首页 > 最新文献

International Journal of Project Management最新文献

英文 中文
Conceptualizing semi-temporary project networks through actor roles in smart city innovation 通过智慧城市创新中的参与者角色概念化半临时项目网络
IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2025-09-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102763
Emilene Leite
Our study examines the under-theorized, yet essential roles adopted by actors in fostering urban innovation, with a focus on the organization of project networks in smart cities, and conceptualizes these as semi-temporary project networks, a new form of organizing innovation. Specifically, it addresses two research questions: (1) How do actors adopt or create roles when organizing project networks for smart city innovation? and (2) How do these roles enable and promote innovation in complex, multi-actor environments such as smart cities? Drawing on two case studies of smart city project networks, the study identifies six distinct actor roles that contribute to innovation: i) the orchestrator, ii) facilitator, iii) integrator, iv) co-creator, v) tester, and vi) knowledge developer. By mapping the actors’ roles and linking them to project networks literature, we show empirically that the role of the orchestrator matters in project development, but some supporting roles in the specific innovation tasks become even more relevant than the orchestrator itself. The interplay between temporality at the project level and relative permanence at the relationship level forms the foundation of semi-temporary project networks for sustained innovation and collaboration across projects. This study has implications for project management literature, particularly on managing and organizing projects for societal impact, as well as for practitioners and municipalities interested in knowing which roles lead to effective smart city implementation.
我们的研究考察了参与者在促进城市创新中所扮演的理论不足但却至关重要的角色,重点关注智慧城市中项目网络的组织,并将其概念化为半临时项目网络,这是一种组织创新的新形式。具体来说,它解决了两个研究问题:(1)在组织智慧城市创新项目网络时,参与者如何采用或创建角色?(2)这些角色如何在智能城市等复杂的多参与者环境中实现和促进创新?通过对智慧城市项目网络的两个案例研究,该研究确定了有助于创新的六种不同的参与者角色:i)协调者,ii)促进者,iii)集成商,iv)共同创造者,v)测试者,vi)知识开发者。通过映射参与者的角色并将其与项目网络文献联系起来,我们从经验上表明,协调者的角色在项目开发中很重要,但在特定的创新任务中,一些支持角色甚至比协调者本身更相关。项目层面的临时性和关系层面的相对持久性之间的相互作用构成了跨项目持续创新和协作的半临时性项目网络的基础。这项研究对项目管理文献具有启示意义,特别是关于管理和组织具有社会影响的项目,以及对了解哪些角色导致有效的智慧城市实施感兴趣的从业者和市政当局。
{"title":"Conceptualizing semi-temporary project networks through actor roles in smart city innovation","authors":"Emilene Leite","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102763","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102763","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Our study examines the under-theorized, yet essential roles adopted by actors in fostering urban innovation, with a focus on the organization of project networks in smart cities, and conceptualizes these as semi-temporary project networks, a new form of organizing innovation. Specifically, it addresses two research questions: (1) How do actors adopt or create roles when organizing project networks for smart city innovation? and (2) How do these roles enable and promote innovation in complex, multi-actor environments such as smart cities? Drawing on two case studies of smart city project networks, the study identifies six distinct actor roles that contribute to innovation: i) the orchestrator, ii) facilitator, iii) integrator, iv) co-creator, v) tester, and vi) knowledge developer. By mapping the actors’ roles and linking them to project networks literature, we show empirically that the role of the orchestrator matters in project development, but some supporting roles in the specific innovation tasks become even more relevant than the orchestrator itself. The interplay between temporality at the project level and relative permanence at the relationship level forms the foundation of semi-temporary project networks for sustained innovation and collaboration across projects. This study has implications for project management literature, particularly on managing and organizing projects for societal impact, as well as for practitioners and municipalities interested in knowing which roles lead to effective smart city implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"43 7","pages":"Article 102763"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145160184","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Project determinants of long-term value in the operations 项目运营中长期价值的决定因素
IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2025-09-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102762
Chiara Ogheri , Tuomas Ahola , Giorgio Locatelli , Matias Ståhle
There is increasing scholarly interest in the long-term impact of projects. In this context, this paper investigates how projects create value during the operations phase, when their outputs have been transferred to end users. We draw on a purposefully selected, in-depth single case study of an urban development project that has been in its operational phase for more than 50 years and has consistently delivered value to end users. Our analysis contrasts the value espoused by the project organisation during the project phase with the value perceived by end users 50 years after project completion. The findings indicate that long-term value creation in the operations phase is facilitated by two key factors: (a) the design, during the project phase, of a permanent organisation operations, and (b) the design of ad hoc processes and structures within this organisation to define and regulate its relationship with end users in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity.
学术界对项目的长期影响越来越感兴趣。在此背景下,本文研究了当项目的产出被传递给最终用户时,项目如何在运营阶段创造价值。我们对一个城市发展项目进行了有目的地选择,深入的单一案例研究,该项目已处于运营阶段超过50年,并始终如一地为最终用户提供价值。我们的分析对比了项目组织在项目阶段所支持的价值与最终用户在项目完成后50年所感知的价值。研究结果表明,两个关键因素促进了运营阶段的长期价值创造:(a)在项目阶段设计一个永久性的组织运营,以及(b)在该组织内设计临时流程和结构,以根据辅助原则定义和规范其与最终用户的关系。
{"title":"Project determinants of long-term value in the operations","authors":"Chiara Ogheri ,&nbsp;Tuomas Ahola ,&nbsp;Giorgio Locatelli ,&nbsp;Matias Ståhle","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102762","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102762","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is increasing scholarly interest in the long-term impact of projects. In this context, this paper investigates how projects create value during the operations phase, when their outputs have been transferred to end users. We draw on a purposefully selected, in-depth single case study of an urban development project that has been in its operational phase for more than 50 years and has consistently delivered value to end users. Our analysis contrasts the value espoused by the project organisation during the project phase with the value perceived by end users 50 years after project completion. The findings indicate that long-term value creation in the operations phase is facilitated by two key factors: (a) the design, during the project phase, of a permanent organisation operations, and (b) the design of ad hoc processes and structures within this organisation to define and regulate its relationship with end users in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"43 7","pages":"Article 102762"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145057224","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Projectification and governance evolution in public sector strategy: A case study of Shenzhen Qianhai mega new town development in China 公共部门战略中的项目化与治理演变——以深圳前海大型新城开发为例
IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102751
Yongkui Li , Mengqi Wang , Ronggui Ding , Sheng Luo , Chunhua Xie
As projectification increasingly dominates the public sector, policies and strategies are predominantly implemented through projects. Achieving long-term strategic goals often entails complex, multi-level projectification, posing significant challenges to the governance capacity of the public sector and demanding a dynamic and adaptive governance system. Yet, existing literature lacks systematic research on this issue. Building on projectification research and governance theory, this study aims to reveal the projectification and governance evolution in public sector strategies, as well as the underlying mechanisms. We employ a longitudinal case study of a Chinese public sector strategy: the Shenzhen Qianhai Mega New Town Development. Tracing its fifteen-year evolution from conception to operation, our findings demonstrate that implementing such project-based strategies involves dynamic interactions among goal setting, institutional system development, organizational structuring, and project planning and construction. Based on these findings, we develop a conceptual model—the SIOP framework (Strategy, Institution, Organization, Project)—to capture the underlying evolutionary mechanisms of public sector strategies. This study contributes to projectification research by integrating governance theory and providing empirical insights, while also offering practical implications for public sectors.
随着项目日益主导公共部门,政策和战略主要通过项目来实施。实现长期战略目标往往需要复杂的、多层次的规划,对公共部门的治理能力提出重大挑战,需要一个动态的、适应性强的治理系统。然而,现有文献缺乏对这一问题的系统研究。基于项目化研究和治理理论,本研究旨在揭示公共部门战略的项目化和治理演变及其背后的机制。我们采用了中国公共部门战略的纵向案例研究:深圳前海巨型新城发展。通过对其从概念到运行的15年演变的追踪,我们的研究结果表明,实施这种基于项目的战略涉及目标设定、制度体系发展、组织结构和项目规划与建设之间的动态互动。基于这些发现,我们开发了一个概念模型——SIOP框架(战略、制度、组织、项目),以捕捉公共部门战略的潜在演化机制。本研究通过整合治理理论和提供实证见解,为项目化研究做出了贡献,同时也为公共部门提供了实践启示。
{"title":"Projectification and governance evolution in public sector strategy: A case study of Shenzhen Qianhai mega new town development in China","authors":"Yongkui Li ,&nbsp;Mengqi Wang ,&nbsp;Ronggui Ding ,&nbsp;Sheng Luo ,&nbsp;Chunhua Xie","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102751","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102751","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As projectification increasingly dominates the public sector, policies and strategies are predominantly implemented through projects. Achieving long-term strategic goals often entails complex, multi-level projectification, posing significant challenges to the governance capacity of the public sector and demanding a dynamic and adaptive governance system. Yet, existing literature lacks systematic research on this issue. Building on projectification research and governance theory, this study aims to reveal the projectification and governance evolution in public sector strategies, as well as the underlying mechanisms. We employ a longitudinal case study of a Chinese public sector strategy: the Shenzhen Qianhai Mega New Town Development. Tracing its fifteen-year evolution from conception to operation, our findings demonstrate that implementing such project-based strategies involves dynamic interactions among goal setting, institutional system development, organizational structuring, and project planning and construction. Based on these findings, we develop a conceptual model—the SIOP framework (Strategy, Institution, Organization, Project)—to capture the underlying evolutionary mechanisms of public sector strategies. This study contributes to projectification research by integrating governance theory and providing empirical insights, while also offering practical implications for public sectors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"43 6","pages":"Article 102751"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144842616","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Theorizing temporary organizing to foster true cross fertilization: Focus on projects, processes and practices 将临时组织理论化以促进真正的交叉发展:关注项目、过程和实践
IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102753
Maude Brunet , Catriona M. Burke , Mohsin Malik , Jörg Sydow
Extant scholarship in project studies is calling for fertilizing across disciplines to pave the way to stronger theorizing. This essay responds to this call by spurring a debate on how to theorize temporary organizing in new and creative ways — both broadly and with a particular focus on projects, arguably the most prevalent form of such organizing. We propose addressing projects and other forms of temporary organization as processual, practice-based phenomena that provide ample opportunities to foster cross-fertilization, in particular between the related disciplines of organization and project studies. To this end, we argue that theoretical advancements in a discipline can occur on a spectrum—ranging from leveraging reference theories from related fields (a top-down approach) to developing home-grown theories grounded in empirical research (a bottom-up approach). This spectrum serves as the foundation for this essay, as we develop this processual, practice-based perspective to project studies by illustrating how (1) reference theories from organization studies such as practice-driven institutionalism generate new insights on temporary organizing and (2) home-grown theories of temporary organizing generated by studying projects and other forms of temporary organization may have theoretical and practical implications beyond project studies.
项目研究领域现存的学术研究呼吁跨学科的融合,为更强的理论化铺平道路。本文通过激发一场关于如何以新的和创造性的方式将临时组织理论化的辩论来回应这一呼吁——既广泛又特别关注项目,可以说是这种组织最普遍的形式。我们建议将项目和其他形式的临时组织作为过程性的、基于实践的现象来处理,这些现象为促进交叉施肥提供了充足的机会,特别是在组织和项目研究的相关学科之间。为此,我们认为,一个学科的理论进步可以发生在一个范围内——从利用相关领域的参考理论(自上而下的方法)到发展基于实证研究的本土理论(自下而上的方法)。这个范围是本文的基础,因为我们通过说明(1)来自组织研究的参考理论,如实践驱动的制度主义,如何产生关于临时组织的新见解;(2)通过研究项目和其他形式的临时组织产生的临时组织的本土理论,可能具有超出项目研究的理论和实践意义,从而将这个过程性的、基于实践的视角发展到项目研究。
{"title":"Theorizing temporary organizing to foster true cross fertilization: Focus on projects, processes and practices","authors":"Maude Brunet ,&nbsp;Catriona M. Burke ,&nbsp;Mohsin Malik ,&nbsp;Jörg Sydow","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102753","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102753","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Extant scholarship in project studies is calling for fertilizing across disciplines to pave the way to stronger theorizing. This essay responds to this call by spurring a debate on how to theorize temporary organizing in new and creative ways — both broadly and with a particular focus on projects, arguably the most prevalent form of such organizing. We propose addressing projects and other forms of temporary organization as processual, practice-based phenomena that provide ample opportunities to foster cross-fertilization, in particular between the related disciplines of organization and project studies. To this end, we argue that theoretical advancements in a discipline can occur on a spectrum—ranging from leveraging reference theories from related fields (a top-down approach) to developing home-grown theories grounded in empirical research (a bottom-up approach). This spectrum serves as the foundation for this essay, as we develop this processual, practice-based perspective to project studies by illustrating how (1) reference theories from organization studies such as practice-driven institutionalism generate new insights on temporary organizing and (2) home-grown theories of temporary organizing generated by studying projects and other forms of temporary organization may have theoretical and practical implications beyond project studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"43 6","pages":"Article 102753"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144878171","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Knowledge governance mechanisms and regulatory focus effects on online collective knowledge sharing in project teams 知识治理机制和监管焦点对项目团队在线集体知识共享的影响
IF 7.4 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2025-07-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102748
Jianyao Jia , Shan Jiang , Yuanyuan Zhang
In today’s mobile internet era, online knowledge sharing has become increasingly prevalent within project teams. However, fostering online knowledge sharing in practice presents significant challenges, and the underlying psychological mechanisms, particularly concerning online collective knowledge sharing, remain incompletely understood. Given that online collective knowledge sharing occurs within public or collective spheres, a primary goal becomes improving the collective good and achieving shared goals. Consequently, online collective knowledge sharing is conceptualized as a process through which team members pursue both organizational and individually-assigned knowledge goals, which are specified by knowledge governance mechanisms. To explain the psychological mechanism involved in reducing goal discrepancies, regulatory focus theory is employed. Utilizing a dataset of 208 project team members, the study examines the proposed hypotheses and finds that prevention focus, rather than promotion focus, directly contributes to online collective knowledge sharing. Furthermore, prevention focus mediates the relationship between knowledge governance mechanisms and online collective knowledge sharing, while promotion focus strengthens the positive association between prevention focus and knowledge sharing. By revealing these complex dynamics, this study contributes to both project management and knowledge management literature. Moreover, it provides practical insights for knowledge management practices within today’s pervasive online environments.
在今天的移动互联网时代,在线知识共享在项目团队中变得越来越普遍。然而,在实践中促进在线知识共享面临着重大挑战,潜在的心理机制,特别是关于在线集体知识共享的心理机制,仍然不完全清楚。鉴于在线集体知识共享发生在公共或集体领域,主要目标变成了改善集体利益和实现共同目标。因此,在线集体知识共享被概念化为团队成员追求组织和个人指定的知识目标的过程,这些目标是由知识治理机制指定的。为了解释减少目标差异的心理机制,运用了调节焦点理论。利用208个项目团队成员的数据集,该研究检验了提出的假设,发现以预防为重点,而不是以促进为重点,直接有助于在线集体知识共享。预防焦点在知识治理机制与网络集体知识共享的关系中起中介作用,而促进焦点在预防焦点与知识共享的正相关关系中起强化作用。通过揭示这些复杂的动态,本研究对项目管理和知识管理的文献都有所贡献。此外,它还为当今无处不在的在线环境中的知识管理实践提供了实用的见解。
{"title":"Knowledge governance mechanisms and regulatory focus effects on online collective knowledge sharing in project teams","authors":"Jianyao Jia ,&nbsp;Shan Jiang ,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102748","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102748","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In today’s mobile internet era, online knowledge sharing has become increasingly prevalent within project teams. However, fostering online knowledge sharing in practice presents significant challenges, and the underlying psychological mechanisms, particularly concerning online collective knowledge sharing, remain incompletely understood. Given that online collective knowledge sharing occurs within public or collective spheres, a primary goal becomes improving the collective good and achieving shared goals. Consequently, online collective knowledge sharing is conceptualized as a process through which team members pursue both organizational and individually-assigned knowledge goals, which are specified by knowledge governance mechanisms. To explain the psychological mechanism involved in reducing goal discrepancies, regulatory focus theory is employed. Utilizing a dataset of 208 project team members, the study examines the proposed hypotheses and finds that prevention focus, rather than promotion focus, directly contributes to online collective knowledge sharing. Furthermore, prevention focus mediates the relationship between knowledge governance mechanisms and online collective knowledge sharing, while promotion focus strengthens the positive association between prevention focus and knowledge sharing. By revealing these complex dynamics, this study contributes to both project management and knowledge management literature. Moreover, it provides practical insights for knowledge management practices within today’s pervasive online environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"43 6","pages":"Article 102748"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144711496","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
There’s people in there! On Daniel Kahneman’s enduring impact 里面有人!关于丹尼尔·卡尼曼的持久影响
IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2025-07-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102749
Harvey Maylor, Alexander Budzier
{"title":"There’s people in there! On Daniel Kahneman’s enduring impact","authors":"Harvey Maylor,&nbsp;Alexander Budzier","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102749","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102749","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"43 7","pages":"Article 102749"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145097756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Behavioral barriers to sustainable action in project management and how to overcome them 项目管理中可持续行动的行为障碍及其克服方法
IF 7.4 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2025-07-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102747
Kevin Friedrich, Peter Wehnert
Project managers encounter behavioral barriers that hinder the integration of sustainability practices into projects. While prior research has explored enabling factors, these barriers project managers face remain understudied. We address this gap through 24 problem-centered interviews, identifying 13 barriers, including low goal commitment, perception-related challenges, feedback-related issues, and role conflicts. The Rubicon phase model provides a structured basis for our conceptual framework for analyzing these barriers, enabling the validation of known general barriers and the discovery of new role-specific ones. Our findings highlight the role-dependent nature of barriers and strategies to overcome them, such as leading by example, establishing guidelines, providing incentives, and capability development. While providing practical value the study also strengthens the theoretical understanding of sustainability-related decision-making and contributes to the sustainability and project management literature by showing that enablers like guidelines, training or rewards are insufficient without simultaneously addressing individual behavioral barriers in perceptions and beliefs.
项目经理会遇到行为障碍,阻碍可持续性实践融入项目。虽然先前的研究已经探索了促成因素,但项目经理面临的这些障碍仍未得到充分研究。我们通过24个以问题为中心的访谈来解决这一差距,确定了13个障碍,包括低目标承诺、感知相关挑战、反馈相关问题和角色冲突。Rubicon阶段模型为我们分析这些障碍的概念框架提供了结构化的基础,从而能够验证已知的一般障碍并发现新的角色特定障碍。我们的发现突出了障碍的角色依赖性质和克服它们的策略,例如以身作则、建立指导方针、提供激励和能力发展。在提供实用价值的同时,该研究还加强了对可持续性相关决策的理论理解,并通过表明指导、培训或奖励等推动因素在没有同时解决个人认知和信念中的行为障碍的情况下是不够的,从而为可持续性和项目管理文献做出了贡献。
{"title":"Behavioral barriers to sustainable action in project management and how to overcome them","authors":"Kevin Friedrich,&nbsp;Peter Wehnert","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102747","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102747","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Project managers encounter behavioral barriers that hinder the integration of sustainability practices into projects. While prior research has explored enabling factors, these barriers project managers face remain understudied. We address this gap through 24 problem-centered interviews, identifying 13 barriers, including low goal commitment, perception-related challenges, feedback-related issues, and role conflicts. The Rubicon phase model provides a structured basis for our conceptual framework for analyzing these barriers, enabling the validation of known general barriers and the discovery of new role-specific ones. Our findings highlight the role-dependent nature of barriers and strategies to overcome them, such as leading by example, establishing guidelines, providing incentives, and capability development. While providing practical value the study also strengthens the theoretical understanding of sustainability-related decision-making and contributes to the sustainability and project management literature by showing that enablers like guidelines, training or rewards are insufficient without simultaneously addressing individual behavioral barriers in perceptions and beliefs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"43 6","pages":"Article 102747"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144702214","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Organic coordination in project design: Complemented or substituted by standardization? 项目设计中的有机协调:标准化是补充还是替代?
IF 7.4 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2025-07-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102738
Ning Sun , Yadi Li , Yan Ning
While high levels of uncertainty and interdependence in project design demand organic coordination, the role of standardization remains ambiguous; limited evidence exists on whether it acts as a complement or a substitute, which complicates the effective configuration of coordination mechanisms to address these challenges. This study examines the relationship between standardization and organic coordination in the context of project design. A questionnaire survey was conducted with 311 respondents from 46 firms involved in Chinese building projects. The results show that the level of interdependence is positively related to the use of group meeting and interpersonal communication; the level of uncertainty is positively related to the use of group meeting only. Also, the use of boundary objects moderately reduces the marginal need for group meeting driven by interdependence. In contrast, the adoption of digital information systems increases the demand for both interpersonal communication and group meeting to manage uncertainty. This study contributes to the project management literature by revealing that the complementary or substitutive relationship between organic coordination and standardization is contingent upon the levels of interdependence, uncertainty, and the specific standardization methods applied. It also offers managerial insights for appropriately configuring these coordination mechanisms in project design.
虽然项目设计中的高度不确定性和相互依赖性要求有机协调,但标准化的作用仍然不明确;关于它是作为补充还是替代的证据有限,这使得有效配置协调机制以应对这些挑战变得复杂。本研究探讨专案设计中标准化与有机协调的关系。对参与中国建筑项目的46家公司的311名受访者进行了问卷调查。结果表明:学生的相互依赖程度与小组会议的使用和人际沟通呈正相关;不确定性水平仅与小组会议的使用呈正相关。此外,边界对象的使用适度地减少了由相互依赖驱动的小组会议的边际需求。相比之下,数字信息系统的采用增加了对人际沟通和小组会议的需求,以管理不确定性。本研究通过揭示有机协调和标准化之间的互补或替代关系取决于相互依赖、不确定性和所采用的具体标准化方法的水平,对项目管理文献做出了贡献。它还提供了在项目设计中适当配置这些协调机制的管理见解。
{"title":"Organic coordination in project design: Complemented or substituted by standardization?","authors":"Ning Sun ,&nbsp;Yadi Li ,&nbsp;Yan Ning","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102738","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102738","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While high levels of uncertainty and interdependence in project design demand organic coordination, the role of standardization remains ambiguous; limited evidence exists on whether it acts as a complement or a substitute, which complicates the effective configuration of coordination mechanisms to address these challenges. This study examines the relationship between standardization and organic coordination in the context of project design. A questionnaire survey was conducted with 311 respondents from 46 firms involved in Chinese building projects. The results show that the level of interdependence is positively related to the use of group meeting and interpersonal communication; the level of uncertainty is positively related to the use of group meeting only. Also, the use of boundary objects moderately reduces the marginal need for group meeting driven by interdependence. In contrast, the adoption of digital information systems increases the demand for both interpersonal communication and group meeting to manage uncertainty. This study contributes to the project management literature by revealing that the complementary or substitutive relationship between organic coordination and standardization is contingent upon the levels of interdependence, uncertainty, and the specific standardization methods applied. It also offers managerial insights for appropriately configuring these coordination mechanisms in project design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"43 6","pages":"Article 102738"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144702213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Igniting fire: Kahneman as a source of creative tension in project studies 点燃火焰:Kahneman作为项目研究中创造性张力的来源
IF 7.4 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102736
Joana Geraldi
This essay explores how Kahneman contributed to debates in project studies. I revisit three debates: Flyvbjerg vs. Hirschman on (over-)optimism, Kahneman vs. Klein on the trustworthiness of intuitive expertise, and Kahneman vs. Gigerenzer on nudging vs. boosting. These discussions illuminate four attributes of insightful debates: addressing practical challenges, confronting epistemological boundaries, building on rigorous research, and owning its ethical standpoint. Ultimately, Kahneman’s legacy inspires scholars in project studies to critically engage, challenge assumptions, and embrace debates as spaces of ethical and reflexive academic practice.
这篇文章探讨了卡尼曼如何为项目研究中的辩论做出贡献。我回顾了三场辩论:Flyvbjerg vs. Hirschman关于(过度)乐观主义,Kahneman vs. Klein关于直觉专业知识的可信度,Kahneman vs. Gigerenzer关于推动vs.推动。这些讨论阐明了有洞察力的辩论的四个属性:解决实际挑战,面对认识论边界,建立在严谨的研究基础上,并拥有其伦理立场。最终,卡尼曼的遗产激励项目研究的学者批判性地参与,挑战假设,并将辩论作为道德和反思性学术实践的空间。
{"title":"Igniting fire: Kahneman as a source of creative tension in project studies","authors":"Joana Geraldi","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102736","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102736","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This essay explores how Kahneman contributed to debates in project studies. I revisit three debates: Flyvbjerg vs. Hirschman on (over-)optimism, Kahneman vs. Klein on the trustworthiness of intuitive expertise, and Kahneman vs. Gigerenzer on nudging vs. boosting. These discussions illuminate four attributes of insightful debates: addressing practical challenges, confronting epistemological boundaries, building on rigorous research, and owning its ethical standpoint. Ultimately, Kahneman’s legacy inspires scholars in project studies to critically engage, challenge assumptions, and embrace debates as spaces of ethical and reflexive academic practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"43 5","pages":"Article 102736"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144557148","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Projecting for sustainability transitions: Contrasting two types of project-oriented agency 可持续性转型的规划:对比两种类型的项目导向机构
IF 7.4 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102721
Ermal Hetemi , Sofia Pemsel , Jonas Söderlund , Anna Jerbrant
A core problem in sustainability transitions is to ensure that actors come together and work on a common goal. Earlier research has argued that developing a project-oriented agency is essential to ensure transitions. By examining two contrasting cases, the Sustainable Transportation program and the Sustainable Hospital program, we identify two distinct types of project-oriented agency: (1) emergent and (2) induced. The former showcases an inclusive approach emphasizing open collaboration and resource mobilization, flexible goals, whereas the latter encompasses prescribed resource mobilization, contractual objectives, and deadlines. Beyond bottom-up vs. top-down dichotomies, these project-oriented agency types highlight different shaping contexts and logics of how actors mobilize projects for change. Our analysis identifies the nuanced dimensions of project-oriented agency and the impetuses, practices, and temporal structures through which they shape transition outcomes. The paper enriches the current understanding of how targeted projects and programs can bridge experimental niches with mainstream regime transformation, thereby enabling system-wide sustainability transitions.
可持续性转型的一个核心问题是确保行为体走到一起,为共同的目标而努力。早期的研究认为,发展一个以项目为导向的机构对于确保过渡至关重要。通过研究可持续交通项目和可持续医院项目这两个对比鲜明的案例,我们确定了两种不同类型的项目导向机构:(1)紧急和(2)诱导。前者展示了一种包容性的方法,强调开放的合作和资源动员,灵活的目标,而后者包括规定的资源动员,合同目标和截止日期。除了自底向上和自顶向下的二分法之外,这些面向项目的代理类型强调了参与者如何动员项目进行变革的不同塑造背景和逻辑。我们的分析确定了项目导向机构的微妙维度,以及它们塑造转型结果的动力、实践和时间结构。本文丰富了目前对有针对性的项目和计划如何将实验利基与主流制度转型联系起来,从而实现全系统可持续性转型的理解。
{"title":"Projecting for sustainability transitions: Contrasting two types of project-oriented agency","authors":"Ermal Hetemi ,&nbsp;Sofia Pemsel ,&nbsp;Jonas Söderlund ,&nbsp;Anna Jerbrant","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102721","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102721","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A core problem in sustainability transitions is to ensure that actors come together and work on a common goal. Earlier research has argued that developing a project-oriented agency is essential to ensure transitions. By examining two contrasting cases, the Sustainable Transportation program and the Sustainable Hospital program, we identify two distinct types of project-oriented agency: (1) emergent and (2) induced. The former showcases an inclusive approach emphasizing open collaboration and resource mobilization, flexible goals, whereas the latter encompasses prescribed resource mobilization<em>,</em> contractual objectives, and deadlines. Beyond bottom-up vs. top-down dichotomies, these project-oriented agency types highlight different shaping contexts and logics of how actors mobilize projects for change. Our analysis identifies the nuanced dimensions of project-oriented agency and the impetuses, practices, and temporal structures through which they shape transition outcomes. The paper enriches the current understanding of how targeted projects and programs can bridge experimental niches with mainstream regime transformation, thereby enabling system-wide sustainability transitions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"43 5","pages":"Article 102721"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144548568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
International Journal of Project Management
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1