Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques最新文献

Backgrounds: In the renal intrarenal stone surgery (RIRS) procedure, ureteral access sheath (UAS) is still used in the majority of surgeries to both protect the flexible ureteroscope (FURS) and reduce intrarenal pressure. ClearPETRA is a new UAS that has an integrated aspiration port. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and effectiveness of Aspiration-Assisted UAS (ClearPETRA) in the RIRS procedure. Methods: One thousand six hundred twenty patients who underwent RIRS between January 2021 and January 2024 were evaluated retrospectively and 512 patients were included in the study. According to stone size, patients with stones less than 2 cm and those with stones between 2 and 3 cm were analyzed separately. Patient's demographic data, stone size, body mass index, Extracoporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy (ESWL) history, stone side, stone density (Hounsfield Unit), operation time, stone-free rate (SFR), and the number of patients with sepsis were recorded. SFR was evaluated with kidney urinary bladder 3 months after surgery for opaque calculi. Nonopaque calculi patients were evaluated with noncontrast computed tomography 3 months after surgery. In the postoperative evaluation, patients with stones less than 4 mm were evaluated as SFR. P value of <0.01 was considered statistically significant. Results: Patient's demographic data, stone characteristics, and history of ESWL were similar in the ClearPETRA and UAS groups (P > .05). A total of 328 patients who underwent RIRS for stones less than 2 cm were included (80 ClearPETRA, 248 UAS). Length of hospital stay, operation time, SFR, secondary intervention, or postoperative sepsis (P ≥ .01) were similar in both groups. The incidence of postoperative fever was statistically significantly lower in the ClearPETRA group (P = .006). A total of 184 patients who underwent RIRS for stones between 2 and 3 cm were included (42 ClearPETRA, 142 UAS). In the ClearPETRA group, operation time was statistically significantly shorter (P = .002), SFR was statistically significantly higher (P = .003), and the number of fever and sepsis were statistically significantly less (P = .003 and 0.002, respectively). Conclusion: We found that ClearPETRA reduces the likelihood of postoperative fever after RIRS surgeries. Moreover, we can say that the use of ClearPETRA in RIRS, especially for stones larger than 2 cm, reduces the operation time, increases the SFR, and also reduces sepsis rates.

Background: Benign ovarian lesions in the pediatric population have variable risk of recurrence or development of metachronous lesions, leading to variations in operative approach. Our study compares outcomes with differing surgical approaches to better elucidate risk of recurrent or metachronous lesions, time to development of these lesions, and hospital length of stay to determine if one operative approach has superior outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively examined data from Indiana University Health facilities from 2002 to 2020. Patients ≤18 years old who underwent surgical management of a benign ovarian lesion were included. Patients were categorized as undergoing oophorectomy versus ovarian sparing surgery (OSS), with open and laparoscopic approaches. Significance was defined as P < .05. Results: We identified 127 patients who underwent an open (n = 65) versus laparoscopic (n = 55) surgical approach. Patients undergoing open surgery had a greater mean size of lesion (P = .05) and longer length of stay (P < .01). Complication rates (P = .1), rates of developing a metachronous or recurrent lesion postoperatively (P = .47), and time to formation of additional lesions were similar between groups (P = .25). The incidence of identifying an additional lesion after surgery was 14.2% (n = 18) in the mean time of 29.5 ± 31.6 months [SEM 7.5]. Risk of developing a metachronous lesion was similar regardless of the operative approach. Surgery for recurrent ovarian lesions was rare and occurred in only 1 case. Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgery was performed for smaller lesions and was associated with a shorter length of hospital stay. Laparoscopic and OSS was found to have no increased risk of developing metachronous lesions nor increased reoperative risk compared with traditional open and oophorectomy techniques.

Background: Ureteral polyps are rare benign ureteral tumor. No guideline recommends that open or minimally invasive surgery is best for treating ureteral polyps. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of the minimally invasive techniques currently available for treating ureteral polyps. Materials and Methods: We performed a comprehensive search of articles published in PubMed, using the keywords "ureteral" and "polyp," or "polyps." Results: A total of 275 studies were obtained from the literature search but 96 articles were excluded. Conclusions: Several minimally invasive approaches were developed with the advancement of medical technology, including endoscopic, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches; however, the best surgical technique was yet to be decided. Due to the advantages and disadvantages of these approaches, the best surgical approach should be tailored to each patient's needs and the surgeon's preferences and experience.

Background: It has been shown that surgical residents who took few or no in-house calls during medical school felt less prepared for the residency. In this study, our objective was to assess the impact of in-house calls carried out by medical students on their perceptions of medical training, including the influence on specialty choice. Methods: The students were asked to complete an anonymized questionnaire at the first and last day of their general surgery clerkship. Students were asked regarding importance for medical training and education, preparation for the internship, learning opportunities, skills acquisition; negative effects, including fatigue, negative effect over medical training, personal life, and physical and mental health derangements; and the student's perception of the residents' in-house calls and parameters affecting specialty selection: difficulty of the residency, prestige, and future career opportunities. Results: A total of 42 medical students responded to 84 questionnaires. There was a significant difference in the importance of calls among male students before the beginning of the clerkships compared with the end of the clerkship (4.53 versus 4.21, P = .034). At the end of general surgery clerkship, students indicated that the calls less impaired studying during the clerkship (2.5 versus 2.21, P < .05) compared with the beginning of the clerkship. Female students ranked the calls as less demanding at the end of the clerkship (2.53 versus 2.12, P < .05). The impact of the residency difficulty on the selection of their future specialty was rated higher by the students at the end of the clerkship compared with their expectations at the beginning (3.13 versus 2.85, P = .033). Conclusions: In conclusion, our study demonstrates that in-house calls performed by medical students during their general surgery clerkships have a significant influence on their perceptions of medical training and choice of specialty. The study also highlights the importance of gender differences in the students' perception of the importance and impact of calls on their well-being.

Background: Esophageal diverticula were traditionally treated with open surgery, which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates. Management has shifted to minimally invasive approaches with several advantages. We examine outcomes in patients with esophageal diverticula treated with minimally invasive techniques by a multidisciplinary surgical team at a single center. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed for patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery for esophageal diverticula at our institution from June 2010 to December 2022. Primary outcomes were 30-day morbidity and mortality rates. Secondary outcomes were symptom resolution, length of stay (LOS), readmission, and need for reintervention. Results: A total of 28 patients were identified. Twelve patients had pharyngeal diverticula, 7 patients had midesophageal diverticula, and 9 patients had epiphrenic diverticula. Thirty-day morbidity and readmission rates were 10.7% (3 patients), 1 pharyngeal (sepsis), 1 midesophageal (refractory nausea), and 1 epiphrenic (poor oral intake). There were no esophageal leaks. Average LOS was 2.3 days, with the pharyngeal group experiencing a significantly shorter LOS (1.3 days versus 3.4 days for midesophageal, P < .01 versus 2.8 days for epiphrenic, P < .05). Symptom resolution after initial operation was 78.6%. Reintervention rate was 17.9%, and symptom resolution after reintervention was 100%. There were no mortalities. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that esophageal diverticula can be repaired safely and efficiently when performed by a multidisciplinary team utilizing advanced minimally invasive endoscopic and robotic surgical techniques. We advocate for the management of this rare condition at a high-volume center with extensive experience in foregut surgery.

Introduction: Pectus bar stabilizers are routinely used for bar fixation in the repair of pectus excavatum. We aimed to determine the optimum technique for bar fixation by reviewing our institutional experience with the use of bilateral, unilateral, and no stabilizer placement. Methods: Retrospective single pediatric center review of patients who underwent minimally invasive bar placement for pectus excavatum and subsequent bar removal between December 2001 and July 2019 was performed. Demographic data, details about the surgery, the number of bars and stabilizers used, and follow-up information were collected. Stabilizer-related complications included pain requiring stabilizer removal, surgical site infections (SSIs), and bar displacement. Data are presented as medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs) and frequencies with percentages. Results: A total of 561 patients were included. The cohort was predominantly male (83.1%, n = 466) with a median age at the time of bar placement of 15 years (IQR 12.4, 16.3) and a median Haller index of 3.8 (IQR 3.4, 4.5). Pain attributed to the stabilizer site that required removal was observed only in the bilateral stabilizer group (2.5%, n = 13). SSI related to the stabilizer site occurred in 1.8% (n = 9) of the bilateral stabilizer cases and 2.1% (n = 1) of the unilateral stabilizer cases. Bar displacement was observed in 0.6% (n = 3) of the bilateral stabilizer cases and 2 of those patients also had an SSI. There were no complications in the no stabilizer group. Conclusion: As the trend moves toward unilateral and no stabilizer use, we observe fewer cases of pain requiring stabilizer removal with no increase in bar displacements.

Introduction: Obesity is associated with numerous chronic conditions and an increased risk for surgical complications. Laparoscopic and robotic adrenalectomy have proven effective in the resection of adrenal tumors. This study analyzes the outcomes of severely obese patients (body-mass index [BMI] ≥35 kg/m²) following minimally invasive adrenalectomy. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent minimally invasive adrenalectomy at our institution between 2010 and 2023 was conducted. Two matching analyses were performed. The first analysis compared patients with BMI greater versus lower than 35 kg/m². The second analysis compared outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic adrenalectomy in patients with a BMI ≥35 kg/m². Results: A total of 278 patients were included in the study. The median tumor size was 29 mm. Adrenal tumors had similar laterality, and most were hormonally active (66.2%). The most common pathological diagnosis was pheochromocytoma (25.5%). No statistical difference was found in peri- and postoperative outcomes between patients with BMI ≥35 and <35 kg/m² who underwent minimally invasive adrenalectomy. When the surgical approach was compared in severely obese patients, robotic adrenalectomy was associated with shorter hospital length of stay with similar operative time as the laparoscopic approach. Conclusions: Minimally invasive adrenalectomy is safe and feasible in patients with BMI ≥35 kg/m². Robotic and laparoscopic approaches are both safe and efficient for the resection of adrenal tumors in severely obese patients.

Objective: To investigate the association between psoas muscle mass (PMM) and failure of ureteral access sheath (UAS) insertion and complications from retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Materials and Methods: A multicenter retrospective case-control study was conducted that included patients who underwent RIRS despite failure of UAS insertion (Cohort 1) and confounder-matched control patients who underwent RIRS after successful UAS insertion (Cohort 2). For morphometric analysis of PMM, ipsilateral psoas muscle areas (iPMAs) were measured using the coreslicer.com webkit. After comparing demographic, clinical, and complication rates and iPMAs between cohorts, gender-specific median iPMAs were also determined to further subdivide patients in each cohort as either low iPMAs or high iPMAs. Thereafter, patients were also compared in terms of RIRS complications. Results: Cohort 1 included 86 patients whereas Cohort 2 consisted of 124 matched cases. The median (interquartile range) iPMAs were similar between the cohorts: Cohort 1, 11.05 (6.82-14.44) cm² versus 11.12 (6.97-13.69) cm² for Cohort 2 (P ˃ .05). There was a significant inverse relationship between iPMAs with age (r = -0.222) and Charlson comorbidity index (r = -0.180) for all patients (P ˂ .05). Perioperative and postoperative complication rates were 8.1% and 16.3% for Cohort 1 and 6.5% and 21% for Cohort 2, respectively. The complication rates were not statistically different between patients with high iPMAs and those with low iPMAs, in male or female patients (P > .05). Conclusions: These results show that failure of UAS was not associated with PMM. Furthermore, since the complication rates were similar between patients with high PMM and low PMM, RIRS may be a reliable treatment choice for sarcopenic patients as well as in nonsarcopenic patients.