Pub Date : 2021-05-31DOI: 10.21143/JHP.VOL50.NO4.2859
David Hardiago
According to Indonesian penal law, an act is considered to be a criminal act based on the principle of legality. Problem arise when political crime is associated with the principle of legality, that said problem is related to the definition of political crime that is not stipulated in any of statutory provisions and/or regulations in Indonesia. This legal research aims to answer two legal problems raised by the Author, those are: Firstly, to determine the parameter of political crime in Indonesia. Secondly, to elaborate on the projection on how political crime should be stipulated in the future. The research in this study used normative legal research in order to find answers for legal problems elaborated by the Author. Secondary data collection is supported by some approaches, those are statutory approach, conceptual approach as well as comparative approach. Those aforementioned shall be constructed qualitatively in order to reach the conclusion using deductive and inductive method alternatively.
{"title":"DELIK POLITIK DALAM HUKUM PIDANA INDONESIA","authors":"David Hardiago","doi":"10.21143/JHP.VOL50.NO4.2859","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21143/JHP.VOL50.NO4.2859","url":null,"abstract":"According to Indonesian penal law, an act is considered to be a criminal act based on the principle of legality. Problem arise when political crime is associated with the principle of legality, that said problem is related to the definition of political crime that is not stipulated in any of statutory provisions and/or regulations in Indonesia. This legal research aims to answer two legal problems raised by the Author, those are: Firstly, to determine the parameter of political crime in Indonesia. Secondly, to elaborate on the projection on how political crime should be stipulated in the future. The research in this study used normative legal research in order to find answers for legal problems elaborated by the Author. Secondary data collection is supported by some approaches, those are statutory approach, conceptual approach as well as comparative approach. Those aforementioned shall be constructed qualitatively in order to reach the conclusion using deductive and inductive method alternatively.","PeriodicalId":53034,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45307304","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui analisis yuridis terkait nelayan kecil yang melakukan tindak pidana blast fishing (studi kasus Putusan No. 47/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Dgl). Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan kasus, dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penegakan hukum pidana tindak pidana blast fishing secara in abstracto diatur dalam Pasal 84 ayat (1) Undang-Undang No. 45 tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2004 tentang Perikanan (UU Perikanan). Akan tetapi, jika pelakunya adalah nelayan kecil, ketentuan pidana yang berlaku adalah Pasal 100B UU. Penerapan Pasal 100B atas tindak pidana blast fishing yang dilakukan oleh nelayan kecil termuat dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Donggala Nomor 47/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Dgl dimana sanksi pidana yang dijatuhkan kepada Terdakwa sudah sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 100B UU Perikanan. Majelis hakim menggunakan teori pemidanaan berupa teori gabungan dalam mengadili perkara tersebut.
{"title":"ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA BLAST FISHING YANG DILAKUKAN NELAYAN KECIL","authors":"Ayu Izza Elvany","doi":"10.26532/jh.v37i1.15553","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26532/jh.v37i1.15553","url":null,"abstract":"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui analisis yuridis terkait nelayan kecil yang melakukan tindak pidana blast fishing (studi kasus Putusan No. 47/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Dgl). Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan kasus, dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penegakan hukum pidana tindak pidana blast fishing secara in abstracto diatur dalam Pasal 84 ayat (1) Undang-Undang No. 45 tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2004 tentang Perikanan (UU Perikanan). Akan tetapi, jika pelakunya adalah nelayan kecil, ketentuan pidana yang berlaku adalah Pasal 100B UU. Penerapan Pasal 100B atas tindak pidana blast fishing yang dilakukan oleh nelayan kecil termuat dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Donggala Nomor 47/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Dgl dimana sanksi pidana yang dijatuhkan kepada Terdakwa sudah sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 100B UU Perikanan. Majelis hakim menggunakan teori pemidanaan berupa teori gabungan dalam mengadili perkara tersebut.","PeriodicalId":53034,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75274708","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-25DOI: 10.21143/JHP.VOL50.NO3.2760
Febrian Dwi Laksono, Thohir Luth, Siti Hamidah
The prevailing legal stipulations on the contract of the Musyarakah Mutanaqisah (MMQ) financing are occurred legal uncertainty, which is caused by obscurity of the encumbrance regulations for land relating to financing with the MMQ contract. One of arising legal issue in the MMQ financing mechanism is a blurring of the norms contained in Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Encumbrance Right over Land And Land-Related Objects (UUHT). The obscurity is caused by unclear stipulating sharia financing or specifically financing with the MMQ contract in UUHT. One of the provisions that reflecting this lack of clarity is to examine the description of the definition of Encumbrance Right. The UUHT definition only explains that the Encumbrance Right is security right which is imposed on a land title to pay off a debt and making the position preferred for Encumbrance. The results showed that the concept of the debt and credit relationship in article 3 of the UUHT was not only limited to the legal relationship between the lending and borrowing as in the concept of the loan-lending agreement in article 1754 of the Civil Code (Civil Code) but also other agreements that have obligatory nature.
{"title":"STATUS HAK TANGGUNGAN PADA PEMBIAYAAN KEPEMILIKAN RUMAH DI AKAD MUSYARAKAH MUTANAQISAH (MMQ)","authors":"Febrian Dwi Laksono, Thohir Luth, Siti Hamidah","doi":"10.21143/JHP.VOL50.NO3.2760","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21143/JHP.VOL50.NO3.2760","url":null,"abstract":"The prevailing legal stipulations on the contract of the Musyarakah Mutanaqisah (MMQ) financing are occurred legal uncertainty, which is caused by obscurity of the encumbrance regulations for land relating to financing with the MMQ contract. One of arising legal issue in the MMQ financing mechanism is a blurring of the norms contained in Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Encumbrance Right over Land And Land-Related Objects (UUHT). The obscurity is caused by unclear stipulating sharia financing or specifically financing with the MMQ contract in UUHT. One of the provisions that reflecting this lack of clarity is to examine the description of the definition of Encumbrance Right. The UUHT definition only explains that the Encumbrance Right is security right which is imposed on a land title to pay off a debt and making the position preferred for Encumbrance. The results showed that the concept of the debt and credit relationship in article 3 of the UUHT was not only limited to the legal relationship between the lending and borrowing as in the concept of the loan-lending agreement in article 1754 of the Civil Code (Civil Code) but also other agreements that have obligatory nature.","PeriodicalId":53034,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41913157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-07DOI: 10.31599/krtha.v14i2.189
Hendrawan Agusta
Perkembangan teknologi informasi sangat pesat, adanya kolaborasi antara teknologi informasi dengan berbagai bidang kehidupan melahirkan berbagai macam inovasi yang membuat kehidupan masyarakat semakin mudah. Inovasi di bidang teknologi informasi melahirkan model bisnis baru yang pada gilirannya mampu menghasilkan efisiensi bagi masyarakat. Revolusi teknologi informasi tersebut terus berkembang dan sekarang memasuki bidang keuangan yang regulasinya ketat. Kolaborasi antara teknologi informasi dengan bidang keuangan melahirkan Teknologi Finansial atau Financial Technology (Fintech), salah satunya pinjam-meminjam uang berbasis teknologi informasi (Peer to Peer Lending/P2P Lending). Masyarakat menjadi lebih mudah mengakses kebutuhan keuangannya melalui P2P Lending. Di sisi lain, muncul tantangan dalam P2P Lending mengenai perlindungan data (data pribadi, data transaksi dan data keuangan). Dalam penelitian ini yang akan dibahas hanya data pribadi Penerima Pinjaman, dimana data pribadi tersebut perlu dilindungi agar tidak terjadi penyalahgunaan yang menimbulkan permasalahan hukum
{"title":"PERLINDUNGAN DATA PRIBADI PENERIMA PINJAMAN DALAM TRANSAKSI PINJAM MEMINJAM UANG BERBASIS TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI (PEER TO PEER LENDING)","authors":"Hendrawan Agusta","doi":"10.31599/krtha.v14i2.189","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v14i2.189","url":null,"abstract":"Perkembangan teknologi informasi sangat pesat, adanya kolaborasi antara teknologi informasi dengan berbagai bidang kehidupan melahirkan berbagai macam inovasi yang membuat kehidupan masyarakat semakin mudah. Inovasi di bidang teknologi informasi melahirkan model bisnis baru yang pada gilirannya mampu menghasilkan efisiensi bagi masyarakat. Revolusi teknologi informasi tersebut terus berkembang dan sekarang memasuki bidang keuangan yang regulasinya ketat. Kolaborasi antara teknologi informasi dengan bidang keuangan melahirkan Teknologi Finansial atau Financial Technology (Fintech), salah satunya pinjam-meminjam uang berbasis teknologi informasi (Peer to Peer Lending/P2P Lending). Masyarakat menjadi lebih mudah mengakses kebutuhan keuangannya melalui P2P Lending. Di sisi lain, muncul tantangan dalam P2P Lending mengenai perlindungan data (data pribadi, data transaksi dan data keuangan). Dalam penelitian ini yang akan dibahas hanya data pribadi Penerima Pinjaman, dimana data pribadi tersebut perlu dilindungi agar tidak terjadi penyalahgunaan yang menimbulkan permasalahan hukum","PeriodicalId":53034,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47859914","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-09-28DOI: 10.21143/JHP.VOL50.NO3.2754
Sukarmi, M. Sudirman, Dwi Egawati
Perusahaan penerbangan dalam pengadaan Pesawat Udara salah satu dengan Sewa Guna Usaha (Operating Lease) oleh Perusahan Leasing. Perusahaan Leasing (Lessor) dalam memperoleh Pesawat Udara dengan pembiayaan dari Bank dan Pesawat Udara tersebut dibebankan Mortgage sebagai jaminan. Pada Perjanjian Sewa Guna Usaha Pesawat Udara, Perusahaan Penerbangan diharuskan menfidusiakan klaim asuransi atas pesawat tersebut. Namun, pada Pasal 10 huruf b UU No. 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia (selanjutnya disebut UUJF) menyatakan bahwa kecuali diperjanjikan lain Jaminan Fidusia meliputi klaim asuransi dalam hal benda yang menjadi objek fidusia diasuransikan
{"title":"KLAIM ASURANSI PESAWAT UDARA SEWA GUNA USAHA (OPERATING LEASE) SEBAGAI OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA","authors":"Sukarmi, M. Sudirman, Dwi Egawati","doi":"10.21143/JHP.VOL50.NO3.2754","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21143/JHP.VOL50.NO3.2754","url":null,"abstract":"Perusahaan penerbangan dalam pengadaan Pesawat Udara salah satu dengan Sewa Guna Usaha (Operating Lease) oleh Perusahan Leasing. Perusahaan Leasing (Lessor) dalam memperoleh Pesawat Udara dengan pembiayaan dari Bank dan Pesawat Udara tersebut dibebankan Mortgage sebagai jaminan. Pada Perjanjian Sewa Guna Usaha Pesawat Udara, Perusahaan Penerbangan diharuskan menfidusiakan klaim asuransi atas pesawat tersebut. Namun, pada Pasal 10 huruf b UU No. 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia (selanjutnya disebut UUJF) menyatakan bahwa kecuali diperjanjikan lain Jaminan Fidusia meliputi klaim asuransi dalam hal benda yang menjadi objek fidusia diasuransikan","PeriodicalId":53034,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43568106","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-09-28DOI: 10.21143/JHP.VOL50.NO2.2585
Fitra Arsil, Q. Ayuni
Indonesia own various of legal models uses to deal with emergencies. Two emergency arrangements in the 1945 Constitution are represented by the phrase "state of danger" in Article 12 of the 1945 Constitution and the phrase " coercive importance " in Article 22 of the 1945 Constitution. Both have different characters and implications for both the power generated and the oversight mechanism. In addition, there are also emergency legal instruments based on laws, which are represented among others by the Disaster Mitigation Act and the Health Quarantine Act. Interestingly, an emergency based on this law is not directly related to an emergency based on the Constitution which has implications for the legal system and character of the resulting emergency power. Dealing with the Covid-19 pandemic The Indonesian government was confronted with these choices to form an emergency policy. The choice of emergency legal scheme chosen by Indonesia is more for activating emergency based on the law in dealing with Covid 19.
{"title":"MODEL PENGATURAN KEDARURATAN DAN PILIHAN KEDARURATAN INDONESIA DALAM MENGHADAPI PANDEMI COVID-19","authors":"Fitra Arsil, Q. Ayuni","doi":"10.21143/JHP.VOL50.NO2.2585","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21143/JHP.VOL50.NO2.2585","url":null,"abstract":"Indonesia own various of legal models uses to deal with emergencies. Two emergency arrangements in the 1945 Constitution are represented by the phrase \"state of danger\" in Article 12 of the 1945 Constitution and the phrase \" coercive importance \" in Article 22 of the 1945 Constitution. Both have different characters and implications for both the power generated and the oversight mechanism. In addition, there are also emergency legal instruments based on laws, which are represented among others by the Disaster Mitigation Act and the Health Quarantine Act. Interestingly, an emergency based on this law is not directly related to an emergency based on the Constitution which has implications for the legal system and character of the resulting emergency power. Dealing with the Covid-19 pandemic The Indonesian government was confronted with these choices to form an emergency policy. The choice of emergency legal scheme chosen by Indonesia is more for activating emergency based on the law in dealing with Covid 19.","PeriodicalId":53034,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46670528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-07-13DOI: 10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.2482
M. Fajri
As a solution to the problems of the Cost Recovery production sharing contract system, the Government of Indonesia through the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources issued Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources of the Republic of Indonesia Regulation Number 08 of 2017 concerning Gross Split Production Sharing Contracts. This new regulation is motivated by the low number and length of time of the discovery of oil and gas reserves, along with the Non-Tax State Revenue (PNBP) which continues to decline in the upstream oil and gas sector. The Gross Split profit sharing scheme also offers bureaucratic cuts in investment that are expected to attract investors to carry out exploration and exploitation in Indonesia. This study aims to analyze the legal rules related to Gross Split regulation in the aspect of improving the upstream investment climate of oil and gas and analyze the new role of the Special Oil and Gas Working Unit as an institution appointed by the state to control and supervise the activities of the PSC’s Company in Production Sharing Contract.
{"title":"ANALISIS HUKUM SKEMA KONTRAK GROSS SPLIT TERHADAP PENINGKATAN INVESTASI HULU MINYAK DAN GAS BUMI","authors":"M. Fajri","doi":"10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.2482","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.2482","url":null,"abstract":"As a solution to the problems of the Cost Recovery production sharing contract system, the Government of Indonesia through the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources issued Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources of the Republic of Indonesia Regulation Number 08 of 2017 concerning Gross Split Production Sharing Contracts. This new regulation is motivated by the low number and length of time of the discovery of oil and gas reserves, along with the Non-Tax State Revenue (PNBP) which continues to decline in the upstream oil and gas sector. The Gross Split profit sharing scheme also offers bureaucratic cuts in investment that are expected to attract investors to carry out exploration and exploitation in Indonesia. This study aims to analyze the legal rules related to Gross Split regulation in the aspect of improving the upstream investment climate of oil and gas and analyze the new role of the Special Oil and Gas Working Unit as an institution appointed by the state to control and supervise the activities of the PSC’s Company in Production Sharing Contract.","PeriodicalId":53034,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.2482","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48285622","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-07-13DOI: 10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.2487
Meirani Suyawan, Kurnia Togar Pandapotan Tanjung
The latest version of the draft bill regarding Law on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition has added new arrangements about the abuse of a superior bargaining position. The new law proposal which is intended to amend existing Indonesian competition law (Law Number 5 Year 1999) stipulates that any business actor is prohibited from abuse its superior bargaining position within a partnership agreement with other less dominant entities. Under Law Number 20 Year 2008 on Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises, a partnership agreement means any agreement made between micro, small and medium enterprises and large enterprises like state or privately owned national businesses, joint ventures and foreign businesses that conduct economic activities in Indonesia. For example under the Indonesian Minister of State-Owned Enterprises (SoE) Regulation No. 7 of 2015, the SoE is obligated to arrange a business partnership agreement with small scale enterprise. Unlike the arrangements on abuse of dominant position which requires the establishment of monopoly power or dominance in a relevant market, the abuse of superior bargaining position may exist without market power and only required competition authority to detect whether there is any exploitation by the counterparty in a relatively stronger bargaining position. Such a condition makes many antitrust experts or economists question the relevancy of regulating abuse of superior bargaining position under competition law. However, several jurisdictions –Japan, Korea, Taiwan, France, and Germany- have regulated the abuse of superior bargaining position under their national competition laws
{"title":"ON PROPOSAL TO REGULATE ABUSE OF SUPERIOR BARGAINING POSITION: LESSONS FROM OTHER JURISDICTIONS","authors":"Meirani Suyawan, Kurnia Togar Pandapotan Tanjung","doi":"10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.2487","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.2487","url":null,"abstract":"The latest version of the draft bill regarding Law on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition has added new arrangements about the abuse of a superior bargaining position. The new law proposal which is intended to amend existing Indonesian competition law (Law Number 5 Year 1999) stipulates that any business actor is prohibited from abuse its superior bargaining position within a partnership agreement with other less dominant entities. Under Law Number 20 Year 2008 on Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises, a partnership agreement means any agreement made between micro, small and medium enterprises and large enterprises like state or privately owned national businesses, joint ventures and foreign businesses that conduct economic activities in Indonesia. For example under the Indonesian Minister of State-Owned Enterprises (SoE) Regulation No. 7 of 2015, the SoE is obligated to arrange a business partnership agreement with small scale enterprise. Unlike the arrangements on abuse of dominant position which requires the establishment of monopoly power or dominance in a relevant market, the abuse of superior bargaining position may exist without market power and only required competition authority to detect whether there is any exploitation by the counterparty in a relatively stronger bargaining position. Such a condition makes many antitrust experts or economists question the relevancy of regulating abuse of superior bargaining position under competition law. However, several jurisdictions –Japan, Korea, Taiwan, France, and Germany- have regulated the abuse of superior bargaining position under their national competition laws","PeriodicalId":53034,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44881633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-07-13DOI: 10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.2492
Muhammad Adiguna Bimasakti
Citizen Lawsuit is an alternative law enforcement mechanism for citizens. Every citizen has the same right to file a Citizen Lawsuit in the court. However, the problems are that there is no definite regulation regarding the authority to adjudicate Citizen Lawsuit, and its contact with the “Judicial Review” which is the constitutional authority of the Supreme Court. In addition there are also problems related to discretionary authority where there is a prohibition for judges to judge the good and bad of the government's discretionary actions. This paper tries to answer these problems through normative and theoretical approaches. The contact between Judicial Review and Citizen Lawsuit is that if the object is an existing regulation. Prohibition for judges from assessing the good and bad of the government's discretionary action can be ruled out as long as the assessment is made regarding purposes of discretionary actions ruled under Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration. The character of Citizen Lawsuit is administrative, not civil, so it should be the authority of the State Administrative Court and not the General Court to adjudicate.
{"title":"MEREKONSTRUKSI PARADIGMA GUGATAN CITIZEN LAWSUIT DI INDONESIA SEBAGAI SENGKETA ADMINISTRASI","authors":"Muhammad Adiguna Bimasakti","doi":"10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.2492","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.2492","url":null,"abstract":"Citizen Lawsuit is an alternative law enforcement mechanism for citizens. Every citizen has the same right to file a Citizen Lawsuit in the court. However, the problems are that there is no definite regulation regarding the authority to adjudicate Citizen Lawsuit, and its contact with the “Judicial Review” which is the constitutional authority of the Supreme Court. In addition there are also problems related to discretionary authority where there is a prohibition for judges to judge the good and bad of the government's discretionary actions. This paper tries to answer these problems through normative and theoretical approaches. The contact between Judicial Review and Citizen Lawsuit is that if the object is an existing regulation. Prohibition for judges from assessing the good and bad of the government's discretionary action can be ruled out as long as the assessment is made regarding purposes of discretionary actions ruled under Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration. The character of Citizen Lawsuit is administrative, not civil, so it should be the authority of the State Administrative Court and not the General Court to adjudicate.","PeriodicalId":53034,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44478424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tujuan dari tulisan ini yaitu untuk menjelaskan kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi menguji konstitusionalitas undang-undang terhadap undang-undang dasar dalam hal ini kewenangan memberikan interpretasi terhadap UUD NRI 1945. Terkait dengan interpretasi konstitusi, maka suatu undang-undang dasar tidak hanya dianggap sebagai suatu documented constitution melainkan dapat bertransformasi menjadi the living constitution. Dalam praktik di Indonesia, dapat dijumpai putusan-putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang menggunakan interpretasi konstitusi untuk menilai konstitusionalitas suatu norma. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian ini menguraikan sejauh mana upaya hakim dalam mewujudkan the living constitution melalui interpretasi hakim dalam pengujian konstitusionalitas. Dalam menafsirkan konstitusi, hakim bebas menggunakan metode interpretasi apapun. Namun kebebasan memilih dan menggunakan metode interpretasi tersebut harus tetap berada dalam koridor Pancasila dan UUD 1945. Hakim harus cermat, mampu memperhatikan, menggali hakekat atau merefleksikan suatu ketentuan pasal di dalam UUD sesuai dengan nilai-nilai Pancasila dan UUD 1945.
{"title":"INTERPRETASI KONSTITUSI DALAM PENGUJIAN KONSTITUSIONALITAS UNTUK MEWUJUDKAN THE LIVING CONSTITUTION","authors":"Fakhris Lutfianto Hapsoro, I. Ismail","doi":"10.33756/jlr.v2i2.5644","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v2i2.5644","url":null,"abstract":"Tujuan dari tulisan ini yaitu untuk menjelaskan kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi menguji konstitusionalitas undang-undang terhadap undang-undang dasar dalam hal ini kewenangan memberikan interpretasi terhadap UUD NRI 1945. Terkait dengan interpretasi konstitusi, maka suatu undang-undang dasar tidak hanya dianggap sebagai suatu documented constitution melainkan dapat bertransformasi menjadi the living constitution. Dalam praktik di Indonesia, dapat dijumpai putusan-putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang menggunakan interpretasi konstitusi untuk menilai konstitusionalitas suatu norma. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian ini menguraikan sejauh mana upaya hakim dalam mewujudkan the living constitution melalui interpretasi hakim dalam pengujian konstitusionalitas. Dalam menafsirkan konstitusi, hakim bebas menggunakan metode interpretasi apapun. Namun kebebasan memilih dan menggunakan metode interpretasi tersebut harus tetap berada dalam koridor Pancasila dan UUD 1945. Hakim harus cermat, mampu memperhatikan, menggali hakekat atau merefleksikan suatu ketentuan pasal di dalam UUD sesuai dengan nilai-nilai Pancasila dan UUD 1945.","PeriodicalId":53034,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41480873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：