Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-10-08DOI: 10.1177/10519815251375814
Suzanne Harmse, Daleen Casteleijn, Karen Jacobs
BackgroundBarriers to the delivery of vocational rehabilitation have been reported as a lack of knowledge, skills and confidence in occupational therapists who deliver these services. A program aimed at overcoming these barriers was developed to provide training in the delivery of vocational rehabilitation services. The program includes three decision-making tools to facilitate not only knowledge translation but also practice changes. The tools are (1) Return-to-Work Decision Tree, (2) Performance-based Assessment Tool, (3) Job Match Tool.ObjectiveThe objective of the research was to obtain consensus on the acceptability and utility of the developed tools to facilitate clinical reasoning in the delivery of vocational rehabilitation services.MethodsA nominal group technique was used to obtain consensus on the developed tools. During a second phase, participants were sent revised versions of the tools and asked to comment on the tools' clinical utility using a four-point Likert scale.ResultsThe Return-to-Work Decision Tree and the Performance-based Assessment Tool received a 100% agreement in terms of clinical utility with the Job Match Tool receiving a 90% agreement for clinical utility. Participants made valuable recommendations such as adding a user manual and a training workshop to facilitate implementation of the tools.ConclusionThe three tools developed to support clinical reasoning and decision making during the vocational rehabilitation process were reported to be acceptable by the expert participants. Further development of the Job Match Tool is recommended.
{"title":"Utilizing nominal group technique to achieve consensus on a clinical decision-making tool for vocational rehabilitation at a grassroots level in South Africa.","authors":"Suzanne Harmse, Daleen Casteleijn, Karen Jacobs","doi":"10.1177/10519815251375814","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10519815251375814","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundBarriers to the delivery of vocational rehabilitation have been reported as a lack of knowledge, skills and confidence in occupational therapists who deliver these services. A program aimed at overcoming these barriers was developed to provide training in the delivery of vocational rehabilitation services. The program includes three decision-making tools to facilitate not only knowledge translation but also practice changes. The tools are (1) Return-to-Work Decision Tree, (2) Performance-based Assessment Tool, (3) Job Match Tool.ObjectiveThe objective of the research was to obtain consensus on the acceptability and utility of the developed tools to facilitate clinical reasoning in the delivery of vocational rehabilitation services.MethodsA nominal group technique was used to obtain consensus on the developed tools. During a second phase, participants were sent revised versions of the tools and asked to comment on the tools' clinical utility using a four-point Likert scale.ResultsThe Return-to-Work Decision Tree and the Performance-based Assessment Tool received a 100% agreement in terms of clinical utility with the Job Match Tool receiving a 90% agreement for clinical utility. Participants made valuable recommendations such as adding a user manual and a training workshop to facilitate implementation of the tools.ConclusionThe three tools developed to support clinical reasoning and decision making during the vocational rehabilitation process were reported to be acceptable by the expert participants. Further development of the Job Match Tool is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"733-743"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12953678/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145253697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Backgroundoccupational stress is one of the problems that exists in almost all jobs and positions. In the related studies, researchers have considered various and numerous factors to be involved in causing occupational stress.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study is to identify, categorize and determine the importance of factors related to occupational stress.MethodA variety of databases were searched and reviewed from 2000 to 2022. In the first stage, 8702 articles were found. One-hundred articles were kept for review after careful screening and factors associated with occupational stress were identified. Fuzzy Dematel method was used for the relationship between identified factors and AHP fuzzy method was used for pairwise comparison of factors. The obtained network was modeled using Bayesian network to determine the importance of factors.ResultsFinally, 89 factors that causing stress in the workforce were identified and extracted. The factors were divided into 7 main categories: individual, occupational, organizational, work environmental, political and cultural, economic, and social. Among all the factors influencing occupational stress, job-related factors have the greatest impact, accounting for 23.1%, while cultural and political factors have the least influence at 6.2%. In a Bayesian network, if all factors are at a very weak level, occupational stress will be severe, with a proportion of 66.5%.ConclusionUsing the findings of this research, it is possible to prioritize the factors affecting the occurrence of occupational stress and try to eliminate or reduce them.
{"title":"Factors affecting occupational stress: Identification, classification and determination of importance.","authors":"Mitra Gholipour, Seyedeh Morvarid Mousavi, Ayda Naghshbandi, Omran Ahmadi","doi":"10.1177/10519815251367230","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10519815251367230","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Backgroundoccupational stress is one of the problems that exists in almost all jobs and positions. In the related studies, researchers have considered various and numerous factors to be involved in causing occupational stress.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study is to identify, categorize and determine the importance of factors related to occupational stress.MethodA variety of databases were searched and reviewed from 2000 to 2022. In the first stage, 8702 articles were found. One-hundred articles were kept for review after careful screening and factors associated with occupational stress were identified. Fuzzy Dematel method was used for the relationship between identified factors and AHP fuzzy method was used for pairwise comparison of factors. The obtained network was modeled using Bayesian network to determine the importance of factors.ResultsFinally, 89 factors that causing stress in the workforce were identified and extracted. The factors were divided into 7 main categories: individual, occupational, organizational, work environmental, political and cultural, economic, and social. Among all the factors influencing occupational stress, job-related factors have the greatest impact, accounting for 23.1%, while cultural and political factors have the least influence at 6.2%. In a Bayesian network, if all factors are at a very weak level, occupational stress will be severe, with a proportion of 66.5%.ConclusionUsing the findings of this research, it is possible to prioritize the factors affecting the occurrence of occupational stress and try to eliminate or reduce them.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"670-685"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145201893","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-10-01DOI: 10.1177/10519815251382212
Elie Bou Sanayeh, Carolla El Chamieh, Marina Makram, Diala El Khoury
BackgroundResilience has recently emerged as a key focus, particularly among healthcare workers (HCWs). However, following the series of crises in Lebanon since 2020, there is limited data on HCWs' resilience levels.ObjectiveOur study assessed resilience levels among Lebanese HCWs and explored potential associated risk factors.MethodsThis is a cross-sectional multicenter study conducted in Lebanon. It included 907 HCWs, comprising medical students, registered nurses, physicians, and postgraduate trainees. Resilience was measured using the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify associated factors.Results74% of our participants demonstrated a normal level of resilience rather than a high level, with a median BRS of 3. Factors associated to lower scores were having less than one year of experience, being a medical student, working in a public sector or in stressful workplaces, and being current heavy smokers. Conversely, higher scores were linked to higher income, better financial well-being, having more than ten years of experience, transitioning to a less stressful work environment, and living with a family member with a chronic illness.ConclusionWhile most HCWs in Lebanon exhibit moderate resilience, it may not be sufficient in the face of future crises, necessitating public measures and healthcare policies to improve HCWs' mental well-being while implementing resilience-supportive interventions.
{"title":"Resilience among healthcare workers in Lebanon: A multi-centered cross-sectional study.","authors":"Elie Bou Sanayeh, Carolla El Chamieh, Marina Makram, Diala El Khoury","doi":"10.1177/10519815251382212","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10519815251382212","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundResilience has recently emerged as a key focus, particularly among healthcare workers (HCWs). However, following the series of crises in Lebanon since 2020, there is limited data on HCWs' resilience levels.ObjectiveOur study assessed resilience levels among Lebanese HCWs and explored potential associated risk factors<b>.</b>MethodsThis is a cross-sectional multicenter study conducted in Lebanon. It included 907 HCWs, comprising medical students, registered nurses, physicians, and postgraduate trainees. Resilience was measured using the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify associated factors.Results74% of our participants demonstrated a normal level of resilience rather than a high level, with a median BRS of 3. Factors associated to lower scores were having less than one year of experience, being a medical student, working in a public sector or in stressful workplaces, and being current heavy smokers. Conversely, higher scores were linked to higher income, better financial well-being, having more than ten years of experience, transitioning to a less stressful work environment, and living with a family member with a chronic illness.ConclusionWhile most HCWs in Lebanon exhibit moderate resilience, it may not be sufficient in the face of future crises, necessitating public measures and healthcare policies to improve HCWs' mental well-being while implementing resilience-supportive interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"686-698"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145208413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-09-24DOI: 10.1177/10519815251377003
Tianbo Wang, Ibrahim Öztürk, Wei Lyu, Zuojiang Ning
BackgroundIn recent years, numerous large-scale manufacturing enterprises in Northeastern China have shifted from the conventional 8-h shift model to an extended 12-h shift schedule. While this change aims to improve production efficiency, prolonged working hours may lead to increased levels of occupational fatigue and pose significant risks to worker health and safety.ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess the physiological and subjective fatigue responses among forklift operators working 12-h shifts, with particular emphasis on differences between day and night shifts, as well as gender-based variations in fatigue susceptibility.MethodsTen forklift truck operators were recruited from a major tire manufacturing enterprise that had implemented a 12-h shift system. Subjective fatigue was measured through self-reported assessments, while objective indicators were captured using surface electromyography (sEMG) and electroencephalography (EEG). Data were collected at multiple time points across both day and night shifts to monitor changes in fatigue levels.ResultsFindings revealed that most operators experienced significant fatigue after 8 h of work, even when shifts extended to 12 h. Fatigue and drowsiness symptoms were more pronounced among night shift workers, with critical fatigue peaks observed between 14:30-16:00 and 2:30-4:00. Gender-based analysis showed negligible differences in daytime fatigue; however, female operators exhibited greater fatigue and drowsiness during night shifts compared to male counterparts.ConclusionsExtended 12-h shifts are associated with considerable fatigue, especially during night work, posing potential safety concerns in industrial environments. The identification of specific fatigue-prone periods and gender-related differences underscores the need for tailored fatigue risk management strategies and evidence-based shift scheduling policies to safeguard worker well-being and operational safety.
{"title":"Fatigue assessment of forklift operators in a 12-hour shift system.","authors":"Tianbo Wang, Ibrahim Öztürk, Wei Lyu, Zuojiang Ning","doi":"10.1177/10519815251377003","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10519815251377003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundIn recent years, numerous large-scale manufacturing enterprises in Northeastern China have shifted from the conventional 8-h shift model to an extended 12-h shift schedule. While this change aims to improve production efficiency, prolonged working hours may lead to increased levels of occupational fatigue and pose significant risks to worker health and safety.ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess the physiological and subjective fatigue responses among forklift operators working 12-h shifts, with particular emphasis on differences between day and night shifts, as well as gender-based variations in fatigue susceptibility.MethodsTen forklift truck operators were recruited from a major tire manufacturing enterprise that had implemented a 12-h shift system. Subjective fatigue was measured through self-reported assessments, while objective indicators were captured using surface electromyography (sEMG) and electroencephalography (EEG). Data were collected at multiple time points across both day and night shifts to monitor changes in fatigue levels.ResultsFindings revealed that most operators experienced significant fatigue after 8 h of work, even when shifts extended to 12 h. Fatigue and drowsiness symptoms were more pronounced among night shift workers, with critical fatigue peaks observed between 14:30-16:00 and 2:30-4:00. Gender-based analysis showed negligible differences in daytime fatigue; however, female operators exhibited greater fatigue and drowsiness during night shifts compared to male counterparts.ConclusionsExtended 12-h shifts are associated with considerable fatigue, especially during night work, posing potential safety concerns in industrial environments. The identification of specific fatigue-prone periods and gender-related differences underscores the need for tailored fatigue risk management strategies and evidence-based shift scheduling policies to safeguard worker well-being and operational safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"625-635"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145132393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-10-06DOI: 10.1177/10519815251382367
Sadia Rehman, Muhammad Raza Sarfraz, Hafsa Tariq, Aasia Ismail, Mehwish Mansoor, Amber Salman, Sami Ajaz, Muneeza Ijaz, Abdullah Hasnat, Hamid Mehmood, Misbah Ijaz
BackgroundAntibiotic self-medication is an emerging global health challenge, contributing significantly to antimicrobial resistance development. Healthcare students' knowledge and practices are particularly crucial, given their future roles as medical professionals.ObjectivesThis investigation sought to assess antibiotic self-medication patterns among Pakistani healthcare students by examining their knowledge, attitudes, and practices, while identifying contributing factors and prevalence rates.MethodsA cross-sectional analysis was implemented at two Pakistani universities, involving 1340 undergraduate healthcare students selected through convenience sampling. Data were collected using a structured, validated questionnaire that evaluated sociodemographic factors as well as participants' understanding, perspectives, and behaviors regarding antibiotic self-medication. Knowledge and attitude measurements were classified as poor/negative or good/positive. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.ResultsThe study revealed that 68.8% of respondents practiced antibiotic self-medication. Despite 63.3% demonstrating adequate antibiotic knowledge, 53.4% exhibited negative self-medication attitudes. Knowledge distribution varied according to academic program and year of study. DPT students showed the highest self-medication frequency at 77.3%. Amoxicillin (56%) and Azithromycin (31.3%) emerged as predominant choices, primarily selected for convenience (77.5%) and respiratory symptoms (50.4%). Previous prescriptions significantly affected antibiotic selection. Analysis revealed a substantial correlation between knowledge levels and attitudes toward antibiotic usage (p < 0.001).ConclusionDespite adequate knowledge levels among participants, a concerning trend of negative attitudes toward antibiotic self-medication practices was observed. These findings emphasize the critical need for comprehensive educational interventions and strengthened regulatory frameworks to minimize inappropriate antibiotic use among healthcare students, which is essential for addressing the growing challenge of antimicrobial resistance, and to reduce inappropriate antibiotic use ensuring both patient safety and future professional performance.
{"title":"Antibiotic self-medication among healthcare students in Pakistan: A dual-center cross-sectional study.","authors":"Sadia Rehman, Muhammad Raza Sarfraz, Hafsa Tariq, Aasia Ismail, Mehwish Mansoor, Amber Salman, Sami Ajaz, Muneeza Ijaz, Abdullah Hasnat, Hamid Mehmood, Misbah Ijaz","doi":"10.1177/10519815251382367","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10519815251382367","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAntibiotic self-medication is an emerging global health challenge, contributing significantly to antimicrobial resistance development. Healthcare students' knowledge and practices are particularly crucial, given their future roles as medical professionals.ObjectivesThis investigation sought to assess antibiotic self-medication patterns among Pakistani healthcare students by examining their knowledge, attitudes, and practices, while identifying contributing factors and prevalence rates.MethodsA cross-sectional analysis was implemented at two Pakistani universities, involving 1340 undergraduate healthcare students selected through convenience sampling. Data were collected using a structured, validated questionnaire that evaluated sociodemographic factors as well as participants' understanding, perspectives, and behaviors regarding antibiotic self-medication. Knowledge and attitude measurements were classified as poor/negative or good/positive. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.ResultsThe study revealed that 68.8% of respondents practiced antibiotic self-medication. Despite 63.3% demonstrating adequate antibiotic knowledge, 53.4% exhibited negative self-medication attitudes. Knowledge distribution varied according to academic program and year of study. DPT students showed the highest self-medication frequency at 77.3%. Amoxicillin (56%) and Azithromycin (31.3%) emerged as predominant choices, primarily selected for convenience (77.5%) and respiratory symptoms (50.4%). Previous prescriptions significantly affected antibiotic selection. Analysis revealed a substantial correlation between knowledge levels and attitudes toward antibiotic usage (p < 0.001).ConclusionDespite adequate knowledge levels among participants, a concerning trend of negative attitudes toward antibiotic self-medication practices was observed. These findings emphasize the critical need for comprehensive educational interventions and strengthened regulatory frameworks to minimize inappropriate antibiotic use among healthcare students, which is essential for addressing the growing challenge of antimicrobial resistance, and to reduce inappropriate antibiotic use ensuring both patient safety and future professional performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"713-724"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145240327","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-28DOI: 10.1177/10519815251394858
Mohammad Hossein Delshad
BackgroundHealth and safety at the workplace are critical to the well-being of workers and to the performance of the organization. Stress management has a significant impact on safety behaviour, especially in high-risk sectors such as cement production.ObjectiveThe aim of the study was to develop and validate a culturally appropriate questionnaire to assess the coping with stress and safety behaviour of cement factory workers.MethodsA cross-sectional psychometric study was conducted from January 2023 to January 2024 at the Zaveh City cement factory in Torbat Heydarieh, Iran, with 276 completed questionnaires.ResultsThe final 21 item tool has demonstrated its robust reliability (Cronbach's alpha and ICC) and validity. EFA explained 69.18 percent of the variability (KOM = 0.89). A significant positive correlation was observed between stress management and safety behaviours (r = 0.58, p < 0.001). The CFA showed excellent fit to the model (CFI = 0.93, GFI = 0.91, RMSEA = 0.049).ConclusionsThe questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool; the findings support the inclusion of stress reduction strategies in the cement industry's safety programmes.
工作场所的健康和安全对工人的福祉和组织的绩效至关重要。压力管理对安全行为有重大影响,特别是在水泥生产等高风险行业。目的:本研究的目的是开发和验证一份文化上合适的问卷,以评估水泥厂工人应对压力和安全行为。方法于2023年1月至2024年1月在伊朗Torbat Heydarieh的Zaveh城水泥厂进行横断面心理测量研究,共填写问卷276份。结果最终的21项工具具有良好的信度(Cronbach’s alpha和ICC)和效度。EFA解释了69.18%的变异(KOM = 0.89)。应激管理与安全行为之间存在显著正相关(r = 0.58, p
{"title":"Development and Psychometric Validation of a Model-Based Questionnaire on Work Stress Management and Safety Behavior in Cement Workers.","authors":"Mohammad Hossein Delshad","doi":"10.1177/10519815251394858","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815251394858","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundHealth and safety at the workplace are critical to the well-being of workers and to the performance of the organization. Stress management has a significant impact on safety behaviour, especially in high-risk sectors such as cement production.ObjectiveThe aim of the study was to develop and validate a culturally appropriate questionnaire to assess the coping with stress and safety behaviour of cement factory workers.MethodsA cross-sectional psychometric study was conducted from January 2023 to January 2024 at the Zaveh City cement factory in Torbat Heydarieh, Iran, with 276 completed questionnaires.ResultsThe final 21 item tool has demonstrated its robust reliability (Cronbach's alpha and ICC) and validity. EFA explained 69.18 percent of the variability (KOM = 0.89). A significant positive correlation was observed between stress management and safety behaviours (r = 0.58, p < 0.001). The CFA showed excellent fit to the model (CFI = 0.93, GFI = 0.91, RMSEA = 0.049).ConclusionsThe questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool; the findings support the inclusion of stress reduction strategies in the cement industry's safety programmes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10519815251394858"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147318884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
BackgroundDespite significant advancements in workplace equality, gender-based discrimination continues to hinder women's leadership aspirations and potential. In many non-Western societies, cultural and institutional structures intensify the influence of sexism on women's professional experiences.ObjectiveThis study explores how benevolent and hostile sexism, together with perceived organizational support, affect female employees' worries about leadership roles. It also examines whether organizational support moderates the relationship between sexism and leadership-related anxieties.MethodsData were collected from 201 full-time female employees working in various occupations in Türkiye. An online survey included the Worries about Leadership scale, the Perceived Organizational Support Scale, and the Perceived/Experienced Sexism Scale. Hypotheses were tested using moderation analysis via the PROCESS macro.ResultsBenevolent sexism and perceived organizational support were both negatively associated with worries about leadership. Perceived organizational support moderated the effect of benevolent sexism on leadership worries, such that higher support reduced its impact, demonstrating a crossover effect. Specifically, benevolent sexism was linked to fewer leadership worries when organizational support was low but associated with more worries when support was high. However, hostile sexism showed no main or interaction effect with POS on WAL.ConclusionThis study highlights the complex role of benevolent sexism in shaping women's leadership concerns, showing both its potentially protective and harmful effects. It also emphasizes the need for culturally sensitive approaches that go beyond generic organizational support to actively challenge subtle sexism and promote gender-inclusive leadership readiness in non-Western contexts.
{"title":"Unpacking women's worries about leadership: The interplay of perceived sexism and organizational support.","authors":"Berru Ayşe Yilmaz, Selin Metin Camgoz, Irem Metin-Orta","doi":"10.1177/10519815261424803","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815261424803","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundDespite significant advancements in workplace equality, gender-based discrimination continues to hinder women's leadership aspirations and potential. In many non-Western societies, cultural and institutional structures intensify the influence of sexism on women's professional experiences.ObjectiveThis study explores how benevolent and hostile sexism, together with perceived organizational support, affect female employees' worries about leadership roles. It also examines whether organizational support moderates the relationship between sexism and leadership-related anxieties.MethodsData were collected from 201 full-time female employees working in various occupations in Türkiye. An online survey included the Worries about Leadership scale, the Perceived Organizational Support Scale, and the Perceived/Experienced Sexism Scale. Hypotheses were tested using moderation analysis via the PROCESS macro.ResultsBenevolent sexism and perceived organizational support were both negatively associated with worries about leadership. Perceived organizational support moderated the effect of benevolent sexism on leadership worries, such that higher support reduced its impact, demonstrating a crossover effect. Specifically, benevolent sexism was linked to fewer leadership worries when organizational support was low but associated with more worries when support was high. However, hostile sexism showed no main or interaction effect with POS on WAL.ConclusionThis study highlights the complex role of benevolent sexism in shaping women's leadership concerns, showing both its potentially protective and harmful effects. It also emphasizes the need for culturally sensitive approaches that go beyond generic organizational support to actively challenge subtle sexism and promote gender-inclusive leadership readiness in non-Western contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10519815261424803"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147318963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-27DOI: 10.1177/10519815261424804
Ozlem Kuculmez, Abdullah Sukun
BackgroundErgonomics plays a critical role in musculoskeletal health, yet validated tools such as ROSA may be impractical in high-demand clinical settings. This study compared ergonomics knowledge, awareness, and behaviors between individuals with and without musculoskeletal pain using a concise yes/no-based tool.ObjectiveTo compare ergonomic behaviors, knowledge, and awareness between individuals with and without musculoskeletal pain, and to identify behavioral factors associated with chronic pain.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among adults aged 18-65 in a tertiary healthcare facility. Participants completed a binary-response ergonomics questionnaire assessing posture, workstation adjustment, screen use, and ergonomic equipment habits. Group comparisons used Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests (p < 0.05).ResultsAmong 222 participants, chronic pain was significantly associated with female gender, being a housewife, poor posture, lack of chair height adjustment, and reduced screen-time awareness. (p < 0.05) Correct posture, chair adjustment, and screen-time awareness were protective. Elbow support use was associated with lower chronic pain prevalence (p = 0.033).ConclusionsA rapid, binary ergonomics assessment effectively identified behavioral risk factors for chronic musculoskeletal pain. This format may support scalable ergonomic screening in diverse occupational environments.
背景:人体工程学在肌肉骨骼健康中起着至关重要的作用,然而,经过验证的工具,如ROSA,在高需求的临床环境中可能不切实际。本研究使用一个简明的是/否为基础的工具,比较了有和没有肌肉骨骼疼痛的个体之间的人体工程学知识、意识和行为。目的比较肌肉骨骼疼痛患者和非肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的人体工程学行为、知识和意识,并确定与慢性疼痛相关的行为因素。方法对某三级医疗机构18-65岁成人进行横断面研究。参与者完成了一份二元反应的人体工程学问卷,评估姿势、工作站调整、屏幕使用和人体工程学设备习惯。组间比较采用卡方检验和Mann-Whitney U检验(p p p = 0.033)。结论快速、二元人机工程学评估可有效识别慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的行为危险因素。这种格式可以支持可扩展的人体工程学筛选在不同的职业环境。
{"title":"Ergonomics knowledge, awareness, and behaviors in a clinical setting: Comparison of individuals with musculoskeletal pain and healthy volunteers.","authors":"Ozlem Kuculmez, Abdullah Sukun","doi":"10.1177/10519815261424804","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815261424804","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundErgonomics plays a critical role in musculoskeletal health, yet validated tools such as ROSA may be impractical in high-demand clinical settings. This study compared ergonomics knowledge, awareness, and behaviors between individuals with and without musculoskeletal pain using a concise yes/no-based tool.ObjectiveTo compare ergonomic behaviors, knowledge, and awareness between individuals with and without musculoskeletal pain, and to identify behavioral factors associated with chronic pain.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among adults aged 18-65 in a tertiary healthcare facility. Participants completed a binary-response ergonomics questionnaire assessing posture, workstation adjustment, screen use, and ergonomic equipment habits. Group comparisons used Chi-square and Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> tests (<i>p</i> < 0.05).ResultsAmong 222 participants, chronic pain was significantly associated with female gender, being a housewife, poor posture, lack of chair height adjustment, and reduced screen-time awareness. (<i>p</i> < 0.05) Correct posture, chair adjustment, and screen-time awareness were protective. Elbow support use was associated with lower chronic pain prevalence (<i>p</i> = 0.033).ConclusionsA rapid, binary ergonomics assessment effectively identified behavioral risk factors for chronic musculoskeletal pain. This format may support scalable ergonomic screening in diverse occupational environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10519815261424804"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147318839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-27DOI: 10.1177/10519815261423859
Chen Wenxuan
BackgroundEmpathy is a core professional competence in social work. Managing the emotional labor arising from empathy is vital to social workers' sustainable development and occupational health.ObjectiveBased on the research findings, we offer practical reflections and recommendations. Our goal is to relieve the emotional burden caused by empathy and support the long-term wellbeing of social workers.MethodsWe widely distributed the "Empathy Capacity Scale for Social Workers" and surveyed 526 practitioners across China. Using structural equation modeling (SEM), we analyzed the relationships among empathy, emotional labor, burnout, and work withdrawal.ResultsResults show that empathy significantly and positively affects emotional labor, burnout, and work withdrawal. Emotional labor and burnout serve as a sequential mediator in the path from empathy to withdrawal. Perceived organizational support moderates the effects of empathy on both emotional labor and burnout.ConclusionsSocial workers operating in empathy-intensive and emotionally demanding environments often endure prolonged psychological and physical strain. This increases the likelihood of work withdrawal and undermines overall wellbeing. However, meaningful support from organizations and society can significantly improve this situation. Further research is needed to examine social workers across different cultures and service contexts, especially those in Western countries.
{"title":"Neglected empathy: A study of the mechanisms of social workers' empathic competence on work withdrawal.","authors":"Chen Wenxuan","doi":"10.1177/10519815261423859","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815261423859","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundEmpathy is a core professional competence in social work. Managing the emotional labor arising from empathy is vital to social workers' sustainable development and occupational health.ObjectiveBased on the research findings, we offer practical reflections and recommendations. Our goal is to relieve the emotional burden caused by empathy and support the long-term wellbeing of social workers.MethodsWe widely distributed the \"Empathy Capacity Scale for Social Workers\" and surveyed 526 practitioners across China. Using structural equation modeling (SEM), we analyzed the relationships among empathy, emotional labor, burnout, and work withdrawal.ResultsResults show that empathy significantly and positively affects emotional labor, burnout, and work withdrawal. Emotional labor and burnout serve as a sequential mediator in the path from empathy to withdrawal. Perceived organizational support moderates the effects of empathy on both emotional labor and burnout.ConclusionsSocial workers operating in empathy-intensive and emotionally demanding environments often endure prolonged psychological and physical strain. This increases the likelihood of work withdrawal and undermines overall wellbeing. However, meaningful support from organizations and society can significantly improve this situation. Further research is needed to examine social workers across different cultures and service contexts, especially those in Western countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10519815261423859"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147318859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-27DOI: 10.1177/10519815261426292
Hüseyin Tolga Çağatay
BackgroundOrganizational ostracism can lead to significant psychological effects, including loneliness and decreased productivity. This study examines the interplay between organizational ostracism, loneliness, depressed mood, and workplace incivility, which increasingly impacts workplace dynamics and employee well-being.ObjectivesThe study aims to evaluate the impact of organizational ostracism on loneliness among grey-collar health care workers, with a focus on the mediating role of depressed mood and the moderating role of workplace incivility.MethodsData were gathered from 397 grey-collar healthcare workers in a university hospital in Ankara, Türkiye, via surveys. Analysis was conducted using SPSS Process Macro Model 14 to evaluate the moderated mediation effect, enabling assessment of both direct and indirect impacts of organizational ostracism on loneliness, moderated by workplace incivility.ResultsFindings revealed a positive link between organizational ostracism and loneliness, mediated by depressed mood. Workplace incivility moderated this link, with low to moderate incivility intensifying the relationship between depressed mood and loneliness. However, at high incivility levels, this effect weakened, indicating that extreme incivility may overshadow other dynamics.ConclusionsAddressing organizational ostracism is essential, as it drives employee loneliness, with depressed mood as a key mediator. The study suggests that environments with low to moderate incivility may worsen the impact of ostracism on loneliness, while high incivility may reduce this effect. These findings underscore the importance of fostering supportive and inclusive workplace environments to safeguard mental health.
组织排斥会导致严重的心理影响,包括孤独感和生产力下降。本研究探讨了组织排斥、孤独感、抑郁情绪和工作场所不文明行为之间的相互作用,这些因素对工作场所动态和员工幸福感的影响越来越大。目的探讨组织排斥对医护人员孤独感的影响,研究抑郁情绪的中介作用和工作场所不文明行为的调节作用。方法对土耳其安卡拉某大学医院的397名灰领医护人员进行问卷调查。使用SPSS Process Macro Model 14进行分析来评估调节的中介效应,从而评估组织排斥对孤独感的直接和间接影响,并由工作场所不文明调节。结果发现组织排斥与孤独感之间存在正相关关系,并以抑郁情绪为中介。工作场所的不礼貌缓和了这种联系,低到中度的不礼貌加剧了抑郁情绪和孤独感之间的关系。然而,在高度不文明的情况下,这种影响减弱了,这表明极端不文明可能会掩盖其他动态。结论解决组织排斥是必要的,因为它会导致员工的孤独感,而抑郁情绪是一个关键的中介。研究表明,低至中度不礼貌的环境可能会加剧孤独感的影响,而高度不礼貌的环境可能会减少这种影响。这些发现强调了培育支持性和包容性工作环境对保障心理健康的重要性。
{"title":"Organizational ostracism and loneliness: Depressed mood at work as mediator and workplace incivility as moderator.","authors":"Hüseyin Tolga Çağatay","doi":"10.1177/10519815261426292","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815261426292","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundOrganizational ostracism can lead to significant psychological effects, including loneliness and decreased productivity. This study examines the interplay between organizational ostracism, loneliness, depressed mood, and workplace incivility, which increasingly impacts workplace dynamics and employee well-being.ObjectivesThe study aims to evaluate the impact of organizational ostracism on loneliness among grey-collar health care workers, with a focus on the mediating role of depressed mood and the moderating role of workplace incivility.MethodsData were gathered from 397 grey-collar healthcare workers in a university hospital in Ankara, Türkiye, via surveys. Analysis was conducted using SPSS Process Macro Model 14 to evaluate the moderated mediation effect, enabling assessment of both direct and indirect impacts of organizational ostracism on loneliness, moderated by workplace incivility.ResultsFindings revealed a positive link between organizational ostracism and loneliness, mediated by depressed mood. Workplace incivility moderated this link, with low to moderate incivility intensifying the relationship between depressed mood and loneliness. However, at high incivility levels, this effect weakened, indicating that extreme incivility may overshadow other dynamics.ConclusionsAddressing organizational ostracism is essential, as it drives employee loneliness, with depressed mood as a key mediator. The study suggests that environments with low to moderate incivility may worsen the impact of ostracism on loneliness, while high incivility may reduce this effect. These findings underscore the importance of fostering supportive and inclusive workplace environments to safeguard mental health.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10519815261426292"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147318866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}