{"title":"Fear of Black Consciousness By Lewis R. Gordon. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2022","authors":"William Paris","doi":"10.1111/1467-8675.12752","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1467-8675.12752","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51578,"journal":{"name":"Constellations-An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140743100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Force of Truth: Critique, Genealogy, and Truth-Telling in Michel Foucault By Daniele Lorenzini, Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press, 2023","authors":"Frieder Vogelmann","doi":"10.1111/1467-8675.12751","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1467-8675.12751","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51578,"journal":{"name":"Constellations-An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140743780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Neoliberal Citizenship: Sacred Markets, Sacrificial Lives By Luca Mavelli, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022","authors":"Luke Glanville","doi":"10.1111/1467-8675.12746","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1467-8675.12746","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51578,"journal":{"name":"Constellations-An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140745554","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Deparochializing Political Theory By Melissa S. Williams, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2020","authors":"Nicholas Tampio","doi":"10.1111/1467-8675.12750","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1467-8675.12750","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51578,"journal":{"name":"Constellations-An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140743516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A Critical Theory of Global Justice: The Frankfurt School and World Society , Malte Frøslee Ibsen, Oxford University Press, 2023.","authors":"Jeffrey Flynn","doi":"10.1111/1467-8675.12734","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1467-8675.12734","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51578,"journal":{"name":"Constellations-An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139613628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Counterinsurgency: The US sends troops to Libya to fight an insurgent group. The insurgents claim the US launched an attack that failed to properly safeguard against civilian deaths. They make this claim publicly, hoping global public opinion will turn against the US and lead it to curtail its attacks, preventing further civilian (and non-civilian) deaths. Activists and media outlets pick up the story and report it around the world. I call cases like this—cross-border political engagements including both kinetic and non-kinetic elements—hybrid cases.1 It is not obvious how to understand the non-kinetic elements of hybrid cases. Should we understand them as warfare—conflicts between “enemies” locked in a “radically adversarial relationship” whose main task is to harm each other and whose main normative quandary is how much and what kind of harm they are permitted to inflict (see Walzer, 2017, p. xiii)? Or should we understand them as some (other) kind of political struggle? The question of which analytic frame to adopt is important, as, I will argue, there are serious democratic costs associated with understanding the non-kinetic elements of hybrid cases as warfare. In Counterinsurgency, understanding civilian casualty reports made by journalists, activists, and insurgents as acts of war would mean seeing them as acts meant to cause harm (by debilitating “enemy” forces) and as strategic communications whose purpose and value were, at best, unconnected to their truth. It would mean seeing their authors as potentially liable to attack—as Gross does when he describes journalists as “the foot soldiers of media warfare” (2015, p. 300) and argues they are therefore liable to harms including “capture, incarceration, expulsion, or the destruction or confiscation of their equipment” (2015, p. 269). And it would mean seeing their audiences as pawns to be manipulated by propagandists. Understanding civilian casualty reports instead as part of a political struggle would mean seeing them as statements that could inform, inspire critical reflection, and form the basis of democratic deliberation and contestation—which might not be contained within the borders of a single state. It would mean seeing their authors as sources of potentially weighty claims deserving real consideration and seeing their audiences as interlocutors capable of judging and responding in good faith to those claims. Existing scholarship does not often explicitly recognize the question of whether to understand the non-kinetic elements of hybrid cases as warfare or political struggle—let alone explicitly evaluate the costs and benefits of making one choice or another.2 Nonetheless, some (e.g., Blank, 2017; Gross, 2015; Gross & Meisels, 2017a; Kittrie, 2016; Walzer, 2017) tend to treat them more like warfare, and others (e.g., Jurkevics, 2019; Miller, 2010, pp. 247–57; Miller, 2018; Valdez, 2019a, 2019b) tend to treat them more like political struggle. Here, I make explicit the implicit assump
这种替代性范式将跨境政治的参与者视为共同政治斗争的参与者，他们不一定会寻求伤害或摧毁对手，他们可能会以战斗人员不会的方式修改他们的目标，他们的行为应该主要受政治责任原则(而不是正义战争原则或军事战略原则)的支配。此外，根据政治斗争范式，边界不需要将对手与盟友明确区分开来下面，我将更彻底地定义战争范式。然后，我认为，过度依赖它会破坏跨境政治以上述三种方式成为(并被认可为)真正民主政治场所的潜力。最后，我概述了另一种政治斗争范式，并认为采用它可以减轻与战争范式相关的民主成本。我并不是说我们永远不应该使用战争模式。也许有时我们应该承担它的民主代价。一些认为跨境政治民主化没有价值的人可能会认为战争模式的民主成本在道德上是微不足道的。我不会试图在这里为民主辩护，反对它的批评者。但是，理解采用战争模式的民主代价，是对这些代价是否值得承担做出任何可信判断的先决条件——甚至是一个值得承担的可信判断。我在这里通过说明战争范式的民主成本以及如何采用替代范式来减轻这些成本来实现这种理解。在揭示跨境政治民主化的新障碍(过度依赖战争范式)时，我的论点可能对跨国民主的支持者具有重要意义(例如，Benhabib, 2005年，2009年;Bohman, 2007)，但对于任何有兴趣诚实地评估民主成本和使用一个或另一个分析框架来理解跨境政治的利益的人来说，它们仍然很重要。战争范式是对政治活动进行概念化和分析的一种特殊方式。只有当这样的活动涉及具有对立目的的行动者时，才有可能使用战争范式，所以我将假设在我讨论的所有情况下都是如此。采用战争范式来分析政治活动意味着将参与者视为陷入“一种彻底的对抗关系”(Walzer, 2017, p. xiii)。Walzer在撰写不采用传统动能战(“软战争”)形式的冲突时，说明了如何将这些冲突识别为“战争”，包括将这种对抗关系作为核心特征:“‘我们’试图伤害那些试图伤害‘我们’的敌人。“在这种战争中，就像在任何其他战争中一样，战斗人员需要知道什么伤害是允许的，什么伤害是不允许的，谁可以成为目标，谁不能成为目标”(Walzer, 2017, p. xiii)。Walzer在格罗斯和梅塞尔斯(2017a, p. 1)编辑的《软战争》一书中写道，该书提出了许多政治参与模式，包括“所有非动态措施，无论是有说服力的还是强制性的，包括网络战和经济制裁;媒体战和宣传，非暴力抵抗和公民不服从，抵制和“法律战”作为“战争”的形式——尽管是“软”的形式。公平地说，沃尔泽并没有主张我们应该总是把这些交战模式理解为“战争”，而是阐明了这样做的(一些)含义。他强调了当我们将一项活动归类为“战争”时所做的一些假设。也就是说，他阐明了一些隐含在战争范式下的假设，我想在这里明确说明。具体来说，沃尔泽指出，在“战争”中，每一个行动者的主要任务是伤害对方，直到他们被击败。每个行为者面临的主要规范性问题是:我给敌人造成多大程度的伤害和什么样的伤害是合理的(见Walzer, 2017, p. xiii)?这并不意味着这种完全对立的关系必须是政治遭遇中唯一合适的战争模式。即使是战争中的敌人也可能分享友谊、家庭关系、浪漫关系和仁慈的行为。但是选择用战争的范式来分析他们的政治活动就是选择把他们作为敌人的身份作为他们的中心身份，他们的任务是伤害他们的敌人来实现他们自己的目的，这是他们的中心任务，他们应该给敌人造成多大程度的伤害和什么样的伤害这是他们的中心规范困境。选择使用战争范式来分析政治活动，就是选择将政治参与者的身份、任务和规范困境(由其他(不太激进的敌对)关系定义)视为边缘。 换句话说，用战争范式来分析政治活动意味着从对抗的角度来分析。运用战争范式还涉及对应该支配政治行为者行为的原则做出某些假设，尽管它所需要的具体假设因其所扮演的角色而异。例如，对于政治理论家来说，使用战争范式涉及诉诸“正义战争”原则，如正当理由(战争应仅出于特定原因发动)，最后手段(战争应仅在其他选择已用尽后发动)，歧视(交战各方应仅攻击合法目标)，必要性(每一场战争都应是实现合法目的所必需的)，3、相称性(无论战争作为一个整体还是任何单独的战争行为，都不应造成与其所承诺的利益相比过大的损害)对于法律分析师来说，采用战争范式意味着假设行为应主要受武装冲突法(LOAC)的支配，该法“支配武装冲突期间国家、个人和非国家行为体的行为”，并且主要基于正义战争原则(Blank, 2017, pp. 90-91)。对于军事领导人来说，采用战争范式意味着假设行为应该主要受军事战略原则的支配，这也可能包括或受到正义战争原则的约束。澄清了什么是“战争范式”之后，我现在可以评估使用它来分析跨境政治混合情况下的非动力因素的成本。在质疑我们是否应该使用战争范式来分析不是字面上的战争的活动时，我同情正义的倡导者，他们认为我们不应该使用正义战争理论来分析短期战争武力的使用(见Brunstetter, 2021;Brunstetter & Braun, 2013;有关唯命是文献的回顾，请参阅Galliott, 2019)。然而，依法治罪的理论家仍然关注武力的使用。事实上，Brunstetter(2021，第8页)明确地将他的讨论局限于“涉及动能、致命力量”的行为。相反，我关注的是跨境冲突的非动力因素。因此，我的分析提供了对唯法文献的必要补充——揭示了另一个领域(混合冲突背景下的非动态交战)，在这个领域中，过度依赖战争范式具有显著的缺点，并最终说明了采用替代的政治斗争范式如何减轻这些缺点。首先，运用战争范式来分析混合案例的非动态因素，包括采用——或鼓励他人采用——一种对抗性的观点，这种观点将边界两侧的参与者视为陷入彻底对抗关系的“敌人”。这反过来又破坏了民主，因为它阻碍了有利于相互学习的尊重关系的形成和承认，并关闭了跨国界团结合作的可能性。我的论点的这一部分类似于Mouffe(2000，第101-104页)的观点，即当政治对手将彼此视为“要被摧毁的敌人”(2000，第102页)时，多元民主就会受到阻碍，而当他们将彼此视为有权在政治舞台上推广自己观点的合法对手时，多元民主就会得以实现。然而，我的观点在关键方面与墨菲的不同——最重要的是，它对国际背景的关注。此外，当Mouffe(2009)考虑到她的民主理论对国际关系的影响时，她得出结论，我们应该努力建立一个“多极”世界，将其划分为不同的地区，每个地区根据自己的文化和价值观进行治理，每个地区制定自己的民主形式，所有这些都被认为是合法的。但这并没有告诉我们，超越墨菲的地区边界的政治活动是民主的，需要什么条件。这就是我在这里提出的问题。墨菲(2009，第553页)接受将世界划分为不同的“集团”，并设想当这些集团中没有一个试图将其价值观强加给其他集团时，民主是最好的。相反，我探索社会之间的间隙空间(在许多情况下是地区或“集团”之间的空间)本身如何成为民主政治的场所，以及什么可能破坏其民主潜力。同样值得注意的是，我的论点(不像墨菲的)应该被广泛的民主理论家所接受，而不仅仅是激动论者。我的论点并不依赖于任何一种民主概念——只依赖于民主存在的几个先决条件，这些条件得到了广泛的民主理论家的认可，他们主张不同的民主概念。除了使我的观点更加普世化之外，这意
{"title":"Not just war by other means: Cross‐border engagement as political struggle","authors":"Lucia M. Rafanelli","doi":"10.1111/1467-8675.12719","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12719","url":null,"abstract":"Counterinsurgency: The US sends troops to Libya to fight an insurgent group. The insurgents claim the US launched an attack that failed to properly safeguard against civilian deaths. They make this claim publicly, hoping global public opinion will turn against the US and lead it to curtail its attacks, preventing further civilian (and non-civilian) deaths. Activists and media outlets pick up the story and report it around the world. I call cases like this—cross-border political engagements including both kinetic and non-kinetic elements—hybrid cases.1 It is not obvious how to understand the non-kinetic elements of hybrid cases. Should we understand them as warfare—conflicts between “enemies” locked in a “radically adversarial relationship” whose main task is to harm each other and whose main normative quandary is how much and what kind of harm they are permitted to inflict (see Walzer, 2017, p. xiii)? Or should we understand them as some (other) kind of political struggle? The question of which analytic frame to adopt is important, as, I will argue, there are serious democratic costs associated with understanding the non-kinetic elements of hybrid cases as warfare. In Counterinsurgency, understanding civilian casualty reports made by journalists, activists, and insurgents as acts of war would mean seeing them as acts meant to cause harm (by debilitating “enemy” forces) and as strategic communications whose purpose and value were, at best, unconnected to their truth. It would mean seeing their authors as potentially liable to attack—as Gross does when he describes journalists as “the foot soldiers of media warfare” (2015, p. 300) and argues they are therefore liable to harms including “capture, incarceration, expulsion, or the destruction or confiscation of their equipment” (2015, p. 269). And it would mean seeing their audiences as pawns to be manipulated by propagandists. Understanding civilian casualty reports instead as part of a political struggle would mean seeing them as statements that could inform, inspire critical reflection, and form the basis of democratic deliberation and contestation—which might not be contained within the borders of a single state. It would mean seeing their authors as sources of potentially weighty claims deserving real consideration and seeing their audiences as interlocutors capable of judging and responding in good faith to those claims. Existing scholarship does not often explicitly recognize the question of whether to understand the non-kinetic elements of hybrid cases as warfare or political struggle—let alone explicitly evaluate the costs and benefits of making one choice or another.2 Nonetheless, some (e.g., Blank, 2017; Gross, 2015; Gross & Meisels, 2017a; Kittrie, 2016; Walzer, 2017) tend to treat them more like warfare, and others (e.g., Jurkevics, 2019; Miller, 2010, pp. 247–57; Miller, 2018; Valdez, 2019a, 2019b) tend to treat them more like political struggle. Here, I make explicit the implicit assump","PeriodicalId":51578,"journal":{"name":"Constellations-An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135167044","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
ConstellationsEarly View ORIGINAL ARTICLE The public university as a real utopia Martin Aidnik, Corresponding Author Martin Aidnik [email protected] Independent Scholar, Tallinn, Estonia Correspondence Martin Aidnik, Juurdeveo 19-44, Tallinn 11312, Estonia. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorHarshwardhani Sharma, Harshwardhani Sharma Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, Faridabad, Haryana, IndiaSearch for more papers by this author Martin Aidnik, Corresponding Author Martin Aidnik [email protected] Independent Scholar, Tallinn, Estonia Correspondence Martin Aidnik, Juurdeveo 19-44, Tallinn 11312, Estonia. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorHarshwardhani Sharma, Harshwardhani Sharma Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, Faridabad, Haryana, IndiaSearch for more papers by this author First published: 22 October 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12716Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES Aidnik, M. (2020). Structural reforms and business ethos in universities under Estonia's post-2008 austerity regime. Policy Futures in Education, 18(8), 957–975. American Association of University Professors. (2023). Data snapshot: Tenure and contingency in US higher education, AAUP. Bahr, A., Eichhorn, K., & Kubon, S. (2022). #IchBinHanna: Prekäre Wissenschaft in Deutschland. Suhrkamp. Barnett, R. (1994). The limits of competence: Knowledge, higher education and society. Society for Research Into Higher Education & Open University Press. Barnett, R. (1997). Higher education: A critical business. Society for Research Into Higher Education & Open University Press. Barnett, R. (2018). The ecological university: A feasible Utopia. Routledge. Barnett, R. (2022). The philosophy of higher education: A critical introduction. Routledge. Bok, D. (2003). Universities in the marketplace: The commercialization of higher education. Princeton University Press. Burawoy, M. (2020). A tale of two Marxisms: Remembering Erik Olin Wright (1947–2019). Politics & Society, 48(4), 467–494. Butler, J. (2017). Academic freedom and the critical task of the university. Globalizations, 14(6), 857–861. Calhoun, C. (2006). The university and the public good. Thesis Eleven, 84, 7–43. Cote, J., & Furlong, A. (2019). Introduction: The history and scope of the sociology of higher education. In J. Cote & A. Furlong (Eds.), Routledge handbook of the sociology of higher education (pp. 1–16). Routledge.
{"title":"The public university as a real utopia","authors":"Martin Aidnik, Harshwardhani Sharma","doi":"10.1111/1467-8675.12716","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12716","url":null,"abstract":"ConstellationsEarly View ORIGINAL ARTICLE The public university as a real utopia Martin Aidnik, Corresponding Author Martin Aidnik [email protected] Independent Scholar, Tallinn, Estonia Correspondence Martin Aidnik, Juurdeveo 19-44, Tallinn 11312, Estonia. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorHarshwardhani Sharma, Harshwardhani Sharma Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, Faridabad, Haryana, IndiaSearch for more papers by this author Martin Aidnik, Corresponding Author Martin Aidnik [email protected] Independent Scholar, Tallinn, Estonia Correspondence Martin Aidnik, Juurdeveo 19-44, Tallinn 11312, Estonia. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorHarshwardhani Sharma, Harshwardhani Sharma Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, Faridabad, Haryana, IndiaSearch for more papers by this author First published: 22 October 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12716Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES Aidnik, M. (2020). Structural reforms and business ethos in universities under Estonia's post-2008 austerity regime. Policy Futures in Education, 18(8), 957–975. American Association of University Professors. (2023). Data snapshot: Tenure and contingency in US higher education, AAUP. Bahr, A., Eichhorn, K., & Kubon, S. (2022). #IchBinHanna: Prekäre Wissenschaft in Deutschland. Suhrkamp. Barnett, R. (1994). The limits of competence: Knowledge, higher education and society. Society for Research Into Higher Education & Open University Press. Barnett, R. (1997). Higher education: A critical business. Society for Research Into Higher Education & Open University Press. Barnett, R. (2018). The ecological university: A feasible Utopia. Routledge. Barnett, R. (2022). The philosophy of higher education: A critical introduction. Routledge. Bok, D. (2003). Universities in the marketplace: The commercialization of higher education. Princeton University Press. Burawoy, M. (2020). A tale of two Marxisms: Remembering Erik Olin Wright (1947–2019). Politics & Society, 48(4), 467–494. Butler, J. (2017). Academic freedom and the critical task of the university. Globalizations, 14(6), 857–861. Calhoun, C. (2006). The university and the public good. Thesis Eleven, 84, 7–43. Cote, J., & Furlong, A. (2019). Introduction: The history and scope of the sociology of higher education. In J. Cote & A. Furlong (Eds.), Routledge handbook of the sociology of higher education (pp. 1–16). Routledge. ","PeriodicalId":51578,"journal":{"name":"Constellations-An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135462359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Critique and praxis: A critical philosophy of illusions, values, and action By Bernard E. Harcourt, New York: Columbia University Press, 2022. p. 696, $30","authors":"Maeve Cooke","doi":"10.1111/1467-8675.12717","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1467-8675.12717","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51578,"journal":{"name":"Constellations-An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135512051","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
ConstellationsEarly View ORIGINAL ARTICLE On old revolutions and new constitutions: Constituent power in the Chilean constituent process Franco Schiappacasse, Corresponding Author Franco Schiappacasse [email protected] University of Chile, Santiago, Chile Correspondence Franco Schiappacasse, Suecia 810, Santiago, Chile. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Franco Schiappacasse, Corresponding Author Franco Schiappacasse [email protected] University of Chile, Santiago, Chile Correspondence Franco Schiappacasse, Suecia 810, Santiago, Chile. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 21 October 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12720Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Books and articles Arato, A. (2016). Post sovereign constitution making: Learning and legitimacy ( 1st ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198755982.001.0001 Arato, A. (2017). The adventures of the constituent power: Beyond revolutions? ( 1st ed.). Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy. Atria, F. (2020). Constituent moment, constituted powers in Chile. Law and Critique, 31(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-020-09258-8 Atria, F. (2013). La Constitución Tramposa ( 1st ed.). LOM Ediciones. Atria, F. (2016). La forma del derecho ( 1st ed.). Marcial Pons. Baquerizo, J. (2021). El concepto de ‘poder constituyente’: Un estudio de teoría analítica del derecho ( 1st ed). Marcial Pons. Barczentewicz, M., & Schneider, A. (2019). Andrew Arato, the adventures of the constituent power: Beyond revolutions? The American Journal of Comparative Law, 67(1), 219–225. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avz001 Böckenforde, E.-W., Künkler, M., & Stein, T. (2017). Constitutional and political theory. Volume I selected writings ( 1st ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714965.003.0010 Colón-Ríos, J. (2020). Constituent power and the law ( 1st ed.). Oxford University. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198785989.003.0001 Colón-Ríos, J. (2012). Weak constitutionalism: Democratic legitimacy and the question of constituent power. Routledge. Conaghan, C. (2008). Ecuador: Correa's Plebiscitary Presidency. Journal of Democracy, 19(2), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2008.0026 Corrales, J. (2015). The authoritarian resurgence: Autocratic legalism in Venezuela. Journal of Democracy, 26(2), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2015.0031 Couso, J. (2013). Trying democracy in the shadow of an aut
旧革命与新宪法:智利制宪过程中的制宪权力Franco Schiappacasse，通讯作者Franco Schiappacasse [email protected]智利圣地亚哥智利大学通讯Franco Schiappacasse, Suecia 810, Santiago, Chile。电子邮件:[Email protected]搜索作者Franco Schiappacasse的更多论文，通讯作者Franco Schiappacasse [Email protected]智利大学，圣地亚哥，智利通信Franco Schiappacasse, Suecia 810，圣地亚哥，智利。邮箱:[Email protected]搜索该作者的更多论文首次发表:2023年10月21日https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12720Read全文taboutpdf ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare给予accessShare全文accessShare全文accessShare全文accessShare请查看我们的使用条款和条件，并勾选下面的复选框共享文章的全文版本。我已经阅读并接受了Wiley在线图书馆使用共享链接的条款和条件，请使用下面的链接与您的朋友和同事分享本文的全文版本。学习更多的知识。复制链接分享链接分享一个邮箱facebook推特linkedinreddit微信图书文章阿拉托a .(2016)。后主权宪法制定:学习与合法性(第1版)。牛津大学出版社。https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198755982.001.0001 Arato, A.(2017)。制宪权力的冒险:超越革命?(第一版)。比较宪法法律与政策“，”奥特里亚，F.(2020)。智利的构成时刻，构成了权力。法律与批判，31(1)，51-58。https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-020-09258-8 Atria, F.(2013)。La Constitución Tramposa(第一版)。LOM Ediciones。Atria, F.(2016)。《政治形式》(第一版)。马歇尔·庞斯。Baquerizo, J.(2021)。El concepto de ' powder constituyente ': unestudio de teoría analítica del derecho(第1版)。马歇尔·庞斯。Barczentewicz, M.， & Schneider, A.(2019)。安德鲁·阿拉托:《制宪权力的冒险:超越革命?》《法学研究》，2011(1)，391 - 391。https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avz001 Böckenforde, e - w。， k<e:1> nkler, M.， & Stein, T.(2017)。宪法和政治理论。第一卷选集(第一版)。牛津大学出版社。https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714965.003.0010 Colón-Ríos, J.(2020)。宪法权力与法律(第1版)。牛津大学。https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198785989.003.0001 Colón-Ríos, J.(2012)。弱宪政:民主合法性与制宪权问题。劳特利奇。康纳汉，C.(2008)。厄瓜多尔:科雷亚担任公民投票主席。民主学报，19(2)，46-60。https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2008.0026 Corrales, J.(2015)。独裁主义的复苏:委内瑞拉的专制法律主义。民主学报，26(2)，37-51。https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2015.0031 Couso, J.(2013)。在专制合法性的阴影下尝试民主:智利向民主的过渡和1980年皮诺切特的宪法。威斯康星国际法杂志，29(2)，393-415。Crispi, R.和Ruiz-Tagle, P.(2017)。《宪法主义论论》(第1版)。LOM Ediciones。Dyzenhaus, D.(2012)。宪政的一把老钥匙:合法性与制宪权。世界宪政，1(2)，229-260。https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381712000032 Fasel, R.(2020)。受约束的惯例:伊曼纽尔·约瑟夫·西耶<s:1>和智利新宪法的制定。法学研究，8(2020)，1-29。https://ssrn.com/abstract=3657316 Fermandois, A.(2021)。《文明宪政进程:Artículo法律限制》135《宪法最终决定》Constitución a Convención。见Asociación Chilena de Derecho constitutional(编)，Tránsito constitutional: Camino Hacia Una Nueva Constitución(第709-731页)。提兰特·洛·布兰奇。garc<s:1>， M.(2019)。2019年10月:新自由主义智利的社会起义。中国文化研究，28(3)，483-491。https://doi.org/10.1080/13569325.2019.1696289 Gargarella, R. (2014) La sala de máquinas de La Constitución: Dos siglos de constitutional alismo en amassica Latina(1810-2010)(第1版)。卡茨。Heiss, C.(2017)。智利的合法性危机与宪法问题:威权主义的遗产。星座，24(3)，470-479。https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12309 Heiss, C.(2021)。革命的社会进程在智利形成。世界卫生社会科学研究，2,69-78。https://doi.org/10.14198/ambos.20981 Kelsen, H.(2005)。纯法律理论(第5版)。法律书交换。朗道，D.(2019)。拉丁美洲的制宪权力与制宪。兰道和勒纳(编)，比较宪法制定(第567-588页)。爱德华·埃尔加出版社。https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785365263.00035 Loughlin, M.(2022)。反对立宪主义(第一版)。哈佛大学出版社。
{"title":"On old revolutions and new constitutions: Constituent power in the Chilean constituent process","authors":"Franco Schiappacasse","doi":"10.1111/1467-8675.12720","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12720","url":null,"abstract":"ConstellationsEarly View ORIGINAL ARTICLE On old revolutions and new constitutions: Constituent power in the Chilean constituent process Franco Schiappacasse, Corresponding Author Franco Schiappacasse [email protected] University of Chile, Santiago, Chile Correspondence Franco Schiappacasse, Suecia 810, Santiago, Chile. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Franco Schiappacasse, Corresponding Author Franco Schiappacasse [email protected] University of Chile, Santiago, Chile Correspondence Franco Schiappacasse, Suecia 810, Santiago, Chile. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 21 October 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12720Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Books and articles Arato, A. (2016). Post sovereign constitution making: Learning and legitimacy ( 1st ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198755982.001.0001 Arato, A. (2017). The adventures of the constituent power: Beyond revolutions? ( 1st ed.). Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy. Atria, F. (2020). Constituent moment, constituted powers in Chile. Law and Critique, 31(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-020-09258-8 Atria, F. (2013). La Constitución Tramposa ( 1st ed.). LOM Ediciones. Atria, F. (2016). La forma del derecho ( 1st ed.). Marcial Pons. Baquerizo, J. (2021). El concepto de ‘poder constituyente’: Un estudio de teoría analítica del derecho ( 1st ed). Marcial Pons. Barczentewicz, M., & Schneider, A. (2019). Andrew Arato, the adventures of the constituent power: Beyond revolutions? The American Journal of Comparative Law, 67(1), 219–225. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avz001 Böckenforde, E.-W., Künkler, M., & Stein, T. (2017). Constitutional and political theory. Volume I selected writings ( 1st ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714965.003.0010 Colón-Ríos, J. (2020). Constituent power and the law ( 1st ed.). Oxford University. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198785989.003.0001 Colón-Ríos, J. (2012). Weak constitutionalism: Democratic legitimacy and the question of constituent power. Routledge. Conaghan, C. (2008). Ecuador: Correa's Plebiscitary Presidency. Journal of Democracy, 19(2), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2008.0026 Corrales, J. (2015). The authoritarian resurgence: Autocratic legalism in Venezuela. Journal of Democracy, 26(2), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2015.0031 Couso, J. (2013). Trying democracy in the shadow of an aut","PeriodicalId":51578,"journal":{"name":"Constellations-An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135512061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Degenerations of democracy By Craig Calhoun, Dilip Parameshwar Gaonkar, Charles Taylor, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 2022, pp. 368. $29.95 (hbk). ISBN: 9780674237582","authors":"Julian Culp","doi":"10.1111/1467-8675.12718","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1467-8675.12718","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51578,"journal":{"name":"Constellations-An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136034542","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：