首页 > 最新文献

STUDIES IN THE NOVEL最新文献

英文 中文
Novels By Aliens: Weird Tales and the Twenty-First Century by Kate Marshall (review) 凯特-马歇尔的《外星人的小说:怪诞故事与二十一世纪》(评论)
IF 0.2 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI: 10.1353/sdn.2024.a935479
Adrienne Ghaly
<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span><p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Novels By Aliens: Weird Tales and the Twenty-First Century</em> by Kate Marshall <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Adrienne Ghaly </li> </ul> MARSHALL, KATE. <em>Novels By Aliens: Weird Tales and the Twenty-First Century</em>. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2023. 232 pp. $26.00 paper; $99.00 cloth. <p>Realism's enduring cultural presence in contemporary American literature is not the result of variations on the bourgeois subject, free indirect discourse's dialectic of intimacy and alienation, the structure of a political unconscious, or its treatment of sociomaterial environments. Instead, argues Kate Marshall in this vibrant work of novel theory and the nonhuman, this persistence derives from realism's tendency to decenter human experiences, often in highly 'weird' ways. On one level, this book might be understood as a lively response to new materialism, theories of the nonhuman, and the Anthropocene; on another, as an engaging and welcome addition to current critical re-engagements with realism. Over the better part of two decades scholars from Fredric Jameson to Jed Esty and Colleen Lye, from Debjani Ganguly to Ramón Saldívar, have interrogated realism's flourishing in contemporary Anglophone literature, often identifying its permeability and propensity for fusion with its putative others, from the romance to the complex generic hybridities of 'speculative' and 'planetary' fiction. <strong>[End Page 331]</strong></p> <p>Marshall's opening chapters seek to track "a <em>longing</em> for the nonhuman" (3) in twenty-first-century fiction and theory by establishing an alternate genealogy found in the modes with which American fiction since the later decades of the nineteenth century sought to imagine nonhuman perspectives. The new weird thinkers—novelists and theorists of new materialism, proponents of object-oriented ontology and speculative realism—share a commitment to "modalities of indifference, the cosmic, and external or object agencies" (31). From Poe to pulp to new materialisms, through American naturalism, para-modernist texts, and post-extinction narratives: in Marshall's vision all are "novels that want to be written by aliens" (13). This animating idea encompasses "shifts of perspective and unlikely experiments with sentience" (3), "build[ing] worlds that <em>feel</em> weird" (4), and "construct[ing] a nonhuman point of view" (9) without consigning such weirdness to the domains of genre fiction. Marshall does not dissolve the category of genre, but argues instead that in the novels under examination "genre becomes mood," a "reflexive knowing" and "feeling…the limitations of the human vantage" (5). This genre shift, Marshall contends, "is doing the work of theory in the novel" (5).</p> <p>This perspective means that <em>Novels by Aliens</em> participates in broader efforts to expand
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: 外星小说:怪诞故事与二十一世纪》(Novels By Aliens: Weird Tales and the Twenty-First Century),凯特-马歇尔(Kate Marshall)著,阿德里安娜-加利(Adrienne Ghaly MARSHALL, KATE.Novels By Aliens: Weird Tales and the Twenty-First Century.芝加哥:芝加哥大学出版社,2023 年。232 pp.纸质版 26.00 美元;布面版 99.00 美元。现实主义在当代美国文学中经久不衰的文化存在,并不是资产阶级主体、自由间接话语的亲密与疏离辩证关系、政治无意识的结构或其对社会物质环境的处理等变化的结果。相反,凯特-马歇尔(Kate Marshall)在这本充满活力的小说理论和非人类作品中指出,这种顽固性源于现实主义倾向于以非常 "怪异 "的方式去中心化人类经验。从一个层面上讲,本书可以被理解为对新唯物主义、非人类理论和人类世的生动回应;从另一个层面上讲,本书是对当前批判性地重新接触现实主义的一个引人入胜、值得欢迎的补充。二十多年来,从弗雷德里克-詹姆逊(Fredric Jameson)到杰德-埃斯蒂(Jed Esty)和科琳-莱伊(Colleen Lye),从德布贾尼-甘古利(Debjani Ganguly)到拉蒙-萨尔迪瓦(Ramón Saldívar),学者们对现实主义在当代英语文学中的蓬勃发展提出了质疑,并经常指出现实主义与其假定的其他文学(从浪漫主义到 "投机 "和 "行星 "小说的复杂混合体)之间的渗透性和融合倾向。[末页331]马歇尔的开篇章节试图追踪21世纪小说和理论中 "对非人类的渴望"(3),方法是在19世纪后几十年以来美国小说试图想象非人类视角的模式中建立另一种谱系。新怪异思想家--新唯物主义小说家和理论家、对象导向本体论和投机现实主义的支持者--都致力于 "冷漠、宇宙和外部或对象机构的模式"(31)。从坡到纸浆到新唯物主义,再到美国自然主义、准现代主义文本和后消亡叙事:在马歇尔的视野中,所有这些都是 "想由外星人来写的小说"(13)。这种充满活力的理念包括 "视角的转换和不太可能的感知实验"(3)、"构建感觉怪异的世界"(4)以及 "构建非人类的视角"(9),而不会将这种怪异归入类型小说的范畴。马歇尔并没有消解类型小说的范畴,而是认为在所研究的小说中,"类型变成了情绪",一种 "反思性的认知 "和 "感受......人类视角的局限性"(5)。马歇尔认为,这种体裁的转变 "正在小说中完成理论的工作"(5)。这一观点意味着,《外国人的小说》参与了更广泛的努力,以扩大现实主义批评对话的管理参数,至少在英语和法语领域是如此。然而,该研究对当代美国现实主义极端外部视角的关注开辟了令人兴奋的新领域。马歇尔在全书六章中提出了许多广泛的论点和干预措施。这些论点和观点汇集成两个相互关联的核心主张。首先,要理解近期许多小说,包括科马克-麦卡锡(Cormac McCarthy)、中国-米维尔(China Miéville)、玛丽莲-罗宾逊(Marilynne Robinson)和特朱-科尔(Teju Cole)等作家的作品中高度怪异的现实主义,就必须认识到这样一个事实,即十九世纪和二十世纪的美国小说总是比人们想象或承认的要怪异得多。在这里,纸浆小说、恐怖小说、S-F 小说和美国哥特式小说都是现实主义不可思议的兄弟姐妹,而不是其他。马歇尔将洛夫克拉夫特(H. P. Lovecraft)、埃德加-赖斯-巴勒斯(Edgar Rice Burroughs)和推理作家与斯蒂芬-克莱恩(Stephen Crane)、弗兰克-诺里斯(Frank Norris)、W. E. B. 杜波依斯(W. E. B. DuBois)和威拉-凯瑟(Willa Cather)的现实主义文本进行了亲密对话。其次,马歇尔认为,当代现实主义的创新来自于对现实主义外部性既有形式的彻底扩展,包括对风景和物质的描述、全知全能的叙述者、意识形式以及被推向 "异域"(15)甚至宇宙视角的多尺度感知。马歇尔认为,她的研究需要一种新的术语。例如,将现实主义的 "意识......与......其他试图在人类之外进行思考的形式......相提并论",将意识转化为更广泛、更包容的 "有知觉 "概念(82)。景观一直被解读为令人不安的代理人,从根本上漠视人类行动者,有时是故事的非人类叙述者,所有这些都揭示了景观一词本身的贫乏。该书指出了景观的三个...
{"title":"Novels By Aliens: Weird Tales and the Twenty-First Century by Kate Marshall (review)","authors":"Adrienne Ghaly","doi":"10.1353/sdn.2024.a935479","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sdn.2024.a935479","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;In lieu of&lt;/span&gt; an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:&lt;/span&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt; &lt;span&gt;Reviewed by:&lt;/span&gt; &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;!-- html_title --&gt; &lt;em&gt;Novels By Aliens: Weird Tales and the Twenty-First Century&lt;/em&gt; by Kate Marshall &lt;!-- /html_title --&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt; Adrienne Ghaly &lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt; MARSHALL, KATE. &lt;em&gt;Novels By Aliens: Weird Tales and the Twenty-First Century&lt;/em&gt;. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2023. 232 pp. $26.00 paper; $99.00 cloth. &lt;p&gt;Realism's enduring cultural presence in contemporary American literature is not the result of variations on the bourgeois subject, free indirect discourse's dialectic of intimacy and alienation, the structure of a political unconscious, or its treatment of sociomaterial environments. Instead, argues Kate Marshall in this vibrant work of novel theory and the nonhuman, this persistence derives from realism's tendency to decenter human experiences, often in highly 'weird' ways. On one level, this book might be understood as a lively response to new materialism, theories of the nonhuman, and the Anthropocene; on another, as an engaging and welcome addition to current critical re-engagements with realism. Over the better part of two decades scholars from Fredric Jameson to Jed Esty and Colleen Lye, from Debjani Ganguly to Ramón Saldívar, have interrogated realism's flourishing in contemporary Anglophone literature, often identifying its permeability and propensity for fusion with its putative others, from the romance to the complex generic hybridities of 'speculative' and 'planetary' fiction. &lt;strong&gt;[End Page 331]&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Marshall's opening chapters seek to track \"a &lt;em&gt;longing&lt;/em&gt; for the nonhuman\" (3) in twenty-first-century fiction and theory by establishing an alternate genealogy found in the modes with which American fiction since the later decades of the nineteenth century sought to imagine nonhuman perspectives. The new weird thinkers—novelists and theorists of new materialism, proponents of object-oriented ontology and speculative realism—share a commitment to \"modalities of indifference, the cosmic, and external or object agencies\" (31). From Poe to pulp to new materialisms, through American naturalism, para-modernist texts, and post-extinction narratives: in Marshall's vision all are \"novels that want to be written by aliens\" (13). This animating idea encompasses \"shifts of perspective and unlikely experiments with sentience\" (3), \"build[ing] worlds that &lt;em&gt;feel&lt;/em&gt; weird\" (4), and \"construct[ing] a nonhuman point of view\" (9) without consigning such weirdness to the domains of genre fiction. Marshall does not dissolve the category of genre, but argues instead that in the novels under examination \"genre becomes mood,\" a \"reflexive knowing\" and \"feeling…the limitations of the human vantage\" (5). This genre shift, Marshall contends, \"is doing the work of theory in the novel\" (5).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;This perspective means that &lt;em&gt;Novels by Aliens&lt;/em&gt; participates in broader efforts to expand","PeriodicalId":54138,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142189731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dorian Unbound: Transnational Decadence and the Wilde Archive by Sean O'toole (review) Dorian Unbound:Sean O'toole 所著的《跨国颓废与王尔德档案》(评论)
IF 0.2 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI: 10.1353/sdn.2024.a935481
Kristin Mahoney
<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span><p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Dorian Unbound: Transnational Decadence and the Wilde Archive</em> by Sean O'toole <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Kristin Mahoney </li> </ul> O'TOOLE, SEAN. <em>Dorian Unbound: Transnational Decadence and the Wilde Archive</em>. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2023. 170 pp. $94.95 hardcover; $34.95 paperback; $34.95 e-book. <p><em>The Picture of Dorian Gray</em> (1890/1891) is a novel that can feel at once too legible and strangely obscure. Critics have wrestled with what to do with the novel's conclusion, which seems to transform a Decadent novel into an overly pat cautionary tale, supplanting all the sinister hedonism that preceded with simplistic moralism, leading readers to struggle as to how to bring the text into accord with the movement from which it emerged. The novel's treatment of desire, which famously underwent numerous revisions, manifests in wildly different ways within different chapters, and critics have struggled as well with how to render coherent this unruly thematic within the text. Sean O'Toole's <em>Dorian Unbound: Transnational Decadence and the Wilde Archive</em> provides a way out of some of these challenges, not by simplifying or reducing the novel, but by foregrounding the fragments of which it is composed, the fact that it is a collage arranged from a network of transnational influences. In illuminating what the novel is made from, he also demonstrates the function of these borrowings and adaptations, the manner in which its fragmentation and bricolage disguised the text's queer project, allowing Wilde to avoid the censoring of its representation of same-sex desire and "circumvent dominant ideology" (38).</p> <p>O'Toole argues that our tendency to see <em>The Picture of Dorian Gray</em> as an outgrowth of Victorian Aestheticism and French Decadence has obscured the broader array of international influences from which Wilde was drawing in his composition of his only novel. In his preface, O'Toole connects this move to place <em>Dorian Gray</em> within a broader transnational and transhistorical framework to recent efforts to "undiscipline" Victorian studies as well as to what has been referred to as "new Decadence studies," which locates Decadence across a wider range of geographic locations, time periods, and media. However, while recent work on the Decadent Movement's global reach by, for example, Stefano Evangelista, Matthew Potolsky, Regenia Gagnier, and Robert Stilling has focused upon Decadence's cosmopolitan networks at the fin de siècle as well as its transnational afterlives in the twentieth century, O'Toole takes a somewhat different tack by disinterring Wilde's international source materials, turning our eyes back to the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, to Irish Gothic, European historical romance, and nineteenth-century American short fiction.
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: Dorian Unbound:Sean O'toole Kristin Mahoney 著 O'TOOLE, SEAN.Dorian Unbound:Dorian Unbound: Transnational Decadence and the Wilde Archive.巴尔的摩:约翰-霍普金斯大学出版社,2023 年。170 pp.精装本 94.95 美元;平装本 34.95 美元;电子书 34.95 美元。多里安-格雷的画像》(1890/1891 年)是一部让人感觉既清晰易读又陌生晦涩的小说。评论家们一直在纠结如何处理小说的结尾,因为它似乎将一部颓废派小说转变成了一个过于平实的警世故事,用简单化的道德主义取代了之前所有险恶的享乐主义,导致读者纠结于如何使文本与其产生的运动相一致。小说对欲望的处理经历了无数次著名的修改,在不同章节中的表现方式也大相径庭,评论家们也一直在苦苦思索如何将这一混乱的主题在文本中连贯起来。肖恩-奥图尔(Sean O'Toole)的《无束缚的多里安》(Dorian Unbound:肖恩-奥图尔(Sean O'Toole)的《无束缚的多里安:跨国颓废与王尔德档案》(Dorian Unbound: Transnational Decadence and the Wilde Archive)一书为解决其中的一些难题提供了一条出路,这不是通过简化或缩小这部小说,而是通过突出它所由的碎片,突出它是由跨国影响网络拼贴而成的这一事实。在揭示小说的创作背景时,他还展示了这些借鉴和改编的作用,即小说的碎片化和拼贴掩盖了文本的同性恋项目,使王尔德得以避免对其同性欲望表现的审查,并 "规避主流意识形态"(38)。O'Toole 认为,我们倾向于将《多伦-格雷的画像》视为维多利亚时代唯美主义和法国颓废派的产物,这掩盖了王尔德在创作其唯一一部小说时所受到的更广泛的国际影响。奥图尔在序言中将这种将《多利安-格雷》置于更广泛的跨国和跨历史框架内的做法与近年来维多利亚时期研究 "非学科化 "的努力以及所谓的 "新颓废派研究 "联系起来,后者将颓废派置于更广泛的地理位置、时间段和媒体中。然而,尽管斯特凡诺-埃万杰利斯塔(Stefano Evangelista)、马修-波托尔斯基(Matthew Potolsky)、雷吉尼亚-加尼耶(Regenia Gagnier)和罗伯特-斯蒂林(Robert Stilling)等人最近对颓废运动的全球影响进行了研究,但他们的研究重点是颓废运动在世纪末的世界性网络以及它在二十世纪的跨国后遗症、奥图尔则另辟蹊径,对王尔德的国际资料进行了发掘,将我们的视线拉回到十八世纪和十九世纪,拉回到爱尔兰哥特式小说、欧洲历史浪漫主义小说和十九世纪美国短篇小说。这不是褪色的现代主义,而是从过去的素材中创造出来的颓废。在所有这些作品中,最有趣的是奥图尔对王尔德所有作品的谨慎态度,他强调王尔德所揭示的 "一闪而过的亲缘关系 "应该被理解为是相互关联的,没有任何一个潜在的来源或影响是 "理解《多利安-格雷》的起源或意义的关键",王尔德创造性地[第337页完]改造和重新使用了这些成分,将它们转化为自己的目的(xii, 92)。这就使得本书的解读与《多利安-格雷》一起被深思熟虑、小心翼翼地安排,而不是与小说直接相关。在本书最引人注目的两章中,O'Toole 展示了对王尔德的借用和典故的关注如何照亮了《多利安-格雷》的结构和结尾。第一章的重点是文本的 "同性恋形式",认为 "小说的形式构成中蕴含着性"(17)。O'Toole 断言,小说的混乱感、流派的融合以及极端的色调变化,都源于其创作的历史条件。这种无序和不和谐非但不能说明小说在美学上的失败,反而说明了王尔德在维多利亚时代审查制度的现实中游刃有余。奥图尔通过分析小说令人兴奋的开头场景,为我们提供了一个文本狡猾计划的缩影模型,开头场景几乎将读者淹没在带有同性恋色彩的感性中(玫瑰和丁香花的香味、颤动的马褂木树枝和香烟的烟雾),然后外来的审美存在(这里指的是......
{"title":"Dorian Unbound: Transnational Decadence and the Wilde Archive by Sean O'toole (review)","authors":"Kristin Mahoney","doi":"10.1353/sdn.2024.a935481","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sdn.2024.a935481","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;In lieu of&lt;/span&gt; an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:&lt;/span&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt; &lt;span&gt;Reviewed by:&lt;/span&gt; &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;!-- html_title --&gt; &lt;em&gt;Dorian Unbound: Transnational Decadence and the Wilde Archive&lt;/em&gt; by Sean O'toole &lt;!-- /html_title --&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt; Kristin Mahoney &lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt; O'TOOLE, SEAN. &lt;em&gt;Dorian Unbound: Transnational Decadence and the Wilde Archive&lt;/em&gt;. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2023. 170 pp. $94.95 hardcover; $34.95 paperback; $34.95 e-book. &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Picture of Dorian Gray&lt;/em&gt; (1890/1891) is a novel that can feel at once too legible and strangely obscure. Critics have wrestled with what to do with the novel's conclusion, which seems to transform a Decadent novel into an overly pat cautionary tale, supplanting all the sinister hedonism that preceded with simplistic moralism, leading readers to struggle as to how to bring the text into accord with the movement from which it emerged. The novel's treatment of desire, which famously underwent numerous revisions, manifests in wildly different ways within different chapters, and critics have struggled as well with how to render coherent this unruly thematic within the text. Sean O'Toole's &lt;em&gt;Dorian Unbound: Transnational Decadence and the Wilde Archive&lt;/em&gt; provides a way out of some of these challenges, not by simplifying or reducing the novel, but by foregrounding the fragments of which it is composed, the fact that it is a collage arranged from a network of transnational influences. In illuminating what the novel is made from, he also demonstrates the function of these borrowings and adaptations, the manner in which its fragmentation and bricolage disguised the text's queer project, allowing Wilde to avoid the censoring of its representation of same-sex desire and \"circumvent dominant ideology\" (38).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;O'Toole argues that our tendency to see &lt;em&gt;The Picture of Dorian Gray&lt;/em&gt; as an outgrowth of Victorian Aestheticism and French Decadence has obscured the broader array of international influences from which Wilde was drawing in his composition of his only novel. In his preface, O'Toole connects this move to place &lt;em&gt;Dorian Gray&lt;/em&gt; within a broader transnational and transhistorical framework to recent efforts to \"undiscipline\" Victorian studies as well as to what has been referred to as \"new Decadence studies,\" which locates Decadence across a wider range of geographic locations, time periods, and media. However, while recent work on the Decadent Movement's global reach by, for example, Stefano Evangelista, Matthew Potolsky, Regenia Gagnier, and Robert Stilling has focused upon Decadence's cosmopolitan networks at the fin de siècle as well as its transnational afterlives in the twentieth century, O'Toole takes a somewhat different tack by disinterring Wilde's international source materials, turning our eyes back to the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, to Irish Gothic, European historical romance, and nineteenth-century American short fiction.","PeriodicalId":54138,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142224484","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Writing Backwards: Historical Fiction and the Reshaping of the American Canon by Alexander Manshel (review) 逆向写作:亚历山大-曼谢尔(Alexander Manshel)的《历史小说与美国经典的重塑》(评论
IF 0.2 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI: 10.1353/sdn.2024.a928660
Hardeep Sidhu
<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span><p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Writing Backwards: Historical Fiction and the Reshaping of the American Canon</em> by Alexander Manshel <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Hardeep Sidhu </li> </ul> MANSHEL, ALEXANDER. <em>Writing Backwards: Historical Fiction and the Reshaping of the American Canon</em>. New York: Columbia University Press, 2023. 352 pp. $35.00 paperback; $140.00 hardcover; $34.99 e-book. <p>For much of the twentieth century, the genre of the historical novel didn’t rank high in literary esteem. The popular form was part of a previous era’s paraliterature, “condemned,” Henry James once wrote, to a “fatal <em>cheapness</em>” (qtd. in Manshel 16–17). Alexander Manshel’s <em>Writing Backwards</em> tells the fascinating story of how historical fiction has now become the most prized mode in American letters. Consider the numbers: Of contemporary novels taught in American universities, 70 percent are historical fiction. Around three-quarters of novels shortlisted for major American literary prizes in recent decades are historical fiction (4). Historical fiction earns 50 percent more scholarly citations than do novels set in the present (250n10). While most popular fiction continues to be set in the present, the fiction that elite cultural institutions consecrate as literary is overwhelmingly set in the past (253n32). “[H]istorical fiction,” writes Manshel, “now stands at the very center of the American literary canon” (5).</p> <p><em>Writing Backwards</em> is an excellent addition to theorizations of the historical novel, from Walter Scott and Georg Lukàcs up through Fredric Jameson, Linda Hutcheon, and Amy Elias. However, Manshel’s idea of what constitutes historical fiction is much roomier than these writers’, more a “literary mode” than a “single, monolithic genre” (12). Instead of ticking boxes to see if novels belong, Manshel uses a common-sense criterion that spans genres: is a novel clearly set in the past? There are some risks to this approach. As the set of objects of study grows, so do the anomalies that undercut generalizations. And when we redefine historical fiction in this way, more of the literature of previous eras (Henry James’s era, say) should now qualify, which in turn <strong>[End Page 212]</strong> raises the question of how sharp Manshel’s “historical turn” really is. For the most part, Manshel’s data go back only to 1950 or so, making it hard to know the longer-term baseline of historical fiction as a share of the literary field. Some of Manshel’s earliest data show that, from 1950 to 1979, historical fiction made up half of novels shortlisted for major prizes (4)—not as many as today, but still a significant proportion. Moreover, even a cursory glance at earlier literary history shows that Manshel’s broadly conceived “mode” of historical fiction—including most of the subgenres analyzed in <em>Writ
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: 向后写作:亚历山大-曼谢尔(Alexander Manshel)著,哈迪普-西杜(Hardeep Sidhu)译。向后写作:历史小说与美国经典的重塑》。纽约:哥伦比亚大学出版社,2023 年。352 pp.平装本 35.00 美元;精装本 140.00 美元;电子书 34.99 美元。在 20 世纪的大部分时间里,历史小说这一体裁在文学界的地位并不高。亨利-詹姆斯(Henry James)曾写道,这种流行的形式是上一个时代准文学的一部分,"被谴责 "为 "致命的廉价"(转引自 Manshel 16-17)。亚历山大-曼谢尔(Alexander Manshel)的《逆向写作》(Writing Backwards)讲述了一个引人入胜的故事:历史小说是如何成为美国文学中最受欢迎的形式的。请看一组数字:在美国大学教授的当代小说中,70%是历史小说。近几十年来,入围美国主要文学奖的小说中,约有四分之三是历史小说(4)。历史小说获得的学术引用比以当代为背景的小说多 50%(250n10)。虽然大多数通俗小说仍然以现在为背景,但被精英文化机构奉为文学的小说却绝大多数以过去为背景(253n32)。曼谢尔写道:"历史小说","现在是美国文学典籍的核心"(5)。从沃尔特-司各特(Walter Scott)和格奥尔格-卢卡奇(Georg Lukàcs)直到弗雷德里克-詹姆逊(Fredric Jameson)、琳达-胡琴(Linda Hutcheon)和艾米-埃利亚斯(Amy Elias),《倒写》是对历史小说理论的极好补充。然而,曼谢尔对历史小说的定义要比这些作家宽泛得多,更像是一种 "文学模式",而非 "单一的、铁板一块的流派"(12)。曼谢尔没有用打勾的方式来判断小说是否属于这一流派,而是采用了一种跨越流派的常识性标准:小说的背景是否清晰地设定在过去?这种方法有一定的风险。随着研究对象的增多,异常现象也会随之增多,从而削弱概括性。当我们以这种方式重新定义历史小说时,更多以前时代(比如亨利-詹姆斯的时代)的文学作品现在应该符合条件,这反过来 [尾页 212]又提出了曼谢尔的 "历史转向 "究竟有多尖锐的问题。曼谢尔的数据大多只追溯到 1950 年左右,因此很难了解历史小说在文学领域所占份额的长期基线。曼谢尔最早的一些数据显示,从1950年到1979年,历史小说占主要奖项入围小说的一半(4)--虽然不如今天那么多,但仍占有相当大的比例。此外,即使粗略地回顾一下早期的文学史,也会发现曼谢尔广义构想的历史小说 "模式"--包括《倒着写》中分析的大多数亚类型--一直在正统文学中占有重要地位。但同样真实的是,针对特定流派的研究和文学史很容易陷入乏味的分类和时期划分。无论该领域的长期变化如何,曼谢尔都发现了一个不可否认的现象:描写当代生活的小说并不像描写过去的小说那样广受好评。逆向写作》对这一现象的形成原因进行了重要的阐述。逆向写作》并不只是一本狭隘的流派研究专著。它调查了当代美国的大部分作品。尽管书中的作品数量庞大,种类繁多,但通过曼谢尔对代表性文本的精辟解读,我们可以发现明显的趋势。创伤历史--奴役、移民和战争--是经常出现的主题,这种历史的多代后遗症也是如此(托尼-莫里森(Toni Morrison)的《心爱的人》(Beloved)[1987 年]是这里的原型;雅-加西(Yaa Gyasi)的《回家》(Homegoing)[2017 年]是最近的一个例子)。这些小说摒弃了许多当代现实主义作品中 "不确定的现在"(210)的设定,有意识地通过时间标记或特定时代的参照物(16)将自身 "历史化"(如本-勒纳和露丝-奥泽基的近代小说)。它们往往具有自我反思性和元规范性(如阮越清的《同情者》[2015])。与后现代主义历史小说家的深刻怀疑主义不同,近来的作家们开始了一项极为认真、甚至是虔诚的历史复原计划。(想想约瑟夫-海勒(Joseph Heller)的《危情二十二》(Catch-22)[1961 年] 和安东尼-杜尔(Anthony Doerr)的《我们看不见的所有光芒》(All the Light We Cannot See)[2014 年] 之间巨大的色调鸿沟)。建立...
{"title":"Writing Backwards: Historical Fiction and the Reshaping of the American Canon by Alexander Manshel (review)","authors":"Hardeep Sidhu","doi":"10.1353/sdn.2024.a928660","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sdn.2024.a928660","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;In lieu of&lt;/span&gt; an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:&lt;/span&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt; &lt;span&gt;Reviewed by:&lt;/span&gt; &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;!-- html_title --&gt; &lt;em&gt;Writing Backwards: Historical Fiction and the Reshaping of the American Canon&lt;/em&gt; by Alexander Manshel &lt;!-- /html_title --&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt; Hardeep Sidhu &lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt; MANSHEL, ALEXANDER. &lt;em&gt;Writing Backwards: Historical Fiction and the Reshaping of the American Canon&lt;/em&gt;. New York: Columbia University Press, 2023. 352 pp. $35.00 paperback; $140.00 hardcover; $34.99 e-book. &lt;p&gt;For much of the twentieth century, the genre of the historical novel didn’t rank high in literary esteem. The popular form was part of a previous era’s paraliterature, “condemned,” Henry James once wrote, to a “fatal &lt;em&gt;cheapness&lt;/em&gt;” (qtd. in Manshel 16–17). Alexander Manshel’s &lt;em&gt;Writing Backwards&lt;/em&gt; tells the fascinating story of how historical fiction has now become the most prized mode in American letters. Consider the numbers: Of contemporary novels taught in American universities, 70 percent are historical fiction. Around three-quarters of novels shortlisted for major American literary prizes in recent decades are historical fiction (4). Historical fiction earns 50 percent more scholarly citations than do novels set in the present (250n10). While most popular fiction continues to be set in the present, the fiction that elite cultural institutions consecrate as literary is overwhelmingly set in the past (253n32). “[H]istorical fiction,” writes Manshel, “now stands at the very center of the American literary canon” (5).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Writing Backwards&lt;/em&gt; is an excellent addition to theorizations of the historical novel, from Walter Scott and Georg Lukàcs up through Fredric Jameson, Linda Hutcheon, and Amy Elias. However, Manshel’s idea of what constitutes historical fiction is much roomier than these writers’, more a “literary mode” than a “single, monolithic genre” (12). Instead of ticking boxes to see if novels belong, Manshel uses a common-sense criterion that spans genres: is a novel clearly set in the past? There are some risks to this approach. As the set of objects of study grows, so do the anomalies that undercut generalizations. And when we redefine historical fiction in this way, more of the literature of previous eras (Henry James’s era, say) should now qualify, which in turn &lt;strong&gt;[End Page 212]&lt;/strong&gt; raises the question of how sharp Manshel’s “historical turn” really is. For the most part, Manshel’s data go back only to 1950 or so, making it hard to know the longer-term baseline of historical fiction as a share of the literary field. Some of Manshel’s earliest data show that, from 1950 to 1979, historical fiction made up half of novels shortlisted for major prizes (4)—not as many as today, but still a significant proportion. Moreover, even a cursory glance at earlier literary history shows that Manshel’s broadly conceived “mode” of historical fiction—including most of the subgenres analyzed in &lt;em&gt;Writ","PeriodicalId":54138,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL","volume":"71 3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141150880","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
"A Little Happy Sound": Collective Labor, Ecocide, and Soundscapes in Charlotte Perkins Gilman's Herland "一点快乐的声音":夏洛特-帕金斯-吉尔曼《赫兰》中的集体劳动、生态灭绝和声音景观
IF 0.2 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI: 10.1353/sdn.2024.a928652
Eliza McCarthy

Abstract:

Previous scholarship on Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s novel Herland (1915) has compellingly argued that the ecological space in the novel reflects an extension of an idealized domestic sphere, as a site where Gilman’s problematic eugenic beliefs manifest through the careful conservation of a park-like space. This analysis tends, however, to be wholly ocularcentric, grounded in the aesthetics of the verdant environment that features in Gilman’s narrative. As a necessary sensory departure from a visually preoccupied body of scholarship, I examine the barren sonic portrait that Gilman creates through her essayistic prose, arguing that female autonomy, individual orality, and bio-diverse ecological space become problematically compromised. Drawing on the intersections between feminist scholarship on Gilman’s novel, soundscape studies, and ecocritical frameworks in the environmental humanities, this essay aims to sonically deconstruct the problematic eugenic discourse that underpins Gilman’s ultimate human fantasy.

摘要:以往关于夏洛特-帕金斯-吉尔曼的小说《赫兰》(1915 年)的研究有力地论证了小说中的生态空间反映了理想化家庭领域的延伸,是吉尔曼通过精心保护公园般的空间来体现其有问题的优生信仰的场所。然而,这种分析倾向于完全以视觉为中心,立足于吉尔曼叙事中的青翠环境美学。作为对视觉至上的学术研究的一种必要的感官偏离,我研究了吉尔曼通过她的散文式散文所创造的贫瘠的声音肖像,认为女性自主、个人口述和生物多样性的生态空间受到了问题的损害。本文借鉴了吉尔曼小说的女性主义学术研究、音景研究和环境人文学科中的生态批评框架之间的交叉点,旨在从声音上解构吉尔曼终极人类幻想中存在问题的优生学话语。
{"title":"\"A Little Happy Sound\": Collective Labor, Ecocide, and Soundscapes in Charlotte Perkins Gilman's Herland","authors":"Eliza McCarthy","doi":"10.1353/sdn.2024.a928652","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sdn.2024.a928652","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>Previous scholarship on Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s novel <i>Herland</i> (1915) has compellingly argued that the ecological space in the novel reflects an extension of an idealized domestic sphere, as a site where Gilman’s problematic eugenic beliefs manifest through the careful conservation of a park-like space. This analysis tends, however, to be wholly ocularcentric, grounded in the aesthetics of the verdant environment that features in Gilman’s narrative. As a necessary sensory departure from a visually preoccupied body of scholarship, I examine the barren sonic portrait that Gilman creates through her essayistic prose, arguing that female autonomy, individual orality, and bio-diverse ecological space become problematically compromised. Drawing on the intersections between feminist scholarship on Gilman’s novel, soundscape studies, and ecocritical frameworks in the environmental humanities, this essay aims to sonically deconstruct the problematic eugenic discourse that underpins Gilman’s ultimate human fantasy.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":54138,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141150911","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Speculation's Profit and Loss: Philosophical, Financial, and Fictional Wagers in Tom McCarthy's Remainder 投机的盈亏:汤姆-麦卡锡《余生》中的哲学、金融和虚构赌注
IF 0.2 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI: 10.1353/sdn.2024.a928654
Ryan Trimm

Abstract:

Tom McCarthy’s Remainder foregrounds speculation as a prominent theme, not least in the narrator’s financial investments. This essay uses those risky wagers as means of exploring the intersecting resonances of speculation in terms of its philosophical, financial, and narrative (speculative fictional) resonances. The novel’s interweaving of these senses reveals competing speculative strategies: on the one hand, a wager that takes limited information but attempts to delve into the unknown and return with a profit; on the other, a loss that nonetheless informs as to what supposedly established givens ultimately do not work.

摘要:汤姆-麦卡锡的《余生》以投机为突出主题,尤其是叙述者的金融投资。本文以这些高风险的赌注为手段,从哲学、金融和叙事(推理小说)的角度探讨了投机的交叉共鸣。小说将这些感官交织在一起,揭示了相互竞争的投机策略:一方面,赌注的信息有限,但却试图深入探索未知世界并获利而归;另一方面,损失却告诉人们哪些所谓的既定假设最终行不通。
{"title":"Speculation's Profit and Loss: Philosophical, Financial, and Fictional Wagers in Tom McCarthy's Remainder","authors":"Ryan Trimm","doi":"10.1353/sdn.2024.a928654","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sdn.2024.a928654","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>Tom McCarthy’s <i>Remainder</i> foregrounds speculation as a prominent theme, not least in the narrator’s financial investments. This essay uses those risky wagers as means of exploring the intersecting resonances of speculation in terms of its philosophical, financial, and narrative (speculative fictional) resonances. The novel’s interweaving of these senses reveals competing speculative strategies: on the one hand, a wager that takes limited information but attempts to delve into the unknown and return with a profit; on the other, a loss that nonetheless informs as to what supposedly established givens ultimately do not work.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":54138,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141150879","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Implicated Realism and the Environmentalism of the Rich in Ben Lerner's 10:04 本-勒纳《10:04》中的隐含现实主义和富人的环保主义
IF 0.2 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI: 10.1353/sdn.2024.a928656
Leila Braun

Abstract:

This essay argues that Ben Lerner’s novel 10:04 (2014) employs “implicated realism” to represent the environmentalism of the rich. Implicated realism is a self-reflexive aesthetic that reveals how the foundations of literary realism—narrative description, bourgeois settings, an emphasis on daily life—rely upon the forms of exploitation that have also produced the climate crisis. I demonstrate that implicated realism in 10:04, paradoxically, consists of both hyperrealism and realist failure. Lerner’s novel applies hyperrealist description to seemingly innocuous scenes, uncovering their implication in the uneven distribution of environmental harm. Such hyperrealism exists alongside realist failure, which 10:04 both thematizes and performs. Through realist failure, then, implicated realism confronts the compromised history of realism and its association with possessive individualism and extractive capitalism. Consequently, although many ecocritics discount realism’s ability to represent climate change, this essay identifies implicated realism as a self-reflexive and adaptive mode.

摘要:本文认为,本-勒纳的小说《10:04》(2014年)运用了 "隐含现实主义 "来表现富人的环保主义。隐含现实主义是一种自我反思的美学,它揭示了文学现实主义的基础--叙事描写、资产阶级背景、对日常生活的强调--是如何依赖于剥削形式的,而剥削形式也产生了气候危机。我证明,《10:04》中的牵连现实主义既包括超现实主义,也包括现实主义的失败。勒纳的小说对看似无害的场景进行了超现实主义的描述,揭示了这些场景对环境危害的不均衡分布的影响。这种超写实主义与现实主义的失败同时存在,《10:04》既将现实主义的失败主题化,又表现了现实主义的失败。通过现实主义的失败,"牵连现实主义 "直面了现实主义妥协的历史及其与占有性个人主义和榨取性资本主义的关联。因此,尽管许多生态批评家对现实主义表现气候变化的能力不屑一顾,本文却认为牵连现实主义是一种自我反思和适应的模式。
{"title":"Implicated Realism and the Environmentalism of the Rich in Ben Lerner's 10:04","authors":"Leila Braun","doi":"10.1353/sdn.2024.a928656","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sdn.2024.a928656","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>This essay argues that Ben Lerner’s novel <i>10:04</i> (2014) employs “implicated realism” to represent the environmentalism of the rich. Implicated realism is a self-reflexive aesthetic that reveals how the foundations of literary realism—narrative description, bourgeois settings, an emphasis on daily life—rely upon the forms of exploitation that have also produced the climate crisis. I demonstrate that implicated realism in <i>10:04</i>, paradoxically, consists of both hyperrealism and realist failure. Lerner’s novel applies hyperrealist description to seemingly innocuous scenes, uncovering their implication in the uneven distribution of environmental harm. Such hyperrealism exists alongside realist failure, which <i>10:04</i> both thematizes and performs. Through realist failure, then, implicated realism confronts the compromised history of realism and its association with possessive individualism and extractive capitalism. Consequently, although many ecocritics discount realism’s ability to represent climate change, this essay identifies implicated realism as a self-reflexive and adaptive mode.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":54138,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141153795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Contributors 贡献者
IF 0.2 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI: 10.1353/sdn.2024.a928662
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Contributors

Leila Braun is a PhD candidate in English Language & Literature at the University of Michigan. Her dissertation, “Everyday Apocalypse: Minor Realism in the Contemporary Climate Novel,” examines how contemporary novels engage partial and contingent forms of literary realism to depict climate change and environmental disaster.

Bridget Chalk is Professor of English at Manhattan College, where she teaches modernism and twentieth- and twenty-first-century British and Anglophone literature. She is the author of Modernism and Mobility: The Passport and Cosmopolitan Experience (Palgrave, 2014), as well as essays and reviews in Modernism/Modernity, The Journal of Modern Literature, Twentieth-Century Literature, and elsewhere. She is currently at work on Novel Schooling, a book about the relationship between education and narrative form.

Eliza McCarthy was in the final year of her undergraduate degree in English at the University of Exeter at the time of writing this article, and she began an MSt in World Literatures at the University of Oxford in October 2023 before pursuing doctoral study. Eliza’s research interests lie in the intersection between literature and cultural geography, notably ocean studies, postcolonial ecocriticism, sound studies, and the Black Diaspora.

Aaron Schneeberger received his doctorate in American Literature in 2018 from the University of Nevada, Reno, where he currently teaches as a postdoctoral scholar. His scholarship has also appeared in Modern Fiction Studies and College Literature.

Ryan Trimm is Professor of English and Film Media at the University of Rhode Island. He has authored the book Heritage and the Legacy of the Past in Contemporary Britain and numerous articles on contemporary British fiction and film.

Copyright © 2024 Johns Hopkins University Press and the University of North Texas ...

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 撰稿人 Leila Braun 是密歇根大学英语语言与文学专业的博士生。她的论文题目是《日常启示录》:她的论文 "日常启示录:当代气候小说中的小写实主义 "探讨了当代小说如何运用文学写实主义的局部和偶然形式来描写气候变化和环境灾难。布里奇特-查克(Bridget Chalk)是曼哈顿学院的英语教授,教授现代主义以及二十世纪和二十一世纪英国文学和英语文学。她著有《现代主义与流动性》(Modernism and Mobility)一书:The Passport and Cosmopolitan Experience》(帕尔格雷夫出版社,2014 年),以及发表在《现代主义/现代性》、《现代文学杂志》、《二十世纪文学》等刊物上的论文和评论。她目前正在撰写《小说校园》(Novel Schooling)一书,探讨教育与叙事形式之间的关系。撰写本文时,Eliza McCarthy 正在埃克塞特大学攻读英语本科学位的最后一年,她将于 2023 年 10 月开始在牛津大学攻读世界文学硕士学位,然后继续攻读博士学位。伊丽莎的研究兴趣在于文学与文化地理之间的交叉,特别是海洋研究、后殖民生态批评、声音研究和黑人散居地。亚伦-施内伯格(Aaron Schneeberger)于2018年从内华达大学里诺分校获得美国文学博士学位,目前作为博士后学者在该校任教。他的学术成果还发表在《现代小说研究》和《大学文学》上。Ryan Trimm 是罗德岛大学英语和电影媒体教授。他著有《当代英国的遗产和过去的遗产》一书,并发表了多篇关于当代英国小说和电影的文章。版权所有 © 2024 年约翰霍普金斯大学出版社和北德克萨斯大学 ...
{"title":"Contributors","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/sdn.2024.a928662","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sdn.2024.a928662","url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\u0000<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Contributors <!-- /html_title --></li> </ul> <p>Leila Braun is a PhD candidate in English Language &amp; Literature at the University of Michigan. Her dissertation, “Everyday Apocalypse: Minor Realism in the Contemporary Climate Novel,” examines how contemporary novels engage partial and contingent forms of literary realism to depict climate change and environmental disaster.</p> <p>Bridget Chalk is Professor of English at Manhattan College, where she teaches modernism and twentieth- and twenty-first-century British and Anglophone literature. She is the author of <em>Modernism and Mobility: The Passport and Cosmopolitan Experience</em> (Palgrave, 2014), as well as essays and reviews in <em>Modernism/Modernity</em>, <em>The Journal of Modern Literature</em>, <em>Twentieth-Century Literature</em>, and elsewhere. She is currently at work on <em>Novel Schooling</em>, a book about the relationship between education and narrative form.</p> <p>Eliza McCarthy was in the final year of her undergraduate degree in English at the University of Exeter at the time of writing this article, and she began an MSt in World Literatures at the University of Oxford in October 2023 before pursuing doctoral study. Eliza’s research interests lie in the intersection between literature and cultural geography, notably ocean studies, postcolonial ecocriticism, sound studies, and the Black Diaspora.</p> <p>Aaron Schneeberger received his doctorate in American Literature in 2018 from the University of Nevada, Reno, where he currently teaches as a postdoctoral scholar. His scholarship has also appeared in <em>Modern Fiction Studies</em> and <em>College Literature</em>.</p> <p>Ryan Trimm is Professor of English and Film Media at the University of Rhode Island. He has authored the book <em>Heritage and the Legacy of the Past in Contemporary Britain</em> and numerous articles on contemporary British fiction and film.</p> Copyright © 2024 Johns Hopkins University Press and the University of North Texas ... </p>","PeriodicalId":54138,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141257986","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Narrative and Its Nonevents: The Unwritten Plots That Shaped Victorian Realism by Carra Glatt (review) 叙事及其非事件:塑造维多利亚时代现实主义的不成文情节》,卡拉-格拉特著(评论)
IF 0.2 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI: 10.1353/sdn.2024.a928659
Priyanka Anne Jacob
<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span><p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Narrative and Its Nonevents: The Unwritten Plots That Shaped Victorian Realism</em> by Carra Glatt <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Priyanka Anne Jacob </li> </ul> GLATT, CARRA. <em>Narrative and Its Nonevents: The Unwritten Plots That Shaped Victorian Realism</em>. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press, 2022. 232 pp. $95.00 cloth; $39.50 paper; $39.50 e-book. <p>The pages of the Victorian novel are strewn with half-expressed desires and waylaid intentions. As a narrative progresses, it leaves in its wake a number of <em>other</em>, possible, outcomes. Those abandoned plots lurk in the complex form of the novel. In <em>Narrative and Its Nonevents: The Unwritten Plots That Shaped Victorian Realism</em>, Carra Glatt demonstrates how these unfulfilled possibilities trail and disrupt the central tale. The Victorian novel, Glatt tells us, “contains within itself the specter of its own discarded alternatives” (50).</p> <p>Glatt’s book joins recent work shining light on the non-dominant elements of the Victorian novel: its lengthy middles, stray impulses, and narrative antinomies. Glatt takes a narratological approach, highlighting the “unwritten plots” that lie in tension with a novel’s main plot. She focuses especially on endings: examining, for instance, the sense that Pip and Estella <em>ought</em> to part, which shadows the veiled implication that they will marry; or how Hardy’s sidelined character Marty is granted not a marriage plot but, at least, the final words of <em>The Woodlanders</em>. Glatt articulates three models for how “the Victorian novel is created out of an interaction between its written and unwritten plots” (7): the shadow plot, the proxy narrative, and the “hypothetically realist” plot. In a thoughtful epilogue, she also offers a glimpse into how realism itself has become an underplot in contemporary fiction.</p> <p>Nineteenth-century realism channels and “demote[s]” the persistent influence of romance into the shadow plot (44). Glatt’s first chapter provides an exhaustive literary history of realism. It is difficult, Glatt points out, to locate a Victorian text strictly in the realist mode, without debts to Gothic, romance, sensation, reform, urban, or other literary conventions. The “hybridity of Victorian form” (17) expands the range of paths a story might take, including “highly melodramatic and sensational ones” (20). Yet, these “radical” options will ultimately be rerouted, as realist novels trend toward the “condition of plausibility” (20). Glatt defines realism not by its concrete descriptiveness, representation of ordinary life, or rejection of romance. Realism is for Glatt a particular relationship to narrative possibility: what at first feels like an open field of possibilities narrows into a limited path of compromise. More than a narrative tendency, this is
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: 叙事及其非事件:Carra Glatt 著,Priyanka Anne Jacob GLATT, CARRA.叙事及其非事件:塑造维多利亚现实主义的不成文情节》。弗吉尼亚州夏洛茨维尔:弗吉尼亚大学出版社,2022 年。232 pp.布版 95.00 美元;纸版 39.50 美元;电子书 39.50 美元。在维多利亚时代的小说中,到处都散落着表达了一半的欲望和被搁置的意图。随着叙述的进行,会留下许多其他可能的结果。这些被遗弃的情节潜伏在小说的复杂形式中。在《叙事及其非事件:塑造维多利亚现实主义的未写情节》一书中,卡拉-格拉特(Carra Glatt)展示了这些未实现的可能性是如何追踪和扰乱中心故事的。格拉特告诉我们,维多利亚时代的小说 "本身就包含着被自己抛弃的其他可能性的幽灵"(50)。格拉特的这本书与近期的其他作品一样,揭示了维多利亚时期小说的非主要元素:冗长的中篇、游离的冲动以及叙事的反传统。格拉特从叙事学的角度出发,强调了与小说主要情节形成张力的 "不成文情节"。她尤其关注结尾:例如,她考察了皮普和埃斯特拉应该分手的感觉,这种感觉暗含着他们将结婚的隐晦暗示;她还考察了哈代笔下被边缘化的人物马蒂是如何获得《林地人》的结尾词的,虽然不是结婚情节,但至少是结尾词。格拉特阐述了 "维多利亚时代的小说是如何在成文情节与非成文情节的互动中产生的"(7)的三种模式:影子情节、代理叙事和 "假定现实主义 "情节。在深思熟虑的后记中,她还窥见了现实主义本身是如何成为当代小说中的一个暗线情节的。十九世纪的现实主义将浪漫主义的持久影响 "降格 "为影子情节(44)。格拉特的第一章详尽介绍了现实主义文学史。格拉特指出,很难将维多利亚时期的文本严格定位为现实主义模式,而不借鉴哥特式、浪漫主义、感觉派、改革派、都市派或其他文学传统。维多利亚时期形式的混合性"(17)扩大了故事的发展范围,包括 "高度戏剧化和煽情"(20)。然而,这些 "激进 "的选择最终会被改变方向,因为现实主义小说趋向于 "似是而非的条件"(20)。格拉特对现实主义的定义并不在于其具体的描述性、对普通生活的表现或对浪漫主义的拒绝。对格拉特而言,现实主义是一种与叙事可能性之间的特殊关系:起初感觉是一个开放的可能性领域,后来却缩小为一条有限的妥协之路。这不仅是一种叙事倾向,更是一种世界观。随着维多利亚现实主义故事的展开,主人公们发现自己的选择受到了无法控制的力量的限制。他们只有在小说调用了与其他一般惯例和其他社会可能性相关的叙事路径,然后[完]又[第210页]压制了这些路径之后,才会选择被压缩的生活。在代理叙事的情况下,小说将其无法言说的危险能量埋藏在情节之下。读者需要在 "所写的场景和一个幽灵场景之间穿梭,而周围的一切都表明这个场景本应如此"(79)。格拉特将本章置于煽情小说的基础之上,煽情小说援引哥特式套路和性丑闻,最后却转向 "婚姻和继承情节的驯服工作"(100)。这些情感意义和幽灵情节萦绕在小说中,虽然 "从未被允许完全实现"(86),但却具有强大的力量。格拉特认为,正是由于这个原因,煽情小说中的秘密一旦揭开,就很少能让人满意:它 "不是作为内容的载体,而是作为形式的机制","是一系列未写情节的场所",小说无法明确讲述(99-100)。理解代理叙事可以帮助我们解决维多利亚时代小说中看似不和谐的地方。格拉特在关于亨利-詹姆斯的一章中将代理叙事作为詹姆斯晚期作品的一把钥匙,在詹姆斯的晚期作品中,所说的内容与文本的含义之间总是存在着差距,每一句话中未被提及的含义都幽灵般地闪烁在书页上的文字周围。最后一章提出了 "假定现实主义 "的情节,即文本指向一个尚未实现的未来。通过将注意力转移到多余的人物身上,"他们显然未能......
{"title":"Narrative and Its Nonevents: The Unwritten Plots That Shaped Victorian Realism by Carra Glatt (review)","authors":"Priyanka Anne Jacob","doi":"10.1353/sdn.2024.a928659","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sdn.2024.a928659","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;In lieu of&lt;/span&gt; an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:&lt;/span&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt; &lt;span&gt;Reviewed by:&lt;/span&gt; &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;!-- html_title --&gt; &lt;em&gt;Narrative and Its Nonevents: The Unwritten Plots That Shaped Victorian Realism&lt;/em&gt; by Carra Glatt &lt;!-- /html_title --&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt; Priyanka Anne Jacob &lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt; GLATT, CARRA. &lt;em&gt;Narrative and Its Nonevents: The Unwritten Plots That Shaped Victorian Realism&lt;/em&gt;. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press, 2022. 232 pp. $95.00 cloth; $39.50 paper; $39.50 e-book. &lt;p&gt;The pages of the Victorian novel are strewn with half-expressed desires and waylaid intentions. As a narrative progresses, it leaves in its wake a number of &lt;em&gt;other&lt;/em&gt;, possible, outcomes. Those abandoned plots lurk in the complex form of the novel. In &lt;em&gt;Narrative and Its Nonevents: The Unwritten Plots That Shaped Victorian Realism&lt;/em&gt;, Carra Glatt demonstrates how these unfulfilled possibilities trail and disrupt the central tale. The Victorian novel, Glatt tells us, “contains within itself the specter of its own discarded alternatives” (50).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Glatt’s book joins recent work shining light on the non-dominant elements of the Victorian novel: its lengthy middles, stray impulses, and narrative antinomies. Glatt takes a narratological approach, highlighting the “unwritten plots” that lie in tension with a novel’s main plot. She focuses especially on endings: examining, for instance, the sense that Pip and Estella &lt;em&gt;ought&lt;/em&gt; to part, which shadows the veiled implication that they will marry; or how Hardy’s sidelined character Marty is granted not a marriage plot but, at least, the final words of &lt;em&gt;The Woodlanders&lt;/em&gt;. Glatt articulates three models for how “the Victorian novel is created out of an interaction between its written and unwritten plots” (7): the shadow plot, the proxy narrative, and the “hypothetically realist” plot. In a thoughtful epilogue, she also offers a glimpse into how realism itself has become an underplot in contemporary fiction.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Nineteenth-century realism channels and “demote[s]” the persistent influence of romance into the shadow plot (44). Glatt’s first chapter provides an exhaustive literary history of realism. It is difficult, Glatt points out, to locate a Victorian text strictly in the realist mode, without debts to Gothic, romance, sensation, reform, urban, or other literary conventions. The “hybridity of Victorian form” (17) expands the range of paths a story might take, including “highly melodramatic and sensational ones” (20). Yet, these “radical” options will ultimately be rerouted, as realist novels trend toward the “condition of plausibility” (20). Glatt defines realism not by its concrete descriptiveness, representation of ordinary life, or rejection of romance. Realism is for Glatt a particular relationship to narrative possibility: what at first feels like an open field of possibilities narrows into a limited path of compromise. More than a narrative tendency, this is","PeriodicalId":54138,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141153792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Refiguring Speech: Late Victorian Fictions of Empire and the Poetics of Talk by Amy R. Wong (review) 重塑言语:维多利亚晚期的帝国虚构与谈话诗学》,Amy R. Wong 著(评论)
IF 0.2 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI: 10.1353/sdn.2024.a928661
Parama Roy
<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span><p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Refiguring Speech: Late Victorian Fictions of Empire and the Poetics of Talk</em> by Amy R. Wong <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Parama Roy </li> </ul> WONG, AMY R. <em>Refiguring Speech: Late Victorian Fictions of Empire and the Poetics of Talk</em>. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2023. xii+228 pages. $70.00 hardcover. <p>Amy R. Wong’s ambition in <em>Refiguring Speech</em> is an expansive one. She seeks, through an examination of late-Victorian fictions of empire, to effect a reconsideration of commonly held assumptions about the place of speech and communication in the novel in the last decades of the nineteenth century. Such a reconsideration is meant to function as a template for counter-intuitive readings of linguistic fluency and political possibility in Victorian fiction. Four novels—R. L. Stevenson’s <em>Treasure Island</em> (1883), Bram Stoker’s <em>Dracula</em> (1897), George Meredith’s <em>One of Our Conquerors</em> (1891), and Joseph Conrad and Ford Madox Ford’s <em>The Inheritors</em> (1901)—make up her archive. These, she suggests, are rich with intimations of the surprising political possibilities of imperial fictions. There is much to be commended in readings that engage imperial fictions as complex rather than ideologically transparent productions. All too often, when it comes to narratives of empire or of race, we read as if our default critical positions must be diagnostic—that they must involve either deprecation or admiration, rather than anything more open-ended. Wong, then, deserves praise for seeking to disabuse us of the foregone (and, I should add, almost invariably censorious) <strong>[End Page 214]</strong> conclusions to which we often take recourse when we read fictions of empire, especially by those of European origin.</p> <p>Wong begins by demarcating certain distinctions between modes of utterance and communication that she identifies, it must be said somewhat idiosyncratically, as “speech” and “talk.” Speech, she avers, is what names “a certain proprietary fantasy in the Anglo-American imagination that prizes a perfect tethering of expression to intent” (1). Speech in this schematic is the property of the sovereign and self-possessed individual, and it emerges in distinction to racial and animal others. Nineteenth-century manuals on the art of conversation, along with the centrality of fluent speech in novels from Austen to James, are adduced as instances of the “quasi-magical, capital-generating” qualities of speech (5). In contrast to the putative racial and colonial logics of speech, talk in the novels functions under the sign of failure, being wayward, inarticulate, and sometimes plethoric in its excess. But can speech as defined in this monograph really be set apart from talk? For one thing, manuals of conversation (or conduct) have always been und
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:审稿人: 重塑演讲:维多利亚晚期的帝国虚构与谈话诗学》,作者:Amy R. Wong Parama Roy WONG, AMY R. Refiguring Speech:维多利亚晚期的帝国虚构与谈话诗学》。加州斯坦福:斯坦福大学出版社,2023 年。xii+228 页。70.00 美元精装。艾米-R.-黄在《重塑话语》一书中雄心勃勃。她试图通过对晚期维多利亚帝国小说的研究,对 19 世纪最后几十年小说中关于言语和交流的地位的普遍假设进行重新思考。这种重新考虑旨在为反直觉解读维多利亚时代小说中的语言流畅性和政治可能性提供一个模板。四部小说--R.L. 史蒂文森的《金银岛》(1883 年)、布拉姆-斯托克的《德古拉》(1897 年)、乔治-梅雷迪思的《我们的征服者之一》(1891 年)以及约瑟夫-康拉德和福特-马多克斯-福特的《继承者》(1901 年)这四部小说构成了她的档案。她认为,这些作品蕴含着帝国小说令人惊讶的政治可能性。将帝国小说作为复杂的而非意识形态上透明的作品来解读,有很多值得称道之处。很多时候,当涉及帝国或种族叙事时,我们的默认批评立场似乎必须是诊断性的--必须是贬低或赞美,而不是更开放的。因此,值得称赞的是,黄氏力图让我们摆脱我们在阅读帝国小说(尤其是欧洲裔小说)时经常会得出的既定结论(我要补充的是,这些结论几乎无一例外都是批评性的)[第214页完]。黄氏一开始就对言语和交流方式进行了区分,她把这些方式称为 "言语 "和 "谈话",不得不说这有点特立独行。她认为,"言语 "是 "英美想象中的某种专有幻想,它推崇表达与意图的完美结合"(1)。在这一图式中,言语是拥有主权和自主权的个人的财产,它的出现区别于其他种族和动物。十九世纪的谈话艺术手册,以及从奥斯汀到詹姆斯的小说中流利言语的中心地位,都被引证为言语 "准魔法、资本生成 "特质的实例(5)。与假定的种族和殖民语言逻辑形成对比的是,小说中的言谈是在失败的标志下发挥作用的,它言不由衷、语焉不详,有时甚至言过其实。但是,本专著所定义的言语真的能与谈话区分开来吗?首先,谈话(或行为)手册一直被理解为规定性的,而非描述性的;无论它们可能会唤起人们对自如而完美的言谈的什么理想,都只是一种概念上的虚构,而非实践中的任何表现。从《日常生活精神病学》(1901 年)和弗洛伊德的其他作品中可以明显看出,失误、遗忘、混乱、支支吾吾和parapraxes--也就是黄氏所说的《继承者》中受困的英国人的 "口吃、胡言乱语、喃喃自语、痉挛等等"(127)--是所有言语不可避免的层面,而不是绝对不恰当言语的特征。此外,黄氏对言语和谈话的阐释在不同时期似乎既有不必要的限制,又有过于随意的扩张。例如,黄氏对 "言谈 "的性别维度仅有一闪而过的考虑。这是一个令人困惑的局限,因为在小说中,说话常常被视为女性的天职--奥斯坦笔下的苏珊夫人就认为她的口才是她最强大的资产--即使女性的言谈也通常与智力低下、琐碎和恶作剧联系在一起。然而,尽管女性的言语在很大程度上被排除在考虑范围之外,但在专著的其他地方,尤其是在关于梅雷迪斯的章节中,言语却得到了极大的扩展,不仅包括虚构人物的言语,还包括人物性格、身体姿态、认知过程、体裁问题以及物质环境。这种对言语含义的扩展使言语成为一个越来越难以捉摸的分析范畴,增加了确定小说言语是什么或不是什么的难度。在专门讨论维多利亚时代晚期小说中的语言问题的四章中,专门讨论维多利亚时代晚期小说中的语言问题的一章...
{"title":"Refiguring Speech: Late Victorian Fictions of Empire and the Poetics of Talk by Amy R. Wong (review)","authors":"Parama Roy","doi":"10.1353/sdn.2024.a928661","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sdn.2024.a928661","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;In lieu of&lt;/span&gt; an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:&lt;/span&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt; &lt;span&gt;Reviewed by:&lt;/span&gt; &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;!-- html_title --&gt; &lt;em&gt;Refiguring Speech: Late Victorian Fictions of Empire and the Poetics of Talk&lt;/em&gt; by Amy R. Wong &lt;!-- /html_title --&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt; Parama Roy &lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt; WONG, AMY R. &lt;em&gt;Refiguring Speech: Late Victorian Fictions of Empire and the Poetics of Talk&lt;/em&gt;. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2023. xii+228 pages. $70.00 hardcover. &lt;p&gt;Amy R. Wong’s ambition in &lt;em&gt;Refiguring Speech&lt;/em&gt; is an expansive one. She seeks, through an examination of late-Victorian fictions of empire, to effect a reconsideration of commonly held assumptions about the place of speech and communication in the novel in the last decades of the nineteenth century. Such a reconsideration is meant to function as a template for counter-intuitive readings of linguistic fluency and political possibility in Victorian fiction. Four novels—R. L. Stevenson’s &lt;em&gt;Treasure Island&lt;/em&gt; (1883), Bram Stoker’s &lt;em&gt;Dracula&lt;/em&gt; (1897), George Meredith’s &lt;em&gt;One of Our Conquerors&lt;/em&gt; (1891), and Joseph Conrad and Ford Madox Ford’s &lt;em&gt;The Inheritors&lt;/em&gt; (1901)—make up her archive. These, she suggests, are rich with intimations of the surprising political possibilities of imperial fictions. There is much to be commended in readings that engage imperial fictions as complex rather than ideologically transparent productions. All too often, when it comes to narratives of empire or of race, we read as if our default critical positions must be diagnostic—that they must involve either deprecation or admiration, rather than anything more open-ended. Wong, then, deserves praise for seeking to disabuse us of the foregone (and, I should add, almost invariably censorious) &lt;strong&gt;[End Page 214]&lt;/strong&gt; conclusions to which we often take recourse when we read fictions of empire, especially by those of European origin.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Wong begins by demarcating certain distinctions between modes of utterance and communication that she identifies, it must be said somewhat idiosyncratically, as “speech” and “talk.” Speech, she avers, is what names “a certain proprietary fantasy in the Anglo-American imagination that prizes a perfect tethering of expression to intent” (1). Speech in this schematic is the property of the sovereign and self-possessed individual, and it emerges in distinction to racial and animal others. Nineteenth-century manuals on the art of conversation, along with the centrality of fluent speech in novels from Austen to James, are adduced as instances of the “quasi-magical, capital-generating” qualities of speech (5). In contrast to the putative racial and colonial logics of speech, talk in the novels functions under the sign of failure, being wayward, inarticulate, and sometimes plethoric in its excess. But can speech as defined in this monograph really be set apart from talk? For one thing, manuals of conversation (or conduct) have always been und","PeriodicalId":54138,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL","volume":"157 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141150884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Affective Subjects and Perceptions of Waste in Don Delillo's Underworld 唐-德里罗《地下世界》中的情感主体与废物观念
IF 0.2 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI: 10.1353/sdn.2024.a928653
Aaron F. Schneeberger

Abstract:

This article reads the trope of waste in Don DeLillo’s Underworld through the lens of theories of affect and embodied cognition. Specifically, it examines how the bodily and perceptual habits of the novel’s characters are shaped through encounters with waste. Furthermore, it argues that these changing perceptions, attitudes, and dispositions toward waste demonstrate broader shifts in the development of capitalist subjects during the latter half of the twentieth century. Specifically, the novel depicts a transition from a desire to reconcile capitalist growth with traditionalism, not unlike the “fusionism” that dominated conservative thought during the middle of the twentieth century, to a more utopian vision of boundless capitalist growth popularized in post-Reagan America. The novel thus suggests that the political dispositions of its characters are better understood in terms of their affects and bodily habits than more traditional metrics like ideology.

摘要:本文通过情感和体现认知理论的视角,解读了唐-德里罗《地下世界》中的废物特例。具体而言,文章探讨了小说人物的身体和感知习惯是如何通过与废物的接触而形成的。此外,该书还认为,这些对废物的认知、态度和处置方式的变化表明,在 20 世纪后半叶,资本主义主体的发展发生了更广泛的变化。具体而言,小说描绘了一个从调和资本主义增长与传统主义的愿望(这与 20 世纪中叶主导保守主义思想的 "融合主义 "并无二致)向后里根时代美国流行的无止境资本主义增长的乌托邦愿景的转变。因此,小说认为,与其用意识形态等更传统的标准来衡量人物的政治倾向,不如从他们的情感和身体习惯来理解。
{"title":"Affective Subjects and Perceptions of Waste in Don Delillo's Underworld","authors":"Aaron F. Schneeberger","doi":"10.1353/sdn.2024.a928653","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sdn.2024.a928653","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>This article reads the trope of waste in Don DeLillo’s <i>Underworld</i> through the lens of theories of affect and embodied cognition. Specifically, it examines how the bodily and perceptual habits of the novel’s characters are shaped through encounters with waste. Furthermore, it argues that these changing perceptions, attitudes, and dispositions toward waste demonstrate broader shifts in the development of capitalist subjects during the latter half of the twentieth century. Specifically, the novel depicts a transition from a desire to reconcile capitalist growth with traditionalism, not unlike the “fusionism” that dominated conservative thought during the middle of the twentieth century, to a more utopian vision of boundless capitalist growth popularized in post-Reagan America. The novel thus suggests that the political dispositions of its characters are better understood in terms of their affects and bodily habits than more traditional metrics like ideology.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":54138,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141150881","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
STUDIES IN THE NOVEL
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1