Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-04-04DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001339
Yong Hoon Chung, Joyce Tam, Brad Wyble, Viola S Störmer
Prior research has shown that visual working memory capacity is enhanced for meaningful stimuli (i.e., real-world objects) compared to abstract shapes (i.e., colored circles). Here, we hypothesized that the shape of meaningful objects would be better remembered incidentally than the shape of nonmeaningful objects in a color memory task where the shape of the objects is task-irrelevant. We used a surprise-trial paradigm in which participants performed a color memory task for several trials before being probed with a surprise trial that asked them about the shape of the last object they saw. Across three experiments, we found a memory advantage for recognizable shapes relative to scrambled versions of these shapes (Experiment 1) that was robust across different encoding times (Experiment 2), and the addition of a verbal suppression task (Experiment 3). Interestingly, this advantage disappeared when all objects were from the same category (Experiment 4), suggesting that people are incidentally encoding broad conceptual information about object identities, but not visual details. Finally, when we asked about the location of objects in a surprise trial, we did not observe any difference between the two stimulus types (Experiment 5). Overall, these results show that conceptual information about the categories of meaningful objects is incidentally encoded into working memory even when task-irrelevant. This privilege for meaningful information does not exhibit a trade-off with location memory, suggesting that meaningful features influence representations of visual working memory in higher-level visual regions without altering the use of spatial reference frames at the lower level. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Conceptual information of meaningful objects is stored incidentally.","authors":"Yong Hoon Chung, Joyce Tam, Brad Wyble, Viola S Störmer","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001339","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001339","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prior research has shown that visual working memory capacity is enhanced for meaningful stimuli (i.e., real-world objects) compared to abstract shapes (i.e., colored circles). Here, we hypothesized that the shape of meaningful objects would be better remembered incidentally than the shape of nonmeaningful objects in a color memory task where the shape of the objects is task-irrelevant. We used a surprise-trial paradigm in which participants performed a color memory task for several trials before being probed with a surprise trial that asked them about the shape of the last object they saw. Across three experiments, we found a memory advantage for recognizable shapes relative to scrambled versions of these shapes (Experiment 1) that was robust across different encoding times (Experiment 2), and the addition of a verbal suppression task (Experiment 3). Interestingly, this advantage disappeared when all objects were from the same category (Experiment 4), suggesting that people are incidentally encoding broad conceptual information about object identities, but not visual details. Finally, when we asked about the location of objects in a surprise trial, we did not observe any difference between the two stimulus types (Experiment 5). Overall, these results show that conceptual information about the categories of meaningful objects is incidentally encoded into working memory even when task-irrelevant. This privilege for meaningful information does not exhibit a trade-off with location memory, suggesting that meaningful features influence representations of visual working memory in higher-level visual regions without altering the use of spatial reference frames at the lower level. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"82-96"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140853349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-05-06DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001354
Simon Stephan
This article investigates people's judgments of actual causation in the context of a previously neglected property of causal structures-their reversibility, that is, whether an effect persists or returns to its original state if its causes are removed. Causal reversibility, and its potential impact on causal judgment, was recently analyzed theoretically by Ross and Woodward (2022). They hypothesized that reversibility might affect people's evaluation of causes in late-preemption scenarios. The typical finding in preemption scenarios is that events happening earlier are considered to be actual causes, while events happening later are regarded as noncauses. The hypothesis is that this robust intuition depends on causal reversibility and that in reversible structures later events are regarded as actual causes. Across three main experiments and one supplementary study (N = 590), it is shown that reversibility has the predicted effect: later causes are perceived to make an actual causal contribution to the effect. It is also shown that Henne et al. (2023), in a first study, did not find evidence for Ross and Woodward's hypothesis because they did not test whether people regard later causes in preemption-like sequences of reversible structures as maintainers and not as triggers of their effect. Because they used test questions that asked explicitly for triggering rather than maintaining or were at least ambiguous, their results seemed to show that people think that later events have no causal impact. Maintaining is a relevant causal concept deserving more attention in both philosophical theories and psychological studies on causal cognition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Reasoning about actual causation in reversible and irreversible causal structures.","authors":"Simon Stephan","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001354","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001354","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article investigates people's judgments of actual causation in the context of a previously neglected property of causal structures-their reversibility, that is, whether an effect persists or returns to its original state if its causes are removed. Causal reversibility, and its potential impact on causal judgment, was recently analyzed theoretically by Ross and Woodward (2022). They hypothesized that reversibility might affect people's evaluation of causes in late-preemption scenarios. The typical finding in preemption scenarios is that events happening earlier are considered to be actual causes, while events happening later are regarded as noncauses. The hypothesis is that this robust intuition depends on causal reversibility and that in reversible structures later events are regarded as actual causes. Across three main experiments and one supplementary study (<i>N</i> = 590), it is shown that reversibility has the predicted effect: later causes are perceived to make an actual causal contribution to the effect. It is also shown that Henne et al. (2023), in a first study, did not find evidence for Ross and Woodward's hypothesis because they did not test whether people regard later causes in preemption-like sequences of reversible structures as maintainers and not as triggers of their effect. Because they used test questions that asked explicitly for triggering rather than maintaining or were at least ambiguous, their results seemed to show that people think that later events have no causal impact. Maintaining is a relevant causal concept deserving more attention in both philosophical theories and psychological studies on causal cognition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"152-169"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140859358","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-05-06DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001344
Emilie Joly-Burra, Maximilian Haas, Gianvito Laera, Paolo Ghisletta, Matthias Kliegel, Sascha Zuber
In sharp contrast to event-based prospective memory (PM), dynamics of (re)allocation of attention between the ongoing and PM tasks have been much less investigated in time-based PM tasks. We propose an in-depth examination of attention allocation in a time-based PM task by jointly analyzing multiple indicators of time-monitoring behavior, net and time-structured intraindividual variability (IIV) in ongoing-task reaction times (OT RTs), and task performance. Results from dynamic structural equation modeling in a lifespan sample of 198 adults (19-86 years) revealed that larger fluctuations in OT RTs (net IIV) predicted poorer OT performance, but fostered a more efficient pattern of time-monitoring behavior (i.e., checking a clock more frequently and strategically, and slowing OT RTs during the PM response window) that, in turn, enhanced PM. Conversely, greater inertia in OT RTs (time-structured IIV) led to fewer clock-checks and poorer PM performance. Focusing attention on time monitoring to enhance PM performance did not detrimentally affect OT accuracy. Instead, participants showed a speed-accuracy tradeoff to optimize both OT and PM accuracies by slowing their OT RTs during the PM response window. This study therefore shows that two concomitant aspects of IIV (net and time-structured IIV) not only predicted time-monitoring behavior, but also OT and PM accuracies differentially, hence advocating for the necessity to consider both aspects of IIV and time monitoring together to better understand attention allocation policies in time-based PM tasks. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
与基于事件的前瞻性记忆(PM)形成鲜明对比的是,在基于时间的前瞻性记忆任务中,注意力在进行中任务和前瞻性记忆任务之间的(再)分配动态研究要少得多。我们建议通过联合分析时间监控行为的多个指标、进行中任务反应时间(OT RTs)的净值和时间结构个体内变异性(IIV)以及任务表现,对基于时间的前瞻性记忆任务中的注意力分配进行深入研究。对 198 名成年人(19-86 岁)进行的动态结构方程建模结果表明,OT 反应时间的较大波动(净 IIV)预示着较差的 OT 成绩,但却促进了更有效的时间监控行为模式(即更频繁、更有策略地查看时钟,并在下午的反应窗口期间减慢 OT 反应时间),进而提高了下午的成绩。相反,OT 实时反应(时间结构 IIV)的惰性越大,则时钟检查次数越少,PM 表现越差。将注意力集中在时间监控上以提高 PM 成绩并不会对 OT 准确性产生不利影响。相反,受试者表现出了速度-准确性的权衡,通过在下午反应窗口期间减慢他们的 OT 实时时间来优化 OT 和 PM 的准确性。因此,本研究表明,IIV的两个并存方面(净IIV和时间结构IIV)不仅能预测时间监控行为,还能预测不同的OT和PM准确率,因此主张有必要同时考虑IIV和时间监控这两个方面,以更好地理解基于时间的PM任务中的注意力分配政策。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"From attentional fluctuations to intentional fluctuations? Monitoring behavior and intraindividual variability in time-based prospective memory.","authors":"Emilie Joly-Burra, Maximilian Haas, Gianvito Laera, Paolo Ghisletta, Matthias Kliegel, Sascha Zuber","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001344","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001344","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In sharp contrast to event-based prospective memory (PM), dynamics of (re)allocation of attention between the ongoing and PM tasks have been much less investigated in time-based PM tasks. We propose an in-depth examination of attention allocation in a time-based PM task by jointly analyzing multiple indicators of time-monitoring behavior, net and time-structured intraindividual variability (IIV) in ongoing-task reaction times (OT RTs), and task performance. Results from dynamic structural equation modeling in a lifespan sample of 198 adults (19-86 years) revealed that larger fluctuations in OT RTs (net IIV) predicted poorer OT performance, but fostered a more efficient pattern of time-monitoring behavior (i.e., checking a clock more frequently and strategically, and slowing OT RTs during the PM response window) that, in turn, enhanced PM. Conversely, greater inertia in OT RTs (time-structured IIV) led to fewer clock-checks and poorer PM performance. Focusing attention on time monitoring to enhance PM performance did not detrimentally affect OT accuracy. Instead, participants showed a speed-accuracy tradeoff to optimize both OT and PM accuracies by slowing their OT RTs during the PM response window. This study therefore shows that two concomitant aspects of IIV (net and time-structured IIV) not only predicted time-monitoring behavior, but also OT and PM accuracies differentially, hence advocating for the necessity to consider both aspects of IIV and time monitoring together to better understand attention allocation policies in time-based PM tasks. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"46-67"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140867072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-02-26DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001337
Ricardo Morales-Torres, Tobias Egner
The capacity for goal-directed behavior relies on the generation and implementation of task sets. While task sets are traditionally defined as mnemonic ensembles linking task goals to stimulus-response mappings, we here asked the question whether they may also entail information about task difficulty: does the level of focus required for performing a task become incorporated within the task set? We addressed this question by employing a cued task-switching protocol, wherein participants engaged in two intermixed tasks with trial-unique stimuli. Both tasks were equally challenging during a baseline and a transfer phase, while their difficulty was manipulated during an intermediate learning phase by varying the proportion of trials with congruent versus incongruent response mappings between the two tasks. Comparing congruency effects between the baseline and transfer phases, Experiment 1 showed that the task with a low (high) proportion of congruent trials in the learning phase displayed reduced (increased) cross-task interference effects in the transfer phase, indicating that the level of task focus required in the learning phase had become associated with each task set. Experiment 2 indicated that strengthening of task focus level in the task with a low proportion of congruent trials was the primary driver of this effect. Experiment 3 ruled out the possibility of cue-control associations mediating this effect. Taken together, our results show that task sets can become associated with the focus level required to successfully implement them, thus significantly expanding our concept of the type of information that makes up a task set. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Beyond stimulus-response rules: Task sets incorporate information about performance difficulty.","authors":"Ricardo Morales-Torres, Tobias Egner","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001337","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001337","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The capacity for goal-directed behavior relies on the generation and implementation of task sets. While task sets are traditionally defined as mnemonic ensembles linking task goals to stimulus-response mappings, we here asked the question whether they may also entail information about task difficulty: does the level of focus required for performing a task become incorporated within the task set? We addressed this question by employing a cued task-switching protocol, wherein participants engaged in two intermixed tasks with trial-unique stimuli. Both tasks were equally challenging during a baseline and a transfer phase, while their difficulty was manipulated during an intermediate learning phase by varying the proportion of trials with congruent versus incongruent response mappings between the two tasks. Comparing congruency effects between the baseline and transfer phases, Experiment 1 showed that the task with a low (high) proportion of congruent trials in the learning phase displayed reduced (increased) cross-task interference effects in the transfer phase, indicating that the level of task focus required in the learning phase had become associated with each task set. Experiment 2 indicated that strengthening of task focus level in the task with a low proportion of congruent trials was the primary driver of this effect. Experiment 3 ruled out the possibility of cue-control associations mediating this effect. Taken together, our results show that task sets can become associated with the focus level required to successfully implement them, thus significantly expanding our concept of the type of information that makes up a task set. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"14-45"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11345883/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139974266","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Julie Y L Chow, Kelly G Garner, Daniel Pearson, James Heber, Mike E Le Pelley
Previous research has demonstrated that attentional prioritization is shaped by prior experience of reward uncertainty: Attention is more likely to be captured by a stimulus associated with a variable (uncertain) reward than a stimulus that provides diagnostic information about available reward. This finding is noteworthy, because it runs counter to the principle that cognition is motivated to reduce uncertainty and hence surprise. Here we investigated whether this pattern of uncertainty-modulated attentional capture (UMAC) reflects a process of attention for learning, wherein uncertainty-related stimuli are prioritized in an attempt to learn about their true predictive status. To address this, we examined the distinct impact of two information sources that modulate potential for learning: explicit instruction versus ongoing experience of prediction error in reward feedback. Experiment 1 demonstrated that providing explicit instructions-and hence negating the need for further learning-did not reduce the magnitude of the UMAC effect, indicating that UMAC does not reflect attention for learning as a strategic approach for determining the task state. On the other hand, Experiment 2 showed that instructions alone were insufficient to generate a UMAC effect in the absence of reward feedback, suggesting that the impact of uncertainty on rapid attentional prioritization is driven by direct experience of prediction error. Taken together, these findings point to two possibilities: UMAC may reflect attention for learning operating at an implicit level or may evince an attentional system that is configured for rapid detection of sources of experienced uncertainty so that subsequent behavior can be tailored appropriately. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
先前的研究表明,注意力优先级是由先前的奖励不确定性经验塑造的:注意力更有可能被与可变(不确定)奖励相关的刺激所捕获,而不是提供有关可用奖励的诊断信息的刺激。这一发现值得注意,因为它违背了认知是为了减少不确定性,从而减少惊喜的原则。在这里,我们研究了这种不确定性调制的注意捕获(UMAC)模式是否反映了一个学习的注意过程,在这个过程中,不确定性相关的刺激被优先考虑,试图了解它们的真实预测状态。为了解决这个问题,我们研究了调节学习潜能的两种信息源的不同影响:显性指导与奖励反馈中预测错误的持续经验。实验1表明,提供明确的指示——从而否定进一步学习的需要——并没有降低UMAC效应的大小,这表明UMAC并没有反映学习注意力作为确定任务状态的策略方法。另一方面,实验2表明,在没有奖励反馈的情况下,指令本身不足以产生UMAC效应,这表明不确定性对快速注意优先化的影响是由预测误差的直接经验驱动的。综上所述,这些发现指出了两种可能性:UMAC可能反映了在内隐水平上对学习操作的注意,或者可能表明了一种注意系统,该系统被配置为快速检测经验不确定性的来源,从而可以适当地调整后续行为。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Effects of instructed and experienced uncertainty on attentional priority.","authors":"Julie Y L Chow, Kelly G Garner, Daniel Pearson, James Heber, Mike E Le Pelley","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001427","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001427","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research has demonstrated that attentional prioritization is shaped by prior experience of reward uncertainty: Attention is more likely to be captured by a stimulus associated with a variable (uncertain) reward than a stimulus that provides diagnostic information about available reward. This finding is noteworthy, because it runs counter to the principle that cognition is motivated to reduce uncertainty and hence surprise. Here we investigated whether this pattern of uncertainty-modulated attentional capture (UMAC) reflects a process of attention for learning, wherein uncertainty-related stimuli are prioritized in an attempt to learn about their true predictive status. To address this, we examined the distinct impact of two information sources that modulate potential for learning: explicit instruction versus ongoing experience of prediction error in reward feedback. Experiment 1 demonstrated that providing explicit instructions-and hence negating the need for further learning-did not reduce the magnitude of the UMAC effect, indicating that UMAC does not reflect attention for learning as a strategic approach for determining the task state. On the other hand, Experiment 2 showed that instructions alone were insufficient to generate a UMAC effect in the absence of reward feedback, suggesting that the impact of uncertainty on rapid attentional prioritization is driven by direct experience of prediction error. Taken together, these findings point to two possibilities: UMAC may reflect attention for learning operating at an implicit level or may evince an attentional system that is configured for rapid detection of sources of experienced uncertainty so that subsequent behavior can be tailored appropriately. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142830745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
An unexamined assumption in many studies of learning and decision making is that people learn underlying probability distributions. However, the acquisition of distributional knowledge is rarely the focus of investigations. We report five experiments (N = 580 adults) that provide this focus and highlight the factors that impact people's ability to accurately learn and reproduce underlying distributions. We find that people accurately reproduced the distribution only when either the environmental signal is strong (e.g., discrete bimodal distributions) or sufficient cues are provided to aid construction of mental representations (e.g., items from the modes in a noisy bimodal distribution are presented in different colors). We interpret these results in terms of participants testing and learning discrete rules corresponding to salient features of the environment rather than spontaneously representing entire distributions. As such, the findings challenge strong assumptions about the role of probability distribution knowledge in explanations of learning and decision making. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
在许多关于学习和决策的研究中,一个未经检验的假设是,人们学习潜在的概率分布。然而,分布知识的获取很少是调查的重点。我们报告了五个实验(N = 580名成年人),这些实验提供了这一重点,并突出了影响人们准确学习和再现潜在分布能力的因素。我们发现,只有当环境信号很强(例如,离散双峰分布)或提供足够的线索来帮助构建心理表征(例如,嘈杂双峰分布中模式的项目以不同的颜色呈现)时,人们才能准确地再现分布。我们根据参与者测试和学习与环境显著特征相对应的离散规则来解释这些结果,而不是自发地代表整个分布。因此,这些发现挑战了关于概率分布知识在解释学习和决策中的作用的强大假设。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Learning the lie of the land: How people construct mental representations of distributions.","authors":"Alice Mason, Aba Szollosi, Ben R Newell","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001402","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001402","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An unexamined assumption in many studies of learning and decision making is that people learn underlying probability distributions. However, the acquisition of distributional knowledge is rarely the focus of investigations. We report five experiments (<i>N</i> = 580 adults) that provide this focus and highlight the factors that impact people's ability to accurately learn and reproduce underlying distributions. We find that people accurately reproduced the distribution only when either the environmental signal is strong (e.g., discrete bimodal distributions) or sufficient cues are provided to aid construction of mental representations (e.g., items from the modes in a noisy bimodal distribution are presented in different colors). We interpret these results in terms of participants testing and learning discrete rules corresponding to salient features of the environment rather than spontaneously representing entire distributions. As such, the findings challenge strong assumptions about the role of probability distribution knowledge in explanations of learning and decision making. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142830747","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Extensive research has shown that differences in cognitive ability predict working memory (WM) performance. However, strategy use may also explain individual differences in WM. Here we explored individual variation in encoding strategy optimization in visual WM. Participants searched for a target that changed between two alternating displays that cycled until response. Critically, participants could freely choose between one red and one blue target, and the ratio of red to blue items varied randomly across trials. Therefore, the optimal strategy was to selectively encode items in the smaller color subset. Results showed a general tendency to choose the optimal (small subset) target, but there were large individual differences in strategy choice, with many participants using suboptimal strategies. While Experiment 1 found no relationship between ability and strategy, a larger sample replication in Experiment 5 found a small, positive correlation between WM ability and strategy optimization. Experiment 2 showed that strategy use was not stable over time. Many participants spontaneously shifted to highly optimal target choices, suggesting a sudden discovery of the optimal strategy. Experiment 3 confirmed the importance of explicit knowledge in strategy choice. Informing participants about the optimal strategy induced a large strategy improvement. Moreover, optimally performing participants demonstrated explicit awareness of the optimal strategy. Experiment 4 showed that, even under greater task demands, when participants viewed the displays only once, strategy use was still suboptimal. Our findings highlight strategy choice as an important source of individual variation and therefore should be considered alongside the ability to fully understand differences in WM. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
大量研究表明,认知能力的差异可以预测工作记忆(WM)的表现。然而,策略使用也可以解释WM的个体差异。本研究探讨了视觉WM编码策略优化的个体差异。参与者搜索的目标在两个交替的显示之间变化,直到回应。关键是,参与者可以在一个红色和一个蓝色目标之间自由选择,而红色和蓝色项目的比例在试验中随机变化。因此,最优策略是在较小的颜色子集中选择性地编码项目。结果显示,参与者普遍倾向于选择最优(小子集)目标,但在策略选择上存在较大的个体差异,许多参与者使用次优策略。实验1没有发现能力与策略之间的关系,而在实验5中更大的样本复制发现WM能力与策略优化之间存在较小的正相关关系。实验2表明,策略使用不随时间的推移而稳定。许多参与者自发地转向高度最优的目标选择,这表明他们突然发现了最优策略。实验3证实了外显知识在策略选择中的重要性。将最优策略告知参与者,会导致策略的大幅改进。此外,表现最优的参与者表现出对最优策略的外显意识。实验4表明,即使在更大的任务要求下,当参与者只看一次显示器时,策略使用仍然是次优的。我们的研究结果强调了策略选择是个体差异的重要来源,因此应该与充分理解WM差异的能力一起考虑。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Individual variation in encoding strategy optimization in visual working memory: Evidence from a change detection task.","authors":"Yin-Ting Lin, Andrew B Leber","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001398","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001398","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extensive research has shown that differences in cognitive ability predict working memory (WM) performance. However, strategy use may also explain individual differences in WM. Here we explored individual variation in encoding strategy optimization in visual WM. Participants searched for a target that changed between two alternating displays that cycled until response. Critically, participants could freely choose between one red and one blue target, and the ratio of red to blue items varied randomly across trials. Therefore, the optimal strategy was to selectively encode items in the smaller color subset. Results showed a general tendency to choose the optimal (small subset) target, but there were large individual differences in strategy choice, with many participants using suboptimal strategies. While Experiment 1 found no relationship between ability and strategy, a larger sample replication in Experiment 5 found a small, positive correlation between WM ability and strategy optimization. Experiment 2 showed that strategy use was not stable over time. Many participants spontaneously shifted to highly optimal target choices, suggesting a sudden discovery of the optimal strategy. Experiment 3 confirmed the importance of explicit knowledge in strategy choice. Informing participants about the optimal strategy induced a large strategy improvement. Moreover, optimally performing participants demonstrated explicit awareness of the optimal strategy. Experiment 4 showed that, even under greater task demands, when participants viewed the displays only once, strategy use was still suboptimal. Our findings highlight strategy choice as an important source of individual variation and therefore should be considered alongside the ability to fully understand differences in WM. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142830746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Collecting an adequate amount of information for a decision is an important skill. However, previous experiments on speed-accuracy trade-offs in sample-based decisions revealed marked oversampling that was impervious to various interventions (Fiedler, McCaughey, et al., 2021). When faced with the threat of being preempted by a rival in making decisions, participants seem to reduce information search substantially (Phillips et al., 2014). Such a decrease provides unique opportunities for metareasoning, which should advance people's understanding of the task and improve their performance. To test this possibility, in the present research (N = 101), participants had to compete with a fast (computer-simulated) rival and indeed substantially reduced self-determined sample size compared to a control condition. This speed increase also carried over to a subsequent decision block without rival, albeit participants regressed to a slower strategy. Mere exposure to a teammate using small samples either in an equivalent competitive version of the task or the standard solitary version led to similar reductions in sample size. This demonstrates that competition is not a necessary requirement for participants to make use of the metareasoning opportunity to improve task performance. Further research is needed to uncover the metacognitive underpinnings of improving performance and facilitate people taking full advantage of such opportunities for metareasoning. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Rivals reloaded: Adapting to sample-based speed-accuracy trade-offs through competitive pressure.","authors":"Linda McCaughey, Johannes Ziegler, Klaus Fiedler","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001408","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001408","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Collecting an adequate amount of information for a decision is an important skill. However, previous experiments on speed-accuracy trade-offs in sample-based decisions revealed marked oversampling that was impervious to various interventions (Fiedler, McCaughey, et al., 2021). When faced with the threat of being preempted by a rival in making decisions, participants seem to reduce information search substantially (Phillips et al., 2014). Such a decrease provides unique opportunities for metareasoning, which should advance people's understanding of the task and improve their performance. To test this possibility, in the present research (<i>N</i> = 101), participants had to compete with a fast (computer-simulated) rival and indeed substantially reduced self-determined sample size compared to a control condition. This speed increase also carried over to a subsequent decision block without rival, albeit participants regressed to a slower strategy. Mere exposure to a teammate using small samples either in an equivalent competitive version of the task or the standard solitary version led to similar reductions in sample size. This demonstrates that competition is not a necessary requirement for participants to make use of the metareasoning opportunity to improve task performance. Further research is needed to uncover the metacognitive underpinnings of improving performance and facilitate people taking full advantage of such opportunities for metareasoning. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142819930","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Past research has shown that semantically richer (i.e., modified) words are retrieved more easily at a subsequent point during language comprehension relative to less rich (i.e., unmodified) words, presumably due to more robust encoding of modified words. We investigated if this modification effect is modulated by age and/or the level of engagement with the task. Young and older participants (total N = 120) read sentences containing unmodified and premodified words followed by a critical verb that triggered their retrieval. The results showed that the retrieval benefit was not modulated by age but depended on the accuracy rates on comprehension questions (a proxy for task engagement), with the retrieval benefit emerging only for participants with lower accuracy rates. We replicated this engagement effect in a reanalysis of an independent, large data set from younger adults (N = 333). Based on these results, it is possible that when engagement is high, the memory representations associated with critical words may remain in the focus of attention when retrieval is being triggered, obviating a retrieval operation and eliminating the modification effect. However, when engagement is low, the critical memory representations may fade to a degree that the modification effect can emerge. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"The facilitatory effect of modifications (semantic richness) on subsequent retrieval during language comprehension is age-invariant, but depends on level of engagement with task.","authors":"Hossein Karimi, Jaden Zinn","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001420","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001420","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Past research has shown that semantically richer (i.e., modified) words are retrieved more easily at a subsequent point during language comprehension relative to less rich (i.e., unmodified) words, presumably due to more robust encoding of modified words. We investigated if this modification effect is modulated by age and/or the level of engagement with the task. Young and older participants (total <i>N</i> = 120) read sentences containing unmodified and premodified words followed by a critical verb that triggered their retrieval. The results showed that the retrieval benefit was not modulated by age but depended on the accuracy rates on comprehension questions (a proxy for task engagement), with the retrieval benefit emerging only for participants with <i>lower</i> accuracy rates. We replicated this engagement effect in a reanalysis of an independent, large data set from younger adults (<i>N</i> = 333). Based on these results, it is possible that when engagement is high, the memory representations associated with critical words may remain in the focus of attention when retrieval is being triggered, obviating a retrieval operation and eliminating the modification effect. However, when engagement is low, the critical memory representations may fade to a degree that the modification effect can emerge. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142819944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cognitive control processes mirror fast and dynamic adaptation toward a change in the environment. When performing dual tasks, mental representations of dual-task-specific control requirements and the task-pair set are established that help to manage dual-task processing (Hirsch et al., 2017, 2018; Hommel, 2004, 2020). In the present study, we investigated to which extent such higher order representations of dual-task processing persist even if major characteristics of the task context change, for example, if one of the tasks of a dual task becomes irrelevant. For this, we adapted the fade-out paradigm (Mayr & Liebscher, 2001) to a dual-task setting and tested whether fade-out costs appear. Performance of pure Task 1 single tasking was compared to the performance of Task 1 processing right after dual-task trials (fade-out phase). Results showed that performance in this fade-out block did not immediately drop to single-task performance (fade-out costs), indicating the persistence of task-pair set representations (Experiments 1 and 3, N = 40 each). In addition, automatic stimulus-response translation processes continued within the fade-out phase, resulting in ongoing between-task interference. Furthermore, the frequency of between-task interference in dual-task blocks was manipulated (75% vs. 25% incongruence) between participants to establish conflict-biased control states of increased versus relaxed task shielding. These different control states, however, did not modulate fade-out costs (Experiment 2, N = 80). Nevertheless, the persistence of these control adaptations was reflected in manipulation-dependent between-task interference during fade-out trials. Implications of this new evidence are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
认知控制过程反映了对环境变化的快速动态适应。在执行双任务时,双任务特定控制需求的心理表征和任务对集的建立有助于管理双任务处理(Hirsch et al., 2017,2018;Hommel, 2004,2020)。在本研究中,我们调查了即使任务上下文的主要特征发生变化,例如,如果双重任务中的一个任务变得无关紧要,这种双任务处理的高阶表征在多大程度上仍然存在。为此,我们将淡出范式(Mayr & Liebscher, 2001)调整为双任务设置,并测试了淡出成本是否出现。在双任务试验(淡出阶段)结束后,将单纯任务1处理的表现与任务1处理的表现进行比较。结果表明,在这个淡出块中的性能并没有立即下降到单任务性能(淡出成本),这表明任务对集表征的持久性(实验1和3,N = 40)。此外,自动刺激-反应转换过程在消退阶段继续进行,导致持续的任务间干扰。此外,在双任务块中,被试之间的任务间干扰频率被操纵(75%对25%不一致性),以建立任务屏蔽增强与放松的冲突偏见控制状态。然而,这些不同的控制状态并没有调节淡出成本(实验2,N = 80)。然而,这些控制适应的持久性反映在淡出试验中依赖于操作的任务间干扰中。讨论了这一新证据的意义。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"The costs of shifting from dual-task to single-task processing: Applying the fade-out paradigm to dual tasking.","authors":"Amelie C Jung, Inga Lück, Rico Fischer","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001414","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001414","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive control processes mirror fast and dynamic adaptation toward a change in the environment. When performing dual tasks, mental representations of dual-task-specific control requirements and the task-pair set are established that help to manage dual-task processing (Hirsch et al., 2017, 2018; Hommel, 2004, 2020). In the present study, we investigated to which extent such higher order representations of dual-task processing persist even if major characteristics of the task context change, for example, if one of the tasks of a dual task becomes irrelevant. For this, we adapted the fade-out paradigm (Mayr & Liebscher, 2001) to a dual-task setting and tested whether fade-out costs appear. Performance of pure Task 1 single tasking was compared to the performance of Task 1 processing right after dual-task trials (fade-out phase). Results showed that performance in this fade-out block did not immediately drop to single-task performance (fade-out costs), indicating the persistence of task-pair set representations (Experiments 1 and 3, <i>N</i> = 40 each). In addition, automatic stimulus-response translation processes continued within the fade-out phase, resulting in ongoing between-task interference. Furthermore, the frequency of between-task interference in dual-task blocks was manipulated (75% vs. 25% incongruence) between participants to establish conflict-biased control states of increased versus relaxed task shielding. These different control states, however, did not modulate fade-out costs (Experiment 2, <i>N</i> = 80). Nevertheless, the persistence of these control adaptations was reflected in manipulation-dependent between-task interference during fade-out trials. Implications of this new evidence are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142819934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}