Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-06-26DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001352
Tong Xie, Fengnan Chen, Shimin Fu
Attention is inherently drawn to distractors with salient physical features, yet it can also be proactively suppressed through top-down control, preventing attentional capture. However, this proactive suppression mechanism can fail under certain conditions. To explore the boundaries of proactive suppression, four experiments were conducted in the present study using the additional singleton paradigm, examining both top-down control and bottom-up factors. In Experiment 1, the singleton-search and feature-search modes were manipulated within subjects. The results revealed a singleton-presence cost in the singleton-search mode but no singleton-presence benefit in the feature-search mode, suggesting that proactive suppression becomes ineffective when search modes are inconsistent. Experiment 2 introduced trial-by-trial variation in targets and singleton distractors, demonstrating that proactive suppression remained effective, indicating its flexibility and rapid deployment. In Experiments 3 and 4, varying levels of singleton distractor salience were examined. The results revealed that proactive suppression was effective for highly salient distractors but failed for low-salience or dynamic distractors. This suggests that proactive suppression requires a certain level of salience and does not extend to dynamic distractors. In conclusion, this study validated the robustness of the proactive suppression mechanism while identifying the conditions under which it fails, shedding light on its operational boundaries. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
注意力本质上被吸引到具有显著物理特征的干扰物上,但它也可以通过自上而下的控制来主动抑制,从而防止注意力捕获。然而,这种主动抑制机制在某些条件下可能失效。为了探索主动抑制的边界,本研究使用额外的单例范式进行了四个实验,研究了自上而下的控制和自下而上的因素。在实验1中,单个搜索和特征搜索模式在被试内部被操纵。结果表明,在单例搜索模式下存在单例存在代价,而在特征搜索模式下没有单例存在收益,这表明当搜索模式不一致时,主动抑制无效。实验2引入了目标和单一干扰物的逐次变化,表明主动抑制仍然有效,表明其灵活性和快速部署。在实验3和4中,测试了不同水平的单干扰显著性。结果表明,主动抑制对高显著性干扰物有效,对低显著性或动态干扰物无效。这表明,主动抑制需要一定程度的显著性,而不会扩展到动态干扰物。总之,本研究验证了主动抑制机制的稳健性,同时确定了其失效的条件,揭示了其操作边界。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Proactive suppression and its boundaries: Examining the conditions for successful top-down control.","authors":"Tong Xie, Fengnan Chen, Shimin Fu","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001352","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001352","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Attention is inherently drawn to distractors with salient physical features, yet it can also be proactively suppressed through top-down control, preventing attentional capture. However, this proactive suppression mechanism can fail under certain conditions. To explore the boundaries of proactive suppression, four experiments were conducted in the present study using the additional singleton paradigm, examining both top-down control and bottom-up factors. In Experiment 1, the singleton-search and feature-search modes were manipulated within subjects. The results revealed a singleton-presence cost in the singleton-search mode but no singleton-presence benefit in the feature-search mode, suggesting that proactive suppression becomes ineffective when search modes are inconsistent. Experiment 2 introduced trial-by-trial variation in targets and singleton distractors, demonstrating that proactive suppression remained effective, indicating its flexibility and rapid deployment. In Experiments 3 and 4, varying levels of singleton distractor salience were examined. The results revealed that proactive suppression was effective for highly salient distractors but failed for low-salience or dynamic distractors. This suggests that proactive suppression requires a certain level of salience and does not extend to dynamic distractors. In conclusion, this study validated the robustness of the proactive suppression mechanism while identifying the conditions under which it fails, shedding light on its operational boundaries. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"1344-1360"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144509253","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-06-30DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001346
Philipp Raßbach, Eric Grießbach, Rouwen Cañal-Bruland, Oliver Herbort
Human decision making often involves making a choice while concurrently moving. Prior studies showed that the dynamic body state biases choices, with deciders opting for choices associated with lower motor effort (motor cost bias) and spatial overlap with concurrent movement (cognitive crosstalk bias). In this study, we examined whether bodily movements (e.g., moving a limb) or resulting visual movements in the environment (e.g., a ball rolling in a specific direction due to the limb movement) give rise to the cognitive crosstalk bias. In a virtual embodied choice task, participants manually tracked a stimulus and concurrently made decisions to evade an obstacle and collect rewards. In two experiments, we orthogonally manipulated the motor costs for choices and spatial features of the body state during tracking. Importantly, we disentangled bodily movements during tracking and resulting visual movements on the computer screen to assess their relative contributions to the cognitive crosstalk bias. Both motor costs and cognitive crosstalk biased participants' choices. Cognitive crosstalk specifically was determined solely by the bodily movement direction in both experiments. This result pattern could not be attenuated by increasing the saliency of visual tracking movements on the computer screen in the second experiment. Our results suggest that bodily movements primarily cause cognitive crosstalk during embodied choices. These findings have implications for embodied choice models and dual-tasking research, as they show a potential divergence between findings from classical dual-task paradigms and more dynamic embodied choices that are influenced by motor costs and cognitive crosstalk resulting from the moving body. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
人类的决策通常涉及在移动的同时做出选择。先前的研究表明,动态身体状态会对选择产生偏倚,决策者会选择与较低运动努力相关的选择(运动成本偏见)和与并发运动相关的空间重叠(认知串扰偏见)。在这项研究中,我们研究了身体运动(例如,移动肢体)或在环境中产生的视觉运动(例如,由于肢体运动而向特定方向滚动的球)是否会引起认知相声偏见。在虚拟具体化选择任务中,参与者手动跟踪刺激,同时做出回避障碍和获得奖励的决定。在两个实验中,我们在跟踪过程中对选择和身体状态的空间特征的运动成本进行正交操纵。重要的是,我们解开了追踪过程中的身体运动和由此在计算机屏幕上产生的视觉运动的纠缠,以评估它们对认知相声偏见的相对贡献。运动成本和认知相声都会影响参与者的选择。在两个实验中,认知相声仅由身体运动方向决定。在第二个实验中,通过增加视觉跟踪运动在计算机屏幕上的显著性,不能减弱这一结果模式。我们的研究结果表明,在具体化的选择过程中,身体运动主要引起认知相声。这些发现对具身选择模型和双任务研究具有启示意义,因为它们显示了经典双任务范式的研究结果与受运动成本和由运动身体产生的认知串扰影响的更动态的具身选择之间的潜在分歧。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Body-related effects of concurrent movement bias embodied choices.","authors":"Philipp Raßbach, Eric Grießbach, Rouwen Cañal-Bruland, Oliver Herbort","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001346","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001346","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human decision making often involves making a choice while concurrently moving. Prior studies showed that the dynamic body state biases choices, with deciders opting for choices associated with lower motor effort (motor cost bias) and spatial overlap with concurrent movement (cognitive crosstalk bias). In this study, we examined whether bodily movements (e.g., moving a limb) or resulting visual movements in the environment (e.g., a ball rolling in a specific direction due to the limb movement) give rise to the cognitive crosstalk bias. In a virtual embodied choice task, participants manually tracked a stimulus and concurrently made decisions to evade an obstacle and collect rewards. In two experiments, we orthogonally manipulated the motor costs for choices and spatial features of the body state during tracking. Importantly, we disentangled bodily movements during tracking and resulting visual movements on the computer screen to assess their relative contributions to the cognitive crosstalk bias. Both motor costs and cognitive crosstalk biased participants' choices. Cognitive crosstalk specifically was determined solely by the bodily movement direction in both experiments. This result pattern could not be attenuated by increasing the saliency of visual tracking movements on the computer screen in the second experiment. Our results suggest that bodily movements primarily cause cognitive crosstalk during embodied choices. These findings have implications for embodied choice models and dual-tasking research, as they show a potential divergence between findings from classical dual-task paradigms and more dynamic embodied choices that are influenced by motor costs and cognitive crosstalk resulting from the moving body. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"1321-1343"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144530781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-06-26DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001347
Xinchi Yu, Sanikaa P Thakurdesai, Weizhen Xie
Integrating prior semantic knowledge with environmental information is essential for everyday cognition, yet how this process affects ongoing perception and memory remains a vexing problem. We investigate this by studying how associative semantic knowledge interacts with perceptual constraints induced by brief encoding times, thereby supporting visual working memory (VWM) for real-world objects. Study 1 reanalyzed data from Quirk et al. (2020), involving 75 participants across 13,750 trials of a VWM task with randomly chosen objects and verbal distraction. We found that objects' semantic associations, estimated by a natural language processing model, predicted trial-level VWM accuracy under brief but not prolonged encoding times (0.2 s vs. 1-2 s). These results, unaffected by image similarity from computer vision models, were replicated in Study 2 with 50 participants across 11,880 trials. Combined, these findings suggest that semantic associations between arbitrary object pairs can facilitate effective grouping among VWM items to mitigate perceptual constraints, highlighting the broad influence of semantic knowledge in VWM formation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
整合先前的语义知识和环境信息对于日常认知是必不可少的,然而这个过程如何影响持续的感知和记忆仍然是一个令人烦恼的问题。我们通过研究联想语义知识如何与短暂编码时间诱导的感知约束相互作用,从而支持对现实世界对象的视觉工作记忆(VWM)来研究这一点。研究1重新分析了Quirk等人(2020)的数据,涉及75名参与者,进行了13,750次随机选择物体和言语分心的VWM任务试验。我们发现,通过自然语言处理模型估计的对象语义关联,可以预测在短暂但不延长的编码时间(0.2 s vs. 1-2 s)下试验级VWM的准确性。这些结果不受计算机视觉模型图像相似性的影响,在研究2中得到了重复,有50名参与者参与了11880次试验。综上所述,这些研究结果表明,任意对象对之间的语义关联可以促进VWM项目之间的有效分组,从而减轻感知约束,突出了语义知识在VWM形成中的广泛影响。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Associating everything with everything else, all at once: Semantic associations facilitate visual working memory formation for real-world objects.","authors":"Xinchi Yu, Sanikaa P Thakurdesai, Weizhen Xie","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001347","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001347","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Integrating prior semantic knowledge with environmental information is essential for everyday cognition, yet how this process affects ongoing perception and memory remains a vexing problem. We investigate this by studying how associative semantic knowledge interacts with perceptual constraints induced by brief encoding times, thereby supporting visual working memory (VWM) for real-world objects. Study 1 reanalyzed data from Quirk et al. (2020), involving 75 participants across 13,750 trials of a VWM task with randomly chosen objects and verbal distraction. We found that objects' semantic associations, estimated by a natural language processing model, predicted trial-level VWM accuracy under brief but not prolonged encoding times (0.2 s vs. 1-2 s). These results, unaffected by image similarity from computer vision models, were replicated in Study 2 with 50 participants across 11,880 trials. Combined, these findings suggest that semantic associations between arbitrary object pairs can facilitate effective grouping among VWM items to mitigate perceptual constraints, highlighting the broad influence of semantic knowledge in VWM formation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"1361-1373"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12229084/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144509246","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-06-26DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001356
Marie Martel, Scott Glover
Recent work in our lab has shown that motor imagery is highly sensitive to tasks that interfere with executive resources, whereas physical actions are largely immune. This has been taken as support for the Motor-Cognitive model of motor imagery and in opposition to the theory of Functional Equivalence. Here, we examined another prediction of the Motor-Cognitive model, namely that an opposite pattern of effects would be observed when the information available for online control was reduced, with physical actions being affected but motor imagery being largely resistant. This was tested in four experiments in which participants performed either physical actions or motor imagery, and in a replication in which they performed both. The experiments manipulated the quality of information available during the online control of movement through: (a) comparing movements made with or without visual feedback (Experiments 1 and 1a); (b) comparing movements made using foveal versus peripheral vision (Experiment 2); and (c) comparing physical to mimed actions (Experiment 3). All four experiments found evidence in favor of the Motor-Cognitive model in that manipulations of online control affected physical action much more than they affected motor imagery. These results were, however, inconsistent with a Functional Equivalence view. We discuss these results in the broader context of other theoretical views of motor imagery. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
我们实验室最近的工作表明,运动意象对干扰执行资源的任务高度敏感,而身体动作在很大程度上是免疫的。这被认为是对运动意象的运动-认知模型的支持,与功能对等理论相反。在这里,我们检验了运动-认知模型的另一个预测,即当可用于在线控制的信息减少时,会观察到相反的效果模式,身体行为受到影响,但运动意象在很大程度上受到抵制。这在四个实验中得到了验证,在这些实验中,参与者要么进行身体动作,要么进行运动想象,然后在一个重复的实验中,他们同时进行这两种动作。实验通过(a)比较有或没有视觉反馈的运动(实验1和1a)来操纵在线运动控制过程中可用信息的质量;(b)比较中央凹视觉和周边视觉的运动(实验2);(c)比较物理动作和模拟动作(实验3)。所有四个实验都发现了支持运动-认知模型的证据,即在线控制操作对身体动作的影响远大于对运动意象的影响。然而,这些结果与功能对等的观点不一致。我们在运动意象的其他理论观点的更广泛的背景下讨论这些结果。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Online versus cognitive control: A dividing line between physical action and motor imagery.","authors":"Marie Martel, Scott Glover","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001356","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001356","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent work in our lab has shown that motor imagery is highly sensitive to tasks that interfere with executive resources, whereas physical actions are largely immune. This has been taken as support for the Motor-Cognitive model of motor imagery and in opposition to the theory of Functional Equivalence. Here, we examined another prediction of the Motor-Cognitive model, namely that an opposite pattern of effects would be observed when the information available for online control was reduced, with physical actions being affected but motor imagery being largely resistant. This was tested in four experiments in which participants performed either physical actions or motor imagery, and in a replication in which they performed both. The experiments manipulated the quality of information available during the online control of movement through: (a) comparing movements made with or without visual feedback (Experiments 1 and 1a); (b) comparing movements made using foveal versus peripheral vision (Experiment 2); and (c) comparing physical to mimed actions (Experiment 3). All four experiments found evidence in favor of the Motor-Cognitive model in that manipulations of online control affected physical action much more than they affected motor imagery. These results were, however, inconsistent with a Functional Equivalence view. We discuss these results in the broader context of other theoretical views of motor imagery. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"1407-1422"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144509252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-07-21DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001357
Xiaoyi Liu, Yingtao Fu, Mowei Shen, Hui Chen
Previous studies have shown that sensory information matching the content of visual working memory (VWM) gains prioritized access into awareness. While these studies primarily focused on a single stimulus, it remains unclear whether the prioritization persists when multiple items are memorized. Using a breaking continuous flash suppression paradigm, the current study systematically investigated the time taken to detect a suppressed stimulus when two items were maintained in VWM. The results demonstrated that multiple items stored in VWM did not prioritize the matched stimuli into awareness, regardless of whether the stimuli presented during suppression were partially matched (Experiment 1) or fully matched (Experiment 2) to the memorized items. Furthermore, no prioritization was observed when the memorized items were either integrated into a single object (Experiment 3) or remembered with increased precision (Experiment 4). After confirming the validity of the current experimental paradigm (Experiments 5a and 5b), we found that the item assigned with a higher priority through a retro cue broke into awareness faster than the uncued and the new items (Experiment 6). These findings suggest that when multiple items are retained in VWM, only one single item stored in the active state can facilitate matched stimuli into awareness, indicating a limited capacity for the modulation of VWM on access to visual awareness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
先前的研究表明,与视觉工作记忆(VWM)内容相匹配的感官信息优先进入意识。虽然这些研究主要集中在一个单一的刺激上,但当记忆多个项目时,这种优先级是否会持续存在仍不清楚。本研究采用打破连续闪光抑制范式,系统地研究了在VWM中维持两个项目时检测抑制刺激所需的时间。结果表明,无论在抑制过程中呈现的刺激物与记忆的刺激物是部分匹配(实验1)还是完全匹配(实验2),存储在VWM中的多个刺激物都不会优先考虑匹配的刺激物进入意识。此外,当记忆项目被整合到一个单一的对象(实验3)或提高记忆精度(实验4)时,没有观察到优先级。在确认当前实验范式的有效性后(实验5a和5b),我们发现通过复古线索分配的优先级较高的项目比未提示和新项目更快地进入意识(实验6)。这些发现表明,当视觉知觉知觉中保留多个项目时,只有一个项目在激活状态下存储,才能促进匹配的刺激进入意识,这表明视觉知觉知觉对视觉知觉的调节能力有限。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Limited capacity for the visual working memory-driven access to visual awareness.","authors":"Xiaoyi Liu, Yingtao Fu, Mowei Shen, Hui Chen","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001357","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001357","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous studies have shown that sensory information matching the content of visual working memory (VWM) gains prioritized access into awareness. While these studies primarily focused on a single stimulus, it remains unclear whether the prioritization persists when multiple items are memorized. Using a breaking continuous flash suppression paradigm, the current study systematically investigated the time taken to detect a suppressed stimulus when two items were maintained in VWM. The results demonstrated that multiple items stored in VWM did not prioritize the matched stimuli into awareness, regardless of whether the stimuli presented during suppression were partially matched (Experiment 1) or fully matched (Experiment 2) to the memorized items. Furthermore, no prioritization was observed when the memorized items were either integrated into a single object (Experiment 3) or remembered with increased precision (Experiment 4). After confirming the validity of the current experimental paradigm (Experiments 5a and 5b), we found that the item assigned with a higher priority through a retro cue broke into awareness faster than the uncued and the new items (Experiment 6). These findings suggest that when multiple items are retained in VWM, only one single item stored in the active state can facilitate matched stimuli into awareness, indicating a limited capacity for the modulation of VWM on access to visual awareness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"1435-1445"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144676378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-06-26DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001351
Luca Pascolini, Andrew P Bayliss, Anh H Le, Natalie A Wyer
Robots are rapidly becoming a common aspect of our physical environments, but it is unclear under what conditions they can integrate into our social world. One prerequisite of such integration may be the perception that robots are agents that act with intention. In two experiments we used a temporal binding paradigm to explore how the implicit sense of agency might be vicariously induced by observing robot actions. In two experiments wherein participants interacted with a simple nonhumanoid toy robot, we found an underestimation of the temporal gap between observed robot action and outcome (i.e., temporal binding, an index of the implicit sense of agency; Experiments 1 and 2). Critically, however, this was only the case if participants had engaged previously with the robot in a "social" game (Experiment 2). In contrast, binding was weaker for participants who had interacted with the robot on a mechanistic basis. These results are consistent with the notion that even nonhumanoid social robots can evoke an implicit sense of vicarious agency, but only in restricted social contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
机器人正迅速成为我们物理环境的一个常见方面,但尚不清楚它们在什么条件下可以融入我们的社交世界。这种整合的一个先决条件可能是人们认为机器人是有意图的代理人。在两个实验中,我们使用了一个时间约束范式来探索内隐代理感是如何通过观察机器人的行为而间接诱导的。在两个实验中,参与者与一个简单的非人形玩具机器人互动,我们发现低估了观察到的机器人动作和结果之间的时间差距(即时间绑定,内隐代理感的指标;实验1和2)。然而,关键的是,只有当参与者之前在“社交”游戏中与机器人互动时才会出现这种情况(实验2)。相比之下,在机械基础上与机器人互动的参与者的绑定较弱。这些结果与这样一种观点是一致的,即即使是非人形的社交机器人也能唤起一种内隐的替代代理感,但仅限于有限的社交环境。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Observed nonhumanoid robot actions induce vicarious agency when perceived as social actors, not as objects.","authors":"Luca Pascolini, Andrew P Bayliss, Anh H Le, Natalie A Wyer","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001351","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001351","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robots are rapidly becoming a common aspect of our physical environments, but it is unclear under what conditions they can integrate into our social world. One prerequisite of such integration may be the perception that robots are agents that act with intention. In two experiments we used a temporal binding paradigm to explore how the implicit sense of agency might be vicariously induced by observing robot actions. In two experiments wherein participants interacted with a simple nonhumanoid toy robot, we found an underestimation of the temporal gap between observed robot action and outcome (i.e., temporal binding, an index of the implicit sense of agency; Experiments 1 and 2). Critically, however, this was only the case if participants had engaged previously with the robot in a \"social\" game (Experiment 2). In contrast, binding was weaker for participants who had interacted with the robot on a mechanistic basis. These results are consistent with the notion that even nonhumanoid social robots can evoke an implicit sense of vicarious agency, but only in restricted social contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"1423-1434"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144509251","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The stop signal task requires people to inhibit an ongoing action when a signal tells them to stop. It measures the act of control people engage to inhibit actions, change goals, adjust to perturbations, and correct errors. It has become a gold standard measure of inhibitory control. This article provides a commentary on the article we published in 1984 that provided a model and a method for measuring the act of control engaged in the stop signal task. The commentary describes the genesis of the theory relating the task to cognitive control, summarizes the model and the method, and suggests reasons why the 1984 article had an impact that extends beyond experimental psychology to cognitive science, cognitive neuroscience, clinical science, and developmental psychology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
停止信号任务要求人们在信号告诉他们停止时抑制正在进行的动作。它衡量的是人们参与抑制行为、改变目标、适应干扰和纠正错误的控制行为。它已经成为抑制控制的黄金标准。本文是对我们在1984年发表的一篇文章的评论,那篇文章提供了一种模型和方法来测量参与停止信号任务的控制行为。这篇评论描述了将任务与认知控制联系起来的理论的起源,总结了模型和方法,并提出了1984年那篇文章产生的影响从实验心理学延伸到认知科学、认知神经科学、临床科学和发展心理学的原因。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"It was 40 years ago today: Reflections \"On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: A model and a method\" by Logan et al. (1984).","authors":"Gordon D Logan","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001303","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001303","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The stop signal task requires people to inhibit an ongoing action when a signal tells them to stop. It measures the act of control people engage to inhibit actions, change goals, adjust to perturbations, and correct errors. It has become a gold standard measure of inhibitory control. This article provides a commentary on the article we published in 1984 that provided a model and a method for measuring the act of control engaged in the stop signal task. The commentary describes the genesis of the theory relating the task to cognitive control, summarizes the model and the method, and suggests reasons why the 1984 article had an impact that extends beyond experimental psychology to cognitive science, cognitive neuroscience, clinical science, and developmental psychology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":"51 10","pages":"1303-1314"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12462884/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145138927","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Reports an error in "Submentalizing: Clarifying how domain general processes explain spontaneous perspective-taking" by Mark R. Gardner and Lisa Thorn (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2025[Jan], Vol 51[1], 7-19; see record 2025-50561-001). The article (https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001250), had the incorrect open access license listed in the author note due to a processing error. The correct open access license for the article is CC BY 4.0; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0. The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2025-50561-001.) Demonstrations of spontaneous perspective-taking are thought to provide some of the best evidence to date for "implicit mentalizing"-the ability to track simple mental states in a fast and efficient manner. However, this evidence has been challenged by a "submentalizing" account proposing that these findings are merely attention-orienting effects. The present research aimed to clarify the cognitive processes responsible by measuring spontaneous perspective-taking while controlling for attention orienting. Four experiments employed the widely used dot perspective task, modified by changing the order that stimuli were presented so that responses would be less influenced by attention orienting. This modification had different effects on speed and accuracy of responding. For response times, it attenuated spontaneous perspective-taking effects for avatars as well as attention-orienting effects for arrows. For error rates, robust spontaneous perspective-taking effects remained that were unaffected by manipulations targeting attention orienting, but contingent upon there being two competing active task sets (self- and other perspectives). These results confirm that attention orienting explains response time effects revealed by the original version of the dot perspective task. Error rate results also reveal the crucial role played by domain-general executive processes in enabling selection between perspectives. The absence of independent evidence for implicit mentalizing lends support to a revised submentalizing account that incorporates executive functions alongside attention orienting. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
报告Mark R. Gardner和Lisa Thorn的“潜意识化:阐明领域一般过程如何解释自发换位思考”中的错误(《实验心理学杂志:人类感知与表现》,2025年[1月],Vol 51 bbb, 7-19;见record 2025-50561-001)。由于处理错误,文章(https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001250)在作者说明中列出了不正确的开放获取许可。正确的开放获取许可是CC BY 4.0;https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0。本文的在线版本已被更正。(以下是原文摘要,收录于record 2025-50561-001。)自发换位思考的表现被认为为“内隐心智化”——一种以快速有效的方式追踪简单心理状态的能力——提供了一些迄今为止最好的证据。然而,这一证据受到了“潜意识化”理论的挑战,该理论认为这些发现仅仅是注意力导向效应。本研究旨在通过测量自发换位思考的认知过程,同时控制注意力导向。四个实验采用了广泛使用的点透视任务,通过改变刺激呈现的顺序来修改,这样反应就不会受到注意力导向的影响。这种修改对反应的速度和准确性有不同的影响。在响应时间方面,它减弱了角色自发的换位思考效应以及箭头的注意力导向效应。对于错误率而言,稳健的自发视角采取效应仍然存在,不受以注意力导向为目标的操纵的影响,但取决于存在两个竞争的活动任务集(自我和其他视角)。这些结果证实了注意定向解释了最初版本的点透视任务所揭示的反应时间效应。错误率结果还揭示了领域通用执行过程在实现视角之间的选择中所起的关键作用。内隐心理化缺乏独立的证据,这为一种修正的潜意识化解释提供了支持,该解释将执行功能与注意力导向结合起来。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Erratum to \"Submentalizing: Clarifying how domain general processes explain spontaneous perspective-taking\" by Gardner and Thorn (2025).","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001372","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001372","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reports an error in \"Submentalizing: Clarifying how domain general processes explain spontaneous perspective-taking\" by Mark R. Gardner and Lisa Thorn (<i>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance</i>, 2025[Jan], Vol 51[1], 7-19; see record 2025-50561-001). The article (https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001250), had the incorrect open access license listed in the author note due to a processing error. The correct open access license for the article is CC BY 4.0; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0. The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2025-50561-001.) Demonstrations of spontaneous perspective-taking are thought to provide some of the best evidence to date for \"implicit mentalizing\"-the ability to track simple mental states in a fast and efficient manner. However, this evidence has been challenged by a \"submentalizing\" account proposing that these findings are merely attention-orienting effects. The present research aimed to clarify the cognitive processes responsible by measuring spontaneous perspective-taking while controlling for attention orienting. Four experiments employed the widely used dot perspective task, modified by changing the order that stimuli were presented so that responses would be less influenced by attention orienting. This modification had different effects on speed and accuracy of responding. For response times, it attenuated spontaneous perspective-taking effects for avatars as well as attention-orienting effects for arrows. For error rates, robust spontaneous perspective-taking effects remained that were unaffected by manipulations targeting attention orienting, but contingent upon there being two competing active task sets (self- and other perspectives). These results confirm that attention orienting explains response time effects revealed by the original version of the dot perspective task. Error rate results also reveal the crucial role played by domain-general executive processes in enabling selection between perspectives. The absence of independent evidence for implicit mentalizing lends support to a revised submentalizing account that incorporates executive functions alongside attention orienting. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":"51 10","pages":"1360"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145138950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-06-30DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001330
Christian Wolf, Michael B Steinborn, Lynn Huestegge
Effort is an important theoretical construct in several psychological disciplines, yet there is little consensus on how it manifests in behavior. Here, we operationalized effort as performance improvements beyond speed-accuracy tradeoffs and argue that oculomotor kinematics offer a novel conceptual lens on effort regulation. We investigated the efficiency and persistence of mere task instructions to induce transient effort. In a saccadic selection task, participants were instructed to look at targets as quickly and accurately as possible (standard instructions) or to mobilize all resources and respond even faster and more accurately ("to give 110%," effort instructions). We compared results to standard speeded performance (baseline block) and to a potential upper performance limit linking effort instructions to performance-contingent rewards (reward block). Eye movements were faster, more accurate, and initiated earlier when effort was instructed. Yet, these effects were more strongly pronounced and more persistent over time when effort was additionally rewarded. Importantly, a simultaneous improvement in speed and accuracy was only observed with reward. Altogether, the present findings show that instructions may spark effort, but reward sustains it, turning volatile engagement into lasting performance. This underscores that effort thrives when driven by purpose. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
努力是几个心理学学科的重要理论建构,但对其如何表现在行为上却鲜有共识。在这里,我们将努力操作为超越速度-精度权衡的性能改进,并认为眼动运动学为努力调节提供了一个新的概念镜头。我们研究了单纯任务指令诱导瞬时努力的效率和持久性。在跳眼选择任务中,参与者被要求尽可能快速准确地观察目标(标准指令),或者调动所有资源,更快更准确地做出反应(“付出110%”的努力指令)。我们将结果与标准速度性能(基线块)和将努力指令与绩效奖励(奖励块)联系起来的潜在性能上限进行了比较。他们的眼球运动更快、更准确,而且在下达动作指令时开始得更早。然而,随着时间的推移,当努力得到额外的奖励时,这些影响会更加明显和持久。重要的是,只有在有奖励的情况下,才能观察到速度和准确性的同时提高。总之,目前的研究结果表明,指示可能会激发努力,但奖励会维持努力,将不稳定的投入转化为持久的表现。这凸显出,在目标的驱动下,努力才能茁壮成长。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Effort in oculomotor control: Role of instructions and reward on spatiotemporal eye movement dynamics.","authors":"Christian Wolf, Michael B Steinborn, Lynn Huestegge","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001330","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001330","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effort is an important theoretical construct in several psychological disciplines, yet there is little consensus on how it manifests in behavior. Here, we operationalized effort as performance improvements beyond speed-accuracy tradeoffs and argue that oculomotor kinematics offer a novel conceptual lens on effort regulation. We investigated the efficiency and persistence of mere task instructions to induce transient effort. In a saccadic selection task, participants were instructed to look at targets as quickly and accurately as possible (standard instructions) or to mobilize all resources and respond even faster and more accurately (\"to give 110%,\" effort instructions). We compared results to standard speeded performance (baseline block) and to a potential upper performance limit linking effort instructions to performance-contingent rewards (reward block). Eye movements were faster, more accurate, and initiated earlier when effort was instructed. Yet, these effects were more strongly pronounced and more persistent over time when effort was additionally rewarded. Importantly, a simultaneous improvement in speed and accuracy was only observed with reward. Altogether, the present findings show that instructions may spark effort, but reward sustains it, turning volatile engagement into lasting performance. This underscores that effort thrives when driven by purpose. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"1279-1302"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144530782","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-06-16DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001344
Zachary Hamblin-Frohman, Jay Pratt
There exists a bidirectional relationship between visual attention and visual working memory (VWM). Some argue that it is a voluntary process to encode an attended item into VWM. However, research has shown that attentional selection (defined as selection of one item from others) exclusively interferes with retained VWM information. The current study puts forth a selective-encoding hypothesis, that a selectively attended item is automatically encoded into VWM, which would clarify a critical link between selective attention and VWM. On Trial 1 (T₁) participants searched for a target item, either presented among nontarget items (selection) or in isolation to account for feature priming (target alone). On Trial 2 (T₂) participants continued to search for the same target among nontargets, however, a color distractor was now present that could either match the color of the T₁ target or was a neutral color. In Experiment 1, we showed that when a target item is selected on T₁ the magnitude of distraction (measured via eye movements and response times) from the matching distractor was greater than the neutral distractor, compared to the target-alone condition. This critical interaction was replicated in Experiments 2a and 2b, which varied different search parameters controlling for stimulus-driven confounds. Experiment 3 established a causal link between selection-driven capture and VWM. When VWM was at capacity, influence from the selectively attended T₁ target on T₂ distraction was eliminated, while performance across memory conditions was consistent for target-alone T₁ conditions. Together the three experiments show evidence for obligatory encoding of selectively attended items into VWM. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
视觉注意与视觉工作记忆之间存在着双向关系。一些人认为,将被关注的项目编码为VWM是一个自愿的过程。然而,研究表明,注意选择(定义为从其他项目中选择一个项目)只会干扰VWM信息的保留。本研究提出了一个选择性编码假设,即选择性注意的项目被自动编码到VWM中,这将澄清选择性注意与VWM之间的关键联系。在试验1 (T₁)中,参与者搜索目标项目,要么在非目标项目中出现(选择),要么孤立地出现以解释特征启动(单独目标)。在试验2 (T₂)中,参与者继续在非目标中寻找相同的目标,然而,现在出现了一个颜色分心物,它可以与T₁目标的颜色相匹配,也可以是中性颜色。在实验1中,我们表明,与单独目标条件相比,当在T 1上选择目标项目时,来自匹配分心物的分心程度(通过眼动和反应时间测量)大于中性分心物。在实验2a和2b中重复了这一关键的相互作用,它们改变了不同的搜索参数,以控制刺激驱动的混淆。实验3建立了选择驱动捕获与VWM之间的因果关系。当VWM处于容量时,选择性参加的T₁目标对T₂分心的影响被消除,而在单独目标的T₁条件下,跨记忆条件的性能是一致的。这三个实验共同证明了选择性参与项目在VWM中的强制性编码。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Selectively attended information is obligatorily encoded into visual working memory.","authors":"Zachary Hamblin-Frohman, Jay Pratt","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001344","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001344","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There exists a bidirectional relationship between visual attention and visual working memory (VWM). Some argue that it is a voluntary process to encode an attended item into VWM. However, research has shown that attentional selection (defined as selection of one item from others) exclusively interferes with retained VWM information. The current study puts forth a selective-encoding hypothesis, that a selectively attended item is automatically encoded into VWM, which would clarify a critical link between selective attention and VWM. On Trial 1 (<i>T</i>₁) participants searched for a target item, either presented among nontarget items (selection) or in isolation to account for feature priming (target alone). On Trial 2 (<i>T</i>₂) participants continued to search for the same target among nontargets, however, a color distractor was now present that could either match the color of the <i>T</i>₁ target or was a neutral color. In Experiment 1, we showed that when a target item is selected on <i>T</i>₁ the magnitude of distraction (measured via eye movements and response times) from the matching distractor was greater than the neutral distractor, compared to the target-alone condition. This critical interaction was replicated in Experiments 2a and 2b, which varied different search parameters controlling for stimulus-driven confounds. Experiment 3 established a causal link between selection-driven capture and VWM. When VWM was at capacity, influence from the selectively attended <i>T</i>₁ target on <i>T</i>₂ distraction was eliminated, while performance across memory conditions was consistent for target-alone <i>T</i>₁ conditions. Together the three experiments show evidence for obligatory encoding of selectively attended items into VWM. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"1211-1223"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144310703","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}