IF 3.8 3区管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS

Futures

Pub Date : 2025-09-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2025.103699

Agnė Paliokaitė , Erika Vaiginienė , Dovilė Gaižauskienė , Aurinta Elenskė

This paper explores the impacts of participatory foresight and societal engagement in policymaking, specifically focusing on Lithuania’s “Lithuania 2050” national visioning process. Participatory foresight integrates diverse stakeholders in strategic processes, yielding tangible outputs like policies and plans, as well as intangible benefits such as increased trust, shared responsibility, and democratic engagement. However, its qualitative and societal impacts often remain underexplored, limiting foresight’s transformative potential. The study proposes and empirically validates a conceptual framework to assess the multidimensional impacts of participatory foresight, emphasizing immediate and intermediate outcomes and focusing on intangible impacts of societal engagement. Using survey data from “Lithuania 2050” co-creators, the research validates diagnostic constructs for participatory foresight impacts using exploratory factor analysis. The proposed final framework bridges theoretical and practical gaps, providing tools for rigorous impact evaluation and highlighting participatory foresight’s potential to enhance inclusivity, resilience, and open governance. Limitations include the need for further validation and long-term impact framework development. This study contributes to advancing participatory foresight impact assessment models, developing valid scales for measuring the impacts of participatory foresight in quantitative research, and fostering open governance.

本文探讨了参与式预见和社会参与对政策制定的影响，特别关注立陶宛的“立陶宛2050”国家愿景过程。参与式远见将不同的利益相关者纳入战略进程，产生政策和计划等有形产出，以及增加信任、分担责任和民主参与等无形利益。然而，其质量和社会影响往往尚未得到充分探索，限制了远见的变革潜力。该研究提出并实证验证了一个概念性框架，以评估参与性远见的多维影响，强调即时和中期结果，并关注社会参与的无形影响。利用“立陶宛2050”共同创作者的调查数据，研究利用探索性因素分析验证了参与性远见影响的诊断结构。拟议的最终框架弥合了理论和实践的差距，为严格的影响评估提供了工具，并突出了参与式远见在增强包容性、复原力和开放治理方面的潜力。限制包括需要进一步验证和长期影响框架的开发。本研究有助于完善参与式前瞻影响评估模型，开发量化研究中有效的参与式前瞻影响测量量表，促进开放式治理。

{"title":"Measuring the intangible: A multidimensional framework for assessing societal engagement in participatory foresight","authors":"Agnė Paliokaitė , Erika Vaiginienė , Dovilė Gaižauskienė , Aurinta Elenskė","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103699","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103699","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores the impacts of participatory foresight and societal engagement in policymaking, specifically focusing on Lithuania’s “Lithuania 2050” national visioning process. Participatory foresight integrates diverse stakeholders in strategic processes, yielding tangible outputs like policies and plans, as well as intangible benefits such as increased trust, shared responsibility, and democratic engagement. However, its qualitative and societal impacts often remain underexplored, limiting foresight’s transformative potential. The study proposes and empirically validates a conceptual framework to assess the multidimensional impacts of participatory foresight, emphasizing immediate and intermediate outcomes and focusing on intangible impacts of societal engagement. Using survey data from “Lithuania 2050” co-creators, the research validates diagnostic constructs for participatory foresight impacts using exploratory factor analysis. The proposed final framework bridges theoretical and practical gaps, providing tools for rigorous impact evaluation and highlighting participatory foresight’s potential to enhance inclusivity, resilience, and open governance. Limitations include the need for further validation and long-term impact framework development. This study contributes to advancing participatory foresight impact assessment models, developing valid scales for measuring the impacts of participatory foresight in quantitative research, and fostering open governance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 103699"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145158863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

How crop models and government visions foreclose imaginaries of agroecological futures 农作物模型和政府愿景如何阻止对农业生态未来的想象

IF 3.8 3区管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS

Futures

Pub Date : 2025-09-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2025.103701

Emma Johansson , Lisette van Beek

Against the backdrop of the ecological crisis, food production systems will need to transform to ensure future food security. There are contrasting visions of what this transformation should look like. This paper scrutinizes these competing imaginaries of future agriculture and associated styles of anticipation in Tanzania. We find that both government visions and global crop models anticipate futures in line with agricultural modernization; a food system driven by productivity and efficiency that is associated with adverse socio-ecological challenges. In contrast, an alternative imaginary transpires through the lived experiences and aspirations of small-holder farmers; an agroecological food system characterized by soil health, food quality and solidarity that is more in line with sustainability and justice. This lived future is overwritten by government visions and global crop models, which render the agroecological future unimaginable by abstracting and emptying the future. Our findings highlight that transformative change may not only be hindered by a ‘lack of imagination’, but rather the politics of anticipation through which existing radical visions become foreclosed. We propose diverse ways in which researchers may empower radical imaginaries that already exist among marginalized communities, including what this might mean for the future use of crop models.

在生态危机的背景下，粮食生产系统需要转型，以确保未来的粮食安全。对于这种转变应该是什么样子，人们有不同的看法。本文仔细研究了这些对坦桑尼亚未来农业的竞争性想象和相关的预期风格。我们发现，无论是政府愿景还是全球作物模型，都预测了符合农业现代化的未来；由生产力和效率驱动的粮食系统与不利的社会生态挑战相关。相比之下，另一种想象是通过小农的生活经历和愿望而产生的；一个以土壤健康、食品质量和团结为特征的农业生态粮食系统，更符合可持续性和正义。这个活生生的未来被政府愿景和全球作物模型所覆盖，通过抽象和清空未来，使农业生态的未来变得不可想象。我们的研究结果强调，变革不仅可能受到“缺乏想象力”的阻碍，而且还可能受到预期政治的阻碍，通过这种政治，现有的激进愿景会被取消赎回权。我们提出了多种方法，研究人员可以赋予已经存在于边缘化社区中的激进想象力量，包括这对未来作物模型的使用可能意味着什么。

{"title":"How crop models and government visions foreclose imaginaries of agroecological futures","authors":"Emma Johansson , Lisette van Beek","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103701","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103701","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Against the backdrop of the ecological crisis, food production systems will need to transform to ensure future food security. There are contrasting visions of what this transformation should look like. This paper scrutinizes these competing imaginaries of future agriculture and associated styles of anticipation in Tanzania. We find that both government visions and global crop models anticipate futures in line with agricultural modernization; a food system driven by productivity and efficiency that is associated with adverse socio-ecological challenges. In contrast, an alternative imaginary transpires through the lived experiences and aspirations of small-holder farmers; an agroecological food system characterized by soil health, food quality and solidarity that is more in line with sustainability and justice. This lived future is overwritten by government visions and global crop models, which render the agroecological future unimaginable by abstracting and emptying the future. Our findings highlight that transformative change may not only be hindered by a ‘lack of imagination’, but rather the politics of anticipation through which existing radical visions become foreclosed. We propose diverse ways in which researchers may empower radical imaginaries that already exist among marginalized communities, including what this might mean for the future use of crop models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 103701"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145119308","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

When adults play, futures unravel: Towards the ethnography of future-making through play-centric methodology in rural Africa 当成年人玩耍时，未来就会瓦解：通过非洲农村以游戏为中心的方法，走向未来创造的民族志

IF 3.8 3区管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS

Futures

Pub Date : 2025-09-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2025.103700

Saymore Ngonidzashe Kativu , Glory Ernest Mella , Castrow Muunda , Anna-Katharina Hornidge

As futures studies continue gaining prominence in the social sciences, questions arise about futuremaking methodologies, about how to solicit and comprehend societal aspirations, visions and actions with which individuals and communities make the future a subject of the present. Questions such as “What are your aspirations or visions for the future?” often entice inadequate responses within future-centric ethnographic studies. Drawing from sociology, environmental studies, the arts, and the disciplines of economics and geography, we depart in search of an ethnographic methodology with which to effectively solicit, organize and make sense of future-making by those at the margins. We combine artefacts and playfulness among adults to socially study futures. We draw empirically on two focus group discussions, a regular discussion workshop and three future-making workshops employing artefacts and participatory playful interactions in rural Tanzania and Namibia to propose a methodology towards succinct responses to difficult ethnographic questions about futures. These are questions outside the capacity for mundane responses, whose answers are rarely actively thought out by groups such as smallholder farmers and rural communities. Using the Lego Identity and Landscape Set (LILS) as utility artifacts for ethnographic inquiry, we outline a methodology enabling smallholder farmers to tell their stories of the future, as rooted in their evolving landscapes and, accordingly, their socioecological systems. A landscape-centric lens aids the understanding of the social-ecologies in which futures unravel. We highlight the methodology’s applicability outside the rural realm, generally towards ethnographies of futures, placing emphasis on the agency of marginalized groups.

随着未来研究在社会科学中不断获得突出地位，关于未来制定方法的问题出现了，关于如何征求和理解社会的愿望，愿景和行动，个人和社区使未来成为现在的主题。在以未来为中心的民族志研究中，诸如“你对未来的愿望或愿景是什么？”这样的问题往往会引起不充分的回应。我们从社会学、环境研究、艺术、经济学和地理学等学科出发，寻找一种民族志方法论，用它来有效地征求、组织和理解边缘人群的未来。我们将人工制品和成年人的玩乐结合起来，从社会角度研究未来。我们从坦桑尼亚和纳米比亚农村的两次焦点小组讨论、一次定期讨论研讨会和三次利用人工制品和参与式有趣互动的未来制作研讨会中汲取经验，提出了一种方法，以简洁地回答有关未来的困难人种学问题。这些问题超出了普通人的回答能力，小农户和农村社区等群体很少积极思考这些问题的答案。利用乐高身份和景观集（LILS）作为民族志调查的实用器物，我们概述了一种方法，使小农能够讲述他们未来的故事，这些故事植根于他们不断发展的景观和相应的社会生态系统。以景观为中心的视角有助于理解未来的社会生态学。我们强调了该方法在农村领域之外的适用性，通常用于未来的民族志，强调边缘化群体的作用。

{"title":"When adults play, futures unravel: Towards the ethnography of future-making through play-centric methodology in rural Africa","authors":"Saymore Ngonidzashe Kativu , Glory Ernest Mella , Castrow Muunda , Anna-Katharina Hornidge","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103700","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103700","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As futures studies continue gaining prominence in the social sciences, questions arise about futuremaking methodologies, about how to solicit and comprehend societal aspirations, visions and actions with which individuals and communities make the future a subject of the present. Questions such as “What are your aspirations or visions for the future?” often entice inadequate responses within future-centric ethnographic studies. Drawing from sociology, environmental studies, the arts, and the disciplines of economics and geography, we depart in search of an ethnographic methodology with which to effectively solicit, organize and make sense of future-making by those at the margins. We combine artefacts and playfulness among adults to socially study futures. We draw empirically on two focus group discussions, a regular discussion workshop and three future-making workshops employing artefacts and participatory playful interactions in rural Tanzania and Namibia to propose a methodology towards succinct responses to difficult ethnographic questions about futures. These are questions outside the capacity for mundane responses, whose answers are rarely actively thought out by groups such as smallholder farmers and rural communities. Using the Lego Identity and Landscape Set (LILS) as utility artifacts for ethnographic inquiry, we outline a methodology enabling smallholder farmers to tell their stories of the future, as rooted in their evolving landscapes and, accordingly, their socioecological systems. A landscape-centric lens aids the understanding of the social-ecologies in which futures unravel. We highlight the methodology’s applicability outside the rural realm, generally towards ethnographies of futures, placing emphasis on the agency of marginalized groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 103700"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145119307","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Practising post-normal science through art-science collaborations: Institutionalising new approaches to future-making at the Joint Research Centre 通过艺术与科学的合作实践后常态科学：在联合研究中心将未来创造的新方法制度化

IF 3.8 3区管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS

Futures

Pub Date : 2025-09-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2025.103696

Sofia Rafaella Greaves, Mario Pansera, Javier Lloveras

Post-normal science (PNS) provides an emerging framework for tackling complex, uncertain, and value-laden scientific challenges by integrating diverse stakeholders, multiple knowledge forms, and democratic procedures into scientific practice. Drawing from institutional theory, which illuminates the dynamics of organizational change and resistance, this paper examines the capacity of PNS-informed interventions to reshape dominant strategies for future making and thus institutional logics within scientific organizations. Our research is empirically grounded in an ethnographic study of the European Commission’s knowledge for policy service, the Joint Research Centre, focusing on the SciArt initiative which brings together artists and scientists to coproduce knowledge. We show how SciArt transforms future making by generating tangible and intangible changes to research perspectives and processes. PNS aligned changes included reflexivity, quality control, the recognition and communication of complexity, democratization of expertise, increased citizen participation, the de-stabilising of beliefs surrounding science, and art. We argue that the potential of such project outcomes to transform the practice of science and policymaking depends upon linked experimental spaces wherein these outcomes can be applied within speculative approaches. Else we argue that the potential for transforming dominant institutional logics remains limited due to "the enclosure of uncertainty": a drive within scientific institutions to reduce uncertainty for policy clarity in contrast to the increased uncertainty required and generated by art-science collaboration. Our study underscores the need for long-term, incremental adaptation in research and policymaking structures to integrate and institutionalize PNS practices, and thus SciArt.

后常态科学（PNS）通过将不同的利益相关者、多种知识形式和民主程序整合到科学实践中，为解决复杂、不确定和充满价值的科学挑战提供了一个新兴框架。从阐明组织变革和抵抗动态的制度理论出发，本文考察了pns知情干预重塑未来制定主导战略的能力，从而在科学组织内重塑制度逻辑。我们的研究基于对欧盟委员会政策服务知识的民族志研究，即联合研究中心，重点关注SciArt倡议，该倡议将艺术家和科学家聚集在一起共同创造知识。我们展示了科学艺术如何通过对研究视角和过程产生有形和无形的变化来改变未来。与PNS相一致的变化包括反身性、质量控制、对复杂性的认识和沟通、专业知识的民主化、公民参与的增加、围绕科学和艺术的信仰的不稳定。我们认为，这些项目成果改变科学和政策制定实践的潜力取决于相关的实验空间，其中这些结果可以应用于投机方法。否则，我们认为，由于“不确定性的封闭”，转变主导制度逻辑的潜力仍然有限：科学机构内部减少政策清晰度不确定性的动力，与艺术-科学合作所要求和产生的不确定性增加形成对比。我们的研究强调了在研究和决策结构中需要长期的、渐进的适应，以整合和制度化PNS实践，从而实现SciArt。

{"title":"Practising post-normal science through art-science collaborations: Institutionalising new approaches to future-making at the Joint Research Centre","authors":"Sofia Rafaella Greaves, Mario Pansera, Javier Lloveras","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103696","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103696","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Post-normal science (PNS) provides an emerging framework for tackling complex, uncertain, and value-laden scientific challenges by integrating diverse stakeholders, multiple knowledge forms, and democratic procedures into scientific practice. Drawing from institutional theory, which illuminates the dynamics of organizational change and resistance, this paper examines the capacity of PNS-informed interventions to reshape dominant strategies for future making and thus institutional logics within scientific organizations. Our research is empirically grounded in an ethnographic study of the European Commission’s knowledge for policy service, the Joint Research Centre, focusing on the SciArt initiative which brings together artists and scientists to coproduce knowledge. We show how SciArt transforms future making by generating tangible and intangible changes to research perspectives and processes. PNS aligned changes included reflexivity, quality control, the recognition and communication of complexity, democratization of expertise, increased citizen participation, the de-stabilising of beliefs surrounding science, and art. We argue that the potential of such project outcomes to transform the practice of science and policymaking depends upon linked experimental spaces wherein these outcomes can be applied within speculative approaches. Else we argue that the potential for transforming dominant institutional logics remains limited due to \"the enclosure of uncertainty\": a drive within scientific institutions to reduce uncertainty for policy clarity in contrast to the increased uncertainty required and generated by art-science collaboration. Our study underscores the need for long-term, incremental adaptation in research and policymaking structures to integrate and institutionalize PNS practices, and thus SciArt.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 103696"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145158865","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

From futures awareness to shaping the food system: Relational foundations of young people's future-oriented agency 从未来意识到塑造食物系统：年轻人未来导向机构的关系基础

IF 3.8 3区管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS

Futures

Pub Date : 2025-09-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2025.103697

Tiina Tuominen, Anu Seisto, Minna Halonen, Juuli Huuhanmäki, Sofi Kurki

The role and agency of citizens in future making are arousing increasing interest in futures studies. While research on future-oriented agency provides insights into how future-oriented, prospective attitude can be stimulated, researchers are still struggling to understand why such attitude does not lead to action. An aspect that deserves more attention in this research is how the relations between people shape attitudes and actions. Young people are an insightful group to investigate in this respect, as their agency and relations in the world are just forming. We draw on sociological theories to suggest that future-oriented agency comprises both future orientation (the motivational element of agency) and relational power (the social element of agency) that together shape future-oriented action. We then examine the role of social relations and positions in the development of agency and refine the conceptualisation of agency using essay data in which students, aged between 14 and 19 years, reflect on their agency in food system transition. The findings reveal five agency types, providing some evidence on how the students’ families, hobbies, and other relations shaped these types. We elaborate on the findings to suggest how to better support young people’s future-oriented agency through education. This way, the paper contributes to understanding the formation of future-oriented agency and the role of education in that process.

公民在未来决策中的作用和代理正日益引起人们对未来研究的兴趣。虽然对面向未来的行为的研究提供了如何激发面向未来的前瞻性态度的见解，但研究人员仍在努力理解为什么这种态度不会导致行动。在本研究中更值得关注的一个方面是人与人之间的关系如何塑造态度和行动。在这方面，年轻人是一个有洞察力的研究群体，因为他们在世界上的代理和关系刚刚形成。我们借鉴社会学理论，认为面向未来的代理包括未来取向（代理的动机因素）和关系权力（代理的社会因素），它们共同塑造了面向未来的行为。然后，我们研究了社会关系和地位在代理发展中的作用，并使用14至19岁的学生反思他们在粮食系统转型中的代理的论文数据来完善代理的概念化。研究结果揭示了五种代理类型，为学生的家庭、爱好和其他关系如何塑造这些类型提供了一些证据。我们对研究结果进行详细阐述，以建议如何通过教育更好地支持青少年面向未来的机构。通过这种方式，本文有助于理解面向未来的机构的形成以及教育在这一过程中的作用。

{"title":"From futures awareness to shaping the food system: Relational foundations of young people's future-oriented agency","authors":"Tiina Tuominen, Anu Seisto, Minna Halonen, Juuli Huuhanmäki, Sofi Kurki","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103697","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103697","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The role and agency of citizens in future making are arousing increasing interest in futures studies. While research on future-oriented agency provides insights into how future-oriented, prospective attitude can be stimulated, researchers are still struggling to understand why such attitude does not lead to action. An aspect that deserves more attention in this research is how the relations between people shape attitudes and actions. Young people are an insightful group to investigate in this respect, as their agency and relations in the world are just forming. We draw on sociological theories to suggest that future-oriented agency comprises both future orientation (the motivational element of agency) and relational power (the social element of agency) that together shape future-oriented action. We then examine the role of social relations and positions in the development of agency and refine the conceptualisation of agency using essay data in which students, aged between 14 and 19 years, reflect on their agency in food system transition. The findings reveal five agency types, providing some evidence on how the students’ families, hobbies, and other relations shaped these types. We elaborate on the findings to suggest how to better support young people’s future-oriented agency through education. This way, the paper contributes to understanding the formation of future-oriented agency and the role of education in that process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 103697"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145107279","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Revitalizing democracy through cybernetics and systems science: Principles and applications for effective governance 通过控制论和系统科学振兴民主：有效治理的原则和应用

IF 3.8 3区管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS

Futures

Pub Date : 2025-09-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2025.103693

Yiannis Laouris , Peter Tuddenham

This paper argues that the erosion of democratic governance is partly due to the neglect or violation of foundational principles from systems science and cybernetics. Concepts such as purpose, feedback, emergence, entropy, self-organization, adaptation, and learning are essential for governing complex (societal) systems but are often overlooked in institutional practice. Drawing on theory and international case studies, the authors show how these principles can inform more resilient, participatory, and adaptive approaches to governance. By applying these principles, this study contributes to anticipatory governance models that can inform more democratic, resilient, and participatory futures. The paper outlines recurring patterns of systemic failure and offers practical reflections for policymakers and institutional designers. It also calls on systems scientists and cyberneticians to engage more directly in educating and supporting those tasked with governing socio-technical systems. In doing so, it reframes systems-cybernetics not as abstract theory but as a necessary foundation for restoring legitimacy, adaptability, and integrity to democratic institutions.

本文认为，民主治理的侵蚀部分是由于忽视或违反了系统科学和控制论的基本原则。目的、反馈、涌现、熵、自组织、适应和学习等概念对于治理复杂（社会）系统至关重要，但在制度实践中往往被忽视。通过理论和国际案例研究，作者展示了这些原则如何能够为更具弹性、参与性和适应性的治理方法提供信息。通过应用这些原则，本研究有助于建立预期治理模式，为更民主、更有弹性和更参与性的未来提供信息。本文概述了系统性失灵的反复出现的模式，并为政策制定者和制度设计者提供了实际的思考。它还呼吁系统科学家和控制论专家更直接地参与教育和支持那些负责管理社会技术系统的人。在此过程中，它重新构建了系统控制论，而不是抽象的理论，而是恢复民主制度合法性、适应性和完整性的必要基础。

{"title":"Revitalizing democracy through cybernetics and systems science: Principles and applications for effective governance","authors":"Yiannis Laouris , Peter Tuddenham","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103693","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103693","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper argues that the erosion of democratic governance is partly due to the neglect or violation of foundational principles from systems science and cybernetics. Concepts such as purpose, feedback, emergence, entropy, self-organization, adaptation, and learning are essential for governing complex (societal) systems but are often overlooked in institutional practice. Drawing on theory and international case studies, the authors show how these principles can inform more resilient, participatory, and adaptive approaches to governance. By applying these principles, this study contributes to anticipatory governance models that can inform more democratic, resilient, and participatory futures. The paper outlines recurring patterns of systemic failure and offers practical reflections for policymakers and institutional designers. It also calls on systems scientists and cyberneticians to engage more directly in educating and supporting those tasked with governing socio-technical systems. In doing so, it reframes systems-cybernetics not as abstract theory but as a necessary foundation for restoring legitimacy, adaptability, and integrity to democratic institutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 103693"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145119300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The bioethics of biomodification for the future of space exploration: Evaluating insights from feminist and non-feminist approaches 未来空间探索的生物修饰的生物伦理学：评价来自女权主义和非女权主义方法的见解

IF 3.8 3区管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS

Futures

Pub Date : 2025-09-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2025.103694

Konrad Szocik , Rakhat Abylkasymova

This article analyzes the bioethical challenges raised by applying human enhancement to future space missions. We first outline mission-specific justifications for bioenhancement –framed within a utilitarian approach tailored to space policy – while rejecting the view that the space environment is morally discontinuous from Earth. We argue instead that moral evaluation should be continuous across environments, even if operational constraints differ. Our central claim is a conditional defense of bioenhancement: under clearly specified mission profiles, expected welfare gains can outweigh risks, provided stringent safeguards are in place. The strength of this justification varies with mission type (exploration, long-duration settlement, in-situ resource utilization, and reproduction in space). We identify uneven risk burdens for particular groups, especially women, people with disabilities, and private-sector spaceworkers, and specify where risk-transfer and consent problems are most acute. We also introduce a feminist lens that both broadens the problem space and surfaces concerns neglected in mainstream space ethics and bioethics (e.g., labor exploitation, reproductive justice, and design biases). While this lens substantially improves risk detection and governance design, we show that a fully comprehensive feminist framework may resist endorsing space expansion under non-ideal social conditions. The paper concludes by mapping policy levers that can reconcile a mission-sensitive utilitarian rationale for enhancement with feminist requirements of fairness and non-domination.

本文分析了将人类增强技术应用于未来太空任务所带来的生物伦理挑战。我们首先概述了生物增强的具体任务的理由——在为空间政策量身定制的实用主义方法框架内——同时拒绝了空间环境在道德上与地球不连续的观点。相反，我们认为道德评价应该在不同的环境中持续进行，即使操作约束不同。我们的核心主张是有条件地为生物增强技术辩护：在明确规定的任务背景下，如果有严格的保障措施，预期的福利收益可以超过风险。这种理由的强度因任务类型（探索、长期定居、就地资源利用和太空再生）而异。我们确定了特定群体，特别是妇女、残疾人和私营部门航天工作者的不均衡风险负担，并指明了风险转移和同意问题最严重的领域。我们还介绍了一个女权主义的镜头，既拓宽了问题空间，又揭示了主流空间伦理学和生物伦理学所忽视的问题（例如，劳动剥削、生殖正义和设计偏见）。虽然这一视角大大提高了风险检测和治理设计，但我们表明，在非理想的社会条件下，一个全面的女权主义框架可能会抵制认可空间扩张。本文通过绘制政策杠杆来总结，这些政策杠杆可以调和任务敏感的功利主义增强理论与女权主义对公平和非支配的要求。

{"title":"The bioethics of biomodification for the future of space exploration: Evaluating insights from feminist and non-feminist approaches","authors":"Konrad Szocik , Rakhat Abylkasymova","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103694","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103694","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article analyzes the bioethical challenges raised by applying human enhancement to future space missions. We first outline mission-specific justifications for bioenhancement –framed within a utilitarian approach tailored to space policy – while rejecting the view that the space environment is morally discontinuous from Earth. We argue instead that moral evaluation should be continuous across environments, even if operational constraints differ. Our central claim is a conditional defense of bioenhancement: under clearly specified mission profiles, expected welfare gains can outweigh risks, provided stringent safeguards are in place. The strength of this justification varies with mission type (exploration, long-duration settlement, in-situ resource utilization, and reproduction in space). We identify uneven risk burdens for particular groups, especially women, people with disabilities, and private-sector spaceworkers, and specify where risk-transfer and consent problems are most acute. We also introduce a feminist lens that both broadens the problem space and surfaces concerns neglected in mainstream space ethics and bioethics (e.g., labor exploitation, reproductive justice, and design biases). While this lens substantially improves risk detection and governance design, we show that a fully comprehensive feminist framework may resist endorsing space expansion under non-ideal social conditions. The paper concludes by mapping policy levers that can reconcile a mission-sensitive utilitarian rationale for enhancement with feminist requirements of fairness and non-domination.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 103694"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145107278","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Capturing the expanding research areas of the future of humanity within the field of futures studies: The case for a transcendental futures subdiscipline 在期货研究领域中捕捉人类未来不断扩大的研究领域：先验期货子学科的案例

IF 3.8 3区管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS

Futures

Pub Date : 2025-09-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2025.103692

Bruce E. Tonn , Chloe J. Hill

Over the past two decades, there has been an increase in the volume of research on topics that cover the futures of humanity and life on Earth. This paper makes a case for the establishment of a new subdiscipline to capture research under the field of futures studies called Transcendental Futures. We believe that this is necessary for two main reasons: 1) to consolidate, weave together and expand on this ongoing futures research across areas such as human extinction, global catastrophic risk, collapse, and obligations to future generations, which we believe would add to the richness and robustness of the field of futures; and 2) to better articulate and communicate the existence of such research to stakeholders outside of the world of academia that are involved in the delivery of important cross-sectoral socioeconomic and environmental initiatives, such as the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the UN Pact for the Future, and who would benefit from having access to more synthesized knowledge that comes out of our field of futures studies. We also believe that the establishment of this new subdiscipline will help to illuminate and help answer vital research questions that are essential for accelerating progress towards safeguarding the survival of life on Earth.

在过去的二十年里，关于人类和地球上生命的未来的研究数量有所增加。本文提出了建立一个新的子学科的案例，以捕捉期货研究领域下的研究，称为先验期货。我们认为，这有两个主要原因：1)巩固、编织和扩展正在进行的期货研究，包括人类灭绝、全球灾难性风险、崩溃和对子孙后代的义务等领域，我们认为这将增加期货领域的丰富性和稳健性；2)向学术界以外的利益相关者更好地表达和沟通此类研究的存在，这些利益相关者参与了重要的跨部门社会经济和环境倡议的实施，例如联合国可持续发展目标（SDGs）和联合国未来公约，他们将受益于获得来自我们未来研究领域的更多综合知识。我们还相信，建立这一新的分支学科将有助于阐明和帮助回答至关重要的研究问题，这些问题对于加速保护地球上生命的生存至关重要。

{"title":"Capturing the expanding research areas of the future of humanity within the field of futures studies: The case for a transcendental futures subdiscipline","authors":"Bruce E. Tonn , Chloe J. Hill","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103692","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103692","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Over the past two decades, there has been an increase in the volume of research on topics that cover the futures of humanity and life on Earth. This paper makes a case for the establishment of a new subdiscipline to capture research under the field of futures studies called <em>Transcendental Futures</em>. We believe that this is necessary for two main reasons: 1) to consolidate, weave together and expand on this ongoing futures research across areas such as human extinction, global catastrophic risk, collapse, and obligations to future generations, which we believe would add to the richness and robustness of the field of futures; and 2) to better articulate and communicate the existence of such research to stakeholders outside of the world of academia that are involved in the delivery of important cross-sectoral socioeconomic and environmental initiatives, such as the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the UN Pact for the Future, and who would benefit from having access to more synthesized knowledge that comes out of our field of futures studies. We also believe that the establishment of this new subdiscipline will help to illuminate and help answer vital research questions that are essential for accelerating progress towards safeguarding the survival of life on Earth.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 103692"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145106819","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The shifty dynamics of future cancellation: Longitudinal discourse analysis of future imaginaries in Dutch environmental futures reports 未来取消的诡谲动态：荷兰环境未来报告中未来想象的纵向话语分析

IF 3.8 3区管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS

Futures

Pub Date : 2025-09-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2025.103691

Wouter de Rijk, Joram Feitsma

Over the past five decades, environmental policymaking has been heavily concerned with developing anticipatory governance capacities and designing ‘future-proof’ institutions. The literature broadly indicates that the field of governmental futuring has evolved within the past decades from ‘forecasting to foresight’, allowing more room for openness and pluralism in futuring work. This sharply differs from the contemporary critical theory analysis of ‘future cancellation’, which claims that our contemporary moment has become incapable of envisioning alternative futures beyond the late capitalist status quo. In this study we seek to empirically explore future cancellation in the context of Dutch environmental governance, a field with a long tradition of institutionalized anticipatory capacities. We conducted a longitudinal discourse analysis of a total of 20 reports from two future-oriented scientific institutes within Dutch government, tracing historical shifts in dominant futuring methods and environmental future imaginaries, and the extent to which these open or instead close the collective views of the future. Our analysis shows that, following the future cancellation thesis, futuring methods and environmental future imaginaries have over time converged into a narrower imagination of the future. This is, however, far from a stable, linear and deterministic process – as the broad-brush thesis of future cancellation might suggest. Rather, we distinguish four distinct periods, characterized by historically contingent processes of future opening and cancellation. When studied in-depth and in historical context, future cancellation in environmental futures research appears of a more shifty nature, both related to futuring methods and the presence of dominant environmental future imaginaries.

在过去的50年里，环境政策制定一直高度关注发展预期治理能力和设计“面向未来”的机构。文献广泛表明，在过去的几十年里，政府未来领域已经从“预测”发展到“预见”，为未来工作的开放性和多元化提供了更大的空间。这与当代批判理论对“未来取消”的分析截然不同，后者声称我们的当代时刻已经变得无法想象超越晚期资本主义现状的替代未来。在这项研究中，我们试图在荷兰环境治理的背景下实证地探索未来的取消，这是一个具有制度化预期能力的悠久传统的领域。我们对荷兰政府内两个面向未来的科学研究所的20份报告进行了纵向话语分析，追踪了主导未来方法和环境未来想象的历史变化，以及这些变化在多大程度上开放或关闭了对未来的集体看法。我们的分析表明，在未来取消理论之后，未来方法和对环境未来的想象随着时间的推移已经融合成对未来的更狭隘的想象。然而，这远不是一个稳定的、线性的和确定的过程——正如未来相互抵消的粗略论点可能暗示的那样。相反，我们区分了四个不同的时期，其特征是未来开放和取消的历史偶然过程。在深入研究和历史背景下，环境未来研究中的未来取消显得更加诡谲，这既与未来方法有关，也与主导环境未来想象的存在有关。

{"title":"The shifty dynamics of future cancellation: Longitudinal discourse analysis of future imaginaries in Dutch environmental futures reports","authors":"Wouter de Rijk, Joram Feitsma","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103691","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103691","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Over the past five decades, environmental policymaking has been heavily concerned with developing anticipatory governance capacities and designing ‘future-proof’ institutions. The literature broadly indicates that the field of governmental futuring has evolved within the past decades from ‘forecasting to foresight’, allowing more room for openness and pluralism in futuring work. This sharply differs from the contemporary critical theory analysis of ‘future cancellation’, which claims that our contemporary moment has become incapable of envisioning alternative futures beyond the late capitalist status quo. In this study we seek to empirically explore future cancellation in the context of Dutch environmental governance, a field with a long tradition of institutionalized anticipatory capacities. We conducted a longitudinal discourse analysis of a total of 20 reports from two future-oriented scientific institutes within Dutch government, tracing historical shifts in dominant futuring methods and environmental future imaginaries, and the extent to which these open or instead close the collective views of the future. Our analysis shows that, following the future cancellation thesis, futuring methods and environmental future imaginaries have over time converged into a narrower imagination of the future. This is, however, far from a stable, linear and deterministic process – as the broad-brush thesis of future cancellation might suggest. Rather, we distinguish four distinct periods, characterized by historically contingent processes of future opening and cancellation. When studied in-depth and in historical context, future cancellation in environmental futures research appears of a more shifty nature, both related to futuring methods and the presence of dominant environmental future imaginaries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 103691"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145020919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

A greener future cannot be bought: On the paradoxes of practising contemporary consumption-driven sustainability 绿色的未来是买不到的：论当代消费驱动型可持续发展的悖论

IF 3.8 3区管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS

Futures

Pub Date : 2025-08-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2025.103683

Janne J. Salovaara , Sophia E. Hagolani-Albov

This paper uses a critical theoretical approach to examine the paradoxical logic(s) underlying contemporary sustainability practices under the umbrella of green economy. Reaching sustainability is commonly framed as demanding transformative shifts in societal and global processes; however, we observe that consumption-centred sustainability measures at best support optimization. We assert that these approaches are more akin to a harmful hope than a manifestation of transformative sustainability, because while they market participation in “sustainability” they are implemented through mechanisms of growth-based world system. We explore the market logic woven throughout these so-called green measures using an illustrative example. Tree planting is often—uncritically—accepted as “good” or “sustainable”; however, the consumption-centred initiatives distract from transformation of the underlying structures and mechanisms. This in essence hides business-as-usual behind a perception of participation in “sustainability”. The same logic can be seen in other areas of transition rhetoric and green economy, which unfortunately is a dominant expression of applied sustainability. We reflect on green consumerism and call for further critical discussion and research on the looming barriers to achieving a more robust sustainability. This article highlights how these consumption-oriented initiatives reproduce the existing market logic (i.e. the perception that we can buy our way out of crisis).

本文采用一种批判性的理论方法来研究绿色经济下当代可持续发展实践的矛盾逻辑。实现可持续性通常被定义为要求社会和全球进程发生变革性转变；然而，我们观察到，以消费为中心的可持续性措施至多支持优化。我们认为，这些方法更像是一种有害的希望，而不是变革性可持续性的表现，因为它们在市场参与“可持续性”的同时，是通过以增长为基础的世界体系机制实施的。我们用一个说明性的例子来探讨贯穿这些所谓的绿色措施的市场逻辑。植树常常被不加批判地认为是“好的”或“可持续的”；然而，以消费为中心的举措分散了对基本结构和机制的改革。这实际上是将一切照旧隐藏在参与“可持续性”的认知背后。同样的逻辑也可以在转型修辞和绿色经济的其他领域看到，不幸的是，绿色经济是应用可持续性的主要表达。我们反思绿色消费主义，并呼吁对实现更强劲的可持续性的潜在障碍进行进一步的批判性讨论和研究。本文强调了这些以消费为导向的举措是如何再现现有的市场逻辑的（即，我们可以通过购买摆脱危机的看法）。

{"title":"A greener future cannot be bought: On the paradoxes of practising contemporary consumption-driven sustainability","authors":"Janne J. Salovaara , Sophia E. Hagolani-Albov","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103683","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103683","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper uses a critical theoretical approach to examine the paradoxical logic(s) underlying contemporary sustainability practices under the umbrella of green economy. Reaching sustainability is commonly framed as demanding transformative shifts in societal and global processes; however, we observe that consumption-centred sustainability measures at best support optimization. We assert that these approaches are more akin to a harmful hope than a manifestation of transformative sustainability, because while they market participation in “sustainability” they are implemented through mechanisms of growth-based world system. We explore the market logic woven throughout these so-called green measures using an illustrative example. Tree planting is often—uncritically—accepted as “good” or “sustainable”; however, the consumption-centred initiatives distract from transformation of the underlying structures and mechanisms. This in essence hides business-as-usual behind a perception of participation in “sustainability”. The same logic can be seen in other areas of transition rhetoric and green economy, which unfortunately is a dominant expression of applied sustainability. We reflect on green consumerism and call for further critical discussion and research on the looming barriers to achieving a more robust sustainability. This article highlights how these consumption-oriented initiatives reproduce the existing market logic (i.e. the perception that we can buy our way out of crisis).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 103683"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144920244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Futures最新文献