This perspective article explains why the article of Coles et al. (1985) must be considered a milestone in research on human cognition: Because it was the first convincing demonstration that Eriksen's theoretical flow idea can be tested and confirmed, because it foreshadowed systematic modeling attempts to capture the dynamics of decision making and response conflicts, and because its findings provided one of the strongest arguments against the back then dominating stage-analytical approach, which opened the door for more dynamic, interactive models of human cognition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"The birth of flow: Why Coles et al. (1985) is important.","authors":"Bernhard Hommel","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001266","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001266","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This perspective article explains why the article of Coles et al. (1985) must be considered a milestone in research on human cognition: Because it was the first convincing demonstration that Eriksen's theoretical flow idea can be tested and confirmed, because it foreshadowed systematic modeling attempts to capture the dynamics of decision making and response conflicts, and because its findings provided one of the strongest arguments against the back then dominating stage-analytical approach, which opened the door for more dynamic, interactive models of human cognition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":"51 2","pages":"151-152"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143366681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2025-01-06DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001257
Luzi Xu, Andre Sahakian, Surya Gayet, Chris L E Paffen, Stefan Van der Stigchel
Visual working memory (VWM) is a capacity-limited cognitive system that is utilized for enabling goal-directed actions. When sampling items for VWM storage, however, observers are often exposed to other items that are not selected for imminent action (hereafter: "prospective items"). Here, we asked whether such exposure leads to memory buildup of these prospective items, facilitating subsequent VWM encoding for imminent action. In a series of experiments, we addressed this question using a copying task, in which participants attempted to reproduce a model display by placing items in an adjacent empty grid. To investigate whether a memory is formed for prospective items, we swapped the position of unplaced items in the model and compared copying task performance to a condition in which items remained stable. The results show that, when prospective items remained stable, participants took less time inspecting the model when encoding these items later (compared to when they were swapped). This reduced inspection duration was not accompanied by a higher number of inspections or an increase in errors. We conclude that the memory system gradually builds up latent memory traces of items that are not selected for imminent action, thus increasing the efficiency of subsequent VWM encoding. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
视觉工作记忆(VWM)是一种容量有限的认知系统,用于实现目标导向的行为。然而,当为VWM存储采样项目时,观察者经常接触到其他未被选择用于即将采取行动的项目(以下简称“预期项目”)。在这里,我们询问这种暴露是否会导致这些预期项目的记忆积累,从而促进随后对即将发生的行动的VWM编码。在一系列实验中,我们使用复制任务解决了这个问题,在这个任务中,参与者试图通过将项目放置在相邻的空网格中来复制模型显示。为了研究是否对预期项目形成了记忆,我们交换了模型中未放置项目的位置,并将复制任务的性能与项目保持稳定的条件进行了比较。结果表明,当预期的项目保持稳定时,参与者在稍后编码这些项目时(与交换项目时相比)花费更少的时间检查模型。这种减少的检查时间并没有伴随着更高的检查次数或错误的增加。我们的结论是,记忆系统逐渐建立了未被选择为即将行动的项目的潜在记忆痕迹,从而提高了后续VWM编码的效率。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Latent memory traces for prospective items in visual working memory.","authors":"Luzi Xu, Andre Sahakian, Surya Gayet, Chris L E Paffen, Stefan Van der Stigchel","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001257","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001257","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Visual working memory (VWM) is a capacity-limited cognitive system that is utilized for enabling goal-directed actions. When sampling items for VWM storage, however, observers are often exposed to other items that are not selected for imminent action (hereafter: \"prospective items\"). Here, we asked whether such exposure leads to memory buildup of these prospective items, facilitating subsequent VWM encoding for imminent action. In a series of experiments, we addressed this question using a copying task, in which participants attempted to reproduce a model display by placing items in an adjacent empty grid. To investigate whether a memory is formed for prospective items, we swapped the position of unplaced items in the model and compared copying task performance to a condition in which items remained stable. The results show that, when prospective items remained stable, participants took less time inspecting the model when encoding these items later (compared to when they were swapped). This reduced inspection duration was not accompanied by a higher number of inspections or an increase in errors. We conclude that the memory system gradually builds up latent memory traces of items that are not selected for imminent action, thus increasing the efficiency of subsequent VWM encoding. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"164-177"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142932808","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hindsight bias arises when people do not realize how extensively observing an event has changed their perception of the world. As a result, the event appears more likely than it actually was, in foresight. Underestimating how much one has to learn is a form of overconfidence that could, in the extreme, lead to a seemingly surprise-free past portending a surprise-full future. Fischhoff (1975) introduced tasks for studying the extent, causes, and consequences of the bias, along with initial evidence using historical vignettes. Subsequent studies have found the bias in a wide variety of experimental and real-world settings. Psychologists have linked the bias to research on cognitive, social, perceptual, and emotional processes. Other disciplines have implicated it in practical problems including clinical diagnosis, patent evaluation, legal adjudication, historical analysis, and safety engineering. Warning people about the bias has no discernible effect. Helping people to reconstruct past perspectives might help. After describing how the research program came about, the article briefly summarizes studies that the author especially likes and which have abundant references to studies in the diverse research areas that either study hindsight bias or use it to study other phenomena. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Fifty years of hindsight bias research-Reflection on Fischhoff (1975).","authors":"Baruch Fischhoff","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001232","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001232","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hindsight bias arises when people do not realize how extensively observing an event has changed their perception of the world. As a result, the event appears more likely than it actually was, in foresight. Underestimating how much one has to learn is a form of overconfidence that could, in the extreme, lead to a seemingly surprise-free past portending a surprise-full future. Fischhoff (1975) introduced tasks for studying the extent, causes, and consequences of the bias, along with initial evidence using historical vignettes. Subsequent studies have found the bias in a wide variety of experimental and real-world settings. Psychologists have linked the bias to research on cognitive, social, perceptual, and emotional processes. Other disciplines have implicated it in practical problems including clinical diagnosis, patent evaluation, legal adjudication, historical analysis, and safety engineering. Warning people about the bias has no discernible effect. Helping people to reconstruct past perspectives might help. After describing how the research program came about, the article briefly summarizes studies that the author especially likes and which have abundant references to studies in the diverse research areas that either study hindsight bias or use it to study other phenomena. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":"51 2","pages":"143-150"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143366613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2025-01-06DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001259
Martin Constant, Dirk Kerzel
Visual working memory (VWM) is a core cognitive system enabling us to select and briefly store relevant visual information. We recently observed that more salient items were recalled more precisely from VWM and demonstrated that these effects of salience resisted manipulations of reward, probability, and selection history. Here, we investigated whether and how salience interacts with shifts of attention induced by pre- and retrocueing. Across four experiments, we consistently found the effects of salience on the accuracy of VWM. Spatial and feature cues presented before the memory display improved accuracy when they validly indicated the target, but valid cues failed to eliminate the salience effect. A similar pattern was observed with retrocues. Overall, there was little evidence that the lower accuracy for less salient stimuli could be compensated by increasing their attentional priority through cueing procedures. This suggests that salience plays a critical role in how items are initially encoded into VWM and that once representations are formed, their relative priority based on salience appears difficult to fully override via top-down priority. These findings highlight bottom-up and top-down processes in the interplay of visual attention and working memory. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
视觉工作记忆(Visual working memory, VWM)是我们对相关视觉信息进行选择和短暂存储的核心认知系统。我们最近观察到,从VWM中更准确地回忆起更突出的项目,并证明了这些显著性的影响抵制了奖励、概率和选择历史的操纵。在这里,我们研究了显著性是否以及如何与前向和后向引起的注意转移相互作用。在四个实验中,我们一致发现显著性对VWM准确性的影响。在记忆显示前呈现的空间和特征提示在有效提示目标时提高了准确性,但有效提示不能消除显著性效应。在回溯中也观察到类似的模式。总的来说,几乎没有证据表明,通过提示程序提高他们的注意优先级可以补偿对不显著刺激的较低准确性。这表明显著性在项目最初如何编码到VWM中起着关键作用,一旦表征形成,它们基于显著性的相对优先级似乎很难通过自上而下的优先级完全覆盖。这些发现强调了视觉注意和工作记忆相互作用中的自下而上和自上而下的过程。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Persistent effects of salience in visual working memory: Limits of cue-driven guidance.","authors":"Martin Constant, Dirk Kerzel","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001259","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001259","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Visual working memory (VWM) is a core cognitive system enabling us to select and briefly store relevant visual information. We recently observed that more salient items were recalled more precisely from VWM and demonstrated that these effects of salience resisted manipulations of reward, probability, and selection history. Here, we investigated whether and how salience interacts with shifts of attention induced by pre- and retrocueing. Across four experiments, we consistently found the effects of salience on the accuracy of VWM. Spatial and feature cues presented before the memory display improved accuracy when they validly indicated the target, but valid cues failed to eliminate the salience effect. A similar pattern was observed with retrocues. Overall, there was little evidence that the lower accuracy for less salient stimuli could be compensated by increasing their attentional priority through cueing procedures. This suggests that salience plays a critical role in how items are initially encoded into VWM and that once representations are formed, their relative priority based on salience appears difficult to fully override via top-down priority. These findings highlight bottom-up and top-down processes in the interplay of visual attention and working memory. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"153-163"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142932971","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Attention capture is an important mechanism that can be important for alerting one to danger, but other times, it is expedient to block distracting information from intrusion. In this experiment, we used an additional singleton paradigm to measure attention capture. Rather than solely using the subtraction method to measure the capture effect, we incorporated eye tracking to provide potentially more reliable measures of overt attention. We calculated multiple dependent variables based on the scan path and estimated a capture effect for each participant using linear mixed effects modeling, which yielded a more reliable measure than the subtraction method. The eye-tracking measures were in fact more reliable than other reaction time indicators of capture. Surprisingly, the reaction time effect was not correlated with dwell time on the distractor, distraction probability, or probability of the first saccade landing on the distractor, but the more reliable mixed model capture effect correlated with dwell time. Finally, we measured individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control with an independent set of measures. Neither working memory capacity nor attention control correlated with either reaction time capture effect, but dwell time on the distractor and verification time were negatively correlated with both. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Individual differences in attention capture, control, and working memory.","authors":"Lauren D Garner, Matthew K Robison","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001264","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001264","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Attention capture is an important mechanism that can be important for alerting one to danger, but other times, it is expedient to block distracting information from intrusion. In this experiment, we used an additional singleton paradigm to measure attention capture. Rather than solely using the subtraction method to measure the capture effect, we incorporated eye tracking to provide potentially more reliable measures of overt attention. We calculated multiple dependent variables based on the scan path and estimated a capture effect for each participant using linear mixed effects modeling, which yielded a more reliable measure than the subtraction method. The eye-tracking measures were in fact more reliable than other reaction time indicators of capture. Surprisingly, the reaction time effect was not correlated with dwell time on the distractor, distraction probability, or probability of the first saccade landing on the distractor, but the more reliable mixed model capture effect correlated with dwell time. Finally, we measured individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control with an independent set of measures. Neither working memory capacity nor attention control correlated with either reaction time capture effect, but dwell time on the distractor and verification time were negatively correlated with both. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":"51 2","pages":"243-259"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143366572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lauren K Schiller, Roberto A Abreu-Mendoza, Charles J Fitzsimmons, Robert S Siegler, Clarissa A Thompson, Miriam Rosenberg-Lee
Growing evidence highlights the predictive power of cross-notation magnitude comparison (e.g., 2/5 vs. 0.25) for math outcomes, but whether these relations persist into adulthood and the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. Across two studies during the 2021-2022 academic year, we investigated undergraduates' cross-notation and within-notation comparison skills given equivalent fractions, decimals, and percentages (Study 1, N = 220 and Study 2, N = 183). We found participants did not perceive equivalent rational numbers equivalently. Cluster analyses revealed that approximately one-quarter of undergraduates exhibited a bias to select percentages as larger in cross-notation comparisons. Compared with the other cluster of undergraduates who showed little-to-no bias, the percentages-are-larger bias cluster performed worse on fraction number line estimation and fraction arithmetic (exact and approximate), as well as reporting lower Scholastic Aptitude Test/American College Test (SAT/ACT) scores. Hierarchical linear regression analyses demonstrated that cross-notation comparison accuracy accounted for variance in SAT/ACT beyond within-notation accuracy. Mediation analyses were consistent with a potential mechanism: Stronger cross-notation knowledge equips individuals to evaluate the reasonableness of fraction arithmetic solutions. Together, these results suggest the importance of an integrated understanding of rational number notations, which may not be fully assessed by within-notation measures alone. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
越来越多的证据强调了交叉符号量级比较对数学成绩的预测能力(例如,2/5 vs. 0.25),但这些关系是否会持续到成年,其潜在机制仍然未知。在2021-2022学年的两项研究中,我们调查了在等分、小数和百分比(研究1,N = 220,研究2,N = 183)的情况下,本科生的交叉记数法和记数法内比较技能。我们发现参与者对等价有理数的感知并不等同。聚类分析显示,大约四分之一的本科生表现出在交叉符号比较中选择百分比较大的偏见。与另一组几乎没有偏差的本科生相比,百分比较大的偏差组在分数数线估计和分数算术(精确和近似)方面表现较差,并且报告的学术能力倾向测试/美国大学考试(SAT/ACT)分数较低。层次线性回归分析表明,交叉记数法比较的准确性可以解释SAT/ACT在记数法内准确性之外的方差。中介分析与一种潜在的机制一致:更强的交叉符号知识使个体能够评估分数算术解的合理性。总之,这些结果表明了对有理数符号的综合理解的重要性,这可能无法通过单独的符号内测量来充分评估。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Lack of integrated number sense among college students: Evidence from rational number cross-notation comparison.","authors":"Lauren K Schiller, Roberto A Abreu-Mendoza, Charles J Fitzsimmons, Robert S Siegler, Clarissa A Thompson, Miriam Rosenberg-Lee","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001268","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001268","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Growing evidence highlights the predictive power of cross-notation magnitude comparison (e.g., 2/5 vs. 0.25) for math outcomes, but whether these relations persist into adulthood and the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. Across two studies during the 2021-2022 academic year, we investigated undergraduates' cross-notation and within-notation comparison skills given equivalent fractions, decimals, and percentages (Study 1, N = 220 and Study 2, N = 183). We found participants did not perceive equivalent rational numbers equivalently. Cluster analyses revealed that approximately one-quarter of undergraduates exhibited a bias to select percentages as larger in cross-notation comparisons. Compared with the other cluster of undergraduates who showed little-to-no bias, the percentages-are-larger bias cluster performed worse on fraction number line estimation and fraction arithmetic (exact and approximate), as well as reporting lower Scholastic Aptitude Test/American College Test (SAT/ACT) scores. Hierarchical linear regression analyses demonstrated that cross-notation comparison accuracy accounted for variance in SAT/ACT beyond within-notation accuracy. Mediation analyses were consistent with a potential mechanism: Stronger cross-notation knowledge equips individuals to evaluate the reasonableness of fraction arithmetic solutions. Together, these results suggest the importance of an integrated understanding of rational number notations, which may not be fully assessed by within-notation measures alone. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":"51 1","pages":"70-91"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142957897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Personal objects are known to have several psychological effects on their owners. However, the formation of a sense of object ownership (SoOO) remains unclear. This study tested the hypothesis that a sense of agency (SoA) is related to the formation of SoOO. As such, we conducted nine experiments: participants played a simple game on a computer, where they controlled colored balls using a mouse. We manipulated the SoA for the balls by altering the delay or consistency between the participants' actions and the ball movements; the participants felt a strong SoA when they controlled the ball without delay or when the ball moved correspondingly to their mouse movements. After the game, participants evaluated the extent to which they felt that the ball was their object. The results consistently showed that the SoOO for the ball was stronger when the SoA was higher than when it was lower. Moreover, this modulation occurred independently of the preference for balls, and the SoOO was higher when the action stemmed from one's own will rather than from another's. Our findings suggest that intended action plays an important role in forming SoOO. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
众所周知,私人物品会对其主人产生几种心理影响。然而,对象所有权意识(SoOO)的形成仍然不清楚。本研究检验了代理意识(SoA)与SoOO形成相关的假设。因此,我们进行了9个实验:参与者在电脑上玩一个简单的游戏,他们用鼠标控制彩色球。我们通过改变参与者的动作和球运动之间的延迟或一致性来操纵球的SoA;当参与者毫不拖延地控制球,或者当球随着他们的鼠标移动而移动时,他们会感受到强烈的SoA。比赛结束后,参与者评估了他们认为球是他们的目标的程度。结果一致表明,当SoA高时,球的SoOO比SoA低时更强。此外,这种调节与对球的偏好无关,当动作源于自己的意愿而不是他人的意愿时,SoOO更高。我们的研究结果表明,预期的行动在形成SoOO中起着重要作用。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Sense of object ownership changes with sense of agency.","authors":"Kyoshiro Sasaki, Katsumi Watanabe, Yuki Yamada","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001253","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001253","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Personal objects are known to have several psychological effects on their owners. However, the formation of a sense of object ownership (SoOO) remains unclear. This study tested the hypothesis that a sense of agency (SoA) is related to the formation of SoOO. As such, we conducted nine experiments: participants played a simple game on a computer, where they controlled colored balls using a mouse. We manipulated the SoA for the balls by altering the delay or consistency between the participants' actions and the ball movements; the participants felt a strong SoA when they controlled the ball without delay or when the ball moved correspondingly to their mouse movements. After the game, participants evaluated the extent to which they felt that the ball was their object. The results consistently showed that the SoOO for the ball was stronger when the SoA was higher than when it was lower. Moreover, this modulation occurred independently of the preference for balls, and the SoOO was higher when the action stemmed from one's own will rather than from another's. Our findings suggest that intended action plays an important role in forming SoOO. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":"51 1","pages":"50-69"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142958107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-12-02DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001250
Mark R Gardner, Lisa Thorn
Demonstrations of spontaneous perspective-taking are thought to provide some of the best evidence to date for "implicit mentalizing"-the ability to track simple mental states in a fast and efficient manner. However, this evidence has been challenged by a "submentalizing" account proposing that these findings are merely attention-orienting effects. The present research aimed to clarify the cognitive processes responsible by measuring spontaneous perspective-taking while controlling for attention orienting. Four experiments employed the widely used dot perspective task, modified by changing the order that stimuli were presented so that responses would be less influenced by attention orienting. This modification had different effects on speed and accuracy of responding. For response times, it attenuated spontaneous perspective-taking effects for avatars as well as attention-orienting effects for arrows. For error rates, robust spontaneous perspective-taking effects remained that were unaffected by manipulations targeting attention orienting, but contingent upon there being two competing active task sets (self- and other perspectives). These results confirm that attention orienting explains response time effects revealed by the original version of the dot perspective task. Error rate results also reveal the crucial role played by domain-general executive processes in enabling selection between perspectives. The absence of independent evidence for implicit mentalizing lends support to a revised submentalizing account that incorporates executive functions alongside attention orienting. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
自发换位思考的表现被认为为“内隐心智化”——一种以快速有效的方式追踪简单心理状态的能力——提供了一些迄今为止最好的证据。然而,这一证据受到了“潜意识化”理论的挑战,该理论认为这些发现仅仅是注意力导向效应。本研究旨在通过测量自发换位思考的认知过程,同时控制注意力导向。四个实验采用了广泛使用的点透视任务,通过改变刺激呈现的顺序来修改,这样反应就不会受到注意力导向的影响。这种修改对反应的速度和准确性有不同的影响。在响应时间方面,它减弱了角色自发的换位思考效应以及箭头的注意力导向效应。对于错误率而言,稳健的自发视角采取效应仍然存在,不受以注意力导向为目标的操纵的影响,但取决于存在两个竞争的活动任务集(自我和其他视角)。这些结果证实了注意定向解释了最初版本的点透视任务所揭示的反应时间效应。错误率结果还揭示了领域通用执行过程在实现视角之间的选择中所起的关键作用。内隐心理化缺乏独立的证据,这为一种修正的潜意识化解释提供了支持,该解释将执行功能与注意力导向结合起来。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Submentalizing: Clarifying how domain general processes explain spontaneous perspective-taking.","authors":"Mark R Gardner, Lisa Thorn","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001250","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001250","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Demonstrations of spontaneous perspective-taking are thought to provide some of the best evidence to date for \"implicit mentalizing\"-the ability to track simple mental states in a fast and efficient manner. However, this evidence has been challenged by a \"submentalizing\" account proposing that these findings are merely attention-orienting effects. The present research aimed to clarify the cognitive processes responsible by measuring spontaneous perspective-taking while controlling for attention orienting. Four experiments employed the widely used dot perspective task, modified by changing the order that stimuli were presented so that responses would be less influenced by attention orienting. This modification had different effects on speed and accuracy of responding. For response times, it attenuated spontaneous perspective-taking effects for avatars as well as attention-orienting effects for arrows. For error rates, robust spontaneous perspective-taking effects remained that were unaffected by manipulations targeting attention orienting, but contingent upon there being two competing active task sets (self- and other perspectives). These results confirm that attention orienting explains response time effects revealed by the original version of the dot perspective task. Error rate results also reveal the crucial role played by domain-general executive processes in enabling selection between perspectives. The absence of independent evidence for implicit mentalizing lends support to a revised submentalizing account that incorporates executive functions alongside attention orienting. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"7-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142774350","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This editorial reflects on the significant role of the Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance in the author's career and outlines key changes that demonstrate its evolution. She discusses three key areas she has focused on over the years: the diversity of our journal's contributors and editors (focusing on gender representation), the quality standards of our research (specifically, study sample sizes), and the analytical methodologies we endorse (namely, the use of Bayesian statistics). She compares how the journal fared when she started in 2017 compared to its first year, and the progress the journal has made since 2017. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
这篇社论反映了《实验心理学杂志:人类感知和表现》在作者职业生涯中的重要作用,并概述了证明其演变的关键变化。她讨论了她多年来一直关注的三个关键领域:我们期刊撰稿人和编辑的多样性(关注性别代表性),我们研究的质量标准(特别是研究样本量),以及我们认可的分析方法(即贝叶斯统计的使用)。她比较了该杂志在2017年创办时与第一年的表现,以及自2017年以来该杂志取得的进展。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Perspective editorial for Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.","authors":"Isabel Gauthier","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001261","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001261","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This editorial reflects on the significant role of the <i>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance</i> in the author's career and outlines key changes that demonstrate its evolution. She discusses three key areas she has focused on over the years: the diversity of our journal's contributors and editors (focusing on gender representation), the quality standards of our research (specifically, study sample sizes), and the analytical methodologies we endorse (namely, the use of Bayesian statistics). She compares how the journal fared when she started in 2017 compared to its first year, and the progress the journal has made since 2017. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":"51 1","pages":"3-4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142958089","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Computational models of eye movement control during reading have revolutionized the study of visual, perceptual, and linguistic processes underlying reading. However, these models can only simulate and test predictions about the reading of single lines of text. Here we report two studies that examined how input variables for lexical processing (frequency and predictability) in these models influence the processing of line-final words. The first study was a linear mixed-effects analysis of the Provo Corpus, which included data from 84 readers reading 55 multiline texts. The second study was a preregistered eye movement experiment, where 32 participants read 128 items where frequency, predictability, and position (intraline vs. line-final) were orthogonally manipulated. Both studies were consistent in showing that reading times were shorter on line-final words. While there was mixed evidence for frequency and predictability effects in the Provo Corpus, our experimental data confirmed additive effects of frequency and predictability for line-final words, which did not differ from those for intraline words. We conclude that while models that make additive assumptions about the role of frequency and predictability may be better suited to modeling the current findings, additional assumptions are required if models are to be capable of modeling shorter reading times on line-final words. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
阅读过程中眼动控制的计算模型已经彻底改变了阅读背后的视觉、感知和语言过程的研究。然而,这些模型只能模拟和测试对单行文本阅读的预测。在这里,我们报告了两项研究,研究了这些模型中词汇处理的输入变量(频率和可预测性)如何影响行尾词的处理。第一项研究是对Provo语料库进行线性混合效应分析,其中包括84名读者阅读55篇多行文本的数据。第二项研究是一个预先注册的眼动实验,32名参与者阅读了128个项目,这些项目的频率、可预测性和位置(线内与线内)是正交操纵的。两项研究都一致表明,阅读行尾词的时间更短。虽然在Provo语料库中存在频率和可预测性效应的混合证据,但我们的实验数据证实了行尾词的频率和可预测性的加性效应,与行内词的加性效应没有区别。我们的结论是,虽然对频率和可预测性的作用做出附加假设的模型可能更适合于模拟当前的发现,但如果模型能够模拟更短的在线阅读时间,则需要额外的假设。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Frequency and predictability effects for line-final words.","authors":"Adam J Parker, Timothy J Slattery","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001245","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001245","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Computational models of eye movement control during reading have revolutionized the study of visual, perceptual, and linguistic processes underlying reading. However, these models can only simulate and test predictions about the reading of single lines of text. Here we report two studies that examined how input variables for lexical processing (frequency and predictability) in these models influence the processing of line-final words. The first study was a linear mixed-effects analysis of the Provo Corpus, which included data from 84 readers reading 55 multiline texts. The second study was a preregistered eye movement experiment, where 32 participants read 128 items where frequency, predictability, and position (intraline vs. line-final) were orthogonally manipulated. Both studies were consistent in showing that reading times were shorter on line-final words. While there was mixed evidence for frequency and predictability effects in the Provo Corpus, our experimental data confirmed additive effects of frequency and predictability for line-final words, which did not differ from those for intraline words. We conclude that while models that make additive assumptions about the role of frequency and predictability may be better suited to modeling the current findings, additional assumptions are required if models are to be capable of modeling shorter reading times on line-final words. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":"51 1","pages":"92-112"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142958198","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}