Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103858
Phurichai Rungcharoenkitkul, Fabian Winkler
We propose a novel explanation for persistent movements in the natural rate of interest, or r-star, based on a model of two-sided learning between the central bank and the private sector. Each side has some information about r-star fundamentals and also learns from observing output, inflation and interest rates. When both sides fail to recognise that their actions influence the other’s beliefs, a “hall-of-mirrors” effect arises that causes persistent shifts in r-star in response to cyclical shocks. The model can explain the post-2008 decline in r-star without changes in long-run fundamentals, as well as the excess sensitivity of long-term yields to monetary policy surprises and the underreaction of interest rate forecasts. Aggressive policy easing designed to counter a recession can inadvertently lower r-star and endogenously narrow policy space.
{"title":"The natural rate of interest through a hall of mirrors","authors":"Phurichai Rungcharoenkitkul, Fabian Winkler","doi":"10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103858","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103858","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We propose a novel explanation for persistent movements in the natural rate of interest, or r-star, based on a model of two-sided learning between the central bank and the private sector. Each side has some information about r-star fundamentals and also learns from observing output, inflation and interest rates. When both sides fail to recognise that their actions influence the other’s beliefs, a “hall-of-mirrors” effect arises that causes persistent shifts in r-star in response to cyclical shocks. The model can explain the post-2008 decline in r-star without changes in long-run fundamentals, as well as the excess sensitivity of long-term yields to monetary policy surprises and the underreaction of interest rate forecasts. Aggressive policy easing designed to counter a recession can inadvertently lower r-star and endogenously narrow policy space.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Monetary Economics","volume":"157 ","pages":"Article 103858"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145694218","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-19DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103869
Javier Bianchi , Louphou Coulibaly
Central banks with flexible exchange rate regimes are often reluctant to let their currency float, a phenomenon known as “fear of floating.” We develop a framework in which a floating exchange rate may exacerbate vulnerability to self-fulfilling financial crises rather than provide the intended insulation against external shocks. A commitment to a crawling peg—where the currency can fluctuate within a predetermined band—can help mitigate the risk of self-fulfilling crises. In contrast to the Mundell–Fleming paradigm, the optimal exchange rate policy entails allowing the exchange rate to float in response to real shocks while maintaining it fixed in response to non-fundamental shocks.
{"title":"A theory of fear of floating","authors":"Javier Bianchi , Louphou Coulibaly","doi":"10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103869","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103869","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Central banks with flexible exchange rate regimes are often reluctant to let their currency float, a phenomenon known as “fear of floating.” We develop a framework in which a floating exchange rate may exacerbate vulnerability to self-fulfilling financial crises rather than provide the intended insulation against external shocks. A commitment to a crawling peg—where the currency can fluctuate within a predetermined band—can help mitigate the risk of self-fulfilling crises. In contrast to the Mundell–Fleming paradigm, the optimal exchange rate policy entails allowing the exchange rate to float in response to real shocks while maintaining it fixed in response to non-fundamental shocks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Monetary Economics","volume":"157 ","pages":"Article 103869"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145694217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-14DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103868
Luca Gemmi , Rosen Valchev
We find empirical evidence that surveys of professional forecasters are biased by strategic incentives. First, we find that individual forecasts overreact to idiosyncratic information but underreact to common information. We show this is consistent with a model of strategic diversification incentives in forecast reporting where forecasters want to optimally “stand out” from the crowd, and thus report forecasts that exaggerate the agents’ true beliefs. Second, we show that no such biases are present in forecasts data that is not subject to strategic incentives. We also test further comparative statics that also confirm the strategic incentive model. Overall, we conclude that strategic reporting biases the inference an econometrician can draw on the true underlying expectations formation process, and the precision and heterogeneity in agents’ information sets, and lastly we show how to correct for this.
{"title":"Biased surveys","authors":"Luca Gemmi , Rosen Valchev","doi":"10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103868","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103868","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We find empirical evidence that surveys of professional forecasters are biased by strategic incentives. First, we find that individual forecasts overreact to idiosyncratic information but underreact to common information. We show this is consistent with a model of strategic diversification incentives in forecast reporting where forecasters want to optimally “stand out” from the crowd, and thus report forecasts that exaggerate the agents’ true beliefs. Second, we show that no such biases are present in forecasts data that is not subject to strategic incentives. We also test further comparative statics that also confirm the strategic incentive model. Overall, we conclude that strategic reporting biases the inference an econometrician can draw on the true underlying expectations formation process, and the precision and heterogeneity in agents’ information sets, and lastly we show how to correct for this.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Monetary Economics","volume":"157 ","pages":"Article 103868"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145694216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-17DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103880
Nils H. Lehr , Pascual Restrepo
Leading AI firms claim to prioritize social welfare. How should firms with a social mandate price and deploy AI? We derive pricing formulas that depart from profit maximization by incorporating incentives to improve welfare and reduce labor disruptions. Using US data, we evaluate several scenarios. A welfarist firm that values both profit and welfare should price closer to marginal cost, as efficiency gains outweigh distributional concerns. A conservative firm focused on labor-market stability should price above the profit-maximizing level in the short run, especially when its AI may displace low-income workers. Overall, socially minded firms face a trade-off between expanding access to AI and the resulting loss in profits and labor market risks.
{"title":"The price of intelligence: How should socially-minded firms price and deploy AI?","authors":"Nils H. Lehr , Pascual Restrepo","doi":"10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103880","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103880","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Leading AI firms claim to prioritize social welfare. <em>How should firms with a social mandate price and deploy AI?</em> We derive pricing formulas that depart from profit maximization by incorporating incentives to improve welfare and reduce labor disruptions. Using US data, we evaluate several scenarios. A <em>welfarist firm</em> that values both profit and welfare should price closer to marginal cost, as efficiency gains outweigh distributional concerns. A <em>conservative firm</em> focused on labor-market stability should price above the profit-maximizing level in the short run, especially when its AI may displace low-income workers. Overall, socially minded firms face a trade-off between expanding access to AI and the resulting loss in profits and labor market risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Monetary Economics","volume":"157 ","pages":"Article 103880"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145840017","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-17DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103882
Olga Goldfayn-Frank , Pascal Kieren , Stefan Trautmann
Economists widely rely on measures of inflation expectations and uncertainty elicited via density forecasts. This approach, which asks respondents to assign probabilities to pre-specified ranges, has proven highly informative, but also faced criticism in recent periods of elevated and volatile inflation. We propose a new method to elicit the full distribution of inflation expectations, which is rooted in decision theory and can be implemented in standard surveys. In two large surveys and a laboratory experiment, we demonstrate that the proposed method leads to well-defined expectations that fulfil both subjective and objective quality criteria. The method is neither perceived as more difficult nor does it take more time to complete compared to the current standard. In contrast to density forecasts, the method is robust to differences in the state of the economy and thus allows comparisons across time and across countries. The method is portable and can be applied to elicit different macroeconomic expectations.
{"title":"A choice-based approach to the measurement of inflation expectations","authors":"Olga Goldfayn-Frank , Pascal Kieren , Stefan Trautmann","doi":"10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103882","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103882","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Economists widely rely on measures of inflation expectations and uncertainty elicited via density forecasts. This approach, which asks respondents to assign probabilities to pre-specified ranges, has proven highly informative, but also faced criticism in recent periods of elevated and volatile inflation. We propose a new method to elicit the full distribution of inflation expectations, which is rooted in decision theory and can be implemented in standard surveys. In two large surveys and a laboratory experiment, we demonstrate that the proposed method leads to well-defined expectations that fulfil both subjective and objective quality criteria. The method is neither perceived as more difficult nor does it take more time to complete compared to the current standard. In contrast to density forecasts, the method is robust to differences in the state of the economy and thus allows comparisons across time and across countries. The method is portable and can be applied to elicit different macroeconomic expectations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Monetary Economics","volume":"157 ","pages":"Article 103882"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145840016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-02DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103876
Enrique Ide, Eduard Talamàs
We analyze how Artificial Intelligence (AI) reshapes global knowledge work in a two-region world where firms organize production hierarchically to use knowledge efficiently: the most knowledgeable individuals specialize in problem-solving, while others perform routine work. Before AI, the Advanced Economy specializes in problem-solving services, whereas the Emerging Economy focuses on routine work. AI converts compute — which is located in the Advanced Economy — into autonomous “AI agents” that perfectly substitute for humans with a given level of knowledge. Basic AI reduces the Advanced Economy’s net exports of problem-solving services, potentially reversing pre-AI trade patterns. In contrast, sophisticated AI expands these exports, reinforcing existing trade patterns. Finally, we show that a global ban on AI autonomy redistributes AI’s gains toward lower-skilled workers, while a regional ban — such as prohibiting autonomy only in the Emerging Economy — offers little benefit to lower-skilled workers and harms the most knowledgeable individuals in that region.
{"title":"The impact of AI on global knowledge work","authors":"Enrique Ide, Eduard Talamàs","doi":"10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103876","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103876","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We analyze how Artificial Intelligence (AI) reshapes global knowledge work in a two-region world where firms organize production hierarchically to use knowledge efficiently: the most knowledgeable individuals specialize in problem-solving, while others perform routine work. Before AI, the Advanced Economy specializes in problem-solving services, whereas the Emerging Economy focuses on routine work. AI converts compute — which is located in the Advanced Economy — into autonomous “AI agents” that perfectly substitute for humans with a given level of knowledge. Basic AI reduces the Advanced Economy’s net exports of problem-solving services, potentially reversing pre-AI trade patterns. In contrast, sophisticated AI expands these exports, reinforcing existing trade patterns. Finally, we show that a global ban on AI autonomy redistributes AI’s gains toward lower-skilled workers, while a regional ban — such as prohibiting autonomy only in the Emerging Economy — offers little benefit to lower-skilled workers and harms the most knowledgeable individuals in that region.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Monetary Economics","volume":"157 ","pages":"Article 103876"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145694220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-16DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103881
Ming Zeng , Guihai Zhao
This paper develops a noisy-information equilibrium model to study how subjective expectations shape the joint dynamics of equity and bond yields. In our framework, movements in asset yields are driven by subjective expectations of dividend and GDP growth, rather than time-varying risk premia. A dual-component dividend structure, together with belief distortions, generates key asset-pricing facts: short-term equity yields are more volatile than long-term yields because short-run dividend growth expectations mean-revert to their stable long-run counterpart; the equity yield slope is procyclical due to countercyclical term structure of expected dividend growth; and the bond-stock correlation changes from positive to negative after the late 1990s, reflecting a shift in the correlation between expected GDP and dividend growth. The model also implies predictable dividend strip returns, with predictability declining with maturity due to dividend forecast revisions, and it successfully replicates the observed dynamics of equity yields and some aggregate moments.
{"title":"Expectation-driven term structure of equity and bond yields","authors":"Ming Zeng , Guihai Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103881","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103881","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper develops a noisy-information equilibrium model to study how subjective expectations shape the joint dynamics of equity and bond yields. In our framework, movements in asset yields are driven by subjective expectations of dividend and GDP growth, rather than time-varying risk premia. A dual-component dividend structure, together with belief distortions, generates key asset-pricing facts: short-term equity yields are more volatile than long-term yields because short-run dividend growth expectations mean-revert to their stable long-run counterpart; the equity yield slope is procyclical due to countercyclical term structure of expected dividend growth; and the bond-stock correlation changes from positive to negative after the late 1990s, reflecting a shift in the correlation between expected GDP and dividend growth. The model also implies predictable dividend strip returns, with predictability declining with maturity due to dividend forecast revisions, and it successfully replicates the observed dynamics of equity yields and some aggregate moments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Monetary Economics","volume":"157 ","pages":"Article 103881"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145790280","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-12DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103877
Boyan Jovanovic , Peter L. Rousseau
We model several ways in which AI may improve decisions, raise the productivity of firms, and raise human capital growth. Each focuses on activities that involve problem solving, with solutions being guided by signals. If AI raises the accuracy of the signals, humans will then make better decisions — individually and in groups.
{"title":"AI and task efficiency","authors":"Boyan Jovanovic , Peter L. Rousseau","doi":"10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103877","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103877","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We model several ways in which AI may improve decisions, raise the productivity of firms, and raise human capital growth. Each focuses on activities that involve problem solving, with solutions being guided by signals. If AI raises the accuracy of the signals, humans will then make better decisions — individually and in groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Monetary Economics","volume":"157 ","pages":"Article 103877"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145790382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-24DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103884
Indira Puri , Laura Veldkamp
We combine insights from the medical and artificial intelligence (AI) literatures to propose a novel model, which suggests that the expansion of AI may exacerbate cognitive inequality. Information providers maximize profit by tailoring the complexity of content, offering less cognition-enhancing content to less able customers. While individuals with high cognitive abilities may benefit from this increased within-cognitive-group homogeneity, those with lower cognitive abilities – and even children – may suffer adverse effects. Anecdotal data from political discourse and cognitive skills scores are consistent with the model predictions. The findings introduce a new consideration to the debate on financial literacy and AI regulation.
{"title":"Artificial intelligence and cognitive inequality","authors":"Indira Puri , Laura Veldkamp","doi":"10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103884","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103884","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We combine insights from the medical and artificial intelligence (AI) literatures to propose a novel model, which suggests that the expansion of AI may exacerbate cognitive inequality. Information providers maximize profit by tailoring the complexity of content, offering less cognition-enhancing content to less able customers. While individuals with high cognitive abilities may benefit from this increased within-cognitive-group homogeneity, those with lower cognitive abilities – and even children – may suffer adverse effects. Anecdotal data from political discourse and cognitive skills scores are consistent with the model predictions. The findings introduce a new consideration to the debate on financial literacy and AI regulation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Monetary Economics","volume":"157 ","pages":"Article 103884"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145883931","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-11DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103878
Roxana Mihet , Kumar Rishabh , Orlando Gomes
The technology revolution is transforming firm and industry dynamics, yet the roots of firm dominance in the modern economy remain unclear. Is industry dynamism driven by compute capabilities (AI), access to data, or the interaction between them? We develop a dynamic model in which firms gain knowledge from raw data using AI, but face “informational entropy”: without sufficient AI, more raw data leads to information overload and has negative returns. The model has two key predictions: (1) improvements in AI (compute) disproportionately benefit data-rich firms; and (2) access to processed data substitutes for compute, increasing industry dynamism and reducing market concentration. We confirm these predictions using novel data from 2000–2023 and two exogenous shocks: the 2006 launch of Amazon Web Services (AWS) and the 2017 introduction of transformer-based architectures. Our findings suggest that regulating data usability, not just AI models, is essential to preserving competition in the modern economy.
{"title":"Is it AI or data that drives firm market power?","authors":"Roxana Mihet , Kumar Rishabh , Orlando Gomes","doi":"10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103878","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103878","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The technology revolution is transforming firm and industry dynamics, yet the roots of firm dominance in the modern economy remain unclear. Is industry dynamism driven by compute capabilities (AI), access to data, or the interaction between them? We develop a dynamic model in which firms gain knowledge from raw data using AI, but face <em>“informational entropy”</em>: without sufficient AI, more raw data leads to information overload and has negative returns. The model has two key predictions: (1) improvements in AI (compute) disproportionately benefit data-rich firms; and (2) access to processed data substitutes for compute, increasing industry dynamism and reducing market concentration. We confirm these predictions using novel data from 2000–2023 and two exogenous shocks: the 2006 launch of Amazon Web Services (AWS) and the 2017 introduction of transformer-based architectures. Our findings suggest that regulating data usability, not just AI models, is essential to preserving competition in the modern economy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Monetary Economics","volume":"157 ","pages":"Article 103878"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145737780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}