic approach.

Results and conclusions: There was a high degree of consensus on what information is required to support caregivers. The topics demonstrate the extensive information that should be provided. The preferred delivery method for primary caregivers was hands-on training with the opportunity to practice and take videos. Stakeholders differed in how they would prefer information delivered. Further research should evaluate the method of delivering training and its effectiveness.

目的:本研究旨在确定提供定制化座椅的重要信息。这些信息的最佳传播方式也值得关注。我们采用了两轮电子德尔菲研究来探索共识。研究人员招募了来自爱尔兰的利益相关者,包括定制轮廓座椅客户定位专家和护理人员。第一轮由开放式问题组成,并采用主题分析法进行分析。第二轮采用评分技术和 7 点李克特量表。事先将共识设定为 70%。信息交流的方式和交流对象按优先顺序排列:共招募了 15 名参与者,其中包括 9 名临床医生和 4 名护理人员。在第一轮中,13/15 名参与者根据六个主题(转移 = 10、定位 = 22、压力护理 = 4、一般使用 = 4、供应后随访 = 8、功能活动 = 4)提出了 52 项陈述。第二轮由 10/15 位参与者完成。49/52 项声明达成了共识,并被视为重要声明。确定了信息的传播方式和传播对象。护理人员希望获得个性化的信息,而临床医生则倾向于采用更通用的方式:结果和结论:对于需要哪些信息来支持护理人员,各方达成了高度共识。这些主题显示了应提供的广泛信息。对于初级护理人员来说,首选的培训方式是实践培训,并提供练习和拍摄视频的机会。利益相关者对提供信息的方式各不相同。进一步的研究应评估提供培训的方法及其有效性。
{"title":"The positioning information that should be provided to caregivers of adults with a physical disability on supply of custom-contoured seating, a Delphi study.","authors":"Ruth Hanley, Johnny Collett","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2382287","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2382287","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This research aims to identify information that is important to provide on supply of custom-contoured seating. The way this information would be best communicated is also of interest. A two-round e-Delphi study was utilised to explore consensus. A panel of stakeholders from Ireland including experts in positioning clients in custom-contoured seating and caregivers were recruited. The first round consisted of open-ended questions and was analysed using thematic analysis. The second round employed a rating technique and 7-point Likert scale. Consensus was set a priori at 70% agreement. The way information should be communicated and by whom was rated in order of preference.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifteen participants were recruited, nine clinicians and four caregivers. Fifty-two statements under six themes (transfers = 10, positioning = 22, pressure care = 4, general use = 4, post-supply follow-up = 8, functional activity = 4) were generated in round 1 by 13/15 participants. Round 2 was completed by 10/15. 49/52 statements reached consensus and were deemed important. The ways information should be communicated and by whom was identified. Caregivers want individualised information whereas clinicians preferred a more generic approach.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>There was a high degree of consensus on what information is required to support caregivers. The topics demonstrate the extensive information that should be provided. The preferred delivery method for primary caregivers was hands-on training with the opportunity to practice and take videos. Stakeholders differed in how they would prefer information delivered. Further research should evaluate the method of delivering training and its effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"423-431"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141735414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1