首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition最新文献

英文 中文
Language choice and naming difficulty: Evidence from bilingual degraded picture naming. 语言选择与命名困难:来自双语退化图片命名的证据。
IF 2.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-15 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001571
Nora Kennis, Sabila R Hantoni, Martin J Pickering, Holly P Branigan

We investigated how anticipated naming difficulty affects voluntary language choice and switching behavior in three experiments. L2 speakers of English (E1: 87 native Dutch speakers, E2: 105 native Dutch speakers, and E3: 65 native Indonesian speakers) performed an online picture-naming task with free language choice. We used image degradation to manipulate the early, prelexical stages of word production to be easy (intact image) or difficult (degraded image). In Experiment 2, we also manipulated word frequency. We hypothesized participants would use English (their nondominant language) and switch languages less on degraded- versus intact-image trials. Participants took longer to name degraded than intact images and lower than higher frequency words, as predicted. They also responded faster on English trials (reverse dominance effect) and language repeat trials (voluntary switch cost) and used English more for higher than lower frequency words (all ps < .001). Crucially, though, results refuted our other predictions: There was no effect of image degradation on language choice or switch choice (p > .05). This suggests that early prelexical sources of naming difficulty do not affect voluntary language selection. These data support modular theories of language production, meaning language decisions at the lexical stage occur independently from the visual processing or conceptual stages. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

我们在三个实验中研究了预期命名困难如何影响自愿语言选择和转换行为。L2英语使用者(E1: 87名荷兰语母语者,E2: 105名荷兰语母语者,E3: 65名印度尼西亚语母语者)在自由语言选择的情况下完成了一项在线图片命名任务。我们使用图像退化来操纵单词生成的早期、前词汇阶段,使其变得容易(完整的图像)或困难(退化的图像)。在实验2中,我们也操纵了词频。我们假设参与者会使用英语(他们的非主导语言),并且在退化图像与完整图像的试验中较少切换语言。正如预测的那样,参与者花了更长的时间来命名退化的图像,而不是完整的图像,并且比高频率的单词更少。他们在英语试验(反向优势效应)和语言重复试验(自愿转换成本)中反应更快,在高频词上使用英语的频率高于低频词(均p < 0.001)。然而,关键的是,结果驳斥了我们的其他预测:图像退化对语言选择或开关选择没有影响(p < 0.05)。这表明命名困难的早期前词汇来源并不影响自发语言选择。这些数据支持语言产生的模块化理论,即词汇阶段的语言决策独立于视觉加工或概念阶段。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Language choice and naming difficulty: Evidence from bilingual degraded picture naming.","authors":"Nora Kennis, Sabila R Hantoni, Martin J Pickering, Holly P Branigan","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001571","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001571","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated how anticipated naming difficulty affects voluntary language choice and switching behavior in three experiments. L2 speakers of English (E1: 87 native Dutch speakers, E2: 105 native Dutch speakers, and E3: 65 native Indonesian speakers) performed an online picture-naming task with free language choice. We used image degradation to manipulate the early, prelexical stages of word production to be easy (intact image) or difficult (degraded image). In Experiment 2, we also manipulated word frequency. We hypothesized participants would use English (their nondominant language) and switch languages less on degraded- versus intact-image trials. Participants took longer to name degraded than intact images and lower than higher frequency words, as predicted. They also responded faster on English trials (reverse dominance effect) and language repeat trials (voluntary switch cost) and used English more for higher than lower frequency words (all <i>p</i>s < .001). Crucially, though, results refuted our other predictions: There was no effect of image degradation on language choice or switch choice (<i>p</i> > .05). This suggests that early prelexical sources of naming difficulty do not affect voluntary language selection. These data support modular theories of language production, meaning language decisions at the lexical stage occur independently from the visual processing or conceptual stages. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145991543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Task sets serve as boundaries for the list-wide proportion congruency effect. 任务集作为列表范围比例一致性效应的边界。
IF 2.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-15 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001578
Daniel H Weissman, Katherine Ni

Context influences how people cope with distraction. For example, a parent might "tune out" a child's voice more while reading than while cooking. The contextual boundaries of control processes that enable people to cope with distraction over relatively long (e.g., minutes) timescales, however, remain unclear, especially in cross-modal tasks. Therefore, we conducted three experiments with a prime-probe task (N = 144) to investigate the boundaries of a laboratory index of these control processes called the list-wide proportion congruency effect (LWPCE). Specifically, we investigated whether (a) sensory modalities on their own or (b) task sets based on sensory modalities serve as boundaries for the LWPCE. Experiments 1 and 2 revealed that the control processes underlying the LWPCE transfer from trials with auditory distractors to trials with visual distractors only when the task structure biases participants to think of auditory and visual stimuli as belonging to the same task. Experiment 3 revealed that participants exhibit such a bias when they cannot classify most of the trials as "purely visual" or "purely auditory." These findings support the view that task sets serve as boundaries for the LWPCE. They also reveal the precise conditions under which control processes transfer across different sensory modalities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

环境影响人们应对分心的方式。例如,父母可能会在阅读时“忽略”孩子的声音,而不是做饭时。然而,使人们能够在相对较长(例如,几分钟)的时间尺度上应对分心的控制过程的上下文边界仍然不清楚,特别是在跨模式任务中。因此,我们通过启动探针任务(N = 144)进行了三个实验,以研究这些控制过程的实验室指标的边界,称为列表范围比例一致性效应(LWPCE)。具体来说,我们研究了(a)感官模式本身还是(b)基于感官模式的任务集作为LWPCE的边界。实验1和2显示,只有当任务结构偏向于将听觉和视觉刺激视为同一任务时,LWPCE的控制过程才会从听觉干扰转移到视觉干扰。实验3显示,当参与者不能将大多数试验分类为“纯视觉”或“纯听觉”时,他们就会表现出这种偏见。这些发现支持了任务集作为LWPCE边界的观点。它们还揭示了控制过程在不同感官模式之间转移的精确条件。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Task sets serve as boundaries for the list-wide proportion congruency effect.","authors":"Daniel H Weissman, Katherine Ni","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001578","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001578","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Context influences how people cope with distraction. For example, a parent might \"tune out\" a child's voice more while reading than while cooking. The contextual boundaries of control processes that enable people to cope with distraction over relatively long (e.g., minutes) timescales, however, remain unclear, especially in cross-modal tasks. Therefore, we conducted three experiments with a prime-probe task (<i>N</i> = 144) to investigate the boundaries of a laboratory index of these control processes called the list-wide proportion congruency effect (LWPCE). Specifically, we investigated whether (a) sensory modalities on their own or (b) task sets based on sensory modalities serve as boundaries for the LWPCE. Experiments 1 and 2 revealed that the control processes underlying the LWPCE transfer from trials with auditory distractors to trials with visual distractors only when the task structure biases participants to think of auditory and visual stimuli as belonging to the same task. Experiment 3 revealed that participants exhibit such a bias when they cannot classify most of the trials as \"purely visual\" or \"purely auditory.\" These findings support the view that task sets serve as boundaries for the LWPCE. They also reveal the precise conditions under which control processes transfer across different sensory modalities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145991552","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Language control during free sentence production: Cued and voluntary switching. 自由造句过程中的语言控制:主动和主动转换。
IF 2.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-15 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001579
L María Sánchez, Esli Struys, David Peeters, Mathieu Declerck

Language control is the process that manages cross-language interference, helping multilinguals to successfully adapt their language choice to a given linguistic environment. Traditionally, language control has been investigated using language-switching experiments that rely on cued picture naming. However, in real-life settings, language choice is not always externally imposed, and language production involves complex and varied syntactic constructions beyond the single-word level. Here, we present findings from French-English bilinguals who switched between languages from one sentence to the other, parting from an action description task. We compared findings from two linguistic contexts: one wherein participants could freely choose when to switch (voluntary language switching) and one wherein they were told when to switch (cued language switching). Overall, our reaction time and filled pause analyses showed no significant switch costs during cued language switching. During voluntary language switching, we observed significant switch costs in second language and a repetition cost in first language. Our findings contrast with those encountered in single-word production experiments and highlight the importance of studying bilingual language control in ecologically valid environments. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

语言控制是管理跨语言干扰的过程,帮助多语言者成功地使他们的语言选择适应给定的语言环境。传统上,语言控制是通过依赖于提示图片命名的语言转换实验来研究的。然而,在现实生活中,语言选择并不总是外部强加的,语言的产生涉及到复杂多样的句法结构,超出了单个单词的水平。在这里,我们展示了法英双语者的研究结果,他们从一个句子切换到另一个句子,离开一个动作描述任务。我们比较了两种语言环境的结果:一种是参与者可以自由选择何时切换(自愿语言切换),另一种是参与者被告知何时切换(提示语言切换)。总的来说,我们的反应时间和填充停顿分析表明,在提示语言转换过程中没有显著的转换成本。在自愿语言转换过程中,我们观察到第二语言的显著转换成本和第一语言的重复成本。我们的研究结果与单词生成实验的结果形成对比,强调了在生态有效环境中研究双语语言控制的重要性。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Language control during free sentence production: Cued and voluntary switching.","authors":"L María Sánchez, Esli Struys, David Peeters, Mathieu Declerck","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001579","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001579","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Language control is the process that manages cross-language interference, helping multilinguals to successfully adapt their language choice to a given linguistic environment. Traditionally, language control has been investigated using language-switching experiments that rely on cued picture naming. However, in real-life settings, language choice is not always externally imposed, and language production involves complex and varied syntactic constructions beyond the single-word level. Here, we present findings from French-English bilinguals who switched between languages from one sentence to the other, parting from an action description task. We compared findings from two linguistic contexts: one wherein participants could freely choose when to switch (voluntary language switching) and one wherein they were told when to switch (cued language switching). Overall, our reaction time and filled pause analyses showed no significant switch costs during cued language switching. During voluntary language switching, we observed significant switch costs in second language and a repetition cost in first language. Our findings contrast with those encountered in single-word production experiments and highlight the importance of studying bilingual language control in ecologically valid environments. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145991589","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reconstruction of temporal and spatial order information. 重构时空秩序信息。
IF 2.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-15 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001575
Madison D Paron, Alice F Healy, Michael J Kahana

A reconstruction-of-order task illuminated the dynamics and strategies that underlie serial order recall. An initial benchmark experiment, either with no variation in spatial positions or with spatial positions coinciding with temporal positions, yielded bowed symmetrical serial position functions in each case, consistent with both simple chaining and simple positional coding models. In contrast, these simple models were challenged by two additional experiments, which orthogonally varied temporal and spatial positions. These experiments yielded large performance differences between recalling temporal and spatial information. In the temporal condition, participants attempted to reconstruct the temporal order of words that were positioned alphabetically within a vertical array. In the spatial condition, participants attempted to reconstruct the spatial positions of words presented in a temporal sequence based on their alphabetical order. After viewing each list, all the words appeared alphabetically, and participants reconstructed the order of the words according to their instructed condition. Compared to temporal recall, spatial recall exhibited superior performance and a more bowed symmetrical serial position function. Analyses showed the effects of temporal contiguity in the spatial condition and spatial contiguity in the temporal condition. These findings suggest the theoretical conclusion that participants do not focus on the words' identities but rather on the temporal-spatial pattern in which the words occur during the study display (i.e., the temporal sequence of the spatial locations in which the words are shown). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

顺序重建任务阐明了序列顺序回忆背后的动态和策略。在初始基准实验中,无论是空间位置没有变化,还是空间位置与时间位置重合,每种情况下都得到了弯曲的对称序列位置函数,这与简单链和简单位置编码模型都是一致的。相反,这些简单的模型受到另外两个实验的挑战,这两个实验正交地改变了时间和空间位置。这些实验表明,记忆时间和空间信息的表现差异很大。在时间条件下,参与者试图重建垂直排列中按字母顺序排列的单词的时间顺序。在空间条件下,参与者试图根据字母顺序重建在时间序列中出现的单词的空间位置。在看完每个列表后,所有的单词按字母顺序出现,参与者根据他们的指示条件重建单词的顺序。与时间回忆相比,空间回忆表现出更优越的表现,并且具有更弯曲的对称序列位置函数。分析表明,时间连续性对空间条件的影响和空间连续性对时间条件的影响。这些发现提出了一个理论结论,即参与者并不关注单词的身份,而是关注单词在研究展示过程中出现的时空模式(即,单词出现的空间位置的时间顺序)。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Reconstruction of temporal and spatial order information.","authors":"Madison D Paron, Alice F Healy, Michael J Kahana","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001575","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001575","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A reconstruction-of-order task illuminated the dynamics and strategies that underlie serial order recall. An initial benchmark experiment, either with no variation in spatial positions or with spatial positions coinciding with temporal positions, yielded bowed symmetrical serial position functions in each case, consistent with both simple chaining and simple positional coding models. In contrast, these simple models were challenged by two additional experiments, which orthogonally varied temporal and spatial positions. These experiments yielded large performance differences between recalling temporal and spatial information. In the <i>temporal</i> condition, participants attempted to reconstruct the temporal order of words that were positioned alphabetically within a vertical array. In the <i>spatial</i> condition, participants attempted to reconstruct the spatial positions of words presented in a temporal sequence based on their alphabetical order. After viewing each list, all the words appeared alphabetically, and participants reconstructed the order of the words according to their instructed condition. Compared to temporal recall, spatial recall exhibited superior performance and a more bowed symmetrical serial position function. Analyses showed the effects of temporal contiguity in the spatial condition and spatial contiguity in the temporal condition. These findings suggest the theoretical conclusion that participants do not focus on the words' identities but rather on the temporal-spatial pattern in which the words occur during the study display (i.e., the temporal sequence of the spatial locations in which the words are shown). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145991541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A cross-task comparison of transposed letter effects with consonants and vowels using visible targets. 使用可见目标对转置字母对辅音和元音的影响进行跨任务比较。
IF 2.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-12 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001569
Stephen J Lupker, Zian Chi, Lucia Colombo, Jiahui Jiang, Giacomo Spinelli

A now well-documented finding is that nonwords created by transposing two internal letters (e.g., vetrical, vercital) are perceived as being more similar to their base word (i.e., vertical) than nonwords created by substituting other letters for the transposed letters (e.g., vefsical, versifal). Most of the relevant research on transposed letter (TL) effects has involved a masked priming procedure with a lexical decision task. The results have typically been explained in terms of the interactions between the orthographic coding process and the lexical access process. The present research was an investigation of TL effects when the TL nonword is a target in both lexical decision tasks and same-different matching tasks in an attempt to determine whether the effect patterns could be explained in a way that is reasonably similar to how current orthographic coding models explain TL effects in masked priming experiments. Essentially parallel results of large TL effects for consonant-consonant transpositions and smaller, but highly significant, TL effects for vowel-vowel transpositions were observed in the two tasks for both adjacent and nonadjacent transpositions. The implications of our data pattern, particularly the large consonant-vowel effect size difference, for accounts of the relevant processes are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

现在一个有充分证据的发现是,通过调换两个内部字母(例如,vertical)创建的非单词被认为比用其他字母替换调换后的字母(例如,vefsical, versial)创建的非单词更类似于它们的基词(例如,vertical)。大多数关于转置字母效应的相关研究都涉及一个带有词汇决策任务的隐藏启动过程。这些结果通常被解释为正字法编码过程和词汇获取过程之间的相互作用。本研究旨在探讨在词法决策任务和相同-不同匹配任务中,当非词性词作为目标时的译入效应,并试图确定这种效应模式是否可以用与当前正字法编码模型解释隐启动实验中译入效应的合理相似的方式来解释。在相邻和非相邻转位的两个任务中,观察到基本上平行的结果:辅音-辅音转位的大TL效应和元音-元音转位的小但非常显著的TL效应。我们的数据模式的含义,特别是大的辅音-元音效应大小差异,对相关过程的说明进行了讨论。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"A cross-task comparison of transposed letter effects with consonants and vowels using visible targets.","authors":"Stephen J Lupker, Zian Chi, Lucia Colombo, Jiahui Jiang, Giacomo Spinelli","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001569","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001569","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A now well-documented finding is that nonwords created by transposing two internal letters (e.g., vetrical, vercital) are perceived as being more similar to their base word (i.e., vertical) than nonwords created by substituting other letters for the transposed letters (e.g., vefsical, versifal). Most of the relevant research on transposed letter (TL) effects has involved a masked priming procedure with a lexical decision task. The results have typically been explained in terms of the interactions between the orthographic coding process and the lexical access process. The present research was an investigation of TL effects when the TL nonword is a target in both lexical decision tasks and same-different matching tasks in an attempt to determine whether the effect patterns could be explained in a way that is reasonably similar to how current orthographic coding models explain TL effects in masked priming experiments. Essentially parallel results of large TL effects for consonant-consonant transpositions and smaller, but highly significant, TL effects for vowel-vowel transpositions were observed in the two tasks for both adjacent and nonadjacent transpositions. The implications of our data pattern, particularly the large consonant-vowel effect size difference, for accounts of the relevant processes are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145960898","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The left-digit bias in two-dimensional manual pointing. 在二维手动指向左数字偏差。
IF 2.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-12 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001576
Carlotta Isabella Zona, Martin H Fischer

The left-digit bias (LDB) is a tendency to estimate differences between numbers sharing the same leftmost digit (e.g., 47 and 49) as smaller than between numbers with different leftmost digits (e.g., 49 and 51) in nonspatial evaluations and number-to-position tasks. In the present study, we examined motoric consequences of LDB by measuring angles of spatial-localization responses in circular space as participants localized spoken numbers (1-12.5 in 0.5-unit increments; e.g., "two point five") on a clock-face arrangement. To test the role of visual feedback, the task was performed either with (N = 27) or without vision (N = 23). After correcting for cyclical errors in angular localization, we found that targets sharing the same leftmost digit were indeed placed closer together in angular space than equidistant targets with different leftmost digits, regardless of visual feedback. This LDB manifested as compression of decimal targets toward the lower boundary of their leftmost digit category. Our findings demonstrate the robustness of LDB signatures across task settings, extend them to angular measures, and point to cognitive rather than perceptual origins. They are consistent with the overweighting of leftmost digits during number processing, which asymmetrically compresses representational space toward lower same-digit boundaries. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

左数字偏差(LDB)是一种倾向,即在非空间评估和数字到位置任务中,将具有相同最左数字(例如47和49)的数字之间的差异估计为小于具有不同最左数字(例如49和51)的数字之间的差异。在本研究中,我们通过测量参与者在圆形空间中定位说出的数字(1-12.5,以0.5个单位的增量,例如“两点五”)在时钟面排列时的空间定位反应角度,来检查LDB的运动后果。为了测试视觉反馈的作用,任务分为有视觉(N = 27)和无视觉(N = 23)两种。在校正了角度定位的周期性误差后,我们发现,在不考虑视觉反馈的情况下,具有相同最左边数字的目标在角度空间中的位置确实比具有不同最左边数字的等距目标靠得更近。这种LDB表现为将十进制目标压缩到其最左边数字类别的下边界。我们的研究结果证明了LDB特征在任务设置中的鲁棒性,将它们扩展到角度测量,并指出认知而不是感知起源。它们与数字处理过程中最左边数字的超重一致,这将不对称地将表示空间压缩到更低的同位数边界。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"The left-digit bias in two-dimensional manual pointing.","authors":"Carlotta Isabella Zona, Martin H Fischer","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001576","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001576","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The <i>left-digit bias</i> (LDB) is a tendency to estimate differences between numbers sharing the same leftmost digit (e.g., 47 and 49) as smaller than between numbers with different leftmost digits (e.g., 49 and 51) in nonspatial evaluations and number-to-position tasks. In the present study, we examined motoric consequences of LDB by measuring angles of spatial-localization responses in circular space as participants localized spoken numbers (1-12.5 in 0.5-unit increments; e.g., \"two point five\") on a clock-face arrangement. To test the role of visual feedback, the task was performed either with (<i>N</i> = 27) or without vision (<i>N</i> = 23). After correcting for cyclical errors in angular localization, we found that targets sharing the same leftmost digit were indeed placed closer together in angular space than equidistant targets with different leftmost digits, regardless of visual feedback. This LDB manifested as compression of decimal targets toward the lower boundary of their leftmost digit category. Our findings demonstrate the robustness of LDB signatures across task settings, extend them to angular measures, and point to cognitive rather than perceptual origins. They are consistent with the overweighting of leftmost digits during number processing, which asymmetrically compresses representational space toward lower same-digit boundaries. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145960884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Testing the convergent validity of the nondecision time parameter of the diffusion model. 验证了扩散模型非决策时间参数的收敛有效性。
IF 2.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-08 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001566
Katja M Pollak, Veronika Lerche, Raphael Hartmann, Andrea Kiesel

Modeling reaction time data using diffusion models comes with the advantage of separating different processes involved in decision making. Each parameter of the diffusion model is assumed to translate into one (or more) process(es). If this assumption holds true, selective manipulations of specific processes involved in decision making should selectively influence the related parameter, but not any other parameter (high convergent and discriminant validities). We present two experiments (total N = 104) and one simulation study that-using a manipulation of the difficulty of encoding in a lexical decision task-tested the convergent validity of the nondecision time t₀. As hypothesized, we found large effects on t₀ in both experiments but also medium to large effects on the drift rate v as well as on the starting point z. Our simulation study suggests that the effects on the drift rate, but not on the starting point, might be explained by incorrect assumptions about the intertrial variability of the nondecision time. Our results speak in favor of a high convergent validity of t₀ but question the discriminant validities of v and z, at least under the assumption that our manipulation affected encoding selectively. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

使用扩散模型对反应时间数据建模的优点是可以分离决策过程中涉及的不同过程。假设扩散模型的每个参数都可以转化为一个(或多个)过程。如果这个假设成立,参与决策的特定过程的选择性操作应该有选择地影响相关参数,但不影响任何其他参数(高收敛和判别效度)。我们提出了两个实验(总N = 104)和一个模拟研究,该研究使用词汇决策任务中编码难度的操作来测试非决策时间t 0的收敛有效性。正如假设的那样,我们发现在两个实验中对t 0有很大的影响,但对漂移率v和起点z也有中等到很大的影响。我们的模拟研究表明,对漂移率的影响,而不是对起点的影响,可能是通过对非决策时间的试验间可变性的错误假设来解释的。我们的结果支持t 0的高收敛有效性,但质疑v和z的判别有效性,至少在假设我们的操作选择性地影响编码的情况下。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Testing the convergent validity of the nondecision time parameter of the diffusion model.","authors":"Katja M Pollak, Veronika Lerche, Raphael Hartmann, Andrea Kiesel","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001566","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001566","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Modeling reaction time data using diffusion models comes with the advantage of separating different processes involved in decision making. Each parameter of the diffusion model is assumed to translate into one (or more) process(es). If this assumption holds true, selective manipulations of specific processes involved in decision making should selectively influence the related parameter, but not any other parameter (high convergent and discriminant validities). We present two experiments (total <i>N</i> = 104) and one simulation study that-using a manipulation of the difficulty of encoding in a lexical decision task-tested the convergent validity of the nondecision time <i>t</i>₀. As hypothesized, we found large effects on <i>t</i>₀ in both experiments but also medium to large effects on the drift rate v as well as on the starting point <i>z</i>. Our simulation study suggests that the effects on the drift rate, but not on the starting point, might be explained by incorrect assumptions about the intertrial variability of the nondecision time. Our results speak in favor of a high convergent validity of <i>t</i>₀ but question the discriminant validities of <i>v</i> and <i>z</i>, at least under the assumption that our manipulation affected encoding selectively. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145935876","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How social is social memory? Isolating the influences of social and nonsocial cues on recall. 社会记忆有多社会化?分离社会和非社会线索对回忆的影响。
IF 2.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-08 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001557
Tori Peña, Nicholas W Pepe, Suparna Rajaram

It is intuitive to think that retrieval cues always aid recall. Surprisingly, cues sometimes hurt recall. This counterintuitive phenomenon occurs regardless of whether the cues come from a social (a person) or a nonsocial (a computer or article) source. However, we do not know whether recall impairment differs depending on the source, raising the question-do social versus nonsocial sources create differential impacts on memory and, if so, what theoretical mechanism underlies this difference? We addressed these questions by directly comparing memory impairment across collaborative recall (cues received from social sources) and part-list cued recall (cues received from nonsocial sources). We aligned the two procedures by taking the recall output of each collaborative group and generating cues for part-list cued participants. This yoked design enabled us to present identical cues and equate their presentation sequence across the two cuing conditions. We also devised a group-level recall index for the part-list cued "groups" yoked to the collaborative groups, thus equating the recall metric between conditions. Across two experiments (N = 270), we replicated both the standard collaborative inhibition and part-list cuing impairments. Collaborative groups exhibited more reciprocal influence on one another's recall than part-list cuing participants, producing responses from the same taxonomic category as the cues more often than part-list cuing participants, and exhibiting greater collective memory. These findings provide evidence for the operation of the cross-cuing mechanism in social remembering relative to nonsocial remembering. We discuss these theoretical contributions and implications for education, information transmission, beliefs, and collective narratives. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

人们直觉地认为,检索线索总是有助于回忆。令人惊讶的是,线索有时会损害记忆。无论线索是来自社会(人)还是非社会(电脑或文章)来源,都会出现这种违反直觉的现象。然而,我们不知道回忆障碍是否因来源不同而不同,这就提出了一个问题:社会来源和非社会来源对记忆产生不同的影响吗?如果是这样,这种差异背后的理论机制是什么?我们通过直接比较协作回忆(来自社会来源的线索)和部分列表回忆(来自非社会来源的线索)的记忆障碍来解决这些问题。我们通过获取每个协作组的回忆输出并为部分列表提示的参与者生成线索来对齐这两个过程。这种交错的设计使我们能够呈现相同的线索,并使它们在两种线索条件下的呈现顺序相等。我们还设计了一个组级召回指数的部分列表提示“组”与协作组,从而相等的召回指标之间的条件。在两个实验中(N = 270),我们复制了标准的协作抑制和部分列表提示损伤。与部分列表提示的参与者相比,合作小组对彼此的回忆表现出更多的互惠影响,比部分列表提示的参与者更经常地产生与线索相同分类类别的反应,并表现出更强的集体记忆。这些发现为社会记忆相对于非社会记忆的交叉提示机制的运作提供了证据。我们将讨论这些理论对教育、信息传递、信念和集体叙事的贡献和影响。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"How social is social memory? Isolating the influences of social and nonsocial cues on recall.","authors":"Tori Peña, Nicholas W Pepe, Suparna Rajaram","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001557","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001557","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is intuitive to think that retrieval cues always aid recall. Surprisingly, cues sometimes hurt recall. This counterintuitive phenomenon occurs regardless of whether the cues come from a social (a person) or a nonsocial (a computer or article) source. However, we do not know whether recall impairment differs depending on the source, raising the question-do social versus nonsocial sources create differential impacts on memory and, if so, what theoretical mechanism underlies this difference? We addressed these questions by directly comparing memory impairment across collaborative recall (cues received from social sources) and part-list cued recall (cues received from nonsocial sources). We aligned the two procedures by taking the recall output of each collaborative group and generating cues for part-list cued participants. This yoked design enabled us to present identical cues and equate their presentation sequence across the two cuing conditions. We also devised a group-level recall index for the part-list cued \"groups\" yoked to the collaborative groups, thus equating the recall metric between conditions. Across two experiments (<i>N</i> = 270), we replicated both the standard collaborative inhibition and part-list cuing impairments. Collaborative groups exhibited more reciprocal influence on one another's recall than part-list cuing participants, producing responses from the same taxonomic category as the cues more often than part-list cuing participants, and exhibiting greater collective memory. These findings provide evidence for the operation of the cross-cuing mechanism in social remembering relative to nonsocial remembering. We discuss these theoretical contributions and implications for education, information transmission, beliefs, and collective narratives. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145935775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Number of senses effects are modulated by semantic and lexical factors: Evidence from megastudy analyses. 感官效应的数量受语义和词汇因素的调节:来自大研究分析的证据。
IF 2.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-08 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001562
Di Mo, Barend Beekhuizen, Suzanne Stevenson, Blair C Armstrong

Most prior studies of polysemy have focused on main effects of the number of related senses (NOS) associated with a word on processing. However, a small number of studies have reported interactions between NOS and other psycholinguistic covariates which can moderate, or potentially reverse, these main effects. Such interactions have important implications for understanding how different representations are gradually activated over time and whether this occurs in an interactive or stage-like fashion. We tested for interactions between 15 psycholinguistic covariates and NOS in megastudies of visual and auditory lexical decision, naming, and semantic decision. We leveraged dimensionality reduction techniques applied to the covariates to maximize the robustness of our inferences. We found that interactions were prevalent, particularly for covariates associated with lexical and semantic representations. In most megastudies, when another aspect of the word facilitated access (e.g., high frequency), the facilitatory NOS effects were attenuated, but did not reverse to become inhibitory. In semantic categorization, if another aspect of a word facilitated access, an inhibitory effect of NOS became even more inhibitory. These results are largely, but not completely, consistent with the results of past studies. They support a cascaded/interactive account of processing wherein the processing of word senses is fundamentally intertwined with the processing of various covariates at the lexical and semantic (but not sublexical) levels. Our work offered insight into how statistical methods and megastudy data can be further leveraged in this area and extended to other ambiguous words (e.g., homonyms). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

以往关于一词多义的研究大多集中在词的相关义数对加工的主要影响上。然而,少数研究报告了NOS与其他心理语言学协变量之间的相互作用,这些协变量可以缓和或潜在地逆转这些主要影响。这种互动对于理解不同的表征是如何随着时间的推移而逐渐激活的,以及这是以互动的方式还是以阶段式的方式发生的,具有重要的意义。我们在视觉和听觉词汇决策、命名和语义决策的大型研究中测试了15个心理语言学协变量与NOS之间的相互作用。我们利用应用于协变量的降维技术来最大化我们的推断的稳健性。我们发现交互是普遍存在的,特别是与词汇和语义表示相关的协变量。在大多数大型研究中,当单词的另一个方面促进获取时(例如,高频),促进性NOS效应减弱,但不会逆转为抑制性。在语义分类中,如果一个词的另一个方面有助于获取,则NOS的抑制作用变得更加抑制。这些结果在很大程度上与过去的研究结果一致,但并不完全一致。它们支持一个级联/交互的处理解释,其中词义的处理基本上与词汇和语义(但不是亚词汇)层面的各种协变量的处理交织在一起。我们的工作为统计方法和大研究数据如何在这一领域进一步利用并扩展到其他歧义词(例如同音异义词)提供了见解。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Number of senses effects are modulated by semantic and lexical factors: Evidence from megastudy analyses.","authors":"Di Mo, Barend Beekhuizen, Suzanne Stevenson, Blair C Armstrong","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001562","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001562","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most prior studies of polysemy have focused on main effects of the number of related senses (NOS) associated with a word on processing. However, a small number of studies have reported interactions between NOS and other psycholinguistic covariates which can moderate, or potentially reverse, these main effects. Such interactions have important implications for understanding how different representations are gradually activated over time and whether this occurs in an interactive or stage-like fashion. We tested for interactions between 15 psycholinguistic covariates and NOS in megastudies of visual and auditory lexical decision, naming, and semantic decision. We leveraged dimensionality reduction techniques applied to the covariates to maximize the robustness of our inferences. We found that interactions were prevalent, particularly for covariates associated with lexical and semantic representations. In most megastudies, when another aspect of the word facilitated access (e.g., high frequency), the facilitatory NOS effects were attenuated, but did not reverse to become inhibitory. In semantic categorization, if another aspect of a word facilitated access, an inhibitory effect of NOS became even more inhibitory. These results are largely, but not completely, consistent with the results of past studies. They support a cascaded/interactive account of processing wherein the processing of word senses is fundamentally intertwined with the processing of various covariates at the lexical and semantic (but not sublexical) levels. Our work offered insight into how statistical methods and megastudy data can be further leveraged in this area and extended to other ambiguous words (e.g., homonyms). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145935766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Congruency effects in the retrieval task of the synesthesia stroop, even for briefly learned letter-color associations. 通感stroop检索任务中的一致性效应,甚至对于短暂学习的字母-颜色关联。
IF 2.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-08 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001570
Aurore Zelazny, Xun Liu, Thomas Alrik Sørensen

Grapheme-color synesthesia is a neurological phenomenon in which graphemes evoke specific color experiences. This study investigates whether the color-naming and retrieval tasks of the synesthesia Stroop produce congruency effects that reliably index the synesthetic experience compared to nonsynesthete controls. Experiment 1 compared 18 associator grapheme-color synesthetes and 18 nonsynesthete controls. The nonsynesthete group memorized five letter-color pairings before performing both a color-naming and a retrieval task. While a congruency effect was observed in the color-naming task for synesthetes only, both groups demonstrated congruency effects in the retrieval task. Furthermore, associator synesthetes showed larger congruency effects during the color-naming compared to the retrieval task, a pattern originally attributed to projector synesthetes. Experiment 2 examined whether associator synesthetes would also exhibit congruency effects for nonsynesthetic letter-color pairings. Following a brief exposure to a novel letter-color association, synesthetes exhibited a congruency effect solely in the retrieval task, mirroring the findings from nonsynesthetes in Experiment 1. These results align with MacLeod and Dunbar's continuum of automaticity, suggesting that congruency effects emerge when retrieval processes are less automatized than color-naming ones. Moreover, the presence of congruency effects in both synesthetes and nonsynesthetes indicates that the retrieval task may not differentiate synesthetic experiences from briefly memorized associations. These findings question the utility of the retrieval task of the synesthesia Stroop as an objective tool for distinguishing synesthetes from nonsynesthetes. It also reinforces the need for refined paradigms that better capture the perceptual properties underlying synesthesia. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

字素-颜色联觉是一种神经学现象,其中字素唤起特定的颜色体验。本研究探讨了与非联觉对照相比,联觉Stroop的颜色命名和检索任务是否产生了能够可靠地索引联觉经验的一致性效应。实验1比较了18名联想字素-颜色联觉者和18名非联觉者对照。非联觉组在执行颜色命名和检索任务之前记住了五个字母和颜色的配对。虽然只有联觉者在颜色命名任务中观察到一致性效应,但两组在检索任务中都表现出一致性效应。此外,联想联觉者在颜色命名任务中表现出比检索任务更大的一致性效应,这一模式最初归因于投射联觉者。实验2考察了联想联觉者在非联觉字母-颜色配对中是否也会表现出一致性效应。在短暂接触新的字母-颜色联想后,联觉者仅在检索任务中表现出一致性效应,这反映了实验1中非联觉者的发现。这些结果与MacLeod和Dunbar的自动性连续体一致,表明当检索过程的自动化程度低于颜色命名过程时,一致性效应就会出现。此外,在联觉者和非联觉者中都存在一致性效应,这表明检索任务可能无法区分联觉经验和短暂记忆的关联。这些发现质疑了联觉Stroop检索任务作为区分联觉者和非联觉者的客观工具的实用性。它也加强了对精细范式的需求,以便更好地捕捉联觉背后的感知特性。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Congruency effects in the retrieval task of the synesthesia stroop, even for briefly learned letter-color associations.","authors":"Aurore Zelazny, Xun Liu, Thomas Alrik Sørensen","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001570","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001570","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Grapheme-color synesthesia is a neurological phenomenon in which graphemes evoke specific color experiences. This study investigates whether the color-naming and retrieval tasks of the synesthesia Stroop produce congruency effects that reliably index the synesthetic experience compared to nonsynesthete controls. Experiment 1 compared 18 associator grapheme-color synesthetes and 18 nonsynesthete controls. The nonsynesthete group memorized five letter-color pairings before performing both a color-naming and a retrieval task. While a congruency effect was observed in the color-naming task for synesthetes only, both groups demonstrated congruency effects in the retrieval task. Furthermore, associator synesthetes showed larger congruency effects during the color-naming compared to the retrieval task, a pattern originally attributed to projector synesthetes. Experiment 2 examined whether associator synesthetes would also exhibit congruency effects for nonsynesthetic letter-color pairings. Following a brief exposure to a novel letter-color association, synesthetes exhibited a congruency effect solely in the retrieval task, mirroring the findings from nonsynesthetes in Experiment 1. These results align with MacLeod and Dunbar's continuum of automaticity, suggesting that congruency effects emerge when retrieval processes are less automatized than color-naming ones. Moreover, the presence of congruency effects in both synesthetes and nonsynesthetes indicates that the retrieval task may not differentiate synesthetic experiences from briefly memorized associations. These findings question the utility of the retrieval task of the synesthesia Stroop as an objective tool for distinguishing synesthetes from nonsynesthetes. It also reinforces the need for refined paradigms that better capture the perceptual properties underlying synesthesia. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145935794","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1