首页 > 最新文献

Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases最新文献

英文 中文
Modified bariatric frailty score to predict postoperative outcomes in elderly patients following sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass 改良的体重衰弱评分预测袖式胃切除术和Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后老年患者的预后。
IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-10-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2025.10.002
Raul Sebastian M.D. , Alba Zevallos M.D. , Oscar Tuesta M.D. , Adrian Riva M.D. , Jorge Cornejo M.D. , Tarek Hassab M.D. , Gina Adrales M.D., M.P.H. , Christina Li M.D. , Michael Schweitzer M.D.

Background

Elderly patients undergo bariatric surgery less frequently than younger patients due to several factors such as increased complication risk. Obesity exacerbates frailty among elderly patients through sarcopenia and metabolic dysfunction. Therefore, specific preoperative risk assessment in elderly patients is crucial.

Objectives

We created the modified Bariatric Frailty Score (mBFS) and compared the 30-day outcomes between low versus high mBFS in elderly patients after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).

Setting

2015–2022 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.

Methods

Patients aged ≥ 60 years who underwent SG and RYGB were included. 14 variables of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging-Frailty Index were mapped onto 9 variables of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (each component equals 1 point). Correlations and multivariate logistical regression analysis were performed between mBFS and 7 postoperative outcomes (nonhome discharge, mortality, prolonged hospital stay, intensive care unit admissions, cardiac complications, pulmonary complications, and renal complications). Finally, a propensity score matching between low mBFS (0–4) and high mBFS (5–9) was performed for SG and RYGB.

Results

A total of 90,239 and 40,272 patients were included for SG and RYGB, respectively. The increasing mBFS was strongly correlated with linear regression. In the multivariate analysis, scores of 5, 6, 7, and 8 strongly predicted the 7 postoperative outcomes of interest. After the propensity score matching, the matched cohorts for SG and RYGB were 3337 and 1655, respectively. A high mBFS (5–9) was associated with an increased rate of postoperative complications in the SG and RYGB groups.

Conclusions

Our mBFS is a better predictor of nonhome discharge, prolonged hospital stays, 30-day mortality, unplanned intensive care unit admissions, and cardiac, pulmonary, and renal complications than the American Society of Anesthesiologists score of III, American Society of Anesthesiologists score of IV–V, renal insufficiency, or smoker status. Our study validated the cumulative deficit theory in elderly bariatric surgery patients.
背景:由于并发症风险增加等因素,老年患者接受减肥手术的频率低于年轻患者。肥胖通过肌肉减少和代谢功能障碍加剧老年患者的虚弱。因此,对老年患者进行具体的术前风险评估至关重要。目的:我们创建了改良的体重虚弱评分(mBFS),并比较了老年患者在袖胃切除术(SG)和Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)后30天的结果。设置:2015-2022年代谢和减肥手术认证和质量改进项目数据库。方法:患者年龄≥60岁,接受过SG和RYGB治疗。将加拿大健康与衰老虚弱指数研究中的14个变量映射为代谢与减肥手术认证与质量改进计划中的9个变量(每个分量等于1分)。对mBFS与7项术后结局(非家庭出院、死亡率、住院时间延长、重症监护病房入院、心脏并发症、肺部并发症和肾脏并发症)进行相关性和多变量logistic回归分析。最后,对SG和RYGB进行低mBFS(0-4)和高mBFS(5-9)的倾向评分匹配。结果:SG和RYGB共纳入90,239例和40,272例患者。mBFS的增加与线性回归密切相关。在多变量分析中,5分、6分、7分和8分强有力地预测了7个感兴趣的术后结果。倾向评分匹配后,SG和RYGB的匹配队列分别为3337和1655。在SG组和RYGB组中,高mBFS(5-9)与术后并发症发生率增加相关。结论:我们的mBFS比美国麻醉学会评分为III分、美国麻醉学会评分为IV-V分、肾功能不全或吸烟状况更好地预测了非家庭出院、延长住院时间、30天死亡率、计划外重症监护病房入院以及心脏、肺部和肾脏并发症。我们的研究在老年减肥手术患者中验证了累积缺陷理论。
{"title":"Modified bariatric frailty score to predict postoperative outcomes in elderly patients following sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass","authors":"Raul Sebastian M.D. ,&nbsp;Alba Zevallos M.D. ,&nbsp;Oscar Tuesta M.D. ,&nbsp;Adrian Riva M.D. ,&nbsp;Jorge Cornejo M.D. ,&nbsp;Tarek Hassab M.D. ,&nbsp;Gina Adrales M.D., M.P.H. ,&nbsp;Christina Li M.D. ,&nbsp;Michael Schweitzer M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.soard.2025.10.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.soard.2025.10.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Elderly patients undergo bariatric surgery less frequently than younger patients due to several factors such as increased complication risk. Obesity exacerbates frailty among elderly patients through sarcopenia and metabolic dysfunction. Therefore, specific preoperative risk assessment in elderly patients is crucial.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We created the modified Bariatric Frailty Score (mBFS) and compared the 30-day outcomes between low versus high mBFS in elderly patients after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>2015–2022 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients aged ≥ 60 years who underwent SG and RYGB were included. 14 variables of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging-Frailty Index were mapped onto 9 variables of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (each component equals 1 point). Correlations and multivariate logistical regression analysis were performed between mBFS and 7 postoperative outcomes (nonhome discharge, mortality, prolonged hospital stay, intensive care unit admissions, cardiac complications, pulmonary complications, and renal complications). Finally, a propensity score matching between low mBFS (0–4) and high mBFS (5–9) was performed for SG and RYGB.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 90,239 and 40,272 patients were included for SG and RYGB, respectively. The increasing mBFS was strongly correlated with linear regression. In the multivariate analysis, scores of 5, 6, 7, and 8 strongly predicted the 7 postoperative outcomes of interest. After the propensity score matching, the matched cohorts for SG and RYGB were 3337 and 1655, respectively. A high mBFS (5–9) was associated with an increased rate of postoperative complications in the SG and RYGB groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our mBFS is a better predictor of nonhome discharge, prolonged hospital stays, 30-day mortality, unplanned intensive care unit admissions, and cardiac, pulmonary, and renal complications than the American Society of Anesthesiologists score of III, American Society of Anesthesiologists score of IV–V, renal insufficiency, or smoker status. Our study validated the cumulative deficit theory in elderly bariatric surgery patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49462,"journal":{"name":"Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases","volume":"22 2","pages":"Pages 206-218"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145447014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Erratum to ‘Virtual care ending the stigma of obesity: insights from surgical and nonsurgical patients’ [Surgery for obesity and related diseases 21/6S (2025) pages S144-S145] “虚拟医疗结束肥胖的耻辱:来自手术和非手术患者的见解”的勘误[肥胖和相关疾病的外科21/6S(2025)页S144-S145]
IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-09-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2025.08.001
Robin McDermott, Laure DeMattia Do DABFM, DABOM, Rachel Fehl MSN, RN, FNP-C, CHC, Payal Sharma DNP, MSN, RN, FNP-BC, CBN
{"title":"Erratum to ‘Virtual care ending the stigma of obesity: insights from surgical and nonsurgical patients’ [Surgery for obesity and related diseases 21/6S (2025) pages S144-S145]","authors":"Robin McDermott,&nbsp;Laure DeMattia Do DABFM, DABOM,&nbsp;Rachel Fehl MSN, RN, FNP-C, CHC,&nbsp;Payal Sharma DNP, MSN, RN, FNP-BC, CBN","doi":"10.1016/j.soard.2025.08.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.soard.2025.08.001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49462,"journal":{"name":"Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases","volume":"21 12","pages":"Page 1371"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145532632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comment on: from disability to productivity: the impact of metabolic and bariatric surgery on return to work 点评:从残疾到生产力:代谢和减肥手术对重返工作岗位的影响。
IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-09-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2025.09.002
Mélissa V. Wills MD, Matthew Kroh MD
{"title":"Comment on: from disability to productivity: the impact of metabolic and bariatric surgery on return to work","authors":"Mélissa V. Wills MD,&nbsp;Matthew Kroh MD","doi":"10.1016/j.soard.2025.09.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.soard.2025.09.002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49462,"journal":{"name":"Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases","volume":"21 12","pages":"Pages e37-e38"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145282451","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cartoon Dec2025 卡通Dec2025
IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-09-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2025.09.001
{"title":"Cartoon Dec2025","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.soard.2025.09.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.soard.2025.09.001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49462,"journal":{"name":"Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases","volume":"21 11","pages":"Page 1292"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145289996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
SOARD Category 1 CME Credit Featured Articles, Volume 21, October 2025 SOARD第一类CME信贷专题文章,第21卷,2025年10月
IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-09-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2025.08.015
{"title":"SOARD Category 1 CME Credit Featured Articles, Volume 21, October 2025","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.soard.2025.08.015","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.soard.2025.08.015","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49462,"journal":{"name":"Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases","volume":"21 10","pages":"Pages 1177-1179"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145026343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comment on: towards a better mouse model of vertical sleeve gastrectomy 点评:建立一种更好的小鼠垂直袖式胃切除术模型。
IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-09-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2025.08.019
Michael Kachmar D.O., Thomas H. Shin M.D., Ph.D., Jerry T. Dang M.D., Ph.D., Vance L. Albaugh M.D., Ph.D.
{"title":"Comment on: towards a better mouse model of vertical sleeve gastrectomy","authors":"Michael Kachmar D.O.,&nbsp;Thomas H. Shin M.D., Ph.D.,&nbsp;Jerry T. Dang M.D., Ph.D.,&nbsp;Vance L. Albaugh M.D., Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.soard.2025.08.019","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.soard.2025.08.019","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49462,"journal":{"name":"Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases","volume":"21 12","pages":"Pages e33-e34"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145215023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Moving beyond risk factors — a deeper look into weight regain after sleeve gastrectomy 超越危险因素——对袖式胃切除术后体重恢复的深入研究。
IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-09-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2025.08.021
Dimitrios I. Athanasiadis MD
{"title":"Moving beyond risk factors — a deeper look into weight regain after sleeve gastrectomy","authors":"Dimitrios I. Athanasiadis MD","doi":"10.1016/j.soard.2025.08.021","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.soard.2025.08.021","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49462,"journal":{"name":"Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases","volume":"21 12","pages":"Pages e31-e32"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145103203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comment on: efficacy and safety comparison of single anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass versus one anastomosis gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis 评价:单吻合式套筒回肠旁路术与单吻合式胃旁路术的疗效和安全性比较:一项系统综述和meta分析。
IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-09-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2025.08.020
Marius Nedelcu, Ramon Vilallonga
{"title":"Comment on: efficacy and safety comparison of single anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass versus one anastomosis gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Marius Nedelcu,&nbsp;Ramon Vilallonga","doi":"10.1016/j.soard.2025.08.020","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.soard.2025.08.020","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49462,"journal":{"name":"Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases","volume":"21 12","pages":"Pages e29-e30"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145103224","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reproductive health counseling, menstruation, contraception, and conception after sleeve gastrectomy: a cross-sectional study 袖式胃切除术后的生殖健康咨询、月经、避孕和受孕:一项横断面研究。
IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2025.08.017
Ahmad Badrieh M.D. , Ram Elazary M.D. , Tair Ben-Porat Ph.D. , Shiri Sherf-Dagan Ph.D. , Amihai Rottenstreich M.D.

Background

Reproductive-aged women constitute a substantial proportion of patients undergoing weight loss procedures. Little is known regarding reproductive health outcomes among women after sleeve gastrectomy (SG).

Objective

We aim to explore reproductive health patterns and outcomes after SG.

Setting

University hospital.

Methods

A cross-sectional study performed among reproductive-aged women who underwent SG at a university hospital. Women were surveyed using a questionnaire developed as a collaborative, multidisciplinary effort of a maternal-fetal medicine expert, general gynecologist, and a bariatric surgeon.

Results

Overall, 1030 women of childbearing age (median 34 years) underwent SG at our center during the study period. Of them, 928 women completed the questionnaire (response rate of 90%) with a median follow-up duration of 8.4 years. Menstrual irregularity rate (11.9% vs. 43.5%, P < .001) and duration of menstrual bleeding (median 5 vs. 6 days, P < .001) were significantly reduced after surgery as compared to preoperatively. Only 632 (68.1%) women received contraceptive advice perioperatively, with oral contraception being the most commonly used method following surgery (n = 322, 34.7%). Most women (n = 867, 93.4%) received a recommendation to delay conception after surgery, however, 65 (7.5%) women were sexually active in the first year postoperatively without using any mode of contraception. Overall, 301 (32.4%) women delivered after surgery, with pregnancy reported as unintended by 22 (7.3%) women, most of them (n = 14) using oral contraception.

Conclusions

Menstrual cycle pattern significantly improves after SG. Adequate reproductive-health counseling is important after SG in order to inform optimal contraceptive care and potentially prevent unintended pregnancies particularly in the early period after surgery.
背景:育龄妇女在接受减肥手术的患者中占相当大的比例。关于袖式胃切除术(SG)后妇女的生殖健康结果知之甚少。目的:探讨生殖健康模式和生殖健康结局。单位:大学医院。方法:在一所大学医院接受SG手术的育龄妇女中进行横断面研究。研究人员使用一份由母胎医学专家、普通妇科医生和减肥外科医生合作开发的多学科调查问卷对妇女进行了调查。结果:研究期间,共有1030名育龄妇女(中位年龄34岁)在本中心接受了SG治疗。其中928名女性完成问卷调查(应答率90%),中位随访时间8.4年。与术前相比,术后月经不调率(11.9% vs. 43.5%, P < 0.001)和月经出血持续时间(中位5 vs. 6天,P < 0.001)均显著减少。只有632名(68.1%)妇女在围手术期接受了避孕建议,口服避孕药是术后最常用的方法(n = 322, 34.7%)。大多数妇女(n = 867, 93.4%)接受了手术后延迟受孕的建议,然而,65名(7.5%)妇女在术后第一年性活跃,未使用任何避孕方式。总的来说,301名(32.4%)妇女在手术后分娩,22名(7.3%)妇女报告意外怀孕,其中大多数(n = 14)使用口服避孕药。结论:SG治疗后月经周期明显改善。在SG之后,适当的生殖健康咨询非常重要,以便告知最佳避孕护理,并可能预防意外怀孕,特别是在手术后的早期。
{"title":"Reproductive health counseling, menstruation, contraception, and conception after sleeve gastrectomy: a cross-sectional study","authors":"Ahmad Badrieh M.D. ,&nbsp;Ram Elazary M.D. ,&nbsp;Tair Ben-Porat Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Shiri Sherf-Dagan Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Amihai Rottenstreich M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.soard.2025.08.017","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.soard.2025.08.017","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Reproductive-aged women constitute a substantial proportion of patients undergoing weight loss procedures. Little is known regarding reproductive health outcomes among women after sleeve gastrectomy (SG).</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We aim to explore reproductive health patterns and outcomes after SG.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>University hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study performed among reproductive-aged women who underwent SG at a university hospital. Women were surveyed using a questionnaire developed as a collaborative, multidisciplinary effort of a maternal-fetal medicine expert, general gynecologist, and a bariatric surgeon.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 1030 women of childbearing age (median 34 years) underwent SG at our center during the study period. Of them, 928 women completed the questionnaire (response rate of 90%) with a median follow-up duration of 8.4 years. Menstrual irregularity rate (11.9% vs. 43.5%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and duration of menstrual bleeding (median 5 vs. 6 days, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) were significantly reduced after surgery as compared to preoperatively. Only 632 (68.1%) women received contraceptive advice perioperatively, with oral contraception being the most commonly used method following surgery (n = 322, 34.7%). Most women (n = 867, 93.4%) received a recommendation to delay conception after surgery, however, 65 (7.5%) women were sexually active in the first year postoperatively without using any mode of contraception. Overall, 301 (32.4%) women delivered after surgery, with pregnancy reported as unintended by 22 (7.3%) women, most of them (n = 14) using oral contraception.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Menstrual cycle pattern significantly improves after SG. Adequate reproductive-health counseling is important after SG in order to inform optimal contraceptive care and potentially prevent unintended pregnancies particularly in the early period after surgery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49462,"journal":{"name":"Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases","volume":"21 12","pages":"Pages 1357-1362"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145103260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Revisional bariatric surgery in the elderly: a comprehensive review of the safety and efficacy profile 老年人修正减肥手术:安全性和有效性的综合评价。
IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-08-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2025.08.012
Noura Jawhar M.D. , Jack W. Sample M.D. , Agustina Pontecorvo M.D. , Jorge Cornejo M.D. , Lorna A. Evans M.D. , Nour El Ghazal M.D. , Simon J. Laplante M.D. , Enrique F. Elli M.D. , Omar M. Ghanem M.D.

Background

Despite the well-known safety and efficacy of metabolic and bariatric surgery, certain patients require revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) due to weight-related and/or procedure-related complications. Date on long-term RBS outcomes remains limited in the elderly.

Objectives

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of RBS in the elderly.

Setting

Tertiary referral centers with prospectively maintained metabolic and bariatric surgery databases.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted for patients aged ≥ 60 years who underwent RBS between 2008 and 2023. Patient demographics, type of revisional procedure, postoperative outcomes, weight loss data, and nutritional parameters were collected. All patients had at least a 6-month follow-up and were followed at least 5 years after RBS when possible.

Results

201 patients were included. The most common indication for RBS was gastroesophageal reflux (37.8%). Conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was the most common RBS procedure (65.2%). This subgroup achieved significantly sustained mean percentage of total weight loss throughout follow-up. Conversion to sleeve gastrectomy subgroup only maintained a significant mean percentage of total weight loss at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. The overall 30-day and late complication rates within the cohort were 17.4% and 26.9%, respectively. A .5% 30-day mortality rate and 0% long-term RBS-related morality rate were reported. For patients indicated for revision, RBS was successful in resolving malnutrition and did not result in recurrence of any nutritional deficiencies.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that RBS is safe and effective in elderly patients in the long term. Proper RBS procedure selection is integral to address revision indication and decrease the risk of long-term complications.
背景:尽管代谢和减肥手术的安全性和有效性众所周知,但由于体重相关和/或手术相关的并发症,某些患者需要修正减肥手术(RBS)。关于老年人长期RBS结果的数据仍然有限。目的:评价RBS在老年患者中的安全性和有效性。环境:三级转诊中心,具有前瞻性的代谢和减肥手术数据库。方法:回顾性分析2008年至2023年间年龄≥60岁接受RBS治疗的患者。收集患者人口统计资料、手术类型、术后结果、体重减轻数据和营养参数。所有患者至少有6个月的随访,如果可能的话,在RBS后至少随访5年。结果:纳入201例患者。RBS最常见的适应症是胃食管反流(37.8%)。转Roux-en-Y胃旁路术是最常见的RBS手术(65.2%)。该亚组在整个随访期间取得了显著持续的总体重减轻的平均百分比。转到套筒胃切除术亚组仅在术后6个月、1年和2年保持显著的总体重减轻的平均百分比。30天和晚期并发症发生率在队列中分别为17.4%和26.9%。一个。30天死亡率为5%,与rbs相关的长期死亡率为0%。对于需要翻修的患者,RBS成功地解决了营养不良问题,并且没有导致任何营养缺乏的复发。结论:我们的研究表明,RBS对老年患者长期安全有效。正确的RBS手术选择对于解决手术适应症和降低长期并发症的风险是不可或缺的。
{"title":"Revisional bariatric surgery in the elderly: a comprehensive review of the safety and efficacy profile","authors":"Noura Jawhar M.D. ,&nbsp;Jack W. Sample M.D. ,&nbsp;Agustina Pontecorvo M.D. ,&nbsp;Jorge Cornejo M.D. ,&nbsp;Lorna A. Evans M.D. ,&nbsp;Nour El Ghazal M.D. ,&nbsp;Simon J. Laplante M.D. ,&nbsp;Enrique F. Elli M.D. ,&nbsp;Omar M. Ghanem M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.soard.2025.08.012","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.soard.2025.08.012","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite the well-known safety and efficacy of metabolic and bariatric surgery, certain patients require revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) due to weight-related and/or procedure-related complications. Date on long-term RBS outcomes remains limited in the elderly.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the safety and efficacy of RBS in the elderly.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Tertiary referral centers with prospectively maintained metabolic and bariatric surgery databases.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective review was conducted for patients aged ≥ 60 years who underwent RBS between 2008 and 2023. Patient demographics, type of revisional procedure, postoperative outcomes, weight loss data, and nutritional parameters were collected. All patients had at least a 6-month follow-up and were followed at least 5 years after RBS when possible.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>201 patients were included. The most common indication for RBS was gastroesophageal reflux (37.8%). Conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was the most common RBS procedure (65.2%). This subgroup achieved significantly sustained mean percentage of total weight loss throughout follow-up. Conversion to sleeve gastrectomy subgroup only maintained a significant mean percentage of total weight loss at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. The overall 30-day and late complication rates within the cohort were 17.4% and 26.9%, respectively. A .5% 30-day mortality rate and 0% long-term RBS-related morality rate were reported. For patients indicated for revision, RBS was successful in resolving malnutrition and did not result in recurrence of any nutritional deficiencies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our study demonstrated that RBS is safe and effective in elderly patients in the long term. Proper RBS procedure selection is integral to address revision indication and decrease the risk of long-term complications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49462,"journal":{"name":"Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases","volume":"21 12","pages":"Pages 1293-1307"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145056496","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1