Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-04-07DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001486
Ruth E Corps, Antje S Meyer
Current theories of speaking suggest that the structure of the lexicon is flexible and changes with exposure. We tested this claim in two experiments that investigated whether the word frequency effect was moderated by item repetition within and across experimental sessions. Participants named high frequency (HF) and low frequency (LF) pictures (Experiment 1) and words (Experiment 2) six times. In both experiments, participants were faster to name HF than LF pictures or words, but this effect was eliminated with repetition. Importantly, this word frequency effect was still absent when participants returned up to 2 weeks later and named old HF and LF pictures, whose names they had produced before, together with new HF and LF pictures, whose names they had not produced. These findings suggest that producing a word multiple times in short succession alters its long-term accessibility, making it easier to produce later. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
目前的说话理论认为,词汇的结构是灵活的,并随着暴露而变化。我们在两个实验中验证了这一说法,这两个实验调查了词频效应是否被实验期间和实验期间的项目重复所缓和。参与者对高频(HF)和低频(LF)图片(实验1)和单词(实验2)分别进行6次命名。在这两个实验中,参与者都比LF更快地说出HF的图片或单词,但这种影响通过重复来消除。重要的是,当参与者在2周后返回并说出他们之前已经说出名字的旧HF和LF图片以及他们没有说出名字的新HF和LF图片时,这种词频效应仍然不存在。这些发现表明,在短时间内多次生成一个单词会改变它的长期可访问性,从而使以后的生成更容易。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Multiple repetitions lead to the long-term elimination of the word frequency effect.","authors":"Ruth E Corps, Antje S Meyer","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001486","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001486","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current theories of speaking suggest that the structure of the lexicon is flexible and changes with exposure. We tested this claim in two experiments that investigated whether the word frequency effect was moderated by item repetition within and across experimental sessions. Participants named high frequency (HF) and low frequency (LF) pictures (Experiment 1) and words (Experiment 2) six times. In both experiments, participants were faster to name HF than LF pictures or words, but this effect was eliminated with repetition. Importantly, this word frequency effect was still absent when participants returned up to 2 weeks later and named old HF and LF pictures, whose names they had produced before, together with new HF and LF pictures, whose names they had not produced. These findings suggest that producing a word multiple times in short succession alters its long-term accessibility, making it easier to produce later. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"489-504"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143804608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-06-02DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001492
Alice E Milne, Maria Chait, Christopher M Conway
Statistical structures and our ability to exploit them are a ubiquitous component of daily life. Yet, we still do not fully understand how we track these sophisticated statistics and the role they play in sensory processing. Predictive coding frameworks hypothesize that for stimuli that can be accurately anticipated based on prior experience, we rely more strongly on our internal model of the sensory world and are more "surprised" when that expectation is unmet. The present study used this phenomenon to probe listeners' sensitivity to probabilistic structures generated using rapid 50 ms tone-pip sequences that precluded conscious prediction of upcoming stimuli. Over three experiments, we measured listeners' sensitivity and response time to deviants of a frequency outside the expected range. Predictable sequences were generated using either a triplet-based or network-style structure, and deviant detection contrasted against the same set of tones but in a random, unpredictable order. All experiments found structured sequences enhanced deviant detection relative to random sequences. Additionally, Experiment 2 used three different instantiations of the community structure to demonstrate that the level of uncertainty in the structured sequences modulated deviant saliency. Finally, Experiment 3 placed the deviant within an established community or immediately after a transition between communities, where the perceptual boundary should generate momentary uncertainty. However, this manipulation did not impact performance. Together, these results demonstrate that probabilistic contexts generated from statistical structures modulate the processing of an ongoing auditory signal, leading to an improved ability to detect unexpected deviant stimuli, consistent with the predictive coding framework. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
统计结构和我们利用它们的能力是日常生活中无处不在的组成部分。然而,我们仍然不完全了解我们如何追踪这些复杂的统计数据,以及它们在感觉处理中的作用。预测编码框架假设,对于可以根据先前经验准确预测的刺激,我们更强烈地依赖于我们的感官世界的内部模型,当预期未达到时,我们会更“惊讶”。本研究利用这一现象来探测听者对使用快速50毫秒音调序列产生的概率结构的敏感性,这种结构排除了对即将到来的刺激的有意识预测。在三个实验中,我们测量了听众对超出预期范围的频率偏差的灵敏度和响应时间。可预测的序列是使用基于三联体或网络风格的结构生成的,并且偏差检测与相同的音调集形成对比,但以随机,不可预测的顺序。所有实验都发现,相对于随机序列,结构化序列能增强偏差检测。此外,实验2使用了三个不同的群落结构实例来证明结构序列中的不确定性水平调节了异常显著性。最后,实验3将离经叛道者置于一个已建立的群体中,或者在群体之间的过渡之后,在这种情况下,感知边界应该会产生短暂的不确定性。然而,这种操作并不影响性能。总之,这些结果表明,由统计结构产生的概率上下文调节了正在进行的听觉信号的处理,从而提高了检测意外异常刺激的能力,与预测编码框架一致。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Probing sensitivity to statistical structure in rapid sound sequences using deviant detection tasks.","authors":"Alice E Milne, Maria Chait, Christopher M Conway","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001492","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001492","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Statistical structures and our ability to exploit them are a ubiquitous component of daily life. Yet, we still do not fully understand how we track these sophisticated statistics and the role they play in sensory processing. Predictive coding frameworks hypothesize that for stimuli that can be accurately anticipated based on prior experience, we rely more strongly on our internal model of the sensory world and are more \"surprised\" when that expectation is unmet. The present study used this phenomenon to probe listeners' sensitivity to probabilistic structures generated using rapid 50 ms tone-pip sequences that precluded conscious prediction of upcoming stimuli. Over three experiments, we measured listeners' sensitivity and response time to deviants of a frequency outside the expected range. Predictable sequences were generated using either a triplet-based or network-style structure, and deviant detection contrasted against the same set of tones but in a random, unpredictable order. All experiments found structured sequences enhanced deviant detection relative to random sequences. Additionally, Experiment 2 used three different instantiations of the community structure to demonstrate that the level of uncertainty in the structured sequences modulated deviant saliency. Finally, Experiment 3 placed the deviant within an established community or immediately after a transition between communities, where the perceptual boundary should generate momentary uncertainty. However, this manipulation did not impact performance. Together, these results demonstrate that probabilistic contexts generated from statistical structures modulate the processing of an ongoing auditory signal, leading to an improved ability to detect unexpected deviant stimuli, consistent with the predictive coding framework. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"335-351"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144200724","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-05-29DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001493
Malina Szychowska, Karolina Ersson, Jonas K Olofsson
Navigating the world and remembering events require processing information from various sensory modalities. However, research on human spatial memory and navigation is dominated by vision and little is known about the nonvisual senses. According to a recent theoretical framework, spatial memory and navigation evolved together with olfaction to aid navigation. We tasked participants with memorizing locations of odors and sounds in a virtual reality setting, hypothesizing that odor memory representations would disproportionately interfere with sound memory representations. In three recall times (immediate, 15-min delay, and 1-week delay), we tested whether spatial memory of odors would retroactively interfere with sounds. We predicted that performance should decline more in the sensory modality encoded first than in the modality encoded second, due to retroactive interference, especially when sounds are encoded first. Results indicated a decline in spatial memory performance over time, and similar retroactive interference effects from smells and sounds, but no olfactory-specific interference. However, exploratory results indicated that olfactory retroactive interference is apparent in error trials where participants tended to misplace sounds in the vicinity of smells related to the same concepts (e.g., misplacing the sound of a coffee maker at the location of the smell of coffee). There was no similar interference from sounds on odor misplacements, suggesting asymmetry or "olfactory dominance," at the conceptual level. Our exploratory results suggest that the hypothesized unique role of olfactory retroactive interference might manifest in the type of errors, rather than in overall performance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
导航世界和记忆事件需要处理来自不同感官模式的信息。然而,对人类空间记忆和导航的研究以视觉为主,对非视觉感官的研究甚少。根据最近的理论框架,空间记忆和导航与嗅觉一起进化,以帮助导航。我们让参与者在虚拟现实环境中记忆气味和声音的位置,假设气味记忆表征会不成比例地干扰声音记忆表征。在三个回忆时间(即时、15分钟延迟和1周延迟)中,我们测试了气味的空间记忆是否会回溯性地干扰声音。我们预测,由于回溯性干扰,特别是当声音先编码时,首先编码的感觉模态比第二编码的模态下降得更多。结果表明,空间记忆性能随着时间的推移而下降,气味和声音也有类似的追溯干扰效应,但没有嗅觉特异性干扰。然而,探索性结果表明,嗅觉追溯干扰在错误试验中是明显的,参与者倾向于把声音放在与相同概念相关的气味附近(例如,把咖啡机的声音放在咖啡气味的位置)。在概念层面上,声音对气味错位没有类似的干扰,这表明不对称或“嗅觉优势”。我们的探索性结果表明,嗅觉追溯干扰的假设独特作用可能体现在错误的类型上,而不是在整体表现上。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Asymmetric cross-sensory interference between spatial memories of sounds and smells revealed in a virtual reality environment.","authors":"Malina Szychowska, Karolina Ersson, Jonas K Olofsson","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001493","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001493","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Navigating the world and remembering events require processing information from various sensory modalities. However, research on human spatial memory and navigation is dominated by vision and little is known about the nonvisual senses. According to a recent theoretical framework, spatial memory and navigation evolved together with olfaction to aid navigation. We tasked participants with memorizing locations of odors and sounds in a virtual reality setting, hypothesizing that odor memory representations would disproportionately interfere with sound memory representations. In three recall times (immediate, 15-min delay, and 1-week delay), we tested whether spatial memory of odors would retroactively interfere with sounds. We predicted that performance should decline more in the sensory modality encoded first than in the modality encoded second, due to retroactive interference, especially when sounds are encoded first. Results indicated a decline in spatial memory performance over time, and similar retroactive interference effects from smells and sounds, but no olfactory-specific interference. However, exploratory results indicated that olfactory retroactive interference is apparent in error trials where participants tended to misplace sounds in the vicinity of smells related to the same concepts (e.g., misplacing the sound of a coffee maker at the location of the smell of coffee). There was no similar interference from sounds on odor misplacements, suggesting asymmetry or \"olfactory dominance,\" at the conceptual level. Our exploratory results suggest that the hypothesized unique role of olfactory retroactive interference might manifest in the type of errors, rather than in overall performance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"403-421"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144182047","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-06-26DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001501
Yibo Li, Nick S Menger, Andreas Keil, Alexandra I Kosachenko, Gaëtan Mertens, Boris Kotchoubey, Yuri G Pavlov
A long-standing debate in the psychology of learning and memory is whether contingency awareness-explicit recognition of the relationship between conditioned stimuli and unconditioned stimuli-is a prerequisite for fear acquisition in humans. In an extensive participant pool (N = 895), we systematically investigated the impact of manipulating core experimental parameters and individual differences that may moderate contingency awareness. Key parameters included the presence of online expectancy or fear ratings, engagement in concurrent tasks, sensory modalities of conditioned stimuli and unconditioned stimuli, and type of instruction. These manipulations strongly influenced the proportion of participants who acquired contingency awareness, ranging between 47% and 96%, with only aware participants exhibiting conditioned responses. We confirm that contingency awareness is necessary for human fear conditioning and highlight the parameters that experimenters can use to ensure learning. Individual differences in age, personality traits, and working memory capacity did not contribute to the probability of becoming contingency aware. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
在学习和记忆心理学中,一个长期存在的争论是,偶然性意识——对条件刺激和非条件刺激之间关系的明确认识——是否是人类恐惧习得的先决条件。在一个广泛的参与者池中(N = 895),我们系统地调查了操纵核心实验参数和个体差异对可能调节应急意识的影响。关键参数包括在线期望或恐惧评级的存在,参与并发任务,条件刺激和非条件刺激的感觉模式,以及教学类型。这些操作强烈影响了获得应急意识的参与者的比例,范围在47%到96%之间,只有有意识的参与者表现出条件反应。我们确认偶然性意识对人类恐惧条件反射是必要的,并强调了实验者可以用来确保学习的参数。年龄、性格特征和工作记忆容量的个体差异对偶然性意识的可能性没有贡献。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Contingency awareness and fear conditioning: A comprehensive examination of associated factors.","authors":"Yibo Li, Nick S Menger, Andreas Keil, Alexandra I Kosachenko, Gaëtan Mertens, Boris Kotchoubey, Yuri G Pavlov","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001501","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001501","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A long-standing debate in the psychology of learning and memory is whether contingency awareness-explicit recognition of the relationship between conditioned stimuli and unconditioned stimuli-is a prerequisite for fear acquisition in humans. In an extensive participant pool (<i>N</i> = 895), we systematically investigated the impact of manipulating core experimental parameters and individual differences that may moderate contingency awareness. Key parameters included the presence of online expectancy or fear ratings, engagement in concurrent tasks, sensory modalities of conditioned stimuli and unconditioned stimuli, and type of instruction. These manipulations strongly influenced the proportion of participants who acquired contingency awareness, ranging between 47% and 96%, with only aware participants exhibiting conditioned responses. We confirm that contingency awareness is necessary for human fear conditioning and highlight the parameters that experimenters can use to ensure learning. Individual differences in age, personality traits, and working memory capacity did not contribute to the probability of becoming contingency aware. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"380-402"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144509245","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-06-05DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001499
Runhan Yang, Aaron S Benjamin
Prior research using attention-demanding tasks has shown that performance can be improved by allowing individuals to control the pacing of trials. This result suggests that people can monitor fluctuations of attention and can take advantage of this metacognitive awareness to synchronize moments with high demand to moments of heightened attention. In two experiments, we decomposed the benefits conferred by self-pacing within the context of a model of attentional capture rooted in signal detection theory. We employed a common orientation discrimination task in which set size varied across blocks of trials. Some subjects controlled the onset of each trial (self-pacing), and others did not. Model analyses revealed that self-pacing both increases target strength and decreases target variability. The between-trial wait times of self-pacing subjects supported the view that these benefits arise in part from the fact that participants appreciated the greater difficulty of larger set sizes and deployed a policy of waiting longer between trials during blocks with larger set sizes in order to offset the larger decrements associated with tasks of greater difficulty. Metacognitive control of self-pacing appears to benefit attention by enhancing the detectability of targets and by reducing the occurrence of target presentations during moments of lessened attention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
先前对需要注意力的任务的研究表明,允许个人控制试验的节奏可以提高表现。这一结果表明,人们可以监测注意力的波动,并可以利用这种元认知意识来同步高需求时刻和高度关注时刻。在两个实验中,我们在基于信号检测理论的注意捕获模型的背景下分解了自定节奏所带来的好处。我们采用了一个共同的取向辨别任务,其中集大小在不同的试验块之间变化。一些受试者控制每次试验的开始(自我定速),而另一些则没有。模型分析表明,自定步既增加了靶强度,又降低了靶变异性。自定节奏受试者的试验间等待时间支持了这样一种观点,即这些好处部分来自于这样一个事实,即参与者认识到较大的集合规模的难度更大,并在较大的集合规模的块中部署了在试验之间等待更长时间的策略,以抵消与较大难度的任务相关的较大减少。自我步调的元认知控制似乎通过增强目标的可探测性和减少在注意力减弱时目标呈现的发生而有利于注意力。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Metacognitive control of workflow enhances stimulus discriminability and reduces signal uncertainty.","authors":"Runhan Yang, Aaron S Benjamin","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001499","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001499","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prior research using attention-demanding tasks has shown that performance can be improved by allowing individuals to control the pacing of trials. This result suggests that people can monitor fluctuations of attention and can take advantage of this metacognitive awareness to synchronize moments with high demand to moments of heightened attention. In two experiments, we decomposed the benefits conferred by self-pacing within the context of a model of attentional capture rooted in signal detection theory. We employed a common orientation discrimination task in which set size varied across blocks of trials. Some subjects controlled the onset of each trial (self-pacing), and others did not. Model analyses revealed that self-pacing both increases target strength and decreases target variability. The between-trial wait times of self-pacing subjects supported the view that these benefits arise in part from the fact that participants appreciated the greater difficulty of larger set sizes and deployed a policy of waiting longer between trials during blocks with larger set sizes in order to offset the larger decrements associated with tasks of greater difficulty. Metacognitive control of self-pacing appears to benefit attention by enhancing the detectability of targets and by reducing the occurrence of target presentations during moments of lessened attention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"352-365"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144235762","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-04-28DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001488
Joelle Hannon, Henry Brice, Benjamin D Zinszer, Brice N'Guessan, Fabrice Tanoh, F Sayako Earle, Kaja K Jasińska
The majority of reading research takes place in high-income "Minority World" countries where children typically begin learning to read in early childhood. This research, however, does not reflect the experience of many children around the world who learn to read later in childhood or in adolescence. Crucially, children who learn to read later in life may rely on different cognitive systems. Specifically, procedural learning, which supports sequence and pattern learning, reaches maturity around early adolescence, while declarative learning, which supports the arbitrary mapping of form and meaning, continues to develop into adulthood. The declarative/procedural model of learning posits that the role of declarative learning increases as an individual ages, and as it matures, will overlap and compete with typically procedural-supported learning. Therefore, declarative-supported learning may lead to poorer outcomes for older first-time readers. This study examined the potential competition between procedural and declarative learning among emergent readers (n = 88) in rural Cote d'Ivoire, aged 10-16. We examined performance on culturally appropriate declarative and procedural memory tasks, and found that declarative learning competes with procedural learning, such that stronger declarative memory negatively impacts the development of early reading skills. These findings are important for understanding the role of learning systems, and their interaction with age, in supporting literacy development. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
大多数阅读研究发生在高收入的“少数民族世界”国家,那里的儿童通常在童年早期就开始学习阅读。然而,这项研究并没有反映出世界上许多在童年或青春期学习阅读的儿童的经历。至关重要的是,学习阅读的孩子可能依赖于不同的认知系统。具体来说,支持顺序和模式学习的程序性学习在青春期早期达到成熟,而支持形式和意义任意映射的陈述性学习则持续发展到成年。陈述性/程序性学习模型认为,陈述性学习的作用随着个体年龄的增长而增加,随着它的成熟,将与典型的程序支持学习重叠和竞争。因此,陈述式学习可能会导致年龄较大的第一次阅读的结果较差。本研究调查了科特迪瓦农村地区10-16岁的紧急读者(n = 88)在程序学习和陈述学习之间的潜在竞争。我们考察了在文化上适当的陈述性和程序性记忆任务上的表现,发现陈述性学习与程序性学习相互竞争,因此更强的陈述性记忆会对早期阅读技能的发展产生负面影响。这些发现对于理解学习系统的作用及其与年龄的相互作用,在支持识字发展方面具有重要意义。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"The role of declarative and procedural learning in adolescent emergent reading.","authors":"Joelle Hannon, Henry Brice, Benjamin D Zinszer, Brice N'Guessan, Fabrice Tanoh, F Sayako Earle, Kaja K Jasińska","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001488","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001488","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The majority of reading research takes place in high-income \"Minority World\" countries where children typically begin learning to read in early childhood. This research, however, does not reflect the experience of many children around the world who learn to read later in childhood or in adolescence. Crucially, children who learn to read later in life may rely on different cognitive systems. Specifically, procedural learning, which supports sequence and pattern learning, reaches maturity around early adolescence, while declarative learning, which supports the arbitrary mapping of form and meaning, continues to develop into adulthood. The declarative/procedural model of learning posits that the role of declarative learning increases as an individual ages, and as it matures, will overlap and compete with typically procedural-supported learning. Therefore, declarative-supported learning may lead to poorer outcomes for older first-time readers. This study examined the potential competition between procedural and declarative learning among emergent readers (<i>n</i> = 88) in rural Cote d'Ivoire, aged 10-16. We examined performance on culturally appropriate declarative and procedural memory tasks, and found that declarative learning competes with procedural learning, such that stronger declarative memory negatively impacts the development of early reading skills. These findings are important for understanding the role of learning systems, and their interaction with age, in supporting literacy development. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"475-488"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144056133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-07-03DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001498
Nathaniel R Greene, Shai T Goldman, Michael J Kahana
In free recall procedures, the order and timing of participants' responses can inform our understanding of human memory. Analyzing a corpus of more than half a million freely recalled words from 127 young adult participants, we develop a statistical model of interresponse times (IRTs) as a function of the temporal and semantic relations among the recalled items and their positions in the output sequence. Residual IRTs exhibited strong sequential dependencies, being positively correlated at lags of one and two transitions. We used this IRT model to evaluate the hypothesis that chunking helps participants learn unstructured materials. Specifically, we hypothesized that chunks would appear as a slow IRT, indicative of a boundary, followed by a sequence of fast IRTs. Model-based analyses that included sequential dependencies in IRTs offered evidence for spontaneous chunking in free recall of lists that lacked any grouping or hierarchical structure. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
在自由回忆过程中,参与者反应的顺序和时间可以告诉我们对人类记忆的理解。本文分析了来自127名年轻成人参与者的50多万个自由回忆词的语料库,建立了反应间时间(IRTs)的统计模型,该模型是被回忆词之间的时间和语义关系及其在输出序列中的位置的函数。剩余IRTs表现出强烈的顺序依赖性,在一个和两个过渡的滞后处呈正相关。我们使用这个IRT模型来评估分组有助于参与者学习非结构化材料的假设。具体来说,我们假设大块会出现一个缓慢的IRT,表明一个边界,然后是一系列快速的IRT。基于模型的分析包括irt中的顺序依赖关系,为自由回忆缺乏任何分组或层次结构的列表提供了自发分块的证据。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Interresponse times in free recall.","authors":"Nathaniel R Greene, Shai T Goldman, Michael J Kahana","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001498","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001498","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In free recall procedures, the order and timing of participants' responses can inform our understanding of human memory. Analyzing a corpus of more than half a million freely recalled words from 127 young adult participants, we develop a statistical model of interresponse times (IRTs) as a function of the temporal and semantic relations among the recalled items and their positions in the output sequence. Residual IRTs exhibited strong sequential dependencies, being positively correlated at lags of one and two transitions. We used this IRT model to evaluate the hypothesis that chunking helps participants learn unstructured materials. Specifically, we hypothesized that chunks would appear as a slow IRT, indicative of a boundary, followed by a sequence of fast IRTs. Model-based analyses that included sequential dependencies in IRTs offered evidence for spontaneous chunking in free recall of lists that lacked any grouping or hierarchical structure. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"422-442"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12233134/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144561808","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Working memory has a limited capacity, and it is therefore crucial to carefully control what information is stored in working memory. It has been suggested that there is a fundamental limitation in the control of working memory in that salient objects will automatically receive enhanced representations. These accounts propose that salient objects automatically compete within working memory, and this competition cannot be prevented by preemptive attentional orienting. The present study questions this claim. Specifically, we investigate a prior study claiming that attentional cueing is insufficient to eliminate salience effects in working memory recall (Constant & Kerzel, 2025). We propose that these findings occurred because participants were not sufficiently encouraged to attend to the cues in these studies. Across two experiments, we improve attentional orienting to the cues by strengthening their predictiveness and by increasing their duration. We find that attentional orienting can completely prevent salience effects on working memory recall, contrary to the conclusions of the original studies. These findings favor a more flexible account of working memory, whereby top-down control can be used to reduce the influence of salience on memory representations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Cue-driven attentional guidance nearly eliminates salience effects in working memory.","authors":"Nicholas Gaspelin, Nelson Cowan","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001595","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001595","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Working memory has a limited capacity, and it is therefore crucial to carefully control what information is stored in working memory. It has been suggested that there is a fundamental limitation in the control of working memory in that salient objects will automatically receive enhanced representations. These accounts propose that salient objects automatically compete within working memory, and this competition cannot be prevented by preemptive attentional orienting. The present study questions this claim. Specifically, we investigate a prior study claiming that attentional cueing is insufficient to eliminate salience effects in working memory recall (Constant & Kerzel, 2025). We propose that these findings occurred because participants were not sufficiently encouraged to attend to the cues in these studies. Across two experiments, we improve attentional orienting to the cues by strengthening their predictiveness and by increasing their duration. We find that attentional orienting can completely prevent salience effects on working memory recall, contrary to the conclusions of the original studies. These findings favor a more flexible account of working memory, whereby top-down control can be used to reduce the influence of salience on memory representations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12948038/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147291661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
While the influence of reward on working memory has been explored extensively, it remains unclear how reward and punishment affect working memory encoding when people are not intentionally encoding their experiences. This study aimed to address this question by integrating reward and aversive conditioning into the attribute amnesia task, which investigates working memory through a surprise test. In Experiment 1, participants were asked to report the location of a color-singleton letter. The reward group experienced associations between color and reward, while the no-outcome group completed the same task without any reward feedback. The results showed that, when unexpectedly asked to report the identity of the color-singleton letter on the surprise trial, the reward group showed no better performance than the no-outcome group, despite the color singleton being rendered in the high-value color. Additionally, the reward group showed lower accuracy in reporting the identity of the color singleton in the trial immediately following the surprise trial, where the color singleton was again presented in the high-value color, compared with the no-outcome group. Experiment 2 replicated these results with a different group of participants undergoing aversive conditioning with electric shock during the attribute amnesia task (shock group). These findings suggest a limitation in the ability of stimulus valence to enhance working memory encoding. Moreover, encoding a valent stimulus feature may interfere with the encoding of other stimulus features. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Conditioned features are selectively encoded into working memory.","authors":"Niya Yan, Brian A Anderson","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001598","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001598","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While the influence of reward on working memory has been explored extensively, it remains unclear how reward and punishment affect working memory encoding when people are not intentionally encoding their experiences. This study aimed to address this question by integrating reward and aversive conditioning into the attribute amnesia task, which investigates working memory through a surprise test. In Experiment 1, participants were asked to report the location of a color-singleton letter. The reward group experienced associations between color and reward, while the no-outcome group completed the same task without any reward feedback. The results showed that, when unexpectedly asked to report the identity of the color-singleton letter on the surprise trial, the reward group showed no better performance than the no-outcome group, despite the color singleton being rendered in the high-value color. Additionally, the reward group showed lower accuracy in reporting the identity of the color singleton in the trial immediately following the surprise trial, where the color singleton was again presented in the high-value color, compared with the no-outcome group. Experiment 2 replicated these results with a different group of participants undergoing aversive conditioning with electric shock during the attribute amnesia task (shock group). These findings suggest a limitation in the ability of stimulus valence to enhance working memory encoding. Moreover, encoding a valent stimulus feature may interfere with the encoding of other stimulus features. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147291642","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Fluency with multiplication facts provides a strong foundation for future mathematics learning. Models of number fact storage and retrieval suggest that multiplication facts are stored in an associative network whereby neighboring facts (e.g., 6 × 7 and 6 × 8) can interfere with one another. While existing theoretical models account for the skilled retrieval of number facts, an understanding of how interference develops during learning, and hence the need for inhibitory control during learning, is poor. In a preregistered study, we tracked adults as they learned a set of new multiplication facts, and we monitored the interference between facts throughout their learning. Our findings are the first to show that interference emerges early in the learning process as individuals acquire knowledge of new facts. Moreover, interference does not decline as learning continues, even when retrieval accuracy is high and individuals continue to practice facts that they already know. These findings are consistent with theoretical assumptions and models of multiplication fact networks proposed by Ashcraft (1987), Campbell (1995), and De Visscher et al. (2016) but do not support the model proposed by Verguts and Fias (2005). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Cognitive interference in the learning of multiplication facts.","authors":"Joanne Eaves, Camilla Gilmore, Lucy Cragg","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001593","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001593","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fluency with multiplication facts provides a strong foundation for future mathematics learning. Models of number fact storage and retrieval suggest that multiplication facts are stored in an associative network whereby neighboring facts (e.g., 6 × 7 and 6 × 8) can interfere with one another. While existing theoretical models account for the skilled retrieval of number facts, an understanding of how interference develops during learning, and hence the need for inhibitory control during learning, is poor. In a preregistered study, we tracked adults as they learned a set of new multiplication facts, and we monitored the interference between facts throughout their learning. Our findings are the first to show that interference emerges early in the learning process as individuals acquire knowledge of new facts. Moreover, interference does not decline as learning continues, even when retrieval accuracy is high and individuals continue to practice facts that they already know. These findings are consistent with theoretical assumptions and models of multiplication fact networks proposed by Ashcraft (1987), Campbell (1995), and De Visscher et al. (2016) but do not support the model proposed by Verguts and Fias (2005). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147291683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}