首页 > 最新文献

Jmir Mental Health最新文献

英文 中文
Comparison of Use Rates of Telehealth Services for Substance Use Disorder During and Following COVID-19 Safety Distancing Recommendations: Two Cross-Sectional Surveys. COVID-19 提出安全距离建议期间和之后远程保健服务对药物使用障碍的使用率比较:两项横断面调查。
IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI: 10.2196/52363
Adrijana Pusnik, Bryan Hartzler, Olivia Vjorn, Beth A Rutkowski, Michael Chaple, Sara Becker, Thomas Freese, Maureen Nichols, Todd Molfenter
<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 social distancing guidelines resulted in a dramatic transition to telephone and video technologies to deliver substance use disorder (SUD) treatment. Before COVID-19, the question was "Will telehealth ever take hold for SUD services?" Now that social distancing guidelines have been lifted, the question is "Will telehealth remain a commonly used care modality?"</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The principal purpose of this investigation was to examine the extent to which telehealth use in SUD service settings persisted following the lifting of COVID-19 safety distancing recommendations. Additionally, the study aimed to explore practitioners' perceptions of telehealth convenience and value after its regular implementation during the pandemic. Specifically, the goal of this study was to compare telehealth activity between time intervals: May-August 2020 (during peak COVID-19 safety distancing recommendations) and October-December 2022 (following discontinuation of distancing recommendations). Specifically, we compared (1) telehealth technologies and services, (2) perceived usefulness of telehealth, (3) ease of use of telephone- and video-based telehealth services, and (4) organizational readiness to use telehealth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online cross-sectional survey consisting of 108 items was conducted to measure the use of telehealth technologies for delivering a specific set of SUD services in the United States and to explore the perceived readiness for use and satisfaction with telephonic and video services. The survey took approximately 25-35 minutes to complete and used the same 3 sets of questions and 2 theory-driven scales as in a previous cross-sectional survey conducted in 2020. Six of 10 Regional Addiction Technology Transfer Centers funded by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration distributed the survey in their respective regions, collectively spanning 37 states. Responses of administrators and clinicians (hereafter referred to as staff) from this 2022 survey were compared to those obtained in the 2020 survey. Responses in 2020 and 2022 were anonymous and comprised two separate samples; therefore, an accurate longitudinal model could not be analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 375 staff responded to the 2022 survey (vs 457 in 2020). Baseline organizational characteristics of the 2022 sample were similar to those of the 2020 sample. Phone and video telehealth utilization rates remained greater than 50% in 2022 for screening and assessment, case management, peer recovery support services, and regular outpatient services. The perceived usefulness of phone-based telehealth was higher in 2022 than in 2020 (mean difference [MD] -0.23; P=.002), but not for video-based telehealth (MD -0.12; P=.13). Ease of use of video-based telehealth was perceived as higher in 2022 than in 2020 (MD-0.35; P<.001), but no difference was found for phone-based telehe
背景:COVID-19 社会疏远指南导致了向电话和视频技术提供药物使用障碍 (SUD) 治疗的巨大转变。在 COVID-19 之前,问题是 "远程医疗能否在 SUD 服务中占据一席之地?现在,社会距离准则已经取消,问题是 "远程保健是否仍将是一种常用的治疗方式?本调查的主要目的是研究在 COVID-19 安全疏远建议取消后,远程保健在 SUD 服务环境中的使用程度。此外,本研究还旨在探讨大流行期间远程保健常规实施后从业人员对其便利性和价值的看法。具体来说,本研究的目标是比较不同时间段的远程医疗活动:2020 年 5 月至 8 月(COVID-19 安全疏导建议高峰期)和 2022 年 10 月至 12 月(疏导建议停止后)。具体而言,我们比较了(1)远程医疗技术和服务;(2)远程医疗的实用性;(3)电话和视频远程医疗服务的易用性;以及(4)组织使用远程医疗的准备情况:方法:进行了一项包含 108 个项目的在线横断面调查,以衡量美国使用远程保健技术提供一组特定的 SUD 服务的情况,并探讨使用远程和视频服务的感知准备程度和满意度。调查大约需要 25-35 分钟完成,使用的 3 组问题和 2 个理论驱动的量表与 2020 年进行的横断面调查相同。由美国药物滥用和心理健康服务管理局资助的 10 个地区戒毒技术转让中心中有 6 个在各自的地区分发了调查问卷,这些地区共涉及 37 个州。2022 年调查中行政人员和临床医生(以下简称员工)的回复与 2020 年调查中的回复进行了比较。2020 年和 2022 年的回复是匿名的,由两个不同的样本组成;因此,无法分析准确的纵向模型:共有 375 名员工回复了 2022 年的调查(2020 年为 457 人)。2022 年样本的基线组织特征与 2020 年样本相似。2022 年,电话和视频远程医疗在筛查和评估、个案管理、同伴康复支持服务以及常规门诊服务方面的使用率仍超过 50%。2022 年,人们对电话远程保健有用性的感知高于 2020 年(平均差 [MD] -0.23;P=.002),但对视频远程保健有用性的感知则低于 2020 年(平均差 -0.12;P=.13)。2022 年,人们认为视频远程保健的易用性高于 2020 年(MD-0.35;P=0.13):尽管 2022 年电话和视频远程保健服务的使用率低于 2020 年,但人们对这两种方式的看法仍然是积极的。未来的研究可能会进一步确定基于视频的服务的相对成本和临床效果,从而帮助解决所提到的 SUD 机构在实施过程中遇到的一些挑战。
{"title":"Comparison of Use Rates of Telehealth Services for Substance Use Disorder During and Following COVID-19 Safety Distancing Recommendations: Two Cross-Sectional Surveys.","authors":"Adrijana Pusnik, Bryan Hartzler, Olivia Vjorn, Beth A Rutkowski, Michael Chaple, Sara Becker, Thomas Freese, Maureen Nichols, Todd Molfenter","doi":"10.2196/52363","DOIUrl":"10.2196/52363","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;The COVID-19 social distancing guidelines resulted in a dramatic transition to telephone and video technologies to deliver substance use disorder (SUD) treatment. Before COVID-19, the question was \"Will telehealth ever take hold for SUD services?\" Now that social distancing guidelines have been lifted, the question is \"Will telehealth remain a commonly used care modality?\"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;The principal purpose of this investigation was to examine the extent to which telehealth use in SUD service settings persisted following the lifting of COVID-19 safety distancing recommendations. Additionally, the study aimed to explore practitioners' perceptions of telehealth convenience and value after its regular implementation during the pandemic. Specifically, the goal of this study was to compare telehealth activity between time intervals: May-August 2020 (during peak COVID-19 safety distancing recommendations) and October-December 2022 (following discontinuation of distancing recommendations). Specifically, we compared (1) telehealth technologies and services, (2) perceived usefulness of telehealth, (3) ease of use of telephone- and video-based telehealth services, and (4) organizational readiness to use telehealth.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;An online cross-sectional survey consisting of 108 items was conducted to measure the use of telehealth technologies for delivering a specific set of SUD services in the United States and to explore the perceived readiness for use and satisfaction with telephonic and video services. The survey took approximately 25-35 minutes to complete and used the same 3 sets of questions and 2 theory-driven scales as in a previous cross-sectional survey conducted in 2020. Six of 10 Regional Addiction Technology Transfer Centers funded by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration distributed the survey in their respective regions, collectively spanning 37 states. Responses of administrators and clinicians (hereafter referred to as staff) from this 2022 survey were compared to those obtained in the 2020 survey. Responses in 2020 and 2022 were anonymous and comprised two separate samples; therefore, an accurate longitudinal model could not be analyzed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;A total of 375 staff responded to the 2022 survey (vs 457 in 2020). Baseline organizational characteristics of the 2022 sample were similar to those of the 2020 sample. Phone and video telehealth utilization rates remained greater than 50% in 2022 for screening and assessment, case management, peer recovery support services, and regular outpatient services. The perceived usefulness of phone-based telehealth was higher in 2022 than in 2020 (mean difference [MD] -0.23; P=.002), but not for video-based telehealth (MD -0.12; P=.13). Ease of use of video-based telehealth was perceived as higher in 2022 than in 2020 (MD-0.35; P&lt;.001), but no difference was found for phone-based telehe","PeriodicalId":48616,"journal":{"name":"Jmir Mental Health","volume":"11 ","pages":"e52363"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11331268/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141972124","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing the Short-Term Efficacy of Digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia With Different Types of Coaching: Randomized Controlled Comparative Trial. 通过不同类型的辅导评估数字认知行为疗法对失眠症的短期疗效:随机对照比较试验。
IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI: 10.2196/51716
Wai Sze Chan, Wing Yee Cheng, Samson Hoi Chun Lok, Amanda Kah Mun Cheah, Anna Kai Win Lee, Albe Sin Ying Ng, Tobias Kowatsch
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (dCBTi) is an effective intervention for treating insomnia. The findings regarding its efficacy compared to face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia are inconclusive but suggest that dCBTi might be inferior. The lack of human support and low treatment adherence are believed to be barriers to dCBTi achieving its optimal efficacy. However, there has yet to be a direct comparative trial of dCBTi with different types of coaching support.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examines whether adding chatbot-based and human coaching would improve the treatment efficacy of, and adherence to, dCBTi.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Overall, 129 participants (n=98, 76% women; age: mean 34.09, SD 12.05 y) whose scores on the Insomnia Severity Index [ISI] were greater than 9 were recruited. A randomized controlled comparative trial with 5 arms was conducted: dCBTi with chatbot-based coaching and therapist support (dCBTi-therapist), dCBTi with chatbot-based coaching and research assistant support, dCBTi with chatbot-based coaching only, dCBTi without any coaching, and digital sleep hygiene and self-monitoring control. Participants were blinded to the condition assignment and study hypotheses, and the outcomes were self-assessed using questionnaires administered on the web. The outcomes included measures of insomnia (the ISI and the Sleep Condition Indicator), mood disturbances, fatigue, daytime sleepiness, quality of life, dysfunctional beliefs about sleep, and sleep-related safety behaviors administered at baseline, after treatment, and at 4-week follow-up. Treatment adherence was measured by the completion of video sessions and sleep diaries. An intention-to-treat analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant condition-by-time interaction effects showed that dCBTi recipients, regardless of having any coaching, had greater improvements in insomnia measured by the Sleep Condition Indicator (P=.003; d=0.45) but not the ISI (P=.86; d=-0.28), depressive symptoms (P<.001; d=-0.62), anxiety (P=.01; d=-0.40), fatigue (P=.02; d=-0.35), dysfunctional beliefs about sleep (P<.001; d=-0.53), and safety behaviors related to sleep (P=.001; d=-0.50) than those who received digital sleep hygiene and self-monitoring control. The addition of chatbot-based coaching and human support did not improve treatment efficacy. However, adding human support promoted greater reductions in fatigue (P=.03; d=-0.33) and sleep-related safety behaviors (P=.05; d=-0.30) than dCBTi with chatbot-based coaching only at 4-week follow-up. dCBTi-therapist had the highest video and diary completion rates compared to other conditions (video: 16/25, 60% in dCBTi-therapist vs <3/21, <25% in dCBTi without any coaching), indicating greater treatment adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings support the efficacy of dCBTi in treating insomnia, reducing thoughts and b
背景失眠症数字认知行为疗法(dCBTi)是治疗失眠症的一种有效干预方法。与面对面的失眠认知行为疗法相比,dCBTi 的疗效尚无定论,但研究结果表明,dCBTi 的疗效可能较差。缺乏人力支持和治疗依从性低被认为是 dCBTi 达到最佳疗效的障碍。然而,目前还没有将 dCBTi 与不同类型的辅导支持进行直接比较试验:本研究探讨了添加聊天机器人和人工辅导是否会提高 dCBTi 的疗效和依从性:共招募了 129 名失眠严重程度指数[ISI]大于 9 分的参与者(n=98,76% 为女性;年龄:平均 34.09 岁,标准差 12.05 岁)。随机对照比较试验分为 5 个部分:带有聊天机器人辅导和治疗师支持的 dCBTi(dCBTi-治疗师)、带有聊天机器人辅导和研究助理支持的 dCBTi、仅带有聊天机器人辅导的 dCBTi、不带任何辅导的 dCBTi,以及数字睡眠卫生和自我监控对照组。参与者在条件分配和研究假设方面均为盲人,研究结果通过网络问卷进行自我评估。结果包括对失眠(ISI 和睡眠状况指标)、情绪障碍、疲劳、白天嗜睡、生活质量、对睡眠的功能失调信念以及与睡眠相关的安全行为的测量,分别在基线、治疗后和 4 周随访时进行。治疗依从性通过完成视频课程和睡眠日记来衡量。进行了意向治疗分析:结果:显著的条件-时间交互效应显示,无论是否接受过任何辅导,dCBTi 受试者在睡眠状况指标(P=.003;d=0.45)而非 ISI(P=.86;d=-0.28)、抑郁症状(PConclusions:我们的研究结果表明,dCBTi 在治疗失眠、减少导致失眠的想法和行为、减少情绪障碍和疲劳以及提高生活质量方面具有疗效。在治疗后,添加基于聊天机器人的辅导和人工支持并不能显著提高 dCBTi 的疗效。但是,增加人工支持对减少疲劳和可能导致失眠长期存在的行为有增量效益,因此可能会提高长期疗效:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05136638;https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05136638。
{"title":"Assessing the Short-Term Efficacy of Digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia With Different Types of Coaching: Randomized Controlled Comparative Trial.","authors":"Wai Sze Chan, Wing Yee Cheng, Samson Hoi Chun Lok, Amanda Kah Mun Cheah, Anna Kai Win Lee, Albe Sin Ying Ng, Tobias Kowatsch","doi":"10.2196/51716","DOIUrl":"10.2196/51716","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Digital cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (dCBTi) is an effective intervention for treating insomnia. The findings regarding its efficacy compared to face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia are inconclusive but suggest that dCBTi might be inferior. The lack of human support and low treatment adherence are believed to be barriers to dCBTi achieving its optimal efficacy. However, there has yet to be a direct comparative trial of dCBTi with different types of coaching support.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;This study examines whether adding chatbot-based and human coaching would improve the treatment efficacy of, and adherence to, dCBTi.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;Overall, 129 participants (n=98, 76% women; age: mean 34.09, SD 12.05 y) whose scores on the Insomnia Severity Index [ISI] were greater than 9 were recruited. A randomized controlled comparative trial with 5 arms was conducted: dCBTi with chatbot-based coaching and therapist support (dCBTi-therapist), dCBTi with chatbot-based coaching and research assistant support, dCBTi with chatbot-based coaching only, dCBTi without any coaching, and digital sleep hygiene and self-monitoring control. Participants were blinded to the condition assignment and study hypotheses, and the outcomes were self-assessed using questionnaires administered on the web. The outcomes included measures of insomnia (the ISI and the Sleep Condition Indicator), mood disturbances, fatigue, daytime sleepiness, quality of life, dysfunctional beliefs about sleep, and sleep-related safety behaviors administered at baseline, after treatment, and at 4-week follow-up. Treatment adherence was measured by the completion of video sessions and sleep diaries. An intention-to-treat analysis was conducted.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Significant condition-by-time interaction effects showed that dCBTi recipients, regardless of having any coaching, had greater improvements in insomnia measured by the Sleep Condition Indicator (P=.003; d=0.45) but not the ISI (P=.86; d=-0.28), depressive symptoms (P&lt;.001; d=-0.62), anxiety (P=.01; d=-0.40), fatigue (P=.02; d=-0.35), dysfunctional beliefs about sleep (P&lt;.001; d=-0.53), and safety behaviors related to sleep (P=.001; d=-0.50) than those who received digital sleep hygiene and self-monitoring control. The addition of chatbot-based coaching and human support did not improve treatment efficacy. However, adding human support promoted greater reductions in fatigue (P=.03; d=-0.33) and sleep-related safety behaviors (P=.05; d=-0.30) than dCBTi with chatbot-based coaching only at 4-week follow-up. dCBTi-therapist had the highest video and diary completion rates compared to other conditions (video: 16/25, 60% in dCBTi-therapist vs &lt;3/21, &lt;25% in dCBTi without any coaching), indicating greater treatment adherence.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Our findings support the efficacy of dCBTi in treating insomnia, reducing thoughts and b","PeriodicalId":48616,"journal":{"name":"Jmir Mental Health","volume":"11 ","pages":"e51716"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11339566/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141903304","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Large Language Models Versus Expert Clinicians in Crisis Prediction Among Telemental Health Patients: Comparative Study. 远程心理健康患者的危机预测:大型语言模型与临床专家的比较。
IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI: 10.2196/58129
Christine Lee, Matthew Mohebbi, Erin O'Callaghan, Mirène Winsberg
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Due to recent advances in artificial intelligence, large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a powerful tool for a variety of language-related tasks, including sentiment analysis, and summarization of provider-patient interactions. However, there is limited research on these models in the area of crisis prediction.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the performance of LLMs, specifically OpenAI's generative pretrained transformer 4 (GPT-4), in predicting current and future mental health crisis episodes using patient-provided information at intake among users of a national telemental health platform.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Deidentified patient-provided data were pulled from specific intake questions of the Brightside telehealth platform, including the chief complaint, for 140 patients who indicated suicidal ideation (SI), and another 120 patients who later indicated SI with a plan during the course of treatment. Similar data were pulled for 200 randomly selected patients, treated during the same time period, who never endorsed SI. In total, 6 senior Brightside clinicians (3 psychologists and 3 psychiatrists) were shown patients' self-reported chief complaint and self-reported suicide attempt history but were blinded to the future course of treatment and other reported symptoms, including SI. They were asked a simple yes or no question regarding their prediction of endorsement of SI with plan, along with their confidence level about the prediction. GPT-4 was provided with similar information and asked to answer the same questions, enabling us to directly compare the performance of artificial intelligence and clinicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the clinicians' average precision (0.7) was higher than that of GPT-4 (0.6) in identifying the SI with plan at intake (n=140) versus no SI (n=200) when using the chief complaint alone, while sensitivity was higher for the GPT-4 (0.62) than the clinicians' average (0.53). The addition of suicide attempt history increased the clinicians' average sensitivity (0.59) and precision (0.77) while increasing the GPT-4 sensitivity (0.59) but decreasing the GPT-4 precision (0.54). Performance decreased comparatively when predicting future SI with plan (n=120) versus no SI (n=200) with a chief complaint only for the clinicians (average sensitivity=0.4; average precision=0.59) and the GPT-4 (sensitivity=0.46; precision=0.48). The addition of suicide attempt history increased performance comparatively for the clinicians (average sensitivity=0.46; average precision=0.69) and the GPT-4 (sensitivity=0.74; precision=0.48).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GPT-4, with a simple prompt design, produced results on some metrics that approached those of a trained clinician. Additional work must be done before such a model can be piloted in a clinical setting. The model should undergo safety checks for bias, given evidence that LLMs can perpetu
背景:由于人工智能(AI)的最新进展,大型语言模型(LLMs)已成为各种语言相关任务的有力工具,包括情感分析和提供者与患者互动的总结。然而,在危机预测领域对这些模型的研究还很有限:本研究旨在评估 LLMs(特别是 OpenAI 的 GPT-4)在预测当前和未来心理健康危机事件方面的性能,这些 LLMs 在预测心理健康危机事件时使用的是全国远程医疗平台用户在入院时提供的患者信息:从 Brightside 远程医疗平台的特定入院问题(包括主诉)中提取了 140 名表示有自杀意念(SI)的患者和另外 120 名后来在治疗过程中表示有 SI 并制定了计划的患者的去身份化患者提供的数据。同时还随机抽取了 200 名在同一时期接受治疗但从未表示过自杀倾向的患者的类似数据。六位布莱特赛德公司的资深临床医生(三位心理学家和三位精神科医生)向他们展示了患者自述的主诉和自述的自杀未遂史,但他们对未来的治疗过程和其他报告的症状(包括 SI)视而不见。他们被问到一个简单的 "是/否 "问题,内容是关于他们是否预测患者会接受 SI 计划以及他们对预测的信心程度。我们向 GPT-4 提供了类似的信息,并要求他们回答同样的问题,这样我们就能直接比较人工智能和临床医生的表现:总体而言,在仅使用主诉识别入院时有计划的 SI(n=140)与无计划的 SI(n=200)时,临床医生的平均精确度(0.698)高于 GPT-4(0.596),而 GPT-4 的灵敏度(0.621)高于临床医生的平均值(0.529)。增加自杀未遂史可提高临床医生的平均灵敏度(0.590)和精确度(0.765),同时提高 GPT-4 的灵敏度(0.590),但降低 GPT-4 的精确度(0.544)。在预测未来有计划的 SI(n=120)与无计划的 SI(n=200)时,临床医生的主诉(平均灵敏度=0.399;平均精确度=0.594)和 GPT-4 的灵敏度=0.458;精确度=0.482)相对下降。增加自杀未遂史后,临床医生(平均灵敏度=0.457;平均精确度=0.687)和GPT-4(灵敏度=0.742;精确度=0.476)的成绩相对提高:结论:采用简单提示设计的 GPT-4 在某些指标上取得了接近训练有素的临床医生的结果。要在临床环境中试用这种模型,还必须做更多的工作。鉴于有证据表明 LLMs 会使其所训练的基础数据的偏差永久化,因此该模型应进行安全检查,以防偏差。我们相信,LLMs 有希望在入院时增强对高风险患者的识别能力,并有可能为患者提供更及时的护理:
{"title":"Large Language Models Versus Expert Clinicians in Crisis Prediction Among Telemental Health Patients: Comparative Study.","authors":"Christine Lee, Matthew Mohebbi, Erin O'Callaghan, Mirène Winsberg","doi":"10.2196/58129","DOIUrl":"10.2196/58129","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Due to recent advances in artificial intelligence, large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a powerful tool for a variety of language-related tasks, including sentiment analysis, and summarization of provider-patient interactions. However, there is limited research on these models in the area of crisis prediction.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;This study aimed to evaluate the performance of LLMs, specifically OpenAI's generative pretrained transformer 4 (GPT-4), in predicting current and future mental health crisis episodes using patient-provided information at intake among users of a national telemental health platform.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;Deidentified patient-provided data were pulled from specific intake questions of the Brightside telehealth platform, including the chief complaint, for 140 patients who indicated suicidal ideation (SI), and another 120 patients who later indicated SI with a plan during the course of treatment. Similar data were pulled for 200 randomly selected patients, treated during the same time period, who never endorsed SI. In total, 6 senior Brightside clinicians (3 psychologists and 3 psychiatrists) were shown patients' self-reported chief complaint and self-reported suicide attempt history but were blinded to the future course of treatment and other reported symptoms, including SI. They were asked a simple yes or no question regarding their prediction of endorsement of SI with plan, along with their confidence level about the prediction. GPT-4 was provided with similar information and asked to answer the same questions, enabling us to directly compare the performance of artificial intelligence and clinicians.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Overall, the clinicians' average precision (0.7) was higher than that of GPT-4 (0.6) in identifying the SI with plan at intake (n=140) versus no SI (n=200) when using the chief complaint alone, while sensitivity was higher for the GPT-4 (0.62) than the clinicians' average (0.53). The addition of suicide attempt history increased the clinicians' average sensitivity (0.59) and precision (0.77) while increasing the GPT-4 sensitivity (0.59) but decreasing the GPT-4 precision (0.54). Performance decreased comparatively when predicting future SI with plan (n=120) versus no SI (n=200) with a chief complaint only for the clinicians (average sensitivity=0.4; average precision=0.59) and the GPT-4 (sensitivity=0.46; precision=0.48). The addition of suicide attempt history increased performance comparatively for the clinicians (average sensitivity=0.46; average precision=0.69) and the GPT-4 (sensitivity=0.74; precision=0.48).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;GPT-4, with a simple prompt design, produced results on some metrics that approached those of a trained clinician. Additional work must be done before such a model can be piloted in a clinical setting. The model should undergo safety checks for bias, given evidence that LLMs can perpetu","PeriodicalId":48616,"journal":{"name":"Jmir Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"e58129"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11329850/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141321831","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Behavior Change Techniques Within Digital Interventions for the Treatment of Eating Disorders: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 治疗进食障碍的数字化干预措施中的行为改变技术:系统回顾与元分析》。
IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.2196/57577
Pamela Carien Thomas, Kristina Curtis, Henry W W Potts, Pippa Bark, Rachel Perowne, Tasmin Rookes, Sarah Rowe
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous systematic reviews of digital eating disorder interventions have demonstrated effectiveness at improving symptoms of eating disorders; however, our understanding of how these interventions work and what contributes to their effectiveness is limited. Understanding the behavior change techniques (BCTs) that are most commonly included within effective interventions may provide valuable information for researchers and developers. Establishing whether these techniques have been informed by theory will identify whether they target those mechanisms of action that have been identified as core to changing eating disorder behaviors. It will also evaluate the importance of a theoretical approach to digital intervention design.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to define the BCTs within digital self-management interventions or minimally guided self-help interventions for adults with eating disorders that have been evaluated within randomized controlled trials. It also assessed which of the digital interventions were grounded in theory and the range of modes of delivery included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search identified randomized controlled trials of digital intervention for the treatment of adults with eating disorders with minimal therapist support. Each digital intervention was coded for BCTs using the established BCT Taxonomy v1; for the application of theory using an adapted version of the theory coding scheme (TCS); and for modes of delivery using the Mode of Delivery Ontology. A meta-analysis evaluated the evidence that any individual BCT moderated effect size or that other potential factors such as the application of theory or number of modes of delivery had an effect on eating disorder outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Digital interventions included an average of 14 (SD 2.6; range 9-18) BCTs. Self-monitoring of behavior was included in all effective interventions, with Problem-solving, Information about antecedents, Feedback on behavior, Self-monitoring of outcomes of behavior, and Action planning identified in >75% (13/17) of effective interventions. Social support and Information about health consequences were more evident in effective interventions at follow-up compared with postintervention measurement. The mean number of modes of delivery was 4 (SD 1.6; range 2-7) out of 12 possible modes, with most interventions (15/17, 88%) being web based. Digital interventions that had a higher score on the TCS had a greater effect size than those with a lower TCS score (subgroup differences: χ<sup>2</sup><sub>1</sub>=9.7; P=.002; I²=89.7%) within the meta-analysis. No other subgroup analyses had statistically significant results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was a high level of consistency in terms of the most common BCTs within effective interventions; however, there was no evidence that any specific BCT contributed to intervention efficacy. The interventio
背景:以前对数字化饮食失调干预措施的系统性回顾表明,这些措施在改善饮食失调症状方面很有效;但是,我们对这些干预措施如何发挥作用以及是什么促成了它们的有效性的了解还很有限。了解有效干预措施中最常采用的行为改变技术(BCT)可为研究人员和开发人员提供有价值的信息。确定这些技巧是否有理论依据,可以确定它们是否针对那些已被确定为改变进食障碍行为核心的作用机制。它还将评估理论方法对数字干预设计的重要性:本研究旨在确定针对成人饮食失调症患者的数字化自我管理干预或最小指导自助干预中的BCTs,这些干预已在随机对照试验中进行了评估。该研究还评估了哪些数字化干预措施是以理论为基础的,以及所包括的一系列实施模式:方法:通过文献检索,确定了针对成人饮食失调症治疗的数字干预的随机对照试验,这些试验只需要极少的治疗师支持。每项数字干预均使用已建立的BCT分类标准v1对BCT进行编码;使用改编版理论编码方案(TCS)对理论应用进行编码;使用 "提供模式本体 "对提供模式进行编码。一项荟萃分析评估了是否有证据表明任何一种BCT会调节效果大小,或其他潜在因素(如理论应用或提供模式的数量)会对饮食失调的结果产生影响:数字干预平均包括 14 种 BCT(标准差 2.6;范围 9-18)。所有有效的干预措施中都包括行为自我监控,超过 75% (13/17)的有效干预措施中确定了问题解决、前因信息、行为反馈、行为结果自我监控和行动规划。与干预后的测量结果相比,社会支持和有关健康后果的信息在后续有效干预中更为明显。在 12 种可能的干预方式中,平均干预方式为 4 种(标准差为 1.6;范围为 2-7),大多数干预方式(15/17,88%)基于网络。在荟萃分析中,TCS得分较高的数字化干预措施比TCS得分较低的干预措施具有更大的效果(亚组差异:χ21=9.7;P=.002;I²=89.7%)。其他亚组分析结果均无统计学意义:有效干预中最常见的 BCT 具有高度的一致性;但是,没有证据表明任何特定的 BCT 对干预效果有促进作用。与等待名单或照常治疗对照组相比,理论依据更强的干预对饮食失调症结果的改善更大。这些结果可为未来数字化饮食失调干预措施的开发提供参考:ProCORD42023410060; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=410060.
{"title":"Behavior Change Techniques Within Digital Interventions for the Treatment of Eating Disorders: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Pamela Carien Thomas, Kristina Curtis, Henry W W Potts, Pippa Bark, Rachel Perowne, Tasmin Rookes, Sarah Rowe","doi":"10.2196/57577","DOIUrl":"10.2196/57577","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Previous systematic reviews of digital eating disorder interventions have demonstrated effectiveness at improving symptoms of eating disorders; however, our understanding of how these interventions work and what contributes to their effectiveness is limited. Understanding the behavior change techniques (BCTs) that are most commonly included within effective interventions may provide valuable information for researchers and developers. Establishing whether these techniques have been informed by theory will identify whether they target those mechanisms of action that have been identified as core to changing eating disorder behaviors. It will also evaluate the importance of a theoretical approach to digital intervention design.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;This study aims to define the BCTs within digital self-management interventions or minimally guided self-help interventions for adults with eating disorders that have been evaluated within randomized controlled trials. It also assessed which of the digital interventions were grounded in theory and the range of modes of delivery included.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;A literature search identified randomized controlled trials of digital intervention for the treatment of adults with eating disorders with minimal therapist support. Each digital intervention was coded for BCTs using the established BCT Taxonomy v1; for the application of theory using an adapted version of the theory coding scheme (TCS); and for modes of delivery using the Mode of Delivery Ontology. A meta-analysis evaluated the evidence that any individual BCT moderated effect size or that other potential factors such as the application of theory or number of modes of delivery had an effect on eating disorder outcomes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Digital interventions included an average of 14 (SD 2.6; range 9-18) BCTs. Self-monitoring of behavior was included in all effective interventions, with Problem-solving, Information about antecedents, Feedback on behavior, Self-monitoring of outcomes of behavior, and Action planning identified in &gt;75% (13/17) of effective interventions. Social support and Information about health consequences were more evident in effective interventions at follow-up compared with postintervention measurement. The mean number of modes of delivery was 4 (SD 1.6; range 2-7) out of 12 possible modes, with most interventions (15/17, 88%) being web based. Digital interventions that had a higher score on the TCS had a greater effect size than those with a lower TCS score (subgroup differences: χ&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt;=9.7; P=.002; I²=89.7%) within the meta-analysis. No other subgroup analyses had statistically significant results.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;There was a high level of consistency in terms of the most common BCTs within effective interventions; however, there was no evidence that any specific BCT contributed to intervention efficacy. The interventio","PeriodicalId":48616,"journal":{"name":"Jmir Mental Health","volume":"11 ","pages":"e57577"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11327638/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141876370","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Acceptability and Engagement of a Smartphone-Delivered Interpretation Bias Intervention in a Sample of Black and Latinx Adults: Open Trial. 在黑人和拉美裔成年人样本中开展智能手机传播的解释偏差干预的可接受性和参与度:公开试验。
IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI: 10.2196/56758
IreLee Ferguson, Grace George, Kevin O Narine, Amari Turner, Zelda McGhee, Harris Bajwa, Frances G Hart, Sierra Carter, Courtney Beard

Background: Access to evidence-based interventions is urgently required, especially for individuals of minoritized identities who experience unique barriers to mental health care. Digital mental health interventions have the potential to increase accessibility. Previous pilot studies testing HabitWorks, a smartphone app providing an interpretation bias intervention, have found strong engagement and adherence for HabitWorks; however, previous trials' samples consisted of predominantly non-Hispanic, White individuals.

Objective: This study conducted an open trial of HabitWorks in a community sample of adults who identified as Black, Hispanic or Latinx, or both. This study aims to test safety, acceptability, and engagement with the HabitWorks app for Black and Latinx adults.

Methods: Black, Hispanic or Latinx adults (mean age 32.83, SD 11.06 y; 22/31, 71% women) who endorsed symptoms of anxiety or depression were asked to complete interpretation modification exercises via HabitWorks 3 times per week for 1 month. Interpretation bias and anxiety and depression symptoms were assessed at baseline and posttreatment assessments. Participants completed qualitative interviews to assess overall perceptions of HabitWorks.

Results: Of the 31 participants that downloaded the app, 27 (87%) used HabitWorks all 4 weeks. On average, participants completed 15.74 (SD 7.43) exercises out of the 12 prescribed, demonstrating high engagement. Acceptability ratings met all a priori benchmarks except for relevancy. Qualitative interviews also demonstrated high acceptability and few negative experiences. Significant improvements were found in interpretation style (t30=2.29; P<.001), with a large effect size (Cohen d=1.53); anxiety symptoms (t30=2.29; P=.03), with a small effect size (Cohen d=0.41); and depression symptoms (t30=3.065; P=.005), with a medium effect size (Cohen d=0.55).

Conclusions: This study adds to the literature evaluating digital mental health interventions in Black and Latinx adults. Preliminary results further support a future controlled trial testing the effectiveness of HabitWorks as an intervention.

背景:我们迫切需要获得循证干预措施,尤其是那些在心理健康护理方面面临独特障碍的少数群体。数字心理健康干预措施具有提高可及性的潜力。以前的试点研究测试了 HabitWorks,这是一款提供解释偏差干预的智能手机应用程序,研究发现 HabitWorks 的参与度和坚持率都很高;但是,以前的试验样本主要由非西班牙裔白人组成:本研究在社区样本中对 HabitWorks 进行了公开试验,样本为自称为黑人、西班牙裔或拉丁裔或两者皆是的成年人。本研究旨在测试黑人和拉美裔成年人使用 HabitWorks 应用程序的安全性、可接受性和参与度:要求有焦虑或抑郁症状的黑人、西班牙裔或拉丁裔成年人(平均年龄 32.83 岁,SD 11.06 岁;22/31,71% 为女性)在 1 个月内每周 3 次通过 HabitWorks 完成口译练习。在基线和治疗后评估中对解释偏差以及焦虑和抑郁症状进行了评估。参与者还完成了定性访谈,以评估对 HabitWorks 的总体看法:在 31 名下载了 HabitWorks 应用程序的参与者中,有 27 人(87%)在 4 周内都使用了 HabitWorks。在规定的 12 项练习中,参与者平均完成了 15.74 项练习(标准差为 7.43),显示出较高的参与度。除相关性外,可接受性评级符合所有先验基准。定性访谈也显示了较高的可接受性和较少的负面体验。在解释风格(t30=2.29;P30=2.29;P=.03)和抑郁症状(t30=3.065;P=.005)方面发现了显著的改善,其影响程度较小(Cohen d=0.41),影响程度中等(Cohen d=0.55):本研究为评估黑人和拉美裔成年人数字心理健康干预措施的文献增添了新的内容。初步结果进一步支持了未来对 HabitWorks 干预效果的对照试验。
{"title":"Acceptability and Engagement of a Smartphone-Delivered Interpretation Bias Intervention in a Sample of Black and Latinx Adults: Open Trial.","authors":"IreLee Ferguson, Grace George, Kevin O Narine, Amari Turner, Zelda McGhee, Harris Bajwa, Frances G Hart, Sierra Carter, Courtney Beard","doi":"10.2196/56758","DOIUrl":"10.2196/56758","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Access to evidence-based interventions is urgently required, especially for individuals of minoritized identities who experience unique barriers to mental health care. Digital mental health interventions have the potential to increase accessibility. Previous pilot studies testing HabitWorks, a smartphone app providing an interpretation bias intervention, have found strong engagement and adherence for HabitWorks; however, previous trials' samples consisted of predominantly non-Hispanic, White individuals.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study conducted an open trial of HabitWorks in a community sample of adults who identified as Black, Hispanic or Latinx, or both. This study aims to test safety, acceptability, and engagement with the HabitWorks app for Black and Latinx adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Black, Hispanic or Latinx adults (mean age 32.83, SD 11.06 y; 22/31, 71% women) who endorsed symptoms of anxiety or depression were asked to complete interpretation modification exercises via HabitWorks 3 times per week for 1 month. Interpretation bias and anxiety and depression symptoms were assessed at baseline and posttreatment assessments. Participants completed qualitative interviews to assess overall perceptions of HabitWorks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 31 participants that downloaded the app, 27 (87%) used HabitWorks all 4 weeks. On average, participants completed 15.74 (SD 7.43) exercises out of the 12 prescribed, demonstrating high engagement. Acceptability ratings met all a priori benchmarks except for relevancy. Qualitative interviews also demonstrated high acceptability and few negative experiences. Significant improvements were found in interpretation style (t<sub>30</sub>=2.29; P<.001), with a large effect size (Cohen d=1.53); anxiety symptoms (t<sub>30</sub>=2.29; P=.03), with a small effect size (Cohen d=0.41); and depression symptoms (t<sub>30</sub>=3.065; P=.005), with a medium effect size (Cohen d=0.55).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study adds to the literature evaluating digital mental health interventions in Black and Latinx adults. Preliminary results further support a future controlled trial testing the effectiveness of HabitWorks as an intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":48616,"journal":{"name":"Jmir Mental Health","volume":"11 ","pages":"e56758"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11325113/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141856870","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Opportunities and Risks of Large Language Models in Mental Health. 心理健康领域大型语言模型的机遇与风险。
IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI: 10.2196/59479
Hannah R Lawrence, Renee A Schneider, Susan B Rubin, Maja J Matarić, Daniel J McDuff, Megan Jones Bell

Unlabelled: Global rates of mental health concerns are rising, and there is increasing realization that existing models of mental health care will not adequately expand to meet the demand. With the emergence of large language models (LLMs) has come great optimism regarding their promise to create novel, large-scale solutions to support mental health. Despite their nascence, LLMs have already been applied to mental health-related tasks. In this paper, we summarize the extant literature on efforts to use LLMs to provide mental health education, assessment, and intervention and highlight key opportunities for positive impact in each area. We then highlight risks associated with LLMs' application to mental health and encourage the adoption of strategies to mitigate these risks. The urgent need for mental health support must be balanced with responsible development, testing, and deployment of mental health LLMs. It is especially critical to ensure that mental health LLMs are fine-tuned for mental health, enhance mental health equity, and adhere to ethical standards and that people, including those with lived experience with mental health concerns, are involved in all stages from development through deployment. Prioritizing these efforts will minimize potential harms to mental health and maximize the likelihood that LLMs will positively impact mental health globally.

无标签:全球心理健康问题的发病率正在上升,人们越来越意识到,现有的心理健康护理模式无法充分扩展以满足需求。随着大型语言模型(LLMs)的出现,人们对其有望创造出支持心理健康的新型大规模解决方案感到非常乐观。尽管大型语言模型刚刚出现,但它们已被应用于与心理健康相关的任务中。在本文中,我们总结了有关使用 LLMs 提供心理健康教育、评估和干预的现有文献,并强调了在每个领域产生积极影响的关键机会。然后,我们强调了将 LLMs 应用于心理健康的相关风险,并鼓励采取策略来降低这些风险。心理健康支持的迫切需要必须与负责任地开发、测试和部署心理健康 LLMs 相平衡。尤其关键的是,要确保心理健康 LLM 针对心理健康进行微调,提高心理健康的公平性,遵守道德标准,并确保人们,包括那些对心理健康问题有亲身经历的人,参与从开发到部署的各个阶段。优先考虑这些工作将最大限度地减少对心理健康的潜在危害,最大限度地提高 LLM 对全球心理健康产生积极影响的可能性。
{"title":"The Opportunities and Risks of Large Language Models in Mental Health.","authors":"Hannah R Lawrence, Renee A Schneider, Susan B Rubin, Maja J Matarić, Daniel J McDuff, Megan Jones Bell","doi":"10.2196/59479","DOIUrl":"10.2196/59479","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Global rates of mental health concerns are rising, and there is increasing realization that existing models of mental health care will not adequately expand to meet the demand. With the emergence of large language models (LLMs) has come great optimism regarding their promise to create novel, large-scale solutions to support mental health. Despite their nascence, LLMs have already been applied to mental health-related tasks. In this paper, we summarize the extant literature on efforts to use LLMs to provide mental health education, assessment, and intervention and highlight key opportunities for positive impact in each area. We then highlight risks associated with LLMs' application to mental health and encourage the adoption of strategies to mitigate these risks. The urgent need for mental health support must be balanced with responsible development, testing, and deployment of mental health LLMs. It is especially critical to ensure that mental health LLMs are fine-tuned for mental health, enhance mental health equity, and adhere to ethical standards and that people, including those with lived experience with mental health concerns, are involved in all stages from development through deployment. Prioritizing these efforts will minimize potential harms to mental health and maximize the likelihood that LLMs will positively impact mental health globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":48616,"journal":{"name":"Jmir Mental Health","volume":"11 ","pages":"e59479"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11301767/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141894664","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Digital Inclusion Initiative to Facilitate Access to Mental Health Services: Service User Interview Study. 促进获得心理健康服务的数字包容倡议的影响:服务使用者访谈研究。
IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI: 10.2196/51315
Amy Oliver, Ella Chandler, Julia A Gillard

Background: Digital exclusion, characterized by a lack of access to digital technology, connectivity, or digital skills, disproportionally affects marginalized groups. An important domain impacted by digital exclusion is access to health care. During COVID-19, health care services had to restrict face-to-face contact to limit the spread of the virus. The subsequent shift toward remote delivery of mental health care exacerbated the digital divide, with limited access to remote mental health care delivery. In response, Camden and Islington National Health Service Foundation Trust launched the innovative Digital Inclusion Scheme (DIS).

Objective: This study aimed to examine the impact of facilitating digital inclusion in mental health access. Camden and Islington National Health Service Foundation Trust implemented the trust-wide DIS for service users who were digitally excluded, that is, were without devices or connectivity or reported poor digital skills. The scheme provided access to a loan digital device (a tablet), internet connectivity devices, and mobile data, as well as personalized digital skills support.

Methods: The DIS went live in October 2021 and received 106 referrals by June 2022. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 12 service users to ask about their experience of accessing the DIS. A thematic analysis identified themes and subthemes relating to the extent of their digital exclusion before engaging with the scheme and the impact of accessing a scheme on their ability to engage with digital technology and well-being.

Results: There were 10 major themes. A total of 6 themes were related to factors impacting the engagement with the scheme, including digital exclusion, relationship to the trust, the importance of personalized digital support, partnership working, device usability and accessibility, and personal circumstances. The remaining 4 themes spoke to the impact of accessing the scheme, including improved access to services, impact on well-being, financial implications, and a greater sense of empowerment.

Conclusions: Participants reported an increased reliance on technology driving the need for digital inclusion; however, differences in motivation for engaging with the scheme were noted, as well as potential barriers, including lack of awareness, disability, and age. Overall, the experience of accessing the DIS was reported as positive, with participants feeling supported to access the digital world. The consequences of engaging with the scheme included greater perceived access to and control of physical and mental health care, improved well-being, and a greater sense of empowerment. An overview of the lessons learned are provided along with suggestions for other health care settings that are looking to implement similar schemes.

背景:数字排斥的特点是缺乏数字技术、连接性或数字技能,对边缘化群体的影响尤为严重。受数字排斥影响的一个重要领域是医疗保健。在 COVID-19 期间,医疗服务不得不限制面对面的接触,以限制病毒的传播。随后向远程提供心理保健服务的转变加剧了数字鸿沟,远程提供心理保健服务的机会受到限制。为此,卡姆登和伊斯灵顿国家卫生服务基金会推出了创新性的 "数字包容计划"(DIS):本研究旨在探讨促进数字包容性对心理健康访问的影响。卡姆登和伊斯林顿国家健康服务基金会信托基金会在整个信托基金会范围内实施了 "数字包容计划",该计划面向被数字技术排斥的服务用户,即没有设备或连接不畅或数字技术欠佳的用户。该计划提供借用数字设备(平板电脑)、互联网连接设备和移动数据,以及个性化数字技能支持:DIS 于 2021 年 10 月上线,截至 2022 年 6 月共收到 106 份转介申请。我们对 12 名服务用户进行了半结构化访谈,询问他们使用 DIS 的体验。主题分析确定了主题和次主题,这些主题和次主题涉及他们在参与计划之前被数字技术排斥的程度,以及参与计划对他们使用数字技术的能力和福祉的影响:结果:共有 10 大主题。共有 6 个主题与影响参与计划的因素有关,包括数字排斥、与信托机构的关系、个性化数字支持的重要性、合作关系、设备的可用性和易用性以及个人情况。其余 4 个主题涉及参与该计划的影响,包括获得服务的机会增加、对福祉的影响、财务影响以及更强的授权感:参与者报告说,对技术的依赖性增加,这也是数字包容的需要;然而,他们也注意到参与该计划的动机存在差异,以及潜在的障碍,包括缺乏认识、残疾和年龄。总体而言,参与 DIS 的体验是积极的,参与者感到自己在进入数字世界方面得到了支持。参与该计划的结果包括:更容易获得和控制身心健康护理、幸福感得到改善,以及增强了权能感。本报告概述了所吸取的经验教训,并为其他希望实施类似计划的医疗机构提供了建议。
{"title":"Impact of Digital Inclusion Initiative to Facilitate Access to Mental Health Services: Service User Interview Study.","authors":"Amy Oliver, Ella Chandler, Julia A Gillard","doi":"10.2196/51315","DOIUrl":"10.2196/51315","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital exclusion, characterized by a lack of access to digital technology, connectivity, or digital skills, disproportionally affects marginalized groups. An important domain impacted by digital exclusion is access to health care. During COVID-19, health care services had to restrict face-to-face contact to limit the spread of the virus. The subsequent shift toward remote delivery of mental health care exacerbated the digital divide, with limited access to remote mental health care delivery. In response, Camden and Islington National Health Service Foundation Trust launched the innovative Digital Inclusion Scheme (DIS).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to examine the impact of facilitating digital inclusion in mental health access. Camden and Islington National Health Service Foundation Trust implemented the trust-wide DIS for service users who were digitally excluded, that is, were without devices or connectivity or reported poor digital skills. The scheme provided access to a loan digital device (a tablet), internet connectivity devices, and mobile data, as well as personalized digital skills support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The DIS went live in October 2021 and received 106 referrals by June 2022. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 12 service users to ask about their experience of accessing the DIS. A thematic analysis identified themes and subthemes relating to the extent of their digital exclusion before engaging with the scheme and the impact of accessing a scheme on their ability to engage with digital technology and well-being.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 10 major themes. A total of 6 themes were related to factors impacting the engagement with the scheme, including digital exclusion, relationship to the trust, the importance of personalized digital support, partnership working, device usability and accessibility, and personal circumstances. The remaining 4 themes spoke to the impact of accessing the scheme, including improved access to services, impact on well-being, financial implications, and a greater sense of empowerment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants reported an increased reliance on technology driving the need for digital inclusion; however, differences in motivation for engaging with the scheme were noted, as well as potential barriers, including lack of awareness, disability, and age. Overall, the experience of accessing the DIS was reported as positive, with participants feeling supported to access the digital world. The consequences of engaging with the scheme included greater perceived access to and control of physical and mental health care, improved well-being, and a greater sense of empowerment. An overview of the lessons learned are provided along with suggestions for other health care settings that are looking to implement similar schemes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48616,"journal":{"name":"Jmir Mental Health","volume":"11 ","pages":"e51315"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11316150/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141761813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring the Efficacy of Large Language Models in Summarizing Mental Health Counseling Sessions: Benchmark Study. 探索大语言模型在总结心理健康咨询会话中的功效:基准研究。
IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI: 10.2196/57306
Prottay Kumar Adhikary, Aseem Srivastava, Shivani Kumar, Salam Michael Singh, Puneet Manuja, Jini K Gopinath, Vijay Krishnan, Swati Kedia Gupta, Koushik Sinha Deb, Tanmoy Chakraborty

Background: Comprehensive session summaries enable effective continuity in mental health counseling, facilitating informed therapy planning. However, manual summarization presents a significant challenge, diverting experts' attention from the core counseling process. Leveraging advances in automatic summarization to streamline the summarization process addresses this issue because this enables mental health professionals to access concise summaries of lengthy therapy sessions, thereby increasing their efficiency. However, existing approaches often overlook the nuanced intricacies inherent in counseling interactions.

Objective: This study evaluates the effectiveness of state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) in selectively summarizing various components of therapy sessions through aspect-based summarization, aiming to benchmark their performance.

Methods: We first created Mental Health Counseling-Component-Guided Dialogue Summaries, a benchmarking data set that consists of 191 counseling sessions with summaries focused on 3 distinct counseling components (also known as counseling aspects). Next, we assessed the capabilities of 11 state-of-the-art LLMs in addressing the task of counseling-component-guided summarization. The generated summaries were evaluated quantitatively using standard summarization metrics and verified qualitatively by mental health professionals.

Results: Our findings demonstrated the superior performance of task-specific LLMs such as MentalLlama, Mistral, and MentalBART evaluated using standard quantitative metrics such as Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation (ROUGE)-1, ROUGE-2, ROUGE-L, and Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers Score across all aspects of the counseling components. Furthermore, expert evaluation revealed that Mistral superseded both MentalLlama and MentalBART across 6 parameters: affective attitude, burden, ethicality, coherence, opportunity costs, and perceived effectiveness. However, these models exhibit a common weakness in terms of room for improvement in the opportunity costs and perceived effectiveness metrics.

Conclusions: While LLMs fine-tuned specifically on mental health domain data display better performance based on automatic evaluation scores, expert assessments indicate that these models are not yet reliable for clinical application. Further refinement and validation are necessary before their implementation in practice.

背景:全面的疗程总结可以有效地保持心理健康咨询的连续性,有助于制定明智的治疗计划。然而,人工总结是一项巨大的挑战,会转移专家对核心咨询过程的注意力。利用自动总结技术的进步来简化总结过程可以解决这个问题,因为这可以让心理健康专家获得冗长治疗过程的简明总结,从而提高他们的工作效率。然而,现有的方法往往忽视了心理咨询互动中固有的细微复杂性:本研究评估了最先进的大语言模型(LLMs)通过基于方面的总结有选择性地总结治疗过程的各个部分的有效性,旨在为其性能设定基准:我们首先创建了 "心理健康咨询-成分引导对话摘要",这是一个基准数据集,由 191 个咨询会话组成,摘要集中于 3 个不同的咨询成分(也称为咨询方面)。接下来,我们评估了 11 种最先进的 LLM 在处理咨询成分引导总结任务方面的能力。我们使用标准摘要指标对生成的摘要进行了定量评估,并由心理健康专业人员对其进行了定性验证:我们的研究结果表明,在心理咨询内容的各个方面,使用标准定量指标(如面向回忆的摘要评估(ROUGE)-1、ROUGE-2、ROUGE-L 和来自转换器的双向编码器表征得分)对特定任务 LLMs(如 MentalLlama、Mistral 和 MentalBART)进行评估时,它们都表现出了卓越的性能。此外,专家评估显示,Mistral 在情感态度、负担、伦理性、一致性、机会成本和感知有效性这 6 个参数上优于 MentalLlama 和 MentalBART。不过,这些模型都有一个共同的弱点,即在机会成本和感知有效性指标上还有改进的余地:结论:虽然根据自动评估分数对专门针对心理健康领域数据进行微调的 LLM 显示出更好的性能,但专家评估表明,这些模型在临床应用中还不可靠。在实际应用之前,有必要对其进行进一步的完善和验证。
{"title":"Exploring the Efficacy of Large Language Models in Summarizing Mental Health Counseling Sessions: Benchmark Study.","authors":"Prottay Kumar Adhikary, Aseem Srivastava, Shivani Kumar, Salam Michael Singh, Puneet Manuja, Jini K Gopinath, Vijay Krishnan, Swati Kedia Gupta, Koushik Sinha Deb, Tanmoy Chakraborty","doi":"10.2196/57306","DOIUrl":"10.2196/57306","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Comprehensive session summaries enable effective continuity in mental health counseling, facilitating informed therapy planning. However, manual summarization presents a significant challenge, diverting experts' attention from the core counseling process. Leveraging advances in automatic summarization to streamline the summarization process addresses this issue because this enables mental health professionals to access concise summaries of lengthy therapy sessions, thereby increasing their efficiency. However, existing approaches often overlook the nuanced intricacies inherent in counseling interactions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluates the effectiveness of state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) in selectively summarizing various components of therapy sessions through aspect-based summarization, aiming to benchmark their performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We first created Mental Health Counseling-Component-Guided Dialogue Summaries, a benchmarking data set that consists of 191 counseling sessions with summaries focused on 3 distinct counseling components (also known as counseling aspects). Next, we assessed the capabilities of 11 state-of-the-art LLMs in addressing the task of counseling-component-guided summarization. The generated summaries were evaluated quantitatively using standard summarization metrics and verified qualitatively by mental health professionals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings demonstrated the superior performance of task-specific LLMs such as MentalLlama, Mistral, and MentalBART evaluated using standard quantitative metrics such as Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation (ROUGE)-1, ROUGE-2, ROUGE-L, and Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers Score across all aspects of the counseling components. Furthermore, expert evaluation revealed that Mistral superseded both MentalLlama and MentalBART across 6 parameters: affective attitude, burden, ethicality, coherence, opportunity costs, and perceived effectiveness. However, these models exhibit a common weakness in terms of room for improvement in the opportunity costs and perceived effectiveness metrics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While LLMs fine-tuned specifically on mental health domain data display better performance based on automatic evaluation scores, expert assessments indicate that these models are not yet reliable for clinical application. Further refinement and validation are necessary before their implementation in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":48616,"journal":{"name":"Jmir Mental Health","volume":"11 ","pages":"e57306"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11303879/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141753061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reliability and Validity of Ecological Momentary Assessment Response Time-Based Measures of Emotional Clarity: Secondary Data Analysis. 基于生态瞬时评估反应时间的情绪清晰度测量的可靠性和有效性:二手数据分析。
IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI: 10.2196/58352
Raymond Hernandez, Claire Hoogendoorn, Jeffrey S Gonzalez, Elizabeth A Pyatak, Gladys Crespo-Ramos, Stefan Schneider
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emotional clarity has often been assessed with self-report measures, but efforts have also been made to measure it passively, which has advantages such as avoiding potential inaccuracy in responses stemming from social desirability bias or poor insight into emotional clarity. Response times (RTs) to emotion items administered in ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) may be an indirect indicator of emotional clarity. Another proposed indicator is the drift rate parameter, which assumes that, aside from how fast a person responds to emotion items, the measurement of emotional clarity also requires the consideration of how careful participants were in providing responses.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper aims to examine the reliability and validity of RTs and drift rate parameters from EMA emotion items as indicators of individual differences in emotional clarity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Secondary data analysis was conducted on data from 196 adults with type 1 diabetes who completed a 2-week EMA study involving the completion of 5 to 6 surveys daily. If lower RTs and higher drift rates (from EMA emotion items) were indicators of emotional clarity, we hypothesized that greater levels (ie, higher clarity) should be associated with greater life satisfaction; lower levels of neuroticism, depression, anxiety, and diabetes distress; and fewer difficulties with emotion regulation. Because prior literature suggested emotional clarity could be valence specific, EMA items for negative affect (NA) and positive affect were examined separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reliability of the proposed indicators of emotional clarity was acceptable with a small number of EMA prompts (ie, 4 to 7 prompts in total or 1 to 2 days of EMA surveys). Consistent with expectations, the average drift rate of NA items across multiple EMAs had expected associations with other measures, such as correlations of r=-0.27 (P<.001) with depression symptoms, r=-0.27 (P=.001) with anxiety symptoms, r=-0.15 (P=.03) with emotion regulation difficulties, and r=0.63 (P<.001) with RTs to NA items. People with a higher NA drift rate responded faster to NA emotion items, had greater subjective well-being (eg, fewer depression symptoms), and had fewer difficulties with overall emotion regulation, which are all aligned with the expectation for an emotional clarity measure. Contrary to expectations, the validities of average RTs to NA items, the drift rate of positive affect items, and RTs to positive affect items were not strongly supported by our results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Study findings provided initial support for the validity of NA drift rate as an indicator of emotional clarity but not for that of other RT-based clarity measures. Evidence was preliminary because the sample size was not sufficient to detect small but potentially meaningful correlations, as the sample size of the diabetes EMA study was chosen for oth
背景:情绪清晰度通常是通过自我报告测量来评估的,但也有人致力于被动测量情绪清晰度,这样做的好处是可以避免因社会可取性偏差或对情绪清晰度的洞察力不足而导致的潜在反应不准确。生态瞬时评估(EMAs)中对情绪项目的反应时间(RTs)可能是情绪清晰度的间接指标。另一个建议的指标是漂移率参数,它假定除了一个人对情绪项目的反应速度之外,情绪清晰度的测量还需要考虑参与者在提供反应时的谨慎程度:本文旨在研究 EMA 情绪项目的反应时间和漂移率参数作为情绪清晰度个体差异指标的可靠性和有效性:对 196 名 1 型糖尿病成人患者的数据进行了二次数据分析,这些患者完成了为期两周的 EMA 研究,每天完成 5 到 6 次调查。如果较低的RT和较高的漂移率(来自EMA情绪项目)是情绪清晰度的指标,我们假设较高的情绪清晰度(即较高的清晰度)应与较高的生活满意度、较低的神经质、抑郁、焦虑和糖尿病困扰水平以及较少的情绪调节困难相关联。由于先前的文献表明情绪清晰度可能具有情绪特异性,因此分别对消极情绪(NA)和积极情绪的 EMA 项目进行了研究:通过少量的 EMA 提示(即总共 4 到 7 个提示或 1 到 2 天的 EMA 调查),所建议的情绪清晰度指标的可靠性是可以接受的。与预期一致的是,多个 EMA 中 NA 项目的平均漂移率与其他测量指标之间存在预期的关联,如 r=-0.27 的相关性(PC 结论:研究结果初步支持了NA漂移率作为情绪清晰度指标的有效性,但不支持其他基于RT的清晰度测量指标的有效性。证据是初步的,因为样本量不足以检测出微小但可能有意义的相关性,因为糖尿病 EMA 研究的样本量是为其他更主要的研究问题而选择的。需要对被动情绪清晰度测量方法进行进一步研究。
{"title":"Reliability and Validity of Ecological Momentary Assessment Response Time-Based Measures of Emotional Clarity: Secondary Data Analysis.","authors":"Raymond Hernandez, Claire Hoogendoorn, Jeffrey S Gonzalez, Elizabeth A Pyatak, Gladys Crespo-Ramos, Stefan Schneider","doi":"10.2196/58352","DOIUrl":"10.2196/58352","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Emotional clarity has often been assessed with self-report measures, but efforts have also been made to measure it passively, which has advantages such as avoiding potential inaccuracy in responses stemming from social desirability bias or poor insight into emotional clarity. Response times (RTs) to emotion items administered in ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) may be an indirect indicator of emotional clarity. Another proposed indicator is the drift rate parameter, which assumes that, aside from how fast a person responds to emotion items, the measurement of emotional clarity also requires the consideration of how careful participants were in providing responses.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;This paper aims to examine the reliability and validity of RTs and drift rate parameters from EMA emotion items as indicators of individual differences in emotional clarity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;Secondary data analysis was conducted on data from 196 adults with type 1 diabetes who completed a 2-week EMA study involving the completion of 5 to 6 surveys daily. If lower RTs and higher drift rates (from EMA emotion items) were indicators of emotional clarity, we hypothesized that greater levels (ie, higher clarity) should be associated with greater life satisfaction; lower levels of neuroticism, depression, anxiety, and diabetes distress; and fewer difficulties with emotion regulation. Because prior literature suggested emotional clarity could be valence specific, EMA items for negative affect (NA) and positive affect were examined separately.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Reliability of the proposed indicators of emotional clarity was acceptable with a small number of EMA prompts (ie, 4 to 7 prompts in total or 1 to 2 days of EMA surveys). Consistent with expectations, the average drift rate of NA items across multiple EMAs had expected associations with other measures, such as correlations of r=-0.27 (P&lt;.001) with depression symptoms, r=-0.27 (P=.001) with anxiety symptoms, r=-0.15 (P=.03) with emotion regulation difficulties, and r=0.63 (P&lt;.001) with RTs to NA items. People with a higher NA drift rate responded faster to NA emotion items, had greater subjective well-being (eg, fewer depression symptoms), and had fewer difficulties with overall emotion regulation, which are all aligned with the expectation for an emotional clarity measure. Contrary to expectations, the validities of average RTs to NA items, the drift rate of positive affect items, and RTs to positive affect items were not strongly supported by our results.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Study findings provided initial support for the validity of NA drift rate as an indicator of emotional clarity but not for that of other RT-based clarity measures. Evidence was preliminary because the sample size was not sufficient to detect small but potentially meaningful correlations, as the sample size of the diabetes EMA study was chosen for oth","PeriodicalId":48616,"journal":{"name":"Jmir Mental Health","volume":"11 ","pages":"e58352"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11294766/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141635047","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Technologies for Supporting Individuals and Caregivers Living With Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder: Scoping Review. 支持胎儿酒精中毒综合症患者和护理人员的技术:范围审查。
IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI: 10.2196/51074
Joanna Ting Wai Chu, Holly Wilson, Cynthia Zhiyin Cai, Jessica C McCormack, David Newcombe, Chris Bullen

Background: Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) is a common developmental disability that requires lifelong and ongoing support but is often difficult to find due to the lack of trained professionals, funding, and support available. Technology could provide cost-effective, accessible, and effective support to those living with FASD and their caregivers.

Objective: In this review, we aimed to explore the use of technology available for supporting people living with FASD and their caregivers.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review to identify studies that included technology for people with FASD or their caregivers; focused on FASD; used an empirical study design; were published since 2005; and used technology for assessment, diagnosis, monitoring, or support for people with FASD. We searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, APA PsycINFO, ACM Digital Library, JMIR Publications journals, the Cochrane Library, EBSCOhost, IEEE, study references, and gray literature to find studies. Searches were conducted in November 2022 and updated in January 2024. Two reviewers (CZC and HW) independently completed study selection and data extraction.

Results: In total, 17 studies exploring technology available for people with FASD showed that technology could be effective at teaching skills, supporting caregivers, and helping people with FASD develop skills.

Conclusions: Technology could provide support for people affected by FASD; however, currently there is limited technology available, and the potential benefits are largely unexplored.

背景:胎儿酒精谱系障碍(FASD)是一种常见的发育障碍,需要终身和持续的支持,但由于缺乏训练有素的专业人员、资金和支持,往往很难找到合适的支持。技术可以为 FASD 患者及其照顾者提供经济、方便、有效的支持:在本综述中,我们旨在探讨如何利用现有技术为 FASD 患者及其照顾者提供支持:我们进行了一次范围界定综述,以确定包含针对 FASD 患者或其照护者的技术的研究;重点关注 FASD;采用实证研究设计;自 2005 年以来发表;使用技术对 FASD 患者进行评估、诊断、监控或支持。我们检索了 MEDLINE、Web of Science、Scopus、Embase、APA PsycINFO、ACM Digital Library、JMIR Publications journals、Cochrane Library、EBSCOhost、IEEE、研究参考文献和灰色文献来查找研究。搜索于 2022 年 11 月进行,并于 2024 年 1 月更新。两位审稿人(CZC 和 HW)独立完成了研究选择和数据提取:共有 17 项研究探讨了 FASD 患者可用的技术,结果表明,技术可以有效地传授技能、支持照顾者并帮助 FASD 患者发展技能:技术可以为 FASD 患者提供支持;然而,目前可用的技术有限,潜在的益处也大多未被发掘。
{"title":"Technologies for Supporting Individuals and Caregivers Living With Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder: Scoping Review.","authors":"Joanna Ting Wai Chu, Holly Wilson, Cynthia Zhiyin Cai, Jessica C McCormack, David Newcombe, Chris Bullen","doi":"10.2196/51074","DOIUrl":"10.2196/51074","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) is a common developmental disability that requires lifelong and ongoing support but is often difficult to find due to the lack of trained professionals, funding, and support available. Technology could provide cost-effective, accessible, and effective support to those living with FASD and their caregivers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this review, we aimed to explore the use of technology available for supporting people living with FASD and their caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a scoping review to identify studies that included technology for people with FASD or their caregivers; focused on FASD; used an empirical study design; were published since 2005; and used technology for assessment, diagnosis, monitoring, or support for people with FASD. We searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, APA PsycINFO, ACM Digital Library, JMIR Publications journals, the Cochrane Library, EBSCOhost, IEEE, study references, and gray literature to find studies. Searches were conducted in November 2022 and updated in January 2024. Two reviewers (CZC and HW) independently completed study selection and data extraction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 17 studies exploring technology available for people with FASD showed that technology could be effective at teaching skills, supporting caregivers, and helping people with FASD develop skills.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Technology could provide support for people affected by FASD; however, currently there is limited technology available, and the potential benefits are largely unexplored.</p>","PeriodicalId":48616,"journal":{"name":"Jmir Mental Health","volume":"11 ","pages":"e51074"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11259581/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141591785","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Jmir Mental Health
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1