首页 > 最新文献

Consciousness and Cognition最新文献

英文 中文
Am I in control? The dynamics of sensory information, performance feedback, and personality in shaping the sense of control 我能控制一切吗?感官信息的动态,表现反馈,和个性在塑造控制感。
IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2025.103938
Maren Giersiepen , Nils Wendel Heinrich , Annika Österdiekhoff , Stefan Kopp , Nele Russwinkel , Simone Schütz-Bosbach , Jakob Kaiser
Sense of control (SoC) over our actions is crucial for regulating our behavior. SoC arises from low-level processes, such as immediate sensory feedback, and high-level processes, such as performance evaluation. Studies using simple action-effect tasks suggest that people rely more on low-level sensory than on high-level cues of control. Yet, it remains unclear how these cues interact to shape the SoC in complex, goal-directed environments that require continuous behavioral adaptation. To investigate this, 50 participants performed a challenging motor control task akin to a video game, steering a spaceship along a continuously changing path. Sensorimotor control was manipulated by varying task difficulty via input noise across experimental blocks. After each trial, participants received negative, neutral, or positive feedback, followed by rating of their SoC. Linear mixed model analyses revealed that both sensory and evaluative feedback influenced the SoC. SoC decreased with increasing task difficulty. Furthermore, independent of difficulty, negative feedback reduced the SoC whereas positive feedback enhanced it, with a stronger effect for negative feedback. Notably, the effects of task difficulty and negative feedback were influenced by participants’ depressive symptoms and their external locus of control, suggesting that generalized control beliefs modulate task-specific control experience. These findings indicate that SoC is informed by both low-level sensorimotor cues and high-level affective feedback, suggesting an integration of multiple types of information to assess control in dynamic task contexts where action-effect contingencies are extended over time. Crucially, these effects depend on trait-like control beliefs, highlighting the need to account for individual differences when investigating situated control experience.
对我们行为的控制感(SoC)对于调节我们的行为至关重要。SoC产生于低级的过程,如即时的感官反馈,以及高级的过程,如性能评估。使用简单动作效果任务的研究表明,人们更多地依赖于低水平的感官信号,而不是高水平的控制信号。然而,这些线索是如何在复杂的、目标导向的、需要持续行为适应的环境中相互作用来塑造SoC的,目前还不清楚。为了调查这一点,50名参与者执行了一项类似于电子游戏的具有挑战性的运动控制任务,即沿着不断变化的路径驾驶宇宙飞船。感觉运动控制通过不同的任务难度通过输入噪声在实验块。每次试验结束后,参与者分别收到消极、中性或积极的反馈,然后对他们的社会反应能力进行评分。线性混合模型分析表明,感官反馈和评价反馈对SoC都有影响。SoC随任务难度的增加而降低。此外,与难度无关,负反馈降低了SoC,而正反馈增强了SoC,且负反馈的效果更强。任务难度和负反馈的效应受到被试抑郁症状和外部控制点的影响,说明广义控制信念调节任务特异性控制体验。这些研究结果表明,SoC既受低水平感觉运动线索的影响,也受高水平情感反馈的影响,这表明在行动效应随时间延长的动态任务情境中,多种类型的信息被整合来评估控制。至关重要的是,这些影响依赖于类似特征的控制信念,强调了在调查情境控制经验时考虑个体差异的必要性。
{"title":"Am I in control? The dynamics of sensory information, performance feedback, and personality in shaping the sense of control","authors":"Maren Giersiepen ,&nbsp;Nils Wendel Heinrich ,&nbsp;Annika Österdiekhoff ,&nbsp;Stefan Kopp ,&nbsp;Nele Russwinkel ,&nbsp;Simone Schütz-Bosbach ,&nbsp;Jakob Kaiser","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2025.103938","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.concog.2025.103938","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sense of control (SoC) over our actions is crucial for regulating our behavior. SoC arises from low-level processes, such as immediate sensory feedback, and high-level processes, such as performance evaluation. Studies using simple action-effect tasks suggest that people rely more on low-level sensory than on high-level cues of control. Yet, it remains unclear how these cues interact to shape the SoC in complex, goal-directed environments that require continuous behavioral adaptation. To investigate this, 50 participants performed a challenging motor control task akin to a video game, steering a spaceship along a continuously changing path. Sensorimotor control was manipulated by varying task difficulty via input noise across experimental blocks. After each trial, participants received negative, neutral, or positive feedback, followed by rating of their SoC. Linear mixed model analyses revealed that both sensory and evaluative feedback influenced the SoC. SoC decreased with increasing task difficulty. Furthermore, independent of difficulty, negative feedback reduced the SoC whereas positive feedback enhanced it, with a stronger effect for negative feedback. Notably, the effects of task difficulty and negative feedback were influenced by participants’ depressive symptoms and their external locus of control, suggesting that generalized control beliefs modulate task-specific control experience. These findings indicate that SoC is informed by both low-level sensorimotor cues and high-level affective feedback, suggesting an integration of multiple types of information to assess control in dynamic task contexts where action-effect contingencies are extended over time. Crucially, these effects depend on trait-like control beliefs, highlighting the need to account for individual differences when investigating situated control experience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 103938"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145253680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ERP responses reveal different neural mechanisms for perception of electrical and tactile stimuli ERP反应揭示了电刺激和触觉刺激感知的不同神经机制。
IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2025.103935
Jona Förster , Giovanni Vardiero , Till Nierhaus , Felix Blankenburg
EEG studies have identified ERP components at various latencies as predictors of conscious somatosensory perception, but it remains largely unclear which factors are responsible for this variation. Here, for the first time we directly compare the event-related potential correlates of stimulus detection under tactile versus electrical peri-threshold stimulation using single-trial modelling and Bayesian model selection within and between groups, while controlling for task-relevance and post-perceptual processes with a visual-somatosensory matching task. We find evidence that the P50 component predicts conscious perception under tactile, but not electrical stimulation: while electrical stimulation evokes a P50 already for subliminal stimuli and activity in this time window is best explained by stimulus intensity, there is almost no subliminal P50 for tactile stimulation, and detection best explains the data. In contrast, the N80 and N140 components correlate with detection and detection probability in both stimulation groups. The P100 and the P300 were modulated by detection in the tactile group, and by detection probability in the electrical group. Our results indicate that cortical processing in somatosensory target detection partly depends on the type of stimulation used. We propose that electrical stimulation of afferent nerve fibers that do not give rise to conscious perception may mask the P50 modulation associated with conscious somatosensory detection, and might contribute to subliminal evoked cortical responses.
脑电图研究已经确定了不同潜伏期的ERP成分作为有意识体感知觉的预测因子,但仍不清楚哪些因素导致了这种变化。在此,我们首次使用单次试验模型和贝叶斯模型选择在组内和组间直接比较触觉和电阈附近刺激下刺激检测的事件相关电位相关性,同时通过视觉-体感匹配任务控制任务相关性和后知觉过程。我们发现有证据表明,P50成分预测了触觉下的意识知觉,而不是电刺激下的意识知觉:虽然电刺激唤起了阈下刺激的P50,并且在这个时间窗口内的活动最好用刺激强度来解释,但触觉刺激几乎没有阈下P50,检测最好地解释了这些数据。相比之下,在两个刺激组中,N80和N140成分与检测和检测概率相关。P100和P300在触觉组通过检测调制,在电组通过检测概率调制。我们的研究结果表明,体感目标检测中的皮质处理部分取决于所使用的刺激类型。我们提出,对传入神经纤维的电刺激不会产生有意识的知觉,可能会掩盖与有意识体感检测相关的P50调节,并可能有助于阈下诱发的皮层反应。
{"title":"ERP responses reveal different neural mechanisms for perception of electrical and tactile stimuli","authors":"Jona Förster ,&nbsp;Giovanni Vardiero ,&nbsp;Till Nierhaus ,&nbsp;Felix Blankenburg","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2025.103935","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.concog.2025.103935","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>EEG studies have identified ERP components at various latencies as predictors of conscious somatosensory perception, but it remains largely unclear which factors are responsible for this variation. Here, for the first time we directly compare the event-related potential correlates of stimulus detection under tactile versus electrical <em>peri</em>-threshold stimulation using single-trial modelling and Bayesian model selection within and between groups, while controlling for task-relevance and post-perceptual processes with a visual-somatosensory matching task. We find evidence that the P50 component predicts conscious perception under tactile, but not electrical stimulation: while electrical stimulation evokes a P50 already for subliminal stimuli and activity in this time window is best explained by stimulus intensity, there is almost no subliminal P50 for tactile stimulation, and detection best explains the data. In contrast, the N80 and N140 components correlate with detection and detection probability in both stimulation groups. The P100 and the P300 were modulated by detection in the tactile group, and by detection probability in the electrical group. Our results indicate that cortical processing in somatosensory target detection partly depends on the type of stimulation used. We propose that electrical stimulation of afferent nerve fibers that do not give rise to conscious perception may mask the P50 modulation associated with conscious somatosensory detection, and might contribute to subliminal evoked cortical responses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 103935"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145187321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Habitual control of instrumental behaviour requires conscious stimulus perception 工具行为的习惯性控制需要有意识的刺激知觉。
IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2025.103937
Jan-Daniel Höhmann , Gerhard Jocham , Lina I. Skora
Habitual behaviour is commonly assumed to operate outside of conscious control, deliberation, or awareness, driven by stimulus–response (S-R) associations rather than goal-directed evaluation. Here, we investigate whether habitual instrumental behaviours can be triggered by stimuli that are prevented from entering subjective awareness with subliminal presentation. In a preregistered within-subjects study (N after exclusions = 75), we examined this question by employing a symmetrical outcome revaluation task. Participants underwent extensive instrumental training, forming strong S-R associations, before completing two testing stages: a conscious stage with fully visible stimuli, and an unconscious stage where stimuli were rendered subliminal via visual masking. In the conscious condition, participants exhibited habitual control, responding more accurately to habit-congruent (still-valuable, still-non-valuable) stimuli than to habit-incongruent (upvalued, devalued) stimuli, replicating prior findings. However, in the unconscious condition participants did not exhibit above-chance accuracy, and responses were not biased toward habitual actions, suggesting that subliminal stimuli were unable to elicit either habitual or goal-directed responses. These findings challenge the notion that habitual control of instrumental behaviour can function independently of stimulus awareness and suggest that conscious access to action-relevant cues may be necessary even for well-established S-R associations to guide behaviour.
习惯行为通常被认为是在意识控制、考虑或意识之外运作的,由刺激-反应(S-R)关联驱动,而不是目标导向的评估。在这里,我们研究是否习惯性的工具行为可以被阻止进入主观意识的潜意识呈现刺激触发。在一项预登记的受试者内研究(排除后N = 75)中,我们通过采用对称结果重估任务来检验这个问题。在完成两个测试阶段之前,参与者接受了广泛的工具训练,形成了强烈的S-R关联:一个有意识阶段,有完全可见的刺激,以及一个无意识阶段,刺激通过视觉掩蔽呈现在潜意识中。在有意识的条件下,参与者表现出习惯控制,对习惯一致(仍然有价值,仍然没有价值)的刺激比对习惯不一致(价值提高,贬值)的刺激反应更准确,重复了先前的发现。然而,在无意识条件下,参与者并没有表现出高于机会的准确性,反应也没有偏向于习惯性行为,这表明潜意识刺激既不能引起习惯性反应,也不能引起目标导向的反应。这些发现挑战了工具行为的习惯控制可以独立于刺激意识而起作用的观念,并表明有意识地获取与行动相关的线索可能是必要的,甚至对于建立良好的S-R关联来指导行为也是必要的。
{"title":"Habitual control of instrumental behaviour requires conscious stimulus perception","authors":"Jan-Daniel Höhmann ,&nbsp;Gerhard Jocham ,&nbsp;Lina I. Skora","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2025.103937","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.concog.2025.103937","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Habitual behaviour is commonly assumed to operate outside of conscious control, deliberation, or awareness, driven by stimulus–response (S-R) associations rather than goal-directed evaluation. Here, we investigate whether habitual instrumental behaviours can be triggered by stimuli that are prevented from entering subjective awareness with subliminal presentation. In a preregistered within-subjects study (N after exclusions = 75), we examined this question by employing a symmetrical outcome revaluation task. Participants underwent extensive instrumental training, forming strong S-R associations, before completing two testing stages: a conscious stage with fully visible stimuli, and an unconscious stage where stimuli were rendered subliminal via visual masking. In the conscious condition, participants exhibited habitual control, responding more accurately to habit-congruent (still-valuable, still-non-valuable) stimuli than to habit-incongruent (upvalued, devalued) stimuli, replicating prior findings. However, in the unconscious condition participants did not exhibit above-chance accuracy, and responses were not biased toward habitual actions, suggesting that subliminal stimuli were unable to elicit either habitual or goal-directed responses. These findings challenge the notion that habitual control of instrumental behaviour can function independently of stimulus awareness and suggest that conscious access to action-relevant cues may be necessary even for well-established S-R associations to guide behaviour.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 103937"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145245708","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Stimulus-response binding and retrieval operates independently of contingency awareness: A mega-analysis 刺激-反应结合和检索独立于偶然性意识运作:大型分析
IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-09-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2025.103936
Matthäus Rudolph , Carina G. Giesen , Klaus Rothermund
There is an ongoing debate about the role of top-down influences on episodic binding and retrieval processes. The Binding and Retrieval in Action Control (BRAC) framework postulates that both, binding and retrieval, are modulated by top-down processes, such as awareness and instructions (Frings et al., 2020). To test this assumption, we conducted a mega-analysis in which we reanalyzed data from four contingency learning experiments (total N = 859). Contingency awareness was assessed in all experiments. Furthermore, in two experiments, contingency awareness was experimentally manipulated by instructing participants about the existing contingencies. Results show that both binding and retrieval neither depend on nor are modulated by higher-order processes such as contingency knowledge or awareness of stimulus–response contingencies (measured and manipulated). In sum, our findings suggest that stimulus–response binding and retrieval is an automatic cognitive process that operates unconsciously and independently of top-down influences such as contingency knowledge and awareness.
关于自上而下的影响在情景结合和检索过程中的作用一直存在争论。动作控制中的绑定和检索(BRAC)框架假设,绑定和检索都是由自上而下的过程(如意识和指令)调节的(Frings等,2020)。为了验证这一假设,我们进行了一项大型分析,重新分析了四个偶然性学习实验(总N = 859)的数据。所有实验均评估应急意识。此外,在两个实验中,通过向被试告知已存在的偶然性来操纵偶然性意识。结果表明,结合和检索既不依赖于也不受高阶过程的调节,如偶然性知识或刺激-反应偶然性意识(测量和操纵)。总之,我们的研究结果表明,刺激-反应结合和检索是一个无意识的自动认知过程,独立于自上而下的影响,如偶然性知识和意识。
{"title":"Stimulus-response binding and retrieval operates independently of contingency awareness: A mega-analysis","authors":"Matthäus Rudolph ,&nbsp;Carina G. Giesen ,&nbsp;Klaus Rothermund","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2025.103936","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.concog.2025.103936","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is an ongoing debate about the role of top-down influences on episodic binding and retrieval processes. The Binding and Retrieval in Action Control (BRAC) framework postulates that both, binding and retrieval, are modulated by top-down processes, such as awareness and instructions (<span><span>Frings et al., 2020</span></span>). To test this assumption, we conducted a mega-analysis in which we reanalyzed data from four contingency learning experiments (total <em>N</em> = 859). Contingency awareness was assessed in all experiments. Furthermore, in two experiments, contingency awareness was experimentally manipulated by instructing participants about the existing contingencies. Results show that both binding and retrieval neither depend on nor are modulated by higher-order processes such as contingency knowledge or awareness of stimulus–response contingencies (measured and manipulated). In sum, our findings suggest that stimulus–response binding and retrieval is an automatic cognitive process that operates unconsciously and independently of top-down influences such as contingency knowledge and awareness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 103936"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145118583","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Individual differences in false memories in the Deese–Roediger–McDermott Paradigm: An attention control account Deese-Roediger-McDermott范式中错误记忆的个体差异:一个注意控制的解释。
IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-09-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2025.103922
Daniel Byrnes, Christopher A. Was
This study examined the underlying mechanisms of false memories observed in the Deese–Roediger–McDermott (DRM) paradigm. Previous work indicates that greater working memory capacity (WMC) and inhibition are associated with lower susceptibility to such false memories. We hypothesized that this may be, due to the closely related construct of attention control. We examined if individual differences in attention control accounted for variance in susceptibility to false memories, above and beyond inhibition and WMC alone. Using a standard DRM procedure in an individual differences approach to examine how WMC, inhibition, and attention control contribute to false word recognition on the DRM task. Our results indicate that attention control accounts for unique variance in susceptibility to the false memories above and beyond that of WMC and inhibition, suggesting that attention control may be more directly related to the true underlying mechanisms behind false memories.
本研究考察了在Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM)范式中观察到的错误记忆的潜在机制。先前的研究表明,更大的工作记忆容量(WMC)和抑制与更低的错误记忆易感性相关。我们假设这可能是由于与注意力控制密切相关的结构。我们研究了注意力控制的个体差异是否能解释对错误记忆的易感性的差异,而不仅仅是抑制和WMC。在个体差异方法中使用标准DRM程序来研究WMC、抑制和注意控制如何促进DRM任务中的假词识别。我们的研究结果表明,除了WMC和抑制之外,注意控制对错误记忆的易感性具有独特的差异,这表明注意控制可能与错误记忆背后的真正潜在机制更直接相关。
{"title":"Individual differences in false memories in the Deese–Roediger–McDermott Paradigm: An attention control account","authors":"Daniel Byrnes,&nbsp;Christopher A. Was","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2025.103922","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.concog.2025.103922","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examined the underlying mechanisms of false memories observed in the Deese–Roediger–McDermott (DRM) paradigm. Previous work indicates that greater working memory capacity (WMC) and inhibition are associated with lower susceptibility to such false memories. We hypothesized that this may be, due to the closely related construct of attention control. We examined if individual differences in attention control accounted for variance in susceptibility to false memories, above and beyond inhibition and WMC alone. Using a standard DRM procedure in an individual differences approach to examine how WMC, inhibition, and attention control contribute to false word recognition on the DRM task. Our results indicate that attention control accounts for unique variance in susceptibility to the false memories above and beyond that of WMC and inhibition, suggesting that attention control may be more directly related to the true underlying mechanisms behind false memories.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 103922"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145092935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Investigating the role of sensorimotor spatial dependencies in shaping conscious access to virtual 3D objects 研究感觉运动空间依赖在塑造对虚拟3D物体的有意识访问中的作用。
IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-09-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2025.103934
Paweł Motyka , David J. Schwartzman , Anil K. Seth , Keisuke Suzuki
According to sensorimotor accounts of perceptual experience, the subjective sense that an object is real builds up as one learns how sensory inputs depend on bodily movements. Using virtual reality (VR), we manipulated the complexity of spatial dependencies governing interactions with unfamiliar 3D objects to assess whether they would show differential access to visual awareness during a continuous flash suppression paradigm (CFS). In specially-designed sensorimotor mastery tasks, participants had to manually control objects rotating in congruent, opposite, novel (orthogonal), or random directions in response to their actions. These tasks alternated with a continuous flash suppression task, in which participants first indicated stimulus detection as quickly as possible and subsequently identified its shape, evaluating the access of stationary objects to visual awareness. We hypothesised that objects governed by lawful (learnable) dependencies would overcome suppression faster than randomly moving objects (for which there is no world-related statistical structure to learn). While sensorimotor control performance decreased with condition difficulty, the pre-registered analysis yielded no differences in breakthrough times across conditions. We discuss methodological factors, stemming from the dual-task CFS design, which potentially account for these null findings and which warrant further study. Overall, our findings are consistent with prior evidence for the negligible role of spatial congruence (compared to contingency) between actions and their visual consequences in shaping perceptual experience under interocular suppression paradigms.
根据感觉运动对知觉经验的描述,当一个人了解到感觉输入是如何依赖于身体运动时,就会建立起一个物体是真实的主观感觉。使用虚拟现实(VR),我们操纵控制与不熟悉的3D物体交互的空间依赖关系的复杂性,以评估它们是否会在连续闪光抑制范式(CFS)中表现出对视觉意识的差异访问。在特别设计的感觉运动掌握任务中,参与者必须手动控制物体以一致、相反、新颖(正交)或随机方向旋转,以响应他们的动作。这些任务与连续的闪光抑制任务交替进行,在该任务中,参与者首先尽可能快地指出刺激检测,随后识别其形状,评估静止物体对视觉意识的访问。我们假设受合法(可学习)依赖关系支配的对象会比随机移动的对象更快地克服抑制(因为没有与世界相关的统计结构需要学习)。虽然感觉运动控制性能随条件困难而下降,但预登记分析显示,不同条件下的突破时间没有差异。我们讨论了源于双任务CFS设计的方法学因素,这些因素可能解释了这些无效发现,并且值得进一步研究。总的来说,我们的研究结果与先前的证据一致,即在眼间抑制范式下,动作及其视觉结果之间的空间一致性(与偶然性相比)在塑造知觉经验方面的作用可以忽略不计。
{"title":"Investigating the role of sensorimotor spatial dependencies in shaping conscious access to virtual 3D objects","authors":"Paweł Motyka ,&nbsp;David J. Schwartzman ,&nbsp;Anil K. Seth ,&nbsp;Keisuke Suzuki","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2025.103934","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.concog.2025.103934","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>According to sensorimotor accounts of perceptual experience, the subjective sense that an object is real builds up as one learns how sensory inputs depend on bodily movements. Using virtual reality (VR), we manipulated the complexity of spatial dependencies governing interactions with unfamiliar 3D objects to assess whether they would show differential access to visual awareness during a continuous flash suppression paradigm (CFS). In specially-designed sensorimotor mastery tasks, participants had to manually control objects rotating in congruent, opposite, novel (orthogonal), or random directions in response to their actions. These tasks alternated with a continuous flash suppression task, in which participants first indicated stimulus detection as quickly as possible and subsequently identified its shape, evaluating the access of stationary objects to visual awareness. We hypothesised that objects governed by lawful (learnable) dependencies would overcome suppression faster than randomly moving objects (for which there is no world-related statistical structure to learn). While sensorimotor control performance decreased with condition difficulty, the pre-registered analysis yielded no differences in breakthrough times across conditions. We discuss methodological factors, stemming from the dual-task CFS design, which potentially account for these null findings and which warrant further study. Overall, our findings are consistent with prior evidence for the negligible role of spatial congruence (compared to contingency) between actions and their visual consequences in shaping perceptual experience under interocular suppression paradigms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 103934"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145082427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
When action expectation meets reward history: The interaction of proactive and reactive control during inhibitory control 当行动期望满足奖励历史:抑制控制中主动控制和反应控制的相互作用
IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-09-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2025.103933
Meng Zou , Yongchun Wang , Zhengqi Tang , Ya Li , Yonghui Wang
Flexibly inhibiting inappropriate responses based on current goals and past experiences is crucial. The dual-mechanism of control (DMC) model proposes that cognitive control involves proactive (expectation-driven) and reactive (stimulus-driven, such as reward history) control. However, how these mechanisms interact during inhibitory control remains unclear. We explored this interaction using cued and non-cued Go/NoGo tasks through two experiments, employing different reward training paradigms: value-driven attentional capture (VDAC, Experiment 1) and monetary incentive delay task (MIDT, Experiment 2). The results showed that reward history interacted with action expectation only when established via the MIDT (Experiment 2), with previously rewarded NoGo target showing lower commission errors under the unexpected condition. In contrast, reward history from the VDAC paradigm (Experiment 1) influenced inhibition independently of action expectation. Across both experiments, reward history generally facilitated response inhibition. These findings suggest that the relationship between proactive and reactive control is flexible, particularly when reactive control is dependent on the nature of prior reward learning. This study provides new insights into how humans weigh current goals with past experiences to guide adaptive behavior in dynamic environments.
根据目前的目标和过去的经验,灵活地抑制不适当的反应是至关重要的。双重控制机制(dual-mechanism of control, DMC)模型认为认知控制包括主动控制(期望驱动)和反应控制(刺激驱动,如奖励历史)。然而,这些机制如何在抑制控制中相互作用仍不清楚。我们通过两个不同的奖励训练范式:价值驱动的注意捕获(实验1)和货币激励延迟任务(实验2),通过线索和非线索的Go/NoGo任务来探索这种相互作用。结果表明,奖励历史仅在通过MIDT建立时才与行动期望相互作用(实验2),先前奖励的NoGo目标在意外条件下表现出较低的任务误差。相反,来自VDAC范式的奖励历史(实验1)对抑制的影响独立于行动期望。在这两个实验中,奖励历史通常会促进反应抑制。这些发现表明,主动控制和反应性控制之间的关系是灵活的,特别是当反应性控制依赖于先前奖励学习的性质时。这项研究为人类如何权衡当前目标和过去经验以指导动态环境中的适应性行为提供了新的见解。
{"title":"When action expectation meets reward history: The interaction of proactive and reactive control during inhibitory control","authors":"Meng Zou ,&nbsp;Yongchun Wang ,&nbsp;Zhengqi Tang ,&nbsp;Ya Li ,&nbsp;Yonghui Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2025.103933","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.concog.2025.103933","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Flexibly inhibiting inappropriate responses based on current goals and past experiences is crucial. The dual-mechanism of control (DMC) model proposes that cognitive control involves proactive (expectation-driven) and reactive (stimulus-driven, such as reward history) control. However, how these mechanisms interact during inhibitory control remains unclear. We explored this interaction using cued and non-cued Go/NoGo tasks through two experiments, employing different reward training paradigms: value-driven attentional capture (VDAC, Experiment 1) and monetary incentive delay task (MIDT, Experiment 2). The results showed that reward history interacted with action expectation only when established via the MIDT (Experiment 2), with previously rewarded NoGo target showing lower commission errors under the unexpected condition. In contrast, reward history from the VDAC paradigm (Experiment 1) influenced inhibition independently of action expectation. Across both experiments, reward history generally facilitated response inhibition. These findings suggest that the relationship between proactive and reactive control is flexible, particularly when reactive control is dependent on the nature of prior reward learning. This study provides new insights into how humans weigh current goals with past experiences to guide adaptive behavior in dynamic environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 103933"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144997309","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Aphantasia and the unconscious imagery hypothesis 幻像症和无意识意象假说
IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-09-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2025.103924
Andy Mckilliam , Manuela Kirberg
Until recently, mental imagery has largely been regarded as an exclusively conscious phenomenon. However, recent empirical results suggest that mental imagery can also occur unconsciously. People who report having no experiences of mental imagery often perform similar to controls on behavioural tasks thought to require imagery. A surprising number of them also display significant levels of imagery-based priming, and recent neural decoding studies have shown that imagery-related information is being processed in their visual cortex. However, investigating unconscious imagery empirically is not straightforward. One challenge is to establish that imagery is genuinely unconscious as opposed to merely going unreported due to response biases. Another is to clarify how imagistic and indirect perceptual processing needs to be to qualify as imagery. In this paper, we take a closer look at the evidence for unconscious imagery, argue that it is not as compelling as it initially appears, and outline a strategy for advancing research on this question.
直到最近,心理意象在很大程度上被认为是一种完全有意识的现象。然而,最近的实证结果表明,心理意象也可以无意识地发生。报告称没有心理意象经历的人在被认为需要意象的行为任务上的表现与对照组相似。令人惊讶的是,他们中有相当多的人还表现出显著的基于图像的启动能力,最近的神经解码研究表明,与图像相关的信息正在他们的视觉皮层中被处理。然而,从经验上调查无意识意象并不简单。其中一个挑战是确定意象是真正无意识的,而不是仅仅由于反应偏差而未被报告。另一个是澄清意象性和间接的知觉加工需要怎样才能成为意象。在本文中,我们仔细研究了无意识意象的证据,认为它并不像最初出现的那样令人信服,并概述了推进这一问题研究的策略。
{"title":"Aphantasia and the unconscious imagery hypothesis","authors":"Andy Mckilliam ,&nbsp;Manuela Kirberg","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2025.103924","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.concog.2025.103924","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Until recently, mental imagery has largely been regarded as an exclusively conscious phenomenon. However, recent empirical results suggest that mental imagery can also occur unconsciously. People who report having no experiences of mental imagery often perform similar to controls on behavioural tasks thought to require imagery. A surprising number of them also display significant levels of imagery-based priming, and recent neural decoding studies have shown that imagery-related information is being processed in their visual cortex. However, investigating unconscious imagery empirically is not straightforward. One challenge is to establish that imagery is genuinely unconscious as opposed to merely going unreported due to response biases. Another is to clarify how imagistic and indirect perceptual processing needs to be to qualify as imagery. In this paper, we take a closer look at the evidence for unconscious imagery, argue that it is not as compelling as it initially appears, and outline a strategy for advancing research on this question.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 103924"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144926513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Moving through time: The influence of body motion on temporal concepts of future in Chinese sighted and blind people. 穿越时空:身体运动对中国视力和盲人未来时间概念的影响。
IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2025.103920
Heng Li, Yu Cao

According to Conceptual Metaphor Theory, individuals represent abstract concepts, such as time, through more concrete experiences, such as the sensorimotor system. For example, left and right spatial orientations can be projected onto temporal concepts of past and future in mental models, which is consistent with various writing systems across cultures. Although evidence indicates that manual and visual experiences can influence lateral mental timelines, it remains unclear whether passive whole-body motion can exert similar effects. In this study, we explored this hypothesized effect among Chinese sighted and blind participants. Participants responded to verbal stimuli corresponding to past and future events while being displaced leftward and rightward on a motion platform. The results demonstrated an expedited categorization of future-related words during rightward motion compared to leftward motion. However, no analogous effects were observed for the categorization of past-related stimuli. This partial metaphor-congruency effect cannot be explained by linguistic conventions, as there are no explicit lateral metaphors for time in Mandarin Chinese. Therefore, a more plausible explanation relates to the malleability of future event representations, which can be more easily shaped by motion experiences compared to past event representations. Together, these findings highlight the significant role of bodily movements in influencing temporal thought.

根据概念隐喻理论,个体通过更具体的经验,如感觉运动系统来表征抽象概念,如时间。例如,在心理模型中,左右空间方向可以投射到过去和未来的时间概念上,这与不同文化的各种书写系统是一致的。尽管有证据表明,手动和视觉体验可以影响横向精神时间线,但被动全身运动是否能产生类似的效果尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们在中国视力正常和失明的参与者中探讨了这种假设效应。当参与者在运动平台上左右移动时,他们会对与过去和未来事件相对应的言语刺激做出反应。结果表明,与向左运动相比,向右运动时与将来相关的词的分类速度更快。然而,对过去相关刺激的分类没有观察到类似的效果。这种部分隐喻一致性效应不能用语言习惯来解释,因为普通话中没有明确的时间横向隐喻。因此,一个更合理的解释与未来事件表征的延展性有关,与过去事件表征相比,未来事件表征更容易被运动经验塑造。总之,这些发现强调了身体运动在影响时间思维方面的重要作用。
{"title":"Moving through time: The influence of body motion on temporal concepts of future in Chinese sighted and blind people.","authors":"Heng Li, Yu Cao","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2025.103920","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.concog.2025.103920","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>According to Conceptual Metaphor Theory, individuals represent abstract concepts, such as time, through more concrete experiences, such as the sensorimotor system. For example, left and right spatial orientations can be projected onto temporal concepts of past and future in mental models, which is consistent with various writing systems across cultures. Although evidence indicates that manual and visual experiences can influence lateral mental timelines, it remains unclear whether passive whole-body motion can exert similar effects. In this study, we explored this hypothesized effect among Chinese sighted and blind participants. Participants responded to verbal stimuli corresponding to past and future events while being displaced leftward and rightward on a motion platform. The results demonstrated an expedited categorization of future-related words during rightward motion compared to leftward motion. However, no analogous effects were observed for the categorization of past-related stimuli. This partial metaphor-congruency effect cannot be explained by linguistic conventions, as there are no explicit lateral metaphors for time in Mandarin Chinese. Therefore, a more plausible explanation relates to the malleability of future event representations, which can be more easily shaped by motion experiences compared to past event representations. Together, these findings highlight the significant role of bodily movements in influencing temporal thought.</p>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":"134 ","pages":"103920"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144818159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing the truth effect’s reliability and test–retest stability 评估真值效应的信度和重测稳定性
IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-08-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2025.103923
Frank Calio , Lena Nadarevic , Jochen Musch
The finding that repeating a statement typically increases its perceived validity is referred to as the truth effect. Research on individual differences in the magnitude of the effect and its correlates is scarce and has yielded rather mixed results. However, any search for replicable relations between the truth effect and other cognitive or personality variables is bound to fail if the truth effect cannot be measured reliably at the individual level and if the effect is not a stable phenomenon. We conducted two experiments investigating the split-half reliability and test–retest stability of the truth effect. To operationalize the magnitude of the effect, Experiment 1 used the between-items criterion and Experiment 2 used the within-items criterion of the truth effect (Dechêne et al., 2010). In both experiments, the truth effect’s test–retest stability was found to be very low, probably due to a highly insufficient reliability of the measures that were used. While there may be meaningful and stable individual differences in the truth effect, our findings raise concerns about the usefulness of established indices and standard measures of the truth effect for personality and individual difference research.
重复陈述通常会增加其感知有效性的发现被称为真相效应。对影响程度的个体差异及其相关因素的研究很少,并且得出了相当复杂的结果。然而,如果真相效应不能在个人层面上可靠地测量,如果真相效应不是一个稳定的现象,那么任何寻找真相效应与其他认知或人格变量之间可复制关系的研究都注定会失败。我们进行了两个实验来研究真相效应的劈半信度和重测稳定性。为了对效果的大小进行操作,实验1使用了项目间标准,实验2使用了真值效应的项目内标准(Dechêne et al., 2010)。在这两个实验中,发现真相效应的测试-重测稳定性非常低,可能是由于所使用的测量方法的可靠性非常不足。虽然真实效应中可能存在有意义和稳定的个体差异,但我们的研究结果引起了人们对真实效应的既定指数和标准测量在人格和个体差异研究中的有用性的关注。
{"title":"Assessing the truth effect’s reliability and test–retest stability","authors":"Frank Calio ,&nbsp;Lena Nadarevic ,&nbsp;Jochen Musch","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2025.103923","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.concog.2025.103923","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The finding that repeating a statement typically increases its perceived validity is referred to as the truth effect. Research on individual differences in the magnitude of the effect and its correlates is scarce and has yielded rather mixed results. However, any search for replicable relations between the truth effect and other cognitive or personality variables is bound to fail if the truth effect cannot be measured reliably at the individual level and if the effect is not a stable phenomenon. We conducted two experiments investigating the split-half reliability and test–retest stability of the truth effect. To operationalize the magnitude of the effect, Experiment 1 used the between-items criterion and Experiment 2 used the within-items criterion of the truth effect (Dechêne et al., 2010). In both experiments, the truth effect’s test–retest stability was found to be very low, probably due to a highly insufficient reliability of the measures that were used. While there may be meaningful and stable individual differences in the truth effect, our findings raise concerns about the usefulness of established indices and standard measures of the truth effect for personality and individual difference research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 103923"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144903368","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Consciousness and Cognition
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1