首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance最新文献

英文 中文
Are abrupt onsets highly salient? 突发性发作是否非常突出?
IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-14 DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001329
Han Zhang, Esha Brar, A Kane York, John Jonides

Abrupt onsets are commonly assumed to be a class of stimuli with high physical salience. This high salience has been used to explain past findings showing abrupt onsets captured attention more strongly compared to other types of distractors, such as color singletons. However, there has been a lack of consensus about the definition and measurement of physical salience. As a result, it is unclear if abrupt onsets capture attention more strongly simply because they are more salient than other types of stimuli. Using a psychophysical technique recently developed by Stilwell et al. (2023), we explicitly quantified the level of physical salience of abrupt onsets, color singletons, and color singleton onsets. Surprisingly, abrupt onsets were the least salient among the three types of items examined. Despite this, only abrupt onsets captured attention in a subsequent visual search task, whereas color singletons and color singleton onsets were both suppressed. Thus, abrupt onsets tend to capture attention more strongly than color singletons, but this is not apparently because of high physical salience. Indeed, high physical salience may make an object easier to suppress during visual search. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

突然发作通常被认为是一类具有高度物理显著性的刺激。这种高度显著性被用来解释过去的研究结果,即与其他类型的干扰物(如颜色单一)相比,突然发作更能吸引注意力。然而,对于身体显著性的定义和测量一直缺乏共识。因此,目前尚不清楚突然发作是否仅仅因为它们比其他类型的刺激更突出而更强烈地吸引注意力。利用Stilwell等人(2023)最近开发的一种心理物理技术,我们明确量化了突发性发作、颜色单性发作和颜色单性发作的物理显著性水平。令人惊讶的是,突然发作是三种类型中最不显著的。尽管如此,在随后的视觉搜索任务中,只有突发性的启动才会引起注意,而颜色单例和颜色单例的启动都被抑制了。因此,突然发作往往比单色更能引起人们的注意,但这显然不是因为身体上的显著性。事实上,在视觉搜索过程中,高度的物理显著性可能使物体更容易被抑制。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Are abrupt onsets highly salient?","authors":"Han Zhang, Esha Brar, A Kane York, John Jonides","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001329","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001329","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abrupt onsets are commonly assumed to be a class of stimuli with high physical salience. This high salience has been used to explain past findings showing abrupt onsets captured attention more strongly compared to other types of distractors, such as color singletons. However, there has been a lack of consensus about the definition and measurement of physical salience. As a result, it is unclear if abrupt onsets capture attention more strongly simply because they are more salient than other types of stimuli. Using a psychophysical technique recently developed by Stilwell et al. (2023), we explicitly quantified the level of physical salience of abrupt onsets, color singletons, and color singleton onsets. Surprisingly, abrupt onsets were the least salient among the three types of items examined. Despite this, only abrupt onsets captured attention in a subsequent visual search task, whereas color singletons and color singleton onsets were both suppressed. Thus, abrupt onsets tend to capture attention more strongly than color singletons, but this is not apparently because of high physical salience. Indeed, high physical salience may make an object easier to suppress during visual search. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"911-926"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12148683/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143996236","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Context-based guidance versus context suppression in contextual learning: Role of un-/certainty in the target-context relations in visual search. 情境学习中基于情境的引导与情境抑制:不确定性/确定性在视觉搜索中目标-情境关系中的作用。
IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-24 DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001321
Siyi Chen, Fredrik Allenmark, Nika Merkuš, Hermann J Müller, Zhuanghua Shi

Standard investigations of contextual facilitation typically use invariant distractor arrangements predicting a fixed target location. In the real world, however, invariant spatial contexts are not always predictive. We examined how facilitation is influenced by uncertainty in target location prediction: comparing conditions where old contexts were 100% versus minimally (3%) predictive (Experiment 1), 80% predictive (20% nonpredictive) versus 20% predictive (Experiment 2), or a trial-wise mixed condition where 80% predicted a fixed location and 20% a random location (Experiment 3). New-context displays with matching target-location probabilities served as baselines. The results revealed both fully predictive and minimally predictive old contexts to expedite the search, but facilitation was larger for the former (Experiment 1). This held even when the display types were randomly intermixed at an 80:20 cross-trial uncertainty ratio (Experiment 3). However, when old displays predicted the target location in 80% of trials (Experiment 2), facilitation dropped to the level of minimally predictive displays. This indicates only fully predictive old displays support acquiring contextual cues that guide attention. The facilitation seen with 80% predictive contexts likely involves a less efficient process: singling out the target by context suppression. These findings can be incorporated into a neural-network model of context effects: When distractor representations are suppressed, the formation of facilitative links between distractor representations and the target location on the priority map becomes unlikely. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

对情境促进的标准研究通常使用预测固定目标位置的不变分心安排。然而,在现实世界中,不变的空间情境并不总是具有预测性。我们研究了目标位置预测的不确定性对促进作用的影响:比较以下条件:旧情境具有 100% 预测性与最小预测性(3%)(实验 1)、80% 预测性(20% 无预测性)与 20% 预测性(实验 2),或 80% 预测固定位置和 20% 预测随机位置的混合试验条件(实验 3)。与目标位置概率相匹配的新情境显示作为基线。结果表明,完全预测性和最小预测性的旧语境都能加快搜索速度,但前者的促进作用更大(实验 1)。即使显示类型以 80:20 的交叉试验不确定性比率随机混合(实验 3),这种情况也依然存在。然而,当旧显示在80%的试验中预测到目标位置时(实验2),促进作用下降到最小预测显示的水平。这表明,只有完全预测的旧显示才支持获取引导注意的情境线索。在 80% 预测性情境中出现的促进作用可能涉及到一个效率较低的过程:通过情境抑制来挑出目标。这些发现可以纳入情境效应的神经网络模型中:当分心表征被抑制时,分心表征与优先图谱上的目标位置之间就不太可能形成促进性联系。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Context-based guidance versus context suppression in contextual learning: Role of un-/certainty in the target-context relations in visual search.","authors":"Siyi Chen, Fredrik Allenmark, Nika Merkuš, Hermann J Müller, Zhuanghua Shi","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001321","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001321","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Standard investigations of contextual facilitation typically use invariant distractor arrangements predicting a fixed target location. In the real world, however, invariant spatial contexts are not always predictive. We examined how facilitation is influenced by uncertainty in target location prediction: comparing conditions where old contexts were 100% versus minimally (3%) predictive (Experiment 1), 80% predictive (20% nonpredictive) versus 20% predictive (Experiment 2), or a trial-wise mixed condition where 80% predicted a fixed location and 20% a random location (Experiment 3). New-context displays with matching target-location probabilities served as baselines. The results revealed both fully predictive and minimally predictive old contexts to expedite the search, but facilitation was larger for the former (Experiment 1). This held even when the display types were randomly intermixed at an 80:20 cross-trial uncertainty ratio (Experiment 3). However, when old displays predicted the target location in 80% of trials (Experiment 2), facilitation dropped to the level of minimally predictive displays. This indicates only fully predictive old displays support acquiring contextual cues that guide attention. The facilitation seen with 80% predictive contexts likely involves a less efficient process: singling out the target by context suppression. These findings can be incorporated into a neural-network model of context effects: When distractor representations are suppressed, the formation of facilitative links between distractor representations and the target location on the priority map becomes unlikely. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"955-977"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143694300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Music listening and the priming paradigm: Then and now. 音乐聆听和启动范式:过去和现在。
IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001305
David R W Sears

This perspective article highlights a few landmark music priming studies published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance over the past 4 decades. Together, these studies explore the potential mechanisms responsible for melodic and harmonic priming effects (sensory vs. cognitive), the hierarchical depth of the music processor (facilitation vs. inhibition), and the type of priming effects obtained (semantic vs. discourse). I then argue that the priming paradigm still has the potential to address some of the field's most longstanding questions, particularly as pertains to musical traditions and/or participant populations from beyond the west. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

这篇观点文章重点介绍了发表在《实验心理学杂志:过去40年人类感知和表现》上的一些具有里程碑意义的音乐启动研究。这些研究共同探讨了旋律和和声启动效应的潜在机制(感觉vs认知),音乐处理器的层次深度(促进vs抑制),以及获得的启动效应类型(语义vs话语)。然后我认为,启动范式仍然有潜力解决该领域一些最长期存在的问题,特别是与音乐传统和/或来自西方以外的参与者群体有关的问题。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Music listening and the priming paradigm: Then and now.","authors":"David R W Sears","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001305","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001305","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This perspective article highlights a few landmark music priming studies published in the <i>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance</i> over the past 4 decades. Together, these studies explore the potential mechanisms responsible for melodic and harmonic priming effects (sensory vs. cognitive), the hierarchical depth of the music processor (facilitation vs. inhibition), and the type of priming effects obtained (semantic vs. discourse). I then argue that the priming paradigm still has the potential to address some of the field's most longstanding questions, particularly as pertains to musical traditions and/or participant populations from beyond the west. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":"51 7","pages":"834-836"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144250615","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bridging concurrent multitasking, task switching, and complex multitasking: The general and specific skills involved. 桥接并发多任务、任务切换和复杂多任务:所涉及的一般和特定技能。
IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-08 DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001332
Kelvin F H Lui, Hezul Tin Yan Ng, Pu Fan, Yetta Kwailing Wong, Alan C-N Wong

Research on multitasking has adopted a diverse range of simple paradigms covering concurrent multitasking and task-switching scenarios, alongside more complex paradigms simulating real-life situations more closely. Investigating the relationships among them is essential for uncovering shared cognitive mechanisms, advancing a unified theory of multitasking, and exploring the link of multitasking to other cognitive functions. We adopted an individual-difference approach to examine the unity and separability of multitasking ability. Nine paradigms were completed by 224 university students, with three paradigms each for concurrent multitasking, task switching, and complex multitasking. Confirmatory factor analyses showed both general and specific factors required to capture individual differences in performance. Specifically, individual differences in task switching performance can be explained by a general ability shared with the other two types of paradigms, whereas both general and specific abilities were involved in concurrent multitasking and complex multitasking. These results help reconcile conflicting findings in previous studies of group differences in multitasking and highlight the limitation in the generalizability of claims based solely on performance in a single paradigm. Given the multifaceted nature of multitasking, it is recommended that assessment and intervention of multitasking encompass a comprehensive array of paradigm types to cover both general and specific abilities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

多任务研究采用了多种简单的范式,包括并发多任务和任务切换场景,以及更接近真实情况的更复杂的范式。研究它们之间的关系对于揭示共同的认知机制、提出统一的多任务处理理论以及探索多任务处理与其他认知功能的联系具有重要意义。我们采用个体差异的方法来检验多任务处理能力的统一性和可分离性。224名大学生完成了9个范式,其中并发多任务、任务切换和复杂多任务各3个范式。验证性因素分析显示了捕获个人表现差异所需的一般因素和特定因素。具体而言,任务转换表现的个体差异可以通过与其他两种范式共享的一般能力来解释,而一般能力和特定能力都涉及并发多任务处理和复杂多任务处理。这些结果有助于调和先前关于多任务处理中群体差异的研究中相互矛盾的发现,并突出了仅基于单一范式中的表现的主张的普遍性的局限性。鉴于多任务处理的多面性,建议对多任务处理的评估和干预包括一个全面的范式类型数组,以涵盖一般和特定的能力。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Bridging concurrent multitasking, task switching, and complex multitasking: The general and specific skills involved.","authors":"Kelvin F H Lui, Hezul Tin Yan Ng, Pu Fan, Yetta Kwailing Wong, Alan C-N Wong","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001332","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001332","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research on multitasking has adopted a diverse range of simple paradigms covering concurrent multitasking and task-switching scenarios, alongside more complex paradigms simulating real-life situations more closely. Investigating the relationships among them is essential for uncovering shared cognitive mechanisms, advancing a unified theory of multitasking, and exploring the link of multitasking to other cognitive functions. We adopted an individual-difference approach to examine the unity and separability of multitasking ability. Nine paradigms were completed by 224 university students, with three paradigms each for concurrent multitasking, task switching, and complex multitasking. Confirmatory factor analyses showed both general and specific factors required to capture individual differences in performance. Specifically, individual differences in task switching performance can be explained by a general ability shared with the other two types of paradigms, whereas both general and specific abilities were involved in concurrent multitasking and complex multitasking. These results help reconcile conflicting findings in previous studies of group differences in multitasking and highlight the limitation in the generalizability of claims based solely on performance in a single paradigm. Given the multifaceted nature of multitasking, it is recommended that assessment and intervention of multitasking encompass a comprehensive array of paradigm types to cover both general and specific abilities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"875-894"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144065007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Quantifying the relationship between search efficiency and perceptual similarity in color space across different efficient search tasks. 量化不同高效搜索任务中搜索效率与色彩空间感知相似性之间的关系。
IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-15 DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001327
Alejandro Lleras, Zoe Jing Xu, Howard Jia He Tan, Yujie Shao, Simona Buetti

When looking for a specific object in the environment, the visual system guides attention toward objects in the scene that contain features that are similar to those of the object in mind, also known as the target template. However, the precise relation between search performance and perceptual similarity (between objects in the scene and the target template) has not been properly characterized. Recently, target-contrast signal theory proposed an explicit relationship linking search performance to the concept of top-down "target-distractor contrast," with contrast being a measure of the amount of perceptual evidence that allows peripheral processing to differentiate target from distractors. We used a well-characterized color space to investigate the relationship between target-distractor similarity and search efficiency. We compared three different models relating color distance to search performance: the universal law of generalization, and two implementations of target-contrast signal theory. In the first, target-distractor distance indexes the target-distractor contrast, while the second uses the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) between the neuronal responses to the attended color and the distractor color to index target-distractor contrast. When the target color is known but the distractor color cannot be anticipated, perceptual distance best predicts performance (Experiments 1, 2A, and 2B). When target and distractor colors repeat from trial to trial, the SNR measure best captures performance (Experiments 3A and 3B). Finally, when neither the target nor the distractor color is known to observers, performance deteriorates significantly and is no longer indexed by either of these two measures of target-distractor contrast (Experiment 4). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

当在环境中寻找一个特定的物体时,视觉系统会将注意力引导到场景中的物体上,这些物体包含与脑海中物体相似的特征,也称为目标模板。然而,搜索性能与感知相似性(场景中的对象与目标模板之间的相似性)之间的精确关系尚未得到适当的表征。最近,目标-对比信号理论提出了一种明确的关系,将搜索性能与自上而下的“目标-干扰物对比”概念联系起来,对比是一种衡量感知证据数量的方法,这种感知证据允许外围处理区分目标和干扰物。我们使用一个特征良好的颜色空间来研究目标-干扰物相似性与搜索效率之间的关系。我们比较了有关颜色距离与搜索性能的三种不同模型:通用泛化定律和目标对比信号理论的两种实现。在第一个实验中,目标-分心物距离是目标-分心物对比的指标,而第二个实验中,神经元对注意颜色和分心物颜色的反应的信噪比是目标-分心物对比的指标。当目标颜色已知但干扰物颜色无法预测时,感知距离最能预测表现(实验1、2A和2B)。当目标和干扰物的颜色在试验中重复时,信噪比测量最能捕获性能(实验3A和3B)。最后,当观察者既不知道目标颜色,也不知道分心物的颜色时,表现会显著恶化,并且不再被这两种目标-分心物对比指标所索引(实验4)。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Quantifying the relationship between search efficiency and perceptual similarity in color space across different efficient search tasks.","authors":"Alejandro Lleras, Zoe Jing Xu, Howard Jia He Tan, Yujie Shao, Simona Buetti","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001327","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001327","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When looking for a specific object in the environment, the visual system guides attention toward objects in the scene that contain features that are similar to those of the object in mind, also known as the target template. However, the precise relation between search performance and perceptual similarity (between objects in the scene and the target template) has not been properly characterized. Recently, target-contrast signal theory proposed an explicit relationship linking search performance to the concept of top-down \"target-distractor contrast,\" with contrast being a measure of the amount of perceptual evidence that allows peripheral processing to differentiate target from distractors. We used a well-characterized color space to investigate the relationship between target-distractor similarity and search efficiency. We compared three different models relating color distance to search performance: the universal law of generalization, and two implementations of target-contrast signal theory. In the first, target-distractor distance indexes the target-distractor contrast, while the second uses the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) between the neuronal responses to the attended color and the distractor color to index target-distractor contrast. When the target color is known but the distractor color cannot be anticipated, perceptual distance best predicts performance (Experiments 1, 2A, and 2B). When target and distractor colors repeat from trial to trial, the SNR measure best captures performance (Experiments 3A and 3B). Finally, when neither the target nor the distractor color is known to observers, performance deteriorates significantly and is no longer indexed by either of these two measures of target-distractor contrast (Experiment 4). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"850-874"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144081598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Repetition violating events do not enhance sensitivity to embedded content, but repeated events can reduce sensitivity. 重复违反事件不会增强对嵌入内容的敏感性,但重复事件会降低对嵌入内容的敏感性。
IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-08 DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001324
Blake W Saurels, Qingyu Ma, Derek H Arnold

Oddball paradigms involve the presentation of sequences of repeated events that are broken by a novel "oddball." These have been used to examine the neural and perceptual consequences of predictive processes in the brain. Two intriguing perceptual findings are that people are more sensitive to visual content embedded in oddballs and that people perceive oddballs as longer lasting-relative to repeated events. Recent investigations have looked at the possibility that fluctuations in attention during presentation sequences might impact perception though. Because the number of repeated "standards" (that do not require a behavioral judgment) seen before a "test" (which can require a behavioral judgment) is often circumscribed, as more standards are encountered, the probability of a further standard decreases, whereas the probability of a test increases. So, later tests can be anticipated, whereas early tests are improbable. It has been shown that when all tests can be anticipated, and all tests are equally likely to be a further repeated standard or an oddball, oddballs still seem longer lasting than repeats. Here we show that the same conditions undermine the visual acuity advantage for oddball content. Our experiment clarifies that this increase in acuity for oddballs results from a degradation of acuity to repeat tests that cannot be anticipated. We found that people's pupils tended to dilate as they expected a test, consistent with top-down attention scaling with test probability. In a second experiment, we replicated the time perception difference and the lack of visual acuity difference under the same experimental conditions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

古怪范式包括一系列重复事件的呈现,这些事件被一个新奇的“古怪”打破了。这些已经被用来检查大脑中预测过程的神经和感知后果。两个有趣的感知发现是,人们对嵌入在奇怪事件中的视觉内容更敏感,人们认为奇怪事件相对于重复事件持续的时间更长。最近的调查研究了在演示过程中注意力的波动可能会影响感知的可能性。因为在“测试”(需要行为判断)之前看到的重复“标准”(不需要行为判断)的数量通常是有限的,当遇到更多的标准时,进一步标准的可能性降低,而测试的可能性增加。所以,后期的测试是可以预测的,而早期的测试是不可能的。研究表明,当所有的测试都可以被预测到,并且所有的测试都同样有可能是一个进一步重复的标准测试或一个古怪的测试时,古怪的测试似乎比重复的测试持续的时间更长。在这里,我们表明,同样的条件会破坏视觉敏锐度对古怪内容的优势。我们的实验表明,这种古怪的人的敏锐度的增加是由于无法预料的重复测试导致的敏锐度下降。我们发现,当人们期待考试时,他们的瞳孔往往会放大,这与自上而下的注意力与考试概率的比例一致。在第二个实验中,我们在相同的实验条件下复制了时间感知差异和缺乏视觉敏锐度差异。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Repetition violating events do not enhance sensitivity to embedded content, but repeated events can reduce sensitivity.","authors":"Blake W Saurels, Qingyu Ma, Derek H Arnold","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001324","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001324","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Oddball paradigms involve the presentation of sequences of repeated events that are broken by a novel \"oddball.\" These have been used to examine the neural and perceptual consequences of predictive processes in the brain. Two intriguing perceptual findings are that people are more sensitive to visual content embedded in oddballs and that people perceive oddballs as longer lasting-relative to repeated events. Recent investigations have looked at the possibility that fluctuations in attention during presentation sequences might impact perception though. Because the number of repeated \"standards\" (that do not require a behavioral judgment) seen before a \"test\" (which can require a behavioral judgment) is often circumscribed, as more standards are encountered, the probability of a further standard decreases, whereas the probability of a test increases. So, later tests can be anticipated, whereas early tests are improbable. It has been shown that when all tests can be anticipated, and all tests are equally likely to be a further repeated standard or an oddball, oddballs still seem longer lasting than repeats. Here we show that the same conditions undermine the visual acuity advantage for oddball content. Our experiment clarifies that this increase in acuity for oddballs results from a degradation of acuity to repeat tests that cannot be anticipated. We found that people's pupils tended to dilate as they expected a test, consistent with top-down attention scaling with test probability. In a second experiment, we replicated the time perception difference and the lack of visual acuity difference under the same experimental conditions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"837-849"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144024607","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rhythm is alive, though it is not (and never was) the whole story. 节奏是鲜活的,尽管它不是(也从来都不是)故事的全部。
IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001258
Thierry Nazzi

Most infants learn their native language, or native languages, if they grow up in a multilingual environment, with amazing speed and apparent ease. Developmental research has taught us that many of these acquisitions begin in the first year of life and has started to specify early developmental trajectories across various languages. One issue that has caught early attention in the field is the question of when and how infants discriminate languages and start recognizing their native language. The present study reviews the literature on this issue, highlighting the influence of rhythm, pointing toward limitations and raising questions for future research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

如果他们在多语言环境中长大,大多数婴儿都会以惊人的速度和明显的轻松学习母语或母语。发展研究告诉我们,许多习得始于生命的第一年,并开始明确不同语言的早期发展轨迹。该领域早期关注的一个问题是婴儿何时以及如何区分语言并开始识别母语的问题。本研究回顾了这一问题的文献,强调了节奏的影响,指出了局限性,并为未来的研究提出了问题。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Rhythm is alive, though it is not (and never was) the whole story.","authors":"Thierry Nazzi","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001258","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001258","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most infants learn their native language, or native languages, if they grow up in a multilingual environment, with amazing speed and apparent ease. Developmental research has taught us that many of these acquisitions begin in the first year of life and has started to specify early developmental trajectories across various languages. One issue that has caught early attention in the field is the question of when and how infants discriminate languages and start recognizing their native language. The present study reviews the literature on this issue, highlighting the influence of rhythm, pointing toward limitations and raising questions for future research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":"51 7","pages":"827-833"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144250616","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The role of kinesthetic and visuospatial cues in pain-related movement avoidance. 运动觉性和视觉空间线索在疼痛相关运动回避中的作用。
IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-17 DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001318
Xaver Fuchs, Tobias Heed

When humans experience pain during a movement, they can develop fear and avoid this movement afterward; these responses likely play a role in chronic pain. Previous experiments have investigated the underlying learning mechanisms by pairing movements with painful stimuli but, usually, other visuospatial cues were concurrently presented during the learning context. Therefore, participants might have primarily avoided these visuospatial rather than the movement-related cues, potentially invalidating related interpretations of pain-induced movement avoidance. Here, we separated kinesthetic from visuospatial cues to investigate their respective contribution to avoidance. Participants used a hand-held robotic manipulandum and, during an acquisition phase, received painful stimuli during center-out movements. Pain stimuli could be avoided by choosing curved rather than direct movement trajectories. To distinguish the contribution of kinesthetic versus visuospatial cues we tested two generalization contexts: either participants executed novel movements that passed through the same location at which pain had previously been presented in the acquisition phase; or they were reseated and then executed identical movements as those that had been associated with pain, but without passing through the pain-associated spatial location. Avoidance generalization was comparable in both contexts, and remarkably, highly correlated between them. Our findings suggest that both visuospatial and kinesthetic cues available during acquisition were associated with pain and led to avoidance. Our research corroborates previous studies' findings that pain can become associated with movements. However, visuospatial cues also play a critical role for avoidance acquisition. Future studies should distinguish movement-related and space-related associations in pain-related avoidance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

当人类在运动中感到疼痛时,他们会产生恐惧,并在之后避免这种运动;这些反应可能在慢性疼痛中起作用。以前的实验通过将运动与疼痛刺激配对来研究潜在的学习机制,但通常,在学习环境中同时出现其他视觉空间线索。因此,参与者可能主要避免这些视觉空间而不是与运动相关的线索,潜在地使疼痛引起的运动回避的相关解释无效。在这里,我们将动觉线索从视觉空间线索中分离出来,研究它们各自对回避的贡献。参与者使用手持式机器人操纵器,在获取阶段,在中心向外运动时接受疼痛刺激。选择弯曲的运动轨迹而不是直接的运动轨迹可以避免疼痛刺激。为了区分运动觉线索和视觉空间线索的作用,我们测试了两种泛化情境:参与者执行的新动作经过了先前在习得阶段出现疼痛的相同位置;或者他们被重新安置,然后执行与疼痛相关的相同动作,但没有经过与疼痛相关的空间位置。回避泛化在两种情况下具有可比性,并且显著地高度相关。我们的研究结果表明,在习得过程中可用的视觉空间和动觉线索都与疼痛有关,并导致回避。我们的研究证实了之前的研究发现,疼痛可能与运动有关。然而,视觉空间线索在回避习得中也起着关键作用。未来的研究应区分运动相关和空间相关在疼痛相关回避中的关联。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"The role of kinesthetic and visuospatial cues in pain-related movement avoidance.","authors":"Xaver Fuchs, Tobias Heed","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001318","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001318","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When humans experience pain during a movement, they can develop fear and avoid this movement afterward; these responses likely play a role in chronic pain. Previous experiments have investigated the underlying learning mechanisms by pairing movements with painful stimuli but, usually, other visuospatial cues were concurrently presented during the learning context. Therefore, participants might have primarily avoided these visuospatial rather than the movement-related cues, potentially invalidating related interpretations of pain-induced movement avoidance. Here, we separated kinesthetic from visuospatial cues to investigate their respective contribution to avoidance. Participants used a hand-held robotic manipulandum and, during an acquisition phase, received painful stimuli during center-out movements. Pain stimuli could be avoided by choosing curved rather than direct movement trajectories. To distinguish the contribution of kinesthetic versus visuospatial cues we tested two generalization contexts: either participants executed novel movements that passed through the same location at which pain had previously been presented in the acquisition phase; or they were reseated and then executed identical movements as those that had been associated with pain, but without passing through the pain-associated spatial location. Avoidance generalization was comparable in both contexts, and remarkably, highly correlated between them. Our findings suggest that both visuospatial and kinesthetic cues available during acquisition were associated with pain and led to avoidance. Our research corroborates previous studies' findings that pain can become associated with movements. However, visuospatial cues also play a critical role for avoidance acquisition. Future studies should distinguish movement-related and space-related associations in pain-related avoidance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"944-954"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144023057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Setting specific goals improves cognitive effort, self-efficacy, and sustained attention. 设定明确的目标可以提高认知能力、自我效能和持续的注意力。
IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-15 DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001331
Lauren D Garner, Rija Mohammed, Matthew K Robison

Investigating the efficacy of goal-setting strategies is critical in understanding how individuals regulate their behavior, particularly within cognitive tasks. The present study examines the impact of self-set versus experimenter-set goals and point incentives on performance across three experiments using two sustained attention tasks. In Experiment 1, we compared self-set and experimenter-set goals in the psychomotor vigilance task, hypothesizing that self-set goals would lead to better performance due to increased agency. No significant differences emerged in task performance between the two conditions. Participants who self-set their goals also set increasingly easier goal standards over time. Experiment 2 introduced a novel task paradigm "Green Means Go," modeled after the psychomotor vigilance task, and revealed faster reaction times in goal-setting conditions compared to a no-goal condition. Having a specific goal, either self-set or experimenter-set, was better for performance than having no goals. Experiment 3 allowed all participants to set their own goals and explored the influence of a points-based incentivization system on goal-setting tendencies. Those who received points set more difficult goals. Findings suggest that goal-setting mechanisms can enhance task performance and help reduce vigilance decrements, with potential implications for using goal-setting to elevate cognitive performance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

研究目标设定策略的有效性对于理解个体如何调节自己的行为,特别是在认知任务中,是至关重要的。本研究通过使用两个持续注意力任务的三个实验,考察了自我设定目标与实验者设定目标和点激励对表现的影响。在实验1中,我们比较了自我设定目标和实验者设定目标在精神运动警觉性任务中的表现,假设自我设定目标会由于能动性的增加而导致更好的表现。两种情况下的任务表现没有显著差异。随着时间的推移,自我设定目标的参与者也会设定越来越容易的目标标准。实验2引入了一种新的任务范式“Green Means Go”,该范式以精神运动警觉性任务为模型,揭示了目标设定条件下的反应速度比无目标条件下更快。有一个明确的目标,无论是自我设定的还是实验设定的,都比没有目标更好。实验3允许所有参与者设定自己的目标,并探索基于积分的激励系统对目标设定倾向的影响。那些得分的人设定了更困难的目标。研究结果表明,目标设定机制可以提高任务表现,并有助于减少警觉性下降,这可能意味着使用目标设定来提高认知表现。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Setting specific goals improves cognitive effort, self-efficacy, and sustained attention.","authors":"Lauren D Garner, Rija Mohammed, Matthew K Robison","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001331","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001331","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Investigating the efficacy of goal-setting strategies is critical in understanding how individuals regulate their behavior, particularly within cognitive tasks. The present study examines the impact of self-set versus experimenter-set goals and point incentives on performance across three experiments using two sustained attention tasks. In Experiment 1, we compared self-set and experimenter-set goals in the psychomotor vigilance task, hypothesizing that self-set goals would lead to better performance due to increased agency. No significant differences emerged in task performance between the two conditions. Participants who self-set their goals also set increasingly easier goal standards over time. Experiment 2 introduced a novel task paradigm \"Green Means Go,\" modeled after the psychomotor vigilance task, and revealed faster reaction times in goal-setting conditions compared to a no-goal condition. Having a specific goal, either self-set or experimenter-set, was better for performance than having no goals. Experiment 3 allowed all participants to set their own goals and explored the influence of a points-based incentivization system on goal-setting tendencies. Those who received points set more difficult goals. Findings suggest that goal-setting mechanisms can enhance task performance and help reduce vigilance decrements, with potential implications for using goal-setting to elevate cognitive performance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"895-910"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144081599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Does an external distractor interfere with the triggering of item-specific control? 外部干扰物是否会干扰特定项目控制的触发?
IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-31 DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001323
Merve Ileri-Tayar, Jihyun Suh, Amina Stern, Logan Whitsitt, Julie M Bugg

People learn to associate external (predictive) cues (e.g., pictures; colors) with the attentional demands (e.g., the likelihood of conflict) that tend to accompany these cues. Such learning supports item-specific control, the reactive triggering of control settings associated with predictive cues (e.g., high level of focus triggered by a cue predicting high attentional demands). Item-specific control is assumed to operate with a degree of automaticity that allows for efficient processing even in the presence of competing demands. In three experiments, we investigated whether the unpredictable appearance of another salient stimulus (external distractor) presented along with the predictive cue would interfere with the triggering of item-specific control settings. The first two blocks of each experiment (i.e., acquisition phase) allowed participants to learn associations between different pictures and their likelihood of conflict in a picture-word Stroop task without external distraction. In the last two blocks (i.e., test phase), we introduced a random visual distractor (Experiments 1 and 2) or a combined visual and auditory distractor (i.e., multisensory; Experiment 3), with Experiment 2 additionally manipulating the timing of the distractor onset. Overall, the item-specific proportion congruence effect remained intact in both distractor-present and distractor-absent trials in all experiments, suggesting that item-specific control is robust to the presence of external distraction. We consider the theoretical implications of the results, with a focus on the automaticity of item-specific control and future investigations of potential boundary conditions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

人们学会将外部(预测性)线索(例如,图片;颜色)和伴随这些线索而来的注意力需求(例如,冲突的可能性)。这种学习支持特定项目控制,即与预测线索相关的控制设置的反应性触发(例如,由预测高注意力需求的线索触发的高水平注意力)。特定项目的控制被认为具有一定程度的自动化,即使在存在竞争性需求的情况下也能进行有效的处理。在三个实验中,我们研究了与预测提示一起出现的另一个显著刺激(外部干扰物)的不可预测的出现是否会干扰特定项目控制设置的触发。每个实验的前两个部分(即习得阶段)允许参与者在没有外部干扰的情况下学习不同图片之间的联系以及他们在图片-单词Stroop任务中冲突的可能性。在最后两个模块(即测试阶段)中,我们引入了随机视觉干扰(实验1和2)或视觉和听觉组合干扰(即多感官;实验3),实验2额外操纵分心物的发生时间。总体而言,在所有实验中,在存在分心物和不存在分心物的实验中,项目特定比例一致性效应保持不变,这表明项目特定控制对外部分心物的存在是稳健的。我们考虑了结果的理论含义,重点是特定项目控制的自动性和潜在边界条件的未来研究。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Does an external distractor interfere with the triggering of item-specific control?","authors":"Merve Ileri-Tayar, Jihyun Suh, Amina Stern, Logan Whitsitt, Julie M Bugg","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001323","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001323","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People learn to associate external (predictive) cues (e.g., pictures; colors) with the attentional demands (e.g., the likelihood of conflict) that tend to accompany these cues. Such learning supports item-specific control, the reactive triggering of control settings associated with predictive cues (e.g., high level of focus triggered by a cue predicting high attentional demands). Item-specific control is assumed to operate with a degree of automaticity that allows for efficient processing even in the presence of competing demands. In three experiments, we investigated whether the unpredictable appearance of another salient stimulus (external distractor) presented along with the predictive cue would interfere with the triggering of item-specific control settings. The first two blocks of each experiment (i.e., acquisition phase) allowed participants to learn associations between different pictures and their likelihood of conflict in a picture-word Stroop task without external distraction. In the last two blocks (i.e., test phase), we introduced a random visual distractor (Experiments 1 and 2) or a combined visual and auditory distractor (i.e., multisensory; Experiment 3), with Experiment 2 additionally manipulating the timing of the distractor onset. Overall, the item-specific proportion congruence effect remained intact in both distractor-present and distractor-absent trials in all experiments, suggesting that item-specific control is robust to the presence of external distraction. We consider the theoretical implications of the results, with a focus on the automaticity of item-specific control and future investigations of potential boundary conditions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"808-825"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081187/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143755602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1