Contemporary Eastern Orthodox theologian, Ioannis Zizioulas, is certainly one of the most prominent theologians of the modern times considering his great work as well as the depth of his thought. Although his work explores a spectrum of theological ideas, this paper brings his ecclesiology into light from a point of view of “liturgical” and “therapeutic” ecclesiology, which Zizioulas recognizes within the eastern tradition as two types of ecclesiology that are intertwined and therefore cannot be separated one from the other. Thus, this paper examines Zizioulas’ work in the context of the contemporary Greek Orthodox theology and puts forward his interest and view on ecclesiology with an aim to illustrate the “liturgical” and “therapeutic” dimension of ecclesiology that is present in his work and thought which are based fairly on patristic theology. Along these lines, this paper presents his ecclesiological concept right through the prism of “liturgical” and “therapeutic” ecclesiology.
{"title":"Ecclesiology of Ioannis Zizioulas Through the Prism of “Liturgical” and “Therapeutic” Ecclesiology","authors":"Antun Japundžić","doi":"10.34075/cs.57.4.9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.34075/cs.57.4.9","url":null,"abstract":"Contemporary Eastern Orthodox theologian, Ioannis Zizioulas, is certainly one of the most prominent theologians of the modern times considering his great work as well as the depth of his thought. Although his work explores a spectrum of theological ideas, this paper brings his ecclesiology into light from a point of view of “liturgical” and “therapeutic” ecclesiology, which Zizioulas recognizes within the eastern tradition as two types of ecclesiology that are intertwined and therefore cannot be separated one from the other. Thus, this paper examines Zizioulas’ work in the context of the contemporary Greek Orthodox theology and puts forward his interest and view on ecclesiology with an aim to illustrate the “liturgical” and “therapeutic” dimension of ecclesiology that is present in his work and thought which are based fairly on patristic theology. Along these lines, this paper presents his ecclesiological concept right through the prism of “liturgical” and “therapeutic” ecclesiology.","PeriodicalId":53546,"journal":{"name":"Crkva u Svijetu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43179631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Članak se bavi okolnostima i kontekstom baselskog izdanja Jeronimovih djela iz 1516. To izdanje jedno je od najslavnijih izdanja crkvenih otaca uopće. Dva su temeljna razloga za to. Prije svega, upravo je u to doba Basel bio središte tiskarstva na sjeveru Europe. Naime, jedan od utemeljitelja baselskog tiskarstva, Johannes Amerbach, isplanirao je objavljivanje sabranih djela četvorice naučitelja crkve: Ambrozija, Jeronima, Augustina i Grgura. Drugi razlog važnosti tog izdanja jest činjenica da je urednikom izdanja Jeronimovih djela bio Erazmo Roterdamski. Unatoč tome što je Amerbach ubrzo umro, izdavanje Jeronimovih djela nije zaustavljeno. Preuzeo ga je također važni baselski tiskar i Amerbachov nasljednik Johannes Froben. Nastavivši i dovršivši izdavanje djela sv. Jeronima, Erazmo je postao središnjom osobom kruga vodećih baselskih intelektualaca. Osim toga, to izdanje djela sv. Jeronima iz 1516., jedno je od vrhunaca ranog sjevernoeuropskog tiskarstva.
本文论述了杰罗姆1516年活动的情况和背景。这是最著名的教会神父版本之一。首先，巴塞尔是北欧媒体的中心。例如，棒球出版社的创始人之一Johannes Amerbach计划出版四位教会教师的集体作品：Ambrosia、Jeronima、Augustine和Greece。这个问题的第二个原因是Jeronim行为的编辑是Erazmo Roterdamski。虽然阿默巴赫很快就去世了，但释放杰罗姆的行动并没有停止。他还被一位重要的棒球记者和阿默巴赫的继任者约翰内斯·弗罗本带走。通过继续并完成圣杰罗姆的工作，埃拉兹莫成为了棒球界领军知识分子的核心人物。Osim toga，致伊兹丹耶·德杰拉（izdanje djela sv.Jeronima iz 1516），jedno je od vrhunaca ranong sjevernoeuroskog tiskarstva。
{"title":"Kontekst Erazmova baselskog izdanja djela sv. Jeronima (1516.)","authors":"Daniel Miščin","doi":"10.34075/cs.57.4.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.34075/cs.57.4.2","url":null,"abstract":"Članak se bavi okolnostima i kontekstom baselskog izdanja Jeronimovih djela iz 1516. To izdanje jedno je od najslavnijih izdanja crkvenih otaca uopće. Dva su temeljna razloga za to. Prije svega, upravo je u to doba Basel bio središte tiskarstva na sjeveru Europe. Naime, jedan od utemeljitelja baselskog tiskarstva, Johannes Amerbach, isplanirao je objavljivanje sabranih djela četvorice naučitelja crkve: Ambrozija, Jeronima, Augustina i Grgura. Drugi razlog važnosti tog izdanja jest činjenica da je urednikom izdanja Jeronimovih djela bio Erazmo Roterdamski. Unatoč tome što je Amerbach ubrzo umro, izdavanje Jeronimovih djela nije zaustavljeno. Preuzeo ga je također važni baselski tiskar i Amerbachov nasljednik Johannes Froben. Nastavivši i dovršivši izdavanje djela sv. Jeronima, Erazmo je postao središnjom osobom kruga vodećih baselskih intelektualaca. Osim toga, to izdanje djela sv. Jeronima iz 1516., jedno je od vrhunaca ranog sjevernoeuropskog tiskarstva.","PeriodicalId":53546,"journal":{"name":"Crkva u Svijetu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41279742","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cilj je ovog rada ukazati na nove spoznaje o glazbeno-liturgijskim izvorima Zagrebačke biskupije, koji predstavljaju vrelo za proučavanje glazbenih varijanti napjeva gregorijanskog pjevanja Crkve zagrebačke u srednjemu vijeku. Hrvatski i mađarski muzikolozi posljednjih su desetljeća, a poglavito od 2017. naovamo, uočili niz znakovitih novih obilježja koja zagrebačke liturgijske knjige u 15. i 16. stoljeću obogaćuju s nekoliko “novih izvora”, koji su do sada (doduše) bili znani, ali nisu provenijencijom bili uvršteni u repertoarni kontekst glazbenih izvora srednjovjekovne Zagrebačke biskupije. Autorica ukazuje na promjenu “destinacije” nekadašnjeg Ostrogonskoga graduala (Graduale Strigoniense) iz 15./16. stoljeća, koji svojim karakteristikama postaje “zagrebački” glazbeni kodeks, te upućuje na gradual Arhiva HAZU III. d. 182 iz 15. stoljeća, čija je recentna analiza pokazala da je doista bio u uporabi u katedrali u Zagrebu tijekom dugoga srednjeg vijeka, ali i stoljećima nakon toga.
这项工作的目的是展示萨格勒布主教音乐心理来源的新知识，这是对中世纪希腊-希腊歌手教会音乐变量的研究热点。克罗地亚和匈牙利音乐是过去的十年，主要是自2017年以来。naovamo，uočili niz znakovitih novih obilježja koja zagrebačke liturgijske knjige u 15。16本世纪有许多迄今为止已知的新音乐来源，但其实施尚未纳入中世纪音乐来源的曲目背景中。作者指出，从15/16开始，前奥地利渐变（渐变Strigoniense）的“目的地”发生了变化。一个世纪，成为“zagrebački”音乐密码，指的是15个档案中的哈祖三级d.182。一个世纪以来，他的最新分析表明，在漫长的中世纪，他确实在萨格勒布的大教堂中使用，但在那之后的几个世纪里也是如此。
{"title":"Ritus et consuetudo almae ecclesiae zagrabiensis: Nova otkrića o glazbi Zagrebačke biskupije u srednjemu vijeku","authors":"Hana Breko Kustura","doi":"10.34075/cs.57.4.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.34075/cs.57.4.4","url":null,"abstract":"Cilj je ovog rada ukazati na nove spoznaje o glazbeno-liturgijskim izvorima Zagrebačke biskupije, koji predstavljaju vrelo za proučavanje glazbenih varijanti napjeva gregorijanskog pjevanja Crkve zagrebačke u srednjemu vijeku. Hrvatski i mađarski muzikolozi posljednjih su desetljeća, a poglavito od 2017. naovamo, uočili niz znakovitih novih obilježja koja zagrebačke liturgijske knjige u 15. i 16. stoljeću obogaćuju s nekoliko “novih izvora”, koji su do sada (doduše) bili znani, ali nisu provenijencijom bili uvršteni u repertoarni kontekst glazbenih izvora srednjovjekovne Zagrebačke biskupije. Autorica ukazuje na promjenu “destinacije” nekadašnjeg Ostrogonskoga graduala (Graduale Strigoniense) iz 15./16. stoljeća, koji svojim karakteristikama postaje “zagrebački” glazbeni kodeks, te upućuje na gradual Arhiva HAZU III. d. 182 iz 15. stoljeća, čija je recentna analiza pokazala da je doista bio u uporabi u katedrali u Zagrebu tijekom dugoga srednjeg vijeka, ali i stoljećima nakon toga.","PeriodicalId":53546,"journal":{"name":"Crkva u Svijetu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48847482","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
U članku se polazi od suvremenog dijagnosticiranja stanja u humanističkim znanostima u kojima je, prema Cliffordu Geertzu, došlo do »zamućivanja žanrova«. Zatim se, da bi se pokušalo uputiti u izvore promjena, osvrće na osnovne dvadesetostoljetne misaone tendencije. One se nastoje egzemplificirati ponajprije filozofijom Martina Heideggera te u znatno manjoj mjeri postmodernim tendencijama (Jacques Derrida, Giles Deleuze). U konačnici donosi se jedno novo upućivanje u humanistiku, zasnovano na kršćanskoj tradiciji. Pritom se polazi od novog, kršćanskog razumijevanja tjelesnosti.
{"title":"Bilješka o humanistici","authors":"Krešimir Šimić","doi":"10.34075/cs.57.4.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.34075/cs.57.4.1","url":null,"abstract":"U članku se polazi od suvremenog dijagnosticiranja stanja u humanističkim znanostima u kojima je, prema Cliffordu Geertzu, došlo do »zamućivanja žanrova«. Zatim se, da bi se pokušalo uputiti u izvore promjena, osvrće na osnovne dvadesetostoljetne misaone tendencije. One se nastoje egzemplificirati ponajprije filozofijom Martina Heideggera te u znatno manjoj mjeri postmodernim tendencijama (Jacques Derrida, Giles Deleuze). U konačnici donosi se jedno novo upućivanje u humanistiku, zasnovano na kršćanskoj tradiciji. Pritom se polazi od novog, kršćanskog razumijevanja tjelesnosti.","PeriodicalId":53546,"journal":{"name":"Crkva u Svijetu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48060421","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The discourse about conscientious objection is becoming increasingly relevant today. Some dispute it, while others see it as the last defense of their beliefs against the onslaught of ethical relativism and an increasing number of permissive laws. The paper emphasizes that conscientious objection is an act of faithfulness to oneself, that is, to one’s belief. The dignity of man, created in the image of Good and called to discover the truth, dictates that he discovers the truth in his conscience and makes free decisions that are in accordance with the known truth, that is, his belief. In this context, the fundamental right of every person is self-determination and making decisions in accordance with our beliefs because our actions simultaneously determine our personality. Therefore, conscientious objection cannot be seen as a conflict between believers and non-believers because the requirement to live according to one’s conscience, given that it stems from the very dignity of the person and their nature, binds every person regardless of their worldview. In the end, conscientious objection is not disobedience to the law or some anti-juridical position but an aspiration to express the correct spirit of the law that does not contradict the inalienable rights of the human person. In particular, conscientious objection is not a passive position where we jealously guard our safety and our space of personal freedom; that is a kind of escape from responsibility, refraining from taking action or transferring responsibility to another. Conscientious objection is a renunciation of one’s own comfort and an expression of courage to oppose imposed laws. It is a form of civic responsibility and religious courage to actively stand up for Good and, at the same time, an authentic way of witnessing the value of personal freedom.
{"title":"Conscientious Objection – an Act of Faithfulness to Oneself","authors":"M. Begić","doi":"10.34075/cs.57.4.8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.34075/cs.57.4.8","url":null,"abstract":"The discourse about conscientious objection is becoming increasingly relevant today. Some dispute it, while others see it as the last defense of their beliefs against the onslaught of ethical relativism and an increasing number of permissive laws. The paper emphasizes that conscientious objection is an act of faithfulness to oneself, that is, to one’s belief. The dignity of man, created in the image of Good and called to discover the truth, dictates that he discovers the truth in his conscience and makes free decisions that are in accordance with the known truth, that is, his belief. In this context, the fundamental right of every person is self-determination and making decisions in accordance with our beliefs because our actions simultaneously determine our personality. Therefore, conscientious objection cannot be seen as a conflict between believers and non-believers because the requirement to live according to one’s conscience, given that it stems from the very dignity of the person and their nature, binds every person regardless of their worldview. In the end, conscientious objection is not disobedience to the law or some anti-juridical position but an aspiration to express the correct spirit of the law that does not contradict the inalienable rights of the human person. In particular, conscientious objection is not a passive position where we jealously guard our safety and our space of personal freedom; that is a kind of escape from responsibility, refraining from taking action or transferring responsibility to another. Conscientious objection is a renunciation of one’s own comfort and an expression of courage to oppose imposed laws. It is a form of civic responsibility and religious courage to actively stand up for Good and, at the same time, an authentic way of witnessing the value of personal freedom.","PeriodicalId":53546,"journal":{"name":"Crkva u Svijetu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46706591","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A public communication between the Catholic Church and radical left in Croatia today is burdened with misunderstandings that are reflections of a deeper ideological confrontation that has historical and sociological background. In this paper, we considered a philosophical work of Milan Kangrga, representative and one of founders of Praxis school to confirm an assumption that we need to reestablish a dialogue between the Church and political left since the prewar dialogue between the theologians and Marxists had his lacks. The dialogue between the Church and Marxists before the war had certain success, although the open and constructive discussion about themes that could be relevant for both sides did not continue after the war, not only due to the war conflicts and its consequences, but political polarization also. We considered the critique of political and social situation in Croatia by Milan Kangrga since his opinions were widely misunderstood, and taken in context of ideological conflict, although we presented how in certain questions regarding the relation toward modernity, civil rights, freedoms, and rule of law, he was not far from critical voices in Catholic Church. The dialogue between the Church and political left can be reestablished and continued in which we need to observe how to overcome a barriers that were, during the long time unnoticed and neglected.
{"title":"Kangrga , \"We\" and \"They\".\u0000Critique of Everything in M. Kangrga and Disrupt Dialogue between the\u0000Church and Marxists in Croatia","authors":"B. Matos, Josip Oslić","doi":"10.34075/cs.57.4.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.34075/cs.57.4.10","url":null,"abstract":"A public communication between the Catholic Church and radical left in Croatia today is burdened with misunderstandings that are reflections of a deeper ideological confrontation that has historical and sociological background. In this paper, we considered a philosophical work of Milan Kangrga, representative and one of founders of Praxis school to confirm an assumption that we need to reestablish a dialogue between the Church and political left since the prewar dialogue between the theologians and Marxists had his lacks. The dialogue between the Church and Marxists before the war had certain success, although the open and constructive discussion about themes that could be relevant for both sides did not continue after the war, not only due to the war conflicts and its consequences, but political polarization also. We considered the critique of political and social situation in Croatia by Milan Kangrga since his opinions were widely misunderstood, and taken in context of ideological conflict, although we presented how in certain questions regarding the relation toward modernity, civil rights, freedoms, and rule of law, he was not far from critical voices in Catholic Church. The dialogue between the Church and political left can be reestablished and continued in which we need to observe how to overcome a barriers that were, during the long time unnoticed and neglected.","PeriodicalId":53546,"journal":{"name":"Crkva u Svijetu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41367052","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The article analyzes the emerging ecclesiology of Pope Francis that revives the teaching of the Vatican Council II and opens a new phase in the reception of Vatican II’s vision of the Church. The introductory part briefly outlines the kerygmatic feature of Pope Francis’s theology, which is in the background of his speech about the Church. The starting point of the second and central part of the article is the phrase “the Church that goes forth”, which represents the hermeneutic key of the Pope’s understanding of the Church. We highlight his reflections about the essence and mission of the Church, such as the missionary transformation of the Church, synodality and polycentric understanding of the Church, Church as a mother and healer, Church and the world. Finally, in the spirit of the Church that goes forth, we elaborate on a ‘Samaritan Church’, a Church as a ‘filed hospital’, characterized by charity, a commitment to the poor, a sense for the periphery and human brotherhood, promoting a culture of encounter and dialogue. The third part of the article focuses on the Pope’s call to holiness and to the realization of Christian spirituality, which internally revives and encourages the missionary transformation of the Church.Research has shown that Pope Francis aims to restore today’s Church in the spirit of the Second Vatican Council. The doctrinal part of his teaching about the Church comes to life in pastoral practice. Pope Francis advocates the Church as a strong moral authority in society and the world. It is a parricidal Church that decisively bears witness, speaks freely and boldly, opens spaces for encounter and authentic dialogue, and knows how to listen and accept criticism.
{"title":"Ecclesiological Themes in the Pontificate of Pope Francis","authors":"Anđelko Domazet","doi":"10.34075/cs.57.4.7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.34075/cs.57.4.7","url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the emerging ecclesiology of Pope Francis that revives the teaching of the Vatican Council II and opens a new phase in the reception of Vatican II’s vision of the Church. The introductory part briefly outlines the kerygmatic feature of Pope Francis’s theology, which is in the background of his speech about the Church. The starting point of the second and central part of the article is the phrase “the Church that goes forth”, which represents the hermeneutic key of the Pope’s understanding of the Church. We highlight his reflections about the essence and mission of the Church, such as the missionary transformation of the Church, synodality and polycentric understanding of the Church, Church as a mother and healer, Church and the world. Finally, in the spirit of the Church that goes forth, we elaborate on a ‘Samaritan Church’, a Church as a ‘filed hospital’, characterized by charity, a commitment to the poor, a sense for the periphery and human brotherhood, promoting a culture of encounter and dialogue. The third part of the article focuses on the Pope’s call to holiness and to the realization of Christian spirituality, which internally revives and encourages the missionary transformation of the Church.Research has shown that Pope Francis aims to restore today’s Church in the spirit of the Second Vatican Council. The doctrinal part of his teaching about the Church comes to life in pastoral practice. Pope Francis advocates the Church as a strong moral authority in society and the world. It is a parricidal Church that decisively bears witness, speaks freely and boldly, opens spaces for encounter and authentic dialogue, and knows how to listen and accept criticism.","PeriodicalId":53546,"journal":{"name":"Crkva u Svijetu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47937796","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rad proučava odnos Katoličke Crkve i oporbene Hrvatske seljačke stranke te vladajućeg državnog režima u Kraljevini Jugoslaviji na primjeru Splitske i makarske biskupije od 1935. do 1939. godine. U tom je razdoblju HSS aktualizirala rješavanje političkog položaja Hrvata u monarhističkoj Jugoslaviji stvarajući općenarodni hrvatski seljački pokret preko kojeg su u državi kao najvažnije nametnuli političko pitanje koje je bilo poznato pod nazivom hrvatsko pitanje. U tako značajnim političkim i društvenim zbivanjima nisu po strani ostali ni svećenici i biskupi. Crkva nije djelovala kao politička organizacija, no pojedini su svećenici bili politički angažirani – većinom na jednoj (HSS), ali i na drugoj strani (Vlada). U tom se kontekstu u radu, prvenstveno na temelju arhivskih i novinskih izvora, opisuje djelovanje svećenstva Katoličke Crkve u Splitskoj i makarskoj biskupiji u politički vrlo intenzivnom i turbulentnom razdoblju.
这项工作研究了天主教会与对立的克罗地亚农村政党以及南斯拉夫王国的统治国家政权之间的关系，例如自1935年以来的斯普利特主教和马其顿主教。直到1939年。年当时，HSS更新了克罗地亚在君主制南斯拉夫的政治立场，在全国范围内发起了一场全球克罗地亚农村运动，将其视为克罗地亚问题这一最重要的政治问题。在如此重大的政治和社会事件中，没有其他牧师或主教。Crkva nije djelovala kao politička organizicija，no pojedini su svećenici bili politićki angažirani–većinom na jednoj（HSS），ali i na drugoj strani（Vlada）。我是拉杜，我是伊兹沃拉，我是卡托利奇克，我是斯普里茨科吉，我是政治上的一员。
{"title":"Katolička Crkva i hrvatski seljački pokret na primjeru Splitske i\u0000makarske biskupije od 1935. do 1939.","authors":"Hrvoje Markulin","doi":"10.34075/cs.57.4.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.34075/cs.57.4.3","url":null,"abstract":"Rad proučava odnos Katoličke Crkve i oporbene Hrvatske seljačke stranke te vladajućeg državnog režima u Kraljevini Jugoslaviji na primjeru Splitske i makarske biskupije od 1935. do 1939. godine. U tom je razdoblju HSS aktualizirala rješavanje političkog položaja Hrvata u monarhističkoj Jugoslaviji stvarajući općenarodni hrvatski seljački pokret preko kojeg su u državi kao najvažnije nametnuli političko pitanje koje je bilo poznato pod nazivom hrvatsko pitanje. U tako značajnim političkim i društvenim zbivanjima nisu po strani ostali ni svećenici i biskupi. Crkva nije djelovala kao politička organizacija, no pojedini su svećenici bili politički angažirani – većinom na jednoj (HSS), ali i na drugoj strani (Vlada). U tom se kontekstu u radu, prvenstveno na temelju arhivskih i novinskih izvora, opisuje djelovanje svećenstva Katoličke Crkve u Splitskoj i makarskoj biskupiji u politički vrlo intenzivnom i turbulentnom razdoblju.","PeriodicalId":53546,"journal":{"name":"Crkva u Svijetu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44674994","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tema ovoga rada jezična je usporedba dvaju izdanja književnokajkavskoga lekcionara Čtejenja i evangelijumi, iz 1831. i 1851. godine. Kako su Čtejenja doživjela niz izdanja, pogodna su za povijesnosociolingvistička istraživanja jer se usporedbom i analizom jezika lekcionara mogu pratiti razvoj jezika i jezične mijene na svim razinama, gotovo iz jednoga desetljeća u drugo. Cilj provedenoga istraživanja bio je utvrditi jezične mijene (na grafijskoj i ortografijskoj, fonološkoj, morfološkoj, sintaktičkoj i leksičkoj razini) koje su tijekom dvaju desetljeća zahvatile kajkavski književni jezik i odgovoriti na pitanje je li se i ako jest, u kojoj mjeri, tijekom dvaju desetljeća književna kajkavština štokavizirala.
{"title":"Od Chtejenya do Čtejenja (jezične\u0000mijene u kajkavskim lekcionarima)","authors":"Barbara Štebih Golub","doi":"10.34075/cs.57.4.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.34075/cs.57.4.5","url":null,"abstract":"Tema ovoga rada jezična je usporedba dvaju izdanja književnokajkavskoga lekcionara Čtejenja i evangelijumi, iz 1831. i 1851. godine. Kako su Čtejenja doživjela niz izdanja, pogodna su za povijesnosociolingvistička istraživanja jer se usporedbom i analizom jezika lekcionara mogu pratiti razvoj jezika i jezične mijene na svim razinama, gotovo iz jednoga desetljeća u drugo. Cilj provedenoga istraživanja bio je utvrditi jezične mijene (na grafijskoj i ortografijskoj, fonološkoj, morfološkoj, sintaktičkoj i leksičkoj razini) koje su tijekom dvaju desetljeća zahvatile kajkavski književni jezik i odgovoriti na pitanje je li se i ako jest, u kojoj mjeri, tijekom dvaju desetljeća književna kajkavština štokavizirala.","PeriodicalId":53546,"journal":{"name":"Crkva u Svijetu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41705204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rad se temelji na istraživanju više od 1000 parnica za proglašenje ženidbe nevaljanom pokrenutih na Crkvenom interdijecezanskom sudu u Splitu u razdoblju od 2000. do 2020. godine. U svrhu prikupljanja svih potrebnih informacija za provedbu istraživanja analiziran je urudžbeni zapisnik Suda, te registri svih parnica, uključujući i one u arhivu. Materijali su analizirani pojedinačno i prikupljani su podatci o kanonima po kojima se vodio postupak i godini pokretanja parnice te osobni podatci o strankama, izneseni potom na anoniman i zbirni način. Korištene su metode deskriptivne (opisne) statistike.Rad se sastoji od teoretskog dijela i metodologije, koja uključuje motiv istraživanja, opis korištenog uzorka i kriterija uključenja, materijale, metode i postupke istraživanja te prikaz rezultata, zajedno s raspravom o rezultatima te implikacijama za njihovu praktičnu primjenu.
{"title":"Postupci za\u0000proglašenje ženidbe nevaljanom pokrenuti na Crkvenom interdijecezanskom sudu u Splitu od 2000. do 2020. god.","authors":"Gina Šparada, Dijana Mihalj","doi":"10.34075/cs.57.3.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.34075/cs.57.3.1","url":null,"abstract":"Rad se temelji na istraživanju više od 1000 parnica za proglašenje ženidbe nevaljanom pokrenutih na Crkvenom interdijecezanskom sudu u Splitu u razdoblju od 2000. do 2020. godine. U svrhu prikupljanja svih potrebnih informacija za provedbu istraživanja analiziran je urudžbeni zapisnik Suda, te registri svih parnica, uključujući i one u arhivu. Materijali su analizirani pojedinačno i prikupljani su podatci o kanonima po kojima se vodio postupak i godini pokretanja parnice te osobni podatci o strankama, izneseni potom na anoniman i zbirni način. Korištene su metode deskriptivne (opisne) statistike.Rad se sastoji od teoretskog dijela i metodologije, koja uključuje motiv istraživanja, opis korištenog uzorka i kriterija uključenja, materijale, metode i postupke istraživanja te prikaz rezultata, zajedno s raspravom o rezultatima te implikacijama za njihovu praktičnu primjenu.","PeriodicalId":53546,"journal":{"name":"Crkva u Svijetu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45892766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：