首页 > 最新文献

Futures最新文献

英文 中文
The role of universities in AI augmented anticipatory governance: Towards a maturity model proposition 大学在人工智能增强预期治理中的作用:迈向成熟度模型命题
IF 3.8 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2025-12-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2025.103753
Mateus Panizzon (Prof.) , Raquel Janissek-Muniz (Prof.)
Facing increasing complexity, uncertainty, and rapid transformations in climate, technology, and geopolitics, traditional governance models often fall short in providing the preparedness, adaptiveness, and inclusive decision-making required for sustainable policymaking. Anticipatory Governance (AG) has therefore emerged as a forward-looking approach grounded in systemic foresight and proactive capacity-building for open and complex systems. Within this context, universities—especially those with strong research, innovation, and societal engagement capabilities—play an increasingly strategic role as anticipatory agents embedded in complex knowledge and governance ecosystems. This conceptual study synthesizes existing literature to propose a comprehensive maturity model that outlines how universities can build and institutionalize AI-augmented AG capabilities. Drawing on a systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines, peer-reviewed studies were analyzed through a combined Technology–Organization–Environment (TOE) and Antecedents–Behavior–Consequences (ABC) at organizational level, analytical lens. The synthesis identifies four foundational pillars—(1) research and knowledge generation, (2) education and capacity building, (3) community engagement, and (4) policy influence—complemented by a fifth pillar focused on Responsible AI infrastructure and applied capabilities. The resulting five-stage maturity model illustrates how universities evolve from fragmented, ad hoc foresight initiatives toward fully institutionalized, AI-enabled systems of anticipatory learning, strategic intelligence, and decision-making. The study also discusses practical challenges, including funding constraints, leadership configurations, institutional path dependencies, and regional diversity, offering policy implications for strengthening university–government foresight interfaces. By integrating futures studies, anticipatory governance, and responsible AI, this article contributes a novel framework that positions universities as distributed hubs of anticipation within regional, national, and international governance ecosystems. In contexts such as emerging countries—where governmental resources for foresight, risk management, and long-term planning remain limited—universities can play a critical complementary role by offering anticipatory capacity, scientific legitimacy, and convening power. This study advances both scholarly understanding and institutional practice, presenting the first integrated framework connecting AG and AI in higher education, and providing a foundation for future empirical validation and cross-regional resilience and regeneration.
面对气候、技术和地缘政治日益增加的复杂性、不确定性和快速变化,传统的治理模式往往无法提供可持续决策所需的准备、适应性和包容性决策。因此,预见性治理已成为一种前瞻性方法,其基础是对开放和复杂系统的系统性预见和主动能力建设。在这种背景下,大学——尤其是那些具有强大研究、创新和社会参与能力的大学——在复杂的知识和治理生态系统中扮演着越来越重要的战略角色。本概念性研究综合了现有文献,提出了一个全面的成熟度模型,该模型概述了大学如何建立和制度化人工智能增强的AG能力。在遵循PRISMA指南的系统文献综述的基础上,通过组织层面的技术-组织-环境(TOE)和前因-行为-后果(ABC)相结合的分析视角,对同行评议的研究进行了分析。该综合报告确定了四个基本支柱(1)研究和知识生成,(2)教育和能力建设,(3)社区参与,(4)政策影响,并辅以第五个支柱,重点是负责任的人工智能基础设施和应用能力。由此产生的五阶段成熟度模型说明了大学如何从分散的、临时的前瞻性举措发展到完全制度化的、人工智能支持的预见性学习、战略情报和决策系统。该研究还讨论了实际挑战,包括资金限制、领导配置、制度路径依赖和区域多样性,为加强大学-政府远见界面提供了政策启示。通过整合未来研究、预期治理和负责任的人工智能,本文提供了一个新的框架,将大学定位为区域、国家和国际治理生态系统中的分布式预期中心。在新兴国家这样的背景下,政府用于远见、风险管理和长期规划的资源仍然有限,大学可以通过提供预测能力、科学合法性和号召力发挥关键的补充作用。该研究促进了学术理解和制度实践,提出了高等教育中第一个连接人工智能和人工智能的综合框架,并为未来的实证验证和跨区域的复原力和再生奠定了基础。
{"title":"The role of universities in AI augmented anticipatory governance: Towards a maturity model proposition","authors":"Mateus Panizzon (Prof.) ,&nbsp;Raquel Janissek-Muniz (Prof.)","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103753","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103753","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Facing increasing complexity, uncertainty, and rapid transformations in climate, technology, and geopolitics, traditional governance models often fall short in providing the preparedness, adaptiveness, and inclusive decision-making required for sustainable policymaking. Anticipatory Governance (AG) has therefore emerged as a forward-looking approach grounded in systemic foresight and proactive capacity-building for open and complex systems. Within this context, universities—especially those with strong research, innovation, and societal engagement capabilities—play an increasingly strategic role as anticipatory agents embedded in complex knowledge and governance ecosystems. This conceptual study synthesizes existing literature to propose a comprehensive maturity model that outlines how universities can build and institutionalize AI-augmented AG capabilities. Drawing on a systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines, peer-reviewed studies were analyzed through a combined Technology–Organization–Environment (TOE) and Antecedents–Behavior–Consequences (ABC) at organizational level, analytical lens. The synthesis identifies four foundational pillars—(1) research and knowledge generation, (2) education and capacity building, (3) community engagement, and (4) policy influence—complemented by a fifth pillar focused on Responsible AI infrastructure and applied capabilities. The resulting five-stage maturity model illustrates how universities evolve from fragmented, ad hoc foresight initiatives toward fully institutionalized, AI-enabled systems of anticipatory learning, strategic intelligence, and decision-making. The study also discusses practical challenges, including funding constraints, leadership configurations, institutional path dependencies, and regional diversity, offering policy implications for strengthening university–government foresight interfaces. By integrating futures studies, anticipatory governance, and responsible AI, this article contributes a novel framework that positions universities as distributed hubs of anticipation within regional, national, and international governance ecosystems. In contexts such as emerging countries—where governmental resources for foresight, risk management, and long-term planning remain limited—universities can play a critical complementary role by offering anticipatory capacity, scientific legitimacy, and convening power. This study advances both scholarly understanding and institutional practice, presenting the first integrated framework connecting AG and AI in higher education, and providing a foundation for future empirical validation and cross-regional resilience and regeneration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 103753"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145883964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Anticipatory alignment work: The politics of anticipation in an emerging innovation ecosystem of neuromorphic computing 预期对齐工作:在新兴的神经形态计算创新生态系统中的预期政治
IF 3.8 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2025-12-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2025.103756
Mareike Smolka , Philipp Neudert , Frieder Bögner , Wenzel Mehnert , Phil Macnaghten , Stefan Böschen
The alignment of science, technology, and innovation with societal values and concerns is a key objective of governance approaches that include technology assessment, responsible (research and) innovation, and anticipatory governance. Such alignment is supposed to take place, inter alia, in anticipatory practices involving technoscientific experts, stakeholders, and publics, whose views are then integrated into research and development. However, we lack knowledge on how alignment is accomplished in practice, and the conditions under which it perpetuates or challenges the anticipation of technocratic and market-oriented futures, especially in commercially competitive environments. This article aims to fill this gap by introducing the concept of anticipatory alignment work. Through a case study on an innovation ecosystem emerging around neuromorphic computing technology, the article demonstrates the analytical potential of the concept. In analyzing different modes of anticipatory alignment work, the study reveals how politics shapes alignment and keeps anticipation locked in dominant constructions of the past and present. The article casts doubt on the optimism typically implicit in science, technology, and innovation governance approaches that promise the advancement of societal alignment, while also discussing opportunities for these approaches to foster novel forms of anticipation.
科学、技术和创新与社会价值和关注的一致性是治理方法的关键目标,这些方法包括技术评估、负责任的(研究和)创新以及预期治理。除其他外,这种协调应该在涉及技术科学专家、利益相关者和公众的预期实践中进行,然后将其观点纳入研究和开发。然而,我们缺乏关于结盟在实践中是如何完成的知识,以及它在什么条件下延续或挑战技术官僚和市场导向的未来预期,特别是在商业竞争环境中。本文旨在通过引入预期对齐工作的概念来填补这一空白。通过对围绕神经形态计算技术出现的创新生态系统的案例研究,本文展示了这一概念的分析潜力。在分析预期结盟工作的不同模式时,该研究揭示了政治如何塑造结盟,并将预期锁定在过去和现在的主导结构中。本文对科学、技术和创新治理方法中通常隐含的乐观主义表示怀疑,这些方法承诺促进社会协调,同时也讨论了这些方法促进新形式预期的机会。
{"title":"Anticipatory alignment work: The politics of anticipation in an emerging innovation ecosystem of neuromorphic computing","authors":"Mareike Smolka ,&nbsp;Philipp Neudert ,&nbsp;Frieder Bögner ,&nbsp;Wenzel Mehnert ,&nbsp;Phil Macnaghten ,&nbsp;Stefan Böschen","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103756","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103756","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The alignment of science, technology, and innovation with societal values and concerns is a key objective of governance approaches that include technology assessment, responsible (research and) innovation, and anticipatory governance. Such alignment is supposed to take place, inter alia, in anticipatory practices involving technoscientific experts, stakeholders, and publics, whose views are then integrated into research and development. However, we lack knowledge on how alignment is accomplished in practice, and the conditions under which it perpetuates or challenges the anticipation of technocratic and market-oriented futures, especially in commercially competitive environments. This article aims to fill this gap by introducing the concept of <em>anticipatory alignment work</em>. Through a case study on an innovation ecosystem emerging around neuromorphic computing technology, the article demonstrates the analytical potential of the concept. In analyzing different modes of anticipatory alignment work, the study reveals how politics shapes alignment and keeps anticipation locked in dominant constructions of the past and present. The article casts doubt on the optimism typically implicit in science, technology, and innovation governance approaches that promise the advancement of societal alignment, while also discussing opportunities for these approaches to foster novel forms of anticipation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 103756"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145883963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The discursive silos of transport discourse in Sweden: Using future storylines to understand the polarization and politicization of sustainable aviation transitions 瑞典交通话语的话语筒仓:利用未来的故事情节来理解可持续航空转型的两极分化和政治化
IF 3.8 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2025-12-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2025.103755
Aneta Kulanovic , Johan Nordensvärd , Frauke Urban
Within the multi-level perspective (MLP) on sustainability transitions, there has been a rise in research on storylines and discursive framing that have become more central in understanding how competing narratives shape the trajectories of innovation. This paper examines how policy actors and stakeholders construct and frame competing scenario narratives of sustainable aviation futures. Using a scenario narrative framing approach, we analyze empirical data from focus groups and interviews with Swedish aviation sector actors. The findings reveal a discursive split: one set of narratives supports an active state fostering sustainable aviation through niche innovation (aligned with ecological modernism), while another advocates for limiting aviation altogether (reflecting green theory). These national narratives are contrasted by a multilateral, risk-averse discourse calling for international or EU-level decision-making processes. Our results highlight a deeper divide — scenario narratives are polarized and politicized, with transport mode innovations increasingly tied to political identities. Centre-right actors tend to support aviation innovation over rail, while green and Centre-left actors often argue the reverse. This politicization reflects broader discursive struggles, as seen in debates such as the proposed closure of Västerås regional airport and Bromma airport. This includes dissuading tourists who use aircrafts, excluding aviation from approaches to collective traffic and lacking integration in any public transport system. This leads to aviation being perceived neither as private nor collective transport in discourses and as ambivalent in policies.
在可持续转型的多层次视角(MLP)中,对故事情节和话语框架的研究有所增加,这些研究在理解相互竞争的叙事如何塑造创新轨迹方面变得更加重要。本文探讨了政策参与者和利益相关者如何构建和框架可持续航空未来的竞争情景叙述。使用场景叙事框架方法,我们分析了焦点小组和对瑞典航空部门参与者的访谈的经验数据。研究结果揭示了一种话语分裂:一组叙述支持积极的国家通过利基创新(与生态现代主义一致)促进可持续航空发展,而另一组则主张完全限制航空发展(反映绿色理论)。这些国家的叙述与多边的、规避风险的话语形成对比,呼吁国际或欧盟层面的决策过程。我们的研究结果强调了更深层次的分歧——情景叙事两极分化和政治化,交通方式创新越来越多地与政治身份联系在一起。中右翼倾向于支持航空创新,而非铁路创新,而绿党和中左翼则往往持相反观点。这种政治化反映了更广泛的话语斗争,如建议关闭Västerås地区机场和Bromma机场等辩论。这包括劝阻乘坐飞机的游客,将航空排除在集体交通方式之外,以及缺乏与任何公共交通系统的整合。这导致航空在话语中既不被视为私人交通工具,也不被视为集体交通工具,在政策上也存在矛盾。
{"title":"The discursive silos of transport discourse in Sweden: Using future storylines to understand the polarization and politicization of sustainable aviation transitions","authors":"Aneta Kulanovic ,&nbsp;Johan Nordensvärd ,&nbsp;Frauke Urban","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103755","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103755","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Within the multi-level perspective (MLP) on sustainability transitions, there has been a rise in research on storylines and discursive framing that have become more central in understanding how competing narratives shape the trajectories of innovation. This paper examines how policy actors and stakeholders construct and frame competing scenario narratives of sustainable aviation futures. Using a scenario narrative framing approach, we analyze empirical data from focus groups and interviews with Swedish aviation sector actors. The findings reveal a discursive split: one set of narratives supports an active state fostering sustainable aviation through niche innovation (aligned with ecological modernism), while another advocates for limiting aviation altogether (reflecting green theory). These national narratives are contrasted by a multilateral, risk-averse discourse calling for international or EU-level decision-making processes. Our results highlight a deeper divide — scenario narratives are polarized and politicized, with transport mode innovations increasingly tied to political identities. Centre-right actors tend to support aviation innovation over rail, while green and Centre-left actors often argue the reverse. This politicization reflects broader discursive struggles, as seen in debates such as the proposed closure of Västerås regional airport and Bromma airport. This includes dissuading tourists who use aircrafts, excluding aviation from approaches to collective traffic and lacking integration in any public transport system. This leads to aviation being perceived neither as private nor collective transport in discourses and as ambivalent in policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 103755"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145840872","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Memories of the future: Literature as a source of the possible 未来的记忆:文学作为可能的源泉
IF 3.8 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2025-12-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2025.103754
Velna Rončević
Our comprehension about the future and orientation towards the future is constantly being mediated and changed by knowledge. Literature has the potential to be such knowledge and can serve as a driver of imagination and anticipation about the future, but also considerations of the past and present. Reflecting on one thousand interviews with non-professional Croatian readers, this paper addresses the role of future orientations in readers’ encounters with literature. I explore how reading influences, mediates, and orients readers towards the future, that is, what kind of imaginings, thoughts and affects related to reading are directed towards the future.
我们对未来的理解和对未来的取向不断地被知识中介和改变。文学有可能成为这样的知识,可以作为想象力和对未来的期待的驱动力,也可以考虑过去和现在。通过对一千名非专业克罗地亚读者的采访,本文探讨了未来取向在读者与文学接触中的作用。我探索阅读是如何影响、中介和引导读者走向未来的,也就是说,与阅读相关的想象、思想和影响是如何指向未来的。
{"title":"Memories of the future: Literature as a source of the possible","authors":"Velna Rončević","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103754","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103754","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Our comprehension about the future and orientation towards the future is constantly being mediated and changed by knowledge. Literature has the potential to be such knowledge and can serve as a driver of imagination and anticipation about the future, but also considerations of the past and present. Reflecting on one thousand interviews with non-professional Croatian readers, this paper addresses the role of future orientations in readers’ encounters with literature. I explore how reading influences, mediates, and orients readers towards the future, that is, what kind of imaginings, thoughts and affects related to reading are directed towards the future.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 103754"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145840871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Beyond trade-offs: Dual-use social innovations for secure and sustainable futures 超越取舍:两用社会创新,实现安全和可持续的未来
IF 3.8 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2025-12-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2025.103752
Agata Stasik
This paper introduces dual-use social innovations (DUSI) as a conceptual and practical framework for integrating security concerns into visioning and planning for sustainable futures. The effective development of DUSI depends on future visions that explicitly unite sustainable transition and security risks – priorities too often considered in isolation. By going beyond trade-offs and intentionally combining these imperatives, DUSI strengthen social resilience and preparedness against security risks while supporting sustainable transitions, transforming social relations by changing how communities organize, decide, and share resources. Amid converging geopolitical tensions and accelerating climate impacts, DUSI offer pathways to avoid privileging security at the expense of sustainability, enabling genuine synergies between civil preparedness and sustainable development. Grounded in the AREA framework for Responsible Research and Innovation (Anticipation, Reflection, Engagement, Action), this work proposes a three-part research agenda: (1) evaluating practices of secure and sustainable visioning across contexts; (2) co-creating frameworks with anticipation communities to understand the intersection of security and sustainability; and (3) developing tools that empower communities to create embedded visions and implement context-relevant DUSI. This approach emphasizes transdisciplinary collaboration and researcher engagement in supporting stakeholders through continuous adaptation – navigating tensions and advancing innovation beyond false choices between security and sustainability.
本文介绍了两用社会创新(DUSI)作为将安全问题纳入可持续未来愿景和规划的概念和实践框架。可持续转型战略的有效发展取决于明确结合可持续转型和安全风险的未来愿景,而这些优先事项往往是孤立考虑的。通过超越权衡,有意地将这些需求结合起来,DUSI加强了社会复原力和防范安全风险的准备,同时支持可持续转型,通过改变社区组织、决策和共享资源的方式来改变社会关系。在地缘政治紧张局势趋同和气候影响加剧的背景下,DUSI提供了避免以牺牲可持续性为代价来保障安全的途径,实现了民事准备和可持续发展之间的真正协同效应。在负责任研究和创新领域框架(预期、反思、参与、行动)的基础上,本工作提出了一个由三部分组成的研究议程:(1)评估跨背景下安全和可持续愿景的实践;(2)与预期社区共同创建框架,以理解安全和可持续性的交集;(3)开发工具,使社区能够创建嵌入式愿景并实施与上下文相关的DUSI。这种方法强调跨学科合作和研究人员的参与,通过持续的适应来支持利益相关者-在安全和可持续性之间的错误选择中导航紧张和推进创新。
{"title":"Beyond trade-offs: Dual-use social innovations for secure and sustainable futures","authors":"Agata Stasik","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103752","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103752","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper introduces dual-use social innovations (DUSI) as a conceptual and practical framework for integrating security concerns into visioning and planning for sustainable futures. The effective development of DUSI depends on future visions that explicitly unite sustainable transition and security risks – priorities too often considered in isolation. By going beyond trade-offs and intentionally combining these imperatives, DUSI strengthen social resilience and preparedness against security risks while supporting sustainable transitions, transforming social relations by changing how communities organize, decide, and share resources. Amid converging geopolitical tensions and accelerating climate impacts, DUSI offer pathways to avoid privileging security at the expense of sustainability, enabling genuine synergies between civil preparedness and sustainable development. Grounded in the AREA framework for Responsible Research and Innovation (Anticipation, Reflection, Engagement, Action), this work proposes a three-part research agenda: (1) evaluating practices of secure and sustainable visioning across contexts; (2) co-creating frameworks with anticipation communities to understand the intersection of security and sustainability; and (3) developing tools that empower communities to create embedded visions and implement context-relevant DUSI. This approach emphasizes transdisciplinary collaboration and researcher engagement in supporting stakeholders through continuous adaptation – navigating tensions and advancing innovation beyond false choices between security and sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 103752"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145791044","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Where will the change come from? Identifying decision-relevant factors in future Land Use and Cover Change (LUCC) scenarios to support planning under uncertainty 这些变化将从何而来?确定未来土地利用/覆被变化(LUCC)情景中与决策相关的因素,以支持不确定性下的规划
IF 3.8 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2025-12-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2025.103751
Orlando Roman , Bryan T. Adey , Benjamin Black , Emma Zeindl
Previous efforts to assess uncertainty in Land Use Cover Change (LUCC) models have primarily focused on increasing model accuracy and hence the credibility of future simulations. However, such an approach does not adequately incorporate the inherent, deep, uncertainty associated with long-term future projections of LUCC. By contrast, exploratory modelling approaches, which capture this uncertainty through the simulation of multiple potential future scenarios, offer better potential to support decision-making.
This paper proposes and demonstrates a framework for exploratory modelling of LUCC scenarios to identify the main factors of change and map decision boundaries to support planning. Specifically, this framework projects a large ensemble of future LUCC simulations to then apply Global Sensitivity Analysis (GSA) in two different settings: Factor prioritisation and Factor mapping to quantify the influence of all possible types of factors driving LUCC: external uncertainties, planning decisions and stochasticity.
The framework is demonstrated through the projection of future urban development scenarios for the Lausanne-Morges agglomeration in Switzerland, under major transport infrastructure development. This case study illustrates the potential value of the framework for planning support by highlighting that new infrastructure development supports densification efforts over a wide range of future scenarios, although the magnitude of this effect exhibits clear spatial variations.
以往评估土地利用覆盖变化(LUCC)模式不确定性的工作主要集中在提高模式的准确性,从而提高未来模拟的可信度。然而,这种方法没有充分考虑与土地利用/土地覆盖变化的长期未来预测有关的固有的、深刻的不确定性。相比之下,探索性建模方法通过模拟多种潜在的未来情景来捕捉这种不确定性,为支持决策提供了更好的潜力。本文提出并论证了一个探索性的土地利用/土地覆盖变化情景建模框架,以确定变化的主要因素,并绘制决策边界以支持规划。具体而言,该框架预测了未来土地覆盖变化模拟的一个大集合,然后在两种不同的设置中应用全局敏感性分析(GSA):因子优先级和因子映射,以量化驱动土地覆盖变化的所有可能类型的因素的影响:外部不确定性、规划决策和随机性。通过对瑞士洛桑-莫尔赫斯城市群未来城市发展情景的预测,在主要交通基础设施发展的情况下,展示了该框架。本案例研究通过强调新的基础设施发展在未来广泛的情景下支持致密化工作,说明了规划支持框架的潜在价值,尽管这种影响的程度表现出明显的空间差异。
{"title":"Where will the change come from? Identifying decision-relevant factors in future Land Use and Cover Change (LUCC) scenarios to support planning under uncertainty","authors":"Orlando Roman ,&nbsp;Bryan T. Adey ,&nbsp;Benjamin Black ,&nbsp;Emma Zeindl","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103751","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103751","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous efforts to assess uncertainty in Land Use Cover Change (LUCC) models have primarily focused on increasing model accuracy and hence the credibility of future simulations. However, such an approach does not adequately incorporate the inherent, deep, uncertainty associated with long-term future projections of LUCC. By contrast, exploratory modelling approaches, which capture this uncertainty through the simulation of multiple potential future scenarios, offer better potential to support decision-making.</div><div>This paper proposes and demonstrates a framework for exploratory modelling of LUCC scenarios to identify the main factors of change and map decision boundaries to support planning. Specifically, this framework projects a large ensemble of future LUCC simulations to then apply Global Sensitivity Analysis (GSA) in two different settings: Factor prioritisation and Factor mapping to quantify the influence of all possible types of factors driving LUCC: external uncertainties, planning decisions and stochasticity.</div><div>The framework is demonstrated through the projection of future urban development scenarios for the Lausanne-Morges agglomeration in Switzerland, under major transport infrastructure development. This case study illustrates the potential value of the framework for planning support by highlighting that new infrastructure development supports densification efforts over a wide range of future scenarios, although the magnitude of this effect exhibits clear spatial variations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 103751"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145791045","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hope and political imagination: Beyond harmful hope in sustainable transitions 希望与政治想象:超越可持续转型中的有害希望
IF 3.8 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2025-12-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2025.103746
Mattias Lehtinen
Sustainable transitions require societies to make profound changes in the ways we imagine politics, including both social relations and the relations between societies and the environment. We therefore need prefigurative politics that seeks to reconfigure our ways of imagining politics in a more sustainable way. This article looks at the role of hope in transforming the way we imagine sociopolitical relations by viewing hope as a force that sustains nondominant political imaginaries such as radical ecological imaginaries. Hope becomes central for maintaining still unrecognized ways of imagining society and politics. Two distinct harms related to hope in climate politics are then identified. The first is cruel optimism, that hope might make ecological struggles maintain facets of currently destructive political imaginaries. The second harm is a consequence of the demandingness of maintaining ecologically radical political imaginaries, linked to burnout, fatigue and isolation. To reflect on how to maintain hope in sustainable futures, an account of strategic hope is conceptualized. This account recommends alleviating the harms of hoping by forming bridges between nondominant imaginaries and by aligning nondominant political imaginaries with dominant ones where possible.
可持续转型要求社会深刻改变我们对政治的看法,包括社会关系以及社会与环境之间的关系。因此,我们需要前瞻性的政治,寻求以更可持续的方式重新配置我们想象政治的方式。这篇文章着眼于希望在改变我们想象社会政治关系的方式中的作用,通过将希望视为一种维持非主导政治想象(如激进生态想象)的力量。希望成为维持仍未被认可的社会和政治想象方式的核心。然后确定了与气候政治中的希望有关的两种不同的危害。第一种是残酷的乐观主义,认为希望可能会使生态斗争维持目前具有破坏性的政治幻想的某些方面。第二个危害是要求维持生态激进的政治想象的结果,与倦怠、疲劳和孤立有关。为了思考如何在可持续的未来中保持希望,提出了战略希望的概念。这种说法建议通过在非主导的想象之间建立桥梁,并在可能的情况下将非主导的政治想象与主导的政治想象结合起来,来减轻希望的危害。
{"title":"Hope and political imagination: Beyond harmful hope in sustainable transitions","authors":"Mattias Lehtinen","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103746","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103746","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sustainable transitions require societies to make profound changes in the ways we imagine politics, including both social relations and the relations between societies and the environment. We therefore need prefigurative politics that seeks to reconfigure our ways of imagining politics in a more sustainable way. This article looks at the role of hope in transforming the way we imagine sociopolitical relations by viewing hope as a force that sustains nondominant political imaginaries such as radical ecological imaginaries. Hope becomes central for maintaining still unrecognized ways of imagining society and politics. Two distinct harms related to hope in climate politics are then identified. The first is cruel optimism, that hope might make ecological struggles maintain facets of currently destructive political imaginaries. The second harm is a consequence of the demandingness of maintaining ecologically radical political imaginaries, linked to burnout, fatigue and isolation. To reflect on how to maintain hope in sustainable futures, an account of strategic hope is conceptualized. This account recommends alleviating the harms of hoping by forming bridges between nondominant imaginaries and by aligning nondominant political imaginaries with dominant ones where possible.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 103746"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145791134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Constructive disagreement and harmful hope in environmental communication for sustainability transition 可持续转型环境沟通中的建设性分歧与有害希望
IF 3.8 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2025-12-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2025.103750
Lars Hallgren, Hanna Bergeå, Daniela Kreber
We investigate how disagreeing is performed in conversations about circular economy futures, and how it is disturbed by discursive norms of hope. Disagreement is recognised as an interactive process essential for knowledge development and democracy. However, conducting democratic investigations of differences becomes difficult when interaction norms prioritise hopeful expressions. Drawing on 11 h of recorded meetings on the circular economy, we analyse how disagreement is interactively performed and link these observations about the constraining effects of ‘harmful hope’ to ideas of radical democracy and expectations surrounding hopeful environmental communication. We identify four discursive procedures of hope—community, appreciative coordination, concept innovation, and underlying disagreements, and demonstrate how these regulate and limit processes of agreeing and disagreeing, thereby influencing the conditions for constructive disagreement essential for democracy. Ultimately, we demonstrate how conversations about futures become dominated by norms of hope, which come at the expense of communicative capacity to constructively examine disagreements necessary for advancing sustainable transitions. This dynamic is evident even when the desired future involves radical transformations of production and consumption systems, as in the circular economy. Our study offers insights into what and how these discursive structures should be challenged in conversations about sustainability futures.
我们调查了在关于循环经济未来的对话中,不同意见是如何表现出来的,以及它是如何被希望的话语规范所干扰的。分歧被认为是知识发展和民主必不可少的互动过程。然而,当互动规范优先考虑充满希望的表达时,对差异进行民主调查变得困难。利用11次 h关于循环经济的会议记录,我们分析了分歧是如何相互作用的,并将这些关于“有害希望”约束效应的观察与激进民主思想和围绕充满希望的环境沟通的期望联系起来。我们确定了希望-社区、欣赏协调、概念创新和潜在分歧的四种话语过程,并展示了这些过程如何调节和限制同意和不同意的过程,从而影响民主所必需的建设性分歧的条件。最后,我们展示了关于未来的对话是如何被希望的规范所主导的,这是以牺牲沟通能力为代价的,而沟通能力是建设性地审视推进可持续转型所必需的分歧。即使期望的未来涉及生产和消费系统的彻底变革,如循环经济,这种动态也是显而易见的。我们的研究为在关于可持续性未来的对话中应该挑战这些话语结构的内容和方式提供了见解。
{"title":"Constructive disagreement and harmful hope in environmental communication for sustainability transition","authors":"Lars Hallgren,&nbsp;Hanna Bergeå,&nbsp;Daniela Kreber","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103750","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103750","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We investigate how disagreeing is performed in conversations about circular economy futures, and how it is disturbed by discursive norms of hope. Disagreement is recognised as an interactive process essential for knowledge development and democracy. However, conducting democratic investigations of differences becomes difficult when interaction norms prioritise hopeful expressions. Drawing on 11 h of recorded meetings on the circular economy, we analyse how disagreement is interactively performed and link these observations about the constraining effects of ‘harmful hope’ to ideas of radical democracy and expectations surrounding hopeful environmental communication. We identify four discursive procedures of hope—<em>community</em>, <em>appreciative coordination</em>, <em>concept innovation</em>, and <em>underlying disagreements</em>, and demonstrate how these regulate and limit processes of agreeing and disagreeing, thereby influencing the conditions for constructive disagreement essential for democracy. Ultimately, we demonstrate how conversations about futures become dominated by norms of hope, which come at the expense of communicative capacity to constructively examine disagreements necessary for advancing sustainable transitions. This dynamic is evident even when the desired future involves radical transformations of production and consumption systems, as in the circular economy. Our study offers insights into what and how these discursive structures should be challenged in conversations about sustainability futures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 103750"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145738264","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Integrated Creative Practices (ICP) for transdisciplinary research and knowledge mobilization 综合创意实践(ICP)跨学科研究和知识动员
IF 3.8 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2025-12-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2025.103747
Joshua R. Hale, Kelly J. Arbeau, David R. Clements
Creative practices have long fueled innovation and insight in the sciences and beyond, yet there remains no widely adopted framework for integrating creative practices into transdisciplinary research. In response, we introduce the Integrated Creative Practices (ICP) framework, grounded in a transdisciplinary research project that addressed a complex environmental challenge. The ICP framework offers a pathway for researchers from the arts and sciences to collaborate with non-academic stakeholders in transdisciplinary research without sacrificing disciplinary rigor or practical outcomes. By leveraging design methods and creative practices, the framework facilitates collaboration across the arts and sciences while bridging the gap between knowledge and its mobilization. As a future-oriented discipline positioned at the intersection of the arts and sciences, design offers a unique set of tools, frameworks, and methods that are well-suited for addressing complex problems that require multifaceted solutions, robust stakeholder engagement, and iterative, non-linear approaches. Moreover, the inherently dialogic, participatory, and socially-oriented aspects of design methods and practices are uniquely well-suited to facilitating transdisciplinary collaborations that bridge the knowledge-to-action gap limiting the impact of academic research.
创造性实践长期以来一直推动着科学和其他领域的创新和洞察力,然而,将创造性实践整合到跨学科研究中仍然没有广泛采用的框架。作为回应,我们引入了综合创意实践(ICP)框架,该框架基于一个跨学科的研究项目,该项目解决了一个复杂的环境挑战。ICP框架为来自艺术和科学领域的研究人员与非学术利益相关者在跨学科研究中合作提供了一条途径,而不会牺牲学科严谨性或实际成果。通过利用设计方法和创造性实践,该框架促进了艺术和科学之间的合作,同时弥合了知识与动员之间的差距。作为一门面向未来的学科,位于艺术和科学的交叉点,设计提供了一套独特的工具、框架和方法,非常适合解决需要多方面解决方案、强有力的利益相关者参与和迭代的非线性方法的复杂问题。此外,设计方法和实践固有的对话、参与和面向社会的方面非常适合促进跨学科合作,弥合了限制学术研究影响的知识到行动的差距。
{"title":"Integrated Creative Practices (ICP) for transdisciplinary research and knowledge mobilization","authors":"Joshua R. Hale,&nbsp;Kelly J. Arbeau,&nbsp;David R. Clements","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103747","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103747","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Creative practices have long fueled innovation and insight in the sciences and beyond, yet there remains no widely adopted framework for integrating creative practices into transdisciplinary research. In response, we introduce the Integrated Creative Practices (ICP) framework, grounded in a transdisciplinary research project that addressed a complex environmental challenge. The ICP framework offers a pathway for researchers from the arts and sciences to collaborate with non-academic stakeholders in transdisciplinary research without sacrificing disciplinary rigor or practical outcomes. By leveraging design methods and creative practices, the framework facilitates collaboration across the arts and sciences while bridging the gap between knowledge and its mobilization. As a future-oriented discipline positioned at the intersection of the arts and sciences, design offers a unique set of tools, frameworks, and methods that are well-suited for addressing complex problems that require multifaceted solutions, robust stakeholder engagement, and iterative, non-linear approaches. Moreover, the inherently dialogic, participatory, and socially-oriented aspects of design methods and practices are uniquely well-suited to facilitating transdisciplinary collaborations that bridge the knowledge-to-action gap limiting the impact of academic research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 103747"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145738230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Intergenerationally just sustainability transitions: The role of alternative entrepreneurship in shaping mnemonic communities for future generations 代际公平的可持续性转变:另类创业在为后代塑造助记社区中的作用
IF 3.8 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2025-11-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2025.103738
Aikaterini Argyrou , Harry Hummels , Bart Jansen
This conceptual paper explores how social innovation contributes to just sustainability transitions, from the perspective of future generations. We adhere to the broader understanding of social innovation which entails organizing in ways that differ from dominant archetypal organizational arrangements that marginalize future generations. As such, we discuss forms of alternative entrepreneurship (i.e., sustainable, social and/or community-based) that deliver market-based activities committed to advancing the interests and the wellbeing of future generations. Future generations are timeless entities with characteristics that transcend temporal contexts, shaping social realities beyond existing conceptions of identity and time. They influence the social context of individuals and provide meaning to both present and future transgenerational social actions. Accordingly, we investigate the benefits that alternative entrepreneurship can gain from conceptual approaches that transcend socially constructed temporal contexts shaped by prevailing social norms. In our discussion we build on the inter-temporal characteristics that are inherent to the idea of a Transgenerational Mnemonic Community (TMC). By focusing on the assumed interests and wellbeing of future generations – which are essential for creating a sustainable and just future for business and society – our paper highlights the importance of mnemonics and intergenerational justice for conceptualizing alternative entrepreneurship.
这篇概念性论文从后代的角度探讨了社会创新如何促进可持续转型。我们坚持对社会创新的更广泛理解,这需要以不同于将后代边缘化的主导原型组织安排的方式进行组织。因此,我们讨论了替代性创业的形式(即可持续的、社会的和/或基于社区的),它们提供以市场为基础的活动,致力于促进子孙后代的利益和福祉。后代是永恒的实体,具有超越时间背景的特征,塑造超越现有身份和时间概念的社会现实。它们影响个人的社会环境,并为现在和未来的跨代社会行为提供意义。因此,我们研究了另类创业可以从超越由主流社会规范形成的社会构建时间背景的概念方法中获得的好处。在我们的讨论中,我们建立在跨代记忆共同体(TMC)思想固有的跨时间特征的基础上。通过关注未来几代人的利益和福祉——这对于创造一个可持续的、公正的商业和社会的未来至关重要——我们的论文强调了在概念化另类创业时,记忆法和代际公正的重要性。
{"title":"Intergenerationally just sustainability transitions: The role of alternative entrepreneurship in shaping mnemonic communities for future generations","authors":"Aikaterini Argyrou ,&nbsp;Harry Hummels ,&nbsp;Bart Jansen","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103738","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103738","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This conceptual paper explores how social innovation contributes to just sustainability transitions, from the perspective of future generations. We adhere to the broader understanding of social innovation which entails organizing in ways that differ from dominant archetypal organizational arrangements that marginalize future generations. As such, we discuss forms of alternative entrepreneurship (i.e., sustainable, social and/or community-based) that deliver market-based activities committed to advancing the interests and the wellbeing of future generations. Future generations are timeless entities with characteristics that transcend temporal contexts, shaping social realities beyond existing conceptions of identity and time. They influence the social context of individuals and provide meaning to both present and future transgenerational social actions. Accordingly, we investigate the benefits that alternative entrepreneurship can gain from conceptual approaches that transcend socially constructed temporal contexts shaped by prevailing social norms. In our discussion we build on the inter-temporal characteristics that are inherent to the idea of a Transgenerational Mnemonic Community (TMC). By focusing on the assumed interests and wellbeing of future generations – which are essential for creating a sustainable and just future for business and society – our paper highlights the importance of mnemonics and intergenerational justice for conceptualizing alternative entrepreneurship.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 103738"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145623875","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Futures
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1