首页 > 最新文献

Health Psychology Review最新文献

英文 中文
The mode of delivery and content of communication strategies used in mandatory and non-mandatory biosimilar transitions: a systematic review with meta-analysis. 强制性和非强制性生物仿制药转换中使用的传播策略的传递模式和内容:一项带有荟萃分析的系统综述。
IF 9.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2021.1970610
Chiara Gasteiger, Alfons A den Broeder, Sarah Stewart, Norina Gasteiger, Urte Scholz, Nicola Dalbeth, Keith J Petrie

Effective patient-provider communication is crucial to promote shared decision-making. However, it is unclear how to explain treatment changes to ensure patient acceptance, such as when transitioning from a bio-originator to a biosimilar. This review investigates communication strategies used to educate patients on transitioning to biosimilars and explores whether the willingness to transition and treatment persistence differs for the delivery (verbal or written) and the amount of information provided. MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and relevant conference databases were systematically searched. Communication strategies from 33 studies (88% observational cohort studies) published from 2012 to 2020 were synthesized and willingness to transition, persistence, and subjective adverse events explored. Patients only received information verbally in 11 studies. The remaining 22 studies also provided written information. Cost-saving was the main reason provided for the transition. Patients were most willing to transition when receiving written and verbal information (χ2 = 5.83, p = .02) or written information that only addressed a few (3-5) concerns (χ2 = 16.08, p < .001). There was no significant difference for persistence or subjective adverse events (p's > .05). Few randomized controlled trials have been conducted. Available data shows more willingness to transition when patients received written and verbal information. Initial documents should contain basic information and consultations or telephone calls used to address concerns.

有效的医患沟通对于促进共同决策至关重要。然而,目前尚不清楚如何解释治疗变化以确保患者接受,例如当从生物原创制药过渡到生物仿制药时。本综述调查了用于教育患者过渡到生物仿制药的沟通策略,并探讨了过渡的意愿和治疗持久性是否因传递(口头或书面)和提供的信息量而不同。系统检索MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus及相关会议数据库。我们综合了2012年至2020年发表的33项研究(88%为观察性队列研究)的沟通策略,并探讨了过渡意愿、持久性和主观不良事件。在11项研究中,患者仅获得口头信息。其余22项研究也提供了书面资料。节省费用是进行过渡的主要原因。当接受书面和口头信息(χ2 = 5.83, p = 0.02)或书面信息仅涉及少数(3-5)个问题时(χ2 = 16.08, p > 0.05),患者最愿意转换。很少进行随机对照试验。现有数据显示,当患者收到书面和口头信息时,他们更愿意转变。初始文件应包含基本信息和用于解决问题的咨询或电话。
{"title":"The mode of delivery and content of communication strategies used in mandatory and non-mandatory biosimilar transitions: a systematic review with meta-analysis.","authors":"Chiara Gasteiger,&nbsp;Alfons A den Broeder,&nbsp;Sarah Stewart,&nbsp;Norina Gasteiger,&nbsp;Urte Scholz,&nbsp;Nicola Dalbeth,&nbsp;Keith J Petrie","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2021.1970610","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2021.1970610","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective patient-provider communication is crucial to promote shared decision-making. However, it is unclear how to explain treatment changes to ensure patient acceptance, such as when transitioning from a bio-originator to a biosimilar. This review investigates communication strategies used to educate patients on transitioning to biosimilars and explores whether the willingness to transition and treatment persistence differs for the delivery (verbal or written) and the amount of information provided. MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and relevant conference databases were systematically searched. Communication strategies from 33 studies (88% observational cohort studies) published from 2012 to 2020 were synthesized and willingness to transition, persistence, and subjective adverse events explored. Patients only received information verbally in 11 studies. The remaining 22 studies also provided written information. Cost-saving was the main reason provided for the transition. Patients were most willing to transition when receiving written and verbal information (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> = 5.83, <i>p</i> = .02) or written information that only addressed a few (3-5) concerns (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> = 16.08, <i>p</i> < .001). There was no significant difference for persistence or subjective adverse events (<i>p's</i> > .05). Few randomized controlled trials have been conducted. Available data shows more willingness to transition when patients received written and verbal information. Initial documents should contain basic information and consultations or telephone calls used to address concerns.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":"17 1","pages":"148-168"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9421603","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Old ideas, new directions: re-examining the predictive utility of the hemodynamic profile of the stress response in healthy populations. 旧的想法,新的方向:重新检查在健康人群的压力反应的血流动力学剖面的预测效用。
IF 9.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2022.2067210
Siobhán Howard

The 'reactivity hypothesis' has a long and fruitful history in health psychology and behavioural medicine, with elements of its thesis taken as core and others lost in the plethora of research on its utility as a theory of psychosomatic disease. One such thesis is that the underlying hemodynamic profile of the stress response may be particularly revealing when detailing the impact of psychological stress on the development of cardiovascular disease. This paper re-examines old ideas surrounding the hemodynamic profile of the stress response, asking why its health-predictive properties were never fully explored. Further, this paper reviews the evidence that a vascular profile of stress responding may be especially predictive of disease development, particularly in the case of hypertension. In addition, measurement of hemodynamic profile, as well as its known psychosocial moderators, is reviewed including how examination of patterns of cardiovascular stress response adaptation may extend the field. This paper highlights that the extension of the reactivity hypothesis to include both hemodynamic profile and patterns of cardiovascular stress response adaptation may hold much explanatory power in detailing the impact of how stress responding and stress tolerance promotes disease development.

“反应性假说”在健康心理学和行为医学领域有着悠久而富有成果的历史,其论文的一些要素被视为核心,而其他一些要素则被大量关于其作为心身疾病理论的实用性的研究所遗忘。其中一个论点是,当详细描述心理压力对心血管疾病发展的影响时,应激反应的潜在血流动力学特征可能特别具有启示意义。本文重新审视了围绕应激反应的血流动力学特征的旧观点,并询问为什么其健康预测特性从未得到充分探索。此外,本文回顾了血管应激反应谱可能特别预测疾病发展的证据,特别是在高血压的情况下。此外,血流动力学特征的测量,以及其已知的社会心理调节因子,包括心血管应激反应适应模式的检查如何扩展该领域。本文强调,反应性假说的扩展,包括血液动力学剖面和心血管应激反应适应模式,可能在详细解释应激反应和应激耐受性如何促进疾病发展的影响方面具有很大的解释力。
{"title":"Old ideas, new directions: re-examining the predictive utility of the hemodynamic profile of the stress response in healthy populations.","authors":"Siobhán Howard","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2022.2067210","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2022.2067210","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 'reactivity hypothesis' has a long and fruitful history in health psychology and behavioural medicine, with elements of its thesis taken as core and others lost in the plethora of research on its utility as a theory of psychosomatic disease. One such thesis is that the underlying hemodynamic profile of the stress response may be particularly revealing when detailing the impact of psychological stress on the development of cardiovascular disease. This paper re-examines old ideas surrounding the hemodynamic profile of the stress response, asking why its health-predictive properties were never fully explored. Further, this paper reviews the evidence that a vascular profile of stress responding may be especially predictive of disease development, particularly in the case of hypertension. In addition, measurement of hemodynamic profile, as well as its known psychosocial moderators, is reviewed including how examination of patterns of cardiovascular stress response adaptation may extend the field. This paper highlights that the extension of the reactivity hypothesis to include both hemodynamic profile and patterns of cardiovascular stress response adaptation may hold much explanatory power in detailing the impact of how stress responding and stress tolerance promotes disease development.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":"17 1","pages":"104-120"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9785289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Differences in stress system (re-)activity between single and dual- or multitasking in healthy adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 健康成人单任务处理与双任务处理或多任务处理之间压力系统(再)活动的差异:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 9.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2022.2071323
Linda Becker, Helena C Kaltenegger, Dennis Nowak, Nicolas Rohleder, Matthias Weigl

In the age of digitilization, multitasking requirements are ubiquitous, especially in the workplace. Multitasking (MT) describes the activity of performing multiple (at least two) tasks at the same time. Dual tasking (DT) refers to the sequential switching between two tasks. The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was first to investigate whether physiological stress systems become activated in response to or during MT/DT and, second, whether this (re-)activity is higher compared to single tasking. We focused on the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), the parasympathetic nervous system (PNS), the hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis, and the immune system. The systematic review has been pre-registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020181415). A total of twenty-five articles were identified as eligible, in which n = 26 studies were reported, with N = 1142 participants. Our main findings are that SNS activity is significantly higher and PNS activity is significantly lower during MT/DT than during single tasking. Only two studies were found, in which HPA axis (re-)activity was surveyed. No eligible study was identified in which immune system (re-)activity was investigated. This is the first systematic synthesis of the literature base showing that stress system activity is increased during MT/DT in comparison to single-tasking.

在数字化时代,多任务处理的要求无处不在,尤其是在工作场所。多任务(MT)描述了同时执行多个(至少两个)任务的活动。双任务是指在两个任务之间进行顺序切换。我们的系统回顾和荟萃分析的目的首先是调查生理应激系统是否在MT/DT响应或期间被激活,其次,与单一任务相比,这种(重新)活动是否更高。我们重点关注交感神经系统(SNS)、副交感神经系统(PNS)、下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺(HPA)轴和免疫系统。该系统评价已在PROSPERO进行预注册(CRD42020181415)。共有25篇文章被确定为符合条件,其中n = 26项研究被报道,n = 1142名参与者。我们的主要发现是,与单一任务相比,在MT/DT任务中,SNS活动明显更高,PNS活动明显更低。仅发现两项研究调查了下丘脑轴(再)活性。没有合适的研究确定免疫系统(再)活性的调查。这是第一个系统的综合文献基础,表明与单任务相比,压力系统活动在MT/DT期间增加。
{"title":"Differences in stress system (re-)activity between single and dual- or multitasking in healthy adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Linda Becker,&nbsp;Helena C Kaltenegger,&nbsp;Dennis Nowak,&nbsp;Nicolas Rohleder,&nbsp;Matthias Weigl","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2022.2071323","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2022.2071323","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the age of digitilization, multitasking requirements are ubiquitous, especially in the workplace. Multitasking (MT) describes the activity of performing multiple (at least two) tasks at the same time. Dual tasking (DT) refers to the sequential switching between two tasks. The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was first to investigate whether physiological stress systems become activated in response to or during MT/DT and, second, whether this (re-)activity is higher compared to single tasking. We focused on the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), the parasympathetic nervous system (PNS), the hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis, and the immune system. The systematic review has been pre-registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020181415). A total of twenty-five articles were identified as eligible, in which <i>n</i> = 26 studies were reported, with <i>N</i> = 1142 participants. Our main findings are that SNS activity is significantly higher and PNS activity is significantly lower during MT/DT than during single tasking. Only two studies were found, in which HPA axis (re-)activity was surveyed. No eligible study was identified in which immune system (re-)activity was investigated. This is the first systematic synthesis of the literature base showing that stress system activity is increased during MT/DT in comparison to single-tasking.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":"17 1","pages":"78-103"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9768903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Affective touch and regulation of stress responses. 情感触摸和应激反应的调节。
IF 9.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2022.2143854
Tara Kidd, Shaunna L Devine, Susannah C Walker

Much has been documented on the association between stress and health. Both direct and indirect pathways have been identified and explored extensively, helping us understand trajectories from healthy individuals to reductions in well-being, and development of preclinical and disease states. Some of these pathways are well established within the field; physiology, affect regulation, and social relationships. The purpose of this review is to push beyond what is known separately about these pathways and provide a means to integrate them using one common mechanism. We propose that social touch, specifically affective touch, may be the missing active ingredient fundamental to our understanding of how close relationships contribute to stress and health. We provide empirical evidence detailing how affective touch is fundamental to the development of our stress systems, critical to the development of attachment bonds and subsequent social relationships across the life course. We will also explore how we can use this in applied contexts and incorporate it into existing interventions.

关于压力和健康之间的关系,已有很多文献记载。已经确定并广泛探索了直接和间接途径,帮助我们了解从健康个体到福祉减少的轨迹,以及临床前和疾病状态的发展。其中一些途径在该领域内已经确立;生理,影响调节,和社会关系。本综述的目的是超越对这些途径的单独了解,并提供一种使用一种共同机制将它们整合起来的方法。我们认为,社交接触,特别是情感接触,可能是我们理解亲密关系如何影响压力和健康的基本要素。我们提供了经验证据,详细说明了情感触摸是我们压力系统发展的基础,对依恋关系和随后的社会关系的发展至关重要。我们还将探讨如何在实际环境中使用这一方法,并将其纳入现有的干预措施。
{"title":"Affective touch and regulation of stress responses.","authors":"Tara Kidd,&nbsp;Shaunna L Devine,&nbsp;Susannah C Walker","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2022.2143854","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2022.2143854","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Much has been documented on the association between stress and health. Both direct and indirect pathways have been identified and explored extensively, helping us understand trajectories from healthy individuals to reductions in well-being, and development of preclinical and disease states. Some of these pathways are well established within the field; physiology, affect regulation, and social relationships. The purpose of this review is to push beyond what is known separately about these pathways and provide a means to integrate them using one common mechanism. We propose that social touch, specifically affective touch, may be the missing active ingredient fundamental to our understanding of <i>how</i> close relationships contribute to stress and health. We provide empirical evidence detailing how affective touch is fundamental to the development of our stress systems, critical to the development of attachment bonds and subsequent social relationships across the life course. We will also explore how we can use this in applied contexts and incorporate it into existing interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":"17 1","pages":"60-77"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9472080","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Introduction to the special issue 'New directions in the biology of stress'. 特刊“压力生物学的新方向”导言。
IF 9.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2023.2182736
Suzanne C Segerstrom
‘Stress, in addition to being itself and the result of itself, is also the cause of itself’ (Roberts, 1950, p. 105). This famous quote illustrates three places where stress can be located: outside the person (a stressor, ‘the cause’ of stress itself), the person’s perception (an appraisal, the perception of stress ‘itself’), or in the person’s psychological or physical response (reactivity, the ‘result’ of stress itself) (Epel et al., 2018; Segerstrom & O’Connor, 2012). Furthermore, as Becker and colleagues (2023) point out, ‘‘feeling stressed’ is not the same as ‘being stressed’, i.e., a subjective stress response is not necessarily accompanied by a physiological reaction and vice versa’ (p. 79). Indeed, a response or reaction can have a different physiological profile for different people (individual response stereotypy) (Hinz et al., 1994, 2002). For example, one person might have large changes in heart rate, another, respiration, and yet another, blood pressure. The five papers in this special issue identify phenomena related to stressors, stress, and stress response and propose new directions in how we conceptualize what a stressor is, what reactivity is, and what biological systems are involved. Slavich and colleagues (2023) give an extended overview of Social Safety Theory. The premise of this theory is that social stressors have primacy when it comes to physiological and especially immunological responses because social acceptance has been important for survival. The size and metabolic demands of the brain likely arose from the complexities of pair-bonded relationships and, later, bondedness with others. The benefits of the ‘social brain’ for humans must therefore exceed the costs of maintaining this large and hungry organ (Dunbar & Shultz, 2007). Kidd and colleagues (2023) propose that social touch may be important for communicating social safety, indeed, communicating safety better than the presence of ‘safe’ social partners (Conradi et al., 2020). They introduce us to a new ‘stress’ pathway, c-tactile afferents, which along with usual suspects (oxytocin and cortisol) can blunt physiological responses to stress and promote well-being. Both Social Safety Theory and affective touch have their roots in attachment theory, but they take it in different directions. Social Safety Theory focuses on the why – what stressors and appraisals are likely to lead to health-damaging physiological changes? – whereas affective touch focuses on the how – what is the pathway to brain regions and physiological responses? From both perspectives, what ‘safety’ and ‘threat’mean can vary across attachment orientation, personality, and the relationship between the social partners. How well must we measure social stress, interactions, and circumstances? ‘Intimate knowledge of what actually happened as well as how the individual perceived the situation’ (Slavich et al., 2023, p. 14) may be hard to obtain but necessary to know when a socially safe situation was und
{"title":"Introduction to the special issue 'New directions in the biology of stress'.","authors":"Suzanne C Segerstrom","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2023.2182736","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2023.2182736","url":null,"abstract":"‘Stress, in addition to being itself and the result of itself, is also the cause of itself’ (Roberts, 1950, p. 105). This famous quote illustrates three places where stress can be located: outside the person (a stressor, ‘the cause’ of stress itself), the person’s perception (an appraisal, the perception of stress ‘itself’), or in the person’s psychological or physical response (reactivity, the ‘result’ of stress itself) (Epel et al., 2018; Segerstrom & O’Connor, 2012). Furthermore, as Becker and colleagues (2023) point out, ‘‘feeling stressed’ is not the same as ‘being stressed’, i.e., a subjective stress response is not necessarily accompanied by a physiological reaction and vice versa’ (p. 79). Indeed, a response or reaction can have a different physiological profile for different people (individual response stereotypy) (Hinz et al., 1994, 2002). For example, one person might have large changes in heart rate, another, respiration, and yet another, blood pressure. The five papers in this special issue identify phenomena related to stressors, stress, and stress response and propose new directions in how we conceptualize what a stressor is, what reactivity is, and what biological systems are involved. Slavich and colleagues (2023) give an extended overview of Social Safety Theory. The premise of this theory is that social stressors have primacy when it comes to physiological and especially immunological responses because social acceptance has been important for survival. The size and metabolic demands of the brain likely arose from the complexities of pair-bonded relationships and, later, bondedness with others. The benefits of the ‘social brain’ for humans must therefore exceed the costs of maintaining this large and hungry organ (Dunbar & Shultz, 2007). Kidd and colleagues (2023) propose that social touch may be important for communicating social safety, indeed, communicating safety better than the presence of ‘safe’ social partners (Conradi et al., 2020). They introduce us to a new ‘stress’ pathway, c-tactile afferents, which along with usual suspects (oxytocin and cortisol) can blunt physiological responses to stress and promote well-being. Both Social Safety Theory and affective touch have their roots in attachment theory, but they take it in different directions. Social Safety Theory focuses on the why – what stressors and appraisals are likely to lead to health-damaging physiological changes? – whereas affective touch focuses on the how – what is the pathway to brain regions and physiological responses? From both perspectives, what ‘safety’ and ‘threat’mean can vary across attachment orientation, personality, and the relationship between the social partners. How well must we measure social stress, interactions, and circumstances? ‘Intimate knowledge of what actually happened as well as how the individual perceived the situation’ (Slavich et al., 2023, p. 14) may be hard to obtain but necessary to know when a socially safe situation was und","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":"17 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9486110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Blunted cardiovascular reactivity to psychological stress and prospective health: a systematic review. 钝化心血管对心理压力的反应与预期健康:一项系统综述。
IF 9.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2022.2068639
Adam O' Riordan, Siobhán Howard, Stephen Gallagher

Novel research demonstrates that lower or 'blunted' cardiovascular reactions to stress are associated with a range of adverse outcomes. The aim of the current review was (1) to examine the prospective outcomes predicted by blunted cardiovascular reactivity and (2) to identify a range of blunted cardiovascular reaction levels that predict these outcomes. Electronic databases were systematically searched (Medline, PsycArticles, PsycInfo, CINAHL, PubMed, Web of Science). Studies were included if they examined the prospective influence of blunted cardiovascular reactivity to psychological stress (SBP, DBP or HR) on a negative health, behavioural or psychological outcome. A total of 23 studies were included in the review. Blunted reactivity predicted (1) adverse cardiovascular health, primarily in cardiac samples (e.g., myocardial infarction, carotid atherosclerosis) and (2) outcomes associated with motivational and behavioural dysregulation in healthy samples (e.g., obesity, smoking addiction, depression). The cardiovascular reactivity threshold levels that were predictive of adverse health outcomes ranged between -3.00-12.59 bpm (14.41% to 136.59% lower than the sample mean) and -2.4-5.00 mmhg (65.99% to 133.80% lower than sample mean), for HR and DBP respectively. We posit that blunted reactions lower than, or equal to, the ranges reported here may be utilised by clinicians and researchers to identify individuals who are at increased risk of adverse cardiovascular health outcomes, as well as outcomes associated with motivational and behavioural dysregulation.

新的研究表明,心血管对压力的反应较低或“迟钝”与一系列不良后果有关。本综述的目的是:(1)检查由钝化心血管反应预测的前瞻性结果,(2)确定预测这些结果的钝化心血管反应水平的范围。系统检索电子数据库(Medline, PsycArticles, PsycInfo, CINAHL, PubMed, Web of Science)。如果研究考察了心血管对心理压力反应减弱(收缩压、舒张压或心率)对健康、行为或心理结果的负面影响,则纳入研究。该综述共纳入了23项研究。钝化的反应性预测(1)心血管健康不良,主要是在心脏样本中(如心肌梗死、颈动脉粥样硬化)和(2)健康样本中与动机和行为失调相关的结果(如肥胖、吸烟成瘾、抑郁)。预测不良健康结果的心血管反应性阈值水平分别为-3.00-12.59 bpm(比样本平均值低14.41% - 136.59%)和-2.4-5.00 mmhg(比样本平均值低65.99% - 133.80%)。我们假设,低于或等于本文报道的范围的钝化反应可能被临床医生和研究人员用来识别心血管健康不良后果风险增加的个体,以及与动机和行为失调相关的后果。
{"title":"Blunted cardiovascular reactivity to psychological stress and prospective health: a systematic review.","authors":"Adam O' Riordan,&nbsp;Siobhán Howard,&nbsp;Stephen Gallagher","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2022.2068639","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2022.2068639","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Novel research demonstrates that lower or 'blunted' cardiovascular reactions to stress are associated with a range of adverse outcomes. The aim of the current review was (1) to examine the prospective outcomes predicted by blunted cardiovascular reactivity and (2) to identify a range of blunted cardiovascular reaction levels that predict these outcomes. Electronic databases were systematically searched (Medline, PsycArticles, PsycInfo, CINAHL, PubMed, Web of Science). Studies were included if they examined the prospective influence of blunted cardiovascular reactivity to psychological stress (SBP, DBP or HR) on a negative health, behavioural or psychological outcome. A total of 23 studies were included in the review. Blunted reactivity predicted (1) adverse cardiovascular health, primarily in cardiac samples (e.g., myocardial infarction, carotid atherosclerosis) and (2) outcomes associated with motivational and behavioural dysregulation in healthy samples (e.g., obesity, smoking addiction, depression). The cardiovascular reactivity threshold levels that were predictive of adverse health outcomes ranged between -3.00-12.59 bpm (14.41% to 136.59% lower than the sample mean) and -2.4-5.00 mmhg (65.99% to 133.80% lower than sample mean), for HR and DBP respectively. We posit that blunted reactions lower than, or equal to, the ranges reported here may be utilised by clinicians and researchers to identify individuals who are at increased risk of adverse cardiovascular health outcomes, as well as outcomes associated with motivational and behavioural dysregulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":"17 1","pages":"121-147"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10062674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
Social Safety Theory: Conceptual foundation, underlying mechanisms, and future directions. 社会安全理论:概念基础、潜在机制和未来方向。
IF 6.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2023-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-30 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2023.2171900
George M Slavich, Lydia G Roos, Summer Mengelkoch, Christian A Webb, Eric C Shattuck, Daniel P Moriarity, Jenna C Alley

Classic theories of stress and health are largely based on assumptions regarding how different psychosocial stressors influence biological processes that, in turn, affect human health and behavior. Although theoretically rich, this work has yielded little consensus and led to numerous conceptual, measurement, and reproducibility issues. Social Safety Theory aims to address these issues by using the primary goal and regulatory logic of the human brain and immune system as the basis for specifying the social-environmental situations to which these systems should respond most strongly to maximize reproductive success and survival. This analysis gave rise to the integrated, multi-level formulation described herein, which transforms thinking about stress biology and provides a biologically based, evolutionary account for how and why experiences of social safety and social threat are strongly related to health, well-being, aging, and longevity. In doing so, the theory advances a testable framework for investigating the biopsychosocial roots of health disparities as well as how health-relevant biopsychosocial processes crystalize over time and how perceptions of the social environment interact with childhood microbial environment, birth cohort, culture, air pollution, genetics, sleep, diet, personality, and self-harm to affect health. The theory also highlights several interventions for reducing social threat and promoting resilience.

压力和健康的经典理论在很大程度上是基于关于不同的心理社会压力源如何影响生物过程的假设,而生物过程又反过来影响人类的健康和行为。尽管理论丰富,但这项工作几乎没有达成共识,并导致了许多概念、测量和再现性问题。社会安全理论旨在通过使用人类大脑和免疫系统的主要目标和调节逻辑作为基础来解决这些问题,以确定这些系统应对最强烈的社会环境状况,从而最大限度地提高生殖成功和生存率。这一分析产生了本文所述的综合、多层次的表述,它改变了对压力生物学的思考,并为社会安全和社会威胁的体验如何以及为什么与健康、幸福、衰老和寿命密切相关提供了一个基于生物学的进化解释。在这样做的过程中,该理论提出了一个可测试的框架,用于调查健康差异的生物心理社会根源,以及与健康相关的生物心理过程如何随着时间的推移而结晶,以及对社会环境的感知如何与儿童微生物环境、出生队列、文化、空气污染、遗传、睡眠、饮食、个性和自残相互作用,从而影响健康。该理论还强调了减少社会威胁和提高复原力的几种干预措施。
{"title":"Social Safety Theory: Conceptual foundation, underlying mechanisms, and future directions.","authors":"George M Slavich, Lydia G Roos, Summer Mengelkoch, Christian A Webb, Eric C Shattuck, Daniel P Moriarity, Jenna C Alley","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2023.2171900","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17437199.2023.2171900","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Classic theories of stress and health are largely based on assumptions regarding how different psychosocial stressors influence biological processes that, in turn, affect human health and behavior. Although theoretically rich, this work has yielded little consensus and led to numerous conceptual, measurement, and reproducibility issues. Social Safety Theory aims to address these issues by using the primary goal and regulatory logic of the human brain and immune system as the basis for specifying the social-environmental situations to which these systems should respond most strongly to maximize reproductive success and survival. This analysis gave rise to the integrated, multi-level formulation described herein, which transforms thinking about stress biology and provides a biologically based, evolutionary account for how and why experiences of social safety and social threat are strongly related to health, well-being, aging, and longevity. In doing so, the theory advances a testable framework for investigating the biopsychosocial roots of health disparities as well as how health-relevant biopsychosocial processes crystalize over time and how perceptions of the social environment interact with childhood microbial environment, birth cohort, culture, air pollution, genetics, sleep, diet, personality, and self-harm to affect health. The theory also highlights several interventions for reducing social threat and promoting resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":"17 1","pages":"5-59"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4e/71/nihms-1881795.PMC10161928.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10660481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mental contrasting with implementation intentions as a technique for media-mediated persuasive health communication. 心理对比与实施意图:媒介媒介劝导健康传播的一种技巧。
IF 9.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2021.1988866
Alexander Ort, Andreas Fahr

Mental Contrasting with Implementation Intentions (MCII) is a self-regulation strategy that combines the strategies mental contrasting (MC) in which individualscontrast a desired future with the current reality with the strategy of forming implementation intentions (II), which involves making concrete if-then plans (implementation intentions, II) to overcome the obstacles standing in the way of the desired future. Numerous studies across behavioral domains have demonstrated the effectiveness of this strategy in supporting people to adopt health-promoting behaviors or changing unhealthy behaviors. However, research on MCII has so far neglected the applicability of the concept in media-mediated persuasive health communication. This conceptual review aims to demonstrate and examine the potentials and effects of MCII as a technique to tailor media-mediated persuasive health messages and their dissemination through different media channels. In doing so, it draws on existing models of health behavior change, especially individuals' threat and coping appraisals. Potential effects of MCII on these cognitive factors are discussed, and practical implications for health message design are outlined.

实施意向心理对比(MCII)是一种自我调节策略,它将个体将期望的未来与当前现实进行对比的心理对比策略(MC)与形成实施意向策略(II)相结合,其中包括制定具体的“如果-那么”计划(实施意向,II),以克服阻碍实现期望的未来的障碍。跨行为领域的大量研究已经证明了这一策略在支持人们采取促进健康的行为或改变不健康行为方面的有效性。然而,到目前为止,对mci的研究忽视了这一概念在媒体介导的说服性健康传播中的适用性。本概念性综述旨在证明和检验mci作为一种技术的潜力和效果,以定制媒体介导的有说服力的健康信息及其通过不同媒体渠道的传播。在此过程中,它借鉴了现有的健康行为改变模型,特别是个人的威胁和应对评估。本文讨论了MCII对这些认知因素的潜在影响,并概述了健康信息设计的实际意义。
{"title":"Mental contrasting with implementation intentions as a technique for media-mediated persuasive health communication.","authors":"Alexander Ort,&nbsp;Andreas Fahr","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2021.1988866","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2021.1988866","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mental Contrasting with Implementation Intentions (MCII) is a self-regulation strategy that combines the strategies mental contrasting (MC) in which individualscontrast a desired future with the current reality with the strategy of forming implementation intentions (II), which involves making concrete if-then plans (implementation intentions, II) to overcome the obstacles standing in the way of the desired future. Numerous studies across behavioral domains have demonstrated the effectiveness of this strategy in supporting people to adopt health-promoting behaviors or changing unhealthy behaviors. However, research on MCII has so far neglected the applicability of the concept in media-mediated persuasive health communication. This conceptual review aims to demonstrate and examine the potentials and effects of MCII as a technique to tailor media-mediated persuasive health messages and their dissemination through different media channels. In doing so, it draws on existing models of health behavior change, especially individuals' threat and coping appraisals. Potential effects of MCII on these cognitive factors are discussed, and practical implications for health message design are outlined.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":"16 4","pages":"602-621"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10470964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
White Paper: Open Digital Health - accelerating transparent and scalable health promotion and treatment. 白皮书:开放的数字健康——加速透明和可扩展的健康促进和治疗。
IF 9.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2022.2046482
Dominika Kwasnicka, Jan Keller, Olga Perski, Sebastian Potthoff, Gill A Ten Hoor, Ben Ainsworth, Rik Crutzen, Simone Dohle, Anne van Dongen, Matti Heino, Julia F Henrich, Liam Knox, Laura M König, Wendy Maltinsky, Claire McCallum, Judith Nalukwago, Efrat Neter, Johanna Nurmi, Manuel Spitschan, Samantha B Van Beurden, L Nynke Van der Laan, Kathrin Wunsch, Jasper J J Levink, Robbert Sanderman

In this White Paper, we outline recommendations from the perspective of health psychology and behavioural science, addressing three research gaps: (1) What methods in the health psychology research toolkit can be best used for developing and evaluating digital health tools? (2) What are the most feasible strategies to reuse digital health tools across populations and settings? (3) What are the main advantages and challenges of sharing (openly publishing) data, code, intervention content and design features of digital health tools? We provide actionable suggestions for researchers joining the continuously growing Open Digital Health movement, poised to revolutionise health psychology research and practice in the coming years. This White Paper is positioned in the current context of the COVID-19 pandemic, exploring how digital health tools have rapidly gained popularity in 2020-2022, when world-wide health promotion and treatment efforts rapidly shifted from face-to-face to remote delivery. This statement is written by the Directors of the not-for-profit Open Digital Health initiative (n = 6), Experts attending the European Health Psychology Society Synergy Expert Meeting (n = 17), and the initiative consultant, following a two-day meeting (19-20th August 2021).

在本白皮书中,我们从健康心理学和行为科学的角度概述了建议,解决了三个研究空白:(1)健康心理学研究工具包中的哪些方法最适合用于开发和评估数字健康工具?(2)在人群和环境中重用数字卫生工具的最可行策略是什么?(3)共享(公开发布)数字健康工具的数据、代码、干预内容和设计特征的主要优势和挑战是什么?我们为参与持续增长的开放数字健康运动的研究人员提供可操作的建议,准备在未来几年彻底改变健康心理学的研究和实践。本白皮书定位于2019冠状病毒病大流行的当前背景,探讨数字卫生工具如何在2020-2022年迅速普及,当时全球健康促进和治疗工作迅速从面对面转向远程提供。本声明由非营利性开放数字健康倡议的主任(n = 6)、参加欧洲健康心理学学会协同专家会议的专家(n = 17)和倡议顾问在为期两天的会议(2021年8月19日至20日)之后撰写。
{"title":"White Paper: Open Digital Health - accelerating transparent and scalable health promotion and treatment.","authors":"Dominika Kwasnicka,&nbsp;Jan Keller,&nbsp;Olga Perski,&nbsp;Sebastian Potthoff,&nbsp;Gill A Ten Hoor,&nbsp;Ben Ainsworth,&nbsp;Rik Crutzen,&nbsp;Simone Dohle,&nbsp;Anne van Dongen,&nbsp;Matti Heino,&nbsp;Julia F Henrich,&nbsp;Liam Knox,&nbsp;Laura M König,&nbsp;Wendy Maltinsky,&nbsp;Claire McCallum,&nbsp;Judith Nalukwago,&nbsp;Efrat Neter,&nbsp;Johanna Nurmi,&nbsp;Manuel Spitschan,&nbsp;Samantha B Van Beurden,&nbsp;L Nynke Van der Laan,&nbsp;Kathrin Wunsch,&nbsp;Jasper J J Levink,&nbsp;Robbert Sanderman","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2022.2046482","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2022.2046482","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this White Paper, we outline recommendations from the perspective of health psychology and behavioural science, addressing three research gaps: (1) What methods in the health psychology research toolkit can be best used for developing and evaluating digital health tools? (2) What are the most feasible strategies to reuse digital health tools across populations and settings? (3) What are the main advantages and challenges of sharing (openly publishing) data, code, intervention content and design features of digital health tools? We provide actionable suggestions for researchers joining the continuously growing Open Digital Health movement, poised to revolutionise health psychology research and practice in the coming years. This White Paper is positioned in the current context of the COVID-19 pandemic, exploring how digital health tools have rapidly gained popularity in 2020-2022, when world-wide health promotion and treatment efforts rapidly shifted from face-to-face to remote delivery. This statement is written by the Directors of the not-for-profit Open Digital Health initiative (n = 6), Experts attending the European Health Psychology Society Synergy Expert Meeting (n = 17), and the initiative consultant, following a two-day meeting (19-20th August 2021).</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":"16 4","pages":"475-491"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10528134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Understanding health behaviours in context: A systematic review and meta-analysis of ecological momentary assessment studies of five key health behaviours. 理解环境中的健康行为:对五种关键健康行为的生态瞬时评估研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 9.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2022.2112258
Olga Perski, Jan Keller, Dimitra Kale, Bernard Yeboah-Asiamah Asare, Verena Schneider, Daniel Powell, Felix Naughton, Gill Ten Hoor, Peter Verboon, Dominika Kwasnicka

Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) involves repeated, real-time sampling of health behaviours in context. We present the state-of-knowledge in EMA research focused on five key health behaviours (physical activity and sedentary behaviour, dietary behaviour, alcohol consumption, tobacco smoking, sexual health), summarising theoretical (e.g., psychological and contextual predictors) and methodological aspects (e.g., study characteristics, EMA adherence). We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science until February 2021. We included studies focused on any of the aforementioned health behaviours in adult, non-clinical populations that assessed ≥1 psychological/contextual predictor and reported a predictor-behaviour association. A narrative synthesis and random-effects meta-analyses of EMA adherence were conducted. We included 633 studies. The median study duration was 14 days. The most frequently assessed predictors were 'negative feeling states' (21%) and 'motivation and goals' (16.5%). The pooled percentage of EMA adherence was high at 81.4% (95% CI = 80.0%, 82.8%, k = 348) and did not differ by target behaviour but was somewhat higher in student (vs. general population) samples, when EMAs were delivered via mobile phones/smartphones (vs. handheld devices), and when event contingent (vs. fixed) sampling was used. This review showcases how the EMA method has been applied to improve understanding and prediction of health behaviours in context.

生态瞬时评估(EMA)涉及对环境中的健康行为进行重复的实时采样。我们介绍了EMA研究的现状,重点关注五种关键健康行为(身体活动和久坐行为、饮食行为、饮酒、吸烟、性健康),总结了理论(如心理和背景预测因素)和方法方面(如研究特征、EMA依从性)。我们检索了Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO和Web of Science,直到2021年2月。我们纳入了针对成人、非临床人群中任何上述健康行为的研究,这些研究评估了≥1个心理/环境预测因子,并报告了预测因子-行为关联。对EMA依从性进行叙事综合和随机效应荟萃分析。我们纳入了633项研究。中位研究持续时间为14天。最常被评估的预测因素是“消极情绪状态”(21%)和“动机和目标”(16.5%)。EMA依从性的总百分比高达81.4% (95% CI = 80.0%, 82.8%, k = 348),并没有因目标行为而异,但在学生(与一般人群)样本中,当通过移动电话/智能手机(与手持设备相比)提供EMA时,以及当使用事件偶然抽样(与固定抽样相比)时,EMA依从性的总百分比略高。这篇综述展示了EMA方法是如何应用于提高对环境中健康行为的理解和预测的。
{"title":"Understanding health behaviours in context: A systematic review and meta-analysis of ecological momentary assessment studies of five key health behaviours.","authors":"Olga Perski,&nbsp;Jan Keller,&nbsp;Dimitra Kale,&nbsp;Bernard Yeboah-Asiamah Asare,&nbsp;Verena Schneider,&nbsp;Daniel Powell,&nbsp;Felix Naughton,&nbsp;Gill Ten Hoor,&nbsp;Peter Verboon,&nbsp;Dominika Kwasnicka","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2022.2112258","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2022.2112258","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) involves repeated, real-time sampling of health behaviours in context. We present the state-of-knowledge in EMA research focused on five key health behaviours (physical activity and sedentary behaviour, dietary behaviour, alcohol consumption, tobacco smoking, sexual health), summarising theoretical (e.g., psychological and contextual predictors) and methodological aspects (e.g., study characteristics, EMA adherence). We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science until February 2021. We included studies focused on any of the aforementioned health behaviours in adult, non-clinical populations that assessed ≥1 psychological/contextual predictor and reported a predictor-behaviour association. A narrative synthesis and random-effects meta-analyses of EMA adherence were conducted. We included 633 studies. The median study duration was 14 days. The most frequently assessed predictors were 'negative feeling states' (21%) and 'motivation and goals' (16.5%). The pooled percentage of EMA adherence was high at 81.4% (95% CI = 80.0%, 82.8%, <i>k </i>= 348) and did not differ by target behaviour but was somewhat higher in student (vs. general population) samples, when EMAs were delivered via mobile phones/smartphones (vs. handheld devices), and when event contingent (vs. fixed) sampling was used. This review showcases how the EMA method has been applied to improve understanding and prediction of health behaviours in context.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":"16 4","pages":"576-601"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9704370/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10469008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
期刊
Health Psychology Review
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1