Pub Date : 2023-03-01DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2021.1970610
Chiara Gasteiger, Alfons A den Broeder, Sarah Stewart, Norina Gasteiger, Urte Scholz, Nicola Dalbeth, Keith J Petrie
Effective patient-provider communication is crucial to promote shared decision-making. However, it is unclear how to explain treatment changes to ensure patient acceptance, such as when transitioning from a bio-originator to a biosimilar. This review investigates communication strategies used to educate patients on transitioning to biosimilars and explores whether the willingness to transition and treatment persistence differs for the delivery (verbal or written) and the amount of information provided. MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and relevant conference databases were systematically searched. Communication strategies from 33 studies (88% observational cohort studies) published from 2012 to 2020 were synthesized and willingness to transition, persistence, and subjective adverse events explored. Patients only received information verbally in 11 studies. The remaining 22 studies also provided written information. Cost-saving was the main reason provided for the transition. Patients were most willing to transition when receiving written and verbal information (χ2 = 5.83, p = .02) or written information that only addressed a few (3-5) concerns (χ2 = 16.08, p < .001). There was no significant difference for persistence or subjective adverse events (p's > .05). Few randomized controlled trials have been conducted. Available data shows more willingness to transition when patients received written and verbal information. Initial documents should contain basic information and consultations or telephone calls used to address concerns.
有效的医患沟通对于促进共同决策至关重要。然而,目前尚不清楚如何解释治疗变化以确保患者接受,例如当从生物原创制药过渡到生物仿制药时。本综述调查了用于教育患者过渡到生物仿制药的沟通策略,并探讨了过渡的意愿和治疗持久性是否因传递(口头或书面)和提供的信息量而不同。系统检索MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus及相关会议数据库。我们综合了2012年至2020年发表的33项研究(88%为观察性队列研究)的沟通策略,并探讨了过渡意愿、持久性和主观不良事件。在11项研究中,患者仅获得口头信息。其余22项研究也提供了书面资料。节省费用是进行过渡的主要原因。当接受书面和口头信息(χ2 = 5.83, p = 0.02)或书面信息仅涉及少数(3-5)个问题时(χ2 = 16.08, p > 0.05),患者最愿意转换。很少进行随机对照试验。现有数据显示,当患者收到书面和口头信息时,他们更愿意转变。初始文件应包含基本信息和用于解决问题的咨询或电话。
{"title":"The mode of delivery and content of communication strategies used in mandatory and non-mandatory biosimilar transitions: a systematic review with meta-analysis.","authors":"Chiara Gasteiger, Alfons A den Broeder, Sarah Stewart, Norina Gasteiger, Urte Scholz, Nicola Dalbeth, Keith J Petrie","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2021.1970610","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2021.1970610","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective patient-provider communication is crucial to promote shared decision-making. However, it is unclear how to explain treatment changes to ensure patient acceptance, such as when transitioning from a bio-originator to a biosimilar. This review investigates communication strategies used to educate patients on transitioning to biosimilars and explores whether the willingness to transition and treatment persistence differs for the delivery (verbal or written) and the amount of information provided. MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and relevant conference databases were systematically searched. Communication strategies from 33 studies (88% observational cohort studies) published from 2012 to 2020 were synthesized and willingness to transition, persistence, and subjective adverse events explored. Patients only received information verbally in 11 studies. The remaining 22 studies also provided written information. Cost-saving was the main reason provided for the transition. Patients were most willing to transition when receiving written and verbal information (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> = 5.83, <i>p</i> = .02) or written information that only addressed a few (3-5) concerns (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> = 16.08, <i>p</i> < .001). There was no significant difference for persistence or subjective adverse events (<i>p's</i> > .05). Few randomized controlled trials have been conducted. Available data shows more willingness to transition when patients received written and verbal information. Initial documents should contain basic information and consultations or telephone calls used to address concerns.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":"17 1","pages":"148-168"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9421603","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-01DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2022.2067210
Siobhán Howard
The 'reactivity hypothesis' has a long and fruitful history in health psychology and behavioural medicine, with elements of its thesis taken as core and others lost in the plethora of research on its utility as a theory of psychosomatic disease. One such thesis is that the underlying hemodynamic profile of the stress response may be particularly revealing when detailing the impact of psychological stress on the development of cardiovascular disease. This paper re-examines old ideas surrounding the hemodynamic profile of the stress response, asking why its health-predictive properties were never fully explored. Further, this paper reviews the evidence that a vascular profile of stress responding may be especially predictive of disease development, particularly in the case of hypertension. In addition, measurement of hemodynamic profile, as well as its known psychosocial moderators, is reviewed including how examination of patterns of cardiovascular stress response adaptation may extend the field. This paper highlights that the extension of the reactivity hypothesis to include both hemodynamic profile and patterns of cardiovascular stress response adaptation may hold much explanatory power in detailing the impact of how stress responding and stress tolerance promotes disease development.
{"title":"Old ideas, new directions: re-examining the predictive utility of the hemodynamic profile of the stress response in healthy populations.","authors":"Siobhán Howard","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2022.2067210","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2022.2067210","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 'reactivity hypothesis' has a long and fruitful history in health psychology and behavioural medicine, with elements of its thesis taken as core and others lost in the plethora of research on its utility as a theory of psychosomatic disease. One such thesis is that the underlying hemodynamic profile of the stress response may be particularly revealing when detailing the impact of psychological stress on the development of cardiovascular disease. This paper re-examines old ideas surrounding the hemodynamic profile of the stress response, asking why its health-predictive properties were never fully explored. Further, this paper reviews the evidence that a vascular profile of stress responding may be especially predictive of disease development, particularly in the case of hypertension. In addition, measurement of hemodynamic profile, as well as its known psychosocial moderators, is reviewed including how examination of patterns of cardiovascular stress response adaptation may extend the field. This paper highlights that the extension of the reactivity hypothesis to include both hemodynamic profile and patterns of cardiovascular stress response adaptation may hold much explanatory power in detailing the impact of how stress responding and stress tolerance promotes disease development.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":"17 1","pages":"104-120"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9785289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-01DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2022.2071323
Linda Becker, Helena C Kaltenegger, Dennis Nowak, Nicolas Rohleder, Matthias Weigl
In the age of digitilization, multitasking requirements are ubiquitous, especially in the workplace. Multitasking (MT) describes the activity of performing multiple (at least two) tasks at the same time. Dual tasking (DT) refers to the sequential switching between two tasks. The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was first to investigate whether physiological stress systems become activated in response to or during MT/DT and, second, whether this (re-)activity is higher compared to single tasking. We focused on the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), the parasympathetic nervous system (PNS), the hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis, and the immune system. The systematic review has been pre-registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020181415). A total of twenty-five articles were identified as eligible, in which n = 26 studies were reported, with N = 1142 participants. Our main findings are that SNS activity is significantly higher and PNS activity is significantly lower during MT/DT than during single tasking. Only two studies were found, in which HPA axis (re-)activity was surveyed. No eligible study was identified in which immune system (re-)activity was investigated. This is the first systematic synthesis of the literature base showing that stress system activity is increased during MT/DT in comparison to single-tasking.
{"title":"Differences in stress system (re-)activity between single and dual- or multitasking in healthy adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Linda Becker, Helena C Kaltenegger, Dennis Nowak, Nicolas Rohleder, Matthias Weigl","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2022.2071323","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2022.2071323","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the age of digitilization, multitasking requirements are ubiquitous, especially in the workplace. Multitasking (MT) describes the activity of performing multiple (at least two) tasks at the same time. Dual tasking (DT) refers to the sequential switching between two tasks. The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was first to investigate whether physiological stress systems become activated in response to or during MT/DT and, second, whether this (re-)activity is higher compared to single tasking. We focused on the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), the parasympathetic nervous system (PNS), the hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis, and the immune system. The systematic review has been pre-registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020181415). A total of twenty-five articles were identified as eligible, in which <i>n</i> = 26 studies were reported, with <i>N</i> = 1142 participants. Our main findings are that SNS activity is significantly higher and PNS activity is significantly lower during MT/DT than during single tasking. Only two studies were found, in which HPA axis (re-)activity was surveyed. No eligible study was identified in which immune system (re-)activity was investigated. This is the first systematic synthesis of the literature base showing that stress system activity is increased during MT/DT in comparison to single-tasking.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":"17 1","pages":"78-103"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9768903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-01DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2022.2143854
Tara Kidd, Shaunna L Devine, Susannah C Walker
Much has been documented on the association between stress and health. Both direct and indirect pathways have been identified and explored extensively, helping us understand trajectories from healthy individuals to reductions in well-being, and development of preclinical and disease states. Some of these pathways are well established within the field; physiology, affect regulation, and social relationships. The purpose of this review is to push beyond what is known separately about these pathways and provide a means to integrate them using one common mechanism. We propose that social touch, specifically affective touch, may be the missing active ingredient fundamental to our understanding of how close relationships contribute to stress and health. We provide empirical evidence detailing how affective touch is fundamental to the development of our stress systems, critical to the development of attachment bonds and subsequent social relationships across the life course. We will also explore how we can use this in applied contexts and incorporate it into existing interventions.
{"title":"Affective touch and regulation of stress responses.","authors":"Tara Kidd, Shaunna L Devine, Susannah C Walker","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2022.2143854","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2022.2143854","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Much has been documented on the association between stress and health. Both direct and indirect pathways have been identified and explored extensively, helping us understand trajectories from healthy individuals to reductions in well-being, and development of preclinical and disease states. Some of these pathways are well established within the field; physiology, affect regulation, and social relationships. The purpose of this review is to push beyond what is known separately about these pathways and provide a means to integrate them using one common mechanism. We propose that social touch, specifically affective touch, may be the missing active ingredient fundamental to our understanding of <i>how</i> close relationships contribute to stress and health. We provide empirical evidence detailing how affective touch is fundamental to the development of our stress systems, critical to the development of attachment bonds and subsequent social relationships across the life course. We will also explore how we can use this in applied contexts and incorporate it into existing interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":"17 1","pages":"60-77"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9472080","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-01DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2023.2182736
Suzanne C Segerstrom
‘Stress, in addition to being itself and the result of itself, is also the cause of itself’ (Roberts, 1950, p. 105). This famous quote illustrates three places where stress can be located: outside the person (a stressor, ‘the cause’ of stress itself), the person’s perception (an appraisal, the perception of stress ‘itself’), or in the person’s psychological or physical response (reactivity, the ‘result’ of stress itself) (Epel et al., 2018; Segerstrom & O’Connor, 2012). Furthermore, as Becker and colleagues (2023) point out, ‘‘feeling stressed’ is not the same as ‘being stressed’, i.e., a subjective stress response is not necessarily accompanied by a physiological reaction and vice versa’ (p. 79). Indeed, a response or reaction can have a different physiological profile for different people (individual response stereotypy) (Hinz et al., 1994, 2002). For example, one person might have large changes in heart rate, another, respiration, and yet another, blood pressure. The five papers in this special issue identify phenomena related to stressors, stress, and stress response and propose new directions in how we conceptualize what a stressor is, what reactivity is, and what biological systems are involved. Slavich and colleagues (2023) give an extended overview of Social Safety Theory. The premise of this theory is that social stressors have primacy when it comes to physiological and especially immunological responses because social acceptance has been important for survival. The size and metabolic demands of the brain likely arose from the complexities of pair-bonded relationships and, later, bondedness with others. The benefits of the ‘social brain’ for humans must therefore exceed the costs of maintaining this large and hungry organ (Dunbar & Shultz, 2007). Kidd and colleagues (2023) propose that social touch may be important for communicating social safety, indeed, communicating safety better than the presence of ‘safe’ social partners (Conradi et al., 2020). They introduce us to a new ‘stress’ pathway, c-tactile afferents, which along with usual suspects (oxytocin and cortisol) can blunt physiological responses to stress and promote well-being. Both Social Safety Theory and affective touch have their roots in attachment theory, but they take it in different directions. Social Safety Theory focuses on the why – what stressors and appraisals are likely to lead to health-damaging physiological changes? – whereas affective touch focuses on the how – what is the pathway to brain regions and physiological responses? From both perspectives, what ‘safety’ and ‘threat’mean can vary across attachment orientation, personality, and the relationship between the social partners. How well must we measure social stress, interactions, and circumstances? ‘Intimate knowledge of what actually happened as well as how the individual perceived the situation’ (Slavich et al., 2023, p. 14) may be hard to obtain but necessary to know when a socially safe situation was und
{"title":"Introduction to the special issue 'New directions in the biology of stress'.","authors":"Suzanne C Segerstrom","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2023.2182736","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2023.2182736","url":null,"abstract":"‘Stress, in addition to being itself and the result of itself, is also the cause of itself’ (Roberts, 1950, p. 105). This famous quote illustrates three places where stress can be located: outside the person (a stressor, ‘the cause’ of stress itself), the person’s perception (an appraisal, the perception of stress ‘itself’), or in the person’s psychological or physical response (reactivity, the ‘result’ of stress itself) (Epel et al., 2018; Segerstrom & O’Connor, 2012). Furthermore, as Becker and colleagues (2023) point out, ‘‘feeling stressed’ is not the same as ‘being stressed’, i.e., a subjective stress response is not necessarily accompanied by a physiological reaction and vice versa’ (p. 79). Indeed, a response or reaction can have a different physiological profile for different people (individual response stereotypy) (Hinz et al., 1994, 2002). For example, one person might have large changes in heart rate, another, respiration, and yet another, blood pressure. The five papers in this special issue identify phenomena related to stressors, stress, and stress response and propose new directions in how we conceptualize what a stressor is, what reactivity is, and what biological systems are involved. Slavich and colleagues (2023) give an extended overview of Social Safety Theory. The premise of this theory is that social stressors have primacy when it comes to physiological and especially immunological responses because social acceptance has been important for survival. The size and metabolic demands of the brain likely arose from the complexities of pair-bonded relationships and, later, bondedness with others. The benefits of the ‘social brain’ for humans must therefore exceed the costs of maintaining this large and hungry organ (Dunbar & Shultz, 2007). Kidd and colleagues (2023) propose that social touch may be important for communicating social safety, indeed, communicating safety better than the presence of ‘safe’ social partners (Conradi et al., 2020). They introduce us to a new ‘stress’ pathway, c-tactile afferents, which along with usual suspects (oxytocin and cortisol) can blunt physiological responses to stress and promote well-being. Both Social Safety Theory and affective touch have their roots in attachment theory, but they take it in different directions. Social Safety Theory focuses on the why – what stressors and appraisals are likely to lead to health-damaging physiological changes? – whereas affective touch focuses on the how – what is the pathway to brain regions and physiological responses? From both perspectives, what ‘safety’ and ‘threat’mean can vary across attachment orientation, personality, and the relationship between the social partners. How well must we measure social stress, interactions, and circumstances? ‘Intimate knowledge of what actually happened as well as how the individual perceived the situation’ (Slavich et al., 2023, p. 14) may be hard to obtain but necessary to know when a socially safe situation was und","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":"17 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9486110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-01DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2022.2068639
Adam O' Riordan, Siobhán Howard, Stephen Gallagher
Novel research demonstrates that lower or 'blunted' cardiovascular reactions to stress are associated with a range of adverse outcomes. The aim of the current review was (1) to examine the prospective outcomes predicted by blunted cardiovascular reactivity and (2) to identify a range of blunted cardiovascular reaction levels that predict these outcomes. Electronic databases were systematically searched (Medline, PsycArticles, PsycInfo, CINAHL, PubMed, Web of Science). Studies were included if they examined the prospective influence of blunted cardiovascular reactivity to psychological stress (SBP, DBP or HR) on a negative health, behavioural or psychological outcome. A total of 23 studies were included in the review. Blunted reactivity predicted (1) adverse cardiovascular health, primarily in cardiac samples (e.g., myocardial infarction, carotid atherosclerosis) and (2) outcomes associated with motivational and behavioural dysregulation in healthy samples (e.g., obesity, smoking addiction, depression). The cardiovascular reactivity threshold levels that were predictive of adverse health outcomes ranged between -3.00-12.59 bpm (14.41% to 136.59% lower than the sample mean) and -2.4-5.00 mmhg (65.99% to 133.80% lower than sample mean), for HR and DBP respectively. We posit that blunted reactions lower than, or equal to, the ranges reported here may be utilised by clinicians and researchers to identify individuals who are at increased risk of adverse cardiovascular health outcomes, as well as outcomes associated with motivational and behavioural dysregulation.
新的研究表明,心血管对压力的反应较低或“迟钝”与一系列不良后果有关。本综述的目的是:(1)检查由钝化心血管反应预测的前瞻性结果,(2)确定预测这些结果的钝化心血管反应水平的范围。系统检索电子数据库(Medline, PsycArticles, PsycInfo, CINAHL, PubMed, Web of Science)。如果研究考察了心血管对心理压力反应减弱(收缩压、舒张压或心率)对健康、行为或心理结果的负面影响,则纳入研究。该综述共纳入了23项研究。钝化的反应性预测(1)心血管健康不良,主要是在心脏样本中(如心肌梗死、颈动脉粥样硬化)和(2)健康样本中与动机和行为失调相关的结果(如肥胖、吸烟成瘾、抑郁)。预测不良健康结果的心血管反应性阈值水平分别为-3.00-12.59 bpm(比样本平均值低14.41% - 136.59%)和-2.4-5.00 mmhg(比样本平均值低65.99% - 133.80%)。我们假设,低于或等于本文报道的范围的钝化反应可能被临床医生和研究人员用来识别心血管健康不良后果风险增加的个体,以及与动机和行为失调相关的后果。
{"title":"Blunted cardiovascular reactivity to psychological stress and prospective health: a systematic review.","authors":"Adam O' Riordan, Siobhán Howard, Stephen Gallagher","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2022.2068639","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2022.2068639","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Novel research demonstrates that lower or 'blunted' cardiovascular reactions to stress are associated with a range of adverse outcomes. The aim of the current review was (1) to examine the prospective outcomes predicted by blunted cardiovascular reactivity and (2) to identify a range of blunted cardiovascular reaction levels that predict these outcomes. Electronic databases were systematically searched (Medline, PsycArticles, PsycInfo, CINAHL, PubMed, Web of Science). Studies were included if they examined the prospective influence of blunted cardiovascular reactivity to psychological stress (SBP, DBP or HR) on a negative health, behavioural or psychological outcome. A total of 23 studies were included in the review. Blunted reactivity predicted (1) adverse cardiovascular health, primarily in cardiac samples (e.g., myocardial infarction, carotid atherosclerosis) and (2) outcomes associated with motivational and behavioural dysregulation in healthy samples (e.g., obesity, smoking addiction, depression). The cardiovascular reactivity threshold levels that were predictive of adverse health outcomes ranged between -3.00-12.59 bpm (14.41% to 136.59% lower than the sample mean) and -2.4-5.00 mmhg (65.99% to 133.80% lower than sample mean), for HR and DBP respectively. We posit that blunted reactions lower than, or equal to, the ranges reported here may be utilised by clinicians and researchers to identify individuals who are at increased risk of adverse cardiovascular health outcomes, as well as outcomes associated with motivational and behavioural dysregulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":"17 1","pages":"121-147"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10062674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-01Epub Date: 2023-03-30DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2023.2171900
George M Slavich, Lydia G Roos, Summer Mengelkoch, Christian A Webb, Eric C Shattuck, Daniel P Moriarity, Jenna C Alley
Classic theories of stress and health are largely based on assumptions regarding how different psychosocial stressors influence biological processes that, in turn, affect human health and behavior. Although theoretically rich, this work has yielded little consensus and led to numerous conceptual, measurement, and reproducibility issues. Social Safety Theory aims to address these issues by using the primary goal and regulatory logic of the human brain and immune system as the basis for specifying the social-environmental situations to which these systems should respond most strongly to maximize reproductive success and survival. This analysis gave rise to the integrated, multi-level formulation described herein, which transforms thinking about stress biology and provides a biologically based, evolutionary account for how and why experiences of social safety and social threat are strongly related to health, well-being, aging, and longevity. In doing so, the theory advances a testable framework for investigating the biopsychosocial roots of health disparities as well as how health-relevant biopsychosocial processes crystalize over time and how perceptions of the social environment interact with childhood microbial environment, birth cohort, culture, air pollution, genetics, sleep, diet, personality, and self-harm to affect health. The theory also highlights several interventions for reducing social threat and promoting resilience.
{"title":"Social Safety Theory: Conceptual foundation, underlying mechanisms, and future directions.","authors":"George M Slavich, Lydia G Roos, Summer Mengelkoch, Christian A Webb, Eric C Shattuck, Daniel P Moriarity, Jenna C Alley","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2023.2171900","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17437199.2023.2171900","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Classic theories of stress and health are largely based on assumptions regarding how different psychosocial stressors influence biological processes that, in turn, affect human health and behavior. Although theoretically rich, this work has yielded little consensus and led to numerous conceptual, measurement, and reproducibility issues. Social Safety Theory aims to address these issues by using the primary goal and regulatory logic of the human brain and immune system as the basis for specifying the social-environmental situations to which these systems should respond most strongly to maximize reproductive success and survival. This analysis gave rise to the integrated, multi-level formulation described herein, which transforms thinking about stress biology and provides a biologically based, evolutionary account for how and why experiences of social safety and social threat are strongly related to health, well-being, aging, and longevity. In doing so, the theory advances a testable framework for investigating the biopsychosocial roots of health disparities as well as how health-relevant biopsychosocial processes crystalize over time and how perceptions of the social environment interact with childhood microbial environment, birth cohort, culture, air pollution, genetics, sleep, diet, personality, and self-harm to affect health. The theory also highlights several interventions for reducing social threat and promoting resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":"17 1","pages":"5-59"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4e/71/nihms-1881795.PMC10161928.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10660481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2021.1988866
Alexander Ort, Andreas Fahr
Mental Contrasting with Implementation Intentions (MCII) is a self-regulation strategy that combines the strategies mental contrasting (MC) in which individualscontrast a desired future with the current reality with the strategy of forming implementation intentions (II), which involves making concrete if-then plans (implementation intentions, II) to overcome the obstacles standing in the way of the desired future. Numerous studies across behavioral domains have demonstrated the effectiveness of this strategy in supporting people to adopt health-promoting behaviors or changing unhealthy behaviors. However, research on MCII has so far neglected the applicability of the concept in media-mediated persuasive health communication. This conceptual review aims to demonstrate and examine the potentials and effects of MCII as a technique to tailor media-mediated persuasive health messages and their dissemination through different media channels. In doing so, it draws on existing models of health behavior change, especially individuals' threat and coping appraisals. Potential effects of MCII on these cognitive factors are discussed, and practical implications for health message design are outlined.
{"title":"Mental contrasting with implementation intentions as a technique for media-mediated persuasive health communication.","authors":"Alexander Ort, Andreas Fahr","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2021.1988866","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2021.1988866","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mental Contrasting with Implementation Intentions (MCII) is a self-regulation strategy that combines the strategies mental contrasting (MC) in which individualscontrast a desired future with the current reality with the strategy of forming implementation intentions (II), which involves making concrete if-then plans (implementation intentions, II) to overcome the obstacles standing in the way of the desired future. Numerous studies across behavioral domains have demonstrated the effectiveness of this strategy in supporting people to adopt health-promoting behaviors or changing unhealthy behaviors. However, research on MCII has so far neglected the applicability of the concept in media-mediated persuasive health communication. This conceptual review aims to demonstrate and examine the potentials and effects of MCII as a technique to tailor media-mediated persuasive health messages and their dissemination through different media channels. In doing so, it draws on existing models of health behavior change, especially individuals' threat and coping appraisals. Potential effects of MCII on these cognitive factors are discussed, and practical implications for health message design are outlined.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":"16 4","pages":"602-621"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10470964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2022.2046482
Dominika Kwasnicka, Jan Keller, Olga Perski, Sebastian Potthoff, Gill A Ten Hoor, Ben Ainsworth, Rik Crutzen, Simone Dohle, Anne van Dongen, Matti Heino, Julia F Henrich, Liam Knox, Laura M König, Wendy Maltinsky, Claire McCallum, Judith Nalukwago, Efrat Neter, Johanna Nurmi, Manuel Spitschan, Samantha B Van Beurden, L Nynke Van der Laan, Kathrin Wunsch, Jasper J J Levink, Robbert Sanderman
In this White Paper, we outline recommendations from the perspective of health psychology and behavioural science, addressing three research gaps: (1) What methods in the health psychology research toolkit can be best used for developing and evaluating digital health tools? (2) What are the most feasible strategies to reuse digital health tools across populations and settings? (3) What are the main advantages and challenges of sharing (openly publishing) data, code, intervention content and design features of digital health tools? We provide actionable suggestions for researchers joining the continuously growing Open Digital Health movement, poised to revolutionise health psychology research and practice in the coming years. This White Paper is positioned in the current context of the COVID-19 pandemic, exploring how digital health tools have rapidly gained popularity in 2020-2022, when world-wide health promotion and treatment efforts rapidly shifted from face-to-face to remote delivery. This statement is written by the Directors of the not-for-profit Open Digital Health initiative (n = 6), Experts attending the European Health Psychology Society Synergy Expert Meeting (n = 17), and the initiative consultant, following a two-day meeting (19-20th August 2021).
{"title":"White Paper: Open Digital Health - accelerating transparent and scalable health promotion and treatment.","authors":"Dominika Kwasnicka, Jan Keller, Olga Perski, Sebastian Potthoff, Gill A Ten Hoor, Ben Ainsworth, Rik Crutzen, Simone Dohle, Anne van Dongen, Matti Heino, Julia F Henrich, Liam Knox, Laura M König, Wendy Maltinsky, Claire McCallum, Judith Nalukwago, Efrat Neter, Johanna Nurmi, Manuel Spitschan, Samantha B Van Beurden, L Nynke Van der Laan, Kathrin Wunsch, Jasper J J Levink, Robbert Sanderman","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2022.2046482","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2022.2046482","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this White Paper, we outline recommendations from the perspective of health psychology and behavioural science, addressing three research gaps: (1) What methods in the health psychology research toolkit can be best used for developing and evaluating digital health tools? (2) What are the most feasible strategies to reuse digital health tools across populations and settings? (3) What are the main advantages and challenges of sharing (openly publishing) data, code, intervention content and design features of digital health tools? We provide actionable suggestions for researchers joining the continuously growing Open Digital Health movement, poised to revolutionise health psychology research and practice in the coming years. This White Paper is positioned in the current context of the COVID-19 pandemic, exploring how digital health tools have rapidly gained popularity in 2020-2022, when world-wide health promotion and treatment efforts rapidly shifted from face-to-face to remote delivery. This statement is written by the Directors of the not-for-profit Open Digital Health initiative (n = 6), Experts attending the European Health Psychology Society Synergy Expert Meeting (n = 17), and the initiative consultant, following a two-day meeting (19-20th August 2021).</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":"16 4","pages":"475-491"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10528134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2022.2112258
Olga Perski, Jan Keller, Dimitra Kale, Bernard Yeboah-Asiamah Asare, Verena Schneider, Daniel Powell, Felix Naughton, Gill Ten Hoor, Peter Verboon, Dominika Kwasnicka
Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) involves repeated, real-time sampling of health behaviours in context. We present the state-of-knowledge in EMA research focused on five key health behaviours (physical activity and sedentary behaviour, dietary behaviour, alcohol consumption, tobacco smoking, sexual health), summarising theoretical (e.g., psychological and contextual predictors) and methodological aspects (e.g., study characteristics, EMA adherence). We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science until February 2021. We included studies focused on any of the aforementioned health behaviours in adult, non-clinical populations that assessed ≥1 psychological/contextual predictor and reported a predictor-behaviour association. A narrative synthesis and random-effects meta-analyses of EMA adherence were conducted. We included 633 studies. The median study duration was 14 days. The most frequently assessed predictors were 'negative feeling states' (21%) and 'motivation and goals' (16.5%). The pooled percentage of EMA adherence was high at 81.4% (95% CI = 80.0%, 82.8%, k = 348) and did not differ by target behaviour but was somewhat higher in student (vs. general population) samples, when EMAs were delivered via mobile phones/smartphones (vs. handheld devices), and when event contingent (vs. fixed) sampling was used. This review showcases how the EMA method has been applied to improve understanding and prediction of health behaviours in context.
生态瞬时评估(EMA)涉及对环境中的健康行为进行重复的实时采样。我们介绍了EMA研究的现状,重点关注五种关键健康行为(身体活动和久坐行为、饮食行为、饮酒、吸烟、性健康),总结了理论(如心理和背景预测因素)和方法方面(如研究特征、EMA依从性)。我们检索了Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO和Web of Science,直到2021年2月。我们纳入了针对成人、非临床人群中任何上述健康行为的研究,这些研究评估了≥1个心理/环境预测因子,并报告了预测因子-行为关联。对EMA依从性进行叙事综合和随机效应荟萃分析。我们纳入了633项研究。中位研究持续时间为14天。最常被评估的预测因素是“消极情绪状态”(21%)和“动机和目标”(16.5%)。EMA依从性的总百分比高达81.4% (95% CI = 80.0%, 82.8%, k = 348),并没有因目标行为而异,但在学生(与一般人群)样本中,当通过移动电话/智能手机(与手持设备相比)提供EMA时,以及当使用事件偶然抽样(与固定抽样相比)时,EMA依从性的总百分比略高。这篇综述展示了EMA方法是如何应用于提高对环境中健康行为的理解和预测的。
{"title":"Understanding health behaviours in context: A systematic review and meta-analysis of ecological momentary assessment studies of five key health behaviours.","authors":"Olga Perski, Jan Keller, Dimitra Kale, Bernard Yeboah-Asiamah Asare, Verena Schneider, Daniel Powell, Felix Naughton, Gill Ten Hoor, Peter Verboon, Dominika Kwasnicka","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2022.2112258","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2022.2112258","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) involves repeated, real-time sampling of health behaviours in context. We present the state-of-knowledge in EMA research focused on five key health behaviours (physical activity and sedentary behaviour, dietary behaviour, alcohol consumption, tobacco smoking, sexual health), summarising theoretical (e.g., psychological and contextual predictors) and methodological aspects (e.g., study characteristics, EMA adherence). We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science until February 2021. We included studies focused on any of the aforementioned health behaviours in adult, non-clinical populations that assessed ≥1 psychological/contextual predictor and reported a predictor-behaviour association. A narrative synthesis and random-effects meta-analyses of EMA adherence were conducted. We included 633 studies. The median study duration was 14 days. The most frequently assessed predictors were 'negative feeling states' (21%) and 'motivation and goals' (16.5%). The pooled percentage of EMA adherence was high at 81.4% (95% CI = 80.0%, 82.8%, <i>k </i>= 348) and did not differ by target behaviour but was somewhat higher in student (vs. general population) samples, when EMAs were delivered via mobile phones/smartphones (vs. handheld devices), and when event contingent (vs. fixed) sampling was used. This review showcases how the EMA method has been applied to improve understanding and prediction of health behaviours in context.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":"16 4","pages":"576-601"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9704370/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10469008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}