Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance最新文献

A nonsignificant result against an H0 of no effect does not distinguish evidence for no effect from no evidence at all one way or the other. Thus, a researcher engaged primarily in significance testing may decide to follow up just the nonsignificant results with a test from another system of inference, such as equivalence tests (more generally, inference by intervals) or Bayes factors. However, selectively using two systems of inference in this way, can lead to inferential inconsistency because different tests are based on different principles, and therefore a researcher can be tempted to select the way each system is used to get the results the researcher wants for just the tests that system is applied to. For a related set of tests, one system of inference should be consistently used. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Adults differ considerably in their perception of both native and nonnative phonemes. For instance, when presented with continua of native phonemes on two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) or visual analog scaling (VAS) tasks, some people show sudden changes in responses (i.e., steep identification slopes) and others show gradual changes (i.e., shallow identification slopes). Moreover, some adults are more successful than others at learning unfamiliar phonemes. The predictors of these individual differences and the relationships between them are poorly understood. It also remains unclear to what extent different tasks (2AFC vs. VAS) may reflect distinct individual differences in perception. In two experiments, we addressed these questions by examining the relationships between individual differences in performance on native and nonnative phonetic perception tasks. We found that shallow 2AFC identification slopes were not related to shallow VAS identification slopes but were related to inconsistent VAS responses. Additionally, our results suggest that consistent native perception may play a role in promoting successful nonnative perception. These findings help characterize the nature of individual differences in phonetic perception and contribute to our understanding of how to measure such differences. This work also has implications for encouraging successful acquisition of new languages in adulthood. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

We examined how bilinguals process language switches between their first (L1) and second language (L2). Language switching costs (slower responses to language switch than nonswitch trials) appear to arise more systematically in production than in comprehension, possibly because the latter context might sometimes elicit less language coactivation (Declerck et al., 2019). This might reduce language competition and in turn the need for bilinguals to apply language control when processing language switches. Yet even in comprehension, language coactivation may vary depending on variables such as the accent of the speaker (e.g., whether the L2 words are pronounced with an L1 or L2 accent) and input modality (spoken or written). In three experiments conducted during 2021-2022, we tested how unbalanced Mandarin-English bilinguals processed language switches during comprehension and the potential influence of a speaker's accent and input modality. Overall, across settings, participants experienced significant language switching costs. In some conditions, switching costs were larger to L1-Mandarin than to L2-English, an asymmetry consistent with the participants' dominance in L1-Mandarin and the application of language control. However, manipulating accent and input modality did not influence language switches, suggesting they did not impact language coactivation sufficiently to modulate language control. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Vision has long been known for its inefficiency in beat perception and synchronization. However, this has been challenged by the finding that moving stimuli (bouncing ball or moving bar) can significantly improve visual beat synchronization. The present study examined two possible mechanisms for this phenomenon: visual motion facilitates temporal processing or promotes sensorimotor coupling. Instead of a single visual object (such as a ball or bar), random-dot kinematograms (RDKs) were used to construct visual motion sequences to avoid confounding factors, such as changes in trajectory and velocity. Experiment 1 showed that RDKs improved beat-timing discrimination compared with visual flashes, but auditory tones were still superior to RDKs. In Experiment 2, synchronized movements improved auditory-tone beat timing but impaired visual-flash beat timing, with no effect on RDK beat timing. Experiment 3 indicated that the regression slope of the phase correction response in RDKs was higher than that in visual flashes but still lower than that in auditory tones. The results showed that moving stimuli enhances both temporal processing (Experiment 1) and sensorimotor coupling (Experiments 2 and 3) in vision, but to a lesser degree, with audition retaining an advantage. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Prior research has shown that visual information, such as a speaker's perceived race or ethnicity, prompts listeners to expect a specific sociophonetic pattern ("social priming"). Indeed, a picture of an East Asian face may facilitate perception of second language (L2) Mandarin Chinese-accented English but interfere with perception of first language- (L1-) accented English. The present study builds on this line of inquiry, addressing the relationship between social priming effects and implicit racial/ethnic associations for L1- and L2-accented speech. For L1-accented speech, we found no priming effects when comparing White versus East Asian or Latina primes. For L2- (Mandarin Chinese-) accented speech, however, transcription accuracy was slightly better following an East Asian prime than a White prime. Across all experiments, a relationship between performance and individual differences in implicit associations emerged, but in no cases did this relationship interact with the priming manipulation. Ultimately, exploring social priming effects with additional methodological approaches, and in different populations of listeners, will help to determine whether these effects operate differently in the context of L1- and L2-accented speech. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Real-world object size is a behaviorally relevant object property that is automatically retrieved when viewing object images: participants are faster to indicate the bigger of two object images when this object is also bigger in the real world. What drives this size Stroop effect? One possibility is that it reflects the automatic retrieval of real-world size after objects are recognized at the basic level (e.g., recognizing an object as a plane activates large real-world size). An alternative possibility is that the size Stroop effect is driven by automatic associations between low-/mid-level visual features (e.g., rectilinearity) and real-world size, bypassing object recognition. Here, we tested both accounts. In Experiment 1, objects were displayed upright and inverted, slowing down recognition while equating visual features. Inversion strongly reduced the Stroop effect, indicating that object recognition contributed to the Stroop effect. Independently of inversion, however, trial-wise differences in rectilinearity also contributed to the Stroop effect. In Experiment 2, the Stroop effect was compared between manmade objects (for which rectilinearity was associated with size) and animals (no association between rectilinearity and size). The Stroop effect was larger for animals than for manmade objects, indicating that rectilinear feature differences were not necessary for the Stroop effect. Finally, in Experiment 3, unrecognizable "texform" objects that maintained size-related visual feature differences were displayed upright and inverted. Results revealed a small Stroop effect for both upright and inverted conditions. Altogether, these results indicate that the size Stroop effect partly follows object recognition with an additional contribution from visual feature associations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Humans use selective attention to prioritize visual features, like color or shape, as well as discrete spatial locations, and these effects are sensitive to the experience of reward. Reward-associated features and locations are accordingly prioritized from early in the visual hierarchy. Attention is also sensitive to the establishment of visual objects: selection of one constituent object part often leads to prioritization of other locations on that object. But very little is known about the influence of reward on this object-based control of attention. Here we show in four experiments that reward prioritization and object prioritization interact in visual cognition to guide selection. Experiment 1 establishes groundwork for this investigation, showing that reward feedback does not negate object prioritization. In Experiment 2, we corroborate the hypothesis that reward prioritization and object prioritization emerge concurrently. In Experiment 3, we find that reward prioritization and object prioritization sustain and interact in extinction, when reward feedback is discontinued. We verify this interaction in Experiment 4, linking it to task experience rather than the strategic utility of the reward association. Results suggest that information gathered from locations on reward-associated objects gains preferential access to cognition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

When two speeded tasks have spatially overlapping responses, preactivated Task 2 (T2) response information influences Task 1 (T1) response selection, a phenomenon known as the backward crosstalk effect (BCE). Current models of the BCE implicitly assume that T2 response information is equally present in trials requiring compatible or incompatible responses, such that T1 performance improves when T2 requires a compatible response and deteriorates when T2 requires an incompatible response. Thus, T2 response information should have a facilitatory and an interfering effect on T1. Interestingly, this hypothesis has never been tested, and the present study (conducted between 2021 and 2023) attempts to fill this gap by using neutral trials in which T2 responses did not spatially overlap with those in T1. The results suggest that the BCE (in T1) reflects both facilitation and interference effects of comparable magnitude, thus corroborating current conceptualizations of the BCE. We also observed an unexpected pattern of effects for T2, with only an interference effect, but no facilitation effect. Additional experiments led us to conclude that the T2 result was sensitive to the specific task characteristics. Conclusions about how the crosstalk transfers from T1 to T2 when switching tasks are therefore not possible. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Some situations require cognitive flexibility, whereas others call for cognitive stability. Recent theories posit lower-level associative learning processes as the basis of contextual control. The present study incorporates six experiments to investigate whether cognitive flexibility can be triggered by task-irrelevant color cues in the task-switching paradigm. In the first learning phase, the cue colors were repeatedly paired with certain task transitions (repetition, switch) without explicit instruction. In the following test phase, voluntary trials were intermixed (where participants can freely choose the task) to measure the voluntary switch rate (VSR) in response to the color cues. For Experiment 2a, cue size and duration were increased, and the learning phase was extended. Additionally, in Experiment 2b, the second half of the test phase consisted of 100% free choices. Experiment 3 contained catch trials to ensure cue processing. In Experiment 4, two tasks of unequal difficulty were used. Experiments 1-4 provided evidence for the null hypothesis indicating no effect of the transition association on the VSR (all BF₁₀ < 0.265). The control Experiment 5 ruled out that the null effect was due to the insensitivity of the paradigm. Therefore, flexibility by association appears to be harder to achieve than recent accounts suggest. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

In timing research, repeated stimuli have been shown to have a shortening effect on time perception compared to novel stimuli. This finding had been attributed to repeated stimuli being more expected and, thus, less arousing and/or attended, or eliciting less neuronal activation due to repetition suppression, which results in temporal underestimation. However, more recent studies in the visual domain that disentangled effects of repetition and expectation suggest a more nuanced interpretation. In these studies, repetition led to temporal contraction while expectation caused subjective dilation of time. It was argued that expectations increase the perceptual strength of the stimulus, which leads to temporal overestimation, while repetitions reduce perceptual strength, which then leads to temporal underestimation. In the present study, we sought to further elaborate on these findings using auditory stimuli. In Experiment 1, we used an implicit method to induce expectation and manipulated the probability of stimulus repetition block-wise in a two-stimulus paradigm with auditory tones. Our findings were in line with the recent findings. When repetitions were less frequent, that is, less expected, we found clear evidence for perceived temporal contraction of repetitions. In contrast, when repetitions were more expected, the shortening effect of stimulus repetition on subjective duration disappeared. In Experiment 2, participants explicitly generated expectations about an upcoming tone in a temporal bisection paradigm. In trials, where expectations were fulfilled, presentation durations were perceived longer compared to trials with unfulfilled expectations. Our findings suggest that factors that increase the perceptual strength of a stimulus contribute to subjective temporal dilation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).