Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.1080/17550874.2023.2277282
Ayushi Kurian, Kanda Naveen Babu, Narayanan Ayyappan
ABSTRACTBackground A gamut of abiotic and biotic factors is related to the amount of above-ground biomass (AGB) produced in ecosystems. Some factors have direct and others indirect relationships with AGB. Detailed analyses in tropical forests are few but much needed for better understanding the potential impacts of global change drivers and for mitigating impacts.Aims Here, we examined the relationship between AGB and different predictor variables and quantitatively evaluated their relative importance in lowland to lower montane deciduous and lower montane – montane evergreen forest types. We hypothesised that the relationship between AGB and climate, topography, structural diversity, species diversity (alpha and beta) and phylogenetic diversity would differ between the two forest types.Methods We inventoried trees from 114 plots (each 0.1 ha) and used partial least square (PLS) structural equation modelling (SEM) to test the direct and indirect relationship between AGB and the predictor variables.Results We found that structural diversity variables, stem density and tree girth, were significantly and positively related to AGB in both forest types, displaying a stronger relationship in montane evergreen forests (w = 0.65 for density and 0.89 for tree girth). In the deciduous forest, alpha and phylogenetic diversity were also important factors, whereas beta and phylogenetic diversity were important in the evergreen forest. The effects of topography and climate varied between forest types, with elevation and precipitation being related to AGB directly and indirectly through their relationship with structural diversity.Conclusion Our results suggest that structural diversity is a key driver of tropical forest biomass, both directly and indirectly. This fundamental understanding can aid in the predictive efforts of biodiversity conservation and forest management.Policy highlightsStructural diversity affects biomass, directly and indirectly facilitating the importance of monitoring and land-use planning.A structurally diversified forest can be considered while selecting reserves for conservation.Prioritizing the preservation and improvement of structural diversity in forests is crucial.Assessing forest productivity requires considering stand characteristics and biodiversity.KEYWORDS: Climatedeciduous forestevergreen foresttree diversityWestern ghatsDisclaimerAs a service to authors and researchers we are providing this version of an accepted manuscript (AM). Copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proofs will be undertaken on this manuscript before final publication of the Version of Record (VoR). During production and pre-press, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal relate to these versions also. Declaration of competing interestThe authors declare no conflict of interest.AcknowledgementsWe thank the Karnataka Forest Department for providing the necessary permissions
摘要背景一系列的非生物和生物因子与生态系统产生的地上生物量(AGB)有关。有些因素与AGB有直接关系,有些因素与AGB有间接关系。对热带森林的详细分析很少,但为了更好地了解全球变化驱动因素的潜在影响和减轻影响,却非常需要这些分析。目的研究不同预测变量与AGB之间的关系,并定量评价其在低海拔山地落叶林和低海拔山地常绿林类型中的相对重要性。我们假设两种森林类型的AGB与气候、地形、结构多样性、物种多样性(α和β)和系统发育多样性之间的关系会有所不同。方法采用偏最小二乘法(PLS)结构方程模型(SEM)对114个样地(每个样地0.1 ha)的树木进行调查,检验AGB与预测变量之间的直接和间接关系。结果两种森林类型的结构多样性变量(茎密度和树周长)均与AGB呈显著正相关,其中山地常绿森林的相关性更强(w = 0.65,树周长= 0.89)。在阔叶林中,α和系统发育多样性也是重要的影响因子,而在常绿林中,α和系统发育多样性是重要的影响因子。地形和气候对不同森林类型的影响不同,海拔和降水通过与结构多样性的关系直接或间接地与AGB相关。结论结构多样性是热带森林生物量的直接和间接驱动因素。这一基本认识有助于生物多样性保护和森林管理的预测工作。结构多样性影响生物量,直接或间接地促进了监测和土地利用规划的重要性。在选择保护区时,可以考虑结构多样化的森林。优先保护和改善森林结构多样性至关重要。评估森林生产力需要考虑林分特征和生物多样性。关键词:气候,落叶森林,常绿森林,树木多样性,西部森林免责声明作为对作者和研究人员的服务,我们提供这个版本的接受手稿(AM)。在最终出版版本记录(VoR)之前,将对该手稿进行编辑、排版和审查。在制作和印前,可能会发现可能影响内容的错误,所有适用于期刊的法律免责声明也与这些版本有关。利益冲突声明作者声明无利益冲突。我们感谢卡纳塔克邦森林部为野外工作提供了必要的许可和协助。我们也对所有匿名审稿人和总编辑的宝贵意见表示衷心的感谢,他们为提高论文的质量做出了贡献。本研究得到了印度政府生物技术部和空间部的支持(资助号:- bt / good . ii /10/02/2016),作为“利用地球观测数据在印度社区层面进行生物多样性表征”项目的一部分。
{"title":"Structural diversity is a key driver of above-ground biomass in tropical forests","authors":"Ayushi Kurian, Kanda Naveen Babu, Narayanan Ayyappan","doi":"10.1080/17550874.2023.2277282","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2023.2277282","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTBackground A gamut of abiotic and biotic factors is related to the amount of above-ground biomass (AGB) produced in ecosystems. Some factors have direct and others indirect relationships with AGB. Detailed analyses in tropical forests are few but much needed for better understanding the potential impacts of global change drivers and for mitigating impacts.Aims Here, we examined the relationship between AGB and different predictor variables and quantitatively evaluated their relative importance in lowland to lower montane deciduous and lower montane – montane evergreen forest types. We hypothesised that the relationship between AGB and climate, topography, structural diversity, species diversity (alpha and beta) and phylogenetic diversity would differ between the two forest types.Methods We inventoried trees from 114 plots (each 0.1 ha) and used partial least square (PLS) structural equation modelling (SEM) to test the direct and indirect relationship between AGB and the predictor variables.Results We found that structural diversity variables, stem density and tree girth, were significantly and positively related to AGB in both forest types, displaying a stronger relationship in montane evergreen forests (w = 0.65 for density and 0.89 for tree girth). In the deciduous forest, alpha and phylogenetic diversity were also important factors, whereas beta and phylogenetic diversity were important in the evergreen forest. The effects of topography and climate varied between forest types, with elevation and precipitation being related to AGB directly and indirectly through their relationship with structural diversity.Conclusion Our results suggest that structural diversity is a key driver of tropical forest biomass, both directly and indirectly. This fundamental understanding can aid in the predictive efforts of biodiversity conservation and forest management.Policy highlightsStructural diversity affects biomass, directly and indirectly facilitating the importance of monitoring and land-use planning.A structurally diversified forest can be considered while selecting reserves for conservation.Prioritizing the preservation and improvement of structural diversity in forests is crucial.Assessing forest productivity requires considering stand characteristics and biodiversity.KEYWORDS: Climatedeciduous forestevergreen foresttree diversityWestern ghatsDisclaimerAs a service to authors and researchers we are providing this version of an accepted manuscript (AM). Copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proofs will be undertaken on this manuscript before final publication of the Version of Record (VoR). During production and pre-press, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal relate to these versions also. Declaration of competing interestThe authors declare no conflict of interest.AcknowledgementsWe thank the Karnataka Forest Department for providing the necessary permissions","PeriodicalId":49691,"journal":{"name":"Plant Ecology & Diversity","volume":"56 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135272072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.1080/17550874.2023.2274839
Anna Ferretto, Pete Smith, David Robert Genney, Robin Matthews, Mostafa Hadizadeh, Rob Brooker
ABSTRACTBackground Species distribution models (SDMs) have been widely used to predict species ranges and their future distribution under climate change scenarios, mostly using only climatic variables. An important factor that is usually neglected, is the habitat of the species that are being modelled. Even when included, it is often considered a fixed factor, but in reality, it is also subjected to changes.Aims In this study, we assessed if this omission can lead to different projected distributions of the species.Methods For this purpose, we applied an ensemble of SDMs, and we projected the distribution of rare bryophyte species in Scotland in the 2050s. Bryophytes are generally very climate-reliant and lend themselves to bioclimatic studies, and we selected species different grades of affinity with blanket bogs, which are threatened by climate change. Blanket bog extension was included in the model as an explanatory variable, and the models were run for three 2050s scenarios: once with the current blanket bog distribution and twice using the blanket bog distribution derived from two bioclimatic models (Lindsay modified and Blanket Bog Tree model), under the same climate change projections.Results The results showed some differences in the predicted future distribution of those species with a strong relationship with blanket bogs, when habitat changes were accounted for. For example, Sphagnum majus, the species with the highest affinity with blanket bog in our study, was not predicted to change its future distribution when blanket bog is held constant at the current level, but was predicted to lose up to 60% of its current suitable area when the projected loss of blanket bog is included.Conclusion Our results suggest that adding future habitat changes could improve the reliability of SDMs in the first steps of planning for conservation and restoration.KEYWORDS: Blanket bogbryophytesclimate changespecies distribution modelsensembleDisclaimerAs a service to authors and researchers we are providing this version of an accepted manuscript (AM). Copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proofs will be undertaken on this manuscript before final publication of the Version of Record (VoR). During production and pre-press, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal relate to these versions also. AcknowledgementsWe thank Andrew Coupar for his help in defining the list of bryophyte species for the study, Astley Hastings and the ADVENT project for providing the Land Cover Map and Christopher Ellis for his technical advice with Maxent. We also thank the many anonymous reviewers who have contributed to greatly improving the manuscript from its first version to this final one. This work was supported by a Studentship from the Macaulay Development Trust (Grant Number: E000646-507 00).Declaration of InterestsThe authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or p
{"title":"Modelling the future distribution of rare bryophytes in Scotland: the importance of the inclusion of habitat loss","authors":"Anna Ferretto, Pete Smith, David Robert Genney, Robin Matthews, Mostafa Hadizadeh, Rob Brooker","doi":"10.1080/17550874.2023.2274839","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2023.2274839","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTBackground Species distribution models (SDMs) have been widely used to predict species ranges and their future distribution under climate change scenarios, mostly using only climatic variables. An important factor that is usually neglected, is the habitat of the species that are being modelled. Even when included, it is often considered a fixed factor, but in reality, it is also subjected to changes.Aims In this study, we assessed if this omission can lead to different projected distributions of the species.Methods For this purpose, we applied an ensemble of SDMs, and we projected the distribution of rare bryophyte species in Scotland in the 2050s. Bryophytes are generally very climate-reliant and lend themselves to bioclimatic studies, and we selected species different grades of affinity with blanket bogs, which are threatened by climate change. Blanket bog extension was included in the model as an explanatory variable, and the models were run for three 2050s scenarios: once with the current blanket bog distribution and twice using the blanket bog distribution derived from two bioclimatic models (Lindsay modified and Blanket Bog Tree model), under the same climate change projections.Results The results showed some differences in the predicted future distribution of those species with a strong relationship with blanket bogs, when habitat changes were accounted for. For example, Sphagnum majus, the species with the highest affinity with blanket bog in our study, was not predicted to change its future distribution when blanket bog is held constant at the current level, but was predicted to lose up to 60% of its current suitable area when the projected loss of blanket bog is included.Conclusion Our results suggest that adding future habitat changes could improve the reliability of SDMs in the first steps of planning for conservation and restoration.KEYWORDS: Blanket bogbryophytesclimate changespecies distribution modelsensembleDisclaimerAs a service to authors and researchers we are providing this version of an accepted manuscript (AM). Copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proofs will be undertaken on this manuscript before final publication of the Version of Record (VoR). During production and pre-press, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal relate to these versions also. AcknowledgementsWe thank Andrew Coupar for his help in defining the list of bryophyte species for the study, Astley Hastings and the ADVENT project for providing the Land Cover Map and Christopher Ellis for his technical advice with Maxent. We also thank the many anonymous reviewers who have contributed to greatly improving the manuscript from its first version to this final one. This work was supported by a Studentship from the Macaulay Development Trust (Grant Number: E000646-507 00).Declaration of InterestsThe authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or p","PeriodicalId":49691,"journal":{"name":"Plant Ecology & Diversity","volume":"33 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135272693","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-17DOI: 10.1080/17550874.2023.2270992
Karl J. Duffy
ABSTRACTBackground The relative influence of both conspecific and heterospecific plant density on the fecundity of generalist rewardless plants is unclear.Aims To test whether distance from both conspecific and heterospecific plants influence pollen removal, deposition, and fruit set in the nectarless orchid, Dactylorhiza sambucina that co-flowers with the rewarding Ranunculus apenninus.Methods I experimentally translocated D. sambucina inflorescences and measured pollen removal and deposition rates. I measured plant height and distance to D. sambucina and R. apenninus plants in 30 D. sambucina patches of varying density. I quantified the proportion of pollen removed, pollinia deposited, and fruit set and tested whether these vary according to plant height and distance to both D. sambucina and R. apenninus.Results Translocated inflorescences outside the population had a higher proportion of pollen removal than control plants within the population, while pollinia deposition rates did not differ. Increased D. sambucina height increased pollen removal rates, while increasing distance from R. apenninus resulted in both increased pollen deposition and fruit set.Conclusion Pollination and fecundity of a nectarless orchid may increase with increasing distance from rewarding heterospecifics. This study improves our understanding of how the fecundity of rewardless plants is influenced by co-flowering plants.KEYWORDS: Fecunditynearest neighbour distancepollinationplant fitnessspatial aggregationDisclaimerAs a service to authors and researchers we are providing this version of an accepted manuscript (AM). Copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proofs will be undertaken on this manuscript before final publication of the Version of Record (VoR). During production and pre-press, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal relate to these versions also. AcknowledgementsI am grateful to Nona Mellaerts for invaluable assistance with field work and Giampiero Ciaschetti for advice in the field. This work was funded by a Starting Investigator Research Grant (Programma STAR) from the University of Naples Federico II and Compagnia San Paolo.I thank an anonymous reviewer and Richard Abbott for their thoughtful comments on the manuscript.Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the Programma STAR .
{"title":"Influence of distance from conspecific and heterospecific co-flowering plants on pollination and fecundity in the nectarless orchid <i>dactylorhiza sambucina</i>","authors":"Karl J. Duffy","doi":"10.1080/17550874.2023.2270992","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2023.2270992","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTBackground The relative influence of both conspecific and heterospecific plant density on the fecundity of generalist rewardless plants is unclear.Aims To test whether distance from both conspecific and heterospecific plants influence pollen removal, deposition, and fruit set in the nectarless orchid, Dactylorhiza sambucina that co-flowers with the rewarding Ranunculus apenninus.Methods I experimentally translocated D. sambucina inflorescences and measured pollen removal and deposition rates. I measured plant height and distance to D. sambucina and R. apenninus plants in 30 D. sambucina patches of varying density. I quantified the proportion of pollen removed, pollinia deposited, and fruit set and tested whether these vary according to plant height and distance to both D. sambucina and R. apenninus.Results Translocated inflorescences outside the population had a higher proportion of pollen removal than control plants within the population, while pollinia deposition rates did not differ. Increased D. sambucina height increased pollen removal rates, while increasing distance from R. apenninus resulted in both increased pollen deposition and fruit set.Conclusion Pollination and fecundity of a nectarless orchid may increase with increasing distance from rewarding heterospecifics. This study improves our understanding of how the fecundity of rewardless plants is influenced by co-flowering plants.KEYWORDS: Fecunditynearest neighbour distancepollinationplant fitnessspatial aggregationDisclaimerAs a service to authors and researchers we are providing this version of an accepted manuscript (AM). Copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proofs will be undertaken on this manuscript before final publication of the Version of Record (VoR). During production and pre-press, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal relate to these versions also. AcknowledgementsI am grateful to Nona Mellaerts for invaluable assistance with field work and Giampiero Ciaschetti for advice in the field. This work was funded by a Starting Investigator Research Grant (Programma STAR) from the University of Naples Federico II and Compagnia San Paolo.I thank an anonymous reviewer and Richard Abbott for their thoughtful comments on the manuscript.Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the Programma STAR .","PeriodicalId":49691,"journal":{"name":"Plant Ecology & Diversity","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136034532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-28DOI: 10.1080/17550874.2023.2261927
Caio C. C. Missagia, Cassio J. O. Mendes, Maria Alice S. Alves
ABSTRACTBackground Most bromeliad (Bromeliaceae) species have specialised flowers for specific pollinators, establishing a mutualistic relationship. However, other animals may also pollinate bromeliads, though it is logical to assume that specialised flowers are more compatible with one specific group of pollinators.Aims We compared the performance of a hummingbird (Thalurania glaucopis) and a butterfly (Heliconius erato) as pollinators of flowers classified as ornithophilous of the bromeliad Tillandsia stricta (Bromeliaceae).Methods We applied the single visit method with seed counting, and measured corolla tube length of flowers. We also conducted observations on plants to determine the effectiveness of pollination by the hummingbird and the butterfly.Results Both animal species pollinated flowers, although the hummingbird was a more frequent and effective pollinator, resulting in greater seed production. The corolla tube length of T. stricta was a significant predictor of seeds produced per flower following interactions with the hummingbird, but not with the butterfly.Conclusion Our results indicate a more intimate flower – pollinator relationship between T. stricta and the hummingbird than the butterfly in this population of the bromeliad in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.KEYWORDS: Atlantic ForestBrazilBromeliaceaefloral syndromehummingbirdspollinationDisclaimerAs a service to authors and researchers we are providing this version of an accepted manuscript (AM). Copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proofs will be undertaken on this manuscript before final publication of the Version of Record (VoR). During production and pre-press, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal relate to these versions also. AcknowledgementsResearch in Pedra Branca State Park (PEPB: Parque Estadual da Pedra Branca) was authorised by the Rio de Janeiro State Environment Institute (INEA: Instituto Estadual do Ambiente) through permit number 008/2015. The authors thank PEPB for logistical support. They are also grateful to Stephen Ferrari for his review of the English text. The authors also thank the editors (including the subject editor, Richard Abbott) and the anonymous reviewers for the valuable contributions which greatly improved the manuscript. Funding for this study was provided by the Brazilian Coordination for Higher Education Personnel Training (CAPES: Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) by granting C.C.C.M. a doctoral research scholarship and C.J.O.M with a master’s scholarship (this study was financed in part by CAPES—Finance Code 001). The Rio de Janeiro State Research Foundation (FAPERJ: Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro) provided C.C.C.M. with a grant (DSC-10 process E_01/201.955/2017) and supported the research of M.A.S.A. (CNE processes E-26/203191/2015, E-26/202.835/2018, E-26/201126/2022). The Brazilian Nati
【摘要】背景:大多数凤梨科(Bromeliaceae)物种都有专门的花,为特定的传粉者授粉,建立了互惠关系。然而,其他动物也可能为凤梨花授粉,尽管假设特定的花朵与特定的传粉者群体更相容是合乎逻辑的。目的比较蜂鸟(Thalurania glaucopis)和蝴蝶(Heliconius erato)在凤梨科(bromelia Tillandsia stricta)亲鸟花中的传粉性能。方法采用单次访种法,测量花的花冠管长。我们还对植物进行了观察,以确定蜂鸟和蝴蝶授粉的有效性。结果两种动物都授粉,但蜂鸟是更频繁和有效的传粉者,导致更多的种子产量。花冠管长度是与蜂鸟交互作用后单花种子产量的显著预测因子,而与蝴蝶交互作用后无显著预测因子。结论在巴西里约热内卢的凤梨科植物中,与蝴蝶相比,扁蝽与蜂鸟的传粉关系更为密切。关键词:大西洋森林巴西凤梨科花卉综合征蜂鸟授粉免责声明作为对作者和研究人员的服务,我们提供此版本的已接受稿件(AM)。在最终出版版本记录(VoR)之前,将对该手稿进行编辑、排版和审查。在制作和印前,可能会发现可能影响内容的错误,所有适用于期刊的法律免责声明也与这些版本有关。Pedra Branca州立公园(PEPB: Parque Estadual da Pedra Branca)的研究由里约热内卢国家环境研究所(INEA: Instituto Estadual do Ambiente)授权,许可号为008/2015。作者感谢PEPB的后勤支持。他们也感谢Stephen Ferrari对英文文本的审阅。作者还感谢编辑(包括主题编辑Richard Abbott)和匿名审稿人的宝贵贡献,他们极大地改进了手稿。本研究由巴西高等教育人才培训协调机构(CAPES: coordindena<s:1> ode aperfeioamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior)提供资金,授予c.c.c.m博士研究奖学金和C.J.O.M硕士奖学金(本研究部分由CAPES - finance Code 001资助)。里约热内卢国家研究基金会(FAPERJ: funda<s:1> o Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro)向ccc.c.m.提供了一笔赠款(DSC-10流程E_01/201.955/2017),并支持M.A.S.A. (CNE流程E-26/203191/2015, E-26/202.835/2018, E-26/201126/2022)的研究。巴西国家研究委员会(CNPq: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico)为M.A.S.A.提供了研究奖学金(PQ流程305798/2014- 6,306.579 /2018- 9,308615 /2022-0),并得到了里约热内卢州立大学(Prociência, UERJ/FAPERJ)的生产力奖学金的支持。scccm构思了研究并设计了方法;CCCM采集数据;CCCM和CJOM分析数据;CCCM和CJOM主导了稿件的撰写。MASA参与了写作,提供了重要的知识内容和修订,并通过她的研究资助提供了财政支持。所有作者都对初稿做出了重要贡献,并最终批准发表。利益声明通讯作者确认本研究不存在任何类型的利益冲突。数据存档声明数据发布在Zenodo知识库(DOI: 10.5281/ Zenodo .6299296)中,禁制期为一年(直到2023年12月31日)。图1所示。凤梨科凤梨花(Tillandsia stricta)花序,可供游客观赏的花(紫色)。照片:XXX。显示完整尺寸图2巴西里约热内卢佩德拉布兰卡州立公园,蜂鸟(Thalurania glaucopis)和蝴蝶(Heliconius erato)对凤梨科凤梨花的花冠管长度的观察。显示完整尺寸图3巴西Pedra Branca州立公园凤梨科花冠管长与蜂鸟(Thalurania glaucopis)相互作用后花冠管长与种子产量的关系显示全尺寸的参考文献。Aizen MA, Harder LD. 2007。扩大花粉限制概念的范围:花粉数量和质量的影响。生态学报,28(2),391 - 391。https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1017 [Crossref] [PubMed] [Web of Science®],[Google Scholar] Almeida JM, Missagia CCC, Alves, MAS。, Jia, Z-Y。2022. 1111 / jofo。[12] [Crossref] [Web Science®],[Google Scholar]。花进化的生态学方面。2亲动物花卉课程。进化,15(1),44-59。https://doi.org/10.2307/2405842 [Crossref] [Web of Science®],[Google Scholar]。[3] [j] [j] [j] [j]; [j] [j]; [j]。费舍尔,耶拿。[Google学术]Vogel S. 2006。花综合症:经验主义与类型学。植物学报,2012(1),5-11。https://doi.org/10.1127/0006-8152/2006/0127-0005 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]王鑫,文敏,钱鑫,裴宁,张东。2020.[链接本文]在一个海洋岛屿群落中,植物被更多的传粉者物种访问,而不是传粉综合征。科学通报,10(1),1 - 12。https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70954-7 [Crossref] [PubMed] [Web of Science®],[Google Scholar] Waser NM, Chittka L, Price MV, Williams NM。欧尔班。1996。强调新思路,促进生态学研究。传粉系统中的泛化及其重要性。生态学报,32(4),344 - 344。10.2307/2265575 [Crossref] [Web of Science®],[Google Scholar] Weinstein BG, Graham CH, Irwin R 2017。热带蜂鸟-植物相互作用中喙和花冠的持续匹配,尽管时间资源发生了变化。生态学报,20(3),326-335。https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12730 [Crossref] [PubMed] [Web of Science®],[Google Scholar]其他信息本研究由Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico支持[PQ # 305798/2014- 6,306.579 /2018- 9,308615 /2022-0];坐标aaperfeiaperoamento de Pessoal de Nível高级[财
{"title":"Performance of pollinators of the tropical bromeliad <i>tillandsia stricta</i> sol. (Bromeliaceae) in the Atlantic Forest, Rio de Janeiro","authors":"Caio C. C. Missagia, Cassio J. O. Mendes, Maria Alice S. Alves","doi":"10.1080/17550874.2023.2261927","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2023.2261927","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTBackground Most bromeliad (Bromeliaceae) species have specialised flowers for specific pollinators, establishing a mutualistic relationship. However, other animals may also pollinate bromeliads, though it is logical to assume that specialised flowers are more compatible with one specific group of pollinators.Aims We compared the performance of a hummingbird (Thalurania glaucopis) and a butterfly (Heliconius erato) as pollinators of flowers classified as ornithophilous of the bromeliad Tillandsia stricta (Bromeliaceae).Methods We applied the single visit method with seed counting, and measured corolla tube length of flowers. We also conducted observations on plants to determine the effectiveness of pollination by the hummingbird and the butterfly.Results Both animal species pollinated flowers, although the hummingbird was a more frequent and effective pollinator, resulting in greater seed production. The corolla tube length of T. stricta was a significant predictor of seeds produced per flower following interactions with the hummingbird, but not with the butterfly.Conclusion Our results indicate a more intimate flower – pollinator relationship between T. stricta and the hummingbird than the butterfly in this population of the bromeliad in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.KEYWORDS: Atlantic ForestBrazilBromeliaceaefloral syndromehummingbirdspollinationDisclaimerAs a service to authors and researchers we are providing this version of an accepted manuscript (AM). Copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proofs will be undertaken on this manuscript before final publication of the Version of Record (VoR). During production and pre-press, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal relate to these versions also. AcknowledgementsResearch in Pedra Branca State Park (PEPB: Parque Estadual da Pedra Branca) was authorised by the Rio de Janeiro State Environment Institute (INEA: Instituto Estadual do Ambiente) through permit number 008/2015. The authors thank PEPB for logistical support. They are also grateful to Stephen Ferrari for his review of the English text. The authors also thank the editors (including the subject editor, Richard Abbott) and the anonymous reviewers for the valuable contributions which greatly improved the manuscript. Funding for this study was provided by the Brazilian Coordination for Higher Education Personnel Training (CAPES: Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) by granting C.C.C.M. a doctoral research scholarship and C.J.O.M with a master’s scholarship (this study was financed in part by CAPES—Finance Code 001). The Rio de Janeiro State Research Foundation (FAPERJ: Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro) provided C.C.C.M. with a grant (DSC-10 process E_01/201.955/2017) and supported the research of M.A.S.A. (CNE processes E-26/203191/2015, E-26/202.835/2018, E-26/201126/2022). The Brazilian Nati","PeriodicalId":49691,"journal":{"name":"Plant Ecology & Diversity","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135386849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-19DOI: 10.1080/17550874.2023.2255999
Aboli Kulkarni, Rohan Shetti, Bhushan K. Shigwan, Smrithy Vijayan, Mandar N. Datar
ABSTRACTBackground Rock outcrops support specialist plant communities that are often adapted to highly seasonal climates and heterogeneous soil cover. However, the relationship between environmental parameters and plant functional types remains unexplored in many regions of the world, including the Northern Western Ghats (NWG) in India.Aims In the present work, we aimed to characterise the vegetation of high and low elevation rock outcrops in the NWG, and investigate the relationship between plant functional types and environmental variables.Methods Vegetation surveys were conducted on 16 high elevation and 14 low elevation sites using a transect and quadrat method. Floristic data were used to calculate plant diversity and plant functional type abundance. The relationship between vegetation and climatic (temperature, precipitation) and soil (soil carbon and nitrogen) variables was explored using cluster and ordination analysis.Results Rock outcrop sites were grouped into two clusters based on elevation, distance from the sea and mean diurnal range. Plant functional type abundance was related to macro-environmental variables such as temperature, precipitation and soil nutrients such as carbon and nitrogen.Conclusions We inferred that the distribution and dominance of different plant functional types in the NWG are related to primarily by elevation (a proxy for temperature) and distance from the sea.Key policy highlightsVegetation of the NWG rock outcrops differ significantly based on elevation.Precipitation, temperature variables and distance from the sea are the key parameters associating with the difference in vegetation across elevation.Since vegetation on rock outcrops differs across elevations; it is essential to protect the outcrops at high as well as low elevations across the entire NWG.KEYWORDS: Indian rock outcropsvegetation-environment relationshipdiurnal rangeplant functional typeephemeral vegetationDisclaimerAs a service to authors and researchers we are providing this version of an accepted manuscript (AM). Copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proofs will be undertaken on this manuscript before final publication of the Version of Record (VoR). During production and pre-press, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal relate to these versions also. AcknowledgmentsAK, BS, SV and MND are thankful to the Director, Agharkar Research Institute, Pune for facilities and encouragement. The authors thank Dr. Aparna Watve and Dr. Karthick Balasubramanian for critical discussions. AK would like to thank Dr. Girish Kulkarni and Dr. Sameer Padhye for solving some doubts related to R.Disclosure statementNo potential competing interest was reported by the authorData availability statementThe authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary materials.Supplementary materialSupplemental data for th
岩石露头支持特殊的植物群落,这些植物群落通常适应高度季节性的气候和异质性的土壤覆盖。然而,在世界上许多地区,包括印度的西北高止山脉(NWG),环境参数与植物功能类型之间的关系仍未被探索。目的研究西北高原高、低海拔岩石露头植被特征,探讨植物功能类型与环境变量之间的关系。方法采用样带样方法对16个高海拔点和14个低海拔点进行植被调查。植物区系数据用于计算植物多样性和植物功能类型丰度。利用聚类和排序分析方法探讨了植被与气候(温度、降水)和土壤(土壤碳氮)变量之间的关系。结果根据海拔高度、离海距离和平均日差将露头地点分为两类。植物功能类型丰度与温度、降水等宏观环境变量和土壤碳、氮等养分有关。结论NWG不同植物功能类型的分布和优势度主要与海拔(代替温度)和离海距离有关。NWG岩石露头的植被因海拔而有显著差异。降水、温度变量和离海距离是影响海拔植被差异的关键参数。因为不同海拔的岩石露头上的植被不同;必须保护整个西北大陆架高海拔和低海拔地区的露头。关键词:印度岩石露头植被-环境关系日变化范围植物功能类型短暂植被免责声明作为对作者和研究人员的服务,我们提供此版本的接受手稿(AM)。在最终出版版本记录(VoR)之前,将对该手稿进行编辑、排版和审查。在制作和印前,可能会发现可能影响内容的错误,所有适用于期刊的法律免责声明也与这些版本有关。感谢ak、BS、SV和MND感谢浦那Agharkar研究所所长提供的便利和鼓励。作者感谢Aparna Watve博士和Karthick Balasubramanian博士的批判性讨论。AK感谢Girish Kulkarni博士和Sameer Padhye博士解决了与r有关的一些疑问。披露声明作者未报告潜在的竞争利益。数据可得性声明作者确认,在文章及其补充材料中可以获得支持本研究结果的数据。补充材料本文的补充数据可以在https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2023.2255999Figure上在线访问1印度西北高止山脉的研究区域,显示了目前工作中采样的岩石露头地点。图2取样设计为本研究采用的样条加样方法。采用1 m × 1 m样方(绿色)嵌套在5 m × 5 m样方的边角处,嵌套在20 m × 20 m样方内,采集植被数据。图3使用Sørensen不相似度指数对所有站点基于物种发生的聚类树状图(见表S2)。蓝色标记的地点:低海拔露头(海拔0-250米);图4基于研究地点植物功能类型丰度的非度量多维标度(NMDS)(应力=0.09)。蓝色标记的地点:低海拔露头(海拔0-250米);图5环境变量与植物功能类型的典型对应分析(CCA)(见表2)。蓝色标记的地点:低海拔露头(0-250m a.s.l);橙色:高海拔露头(海拔高度600-1500米)。功能类型用绿色标记,环境变量用黑色标记。TempAnnRange:温度年变化范围AnnPreci:年降水,MnDiurRange:平均日变化范围,PreciWettestQuar:最湿季降水,AnnMnTemp:年平均温度,TempSeason:温度季节性,DistSea:与海洋的距离。印度政府科学和工业研究理事会向SV和马哈拉施特拉邦SARTHI向BS提供部分资金支持。关于贡献者的说明aboli kulkarni (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4495-977X)博士研究了西高止山脉的岩石露头。 在此期间,她研究了植被多样性、分布及其与环境的关系。罗汉·谢蒂(https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2967-0193)is)植物生态学和气候变化领域的博士后研究科学家,他的大部分研究集中在了解亚北极、高山和热带地区的植被模式变化与当代气候变暖的关系。Bhushan K. shigwan (https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8657-7502)是一位植物分类学家和生态学家,对西高止山脉的森林生态、多样性、破碎化和分布感兴趣。Smrithy VijayanSmrithyVijayan(https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4697-2641)是一名生态学学生,对悬崖和露头植被及其生态功能特别感兴趣。Mandar N. Datar (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4437-7796)是一位对西高止山脉开花植物的多样性、分布和特有感兴趣的分类学家和生态学家。
{"title":"The relationship between vegetation, plant functional diversity and environment on rock outcrops in the Western Ghats, India","authors":"Aboli Kulkarni, Rohan Shetti, Bhushan K. Shigwan, Smrithy Vijayan, Mandar N. Datar","doi":"10.1080/17550874.2023.2255999","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2023.2255999","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTBackground Rock outcrops support specialist plant communities that are often adapted to highly seasonal climates and heterogeneous soil cover. However, the relationship between environmental parameters and plant functional types remains unexplored in many regions of the world, including the Northern Western Ghats (NWG) in India.Aims In the present work, we aimed to characterise the vegetation of high and low elevation rock outcrops in the NWG, and investigate the relationship between plant functional types and environmental variables.Methods Vegetation surveys were conducted on 16 high elevation and 14 low elevation sites using a transect and quadrat method. Floristic data were used to calculate plant diversity and plant functional type abundance. The relationship between vegetation and climatic (temperature, precipitation) and soil (soil carbon and nitrogen) variables was explored using cluster and ordination analysis.Results Rock outcrop sites were grouped into two clusters based on elevation, distance from the sea and mean diurnal range. Plant functional type abundance was related to macro-environmental variables such as temperature, precipitation and soil nutrients such as carbon and nitrogen.Conclusions We inferred that the distribution and dominance of different plant functional types in the NWG are related to primarily by elevation (a proxy for temperature) and distance from the sea.Key policy highlightsVegetation of the NWG rock outcrops differ significantly based on elevation.Precipitation, temperature variables and distance from the sea are the key parameters associating with the difference in vegetation across elevation.Since vegetation on rock outcrops differs across elevations; it is essential to protect the outcrops at high as well as low elevations across the entire NWG.KEYWORDS: Indian rock outcropsvegetation-environment relationshipdiurnal rangeplant functional typeephemeral vegetationDisclaimerAs a service to authors and researchers we are providing this version of an accepted manuscript (AM). Copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proofs will be undertaken on this manuscript before final publication of the Version of Record (VoR). During production and pre-press, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal relate to these versions also. AcknowledgmentsAK, BS, SV and MND are thankful to the Director, Agharkar Research Institute, Pune for facilities and encouragement. The authors thank Dr. Aparna Watve and Dr. Karthick Balasubramanian for critical discussions. AK would like to thank Dr. Girish Kulkarni and Dr. Sameer Padhye for solving some doubts related to R.Disclosure statementNo potential competing interest was reported by the authorData availability statementThe authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary materials.Supplementary materialSupplemental data for th","PeriodicalId":49691,"journal":{"name":"Plant Ecology & Diversity","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135059823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-16DOI: 10.1080/17550874.2023.2255985
Alexander Rudov, Laura de la Puente, Sara Palacio, Arash Sharifi, José Ignacio Querejeta, Juan Pedro Ferrio, Hossein Rahmaninia, Hossein Akhani
ABSTRACTBackground Xerophilic subshrubs exhibit multiple functional types and frequently show hydrological niche segregation. In the poorly studied Irano-Turanian gypsum deserts, knowledge of the ecohydrological strategies of different plant species is essential to understand community complexity in these vulnerable ecosystems.Aim We studied the ecohydrological strategies of five co-existing subshrub members of Caryophyllales, ascertaining if their rooting architecture, gypsum affinity or photosynthetic pathway determined their water uptake, and if gypsum crystallisation water could be a relevant water source for plants in different seasons.Methods We conducted soil and xylem sampling for isotope analyses in spring and summer and extracted water by cryogenic vacuum distillation. Oxygen and hydrogen isotope compositions were determined and compared with visual representation and Bayesian Mixing Models to determine species ecohydrological strategies.Results Species – season interactions were related to differences in xylem sap isotopic composition. Three basic strategies relying on contrasting the use of free topsoil moisture and deep soil water could be detected and were in part explained by rooting architecture. Plant gypsum affinity and photosynthetic pathways did not have a significant effect on the water sources used by the plants.Conclusions Ecohydrological niche segregation was explained partly by rooting architecture and species-specific traits. Gypsum crystallisation water was not used in summer by the studied species.KEYWORDS: Caryophyllalesdesert subshrubsgypsumIranniche segregationstable isotopeswater use AcknowledgmentsThis paper is in part the result of postdoctoral studies of AR and AS in the Halophytes and C4 Plants Research Laboratory, University of Tehran. The authors would like to express their gratitude to Maryam Malekmohammadi (Halophytes and C4 Plants Research Laboratory, University of Tehran) for her participation in fieldwork. Finally, the authors would like to thank three anonymous reviewers and the editor for their immense help and precious feedback to improve this manuscriptDisclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Author contributionsHA and SP designed the study; AS, HA, AR, IQ, HR and SP performed fieldwork; AR ran water extractions with contributions from IQ, LP and PF; LP and PF analysed data; HR performed the soil gypsum content analysis; LP and AR led manuscript writing with contributions from all authors.Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2023.2255985Additional informationFundingThe study was supported by grants from the Research Council and International Office, University of Tehran, the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Project H2020-MSCA-RISE-GYPWORLD GA No. 777803), the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN, PID2019-111159GB-C31), and the Spanish
【摘要】背景喜旱亚灌木具有多种功能类型,并经常出现水文生态位分离。在研究较少的伊朗-图兰石膏沙漠中,了解不同植物物种的生态水文策略对于了解这些脆弱生态系统中的群落复杂性至关重要。目的研究5种石竹属亚灌丛植物的生态水文策略,确定它们的根系结构、石膏亲和力或光合途径是否决定了它们的吸水性,以及石膏结晶水是否可能是不同季节植物的相关水源。方法春季和夏季采集土壤和木质部样品进行同位素分析,采用低温真空蒸馏法提取水分。测定氧和氢同位素组成,并与视觉表示和贝叶斯混合模型进行比较,以确定物种生态水文策略。结果种季交互作用与木质部汁液同位素组成差异有关。通过对比表层土壤水分和深层土壤水分的利用,可以检测到三种基本策略,并在一定程度上解释了生根结构。植物石膏亲和力和光合途径对植物对水源的利用没有显著影响。结论根构型和种特异性状可部分解释生态水文位分离。石膏结晶水在夏季不被研究物种使用。本文是德黑兰大学盐生植物和C4植物研究实验室博士后研究AR和AS的部分成果。作者要感谢Maryam Malekmohammadi(德黑兰大学盐生植物和C4植物研究实验室)参与实地工作。最后,作者要感谢三位匿名审稿人和编辑为改进本文提供的巨大帮助和宝贵反馈。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。作者贡献sha和SP设计了本研究;AS, HA, AR, IQ, HR和SP进行了现场工作;IQ、LP和PF贡献的AR水提物;LP和PF分析数据;HR进行土壤石膏含量分析;LP和AR领导手稿写作与所有作者的贡献。本研究得到了研究委员会和国际办公室,德黑兰大学,欧盟地平线2020研究和创新计划(项目H2020-MSCA-RISE-GYPWORLD GA No. 777803),西班牙科学和创新部(MICINN, PID2019-111159GB-C31)的资助。和西班牙研究委员会(CSIC, I-COOPB20231)。中科院博士后由国家精英基金会设立。LdP和SP分别获得了西班牙Gobierno de Aragón的FSE (Fondo Social Europeo) -Aragón2014-2020和MICINN (RyC fellowship RyC -2013-14164)的资助。JPF得到了参考小组H09_20R (Gobierno de Aragón,西班牙)的支持。
{"title":"Ecohydrological niche segregation among desert shrubs in a gypsum-calcareous formation, north-western Iran","authors":"Alexander Rudov, Laura de la Puente, Sara Palacio, Arash Sharifi, José Ignacio Querejeta, Juan Pedro Ferrio, Hossein Rahmaninia, Hossein Akhani","doi":"10.1080/17550874.2023.2255985","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2023.2255985","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTBackground Xerophilic subshrubs exhibit multiple functional types and frequently show hydrological niche segregation. In the poorly studied Irano-Turanian gypsum deserts, knowledge of the ecohydrological strategies of different plant species is essential to understand community complexity in these vulnerable ecosystems.Aim We studied the ecohydrological strategies of five co-existing subshrub members of Caryophyllales, ascertaining if their rooting architecture, gypsum affinity or photosynthetic pathway determined their water uptake, and if gypsum crystallisation water could be a relevant water source for plants in different seasons.Methods We conducted soil and xylem sampling for isotope analyses in spring and summer and extracted water by cryogenic vacuum distillation. Oxygen and hydrogen isotope compositions were determined and compared with visual representation and Bayesian Mixing Models to determine species ecohydrological strategies.Results Species – season interactions were related to differences in xylem sap isotopic composition. Three basic strategies relying on contrasting the use of free topsoil moisture and deep soil water could be detected and were in part explained by rooting architecture. Plant gypsum affinity and photosynthetic pathways did not have a significant effect on the water sources used by the plants.Conclusions Ecohydrological niche segregation was explained partly by rooting architecture and species-specific traits. Gypsum crystallisation water was not used in summer by the studied species.KEYWORDS: Caryophyllalesdesert subshrubsgypsumIranniche segregationstable isotopeswater use AcknowledgmentsThis paper is in part the result of postdoctoral studies of AR and AS in the Halophytes and C4 Plants Research Laboratory, University of Tehran. The authors would like to express their gratitude to Maryam Malekmohammadi (Halophytes and C4 Plants Research Laboratory, University of Tehran) for her participation in fieldwork. Finally, the authors would like to thank three anonymous reviewers and the editor for their immense help and precious feedback to improve this manuscriptDisclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Author contributionsHA and SP designed the study; AS, HA, AR, IQ, HR and SP performed fieldwork; AR ran water extractions with contributions from IQ, LP and PF; LP and PF analysed data; HR performed the soil gypsum content analysis; LP and AR led manuscript writing with contributions from all authors.Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2023.2255985Additional informationFundingThe study was supported by grants from the Research Council and International Office, University of Tehran, the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Project H2020-MSCA-RISE-GYPWORLD GA No. 777803), the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN, PID2019-111159GB-C31), and the Spanish ","PeriodicalId":49691,"journal":{"name":"Plant Ecology & Diversity","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135306787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-31eCollection Date: 2024-03-01DOI: 10.1002/wjo2.95
Meleeka Akbarpour, Karen Tawk, Madelyn Frank, Alizah S Gomez, Navid Mostaghni, Mehdi Abouzari
Objective: To assess and characterize online ratings and comments on laryngologists and determine factors that correlate with higher ratings.
Methods: All the American Laryngological Association (ALA) members were queried across several online platforms. Ratings were normalized for comparison on a five-point Likert scale. Ratings were categorized based on context and for positive/negative aspects.
Results: Of the 331 ALA members, 256 (77%) were rated on at least one online platform. Across all platforms, the average overall rating was 4.39 ± 0.61 (range: 1.00-5.00). Specific positive ratings including "bedside manners," "diagnostic accuracy," "adequate time spent with patient," "appropriate follow-up," and "physician timeliness" had significant positive correlations to overall ratings, by Pearson's correlation (P < 0.001). Long wait times had significant negative correlations to overall ratings (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Online ratings and comments for laryngologists are significantly influenced by patient perceptions of bedside manner, physician competence, and time spent with the patient.
目的评估有关喉科专家的在线评分和评论,并确定与较高评分相关的因素:通过多个在线平台对美国喉科学协会(ALA)的所有会员进行了调查。对评分进行了标准化处理,以利克特五点量表进行比较。评分根据背景和积极/消极方面进行分类:在 331 名 ALA 会员中,有 256 人(77%)至少在一个在线平台上获得了评分。在所有平台上,平均总体评分为 4.39 ± 0.61(范围:1.00-5.00)。根据皮尔逊相关性,"床边礼仪"、"诊断准确性"、"与患者相处时间充足"、"适当的随访 "和 "医生的及时性 "等具体的正面评分与总体评分有显著的正相关性(P P 结论:患者对喉科医生的床边态度、医生能力和与患者共处时间的看法会对在线评分和评论产生重大影响。
{"title":"Assessment of laryngologists' ratings on physician review websites.","authors":"Meleeka Akbarpour, Karen Tawk, Madelyn Frank, Alizah S Gomez, Navid Mostaghni, Mehdi Abouzari","doi":"10.1002/wjo2.95","DOIUrl":"10.1002/wjo2.95","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess and characterize online ratings and comments on laryngologists and determine factors that correlate with higher ratings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All the American Laryngological Association (ALA) members were queried across several online platforms. Ratings were normalized for comparison on a five-point Likert scale. Ratings were categorized based on context and for positive/negative aspects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 331 ALA members, 256 (77%) were rated on at least one online platform. Across all platforms, the average overall rating was 4.39 ± 0.61 (range: 1.00-5.00). Specific positive ratings including \"bedside manners,\" \"diagnostic accuracy,\" \"adequate time spent with patient,\" \"appropriate follow-up,\" and \"physician timeliness\" had significant positive correlations to overall ratings, by Pearson's correlation (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Long wait times had significant negative correlations to overall ratings (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Online ratings and comments for laryngologists are significantly influenced by patient perceptions of bedside manner, physician competence, and time spent with the patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":49691,"journal":{"name":"Plant Ecology & Diversity","volume":"2 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10979035/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82375692","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-05DOI: 10.1080/17550874.2022.2155079
Andreu Cera, G. Montserrat-Martí, A. Luzuriaga, Y. Pueyo, S. Palacio
ABSTRACT Background Plants growing on extreme soils have mainly been described in relation to their adaptations to edaphic conditions, although herbivores may also be an important factor in these ecosystems. Gypsum soils occur in drylands often where livestock practices occur. However, it is unknown whether plant traits related to gypsum soil constraints are associated with resistance to herbivory. Aims In order to assess whether gypsum specialist species might be favoured at higher grazing levels and to detect the traits involved, we evaluated the responses of gypsum specialists vs. generalists to three intensities of livestock pressure. Methods We analysed the relative cover shifts of species along a livestock gradient, and variation in canopy height, canopy area, leaf carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and sulphur (S), specific leaf area (SLA) and leaf dry matter content (LDMC). Results We found that gypsum-specialists responded by increasing or maintaining their cover at medium and high grazing pressure, whereas most generalists responded by decreasing it. Gypsum-specialists showed higher leaf S than generalists, regardless of grazing intensity. All species showed similar patterns for traits linked to loss of above-ground biomass when grazing increased. Conclusions Plant affinity to gypsum soils mediates vulnerability to grazing with foliar S possibly being a defence trait.
{"title":"Plant affinity to extreme soils and foliar sulphur mediate species-specific responses to sheep grazing in gypsum systems","authors":"Andreu Cera, G. Montserrat-Martí, A. Luzuriaga, Y. Pueyo, S. Palacio","doi":"10.1080/17550874.2022.2155079","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2022.2155079","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Plants growing on extreme soils have mainly been described in relation to their adaptations to edaphic conditions, although herbivores may also be an important factor in these ecosystems. Gypsum soils occur in drylands often where livestock practices occur. However, it is unknown whether plant traits related to gypsum soil constraints are associated with resistance to herbivory. Aims In order to assess whether gypsum specialist species might be favoured at higher grazing levels and to detect the traits involved, we evaluated the responses of gypsum specialists vs. generalists to three intensities of livestock pressure. Methods We analysed the relative cover shifts of species along a livestock gradient, and variation in canopy height, canopy area, leaf carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and sulphur (S), specific leaf area (SLA) and leaf dry matter content (LDMC). Results We found that gypsum-specialists responded by increasing or maintaining their cover at medium and high grazing pressure, whereas most generalists responded by decreasing it. Gypsum-specialists showed higher leaf S than generalists, regardless of grazing intensity. All species showed similar patterns for traits linked to loss of above-ground biomass when grazing increased. Conclusions Plant affinity to gypsum soils mediates vulnerability to grazing with foliar S possibly being a defence trait.","PeriodicalId":49691,"journal":{"name":"Plant Ecology & Diversity","volume":"15 1","pages":"253 - 263"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43553251","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-05DOI: 10.1080/17550874.2022.2164703
F. Picó, R. Abbott, L. Llambí, N. Rajakaruna, Alexander S. T. Papadopulos, L. Nagy
ABSTRACT In plant ecology, extreme environments are those that pose physiological or other limitations to plant growth, especially for non-adapted taxa. In these environments, the severity of climate conditions and/or the limitations imposed by particular soil substrates represent major selective pressures for plants, leading to the evolution of a wide array of functional traits, specific strategies and adapted taxa. In this special issue, we present a collection of papers that focuses on plants in various extreme environments, including the Arctic and Antarctic, regions with serpentine and gypsum soils, high mountain areas and deserts. The papers include a broad array of methods to study the ecology and evolution of plants in extreme environments, such as field surveys, greenhouse and field experiments, molecular phylogenetic analyses and/or physiological measurements. Overall, this special issue showcases research on how plants thrive in extreme environments which, in turn, may provide pointers to how plant communities might respond to living in increasingly challenging environments resulting from unprecedented land-use changes and climate warming at the present time and in the future.
{"title":"Introduction to special issue: the ecology and evolution of plants in extreme environments","authors":"F. Picó, R. Abbott, L. Llambí, N. Rajakaruna, Alexander S. T. Papadopulos, L. Nagy","doi":"10.1080/17550874.2022.2164703","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2022.2164703","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In plant ecology, extreme environments are those that pose physiological or other limitations to plant growth, especially for non-adapted taxa. In these environments, the severity of climate conditions and/or the limitations imposed by particular soil substrates represent major selective pressures for plants, leading to the evolution of a wide array of functional traits, specific strategies and adapted taxa. In this special issue, we present a collection of papers that focuses on plants in various extreme environments, including the Arctic and Antarctic, regions with serpentine and gypsum soils, high mountain areas and deserts. The papers include a broad array of methods to study the ecology and evolution of plants in extreme environments, such as field surveys, greenhouse and field experiments, molecular phylogenetic analyses and/or physiological measurements. Overall, this special issue showcases research on how plants thrive in extreme environments which, in turn, may provide pointers to how plant communities might respond to living in increasingly challenging environments resulting from unprecedented land-use changes and climate warming at the present time and in the future.","PeriodicalId":49691,"journal":{"name":"Plant Ecology & Diversity","volume":"15 1","pages":"179 - 182"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47049174","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-05DOI: 10.1080/17550874.2022.2160673
Thomas J. Samojedny, Claudia Garnica-Díaz, Dena L. Grossenbacher, G. Adamidis, P. Dimitrakopoulos, S. Siebert, M. Spasojevic, C. Hulshof, N. Rajakaruna
ABSTRACT Background Specific leaf area (SLA) is a core trait within the leaf economic spectrum that describes differences in plant performance and productivity. Research on the sources of variation in the leaf economic spectrum and SLA has primarily focused on climate. Much less is known about SLA variation across unusual edaphic environments, such as on ultramafic soils. Aims To determine the role of ultramafic soils as a driver of SLA variation. Methods We measured SLA for dominant species on paired ultramafic and non-ultramafic soils in five biogeographically distinct regions around the globe and compared mean SLA values to globally reported values. Results SLA was lower on ultramafic than on non-ultramafic soils in all regions, except Puerto Rico, and both climate and soil were important drivers of SLA. For three of the five regions, SLA values on ultramafic soils were lower than the global average. Conclusions Soils can be a major driver of SLA along with climate. Low SLA on ultramafic soil points to selection for stress resistance strategies. Furthermore, in some bioregions, SLA values on ultramafic soils were among the lowest on the planet and thus represent globally rare phenotypes that should be conserved within these unique edaphic habitats.
{"title":"Specific leaf area is lower on ultramafic than on neighbouring non-ultramafic soils","authors":"Thomas J. Samojedny, Claudia Garnica-Díaz, Dena L. Grossenbacher, G. Adamidis, P. Dimitrakopoulos, S. Siebert, M. Spasojevic, C. Hulshof, N. Rajakaruna","doi":"10.1080/17550874.2022.2160673","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2022.2160673","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Specific leaf area (SLA) is a core trait within the leaf economic spectrum that describes differences in plant performance and productivity. Research on the sources of variation in the leaf economic spectrum and SLA has primarily focused on climate. Much less is known about SLA variation across unusual edaphic environments, such as on ultramafic soils. Aims To determine the role of ultramafic soils as a driver of SLA variation. Methods We measured SLA for dominant species on paired ultramafic and non-ultramafic soils in five biogeographically distinct regions around the globe and compared mean SLA values to globally reported values. Results SLA was lower on ultramafic than on non-ultramafic soils in all regions, except Puerto Rico, and both climate and soil were important drivers of SLA. For three of the five regions, SLA values on ultramafic soils were lower than the global average. Conclusions Soils can be a major driver of SLA along with climate. Low SLA on ultramafic soil points to selection for stress resistance strategies. Furthermore, in some bioregions, SLA values on ultramafic soils were among the lowest on the planet and thus represent globally rare phenotypes that should be conserved within these unique edaphic habitats.","PeriodicalId":49691,"journal":{"name":"Plant Ecology & Diversity","volume":"15 1","pages":"243 - 252"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45497462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}