Bilinguals simultaneously activate both languages during comprehension and production, requiring cognitive control to manage cross-language interference. Language-switching naming tasks using pictures or digits are traditionally employed to study this control. However, comparisons of these stimuli are scarce, raising critical questions about whether they engage similar cognitive processes. Importantly, assuming their equivalency risks overlooking key aspects of bilingual language control mechanisms. To investigate this, 192 native Chinese speakers learned Turkish words under seven conditions designed to manipulate semantic and associative relationships: unrelated pictures, semantically and associatively related pictures, as well as digits and magnitudes presented either sequentially or randomly. After learning the words to criterion accuracy, participants completed a language-switching picture-naming task. Results revealed larger switching costs for digits than unrelated pictures, an effect absent for magnitudes or other picture types. These findings suggest that digit naming may bypass semantic processing pathways, diverging from the top-down processes typically engaged in picture and magnitude naming. This divergence highlights key differences in cognitive processing and emphasizes the need for caution when comparing stimuli in language control research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
双语者在理解和生产过程中同时激活两种语言,需要认知控制来管理跨语言干扰。使用图片或数字的语言切换命名任务传统上被用来研究这种控制。然而,这些刺激的比较很少,提出了关于它们是否参与类似认知过程的关键问题。重要的是,假设它们是对等的,可能会忽视双语语言控制机制的关键方面。为了研究这一点,192名母语为汉语的人在七种设计条件下学习土耳其语单词,这些条件旨在操纵语义和联想关系:不相关的图片、语义和联想相关的图片、顺序或随机呈现的数字和数值。在学习单词达到标准准确度后,参与者完成了一项语言转换图片命名任务。结果显示,数字的转换成本比不相关的图片要高,而大小或其他图片类型则没有这种影响。这些发现表明,数字命名可能绕过语义处理途径,偏离了通常涉及图像和数量级命名的自上而下的过程。这种差异突出了认知处理的关键差异,并强调了在语言控制研究中比较刺激时需要谨慎。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Digits switch differently: Evidence of divergent cognitive control mechanisms in picture and digit language switching among ab initio learners.","authors":"Adel Chaouch-Orozco, Hong Liu","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001546","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001546","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bilinguals simultaneously activate both languages during comprehension and production, requiring cognitive control to manage cross-language interference. Language-switching naming tasks using pictures or digits are traditionally employed to study this control. However, comparisons of these stimuli are scarce, raising critical questions about whether they engage similar cognitive processes. Importantly, assuming their equivalency risks overlooking key aspects of bilingual language control mechanisms. To investigate this, 192 native Chinese speakers learned Turkish words under seven conditions designed to manipulate semantic and associative relationships: unrelated pictures, semantically and associatively related pictures, as well as digits and magnitudes presented either sequentially or randomly. After learning the words to criterion accuracy, participants completed a language-switching picture-naming task. Results revealed larger switching costs for digits than unrelated pictures, an effect absent for magnitudes or other picture types. These findings suggest that digit naming may bypass semantic processing pathways, diverging from the top-down processes typically engaged in picture and magnitude naming. This divergence highlights key differences in cognitive processing and emphasizes the need for caution when comparing stimuli in language control research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145460435","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The present study investigates whether voluntary saccades or fixations on an item ensure its visual working memory consolidation through three experiments, which used modified attribute amnesia paradigms. In each trial, all the items were first masked, and participants needed to gaze at the masked locations to temporarily unmask the items below. They were asked to search for the target and report its location in presurprise trials and then were unexpectedly asked to report its identity in a surprise trial and two control trials. In Experiments 3 and 4, the participants were further asked to retain information for a brief while before reporting colors or identities. Report accuracy in the surprise trial was significantly lower than in control trials across four experiments, indicating that an attribute amnesia phenomenon was found. All these results demonstrate that neither voluntary saccades toward an item nor fixations on it are a sufficient condition of automatic visual working memory consolidation of it, indicating the separation between the mechanisms of foveal attention and visual working memory consolidation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
本研究采用改进的属性遗忘范式,通过三个实验探讨了自愿性扫视或注视是否确保了视觉工作记忆的巩固。在每次试验中,所有的项目首先被蒙住,参与者需要盯着蒙住的位置暂时揭开下面的项目。在突发性试验中,他们被要求寻找目标并报告其位置,然后在突发性试验和两个对照试验中,他们被意外地要求报告其身份。在实验3和4中,参与者被进一步要求在报告颜色或身份之前保留一小段时间的信息。在四个实验中,意外试验的报告准确性显著低于对照试验,表明发现了属性遗忘现象。这些结果表明,对某一事物的自发扫视和注视都不是该事物自动视觉工作记忆巩固的充分条件,表明中央凹注意与视觉工作记忆巩固的机制存在分离。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Attention, voluntary saccade, or long-term fixation: None of them confirms visual working memory consolidation.","authors":"Xuanxuan Cai, Enfu Sun, Zhongting Chen, Hui Chen","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001545","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001545","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study investigates whether voluntary saccades or fixations on an item ensure its visual working memory consolidation through three experiments, which used modified attribute amnesia paradigms. In each trial, all the items were first masked, and participants needed to gaze at the masked locations to temporarily unmask the items below. They were asked to search for the target and report its location in presurprise trials and then were unexpectedly asked to report its identity in a surprise trial and two control trials. In Experiments 3 and 4, the participants were further asked to retain information for a brief while before reporting colors or identities. Report accuracy in the surprise trial was significantly lower than in control trials across four experiments, indicating that an attribute amnesia phenomenon was found. All these results demonstrate that neither voluntary saccades toward an item nor fixations on it are a sufficient condition of automatic visual working memory consolidation of it, indicating the separation between the mechanisms of foveal attention and visual working memory consolidation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145439789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Samantha A Goewert, Melissa L Stone, Benjamin J Herstam, Alexander L Walters, Brenda A Kirchhoff
Numerous episodic memory research studies have shown that young adults use self-initiated intentional strategies to encode verbal stimuli and that self-initiated intentional encoding strategy use plays a significant role in memory performance. However, the types, frequency, and effectiveness of self-initiated intentional memory retrieval strategies that young adults use during free recall of verbal stimuli from episodic memory have not been systematically investigated. The goals of this study were to (a) systematically examine the types and frequency of self-initiated intentional memory retrieval strategies that young adults use to recall individually presented unrelated words and to (b) investigate whether use of self-initiated intentional memory retrieval strategies during free recall could benefit memory for individually presented unrelated words in addition to use of self-initiated intentional memory strategies during encoding. Young adults intentionally encoded individually presented unrelated words, completed a free recall memory assessment, and made retrospective open-ended and frequency rating scale encoding and retrieval strategy reports. Several types of self-initiated intentional memory retrieval strategies were reported. Ninety-seven and one hundred percent of participants reported using at least one self-initiated systematic intentional memory retrieval strategy in their open-ended and frequency rating scale strategy reports, respectively. Participants reported using individual self-initiated intentional memory retrieval strategies to try to recall 10%-59% of words on average. Self-reported use of concept imagery and sentence generation retrieval strategies predicted free recall when controlling for self-reported use of concept imagery and sentence generation encoding strategies, suggesting that use of self-initiated intentional memory retrieval strategies could benefit verbal episodic memory. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
大量情景记忆研究表明,年轻人使用自发意向策略对言语刺激进行编码,自发意向策略的使用在记忆表现中起着重要作用。然而,年轻人在情景记忆中自由回忆言语刺激时使用的自我发起的有意记忆检索策略的类型、频率和有效性尚未得到系统的研究。本研究的目的是:(a)系统地检查年轻人在回忆单独呈现的不相关词汇时使用的自我发起的有意记忆检索策略的类型和频率;(b)调查在自由回忆过程中,除了在编码过程中使用自我发起的有意记忆策略外,使用自我发起的有意记忆检索策略是否有助于对单独呈现的不相关词汇的记忆。青少年有意编码单独呈现的不相关词汇,完成自由回忆记忆评估,并制作回顾性开放式和频率评定量表编码和检索策略报告。本文报道了几种自我启动的有意记忆检索策略。97%和100%的参与者分别在他们的开放式和频率评定量表策略报告中使用了至少一种自我发起的系统性有意记忆检索策略。参与者报告说,他们使用个人主动有意识的记忆检索策略,试图平均回忆10%-59%的单词。当控制概念意象和句子生成编码策略的使用时,自我报告的概念意象和句子生成检索策略的使用预测了自由回忆,表明使用自我发起的有意记忆检索策略可以促进言语情景记忆。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Young adults' self-initiated intentional memory retrieval strategy use during free recall of unrelated words from episodic memory.","authors":"Samantha A Goewert, Melissa L Stone, Benjamin J Herstam, Alexander L Walters, Brenda A Kirchhoff","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001527","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001527","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Numerous episodic memory research studies have shown that young adults use self-initiated intentional strategies to encode verbal stimuli and that self-initiated intentional encoding strategy use plays a significant role in memory performance. However, the types, frequency, and effectiveness of self-initiated intentional memory retrieval strategies that young adults use during free recall of verbal stimuli from episodic memory have not been systematically investigated. The goals of this study were to (a) systematically examine the types and frequency of self-initiated intentional memory retrieval strategies that young adults use to recall individually presented unrelated words and to (b) investigate whether use of self-initiated intentional memory retrieval strategies during free recall could benefit memory for individually presented unrelated words in addition to use of self-initiated intentional memory strategies during encoding. Young adults intentionally encoded individually presented unrelated words, completed a free recall memory assessment, and made retrospective open-ended and frequency rating scale encoding and retrieval strategy reports. Several types of self-initiated intentional memory retrieval strategies were reported. Ninety-seven and one hundred percent of participants reported using at least one self-initiated systematic intentional memory retrieval strategy in their open-ended and frequency rating scale strategy reports, respectively. Participants reported using individual self-initiated intentional memory retrieval strategies to try to recall 10%-59% of words on average. Self-reported use of concept imagery and sentence generation retrieval strategies predicted free recall when controlling for self-reported use of concept imagery and sentence generation encoding strategies, suggesting that use of self-initiated intentional memory retrieval strategies could benefit verbal episodic memory. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145439806","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Adaptive control refers to flexible adjustments in control settings in response to conflicting situations. There has been a long-standing debate as to whether this adaptation relies on a domain-general or domain-specific process. Recent models predict a U-shaped relation where only highly similar or highly dissimilar tasks show adaptation across tasks, because only those tasks can be represented or activated in parallel. While there has been an abundance of evidence for adaptation within and across highly similar tasks, only some recent studies have reported adaptation across highly dissimilar tasks, with some failures to replicate. In order to further investigate this, we interleaved two very different conflict tasks, a manual multisource interference task and a vocal picture-word interference task. We ran this experiment in Dutch (Experiment 1) and Mandarin (Experiment 2). Across the two experiments, results show no cross-task conflict adaptation. These results do not fit with the suggestion of domain-general adaptive processes nor with the hypothesis of a U-shaped model. Instead, our results are most compatible with a task-specific view on the mechanisms behind adaptive control. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
自适应控制是指对控制设置的灵活调整,以应对冲突的情况。关于这种适应是依赖于领域通用过程还是特定于领域的过程,一直存在着长期的争论。最近的模型预测了一个u型关系,即只有高度相似或高度不相似的任务显示出跨任务的适应性,因为只有这些任务可以并行地表示或激活。虽然有大量证据表明,在高度相似的任务内部和任务之间存在适应,但只有最近的一些研究报告了在高度不同的任务之间的适应,其中一些无法复制。为了进一步研究这一点,我们将两个非常不同的冲突任务,一个手动多源干扰任务和一个语音图像-单词干扰任务交织在一起。我们在荷兰语(实验1)和普通话(实验2)中进行了这个实验。在两个实验中,结果显示没有跨任务冲突适应。这些结果不符合领域一般适应过程的建议,也不符合u型模型的假设。相反,我们的结果与自适应控制背后机制的特定于任务的观点最为一致。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Cognitive control is task specific: Further evidence against the idea of domain-general conflict adaptation.","authors":"Daxun Zhu, Xiangpeng Wang, Enwei Zhao, Nazbanou Nozari, Wim Notebaert, Senne Braem","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001480","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001480","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adaptive control refers to flexible adjustments in control settings in response to conflicting situations. There has been a long-standing debate as to whether this adaptation relies on a domain-general or domain-specific process. Recent models predict a U-shaped relation where only highly similar or highly dissimilar tasks show adaptation across tasks, because only those tasks can be represented or activated in parallel. While there has been an abundance of evidence for adaptation within and across highly similar tasks, only some recent studies have reported adaptation across highly dissimilar tasks, with some failures to replicate. In order to further investigate this, we interleaved two very different conflict tasks, a manual multisource interference task and a vocal picture-word interference task. We ran this experiment in Dutch (Experiment 1) and Mandarin (Experiment 2). Across the two experiments, results show no cross-task conflict adaptation. These results do not fit with the suggestion of domain-general adaptive processes nor with the hypothesis of a U-shaped model. Instead, our results are most compatible with a task-specific view on the mechanisms behind adaptive control. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"1703-1715"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143755595","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-05-19DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001479
September Hope Cowley, Lucy Pearson, David Barner
It is well established that in sentences exhibiting quantifier scope ambiguity such as "a hiker climbed every hill," the surface scope interpretation (where a single hiker climbed all relevant hills) is preferred over the inverse scope interpretation (where multiple hikers each climbed potentially different hills). However, less is known about how individual differences modulate these preferences. In this study, we asked how language experience, as measured by print exposure, affects acceptability judgments and reaction times for surface versus inverse interpretations of sentences with quantifier scope ambiguity. We found that print exposure predicts both of these measures: participants with higher scores on measures of print exposure gave ambiguous sentences lower ratings than participants with lower levels of print exposure and had significantly longer reaction times for inverse scope items in particular than participants with lower levels of print exposure. We conclude that high print exposure may strengthen expectations for the dominant surface scope interpretation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
众所周知,在表现量词范围歧义的句子中,如“一个徒步旅行者爬了每座山”,表面范围解释(一个徒步旅行者爬了所有相关的山)比反向范围解释(多个徒步旅行者每个可能爬不同的山)更可取。然而,对于个体差异如何调节这些偏好,我们所知甚少。在这项研究中,我们询问了语言经验(通过印刷品曝光来衡量)如何影响对量词范围歧义句子的表面解释和反向解释的可接受性判断和反应时间。我们发现,印刷品的暴露可以预测这两项指标:印刷品暴露测试得分较高的参与者对模棱两可句子的评分低于印刷品暴露水平较低的参与者,特别是在反范围项目上的反应时间明显比印刷品暴露水平较低的参与者长。我们的结论是,高印刷曝光可能会加强对显性表面范围解释的期望。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Great expectations: Print exposure predicts resolution of quantifier scope ambiguity.","authors":"September Hope Cowley, Lucy Pearson, David Barner","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001479","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001479","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is well established that in sentences exhibiting quantifier scope ambiguity such as \"a hiker climbed every hill,\" the surface scope interpretation (where a single hiker climbed all relevant hills) is preferred over the inverse scope interpretation (where multiple hikers each climbed potentially different hills). However, less is known about how individual differences modulate these preferences. In this study, we asked how language experience, as measured by print exposure, affects acceptability judgments and reaction times for surface versus inverse interpretations of sentences with quantifier scope ambiguity. We found that print exposure predicts both of these measures: participants with higher scores on measures of print exposure gave ambiguous sentences lower ratings than participants with lower levels of print exposure and had significantly longer reaction times for inverse scope items in particular than participants with lower levels of print exposure. We conclude that high print exposure may strengthen expectations for the dominant surface scope interpretation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"1837-1850"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144095469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-04-07DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001478
Caitlin R Bowman, Dagmar Zeithamova
How do we tailor learning experiences to promote the formation and generalization of conceptual knowledge? Exposing learners to a highly variable set of examples has been postulated to benefit generalization, but evidence is conflicting. In the present study, we manipulated training set variability in terms of both the typicality of training examples (high vs. low coherence) and the number of unique examples (small vs. large set size) while controlling the total number of training trials. The face family category structure was designed to allow participants to learn by picking up on shared features across category members and/or by attending to unique features of individual category members. We found relatively little effect of set size but a clear benefit of high-coherence (lower variability) training both in terms of category learning and generalization. Moreover, high-coherence training biased participants to make judgments based on shared features in both categorization and recognition. Using an exploratory model fitting procedure, we tested the hypothesis that high-coherence training facilitates prototype abstraction. Instead, we found an exemplar model advantage across training conditions. However, there was also systematic misfit for all models for some trial types, including underestimating the influence of shared features in categorization responses. Overall, we show that high-variability training is not necessarily beneficial for concept learning when the total length of training is controlled. Instead, training on typical examples promotes fast learning and broad category knowledge by helping learners extract shared category features. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
我们如何调整学习经验来促进概念性知识的形成和概括?让学习者接触一组高度可变的例子被认为有利于泛化,但证据是相互矛盾的。在本研究中,我们在控制训练试验总数的同时,根据训练样例的典型化(高一致性与低一致性)和唯一样例的数量(小与大集大小)来操纵训练集的可变性。面部家庭类别结构的设计是为了让参与者通过选择类别成员的共同特征和/或通过关注单个类别成员的独特特征来学习。我们发现集合大小的影响相对较小,但在类别学习和泛化方面,高连贯(低可变性)训练都有明显的好处。此外,高连贯训练使参与者在分类和识别方面都倾向于基于共同特征做出判断。使用探索性模型拟合程序,我们验证了高连贯训练促进原型抽象的假设。相反,我们发现了跨训练条件的范例模型优势。然而,对于某些试验类型的所有模型也存在系统性的不拟合,包括低估了分类反应中共同特征的影响。总的来说,我们表明,当训练的总长度受到控制时,高可变性训练并不一定有利于概念学习。相反,对典型示例的训练通过帮助学习者提取共享的类别特征来促进快速学习和广泛的类别知识。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"High coherence among training exemplars promotes broad generalization of face families.","authors":"Caitlin R Bowman, Dagmar Zeithamova","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001478","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001478","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How do we tailor learning experiences to promote the formation and generalization of conceptual knowledge? Exposing learners to a highly variable set of examples has been postulated to benefit generalization, but evidence is conflicting. In the present study, we manipulated training set variability in terms of both the typicality of training examples (high vs. low coherence) and the number of unique examples (small vs. large set size) while controlling the total number of training trials. The face family category structure was designed to allow participants to learn by picking up on shared features across category members and/or by attending to unique features of individual category members. We found relatively little effect of set size but a clear benefit of high-coherence (lower variability) training both in terms of category learning and generalization. Moreover, high-coherence training biased participants to make judgments based on shared features in both categorization and recognition. Using an exploratory model fitting procedure, we tested the hypothesis that high-coherence training facilitates prototype abstraction. Instead, we found an exemplar model advantage across training conditions. However, there was also systematic misfit for all models for some trial types, including underestimating the influence of shared features in categorization responses. Overall, we show that high-variability training is not necessarily beneficial for concept learning when the total length of training is controlled. Instead, training on typical examples promotes fast learning and broad category knowledge by helping learners extract shared category features. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"1735-1760"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143804605","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The present study investigated the word-form encoding process of handwriting in a nonalphabetic writing system, Chinese. The form-preparation paradigm (Experiment 1) and the picture-word interference paradigm (Experiment 2) were adopted to examine the facilitation effects of radical or logographeme overlap in Chinese handwritten production. Three different groups of Chinese writers were involved: Mainland Chinese participants who mainly used phonology-based Chinese input methods (Pinyin) for typewriting and the simplified Chinese script, Hong Kong participants who mainly used orthography-based input methods (e.g., Sucheng, Cangjie) and the traditional script, and Taiwanese participants who mainly used phonology-based input methods (Zhuyin) and the traditional script. The radical effects were consistently observed in the two paradigms across groups, indicating a prominent role of radicals in planning Chinese handwritten production. The Hong Kong participants showed a significantly larger radical effect than the Taiwanese participants, suggesting an influence of typewriting experience on the salience of radicals during Chinese handwriting. On the other hand, the logographeme effects were significant in the Mainland participants only and significantly smaller than the radical effects in the form-preparation paradigm and at 0-ms stimulus onset asynchrony in the picture-word interference paradigm. No significant difference was found between the radical and logographeme effects at -100- and 100-ms stimulus onset asynchrony, suggesting that the time courses of radical processing and logographeme processing are similar despite the lower salience of logographemes in planning Chinese handwritten production. Overall, these findings suggest that radicals and (nonradical) logographemes are processed at the same level of word-form encoding during Chinese handwritten production, but with different saliences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
本研究研究了汉语非字母书写系统中手写的词形编码过程。采用形式准备范式(实验1)和图词干扰范式(实验2)考察了词根重叠或字素重叠在汉语手写体生产中的促进作用。研究涉及三个不同的中国写作者群体:大陆参与者主要使用基于语音的中文输入法(拼音)打字和简体汉字,香港参与者主要使用基于正字法的输入法(如宿城、仓颉)和繁体汉字,台湾参与者主要使用基于语音的输入法(注音)和繁体汉字。自由基效应在两种范式中均得到了一致的观察,这表明自由基在规划汉语手写生产中起着重要作用。香港参与者比台湾参与者表现出更大的激进效应,这表明打字经历对汉字书写中激进的显著性有影响。另一方面,字素效应仅在大陆被试中显著,且显著小于形式-准备范式和图-词干扰范式在0-ms刺激启动时的非同步效应。在-100 ms和100 ms刺激开始时,自由基和字素的非同步效应无显著性差异,这表明尽管字素在规划汉字手写生产中的显著性较低,但自由基加工和字素加工的时间过程是相似的。综上所述,这些发现表明,在汉语手写体生产过程中,词根和(非词根)标素在相同的词形编码水平上被加工,但具有不同的显著性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Planning units in Chinese handwriting: Comparing the role of radicals and logographemes.","authors":"Jie Wang, Leqi Cheng, Ya-Ning Chang, Urs Maurer, Suiping Wang, Hsuan-Chih Chen","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001458","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001458","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study investigated the word-form encoding process of handwriting in a nonalphabetic writing system, Chinese. The form-preparation paradigm (Experiment 1) and the picture-word interference paradigm (Experiment 2) were adopted to examine the facilitation effects of radical or logographeme overlap in Chinese handwritten production. Three different groups of Chinese writers were involved: Mainland Chinese participants who mainly used phonology-based Chinese input methods (Pinyin) for typewriting and the simplified Chinese script, Hong Kong participants who mainly used orthography-based input methods (e.g., Sucheng, Cangjie) and the traditional script, and Taiwanese participants who mainly used phonology-based input methods (Zhuyin) and the traditional script. The radical effects were consistently observed in the two paradigms across groups, indicating a prominent role of radicals in planning Chinese handwritten production. The Hong Kong participants showed a significantly larger radical effect than the Taiwanese participants, suggesting an influence of typewriting experience on the salience of radicals during Chinese handwriting. On the other hand, the logographeme effects were significant in the Mainland participants only and significantly smaller than the radical effects in the form-preparation paradigm and at 0-ms stimulus onset asynchrony in the picture-word interference paradigm. No significant difference was found between the radical and logographeme effects at -100- and 100-ms stimulus onset asynchrony, suggesting that the time courses of radical processing and logographeme processing are similar despite the lower salience of logographemes in planning Chinese handwritten production. Overall, these findings suggest that radicals and (nonradical) logographemes are processed at the same level of word-form encoding during Chinese handwritten production, but with different saliences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"1821-1836"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143415931","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-03-31DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001456
Soobin H Hong, Amy R Zou, Aspen H Yoo, Anne G E Collins
Reinforcement learning (RL) frameworks have been extremely successful at capturing how biological agents learn to make rewarding choices. However, there is also increasing evidence that multiple cognitive processes, including working memory (WM) and episodic memory (EM), support such learning in parallel with value-based mechanisms such as RL. Here, we investigate EM's role in a context where both RL and WM are known to strongly support learning. We develop two new experimental paradigms to isolate EM's contributions, using trial-unique signals (Experiment 1) and temporal context effects (Experiment 2) to tag EM. As predicted, our results across both experiments consistently showed a weak role of EM in learning alongside RL and WM. However, surprisingly, we showed that EM's contributions did not improve overall behavior; instead, participants appeared to primarily encode in or retrieve from the EM part of a past trial's information (the stimulus-action choice, without outcome), leading to characteristic error patterns. Across both experiments, computational modeling confirmed a small contribution of traces of past stimulus-action (association) events stored in EM to learning behavior. Our results shed light on the format of EM traces and how they support decision making. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
强化学习(RL)框架在捕捉生物代理如何学习做出有益选择方面非常成功。然而,也有越来越多的证据表明,包括工作记忆(WM)和情景记忆(EM)在内的多种认知过程与RL等基于价值的机制同时支持这种学习。在这里,我们研究了在RL和WM都强烈支持学习的背景下,EM的作用。我们开发了两个新的实验范例来分离EM的贡献,使用试验唯一信号(实验1)和时间上下文效应(实验2)来标记EM。正如预测的那样,我们在两个实验中的结果一致表明EM在学习中的作用与RL和WM一样弱。然而,令人惊讶的是,我们发现EM的贡献并没有改善整体行为;相反,参与者似乎主要是对过去试验信息的EM部分进行编码或检索(刺激-行动选择,没有结果),从而导致典型的错误模式。在这两个实验中,计算模型证实了存储在EM中的过去刺激-动作(关联)事件的痕迹对学习行为的一小部分贡献。我们的研究结果揭示了EM轨迹的格式以及它们如何支持决策。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Episodic memory contributions to working memory-supported reinforcement learning.","authors":"Soobin H Hong, Amy R Zou, Aspen H Yoo, Anne G E Collins","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001456","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001456","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reinforcement learning (RL) frameworks have been extremely successful at capturing how biological agents learn to make rewarding choices. However, there is also increasing evidence that multiple cognitive processes, including working memory (WM) and episodic memory (EM), support such learning in parallel with value-based mechanisms such as RL. Here, we investigate EM's role in a context where both RL and WM are known to strongly support learning. We develop two new experimental paradigms to isolate EM's contributions, using trial-unique signals (Experiment 1) and temporal context effects (Experiment 2) to tag EM. As predicted, our results across both experiments consistently showed a weak role of EM in learning alongside RL and WM. However, surprisingly, we showed that EM's contributions did not improve overall behavior; instead, participants appeared to primarily encode in or retrieve from the EM part of a past trial's information (the stimulus-action choice, without outcome), leading to characteristic error patterns. Across both experiments, computational modeling confirmed a small contribution of traces of past stimulus-action (association) events stored in EM to learning behavior. Our results shed light on the format of EM traces and how they support decision making. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"1716-1734"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143755596","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-04-07DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001476
Glenn P Williams, Neil W Kirk, Luz María Sánchez, Ziba Afshar, Yun Wen, Mathieu Declerck
Language control is an essential cognitive process that allows bilinguals to fluently produce language by reducing cross-language interference. Yet, it remains unclear whether the control processes implemented when reducing cross-language interference are similar to those when reducing within-language interference. Since prior research has shown contradictory results, we set out to investigate this issue further based on a combination of language switch costs, as a measure of control processes resolving cross-language interference, and Stroop incongruency, as a measure of control processes resolving within-language interference. Relying on a range of statistical techniques, the results across three experiments, including a replication of Experiment 1 of Liu et al. (2019), testing three different groups of bilinguals (i.e., Dutch-English, Arabic-English, and Chinese-English) showed no clear interaction between language switch costs and Stroop incongruency, and neither was this pattern influenced by language dominance. These results are more in line with the claim that control processes implemented to reduce cross- and within-language interference are separate or occur in separate stages of processing. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
语言控制是一个重要的认知过程,它使双语者能够通过减少跨语言干扰而流利地产生语言。然而,减少跨语言干扰时实施的控制过程是否与减少语言内干扰时实施的控制过程相似尚不清楚。由于先前的研究显示出相互矛盾的结果,我们开始基于语言转换成本(解决跨语言干扰的控制过程的衡量标准)和Stroop不一致(解决语言内干扰的控制过程的衡量标准)的组合来进一步研究这个问题。基于一系列统计技术,三个实验的结果,包括Liu等人(2019)的实验1的复制,测试了三组不同的双语者(即荷兰语-英语、阿拉伯语-英语和汉语-英语),结果显示语言转换成本和Stroop不一致之间没有明显的相互作用,这种模式也不受语言优势的影响。这些结果更符合这样一种说法,即为减少跨语言和语言内部干扰而实施的控制过程是分开的,或者发生在处理的不同阶段。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Control processes of cross- and within-language interference-A replication of Liu et al. (2019).","authors":"Glenn P Williams, Neil W Kirk, Luz María Sánchez, Ziba Afshar, Yun Wen, Mathieu Declerck","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001476","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001476","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Language control is an essential cognitive process that allows bilinguals to fluently produce language by reducing cross-language interference. Yet, it remains unclear whether the control processes implemented when reducing cross-language interference are similar to those when reducing within-language interference. Since prior research has shown contradictory results, we set out to investigate this issue further based on a combination of language switch costs, as a measure of control processes resolving cross-language interference, and Stroop incongruency, as a measure of control processes resolving within-language interference. Relying on a range of statistical techniques, the results across three experiments, including a replication of Experiment 1 of Liu et al. (2019), testing three different groups of bilinguals (i.e., Dutch-English, Arabic-English, and Chinese-English) showed no clear interaction between language switch costs and Stroop incongruency, and neither was this pattern influenced by language dominance. These results are more in line with the claim that control processes implemented to reduce cross- and within-language interference are separate or occur in separate stages of processing. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"1796-1820"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143804559","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-06-02DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001494
Phil Peper, B Hunter Ball
Research in the retrospective memory domain has shown that individuals encode information less effortfully when expecting a reminder system (i.e., external store) to be available at the test. Critically, this expectation leads to worse memory performance when the reminder is unexpectedly removed. The present study examined whether these findings extend to prospective memory (PM) intentions, which are thought to maintain a privileged status in memory and therefore may be less sensitive to expectancy effects. Participants formed the intention to make a special PM response to target items across four ongoing task blocks. Study duration (Experiments 1 and 3), pupil size (Experiment 2), and self-report (Experiments 1-3) indexed encoding effort while learning these targets. Participants had reminders available across the first three blocks (i.e., targets listed at the top of the screen), but not on the fourth. Critically, only one condition was informed that they would not have a reminder prior to encoding targets in the fourth block. Results showed that expecting a reminder lowered objective (Experiments 1 and 3) and subjective (Experiments 1-3) encoding effort and reduced unaided PM retrieval (Experiments 1-3) in the fourth block, independent of memory load (Experiments 3). Objective (Experiments 1 and 3) and subjective (Experiments 1-3) effort also partially mediated the influence of expectations on unaided PM retrieval. These findings suggest PM and retrospective memory encoding operate similarly and that participants can alter learning to more effectively commit PM targets to memory when reminders are not expected. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
回顾记忆领域的研究表明,当个体期望在测试中有一个提醒系统(即外部存储)可用时,他们编码信息的努力会减少。关键的是,当提醒被意外删除时,这种期望会导致更差的内存性能。目前的研究考察了这些发现是否延伸到前瞻记忆(PM)意图,它被认为在记忆中保持特权地位,因此可能对预期效应不太敏感。参与者形成了对四个正在进行的任务块中的目标项目做出特殊PM响应的意图。学习时间(实验1和3)、瞳孔大小(实验2)和自我报告(实验1-3)对学习这些目标时的编码努力进行了评价。参与者在前三个模块(即屏幕顶部列出的目标)中都有提醒,但在第四个模块中没有。关键的是,只有一个条件被告知他们在编码第四个块中的目标之前不会有提醒。结果表明,期待提示降低了客观(实验1和3)和主观(实验1-3)的编码努力,并减少了独立于记忆负荷(实验3)的第四个区块的无辅助PM检索(实验1-3)。客观努力(实验1和实验3)和主观努力(实验1-3)也部分介导了期望对自助PM检索的影响。这些发现表明,PM和回顾性记忆编码的运作相似,参与者可以改变学习方式,在不期望提醒时更有效地将PM目标记在记忆中。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Great expectations: Anticipating a reminder influences prospective memory encoding and unaided retrieval.","authors":"Phil Peper, B Hunter Ball","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001494","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001494","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research in the retrospective memory domain has shown that individuals encode information less effortfully when expecting a reminder system (i.e., external store) to be available at the test. Critically, this expectation leads to worse memory performance when the reminder is unexpectedly removed. The present study examined whether these findings extend to prospective memory (PM) intentions, which are thought to maintain a privileged status in memory and therefore may be less sensitive to expectancy effects. Participants formed the intention to make a special PM response to target items across four ongoing task blocks. Study duration (Experiments 1 and 3), pupil size (Experiment 2), and self-report (Experiments 1-3) indexed encoding effort while learning these targets. Participants had reminders available across the first three blocks (i.e., targets listed at the top of the screen), but not on the fourth. Critically, only one condition was informed that they would not have a reminder prior to encoding targets in the fourth block. Results showed that expecting a reminder lowered objective (Experiments 1 and 3) and subjective (Experiments 1-3) encoding effort and reduced unaided PM retrieval (Experiments 1-3) in the fourth block, independent of memory load (Experiments 3). Objective (Experiments 1 and 3) and subjective (Experiments 1-3) effort also partially mediated the influence of expectations on unaided PM retrieval. These findings suggest PM and retrospective memory encoding operate similarly and that participants can alter learning to more effectively commit PM targets to memory when reminders are not expected. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"1761-1777"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12262018/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144200722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}