首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Pain最新文献

英文 中文
“My lived experience was valued”: Co-designing ‘OA Champions’ – A pain science-informed peer mentorship program for people with knee osteoarthritis “我的生活经验很有价值”:参与设计“OA冠军”——一个针对膝关节骨关节炎患者的疼痛科学同伴指导项目。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2026.106193
Monique V. Wilson , Aaron Davis , Felicity A. Braithwaite , John B. Arnold , Ian Gwilt , Stuart Campbell , John Porton , Olivia Petropoulos , Tasha R. Stanton
Access to first-line care for knee osteoarthritis (OA) is limited. Peer-led strategies offer a promising alternative for delivering support and up-to-date information to help individuals manage knee OA. This study used a co-design approach to develop a pain science-informed peer mentorship program to support knee OA self-management. Peer mentorship involves one-to-one tailored support delivered by a trained mentor with the same condition. Co-design ensures meaningful involvement of end-users across all stages of program development, guaranteeing their needs and preferences are captured. Individuals with knee OA were engaged as equal partners across one rural and four metropolitan co-design workshops. Guided by the Double Diamond design process, workshops utilized a range of participatory strategies and involved both researcher-led and co-researcher-led analysis. Twenty-seven co-researchers (mean age 65.1 [SD 9.3] years; 59% female) participated across the workshops. Co-researchers identified unmet support needs throughout the knee OA journey and informed the type of support that could be offered by peer mentors in these situations, drawing from lived experience. Key components of the program were also informed, including preference for a blended mentor training model, considerations for mentor-mentee matching, the development of mentorship session cards, and the importance of session monitoring. The co-designed peer mentorship program, now ready for pilot feasibility testing, offers a flexible intervention that can be tailored to individual support needs, promoting self-management and disseminating contemporary pain science education. Strong evidence of meaningful end-user involvement also positions this study as an exemplar for engaging people with lived experience in developing complex interventions.

Perspective

This article presents a multi-stage co-design process that meaningfully involved people with lived experience of knee osteoarthritis to develop a pain-science informed peer mentorship program supporting self-management. Aligning with end-user needs and preferences, the flexible program can be tailored to individual support needs.
获得第一线护理膝关节骨关节炎(OA)是有限的。同行领导的策略提供了一个有前途的替代提供支持和最新的信息,以帮助个人管理膝关节OA。本研究采用共同设计的方法来开发一个疼痛科学知识的同伴指导计划,以支持膝关节OA的自我管理。同侪辅导包括由受过训练的导师在相同条件下提供一对一的量身定制的支持。协同设计确保最终用户在程序开发的各个阶段都有意义的参与,保证他们的需求和偏好被捕获。膝关节炎患者作为平等的合作伙伴参与了一个农村和四个城市的共同设计工作坊。在双钻石设计过程的指导下,研讨会采用了一系列参与式策略,并涉及研究人员主导和共同研究人员主导的分析。27名共同研究人员(平均年龄65.1 [SD 9.3]岁,59%为女性)参加了整个研讨会。共同研究人员确定了整个膝关节OA过程中未满足的支持需求,并根据生活经验告知同伴导师在这些情况下可以提供的支持类型。该计划的关键组成部分也被告知,包括对混合导师培训模式的偏好,对导师-被指导者匹配的考虑,指导会议计划的发展,以及会议监控的重要性。共同设计的同伴指导计划现已准备进行试点可行性测试,提供了一种灵活的干预措施,可以根据个人支持需求量身定制,促进自我管理并传播当代疼痛科学教育。有意义的最终用户参与的有力证据也使本研究成为让有生活经验的人参与开发复杂干预措施的典范。观点:这篇文章提出了一个多阶段的共同设计过程,有意义地让有膝关节骨关节炎生活经验的人参与其中,以开发一个支持自我管理的疼痛科学知识同伴指导计划。与最终用户的需求和偏好保持一致,灵活的程序可以根据个人支持需求进行定制。
{"title":"“My lived experience was valued”: Co-designing ‘OA Champions’ – A pain science-informed peer mentorship program for people with knee osteoarthritis","authors":"Monique V. Wilson ,&nbsp;Aaron Davis ,&nbsp;Felicity A. Braithwaite ,&nbsp;John B. Arnold ,&nbsp;Ian Gwilt ,&nbsp;Stuart Campbell ,&nbsp;John Porton ,&nbsp;Olivia Petropoulos ,&nbsp;Tasha R. Stanton","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2026.106193","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jpain.2026.106193","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Access to first-line care for knee osteoarthritis (OA) is limited. Peer-led strategies offer a promising alternative for delivering support and up-to-date information to help individuals manage knee OA. This study used a co-design approach to develop a pain science-informed peer mentorship program to support knee OA self-management. Peer mentorship involves one-to-one tailored support delivered by a trained mentor with the same condition. Co-design ensures meaningful involvement of end-users across all stages of program development, guaranteeing their needs and preferences are captured. Individuals with knee OA were engaged as equal partners across one rural and four metropolitan co-design workshops. Guided by the Double Diamond design process, workshops utilized a range of participatory strategies and involved both researcher-led and co-researcher-led analysis. Twenty-seven co-researchers (mean age 65.1 [SD 9.3] years; 59% female) participated across the workshops. Co-researchers identified unmet support needs throughout the knee OA journey and informed the type of support that could be offered by peer mentors in these situations, drawing from lived experience. Key components of the program were also informed, including preference for a blended mentor training model, considerations for mentor-mentee matching, the development of mentorship session cards, and the importance of session monitoring. The co-designed peer mentorship program, now ready for pilot feasibility testing, offers a flexible intervention that can be tailored to individual support needs, promoting self-management and disseminating contemporary pain science education. Strong evidence of meaningful end-user involvement also positions this study as an exemplar for engaging people with lived experience in developing complex interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><div>This article presents a multi-stage co-design process that meaningfully involved people with lived experience of knee osteoarthritis to develop a pain-science informed peer mentorship program supporting self-management. Aligning with end-user needs and preferences, the flexible program can be tailored to individual support needs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 106193"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145953766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Potential mediators of the effects of clinical hypnosis, mindfulness meditation, and pain education on chronic pain in Veterans 临床催眠、正念冥想和疼痛教育对退伍军人慢性疼痛影响的潜在中介。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2025.106176
Mark P. Jensen , Marcia A. Ciol , Kevin J. Gertz , Dawn M. Ehde , Shahin Hakimian , Melissa A. Day , Mark W. Pettet , Aaron P. Turner , Colin G. Sarabosing , Rhonda M. Williams
Psychological interventions have reliable but modest effects on chronic pain outcomes, but our understanding of the mechanisms that underlie these effects remains limited. This paper presents the findings from a series of secondary analyses using data from a randomized clinical trial (clinicalTrials.gov, NCT02653664). Three hundred and twenty-eight Veterans of the US Armed Forces with chronic pain were randomized to receive clinical hypnosis, mindfulness meditation training, or pain education via 8 in-person group sessions. Of 17 candidate mediator variables assessed before and after treatment, 10 changed with treatment. Three of these were associated significantly with reductions in pain intensity and interference across all three treatment conditions: greater willingness to tolerate pain, greater engagement in valued activities despite pain, and reduced catastrophizing. A fourth candidate mediator assessed during treatment (working alliance) was significantly associated with reductions in pain intensity for those receiving clinical hypnosis. When comparing effects between treatments, catastrophizing appeared to play a larger role for the effects of mindfulness training on pain intensity and interference, and pain willingness appeared to play a larger role in the effect of therapeutic hypnosis on pain interference. Further research is needed to validate the reliability of the mediators identified in this study. If the findings from the current study replicate in other samples, they would support the importance of focusing treatment on thoughts about pain, pain avoidance, engagement in valued activities, and working alliance.

Perspective

Three psychological variables were identified as being possible mediators of the beneficial effects of mindfulness, clinical hypnosis, and pain education on pain. Additional research is needed to definitively test these variables as potential mediators of psychological pain treatments.
心理干预对慢性疼痛结果有可靠但适度的影响,但我们对这些影响背后的机制的理解仍然有限。本文介绍了使用随机临床试验(clinicalTrials.gov, NCT02653664)数据进行的一系列二次分析的结果。328名患有慢性疼痛的美国武装部队退伍军人被随机分配接受临床催眠、正念冥想训练或通过8次面对面小组会议进行疼痛教育。在治疗前后评估的17个候选中介变量中,有10个随治疗而改变。在所有三种治疗条件下,其中三种与疼痛强度和干扰的减少显著相关:更愿意忍受疼痛,更愿意不顾疼痛参与有价值的活动,减少灾难。在治疗工作联盟期间评估的第四个候选中介与接受临床催眠的患者疼痛强度的减少显着相关。在比较两种治疗的效果时,灾难化似乎在正念训练对疼痛强度和干扰的影响中发挥更大的作用,而疼痛意愿似乎在治疗性催眠对疼痛干扰的影响中发挥更大的作用。需要进一步的研究来验证本研究中确定的介质的可靠性。如果目前的研究结果在其他样本中得到了重复,它们将支持将治疗重点放在疼痛思考、疼痛避免、参与有价值的活动和工作联盟上的重要性。观点:三个心理变量被确定为正念、临床催眠和疼痛教育对疼痛的有益影响的可能中介。需要进一步的研究来明确地测试这些变量作为心理疼痛治疗的潜在介质。
{"title":"Potential mediators of the effects of clinical hypnosis, mindfulness meditation, and pain education on chronic pain in Veterans","authors":"Mark P. Jensen ,&nbsp;Marcia A. Ciol ,&nbsp;Kevin J. Gertz ,&nbsp;Dawn M. Ehde ,&nbsp;Shahin Hakimian ,&nbsp;Melissa A. Day ,&nbsp;Mark W. Pettet ,&nbsp;Aaron P. Turner ,&nbsp;Colin G. Sarabosing ,&nbsp;Rhonda M. Williams","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.106176","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.106176","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Psychological interventions have reliable but modest effects on chronic pain outcomes, but our understanding of the mechanisms that underlie these effects remains limited. This paper presents the findings from a series of secondary analyses using data from a randomized clinical trial (clinicalTrials.gov, NCT02653664). Three hundred and twenty-eight Veterans of the US Armed Forces with chronic pain were randomized to receive clinical hypnosis, mindfulness meditation training, or pain education via 8 in-person group sessions. Of 17 candidate mediator variables assessed before and after treatment, 10 changed with treatment. Three of these were associated significantly with reductions in pain intensity and interference across all three treatment conditions: greater willingness to tolerate pain, greater engagement in valued activities despite pain, and reduced catastrophizing. A fourth candidate mediator assessed during treatment (working alliance) was significantly associated with reductions in pain intensity for those receiving clinical hypnosis. When comparing effects between treatments, catastrophizing appeared to play a larger role for the effects of mindfulness training on pain intensity and interference, and pain willingness appeared to play a larger role in the effect of therapeutic hypnosis on pain interference. Further research is needed to validate the reliability of the mediators identified in this study. If the findings from the current study replicate in other samples, they would support the importance of focusing treatment on thoughts about pain, pain avoidance, engagement in valued activities, and working alliance.</div></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><div>Three psychological variables were identified as being possible mediators of the beneficial effects of mindfulness, clinical hypnosis, and pain education on pain. Additional research is needed to definitively test these variables as potential mediators of psychological pain treatments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 106176"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145936005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Beyond Linear Assumptions: Advancing Lipidomic Analysis in Localized provoked Vulvodynia. 超越线性假设:推进局部诱发性外阴痛的脂质组学分析。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2025.106179
Souichi Oka, Kiyo Yoshida, Yoshiyasu Takefuji
{"title":"Beyond Linear Assumptions: Advancing Lipidomic Analysis in Localized provoked Vulvodynia.","authors":"Souichi Oka, Kiyo Yoshida, Yoshiyasu Takefuji","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.106179","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2025.106179","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"106179"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145936030","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Re: Letter to the Editor Re: Effects of centrally acting analgesics on resting-state electroencephalography biomarker candidates of chronic pain. 回复:致编辑的信回复:中枢镇痛药对慢性疼痛静息状态脑电图生物标志物候选物的影响。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2026.106183
Paul Theo Zebhauser, Markus Ploner
{"title":"Re: Letter to the Editor Re: Effects of centrally acting analgesics on resting-state electroencephalography biomarker candidates of chronic pain.","authors":"Paul Theo Zebhauser, Markus Ploner","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2026.106183","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jpain.2026.106183","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"106183"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145913876","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The effect of positive, neutral, and negative expectations about spinal manipulative therapy on pain intensity in chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial 一项随机对照试验:对脊椎操纵疗法的积极、中性和消极预期对慢性腰痛疼痛强度的影响。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-31 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2025.106177
Bianca Emanuelli Saes Campanha , Thamiris Costa de Lima , Helen Cristina Nogueira Carrer , Steven Z. George , Felipe J.J. Reis , Thaís Cristina Chaves
Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) has favorable, but small effects on pain intensity to treat chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, there is the potential for these effects to be enhanced by manipulating treatment expectations. Our objective was to investigate the effect of verbally delivered treatment expectations in association with SMT on pain intensity for individuals with CLBP. Our sample consisted of sixty participants who were randomly allocated to three groups in which verbally delivered expectations (positive [PEG], neutral [NEUG], and negative [NEG]) were administered by video before one session of SMT. Pain intensity (primary outcome), global perceived effect (GPE) of improvement, disability, participants’ expectations, and empathy as secondary outcomes were assessed immediately post-treatment and pain intensity, GPE, and disability at the 3-month follow-up. Participants were interviewed about their perceptions regarding the videos. Pain intensity significantly decreased in the PEG and NEUG immediately after the SMT session (mean difference=MD), PEG - MD=-1.9 [95% CI −3.4 - −0.3] and NEUG - MD=-1.6 [95% CI −3.2 - −0.05], both when compared to the NEG. However, these findings weren’t maintained at the 3-month follow-up. No significant changes in GPE and disability were observed between groups. Our findings suggest that positive and neutral verbally delivered treatment expectations resulted in short-term SMT hypoalgesia compared to negative expectations; however, these effects did not persist at 3-month follow-up. Such results suggest that both positive and neutral SMT-related expectations should be adopted when communicating the expected treatment effects to patients.

Clinical trials registration number

NCT05996991, protocol registration: August 2023, study start date 1st October, 2023

Perspective

Our findings showed that using positive or neutral verbally delivered expectations has the potential to enhance short-term hypoalgesia associated with SMT in CLBP.
脊椎推拿疗法(SMT)治疗慢性腰痛(CLBP)对疼痛强度的影响较小,但效果较好。然而,有可能通过操纵治疗预期来增强这些效果。我们的目的是调查口头传递治疗期望与SMT对CLBP患者疼痛强度的影响。我们的样本由60名参与者组成,他们被随机分配到三组,其中口头传递期望(积极的[PEG],中性的[NEUG]和消极的[NEG])在一次SMT之前通过视频进行管理。治疗后立即评估疼痛强度(主要结局)、改善的总体感知效应(GPE)、残疾、参与者期望和共情作为次要结局,并在3个月随访时评估疼痛强度、GPE和残疾。参与者被问及他们对这些视频的看法。与NEG相比,SMT治疗后PEG和NEUG的疼痛强度立即显著降低(平均差值=MD), PEG - MD=-1.9 [95% CI -3.4 - -0.3], NEUG - MD=-1.6 [95% CI -3.2 - -0.05]。然而,这些发现在3个月的随访中没有得到维持。两组间GPE和残疾无明显变化。我们的研究结果表明,与消极预期相比,积极和中性的口头传递治疗预期导致短期SMT痛觉减退;然而,这些效果在3个月的随访中并未持续。这些结果表明,在向患者传达预期治疗效果时,应采用积极和中性的smt相关期望。临床试验注册号:NCT05996991,方案注册:2023年8月,研究开始日期2023年10月1日。观点:我们的研究结果表明,使用积极或中性的口头传递期望有可能增强CLBP患者与SMT相关的短期痛觉减退。
{"title":"The effect of positive, neutral, and negative expectations about spinal manipulative therapy on pain intensity in chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Bianca Emanuelli Saes Campanha ,&nbsp;Thamiris Costa de Lima ,&nbsp;Helen Cristina Nogueira Carrer ,&nbsp;Steven Z. George ,&nbsp;Felipe J.J. Reis ,&nbsp;Thaís Cristina Chaves","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.106177","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.106177","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) has favorable, but small effects on pain intensity to treat chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, there is the potential for these effects to be enhanced by manipulating treatment expectations. Our objective was to investigate the effect of verbally delivered treatment expectations in association with SMT on pain intensity for individuals with CLBP. Our sample consisted of sixty participants who were randomly allocated to three groups in which verbally delivered expectations (positive [PEG], neutral [NEUG], and negative [NEG]) were administered by video before one session of SMT. Pain intensity (primary outcome), global perceived effect (GPE) of improvement, disability, participants’ expectations, and empathy as secondary outcomes were assessed immediately post-treatment and pain intensity, GPE, and disability at the 3-month follow-up. Participants were interviewed about their perceptions regarding the videos. Pain intensity significantly decreased in the PEG and NEUG immediately after the SMT session (mean difference=MD), PEG - MD=-1.9 [95% CI −3.4 - −0.3] and NEUG - MD=-1.6 [95% CI −3.2 - −0.05], both when compared to the NEG. However, these findings weren’t maintained at the 3-month follow-up. No significant changes in GPE and disability were observed between groups. Our findings suggest that positive and neutral verbally delivered treatment expectations resulted in short-term SMT hypoalgesia compared to negative expectations; however, these effects did not persist at 3-month follow-up. Such results suggest that both positive and neutral SMT-related expectations should be adopted when communicating the expected treatment effects to patients.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical trials registration number</h3><div>NCT05996991, protocol registration: August 2023, study start date 1st October, 2023</div></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><div>Our findings showed that using positive or neutral verbally delivered expectations has the potential to enhance short-term hypoalgesia associated with SMT in CLBP.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 106177"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145893460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Quality matters: Interpreting amputation outcomes in CRPS - Authors reply. 质量问题:解释CRPS的截肢结果-作者回复。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-31 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2025.106178
Yannick L Gilanyi, Michael C Ferraro, Andreas Goebel, Neil E O'Connell, Matthew D Jones, Saurab Sharma, Debbie Bean, Sylvia M Gustin, James H McAuley
{"title":"Quality matters: Interpreting amputation outcomes in CRPS - Authors reply.","authors":"Yannick L Gilanyi, Michael C Ferraro, Andreas Goebel, Neil E O'Connell, Matthew D Jones, Saurab Sharma, Debbie Bean, Sylvia M Gustin, James H McAuley","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.106178","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.106178","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"106178"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145893393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The efficacy and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for comorbid chronic low back pain and insomnia: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot trial 重复经颅磁刺激治疗共病慢性腰痛和失眠的有效性和安全性:一项随机、双盲、假对照的试点试验
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-31 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2025.106180
Jeremy R. Chang , Eliza R. Sun , Minxia Jin , Leo GH Lin , Shirley X. Li , Jannet LC Lee , Frank F. Huang , Rachel LC Kwan , Daniel KY Zheng , Dino Samartzis , Siu-Ngor Fu , Arnold YL Wong
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has shown efficacy in treating chronic pain or insomnia independently. Given the high prevalence of insomnia in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP), this pilot randomized controlled trial assessed the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of rTMS targeting either the left primary motor cortex (M1) or right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in individuals with comorbid CLBP and insomnia. Thirty-six participants were randomized to receive sham-rTMS, active M1-rTMS (10 Hz, 1500 pulses), or active DLPFC-rTMS (1 Hz, 1500 pulses) over 10 sessions for two weeks (five sessions per week), with a one-month follow-up. Primary outcomes were feasibility and acceptability. Secondary outcomes included pain intensity, insomnia severity, disability, psychological measures, subjective and objective sleep parameters, pain threshold, temporal summation of pain, and conditioned pain modulation. rTMS was highly feasible and acceptable, as evidenced by excellent session attendance and no participant attrition. No serious adverse events were reported. Both active M1- and DLPFC-rTMS significantly reduced pain intensity and enhanced the descending pain inhibitory pathways compared with sham stimulation. Importantly, DLPFC-rTMS was superior to sham in reducing insomnia severity, objective wake after sleep onset, and temporal summation of pain. These findings suggest that rTMS is a feasible, well-tolerated, and promising intervention for individuals with comorbid CLBP and insomnia. While both stimulation protocols yielded analgesic benefits, DLPFC-rTMS may confer additional advantages for addressing sleep disturbance. Further full-scale randomized clinical trials are warranted to validate these preliminary findings and optimize rTMS protocols for this complex clinical population.

Perspective

rTMS was feasible for comorbid chronic low back pain and insomnia, with DLPFC stimulation yielding superior effects on sleep disturbance and pain processing. Further large-scale RCTs using neuroimaging are warranted to validate and expand upon these preliminary results and elucidate the neurophysiological basis of treatment efficacy.
重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)已显示出治疗慢性疼痛或失眠的疗效。鉴于慢性腰痛(CLBP)患者失眠的高发率,本随机对照试验评估了针对CLBP和失眠患者的左初级运动皮质(M1)或右背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC)的rTMS的可行性、可接受性和初步疗效。36名参与者随机接受假rtms,活跃M1-rTMS (10Hz, 1500次脉冲)或活跃DLPFC-rTMS (1Hz, 1500次脉冲),为期两周(每周5次),为期一个月的随访。主要结局是可行性和可接受性。次要结局包括疼痛强度、失眠严重程度、残疾、心理测量、主观和客观睡眠参数、痛阈、疼痛时间总和和条件性疼痛调节。rTMS是高度可行和可接受的,证明了良好的会议出席率和无参与者流失。无严重不良事件报告。与假刺激相比,活性M1-和DLPFC-rTMS均能显著降低疼痛强度,增强下行疼痛抑制通路。重要的是,DLPFC-rTMS在降低失眠严重程度、入睡后客观清醒和疼痛时间累积方面优于假手术。这些发现表明,rTMS是一种可行的、耐受性良好的、有希望的CLBP和失眠合并症患者干预方法。虽然两种刺激方案都有镇痛效果,但DLPFC-rTMS可能在解决睡眠障碍方面具有额外的优势。需要进一步的全面随机临床试验来验证这些初步发现,并优化rTMS方案,以适应这一复杂的临床人群。观点:rTMS治疗合并慢性腰痛和失眠是可行的,DLPFC刺激对睡眠障碍和疼痛加工的效果更佳。进一步使用神经影像学的大规模随机对照试验是必要的,以验证和扩展这些初步结果,并阐明治疗效果的神经生理学基础。
{"title":"The efficacy and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for comorbid chronic low back pain and insomnia: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot trial","authors":"Jeremy R. Chang ,&nbsp;Eliza R. Sun ,&nbsp;Minxia Jin ,&nbsp;Leo GH Lin ,&nbsp;Shirley X. Li ,&nbsp;Jannet LC Lee ,&nbsp;Frank F. Huang ,&nbsp;Rachel LC Kwan ,&nbsp;Daniel KY Zheng ,&nbsp;Dino Samartzis ,&nbsp;Siu-Ngor Fu ,&nbsp;Arnold YL Wong","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.106180","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.106180","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has shown efficacy in treating chronic pain or insomnia independently. Given the high prevalence of insomnia in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP), this pilot randomized controlled trial assessed the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of rTMS targeting either the left primary motor cortex (M1) or right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in individuals with comorbid CLBP and insomnia. Thirty-six participants were randomized to receive sham-rTMS, active M1-rTMS (10 Hz, 1500 pulses), or active DLPFC-rTMS (1 Hz, 1500 pulses) over 10 sessions for two weeks (five sessions per week), with a one-month follow-up. Primary outcomes were feasibility and acceptability. Secondary outcomes included pain intensity, insomnia severity, disability, psychological measures, subjective and objective sleep parameters, pain threshold, temporal summation of pain, and conditioned pain modulation. rTMS was highly feasible and acceptable, as evidenced by excellent session attendance and no participant attrition. No serious adverse events were reported. Both active M1- and DLPFC-rTMS significantly reduced pain intensity and enhanced the descending pain inhibitory pathways compared with sham stimulation. Importantly, DLPFC-rTMS was superior to sham in reducing insomnia severity, objective wake after sleep onset, and temporal summation of pain. These findings suggest that rTMS is a feasible, well-tolerated, and promising intervention for individuals with comorbid CLBP and insomnia. While both stimulation protocols yielded analgesic benefits, DLPFC-rTMS may confer additional advantages for addressing sleep disturbance. Further full-scale randomized clinical trials are warranted to validate these preliminary findings and optimize rTMS protocols for this complex clinical population.</div></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><div>rTMS was feasible for comorbid chronic low back pain and insomnia, with DLPFC stimulation yielding superior effects on sleep disturbance and pain processing. Further large-scale RCTs using neuroimaging are warranted to validate and expand upon these preliminary results and elucidate the neurophysiological basis of treatment efficacy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 106180"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145893472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How do people with fibromyalgia interpret ambiguous cues in empathy-related healthcare scenarios? 纤维肌痛患者如何在共情相关的医疗场景中解释模棱两可的线索?
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2025.106181
Maria Planes Alias , David J Moore , Nicholas Fallon , Katie Herron , Charlotte Krahé
Empathic communication is essential for high-quality healthcare, yet patients must often interpret subtle and ambiguous interpersonal cues during healthcare encounters. In such contexts, prior experiences and cognitive-affective processes may shape interpretations in biased ways. In Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS), a frequently stigmatised and ‘invisible’ condition, such biases may influence how patients perceive unclear messages from healthcare professionals. While interpretation bias for pain-related information has been explored, bias in interpreting social-emotional information has not. This study investigated interpretations of ambiguous social-emotional cues from healthcare professionals in individuals with FMS (n = 65), compared with those with other chronic pain conditions (n = 51) and pain-free controls (n = 77). Participants completed a novel scenario-based task assessing the perceived likelihood of positive, neutral, and negative interpretations of ambiguous clinical situations. Validated self-report measures of psychological distress and perceived clinical empathy were also administered. Results showed that individuals with FMS were significantly more likely to endorse negative interpretations and less likely to endorse positive ones relative to both comparison groups, even after controlling for depression, anxiety, and stress. The FMS group also reported greater psychological distress and lower perceived empathy. Moreover, negative interpretation bias was associated with greater distress and lower perceived clinical empathy, while positive bias showed the opposite pattern. These findings suggest that individuals with FMS interpret ambiguous healthcare communication through a distinct cognitive-affective lens. This highlights that patient–provider interactions are not experienced uniformly across chronic pain populations, and that interpretative biases should be considered to improve healthcare communication.

Perspective

We explored how individuals with fibromyalgia (compared to other chronic pain and pain-free groups) interpret empathy-related ambiguous cues from healthcare professionals. Controlling for psychological distress, the fibromyalgia group showed a stronger negative interpretation bias than both comparison groups. Understanding these socio-cognitive patterns may help improve communication and empathy in fibromyalgia care.
移情沟通对于高质量的医疗保健是必不可少的,然而患者必须经常在医疗保健遭遇中解释微妙和模糊的人际关系线索。在这种情况下,先前的经验和认知-情感过程可能以有偏见的方式塑造解释。纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)是一种经常被污名化和“隐形”的疾病,这种偏见可能会影响患者如何感知来自医疗保健专业人员的不明确信息。虽然对疼痛相关信息的解释偏见已经被探索过,但对社会情绪信息的解释偏见还没有。本研究调查了FMS患者(n = 65)与其他慢性疼痛患者(n = 51)和无痛对照(n = 77)相比,医疗保健专业人员对模棱两可的社会情感线索的解释。参与者完成了一项新的基于场景的任务,评估对模棱两可的临床情况的积极、中性和消极解释的感知可能性。心理困扰的自我报告测量和临床共情感知也被执行。结果显示,即使在控制了抑郁、焦虑和压力之后,相对于两个对照组,FMS患者更有可能支持消极的解释,而更不可能支持积极的解释。FMS组还报告了更大的心理困扰和更低的感知同理心。此外,消极解释偏见与更大的痛苦和更低的临床共情感知相关,而积极偏见则呈现相反的模式。这些发现表明,FMS患者通过不同的认知-情感视角解读模棱两可的医疗保健沟通。这突出表明,在慢性疼痛人群中,患者与提供者之间的互动并不一致,应该考虑解释偏差,以改善医疗保健沟通。观点:我们探讨了纤维肌痛患者(与其他慢性疼痛和无痛组相比)如何解释医疗保健专业人员提供的与移情相关的模糊线索。控制心理困扰,纤维肌痛组表现出比两个对照组更强的负面解释偏见。了解这些社会认知模式可能有助于改善纤维肌痛护理中的沟通和同理心。
{"title":"How do people with fibromyalgia interpret ambiguous cues in empathy-related healthcare scenarios?","authors":"Maria Planes Alias ,&nbsp;David J Moore ,&nbsp;Nicholas Fallon ,&nbsp;Katie Herron ,&nbsp;Charlotte Krahé","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.106181","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.106181","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Empathic communication is essential for high-quality healthcare, yet patients must often interpret subtle and ambiguous interpersonal cues during healthcare encounters. In such contexts, prior experiences and cognitive-affective processes may shape interpretations in biased ways. In Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS), a frequently stigmatised and ‘invisible’ condition, such biases may influence how patients perceive unclear messages from healthcare professionals. While interpretation bias for pain-related information has been explored, bias in interpreting social-emotional information has not. This study investigated interpretations of ambiguous social-emotional cues from healthcare professionals in individuals with FMS (<em>n</em> = 65), compared with those with other chronic pain conditions (<em>n</em> = 51) and pain-free controls (<em>n</em> = 77). Participants completed a novel scenario-based task assessing the perceived likelihood of positive, neutral, and negative interpretations of ambiguous clinical situations. Validated self-report measures of psychological distress and perceived clinical empathy were also administered. Results showed that individuals with FMS were significantly more likely to endorse negative interpretations and less likely to endorse positive ones relative to both comparison groups, even after controlling for depression, anxiety, and stress. The FMS group also reported greater psychological distress and lower perceived empathy. Moreover, negative interpretation bias was associated with greater distress and lower perceived clinical empathy, while positive bias showed the opposite pattern. These findings suggest that individuals with FMS interpret ambiguous healthcare communication through a distinct cognitive-affective lens. This highlights that patient–provider interactions are not experienced uniformly across chronic pain populations, and that interpretative biases should be considered to improve healthcare communication.</div></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><div>We explored how individuals with fibromyalgia (compared to other chronic pain and pain-free groups) interpret empathy-related ambiguous cues from healthcare professionals. Controlling for psychological distress, the fibromyalgia group showed a stronger negative interpretation bias than both comparison groups. Understanding these socio-cognitive patterns may help improve communication and empathy in fibromyalgia care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 106181"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145890527","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pain and functional disability in older adults with cardiovascular disease: A cross-national comparison of India, China, and Mexico 老年心血管疾病患者的疼痛和功能障碍:印度、中国和墨西哥的跨国比较
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2025.106182
Hongtao Cheng , Huijun Wu , Lu Shao, Jie Jiang, Tingting Xie, June Zhang
Pain is highly prevalent among older adults with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and may compromise functional independence. However, the nature of this relationship in different cultural and healthcare contexts is not well understood. We examined the association between pain and functional limitations among adults aged 60 years and older with self-reported cardiovascular disease (CVD) using nationally representative data from the Longitudinal Aging Study in India (LASI, n = 11,247), the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS, n = 3733) and the Mexican Health and Aging Study (MHAS, n = 5108). Pain was assessed through self-report, and functional status was evaluated across activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), and mobility. Cross-sectional associations were estimated using multivariable logistic regression, and longitudinal analyses examined the effect of baseline pain on incident disability at 3-year follow-up in the Chinese and Mexican cohorts. Pain was reported by 43.7%, 36.2%, and 43.6% of participants in India, China, and Mexico, respectively. After adjustment for covariates, pain was significantly associated with ADL disability in all three countries (India OR=1.86, China OR=2.22, Mexico OR=2.32), with similar associations observed for IADL and mobility limitations. Strong dose–response relationships were identified between pain frequency or severity and functional limitations. Longitudinal analyses further showed that baseline pain predicted new-onset ADL and IADL disability at follow-up. These findings demonstrate that pain is consistently associated with functional decline among older adults with CVD, underscoring the importance of pain assessment and management in geriatric cardiovascular care globally.

Perspective

This study reveals consistent cross-national associations between pain and functional disability among older adults with cardiovascular disease. Pain independently predicts future functional decline, underscoring its value as a clinical marker for early intervention and as a modifiable target in integrated cardiovascular and geriatric care programs.
疼痛在患有心血管疾病(CVD)的老年人中非常普遍,并可能损害功能独立性。然而,在不同的文化和医疗背景下,这种关系的性质并没有得到很好的理解。我们使用来自印度纵向老龄化研究(LASI, n = 11,247)、中国健康与退休纵向研究(CHARLS, n = 3,733)和墨西哥健康与老龄化研究(MHAS, n = 5,108)的全国代表性数据,研究了60岁及以上自报心血管疾病(CVD)的成年人疼痛和功能限制之间的关系。通过自我报告评估疼痛,并通过日常生活活动(ADL)、日常生活工具活动(IADL)和活动能力评估功能状态。使用多变量逻辑回归估计横断面关联,并在中国和墨西哥队列中进行了3年随访,纵向分析检查了基线疼痛对事件残疾的影响。在印度、中国和墨西哥,分别有43.7%、36.2%和43.6%的参与者报告疼痛。调整协变量后,在所有三个国家(印度OR=1.86,中国OR=2.22,墨西哥OR=2.32),疼痛与ADL残疾显著相关,在IADL和活动受限方面也观察到类似的关联。疼痛频率或严重程度与功能限制之间存在强烈的剂量-反应关系。纵向分析进一步表明,基线疼痛预测了随访时新发ADL和IADL残疾。这些发现表明,疼痛一直与老年心血管疾病患者的功能下降有关,强调了全球老年心血管护理中疼痛评估和管理的重要性。观点:这项研究揭示了在患有心血管疾病的老年人中疼痛和功能障碍之间的一致的跨国关联。疼痛独立预测未来的功能衰退,强调其作为早期干预的临床标志的价值,以及作为心血管和老年综合护理计划的可修改目标。
{"title":"Pain and functional disability in older adults with cardiovascular disease: A cross-national comparison of India, China, and Mexico","authors":"Hongtao Cheng ,&nbsp;Huijun Wu ,&nbsp;Lu Shao,&nbsp;Jie Jiang,&nbsp;Tingting Xie,&nbsp;June Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.106182","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.106182","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pain is highly prevalent among older adults with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and may compromise functional independence. However, the nature of this relationship in different cultural and healthcare contexts is not well understood. We examined the association between pain and functional limitations among adults aged 60 years and older with self-reported cardiovascular disease (CVD) using nationally representative data from the Longitudinal Aging Study in India (LASI, n = 11,247), the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS, n = 3733) and the Mexican Health and Aging Study (MHAS, n = 5108). Pain was assessed through self-report, and functional status was evaluated across activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), and mobility. Cross-sectional associations were estimated using multivariable logistic regression, and longitudinal analyses examined the effect of baseline pain on incident disability at 3-year follow-up in the Chinese and Mexican cohorts. Pain was reported by 43.7%, 36.2%, and 43.6% of participants in India, China, and Mexico, respectively. After adjustment for covariates, pain was significantly associated with ADL disability in all three countries (India OR=1.86, China OR=2.22, Mexico OR=2.32), with similar associations observed for IADL and mobility limitations. Strong dose–response relationships were identified between pain frequency or severity and functional limitations. Longitudinal analyses further showed that baseline pain predicted new-onset ADL and IADL disability at follow-up. These findings demonstrate that pain is consistently associated with functional decline among older adults with CVD, underscoring the importance of pain assessment and management in geriatric cardiovascular care globally.</div></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><div>This study reveals consistent cross-national associations between pain and functional disability among older adults with cardiovascular disease. Pain independently predicts future functional decline, underscoring its value as a clinical marker for early intervention and as a modifiable target in integrated cardiovascular and geriatric care programs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 106182"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145890551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Are gray matter changes following pain reprocessing therapy associated with clinical improvement? A voxel-based morphometry mediation analysis 疼痛再加工治疗后灰质变化与临床改善相关吗?基于体素的形态测量中介分析。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105644
Carlos Murillo , Tor D. Wager , Yoni K. Ashar
Chronic back pain (CBP) has been associated with reorganization of gray matter (GM), and treatment may reverse these GM adaptations. Prior trials testing treatment effects on GM did not included a randomized control group, found no treatment vs. control differences, or did not attempt to link treatment-induced GM changes to improvements in clinical outcomes. We addressed this gap by performing a voxel-based morphometry mediation analysis testing for effects of a psychological treatment (pain reprocessing therapy, PRT, n=44) vs. two randomized control groups (treatment as usual, n=47, and open-label placebo, n=44) on GM, and testing whether treatment-specific GM changes were associated with reductions in disability (ODI) and pain intensity (BPI). Relative to both control groups, PRT increased GM in the anterior cingulate and orbitofrontal cortex. These treatment-induced GM increases, however, did not mediate PRT effects on clinical outcomes. Instead, improvements in disability and pain were associated with GM increases in the lateral prefrontal cortex and GM decreases in the thalamus and amygdala. These findings indicate that PRT vs. control increases GM in key pain-modulatory regions, and, that clinical improvement is related to different prefrontal and subcortical GM changes in regions processing nociceptive input and regulating pain. The lack of mediation may indicate either that GM changes are not a treatment mechanism, or a lack of power to detect smaller effects. Future research is needed to better understand how treatments act on neurobiology to drive clinical improvement.
慢性背痛(CBP)与灰质重组(GM)有关,治疗可能逆转这些GM适应。先前测试转基因治疗效果的试验没有纳入随机对照组,没有发现治疗组与对照组的差异,或者没有试图将治疗诱导的转基因改变与临床结果的改善联系起来。我们通过对心理治疗(疼痛再加工治疗,PRT, n=44)和两个随机对照组(常规治疗,n=47和开放标签安慰剂,n=44)对GM的影响进行基于体素的形态测量调解分析,并测试治疗特异性GM的改变是否与残疾(ODI)和疼痛强度(BPI)的减少有关,从而解决了这一差距。与对照组相比,PRT增加了前扣带皮层和眶额皮质的GM。然而,这些治疗诱导的GM增加并没有介导PRT对临床结果的影响。相反,残疾和疼痛的改善与外侧前额皮质GM的增加和丘脑和杏仁核GM的减少有关。这些研究结果表明,PRT与对照组相比增加了关键疼痛调节区域的GM,并且临床改善与处理伤害性输入和调节疼痛的区域的前额叶和皮层下GM的不同变化有关。缺乏调解可能表明转基因变化不是一种治疗机制,或者缺乏检测较小影响的能力。未来的研究需要更好地了解治疗如何作用于神经生物学以推动临床改善。
{"title":"Are gray matter changes following pain reprocessing therapy associated with clinical improvement? A voxel-based morphometry mediation analysis","authors":"Carlos Murillo ,&nbsp;Tor D. Wager ,&nbsp;Yoni K. Ashar","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105644","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105644","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Chronic back pain (CBP) has been associated with reorganization of gray matter (GM), and treatment may reverse these GM adaptations. Prior trials testing treatment effects on GM did not included a randomized control group, found no treatment vs. control differences, or did not attempt to link treatment-induced GM changes to improvements in clinical outcomes. We addressed this gap by performing a voxel-based morphometry mediation analysis testing for effects of a psychological treatment (pain reprocessing therapy, PRT, n=44) vs. two randomized control groups (treatment as usual, n=47, and open-label placebo, n=44) on GM, and testing whether treatment-specific GM changes were associated with reductions in disability (ODI) and pain intensity (BPI). Relative to both control groups, PRT increased GM in the anterior cingulate and orbitofrontal cortex. These treatment-induced GM increases, however, did not mediate PRT effects on clinical outcomes. Instead, improvements in disability and pain were associated with GM increases in the lateral prefrontal cortex and GM decreases in the thalamus and amygdala. These findings indicate that PRT vs. control increases GM in key pain-modulatory regions, and, that clinical improvement is related to different prefrontal and subcortical GM changes in regions processing nociceptive input and regulating pain. The lack of mediation may indicate either that GM changes are not a treatment mechanism, or a lack of power to detect smaller effects. Future research is needed to better understand how treatments act on neurobiology to drive clinical improvement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 105644"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145835250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Pain
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1