首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology最新文献

英文 中文
Bridging the Principle-Implementation Gap: Evaluating organizational change to achieve interoperability between the UK Emergency Services 弥合原则与实施之间的差距:评估组织变革以实现英国紧急服务之间的互操作性
IF 3.5 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI: 10.1111/joop.70010
Nicola Power, Richard Philpot, Mark Levine, Jennifer Alcock

Improving inter-agency working across organizations is an important goal across public and private sectors. The UK Emergency Services have spent a decade implementing organizational change to improve interoperability between the Police, Fire and Ambulance Services. JESIP—the group tasked with realising this change—have faced criticism. We evaluated JESIP's efforts by interviewing expert commanders, finding participants supported the principle of change, but issues impeded its implementation. We developed the Principle-Implementation Change Framework for Interoperability (PICI) to describe the gap between change principles and change implementation, identifying the macro-systemic, meso-organizational and micro-psychological processes between them. Key obstacles to implementation included macro-level funding issues, incompatible meso-level organizational structures and strained micro-level peer-to-peer relationships. Participants also reflected on the facilitators of change. At the meso-organizational level, JESIP was perceived to have improved inter-team communication and flexibility. At the micro-psychological level participants described enhanced trust, shared identities and the emergence of a new type of interoperability leader. This study highlights the importance of gaining support for the principle of interoperability while addressing implementation challenges posed by the inherent social complexities involved in this change. Change efforts must be monitored over time, considering the macro, meso and micro-level processes that influence the principle-implementation gap.

改善跨组织的机构间工作是公共和私营部门的一个重要目标。英国紧急服务部门花了十年时间实施组织变革,以改善警察、消防和救护车服务之间的互操作性。jesep——负责实现这一变化的组织——面临着批评。我们通过采访专家指挥官来评估JESIP的努力,发现参与者支持变革原则,但问题阻碍了其实施。我们开发了互操作性的原则-实施变革框架(PICI)来描述变革原则和变革实施之间的差距,确定它们之间的宏观系统、中观组织和微观心理过程。实施的主要障碍包括宏观层面的资金问题、中观层面的组织结构不兼容以及微观层面的点对点关系紧张。与会者还对变革的推动者进行了反思。在中观组织层面,JESIP被认为改善了团队间的沟通和灵活性。在微观心理层面,参与者描述了增强的信任、共享的身份和新型互操作性领导者的出现。这项研究强调了在解决由这一变化所涉及的固有社会复杂性所带来的实现挑战的同时,获得对互操作性原则的支持的重要性。必须长期监测变革工作,同时考虑到影响原则-执行差距的宏观、中观和微观层面的过程。
{"title":"Bridging the Principle-Implementation Gap: Evaluating organizational change to achieve interoperability between the UK Emergency Services","authors":"Nicola Power,&nbsp;Richard Philpot,&nbsp;Mark Levine,&nbsp;Jennifer Alcock","doi":"10.1111/joop.70010","DOIUrl":"10.1111/joop.70010","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Improving inter-agency working across organizations is an important goal across public and private sectors. The UK Emergency Services have spent a decade implementing organizational change to improve interoperability between the Police, Fire and Ambulance Services. JESIP—the group tasked with realising this change—have faced criticism. We evaluated JESIP's efforts by interviewing expert commanders, finding participants supported the principle of change, but issues impeded its implementation. We developed the Principle-Implementation Change Framework for Interoperability (PICI) to describe the gap between change principles and change implementation, identifying the macro-systemic, meso-organizational and micro-psychological processes between them. Key obstacles to implementation included macro-level funding issues, incompatible meso-level organizational structures and strained micro-level peer-to-peer relationships. Participants also reflected on the facilitators of change. At the meso-organizational level, JESIP was perceived to have improved inter-team communication and flexibility. At the micro-psychological level participants described enhanced trust, shared identities and the emergence of a new type of interoperability leader. This study highlights the importance of gaining support for the principle of interoperability while addressing implementation challenges posed by the inherent social complexities involved in this change. Change efforts must be monitored over time, considering the macro, meso and micro-level processes that influence the principle-implementation gap.</p>","PeriodicalId":48330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joop.70010","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143118809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Voice for ourselves or myself in times of crisis: When and how crisis-related uncertainty motivates employee voices 在危机时刻为自己发声:危机相关的不确定性何时以及如何激发员工发声
IF 3.5 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI: 10.1111/joop.70007
Xiaotian Wang, Jinyun Duan, Yue Xu, Lixiaoyun Shi, Cheng Qian

Drawing on fairness heuristic theory, we propose that organizational justice serves as a boundary condition determining how employees respond to perceived uncertainty in times of organizational crisis with different types of proactive voice (i.e. prosocial or self-interested). We conducted a three-wave survey study to test our hypotheses with a sample of 401 employee-supervisor dyads during the COVID-19 period. Results demonstrated the employee crisis-related uncertainty perception's positive indirect effect on employee prosocial voice via prosocial motive when organizational justice was higher, and its positive indirect effect on employee self-interested voice via self-interested motive when organizational justice was lower. We then discussed our implications for organizational crisis and employee voice literature.

利用公平启发式理论,我们提出组织公正作为一个边界条件,决定了员工在组织危机时期如何用不同类型的主动声音(即亲社会或自利)来应对感知到的不确定性。我们进行了一项三波调查研究,以COVID-19期间401名员工-主管对为样本来检验我们的假设。结果表明,当组织公平感较高时,员工危机相关不确定性感知通过亲社会动机对员工亲社会建言产生正向间接影响;当组织公平感较低时,员工危机相关不确定性感知通过自利动机对员工自利建言产生正向间接影响。然后我们讨论了我们对组织危机和员工声音文学的启示。
{"title":"Voice for ourselves or myself in times of crisis: When and how crisis-related uncertainty motivates employee voices","authors":"Xiaotian Wang,&nbsp;Jinyun Duan,&nbsp;Yue Xu,&nbsp;Lixiaoyun Shi,&nbsp;Cheng Qian","doi":"10.1111/joop.70007","DOIUrl":"10.1111/joop.70007","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Drawing on fairness heuristic theory, we propose that organizational justice serves as a boundary condition determining how employees respond to perceived uncertainty in times of organizational crisis with different types of proactive voice (i.e. prosocial or self-interested). We conducted a three-wave survey study to test our hypotheses with a sample of 401 employee-supervisor dyads during the COVID-19 period. Results demonstrated the employee crisis-related uncertainty perception's positive indirect effect on employee prosocial voice via prosocial motive when organizational justice was higher, and its positive indirect effect on employee self-interested voice via self-interested motive when organizational justice was lower. We then discussed our implications for organizational crisis and employee voice literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":48330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143117271","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A multilevel argument-based approach to validation and interpretation of safety climate scores 多级论证为基础的方法来验证和解释安全气候得分
IF 3.5 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI: 10.1111/joop.70008
Andrea Bazzoli, Brian F. French

We introduce Kane's Interpretation Use Argument approach to establishing a measure's validity to organizational scientists and extend it to multilevel constructs. First, we review five types of inferences (i.e., domain description, scoring, generalization, extrapolation and implication) that could be targeted by applied psychologists and management scholars, enumerate the types of analyses that fall under each of the inferences and describe how they help provide a clearer overview to support score use. We apply this framework to organize evidence related to a short and theory-driven scale that measures safety climate by developing six potential factor structures for safety climate scores, along with their meaning and interpretations, selecting items from the SOPS survey and analysing data from the 2021 and 2022 SOPS datasets, two large government surveys from the health care industry (N = 77,674 and 183,573, respectively) that feature a nested data structure on three levels. A shared construct model was the model that received the most empirical support. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of measuring safety climate using shared construct models, the limitations of the SOPS survey, and we trace a map for future efforts to constructing a validity argument.

我们将凯恩的解释和论证方法引入到组织科学家中来建立测量的效度,并将其扩展到多层次结构。首先,我们回顾了应用心理学家和管理学者可能针对的五种推断(即领域描述、评分、概括、外推和暗示),列举了每种推断下的分析类型,并描述了它们如何帮助提供更清晰的概述,以支持评分的使用。我们应用这一框架来组织与一个简短的、理论驱动的量表相关的证据,该量表通过开发安全气候得分的六个潜在因素结构,以及它们的含义和解释,从SOPS调查中选择项目,并分析来自2021年和2022年SOPS数据集的数据,这两个来自医疗保健行业的大型政府调查(N = 77,674和183,573),在三个层面上具有嵌套的数据结构。共享结构模型是得到最多经验支持的模型。最后,我们讨论了使用共享结构模型测量安全气候的含义,SOPS调查的局限性,并为未来构建有效性论证的努力绘制了地图。
{"title":"A multilevel argument-based approach to validation and interpretation of safety climate scores","authors":"Andrea Bazzoli,&nbsp;Brian F. French","doi":"10.1111/joop.70008","DOIUrl":"10.1111/joop.70008","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We introduce Kane's Interpretation Use Argument approach to establishing a measure's validity to organizational scientists and extend it to multilevel constructs. First, we review five types of inferences (i.e., domain description, scoring, generalization, extrapolation and implication) that could be targeted by applied psychologists and management scholars, enumerate the types of analyses that fall under each of the inferences and describe how they help provide a clearer overview to support score use. We apply this framework to organize evidence related to a short and theory-driven scale that measures safety climate by developing six potential factor structures for safety climate scores, along with their meaning and interpretations, selecting items from the SOPS survey and analysing data from the 2021 and 2022 SOPS datasets, two large government surveys from the health care industry (<i>N</i> = 77,674 and 183,573, respectively) that feature a nested data structure on three levels. A shared construct model was the model that received the most empirical support. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of measuring safety climate using shared construct models, the limitations of the SOPS survey, and we trace a map for future efforts to constructing a validity argument.</p>","PeriodicalId":48330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143117232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Leaders' power construal influences malevolent creativity: The mediating role of organizational conspiracy beliefs 领导者权力解释对恶意创造力的影响:组织阴谋信念的中介作用
IF 3.5 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI: 10.1111/joop.70005
Kyriaki Fousiani, Sylvia Xu, Jan-Willem van Prooijen

How employees perceive their leaders' power can influence their view and treatment of organizations. This study examines how employees' perceptions of their leaders' power construal—primarily as responsibility (PaR) or primarily as opportunity (PaO)—influence employee malevolent creativity towards the organization, with organizational conspiracy beliefs mediating this relationship. We hypothesized that when leaders' power is perceived primarily as responsibility, it diminishes employee endorsement of conspiracy beliefs and, in turn, reduces malevolent creativity. Conversely, perceiving leaders' power mainly as opportunity was expected to amplify conspiracy beliefs and subsequently malevolent creativity. Study 1, a three-wave study among employees, showed that increased PaO was positively related to employee malevolent creativity through increased organizational conspiracy beliefs. Moreover, PaR was negatively related to malevolent creativity through organizational conspiracy beliefs. Study 2 (preregistered) experimentally tested these relationships and provided support for all hypotheses. Study 3 (also preregistered) manipulated exposure to organizational conspiracy theories (the mediator) to address the ‘measurement-of-mediation’ issue and found that conspiracy theories increase malevolent creativity. This study demonstrates the adverse consequences of leader's power construal as opportunity through employee's organizational conspiracy beliefs.

员工如何看待领导者的权力会影响他们对组织的看法和态度。本研究考察了员工对领导者权力解释的认知——主要作为责任(PaR)或主要作为机会(PaO)——如何影响员工对组织的恶意创造力,而组织阴谋信念在这种关系中起中介作用。我们假设,当领导者的权力主要被视为责任时,它会减少员工对阴谋论的认可,进而减少恶意的创造力。相反,认为领导者的权力主要是机会,预计会放大阴谋信念,随后是恶意的创造力。研究1是一项针对员工的三波研究,结果表明PaO的增加通过组织阴谋信念的增加与员工恶意创造力呈正相关。此外,PaR通过组织阴谋信念与恶意创造力呈负相关。研究2(预登记)通过实验检验了这些关系,并为所有假设提供了支持。研究3(同样是预先注册的)操纵暴露于组织阴谋论(中介)来解决“中介测量”问题,并发现阴谋论增加了恶意创造力。本研究通过员工的组织阴谋信念证明了领导者权力解释作为机会的不良后果。
{"title":"Leaders' power construal influences malevolent creativity: The mediating role of organizational conspiracy beliefs","authors":"Kyriaki Fousiani,&nbsp;Sylvia Xu,&nbsp;Jan-Willem van Prooijen","doi":"10.1111/joop.70005","DOIUrl":"10.1111/joop.70005","url":null,"abstract":"<p>How employees perceive their leaders' power can influence their view and treatment of organizations. This study examines how employees' perceptions of their leaders' power construal—primarily as responsibility (PaR) or primarily as opportunity (PaO)—influence employee malevolent creativity towards the organization, with organizational conspiracy beliefs mediating this relationship. We hypothesized that when leaders' power is perceived primarily as responsibility, it diminishes employee endorsement of conspiracy beliefs and, in turn, reduces malevolent creativity. Conversely, perceiving leaders' power mainly as opportunity was expected to amplify conspiracy beliefs and subsequently malevolent creativity. Study 1, a three-wave study among employees, showed that increased PaO was positively related to employee malevolent creativity through increased organizational conspiracy beliefs. Moreover, PaR was negatively related to malevolent creativity through organizational conspiracy beliefs. Study 2 (preregistered) experimentally tested these relationships and provided support for all hypotheses. Study 3 (also preregistered) manipulated exposure to organizational conspiracy theories (the mediator) to address the ‘measurement-of-mediation’ issue and found that conspiracy theories increase malevolent creativity. This study demonstrates the adverse consequences of leader's power construal as opportunity through employee's organizational conspiracy beliefs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joop.70005","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143117230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Long-term development in job crafting in employees with and without mental health issues during COVID-19: The role of job resources COVID-19期间有和没有精神健康问题的员工工作制定的长期发展:工作资源的作用
IF 3.5 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI: 10.1111/joop.70002
Anja I. Lehmann, Philipp Kerksieck, Georg F. Bauer

The aim of this study was to investigate long-term development in job crafting during the COVID-19 pandemic among employees with and without mental health issues (MHI). Furthermore, this study aimed to explore the role of job resources regarding these changes. We have analysed longitudinal panel data of six waves between 2019 (applied as pre-pandemic baseline) and 2022 from employees in Switzerland, Germany and Austria. Hierarchical linear modelling showed change differences in job crafting: employees with MHI experienced a higher decrease in job crafting during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with employees without MHI. When investigating the specific crafting dimensions, we found that there was a group difference only for crafting for structural resources, but not for crafting for social resources. Moreover, job resources buffered the decrease in job crafting among employees with MHI. Particularly, social support buffered the decrease in crafting for social resources and role clarity buffered the decrease in crafting for structural resources. These results suggest that in times of crisis, strengthening job resources can help employees with MHI maintain their job crafting behaviour.

本研究的目的是调查在COVID-19大流行期间,有和没有心理健康问题(MHI)的员工在工作制定方面的长期发展。此外,本研究旨在探讨工作资源在这些变化中的作用。我们分析了瑞士、德国和奥地利员工在2019年(作为大流行前基线)至2022年期间的六波纵向面板数据。分层线性模型显示了工作制作的变化差异:在COVID-19大流行期间,与没有MHI的员工相比,拥有MHI的员工在工作制作方面的下降幅度更高。在调查具体的制造维度时,我们发现只有在为结构资源而制造时才存在群体差异,而在为社会资源而制造时则没有。此外,工作资源缓冲了MHI员工工作制作的减少。特别是,社会支持缓冲了社会资源制造的减少,角色清晰度缓冲了结构资源制造的减少。这些结果表明,在危机时期,加强工作资源可以帮助MHI员工保持他们的工作制造行为。
{"title":"Long-term development in job crafting in employees with and without mental health issues during COVID-19: The role of job resources","authors":"Anja I. Lehmann,&nbsp;Philipp Kerksieck,&nbsp;Georg F. Bauer","doi":"10.1111/joop.70002","DOIUrl":"10.1111/joop.70002","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of this study was to investigate long-term development in job crafting during the COVID-19 pandemic among employees with and without mental health issues (MHI). Furthermore, this study aimed to explore the role of job resources regarding these changes. We have analysed longitudinal panel data of six waves between 2019 (applied as pre-pandemic baseline) and 2022 from employees in Switzerland, Germany and Austria. Hierarchical linear modelling showed change differences in job crafting: employees with MHI experienced a higher decrease in job crafting during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with employees without MHI. When investigating the specific crafting dimensions, we found that there was a group difference only for crafting for structural resources, but not for crafting for social resources. Moreover, job resources buffered the decrease in job crafting among employees with MHI. Particularly, social support buffered the decrease in crafting for social resources and role clarity buffered the decrease in crafting for structural resources. These results suggest that in times of crisis, strengthening job resources can help employees with MHI maintain their job crafting behaviour.</p>","PeriodicalId":48330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143117231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Learning processes as mediators of the impact of workplace coaching interventions on goal attainment 学习过程作为工作场所教练干预对目标达成影响的中介
IF 3.5 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI: 10.1111/joop.70004
Conny H. Antoni, Alexandra Tatar

This study contributes to research on how workplace coaching works by examining learning processes as a mediating mechanism of the impact of problem-specific interventions on goal attainment. This has rarely been investigated. Fifty-five coach–coachee dyads with 51 coaches and 55 coachees participated in the study. Workplace coaching lasted seven to eight coaching sessions in average. Coaches and coachees gave ratings in each session. We analysed this data (NLevel2 = 55, NLevel1 = 335–407) using longitudinal multilevel structural equation modelling accounting for the nested data structure. As expected, coachees' perceived goal attainment increased throughout the coaching process. The results of the study also revealed the mediating role of learning processes in the impact of problem-specific interventions, specifically clarification of meaning and mastery/coping, and, but to a lesser extent, implementation actuation, on goal attainment in coaching. Data for all hypothesised models showed a good or acceptable model fit. In contrast, the model fit was poor, when we explored differential mediation effects, which supported only single-loop learning as a mediator. These results underscore the importance of stimulating learning processes through specific interventions to improve the effectiveness of workplace coaching.

本研究通过考察学习过程作为特定问题干预对目标实现影响的中介机制,有助于研究工作场所指导的工作原理。很少有人对此进行调查。55对教练-教练组合,51名教练和55名教练参与了这项研究。职场辅导平均持续7到8次。教练和教练员在每次训练中都给出了评分。我们使用考虑嵌套数据结构的纵向多层结构方程模型分析了这些数据(NLevel2 = 55, NLevel1 = 335-407)。正如预期的那样,教练的感知目标实现在整个执教过程中都有所增加。研究结果还揭示了学习过程在特定问题干预(特别是意义澄清和掌握/应对)的影响中的中介作用,以及在指导目标达成方面的实施驱动(但程度较低)的中介作用。所有假设模型的数据都显示出良好或可接受的模型拟合。相比之下,当我们探索差分中介效应时,模型拟合很差,它只支持单环学习作为中介。这些结果强调了通过具体的干预措施来促进学习过程以提高工作场所指导的有效性的重要性。
{"title":"Learning processes as mediators of the impact of workplace coaching interventions on goal attainment","authors":"Conny H. Antoni,&nbsp;Alexandra Tatar","doi":"10.1111/joop.70004","DOIUrl":"10.1111/joop.70004","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study contributes to research on how workplace coaching works by examining learning processes as a mediating mechanism of the impact of problem-specific interventions on goal attainment. This has rarely been investigated. Fifty-five coach–coachee dyads with 51 coaches and 55 coachees participated in the study. Workplace coaching lasted seven to eight coaching sessions in average. Coaches and coachees gave ratings in each session. We analysed this data (NLevel2 = 55, NLevel1 = 335–407) using longitudinal multilevel structural equation modelling accounting for the nested data structure. As expected, coachees' perceived goal attainment increased throughout the coaching process. The results of the study also revealed the mediating role of learning processes in the impact of problem-specific interventions, specifically clarification of meaning and mastery/coping, and, but to a lesser extent, implementation actuation, on goal attainment in coaching. Data for all hypothesised models showed a good or acceptable model fit. In contrast, the model fit was poor, when we explored differential mediation effects, which supported only single-loop learning as a mediator. These results underscore the importance of stimulating learning processes through specific interventions to improve the effectiveness of workplace coaching.</p>","PeriodicalId":48330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joop.70004","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143111478","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bad behaviours because of a dead-end job? Effects of career plateau on counterproductive work behaviours 工作没有前途导致不良行为?职业平台期对反生产行为的影响
IF 3.5 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI: 10.1111/joop.70003
Jun Zhao, Ziguang Chen, Wing Lam, Yuping Xie, Zhiqiang Liu, Lirong Long

Career advancement offers employee motivation, but what happens when an upward path reaches a plateau? With a three-wave survey of 244 members of 58 work teams, the current study explores how and when career plateaus influence counterproductive work behaviours (CWBs), in accordance with negative reciprocity theory. The results show that at the individual level, individual job content plateaus relate positively to individual CWBs, through individual work alienation; individual task crafting weakens this mediating effect. At the team level, the team hierarchical plateaus relate positively to team CWBs through team work alienation, and team participation in decision-making weakens this mediating effect. This multi-level perspective establishes both theoretical contributions and practical implications.

职业发展为员工提供了动力,但是当上升的道路达到瓶颈时,会发生什么呢?本研究根据负互惠理论,对58个工作团队的244名成员进行了三波调查,探讨了职业停滞期如何以及何时影响反生产行为。结果表明,在个体层面上,个体工作内容平台通过个体工作异化与个体CWBs呈正相关;个人任务制作削弱了这种中介效应。在团队层面,团队层级平台效应通过团队工作疏离感对团队CWBs产生正向影响,团队参与决策削弱了这一中介效应。这种多层次的视角既有理论贡献,又有实践意义。
{"title":"Bad behaviours because of a dead-end job? Effects of career plateau on counterproductive work behaviours","authors":"Jun Zhao,&nbsp;Ziguang Chen,&nbsp;Wing Lam,&nbsp;Yuping Xie,&nbsp;Zhiqiang Liu,&nbsp;Lirong Long","doi":"10.1111/joop.70003","DOIUrl":"10.1111/joop.70003","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Career advancement offers employee motivation, but what happens when an upward path reaches a plateau? With a three-wave survey of 244 members of 58 work teams, the current study explores how and when career plateaus influence counterproductive work behaviours (CWBs), in accordance with negative reciprocity theory. The results show that at the individual level, individual job content plateaus relate positively to individual CWBs, through individual work alienation; individual task crafting weakens this mediating effect. At the team level, the team hierarchical plateaus relate positively to team CWBs through team work alienation, and team participation in decision-making weakens this mediating effect. This multi-level perspective establishes both theoretical contributions and practical implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":48330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143121152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Measuring work attitudes with less: Supervised construct scoring to shorten work attitude measures 用更少的量测工作态度:监督构念计分以缩短工作态度测量
IF 3.5 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2024-12-25 DOI: 10.1111/joop.70001
Andrew B. Speer, Angie Y. Delacruz, Lauren J. Wegmeyer

Work attitude and perceptions surveys are useful to understand workforces and improve employee well-being. However, surveys are often lengthy, leading companies to use less effective methods or measure only a few constructs. Researchers have tried various scale reduction methods, including single-item measures (Matthews et al., Journal of Business and Psychology, 2022), but these and other scale-shortening methods often compromise content validity and reliability. This research tests a novel scale-shortening method called supervised construct scoring (SCS) to create shorter work attitude and perception measures. Despite using only 39% of the original items, SCS scores exhibited nearly equivalent psychometric properties as full-scale scores and superior psychometric properties when compared to single-item measures. SCS represents a paradigm shift in scale shortening, and the new Short Work Attitude and Perception Scales (SWAPS) algorithms are made freely available: https://osf.io/9tueh/?view_only=482dc89e3cbf4c1489e28aabff307caa.

工作态度和看法调查对了解员工队伍和提高员工福利很有用。然而,调查通常很长,导致公司使用不太有效的方法或只测量几个结构。研究人员已经尝试了各种缩减量表的方法,包括单项目测量(Matthews等人,Journal of Business and Psychology, 2022),但这些和其他缩减量表的方法往往会损害内容的效度和可靠性。本研究以监督构念评分(SCS)作为一种新的缩短量表的方法,来创造更短的工作态度和知觉量表。尽管只使用了39%的原始项目,SCS分数表现出与全量表分数几乎相同的心理测量特性,并且与单项目测量相比具有更优越的心理测量特性。SCS代表了量表缩短的范式转变,新的短工作态度和感知量表(swap)算法免费提供:https://osf.io/9tueh/?view_only=482dc89e3cbf4c1489e28aabff307caa。
{"title":"Measuring work attitudes with less: Supervised construct scoring to shorten work attitude measures","authors":"Andrew B. Speer,&nbsp;Angie Y. Delacruz,&nbsp;Lauren J. Wegmeyer","doi":"10.1111/joop.70001","DOIUrl":"10.1111/joop.70001","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Work attitude and perceptions surveys are useful to understand workforces and improve employee well-being. However, surveys are often lengthy, leading companies to use less effective methods or measure only a few constructs. Researchers have tried various scale reduction methods, including single-item measures (Matthews et al., <i>Journal of Business and Psychology</i>, 2022), but these and other scale-shortening methods often compromise content validity and reliability. This research tests a novel scale-shortening method called supervised construct scoring (SCS) to create shorter work attitude and perception measures. Despite using only 39% of the original items, SCS scores exhibited nearly equivalent psychometric properties as full-scale scores and superior psychometric properties when compared to single-item measures. SCS represents a paradigm shift in scale shortening, and the new Short Work Attitude and Perception Scales (SWAPS) algorithms are made freely available: https://osf.io/9tueh/?view_only=482dc89e3cbf4c1489e28aabff307caa.</p>","PeriodicalId":48330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joop.70001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143119009","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perceived financial incentive salience and its undermining effect: A moderated-mediation model 感知财务激励显著性及其破坏效应:一个有调节的中介模型
IF 3.5 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI: 10.1111/joop.70000
Manish Saini, Nishant Uppal, Joshua L. Howard

How incentives are perceived by a receiver can determine how they affect their autonomy and intrinsic motivation. Guided by self-determination theory, we investigate the relationship between perceived financial incentive salience (PFIS) and change in intrinsic motivation by focusing on the mediating role of autonomy frustration and the moderating role of task heuristic. To test this model, we utilize a repeated-measure two-wave design in two field studies (n = 169 and 341) under a non-contingent versus contingent pay system. The findings demonstrated that perceived salience is a key determinant behind the undermining effect caused by financial incentives, independently of incentive contingency. In addition, task heuristic and autonomy frustration are crucial factors in understanding the nuances behind the undermining effect. Under both types of incentive systems (a) PFIS had a positive association with autonomy frustration, and (b) PFIS and autonomy frustration both related negatively to intrinsic motivation in high-heuristic tasks. However, the autonomy frustration-intrinsic motivation relationship and PFIS-intrinsic motivation relationship had considerable differences in low-heuristic tasks among non-contingent versus contingent systems. We discuss the implications of the findings for future research on incentive salience and work motivation.

受激励者如何看待激励可以决定激励如何影响他们的自主性和内在动机。在自我决定理论的指导下,我们研究了感知到的经济激励显著性(PFIS)与内在动机变化之间的关系,重点关注自主性挫折的中介作用和任务启发式的调节作用。为了检验这一模型,我们在两项实地研究(n = 169 和 341)中采用了重复测量两波设计,研究对象分别是非权变薪酬制度和权变薪酬制度。研究结果表明,感知显著性是决定经济激励所产生的破坏效应的关键因素,与激励或然性无关。此外,任务启发式和自主性挫折感也是理解破坏效应背后细微差别的关键因素。在两种激励制度下,(a) PFIS 与自主挫败感呈正相关;(b) PFIS 和自主挫败感都与高启发式任务中的内在动机呈负相关。然而,在低启发式任务中,自主挫败感与内在动机的关系以及 PFIS 与内在动机的关系在非权变与权变系统中存在很大差异。我们讨论了这些发现对未来激励显著性和工作动机研究的影响。
{"title":"Perceived financial incentive salience and its undermining effect: A moderated-mediation model","authors":"Manish Saini,&nbsp;Nishant Uppal,&nbsp;Joshua L. Howard","doi":"10.1111/joop.70000","DOIUrl":"10.1111/joop.70000","url":null,"abstract":"<p>How incentives are perceived by a receiver can determine how they affect their autonomy and intrinsic motivation. Guided by self-determination theory, we investigate the relationship between perceived financial incentive salience (PFIS) and change in intrinsic motivation by focusing on the mediating role of autonomy frustration and the moderating role of task heuristic. To test this model, we utilize a repeated-measure two-wave design in two field studies (<i>n</i> = 169 and 341) under a non-contingent versus contingent pay system. The findings demonstrated that perceived salience is a key determinant behind the undermining effect caused by financial incentives, independently of incentive contingency. In addition, task heuristic and autonomy frustration are crucial factors in understanding the nuances behind the undermining effect. Under both types of incentive systems (a) PFIS had a positive association with autonomy frustration, and (b) PFIS and autonomy frustration both related negatively to intrinsic motivation in high-heuristic tasks. However, the autonomy frustration-intrinsic motivation relationship and PFIS-intrinsic motivation relationship had considerable differences in low-heuristic tasks among non-contingent versus contingent systems. We discuss the implications of the findings for future research on incentive salience and work motivation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142868931","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Negative emotions, difficult conversations and leader–follower relationships 负面情绪、困难对话和领导者与追随者的关系
IF 3.5 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI: 10.1111/joop.12566
Courtney E. Williams, Jane Shumski Thomas, Janaki Gooty, Danielle D. Dunne

The world of work is replete with daily hassles that make the experience of negative emotions ubiquitous. Conversations between leaders and followers during challenging times are often characterized by negative emotions, and thus, are of central importance in modern organizations. Yet, the intersection of negative emotion, difficult conversations and leader–follower relationships is often ignored, and these topics are treated as separate areas of study. We integrate these various streams with research on asymmetrical leader negative emotion displays to identify when and how difficult conversations laden with negative emotions result in benefits to leader–follower relationships. Using a grounded theory approach, we build a theoretical model based on interviews with 21 leaders and 17 followers describing 166 difficult conversations. Our work depicts specific communication strategies that leaders use to facilitate difficult conversations. These strategies, in turn, create shared meaning and validate followers' feelings during difficult conversations, which allows for beneficial relationship-specific outcomes to ensue. We unpack these findings in the context of the power differential between leaders and followers to advance current thinking on the intersection of negative emotions and communication in leader–follower relationships.

工作的世界充满了日常的麻烦,让负面情绪无处不在。在充满挑战的时期,领导者和追随者之间的对话往往以负面情绪为特征,因此,在现代组织中至关重要。然而,负面情绪、困难对话和领导与下属关系的交叉往往被忽视,这些主题被视为单独的研究领域。我们将这些不同的信息流与对不对称领导消极情绪表现的研究结合起来,以确定何时以及如何通过充满消极情绪的艰难对话来促进领导与下属的关系。采用扎根理论的方法,我们基于对21位领导者和17位追随者的访谈建立了一个理论模型,描述了166个困难的对话。我们的工作描述了领导者用来促进困难对话的具体沟通策略。这些策略,反过来,创造共享的意义,并在困难的对话中验证追随者的感受,这使得有益的特定关系的结果随之而来。我们在领导者和追随者之间的权力差异的背景下对这些发现进行了分析,以推进当前对领导者-追随者关系中负面情绪和沟通交叉的思考。
{"title":"Negative emotions, difficult conversations and leader–follower relationships","authors":"Courtney E. Williams,&nbsp;Jane Shumski Thomas,&nbsp;Janaki Gooty,&nbsp;Danielle D. Dunne","doi":"10.1111/joop.12566","DOIUrl":"10.1111/joop.12566","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The world of work is replete with daily hassles that make the experience of negative emotions ubiquitous. Conversations between leaders and followers during challenging times are often characterized by negative emotions, and thus, are of central importance in modern organizations. Yet, the intersection of negative emotion, difficult conversations and leader–follower relationships is often ignored, and these topics are treated as separate areas of study. We integrate these various streams with research on asymmetrical leader negative emotion displays to identify when and how difficult conversations laden with negative emotions result in benefits to leader–follower relationships. Using a grounded theory approach, we build a theoretical model based on interviews with 21 leaders and 17 followers describing 166 difficult conversations. Our work depicts specific communication strategies that leaders use to facilitate difficult conversations. These strategies, in turn, create shared meaning and validate followers' feelings during difficult conversations, which allows for beneficial relationship-specific outcomes to ensue. We unpack these findings in the context of the power differential between leaders and followers to advance current thinking on the intersection of negative emotions and communication in leader–follower relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":48330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142861021","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1