首页 > 最新文献

Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki最新文献

英文 中文
GENDER NEUTRALITY IN SCIENTIFIC RUSSIAN DISCOURSE 俄语科学话语中的性别中立
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.20916/1812-3228-2023-2-111-121
L. V. Kopot
This article is supposed to prove an assumption that scientific and technical texts in academic discourse are void of gender specificities which get neutralized. The scientific novelty of the study is in survey and description of discursive gender means in scientific and technical articles, identification of gender-neutral language means equally used by both men and women in scientific texts. The proposed study reflects the linguistic features of achieving gender neutrality in scientific texts written by men or women. The study is aimed at more careful thought of gender neutrality and gender markedness of discourse. The data for study is the texts of articles presented in the journal of “ Current Issues of Oil and Gas”( The I.M. Gubkin Institute of Oil and Gas Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences) schedulized in the List of peer-reviewed scientific publications of the Higher Attestation Commission of Russia. The journals publish the scientific achievements in the oil and gas industry. The read out included texts from 2009 till 2022. In total, 60 texts of scientific and technical articles written both by men and women have been analyzed. A comparative method is used to draw an analogy between similar phenomena presented by authors of different genders; a componential analysis ; discourse-analytic approaches for pointing out sustained discursive formulae in scientific discourse. The article presents institutional features of the scientific discourse, articulates the concepts of gender markedness and gender neutrality. The characteristic linguistic properties of the gender neutrality in the scientific discourse are revealed. The discursive and lexico-grammatical analyses of the scientific and technical texts written both by men and women extracted a trend to neutralization of gender in scientific discourse. Gender markedness of the discourse is specified through either implicit or explicit linguistic gender properties. The gender neutrality of the scientific discourse is meant the usage of discursive formulas and lexical units which do not indicate the communicators’ gender parameters. The survey of scientific articles published in technical journals demonstrated zero gender differences in scientific discourse between male and female authors’ texts. Thus, according to research carried out Russian scientific discourse is specified by a consistent trend in gender neutralization which is proved by a lack of gender marked discursive and linguistic means pointing at gender properties of the authors. A scientific article as a genre of scientific discourse contains specific evaluative vocabulary used by both men and women. Although scientific functional style is void of expressive means the research points out a tendency to use colloquial expressions, idiomatic units and also descriptive-representational devices such as metaphors and adjectives in superlative degree. Directions for future research are seen in the development of a universal for diffe
本文旨在证明一种假设,即学术话语中的科技文本不存在性别特异性,性别特异性被中性化。本研究的科学新颖之处在于调查和描述科技文章中的话语性手段,确定男女在科技文章中平等使用的中性语言手段。该研究反映了男性或女性撰写的科学文本中实现性别中立的语言特征。本研究旨在对话语的性别中性和性别标记进行更细致的思考。用于研究的数据是在俄罗斯高级认证委员会同行评审的科学出版物清单中列出的“当前石油和天然气问题”杂志(俄罗斯科学院I.M. Gubkin石油和天然气问题研究所)上发表的文章的文本。这些期刊刊登石油和天然气行业的科学成果。宣读的内容包括2009年至2022年的文本。总共分析了60篇男女共同撰写的科技文章。用比较的方法对不同性别作者所呈现的相似现象进行类比;成分分析;指出科学话语中持续话语公式的话语分析方法。本文阐述了科学话语的制度性特征,阐述了性别标记和性别中立的概念。揭示了科学话语中性别中立的语言特征。通过对男性和女性撰写的科技文本的话语和词汇语法分析,我们发现了科学话语中性别中性化的趋势。话语的性别标记是通过显性或隐性的语言性别属性来确定的。科学语篇的性别中立是指语篇公式和词汇单位的使用不表明传播者的性别参数。对发表在技术期刊上的科学文章的调查表明,男性和女性作者的文本在科学话语中没有性别差异。因此,根据所开展的研究,俄语科学话语具有一致的性别中性化趋势,这可以从缺乏指向作者性别属性的性别标记的话语和语言手段来证明。科学文章作为科学话语的一种体裁,包含男性和女性使用的特定评价词汇。虽然科学功能文体缺乏表达手段,但研究指出,科学功能文体倾向于使用俗语表达、习惯单位以及最高级的隐喻、形容词等描述性表征手段。未来研究的方向是发展一种普遍适用于不同话语的性别模式。
{"title":"GENDER NEUTRALITY IN SCIENTIFIC RUSSIAN DISCOURSE","authors":"L. V. Kopot","doi":"10.20916/1812-3228-2023-2-111-121","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2023-2-111-121","url":null,"abstract":"This article is supposed to prove an assumption that scientific and technical texts in academic discourse are void of gender specificities which get neutralized. The scientific novelty of the study is in survey and description of discursive gender means in scientific and technical articles, identification of gender-neutral language means equally used by both men and women in scientific texts. The proposed study reflects the linguistic features of achieving gender neutrality in scientific texts written by men or women. The study is aimed at more careful thought of gender neutrality and gender markedness of discourse. The data for study is the texts of articles presented in the journal of “ Current Issues of Oil and Gas”( The I.M. Gubkin Institute of Oil and Gas Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences) schedulized in the List of peer-reviewed scientific publications of the Higher Attestation Commission of Russia. The journals publish the scientific achievements in the oil and gas industry. The read out included texts from 2009 till 2022. In total, 60 texts of scientific and technical articles written both by men and women have been analyzed. A comparative method is used to draw an analogy between similar phenomena presented by authors of different genders; a componential analysis ; discourse-analytic approaches for pointing out sustained discursive formulae in scientific discourse. The article presents institutional features of the scientific discourse, articulates the concepts of gender markedness and gender neutrality. The characteristic linguistic properties of the gender neutrality in the scientific discourse are revealed. The discursive and lexico-grammatical analyses of the scientific and technical texts written both by men and women extracted a trend to neutralization of gender in scientific discourse. Gender markedness of the discourse is specified through either implicit or explicit linguistic gender properties. The gender neutrality of the scientific discourse is meant the usage of discursive formulas and lexical units which do not indicate the communicators’ gender parameters. The survey of scientific articles published in technical journals demonstrated zero gender differences in scientific discourse between male and female authors’ texts. Thus, according to research carried out Russian scientific discourse is specified by a consistent trend in gender neutralization which is proved by a lack of gender marked discursive and linguistic means pointing at gender properties of the authors. A scientific article as a genre of scientific discourse contains specific evaluative vocabulary used by both men and women. Although scientific functional style is void of expressive means the research points out a tendency to use colloquial expressions, idiomatic units and also descriptive-representational devices such as metaphors and adjectives in superlative degree. Directions for future research are seen in the development of a universal for diffe","PeriodicalId":53482,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67637617","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
THE CONCEPT OF LEGAL DOCUMENT IN THE PROFESSIONAL SPHERE 法律文书在专业领域的概念
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.20916/1812-3228-2023-1-32-42
E. Troshchenkova, E. Rudneva
The article aims at analyzing LEGAL DOCUMENT within the framework of conceptualization to create specific forms of mental representations such as scientific concepts. This specific case is used to model the formation of special knowledge and diagnose the problems that the expert community may encounter when using the classical attribute approach with binary oppositions in the content of the defined concept. We tried to show how both in written and spoken discourse lawyers fail to find common and essential features, which would unite all the elements included in the concept of LEGAL DOCUMENT and simultaneously differentiate it from documents of non-legal nature. Despite the fact that the phrase “legal document” is repeatedly mentioned in textbooks on the theory of state and law, often a self-evident expression, legal researchers admit that the concept of LEGAL DOCUMENT is difficult to define and there is a lot of controversy about it within the professional community. The study considered a) fragments of theoretical works (articles and monographs) and textbooks with explicit definitions of “legal document” and discussions of definitions by other authors, as well as other contexts of using “legal document” in scientific legal discourse and legal documents themselves; and b) oral statements of practicing lawyers on their understanding of what a “legal document” is - fragments of 5 semi-structured interviews. Cognitive-discursive and socio- and anthropolinguistic approaches were used for material analysis. Structural, lexical-semantic and conceptual analysis of the proposed definitions and quasi-definitions, as well as conversational analysis of the interviews were carried out. Individual statements were further considered in the broader context of reasoning about the problem, taking into account the general logic of argumentation development, the coherence/inconsistency of judgments both by different speakers and in the reasoning of one speaker, contradictions of examples of the formulated position, focusing/defocusing. Conversational analysis also took into account hesitation markers, prosody and extralinguistic multimodal data to reason about mental processes of the interviewees. The study shows that we seem to be dealing with an attempt to delineate with the traditional logical definition the boundaries of a scientific concept, which is based on the pre-existing and well-formed fragment of everyday knowledge, having slightly different structure and resisting such definition methods. As a concept of everyday consciousness, it would seem productive to describe the LEGAL DOCUMENT from the position of family resemblance as a fuzzy set of partially overlapping elements (without uniform feature(s), or some of them being a continuum of graded parameters). Such mental representation could be conveniently described through the idea of prototypes with good and bad examples of the category. However, the lawyers in legal discourse intermittently try to use t
本文试图在概念化的框架内对法律文书进行分析,以创造科学概念等具体的心理表征形式。利用这一具体案例对专业知识的形成进行建模,并诊断专家群体在使用经典属性方法时可能遇到的问题,这些方法在定义概念的内容中具有二元对立。我们试图说明,律师在书面和口头话语中都未能找到共同的和本质的特征,而这些特征将把法律文件概念所包含的所有要素统一起来,同时将其与非法律性质的文件区分开来。尽管“法律文件”一词在国家和法律理论的教科书中被反复提及,往往是一种不言而喻的表达,但法律研究者承认,法律文件的概念很难界定,在专业范围内也存在很多争议。研究考虑了a)对“法律文件”有明确定义的理论著作(文章和专著)片段和教科书以及其他作者对定义的讨论,以及在科学法律话语和法律文件本身中使用“法律文件”的其他背景;b)执业律师对什么是“法律文件”的理解的口头陈述——5个半结构化访谈的片段。材料分析采用了认知话语和社会与人类语言学方法。对拟定义和拟定义进行了结构分析、词汇语义分析和概念分析,并对访谈进行了会话分析。在对问题进行推理的更广泛的背景下进一步审议个别陈述,考虑到论证发展的一般逻辑、不同说话者和一个说话者在推理中判断的一致性/不一致性、表述立场的例子的矛盾、集中/分散。会话分析还考虑了犹豫标记、韵律和语外多模态数据来推断受访者的心理过程。研究表明,我们似乎正在处理一种试图用传统的逻辑定义来描绘科学概念边界的尝试,这种定义是基于预先存在的、结构良好的日常知识片段,结构略有不同,并且抵制这种定义方法。作为一个日常意识的概念,从家族相似性的角度将法律文件描述为部分重叠元素的模糊集合(没有统一的特征,或者其中一些是分级参数的连续体)似乎是有效的。这种心理表征可以很方便地通过原型的概念来描述这个类别的好例子和坏例子。然而,在法律话语中,律师们断断续续地试图将这一概念作为一种日常意识和一种科学形态来使用,并没有充分意识到差异的程度。因此,我们看到专业话语中的逻辑矛盾是如何加剧的。
{"title":"THE CONCEPT OF LEGAL DOCUMENT IN THE PROFESSIONAL SPHERE","authors":"E. Troshchenkova, E. Rudneva","doi":"10.20916/1812-3228-2023-1-32-42","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2023-1-32-42","url":null,"abstract":"The article aims at analyzing LEGAL DOCUMENT within the framework of conceptualization to create specific forms of mental representations such as scientific concepts. This specific case is used to model the formation of special knowledge and diagnose the problems that the expert community may encounter when using the classical attribute approach with binary oppositions in the content of the defined concept. We tried to show how both in written and spoken discourse lawyers fail to find common and essential features, which would unite all the elements included in the concept of LEGAL DOCUMENT and simultaneously differentiate it from documents of non-legal nature. Despite the fact that the phrase “legal document” is repeatedly mentioned in textbooks on the theory of state and law, often a self-evident expression, legal researchers admit that the concept of LEGAL DOCUMENT is difficult to define and there is a lot of controversy about it within the professional community. The study considered a) fragments of theoretical works (articles and monographs) and textbooks with explicit definitions of “legal document” and discussions of definitions by other authors, as well as other contexts of using “legal document” in scientific legal discourse and legal documents themselves; and b) oral statements of practicing lawyers on their understanding of what a “legal document” is - fragments of 5 semi-structured interviews. Cognitive-discursive and socio- and anthropolinguistic approaches were used for material analysis. Structural, lexical-semantic and conceptual analysis of the proposed definitions and quasi-definitions, as well as conversational analysis of the interviews were carried out. Individual statements were further considered in the broader context of reasoning about the problem, taking into account the general logic of argumentation development, the coherence/inconsistency of judgments both by different speakers and in the reasoning of one speaker, contradictions of examples of the formulated position, focusing/defocusing. Conversational analysis also took into account hesitation markers, prosody and extralinguistic multimodal data to reason about mental processes of the interviewees. The study shows that we seem to be dealing with an attempt to delineate with the traditional logical definition the boundaries of a scientific concept, which is based on the pre-existing and well-formed fragment of everyday knowledge, having slightly different structure and resisting such definition methods. As a concept of everyday consciousness, it would seem productive to describe the LEGAL DOCUMENT from the position of family resemblance as a fuzzy set of partially overlapping elements (without uniform feature(s), or some of them being a continuum of graded parameters). Such mental representation could be conveniently described through the idea of prototypes with good and bad examples of the category. However, the lawyers in legal discourse intermittently try to use t","PeriodicalId":53482,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67637887","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
LINGUOCREATIVE MODELING OF DISCOURSES OF DIFFERENT MODALITY IN CONTRAST: SCREENPLAY VS. FILM 不同情态话语的语言创造模型之比较:剧本与电影
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.20916/1812-3228-2023-3-16-30
I. Zykova
The article contains the results of a comparative study of linguistic creativity, carried out on the material of a screenplay and a film, representing discourses with different types of modality. The author has developed the criteria for selecting research material and an algorithm for its analysis by means of the method of parameterization of linguistic creativity. The research has established the elements of the text of the screenplay and the verbal system of the film, which are relevant and irrelevant for the study of linguistic creativity in these types of works. The data obtained reveal a variability in the use of linguocreative means in the screenplay and film, which is an important indicator of the text transformations produced. It is shown that the specificity of the linguocreative modeling of the screenplay and the film is determined by the difference in the activity of the lexical parameters of linguistic creativity that quantitatively prevail in both studied works. The method elaborated and the results obtained help to step further towards the goal of understanding the phenomena of linguistic and multimodal creativity.
本文以电影和剧本为研究对象,对不同情态类型的话语进行了语言创造性的比较研究。作者运用语言创造性参数化的方法,提出了研究材料的选择标准和分析算法。本研究确立了电影剧本的文本元素和电影的语言系统,这些元素与研究这类作品的语言创造力是相关的,也是不相关的。所获得的数据揭示了在剧本和电影中使用语言创造手段的可变性,这是产生文本转换的重要指标。研究表明,剧本和电影的语言创造性模型的特殊性是由语言创造性词汇参数活动的差异决定的,这种差异在两种研究作品中都是定量的。所阐述的方法和所获得的结果有助于进一步了解语言和多模态创造力现象的目标。
{"title":"LINGUOCREATIVE MODELING OF DISCOURSES OF DIFFERENT MODALITY IN CONTRAST: SCREENPLAY VS. FILM","authors":"I. Zykova","doi":"10.20916/1812-3228-2023-3-16-30","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2023-3-16-30","url":null,"abstract":"The article contains the results of a comparative study of linguistic creativity, carried out on the material of a screenplay and a film, representing discourses with different types of modality. The author has developed the criteria for selecting research material and an algorithm for its analysis by means of the method of parameterization of linguistic creativity. The research has established the elements of the text of the screenplay and the verbal system of the film, which are relevant and irrelevant for the study of linguistic creativity in these types of works. The data obtained reveal a variability in the use of linguocreative means in the screenplay and film, which is an important indicator of the text transformations produced. It is shown that the specificity of the linguocreative modeling of the screenplay and the film is determined by the difference in the activity of the lexical parameters of linguistic creativity that quantitatively prevail in both studied works. The method elaborated and the results obtained help to step further towards the goal of understanding the phenomena of linguistic and multimodal creativity.","PeriodicalId":53482,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67637920","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Verbal component types in conflict-generating Internet-memes: frequency and specificity 产生冲突的网络模因的言语成分类型:频率和特异性
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.20916/1812-3228-2023-1-43-50
M. Latu
This article continues the series of studies devoted to the current problem of conflict Internet communication, the features of conflict-generating polycode texts and the issues of verbal and iconic representation of knowledge in their structure. In this regard, the primary goal is to establish the frequency of actualization of verbal component types used in the structure of graphic-verbal conflict polycode texts (Internet memes) of xenophobic nature, and their specificity in the representation of the content within the framework of the cognitive matrix “Friend or Foe”. The methods of content analysis, comparative analysis and quantification analysis were used to study the features of the verbal components and the language units in the considered polycode texts. It was determined that the most frequent verbal component types are “comment/statement”, “instruction”, “word/phrase-identifier”, less frequent are “dialogue situation”, “quote”, “definition of a concept”, “question/reflection”, “poetic text”. We paid attention to differences in the representation of knowledge and transmitted meanings of conflict nature by means of these types of verbal component. The results of the research may be applied in further studies devoted to the problem of verbal and iconic components correlating in polycode texts.
本文将继续一系列研究,致力于当前的冲突网络传播问题,产生冲突的多码文本的特征,以及知识在其结构中的口头和符号表示问题。在这方面,主要目标是确定仇外性质的图形-言语冲突多码文本(网络模因)结构中使用的言语成分类型的实现频率,以及它们在“朋友或敌人”认知矩阵框架内表征内容的特异性。采用内容分析、比较分析和量化分析的方法,研究了多码文本中言语成分和语言单位的特征。调查确定,最常见的言语成分类型是“评论/陈述”、“指示”、“词/短语标识符”,较少出现的是“对话情景”、“引用”、“概念定义”、“问题/反思”、“诗意文本”。通过这些类型的言语成分,我们注意到知识的表征和冲突性质的传递意义的差异。本研究结果可应用于多码文本中言语成分和符号成分相关问题的进一步研究。
{"title":"Verbal component types in conflict-generating Internet-memes: frequency and specificity","authors":"M. Latu","doi":"10.20916/1812-3228-2023-1-43-50","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2023-1-43-50","url":null,"abstract":"This article continues the series of studies devoted to the current problem of conflict Internet communication, the features of conflict-generating polycode texts and the issues of verbal and iconic representation of knowledge in their structure. In this regard, the primary goal is to establish the frequency of actualization of verbal component types used in the structure of graphic-verbal conflict polycode texts (Internet memes) of xenophobic nature, and their specificity in the representation of the content within the framework of the cognitive matrix “Friend or Foe”. The methods of content analysis, comparative analysis and quantification analysis were used to study the features of the verbal components and the language units in the considered polycode texts. It was determined that the most frequent verbal component types are “comment/statement”, “instruction”, “word/phrase-identifier”, less frequent are “dialogue situation”, “quote”, “definition of a concept”, “question/reflection”, “poetic text”. We paid attention to differences in the representation of knowledge and transmitted meanings of conflict nature by means of these types of verbal component. The results of the research may be applied in further studies devoted to the problem of verbal and iconic components correlating in polycode texts.","PeriodicalId":53482,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67637976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
THE LINGUISTIC-COGNITIVE ASPECT IN STUDYING WOMEN’S EMOTIONAL-EVALUATIVE LEXIS IN ADVERTISING DISCOURSE 广告语篇中女性情感评价词汇研究的语言认知层面
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.20916/1812-3228-2023-1-71-79
E. Malyuga, A.A. Khaperstkova
The subject matter of the article covers women’s emotional-evaluative lexis to study the linguistic-cognitive aspects of advertising, which determine the ways of influencing the critical thinking of the audience. The authors consider the theoretical prerequisites for applying the linguistic-cognitive approach as the key methodology to analyze the language of advertising in conjunction with the approaches used in the framework of gender linguistics. The relevance of the study stems from insufficient scientific coverage and the lack of a systematic description of the linguistic-cognitive aspects of advertising discourse in general, and the goals of using women’s emotional-evaluative lexis in the advertising text, in particular. Study results suggest that the main techniques implementing women’s emotional-evaluative lexis in an advertising text include anaphora, comparison, opposition, clarifying questions, hyperbolisation, etc. These language tools are used to promote generally accepted stereotypes and influence advertisement recipients - women who are the target audience of the advertised goods. Study results can be applied in further research covering the linguistic-cognitive aspects of advertising and gender-specific facets of emotional-evaluative lexis.
本文以女性情感评价词汇为主题,研究广告的语言认知方面,这决定了影响受众批判性思维的方式。作者结合性别语言学框架下的研究方法,探讨了将语言认知方法作为分析广告语言的关键方法论的理论前提。这项研究的相关性源于科学覆盖不足,缺乏对广告话语的语言认知方面的系统描述,特别是在广告文本中使用女性情感评价词汇的目标。研究结果表明,女性情感评价词汇在广告语篇中的运用主要有回指法、比较法、对立法、问题澄清法、夸张手法等。这些语言工具被用来宣传普遍接受的陈规定型观念,并影响广告接受者————作为广告商品目标受众的妇女。研究结果可以应用于广告的语言认知方面和情感评价词汇的性别差异方面的进一步研究。
{"title":"THE LINGUISTIC-COGNITIVE ASPECT IN STUDYING WOMEN’S EMOTIONAL-EVALUATIVE LEXIS IN ADVERTISING DISCOURSE","authors":"E. Malyuga, A.A. Khaperstkova","doi":"10.20916/1812-3228-2023-1-71-79","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2023-1-71-79","url":null,"abstract":"The subject matter of the article covers women’s emotional-evaluative lexis to study the linguistic-cognitive aspects of advertising, which determine the ways of influencing the critical thinking of the audience. The authors consider the theoretical prerequisites for applying the linguistic-cognitive approach as the key methodology to analyze the language of advertising in conjunction with the approaches used in the framework of gender linguistics. The relevance of the study stems from insufficient scientific coverage and the lack of a systematic description of the linguistic-cognitive aspects of advertising discourse in general, and the goals of using women’s emotional-evaluative lexis in the advertising text, in particular. Study results suggest that the main techniques implementing women’s emotional-evaluative lexis in an advertising text include anaphora, comparison, opposition, clarifying questions, hyperbolisation, etc. These language tools are used to promote generally accepted stereotypes and influence advertisement recipients - women who are the target audience of the advertised goods. Study results can be applied in further research covering the linguistic-cognitive aspects of advertising and gender-specific facets of emotional-evaluative lexis.","PeriodicalId":53482,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67638084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
SYNTACTIC CONSTRUCTIONS: SOURCES, PATHS, MEANS AND MECHANISM OF GRAMMATICALIZATION 句法结构:语法化的来源、途径、手段和机制
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.20916/1812-3228-2023-3-85-105
V. Melikyan, A. Melikyan
The article examines the phenomenon of grammaticalization on the material of syntactic constructions. The authors reveal the sources (linguistic means) of grammaticalization, their linguistic nature (causes of grammaticalization), determine the grammaticalization degree of each source; have formed a typology of sources for free and phraseologized syntactic constructions, have determined universal and unique sources; justified the allocation of syntactic sources proper. The paths of grammaticalization are described. Two means of grammaticalization have been established: the main one is the deactualization of the indicator, the secondary means is actualization. At the same time, both means lead to a generalization of lexical, grammatical and functional semantics, to decategorization or transcategorization of the language sign. Thus, we argue that in the field of syntactic constructions there is only one mechanism of grammaticalization - generalization / abstraction / expansion of the language sign meaning. We formulated the following definition of syntactic construction grammaticalization: grammaticalization of the compulsory unchangeable component of the fixed phrase scheme is the transition of a functional or notional lexeme (or a combination of lexemes) into a compulsory component of a phraseologized syntactic construction as a result of complete or partial deactualization of its lexical-morphological and syntactic meaning, i.e. the transition of language signs from the lexical-morphological sphere to the syntactic (syntaxization). The grammaticalization of the syntactic construction ultimately leads to the formation of a new linguistic tool (syntactic phraseological unit: a fixed model, fixed phrase scheme or fixed phrase) with new grammatical indicators, as well as a new way of representing both grammatical and dictum-modus (a fixed model, fixed phrase scheme) or only modus (fixed phrase) meaning.
本文探讨了句法结构材料上的语法化现象。揭示了语法化的来源(语言手段)及其语言性质(语法化的原因),确定了各个来源的语法化程度;形成了自由和短语化句法结构的语源类型学,确定了普遍和独特的语源;合理分配语法源。描述了语法化的途径。建立了两种语法化手段:主要手段是指示物的非现实性,次要手段是现实性。同时,这两种方式都会导致词汇语义、语法语义和功能语义的泛化,导致语言符号的去范畴化或跨范畴化。因此,我们认为在句法结构领域中,只有一种语法化机制——语言符号意义的概括/抽象/扩展。我们对句法结构语法化的定义如下:固定短语图式中强制不变成分的语法化是指功能或概念词素(或词素组合)由于其词汇形态和句法意义的完全或部分非现实性而转变为短语化句法结构的强制成分,即语言符号从词汇形态领域向句法领域的过渡(句法化)。句法结构的语法化最终形成了具有新的语法指示符的新的语言工具(句法词组单位:固定模式、固定短语方案或固定短语),也形成了既表示语法又表示语态-语态(固定模式、固定短语方案)或仅表示语态(固定短语)意义的新方式。
{"title":"SYNTACTIC CONSTRUCTIONS: SOURCES, PATHS, MEANS AND MECHANISM OF GRAMMATICALIZATION","authors":"V. Melikyan, A. Melikyan","doi":"10.20916/1812-3228-2023-3-85-105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2023-3-85-105","url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the phenomenon of grammaticalization on the material of syntactic constructions. The authors reveal the sources (linguistic means) of grammaticalization, their linguistic nature (causes of grammaticalization), determine the grammaticalization degree of each source; have formed a typology of sources for free and phraseologized syntactic constructions, have determined universal and unique sources; justified the allocation of syntactic sources proper. The paths of grammaticalization are described. Two means of grammaticalization have been established: the main one is the deactualization of the indicator, the secondary means is actualization. At the same time, both means lead to a generalization of lexical, grammatical and functional semantics, to decategorization or transcategorization of the language sign. Thus, we argue that in the field of syntactic constructions there is only one mechanism of grammaticalization - generalization / abstraction / expansion of the language sign meaning. We formulated the following definition of syntactic construction grammaticalization: grammaticalization of the compulsory unchangeable component of the fixed phrase scheme is the transition of a functional or notional lexeme (or a combination of lexemes) into a compulsory component of a phraseologized syntactic construction as a result of complete or partial deactualization of its lexical-morphological and syntactic meaning, i.e. the transition of language signs from the lexical-morphological sphere to the syntactic (syntaxization). The grammaticalization of the syntactic construction ultimately leads to the formation of a new linguistic tool (syntactic phraseological unit: a fixed model, fixed phrase scheme or fixed phrase) with new grammatical indicators, as well as a new way of representing both grammatical and dictum-modus (a fixed model, fixed phrase scheme) or only modus (fixed phrase) meaning.","PeriodicalId":53482,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67638206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
WAYS TO ELIMINATE DISSONANCE IN THE PERCEPTION OF FAKE NEWS: A COGNITIVE VIEW 消除假新闻认知失调的方法:一种认知观点
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-5-16
L. Furs
The purpose of research is to consider the cognitive basis for the formation of fake information and describe the ways of giving this information the characteristics of truth. To achieve this goal, were applied the method of cognitive modeling and cognitive-discourse analysis. In information processing in order to impart truth characteristics to fake information, both cognitive and metacognitive levels are activated. Static declarative knowledge, which is obtained empirically and is stored in the human memory, is not sufficient for the authors of fake news. Such knowledge is objective and does not create the necessary associations. Due to the metacognitive level and its aspect - procedural knowledge, the authors of fake news manage to process the information in such a way that despite its unreliability, newly designed knowledge is perceived as true. This process involves the cognitive mechanisms of generalization, specification, cognitive metonymy, metaphtonymy, conceptual comparison, visualization, frame recurrence, concept substitution, and attention nesting. These mechanisms act as components of the procedural knowledge model which is the basis for the adaptability of fake news to truth indicators. All cognitive mechanisms are characterized by purposefulness, controllability, dynamism and interactivity. We see the prospect of further research in the need to compare the cognitive principles and mechanisms that are in demand in the elimination of cognitive dissonance in the perception of fake news by different authors and on the material of other languages.
研究的目的是考虑虚假信息形成的认知基础,并描述赋予这些信息真实特征的方法。为了实现这一目标,我们采用了认知建模和认知语篇分析的方法。在信息处理过程中,为了赋予虚假信息真实特征,认知和元认知两个层面都被激活。静态的陈述性知识是经验获得的,储存在人类的记忆中,对于假新闻的作者来说是不够的。这种认识是客观的,不会产生必要的联系。由于元认知水平及其方面——程序性知识,假新闻的作者设法以这样一种方式处理信息,尽管它不可靠,但新设计的知识被认为是真实的。这一过程涉及概括、规范、认知转喻、转喻、概念比较、可视化、框架递归、概念替代和注意嵌套等认知机制。这些机制作为程序知识模型的组成部分,而程序知识模型是假新闻对真相指标适应性的基础。所有的认知机制都具有目的性、可控性、动态性和互动性的特点。我们看到了进一步研究的前景,需要比较在消除不同作者和其他语言材料对假新闻感知的认知失调方面所需要的认知原则和机制。
{"title":"WAYS TO ELIMINATE DISSONANCE IN THE PERCEPTION OF FAKE NEWS: A COGNITIVE VIEW","authors":"L. Furs","doi":"10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-5-16","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-5-16","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of research is to consider the cognitive basis for the formation of fake information and describe the ways of giving this information the characteristics of truth. To achieve this goal, were applied the method of cognitive modeling and cognitive-discourse analysis. In information processing in order to impart truth characteristics to fake information, both cognitive and metacognitive levels are activated. Static declarative knowledge, which is obtained empirically and is stored in the human memory, is not sufficient for the authors of fake news. Such knowledge is objective and does not create the necessary associations. Due to the metacognitive level and its aspect - procedural knowledge, the authors of fake news manage to process the information in such a way that despite its unreliability, newly designed knowledge is perceived as true. This process involves the cognitive mechanisms of generalization, specification, cognitive metonymy, metaphtonymy, conceptual comparison, visualization, frame recurrence, concept substitution, and attention nesting. These mechanisms act as components of the procedural knowledge model which is the basis for the adaptability of fake news to truth indicators. All cognitive mechanisms are characterized by purposefulness, controllability, dynamism and interactivity. We see the prospect of further research in the need to compare the cognitive principles and mechanisms that are in demand in the elimination of cognitive dissonance in the perception of fake news by different authors and on the material of other languages.","PeriodicalId":53482,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67636622","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
FUNCTIONAL FEATURES OF PARAMETRIC ADJECTIVES WITH THE NAMES OF THE PERSON IN TATAR AND ENGLISH LANGUAGES 鞑靼语和英语带人名的参数形容词的功能特征
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-95-104
G. Lutfullina
The article is devoted to the examination of the size adjectives “big / small” functioning in the Tatar and English languages. When combined with a person’s names differences and similarities in both languages are observed. The isomorphism of the Tatar and English languages is manifested when characterizing people in terms of the intensity of their activity. Duality of interpretation is characteristic the Tatar language where the meanings “occupying a large space” and “having achieved greatness” are possible. The main purpose of the article is to determine the range of a person’s names that function in combination with size adjectives in Tatar and English. The scientific novelty of the research lies in the fact that for the first time meanings expressed by size adjectives in combination with person’s names have been compared. As a result of the conducted research, it can be concluded that the meanings of size adjectives in different languages coincide although in the Tatar language two adjectives are involved.
本文研究了鞑靼语和英语中大小形容词“大/小”的用法。当与一个人的名字结合在一起时,可以观察到两种语言的差异和相似之处。鞑靼语和英语的同构性体现在人们活动强度的特征上。双重解释是鞑靼语的特点,“占据很大的空间”和“成就伟大”的意思都是可能的。这篇文章的主要目的是确定一个人的名字在鞑靼语和英语中结合大小形容词的作用范围。本研究的科学新颖之处在于,首次将大小形容词与人名结合所表达的意义进行了比较。通过研究可以发现,虽然鞑靼语中有两个大小形容词,但不同语言中大小形容词的意义是一致的。
{"title":"FUNCTIONAL FEATURES OF PARAMETRIC ADJECTIVES WITH THE NAMES OF THE PERSON IN TATAR AND ENGLISH LANGUAGES","authors":"G. Lutfullina","doi":"10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-95-104","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-95-104","url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the examination of the size adjectives “big / small” functioning in the Tatar and English languages. When combined with a person’s names differences and similarities in both languages are observed. The isomorphism of the Tatar and English languages is manifested when characterizing people in terms of the intensity of their activity. Duality of interpretation is characteristic the Tatar language where the meanings “occupying a large space” and “having achieved greatness” are possible. The main purpose of the article is to determine the range of a person’s names that function in combination with size adjectives in Tatar and English. The scientific novelty of the research lies in the fact that for the first time meanings expressed by size adjectives in combination with person’s names have been compared. As a result of the conducted research, it can be concluded that the meanings of size adjectives in different languages coincide although in the Tatar language two adjectives are involved.","PeriodicalId":53482,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67636888","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
COGNITIVE WORLD VIEW FROM IDEOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE OF LINGUISTIC DICTIONARY ENTRIES (based on material from encyclopaedia “Russian language”, First edition) 意识形态视角下的语言词典词条认知世界观(基于《俄语》第一版百科全书材料)
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-119-128
O. Valentinova, O. V. Nikitin
The authors analyze the conceptual apparatus of the first edition of the encyclopedia “The Russian language” in cognitive aspect. The aim of the work is to reveal the role of ideology in the formation of the official portrait of linguistic science in the 1970s and to determine its influence on presentation and description of scientific terms. The study uses the method of contextual analysis, logical-semantic, historical-linguistic, cognitive modeling methods. The most important articles-ideologems from the point of view of the cognitive world view are considered: “History of the Russian literary language”, “Culture of language”, “Journalistic style”, “Russian language”, “Language and society”, etc. They allow to recreate the metacultural connections of a specific historical time and to identify ways of forming an ideologized context. The study showed that the transformation of the cognitive world view in Soviet science can be carried out without nominatively expressed references to ideological attitudes. And, conversely, not every reference to ideological formulas distorts the scientific model of reality. The results obtained can be used in the theory and practice of compiling dictionaries of terminological units and sociolinguistic dictionaries, in studying cognitive problems of modern scientific discourse. The authors come to the conclusion that the articles of the encyclopedic dictionary form a specific model of ideas about the Russian language, based on the evaluativeness of linguistic facts, the opposition of ideas and the deliberate distortion of reality in the direction of manipulation of concepts.
作者从认知的角度分析了第一版《俄语》百科全书的概念结构。这项工作的目的是揭示意识形态在20世纪70年代语言科学官方形象形成中的作用,并确定其对科学术语的呈现和描述的影响。本研究采用语境分析、逻辑语义、历史语言、认知建模等方法。从认知世界观的角度考察了最重要的意识形态文章:《俄罗斯文学语言史》、《语言文化》、《新闻风格》、《俄语》、《语言与社会》等。它们允许重建特定历史时期的元文化联系,并确定形成意识形态语境的方式。研究表明,苏联科学认知世界观的转变可以在没有名义上表达意识形态态度的情况下进行。反过来说,并不是每次提到意识形态公式都会扭曲现实的科学模型。所得结果可用于术语单位词典和社会语言学词典编纂的理论和实践,研究现代科学语篇的认知问题。作者得出的结论是,百科全书词典的条目形成了关于俄语的一种特定的思想模式,其基础是对语言事实的评价,思想的对立和在操纵概念的方向上故意歪曲现实。
{"title":"COGNITIVE WORLD VIEW FROM IDEOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE OF LINGUISTIC DICTIONARY ENTRIES (based on material from encyclopaedia “Russian language”, First edition)","authors":"O. Valentinova, O. V. Nikitin","doi":"10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-119-128","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-119-128","url":null,"abstract":"The authors analyze the conceptual apparatus of the first edition of the encyclopedia “The Russian language” in cognitive aspect. The aim of the work is to reveal the role of ideology in the formation of the official portrait of linguistic science in the 1970s and to determine its influence on presentation and description of scientific terms. The study uses the method of contextual analysis, logical-semantic, historical-linguistic, cognitive modeling methods. The most important articles-ideologems from the point of view of the cognitive world view are considered: “History of the Russian literary language”, “Culture of language”, “Journalistic style”, “Russian language”, “Language and society”, etc. They allow to recreate the metacultural connections of a specific historical time and to identify ways of forming an ideologized context. The study showed that the transformation of the cognitive world view in Soviet science can be carried out without nominatively expressed references to ideological attitudes. And, conversely, not every reference to ideological formulas distorts the scientific model of reality. The results obtained can be used in the theory and practice of compiling dictionaries of terminological units and sociolinguistic dictionaries, in studying cognitive problems of modern scientific discourse. The authors come to the conclusion that the articles of the encyclopedic dictionary form a specific model of ideas about the Russian language, based on the evaluativeness of linguistic facts, the opposition of ideas and the deliberate distortion of reality in the direction of manipulation of concepts.","PeriodicalId":53482,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67636986","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
BOOSTING IN DISSENTING OPINIONS: TYPES AND LEXICAL REALIZATIONS 反对意见的增加:类型和词汇实现
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.20916/1812-3228-2023-3-106-111
O. Boginskaya
The paper explores the role of boosting as a metadiscourse feature used by justices in dissenting opinions to challenge the majority decisions and convince an audience. The aim is to identify the types of boosting and lexical items used for indicating certainty and commitment. As the study aims to analyze how boosting is realized linguistically, the methods of quantitative and interpretative analysis were applied. The study revealed that the justices make extensive use of boosters to show disagreement and persuade the audience to agree with their views. For this purpose, they use four types of boosting, including certainty boosters, intensity boosters, solidarity boosters, and extremity boosters with a quantitative predominance of the first type.
本文探讨了促进作为法官在反对意见中使用的元话语特征的作用,以挑战多数人的决定并说服听众。目的是确定用于表示确定性和承诺的促进和词汇项目的类型。由于研究的目的是分析提升是如何在语言上实现的,因此采用了定量分析和解释分析的方法。研究显示,法官们广泛使用助推器来表达不同意见,并说服听众同意他们的观点。为此,他们使用了四种类型的促进,包括确定性促进、强度促进、团结促进和极端促进,其中第一种类型的数量优势。
{"title":"BOOSTING IN DISSENTING OPINIONS: TYPES AND LEXICAL REALIZATIONS","authors":"O. Boginskaya","doi":"10.20916/1812-3228-2023-3-106-111","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2023-3-106-111","url":null,"abstract":"The paper explores the role of boosting as a metadiscourse feature used by justices in dissenting opinions to challenge the majority decisions and convince an audience. The aim is to identify the types of boosting and lexical items used for indicating certainty and commitment. As the study aims to analyze how boosting is realized linguistically, the methods of quantitative and interpretative analysis were applied. The study revealed that the justices make extensive use of boosters to show disagreement and persuade the audience to agree with their views. For this purpose, they use four types of boosting, including certainty boosters, intensity boosters, solidarity boosters, and extremity boosters with a quantitative predominance of the first type.","PeriodicalId":53482,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67637841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1