Pub Date : 2025-11-08DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102554
Auzeen Shariati , Fariba Allahyoorti Dehaghi , Ali Amini
We examined how the consequences of stalking victimization shape victims' help-seeking behaviors, using the 2019 National Crime Victimization Survey, Supplemental Victimization data. We analyzed three distinct help-seeking outcomes: (a) reporting to police, (b) help-seeking from victim-serving agencies, and (c) help-seeking from personal networks. Logistic regression models assessed the statistical significance of individual predictors, while our non-parametric Machine Learning approach evaluated their predictive power and captured non-linear patterns. Regression results revealed that substantial emotional distress significantly increased the likelihood of all three help-seeking behaviors. Health, social, and financial problems increased the likelihood of network help-seeking, while social problems were associated with lower odds of police reporting. Machine learning identified financial problems, emotional distress, and health problems as the most predictive features for police reporting, agency help-seeking, and network help-seeking, respectively. These findings underscore the multidimensional nature of victimization consequences and the value of combining traditional statistical inference with machine learning to better understand victim decision-making.
{"title":"Help-seeking behaviors of stalking victims: Integrating machine learning and regression approaches to examine how victimization consequences shape victims' decisions","authors":"Auzeen Shariati , Fariba Allahyoorti Dehaghi , Ali Amini","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102554","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102554","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examined how the consequences of stalking victimization shape victims' help-seeking behaviors, using the 2019 National Crime Victimization Survey, Supplemental Victimization data. We analyzed three distinct help-seeking outcomes: (a) reporting to police, (b) help-seeking from victim-serving agencies, and (c) help-seeking from personal networks. Logistic regression models assessed the statistical significance of individual predictors, while our non-parametric Machine Learning approach evaluated their predictive power and captured non-linear patterns. Regression results revealed that substantial emotional distress significantly increased the likelihood of all three help-seeking behaviors. Health, social, and financial problems increased the likelihood of network help-seeking, while social problems were associated with lower odds of police reporting. Machine learning identified financial problems, emotional distress, and health problems as the most predictive features for police reporting, agency help-seeking, and network help-seeking, respectively. These findings underscore the multidimensional nature of victimization consequences and the value of combining traditional statistical inference with machine learning to better understand victim decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Justice","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 102554"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145468872","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-07DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102538
Andrea Canel , Marc Graf , Christian Huber , Jérôme Endrass , Nathalie Brackmann
The social climate of secure settings plays a critical role in correctional rehabilitation, yet little is known about how interpersonal dynamics between clients and staff shape these environments. This study investigated the influence of interpersonal motives on perceptions of social climate in correctional facilities and forensic psychiatric hospitals in Switzerland. Interpersonal motives are preferences for certain interpersonal outcomes or modes of reactions along the dimensions of dominance and affiliation. Data were collected from 442 participants (369 clients, 73 staff) across six institutions using validated self-report and observer-rated measures. Multilevel modeling was used to assess individual and institutional-level predictors of three key social climate dimensions: Experienced Safety, Resident Cohesion, and Therapeutic Hold. For clients, higher levels of affiliative motives, both self-reported and perceived in staff, consistently predicted more positive perceptions of the social climate across all dimensions. In contrast, dominance-related motives showed no significant associations. Staff members' perceptions of social climate were more strongly shaped by institutional context, though perceiving clients as affiliative was linked to higher ratings of Resident Cohesion and the social climate overall. Individual affiliative motives also predicted stronger perceptions of Therapeutic Hold among staff. These findings underscore the relevance of everyday relational dynamics—particularly affiliative behaviors—in promoting safe, cohesive, and rehabilitative environments. The study highlights the reciprocal nature of staff-client relationships and the need to train and support frontline staff in cultivating prosocial, compassionate interactions. Understanding how interpersonal motives shape climate perceptions provides valuable insights for improving correctional outcomes and working conditions in secure settings.
{"title":"Influence of social motives of clients and staff on the social climate of secure settings","authors":"Andrea Canel , Marc Graf , Christian Huber , Jérôme Endrass , Nathalie Brackmann","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102538","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102538","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The social climate of secure settings plays a critical role in correctional rehabilitation, yet little is known about how interpersonal dynamics between clients and staff shape these environments. This study investigated the influence of interpersonal motives on perceptions of social climate in correctional facilities and forensic psychiatric hospitals in Switzerland. Interpersonal motives are preferences for certain interpersonal outcomes or modes of reactions along the dimensions of dominance and affiliation. Data were collected from 442 participants (369 clients, 73 staff) across six institutions using validated self-report and observer-rated measures. Multilevel modeling was used to assess individual and institutional-level predictors of three key social climate dimensions: Experienced Safety, Resident Cohesion, and Therapeutic Hold. For clients, higher levels of affiliative motives, both self-reported and perceived in staff, consistently predicted more positive perceptions of the social climate across all dimensions. In contrast, dominance-related motives showed no significant associations. Staff members' perceptions of social climate were more strongly shaped by institutional context, though perceiving clients as affiliative was linked to higher ratings of Resident Cohesion and the social climate overall. Individual affiliative motives also predicted stronger perceptions of Therapeutic Hold among staff. These findings underscore the relevance of everyday relational dynamics—particularly affiliative behaviors—in promoting safe, cohesive, and rehabilitative environments. The study highlights the reciprocal nature of staff-client relationships and the need to train and support frontline staff in cultivating prosocial, compassionate interactions. Understanding how interpersonal motives shape climate perceptions provides valuable insights for improving correctional outcomes and working conditions in secure settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Justice","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 102538"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145468871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-06DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102552
Marco Dugato , Alejandro Giménez-Santana , Adriana Santos , Joel M. Caplan , Leslie W. Kennedy
This study investigates the spatial relationship between corner stores and crime in Newark, New Jersey, to assess whether these venues play a distinct criminogenic role compared to other businesses. Although previous literature has often treated convenience stores as a homogeneous risk category, we hypothesize that corner stores exert a unique influence on crime patterns. Using crime data for 2022, this paper aims to investigate how the distribution of gun violence, robberies, and aggravated assaults is spatially connected to proximity to corner stores in comparison with other similar venues, like convenience stores, pharmacies, retail stores, restaurants, or gas stations, and how these associations are influenced by neighborhood characteristics and temporal variables. Our findings reveal that crime is significantly concentrated around corner stores, and that this association is stronger for gun violence and aggravated assaults than for robberies. Interaction effects suggest that neighborhood characteristics shape the degree and nature of crime around these stores. Further, crime persists around corner stores during both day and night, implying mechanisms beyond mere business hours. The study underscores the need to disaggregate place-based risk assessments and to differentiate interventions considering both micro-place features and broader contexts. These insights have implications for crime prevention, urban planning, and community safety policies.
{"title":"“Not all convenience stores are equal”. An analysis of the criminogenic role of corner Stores in Newark, NJ","authors":"Marco Dugato , Alejandro Giménez-Santana , Adriana Santos , Joel M. Caplan , Leslie W. Kennedy","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102552","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102552","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the spatial relationship between corner stores and crime in Newark, New Jersey, to assess whether these venues play a distinct criminogenic role compared to other businesses. Although previous literature has often treated convenience stores as a homogeneous risk category, we hypothesize that corner stores exert a unique influence on crime patterns. Using crime data for 2022, this paper aims to investigate how the distribution of gun violence, robberies, and aggravated assaults is spatially connected to proximity to corner stores in comparison with other similar venues, like convenience stores, pharmacies, retail stores, restaurants, or gas stations, and how these associations are influenced by neighborhood characteristics and temporal variables. Our findings reveal that crime is significantly concentrated around corner stores, and that this association is stronger for gun violence and aggravated assaults than for robberies. Interaction effects suggest that neighborhood characteristics shape the degree and nature of crime around these stores. Further, crime persists around corner stores during both day and night, implying mechanisms beyond mere business hours. The study underscores the need to disaggregate place-based risk assessments and to differentiate interventions considering both micro-place features and broader contexts. These insights have implications for crime prevention, urban planning, and community safety policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Justice","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 102552"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145448681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102545
Rachael M. Rief, Alessa S. Juárez
This study examines how female representation in law enforcement affects victim-centric policies and cooperation, whether agencies with more female officers are more likely to have victim services and domestic violence units and reduce exceptional clearance due to victim non-cooperation. Using Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics datasets and the 2020 National Incident Based Reporting System dataset, we analyzed whether agency characteristics predicted victim non-cooperation in a sample of incidents involving nearly 1,000,000 assault and rape victims and about 2700 agencies. Logistic regression results show that agencies with 30 % or more female officers are significantly more likely to have victim services and domestic violence units than agencies with less than 30 %. However, multi-level logistic regression reveals that higher female presence may not impact victim cooperation when considering other victim and agency characteristics. Findings suggest increased female representation provide tangible benefits for victim-centric policies and practices but fall short of affecting victim cooperation.
{"title":"Effects of female representation in law enforcement on victim-centered practices and victim cooperation","authors":"Rachael M. Rief, Alessa S. Juárez","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102545","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102545","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines how female representation in law enforcement affects victim-centric policies and cooperation, whether agencies with more female officers are more likely to have victim services and domestic violence units and reduce exceptional clearance due to victim non-cooperation. Using Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics datasets and the 2020 National Incident Based Reporting System dataset, we analyzed whether agency characteristics predicted victim non-cooperation in a sample of incidents involving nearly 1,000,000 assault and rape victims and about 2700 agencies. Logistic regression results show that agencies with 30 % or more female officers are significantly more likely to have victim services and domestic violence units than agencies with less than 30 %. However, multi-level logistic regression reveals that higher female presence may not impact victim cooperation when considering other victim and agency characteristics. Findings suggest increased female representation provide tangible benefits for victim-centric policies and practices but fall short of affecting victim cooperation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Justice","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 102545"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145415640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102547
Makayla Butler , Lucas M. Alward , Ashley Lockwood , Jill Viglione
Purpose
This study examined the sources of PPOs' feelings of occupational stress and burnout during the pandemic, including whether their stress and burnout levels changed over time.
Methods
Using three waves of semi-structured qualitative interviews with American PPOs, the current study examined: 1) the main sources of PPO stress and burnout, including how officers' experiences changed over time, and 2) the strategies or coping mechanisms PPOs used to manage their well-being over time.
Results
Findings from thematic analysis revealed that most PPOs were not initially stressed during the onset of the pandemic; however, inconsistent messaging and limited organizational support contributed to the rise of stress and burnout over time. Findings also indicated that when agencies implemented policies that supported PPOs' ability to work from home, such adjustments served as key coping mechanisms.
Conclusions
This study highlights the potential of remote policies and organizational support, facilitated through communication and technology assistance, to mitigate supervisory duties and enhance officer well-being.
{"title":"A longitudinal qualitative analysis of probation and parole officer stress and burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Makayla Butler , Lucas M. Alward , Ashley Lockwood , Jill Viglione","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102547","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102547","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study examined the sources of PPOs' feelings of occupational stress and burnout during the pandemic, including whether their stress and burnout levels changed over time.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using three waves of semi-structured qualitative interviews with American PPOs, the current study examined: 1) the main sources of PPO stress and burnout, including how officers' experiences changed over time, and 2) the strategies or coping mechanisms PPOs used to manage their well-being over time.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Findings from thematic analysis revealed that most PPOs were not initially stressed during the onset of the pandemic; however, inconsistent messaging and limited organizational support contributed to the rise of stress and burnout over time. Findings also indicated that when agencies implemented policies that supported PPOs' ability to work from home, such adjustments served as key coping mechanisms.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study highlights the potential of remote policies and organizational support, facilitated through communication and technology assistance, to mitigate supervisory duties and enhance officer well-being.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Justice","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 102547"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145415642","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102533
Sarah Paquette , Angela W. Eke , Shelby Scott , Jean-Pierre Guay , Manon Duval , Francis Fortin , Michael C. Seto , Yves Paradis
{"title":"Corrigendum to “Is the Static-99R valid for all men with ‘identifiable’ victims? Examining cases of online sexual solicitation of children” [Journal of Criminal Justice 97 (2025) 102358]","authors":"Sarah Paquette , Angela W. Eke , Shelby Scott , Jean-Pierre Guay , Manon Duval , Francis Fortin , Michael C. Seto , Yves Paradis","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102533","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102533","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Justice","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 102533"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145520124","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102546
Meghan Koza, Stuti S. Kokkalera
Prior research on parole board decision-making indicates that clear demonstrations of rehabilitative efforts are salient in deciding if a candidate will receive parole. In the United States, roughly one-third of all individuals serving life sentences are under the age of 25 (Nellis & Barry, 2025). Several U.S. Supreme Court decisions and state appellate courts have designated juvenile lifers as a protected constitutional class due to their reduced culpability and unique rehabilitative potential. However, there is no consensus about whether age at the time of the sentencing offense and rehabilitative program participation jointly influence the decision to release. This study aims to identify if the possibility of parole release differs among juvenile, emerging adult, and adult lifers based on rehabilitative program participation, and if so, if any specific program type is driving this difference. To do so, data derived from written parole hearing decisions for 648 parole candidates in one state who had hearings between 2017 and 2024 are analyzed. Logistic regression results show that while age at the time of offense may not be a significant predictor, participation in rehabilitative programs is associated with an increased likelihood of release, particularly programs that have practical implications for successful reentry. How parole boards perceive rehabilitative efforts through program participation while incarcerated, particularly for those who were juveniles or emerging adults at the time of the offense, has policy and practical implications as they influence parole candidates' likelihood of release.
{"title":"Parole outcomes in a developmental context: The interplay of age at offense and rehabilitation","authors":"Meghan Koza, Stuti S. Kokkalera","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102546","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102546","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Prior research on parole board decision-making indicates that clear demonstrations of rehabilitative efforts are salient in deciding if a candidate will receive parole. In the United States, roughly one-third of all individuals serving life sentences are under the age of 25 (Nellis & Barry, 2025). Several U.S. Supreme Court decisions and state appellate courts have designated juvenile lifers as a protected constitutional class due to their reduced culpability and unique rehabilitative potential. However, there is no consensus about whether age at the time of the sentencing offense and rehabilitative program participation jointly influence the decision to release. This study aims to identify if the possibility of parole release differs among juvenile, emerging adult, and adult lifers based on rehabilitative program participation, and if so, if any specific program type is driving this difference. To do so, data derived from written parole hearing decisions for 648 parole candidates in one state who had hearings between 2017 and 2024 are analyzed. Logistic regression results show that while age at the time of offense may not be a significant predictor, participation in rehabilitative programs is associated with an increased likelihood of release, particularly programs that have practical implications for successful reentry. How parole boards perceive rehabilitative efforts through program participation while incarcerated, particularly for those who were juveniles or emerging adults at the time of the offense, has policy and practical implications as they influence parole candidates' likelihood of release.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Justice","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 102546"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145415641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102530
Skyler Morgan , Kayla Freemon , Andrea N. Montes , Joshua C. Cochran
Understanding the uniquely painful incarceration experiences for LGB+ and transgender people is important because it can inform theory, research, and policy aimed at reducing harms. The current study expands upon Sykes' pains of imprisonment framework to compare the incarceration experiences of LGB+ and heterosexual people and, separately, the experiences of transgender and cisgender people. We use the National Inmate Survey, a nationally representative survey, to identify the pains more likely to be experienced by LGB+ and trans people and the impact these pains have on serious psychological distress. We find that LGB+ and trans people report experiencing more pains of imprisonment, including a hostile institutional environment, solitary confinement placements, lack of social support, and sexual victimization from other incarcerated people and staff. The analyses reveal limited social support to be a key factor predicting serious psychological distress for LGB+ incarcerated people. The findings demonstrate a need for more research examining the experiences of LGB+ and trans people in carceral settings and the urgency for policy that provides social and mental health support.
{"title":"Measuring the uniquely painful incarceration experiences of LGB+ and trans people and the implications for mental health","authors":"Skyler Morgan , Kayla Freemon , Andrea N. Montes , Joshua C. Cochran","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102530","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102530","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding the uniquely painful incarceration experiences for LGB+ and transgender people is important because it can inform theory, research, and policy aimed at reducing harms. The current study expands upon Sykes' pains of imprisonment framework to compare the incarceration experiences of LGB+ and heterosexual people and, separately, the experiences of transgender and cisgender people. We use the National Inmate Survey, a nationally representative survey, to identify the pains more likely to be experienced by LGB+ and trans people and the impact these pains have on serious psychological distress. We find that LGB+ and trans people report experiencing more pains of imprisonment, including a hostile institutional environment, solitary confinement placements, lack of social support, and sexual victimization from other incarcerated people and staff. The analyses reveal limited social support to be a key factor predicting serious psychological distress for LGB+ incarcerated people. The findings demonstrate a need for more research examining the experiences of LGB+ and trans people in carceral settings and the urgency for policy that provides social and mental health support.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Justice","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 102530"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145415644","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102549
Calvin Proffit
The immigrant revitalization thesis has served as the guiding framework for understanding why immigration often protects communities from various forms of crime and violence. While it is well established that immigrants often settle in disadvantaged communities, foundational research spearheaded by Lauren Krivo and Ruth Peterson shows disadvantage fundamentally alters how community context matters. Thus, it is possible that immigration may serve as a strong revitalizing force in extremely disadvantaged communities, whereas its effects may be less pronounced in communities facing low-moderate levels of disadvantage. This study examines within-community change in Chicago's 77 Community Areas (2008–2021) using fixed-effects models to assess how immigration-crime relationships vary across neighborhoods with different levels of disadvantage. It also explores how revitalization mechanisms function differently in varying contexts of disadvantage. Findings suggest immigration effects and the revitalization process are conditioned by contexts of disadvantage.
{"title":"Conditional revitalization: Immigration, disadvantage, and crime in divergent social worlds","authors":"Calvin Proffit","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102549","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102549","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The immigrant revitalization thesis has served as the guiding framework for understanding why immigration often protects communities from various forms of crime and violence. While it is well established that immigrants often settle in disadvantaged communities, foundational research spearheaded by Lauren Krivo and Ruth Peterson shows disadvantage fundamentally alters how community context matters. Thus, it is possible that immigration may serve as a strong revitalizing force in extremely disadvantaged communities, whereas its effects may be less pronounced in communities facing low-moderate levels of disadvantage. This study examines within-community change in Chicago's 77 Community Areas (2008–2021) using fixed-effects models to assess how immigration-crime relationships vary across neighborhoods with different levels of disadvantage. It also explores how revitalization mechanisms function differently in varying contexts of disadvantage. Findings suggest immigration effects and the revitalization process are conditioned by contexts of disadvantage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Justice","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 102549"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145415643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102550
Ahmet Guler , Sedat Kula , Kaan Boke
This study empirically investigates the socio-psychological, contextual, and demographic factors influencing individual support for defunding and refunding the police. Using survey data from the northeastern U.S., the study tests eight hypotheses within a structural equation modeling framework. The analysis finds that confidence in police is positively associated with support for refunding the police but is not significantly associated with support for defunding. Willingness to collaborate with police is negatively associated with support for defunding and positively associated with support for refunding. In addition, willingness to collaborate mediates the relationship between confidence in police and both defunding and refunding attitudes. Moreover, the perceived need for police reform mediates the relationship between confidence in police and support for defunding but does not mediate the relationship between confidence in police and support for refunding. Among demographic and contextual variables, age, education, household income, and television consumption significantly predict funding preferences, while political ideology, race, sex, newspaper readership, and social media usage do not. These findings highlight the complex interplay of individual perceptions and demographic factors in shaping public opinion on police reform through funding preferences. Policy implications and future research directions are discussed.
{"title":"Defund vs. refund: The role of funding in police reform in the U.S.","authors":"Ahmet Guler , Sedat Kula , Kaan Boke","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102550","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102550","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study empirically investigates the socio-psychological, contextual, and demographic factors influencing individual support for defunding and refunding the police. Using survey data from the northeastern U.S., the study tests eight hypotheses within a structural equation modeling framework. The analysis finds that confidence in police is positively associated with support for refunding the police but is not significantly associated with support for defunding. Willingness to collaborate with police is negatively associated with support for defunding and positively associated with support for refunding. In addition, willingness to collaborate mediates the relationship between confidence in police and both defunding and refunding attitudes. Moreover, the perceived need for police reform mediates the relationship between confidence in police and support for defunding but does not mediate the relationship between confidence in police and support for refunding. Among demographic and contextual variables, age, education, household income, and television consumption significantly predict funding preferences, while political ideology, race, sex, newspaper readership, and social media usage do not. These findings highlight the complex interplay of individual perceptions and demographic factors in shaping public opinion on police reform through funding preferences. Policy implications and future research directions are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Justice","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 102550"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145465634","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}