Glanded (Gd) cottonseed (Gossypium hirsutum L.) contains scattered gossypol glands. Glandless (Gl) cottonseed is a new type of seed containing only trace levels of gossypol. This work quantitatively compared the content and migration pattern of Gd and Gl protein isolates. Both protein samples were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-gel electrophoresis, and the protein gel bands were separated into seven partitions for peptide mass spectroscopic analysis. While multiple peptide fragments (isoformers) of vicilin and legumin proteins were present in both samples, the percentage of vicilins in total seed protein was higher in Gd (74.9%) than in Gl (63.4%). In contrast, legumin proteins were more abundant in Gl (30.4%) than Gd (23.6%). Minor protein components such as lipid-related oleosins and vicilin-like antimicrobial peptides 2-2 were also observed at a relatively higher incidence in Gl compared with Gd, potentially reflecting a need for increased protein-related defense capability in the absence of gossypol against natural predators or adverse growth environment.
{"title":"Quantitative comparison of the storage protein distribution in glandless and glanded cottonseeds","authors":"Zhongqi He, Dunhua Zhang, Christopher P. Mattison","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20076","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ael2.20076","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Glanded (Gd) cottonseed (<i>Gossypium hirsutum</i> L.) contains scattered gossypol glands. Glandless (Gl) cottonseed is a new type of seed containing only trace levels of gossypol. This work quantitatively compared the content and migration pattern of Gd and Gl protein isolates. Both protein samples were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-gel electrophoresis, and the protein gel bands were separated into seven partitions for peptide mass spectroscopic analysis. While multiple peptide fragments (isoformers) of vicilin and legumin proteins were present in both samples, the percentage of vicilins in total seed protein was higher in Gd (74.9%) than in Gl (63.4%). In contrast, legumin proteins were more abundant in Gl (30.4%) than Gd (23.6%). Minor protein components such as lipid-related oleosins and vicilin-like antimicrobial peptides 2-2 were also observed at a relatively higher incidence in Gl compared with Gd, potentially reflecting a need for increased protein-related defense capability in the absence of gossypol against natural predators or adverse growth environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2022-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20076","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49236068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This study determined the effect of hybrid breeding on cultivar diversity in rice (Oryza sativa L.) production in China. The results showed that hybrid breeding led to increases in the Shannon index of cultivar diversity by 29–184% during the period 2011–2015 compared with the period 1986–1990 for 10 major hybrid rice-producing provinces in China. There was a significant exponential relationship between the Shannon index of cultivar diversity and the number of hybrid cultivars and the total number of cultivars across the 10 provinces and the two 5-yr periods. The results of this study also demonstrate that hybrid rice breeding resulted in a cultivar diversity that came close to saturation in some provinces, such as Anhui, Hunan, Jiangxi, and Sichuan, and highlight the urgent need for a reconsideration of the development of hybrid rice industrialization in China to avoid wasting resources caused by overbreeding.
{"title":"Hybrid breeding and cultivar diversity in rice production in China","authors":"Min Huang","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20074","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ael2.20074","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study determined the effect of hybrid breeding on cultivar diversity in rice (<i>Oryza sativa</i> L.) production in China. The results showed that hybrid breeding led to increases in the Shannon index of cultivar diversity by 29–184% during the period 2011–2015 compared with the period 1986–1990 for 10 major hybrid rice-producing provinces in China. There was a significant exponential relationship between the Shannon index of cultivar diversity and the number of hybrid cultivars and the total number of cultivars across the 10 provinces and the two 5-yr periods. The results of this study also demonstrate that hybrid rice breeding resulted in a cultivar diversity that came close to saturation in some provinces, such as Anhui, Hunan, Jiangxi, and Sichuan, and highlight the urgent need for a reconsideration of the development of hybrid rice industrialization in China to avoid wasting resources caused by overbreeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2022-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20074","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44067070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>Maintaining the editorial standards of a scientific journal is an important responsibility because the publications of a society are one of its major services to its members. This task can only be accomplished with the advice of a large number of colleagues who are invited to review manuscripts. Their critical comments and helpful suggestions have played a major part in making <i>Agricultural & Environmental Letters</i> a success. The members of the <i>Agricultural & Environmental Letters</i> Editorial Board express their thanks to all those scientists who reviewed manuscripts in 2021. We extend our apologies and thanks to those reviewers whose names have been inadvertently omitted from this list.</p><p>Adeli, Ardeshir, USDA, United States</p><p>Akula, Umakanth, ICAR-Indian Institute of Millets Research, Hyderabad, India</p><p>Archer, David, USDA-ARS-NGPRL, Mandan, North Dakota, United States</p><p>Arzani, Ahmad, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran</p><p>Barcellos, Diego</p><p>Barnes, Ed, Cotton Inc., Cary, North Carolina, United States</p><p>Berti, Marisol, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, United States</p><p>Bir, Courtney, Oklahoma State University System, Stillwater, Oklahoma, United States</p><p>Buda, Anthony, USDA-ARS, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States</p><p>Chatterjee, Amitava, Oxford, Mississippi, United States</p><p>Culman, Steven, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, Ohio, United States</p><p>Daigh, Aaron, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, United States</p><p>De Guzman, Christian, University of Arkansas System, Stuttgart, Arkansas, United States</p><p>Delhom, Chris, USDA-ARS Mid South Area, United States</p><p>Dick, Warren, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, United States</p><p>Dorau, Kristof, Universität zu Köln</p><p>Eagle, Alison, Environmental Defense Fund, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States</p><p>Feleke, Shiferaw, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania</p><p>Franzluebbers, Alan, USDA, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States</p><p>Ganie, Zahoor</p><p>Goos, R., NDSU, Fargo, North Dakota, United States</p><p>Govindasamy, Prabhu, Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, India</p><p>Graham, Jennifer, US Geological Survey Northeast Region, United States</p><p>Grusak, Mike, USDA-ARS Plains Area, Fargo, North Dakota, United States</p><p>Guillen-Portal, Fernando, Texas A and M University College Station, College Station, Texas, United States</p><p>Haden, Ryan, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, United States</p><p>Hadrich, Joleen, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States</p><p>Hall, Clifford</p><p>He, Zhongqi, USDA-ARS, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States</p><p>Houser, Matthew, Indiana University System, Bloomington, Indiana, United States</p><p>Huggins, Trevis, USDA-ARS Southeast Area, Stuttgart, Arkansas, United States</p><
保持科学期刊的编辑标准是一项重要的责任,因为一个学会的出版物是其为会员提供的主要服务之一。这项任务只有在大量受邀审阅手稿的同事的建议下才能完成。他们的批评性意见和有益的建议对我国农业科学技术的发展起到了重要作用;《环保快报》获得成功。农业及农业组织的成员;《环境快报》编委会感谢所有在2021年审阅手稿的科学家。我们向那些名字被无意中从这份名单中省略的评审员表示歉意和感谢。Adeli,Ardeshir,美国农业部,美国Kula,Umakanth,ICAR-Indian Millets Research Institute,Hyderabad,IndiaArcher,David,USDA-ARS-NGPRL,Mandan,North Dakota,美国阿尔扎尼,Ahmad,伊斯法罕理工大学,Isfahan,伊朗伊斯兰共和国Barcellos,DiegoBarnes,Ed,Cotton股份有限公司,Cary,North Carolina,United States,美国北达科他州比尔、考特尼、俄克拉荷马州立大学系统、斯蒂尔沃特、俄克拉何马州布达、安东尼、USDA-ARS、宾夕法尼亚州大学公园、美国查特吉、阿米塔瓦、牛津、密西西比州、美国库曼、史蒂文、俄亥俄州农业研究与发展中心、俄亥俄州伍斯特,美国德古兹曼,克里斯蒂安,阿肯色大学系统,斯图加特,阿肯色州,美国德霍姆,克里斯,USDA-ARS中南部地区,美国迪克,沃伦,俄亥俄州立大学,伍斯特,俄亥俄州,美国多劳,克里斯托夫,科恩伊格尔大学,艾莉森,环境保护基金,北卡罗来纳州罗利,坦桑尼亚联合共和国达累斯萨拉姆国际热带农业研究所Franzluebers,Alan,美国农业部,北卡罗来纳州罗利市,美国Ganie,ZahoorGoos,R.,NDSU,北达科他州法戈,美国Govindasamy,Prabhu,印度草原和饲料研究所,Jhansi,IndiaGraham,Jennifer,美国地质调查局东北地区,美国Grusak,Mike,USDA-ARS平原地区,法戈,北达科他州,美国Guillen Portal,Fernando,德克萨斯州农工大学学院站,德克萨斯州学院站,美国哈登,瑞安,俄亥俄州立大学,俄亥俄州伍斯特,美国哈德里希,乔琳,明尼苏达大学,明尼苏达州圣保罗,美国霍尔,CliffordHe,中启,USDA-ARS,新奥尔良,路易斯安那州,美国Houser,Matthew,印第安纳大学系统,印第安纳州布卢明顿,美国哈金斯,特雷维斯,USDA-ARS东南地区,斯图加特,阿肯色州,美国Jha,Gaurav,加州大学戴维斯,加利福尼亚州,美国Jones,Jessica L.,美国食品,美国Jungers,Jacob,明尼苏达大学,圣保罗,明尼苏达州,美国,康奈尔大学,伊萨卡,纽约,美国Kiniry,Jim,USDA-ARS,得克萨斯州坦普尔,美国Koehler Cole,Katja,内布拉斯加大学林肯,内布拉斯加州,美国Kolka,Randy,美国农业部林务局,大急流城,明尼苏达州,美国Kusi,Nana,弗吉尼亚州立大学,弗吉尼亚州彼得堡,美国Lamba,Jasmeet,奥本大学,阿拉巴马州奥本,美国Lehman,R.,USDA-ARS,布鲁金斯,南达科他州,美国Lewis,Katie,德克萨斯A&;M AgriLife Research,Halfway,Texas,UnitedStatesLi,ChenhuiLi,XiaofeiLindsey,Alexander,Ohio State University,Columbus,Ohio,UnitedStates Lobry de Bruyn,Lisa Malone,Robert,USDA-ARS,Ames,Iowa,UnitedStatesMcKnight,BenjemanMiranda,Carrie,North Dakota State University,Fargo,North Da科塔州,Randy,明尼苏达大学扩展分校,美国明尼苏达州摩尔黑德。’Brien,Peter,USDA-ARS国家农业与环境实验室,美国爱荷华州埃姆斯。Reja,Fernando Panchbai,Ajay,国际水稻研究所,内罗毕,KenyaPlastina,Alejandro,爱荷华州州立大学,艾奥瓦州埃姆斯。Power,Rebecca,威斯康星大学,威斯康星州麦迪逊,美国邱,湖北省粮食产业协同创新中心,中国Rabenhorst,Marty Ray,Ram,Prairie View A&;M大学,Prairie View,德克萨斯州,美国Ruark,Matthew,威斯康星大学,威斯康星麦迪逊,美国Ruiz Diaz,Dorivar,堪萨斯州立大学,曼哈顿,堪萨斯州,美国Sauvadet,MarieSchlossberg,Maxim,宾夕法尼亚州立大学。 ,宾夕法尼亚大学帕克分校,美国森古普塔,阿迪蒂,亚利桑那大学,亚利桑那州图森市,美国辛,哈里,Fort Valley州立大学,Fort谷,佐治亚州,美国陶,海鹰,华盛顿州立大学,华盛顿州普尔曼,美国迪德尔,埃苏巴勒,Debre Markos大学农业与自然资源学院,美国联邦农业与自然科学部,美国密西西比州Thompson,Laura,内布拉斯加大学林肯分校,美国内布拉斯加福尔斯市Unruh,Bryan,佛罗里达大学Jay,佛罗里达州,美国von Haden,Adam,伊利诺伊大学厄巴纳-香槟分校,伊利诺伊州厄巴纳,美国White,Paul,美国农业部农业研究服务中心,路易斯安那州侯马,美国Wills,SkyeYousef,Lina,阿拉伯联合酋长国马斯达尔市马斯达尔科技学院张,海林,俄克拉荷马州立大学,美国俄克拉荷马州斯蒂尔沃特
{"title":"Thanks to our 2021 reviewers","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20072","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.20072","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Maintaining the editorial standards of a scientific journal is an important responsibility because the publications of a society are one of its major services to its members. This task can only be accomplished with the advice of a large number of colleagues who are invited to review manuscripts. Their critical comments and helpful suggestions have played a major part in making <i>Agricultural & Environmental Letters</i> a success. The members of the <i>Agricultural & Environmental Letters</i> Editorial Board express their thanks to all those scientists who reviewed manuscripts in 2021. We extend our apologies and thanks to those reviewers whose names have been inadvertently omitted from this list.</p><p>Adeli, Ardeshir, USDA, United States</p><p>Akula, Umakanth, ICAR-Indian Institute of Millets Research, Hyderabad, India</p><p>Archer, David, USDA-ARS-NGPRL, Mandan, North Dakota, United States</p><p>Arzani, Ahmad, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran</p><p>Barcellos, Diego</p><p>Barnes, Ed, Cotton Inc., Cary, North Carolina, United States</p><p>Berti, Marisol, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, United States</p><p>Bir, Courtney, Oklahoma State University System, Stillwater, Oklahoma, United States</p><p>Buda, Anthony, USDA-ARS, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States</p><p>Chatterjee, Amitava, Oxford, Mississippi, United States</p><p>Culman, Steven, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, Ohio, United States</p><p>Daigh, Aaron, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, United States</p><p>De Guzman, Christian, University of Arkansas System, Stuttgart, Arkansas, United States</p><p>Delhom, Chris, USDA-ARS Mid South Area, United States</p><p>Dick, Warren, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, United States</p><p>Dorau, Kristof, Universität zu Köln</p><p>Eagle, Alison, Environmental Defense Fund, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States</p><p>Feleke, Shiferaw, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania</p><p>Franzluebbers, Alan, USDA, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States</p><p>Ganie, Zahoor</p><p>Goos, R., NDSU, Fargo, North Dakota, United States</p><p>Govindasamy, Prabhu, Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, India</p><p>Graham, Jennifer, US Geological Survey Northeast Region, United States</p><p>Grusak, Mike, USDA-ARS Plains Area, Fargo, North Dakota, United States</p><p>Guillen-Portal, Fernando, Texas A and M University College Station, College Station, Texas, United States</p><p>Haden, Ryan, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, United States</p><p>Hadrich, Joleen, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States</p><p>Hall, Clifford</p><p>He, Zhongqi, USDA-ARS, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States</p><p>Houser, Matthew, Indiana University System, Bloomington, Indiana, United States</p><p>Huggins, Trevis, USDA-ARS Southeast Area, Stuttgart, Arkansas, United States</p><","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20072","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71985478","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cover crops (CCs) were used on only ∼5% of harvested cropland in the United States in 2017. Lack of information about effective CC management and the costs and benefits of CCs may contribute to low adoption. We use CC management data from 112 farms in the Soil Health Partnership network (2015–2021) to characterize CC management practices and costs. Soil Health Partnership farmers spent a median of US$98.84 per hectare to plant CCs on trial fields in the 2021 crop year, and costs varied with management practices. Farmers also experimented with CC management practices; more than half of 100 farmers providing panel data used more than one seeding method, and the share “planting green” increased over time. This diversity of CC management practices, heterogeneity in costs (and benefits), and experimentation process—among other factors—may make it challenging for farmers to develop expectations about whether CCs will be profitable on their farm in the short, medium, or long-run.
{"title":"Farmers employ diverse cover crop management strategies to meet soil health goals","authors":"Maria Bowman, Kristin Poley, Elyssa McFarland","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20070","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ael2.20070","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cover crops (CCs) were used on only ∼5% of harvested cropland in the United States in 2017. Lack of information about effective CC management and the costs and benefits of CCs may contribute to low adoption. We use CC management data from 112 farms in the Soil Health Partnership network (2015–2021) to characterize CC management practices and costs. Soil Health Partnership farmers spent a median of US$98.84 per hectare to plant CCs on trial fields in the 2021 crop year, and costs varied with management practices. Farmers also experimented with CC management practices; more than half of 100 farmers providing panel data used more than one seeding method, and the share “planting green” increased over time. This diversity of CC management practices, heterogeneity in costs (and benefits), and experimentation process—among other factors—may make it challenging for farmers to develop expectations about whether CCs will be profitable on their farm in the short, medium, or long-run.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2022-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20070","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42480360","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The diffusive gradients in thin-films (DGT) technique shows in many publications a superior correlation to the amount of plant-available phosphorus (P) in soil. However, this technique cannot give information on the plant-available P species in soil. Therefore, we combined DGT with solution 31P nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. This was achieved by using a modified DGT device in which the diffusive layer had a larger pore size, the binding layer incorporated an adsorption material with a higher capacity, and the device had a larger exposure area. The spectroscopic investigation was undertaken after elution of the deployed DGT binding layer in a NaOH solution. Adsorption tests using solutions of known organic P compounds showed that a sufficient amount of these compounds could be adsorbed on the binding layer in order for them to be analyzed by solution 31P NMR spectroscopy. Furthermore, various intermediates of the hydrolysis of trimetaphosphate in soil could be also analyzed over time.