The Psi Chi/APA Edwin B. Newman Graduate Research Award is given jointly by APA and Psi Chi for the best paper published or presented by a graduate student at the APA or Psi Chi convention or at any regional or state psychological association meeting held between January 1 and December 31 of the previous calendar year. This award is given to Logan T. Smith for an exceptional research paper titled, 'Social Jetlag and Trajectories of Mood Symptoms and Reward Responsiveness in Individuals at Low-Risk, High-Risk, and With Bipolar Spectrum Disorders: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.' The research for the article was conducted at Temple University with faculty research advisor Lauren B. Alloy, PhD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
Psi Chi/APA Edwin B. Newman研究生研究奖由APA和Psi Chi联合颁发,以表彰在APA或Psi Chi会议上或在上一年1月1日至12月31日举行的任何地区或州心理协会会议上发表或提交的最佳论文。该奖项授予洛根·t·史密斯,以表彰其杰出的研究论文《低风险、高风险和双相情感障碍个体的社会时差、情绪症状和奖励反应轨迹:一项生态瞬时评估研究》。这篇文章的研究是在天普大学与教师研究顾问劳伦B.合金博士一起进行的。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Psi Chi/APA Edwin B. Newman Graduate Research Award: Logan T. Smith.","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/amp0001466","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001466","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Psi Chi/APA Edwin B. Newman Graduate Research Award is given jointly by APA and Psi Chi for the best paper published or presented by a graduate student at the APA or Psi Chi convention or at any regional or state psychological association meeting held between January 1 and December 31 of the previous calendar year. This award is given to Logan T. Smith for an exceptional research paper titled, 'Social Jetlag and Trajectories of Mood Symptoms and Reward Responsiveness in Individuals at Low-Risk, High-Risk, and With Bipolar Spectrum Disorders: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.' The research for the article was conducted at Temple University with faculty research advisor Lauren B. Alloy, PhD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":"79 9","pages":"1400-1402"},"PeriodicalIF":12.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142883312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nancy Eisenberg, Tracy L Spinrad, Maciel M Hernández, Antonio Zuffianò
Research and theory on the role of top-down self-regulation (TDSR) in children's developmental outcomes has received considerable attention in the last few decades. In this review, we distinguish TDSR (and overlapping self-regulatory processes) from bottom-up regulation. With a particular focus on Eisenberg et al.'s body of work, we review evidence for the role of individual differences in children's TDSR to a variety of developmental outcomes. Children's TDSR processes are consistently inversely related to externalizing problems and internalizing problems, although less consistently for the latter. Moreover, TDSR processes are positively associated with social competence, empathy-related responding and prosocial outcomes, and school-related outcomes. We briefly review complexities in these associations, such as bidirectional relations, mediators, and moderators. Key areas for future work are also discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
自顶向下自我调节(TDSR)在儿童发展结果中的作用的研究和理论在过去的几十年里受到了相当大的关注。在这篇综述中,我们将TDSR(和重叠的自我监管过程)与自下而上的监管区分开来。特别关注艾森伯格等人的工作,我们回顾了儿童TDSR的个体差异对各种发展结果的作用的证据。儿童的TDSR过程始终与外化问题和内化问题呈负相关,尽管后者的一致性较低。此外,TDSR过程与社会能力、共情相关反应和亲社会结果以及学校相关结果呈正相关。我们简要回顾这些关联的复杂性,如双向关系、中介和调节。讨论了今后工作的重点领域。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Top-down self-regulation as a core construct in children's and adolescents' optimal development.","authors":"Nancy Eisenberg, Tracy L Spinrad, Maciel M Hernández, Antonio Zuffianò","doi":"10.1037/amp0001408","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001408","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research and theory on the role of top-down self-regulation (TDSR) in children's developmental outcomes has received considerable attention in the last few decades. In this review, we distinguish TDSR (and overlapping self-regulatory processes) from bottom-up regulation. With a particular focus on Eisenberg et al.'s body of work, we review evidence for the role of individual differences in children's TDSR to a variety of developmental outcomes. Children's TDSR processes are consistently inversely related to externalizing problems and internalizing problems, although less consistently for the latter. Moreover, TDSR processes are positively associated with social competence, empathy-related responding and prosocial outcomes, and school-related outcomes. We briefly review complexities in these associations, such as bidirectional relations, mediators, and moderators. Key areas for future work are also discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":"79 9","pages":"1255-1268"},"PeriodicalIF":12.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142883404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Shahar Hechtlinger, Christin Schulze, Christina Leuker, Ralph Hertwig
Research on judgment and decision making typically studies "small worlds"-highly simplified and stylized tasks such as monetary gambles-among homogenous populations rather than big real-life decisions made by people around the globe. These transformative life decisions (e.g., whether or not to emigrate or flee a country, disclose one's sexual orientation, get divorced, or report a sexual assault) can shape lives. This article argues that rather than reducing such consequential decisions to fit small-world models, researchers need to analyze their real-world properties. Drawing on principles of bounded and ecological rationality, it proposes a framework that identifies five dimensions of transformative life decisions: conflicting cues, change of self, uncertain experiential value, irreversibility, and risk. The framework also specifies simple, versatile choice strategies that address these dimensions by, for instance, breaking down a decision into steps, avoiding trade-offs between present and future selves, or sampling others' experiences. Finally, it suggests benchmarks for assessing the rationality of transformative life decisions. Methodologically, this framework adapts a long tradition of mainly lab-based judgment and decision-making research to a text-based approach, thereby setting the stage for empirical work that analyzes real-world decisions using natural-language processing. Only by understanding decisions with the potential to transform life trajectories-and people in the process-will it be possible to develop encompassing and inclusive theories of human decision making. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"The psychology of life's most important decisions.","authors":"Shahar Hechtlinger, Christin Schulze, Christina Leuker, Ralph Hertwig","doi":"10.1037/amp0001439","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001439","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research on judgment and decision making typically studies \"small worlds\"-highly simplified and stylized tasks such as monetary gambles-among homogenous populations rather than big real-life decisions made by people around the globe. These transformative life decisions (e.g., whether or not to emigrate or flee a country, disclose one's sexual orientation, get divorced, or report a sexual assault) can shape lives. This article argues that rather than reducing such consequential decisions to fit small-world models, researchers need to analyze their real-world properties. Drawing on principles of bounded and ecological rationality, it proposes a framework that identifies five dimensions of transformative life decisions: conflicting cues, change of self, uncertain experiential value, irreversibility, and risk. The framework also specifies simple, versatile choice strategies that address these dimensions by, for instance, breaking down a decision into steps, avoiding trade-offs between present and future selves, or sampling others' experiences. Finally, it suggests benchmarks for assessing the rationality of transformative life decisions. Methodologically, this framework adapts a long tradition of mainly lab-based judgment and decision-making research to a text-based approach, thereby setting the stage for empirical work that analyzes real-world decisions using natural-language processing. Only by understanding decisions with the potential to transform life trajectories-and people in the process-will it be possible to develop encompassing and inclusive theories of human decision making. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142630818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Many of us-60% of humanity, according to one study-would like to change some of our personality traits, such as decreasing pessimism or neuroticism. Dweck (2008) proposed that traits might be altered by changing beliefs. However, novel beliefs must be identified, she contends, because currently studied beliefs are empirically inadequate (e.g., low correlations to broad personality traits) and because a belief's influence on behavior is usually confined to a particular situation or topic. When psychologists refer to the psychological impact of beliefs about situations, they typically mean local situations: situations individuals can enter and leave (e.g., "This neighborhood is dangerous"). The novel theoretical suggestion of this article is that a person's basic beliefs about a situation they never leave such as the world (e.g., "This world is dangerous") are uniquely suited to impact cross-situational behavior patterns often associated with broad personality traits. Historically, general beliefs about the world (termed "primal world beliefs") were understudied, and many remained unknown, rendering systematic investigation infeasible. However, using several methods that helped identify Big Five traits decades ago, a recent effort seeking to map primal world beliefs found a structure of 26 dimensions (most clustering into the beliefs that the world is Safe, Enticing, and Alive) suggesting promising avenues for primals-personality research. This article presents a nuanced, working, speculative hypothesis future research can explore: Average behavioral tendencies that persist wherever the individual goes (personality traits) theoretically should result from beliefs about the broader situation the individual never leaves (the world). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Beliefs that influence personality likely concern a situation humans never leave.","authors":"Jeremy D W Clifton, Alia J Crum","doi":"10.1037/amp0001436","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001436","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many of us-60% of humanity, according to one study-would like to change some of our personality traits, such as decreasing pessimism or neuroticism. Dweck (2008) proposed that traits might be altered by changing beliefs. However, novel beliefs must be identified, she contends, because currently studied beliefs are empirically inadequate (e.g., low correlations to broad personality traits) and because a belief's influence on behavior is usually confined to a particular situation or topic. When psychologists refer to the psychological impact of beliefs about situations, they typically mean local situations: situations individuals can enter and leave (e.g., \"This neighborhood is dangerous\"). The novel theoretical suggestion of this article is that a person's basic beliefs about a situation <i>they never leave</i> such as the world (e.g., \"This world is dangerous\") are uniquely suited to impact cross-situational behavior patterns often associated with broad personality traits. Historically, general beliefs about the world (termed \"primal world beliefs\") were understudied, and many remained unknown, rendering systematic investigation infeasible. However, using several methods that helped identify Big Five traits decades ago, a recent effort seeking to map primal world beliefs found a structure of 26 dimensions (most clustering into the beliefs that the world is <i>Safe, Enticing,</i> and <i>Alive</i>) suggesting promising avenues for primals-personality research. This article presents a nuanced, working, speculative hypothesis future research can explore: Average behavioral tendencies that persist wherever the individual goes (personality traits) theoretically should result from beliefs about the broader situation the individual never leaves (the world). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142606551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alea Ruf, Kira F Ahrens, Judith R Gruber, Rebecca J Neumann, Bianca Kollmann, Raffael Kalisch, Klaus Lieb, Oliver Tüscher, Michael M Plichta, Ute Nöthlings, Ulrich Ebner-Priemer, Andreas Reif, Silke Matura
Adverse life experiences are associated with an increased risk of mental disorders. The successful adaptation to adversity and maintenance or quick restoration of mental health despite adversity is referred to as resilience. Identifying factors that promote resilience can contribute to the prevention of mental disorders. Lifestyle behaviors, increasingly recognized for their impact on mental health, are discussed as potential resilience factors. Several studies found that healthy eating and physical activity (PA) are positively associated with resilience. However, most of these studies assessed resilience through questionnaires, which is unsatisfactory given that resilience research is moving toward conceptualizing resilience as the outcome of a dynamic process, which can only be assessed prospectively and longitudinally. The present study is the first to assess the relationship between diet quality, PA, sedentary behavior (SB), and resilience, captured prospectively and longitudinally in a sample of 145 individuals (75.17% female; Mage = 28.88, SDage = 7.80; MBMI = 24.11, SDBMI = 3.97). Resilience was assessed as the relationship between stressor exposure and mental health (i.e., the stressor reactivity score: higher scores indicate lower resilience and vice versa). Diet quality (i.e., the Healthy Eating Index) was assessed on the basis of app-based food records and 24-hr dietary recalls. PA and SB were objectively recorded through accelerometers. Regression analysis showed that neither diet quality nor PA and SB predicted resilience (ps > .30). Profound differences in the conceptualization and operationalization of resilience might explain the contrary findings. Prospective longitudinal studies are needed to replicate the findings of the present study. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Move past adversity or bite through it? Diet quality, physical activity, and sedentary behavior in relation to resilience.","authors":"Alea Ruf, Kira F Ahrens, Judith R Gruber, Rebecca J Neumann, Bianca Kollmann, Raffael Kalisch, Klaus Lieb, Oliver Tüscher, Michael M Plichta, Ute Nöthlings, Ulrich Ebner-Priemer, Andreas Reif, Silke Matura","doi":"10.1037/amp0001423","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001423","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adverse life experiences are associated with an increased risk of mental disorders. The successful adaptation to adversity and maintenance or quick restoration of mental health despite adversity is referred to as resilience. Identifying factors that promote resilience can contribute to the prevention of mental disorders. Lifestyle behaviors, increasingly recognized for their impact on mental health, are discussed as potential resilience factors. Several studies found that healthy eating and physical activity (PA) are positively associated with resilience. However, most of these studies assessed resilience through questionnaires, which is unsatisfactory given that resilience research is moving toward conceptualizing resilience as the outcome of a dynamic process, which can only be assessed prospectively and longitudinally. The present study is the first to assess the relationship between diet quality, PA, sedentary behavior (SB), and resilience, captured prospectively and longitudinally in a sample of 145 individuals (75.17% female; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 28.88, <i>SD</i><sub>age</sub> = 7.80; <i>M</i><sub>BMI</sub> = 24.11, <i>SD</i><sub>BMI</sub> = 3.97). Resilience was assessed as the relationship between stressor exposure and mental health (i.e., the stressor reactivity score: higher scores indicate lower resilience and vice versa). Diet quality (i.e., the Healthy Eating Index) was assessed on the basis of app-based food records and 24-hr dietary recalls. PA and SB were objectively recorded through accelerometers. Regression analysis showed that neither diet quality nor PA and SB predicted resilience (<i>p</i>s > .30). Profound differences in the conceptualization and operationalization of resilience might explain the contrary findings. Prospective longitudinal studies are needed to replicate the findings of the present study. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142606559","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Article memorializes Frans B. M. de Waal (1948-2024). Franciscus (Frans) Bernardus Maria de Waal was a Dutch-American primatologist and ethologist who was born on October 29, 1948, in Hertogenbosch, in the southern Netherlands. Frans was taken by stomach cancer in March 2024, at the age of 75. Frans's long and storied career and life touched the lives of so many, all around the world. Through 13 books (in 20 languages), courses, lectures, field visits (to nearly every continent), collaborations, and many abiding friendships, Frans shared his love of animals and the natural world with us all. May we honor his legacy by caring for those around us, large and small. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
文章纪念弗兰斯-B.M.-德瓦尔(1948-2024)。弗朗西斯库斯(弗兰斯)-伯纳德斯-玛丽亚-德瓦尔是美籍荷兰灵长类动物学家和人种学家,1948 年 10 月 29 日出生于荷兰南部的赫托亨博斯。2024 年 3 月,弗朗斯因胃癌去世,享年 75 岁。弗兰斯漫长而传奇的职业生涯和人生影响了世界各地许多人的生活。通过 13 本著作(20 种语言)、课程、讲座、实地考察(几乎遍及各大洲)、合作以及许多深厚的友谊,弗兰斯与我们所有人分享了他对动物和自然世界的热爱。愿我们关爱身边大大小小的人,以此纪念他的遗产。 (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
{"title":"Frans B. M. de Waal (1948-2024).","authors":"Stephanie D Preston","doi":"10.1037/amp0001456","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001456","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Article memorializes Frans B. M. de Waal (1948-2024). Franciscus (Frans) Bernardus Maria de Waal was a Dutch-American primatologist and ethologist who was born on October 29, 1948, in Hertogenbosch, in the southern Netherlands. Frans was taken by stomach cancer in March 2024, at the age of 75. Frans's long and storied career and life touched the lives of so many, all around the world. Through 13 books (in 20 languages), courses, lectures, field visits (to nearly every continent), collaborations, and many abiding friendships, Frans shared his love of animals and the natural world with us all. May we honor his legacy by caring for those around us, large and small. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142606555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Attention to issues of sample diversity and generalizability has increased dramatically in the past 15 years, as psychological scientists have confronted the limitations of relatively homogeneous samples. Though this reckoning was perhaps overdue and has undoubtedly shined a light on some poor research practices, recommendations surrounding sample diversity are sometimes applied to research that does not aim for generalizability across peoples. In this article, I seek to promote discussion about when and why sample diversity and generalizability matter. In doing so, I address problems with language surrounding generalizability, the broader question of generalizability beyond samples, challenges for determining sufficient generalizability, and the inherent question of moderation in psychological science, given the reality of limited time and resources. I then discuss the important roles that basic research plays in understanding group differences, producing generalizable knowledge, and developing applied interventions. Finally, I address issues of equity surrounding sample diversity, emphasizing the distinction between WEIRD samples and convenience samples and the importance of convenience samples for globalizing psychological science. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
在过去的 15 年里,随着心理科学家们正视相对单一样本的局限性,对样本多样性和可推广性问题的关注急剧增加。尽管这种反思也许早就应该进行,而且无疑也揭示了一些不良的研究实践,但围绕样本多样性的建议有时却被应用于那些不以在不同民族间实现可推广性为目标的研究中。在本文中,我试图推动关于样本多样性和可推广性何时以及为何重要的讨论。在此过程中,我将讨论有关可推广性的语言问题、样本之外的更广泛的可推广性问题、确定充分的可推广性所面临的挑战,以及在时间和资源有限的现实情况下,心理科学中固有的节制问题。然后,我讨论了基础研究在理解群体差异、产生可推广的知识和开发应用干预措施方面的重要作用。最后,我讨论了与样本多样性相关的公平问题,强调了 WEIRD 样本与便利样本之间的区别,以及便利样本对于心理科学全球化的重要性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
{"title":"There is nothing WEIRD about basic research: The critical role of convenience samples in psychological science.","authors":"Jeffrey W Sherman","doi":"10.1037/amp0001443","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001443","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Attention to issues of sample diversity and generalizability has increased dramatically in the past 15 years, as psychological scientists have confronted the limitations of relatively homogeneous samples. Though this reckoning was perhaps overdue and has undoubtedly shined a light on some poor research practices, recommendations surrounding sample diversity are sometimes applied to research that does not aim for generalizability across peoples. In this article, I seek to promote discussion about when and why sample diversity and generalizability matter. In doing so, I address problems with language surrounding generalizability, the broader question of generalizability beyond samples, challenges for determining sufficient generalizability, and the inherent question of moderation in psychological science, given the reality of limited time and resources. I then discuss the important roles that basic research plays in understanding group differences, producing generalizable knowledge, and developing applied interventions. Finally, I address issues of equity surrounding sample diversity, emphasizing the distinction between WEIRD samples and convenience samples and the importance of convenience samples for globalizing psychological science. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142606733","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Reports an error in "The narcissistic appeal of leadership theories" by Niklas K. Steffens, Mark S. P. Chong and S. Alexander Haslam (American Psychologist, 2022[Feb-Mar], Vol 77[2], 234-248). In the article, Mark S. P. Chong was incorrectly omitted from the author list. The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2020-81554-001.) Leadership is one of the most researched topics in psychological and other social and behavioral sciences. It is routinely seen as vital to the success and vitality of various forms of collaborative activity not only in organizations but in society at large. This has provided the stimulus for a massive amount of theoretical and applied research and also supports a huge industry. But to whom does this body of work appeal? More specifically, does it appeal to people with a broad interest in advancing groups and society or to people who are primarily interested in promoting themselves? To answer this question, we explore the extent to which individuals' narcissism predicts their endorsement of leadership theories. Results provide empirical evidence that the more narcissistic people are, the more they find leadership theories appealing and the more interest they have in learning about the ideas behind particular theories. The predictive power of narcissism also holds when accounting for other variables (including demographic, Big Five traits, and ideological and motivational variables). We conclude that psychological theorizing about leadership can be a double-edged sword in so far as the lionization of leaders(hip) appeals to, and legitimizes, the tastes of a narcissistic audience. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
报告 Niklas K. Steffens、Mark S. P. Chong 和 S. Alexander Haslam 所著《领导力理论的自恋魅力》(《美国心理学家》,2022 年[2-3 月],第 77[2] 卷,234-248 页)中的一处错误。文章中,Mark S. P. Chong 被错误地从作者名单中删除。本文网络版已作更正。(以下为 2020-81554-001 号记录中的原文摘要)。领导力是心理学及其他社会和行为科学领域研究最多的课题之一。不仅在组织中,而且在整个社会中,人们都认为领导力对于各种形式的合作活动的成功和活力至关重要。这为大量的理论和应用研究提供了动力,也为一个庞大的产业提供了支持。但是,这些工作对谁有吸引力呢?更具体地说,它是吸引那些对促进团体和社会发展有着广泛兴趣的人,还是吸引那些主要对提升自己感兴趣的人?为了回答这个问题,我们探讨了个人的自恋在多大程度上能预测他们对领导力理论的认可程度。结果提供的经验证据表明,越是自恋的人,越觉得领导力理论有吸引力,越有兴趣了解特定理论背后的思想。当考虑到其他变量(包括人口统计学、五大特质、意识形态和动机变量)时,自恋的预测能力也是成立的。我们的结论是,关于领导力的心理学理论研究可能是一把双刃剑,因为对领导者(时髦人物)的赞美迎合了自恋受众的口味,并使之合法化。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Correction to \"The narcissistic appeal of leadership theories\" by Steffens et al. (2022).","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/amp0001418","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001418","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reports an error in \"The narcissistic appeal of leadership theories\" by Niklas K. Steffens, Mark S. P. Chong and S. Alexander Haslam (<i>American Psychologist</i>, 2022[Feb-Mar], Vol 77[2], 234-248). In the article, Mark S. P. Chong was incorrectly omitted from the author list. The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2020-81554-001.) Leadership is one of the most researched topics in psychological and other social and behavioral sciences. It is routinely seen as vital to the success and vitality of various forms of collaborative activity not only in organizations but in society at large. This has provided the stimulus for a massive amount of theoretical and applied research and also supports a huge industry. But to whom does this body of work appeal? More specifically, does it appeal to people with a broad interest in advancing groups and society or to people who are primarily interested in promoting themselves? To answer this question, we explore the extent to which individuals' narcissism predicts their endorsement of leadership theories. Results provide empirical evidence that the more narcissistic people are, the more they find leadership theories appealing and the more interest they have in learning about the ideas behind particular theories. The predictive power of narcissism also holds when accounting for other variables (including demographic, Big Five traits, and ideological and motivational variables). We conclude that psychological theorizing about leadership can be a double-edged sword in so far as the lionization of leaders(hip) appeals to, and legitimizes, the tastes of a narcissistic audience. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":"79 8","pages":"1048"},"PeriodicalIF":12.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142630824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Juan Del Toro, Riana E Anderson, Xiaoran Sun, Richard M Lee
Ethnically and racially underrepresented adolescents are experiencing pubertal development earlier in life than prior cohorts and their White American peers. This early onset of puberty is partly attributable to ethnic-racial discrimination. To contribute to adolescents' resilience and posttraumatic growth in the face of ethnic-racial discrimination, parents' ethnic-racial identities may spill over into their parenting beliefs and practices. Parents who have a sense of belonging with and commitment to their ethnic-racial identities may be aware of discrimination and actively and consistently engage in practices that build supportive home environments to support their children's development in the context of ethnic-racial discrimination. To assess whether parents' ethnic-racial identity commitment predicted adolescents' resilience against ethnic-racial discrimination, we used multiple waves of survey data from adolescent siblings and their parents participating in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study (N-adolescents = 1,651; N-families = 805; 35% Black, 37% Latinx, 3% Asian, 25% other ethnically and racially underrepresented youth; 49% boys, 50% girls, 1% gender nonconforming youth; Mage = 11.49, SD = 0.51). Results indicated that adolescents who experienced more frequent ethnic-racial discrimination than their siblings showed more advanced pubertal development. Parental ethnic-racial identity commitment reduced the relation between discrimination and pubertal development within a family. Results suggest that ethnic-racial identity commitment in parents can protect children when they experience ethnic-racial discrimination. Building on extant propositions related to resilience (Infurna & Luthar, 2018), the present study amplifies the depiction of resilience, yields recommendations for analysis of future research, and provides implications regarding the role of ethnicity-race in familial practices. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
与以前的同龄人和美国白人同龄人相比,在族裔和种族上代表性不足的青少年青春期发育较早。青春期发育提前的部分原因是种族歧视。为了促进青少年在面对族裔-种族歧视时的复原力和创伤后成长,父母的族裔-种族身份可能会影响到他们的育儿信念和做法。对自己的民族-种族身份有归属感和承诺的父母可能会意识到歧视,并积极、持续地参与到营造支持性家庭环境的实践中,以支持孩子在民族-种族歧视背景下的发展。为了评估父母的民族-种族身份承诺是否能预测青少年抵御民族-种族歧视的能力,我们使用了参与青少年大脑认知发展研究的青少年兄弟姐妹及其父母的多波调查数据(青少年人数 = 1,651;家庭人数 = 805;35% 为黑人,37% 为拉丁裔,3% 为亚裔,25% 为其他民族和种族代表性不足的青少年;49% 为男孩,50% 为女孩,1% 为性别不符青少年;Mage = 11.49,SD = 0.51)。结果表明,与兄弟姐妹相比,遭受更多民族-种族歧视的青少年的青春期发育更快。父母的种族认同承诺降低了家庭中歧视与青春期发育之间的关系。研究结果表明,父母的种族认同承诺可以在孩子遭受种族歧视时保护他们。本研究在与复原力相关的现有命题(Infurna & Luthar, 2018)的基础上,扩大了对复原力的描述,提出了对未来研究分析的建议,并就民族-种族在家庭实践中的作用提供了启示。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
{"title":"Early adolescents' ethnic-racial discrimination and pubertal development: Parents' ethnic-racial identities promote adolescents' resilience.","authors":"Juan Del Toro, Riana E Anderson, Xiaoran Sun, Richard M Lee","doi":"10.1037/amp0001284","DOIUrl":"10.1037/amp0001284","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ethnically and racially underrepresented adolescents are experiencing pubertal development earlier in life than prior cohorts and their White American peers. This early onset of puberty is partly attributable to ethnic-racial discrimination. To contribute to adolescents' resilience and posttraumatic growth in the face of ethnic-racial discrimination, parents' ethnic-racial identities may spill over into their parenting beliefs and practices. Parents who have a sense of belonging with and commitment to their ethnic-racial identities may be aware of discrimination and actively and consistently engage in practices that build supportive home environments to support their children's development in the context of ethnic-racial discrimination. To assess whether parents' ethnic-racial identity commitment predicted adolescents' resilience against ethnic-racial discrimination, we used multiple waves of survey data from adolescent siblings and their parents participating in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study (N-adolescents = 1,651; N-families = 805; 35% Black, 37% Latinx, 3% Asian, 25% other ethnically and racially underrepresented youth; 49% boys, 50% girls, 1% gender nonconforming youth; Mage = 11.49, SD = 0.51). Results indicated that adolescents who experienced more frequent ethnic-racial discrimination than their siblings showed more advanced pubertal development. Parental ethnic-racial identity commitment reduced the relation between discrimination and pubertal development within a family. Results suggest that ethnic-racial identity commitment in parents can protect children when they experience ethnic-racial discrimination. Building on extant propositions related to resilience (Infurna & Luthar, 2018), the present study amplifies the depiction of resilience, yields recommendations for analysis of future research, and provides implications regarding the role of ethnicity-race in familial practices. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":"79 8","pages":"1109-1122"},"PeriodicalIF":12.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142630826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kira F Ahrens, Charlotte Schenk, Bianca Kollmann, Lara M C Puhlmann, Rebecca J Neumann, Sarah K Schäfer, Dorota Reis, Ulrike Basten, Danuta Weichert, Christian J Fiebach, Beat Lutz, Michèle Wessa, Jonathan Repple, Klaus Lieb, Oliver Tüscher, Andreas Reif, Raffael Kalisch, Michael M Plichta
Resilience has been defined as the maintenance or quick recovery of mental health during and after stressor exposure. One popular operationalization of this concept is to model prototypical trajectories of mental health in response to an adverse event, where trajectories of undisturbed low or rapidly recovering symptoms both comply with the resilience definition. However, mental health responses are likely also influenced by other stressors occurring before or during the observation time window. These "background" stressors may affect a person's assignment to a trajectory class. When using these classes as dependent variables to identify resilience-predictive factors, this may lead to false estimates. A new method to build exposure-controlled trajectories based on time courses of stressor reactivity (SR), rather than pure mental health scores, is demonstrated on a data set of 707 initially healthy participants living in Germany (67.33% female; Mage = 29.20, SD = 8.27). SR scores express individual deviations from the sample's normative mental health reaction to observed real-life stressors during the observation time window, thus accounting for individual differences in exposure to background stressors. The resulting trajectory models are plausible. In analyses additionally controlling for background stressors occurring before the observation time window (past life events), low SR trajectories are predicted by the well-documented resilience factor sense of coherence, suggesting construct validity. Further, they are associated with lower odds of developing categorical mental health conditions, suggesting predictive validity. Our study provides the first proof of principle for a refined method to identify predictors of resilience to major stressor events. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
复原力被定义为在受到压力时或压力过后心理健康的维持或快速恢复。对这一概念的一种流行的操作方法是,模拟心理健康在应对不利事件时的原型轨迹,其中不受干扰的低症状或快速恢复的症状轨迹都符合复原力的定义。然而,心理健康反应也可能受到观察时间窗口之前或期间发生的其他压力因素的影响。这些 "背景 "压力可能会影响一个人的轨迹分类。当使用这些类别作为因变量来识别复原力预测因素时,可能会导致错误的估计。我们在一个由 707 名居住在德国、初始健康的参与者(67.33% 为女性;年龄 = 29.20,标准差 = 8.27)组成的数据集上,展示了一种基于压力源反应性(SR)时间历程而非纯粹的心理健康评分来构建暴露控制轨迹的新方法。SR 分数表示在观察时间窗口内,个体对观察到的现实生活压力的心理健康反应与样本正常心理健康反应之间的偏差,从而反映出个体在背景压力下的暴露差异。由此得出的轨迹模型是可信的。在对观察时间窗之前发生的背景压力因素(过去的生活事件)进行额外控制的分析中,低 SR 轨迹是由已被充分证明的复原力因素一致性感预测的,这表明了建构的有效性。此外,低 SR 轨迹还与较低的分类精神健康状况发生几率相关,这也表明了预测的有效性。我们的研究首次证明了确定重大压力事件复原力预测因子的改进方法的原理。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Resilience to major life events: Advancing trajectory modeling and resilience factor identification by controlling for background stressor exposure.","authors":"Kira F Ahrens, Charlotte Schenk, Bianca Kollmann, Lara M C Puhlmann, Rebecca J Neumann, Sarah K Schäfer, Dorota Reis, Ulrike Basten, Danuta Weichert, Christian J Fiebach, Beat Lutz, Michèle Wessa, Jonathan Repple, Klaus Lieb, Oliver Tüscher, Andreas Reif, Raffael Kalisch, Michael M Plichta","doi":"10.1037/amp0001315","DOIUrl":"10.1037/amp0001315","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Resilience has been defined as the maintenance or quick recovery of mental health during and after stressor exposure. One popular operationalization of this concept is to model prototypical trajectories of mental health in response to an adverse event, where trajectories of undisturbed low or rapidly recovering symptoms both comply with the resilience definition. However, mental health responses are likely also influenced by other stressors occurring before or during the observation time window. These \"background\" stressors may affect a person's assignment to a trajectory class. When using these classes as dependent variables to identify resilience-predictive factors, this may lead to false estimates. A new method to build exposure-controlled trajectories based on time courses of stressor reactivity (SR), rather than pure mental health scores, is demonstrated on a data set of 707 initially healthy participants living in Germany (67.33% female; Mage = 29.20, SD = 8.27). SR scores express individual deviations from the sample's normative mental health reaction to observed real-life stressors during the observation time window, thus accounting for individual differences in exposure to background stressors. The resulting trajectory models are plausible. In analyses additionally controlling for background stressors occurring before the observation time window (past life events), low SR trajectories are predicted by the well-documented resilience factor sense of coherence, suggesting construct validity. Further, they are associated with lower odds of developing categorical mental health conditions, suggesting predictive validity. Our study provides the first proof of principle for a refined method to identify predictors of resilience to major stressor events. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":"79 8","pages":"1076-1091"},"PeriodicalIF":12.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142629666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}