首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition最新文献

英文 中文
Better source memory for remembered to-be-forgotten items than for remembered to-be-remembered items. 对已记忆待遗忘项目的源记忆优于对已记忆待记忆项目的源记忆。
IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001362
Vincent L Ott, Johanna M Höhs, Jan Rummel

When participants study items one-by-one and are directed to either remember or forget the respective item directly after its presentation, retention of to-be-forgotten items is regularly worse than of to-be-remembered items. We tested whether this directed forgetting effect which is regularly observed for item memory generalizes to source memory. In three experiments, participants studied items in two different source colors (N = 101) or at two different source locations (N = 64; N = 81). Sources were manipulated orthogonally to item type (remember vs. forget). At test, we asked participants to recognize all studied items and also to identify their source. We used a multinomial processing tree model to disentangle item memory, source memory, and guessing. In all three experiments, we replicated the directed forgetting effect in item memory. Source memory for to-be-forgotten items that were recognized despite the intention to forget, however, tended to be even better than source memory for to-be-remembered items that were recognized. These results suggest that the directed forgetting effect does not simply translate from item to source memory. Rather source memory seems to be disproportionally increased in to-be-forgotten items that are remembered. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

当被试者逐个学习项目,并在项目呈现后直接被指示记忆或遗忘相应项目时,待遗忘项目的保持通常比待记忆项目的保持要差。我们测试了在项目记忆中经常观察到的这种定向遗忘效应是否也适用于源记忆。在三个实验中,参与者学习了两种不同来源颜色(N = 101)或两种不同来源位置(N = 64; N = 81)的项目。来源与项目类型(记忆与遗忘)正交排列。测试时,我们要求被试识别所有学习过的项目,并识别其来源。我们使用多叉加工树模型来区分项目记忆、来源记忆和猜测。在所有三个实验中,我们都复制了项目记忆中的定向遗忘效应。然而,对于那些尽管有遗忘意图但还是被识别出来的待遗忘项目,其来源记忆往往比被识别出来的待记忆项目的来源记忆更好。这些结果表明,定向遗忘效应并不能简单地从项目记忆转化为源记忆。相反,在记忆的待遗忘项目中,源记忆似乎不成比例地增加了。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Better source memory for remembered to-be-forgotten items than for remembered to-be-remembered items.","authors":"Vincent L Ott, Johanna M Höhs, Jan Rummel","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001362","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001362","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When participants study items one-by-one and are directed to either remember or forget the respective item directly after its presentation, retention of to-be-forgotten items is regularly worse than of to-be-remembered items. We tested whether this directed forgetting effect which is regularly observed for item memory generalizes to source memory. In three experiments, participants studied items in two different source colors (<i>N</i> = 101) or at two different source locations (<i>N</i> = 64; <i>N</i> = 81). Sources were manipulated orthogonally to item type (remember vs. forget). At test, we asked participants to recognize all studied items and also to identify their source. We used a multinomial processing tree model to disentangle item memory, source memory, and guessing. In all three experiments, we replicated the directed forgetting effect in item memory. Source memory for to-be-forgotten items that were recognized despite the intention to forget, however, tended to be even better than source memory for to-be-remembered items that were recognized. These results suggest that the directed forgetting effect does not simply translate from item to source memory. Rather source memory seems to be disproportionally increased in to-be-forgotten items that are remembered. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141200536","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Testing the response suppression mechanism of working memory. 测试工作记忆的反应抑制机制
IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001359
Benjamin Kowialiewski, Klaus Oberauer

Many working memory (WM) paradigms involve recalling multiple items from the same memory set. Participants rarely repeat items they have already recalled, avoiding repetition errors. To prevent these errors, WM models incorporate a response suppression mechanism that removes recalled items from the set of response options. Despite its importance for our understanding of WM, response suppression has received limited direct testing. To address this gap, we used computational models implementing two hypothetical mechanisms of response suppression to derive predictions and tested these predictions experimentally. Participants were asked to recall the same items multiple times during a single trial. If already recalled items are removed from the response set to prevent repetition errors, memory performance should be impaired when the same item is tested again. Contrary to this, we found that memory performance was unimpaired when the same item was tested a second time, and even displayed a recall advantage. Therefore, this study demonstrates the implausibility of response suppression to account for how people avoid repetition errors. We discuss alternative explanations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

许多工作记忆(WM)范式都涉及从同一记忆集中回忆多个项目。为了避免重复错误,被试很少重复他们已经回忆过的项目。为了避免这些错误,工作记忆模型中包含了一种反应抑制机制,它可以从反应选项集中删除已回忆起的项目。尽管反应抑制机制对我们理解 WM 非常重要,但对它的直接测试却很有限。为了弥补这一不足,我们使用计算模型实现了两种假设的反应抑制机制,从而得出了预测结果,并通过实验对这些预测结果进行了测试。我们要求参与者在一次试验中多次回忆相同的项目。如果为了防止重复错误而将已经回忆起的项目从反应集中删除,那么当再次测试同一项目时,记忆表现应该会受到影响。与此相反,我们发现,当同一项目被第二次测试时,记忆表现并没有受到影响,甚至还表现出了回忆优势。因此,这项研究表明,用反应抑制来解释人们如何避免重复错误是不靠谱的。我们将讨论其他的解释。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Testing the response suppression mechanism of working memory.","authors":"Benjamin Kowialiewski, Klaus Oberauer","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001359","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001359","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many working memory (WM) paradigms involve recalling multiple items from the same memory set. Participants rarely repeat items they have already recalled, avoiding repetition errors. To prevent these errors, WM models incorporate a response suppression mechanism that removes recalled items from the set of response options. Despite its importance for our understanding of WM, response suppression has received limited direct testing. To address this gap, we used computational models implementing two hypothetical mechanisms of response suppression to derive predictions and tested these predictions experimentally. Participants were asked to recall the same items multiple times during a single trial. If already recalled items are removed from the response set to prevent repetition errors, memory performance should be impaired when the same item is tested again. Contrary to this, we found that memory performance was unimpaired when the same item was tested a second time, and even displayed a recall advantage. Therefore, this study demonstrates the implausibility of response suppression to account for how people avoid repetition errors. We discuss alternative explanations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141200477","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The number of different digits determines solution and verification of multiplication problems. 不同数字的个数决定了乘法问题的解和验证。
IF 2.2 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-16 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001310
Smadar Sapir-Yogev, Gitit Kavé, Sarit Ashkenazi

The solution and verification of single-digit multiplication problems vary in speed and accuracy. The current study examines whether the number of different digits in a problem accounts for this variance. In Experiment 1, 41 participants solved all 2-9 multiplication problems. In Experiment 2, 43 participants verified these problems. In Experiment 3, 26 participants solved 10 problems that differed in shared-digit network (SDN) size and matched in problem size. In Experiment 4, 24 participants verified these matched sets. Results show faster and more accurate responses to problems that include fewer different digits relative to problems with more different digits, and faster and more accurate responses to problems whose SDN is small relative to problems whose SDN is large. We thus show that the number of different digits in a problem, including the operands and the solution, determines the speed and accuracy of its solution and verification. This parsimonious account also explains why responses to five and tie problems, which include fewer different digits relative to nonfive and nontie problems, are faster and more accurate than responses to other problems. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

解决和验证个位数乘法问题的速度和准确性各不相同。目前的研究考察了问题中不同数字的数量是否能解释这种差异。在实验1中,41名参与者解决了所有2-9乘法问题。在实验2中,43名参与者验证了这些问题。在实验3中,26名被试解决了10个共享数字网络(shared-digit network, SDN)大小不同但问题大小匹配的问题。在实验4中,24名参与者验证了这些匹配集。结果表明,对于不同数字较少的问题,响应速度比不同数字较多的问题更快、更准确;对于SDN较小的问题,响应速度比SDN较大的问题更快、更准确。因此,我们表明,一个问题中不同数字的数量,包括操作数和解,决定了其解和验证的速度和准确性。这种简洁的解释也解释了为什么对五和八问题的反应比对其他问题的反应更快、更准确,因为与非五和八问题相比,五和八问题包含的不同数字更少。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"The number of different digits determines solution and verification of multiplication problems.","authors":"Smadar Sapir-Yogev, Gitit Kavé, Sarit Ashkenazi","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001310","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001310","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The solution and verification of single-digit multiplication problems vary in speed and accuracy. The current study examines whether the number of different digits in a problem accounts for this variance. In Experiment 1, 41 participants solved all 2-9 multiplication problems. In Experiment 2, 43 participants verified these problems. In Experiment 3, 26 participants solved 10 problems that differed in shared-digit network (SDN) size and matched in problem size. In Experiment 4, 24 participants verified these matched sets. Results show faster and more accurate responses to problems that include fewer different digits relative to problems with more different digits, and faster and more accurate responses to problems whose SDN is small relative to problems whose SDN is large. We thus show that the number of different digits in a problem, including the operands and the solution, determines the speed and accuracy of its solution and verification. This parsimonious account also explains why responses to five and tie problems, which include fewer different digits relative to nonfive and nontie problems, are faster and more accurate than responses to other problems. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136400081","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The function/content word distinction and eye movements in reading. 阅读中的功能/内容单词区分和眼动。
IF 2.2 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-26 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001301
Adrian Staub

A substantial quantity of research has explored whether readers' eye movements are sensitive to the distinction between function and content words. No clear answer has emerged, in part due to the difficulty of accounting for differences in length, frequency, and predictability between the words in the two classes. Based on evidence that readers differentially overlook function word errors, we hypothesized that function words may be more frequently skipped or may receive shorter fixations. We present two very large-scale eyetracking experiments using selected sentences from a corpus of natural text, with each sentence containing a target function or content word. The target words in the two classes were carefully matched on length, frequency, and predictability, with the latter variable operationalized in terms of next-word probability obtained from the large language model GPT-2. While the experiments replicated a range of expected effects, word class did not have any clear influence on target word skipping probability, and there was some evidence for a content word advantage in fixation duration measures. These results indicate that readers' tendency to overlook function word errors is not due to reduced time spent encoding these words. The results also broadly support the implicit assumption in prominent models of eye movement control in reading that a word's syntactic category does not play an important role in decisions about when and where to move the eyes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

大量研究探讨了读者的眼球运动是否对功能词和内容词之间的区别敏感。目前还没有明确的答案,部分原因是很难解释这两个类别中单词在长度、频率和可预测性方面的差异。基于读者不同地忽略虚词错误的证据,我们假设虚词可能更频繁地被跳过,或者可能受到更短的注视。我们提出了两个非常大规模的眼动追踪实验,使用从自然文本语料库中选择的句子,每个句子都包含一个目标函数或内容词。两类中的目标词在长度、频率和可预测性方面进行了仔细匹配,后一个变量根据从大型语言模型GPT-2中获得的下一个单词概率进行了操作。虽然实验复制了一系列预期效果,但单词类别对目标单词跳过概率没有任何明显的影响,并且有一些证据表明内容单词在固定持续时间测量方面具有优势。这些结果表明,读者忽视虚词错误的倾向并不是因为编码这些单词所花费的时间减少。研究结果还广泛支持了阅读中眼动控制突出模型中的隐含假设,即单词的句法类别在决定何时何地移动眼睛方面并不起重要作用。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"The function/content word distinction and eye movements in reading.","authors":"Adrian Staub","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001301","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001301","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A substantial quantity of research has explored whether readers' eye movements are sensitive to the distinction between function and content words. No clear answer has emerged, in part due to the difficulty of accounting for differences in length, frequency, and predictability between the words in the two classes. Based on evidence that readers differentially overlook function word errors, we hypothesized that function words may be more frequently skipped or may receive shorter fixations. We present two very large-scale eyetracking experiments using selected sentences from a corpus of natural text, with each sentence containing a target function or content word. The target words in the two classes were carefully matched on length, frequency, and predictability, with the latter variable operationalized in terms of next-word probability obtained from the large language model GPT-2. While the experiments replicated a range of expected effects, word class did not have any clear influence on target word skipping probability, and there was some evidence for a <i>content</i> word advantage in fixation duration measures. These results indicate that readers' tendency to overlook function word errors is not due to reduced time spent encoding these words. The results also broadly support the implicit assumption in prominent models of eye movement control in reading that a word's syntactic category does not play an important role in decisions about when and where to move the eyes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50163470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cognitive control in cross-modal contexts: Abstract feature transitions of task-related but not task-unrelated stimuli modulate the congruency sequence effect. 跨模态环境下的认知控制:任务相关但非任务无关刺激的抽象特征转换调节一致序列效应。
IF 2.2 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-26 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001300
Paul Kelber, Ian Grant Mackenzie, Victor Mittelstädt

Context information can guide cognitive control, but both the extent and the underlying processes are poorly understood. Previous studies often found that the congruency sequence effect (CSE) is larger when perceptual context features (e.g., modality and format) of task-related distractors and targets repeat compared to change. However, it is unclear whether control adjustments can also be contextualized by more abstract stimulus features and/or by features of task-unrelated stimuli. The present study addressed this issue using a novel context manipulation in a confound-minimized prime-probe task. In Experiment (Exp.) 1, the modality (visual and auditory) of the distractor and target either repeated or changed. Critically, in Exp. 2, the distractor and target modality always switched, but the cross-modal intensity (brightness and loudness) could either repeat (e.g., bright → loud) or change (e.g., bright → soft). A larger CSE for context repeats (vs. changes) was observed in Exps. 1 and 2, indicating that both concrete (modality) and abstract stimulus features (cross-modal intensity) can contextualize control adjustments. Exps. 3 and 4 demonstrated that the CSE was not reliably affected when the context manipulation concerned a prior signal or a simultaneous background stimulus. Thus, task-related, but not task-unrelated, concrete and abstract stimulus features contextualize control adjustments. Moreover, distributional (delta plot) analyses of present and previous data revealed that the confound-minimized CSE and its contextual modulation reflect adjustments in the strength of cognitive control rather than in its timing. Overall, the present study provides new insights into how context information interacts with cognitive control to optimize decision making under conflict. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

语境信息可以指导认知控制,但其程度和潜在过程都知之甚少。先前的研究经常发现,与变化相比,当任务相关干扰物和目标的感知上下文特征(如模态和格式)重复时,一致序列效应(CSE)更大。然而,尚不清楚控制调整是否也可以通过更抽象的刺激特征和/或任务无关刺激的特征来情境化。本研究使用一种新的上下文操作来解决这个问题,该操作用于最小化混杂的主探针任务。在实验(实验)1中,干扰物和目标的模态(视觉和听觉)重复或改变。至关重要的是,在实验2中,干扰物和目标模态总是切换,但跨模态强度(亮度和响度)可以重复(例如,明亮→ 大声)或变化(例如,明亮→ 柔软)。在实验中观察到上下文重复(相对于变化)的CSE更大。1和2,表明具体的(模态)和抽象的刺激特征(跨模态强度)都可以将控制调整情境化。Exps。图3和图4表明,当上下文操纵涉及先前信号或同时的背景刺激时,CSE没有受到可靠的影响。因此,与任务相关但并非与任务无关的具体和抽象刺激特征将控制调整情境化。此外,对当前和先前数据的分布(德尔塔图)分析表明,混杂最小化的CSE及其上下文调节反映了认知控制强度的调整,而不是时间的调整。总的来说,本研究为上下文信息如何与认知控制相互作用以优化冲突下的决策提供了新的见解。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Cognitive control in cross-modal contexts: Abstract feature transitions of task-related but not task-unrelated stimuli modulate the congruency sequence effect.","authors":"Paul Kelber, Ian Grant Mackenzie, Victor Mittelstädt","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001300","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001300","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Context information can guide cognitive control, but both the extent and the underlying processes are poorly understood. Previous studies often found that the congruency sequence effect (CSE) is larger when perceptual context features (e.g., modality and format) of task-related distractors and targets repeat compared to change. However, it is unclear whether control adjustments can also be contextualized by more abstract stimulus features and/or by features of task-unrelated stimuli. The present study addressed this issue using a novel context manipulation in a confound-minimized prime-probe task. In Experiment (Exp.) 1, the modality (visual and auditory) of the distractor and target either repeated or changed. Critically, in Exp. 2, the distractor and target modality always switched, but the cross-modal intensity (brightness and loudness) could either repeat (e.g., bright → loud) or change (e.g., bright → soft). A larger CSE for context repeats (vs. changes) was observed in Exps. 1 and 2, indicating that both concrete (modality) and abstract stimulus features (cross-modal intensity) can contextualize control adjustments. Exps. 3 and 4 demonstrated that the CSE was not reliably affected when the context manipulation concerned a prior signal or a simultaneous background stimulus. Thus, task-related, but not task-unrelated, concrete and abstract stimulus features contextualize control adjustments. Moreover, distributional (delta plot) analyses of present and previous data revealed that the confound-minimized CSE and its contextual modulation reflect adjustments in the strength of cognitive control rather than in its timing. Overall, the present study provides new insights into how context information interacts with cognitive control to optimize decision making under conflict. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50163463","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From association to gist: Some critical tests. 从关联到主旨:一些关键的测试。
IF 2.2 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-16 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001304
C J Brainerd, M Chang, D M Bialer, X Liu

We report the first evidence that the gist mechanism of fuzzy-trace theory and the associative mechanism of activation monitoring theory operate in parallel, in the recall version of the Deese/Roediger/McDermott illusion. In three experiments, we implemented a new methodology that allows their respective empirical indexes, gist strength (GS) and backward associative strength (BAS), to each be manipulated while the other is held constant. In Experiment 1, increasing GS increased false recall of missing words, but increasing BAS did not. In Experiments 2 and 3, however, increasing GS and increasing BAS both increased recall of missing words, and those effects were independent and additive. In all three experiments, GS and BAS affected true recall of list words in qualitatively different ways: (a) Increasing GS always improved true recall, regardless of whether BAS was high or low, but (b) increasing BAS impaired true recall when GS was high and improved true recall when GS was low. To pinpoint the retrieval loci of the two variables' effects, we analyzed the data of all experiments with the dual-retrieval model. Those analyses showed that the variables' respective effects were due to different retrieval processes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

在回忆版的Deese/Roediger/McDermott错觉中,我们首次发现了模糊痕迹理论的主要机制和激活监测理论的联想机制并行运作的证据。在三个实验中,我们实施了一种新的方法,允许各自的经验指标,gist强度(GS)和backward associative strength (BAS),在另一个保持不变的情况下进行操作。在实验1中,增加GS会增加缺失词的错误回忆,而增加BAS则没有。然而,在实验2和实验3中,增加GS和增加BAS都增加了缺失词的回忆,并且这些影响是独立的和相加的。在所有三个实验中,GS和BAS对列表词的真实回忆的影响具有质的不同:(a)无论BAS是高还是低,增加GS总是提高真实回忆,但(b)当GS高时,增加BAS会损害真实回忆,而当GS低时,增加BAS会提高真实回忆。为了确定这两个变量影响的检索位点,我们使用双检索模型对所有实验数据进行了分析。分析表明,各变量各自的影响是由于不同的检索过程。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"From association to gist: Some critical tests.","authors":"C J Brainerd, M Chang, D M Bialer, X Liu","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001304","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001304","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We report the first evidence that the gist mechanism of fuzzy-trace theory and the associative mechanism of activation monitoring theory operate in parallel, in the recall version of the Deese/Roediger/McDermott illusion. In three experiments, we implemented a new methodology that allows their respective empirical indexes, gist strength (GS) and backward associative strength (BAS), to each be manipulated while the other is held constant. In Experiment 1, increasing GS increased false recall of missing words, but increasing BAS did not. In Experiments 2 and 3, however, increasing GS and increasing BAS both increased recall of missing words, and those effects were independent and additive. In all three experiments, GS and BAS affected true recall of list words in qualitatively different ways: (a) Increasing GS always improved true recall, regardless of whether BAS was high or low, but (b) increasing BAS impaired true recall when GS was high and improved true recall when GS was low. To pinpoint the retrieval loci of the two variables' effects, we analyzed the data of all experiments with the dual-retrieval model. Those analyses showed that the variables' respective effects were due to different retrieval processes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136400079","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Multimodal aspects of sentence comprehension: Do facial and color cues interact with processing negated and affirmative sentences? 句子理解的多模态方面:面部和颜色线索与处理否定句和肯定句是否有相互作用?
IF 2.2 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-14 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001302
Emanuel Schütt, Merle Weicker, Carolin Dudschig

Negation is usually considered as a linguistic operator reversing the truth value of a proposition. However, there are various ways to express negation in a multimodal manner. It still remains an unresolved issue whether nonverbal expressions of negation can influence linguistic negation comprehension. Based on extensive evidence demonstrating that language comprehenders are able to instantly integrate extralinguistic information such as a speaker's identity, we expected that nonverbal cues of negation and affirmation might similarly affect sentence comprehension. In three preregistered experiments, we examined how far nonverbal markers of negation and affirmation-specifically, the so-called "not face" (see Benitez-Quiroz et al., 2016) and red or green color (see Dudschig et al., 2023)-interact with comprehending negation and affirmation at the sentential level. Participants were presented with photos ("not face" vs. positive control; Experiments 1 and 2) or color patches (red vs. green; Experiment 3). They then read negated and affirmative sentences in a self-paced manner or judged the sensibility of negated and affirmative sentences (e.g., "No, I do not want to sing" vs. "Yes, I would like to buy a sofa"). Both frequentist statistics and Bayes factors resulting from linear mixed-effects analyses showed that processing times for negated and affirmative sentences were not significantly modulated by the nonverbal features under investigation. This indicates that their influence might not extend to sentential negation or affirmation comprehension. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

否定通常被认为是颠倒命题真值的语言运算符。然而,以多模态方式表达否定的方式多种多样。否定的非语言表达是否会影响对语言否定的理解,这仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。有大量证据表明,语言理解者能够即时整合说话者的身份等语外信息,基于此,我们预计否定和肯定的非语言提示可能会同样影响句子理解。在三个预先登记的实验中,我们考察了否定和肯定的非语言标记--特别是所谓的 "不是脸"(见 Benitez-Quiroz 等人,2016 年)和红色或绿色(见 Dudschig 等人,2023 年)--在多大程度上与句子层面的否定和肯定的理解相互影响。实验向参与者展示了照片("不是脸 "与正面对照;实验 1 和 2)或色块(红色与绿色;实验 3)。然后,他们以自定步调的方式阅读否定句和肯定句,或判断否定句和肯定句的可感性(例如,"不,我不想唱歌 "与 "是的,我想买沙发")。频数统计和线性混合效应分析得出的贝叶斯因子都表明,否定句和肯定句的处理时间并没有受到所研究的非语言特征的显著调节。这表明,它们的影响可能不会扩展到否定句或肯定句的理解。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Multimodal aspects of sentence comprehension: Do facial and color cues interact with processing negated and affirmative sentences?","authors":"Emanuel Schütt, Merle Weicker, Carolin Dudschig","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001302","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001302","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Negation is usually considered as a linguistic operator reversing the truth value of a proposition. However, there are various ways to express negation in a multimodal manner. It still remains an unresolved issue whether nonverbal expressions of negation can influence linguistic negation comprehension. Based on extensive evidence demonstrating that language comprehenders are able to instantly integrate extralinguistic information such as a speaker's identity, we expected that nonverbal cues of negation and affirmation might similarly affect sentence comprehension. In three preregistered experiments, we examined how far nonverbal markers of negation and affirmation-specifically, the so-called \"not face\" (see Benitez-Quiroz et al., 2016) and red or green color (see Dudschig et al., 2023)-interact with comprehending negation and affirmation at the sentential level. Participants were presented with photos (\"not face\" vs. positive control; Experiments 1 and 2) or color patches (red vs. green; Experiment 3). They then read negated and affirmative sentences in a self-paced manner or judged the sensibility of negated and affirmative sentences (e.g., \"No, I do not want to sing\" vs. \"Yes, I would like to buy a sofa\"). Both frequentist statistics and Bayes factors resulting from linear mixed-effects analyses showed that processing times for negated and affirmative sentences were not significantly modulated by the nonverbal features under investigation. This indicates that their influence might not extend to sentential negation or affirmation comprehension. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138812334","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Consciousness influences the enhancement of visual statistical learning in Zipfian distributions. 意识影响Zipfian分布中视觉统计学习的增强。
IF 2.2 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-26 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001275
Sachio Otsuka, Yuki Miura, Jun Saiki

It has been reported that visual statistical learning (VSL) is facilitated in skewed distributions. However, it remains unclear whether enhancement of VSL in Zipfian distributions is due to consciousness of the regularities presented at high frequency. This study addressed this issue. We measured participants' subjective confidence in regularities and awareness of regularities during familiarization by combining a previously reported procedure for VSL with a postdecision wagering task and posttest questionnaire. The results demonstrated that Zipfian distribution enhanced not only VSL but also metacognitive sensitivity, particularly for high-frequency regularities, as the effects of consciousness on VSL were limited to high-frequency regularities. Moreover, the results indicated that awareness during familiarization mediated VSL enhancement in the Zipfian distribution. These results suggest that VSL for events with high-frequency regularities plays an important role in the cognition of events with low-frequency regularities via awareness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

据报道,视觉统计学习(VSL)在偏斜分布中很容易实现。然而,尚不清楚齐普芬分布中VSL的增强是否是由于意识到高频出现的规律。这项研究解决了这个问题。我们通过将先前报道的VSL程序与决策后下注任务和测试后问卷相结合,测量了参与者在熟悉过程中对规则的主观信心和对规则的意识。结果表明,Zipfan分布不仅增强了VSL,而且增强了元认知敏感性,特别是对高频规律的敏感性,因为意识对VSL的影响仅限于高频规律。此外,研究结果表明,熟悉过程中的意识介导了Zipfian分布中VSL的增强。这些结果表明,具有高频规律的事件的VSL在通过意识认知具有低频规律的事件中起着重要作用。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Consciousness influences the enhancement of visual statistical learning in Zipfian distributions.","authors":"Sachio Otsuka, Yuki Miura, Jun Saiki","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001275","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001275","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It has been reported that visual statistical learning (VSL) is facilitated in skewed distributions. However, it remains unclear whether enhancement of VSL in Zipfian distributions is due to consciousness of the regularities presented at high frequency. This study addressed this issue. We measured participants' subjective confidence in regularities and awareness of regularities during familiarization by combining a previously reported procedure for VSL with a postdecision wagering task and posttest questionnaire. The results demonstrated that Zipfian distribution enhanced not only VSL but also metacognitive sensitivity, particularly for high-frequency regularities, as the effects of consciousness on VSL were limited to high-frequency regularities. Moreover, the results indicated that awareness during familiarization mediated VSL enhancement in the Zipfian distribution. These results suggest that VSL for events with high-frequency regularities plays an important role in the cognition of events with low-frequency regularities via awareness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50163464","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The effects of goal-driven attention on the acquisition of location probability learning. 目标驱动注意对位置概率学习习得的影响。
IF 2.2 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-13 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001312
Emma C Holtz, Vanessa G Lee

Increasing evidence has shown that implicit learning shapes visuospatial attention, yet how such learning interacts with top-down, goal-driven attention remains unclear. This study investigated the relationship between task goals and selection history using a location probability learning (LPL) paradigm. We tested whether a top-down spatial cue facilitates or interferes with the acquisition of implicit LPL. In a visual search task, participants were asked to give precedence to one of four, spatially cued, quadrants of the screen. Unbeknownst to them, there was an underlying uneven spatial probability in which the target appeared disproportionately often in the cued quadrant (37.5%) and a second, uncued quadrant (37.5%). To assess what participants had learned, neutral, uncued testing trials with an equal target location probability (25%) were used. Results revealed faster search times in the cued and the uncued high-probability quadrants compared to the two low-probability quadrants and these fast search times remained prevalent in the neutral testing blocks. Importantly, LPL was comparable between the cued and uncued locations in the testing blocks, suggesting that the spatial cue neither facilitated nor interfered with LPL. These results support the dual-system view of attention, revealing parallel systems supporting both goal-driven and experience-guided attention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

越来越多的证据表明,内隐学习塑造了视觉空间注意,但这种学习如何与自上而下、目标驱动的注意相互作用仍不清楚。本研究采用位置概率学习(LPL)范式研究任务目标与选择历史之间的关系。我们测试了自上而下的空间线索是促进还是干扰内隐LPL的习得。在视觉搜索任务中,参与者被要求优先选择屏幕上四个有空间提示的象限中的一个。他们不知道的是,目标在有线索的象限(37.5%)和第二个没有线索的象限(37.5%)中出现的频率不成比例,这是一种潜在的不均匀空间概率。为了评估参与者所学到的知识,使用了具有相同目标定位概率(25%)的中性、无线索测试试验。结果显示,与两个低概率象限相比,提示和未提示的高概率象限的搜索时间更快,并且这些快速搜索时间在中性测试块中仍然普遍存在。重要的是,LPL在测试块中提示和未提示位置之间具有可比性,这表明空间提示既不会促进也不会干扰LPL。这些结果支持注意的双系统观点,揭示了支持目标驱动和经验引导注意的平行系统。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"The effects of goal-driven attention on the acquisition of location probability learning.","authors":"Emma C Holtz, Vanessa G Lee","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001312","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001312","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Increasing evidence has shown that implicit learning shapes visuospatial attention, yet how such learning interacts with top-down, goal-driven attention remains unclear. This study investigated the relationship between task goals and selection history using a location probability learning (LPL) paradigm. We tested whether a top-down spatial cue facilitates or interferes with the acquisition of implicit LPL. In a visual search task, participants were asked to give precedence to one of four, spatially cued, quadrants of the screen. Unbeknownst to them, there was an underlying uneven spatial probability in which the target appeared disproportionately often in the cued quadrant (37.5%) and a second, uncued quadrant (37.5%). To assess what participants had learned, neutral, uncued testing trials with an equal target location probability (25%) were used. Results revealed faster search times in the cued and the uncued high-probability quadrants compared to the two low-probability quadrants and these fast search times remained prevalent in the neutral testing blocks. Importantly, LPL was comparable between the cued and uncued locations in the testing blocks, suggesting that the spatial cue neither facilitated nor interfered with LPL. These results support the dual-system view of attention, revealing parallel systems supporting both goal-driven and experience-guided attention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"92157204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Encoding variability explains the multisensory benefit in recognition memory. 编码变异性解释了识别记忆中的多感官益处。
IF 2.2 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-26 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001305
Daan Hendriks, Peter Verkoeijen, Diane Pecher

Numerous studies have found better memory for multimodal than unimodal stimuli. In these studies, however, multimodal stimuli consist not only of multiple modalities, but also of more varied information than unimodal. Therefore, in the present study, we investigated encoding variability as an explanation for the multisensory benefit. Written words were studied together with two different orienting questions that promoted processing of same modality (both visual or both auditory) or different modality information (one visual and one auditory). In Experiment 1, recognition memory did not differ between constant modality and varied modality conditions. In Experiment 2, we replicated this effect with items that were repeated at a lag and we found an advantage of any type of encoding variability (within and between modality) compared to a condition in which the same orienting question was repeated. In Experiments 3 and 4, these findings were replicated when there was a day delay between study and test. We conclude that we did find an encoding variability benefit on memory, but no multisensory benefit. This conclusion challenges the sensory integration explanation and provides support for encoding variability as an explanation of the multisensory benefit. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

许多研究发现,多模式刺激的记忆力比单一模式刺激的要好。然而,在这些研究中,多模式刺激不仅包括多种模式,而且包括比单模式更丰富的信息。因此,在本研究中,我们研究了编码变异性,作为多感官益处的解释。书面单词与两个不同的定向问题一起研究,这两个问题促进了对相同模态(既有视觉的,也有听觉的)或不同模态信息(一个视觉的和一个听觉的)的处理。在实验1中,恒定模态和不同模态条件下的识别记忆没有差异。在实验2中,我们用延迟重复的项目复制了这种效果,我们发现与重复相同定向问题的条件相比,任何类型的编码可变性(模态内和模态间)都有优势。在实验3和4中,当研究和测试之间有一天的延迟时,这些发现被复制。我们得出的结论是,我们确实发现了编码变异性对记忆的好处,但没有多感官的好处。这一结论挑战了感官整合的解释,并为编码变异性作为多感官益处的解释提供了支持。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Encoding variability explains the multisensory benefit in recognition memory.","authors":"Daan Hendriks, Peter Verkoeijen, Diane Pecher","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001305","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xlm0001305","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Numerous studies have found better memory for multimodal than unimodal stimuli. In these studies, however, multimodal stimuli consist not only of multiple modalities, but also of more varied information than unimodal. Therefore, in the present study, we investigated encoding variability as an explanation for the multisensory benefit. Written words were studied together with two different orienting questions that promoted processing of same modality (both visual or both auditory) or different modality information (one visual and one auditory). In Experiment 1, recognition memory did not differ between constant modality and varied modality conditions. In Experiment 2, we replicated this effect with items that were repeated at a lag and we found an advantage of any type of encoding variability (within and between modality) compared to a condition in which the same orienting question was repeated. In Experiments 3 and 4, these findings were replicated when there was a day delay between study and test. We conclude that we did find an encoding variability benefit on memory, but no multisensory benefit. This conclusion challenges the sensory integration explanation and provides support for encoding variability as an explanation of the multisensory benefit. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50163465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1