Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-10-16DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001369
Dariusz Asanowicz, Justyna Kotowicz, Klaudia Tondos, Paweł Rutkowski, Zofia Wodniecka
This study investigated whether lifelong bimodal bilingualism could enhance cognitive functioning in two nonlinguistic domains: executive control and visuospatial attention. Three groups participated in the study: bimodal bilinguals-hearing "children of deaf adults" (CODA) using Polish Sign Language and Polish spoken language, unimodal bilinguals (using two spoken languages), and monolinguals (using one spoken language). Participants performed two versions of the flanker task: a flanker task with different spatial gaps (stimulus eccentricities) between target and flanker stimuli, and an attention network test with different degrees of stimulus lateralization (relative to the central fixation). The two tasks assessed the behavioral efficiency of conflict resolution and spatial processing under different visuospatial demands. The results showed that bimodal and unimodal bilinguals did not differ significantly in the efficiency of conflict resolution, while both bilingual groups outperformed monolinguals. Secondly, bimodal bilinguals showed specific modulatory effects in visuospatial processing, compared to both unimodal bilinguals and monolinguals. In conclusion, contrary to previous claims, the current findings suggest that lifelong bimodal bilingualism might provide an effective "training" augmenting specific aspects of both executive control and visuospatial attention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
本研究旨在探讨终身使用双峰双语是否能提高执行控制和视觉空间注意这两个非语言领域的认知功能。三组参与了这项研究:双模双语-使用波兰手语和波兰口语的“聋人成人的孩子”(CODA),单模双语者(使用两种口语)和单语者(使用一种口语)。参与者执行了两个版本的侧翼任务:目标和侧翼刺激之间具有不同空间间隙(刺激偏心率)的侧翼任务,以及不同程度的刺激偏侧(相对于中心注视)的注意网络测试。两个任务分别评估了不同视觉空间需求下冲突解决和空间加工的行为效率。结果表明,双模和单模双语者在解决冲突的效率上没有显著差异,而两种双语组都优于单模双语组。其次,与单峰双语者和单峰双语者相比,双峰双语者在视觉空间加工中表现出特定的调节作用。总之,与之前的说法相反,目前的研究结果表明,终身双模双语可能提供了一种有效的“训练”,增强了执行控制和视觉空间注意力的特定方面。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"A CODA effect: Executive control and spatial attention in bimodal bilinguals.","authors":"Dariusz Asanowicz, Justyna Kotowicz, Klaudia Tondos, Paweł Rutkowski, Zofia Wodniecka","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001369","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001369","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated whether lifelong bimodal bilingualism could enhance cognitive functioning in two nonlinguistic domains: executive control and visuospatial attention. Three groups participated in the study: bimodal bilinguals-hearing \"children of deaf adults\" (CODA) using Polish Sign Language and Polish spoken language, unimodal bilinguals (using two spoken languages), and monolinguals (using one spoken language). Participants performed two versions of the flanker task: a flanker task with different spatial gaps (stimulus eccentricities) between target and flanker stimuli, and an attention network test with different degrees of stimulus lateralization (relative to the central fixation). The two tasks assessed the behavioral efficiency of conflict resolution and spatial processing under different visuospatial demands. The results showed that bimodal and unimodal bilinguals did not differ significantly in the efficiency of conflict resolution, while both bilingual groups outperformed monolinguals. Secondly, bimodal bilinguals showed specific modulatory effects in visuospatial processing, compared to both unimodal bilinguals and monolinguals. In conclusion, contrary to previous claims, the current findings suggest that lifelong bimodal bilingualism might provide an effective \"training\" augmenting specific aspects of both executive control and visuospatial attention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"1626-1644"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145309809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-09-22DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001374
Cansu Sümer, Benjamin G Serfas, Kim Büttner, Oliver B Büttner
A long line of research has investigated vigilance decrement, the decline in the sustained attention performance over time. Overload perspectives suggest this decrement results from cognitive resource depletion because of task load, while underload perspectives attribute it to attention disengagement from tasks that are inherently underarousing and monotonous. Based on these two perspectives, this article investigates whether background music influences arousal and task load, thereby affecting vigilance performance. Across two experiments that were conducted in 2023 and 2024, we systematically examined the effects of music presence and different types of music (liked, disliked) on performance during an abbreviated and visually taxing vigilance task. We analyzed the roles of arousal, boredom, task load, task engagement, and personality traits (extraversion, boredom proneness). Our results did not fully align with either the overload or underload perspectives. We discuss these findings within alternative theoretical frameworks, offering new insights into the complex dynamics of vigilance and attention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
一长串的研究调查了警觉性下降,随着时间的推移,持续注意力的下降。超负荷的观点认为,这种减少是由于任务负荷导致的认知资源枯竭,而负荷不足的观点则将其归因于从本质上缺乏激情和单调的任务中脱离出来的注意力。基于这两个角度,本文研究背景音乐是否会影响唤醒和任务负荷,从而影响警觉性表现。在2023年和2024年进行的两项实验中,我们系统地研究了音乐的存在和不同类型的音乐(喜欢的、不喜欢的)对在一个简短的、视觉上费力的警戒任务中的表现的影响。我们分析了唤醒、无聊、任务负荷、任务参与和人格特征(外向性、无聊倾向)的作用。我们的结果并不完全符合过载或欠负载的观点。我们在不同的理论框架内讨论这些发现,为警惕性和注意力的复杂动态提供新的见解。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"With a little help from my playlists: The impact of background music on sustained attention performance.","authors":"Cansu Sümer, Benjamin G Serfas, Kim Büttner, Oliver B Büttner","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001374","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001374","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A long line of research has investigated vigilance decrement, the decline in the sustained attention performance over time. Overload perspectives suggest this decrement results from cognitive resource depletion because of task load, while underload perspectives attribute it to attention disengagement from tasks that are inherently underarousing and monotonous. Based on these two perspectives, this article investigates whether background music influences arousal and task load, thereby affecting vigilance performance. Across two experiments that were conducted in 2023 and 2024, we systematically examined the effects of music presence and different types of music (liked, disliked) on performance during an abbreviated and visually taxing vigilance task. We analyzed the roles of arousal, boredom, task load, task engagement, and personality traits (extraversion, boredom proneness). Our results did not fully align with either the overload or underload perspectives. We discuss these findings within alternative theoretical frameworks, offering new insights into the complex dynamics of vigilance and attention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"1691-1707"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145138902","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Reports an error in "The best fitting of three contemporary observer models reveals how participants' strategy influences the window of subjective synchrony" by Kielan Yarrow, Joshua A. Solomon, Derek H. Arnold and Warrick Roseboom (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2023[Dec], Vol 49[12], 1534-1563; see record 2024-22272-001). In the article (https://doi.org/10.1037/ xhp0001154), "2" was missing before "l" in four equations. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2024-22272-001.) When experimenters vary the timing between two intersensory events, and participants judge their simultaneity, an inverse-U-shaped psychometric function is obtained. Typically, this simultaneity function is first fitted with a model for each participant separately, before best-fitting parameters are utilized (e.g., compared across conditions) in the second stage of a two-step inferential procedure. Often, simultaneity-function width is interpreted as representing sensitivity to asynchrony, and/or ascribed theoretical equivalence to a window of multisensory temporal binding. Here, we instead fit a single (principled) multilevel model to data from the entire group and across several conditions at once. By asking 20 participants to sometimes be more conservative in their judgments, we demonstrate how the width of the simultaneity function is prone to strategic change and thus questionable as a measure of either sensitivity to asynchrony or multisensory binding. By repeating our analysis with three different models (two implying a decision based directly on subjective asynchrony, and a third deriving this decision from the correlation between filtered responses to sensory inputs) we find that the first model, which hypothesizes, in particular, Gaussian latency noise and difficulty maintaining the stability of decision criteria across trials, is most plausible for these data. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
Kielan Yarrow, Joshua A. Solomon, Derek H. Arnold和Warrick Roseboom撰写的“三个当代观察者模型的最佳拟合揭示了参与者的策略如何影响主观同步窗口”(实验心理学杂志:人类感知与表现,2023[12],Vol 49 bbb, 1534-1563;见record 2024-22272-001)。在文章(https://doi.org/10.1037/ xhp0001154)中,有四个方程在“1”之前缺少“2”。(以下是原文摘要,编号:2024-22272-001)当实验者改变两个感觉间事件之间的时间,被试判断其同时性时,得到一个反u型的心理测量函数。通常,在两步推理程序的第二阶段使用最佳拟合参数(例如,跨条件比较)之前,首先为每个参与者单独拟合该同时性函数。通常,同时函数宽度被解释为对异步的敏感性,和/或将理论等效归因于多感官时间绑定的窗口。在这里,我们将一个单一的(原则性的)多层模型拟合到来自整个组的数据中,并同时跨越几个条件。通过要求20名参与者有时在他们的判断中更加保守,我们证明了同时性函数的宽度如何容易受到战略变化的影响,因此作为对异步或多感官结合的敏感性的衡量是值得怀疑的。通过用三个不同的模型重复我们的分析(两个模型暗示直接基于主观异步的决策,第三个模型从过滤后的感官输入响应之间的相关性中得出该决策),我们发现第一个模型,特别是假设高斯延迟噪声和难以维持决策标准的稳定性,对于这些数据是最合理的。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Correction to \"The best fitting of three contemporary observer models reveals how participants' strategy influences the window of subjective synchrony\" by Yarrow et al. (2023).","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001226","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001226","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reports an error in \"The best fitting of three contemporary observer models reveals how participants' strategy influences the window of subjective synchrony\" by Kielan Yarrow, Joshua A. Solomon, Derek H. Arnold and Warrick Roseboom (<i>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance</i>, 2023[Dec], Vol 49[12], 1534-1563; see record 2024-22272-001). In the article (https://doi.org/10.1037/ xhp0001154), \"2\" was missing before \"l\" in four equations. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2024-22272-001.) When experimenters vary the timing between two intersensory events, and participants judge their simultaneity, an inverse-U-shaped psychometric function is obtained. Typically, this <i>simultaneity function</i> is first fitted with a model for each participant separately, before best-fitting parameters are utilized (e.g., compared across conditions) in the second stage of a two-step inferential procedure. Often, simultaneity-function width is interpreted as representing sensitivity to asynchrony, and/or ascribed theoretical equivalence to a window of multisensory temporal binding. Here, we instead fit a single (principled) multilevel model to data from the entire group and across several conditions at once. By asking 20 participants to sometimes be more conservative in their judgments, we demonstrate how the width of the simultaneity function is prone to strategic change and thus questionable as a measure of either sensitivity to asynchrony or multisensory binding. By repeating our analysis with three different models (two implying a decision based directly on subjective asynchrony, and a third deriving this decision from the correlation between filtered responses to sensory inputs) we find that the first model, which hypothesizes, in particular, Gaussian latency noise and difficulty maintaining the stability of decision criteria across trials, is most plausible for these data. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":"51 12","pages":"1708"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145656275","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The year 2025 marked the 50th anniversary of the Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance (JEP:HPP). JEP:HPP started as a standalone journal in January 1975 under the editorship of Michael Posner. The semicentennial birthday is a special occasion and warrants a special recognition. To celebrate, the editorial team curated a series of articles that explored the impact, the reach, and the value of research published in JEP: HPP. The articles were published throughout 2025. While scientific journals are often evaluated through metrics like impact factor, our celebratory articles show that the influence of JEP:HPP extends far beyond such simple measures. The 27 articles that made up the celebratory series demonstrated the vast reach and diverse influence of research published in JEP:HPP, crossing millennia from Plato to modern feminism to address questions ranging from perception of beauty (Grzywacz, 2025), music (Prpic, 2025; Sears, 2025), human reasoning (Fischhoff, 2025), and language acquisition (Nazzi, 2025) to attention (Olivers et al., 2025; Sauter, 2025; Zhang et al., 2025), representation of space (Yamamoto & Phillbeck, 2025), mental imagery (Martarelli & Mast, 2025), working memory (Olivers et al., 2025), cognitive (Logan, 2025), and attentional control (Montakhaby Nodeh, 2025), as well as social perception and action (Ferier & Heurley, 2025; Hafri & Papeo, 2025; Oswald, 2025). The anniversary series of articles included seven invited literature reviews, three editorial perspectives, and 17 readers' perspectives. Each contribution gave a window into a finding, a researcher, and a time. We got a peek into research from 50 years ago-the ways in which "subjects" were tested, data were plotted, and graphs were physically printed. The authors shared the story of data, how they came about, and how they continued to "live" in the literature. This capture of time, from 1975 to today, was one of the motivating factors in planning the celebratory series. The idea was to honor not only the journal but also people connected to the journal over those 50 years- those who led the journal, those who published in the journal, and, of course, those who read the journal. Thus, as the series celebrated the contributions of research published in JEP:HPP, it also celebrated the community of researchers making JEP:HPP, the diversity of our research questions, opinions, methods, and data, as well as the unity with which we converge in our keen interest in understanding the human mind. The editorial team received enthusiastic contributions from both established and up-and-coming junior scientists who are just embarking on a career journey similar to that taken by their predecessors. And while the two groups may differ in their training and methodological affinities, they appear to share the same passion and fire for scientific discovery (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 50th anniversary special article series editorial.","authors":"Jelena Ristic, Isabel Gauthier","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001361","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001361","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The year 2025 marked the 50th anniversary of the <i>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance</i> (JEP:HPP). JEP:HPP started as a standalone journal in January 1975 under the editorship of Michael Posner. The semicentennial birthday is a special occasion and warrants a special recognition. To celebrate, the editorial team curated a series of articles that explored the impact, the reach, and the value of research published in JEP: HPP. The articles were published throughout 2025. While scientific journals are often evaluated through metrics like impact factor, our celebratory articles show that the influence of JEP:HPP extends far beyond such simple measures. The 27 articles that made up the celebratory series demonstrated the vast reach and diverse influence of research published in JEP:HPP, crossing millennia from Plato to modern feminism to address questions ranging from perception of beauty (Grzywacz, 2025), music (Prpic, 2025; Sears, 2025), human reasoning (Fischhoff, 2025), and language acquisition (Nazzi, 2025) to attention (Olivers et al., 2025; Sauter, 2025; Zhang et al., 2025), representation of space (Yamamoto & Phillbeck, 2025), mental imagery (Martarelli & Mast, 2025), working memory (Olivers et al., 2025), cognitive (Logan, 2025), and attentional control (Montakhaby Nodeh, 2025), as well as social perception and action (Ferier & Heurley, 2025; Hafri & Papeo, 2025; Oswald, 2025). The anniversary series of articles included seven invited literature reviews, three editorial perspectives, and 17 readers' perspectives. Each contribution gave a window into a finding, a researcher, and a time. We got a peek into research from 50 years ago-the ways in which \"subjects\" were tested, data were plotted, and graphs were physically printed. The authors shared the story of data, how they came about, and how they continued to \"live\" in the literature. This capture of time, from 1975 to today, was one of the motivating factors in planning the celebratory series. The idea was to honor not only the journal but also people connected to the journal over those 50 years- those who led the journal, those who published in the journal, and, of course, those who read the journal. Thus, as the series celebrated the contributions of research published in JEP:HPP, it also celebrated the community of researchers making JEP:HPP, the diversity of our research questions, opinions, methods, and data, as well as the unity with which we converge in our keen interest in understanding the human mind. The editorial team received enthusiastic contributions from both established and up-and-coming junior scientists who are just embarking on a career journey similar to that taken by their predecessors. And while the two groups may differ in their training and methodological affinities, they appear to share the same passion and fire for scientific discovery (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":"51 12","pages":"1623-1625"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145656340","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance is commemorating its 50th anniversary. To celebrate, this commentary examines the adoption of open science practices as a function of the editorial policies implemented in the journal over a period of 8 years (2016-2023). Between 2016 and 2017, no open science policy was in effect. Accordingly, the rates of materials/data/code sharing and preregistration were nearly zero in published articles. In 2018, policy changed requiring sample size justification and recommending the inclusion of open science practices. This produced almost 100% sample size justification compliance between 2019 and 2020 and an increase in the adoption of all open science practices. Finally, in 2021, the journal adopted the Transparency and Openness in Publishing guidelines. Between 2022 and 2023, the adoption of all open science practices further increased, with over 88% of articles sharing their data and about half sharing the analysis code. This analysis shows that editorial policies can have a pivotal role in driving authors toward more transparent and replicable practices in their published articles. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
《实验心理学杂志:人类感知与表现》正在庆祝创刊50周年。为了庆祝这一成就,本评论考察了该期刊在8年(2016-2023年)期间实施的编辑政策对开放科学实践的影响。在2016年至2017年期间,没有开放科学政策生效。因此,在已发表的文章中,材料/数据/代码共享和预注册率几乎为零。2018年,政策发生了变化,要求对样本量进行论证,并建议纳入开放科学实践。这在2019年至2020年期间产生了几乎100%的样本量证明合规性,并增加了所有开放科学实践的采用。最后,在2021年,该期刊采用了出版透明度和开放性准则。在2022年至2023年期间,所有开放科学实践的采用进一步增加,超过88%的文章共享其数据,约一半共享分析代码。这一分析表明,编辑政策可以在推动作者在其发表的文章中采取更透明和可复制的做法方面发挥关键作用。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"JEP:HPP Is TOP: Editorial policies for transparency and openness in publishing.","authors":"Alessandra S Souza","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001299","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001299","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The <i>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance</i> is commemorating its 50th anniversary. To celebrate, this commentary examines the adoption of open science practices as a function of the editorial policies implemented in the journal over a period of 8 years (2016-2023). Between 2016 and 2017, no open science policy was in effect. Accordingly, the rates of materials/data/code sharing and preregistration were nearly zero in published articles. In 2018, policy changed requiring sample size justification and recommending the inclusion of open science practices. This produced almost 100% sample size justification compliance between 2019 and 2020 and an increase in the adoption of all open science practices. Finally, in 2021, the journal adopted the Transparency and Openness in Publishing guidelines. Between 2022 and 2023, the adoption of all open science practices further increased, with over 88% of articles sharing their data and about half sharing the analysis code. This analysis shows that editorial policies can have a pivotal role in driving authors toward more transparent and replicable practices in their published articles. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":"51 12","pages":"1619-1622"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145656346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Are eye movements miscalibrated when the distance to be crossed is misperceived? The two-visual-stream hypothesis posits that while perception is influenced by visual context and thus prone to illusions, actions rely on context-independent metrics and are thus unaffected by such distortions. In contrast, empirical evidence consistently shows that saccadic eye movements are influenced by the Müller-Lyer illusion. However, this finding could be explained by saccades being attracted toward the figure's center of gravity, while perceptual distortion would result from distinct mechanisms. To disentangle these effects, we conducted four experiments (N = 114) between 2022 and 2025, measuring the amplitude of saccades performed along horizontal lines embedded in Müller-Lyer figures carefully designed to control for center-of-gravity biases. Results showed that both saccade amplitude and length judgment were systematically modulated by the illusion beyond what could be attributed to changes in the actual center of gravity, its saliency, or computation time. Additionally, the illusion's influence on saccade amplitude diminished after a longer previewing time (2,000 ms) compared to a shorter one (50 ms). These findings support the hypothesis that perception and oculomotor behavior rely on a shared visual representation that is influenced by contextual information but becomes more precise with increased processing time. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
当距离被错误地感知时,眼球运动是否被错误地校准?双视觉流假说认为,虽然感知受到视觉环境的影响,因此容易产生错觉,但行动依赖于与环境无关的指标,因此不受这种扭曲的影响。相反,经验证据一致表明,跳眼运动受到勒-莱尔错觉的影响。然而,这一发现可以用扫视被吸引到人物的重心来解释,而感知扭曲则是由不同的机制造成的。为了解开这些影响,我们在2022年至2025年间进行了四次实验(N = 114),测量了沿嵌入在精心设计以控制重心偏差的勒-莱尔图中的水平线进行的扫眼幅度。结果表明,眼跳振幅和长度的判断都是由幻觉系统地调制的,而不是由于实际重心、其显著性或计算时间的变化。此外,与较短的预览时间(50 ms)相比,较长的预览时间(2000 ms)对扫视幅度的影响减弱。这些发现支持了一种假设,即感知和动眼肌行为依赖于受上下文信息影响的共同视觉表征,但随着处理时间的增加而变得更加精确。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"The time-dependent modulation of saccade amplitude by illusory length reflects a shared representation between perception and action.","authors":"Laurie Geers, Karine Doré-Mazars, Michael Andres","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001382","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001382","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Are eye movements miscalibrated when the distance to be crossed is misperceived? The two-visual-stream hypothesis posits that while perception is influenced by visual context and thus prone to illusions, actions rely on context-independent metrics and are thus unaffected by such distortions. In contrast, empirical evidence consistently shows that saccadic eye movements are influenced by the Müller-Lyer illusion. However, this finding could be explained by saccades being attracted toward the figure's center of gravity, while perceptual distortion would result from distinct mechanisms. To disentangle these effects, we conducted four experiments (<i>N</i> = 114) between 2022 and 2025, measuring the amplitude of saccades performed along horizontal lines embedded in Müller-Lyer figures carefully designed to control for center-of-gravity biases. Results showed that both saccade amplitude and length judgment were systematically modulated by the illusion beyond what could be attributed to changes in the actual center of gravity, its saliency, or computation time. Additionally, the illusion's influence on saccade amplitude diminished after a longer previewing time (2,000 ms) compared to a shorter one (50 ms). These findings support the hypothesis that perception and oculomotor behavior rely on a shared visual representation that is influenced by contextual information but becomes more precise with increased processing time. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145490739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The production of a word is delayed by the recent production of one or more semantically related words. This phenomenon, known as semantic interference, has been observed in picture naming tasks involving either large sets of pictures named once (continuous naming) or small sets of pictures named repeatedly (blocked-cyclic naming). It has been attributed to an adaptive learning mechanism that operates after each naming episode. However, the interference develops differently in these tasks: It is cumulative in continuous naming and noncumulative in blocked-cyclic naming. It has been suggested that the small local response sets in blocked naming are easily identified and stored in working memory, which then introduces an additional process that constrains the interference. We reasoned that this process would be less effective as the local response sets increased in size, resulting in cumulative interference. In blocked naming experiments involving local response sets of 10 or 19 items, we found that the interference did not increase continuously; rather, it carried on across more presentations than for the typically used small sets. This finding lends support to the notion of a control mechanism that operates gradually and interacts with an adaptive learning mechanism. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
一个词的产生被最近产生的一个或多个语义相关的词所延迟。这种现象被称为语义干扰,在图片命名任务中被观察到,包括一次命名的大图片集(连续命名)或重复命名的小图片集(阻塞循环命名)。这被归因于一种自适应学习机制,这种机制在每次命名后都会起作用。然而,在这些任务中,干扰的发展是不同的:在连续命名中是累积的,在阻塞循环命名中是非累积的。有研究表明,阻塞命名中的小局部响应集很容易被识别并存储在工作记忆中,然后引入一个额外的过程来限制干扰。我们认为,随着局部响应集规模的增加,这一过程的有效性会降低,从而导致累积干扰。在包含10项或19项局部响应集的分组命名实验中,我们发现干扰并没有持续增加;相反,与通常使用的小集合相比,它在更多的演示中继续进行。这一发现支持了控制机制逐渐运作并与适应性学习机制相互作用的概念。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Semantic interference in blocked naming: Does it become cumulative with large local response sets?","authors":"Stefan Wöhner, Jörg D Jescheniak","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001384","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001384","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The production of a word is delayed by the recent production of one or more semantically related words. This phenomenon, known as semantic interference, has been observed in picture naming tasks involving either large sets of pictures named once (continuous naming) or small sets of pictures named repeatedly (blocked-cyclic naming). It has been attributed to an adaptive learning mechanism that operates after each naming episode. However, the interference develops differently in these tasks: It is cumulative in continuous naming and noncumulative in blocked-cyclic naming. It has been suggested that the small local response sets in blocked naming are easily identified and stored in working memory, which then introduces an additional process that constrains the interference. We reasoned that this process would be less effective as the local response sets increased in size, resulting in cumulative interference. In blocked naming experiments involving local response sets of 10 or 19 items, we found that the interference did not increase continuously; rather, it carried on across more presentations than for the typically used small sets. This finding lends support to the notion of a control mechanism that operates gradually and interacts with an adaptive learning mechanism. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145490772","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
How does the visual system achieve efficient information selection under limited processing capacity is a fundamental question in cognitive psychology. Through three experiments, the present study reveals a time-constrained two-stage visual selection mechanism. Experiment 1's color search tasks demonstrated bilinear Search Time × Set Size functions, with a clear kink point at 50-100 ms after stimulus onset, showing shallower slopes (2.7-10.4 ms/item) before versus steeper slopes (10.7-20.7 ms/item) after, indicating two distinct processing stages. Experiment 2 extended these findings to digit search: despite capacity differences (color = 7.6 vs. digit = 3.8 items), the critical kink point time remained stable (60-70 ms), suggesting cross-stimulus generalizability. Experiment 3 disrupted this bilinear pattern by delaying search onset, confirming its time dependence. Individual analyses showed unimodal kink point time distributions (peak 60-80 ms) but multimodal set-size distributions, indicating time-driven stage transitions. These findings establish that visual selection has a time-based parallel-to-serial transition, and the early parallel stage has a stimulus-dependent capacity. This two-stage selection model integrates the core tenets of the Guided Search model and attentional window theories, offering a new perspective for the architecture of visual information processing. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"A time-based two-stage model of visual selection: Evidence from standard visual search tasks.","authors":"Yujie Zheng, Keyun Xin, Zhi Li","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001383","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001383","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How does the visual system achieve efficient information selection under limited processing capacity is a fundamental question in cognitive psychology. Through three experiments, the present study reveals a time-constrained two-stage visual selection mechanism. Experiment 1's color search tasks demonstrated bilinear Search Time × Set Size functions, with a clear kink point at 50-100 ms after stimulus onset, showing shallower slopes (2.7-10.4 ms/item) before versus steeper slopes (10.7-20.7 ms/item) after, indicating two distinct processing stages. Experiment 2 extended these findings to digit search: despite capacity differences (color = 7.6 vs. digit = 3.8 items), the critical kink point time remained stable (60-70 ms), suggesting cross-stimulus generalizability. Experiment 3 disrupted this bilinear pattern by delaying search onset, confirming its time dependence. Individual analyses showed unimodal kink point time distributions (peak 60-80 ms) but multimodal set-size distributions, indicating time-driven stage transitions. These findings establish that visual selection has a time-based parallel-to-serial transition, and the early parallel stage has a stimulus-dependent capacity. This two-stage selection model integrates the core tenets of the Guided Search model and attentional window theories, offering a new perspective for the architecture of visual information processing. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145439821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tucker and Ellis (1998) is a seminal work in perception-action binding research. By using manipulable objects in more realistic contexts, their study has offered profound insights into the neurocognitive processes involved in our daily interactions with tools. They were the first to highlight the action potentiation effect. Subsequent research has specified the conditions under which the effect can be observed, evolved the paradigm, and adapted response devices to address other types of questions related to the motor dimension of cognition. Over the past 25 years, their contribution has significantly advanced research and ignited extensive debates on embodied, plastic, and proactive models of cognition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
塔克和埃利斯(1998)是感知-行动结合研究的开创性著作。通过在更现实的环境中使用可操纵的物体,他们的研究为我们与工具的日常互动所涉及的神经认知过程提供了深刻的见解。他们首先强调了动作增强效应。随后的研究明确了观察效果的条件,发展了范式,并调整了反应装置,以解决与认知的运动维度相关的其他类型的问题。在过去的25年里,他们的贡献极大地推动了研究,并引发了关于具身、可塑和主动认知模型的广泛争论。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"From perception to action and action to perception: Tribute to the 1998 Mike Tucker and Rob Ellis' article.","authors":"Laurent P Ferrier, Loïc P Heurley","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001277","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001277","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tucker and Ellis (1998) is a seminal work in perception-action binding research. By using manipulable objects in more realistic contexts, their study has offered profound insights into the neurocognitive processes involved in our daily interactions with tools. They were the first to highlight the action potentiation effect. Subsequent research has specified the conditions under which the effect can be observed, evolved the paradigm, and adapted response devices to address other types of questions related to the motor dimension of cognition. Over the past 25 years, their contribution has significantly advanced research and ignited extensive debates on embodied, plastic, and proactive models of cognition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":"51 11","pages":"1457-1460"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145259845","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The attentional blink (AB) refers to the outcome where in a rapidly presented stream of stimuli observers are unable to successfully report the second of two previously defined targets relative to an otherwise identical control condition where the first target does not require report. The first AB article was published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance in 1992 and in the ensuing 32 years has garnered the interest of many researchers spanning multiple disciplines and experimental approaches, both basic and applied. Moreover, it has attracted the attention of a variety of social media whose authors have appropriately and in some cases inappropriately used the AB to account for human behavior. Perhaps one of the most important outcomes of this research has been to shift the focus from the study of spatial attention to include that of attention over time, or temporal attention. Given the upcoming 50th anniversary of Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, the journal has asked the original authors to reflect on the history of attentional blink research. We wish to acknowledge that such reflection must be bounded by space and time (pun intended) limitations so apologies to those authors whose undoubtedly important research we were unable to cover. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
注意瞬变(attention blink, AB)是指在快速呈现的刺激流中,观察者无法成功地报告先前定义的两个目标中的第二个,而在其他相同的控制条件下,第一个目标不需要报告。AB的第一篇文章发表在1992年的《实验心理学杂志:人类感知和表现》上,在随后的32年里,它引起了许多研究人员的兴趣,这些研究人员跨越了多个学科和实验方法,包括基础和应用。此外,它还引起了各种社交媒体的注意,这些媒体的作者恰当地(在某些情况下不恰当地)使用AB来解释人类行为。也许这项研究最重要的成果之一是将注意力从空间注意力的研究转移到时间注意力或时间注意力的研究上。鉴于即将到来的《实验心理学杂志:人类感知和表现》50周年纪念日,该杂志要求原作者反思注意力眨眼研究的历史。我们希望承认,这种反思必须受到空间和时间(双关语)的限制,因此向那些我们无法涵盖其无疑重要研究的作者道歉。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"The attentional blink: Then and now.","authors":"Kimron Shapiro, Jane Raymond","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001350","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001350","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The attentional blink (AB) refers to the outcome where in a rapidly presented stream of stimuli observers are unable to successfully report the second of two previously defined targets relative to an otherwise identical control condition where the first target does not require report. The first AB article was published in the <i>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance</i> in 1992 and in the ensuing 32 years has garnered the interest of many researchers spanning multiple disciplines and experimental approaches, both basic and applied. Moreover, it has attracted the attention of a variety of social media whose authors have appropriately and in some cases inappropriately used the AB to account for human behavior. Perhaps one of the most important outcomes of this research has been to shift the focus from the study of spatial attention to include that of attention over time, or temporal attention. Given the upcoming 50th anniversary of <i>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance</i>, the journal has asked the original authors to reflect on the history of attentional blink research. We wish to acknowledge that such reflection must be bounded by space and time (pun intended) limitations so apologies to those authors whose undoubtedly important research we were unable to cover. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":"51 11","pages":"1464-1475"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145259793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}