Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-04-15DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001206
Christopher Hauck, Eric Ruthruff, Mei-Ching Lien
We examined whether proactive suppression can be applied on demand. A prompt cue indicated the to-be-ignored distractor color for each trial. Participants needed to use this cue to know which of two target shapes to respond to. To assess proactive suppression of the cued distractor color, we presented a probe letter recall task on a minority (25%) of the trials. A letter appeared inside each of the six shapes of the search array and participants recalled as many letters as they could. When the to-be-ignored color was fixed in Experiment 1, probe recall accuracy was lower for probe letters inside to-be-ignored-color distractors than target-color distractors, known as the probe suppression effect. However, when the prompted to-be-ignored color varied from trial to trial, the probe suppression effect disappeared, regardless of whether the prompt was a colored circle (Experiment 2) or a colored word (Experiment 3). Experiment 4 tested the search and destroy hypothesis by shortening the search display duration from 200 to 50 ms. No capture effect by the to-be-ignored color was evident, suggesting that participants did not first search for the to-be-ignored color, prior to suppressing it. We conclude that when rejection of a distractor color is required on demand, one cannot accomplish such suppression proactively but instead must deal with the distractor reactively, incurring a large cost in performance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Proactive suppression is an implicit process that cannot be summoned on demand.","authors":"Christopher Hauck, Eric Ruthruff, Mei-Ching Lien","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001206","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001206","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We examined whether proactive suppression can be applied on demand. A prompt cue indicated the to-be-ignored distractor color for each trial. Participants needed to use this cue to know which of two target shapes to respond to. To assess proactive suppression of the cued distractor color, we presented a probe letter recall task on a minority (25%) of the trials. A letter appeared inside each of the six shapes of the search array and participants recalled as many letters as they could. When the to-be-ignored color was fixed in Experiment 1, probe recall accuracy was lower for probe letters inside to-be-ignored-color distractors than target-color distractors, known as the probe suppression effect. However, when the prompted to-be-ignored color varied from trial to trial, the probe suppression effect disappeared, regardless of whether the prompt was a colored circle (Experiment 2) or a colored word (Experiment 3). Experiment 4 tested the search and destroy hypothesis by shortening the search display duration from 200 to 50 ms. No capture effect by the to-be-ignored color was evident, suggesting that participants did not first search for the to-be-ignored color, prior to suppressing it. We conclude that when rejection of a distractor color is required on demand, one cannot accomplish such suppression proactively but instead must deal with the distractor reactively, incurring a large cost in performance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"636-653"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140853350","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Intentional binding refers to the subjective temporal compression between a voluntary action and its subsequent sensory outcome. Despite some studies challenging the link between temporal compression and intentional action, intentional binding is still widely used as an implicit measure for the sense of agency. The debate remains unsettled primarily because the experimental conditions used in previous studies were confounded with various alternative causes for temporal compression, and action intention has not yet been tested comprehensively against all potential alternative causes in a single study. Here, we solve this puzzle by jointly comparing participants' estimates of the interval between three types of triggering events with comparable predictability-voluntary movement, passive movement, and external sensory event-and an external sensory outcome (auditory or visual across experiments). The results failed to show intentional binding, that is, no shorter interval estimation for the voluntary than the passive movement conditions. Instead, we observed temporal (but not intentional) binding when comparing both movement conditions with the external sensory condition. Thus, temporal binding appears to originate from sensory integration and temporal prediction, not from action intention. As such, these findings underscore the need to reconsider the use of "intentional binding" as a reliable proxy of the sense of agency. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
意向束缚指的是自愿行动与随后的感官结果之间的主观时间压缩。尽管一些研究对时间压缩与有意行动之间的联系提出了质疑,但有意束缚仍被广泛用作衡量代理感的隐性指标。这一争论之所以悬而未决,主要是因为以往研究中使用的实验条件与时间压缩的各种替代原因相混淆,而行动意向尚未在一项研究中针对所有潜在的替代原因进行全面测试。在这里,我们通过联合比较参与者对三类具有可比预测性的触发事件--自主运动、被动运动和外部感觉事件--与外部感觉结果(听觉或视觉,不同实验中均有)之间的时间间隔的估计,解决了这一难题。结果未能显示出有意结合,也就是说,自主运动条件下的时间间隔估计没有比被动运动条件下的时间间隔估计短。相反,在将两种运动条件与外部感觉条件进行比较时,我们观察到了时间上的(但不是有意的)约束。因此,时间束缚似乎源于感觉整合和时间预测,而非行动意图。因此,这些发现强调有必要重新考虑使用 "意向束缚 "作为代理感的可靠代表。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
{"title":"No evidence in favor of the existence of \"intentional\" binding.","authors":"Gaiqing Kong, Cheryne Aberkane, Clément Desoche, Alessandro Farnè, Marine Vernet","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001204","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001204","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intentional binding refers to the subjective temporal compression between a voluntary action and its subsequent sensory outcome. Despite some studies challenging the link between temporal compression and intentional action, intentional binding is still widely used as an implicit measure for the sense of agency. The debate remains unsettled primarily because the experimental conditions used in previous studies were confounded with various alternative causes for temporal compression, and action intention has not yet been tested comprehensively against all potential alternative causes in a single study. Here, we solve this puzzle by jointly comparing participants' estimates of the interval between three types of triggering events with comparable predictability-voluntary movement, passive movement, and external sensory event-and an external sensory outcome (auditory or visual across experiments). The results failed to show intentional binding, that is, no shorter interval estimation for the voluntary than the passive movement conditions. Instead, we observed temporal (but not intentional) binding when comparing both movement conditions with the external sensory condition. Thus, temporal binding appears to originate from sensory integration and temporal prediction, not from action intention. As such, these findings underscore the need to reconsider the use of \"intentional binding\" as a reliable proxy of the sense of agency. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"626-635"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140873268","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2024-02-29DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001195
Beatriz Velado, Beatriz Santos Miranda, Francisca Almeida Oliveira, Henrique Marques de Oliveira, Sergio Delle Monache, Nuno De Sá Teixeira
A wealth of converging research lines has led support to the notion that specialized neural processes output a priori information about the expected effects of gravity to fine-tune motor and perceptual responses to dynamic events. Arguably, these putative internal models of gravity might modulate the efficiency in visual search for objects conforming or not to gravitationally coherent dynamics. In the present work, we explored this possibility with a visual search task involving arrays of two to eight objects moving periodically back and forth. The target could be an accelerating/decelerating ball (as if bouncing on earth's surface-1g) with distractors moving at a constant speed (0g) or the reverse. Moreover, the direction of the gravitational pull, as implied by the 1g motion patterns, could be aligned or misaligned with Earth's gravity. Overall, searches for 1g targets were more efficient than 0g targets except, notably, when stimuli displays were congruent with Earth's gravitational pull, in which case the visual search asymmetry is significantly reduced. Outcomes are interpreted as reflecting the joint and mutually cancelling contribution of low-level detection of acceleration patterns and higher level detection of unexpected violations of gravitational motion. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Gravity's impact on visual search asymmetries: Is visual gravitational motion a distinct visual feature or a familiar dynamic event?","authors":"Beatriz Velado, Beatriz Santos Miranda, Francisca Almeida Oliveira, Henrique Marques de Oliveira, Sergio Delle Monache, Nuno De Sá Teixeira","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001195","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001195","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A wealth of converging research lines has led support to the notion that specialized neural processes output a priori information about the expected effects of gravity to fine-tune motor and perceptual responses to dynamic events. Arguably, these putative internal models of gravity might modulate the efficiency in visual search for objects conforming or not to gravitationally coherent dynamics. In the present work, we explored this possibility with a visual search task involving arrays of two to eight objects moving periodically back and forth. The target could be an accelerating/decelerating ball (as if bouncing on earth's surface-1g) with distractors moving at a constant speed (0g) or the reverse. Moreover, the direction of the gravitational pull, as implied by the 1g motion patterns, could be aligned or misaligned with Earth's gravity. Overall, searches for 1g targets were more efficient than 0g targets except, notably, when stimuli displays were congruent with Earth's gravitational pull, in which case the visual search asymmetry is significantly reduced. Outcomes are interpreted as reflecting the joint and mutually cancelling contribution of low-level detection of acceleration patterns and higher level detection of unexpected violations of gravitational motion. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"451-463"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139998066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2024-03-28DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001203
Stefan Wöhner, Jana Luckow, Miriam Brandt, Jens Stahlmann, Annika Werwach, Jörg D Jescheniak
Semantic context effects in picture naming and categorization tasks are central to the development and evaluation of current models of word production. When pictures are named in a semantically blocked context, response latencies are delayed. Belke (2013) found that when the naming task was replaced with a semantic categorization task (natural vs. man-made), response latencies were facilitated. From this pattern, she concluded that semantic interference in blocked picture naming has its locus at the lexical level but its origin at the preceding semantic level. However, other studies using the blocking procedure have failed to find facilitation in semantic categorization tasks (Damian et al., 2001; Riley et al., 2015), calling this conclusion into question. In three blocked picture naming and categorization experiments, we investigated different variables that might account for the discrepant results in semantic categorization. We used different semantic categorization tasks, different response modalities, different response set sizes, and different blocking procedures. Semantic facilitation was reliably found in naturalness categorization, but there was no semantic effect in natural size categorization. We discuss the implications of these findings for appropriate task selection. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Semantic facilitation in blocked picture categorization: Some data and considerations regarding task selection.","authors":"Stefan Wöhner, Jana Luckow, Miriam Brandt, Jens Stahlmann, Annika Werwach, Jörg D Jescheniak","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001203","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001203","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Semantic context effects in picture naming and categorization tasks are central to the development and evaluation of current models of word production. When pictures are named in a semantically blocked context, response latencies are delayed. Belke (2013) found that when the naming task was replaced with a semantic categorization task (natural vs. man-made), response latencies were facilitated. From this pattern, she concluded that semantic interference in blocked picture naming has its locus at the lexical level but its origin at the preceding semantic level. However, other studies using the blocking procedure have failed to find facilitation in semantic categorization tasks (Damian et al., 2001; Riley et al., 2015), calling this conclusion into question. In three blocked picture naming and categorization experiments, we investigated different variables that might account for the discrepant results in semantic categorization. We used different semantic categorization tasks, different response modalities, different response set sizes, and different blocking procedures. Semantic facilitation was reliably found in naturalness categorization, but there was no semantic effect in natural size categorization. We discuss the implications of these findings for appropriate task selection. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"515-530"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140307675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2024-04-04DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001199
Yi Ni Toh, Vanessa G Lee
Multitasking typically leads to interference. However, responding to attentionally demanding targets in a continuous task paradoxically enhances memory for concurrently presented images, known as the "attentional boost effect" (ABE). Previous research has attributed the ABE to a temporal orienting response induced by the release of norepinephrine from the locus coeruleus when a stimulus is classified as a target. In this study, we tested whether target classification and response decisions act in an all-or-none manner on the ABE, or whether the processes leading up to these decisions also modulate the ABE. Participants encoded objects into memory while monitoring a stream of letters and digits, pressing a key for target letters. To change the process leading to target classification, we asked participants to respond either to a specific target letter or an entire category of letters. To change the process leading to response, we asked participants to either respond immediately to the target or withhold the response until the appearance of the next stimulus. Despite successfully identifying the target and responding to it in all conditions, participants benefited less from target detection in category search than in exact search and less from delayed response than immediate response. These findings suggest that target and response decisions do not act in an all-or-none manner. Instead, the ABE and the temporal orienting response is sensitive to the speed of reaching a perceptual or response decision. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
多任务处理通常会导致干扰。然而,在连续任务中对注意力要求较高的目标做出反应,反而会增强对同时呈现的图像的记忆,这就是所谓的 "注意力增强效应"(ABE)。以往的研究认为,当刺激被归类为目标时,脑室释放去甲肾上腺素,从而诱发了时间定向反应。在这项研究中,我们测试了目标分类和反应决策是否以全或非的方式作用于 ABE,或者这些决策的前导过程是否也会调节 ABE。受试者在监测字母和数字流的同时将对象编码到记忆中,并按下目标字母的按键。为了改变导致目标分类的过程,我们要求参与者对特定的目标字母或整个字母类别做出反应。为了改变作出反应的过程,我们要求参与者要么立即对目标作出反应,要么在下一个刺激出现之前暂不作出反应。尽管受试者在所有条件下都能成功识别目标并做出反应,但在类别搜索中,受试者从目标检测中获益的程度低于精确搜索,而从延迟反应中获益的程度也低于立即反应。这些发现表明,目标和反应决策并不是以一种非此即彼的方式发挥作用的。相反,ABE和时间定向反应对达成知觉或反应决策的速度很敏感。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"It is a match! Timely response to a specific target boosts concurrent task processing.","authors":"Yi Ni Toh, Vanessa G Lee","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001199","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001199","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multitasking typically leads to interference. However, responding to attentionally demanding targets in a continuous task paradoxically enhances memory for concurrently presented images, known as the \"attentional boost effect\" (ABE). Previous research has attributed the ABE to a temporal orienting response induced by the release of norepinephrine from the locus coeruleus when a stimulus is classified as a target. In this study, we tested whether target classification and response decisions act in an all-or-none manner on the ABE, or whether the processes leading up to these decisions also modulate the ABE. Participants encoded objects into memory while monitoring a stream of letters and digits, pressing a key for target letters. To change the process leading to target classification, we asked participants to respond either to a specific target letter or an entire category of letters. To change the process leading to response, we asked participants to either respond immediately to the target or withhold the response until the appearance of the next stimulus. Despite successfully identifying the target and responding to it in all conditions, participants benefited less from target detection in category search than in exact search and less from delayed response than immediate response. These findings suggest that target and response decisions do not act in an all-or-none manner. Instead, the ABE and the temporal orienting response is sensitive to the speed of reaching a perceptual or response decision. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":"50 5","pages":"498-514"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140854250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2024-03-28DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001198
Qiwei Zhang, Kuan-Jung Huang, Xingshan Li
How compound words are processed remains a central question in research on Chinese reading. The Chinese reading model assumes that all possible words sharing characters are activated during word processing and these activated words compete for a winner (Li & Pollatsek, 2020). The present studies aimed to examine whether embedded component words compete with whole compound words in Chinese reading. In Study 1, we analyzed two existing lexical decision databases and revealed inhibitory effects of component-word frequency and facilitative effects of character frequency on the first components. In Study 2, we conducted two factorial experiments to further examine the effects of first component-word frequency, with character frequencies controlled. The results consistently indicated significant inhibitory effects of component-word frequency. Collectively, these findings support the theoretical proposition that both component words and compound words are activated and engage in competition during word processing. This provides a new approach to compound word processing in Chinese reading and a possible solution to mixed results of character frequency effects reported in the literature. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
如何处理复合词仍然是中文阅读研究的核心问题。汉语阅读模型假定,在词语处理过程中,所有可能的共用字词都会被激活,这些被激活的词会在竞争中胜出(Li & Pollatsek, 2020)。本研究旨在探讨在中文阅读中,嵌入成分词是否会与整个复合词竞争。在研究 1 中,我们分析了两个现有的词汇决策数据库,发现成分词频率对第一成分词有抑制作用,而字符频率对第一成分词有促进作用。在研究 2 中,我们进行了两个因子实验,在控制字频的情况下进一步考察了第一成分-词频的影响。结果一致表明,成分-词频具有明显的抑制作用。总之,这些研究结果支持了这样一个理论命题,即在单词处理过程中,成分词和复合词都会被激活并参与竞争。这为中文阅读中的复合词处理提供了一种新的方法,也为文献中报道的字频效应的混合结果提供了一种可能的解决方案。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
{"title":"Competition between parts and whole: A new approach to Chinese compound word processing.","authors":"Qiwei Zhang, Kuan-Jung Huang, Xingshan Li","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001198","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001198","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How compound words are processed remains a central question in research on Chinese reading. The Chinese reading model assumes that all possible words sharing characters are activated during word processing and these activated words compete for a winner (Li & Pollatsek, 2020). The present studies aimed to examine whether embedded component words compete with whole compound words in Chinese reading. In Study 1, we analyzed two existing lexical decision databases and revealed inhibitory effects of component-word frequency and facilitative effects of character frequency on the first components. In Study 2, we conducted two factorial experiments to further examine the effects of first component-word frequency, with character frequencies controlled. The results consistently indicated significant inhibitory effects of component-word frequency. Collectively, these findings support the theoretical proposition that both component words and compound words are activated and engage in competition during word processing. This provides a new approach to compound word processing in Chinese reading and a possible solution to mixed results of character frequency effects reported in the literature. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"479-497"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140307674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2024-02-29DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001192
Daniel Toledano, Mor Sasi, Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg, Dominique Lamy
Most visual-search theories assume that our attention is automatically allocated to the location with the highest priority at any given moment. The Priority Accumulation Framework (PAF) challenges this assumption. It suggests that the priority weight at each location accumulates across sequential events and that evidence for the presence of action-relevant information contributes to determining when attention is deployed to the location with the highest accumulated priority. Here, we tested these hypotheses for overt attention by recording first saccades in a free-viewing spatial-cueing task. We manipulated search difficulty (Experiments 1 and 2) and cue salience (Experiment 2). Standard theories posit that when oculomotor capture by the cue occurs, it is initiated before the search display appears; therefore, these theories predict that the cue's impact on the distribution of first saccades should be independent of search difficulty but influenced by the cue's saliency. By contrast, PAF posits that the cue can bias competition later, after processing of the search display has already started, and therefore predicts that such late impact should increase with both search difficulty and cue salience. The results fully supported PAF's predictions. Our account suggests a distinction between attentional capture and attentional-priority bias that resolves enduring inconsistencies in the attentional-capture literature. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"On the timing of overt attention deployment: Eye-movement evidence for the priority accumulation framework.","authors":"Daniel Toledano, Mor Sasi, Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg, Dominique Lamy","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001192","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001192","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most visual-search theories assume that our attention is automatically allocated to the location with the highest priority at any given moment. The Priority Accumulation Framework (PAF) challenges this assumption. It suggests that the priority weight at each location accumulates across sequential events and that evidence for the presence of action-relevant information contributes to determining when attention is deployed to the location with the highest accumulated priority. Here, we tested these hypotheses for overt attention by recording first saccades in a free-viewing spatial-cueing task. We manipulated search difficulty (Experiments 1 and 2) and cue salience (Experiment 2). Standard theories posit that when oculomotor capture by the cue occurs, it is initiated before the search display appears; therefore, these theories predict that the cue's impact on the distribution of first saccades should be independent of search difficulty but influenced by the cue's saliency. By contrast, PAF posits that the cue can bias competition later, after processing of the search display has already started, and therefore predicts that such late impact should increase with both search difficulty and cue salience. The results fully supported PAF's predictions. Our account suggests a distinction between attentional capture and attentional-priority bias that resolves enduring inconsistencies in the attentional-capture literature. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"431-450"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139998068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2024-02-29DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001196
Hyung-Bum Park, Weiwei Zhang
Working memory (WM) is a central cognitive bottleneck, which has primarily been attributed to its well-known storage limit. However, relatively little is known about the processing limit during the initial memory encoding stage, which may also constrain various cognitive processes. The present study introduces a novel method using dynamic stimulus presentation and hierarchical Bayesian modeling to quantitatively estimate visual WM encoding speed. Participants performed a delayed-estimation task with two memory items continuously changing color hues in perceptually unnoticeable steps. Across three experiments, the recall errors systematically shifted toward the direction of color change, providing a proxy measure of encoding speed. Importantly, the observed shifts were best characterized by a temporal lag during the encoding of different items, supported by a mixture of two distributions with credibly distinct encoding times. A supplementary model-free analysis further confirmed the discrete encoding component in visual WM for multiple items. These findings shed light on the temporal dynamics of WM encoding processes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"A discrete component in visual working memory encoding.","authors":"Hyung-Bum Park, Weiwei Zhang","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001196","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001196","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Working memory (WM) is a central cognitive bottleneck, which has primarily been attributed to its well-known storage limit. However, relatively little is known about the processing limit during the initial memory encoding stage, which may also constrain various cognitive processes. The present study introduces a novel method using dynamic stimulus presentation and hierarchical Bayesian modeling to quantitatively estimate visual WM encoding speed. Participants performed a delayed-estimation task with two memory items continuously changing color hues in perceptually unnoticeable steps. Across three experiments, the recall errors systematically shifted toward the direction of color change, providing a proxy measure of encoding speed. Importantly, the observed shifts were best characterized by a temporal lag during the encoding of different items, supported by a mixture of two distributions with credibly distinct encoding times. A supplementary model-free analysis further confirmed the discrete encoding component in visual WM for multiple items. These findings shed light on the temporal dynamics of WM encoding processes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"464-478"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139998065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A nonsignificant result against an H0 of no effect does not distinguish evidence for no effect from no evidence at all one way or the other. Thus, a researcher engaged primarily in significance testing may decide to follow up just the nonsignificant results with a test from another system of inference, such as equivalence tests (more generally, inference by intervals) or Bayes factors. However, selectively using two systems of inference in this way, can lead to inferential inconsistency because different tests are based on different principles, and therefore a researcher can be tempted to select the way each system is used to get the results the researcher wants for just the tests that system is applied to. For a related set of tests, one system of inference should be consistently used. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Use one system for all results to avoid contradiction: Advice for using significance tests, equivalence tests, and Bayes factors.","authors":"Zoltan Dienes","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001202","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001202","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A nonsignificant result against an H0 of no effect does not distinguish evidence for no effect from no evidence at all one way or the other. Thus, a researcher engaged primarily in significance testing may decide to follow up just the nonsignificant results with a test from another system of inference, such as equivalence tests (more generally, inference by intervals) or Bayes factors. However, selectively using two systems of inference in this way, can lead to inferential inconsistency because different tests are based on different principles, and therefore a researcher can be tempted to select the way each system is used to get the results the researcher wants for just the tests that system is applied to. For a related set of tests, one system of inference should be consistently used. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":"50 5","pages":"531-534"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140867248","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01Epub Date: 2024-02-22DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001190
Marion Coumel, Cong Liu, Danijela Trenkic, Angela de Bruin
We examined how bilinguals process language switches between their first (L1) and second language (L2). Language switching costs (slower responses to language switch than nonswitch trials) appear to arise more systematically in production than in comprehension, possibly because the latter context might sometimes elicit less language coactivation (Declerck et al., 2019). This might reduce language competition and in turn the need for bilinguals to apply language control when processing language switches. Yet even in comprehension, language coactivation may vary depending on variables such as the accent of the speaker (e.g., whether the L2 words are pronounced with an L1 or L2 accent) and input modality (spoken or written). In three experiments conducted during 2021-2022, we tested how unbalanced Mandarin-English bilinguals processed language switches during comprehension and the potential influence of a speaker's accent and input modality. Overall, across settings, participants experienced significant language switching costs. In some conditions, switching costs were larger to L1-Mandarin than to L2-English, an asymmetry consistent with the participants' dominance in L1-Mandarin and the application of language control. However, manipulating accent and input modality did not influence language switches, suggesting they did not impact language coactivation sufficiently to modulate language control. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Do accent and input modality modulate processing of language switches in bilingual language comprehension?","authors":"Marion Coumel, Cong Liu, Danijela Trenkic, Angela de Bruin","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001190","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001190","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We examined how bilinguals process language switches between their first (L1) and second language (L2). Language switching costs (slower responses to language switch than nonswitch trials) appear to arise more systematically in production than in comprehension, possibly because the latter context might sometimes elicit less language coactivation (Declerck et al., 2019). This might reduce language competition and in turn the need for bilinguals to apply language control when processing language switches. Yet even in comprehension, language coactivation may vary depending on variables such as the accent of the speaker (e.g., whether the L2 words are pronounced with an L1 or L2 accent) and input modality (spoken or written). In three experiments conducted during 2021-2022, we tested how unbalanced Mandarin-English bilinguals processed language switches during comprehension and the potential influence of a speaker's accent and input modality. Overall, across settings, participants experienced significant language switching costs. In some conditions, switching costs were larger to L1-Mandarin than to L2-English, an asymmetry consistent with the participants' dominance in L1-Mandarin and the application of language control. However, manipulating accent and input modality did not influence language switches, suggesting they did not impact language coactivation sufficiently to modulate language control. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"395-415"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139933891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}