This article aims to present some novel experimental approaches and computational methods providing detailed insights into the mechanical behavior of skeletal muscles relevant to clinical problems associated with managing and treating musculoskeletal diseases. The mechanical characterization of skeletal muscles in vivo is crucial for better understanding of, prevention of, or intervention in movement alterations due to exercise, aging, or pathologies related to neuromuscular diseases. To achieve this, we suggest an intraoperative experimental method including direct measurements of human muscle forces supported by computational methodologies. A set of intraoperative experiments indicated the major role of extracellular matrix (ECM) in spastic cerebral palsy. The force data linked to joint function are invaluable and irreplaceable for evaluating individual muscles however, they are not feasible in many situations. Three-dimensional, continuum-mechanical models provide a way to predict the exerted muscle forces. To obtain, however, realistic predictions, it is important to investigate the muscle not by itself, but embedded within the respective musculoskeletal system, for example, a 6-muscle upper arm model, and the ability to obtain non-invasively, or at least, minimally invasively material parameters for continuum-mechanical skeletal muscle models, for example, by presently proposed homogenization methodologies. Botulinum toxin administration as a treatment option for spasticity is exemplified by combining experiments with modeling to find out the mechanical outcomes of altered ECM and the controversial effects of the toxin. The potentials and limitations of both experimental and modeling approaches and how they need each other are discussed.
{"title":"Experiments meet simulations: Understanding skeletal muscle mechanics to address clinical problems","authors":"Filiz Ateş, Oliver Röhrle","doi":"10.1002/gamm.202370012","DOIUrl":"10.1002/gamm.202370012","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article aims to present some novel experimental approaches and computational methods providing detailed insights into the mechanical behavior of skeletal muscles relevant to clinical problems associated with managing and treating musculoskeletal diseases. The mechanical characterization of skeletal muscles in vivo is crucial for better understanding of, prevention of, or intervention in movement alterations due to exercise, aging, or pathologies related to neuromuscular diseases. To achieve this, we suggest an intraoperative experimental method including direct measurements of human muscle forces supported by computational methodologies. A set of intraoperative experiments indicated the major role of extracellular matrix (ECM) in spastic cerebral palsy. The force data linked to joint function are invaluable and irreplaceable for evaluating individual muscles however, they are not feasible in many situations. Three-dimensional, continuum-mechanical models provide a way to predict the exerted muscle forces. To obtain, however, realistic predictions, it is important to investigate the muscle not by itself, but embedded within the respective musculoskeletal system, for example, a 6-muscle upper arm model, and the ability to obtain non-invasively, or at least, minimally invasively material parameters for continuum-mechanical skeletal muscle models, for example, by presently proposed homogenization methodologies. Botulinum toxin administration as a treatment option for spasticity is exemplified by combining experiments with modeling to find out the mechanical outcomes of altered ECM and the controversial effects of the toxin. The potentials and limitations of both experimental and modeling approaches and how they need each other are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":53634,"journal":{"name":"GAMM Mitteilungen","volume":"47 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gamm.202370012","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140239577","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yesid Villota-Narvaez, Christian Bleiler, Oliver Röhrle
All digital objects that result from the modeling and simulation field are valid sets of research data. In general, research data are the result of intense intellectual activity that is worth communicating. This communication is an essential research practice that, whether with the aim of understanding, critiquing or further developing results, smoothly leads to collaboration, which not only involves discussions, and sharing institutional resources, but also the sharing of data and information at several stages of the research process. Data sharing is intended to improve and facilitate collaboration but quickly introduces challenges like reproducibility, reusability, interoperability, and standardization. These challenges are deeply rooted in an apparent reproducibility standard, about which there is a debate worth considering before emphasizing how the modeling and simulation workflow commonly occurs. Although that workflow is almost natural for practitioners, the sharing practices still require special attention because the principles (known as FAIR principles) that guide research practices towards data sharing also guide the requirements for machine actionable results. The FAIR principles, however, do not address the actual implementation of the data sharing process. This implementation requires careful consideration of characteristics of the sharing platforms for benefiting the most of the data sharing activity. This article serves as an invitation to integrate data sharing practices into the established routines of researchers and elaborates on the perspectives, and guidelines surrounding data sharing implementation.
{"title":"Data sharing in modeling and simulation of biomechanical systems in interdisciplinary environments","authors":"Yesid Villota-Narvaez, Christian Bleiler, Oliver Röhrle","doi":"10.1002/gamm.202370006","DOIUrl":"10.1002/gamm.202370006","url":null,"abstract":"<p>All digital objects that result from the modeling and simulation field are valid sets of research data. In general, research data are the result of intense intellectual activity that is worth communicating. This communication is an essential research practice that, whether with the aim of understanding, critiquing or further developing results, smoothly leads to collaboration, which not only involves discussions, and sharing institutional resources, but also the sharing of data and information at several stages of the research process. Data sharing is intended to improve and facilitate collaboration but quickly introduces challenges like reproducibility, reusability, interoperability, and standardization. These challenges are deeply rooted in an apparent reproducibility standard, about which there is a debate worth considering before emphasizing how the modeling and simulation workflow commonly occurs. Although that workflow is almost natural for practitioners, the sharing practices still require special attention because the principles (known as FAIR principles) that guide research practices towards data sharing also guide the requirements for machine actionable results. The FAIR principles, however, do not address the actual implementation of the data sharing process. This implementation requires careful consideration of characteristics of the sharing platforms for benefiting the most of the data sharing activity. This article serves as an invitation to integrate data sharing practices into the established routines of researchers and elaborates on the perspectives, and guidelines surrounding data sharing implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":53634,"journal":{"name":"GAMM Mitteilungen","volume":"47 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gamm.202370006","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140440453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lukas Obermeier, Jana Korte, Katharina Vellguth, Fabian Barbieri, Florian Hellmeier, Philipp Berg, Leonid Goubergrits
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) carry the potential to provide detailed insights into intraventricular hemodynamics and complement in vivo flow measurement techniques. A variety of CFD approaches emerged in recent years, mostly building solely on medical image data as patient-specific input. While the utilized medical imaging method and chosen CFD approach both influence the computed hemodynamics, thereto related differences are rarely investigated. The present study addresses this issue with an inter-(imaging)-modality and inter-model comparison of intracardiac flow computations. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) data of a volunteer were acquired and used to reconstruct the anatomical structures. For each modality, the reconstructed shapes were applied in two previously introduced CFD approaches to compute whole-cycle ventricular flow patterns. While both methods involved benefits and challenges, similar valve velocities were computed, being in accordance with in vivo 4D flow MRI and pulsed-wave Doppler velocity measurements (systolic peak velocity: 1.24–1.26 m/s (MRI), 0.9–1.25 m/s (TTE); diastolic peak velocity: 0.54 m/s (MRI), 0.59–0.75 m/s (TTE)). A detailed flow analysis with vortex formation, kinetic energy, and mid-ventricular velocities indicated the computed inter-modality differences to be larger than inter-method ones. Quantitatively, this could be observed in the direct flow rate (