首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Safety Research最新文献

英文 中文
COVID-19 and speeding: Results of population-based survey of ontario drivers COVID-19 和超速:安大略省驾驶员人口调查结果
IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2024.08.005
Evelyn Vingilis , Jane Seeley , Christine M. Wickens , Brian Jonah , Jennifer Johnson , Mark J. Rapoport , Doug Beirness , Paul Boase

Introduction: During COVID-19, increased speeding was observed in many jurisdictions. Yet, evidence is limited on what factors predicted increased speeding during the pandemic. This study’s purpose was to examine speeding, and person and situation factors associated with increased speeding since the start of the pandemic. Methods: An online panel survey sampled 1,595 drivers using sex, age, and region quota sampling and weighting to approximate the Ontario, Canada adult population. Measures included: (1) person factors: socio-demographics (age, sex, region); psychological trait of risk propensity (Competitive Attitudes Toward Driving Scale (CATDS)); psychological states (distress - general and COVID-19-related); and behaviors (kilometers driven, alcohol use, police stops and collisions); and (2) COVID-19-related situation factors: perceived changes in (traffic volume, police enforcement). Results: 67.2% of respondents reported speeding; 7.2% reported increased speeding since the start of the pandemic. Bivariate analyses indicated that person factors of younger age, male sex, higher CATDS, higher distress, more alcohol use, more kilometers traveled, police stops, and collisions since the start of the pandemic were associated with increased speeding. Situation factor of perceived less traffic volume since the start of the pandemic was associated with increased speeding. Logistic regression analysis identified odds of reported increased speeding during the pandemic was significantly higher for drivers with higher scores on the CATDS, higher kilometers traveled, and more alcohol use during the pandemic. Conclusions: These findings suggest that higher risk propensity as well as the more kilometers driven and increased alcohol consumption were risk factors for increased speeding. Practical Applications:  COVID-19-related factors of lower traffic volume and enforcement are less predictive of increased speeding than driver personality and pandemic-related behaviors of more driving and drinking. Interventions to reduce speeding still need to focus on these person factors through education, enforcement, and strong sanctions for speeding.

导言:在 COVID-19 期间,许多地区都发现超速现象增多。然而,关于大流行期间哪些因素会导致超速现象增加的证据却很有限。本研究的目的是调查自大流行开始以来超速行驶的情况,以及与超速行驶增加相关的人员和环境因素。研究方法通过性别、年龄、地区配额抽样和加权,对 1595 名驾驶员进行了在线小组调查,以接近加拿大安大略省的成年人口。衡量标准包括(1) 个人因素:社会人口统计学(年龄、性别、地区);风险倾向心理特征(竞争驾驶态度量表 (CATDS));心理状态(痛苦--一般和 COVID-19 相关);行为(驾驶公里数、饮酒、警察拦截和碰撞);以及 (2) COVID-19 相关情况因素:感知到的变化(交通流量、警察执法)。结果67.2%的受访者报告超速行驶;7.2%的受访者报告自大流行病开始以来超速行驶的情况有所增加。双变量分析表明,年龄较小、性别为男性、CATDS 较高、痛苦程度较高、饮酒较多、行驶公里数较多、被警察拦截以及自大流行病开始以来发生过碰撞等个人因素与超速增加有关。自大流行开始以来,认为交通流量减少的情况因素与超速行驶增加有关。逻辑回归分析表明,在大流行期间,CATDS 分数较高、行驶公里数较高和饮酒较多的驾驶员报告超速的几率明显较高。结论:这些研究结果表明,较高的风险倾向、行驶公里数较多和饮酒较多是超速增加的风险因素。实际应用: 与 COVID-19 相关的低交通流量和执法因素对超速行驶增加的预测性低于驾驶员的个性以及与大流行相关的多驾驶和多饮酒行为。减少超速行驶的干预措施仍需通过教育、执法和对超速行驶的严厉处罚来关注这些个人因素。
{"title":"COVID-19 and speeding: Results of population-based survey of ontario drivers","authors":"Evelyn Vingilis ,&nbsp;Jane Seeley ,&nbsp;Christine M. Wickens ,&nbsp;Brian Jonah ,&nbsp;Jennifer Johnson ,&nbsp;Mark J. Rapoport ,&nbsp;Doug Beirness ,&nbsp;Paul Boase","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.08.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.08.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Introduction:</em> During COVID-19, increased speeding was observed in many jurisdictions. Yet, evidence is limited on what factors predicted increased speeding during the pandemic. This study’s purpose was to examine speeding, and person and situation factors associated with increased speeding since the start of the pandemic. <em>Methods:</em> An online panel survey sampled 1,595 drivers using sex, age, and region quota sampling and weighting to approximate the Ontario, Canada adult population. Measures included: (1) person factors: socio-demographics (age, sex, region); psychological trait of risk propensity (Competitive Attitudes Toward Driving Scale (CATDS)); psychological states (distress - general and COVID-19-related); and behaviors (kilometers driven, alcohol use, police stops and collisions); and (2) COVID-19-related situation factors: perceived changes in (traffic volume, police enforcement). <em>Results:</em> 67.2% of respondents reported speeding; 7.2% reported increased speeding since the start of the pandemic. Bivariate analyses indicated that person factors of younger age, male sex, higher CATDS, higher distress, more alcohol use, more kilometers traveled, police stops, and collisions since the start of the pandemic were associated with increased speeding. Situation factor of perceived less traffic volume since the start of the pandemic was associated with increased speeding. Logistic regression analysis identified odds of reported increased speeding during the pandemic was significantly higher for drivers with higher scores on the CATDS, higher kilometers traveled, and more alcohol use during the pandemic. <em>Conclusions:</em> These findings suggest that higher risk propensity as well as the more kilometers driven and increased alcohol consumption were risk factors for increased speeding. <em>Practical Applications:</em> <!--> COVID-19-related factors of lower traffic volume and enforcement are less predictive of increased speeding than driver personality and pandemic-related behaviors of more driving and drinking. Interventions to reduce speeding still need to focus on these person factors through education, enforcement, and strong sanctions for speeding.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"91 ","pages":"Pages 58-67"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142020448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Traumatic workplace injuries: A cross-sectional analysis of OSHA severe injury reports, including the impacts of seasonality and COVID-19 from 2015 to 2022 创伤性工伤:对 2015 年至 2022 年 OSHA 严重工伤报告的横截面分析,包括季节性和 COVID-19 的影响
IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2024.08.004
Augusta A. Williams, Jarvis Marc

Introduction: Millions of workers are injured on the job each year. Updated injury reporting regulations from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) in 2014 have resulted in publicly available data on reported severe injuries. Methods: OSHA severe injury reports (SIRs) were analyzed from 2015 to 2022. Severe injury rates were calculated using total employment estimates by industry and state to characterize the distribution of SIRs. Secondary analyses examined how SIRs differed seasonally, as well as before and after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: There were 83,338 severe workplace injuries reported across the 29 states that are under federal OSHA coverage. Manufacturing (375.98 per 100,000 workers) and Utilities (277.21 per 100,000 workers) had the highest rates of severe injuries. Despite summertime peaks in SIRs, there were not significant differences between seasons when examining SIRs by industry (p = 0.9763) or various injury factors. 1,846 of the SIRs were heat-related, and Utilities had the highest rate of heat-related severe injuries (13.34 per 100,000 workers). There was a statistically significant difference in the average injury rate when comparing pre- and post-COVID-19 periods (p < 0.001), which was statistically similar across all industries (p = 0.8143). Conclusions: Although several prior studies have examined the OSHA SIR data, this is the first known analysis of SIRs in relation to state- and industry-specific employment data. Despite the lack of a significant seasonality in SIRs, many industries seem to be impacted by heat-related injuries across all states. The number and rate of SIRs declined during COVID-19 similarly across all industries, with some industries maintaining low injury reporting rates through 2022. Practical Application: Findings of which industries and states may be experiencing a disproportionate burden of SIRs, including heat-related injuries, can inform injury prevention efforts. Additional work is needed to disentangle the drivers behind decreases in reported severe injuries during the COVID-19 pandemic.

导言:每年有数百万工人在工作中受伤。美国职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)于 2014 年更新了工伤报告条例,从而公开了有关严重工伤报告的数据。方法:分析了 2015 年至 2022 年的 OSHA 重伤报告 (SIR)。利用按行业和州分列的总就业人数估算值计算重伤率,以描述 SIR 的分布特征。二次分析研究了 SIR 的季节性差异以及 COVID-19 大流行开始前后的差异。结果:联邦职业安全与健康管理局覆盖的 29 个州共报告了 83,338 起严重工伤事故。制造业(每 10 万名工人 375.98 起)和公用事业(每 10 万名工人 277.21 起)的严重工伤率最高。尽管夏季是严重伤害事故发生率的高峰期,但在按行业(P = 0.9763)或各种伤害因素检查严重伤害事故发生率时,季节之间的差异并不显著。1,846 起 SIR 事件与高温有关,公用事业行业的高温重伤率最高(每 100,000 名工人中 13.34 起)。比较 COVID-19 前后两个时期的平均工伤率,在统计上有显著差异(p < 0.001),在统计上,所有行业的平均工伤率相似(p = 0.8143)。结论:尽管之前有几项研究对 OSHA SIR 数据进行了研究,但这是首次将 SIR 与各州和各行业的就业数据联系起来进行分析。尽管 SIR 没有明显的季节性,但各州的许多行业似乎都受到了与高温有关的伤害的影响。在 COVID-19 期间,所有行业的 SIR 数量和比率都出现了类似的下降,一些行业在 2022 年之前一直保持着较低的工伤报告率。实际应用:关于哪些行业和州可能正在经历不成比例的 SIR 负担(包括与高温有关的伤害)的研究结果可为伤害预防工作提供信息。我们还需要做更多的工作来揭示 COVID-19 大流行期间严重伤害报告率下降背后的驱动因素。
{"title":"Traumatic workplace injuries: A cross-sectional analysis of OSHA severe injury reports, including the impacts of seasonality and COVID-19 from 2015 to 2022","authors":"Augusta A. Williams,&nbsp;Jarvis Marc","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.08.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.08.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Introduction:</em> Millions of workers are injured on the job each year. Updated injury reporting regulations from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) in 2014 have resulted in publicly available data on reported severe injuries. <em>Methods:</em> OSHA severe injury reports (SIRs) were analyzed from 2015 to 2022. Severe injury rates were calculated using total employment estimates by industry and state to characterize the distribution of SIRs. Secondary analyses examined how SIRs differed seasonally, as well as before and after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. <em>Results:</em> There were 83,338 severe workplace injuries reported across the 29 states that are under federal OSHA coverage. Manufacturing (375.98 per 100,000 workers) and Utilities (277.21 per 100,000 workers) had the highest rates of severe injuries. Despite summertime peaks in SIRs, there were not significant differences between seasons when examining SIRs by industry (<em>p = 0.9763</em>) or various injury factors. 1,846 of the SIRs were heat-related, and Utilities had the highest rate of heat-related severe injuries (13.34 per 100,000 workers). There was a statistically significant difference in the average injury rate when comparing pre- and post-COVID-19 periods (<em>p &lt; 0.001</em>), which was statistically similar across all industries (<em>p = 0.8143</em>). <em>Conclusions:</em> Although several prior studies have examined the OSHA SIR data, this is the first known analysis of SIRs in relation to state- and industry-specific employment data. Despite the lack of a significant seasonality in SIRs, many industries seem to be impacted by heat-related injuries across all states. The number and rate of SIRs declined during COVID-19 similarly across all industries, with some industries maintaining low injury reporting rates through 2022. <em>Practical Application:</em> Findings of which industries and states may be experiencing a disproportionate burden of SIRs, including heat-related injuries, can inform injury prevention efforts. Additional work is needed to disentangle the drivers behind decreases in reported severe injuries during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"91 ","pages":"Pages 38-49"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142012143","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Head kinematics of human subjects during laboratory-induced ladder falls to the ground 人体在实验室诱发的梯子落地过程中的头部运动学特征
IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2024.08.003
Gabrielle M. Ferro , Steven Rowson , Michael L. Madigan

Introduction: Fall-induced traumatic brain injury (TBI) is considered one of the most serious occupational injuries in construction. Given the frequency of falls from ladders, knowledge of head kinematics during ladder falls to the ground may help inform any potential improvement to construction safety helmet design and improve their protection against head injury. Therefore, the goal of this descriptive study was to measure head kinematics during laboratory-induced ladder falls to the ground. Method: Eighteen young adults wearing a hockey helmet simulated construction tasks that challenged their balance while standing on stepladders and an extension ladder with their feet at heights up to 1.8 m above padding covering the ground. Falls onto the padding occurred spontaneously or were induced by an investigator nudging the ladder to simulate ladder movement resulting from the ground shifting. Optoelectronic motion capture was used to capture head kinematics up to the instant immediately before head impact. Results: Of 115 total falls, 15 involved head impact with the padding and were analyzed. Head impact during all 15 of these falls occurred on the back of the head. Immediately before impact with the padding, head vertical velocity ranged from 0.42 to 3.88 m/s and head angular velocity about a medial–lateral axis ranged from 60.1 to 1215.5 deg/s. Conclusions: These data can be used with computer simulations or headform impact testing to estimate true head impact kinematics, or to inform future versions of construction safety helmet testing standards. Practical applications: This is the first study we are aware of to capture head kinematics of human subjects during ladder falls to the ground. These results have the potential to inform future versions of construction safety helmet testing standards and contribute to improved helmet design for protection against fall-induced head injury.

导言:坠落导致的创伤性脑损伤(TBI)被认为是建筑业中最严重的职业伤害之一。鉴于从梯子上跌落的频率很高,了解梯子跌落地面时头部的运动学特性有助于为建筑安全帽设计的潜在改进提供信息,并提高其对头部损伤的保护能力。因此,本描述性研究的目的是测量实验室诱发的梯子落地时的头部运动学特性。研究方法戴着曲棍球头盔的 18 名年轻人模拟了挑战平衡能力的建筑任务,他们站在阶梯和加长梯上,双脚站在距离地面衬垫 1.8 米的高度上。摔倒在垫子上的情况有的是自发发生的,有的是由调查人员轻推梯子诱发的,以模拟地面移动导致的梯子移动。光电运动捕捉用于捕捉头部运动学数据,直至头部受到撞击前的瞬间。结果:在总共 115 次摔倒中,有 15 次涉及头部撞击垫子并进行了分析。在这 15 次跌倒中,头部撞击均发生在后脑勺。在头部撞击衬垫前,头部垂直速度范围为 0.42 至 3.88 米/秒,头部围绕内外侧轴的角速度范围为 60.1 至 1215.5 度/秒。结论:这些数据可用于计算机模拟或头模撞击测试,以估算真实的头部撞击运动学,或为未来版本的建筑安全头盔测试标准提供参考。实际应用:据我们所知,这是第一项捕捉人体在梯子跌落地面时头部运动学特性的研究。这些结果有可能为未来版本的建筑安全头盔测试标准提供参考,并有助于改进头盔设计,防止坠落引起的头部伤害。
{"title":"Head kinematics of human subjects during laboratory-induced ladder falls to the ground","authors":"Gabrielle M. Ferro ,&nbsp;Steven Rowson ,&nbsp;Michael L. Madigan","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.08.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.08.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Introduction:</em> Fall-induced traumatic brain injury (TBI) is considered one of the most serious occupational injuries in construction. Given the frequency of falls from ladders, knowledge of head kinematics during ladder falls to the ground may help inform any potential improvement to construction safety helmet design and improve their protection against head injury. Therefore, the goal of this descriptive study was to measure head kinematics during laboratory-induced ladder falls to the ground. <em>Method:</em> Eighteen young adults wearing a hockey helmet simulated construction tasks that challenged their balance while standing on stepladders and an extension ladder with their feet at heights up to 1.8 m above padding covering the ground. Falls onto the padding occurred spontaneously or were induced by an investigator nudging the ladder to simulate ladder movement resulting from the ground shifting. Optoelectronic motion capture was used to capture head kinematics up to the instant immediately before head impact. <em>Results:</em> Of 115 total falls, 15 involved head impact with the padding and were analyzed. Head impact during all 15 of these falls occurred on the back of the head. Immediately before impact with the padding, head vertical velocity ranged from 0.42 to 3.88 m/s and head angular velocity about a medial–lateral axis ranged from 60.1 to 1215.5 deg/s. <em>Conclusions:</em> These data can be used with computer simulations or headform impact testing to estimate true head impact kinematics, or to inform future versions of construction safety helmet testing standards. <em>Practical applications:</em> This is the first study we are aware of to capture head kinematics of human subjects during ladder falls to the ground. These results have the potential to inform future versions of construction safety helmet testing standards and contribute to improved helmet design for protection against fall-induced head injury.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"91 ","pages":"Pages 50-57"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142012144","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The effectiveness of driving simulator training on driving skills and safety in young novice drivers: A systematic review of interventions 驾驶模拟器培训对年轻新手驾驶技能和安全的影响:干预措施系统回顾
IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2024.08.002
Sarah Krasniuk , Ryan Toxopeus , Melissa Knott , Mackenzie McKeown , Alexander M. Crizzle

Introduction: This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of driving simulator training on simulated/on-road driving skills and safety in young novice drivers. Method: Searches were performed in Embase, Global Health, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, and on Google advanced, Google Scholar, and the Transport Research International Documentation websites. A total of 1,630 unique sources (titles and abstracts) were screened by two reviewers independently with 99 full-text articles reviewed for inclusion. Studies were included if they were a primary driving simulator intervention study that consisted of a randomized controlled trial, quasi-experimental, prospective cohort, and case-control design, published in English between January 1, 2010 and January 26, 2024. Results: The review included 15 studies published in 2010–2022 (study sample size ranged from 30 to 183,197). Findings showed that driving simulator training (compared to control conditions) can immediately improve simulated driving skills (e.g., adjustment to stimuli, lane maintenance, and speed regulation), although it was unclear whether simulator training can improve on-road driving skills or safety, immediately or longitudinally. Studies showed low quality of evidence with increased risks of selection bias, confounding factors, and type I errors influencing findings. Practical Applications: Since it is not known whether driving simulator training has short-term or long-term benefits on drivers’ real-world driving skills or safety, it should not replace any training offered in driver education programs. However, driving simulator training can be included in driver education programs to supplement the in-class and on-road training. Conclusions: The quality of evidence in this review shows low confidence on whether findings accurately reflect true effects on driving skills or safety. Further research should enhance the quality of evidence and demonstrate the transfer effects of driving simulator training to valid measures of real-world driving before recommending any integration of simulator training into standard practice.

导言:本系统综述评估了驾驶模拟器培训对年轻新手驾驶员的模拟/道路驾驶技能和安全性的影响。研究方法在 Embase、Global Health、Medline、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库以及 Google advanced、Google Scholar 和 Transport Research International Documentation 网站上进行了检索。两名审稿人分别独立筛选了 1,630 个独特的资料来源(标题和摘要),并对 99 篇全文进行了审阅。只要是在 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2024 年 1 月 26 日期间用英语发表的、由随机对照试验、准实验、前瞻性队列和病例对照设计组成的主要驾驶模拟器干预研究,均被纳入其中。研究结果回顾性研究包括 2010-2022 年间发表的 15 项研究(研究样本量从 30 到 183,197 不等)。研究结果表明,驾驶模拟器训练(与对照条件相比)可立即提高模拟驾驶技能(如适应刺激、车道保持和速度调节),但模拟器训练是否能立即或纵向提高道路驾驶技能或安全性尚不清楚。研究显示证据质量较低,选择偏差、混杂因素和 I 类错误影响研究结果的风险较高。实际应用:由于尚不清楚驾驶模拟器培训对驾驶者的实际驾驶技能或安全是否有短期或长期的益处,因此它不应取代驾驶教育项目中提供的任何培训。不过,驾驶模拟器培训可以纳入驾驶员教育计划,作为课堂培训和道路培训的补充。结论:本综述的证据质量显示,对于研究结果是否能准确反映出对驾驶技能或安全的真实影响,人们的信心不足。在建议将模拟器培训纳入标准实践之前,进一步的研究应提高证据的质量,并证明驾驶模拟器培训对真实世界驾驶的有效测量的转移效应。
{"title":"The effectiveness of driving simulator training on driving skills and safety in young novice drivers: A systematic review of interventions","authors":"Sarah Krasniuk ,&nbsp;Ryan Toxopeus ,&nbsp;Melissa Knott ,&nbsp;Mackenzie McKeown ,&nbsp;Alexander M. Crizzle","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.08.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.08.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Introduction:</em> This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of driving simulator training on simulated/on-road driving skills and safety in young novice drivers. <em>Method:</em> Searches were performed in Embase, Global Health, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, and on Google advanced, Google Scholar, and the Transport Research International Documentation websites. A total of 1,630 unique sources (titles and abstracts) were screened by two reviewers independently with 99 full-text articles reviewed for inclusion. Studies were included if they were a primary driving simulator intervention study that consisted of a randomized controlled trial, quasi-experimental, prospective cohort, and case-control design, published in English between January 1, 2010 and January 26, 2024. <em>Results:</em> The review included 15 studies published in 2010–2022 (study sample size ranged from 30 to 183,197). Findings showed that driving simulator training (compared to control conditions) can immediately improve simulated driving skills (e.g., adjustment to stimuli, lane maintenance, and speed regulation), although it was unclear whether simulator training can improve on-road driving skills or safety, immediately or longitudinally. Studies showed low quality of evidence with increased risks of selection bias, confounding factors, and type I errors influencing findings. <em>Practical Applications:</em> Since it is not known whether driving simulator training has short-term or long-term benefits on drivers’ real-world driving skills or safety, it should not replace any training offered in driver education programs. However, driving simulator training can be included in driver education programs to supplement the in-class and on-road training. <em>Conclusions:</em> The quality of evidence in this review shows low confidence on whether findings accurately reflect true effects on driving skills or safety. Further research should enhance the quality of evidence and demonstrate the transfer effects of driving simulator training to valid measures of real-world driving before recommending any integration of simulator training into standard practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"91 ","pages":"Pages 20-37"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437524000975/pdfft?md5=bf38d9eccb6dfca92364a841aee5f373&pid=1-s2.0-S0022437524000975-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142012131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Psychological safety and psychosocial safety climate in workplace: A bibliometric analysis and systematic review towards a research agenda 工作场所的心理安全和社会心理安全氛围:针对研究议程的文献计量分析和系统综述
IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2024.08.001
Rebecca Kechen Dong , Xiaomei Li , 'Banjo' Roxas Hernan

Introduction: Research on workplace safety has seen significant growth in academic and industry-focused literature over the past 20 years. However, the extant literature on workplace safety tends to focus on safety outcomes of physical accidents and injuries while relegating its conceptual and theoretical development to the background. Psychological safety and psychosocial safety climate in the workplace are essential to workers’ health and safety. These concepts are crucial in enabling job satisfaction, work engagement, and performance productivity. Progressing the literature on this subject is necessary to keep abreast with the changing dynamics of the post-COVID challenges, such as working from home, isolation, and stress from AI, among others. A significant gap in the extant literature burrows in the lack of conceptual clarity of workplace safety from a psychological perspective and the poor understanding of its substantive effects on organizations. Hence, re-examining workplace safety's conceptual and theoretical foundations from a psychological lens offers a more nuanced understanding of its potential to contribute to employee well-being and organizational resilience, pursuing a better work-life safe and more comfortable working environment. Method: This study: (a) synthesizes the theoretical propositions and empirical findings from 990 research articles published between 2000 and 2023 to map the existing body of knowledge about psychological safety and psychosocial safety climate, including their theoretical underpinnings and mechanisms, to offer a state-of-the-art overview of the scope of workplace occupational health and safety research from a psychological perspective; (b) applied a data-based research design adhering to PRISMA; (c) compiled descriptive synthesis and textual narrative syntheses through bibliometric analysis and a systematic literature review; and (d) opens the black box of workplace safety research by presenting significant findings to inform future conceptual, theoretical, and methodological research as well as the practice of workplace safety through the lens of psychology. Results: This study’s findings further offer managerial implications to workplace safety policy-making and human resource management practices to enhance employees’ psychological safety and eliminate workplace psychosocial hazards.

导言:在过去的 20 年里,有关工作场所安全的研究在学术界和以行业为重点的文献中取得了长足的发展。然而,关于工作场所安全的现有文献往往侧重于物理事故和伤害的安全结果,而将其概念和理论发展置于次要地位。工作场所的心理安全和社会心理安全氛围对工人的健康和安全至关重要。这些概念对于提高工作满意度、工作参与度和工作效率至关重要。为了跟上后职业安全与发展挑战(如在家工作、与世隔绝和来自人工智能的压力等)不断变化的动态,有必要推进有关这一主题的文献。现有文献中的一个重大空白在于,从心理学角度来看,工作场所安全的概念不够清晰,对其对组织的实质性影响也缺乏了解。因此,从心理学角度重新审视工作场所安全的概念和理论基础,可以更细致地了解工作场所安全在促进员工福祉和组织复原力、追求更好的工作-生活安全和更舒适的工作环境方面的潜力。研究方法本研究(a) 综合了 2000 年至 2023 年间发表的 990 篇研究文章中的理论命题和实证研究结果,描绘了有关心理安全和社会心理安全氛围的现有知识体系,包括其理论基础和机制,从而从心理学角度对工作场所职业健康与安全的研究范围进行了最新概述;(b) 采用基于数据的研究设计,遵守 PRISMA;(c) 通过文献计量分析和系统性文献综述,编制描述性综述和文本叙述性综述;(d) 打开工作场所安全研究的黑盒子,提出重要发现,为未来的概念、理论和方法研究以及通过心理学视角的工作场所安全实践提供参考。研究结果本研究的发现进一步为工作场所安全政策制定和人力资源管理实践提供了管理启示,以提高员工的心理安全,消除工作场所的社会心理危害。
{"title":"Psychological safety and psychosocial safety climate in workplace: A bibliometric analysis and systematic review towards a research agenda","authors":"Rebecca Kechen Dong ,&nbsp;Xiaomei Li ,&nbsp;'Banjo' Roxas Hernan","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.08.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.08.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Introduction:</em> Research on workplace safety has seen significant growth in academic and industry-focused literature over the past 20 years. However, the extant literature on workplace safety tends to focus on safety outcomes of physical accidents and injuries while relegating its conceptual and theoretical development to the background. Psychological safety and psychosocial safety climate in the workplace are essential to workers’ health and safety. These concepts are crucial in enabling job satisfaction, work engagement, and performance productivity. Progressing the literature on this subject is necessary to keep abreast with the changing dynamics of the post-COVID challenges, such as working from home, isolation, and stress from AI, among others. A significant gap in the extant literature burrows in the lack of conceptual clarity of workplace safety from a psychological perspective and the poor understanding of its substantive effects on organizations. Hence, re-examining workplace safety's conceptual and theoretical foundations from a psychological lens offers a more nuanced understanding of its potential to contribute to employee well-being and organizational resilience, pursuing a better work-life safe and more comfortable working environment. <em>Method:</em> This study: (a) synthesizes the theoretical propositions and empirical findings from 990 research articles published between 2000 and 2023 to map the existing body of knowledge about psychological safety and psychosocial safety climate, including their theoretical underpinnings and mechanisms, to offer a state-of-the-art overview of the scope of workplace occupational health and safety research from a psychological perspective; (b) applied a data-based research design adhering to PRISMA; (c) compiled descriptive synthesis and textual narrative syntheses through bibliometric analysis and a systematic literature review; and (d) opens the black box of workplace safety research by presenting significant findings to inform future conceptual, theoretical, and methodological research as well as the practice of workplace safety through the lens of psychology. <em>Results:</em> This study’s findings further offer managerial implications to workplace safety policy-making and human resource management practices to enhance employees’ psychological safety and eliminate workplace psychosocial hazards.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"91 ","pages":"Pages 1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437524000963/pdfft?md5=ccb83ab25b916fd7893f1dd53fe6d7cf&pid=1-s2.0-S0022437524000963-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142012130","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Meta-analysis of the safety effect of electronic stability control 电子稳定控制系统安全效果的元分析
IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2024.07.004
A.E. af Wåhlberg, L. Dorn

Objective: Electronic Stability Control (ESC) is a standard feature on most modern cars, due to its reported efficiency to reduce the number of crashes of several types. However, empirical studies of safety effects of ESC for passenger vehicles have not considered some methodological problems that might have inflated the effects. This includes self-selection of drivers who buy/use ESC and behavioral adaptation to the system over long time periods, but also the dominant method of induced exposure. This study aimed to investigate whether such methodological problems might have influenced the results. Method: A meta-analysis was undertaken to investigate whether there are systematic differences between published studies. Moderators tested included when the study was undertaken, the type of vehicle studied, the percent ESC in the sample, size of sample, the length of the study, whether matched or un-matched vehicles were studied, whether induced exposure was used, and two variants of types of crashes used as controls. Results: The effects found ranged from 38% to 75% reduction of crashes for the main targets of singles, running off road and rollover crashes. However, these effects were heterogeneous, and differed depending on the methods used. Most importantly, information that could have allowed more precise analyses of the moderators were missing in most publications. Conclusions: Although average effects were large and in agreement with previous meta-analyses, heterogeneity of the data was large, and lack of information about important moderators means that firm conclusions about what kind of mechanisms were influencing the effects cannot be drawn. The available data on ESC efficiency are not unanimous, and further investigations into the effects of ESC on safety using different methodologies are warranted.

目的:电子稳定控制系统(ESC)是大多数现代汽车的标准配置,据报道它能有效减少几种类型的碰撞事故。然而,对乘用车电子稳定性控制系统(ESC)安全效果的实证研究并没有考虑到一些可能会夸大效果的方法问题。这包括购买/使用电子稳定性控制系统的驾驶员的自我选择和长期对系统的行为适应,以及诱导暴露的主要方法。本研究旨在调查这些方法问题是否会影响研究结果。研究方法进行了一项荟萃分析,以调查已发表的研究之间是否存在系统性差异。测试的调节因素包括:研究进行的时间、研究车辆的类型、样本中 ESC 的百分比、样本的大小、研究时间的长短、研究的是匹配车辆还是非匹配车辆、是否使用了诱导暴露以及作为对照的两种碰撞类型。研究结果研究发现,对于单车、冲出道路和翻车等主要目标,减少碰撞事故的效果从 38% 到 75% 不等。然而,这些效果并不均衡,而且因使用的方法不同而各异。最重要的是,在大多数出版物中都缺少能够对调节因素进行更精确分析的信息。结论:虽然平均效应很大,而且与之前的荟萃分析结果一致,但数据的异质性很大,而且缺乏关于重要调节因素的信息,这意味着无法就影响效应的机制得出确切结论。关于ESC效率的现有数据并不一致,因此有必要使用不同的方法进一步研究ESC对安全性的影响。
{"title":"Meta-analysis of the safety effect of electronic stability control","authors":"A.E. af Wåhlberg,&nbsp;L. Dorn","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.07.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.07.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Objective</em>: Electronic Stability Control (ESC) is a standard feature on most modern cars, due to its reported efficiency to reduce the number of crashes of several types. However, empirical studies of safety effects of ESC for passenger vehicles have not considered some methodological problems that might have inflated the effects. This includes self-selection of drivers who buy/use ESC and behavioral adaptation to the system over long time periods, but also the dominant method of induced exposure. This study aimed to investigate whether such methodological problems might have influenced the results. <em>Method:</em> A <em>meta</em>-analysis was undertaken to investigate whether there are systematic differences between published studies. Moderators tested included when the study was undertaken, the type of vehicle studied, the percent ESC in the sample, size of sample, the length of the study, whether matched or un-matched vehicles were studied, whether induced exposure was used, and two variants of types of crashes used as controls. <em>Results:</em> The effects found ranged from 38% to 75% reduction of crashes for the main targets of singles, running off road and rollover crashes. However, these effects were heterogeneous, and differed depending on the methods used. Most importantly, information that could have allowed more precise analyses of the moderators were missing in most publications. <em>Conclusions:</em> Although average effects were large and in agreement with previous <em>meta</em>-analyses, heterogeneity of the data was large, and lack of information about important moderators means that firm conclusions about what kind of mechanisms were influencing the effects cannot be drawn. The available data on ESC efficiency are not unanimous, and further investigations into the effects of ESC on safety using different methodologies are warranted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"90 ","pages":"Pages 350-370"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437524000938/pdfft?md5=1c6998e5f667c0b4daef775d1f544b8d&pid=1-s2.0-S0022437524000938-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141962392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Examining strategies, policies, and guidance for addressing wrong-way driving in the United States: A comprehensive national survey 研究美国解决错向驾驶问题的战略、政策和指南:全国综合调查
IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2024.06.009
Yukun Song , Huaguo Zhou , Priscilla Tobias , Qing Chang

Introduction: This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the current and emerging solutions, policies, and guidance employed by various agencies to mitigate wrong-way driving (WWD) activities in the United States. The study utilized a two-pronged approach, involving an online survey and follow-up phone interviews with respondents from state transportation agencies, tollway authorities, and law enforcement. Methods: The initial step involved conducting an online survey to gather general insights about the existing strategies and practices used to combat WWD. The survey questionnaire, consisting of 12 questions, covered topics such as mitigation strategies/policies, guidance for selecting countermeasures, and topics/needs for national handbook. The survey was emailed to traffic and safety engineers from all 50 state transportation agencies and 59 tollway authorities across the nation. As the second step, follow-up phone interviews were conducted with respondents identified from the online survey. The interviews delved deeper into specific aspects such as crash/incident data collection methods, identification of crash-prone locations, countermeasure selection and implementation, experience with Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) applications, and future initiatives. Results: The findings from the survey and interviews indicated an increasing awareness and adoption of best practices to combat WWD. Various states have implemented new policies and advanced technologies to deter WWD incidents. The insights gathered from the survey and interviews with different agencies are invaluable in shaping safe system approaches and guidelines for the national handbook on WWD solutions. Practical applications: Overall, this study sheds light on the efforts and progress made by state transportation agencies, tollway authorities, and law enforcement in addressing the critical issue of WWD. By gathering valuable lessons and practices from the various agencies, this research lays the groundwork for developing national guidelines to reduce WWD crashes and incidents on divided highways.

本文全面调查了美国各机构为减少错向驾驶(WWD)活动而采用的现有和新兴解决方案、政策和指南。研究采用了双管齐下的方法,包括在线调查和对来自各州交通机构、收费公路管理部门和执法部门的受访者进行后续电话采访。第一步是进行在线调查,收集有关打击 WWD 的现有策略和做法的一般见解。调查问卷由 12 个问题组成,涉及的主题包括缓解策略/政策、对策选择指南以及国家手册的主题/需求。调查问卷通过电子邮件发送给全国 50 个州交通机构和 59 个收费公路管理机构的交通和安全工程师。第二步,对在线调查中确定的受访者进行了后续电话访谈。访谈深入探讨了碰撞/事故数据收集方法、碰撞易发地点识别、对策选择和实施、智能交通系统(ITS)应用经验以及未来计划等具体方面。调查和访谈的结果表明,人们对防治 WWD 的最佳做法的认识和采用程度都在不断提高。各州都实施了新政策和先进技术,以遏制 WWD 事件。从调查和与不同机构的访谈中收集到的见解,对于制定安全系统方法和国家 WWD 解决方案手册的指导方针非常有价值。总之,本研究揭示了各州交通机构、收费公路管理部门和执法部门在解决 WWD 这一关键问题上所做的努力和取得的进展。通过收集各机构的宝贵经验和做法,本研究为制定国家指导方针以减少分隔高速公路上的 WWD 事故奠定了基础。
{"title":"Examining strategies, policies, and guidance for addressing wrong-way driving in the United States: A comprehensive national survey","authors":"Yukun Song ,&nbsp;Huaguo Zhou ,&nbsp;Priscilla Tobias ,&nbsp;Qing Chang","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.06.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.06.009","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Introduction:</em> This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the current and emerging solutions, policies, and guidance employed by various agencies to mitigate wrong-way driving (WWD) activities in the United States. The study utilized a two-pronged approach, involving an online survey and follow-up phone interviews with respondents from state transportation agencies, tollway authorities, and law enforcement. <em>Methods:</em> The initial step involved conducting an online survey to gather general insights about the existing strategies and practices used to combat WWD. The survey questionnaire, consisting of 12 questions, covered topics such as mitigation strategies/policies, guidance for selecting countermeasures, and topics/needs for national handbook. The survey was emailed to traffic and safety engineers from all 50 state transportation agencies and 59 tollway authorities across the nation. As the second step, follow-up phone interviews were conducted with respondents identified from the online survey. The interviews delved deeper into specific aspects such as crash/incident data collection methods, identification of crash-prone locations, countermeasure selection and implementation, experience with Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) applications, and future initiatives. <em>Results:</em> The findings from the survey and interviews indicated an increasing awareness and adoption of best practices to combat WWD. Various states have implemented new policies and advanced technologies to deter WWD incidents. The insights gathered from the survey and interviews with different agencies are invaluable in shaping safe system approaches and guidelines for the national handbook on WWD solutions. <em>Practical applications:</em> Overall, this study sheds light on the efforts and progress made by state transportation agencies, tollway authorities, and law enforcement in addressing the critical issue of WWD. By gathering valuable lessons and practices from the various agencies, this research lays the groundwork for developing national guidelines to reduce WWD crashes and incidents on divided highways.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"90 ","pages":"Pages 341-349"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141884360","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development of an algorithm for analysis of routes: Case studies using novice and older drivers 开发路线分析算法:使用新手和老司机进行案例研究
IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2024.07.003
Siyao Zhu , Theresa J. Chirles , Joel A. Keller , Andrew Hellinger , Yifang Xu , Gayane Yenokyan , Chia-Hsiu Chang , Rebecca Weast , Jeffrey N. Keller , Takeru Igusa , Johnathon P. Ehsani

Introduction: This study addresses the lack of methods to quantify driver familiarity with roadways, which poses a higher risk of crashes. Method: We present a new approach to assessing driving route diversity and familiarity using data from the DrivingApp, a smartphone-based research tool that collects trip-level information, including driving exposure and global positioning system (GPS) data, from young novice drivers (15–19 years old) to older drivers (67–78 years old). Using these data, we developed a GPS data-based algorithm to analyze the uniqueness of driving routes. The algorithm creates same route trip (SRT) arrays by comparing each trip of an identified user, employing statistically determined thresholds for GPS coordinate proximity and trip overlap. The optimal thresholds were established using a General Linear Model (GLM) to examine distance, and repeated observations. The Adjusted Breadth-First Search method is applied to the SRT arrays to prevent double counting or trip omission. The resulting list is classified as geographically distinct routes, or unique routes (URs). Results: Manual comparison of algorithm output with geographical maps yielded an overall precision of 0.93 and accuracy of 0.91. The algorithm produces two main outputs: a measure of driving diversity (number of URs) and a measure of route-based familiarity derived from the Rescorla–Wagner model. To evaluate the utility of these measures, a Gaussian mixture model clustering algorithm was used on the young novice driver dataset, revealing two distinct groups: the low-frequency driving group with lower route familiarity when having higher route diversity, whereas the high-frequency driving group with the opposite pattern. In the older driver group, there was a significant correlation found between the number of URs and Geriatric Depression Score, or walking gait speed. Practical Applications: These findings suggest that route diversity and familiarity could complement existing measures to understand driving safety and how driving behavior is related to physical and psychological outcomes.

驾驶员对道路的熟悉程度会导致更高的撞车风险,而目前缺乏量化驾驶员对道路熟悉程度的方法。我们提出了一种评估驾驶路线多样性和熟悉程度的新方法,使用的数据来自于基于智能手机的研究工具 "GPS",该工具可收集年轻新手驾驶员(15-19 岁)到年长驾驶员(67-78 岁)的行程信息,包括驾驶暴露和全球定位系统 (GPS) 数据。利用这些数据,我们开发了一种基于 GPS 数据的算法来分析驾驶路线的独特性。该算法通过对已识别用户的每次行程进行比较,采用统计确定的 GPS 坐标邻近度和行程重叠度阈值,创建相同路线行程 (SRT) 阵列。最佳阈值是通过使用一般线性模型(GLM)检查距离和重复观测确定的。调整后的广度优先搜索法适用于 SRT 阵列,以防止重复计算或行程遗漏。得出的列表被归类为地理上不同的路线或独特路线(UR)。人工将算法输出与地理地图进行比较,得出的总体精确度为 0.93,准确度为 0.91。该算法有两个主要输出结果:驾驶多样性度量(UR 数量)和基于 Rescorla-Wagner 模型的路线熟悉度量。为了评估这些测量方法的实用性,我们在年轻新手驾驶员数据集上使用了高斯混合模型聚类算法,结果显示出两个不同的组别:低频率驾驶组在路线多样性较高的情况下路线熟悉度较低,而高频率驾驶组则相反。在老年驾驶员组中,UR次数与老年抑郁评分或步行步速之间存在显著相关性。这些研究结果表明,路线多样性和熟悉程度可以补充现有的测量方法,从而了解驾驶安全以及驾驶行为与生理和心理结果之间的关系。
{"title":"Development of an algorithm for analysis of routes: Case studies using novice and older drivers","authors":"Siyao Zhu ,&nbsp;Theresa J. Chirles ,&nbsp;Joel A. Keller ,&nbsp;Andrew Hellinger ,&nbsp;Yifang Xu ,&nbsp;Gayane Yenokyan ,&nbsp;Chia-Hsiu Chang ,&nbsp;Rebecca Weast ,&nbsp;Jeffrey N. Keller ,&nbsp;Takeru Igusa ,&nbsp;Johnathon P. Ehsani","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.07.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Introduction:</em> This study addresses the lack of methods to quantify driver familiarity with roadways, which poses a higher risk of crashes. <em>Method:</em> We present a new approach to assessing driving route diversity and familiarity using data from the <em>DrivingApp</em>, a smartphone-based research tool that collects trip-level information, including driving exposure and global positioning system (GPS) data, from young novice drivers (15–19 years old) to older drivers (67–78 years old). Using these data, we developed a GPS data-based algorithm to analyze the uniqueness of driving routes. The algorithm creates same route trip (SRT) arrays by comparing each trip of an identified user, employing statistically determined thresholds for GPS coordinate proximity and trip overlap. The optimal thresholds were established using a General Linear Model (GLM) to examine distance, and repeated observations. The Adjusted Breadth-First Search method is applied to the SRT arrays to prevent double counting or trip omission. The resulting list is classified as geographically distinct routes, or unique routes (URs). <em>Results:</em> Manual comparison of algorithm output with geographical maps yielded an overall precision of 0.93 and accuracy of 0.91. The algorithm produces two main outputs: a measure of driving diversity (number of URs) and a measure of route-based familiarity derived from the Rescorla–Wagner model. To evaluate the utility of these measures, a Gaussian mixture model clustering algorithm was used on the young novice driver dataset, revealing two distinct groups: the low-frequency driving group with lower route familiarity when having higher route diversity, whereas the high-frequency driving group with the opposite pattern. In the older driver group, there was a significant correlation found between the number of URs and Geriatric Depression Score, or walking gait speed. <em>Practical Applications:</em> These findings suggest that route diversity and familiarity could complement existing measures to understand driving safety and how driving behavior is related to physical and psychological outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"90 ","pages":"Pages 319-332"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141884247","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing psychological distress of healthcare workers with and without work injuries: The role of job control 评估有工伤和无工伤医护人员的心理困扰:工作控制的作用
IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2024.07.001
Joshua Davis , Steve Granger , Nick Turner

Introduction: The study investigates the relationship between work-related injuries, psychological distress, and the influence of perceived job control on healthcare workers, using Bakker and Demerouti’s (2007) job demands-resources model as theoretical grounding. Method: We analyzed data from 610 healthcare workers (81.1% female) at a northern UK hospital, incorporating both self-reported and organizationally recorded work injury incidents over the three years preceding the survey, along with measures of psychological distress and perceived job control. Results: Unexpectedly, we found that the occurrence of work-related injuries, irrespective of the method of reporting, is not related to lower psychological distress among those employees who report a high level of job control. This relationship holds even when adjusting for various demographic and occupational variables. Conclusions and Practical Applications: Given the prevalence of work injuries in the healthcare sector, our findings suggest a need for a deeper exploration into how job characteristics might interact to offset the consequences of work injuries, challenging existing assumptions and opening new avenues for research into the psychology of workplace safety.

本研究以工作需求-资源模型为理论基础,探讨了工伤、心理压力和感知到的工作控制对医护人员的影响之间的关系。我们分析了英国北部一家医院的 610 名医护人员(81.1% 为女性)的数据,包括调查前三年内自我报告和组织记录的工伤事故,以及心理困扰和感知工作控制的测量值。出乎意料的是,我们发现无论采用哪种工伤事故报告方式,工伤事故的发生与那些报告工作控制能力较强的员工的心理压力较低并无关系。即使对各种人口统计学和职业变量进行调整,这种关系仍然存在:鉴于工伤在医疗保健行业的普遍性,我们的研究结果表明,有必要深入探讨工作特征可能如何相互作用以抵消工伤的后果,这对现有假设提出了挑战,并为工作场所安全心理学的研究开辟了新途径。
{"title":"Assessing psychological distress of healthcare workers with and without work injuries: The role of job control","authors":"Joshua Davis ,&nbsp;Steve Granger ,&nbsp;Nick Turner","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.07.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.07.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Introduction:</em> The study investigates the relationship between work-related injuries, psychological distress, and the influence of perceived job control on healthcare workers, using <span><span>Bakker and Demerouti’s (2007)</span></span> job demands-resources model as theoretical grounding. <em>Method:</em> We analyzed data from 610 healthcare workers (81.1% female) at a northern UK hospital, incorporating both self-reported and organizationally recorded work injury incidents over the three years preceding the survey, along with measures of psychological distress and perceived job control. <em>Results:</em> Unexpectedly, we found that the occurrence of work-related injuries, irrespective of the method of reporting, is not related to lower psychological distress among those employees who report a high level of job control. This relationship holds even when adjusting for various demographic and occupational variables. <em>Conclusions and Practical Applications</em>: Given the prevalence of work injuries in the healthcare sector, our findings suggest a need for a deeper exploration into how job characteristics might interact to offset the consequences of work injuries, challenging existing assumptions and opening new avenues for research into the psychology of workplace safety.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"90 ","pages":"Pages 333-340"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437524000902/pdfft?md5=4254b46948886b44cb7ff7ffc04bd513&pid=1-s2.0-S0022437524000902-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141887228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Which drivers drive as they live and who are transformed while driving? Analysis of moderators in the relationship between general anger and driving anger 哪些司机会边开车边生活,哪些司机会在开车时转变?一般愤怒与驾驶愤怒之间关系的调节因素分析
IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2024.07.002
David Herrero-Fernández , Smaranda R. Bogdan-Ganea , Carla Álvarez-Ferradas , Juan Luis Martín-Ayala

Introduction: Trait driving anger is a widely studied personality variable in the field of road safety, due to its strong relationship with both risky behavior on the road and crash-related events. The Deffenbacher’s Driving Anger Scale theoretical approach has underlined different situations that could provoke anger in drivers, although trait driving anger is usually analyzed as a whole. Trait general anger has been proposed as one of the most relevant predictors of trait driving anger, showing moderate relationships with it. Method: The current research aimed to analyze the relationship between trait general anger and each one of the situations provoking anger, as well as to search for personality variables that could moderate these relationships. Based on literature review, it was expected that self-esteem would moderate both Discourtesy and Hostile gestures, Type-A behavior pattern would moderate both Slow driving and Traffic obstructions, and conscientiousness would moderate both Police presence and Illegal driving. A sample of 417 drivers (Mage = 31.24, SDage = 13.59, 64.5% females) taken from the Spanish general population completed a set of self-reports. Results: The results showed significant moderation effects in the case of Hostile gestures, Discourtesy, Illegal driving, and Slow driving. Conditional processes of these moderations were analyzed. Lastly, practical implications are discussed, allowing for tailored interventions to be implemented based on individual drivers' tendencies. Therefore, interventions should address different triggers of driving anger: boosting self-esteem for those angered by disrespect, targeting Type-A behavior reduction for those angered by traffic slowdowns, and promoting conscientiousness enhancement for those angered by others' risky driving.

简介特质性驾驶愤怒是道路安全领域广泛研究的一个人格变量,因为它与道路上的危险行为和车祸相关事件都有密切关系。德芬巴赫驾驶愤怒量表的理论方法强调了可能激起驾驶者愤怒的不同情况,但通常将特质驾驶愤怒作为一个整体进行分析。一般特质愤怒被认为是特质驾驶愤怒最相关的预测因素之一,与驾驶愤怒的关系适中。研究方法目前的研究旨在分析特质性一般愤怒与每一种激怒情况之间的关系,并寻找可能缓和这些关系的人格变量。根据文献综述,预计自尊会调节无礼和敌意手势,A 型行为模式会调节慢速驾驶和交通阻塞,自觉性会调节警察在场和非法驾驶。从西班牙普通人群中抽取的 417 名驾驶员(平均年龄 31.24 岁,最小年龄 13.59 岁,64.5% 为女性)完成了一套自我报告。结果显示结果显示,敌意手势、不礼貌、非法驾驶和慢速驾驶具有明显的调节作用。对这些调节作用的条件过程进行了分析。最后,讨论了实际意义,以便根据驾驶员的个人倾向实施有针对性的干预措施。因此,干预措施应针对不同的驾驶愤怒诱因:对于因不尊重而愤怒的人,应增强其自尊心;对于因交通减速而愤怒的人,应减少其A型行为;对于因他人危险驾驶而愤怒的人,应提高其自觉性。
{"title":"Which drivers drive as they live and who are transformed while driving? Analysis of moderators in the relationship between general anger and driving anger","authors":"David Herrero-Fernández ,&nbsp;Smaranda R. Bogdan-Ganea ,&nbsp;Carla Álvarez-Ferradas ,&nbsp;Juan Luis Martín-Ayala","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.07.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.07.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Introduction</em>: Trait driving anger is a widely studied personality variable in the field of road safety, due to its strong relationship with both risky behavior on the road and crash-related events. The Deffenbacher’s Driving Anger Scale theoretical approach has underlined different situations that could provoke anger in drivers, although trait driving anger is usually analyzed as a whole. Trait general anger has been proposed as one of the most relevant predictors of trait driving anger, showing moderate relationships with it. <em>Method:</em> The current research aimed to analyze the relationship between trait general anger and each one of the situations provoking anger, as well as to search for personality variables that could moderate these relationships. Based on literature review, it was expected that self-esteem would moderate both Discourtesy and Hostile gestures, Type-A behavior pattern would moderate both Slow driving and Traffic obstructions, and conscientiousness would moderate both Police presence and Illegal driving. A sample of 417 drivers (M<sub>age</sub> = 31.24, SD<sub>age</sub> = 13.59, 64.5% females) taken from the Spanish general population completed a set of self-reports. <em>Results:</em> The results showed significant moderation effects in the case of Hostile gestures, Discourtesy, Illegal driving, and Slow driving. Conditional processes of these moderations were analyzed. Lastly, practical implications are discussed, allowing for tailored interventions to be implemented based on individual drivers' tendencies. Therefore, interventions should address different triggers of driving anger: boosting self-esteem for those angered by disrespect, targeting Type-A behavior reduction for those angered by traffic slowdowns, and promoting conscientiousness enhancement for those angered by others' risky driving.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"90 ","pages":"Pages 295-305"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141949966","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Safety Research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1