Efficient environmental search is an important and adaptive everyday skill. A particular feature of theoretical interest is whether large-scale search is informed by the spatial statistics of the environment-probability cueing is a robust effect in two-dimensional visual search tasks, but studies of large-scale search have generated equivocal findings. Here, we examined whether sensitivity to a statistical cue specified within an allocentric reference frame is modulated by the presence and location of environmental landmarks. Participants explored fully immersive virtual environments, wherein they were presented with an array of locations (columns) and required to search them for a hidden target (i.e., the column that changed color upon activation). A target was present on each trial, appearing within the cued hemispace on 80% of trials. In Experiment 1, the array was surrounded by a featureless circular wall, and participants exhibited no reliable cueing effects. Experiments 2 and 3 introduced a stable landmark into the environment and manipulated its location to be either orthogonal or adjacent to the cued hemispace. Participants reliably biased their search in response to the probability cue, although learning was only observed when the landmark was positioned along the axis orthogonal to the midline separating hemispaces. These findings suggest that adapting search behavior in response to a statistical cue is facilitated by the presence of a stable landmark when it is specified independently of the searcher's viewpoint, although this is dependent upon the spatial relationship between the landmark and the distribution itself. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Probability cueing in large-scale environmental search: The role of landmark cues in statistical learning.","authors":"Shaun Dordoy, Rory Baxter, Alastair D Smith","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001573","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001573","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Efficient environmental search is an important and adaptive everyday skill. A particular feature of theoretical interest is whether large-scale search is informed by the spatial statistics of the environment-probability cueing is a robust effect in two-dimensional visual search tasks, but studies of large-scale search have generated equivocal findings. Here, we examined whether sensitivity to a statistical cue specified within an allocentric reference frame is modulated by the presence and location of environmental landmarks. Participants explored fully immersive virtual environments, wherein they were presented with an array of locations (columns) and required to search them for a hidden target (i.e., the column that changed color upon activation). A target was present on each trial, appearing within the cued hemispace on 80% of trials. In Experiment 1, the array was surrounded by a featureless circular wall, and participants exhibited no reliable cueing effects. Experiments 2 and 3 introduced a stable landmark into the environment and manipulated its location to be either orthogonal or adjacent to the cued hemispace. Participants reliably biased their search in response to the probability cue, although learning was only observed when the landmark was positioned along the axis orthogonal to the midline separating hemispaces. These findings suggest that adapting search behavior in response to a statistical cue is facilitated by the presence of a stable landmark when it is specified independently of the searcher's viewpoint, although this is dependent upon the spatial relationship between the landmark and the distribution itself. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145935903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-02-13DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001446
Yu Chen, Jiawei Huang, Kaiwen Cheng
Efficient written word recognition is crucial for effective reading and comprehension. However, whether deaf people recognize written words through the same psychological mechanisms as those of hearing individuals remains controversial. The present study utilized mouse-tracking technology to examine the differences in the transposed-character effect and the substituted-character effect during the recognition of four-character Chinese words between prelingually deaf adults (PDAs) and their hearing counterparts. The PDAs were found to experience greater difficulties in recognizing Chinese written pseudowords although both groups exhibited significant transposed-character effects with lower accuracies, longer response times, and larger areas under the curve in transposed-character pseudoword conditions. Furthermore, the PDAs demonstrated more pronounced substituted-character effects in the substituted-character pseudoword conditions compared with hearing people. These results revealed that Chinese written word recognition of the hearing participants followed the multiple-route model derived from alphabetic languages, while PDAs tend to rely more on whole-word and orthographic processing due to their limited access to phonological information. This study can provide theoretical guidance and potential targeted intervention measures for enhancing the reading abilities of deaf individuals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
有效的书面单词识别对于有效的阅读和理解至关重要。然而,聋人是否通过与正常人相同的心理机制来识别书面文字仍有争议。本研究利用鼠标跟踪技术,研究了学龄前聋人与正常聋人在四字汉字识别过程中的转置字符效应和替代字符效应差异。结果表明,两组pda在识别汉字假词时均表现出较低的正确率、较长的响应时间和较大的曲线下面积,但在识别汉字假词方面存在较大的困难。此外,与听力正常的人相比,pda在替换字符假词条件下表现出更明显的替换字符效应。结果表明,听力被试的汉字书面识别遵循的是源自字母语言的多路径模式,而pda由于语音信息的获取有限,更倾向于依赖全词和正字法处理。本研究可为提高聋人阅读能力提供理论指导和潜在的针对性干预措施。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Transposed- and substituted-character effects in written word recognition by Chinese prelingually deaf adults: Evidence from mouse-tracking technology.","authors":"Yu Chen, Jiawei Huang, Kaiwen Cheng","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001446","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001446","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Efficient written word recognition is crucial for effective reading and comprehension. However, whether deaf people recognize written words through the same psychological mechanisms as those of hearing individuals remains controversial. The present study utilized mouse-tracking technology to examine the differences in the transposed-character effect and the substituted-character effect during the recognition of four-character Chinese words between prelingually deaf adults (PDAs) and their hearing counterparts. The PDAs were found to experience greater difficulties in recognizing Chinese written pseudowords although both groups exhibited significant transposed-character effects with lower accuracies, longer response times, and larger areas under the curve in transposed-character pseudoword conditions. Furthermore, the PDAs demonstrated more pronounced substituted-character effects in the substituted-character pseudoword conditions compared with hearing people. These results revealed that Chinese written word recognition of the hearing participants followed the multiple-route model derived from alphabetic languages, while PDAs tend to rely more on whole-word and orthographic processing due to their limited access to phonological information. This study can provide theoretical guidance and potential targeted intervention measures for enhancing the reading abilities of deaf individuals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"138-149"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143416091","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-02-27DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001459
James A Grange
Successful goal-directed behavior requires not only selecting the correct response to an object in our environment but also requires selecting the correct object in our environment upon which to act. While most task-switching studies investigate the selection and maintenance of mental representations of response options (so-called response sets), they often do not investigate the selection and maintenance of mental representations of object selection (so-called stimulus sets). In the present study, participants were exposed to a taskswitching paradigm with multiple stimuli in which the relevant stimulus set (i.e., which object to respond to) and response set (i.e., how to respond to that object) independently either repeated or switched on each trial. Of interest was the nature of the task set representation required, and whether response set and stimulus set could be updated independently. Guided by predictions from a computational model of dual-task control (executive control of the theory of visual attention; Logan & Gordon, 2001), seven experiments were conducted that evaluated the independence of task-set components. All experiments confirmed executive control of the theory of visual attention's predictions of an underadditive interaction between response-set and stimulus-set sequence-diagnostic of independent and parallel reconfiguration of components. However, limitations to this independent updating were observed when participants were encouraged to selectively prioritize response-set or stimulus-set reconfiguration via component-specific preparation manipulations. The results are discussed in terms of various hypotheses on the structure of task-set representation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
成功的目标导向行为不仅需要对环境中的物体做出正确的反应,还需要在我们的环境中选择正确的物体来采取行动。虽然大多数任务转换研究调查了反应选项的心理表征的选择和维持(所谓的反应集),但它们通常不调查对象选择的心理表征的选择和维持(所谓的刺激集)。在本研究中,参与者暴露于具有多个刺激的任务切换范式中,其中相关刺激集(即对哪个对象作出反应)和反应集(即如何对该对象作出反应)在每个试验中独立重复或切换。令人感兴趣的是任务集表征的性质,以及反应集和刺激集是否可以独立更新。在双任务控制计算模型预测的指导下(视觉注意理论的执行控制;Logan & Gordon, 2001),进行了七个实验来评估任务集组件的独立性。所有实验都证实了视觉注意理论对反应集和刺激集序列之间的欠加性相互作用的预测的执行控制-独立和平行组件重新配置的诊断。然而,当参与者被鼓励通过特定组件的准备操作来选择性地优先考虑反应集或刺激集重新配置时,这种独立更新的局限性被观察到。根据任务集表示结构的各种假设,对结果进行了讨论。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Control of stimulus set and response set in task switching.","authors":"James A Grange","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001459","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001459","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Successful goal-directed behavior requires not only selecting the correct <i>response</i> to an object in our environment but also requires selecting the correct <i>object</i> in our environment upon which to act. While most task-switching studies investigate the selection and maintenance of mental representations of response options (so-called <i>response sets</i>), they often do not investigate the selection and maintenance of mental representations of object selection (so-called <i>stimulus sets</i>). In the present study, participants were exposed to a taskswitching paradigm with multiple stimuli in which the relevant stimulus set (i.e., which object to respond to) and response set (i.e., how to respond to that object) independently either repeated or switched on each trial. Of interest was the nature of the task set representation required, and whether response set and stimulus set could be updated independently. Guided by predictions from a computational model of dual-task control (executive control of the theory of visual attention; Logan & Gordon, 2001), seven experiments were conducted that evaluated the independence of task-set components. All experiments confirmed executive control of the theory of visual attention's predictions of an underadditive interaction between response-set and stimulus-set sequence-diagnostic of independent and parallel reconfiguration of components. However, limitations to this independent updating were observed when participants were encouraged to selectively prioritize response-set or stimulus-set reconfiguration via component-specific preparation manipulations. The results are discussed in terms of various hypotheses on the structure of task-set representation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"1-33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143525033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-02-24DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001451
Victor Btesh, Neil R Bramley, Maarten Speekenbrink, David A Lagnado
In this study, we investigated human causal learning in a continuous time and space setting. We find participants to be capable active causal structure learners, and with the help of computational modeling explore how they mitigate the complexity of continuous dynamics data to achieve this. We propose that participants combine systematic interventions with a narrowed focus on causal dynamics that occur during and directly downstream of their interventions. This task decomposition approach achieves comparable accuracy to attending to all the dynamics, while discarding almost half of the data. We argue this strategy makes sense from a resource rationality perspective: Ignoring dynamics outside of interventions saves computational cost while the interventions naturally decompose the global learning problem into a series of more manageable subproblems. We also find that when the causal relata are given real-world labels, participants will use their domain-specific priors to guide their structure inferences. In particular, individuals with accurate prior expectations were less likely to make the common local computations error of mistaking an indirect for a direct relationship. Overall, our experiments reinforce the idea that humans are frugal and intuitive active learners who combine actions and inference to optimize learning while minimizing effort. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
在本研究中,我们研究了人类在连续时间和空间环境下的因果学习。我们发现参与者是有能力的主动因果结构学习者,并在计算建模的帮助下探索他们如何减轻连续动态数据的复杂性来实现这一目标。我们建议参与者将系统干预与集中关注其干预期间和直接下游发生的因果动态相结合。这种任务分解方法达到了相当的精度,可以处理所有的动态,同时丢弃几乎一半的数据。我们认为,从资源理性的角度来看,这种策略是有意义的:忽略干预之外的动态可以节省计算成本,而干预会自然地将全局学习问题分解为一系列更易于管理的子问题。我们还发现,当因果关系被赋予现实世界的标签时,参与者将使用他们特定领域的先验来指导他们的结构推理。特别是,具有准确的先验期望的个体不太可能犯将间接关系误认为直接关系的常见局部计算错误。总的来说,我们的实验强化了这样一种观点,即人类是节俭和直觉的主动学习者,他们结合行动和推理来优化学习,同时最大限度地减少努力。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Less is more: Local focus in continuous time causal learning.","authors":"Victor Btesh, Neil R Bramley, Maarten Speekenbrink, David A Lagnado","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001451","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001451","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, we investigated human causal learning in a continuous time and space setting. We find participants to be capable active causal structure learners, and with the help of computational modeling explore how they mitigate the complexity of continuous dynamics data to achieve this. We propose that participants combine systematic interventions with a narrowed focus on causal dynamics that occur during and directly downstream of their interventions. This task decomposition approach achieves comparable accuracy to attending to all the dynamics, while discarding almost half of the data. We argue this strategy makes sense from a resource rationality perspective: Ignoring dynamics outside of interventions saves computational cost while the interventions naturally decompose the global learning problem into a series of more manageable subproblems. We also find that when the causal relata are given real-world labels, participants will use their domain-specific priors to guide their structure inferences. In particular, individuals with accurate prior expectations were less likely to make the common local computations error of mistaking an indirect for a direct relationship. Overall, our experiments reinforce the idea that humans are frugal and intuitive active learners who combine actions and inference to optimize learning while minimizing effort. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"55-80"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143494340","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-04-17DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001489
Jeremy B Caplan, Dominic Guitard
If some list items are studied strongly and others weakly, many memory models predict the effect of strength on memory will be larger when strengths are mixed within a list than between pure lists of a single strength: a list-strength effect. In explaining why list-strength effects were elusive in old/new recognition, Shiffrin et al. (1990) introduced differentiation. This gave the model a way to produce an inverted list-strength effect, which they thought was usually offset by the coexisting expected "upright" list-strength effect. Alternatively, attentional subsetting theory (Caplan, 2023; Caplan & Guitard, 2024b) predicted inverted list-strength effects in some circumstances by considering how the dimensionalities of attended feature spaces might differ for strong and weak items. Inversions were indeed found in manipulations of stimulus duration (e.g., 500 ms vs. 2,000 ms study time/word). Here we replicated the pattern when display time was equated (Experiment 1) and with massed repetition (Experiment 2), ruling out the relevance of vision-locked features and the number of stimulus onsets. Both theoretical accounts of inverted list-strength effects, however, miss the fine structure of the data, namely, reduced hit rates for weak items in pure than mixed lists and the reverse effect (albeit less robust) for strong items. Model fits suggested the critical factor is that list composition parametrically influences the number of deep features processed at test combined with participants' response bias adapting to list composition. In sum, inverted list-strength effects are robustly found in manipulations of item study time and point to differential processing of probe features depending on list composition, compatible with most models. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
如果一些列表项目被研究得很强,而另一些项目被研究得很弱,那么许多记忆模型预测,当列表中混合了强度时,强度对记忆的影响会比在单一强度的纯列表中更大:列表强度效应。Shiffrin等人(1990)在解释为什么列表强度效应在新旧识别中难以捉摸时引入了分化。这给模型提供了一种产生反向列表强度效应的方法,他们认为这种效应通常被共存的预期“直立”列表强度效应所抵消。另外,注意子集理论(Caplan, 2023;Caplan & Guitard, 2024b)通过考虑强项目和弱项目参与特征空间的维度如何不同,预测了在某些情况下的倒列表强度效应。在刺激持续时间的操作中确实发现了反转(例如,500毫秒对2000毫秒的学习时间/单词)。在这里,我们复制了显示时间相等(实验1)和大量重复(实验2)时的模式,排除了视觉锁定特征和刺激次数的相关性。然而,倒排列表强度效应的两种理论解释都忽略了数据的精细结构,即纯列表中弱项目的命中率低于混合列表,而强项目的相反效果(尽管不那么健壮)。模型拟合表明,关键因素是列表组成和参与者对列表组成的反应偏差对深度特征处理数量的参数影响。总之,倒列表强度效应在项目学习时间的操纵中得到了强有力的发现,并指出了根据列表组成对探针特征的差分处理,与大多数模型兼容。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Inverted list-strength effects in recognition.","authors":"Jeremy B Caplan, Dominic Guitard","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001489","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001489","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>If some list items are studied strongly and others weakly, many memory models predict the effect of strength on memory will be larger when strengths are mixed within a list than between pure lists of a single strength: a list-strength effect. In explaining why list-strength effects were elusive in old/new recognition, Shiffrin et al. (1990) introduced differentiation. This gave the model a way to produce an inverted list-strength effect, which they thought was usually offset by the coexisting expected \"upright\" list-strength effect. Alternatively, attentional subsetting theory (Caplan, 2023; Caplan & Guitard, 2024b) predicted inverted list-strength effects in some circumstances by considering how the dimensionalities of attended feature spaces might differ for strong and weak items. Inversions were indeed found in manipulations of stimulus duration (e.g., 500 ms vs. 2,000 ms study time/word). Here we replicated the pattern when display time was equated (Experiment 1) and with massed repetition (Experiment 2), ruling out the relevance of vision-locked features and the number of stimulus onsets. Both theoretical accounts of inverted list-strength effects, however, miss the fine structure of the data, namely, reduced hit rates for weak items in pure than mixed lists and the reverse effect (albeit less robust) for strong items. Model fits suggested the critical factor is that list composition parametrically influences the number of deep features processed at test combined with participants' response bias adapting to list composition. In sum, inverted list-strength effects are robustly found in manipulations of item study time and point to differential processing of probe features depending on list composition, compatible with most models. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"81-101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144037883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-02-17DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001468
Can Mekik, Olivier Vivier, Henry Markovits
There is empirical evidence that people have some intuitive discomfort when they judge that a believable, but invalid response is logically valid. This has led to the hypothesis that there exists a form of "logical intuition" that is responsive to logical form. However, there is also clear evidence that when reasoning with identical forms of inference, responses are not uniform but are instead modulated by access to semantic information related to potential alternatives. In two preregistered studies, we examine the hypothesis that differential access to such information determines the extent to which intuitions signal discomfort. To examine this, we constructed syllogisms using the same logical form but having either few or many alternatives associated with the premises. In Study 1, we show that when accepting a believable conclusion as being valid, confidence was lower for syllogisms having many alternatives. In Study 2, we show that people "like" conclusions based on logically invalid syllogisms having few alternatives more than those based on syllogisms having many alternatives. These results provide clear evidence for a form of "logical intuition" that relies on access to semantic information rather than pure logical form. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
有经验证据表明,当人们判断一个可信但无效的反应在逻辑上是有效的时,他们会有一些直觉上的不适。这导致了一种假设,即存在一种对逻辑形式有反应的“逻辑直觉”形式。然而,也有明确的证据表明,当用相同的推理形式进行推理时,反应不是统一的,而是通过获取与潜在替代方案相关的语义信息来调节的。在两个预先注册的研究中,我们检验了这样一个假设,即对这些信息的不同访问决定了直觉信号不适的程度。为了检验这一点,我们使用相同的逻辑形式构建三段论,但与前提相关联的选择要么少,要么多。在研究1中,我们表明,当接受可信结论为有效时,对于具有许多替代方案的三段论,置信度较低。在研究2中,我们表明人们“喜欢”基于逻辑上无效的、有很少选择的三段论的结论,而不是基于有很多选择的三段论的结论。这些结果为“逻辑直觉”的一种形式提供了明确的证据,这种形式依赖于对语义信息的访问,而不是纯粹的逻辑形式。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"A \"logical intuition\" based on semantic associations.","authors":"Can Mekik, Olivier Vivier, Henry Markovits","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001468","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001468","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is empirical evidence that people have some intuitive discomfort when they judge that a believable, but invalid response is logically valid. This has led to the hypothesis that there exists a form of \"logical intuition\" that is responsive to logical form. However, there is also clear evidence that when reasoning with identical forms of inference, responses are not uniform but are instead modulated by access to semantic information related to potential alternatives. In two preregistered studies, we examine the hypothesis that differential access to such information determines the extent to which intuitions signal discomfort. To examine this, we constructed syllogisms using the same logical form but having either few or many alternatives associated with the premises. In Study 1, we show that when accepting a believable conclusion as being valid, confidence was lower for syllogisms having many alternatives. In Study 2, we show that people \"like\" conclusions based on logically invalid syllogisms having few alternatives more than those based on syllogisms having many alternatives. These results provide clear evidence for a form of \"logical intuition\" that relies on access to semantic information rather than pure logical form. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"102-112"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143442641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-02-17DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001469
Manuel F Pulido, Marijana Macis, Suhad Sonbul
There is now robust evidence of priming effects during sentence processing for adjacent words that form collocations (statistically associated combinations). However, there is very limited evidence regarding how nonadjacent collocations might facilitate processing. Furthermore, no previous research has examined how nonadjacent collocations interplay with other (non)collocational material in the surrounding context. We employed "nested" collocations for the first time, in which more than one contextual element (verb, adjective) is a potential collocate for a noun. For example, in a verb-adjective-noun (V-A-N) phrase, two collocations may be "nested" ("express concerns" + "valid concerns" = "express valid concerns") or only the verb (nonadjacent) or adjective (adjacent) might be collocational. In an eye-tracking experiment with L1 English speakers, we manipulated the collocational status of adjectives adjacent to the noun, (V)-A-N, and verbs nonadjacent to the noun, V-(A)-N. Our results replicated the basic adjacent effect and produced evidence of facilitation for nonadjacent collocations. Additionally, we find preliminary evidence for a syntactic primacy effect, whereby collocational links involving the verb prove more impactful than adjective-noun collocations, despite nonadjacency. Importantly, the results reveal cumulative facilitation in "nested collocations," with a boost resulting from the simultaneous effects observed in adjacent and nonadjacent collocations. Altogether, the results extend our understanding of collocational priming effects beyond single collocations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
现在有强有力的证据表明,在句子处理过程中,对形成搭配(统计相关组合)的相邻单词会产生启动效应。然而,关于非相邻搭配如何促进处理的证据非常有限。此外,以前的研究没有考察非相邻搭配如何与周围环境中的其他(非)搭配材料相互作用。我们首次使用了“嵌套”搭配,其中多个上下文元素(动词,形容词)是名词的潜在搭配。例如,在动词-形容词-名词(V-A-N)短语中,两个搭配可能是“嵌套的”(“表达关注”+“有效关注”=“表达有效关注”),或者只有动词(非相邻)或形容词(相邻)可能是搭配的。在一项以母语为英语的人为对象的眼球追踪实验中,我们操纵了与名词相邻的形容词(V) A- n和非与名词相邻的动词V-(A)- n的搭配状态。我们的研究结果复制了基本的相邻效应,并为非相邻搭配提供了便利的证据。此外,我们发现了句法首因效应的初步证据,即尽管不相邻,但涉及动词的搭配链接证明比形容词-名词搭配更有影响力。重要的是,结果揭示了“嵌套搭配”中的累积促进作用,在相邻和非相邻搭配中观察到的同时效应导致了促进作用的增强。总之,这些结果扩展了我们对搭配启动效应的理解,超越了单一搭配。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"The effects of adjacent and nonadjacent collocations on processing: Eye-tracking evidence from \"nested\" collocations.","authors":"Manuel F Pulido, Marijana Macis, Suhad Sonbul","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001469","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001469","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is now robust evidence of priming effects during sentence processing for adjacent words that form collocations (statistically associated combinations). However, there is very limited evidence regarding how nonadjacent collocations might facilitate processing. Furthermore, no previous research has examined how nonadjacent collocations interplay with other (non)collocational material in the surrounding context. We employed \"nested\" collocations for the first time, in which more than one contextual element (verb, adjective) is a potential collocate for a noun. For example, in a verb-adjective-noun (V-A-N) phrase, two collocations may be \"nested\" (\"express concerns\" + \"valid concerns\" = \"express valid concerns\") or only the verb (nonadjacent) or adjective (adjacent) might be collocational. In an eye-tracking experiment with L1 English speakers, we manipulated the collocational status of adjectives adjacent to the noun, (V)-A-N, and verbs nonadjacent to the noun, V-(A)-N. Our results replicated the basic adjacent effect and produced evidence of facilitation for nonadjacent collocations. Additionally, we find preliminary evidence for a syntactic primacy effect, whereby collocational links involving the verb prove more impactful than adjective-noun collocations, despite nonadjacency. Importantly, the results reveal cumulative facilitation in \"nested collocations,\" with a boost resulting from the simultaneous effects observed in adjacent and nonadjacent collocations. Altogether, the results extend our understanding of collocational priming effects beyond single collocations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"150-167"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143442652","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-02-13DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001466
Luca Moretti, Iring Koch, Raphael Hornjak, Claudia C von Bastian
In conflict tasks, congruency effects are thought to reflect attentional control mechanisms needed to counteract response conflict elicited by incongruent stimuli. Although congruency effects are well-replicable experimentally, recent studies have evidenced low correlations between congruency effects measured across different paradigms, leading to a heated debate over whether these low correlations indicate a lack of construct validity or are rather attributable to high measurement error, as indicated by the poor reliability typically displayed by congruency effects. In the present study, we investigated whether the poor reliabilities of congruency effects are due to their poor theoretical specification. Specifically, we tested whether the psychometric properties of congruency effects can be improved by focusing exclusively on those trials in which response conflict is theoretically expected to be highest. We considered two factors modulating the degree of response conflict: previous trial congruency, with higher conflict following congruent trials, and the time elapsed since stimulus onset, with higher conflict in fast responses. Data from 195 participants completing a Simon and a spatial Stroop paradigm showed that generally poor split-half reliabilities for the full set of trials improved greatly when excluding postincongruent and slow trials. Importantly, between-task correlations also increased substantially when controlling for these factors, suggesting that, with increased reliability, these tasks capture common attentional control ability. Our results suggest that individual differences in conflict tasks can provide valid and reliable measures of inhibition as a major component of attentional control when focusing on the trials with the theoretically highest response conflict. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
在冲突任务中,一致性效应被认为反映了抵消不一致刺激引起的反应冲突所需的注意控制机制。尽管一致性效应在实验上可很好地复制,但最近的研究表明,在不同范式中测量的一致性效应之间存在低相关性,这导致了一场激烈的争论,即这些低相关性是否表明缺乏结构效度,还是可归因于高测量误差,正如一致性效应通常显示的低信度所表明的那样。在本研究中,我们探讨了一致性效应的低信度是否由于它们的理论规范较差。具体来说,我们测试了一致性效应的心理测量特性是否可以通过只关注那些理论上预期反应冲突最高的试验来改善。我们考虑了调节反应冲突程度的两个因素:先前的试验一致性,在一致性试验之后具有更高的冲突,以及自刺激开始以来经过的时间,在快速反应中具有更高的冲突。来自195名完成Simon和空间Stroop范式的参与者的数据表明,当排除后不一致和缓慢的试验时,整套试验通常较差的一半分信度得到了极大的改善。重要的是,当控制这些因素时,任务之间的相关性也大大增加,这表明,随着可靠性的提高,这些任务捕获了共同的注意力控制能力。我们的研究结果表明,当关注具有理论上最高反应冲突的试验时,冲突任务中的个体差异可以作为注意控制的主要组成部分提供有效和可靠的抑制措施。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Quality over quantity: Focusing on high-conflict trials to improve the reliability and validity of attentional control measures.","authors":"Luca Moretti, Iring Koch, Raphael Hornjak, Claudia C von Bastian","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001466","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001466","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In conflict tasks, congruency effects are thought to reflect attentional control mechanisms needed to counteract response conflict elicited by incongruent stimuli. Although congruency effects are well-replicable experimentally, recent studies have evidenced low correlations between congruency effects measured across different paradigms, leading to a heated debate over whether these low correlations indicate a lack of construct validity or are rather attributable to high measurement error, as indicated by the poor reliability typically displayed by congruency effects. In the present study, we investigated whether the poor reliabilities of congruency effects are due to their poor theoretical specification. Specifically, we tested whether the psychometric properties of congruency effects can be improved by focusing exclusively on those trials in which response conflict is theoretically expected to be highest. We considered two factors modulating the degree of response conflict: previous trial congruency, with higher conflict following congruent trials, and the time elapsed since stimulus onset, with higher conflict in fast responses. Data from 195 participants completing a Simon and a spatial Stroop paradigm showed that generally poor split-half reliabilities for the full set of trials improved greatly when excluding postincongruent and slow trials. Importantly, between-task correlations also increased substantially when controlling for these factors, suggesting that, with increased reliability, these tasks capture common attentional control ability. Our results suggest that individual differences in conflict tasks can provide valid and reliable measures of inhibition as a major component of attentional control when focusing on the trials with the theoretically highest response conflict. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"34-54"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143415932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-03-20DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001471
Zhiting Yin, Shuyuan Chen, Ni Wen, Bingsong Zhao, Zhican He, Yanping Liu
The allocation of attention during reading has long been a central focus of research. A key question concerns the extent to which lexical processing is influenced solely by the difficulty of currently fixated words, as proposed by the serial attention hypothesis, or whether it is also influenced by the difficulty of upcoming words (i.e., parafoveal-on-foveal effects [PoF effects]), as proposed by the attention gradient hypothesis. The present study provides oculomotor and neural evidence for how mislocated fixation can influence PoF effects in Chinese reading. We manipulated preview words following the target words (repeated vs. original) and categorized the two-character target words into two fixation position groups (Character 1: no fixation error group vs. Character 2: potential mislocated fixations group). Experiment 1 used an eye-tracking technique, and Experiment 2 coregistered electroencephalogram and eye tracking with a larger character size to validate the findings. Overall, the results indicated that inhibitory repeated PoF effects were observed only at Character 2, as evidenced by fixation durations and fixation-related potentials. These findings provide novel eye-movement and neural evidence suggesting that inhibitory repeated PoF effects may, at least in part, be related to mislocated fixations caused by fixations on posttarget words that are mistakenly recorded as being at the end of target words due to measurement (or saccade) errors, while attention remains focused on repeated preview. Taken together, these findings suggest that the mislocated fixation account, situated within the serial attention hypothesis, provides a viable explanation for interpreting the PoF effect without requiring parallel processing. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
阅读过程中注意力的分配一直是研究的焦点。一个关键的问题是,词汇加工在多大程度上仅仅受到当前固定单词的难度的影响,如连续注意假说所提出的那样,或者是否也受到即将到来的单词的难度的影响(即,如注意梯度假说所提出的,中央凹-中央凹效应[PoF效应])。本研究提供了眼动学和神经学的证据,证明错位注视如何影响汉语阅读中的PoF效应。我们在目标词之后操作预览词(重复和原始),并将两个字符的目标词分为两个注视位置组(字符1:无注视错误组和字符2:潜在注视错误组)。实验1采用眼动追踪技术,实验2用更大的字数共同注册脑电图和眼动追踪来验证研究结果。总的来说,研究结果表明,只有在特征2时才观察到抑制重复PoF效应,这一点可以通过注视时间和注视相关电位来证明。这些发现提供了新的眼动和神经证据,表明抑制重复PoF效应可能(至少在一定程度上)与错误的注视有关:由于测量(或扫视)错误,当注意力仍然集中在重复的预览上时,对后目标词的注视被错误地记录为目标词的结尾。综上所述,这些发现表明,定位错误的固定解释,位于序列注意假说中,为解释PoF效应提供了一个可行的解释,而不需要并行处理。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Repeated previews elicit an inhibitory parafoveal-on-foveal effect in Chinese reading: Implications for attention allocation.","authors":"Zhiting Yin, Shuyuan Chen, Ni Wen, Bingsong Zhao, Zhican He, Yanping Liu","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001471","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001471","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The allocation of attention during reading has long been a central focus of research. A key question concerns the extent to which lexical processing is influenced solely by the difficulty of currently fixated words, as proposed by the serial attention hypothesis, or whether it is also influenced by the difficulty of upcoming words (i.e., parafoveal-on-foveal effects [PoF effects]), as proposed by the attention gradient hypothesis. The present study provides oculomotor and neural evidence for how mislocated fixation can influence PoF effects in Chinese reading. We manipulated preview words following the target words (repeated vs. original) and categorized the two-character target words into two fixation position groups (Character 1: no fixation error group vs. Character 2: potential mislocated fixations group). Experiment 1 used an eye-tracking technique, and Experiment 2 coregistered electroencephalogram and eye tracking with a larger character size to validate the findings. Overall, the results indicated that inhibitory repeated PoF effects were observed only at Character 2, as evidenced by fixation durations and fixation-related potentials. These findings provide novel eye-movement and neural evidence suggesting that inhibitory repeated PoF effects may, at least in part, be related to mislocated fixations caused by fixations on posttarget words that are mistakenly recorded as being at the end of target words due to measurement (or saccade) errors, while attention remains focused on repeated preview. Taken together, these findings suggest that the mislocated fixation account, situated within the serial attention hypothesis, provides a viable explanation for interpreting the PoF effect without requiring parallel processing. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"113-137"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143671621","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Regressive eye movements are commonly observed in response to syntactic ambiguities, yet their characteristics and role in ambiguity resolution remain unclear. This study examined two key questions about rereading in Chinese garden-path sentences: (1) whether rereading is selective, meaning that readers allocate more or longer fixations to specific regions following garden-path disambiguation and (2) whether rereading facilitates comprehension by aiding the recovery of the globally correct interpretation. We therefore conducted an eye-tracking experiment on sentences featuring a naturally occurring syntactic ambiguity (NP1 + VP + NP2 + de + NP3). The results provide clear evidence of selective rereading, as readers refixated the ambiguous region after encountering processing difficulty. However, these refixations did not aid ambiguity resolution, suggesting that while regressions reflect sensitivity to processing disruptions, they do not always contribute to successful reinterpretation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
对句法歧义的反应通常观察到后退性眼动,但其特征和在歧义解决中的作用尚不清楚。本研究考察了汉语园林路径句子重读的两个关键问题:(1)重读是否具有选择性,即读者在园林路径消歧后将更多或更长时间的注意力分配到特定区域;(2)重读是否通过帮助恢复全局正确的解释来促进理解。因此,我们对具有自然句法歧义的句子(NP1 + VP + NP2 + de + NP3)进行了眼动追踪实验。结果提供了选择性重读的明确证据,因为读者在遇到处理困难后重新定位了模糊区域。然而,这些修正并不能帮助解决歧义,这表明虽然回归反映了对处理中断的敏感性,但它们并不总是有助于成功的重新解释。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Selective rereading in Chinese garden path sentences.","authors":"Huandi Chen, Min-Tzu Wu, Patrick Sturt","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001558","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001558","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Regressive eye movements are commonly observed in response to syntactic ambiguities, yet their characteristics and role in ambiguity resolution remain unclear. This study examined two key questions about rereading in Chinese garden-path sentences: (1) whether rereading is selective, meaning that readers allocate more or longer fixations to specific regions following garden-path disambiguation and (2) whether rereading facilitates comprehension by aiding the recovery of the globally correct interpretation. We therefore conducted an eye-tracking experiment on sentences featuring a naturally occurring syntactic ambiguity (NP1 + VP + NP2 + de + NP3). The results provide clear evidence of selective rereading, as readers refixated the ambiguous region after encountering processing difficulty. However, these refixations did not aid ambiguity resolution, suggesting that while regressions reflect sensitivity to processing disruptions, they do not always contribute to successful reinterpretation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145758265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}