Pub Date : 2024-05-13DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104748
Seong-Hi Park , Eun Young Kim
Background
The Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCDQ) has been used to screen children who probably have developmental coordination disorder (DCD).
Aims
We systematically reviewed studies on the predictive validity of the DCDQ and performed a meta-analysis on its diagnostic accuracy.
Methods and procedures
Literature was searched through four electronic databases: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycArticles. A total of 27 studies was selected based on the inclusion criteria. The sensitivity and specificity of the DCDQ were assessed using summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to the DCDQ type, reference standard, and participant type.
Outcomes and results
Overall, the DCDQ has a sensitivity of 0.70 and a specificity of 0.77, showing moderate diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve, 0.80). Subgroup analysis showed that the revised version of the DCDQ had higher diagnostic accuracy than the original version. When the reference standard was the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, the sensitivity and specificity of the DCDQ were 0.87 and 0.83, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was higher in clinical samples compared to the general population.
Conclusions and implications
This study demonstrated that the DCDQ has adequate diagnostic accuracy, suggesting it can help screen children with motor skill deficits.
{"title":"Predictive validity of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire as a screening tool to identify motor skill problems: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Seong-Hi Park , Eun Young Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104748","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104748","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (<em>DCDQ</em>) has been used to screen children who probably have developmental coordination disorder (DCD).</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>We systematically reviewed studies on the predictive validity of the <em>DCDQ</em> and performed a meta-analysis on its diagnostic accuracy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and procedures</h3><p>Literature was searched through four electronic databases: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycArticles. A total of 27 studies was selected based on the inclusion criteria. The sensitivity and specificity of the <em>DCDQ</em> were assessed using summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to the <em>DCDQ</em> type, reference standard, and participant type.</p></div><div><h3>Outcomes and results</h3><p>Overall, the <em>DCDQ</em> has a sensitivity of 0.70 and a specificity of 0.77, showing moderate diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve, 0.80). Subgroup analysis showed that the revised version of the DCDQ had higher diagnostic accuracy than the original version. When the reference standard was the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, the sensitivity and specificity of the <em>DCDQ</em> were 0.87 and 0.83, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was higher in clinical samples compared to the general population.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and implications</h3><p>This study demonstrated that the <em>DCDQ</em> has adequate diagnostic accuracy, suggesting it can help screen children with motor skill deficits.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51351,"journal":{"name":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891422224000805/pdfft?md5=7cdcd099e9aa553b7911c47b55913a72&pid=1-s2.0-S0891422224000805-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140913867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-11DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104741
Tomofumi Fukuda , Masayuki Shimono , Reiko Suga , Ryota Igarashi , Kiyoshi Yoshino , Yoshihisa Fujino , Mayumi Tsuji , Kazue Ishitsuka , Masafumi Sanefuji , Shouichi Ohga , Koichi Kusuhara , on behalf of the Japan Environment and Children's Study Group
Background
The impact of parent-childbearing age on child development at 36 months of age is controversial.
Aims
We used data from a large cohort study with multiple imputation and mediation analyses of variables.
Methods and Procedures
A total of 72,606 parent–child pairs from the Japan Environment and Children's Study were included in the study. Parents' ages were categorized into five groups. We used five domains of the Japanese translation of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, Third Edition (J-ASQ-3). Scores below the cutoff value at 36 months were defined as developmental delays in each domain. We used three logistic analysis models. In Model 3, we analyzed maternal and paternal age using other variables and covariates.
Outcomes and Results
The outcome was a developmental delay in the five domains of J-ASQ-3. In Model 3, ORs for the developmental delay scores regarding parental age were significantly associated with all five domains of J-ASQ-3. The mediation analysis showed a significant mediation interaction effect for mothers but localized for fathers.
Conclusion
Advanced paternal and maternal ages were associated with developmental delay in children. Awareness of the risks of childbearing at an advanced age is crucial.
What’s the paper adds
This manuscript used data from a large cohort study with multiple imputation and mediation analyses. With these analyses, we identified the pure effect of advanced parental age on their children’s development at 36 months.
{"title":"The effect of parental age on child development at 36 months: Insights from the Japan environment and children's study","authors":"Tomofumi Fukuda , Masayuki Shimono , Reiko Suga , Ryota Igarashi , Kiyoshi Yoshino , Yoshihisa Fujino , Mayumi Tsuji , Kazue Ishitsuka , Masafumi Sanefuji , Shouichi Ohga , Koichi Kusuhara , on behalf of the Japan Environment and Children's Study Group","doi":"10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104741","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104741","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The impact of parent-childbearing age on child development at 36 months of age is controversial.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>We used data from a large cohort study with multiple imputation and mediation analyses of variables.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Procedures</h3><p>A total of 72,606 parent–child pairs from the Japan Environment and Children's Study were included in the study. Parents' ages were categorized into five groups. We used five domains of the Japanese translation of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, Third Edition (J-ASQ-3). Scores below the cutoff value at 36 months were defined as developmental delays in each domain. We used three logistic analysis models. In Model 3, we analyzed maternal and paternal age using other variables and covariates.</p></div><div><h3>Outcomes and Results</h3><p>The outcome was a developmental delay in the five domains of J-ASQ-3. In Model 3, ORs for the developmental delay scores regarding parental age were significantly associated with all five domains of J-ASQ-3. The mediation analysis showed a significant mediation interaction effect for mothers but localized for fathers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Advanced paternal and maternal ages were associated with developmental delay in children. Awareness of the risks of childbearing at an advanced age is crucial.</p></div><div><h3>What’s the paper adds</h3><p>This manuscript used data from a large cohort study with multiple imputation and mediation analyses. With these analyses, we identified the pure effect of advanced parental age on their children’s development at 36 months.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51351,"journal":{"name":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140909904","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-08DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104750
Hussain A. Almalky, Ali N. Alasmari
The employment of individuals with disabilities is significantly low. Many factors are associated with this issue; however, support and accommodations that can be provided to such individuals can improve their employment rate and outcomes. This study aimed to examine the support provided to employees with disabilities in Saudi Arabia. The descriptive approach was utilized, and a survey was used to collect the data. The sample consisted of 86 employer participants to examine the support of their employees with disabilities. Findings revealed that the support provided was high, and the participants reported that such support facilitates finding and maintaining a job. In addition, the variables were all found to have no significant differences. Providing needed and necessary support is an effective strategy that leads to competitive employment for individuals with disabilities, especially for the long term. Implications and recommendations are also discussed.
{"title":"Employers’ perceptions of supports provided to their employees with disabilities","authors":"Hussain A. Almalky, Ali N. Alasmari","doi":"10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104750","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104750","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The employment of individuals with disabilities is significantly low. Many factors are associated with this issue; however, support and accommodations that can be provided to such individuals can improve their employment rate and outcomes. This study aimed to examine the support provided to employees with disabilities in Saudi Arabia. The descriptive approach was utilized, and a survey was used to collect the data. The sample consisted of 86 employer participants to examine the support of their employees with disabilities. Findings revealed that the support provided was high, and the participants reported that such support facilitates finding and maintaining a job. In addition, the variables were all found to have no significant differences. Providing needed and necessary support is an effective strategy that leads to competitive employment for individuals with disabilities, especially for the long term. Implications and recommendations are also discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51351,"journal":{"name":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140894474","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-27DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104742
Ana Sofia Machado , Goretti Dias , Irene P. Carvalho
Background
Autistic features and sensory processing difficulties and their phenotypic co-expression with alexithymia share a transdiagnostic vulnerability. In this work, we explored whether the current concept of broad autism phenotype rather translates altered sensory processing (non-specific to autism), meaning that the characteristics of altered sensory processing should be overexpressed among individuals with heightened vulnerability to sensory processing atypicalities (parents of children with sensorial processing disorder, or SPD parents) and individuals with heightened vulnerability to autistic traits (parents of children with autism spectrum disorders, or ASD parents). In addition, the association between altered sensory processing and alexithymia was inspected.
Method
The Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile, Autism Spectrum Quotient, and Toronto Alexithymia Scale were completed by 31 parents of children with ASD, 32 parents of children with SPD, and 52 parents of typically developed (TD) children.
Results
Extreme sensory patterns were overexpressed both in parents of children with SPD and parents of children with ASD when compared to parents of TD children. In addition, extreme sensory patterns were significantly associated with alexithymia scores. Specifically, sensory avoidance, low registration, and sensory sensitivity were positively correlated with alexithymia. No significant differences were found regarding the proportion of autistic traits and alexithymia between ASD and SPD groups of parents.
Conclusions
These results challenge the specificity of broad autism phenotype and suggest a neurodevelopmental atypicity with roots in altered sensory and emotional processing.
背景自闭症特征和感觉处理障碍及其与孤独症的表型共同表现具有跨诊断的脆弱性。在这项研究中,我们探讨了目前广义自闭症表型的概念是否是指感官加工改变(非自闭症特异性),即感官加工改变的特征应在感官加工不典型性易感性增高的个体(感官加工障碍儿童的父母,或 SPD 父母)和自闭症特征易感性增高的个体(自闭症谱系障碍儿童的父母,或 ASD 父母)中过度表达。方法31名自闭症谱系障碍儿童的家长、32名感觉处理障碍儿童的家长和52名典型发育(TD)儿童的家长填写了青少年/成人感觉档案、自闭症谱系商数和多伦多自闭症量表。结果与典型发育(TD)儿童的家长相比,感觉处理障碍儿童的家长和自闭症谱系障碍儿童的家长都过度表现出极端感觉模式。此外,极端感觉模式与情感障碍得分有显著关联。具体来说,感官回避、低登记和感官敏感与情感障碍呈正相关。这些结果对广义自闭症表型的特异性提出了质疑,并表明自闭症是一种神经发育异常,其根源在于感官和情绪处理的改变。
{"title":"Disentangling the relationship between sensory processing, alexithymia and broad autism spectrum: A study in parents’ of children with autism spectrum disorders and sensory processing disorders","authors":"Ana Sofia Machado , Goretti Dias , Irene P. Carvalho","doi":"10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104742","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104742","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Autistic features and sensory processing difficulties and their phenotypic co-expression with alexithymia share a transdiagnostic vulnerability. In this work, we explored whether the current concept of broad autism phenotype rather translates altered sensory processing (non-specific to autism), meaning that the characteristics of altered sensory processing should be overexpressed among individuals with heightened vulnerability to sensory processing atypicalities (parents of children with sensorial processing disorder, or SPD parents) and individuals with heightened vulnerability to autistic traits (parents of children with autism spectrum disorders, or ASD parents). In addition, the association between altered sensory processing and alexithymia was inspected.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile, Autism Spectrum Quotient, and Toronto Alexithymia Scale were completed by 31 parents of children with ASD, 32 parents of children with SPD, and 52 parents of typically developed (TD) children.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Extreme sensory patterns were overexpressed both in parents of children with SPD and parents of children with ASD when compared to parents of TD children. In addition, extreme sensory patterns were significantly associated with alexithymia scores. Specifically, sensory avoidance, low registration, and sensory sensitivity were positively correlated with alexithymia. No significant differences were found regarding the proportion of autistic traits and alexithymia between ASD and SPD groups of parents.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These results challenge the specificity of broad autism phenotype and suggest a neurodevelopmental atypicity with roots in altered sensory and emotional processing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51351,"journal":{"name":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089142222400074X/pdfft?md5=0f22eb6d8a53377e9696e6f552636da8&pid=1-s2.0-S089142222400074X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140807198","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-27DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104747
Eva Aguilar-Mediavilla, Victor A. Sanchez-Azanza, Mario Valera-Pozo, Inmaculada Sureda-García, Daniel Adrover-Roig
Background
Children with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) and Reading Difficulties (RD) can show more peer relation problems depending on the informant.
Aims
(1) To explore bullying victims' categorization, evaluated by self- and peer-reports, in children with DLD and RD; and (2) to assess agreement rates between informants.
Method and procedures
Victimization was assessed using a self-report (EBIP-Q) and a peer-report sociogram (CESC) in a sample of 83 participants (9–12 years; 10.5 ± 1.1 years), comprising of DLD (n = 19), RD (n = 32), and Control (n = 32) groups.
Outcomes and Results
We found a higher frequency of the rejected sociometric profile in the DLD and RD groups, a higher peer-reported victimization in the DLD group, and more severe self-reported victimization in the DLD and RD groups. Odds of being classified as victimized were higher for self-report except in the DLD group. Informants’ agreement was high using the most restrictive EBIP-Q criterion (7 points) for both the Control and the RD groups, being non-significant for the DLD group regardless of the criteria used.
Conclusions and Implications
We found a higher victimization risk in children with language difficulties, although self-assessment seems to under-detect children with DLD according to the agreement rates, pointing out the need to combine assessments and informants.
What does this paper add?
Several studies have shown that children with DLD or RD obtain higher scores of victimization and score lower on several scales of social skills with continuous data. Although continuous analyses are usual in research, professional decisions are usually based on cut-off criteria more than how high or low a score is in contrast to another group. This is one of the first works that analyses victimization following the cut-off criteria of self and peer assessments that professionals used in the school settings in children with DLD and RD. Our results will raise awareness among school professionals based on the evidence about the high risk of victimization, especially in children with DLD, and the implications of selecting between several measures of victimization, in this group of children. We think that our results would help to better detect and prevent bullying in schools for children with DLD.
{"title":"The informant matters: Differences in bullying victim categorization rates assessed with self- and peer-reports in children with developmental language disorder and reading difficulties","authors":"Eva Aguilar-Mediavilla, Victor A. Sanchez-Azanza, Mario Valera-Pozo, Inmaculada Sureda-García, Daniel Adrover-Roig","doi":"10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104747","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104747","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Children with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) and Reading Difficulties (RD) can show more peer relation problems depending on the informant.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>(1) To explore bullying victims' categorization, evaluated by self- and peer-reports, in children with DLD and RD; and (2) to assess agreement rates between informants.</p></div><div><h3>Method and procedures</h3><p>Victimization was assessed using a self-report (EBIP-Q) and a peer-report sociogram (CESC) in a sample of 83 participants (9–12 years; 10.5 ± 1.1 years), comprising of DLD (<em>n</em> = 19), RD (<em>n</em> = 32), and Control (<em>n</em> = 32) groups.</p></div><div><h3>Outcomes and Results</h3><p>We found a higher frequency of the rejected sociometric profile in the DLD and RD groups, a higher peer-reported victimization in the DLD group, and more severe self-reported victimization in the DLD and RD groups. Odds of being classified as victimized were higher for self-report except in the DLD group. Informants’ agreement was high using the most restrictive EBIP-Q criterion (7 points) for both the Control and the RD groups, being non-significant for the DLD group regardless of the criteria used.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><p>We found a higher victimization risk in children with language difficulties, although self-assessment seems to under-detect children with DLD according to the agreement rates, pointing out the need to combine assessments and informants.</p></div><div><h3>What does this paper add?</h3><p>Several studies have shown that children with DLD or RD obtain higher scores of victimization and score lower on several scales of social skills with continuous data. Although continuous analyses are usual in research, professional decisions are usually based on cut-off criteria more than how high or low a score is in contrast to another group. This is one of the first works that analyses victimization following the cut-off criteria of self and peer assessments that professionals used in the school settings in children with DLD and RD. Our results will raise awareness among school professionals based on the evidence about the high risk of victimization, especially in children with DLD, and the implications of selecting between several measures of victimization, in this group of children. We think that our results would help to better detect and prevent bullying in schools for children with DLD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51351,"journal":{"name":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891422224000799/pdfft?md5=6428c9205e742c8439b572fe51adb013&pid=1-s2.0-S0891422224000799-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140649570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-27DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104746
Kinga Pozniak , Gillian King , Elizabeth Marie Chambers , Sarah Wellman-Earl , Olaf Kraus de Camargo , Rachel Teplicky , Peter Rosenbaum
Background
When healthcare providers (HCPs) become patients, the experience affects their sense of identity, the care they receive, and their clinical practice. In child health, considerably less is known about the experiences of HCP-parents who access the pediatric healthcare system with their own children with disabilities and/or chronic medical conditions.
Aims
This study aimed to examine the experiences of HCPs who have children with disabilities to identify their experiences with healthcare delivery.
Methods and procedures
A qualitative descriptive study was conducted with HCP-parents, using focus groups and open-ended interviews. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Results
For HCP-parents, the experience of having a child with a disability affects how they see themselves, their patients, service organizations, and the healthcare system in general. Having medical knowledge and access to networks brings both benefits and unique challenges. HCP-parents also have unique needs that are not currently being addressed. The lived experiences of HCP-parents can contribute to improving patient care. However, the value of this lived experience is unrecognized and underutilized.
Conclusions
The lived experiences of HCP-parents can contribute important insights regarding service delivery, and in particular regarding the application of Family-Centered Service.
{"title":"Family-centered service through the eyes of insiders: Healthcare providers who are parents speak about receiving and providing healthcare in child health","authors":"Kinga Pozniak , Gillian King , Elizabeth Marie Chambers , Sarah Wellman-Earl , Olaf Kraus de Camargo , Rachel Teplicky , Peter Rosenbaum","doi":"10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104746","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104746","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>When healthcare providers (HCPs) become patients, the experience affects their sense of identity, the care they receive, and their clinical practice. In child health, considerably less is known about the experiences of HCP-parents who access the pediatric healthcare system with their own children with disabilities and/or chronic medical conditions.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>This study aimed to examine the experiences of HCPs who have children with disabilities to identify their experiences with healthcare delivery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and procedures</h3><p>A qualitative descriptive study was conducted with HCP-parents, using focus groups and open-ended interviews. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For HCP-parents, the experience of having a child with a disability affects how they see themselves, their patients, service organizations, and the healthcare system in general. Having medical knowledge and access to networks brings both benefits and unique challenges. HCP-parents also have unique needs that are not currently being addressed. The lived experiences of HCP-parents can contribute to improving patient care. However, the value of this lived experience is unrecognized and underutilized.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The lived experiences of HCP-parents can contribute important insights regarding service delivery, and in particular regarding the application of Family-Centered Service.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51351,"journal":{"name":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891422224000787/pdfft?md5=f5e4d33cf224397e1e84f26de457789c&pid=1-s2.0-S0891422224000787-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140807199","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-26DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104743
Abdullah Madhesh
Inclusive education focuses on implementing education for individuals who do not follow typical learning trajectory and require special educational needs (SEN). Educational systems in many countries around the world, including Saudi Arabia, tend to implement and practise inclusive education in order to fulfill relevant international conventions and achieve educational standards of acceptable quality in educating children and young people with medical and neurodevelopmental conditions. This study seeks to reveal some of the factors that may help to overcome the obstacles faced in the implementation of inclusive education from the point of view of academics of special education in Saudi universities. To achieve this goal, the study used semi-structured interviews as its primary tool for data collection. Sixteen male and female faculty members specialized in special education in several Saudi public universities were interviewed. The data were analysed thematically. Two master themes were derived from the thematic analyses, 1) theoretical factors and 2) applied factors. Both master themes had several sub-themes. A number of factors were identified as helping to implement inclusive education thereby changing the behaviours and attitudes towards including students with disabilities Saudi context. It is suggested here that similar factors might exist in other countries in Middle East and beyond.
{"title":"Examining contributing factors for the implementation of inclusion students with disabilities from the perspective of university academics in Saudi Arabia","authors":"Abdullah Madhesh","doi":"10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104743","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104743","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Inclusive education focuses on implementing education for individuals who do not follow typical learning trajectory and require special educational needs (SEN). Educational systems in many countries around the world, including Saudi Arabia, tend to implement and practise inclusive education in order to fulfill relevant international conventions and achieve educational standards of acceptable quality in educating children and young people with medical and neurodevelopmental conditions. This study seeks to reveal some of the factors that may help to overcome the obstacles faced in the implementation of inclusive education from the point of view of academics of special education in Saudi universities. To achieve this goal, the study used semi-structured interviews as its primary tool for data collection. Sixteen male and female faculty members specialized in special education in several Saudi public universities were interviewed. The data were analysed thematically. Two master themes were derived from the thematic analyses, 1) theoretical factors and 2) applied factors. Both master themes had several sub-themes. A number of factors were identified as helping to implement inclusive education thereby changing the behaviours and attitudes towards including students with disabilities Saudi context. It is suggested here that similar factors might exist in other countries in Middle East and beyond.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51351,"journal":{"name":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140647793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Developmental dyscalculia (DD) is a specific learning disability which prevents children from acquiring adequate numerical and arithmetical competences. We investigated whether difficulties in children with DD spread beyond the numerical domain and impact also their ability to perceive time. A group of 37 children/adolescent with and without DD were tested with an auditory categorization task measuring time perception thresholds in the sub-second (0.25–1 s) and supra-second (0.75–3 s) ranges. Results showed that auditory time perception was strongly impaired in children with DD at both time scales. The impairment remained even when age, non-verbal reasoning, and gender were regressed out. Overall, our results show that the difficulties of DD can affect magnitudes other than numerical and contribute to the increasing evidence that frames dyscalculia as a disorder affecting multiple neurocognitive and perceptual systems.
{"title":"Auditory time perception impairment in children with developmental dyscalculia","authors":"Elisa Castaldi , Francesca Tinelli , Gasperini Filippo , Mariaelisa Bartoli , Giovanni Anobile","doi":"10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104733","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104733","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Developmental dyscalculia (DD) is a specific learning disability which prevents children from acquiring adequate numerical and arithmetical competences. We investigated whether difficulties in children with DD spread beyond the numerical domain and impact also their ability to perceive time. A group of 37 children/adolescent with and without DD were tested with an auditory categorization task measuring time perception thresholds in the sub-second (0.25–1 s) and supra-second (0.75–3 s) ranges. Results showed that auditory time perception was strongly impaired in children with DD at both time scales. The impairment remained even when age, non-verbal reasoning, and gender were regressed out. Overall, our results show that the difficulties of DD can affect magnitudes other than numerical and contribute to the increasing evidence that frames dyscalculia as a disorder affecting multiple neurocognitive and perceptual systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51351,"journal":{"name":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891422224000659/pdfft?md5=40c8c3d3a9824c61419a424cccaabbed&pid=1-s2.0-S0891422224000659-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140646483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-24DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104732
Mehdi Abid , Ousama Ben-Salha , Karim Gasmi , Nasareldeen Hamed Ahmed Alnor
There is a growing debate among scholars regarding the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on the employment opportunities and professional development of people with disability. Although there has been an increasing body of empirical research on the topic, it has generally yielded conflicting findings. This study contributes to the ongoing debate by examining the linear and nonlinear effects of AI on the unemployment of people with disability in 40 countries between 2007 and 2021. Using the system Generalized Methods of Moments and panel smooth transition regression, the main conclusions are as follows. First, AI reduces the unemployment of people with disability in the full sample. Second, upon disaggregating the sample based on income level (high income/non-high income) and gender (men/women), the linear model only detects an inverse correlation between AI and unemployment among people with disability in high-income countries and among men, whereas it does not influence unemployment in non-high-income countries and women. Third, the panel smooth transition regression model suggests that the effects of AI on the unemployment of people with disability and among women are only observed once artificial intelligence interest search exceeds a specific threshold level. The effects of AI in non-high-income economies and among women are not significant in the lower regime, which confirms the nonlinear association between AI and the unemployment rate of people with disability. These findings have important policy implications for facilitating the integration of people with disability into the labor market.
{"title":"Modelling for disability: How does artificial intelligence affect unemployment among people with disability? An empirical analysis of linear and nonlinear effects","authors":"Mehdi Abid , Ousama Ben-Salha , Karim Gasmi , Nasareldeen Hamed Ahmed Alnor","doi":"10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104732","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104732","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is a growing debate among scholars regarding the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on the employment opportunities and professional development of people with disability. Although there has been an increasing body of empirical research on the topic, it has generally yielded conflicting findings. This study contributes to the ongoing debate by examining the linear and nonlinear effects of AI on the unemployment of people with disability in 40 countries between 2007 and 2021. Using the system Generalized Methods of Moments and panel smooth transition regression, the main conclusions are as follows. First, AI reduces the unemployment of people with disability in the full sample. Second, upon disaggregating the sample based on income level (high income/non-high income) and gender (men/women), the linear model only detects an inverse correlation between AI and unemployment among people with disability in high-income countries and among men, whereas it does not influence unemployment in non-high-income countries and women. Third, the panel smooth transition regression model suggests that the effects of AI on the unemployment of people with disability and among women are only observed once artificial intelligence interest search exceeds a specific threshold level. The effects of AI in non-high-income economies and among women are not significant in the lower regime, which confirms the nonlinear association between AI and the unemployment rate of people with disability. These findings have important policy implications for facilitating the integration of people with disability into the labor market.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51351,"journal":{"name":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140646482","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-24DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104731
Joseph Hin Yan Lam , Molly A. Leachman , Amy S. Pratt
Children with developmental language disorder (DLD) have a high rate of co-occurring reading difficulties. The current study aims to (i) examine which factors within the Active View of Reading (AVR; Duke & Cartwright, 2021) apply to individuals with DLD and (ii) investigate other possible factors that relate to reading comprehension ability in individuals with DLD, outside the components in the AVR. Electronic database search and journal hand-search yielded 5058 studies published before March 2022 related to reading comprehension in children with DLD. 4802 articles were excluded during abstract screening, yielding 256 studies eligible for full-text review. Following full-text review, 44 studies were included and further coded for demographics, language of assessment, description of reported disabilities, behavioral assessment, and reading comprehension assessment. While the results aligned with the AVR model, three additional factors were identified as significantly relating to reading comprehension abilities in children with DLD: expressive language (oral and written), question types of reading assessment, and language disorder history. Specifically, expressive language was positively associated with reading comprehension ability, while resolved DLD showed higher reading comprehension abilities than persistent DLD. Furthermore, children with DLD may face additional difficulties in comprehending inference-based questions. This study provides factors for researchers, educators, and clinical professionals to consider when evaluating the reading comprehension of individuals with DLD. Future research should further explore the relative importance of factors of the AVR to reading comprehension outcomes throughout development.
{"title":"A systematic review of factors that impact reading comprehension in children with developmental language disorders","authors":"Joseph Hin Yan Lam , Molly A. Leachman , Amy S. Pratt","doi":"10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104731","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104731","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Children with developmental language disorder (DLD) have a high rate of co-occurring reading difficulties. The current study aims to (i) examine which factors within the Active View of Reading (AVR; Duke & Cartwright, 2021) apply to individuals with DLD and (ii) investigate other possible factors that relate to reading comprehension ability in individuals with DLD, outside the components in the AVR. Electronic database search and journal hand-search yielded 5058 studies published before March 2022 related to reading comprehension in children with DLD. 4802 articles were excluded during abstract screening, yielding 256 studies eligible for full-text review. Following full-text review, 44 studies were included and further coded for demographics, language of assessment, description of reported disabilities, behavioral assessment, and reading comprehension assessment. While the results aligned with the AVR model, three additional factors were identified as significantly relating to reading comprehension abilities in children with DLD: expressive language (oral and written), question types of reading assessment, and language disorder history. Specifically, expressive language was positively associated with reading comprehension ability, while resolved DLD showed higher reading comprehension abilities than persistent DLD. Furthermore, children with DLD may face additional difficulties in comprehending inference-based questions. This study provides factors for researchers, educators, and clinical professionals to consider when evaluating the reading comprehension of individuals with DLD. Future research should further explore the relative importance of factors of the AVR to reading comprehension outcomes throughout development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51351,"journal":{"name":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891422224000635/pdfft?md5=46b94d94ee5edf45cb25f3ecc726dca2&pid=1-s2.0-S0891422224000635-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140646484","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}