首页 > 最新文献

Cognition最新文献

英文 中文
Causal relational problem solving in toddlers 幼儿解决因果关系问题的能力
IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105959
Mariel K. Goddu , Eunice Yiu , Alison Gopnik
We investigate young children's capacity for “causal relational reasoning”: the ability to use relational reasoning to design novel interventions and bring about novel outcomes. In two experiments, we show that 24–30-month-old toddlers and three-year-old preschoolers use relational reasoning in a causal problem-solving task. Even toddlers rapidly inferred relational causal rules and applied this knowledge to solve novel problems––thus demonstrating both surprisingly early competence in relational reasoning and sophisticated causal inference. In both experiments, children observed a handful of trials in which a mechanistically opaque machine made objects larger or smaller. When prompted to solve a new problem, they used the machine to change the relative size of a novel object – even though its appearance and absolute size differed from previous observations, and even though subjects had never seen the machine generate objects of the required size before. This suggests that children quickly inferred abstract causal relations and then generalized these relations to determine which intervention would bring about the novel outcome required to solve the problem. These findings suggest a close link between early relational reasoning and active causal learning and inference.
我们研究了幼儿的 "因果关系推理 "能力:利用关系推理设计新颖的干预措施并带来新结果的能力。在两个实验中,我们发现 24-30 个月大的幼儿和三岁的学龄前儿童在因果问题解决任务中使用了关系推理。即使是蹒跚学步的儿童也能迅速推断出关系因果规则,并运用这些知识解决新问题--因此,他们在关系推理和复杂的因果推理方面都表现出了惊人的早期能力。在这两项实验中,幼儿观察的都是机械不透明的机器将物体变大或变小的少量试验。当要求他们解决一个新问题时,他们会用机器改变一个新物体的相对大小--尽管该物体的外观和绝对大小与之前观察到的不同,尽管受试者之前从未见过机器生成所需大小的物体。这表明,儿童很快就能推断出抽象的因果关系,然后对这些关系进行归纳,以确定哪种干预措施能带来解决问题所需的新结果。这些发现表明,早期关系推理与主动因果学习和推理之间存在密切联系。
{"title":"Causal relational problem solving in toddlers","authors":"Mariel K. Goddu ,&nbsp;Eunice Yiu ,&nbsp;Alison Gopnik","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105959","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105959","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We investigate young children's capacity for “causal relational reasoning”: the ability to use relational reasoning to design novel interventions and bring about novel outcomes. In two experiments, we show that 24–30-month-old toddlers and three-year-old preschoolers use relational reasoning in a causal problem-solving task. Even toddlers rapidly inferred relational causal rules and applied this knowledge to solve novel problems––thus demonstrating both surprisingly early competence in relational reasoning and sophisticated causal inference. In both experiments, children observed a handful of trials in which a mechanistically opaque machine made objects larger or smaller. When prompted to solve a new problem, they used the machine to change the relative size of a novel object – even though its appearance and absolute size differed from previous observations, and even though subjects had never seen the machine generate objects of the required size before. This suggests that children quickly inferred abstract causal relations and then generalized these relations to determine which intervention would bring about the novel outcome required to solve the problem. These findings suggest a close link between early relational reasoning and active causal learning and inference.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 105959"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142326559","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Discourse-based constraints on long-distance dependencies generalize across constructions in English and French 在英语和法语中,基于话语的长距离依存关系约束在不同结构中具有普遍性
IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105950
Elodie Winckel , Anne Abeillé , Barbara Hemforth , Edward Gibson
The article presents four acceptability judgment experiments that evaluate novel predictions of the Focus-Background Conflict constraint (Abeillé et al. 2020, Cognition) with respect to the acceptability of long distance dependencies for so-called “subject islands” in English and French. In contrast with syntactic accounts, the Focus-Background Conflict constraint predicts differential behavior across different constructions. The current paper tests a novel prediction of this theory, in a construction that has not yet been tested experimentally: it-clefts. Experiment 1 shows that elements in clefted clauses are not uniformly backgrounded, contrary to a standard assumption in the syntax / discourse literature. Experiments 2–4 tested long-distance dependency relations in relative clauses and clefts. In both languages, there is strong evidence of a cross-construction difference when comparing the two constructions with each other: extraction of the subject complement out of a subject NP was super-additively difficult in clefts, but not in relative clauses, as predicted by the Focus-Background Conflict constraint.
文章介绍了四个可接受性判断实验,这些实验评估了焦点-背景冲突约束(Abeillé 等人,2020 年,《认知》)对英语和法语中所谓 "主语岛 "的长距离依存关系可接受性的新预测。与句法解释不同的是,"焦点-背景冲突约束 "预测了不同结构中的不同行为。本文在一种尚未进行过实验测试的结构中测试了这一理论的新预测:it-clefts。实验 1 显示,与句法/语篇文献中的标准假设相反,裂隙分句中的元素并不是统一背景的。实验 2-4 测试了相对从句和裂隙中的长距离依存关系。在这两种语言中,将两种结构相互比较时,有强有力的证据表明了跨结构的差异:从主语 NP 中提取主语补语在裂隙中是超加困难的,而在相对从句中则不然,这是由焦点-背景冲突约束所预测的。
{"title":"Discourse-based constraints on long-distance dependencies generalize across constructions in English and French","authors":"Elodie Winckel ,&nbsp;Anne Abeillé ,&nbsp;Barbara Hemforth ,&nbsp;Edward Gibson","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105950","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105950","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The article presents four acceptability judgment experiments that evaluate novel predictions of the Focus-Background Conflict constraint (Abeillé et al. 2020, Cognition) with respect to the acceptability of long distance dependencies for so-called “subject islands” in English and French. In contrast with syntactic accounts, the Focus-Background Conflict constraint predicts differential behavior across different constructions. The current paper tests a novel prediction of this theory, in a construction that has not yet been tested experimentally: <em>it</em>-clefts. Experiment 1 shows that elements in clefted clauses are not uniformly backgrounded, contrary to a standard assumption in the syntax / discourse literature. Experiments 2–4 tested long-distance dependency relations in relative clauses and clefts. In both languages, there is strong evidence of a cross-construction difference when comparing the two constructions with each other: extraction of the subject complement out of a subject NP was super-additively difficult in clefts, but not in relative clauses, as predicted by the Focus-Background Conflict constraint.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 105950"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142326555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
AI-induced indifference: Unfair AI reduces prosociality 人工智能引发的冷漠:不公平的人工智能会降低亲社会性
IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105937
Raina Zexuan Zhang , Ellie J. Kyung , Chiara Longoni , Luca Cian , Kellen Mrkva
The growing prevalence of artificial intelligence (AI) in our lives has brought the impact of AI-based decisions on human judgments to the forefront of academic scholarship and public debate. Despite growth in research on people's receptivity towards AI, little is known about how interacting with AI shapes subsequent interactions among people. We explore this question in the context of unfair decisions determined by AI versus humans and focus on the spillover effects of experiencing such decisions on the propensity to act prosocially. Four experiments (combined N = 2425) show that receiving an unfair allocation by an AI (versus a human) actor leads to lower rates of prosocial behavior towards other humans in a subsequent decision—an effect we term AI-induced indifference. In Experiment 1, after receiving an unfair monetary allocation by an AI (versus a human) actor, people were less likely to act prosocially, defined as punishing an unfair human actor at a personal cost in a subsequent, unrelated decision. Experiments 2a and 2b provide evidence for the underlying mechanism: People blame AI actors less than their human counterparts for unfair behavior, decreasing people's desire to subsequently sanction injustice by punishing the unfair actor. In an incentive-compatible design, Experiment 3 shows that AI-induced indifference manifests even when the initial unfair decision and subsequent interaction occur in different contexts. These findings illustrate the spillover effect of human-AI interaction on human-to-human interactions and suggest that interacting with unfair AI may desensitize people to the bad behavior of others, reducing their likelihood to act prosocially. Implications for future research are discussed.
All preregistrations, data, code, statistical outputs, stimuli qsf files, and the Supplementary Appendix are posted on OSF at: https://bit.ly/OSF_unfairAI
人工智能(AI)在我们的生活中日益普及,这使得基于人工智能的决策对人类判断的影响成为学术界和公众讨论的焦点。尽管有关人们对人工智能接受程度的研究不断增加,但人们对与人工智能的互动如何影响人与人之间的后续互动却知之甚少。我们以人工智能与人类做出的不公平决定为背景,探讨了这一问题,并重点研究了体验此类决定对亲社会行为倾向的溢出效应。四项实验(总人数 = 2425)表明,人工智能(相对于人类)行为者在做出不公平分配后,会导致在后续决策中对其他人类的亲社会行为发生率降低--我们将这种效应称为人工智能诱发的冷漠。在实验 1 中,在接受了人工智能(相对于人类)行为者的不公平货币分配后,人们不太可能采取亲社会行为,即在随后的无关决策中以个人代价惩罚不公平的人类行为者。实验 2a 和 2b 为基本机制提供了证据:与人类行为者相比,人们对人工智能行为者不公平行为的指责更少,从而降低了人们随后通过惩罚不公平行为者来制裁不公平行为的愿望。在一个激励兼容的设计中,实验 3 表明,即使最初的不公平决定和随后的互动发生在不同的情境中,人工智能诱发的冷漠也会表现出来。这些发现说明了人与人工智能互动对人与人互动的溢出效应,并表明与不公平的人工智能互动可能会使人们对他人的不良行为失去敏感性,从而降低他们采取亲社会行为的可能性。所有预注册、数据、代码、统计输出、刺激qsf文件和补充附录都发布在OSF上:https://bit.ly/OSF_unfairAI。
{"title":"AI-induced indifference: Unfair AI reduces prosociality","authors":"Raina Zexuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Ellie J. Kyung ,&nbsp;Chiara Longoni ,&nbsp;Luca Cian ,&nbsp;Kellen Mrkva","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105937","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105937","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The growing prevalence of artificial intelligence (AI) in our lives has brought the impact of AI-based decisions on human judgments to the forefront of academic scholarship and public debate. Despite growth in research on people's receptivity towards AI, little is known about how interacting with AI shapes subsequent interactions among people. We explore this question in the context of unfair decisions determined by AI versus humans and focus on the spillover effects of experiencing such decisions on the propensity to act prosocially. Four experiments (combined <em>N</em> = 2425) show that receiving an unfair allocation by an AI (versus a human) actor leads to lower rates of prosocial behavior towards other humans in a subsequent decision—an effect we term <em>AI-induced indifference</em>. In Experiment 1, after receiving an unfair monetary allocation by an AI (versus a human) actor, people were less likely to act prosocially, defined as punishing an unfair human actor at a personal cost in a subsequent, unrelated decision. Experiments 2a and 2b provide evidence for the underlying mechanism: People blame AI actors less than their human counterparts for unfair behavior, decreasing people's desire to subsequently sanction injustice by punishing the unfair actor. In an incentive-compatible design, Experiment 3 shows that AI-induced indifference manifests even when the initial unfair decision and subsequent interaction occur in different contexts. These findings illustrate the spillover effect of human-AI interaction on human-to-human interactions and suggest that interacting with unfair AI may desensitize people to the bad behavior of others, reducing their likelihood to act prosocially. Implications for future research are discussed.</div><div>All preregistrations, data, code, statistical outputs, stimuli qsf files, and the Supplementary Appendix are posted on OSF at: <span><span>https://bit.ly/OSF_unfairAI</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 105937"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142311048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Seven reasons to (still) doubt the existence of number adaptation: A rebuttal to Burr et al. and Durgin 怀疑数字适应存在的七个理由:对伯尔等人和杜金的反驳
IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105939
Sami R. Yousif , Sam Clarke , Elizabeth M. Brannon
Does the visual system adapt to number? For more than fifteen years, most have assumed that the answer is an unambiguous “yes”. Against this prevailing orthodoxy, we recently took a critical look at the phenomenon, questioning its existence on both empirical and theoretical grounds, and providing an alternative explanation for extant results (the old news hypothesis). We subsequently received two critical responses. Burr, Anobile, and Arrighi rejected our critiques wholesale, arguing that the evidence for number adaptation remains overwhelming. Durgin questioned our old news hypothesis — preferring instead a theory about density adaptation he has championed for decades — but also highlighted several ways in which our arguments do pose serious challenges for proponents of number adaptation. Here, we reply to both. We first clarify our position regarding number adaptation. Then, we respond to our critics' concerns, highlighting seven reasons why we remain skeptical about number adaptation. We conclude with some thoughts about where the debate may head from here.
视觉系统能适应数字吗?十五年来,大多数人都认为答案是明确的 "是"。针对这一普遍的正统观点,我们最近对这一现象进行了批判性的审视,从经验和理论两方面质疑这一现象的存在,并为现有结果提供了另一种解释(旧闻假说)。随后,我们收到了两篇批判性的回应。Burr、Anobile 和 Arrighi 全盘否定了我们的批评,认为数字适应的证据仍然是压倒性的。杜金对我们的旧闻假说提出质疑--他更倾向于自己几十年来一直倡导的密度适应理论--但同时也强调了我们的论点在几个方面确实给数量适应的支持者带来了严峻的挑战。在此,我们将对这两方面做出回应。我们首先澄清我们对数量适应的立场。然后,我们回应了批评者的担忧,强调了我们仍然对数字适应持怀疑态度的七个原因。最后,我们就辩论的走向提出一些想法。
{"title":"Seven reasons to (still) doubt the existence of number adaptation: A rebuttal to Burr et al. and Durgin","authors":"Sami R. Yousif ,&nbsp;Sam Clarke ,&nbsp;Elizabeth M. Brannon","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105939","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105939","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Does the visual system adapt to number? For more than fifteen years, most have assumed that the answer is an unambiguous “yes”. Against this prevailing orthodoxy, we recently took a critical look at the phenomenon, questioning its existence on both empirical and theoretical grounds, and providing an alternative explanation for extant results (<em>the old news hypothesis</em>). We subsequently received two critical responses. Burr, Anobile, and Arrighi rejected our critiques wholesale, arguing that the evidence for number adaptation remains overwhelming. Durgin questioned our old news hypothesis — preferring instead a theory about density adaptation he has championed for decades — but also highlighted several ways in which our arguments do pose serious challenges for proponents of number adaptation. Here, we reply to both. We first clarify our position regarding number adaptation. Then, we respond to our critics' concerns, highlighting seven reasons why we remain skeptical about number adaptation. We conclude with some thoughts about where the debate may head from here.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 105939"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142311047","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Expectations about presence enhance the influence of content-specific expectations on low-level orientation judgements 对存在的预期会增强特定内容的预期对低层次定向判断的影响
IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105961
Joost Haarsma , Aaron Kaltenmaier , Stephen M. Fleming , Peter Kok

Will something appear and if so, what will it be? Perceptual expectations can concern both the presence and content of a stimulus. However, it is unclear how these different types of expectations interact with each other in biasing perception. Here, we tested how expectations about stimulus presence and content differently affect perceptual inference. Across separate online discovery (N = 110) and replication samples (N = 218), participants were asked to judge both the presence and content (orientation) of noisy grating stimuli. Crucially, preceding compound cues simultaneously and orthogonally predicted both whether a grating was likely to appear as well as what its orientation would be. Across both samples we found that content cues affected both discrimination and presence judgements directly, namely by biasing the orientation judgements in the expected direction and enhancing confidence in stimulus presence on congruent trials. In contrast, presence cues did not affect discrimination judgements directly. Instead, presence cues influenced discrimination judgements indirectly by enhancing the effect of the orientation cues when expecting a stimulus to be present. This was the case on trials where a stimulus was present, as well as on grating-absent trials. Further, presence cues directly affected confidence in stimulus presence. This suggests that presence expectations may act as a regulatory volume knob for the influence of content expectations. Further, modelling revealed higher sensitivity in distinguishing between grating presence and absence following absence cues than presence cues, demonstrating an asymmetry between gathering evidence in favour of stimulus presence and absence. Finally, evidence for overweighted expectations being associated with hallucination-like perception was inconclusive. In sum, our results provide nuance to popular predictive processing accounts of perception by showing that expectations of presence and content have distinct but interacting roles in shaping conscious perception.

会不会出现什么东西,如果会,是什么?知觉期望既可能涉及刺激物的存在,也可能涉及刺激物的内容。然而,目前还不清楚这些不同类型的期望在影响知觉方面是如何相互作用的。在这里,我们测试了对刺激存在和内容的预期如何以不同方式影响知觉推断。在独立的在线发现样本(N = 110)和复制样本(N = 218)中,参与者被要求判断噪声光栅刺激的存在和内容(方向)。最重要的是,前面的复合线索同时正交地预测了光栅是否可能出现以及光栅的方向。在这两个样本中,我们发现内容线索会直接影响辨别和出现判断,即通过使方向判断向预期方向偏移,并在一致的试验中增强对刺激出现的信心。相比之下,存在线索并不直接影响辨别判断。相反,当预期刺激物存在时,存在线索会增强方位线索的效果,从而间接影响辨别判断。在刺激物存在的试验和光栅不存在的试验中都是如此。此外,存在线索直接影响了对刺激物存在的信心。这表明,对刺激存在的预期可能会对内容预期的影响起到调节作用。此外,建模显示,在没有光栅提示的情况下,区分光栅存在和不存在的灵敏度要高于存在提示,这表明在收集有利于刺激存在和不存在的证据之间存在不对称。最后,过重的预期与幻觉样知觉相关的证据并不确定。总之,我们的研究结果表明,在形成有意识知觉的过程中,对刺激存在和刺激内容的预期具有截然不同但又相互影响的作用,从而为流行的知觉预测加工理论提供了新的解释。
{"title":"Expectations about presence enhance the influence of content-specific expectations on low-level orientation judgements","authors":"Joost Haarsma ,&nbsp;Aaron Kaltenmaier ,&nbsp;Stephen M. Fleming ,&nbsp;Peter Kok","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105961","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105961","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Will something appear and if so, what will it be? Perceptual expectations can concern both the presence and content of a stimulus. However, it is unclear how these different types of expectations interact with each other in biasing perception. Here, we tested how expectations about stimulus presence and content differently affect perceptual inference. Across separate online discovery (<em>N</em> = 110) and replication samples (<em>N</em> = 218), participants were asked to judge both the presence and content (orientation) of noisy grating stimuli. Crucially, preceding compound cues simultaneously and orthogonally predicted both whether a grating was likely to appear as well as what its orientation would be. Across both samples we found that content cues affected both discrimination and presence judgements directly, namely by biasing the orientation judgements in the expected direction and enhancing confidence in stimulus presence on congruent trials. In contrast, presence cues did not affect discrimination judgements directly. Instead, presence cues influenced discrimination judgements indirectly by enhancing the effect of the orientation cues when expecting a stimulus to be present. This was the case on trials where a stimulus was present, as well as on grating-absent trials. Further, presence cues directly affected confidence in stimulus presence. This suggests that presence expectations may act as a regulatory volume knob for the influence of content expectations. Further, modelling revealed higher sensitivity in distinguishing between grating presence and absence following absence cues than presence cues, demonstrating an asymmetry between gathering evidence in favour of stimulus presence and absence. Finally, evidence for overweighted expectations being associated with hallucination-like perception was inconclusive. In sum, our results provide nuance to popular predictive processing accounts of perception by showing that expectations of presence and content have distinct but interacting roles in shaping conscious perception.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 105961"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142271536","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Readers encode absolute letter positions 阅读器对字母的绝对位置进行编码
IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105960
Joshua Snell, Joelle Simon

Reading research has long been concerned with the question of whether the reading brain accesses lexical representations via absolute or relative letter position information. In recent years, important results have been obtained with the flanker lexical decision task. Studies have shown faster decisions about target words (e.g., ‘rock’) when flanked by related letters (‘ro rock ck’) than unrelated letters (‘st rock ep')—and crucially, equal facilitation upon switching flanker positions (‘ck rock ro'), pointing to relative rather than absolute letter position coding. Yet, a later study employing longer targets and flankers yielded detrimental effects of switching flanker positions. In order to get a better grasp on the equivocal evidence thus far, here we carried out an extensive test of flanker relatedness and position effects, using various target and flanker lengths, all within a single experiment. We observed a clear reduction of flanker relatedness effects upon switching flanker positions, and this held true across target and flanker lengths. The present results unambiguously suggest that lexical access is driven by absolute letter position information, and furthermore, are accurately predicted by the recent PONG model (Snell, 2024b).

长期以来,阅读研究一直关注阅读大脑是通过绝对还是相对字母位置信息来获取词汇表征的问题。近年来,侧翼词汇决策任务取得了重要成果。研究表明,当目标词(如 "rock")的侧翼是相关字母("ro rock ck")时,其决策速度要快于非相关字母("st rock ep")--更关键的是,当侧翼位置发生变化时("ck rock ro"),其决策速度也会发生变化,这表明字母位置编码是相对的,而不是绝对的。然而,后来一项使用较长目标和侧翼词的研究却发现,切换侧翼词位置会产生不利影响。为了更好地掌握迄今为止模棱两可的证据,我们在这里对侧翼相关性和位置效应进行了一次广泛的测试,在一次实验中使用了不同长度的目标和侧翼。我们观察到,在转换侧翼者位置时,侧翼者相关性效应明显减弱,而且在不同的目标和侧翼者长度上都是如此。本实验结果明确地表明,词性的获取是由绝对字母位置信息驱动的,而且,最近的 PONG 模型(Snell,2024b)也对此进行了准确的预测。
{"title":"Readers encode absolute letter positions","authors":"Joshua Snell,&nbsp;Joelle Simon","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105960","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105960","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Reading research has long been concerned with the question of whether the reading brain accesses lexical representations via absolute or relative letter position information. In recent years, important results have been obtained with the flanker lexical decision task. Studies have shown faster decisions about target words (e.g., ‘rock’) when flanked by related letters (‘ro rock ck’) than unrelated letters (‘st rock ep')—and crucially, equal facilitation upon switching flanker positions (‘ck rock ro'), pointing to relative rather than absolute letter position coding. Yet, a later study employing longer targets and flankers yielded detrimental effects of switching flanker positions. In order to get a better grasp on the equivocal evidence thus far, here we carried out an extensive test of flanker relatedness and position effects, using various target and flanker lengths, all within a single experiment. We observed a clear reduction of flanker relatedness effects upon switching flanker positions, and this held true across target and flanker lengths. The present results unambiguously suggest that lexical access is driven by absolute letter position information, and furthermore, are accurately predicted by the recent PONG model (<span><span>Snell, 2024b</span></span>).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 105960"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027724002464/pdfft?md5=657cde790cc5c0a8516adcb284016d6c&pid=1-s2.0-S0010027724002464-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142238645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Do early meanings of negation map onto a fully-fledged negation concept in infancy? 否定的早期含义是否与婴儿期成熟的否定概念相对应?
IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105929
Eszter Szabó, Ágnes-Melinda Kovács

Young children acquire an amazing knowledge base, rapidly learning from, and even going beyond the observable evidence. They arrive at forming abstract concepts and generalizations and recruit logical operations. The question whether young infants can already rely on abstract logical operations, such as disjunction or negation, or whether these operations emerge gradually over development has recently become a central topic of interest. Here we target this question by focusing on infants' early understanding of negation. According to one view, negation comprehension is initially restricted to a narrow range of meanings (such as rejection or non-existence) and only much later infants develop a broader understanding that maps onto a fully-fledged negation concept. Alternatively, however, infants may rely on a fully-fledged negation concept from early on, but some forms of negation may pose more mapping and processing difficulties than others.

Here we tested infants' understanding of two syntactically and semantically different forms of negation, existential negation and propositional denial in a language (Hungarian) that has a separate negative particle for each, and thus the two negation forms can be directly compared. We engaged 15- and 18-month-old infants in a search task where they had to find a toy in one out of two locations based on verbal utterances referring to the object at one of the locations involving existential negation (Nincsen - not.be.3SG) or propositional denial (Nem itt van - not here be.3SG). In Experiments 1–3 we found a parallel development for these two kinds of negation. 18-month-olds successfully comprehended both, while 15-month-olds were at chance for both. In Experiment 4 we excluded the possibility that 15-month-olds' chance performance is explained by task-related difficulties, as they succeeded in a similar, but nonverbal task. Thus, 15-month-olds likely still have not solved the mapping for the two negation forms. The parallel performance of the two age groups with the two negation types (failing or succeeding on both) is consistent with the hypothesis that different forms of negation rely on similar conceptual underpinnings already in early development.

幼儿获得了惊人的知识基础,迅速从可观察到的证据中学习,甚至超越这些证据。他们开始形成抽象概念和概括,并开始使用逻辑运算。幼儿是否已经可以依赖析取或否定等抽象逻辑运算,或者这些运算是否是在发展过程中逐渐出现的,这个问题最近成为了人们关注的核心话题。在此,我们针对这一问题,重点研究幼儿对否定的早期理解。有一种观点认为,婴儿最初对否定的理解仅限于狭窄的含义范围(如拒绝或不存在),只有到了很晚的时候,婴儿才会发展出更广泛的理解,从而映射出一个完整的否定概念。在这里,我们测试了婴儿对两种句法和语义不同的否定形式--存在否定和命题否定--的理解,这两种语言(匈牙利语)都有单独的否定词,因此可以直接比较这两种否定形式。我们让 15 和 18 个月大的婴儿参加一项搜索任务,让他们根据涉及存在否定(Nincsen - not.be.3SG)或命题否定(Nem itt van - not here be.3SG)的言语,在两个地点中的一个地点找到一个玩具。在实验 1-3 中,我们发现这两种否定的发展是平行的。18 个月大的幼儿成功地理解了这两种否定,而 15 个月大的幼儿对这两种否定的理解都处于偶然状态。在实验 4 中,我们排除了 15 个月幼儿的偶然表现是由于任务相关困难所致的可能性,因为他们在类似的非言语任务中也取得了成功。因此,15 个月大的幼儿很可能仍未解决两种否定形式的映射问题。两个年龄组在两种否定类型上的平行表现(均失败或均成功)与不同形式的否定在早期发展中已依赖于相似概念基础的假设是一致的。
{"title":"Do early meanings of negation map onto a fully-fledged negation concept in infancy?","authors":"Eszter Szabó,&nbsp;Ágnes-Melinda Kovács","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105929","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105929","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Young children acquire an amazing knowledge base, rapidly learning from, and even going beyond the observable evidence. They arrive at forming abstract concepts and generalizations and recruit logical operations. The question whether young infants can already rely on abstract logical operations, such as disjunction or negation, or whether these operations emerge gradually over development has recently become a central topic of interest. Here we target this question by focusing on infants' early understanding of negation. According to one view, negation comprehension is initially restricted to a narrow range of meanings (such as rejection or non-existence) and only much later infants develop a broader understanding that maps onto a fully-fledged negation concept. Alternatively, however, infants may rely on a fully-fledged negation concept from early on, but some forms of negation may pose more mapping and processing difficulties than others.</p><p>Here we tested infants' understanding of two syntactically and semantically different forms of negation, existential negation and propositional denial in a language (Hungarian) that has a separate negative particle for each, and thus the two negation forms can be directly compared. We engaged 15- and 18-month-old infants in a search task where they had to find a toy in one out of two locations based on verbal utterances referring to the object at one of the locations involving existential negation (<em>Nincsen</em> - not.be.3SG) or propositional denial (<em>Nem itt van</em> - not here be.3SG). In Experiments 1–3 we found a parallel development for these two kinds of negation. 18-month-olds successfully comprehended both, while 15-month-olds were at chance for both. In Experiment 4 we excluded the possibility that 15-month-olds' chance performance is explained by task-related difficulties, as they succeeded in a similar, but nonverbal task. Thus, 15-month-olds likely still have not solved the mapping for the two negation forms. The parallel performance of the two age groups with the two negation types (failing or succeeding on both) is consistent with the hypothesis that different forms of negation rely on similar conceptual underpinnings already in early development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 105929"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027724002154/pdfft?md5=471b3c98ca100e618b168c352327ac39&pid=1-s2.0-S0010027724002154-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142230548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The primacy of taxonomic semantic organization over thematic semantic organization during picture naming 图片命名过程中分类语义组织优先于主题语义组织
IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105951
Mingjun Zhai , Chen Feng , Qingqing Qu , Simon Fischer-Baum

Different organizational structures have been argued to underlie semantic knowledge about concepts; taxonomic organization, based on shared features, and thematic organization based on co-occurrence in common scenes and scenarios. The goal of the current study is to examine which of the two organizational systems are more engaged in the semantic context of a picture naming task. To address this question, we examined the representational structure underlying the semantic space in different picture naming tasks by applying representational similarity analysis (RSA) to electroencephalography (EEG) datasets. In a series of experiments, EEG signals were collected while participants named pictures under different semantic contexts. Study 1 reanalyzes existing data from semantic contexts directing attention to taxonomic organization and semantic contexts that are not biased towards either taxonomic or thematic organization. In Study 2 we keep the stimuli the same and vary semantic contexts to draw attention to either taxonomic or thematic organization. The RSA approach allows us to examine the pairwise similarity in scalp-recorded amplitude patterns at each time point following the onset of the picture and relate it to theoretical taxonomic and thematic measures derived from computational models of semantics. Across all tasks, the similarity structure of scalp-recorded neural activity correlated better with taxonomic than thematic measures, in time windows associated with semantic processing. Most strikingly, we found that the scalp-recorded patterns of neural activity between taxonomically related items were more similar to each other than the scalp-recorded patterns of neural activity for thematically related or unrelated items, even in tasks that makes thematic information more salient. These results suggest that the principle semantic organization of these concepts during picture naming is taxonomic, at least in the context of picture naming.

不同的组织结构被认为是概念语义知识的基础;分类组织基于共同特征,而主题组织则基于共同场景和情景中的共同出现。本研究的目的是考察在图片命名任务的语义语境中,这两种组织系统中哪一种更能发挥作用。为了解决这个问题,我们将表征相似性分析(RSA)应用于脑电图(EEG)数据集,从而研究了不同图片命名任务中语义空间的表征结构。在一系列实验中,我们收集了参与者在不同语义语境下命名图片时的脑电信号。研究 1 对现有的数据进行了重新分析,这些数据来自关注分类组织的语义上下文和不偏重分类或主题组织的语义上下文。在研究 2 中,我们保持刺激物不变,并改变语义上下文,以引起对分类学或主题组织的注意。通过 RSA 方法,我们可以检查图片开始后每个时间点头皮记录的振幅模式的成对相似性,并将其与语义计算模型中得出的理论分类和主题测量结果联系起来。在所有任务中,在与语义处理相关的时间窗口中,头皮记录神经活动的相似性结构与分类学测量的相关性要好于与主题测量的相关性。最引人注目的是,我们发现分类学相关项目之间的头皮记录神经活动模式比主题相关或不相关项目的头皮记录神经活动模式更加相似,即使在主题信息更加突出的任务中也是如此。这些结果表明,在图片命名过程中,这些概念的主要语义组织是分类学的,至少在图片命名的语境中是如此。
{"title":"The primacy of taxonomic semantic organization over thematic semantic organization during picture naming","authors":"Mingjun Zhai ,&nbsp;Chen Feng ,&nbsp;Qingqing Qu ,&nbsp;Simon Fischer-Baum","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105951","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105951","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Different organizational structures have been argued to underlie semantic knowledge about concepts; taxonomic organization, based on shared features, and thematic organization based on co-occurrence in common scenes and scenarios. The goal of the current study is to examine which of the two organizational systems are more engaged in the semantic context of a picture naming task. To address this question, we examined the representational structure underlying the semantic space in different picture naming tasks by applying representational similarity analysis (RSA) to electroencephalography (EEG) datasets. In a series of experiments, EEG signals were collected while participants named pictures under different semantic contexts. Study 1 reanalyzes existing data from semantic contexts directing attention to taxonomic organization and semantic contexts that are not biased towards either taxonomic or thematic organization. In Study 2 we keep the stimuli the same and vary semantic contexts to draw attention to either taxonomic or thematic organization. The RSA approach allows us to examine the pairwise similarity in scalp-recorded amplitude patterns at each time point following the onset of the picture and relate it to theoretical taxonomic and thematic measures derived from computational models of semantics. Across all tasks, the similarity structure of scalp-recorded neural activity correlated better with taxonomic than thematic measures, in time windows associated with semantic processing. Most strikingly, we found that the scalp-recorded patterns of neural activity between taxonomically related items were more similar to each other than the scalp-recorded patterns of neural activity for thematically related or unrelated items, even in tasks that makes thematic information more salient. These results suggest that the principle semantic organization of these concepts during picture naming is taxonomic, at least in the context of picture naming.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 105951"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142230547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Speech-to-song transformation in perception and production 感知和制作中的语音到歌曲转换
IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105933
Yan Chen , Adam Tierney , Peter Q. Pfordresher

The speech-to-song transformation is an illusion in which certain spoken phrases are perceived as more song-like after being repeated several times. The present study addresses whether this perceptual transformation leads to a corresponding change in how accurately participants imitate pitch/time patterns in speech. We used illusion-inducing (illusion stimuli) and non-inducing (control stimuli) spoken phrases as stimuli. In each trial, one stimulus was presented eight times in succession. Participants were asked to reproduce the phrase and rate how music-like the phrase sounded after the first and final (eighth) repetitions. The ratings of illusion stimuli reflected more song-like perception after the final repetition than the first repetition, but the ratings of control stimuli did not change over repetitions. The results from imitative production mirrored the perceptual effects: pitch matching of illusion stimuli improved from the first to the final repetition, but pitch matching of control stimuli did not improve. These findings suggest a consistent pattern of speech-to-song transformation in both perception and production, suggesting that distinctions between music and language may be more malleable than originally thought both in perception and production.

语音到歌曲的转换是一种错觉,即某些口语短语在重复多次后会被认为更像歌曲。本研究探讨了这种知觉转换是否会导致受试者模仿语音中音高/时间模式的准确性发生相应变化。我们使用幻觉诱导(幻觉刺激)和非诱导(对照刺激)口语短语作为刺激。在每个试验中,一个刺激连续出现八次。参与者被要求重现该短语,并在第一次和最后一次(第八次)重现后对该短语听起来的音乐感进行评分。幻觉刺激的评分反映了最后一次重复后比第一次重复时更像歌曲的感觉,但对照刺激的评分在重复时没有变化。模仿制作的结果反映了知觉效应:幻觉刺激的音高匹配从第一次重复到最后一次重复都有所改善,但对照刺激的音高匹配没有改善。这些研究结果表明,在感知和制作过程中,语音到歌曲的转化模式是一致的,这表明在感知和制作过程中,音乐和语言之间的区别可能比最初想象的更具可塑性。
{"title":"Speech-to-song transformation in perception and production","authors":"Yan Chen ,&nbsp;Adam Tierney ,&nbsp;Peter Q. Pfordresher","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105933","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105933","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The speech-to-song transformation is an illusion in which certain spoken phrases are perceived as more song-like after being repeated several times. The present study addresses whether this perceptual transformation leads to a corresponding change in how accurately participants imitate pitch/time patterns in speech. We used illusion-inducing (illusion stimuli) and non-inducing (control stimuli) spoken phrases as stimuli. In each trial, one stimulus was presented eight times in succession. Participants were asked to reproduce the phrase and rate how music-like the phrase sounded after the first and final (eighth) repetitions. The ratings of illusion stimuli reflected more song-like perception after the final repetition than the first repetition, but the ratings of control stimuli did not change over repetitions. The results from imitative production mirrored the perceptual effects: pitch matching of illusion stimuli improved from the first to the final repetition, but pitch matching of control stimuli did not improve. These findings suggest a consistent pattern of speech-to-song transformation in both perception and production, suggesting that distinctions between music and language may be more malleable than originally thought both in perception and production.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 105933"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142172476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Does reductive information increase satisfaction with scientific explanations? Three preregistered tests of the reductive allure effect 还原信息会提高科学解释的满意度吗?还原诱惑效应的三个预先注册测试
IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105941
Kevin D. Wilson, May Lonergan , Claire Nagel , Brian P. Meier

Understanding information processing biases is critical for improving scientific literacy. Research suggests that people rate scientific explanations with reductive jargon (e.g., irrelevant chemistry jargon in the explanation of a biological phenomenon) as better than those without – a phenomenon known as the reductive allure (RA) effect. Here, however, in three preregistered online experiments, we were unable to replicate this reductive allure effect using similar (and in some cases identical) materials and procedures to the original demonstration of the phenomena. Our results suggest that text-based RA effects may not be as strong as previously thought and are possibly changing over time.

了解信息处理偏差对于提高科学素养至关重要。研究表明,人们对使用还原性专业术语(例如,在解释生物现象时使用无关的化学专业术语)的科学解释的评价要好于没有还原性专业术语的解释--这种现象被称为还原性诱惑(RA)效应。然而,在这里,在三个预先登记的在线实验中,我们使用了与原始现象演示相似(在某些情况下完全相同)的材料和程序,却无法复制这种还原诱惑效应。我们的结果表明,基于文本的还原诱惑效应可能并不像以前认为的那样强烈,而且可能会随着时间的推移而发生变化。
{"title":"Does reductive information increase satisfaction with scientific explanations? Three preregistered tests of the reductive allure effect","authors":"Kevin D. Wilson,&nbsp;May Lonergan ,&nbsp;Claire Nagel ,&nbsp;Brian P. Meier","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105941","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105941","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Understanding information processing biases is critical for improving scientific literacy. Research suggests that people rate scientific explanations with reductive jargon (e.g., irrelevant chemistry jargon in the explanation of a biological phenomenon) as better than those without – a phenomenon known as the reductive allure (RA) effect. Here, however, in three preregistered online experiments, we were unable to replicate this reductive allure effect using similar (and in some cases identical) materials and procedures to the original demonstration of the phenomena. Our results suggest that text-based RA effects may not be as strong as previously thought and are possibly changing over time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 105941"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142164821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Cognition
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1