首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Comparative Psychology最新文献

英文 中文
Detouring while foraging up a tree: What bull ants (Myrmecia midas) learn and their reactions to novel sensory cues. 在树上觅食时绕道而行:牛蚁(Myrmecia midas)学习什么以及它们对新感官线索的反应。
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.1037/com0000333
Muzahid Islam, Sudhakar Deeti, Zakia Mahmudah, J Frances Kamhi, Ken Cheng

Many animals navigate in a structurally complex environment, which requires them to detour around the physical barriers that they encounter. Although many studies in animal cognition suggest that they are able to adeptly avoid obstacles, it is unclear whether a new route is learned to navigate around these barriers and, if so, what sensory information may be used to do so. We investigated detour learning in traveling up a tree in the Australian bull ant, Myrmecia midas, which primarily uses visual landmarks. We first placed a barrier on the ants' upward path. Initially, 46% of foragers were unsuccessful in detouring the obstacle. On subsequent trips, the ants became more successful and established a new route. We observed up to eight successful foraging trips detouring around the barrier. We then tested the same foragers in a series of manipulations, including changing the position of the barrier, making a new gap in the middle of the obstacle, or removing the barrier altogether. The ants mostly showed the same learned motor routine, detouring with a similar path as in the initial trials, suggesting that foragers were not relying on barrier cues and therefore learned a new route around the obstacle. When foragers encountered new olfactory or tactile cues, or the visual environment was blocked; however, their navigation was profoundly disrupted. These results suggest that changing sensory information drastically affects the foragers' navigational performance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

许多动物在结构复杂的环境中导航,这就要求它们绕过遇到的物理障碍。尽管许多关于动物认知的研究表明,它们能够熟练地避开障碍物,但尚不清楚它们是否学会了一条绕过这些障碍物的新路线,如果是的话,它们可能会利用什么感官信息来做到这一点。我们研究了澳大利亚牛蚁(Myrmecia midas)爬树时的绕路学习,它们主要使用视觉地标。我们首先在蚂蚁向上的路上设置了一个障碍物。一开始,46%的觅食者没有成功绕过障碍物。在随后的旅行中,蚂蚁变得更加成功,并建立了一条新的路线。我们观察到多达8次成功的觅食之旅绕过屏障。然后,我们对同样的觅食者进行了一系列的操作测试,包括改变障碍物的位置,在障碍物中间制造一个新的间隙,或者完全移除障碍物。这些蚂蚁大多表现出了相同的习得的运动规律,与最初的试验中相似的路径绕行,这表明觅食者不依赖于障碍物的线索,因此学会了绕过障碍物的新路线。当觅食者遇到新的嗅觉或触觉线索,或视觉环境受阻时;然而,他们的航行被彻底打乱了。这些结果表明,感官信息的改变极大地影响了觅食者的导航表现。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Detouring while foraging up a tree: What bull ants (Myrmecia midas) learn and their reactions to novel sensory cues.","authors":"Muzahid Islam,&nbsp;Sudhakar Deeti,&nbsp;Zakia Mahmudah,&nbsp;J Frances Kamhi,&nbsp;Ken Cheng","doi":"10.1037/com0000333","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000333","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many animals navigate in a structurally complex environment, which requires them to detour around the physical barriers that they encounter. Although many studies in animal cognition suggest that they are able to adeptly avoid obstacles, it is unclear whether a new route is learned to navigate around these barriers and, if so, what sensory information may be used to do so. We investigated detour learning in traveling up a tree in the Australian bull ant, Myrmecia midas, which primarily uses visual landmarks. We first placed a barrier on the ants' upward path. Initially, 46% of foragers were unsuccessful in detouring the obstacle. On subsequent trips, the ants became more successful and established a new route. We observed up to eight successful foraging trips detouring around the barrier. We then tested the same foragers in a series of manipulations, including changing the position of the barrier, making a new gap in the middle of the obstacle, or removing the barrier altogether. The ants mostly showed the same learned motor routine, detouring with a similar path as in the initial trials, suggesting that foragers were not relying on barrier cues and therefore learned a new route around the obstacle. When foragers encountered new olfactory or tactile cues, or the visual environment was blocked; however, their navigation was profoundly disrupted. These results suggest that changing sensory information drastically affects the foragers' navigational performance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9287704","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Sound order discrimination in two species of birds-Taeniopygia guttata and Melopsittacus undulatus. 两种鸟类——古塔带翅鸟和波状斑翅鸟的有序区分。
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.1037/com0000340
Katherine A Stennette, Adam Fishbein, Nora Prior, Gregory F Ball, Robert J Dooling

Recent psychophysical experiments have shown that zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata-a songbird) are surprisingly insensitive to syllable sequence changes in their species-specific motifs while budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus-a psittacine) do much better when tested on exactly the same sounds. This is unexpected since zebra finch males learn the order of syllables in their songs when young and sing the same song throughout adulthood. Here we probe the limits of this species difference by testing birds on an order change involving just two syllables, hereafter called bi-syllable phrases. Results show budgerigars still perform better than zebra finches on an order change involving just two syllables. An analysis of response latencies shows that both species respond to an order change in a bi-syllable motif at the onset of the first syllable rather than listening to the entire sequence before responding. Additional tests with one syllable omitted or doubled, or with white noise bursts substituted for syllables, indicate that the first syllable in the sequence has a dominant effect on subsequent discrimination of changes in a bi-syllable pattern. These results are surprising in that zebra finch males sing their full motif syllable sequence with a high degree of stereotypy throughout life, suggesting that this consistency in production may not rely on perceptual mechanisms for processing syllable order in adulthood. Budgerigars, on the other hand, are quite sensitive to bi-syllable order changes, an ability that may be related to useful information being encoded in the sequence of syllables in their natural song. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

最近的心理物理实验表明,斑马雀(Taeniopygia guttata-一种鸣禽)对其物种特有的音节序列变化不敏感,而鹦鹉(Melopsittacus波动-一种鹦鹉)在对完全相同的声音进行测试时表现得更好。这是出乎意料的,因为雄性斑胸草雀在年轻时就学会了歌曲中的音节顺序,并在成年后唱同一首歌。在这里,我们通过测试鸟类在仅涉及两个音节的顺序变化(以下称为双音节短语)来探索这种物种差异的极限。结果显示,在涉及两个音节的顺序变化上,虎皮鹦鹉仍然比斑胸草雀表现得更好。对反应潜伏期的分析表明,这两个物种都对双音节基序的第一个音节开始的顺序变化作出反应,而不是在反应前听整个序列。省略或加倍一个音节,或用白噪音代替音节的额外测试表明,序列中的第一个音节对随后对双音节模式变化的辨别具有主要影响。这些结果令人惊讶,因为雄性斑胸草雀在一生中以高度刻板的方式唱出完整的母基音节序列,这表明这种一致性的生产可能不依赖于成年期处理音节顺序的感知机制。另一方面,虎皮鹦鹉对双音节顺序的变化非常敏感,这种能力可能与它们自然鸣叫中的音节序列中编码的有用信息有关。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Sound order discrimination in two species of birds-Taeniopygia guttata and Melopsittacus undulatus.","authors":"Katherine A Stennette,&nbsp;Adam Fishbein,&nbsp;Nora Prior,&nbsp;Gregory F Ball,&nbsp;Robert J Dooling","doi":"10.1037/com0000340","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000340","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent psychophysical experiments have shown that zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata-a songbird) are surprisingly insensitive to syllable sequence changes in their species-specific motifs while budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus-a psittacine) do much better when tested on exactly the same sounds. This is unexpected since zebra finch males learn the order of syllables in their songs when young and sing the same song throughout adulthood. Here we probe the limits of this species difference by testing birds on an order change involving just two syllables, hereafter called bi-syllable phrases. Results show budgerigars still perform better than zebra finches on an order change involving just two syllables. An analysis of response latencies shows that both species respond to an order change in a bi-syllable motif at the onset of the first syllable rather than listening to the entire sequence before responding. Additional tests with one syllable omitted or doubled, or with white noise bursts substituted for syllables, indicate that the first syllable in the sequence has a dominant effect on subsequent discrimination of changes in a bi-syllable pattern. These results are surprising in that zebra finch males sing their full motif syllable sequence with a high degree of stereotypy throughout life, suggesting that this consistency in production may not rely on perceptual mechanisms for processing syllable order in adulthood. Budgerigars, on the other hand, are quite sensitive to bi-syllable order changes, an ability that may be related to useful information being encoded in the sequence of syllables in their natural song. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9234076","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adaptable navigation in bull ants (Myrmecia midas). 牛蚁的适应性导航。
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.1037/com0000343
Dorothy Munkenbeck Fragaszy

In an early scientific description of navigation (finding one's way from a known location to a known destination) in an arthropod, Charles Turner, one of comparative psychology's staunchest early proponents of studying individual variation. The field of comparative psychology has caught up with Charles Turner. In this essay, the author presents an overview of the results of previous studies which suggest that several species of ants use vision effectively to navigate in three dimensions, in daylight, and in darkness. Bull ants, a species that navigates in dim light, have large compound eyes containing receptors that are sensitive to ultraviolet (UV), blue, and green regions of the electromagnetic spectrum. Islam et al.'s findings illustrate a very general point about behavior that comparative psychologists do (and should continue to) take seriously, theoretically, and empirically. When we take the time to look closely, the behavior of individuals varies in biologically and psychologically important ways, no matter the size of their bodies or nervous systems. The adaptability of individuals arises from variation within the individual over time, manifest in this study as the adoption of novel routes as circumstances required. The adaptability of populations arises from variation across individuals, evident in this study in ants that learned to travel directly to the edge of the barrier and ants that learned to travel directly to the barrier, then make a right-angle turn to travel along it to an edge. The sources and consequences of behavioral variability, within and across individuals, and its manifestations across species, must remain core concerns for comparative psychology, as they were for Charles Turner more than 100 years ago. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

查尔斯·特纳(Charles Turner)是比较心理学研究个体差异最坚定的早期支持者之一,他在一篇关于节肢动物导航(从一个已知地点找到一个已知目的地)的早期科学描述中写道。比较心理学领域已经赶上了查尔斯·特纳。在这篇文章中,作者概述了以前的研究结果,这些研究表明,几种蚂蚁在白天和黑暗中都能有效地利用视觉在三维空间中导航。牛蚁是一种在昏暗的光线下行走的物种,它们有巨大的复眼,复眼中含有对电磁波谱中的紫外线、蓝色和绿色区域敏感的受体。Islam等人的发现说明了一个关于行为的非常普遍的观点,比较心理学家已经(也应该继续)从理论上和经验上认真对待这个观点。当我们花时间仔细观察时,无论他们的身体或神经系统的大小,个体的行为在生物学和心理上都是不同的。个体的适应性源于个体内部随时间的变化,在本研究中表现为根据环境需要采用新的路线。种群的适应性来自个体之间的差异,在这项研究中,蚂蚁学会了直接移动到屏障边缘,蚂蚁学会了直接移动到屏障边缘,然后做一个直角转弯,沿着屏障移动到边缘。个体内部和个体之间的行为变异的来源和后果,以及它在物种之间的表现,必须成为比较心理学的核心关注点,就像100多年前查尔斯·特纳(Charles Turner)关注的那样。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Adaptable navigation in bull ants (Myrmecia midas).","authors":"Dorothy Munkenbeck Fragaszy","doi":"10.1037/com0000343","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000343","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In an early scientific description of navigation (finding one's way from a known location to a known destination) in an arthropod, Charles Turner, one of comparative psychology's staunchest early proponents of studying individual variation. The field of comparative psychology has caught up with Charles Turner. In this essay, the author presents an overview of the results of previous studies which suggest that several species of ants use vision effectively to navigate in three dimensions, in daylight, and in darkness. Bull ants, a species that navigates in dim light, have large compound eyes containing receptors that are sensitive to ultraviolet (UV), blue, and green regions of the electromagnetic spectrum. Islam et al.'s findings illustrate a very general point about behavior that comparative psychologists do (and should continue to) take seriously, theoretically, and empirically. When we take the time to look closely, the behavior of individuals varies in biologically and psychologically important ways, no matter the size of their bodies or nervous systems. The adaptability of individuals arises from variation within the individual over time, manifest in this study as the adoption of novel routes as circumstances required. The adaptability of populations arises from variation across individuals, evident in this study in ants that learned to travel directly to the edge of the barrier and ants that learned to travel directly to the barrier, then make a right-angle turn to travel along it to an edge. The sources and consequences of behavioral variability, within and across individuals, and its manifestations across species, must remain core concerns for comparative psychology, as they were for Charles Turner more than 100 years ago. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9259977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Spatial frequency and global-local visual processing in capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.) and humans (Homo sapiens). 卷尾猴(Sapajus spp.)和人类(智人)的空间频率和全局-局部视觉处理。
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.1037/com0000344
Milena Palumbo, Giovanna Spinozzi, Valentina Truppa, Carlo De Lillo

Two experiments employing an identity matching-to-sample procedure were carried out to clarify the factors affecting global-local visual processing of capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.) in comparison with humans. In the first experiment, we assessed the relative ability of the two species to discriminate high, medium, or low spatial frequencies (HSFs, MSFs, or LSFs). Then, in a second experiment, we determined if the use of a procedure designed to induce a bias toward attending given spatial frequencies could produce a top-down or selection-history modulation of global-local visual processing in capuchins and humans. In the first experiment, monkeys discriminated better HSFs. By contrast, humans discriminated better MSFs and LSFs. The second experiment showed an effect of SF processing on global-local processing in both species. However, this effect was confined to local trials only and occurred under different conditions in the two species. In monkeys, it occurred following a bias toward attending HSFs, whereas in humans, it occurred following a bias toward attending LSFs. These results provide new information about the relative sensitivity of humans and capuchins to different spatial frequencies in vision. Moreover, they suggest that global-local visual processing can be modulated in both humans and monkeys by processes that are not confined to attending one or the other level of stimulus structure. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

采用身份匹配-样本程序进行了两个实验,以澄清影响卷尾猴(Sapajus spp.)与人类的全局-局部视觉处理的因素。在第一个实验中,我们评估了两个物种区分高、中、低空间频率(hsf、msf或lsf)的相对能力。然后,在第二个实验中,我们确定使用一个程序来诱导对特定空间频率的偏好,是否可以在卷尾猴和人类的全局-局部视觉处理中产生自上而下或选择历史调制。在第一个实验中,猴子能更好地辨别出hsf。相比之下,人类对msf和lsf的辨别能力更强。第二个实验显示了SF加工对两个物种的全局-局部加工的影响。然而,这种效应仅局限于局部试验,并且在两个物种的不同条件下发生。在猴子中,它发生在对参加hsf的偏见之后,而在人类中,它发生在对参加lsf的偏见之后。这些结果为人类和卷尾猴在视觉上对不同空间频率的相对敏感度提供了新的信息。此外,他们认为人类和猴子的全局-局部视觉处理可以通过不局限于一个或另一个刺激结构水平的过程来调节。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Spatial frequency and global-local visual processing in capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.) and humans (Homo sapiens).","authors":"Milena Palumbo,&nbsp;Giovanna Spinozzi,&nbsp;Valentina Truppa,&nbsp;Carlo De Lillo","doi":"10.1037/com0000344","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000344","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two experiments employing an identity matching-to-sample procedure were carried out to clarify the factors affecting global-local visual processing of capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.) in comparison with humans. In the first experiment, we assessed the relative ability of the two species to discriminate high, medium, or low spatial frequencies (HSFs, MSFs, or LSFs). Then, in a second experiment, we determined if the use of a procedure designed to induce a bias toward attending given spatial frequencies could produce a top-down or selection-history modulation of global-local visual processing in capuchins and humans. In the first experiment, monkeys discriminated better HSFs. By contrast, humans discriminated better MSFs and LSFs. The second experiment showed an effect of SF processing on global-local processing in both species. However, this effect was confined to local trials only and occurred under different conditions in the two species. In monkeys, it occurred following a bias toward attending HSFs, whereas in humans, it occurred following a bias toward attending LSFs. These results provide new information about the relative sensitivity of humans and capuchins to different spatial frequencies in vision. Moreover, they suggest that global-local visual processing can be modulated in both humans and monkeys by processes that are not confined to attending one or the other level of stimulus structure. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9234075","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Same-different conceptualization in dogs (Canis familiaris). 相同-不同的概念在狗(犬)。
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.1037/com0000332
Allison Scagel, Eduardo Mercado

concept formation was once thought to be a uniquely human ability. An increasing variety of nonhuman species have demonstrated aspects of this ability, however, suggesting that conceptualization is a widely shared aspect of cognition. The capacity to form a concept of same-different, in particular, has now been shown in pigeons, primates, bottlenose dolphins, sea lions, and more. Traditional methods of studying abstract concept formation include matching-to-sample (MTS), same/different (S/D), and relational-matching-to-sample tasks, tasks that typically require animals to discriminate sets of planar images. Some of these methods may actually test familiarity, memory, associative learning, or other phenomena rather than a concept of same-different. In the current study, we tested same-different concept formation in domestic dogs using a variation on the S/D task that required subjects to discriminate sets of three-dimensional objects. This method avoids some pitfalls of matching-to-sample and S/D tasks that use two-dimensional images and thousands of training trials. Dogs were able to learn to classify sets of objects as "same" and "different" and proved to be able to immediately transfer this ability to novel sets, including sets of only two objects. Domestic dogs are promising subjects for future studies of same-different conceptualization due to their widespread availability and willingness to work cooperatively with humans. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

概念形成曾被认为是人类独有的能力。然而,越来越多的非人类物种已经表现出这种能力的各个方面,这表明概念化是认知的一个广泛共享的方面。特别是,鸽子、灵长类动物、宽吻海豚、海狮等动物都有形成相同-不同概念的能力。研究抽象概念形成的传统方法包括匹配到样本(MTS)、相同/不同(S/D)和关系匹配到样本(relationship -matching-to-sample)任务,这些任务通常要求动物区分平面图像集。其中一些方法实际上可能测试熟悉度、记忆力、联想学习或其他现象,而不是相同-不同的概念。在当前的研究中,我们使用S/D任务的变体测试了家养狗的相同-不同概念形成,该任务要求受试者区分一组三维物体。该方法避免了使用二维图像和数千次训练试验的匹配样本和S/D任务的一些缺陷。狗能够学会将物体分类为“相同”和“不同”,并被证明能够立即将这种能力转移到新的集合,包括只有两个物体的集合。由于家养狗的广泛可用性和与人类合作的意愿,它们是未来研究相同-不同概念的有希望的对象。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Same-different conceptualization in dogs (Canis familiaris).","authors":"Allison Scagel,&nbsp;Eduardo Mercado","doi":"10.1037/com0000332","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000332","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>concept formation was once thought to be a uniquely human ability. An increasing variety of nonhuman species have demonstrated aspects of this ability, however, suggesting that conceptualization is a widely shared aspect of cognition. The capacity to form a concept of same-different, in particular, has now been shown in pigeons, primates, bottlenose dolphins, sea lions, and more. Traditional methods of studying abstract concept formation include matching-to-sample (MTS), same/different (S/D), and relational-matching-to-sample tasks, tasks that typically require animals to discriminate sets of planar images. Some of these methods may actually test familiarity, memory, associative learning, or other phenomena rather than a concept of same-different. In the current study, we tested same-different concept formation in domestic dogs using a variation on the S/D task that required subjects to discriminate sets of three-dimensional objects. This method avoids some pitfalls of matching-to-sample and S/D tasks that use two-dimensional images and thousands of training trials. Dogs were able to learn to classify sets of objects as \"same\" and \"different\" and proved to be able to immediately transfer this ability to novel sets, including sets of only two objects. Domestic dogs are promising subjects for future studies of same-different conceptualization due to their widespread availability and willingness to work cooperatively with humans. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9230841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Convergence between G and g in three monkey species (Sapajus spp, Ateles geoffroyi, and Macaca fascicularis). 三种猴子(Sapajus spp, Ateles geoffroyi和Macaca fascicularis)中G和G的趋同。
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.1037/com0000323
Michael A Woodley Of Menie, Mateo Peñaherrera-Aguirre

An open question in comparative psychology is whether the source of correlations among different measures of ability (the g factor) is shared between species, or is distinct. This is examined using data on the performance of three monkey species (tufted capuchins, black-handed spider monkeys, and long-tailed macaques) on 16 cognitive ability measures. The differences between species pairs across measures are not generally strongly related to the degree to which the g factor loads on each subtest. Iteratively removing the subtests with the lowest coefficients of variance (CV), and recorrelating the species differences with subtest g-loadings was found to increase the association between the two. Across iterations, subtest pooled CV strongly and positively predicts the increase in the degree to which g-loadings are predictive of species difference in two comparisons, but is a weaker predictor in the comparison between tufted capuchins and black-handed spider monkeys. These associations were not related to phylogenetic distance but were very strongly related to species differences in the means of certain ecological factors. g-scores computed for each species on the basis of the three subtests with the highest CV values exhibited very-high magnitude (>.9) associations with species-level G-scores. G is simply the species-level equivalent of g, resulting from covariation among cognitive ability measures at the level of species differences. Finally, as with previous studies, subtests that show the greatest species differences seem to draw on executive functioning, and attention, suggesting that these may be a phylogenetically conserved source of g across many animal taxa. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

比较心理学中一个悬而未决的问题是,不同能力度量(g因子)之间的相关性来源是在物种之间共享的,还是不同的。这是用三种猴子(簇尾卷尾猴、黑手蜘蛛猴和长尾猕猴)在16项认知能力测试中的表现数据来检验的。跨测量的物种对之间的差异通常与g因子在每个子测试上的负荷程度不强相关。反复剔除方差系数(CV)最低的子检验,并将物种差异与子检验的g负荷重新联系起来,发现两者之间的相关性增加。在迭代过程中,子测试将CV汇集在一起,强烈并积极地预测了两种比较中g负荷预测物种差异的程度的增加,但在簇尾卷尾猴和黑手蜘蛛猴之间的比较中,它的预测能力较弱。这些关联与系统发育距离无关,但与某些生态因子的物种差异密切相关。基于CV值最高的三个子测试计算的每个物种的g-得分与物种水平的g-得分表现出非常高的相关性(>.9)。G仅仅是物种水平上G的等价物,是物种差异水平上认知能力测量的共变结果。最后,与先前的研究一样,显示最大物种差异的亚测试似乎利用了执行功能和注意力,这表明这些可能是许多动物类群中系统发育上保守的g来源。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Convergence between G and g in three monkey species (Sapajus spp, Ateles geoffroyi, and Macaca fascicularis).","authors":"Michael A Woodley Of Menie,&nbsp;Mateo Peñaherrera-Aguirre","doi":"10.1037/com0000323","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000323","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An open question in comparative psychology is whether the source of correlations among different measures of ability (the <i>g</i> factor) is shared between species, or is distinct. This is examined using data on the performance of three monkey species (tufted capuchins, black-handed spider monkeys, and long-tailed macaques) on 16 cognitive ability measures. The differences between species pairs across measures are not generally strongly related to the degree to which the g factor loads on each subtest. Iteratively removing the subtests with the lowest coefficients of variance (CV), and recorrelating the species differences with subtest <i>g</i>-loadings was found to increase the association between the two. Across iterations, subtest pooled CV strongly and positively predicts the increase in the degree to which g-loadings are predictive of species difference in two comparisons, but is a weaker predictor in the comparison between tufted capuchins and black-handed spider monkeys. These associations were not related to phylogenetic distance but were very strongly related to species differences in the means of certain ecological factors. g-scores computed for each species on the basis of the three subtests with the highest CV values exhibited very-high magnitude (>.9) associations with species-level <i>G</i>-scores. <i>G</i> is simply the species-level equivalent of g, resulting from covariation among cognitive ability measures at the level of species differences. Finally, as with previous studies, subtests that show the greatest species differences seem to draw on executive functioning, and attention, suggesting that these may be a phylogenetically conserved source of <i>g</i> across many animal taxa. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9231637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Supplemental Material for Influence of Group Size on Shelter Choice in Blaptica dubia Cockroaches 小强群体大小对生境选择影响的补充资料
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1037/com0000349.supp
{"title":"Supplemental Material for Influence of Group Size on Shelter Choice in Blaptica dubia Cockroaches","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/com0000349.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000349.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78480580","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Simplicity and complexity in human and nonhuman communication. 人类与非人类交流的简单与复杂。
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI: 10.1037/com0000334
Todd M Freeberg

Comments on an article by Limor Raviv et al. (see record 2023-07345-001). Raviv et al. argue that the conflicting findings from human language and from studies of communication in nonhuman animals boil down to different levels of analysis used by researchers studying non-humans compared with those studying humans. Researchers studying nonhuman animal communication typically focus on the size of signal repertoires or the structural variation within and among signals within a repertoire. Researchers studying human language, conversely, largely focus on the question of grammatical rules that govern the way units (words and phrases) are put together in speech streams. Rules of composition that govern the way units are put together are considered more complex in nonhuman signaling systems, but simpler in human language systems. The discrepancy here, according to Raviv et al., stems from two sources. According to the commenting authors, the take home message of Raviv et al. is one that will be helpful to future studies of the evolution of communication systems. Raviv et al. recommend that we work harder to avoid terms such as "complex" and "simple" with regard to communication and instead focus on the specifics of what we are analyzing. Phrases such as "larger repertoire size" or "stronger compositional structure" represent cleaner and more neutral phrases for discussions of communication and would better allow findings from non-humans and from humans to be compared. Finally, Raviv et al. advocate for greater collaborative work across nonhuman and human communication systems, and interdisciplinary work has a long history of fundamental discoveries. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

对Limor Raviv等人的文章的评论(见记录2023-07345-001)。拉维夫等人认为,来自人类语言和非人类动物交流研究的相互矛盾的发现,归结为研究非人类的研究人员与研究人类的研究人员使用了不同的分析水平。研究非人类动物交流的研究人员通常关注信号库的大小或信号库内部和之间的结构变化。相反,研究人类语言的研究人员主要关注的是语法规则问题,这些规则决定了单元(单词和短语)在语音流中的组合方式。控制单元组合方式的组合规则在非人类信号系统中被认为更复杂,但在人类语言系统中更简单。根据拉维夫等人的说法,这种差异源于两个方面。根据评论作者的说法,Raviv等人的关键信息将有助于未来对通信系统进化的研究。Raviv等人建议我们更努力地避免使用诸如“复杂”和“简单”之类的术语,而是专注于我们正在分析的细节。“更大的曲目规模”或“更强的作曲结构”等短语代表了讨论交流时更清晰和更中立的短语,并且可以更好地比较来自非人类和人类的发现。最后,Raviv等人提倡在非人类和人类交流系统之间进行更大的合作,跨学科的工作有着悠久的基础发现历史。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Simplicity and complexity in human and nonhuman communication.","authors":"Todd M Freeberg","doi":"10.1037/com0000334","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000334","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Comments on an article by Limor Raviv et al. (see record 2023-07345-001). Raviv et al. argue that the conflicting findings from human language and from studies of communication in nonhuman animals boil down to different levels of analysis used by researchers studying non-humans compared with those studying humans. Researchers studying nonhuman animal communication typically focus on the size of signal repertoires or the structural variation within and among signals within a repertoire. Researchers studying human language, conversely, largely focus on the question of grammatical rules that govern the way units (words and phrases) are put together in speech streams. Rules of composition that govern the way units are put together are considered more complex in nonhuman signaling systems, but simpler in human language systems. The discrepancy here, according to Raviv et al., stems from two sources. According to the commenting authors, the take home message of Raviv et al. is one that will be helpful to future studies of the evolution of communication systems. Raviv et al. recommend that we work harder to avoid terms such as \"complex\" and \"simple\" with regard to communication and instead focus on the specifics of what we are analyzing. Phrases such as \"larger repertoire size\" or \"stronger compositional structure\" represent cleaner and more neutral phrases for discussions of communication and would better allow findings from non-humans and from humans to be compared. Finally, Raviv et al. advocate for greater collaborative work across nonhuman and human communication systems, and interdisciplinary work has a long history of fundamental discoveries. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10474440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Children (Homo sapiens), but not rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), perceive the one-is-more illusion. 儿童(智人),而不是恒河猴(猕猴),能感知“一比多”的错觉。
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI: 10.1037/com0000316
Emma J McKeon, Michael J Beran, Audrey E Parrish

Visual illusions are of particular interest to cognitive researchers because they reflect the active role of the brain in processing the world around us. Yousif and Scholl (2019) recently described a new visual experience, the one-is-more illusion, in which adult humans perceived continuous objects as longer than sets of discrete objects of equal length. In the current study, we investigated this phenomenon in human children (Homo sapiens) and rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Children were presented with a computerized 2-choice discrimination task and successfully selected the longer of 2 images for control trials. On trials in which 2 versions of the same image were presented (identical in length), and one was of a continuous form and the other consisted of 2 or more distinct units, children showed a bias for the continuous object. Monkeys were given the same computerized task and learned to choose the longer of 2 otherwise identical stimuli. However, monkeys did not show a bias to choose the continuous probe images as longer than the discrete images in the critical test trials with equal-length stimuli. These results are discussed in light of developmental and comparative research on related illusory experiences and perceptual mechanisms. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

认知研究者对视觉错觉特别感兴趣,因为它们反映了大脑在处理我们周围世界时的活跃作用。Yousif和Scholl(2019)最近描述了一种新的视觉体验,即一比多的错觉,在这种错觉中,成年人认为连续的物体比一组长度相等的离散物体更长。在本研究中,我们调查了人类儿童(智人)和恒河猴(Macaca mulatta)的这一现象。孩子们被提供了一个计算机化的两项选择辨别任务,并成功地选择了两幅图像中较长的一幅作为对照试验。在相同图像的两个版本(长度相同),一个是连续的形式,另一个由2个或更多不同的单元组成的试验中,儿童表现出对连续物体的偏见。给猴子们同样的电脑任务,让他们学会在两个完全相同的刺激中选择时间较长的那个。然而,在等长度刺激的关键测试试验中,猴子没有表现出选择连续探针图像比选择离散图像更长的偏见。本文结合相关幻觉体验和知觉机制的发展和比较研究对这些结果进行了讨论。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Children (Homo sapiens), but not rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), perceive the one-is-more illusion.","authors":"Emma J McKeon,&nbsp;Michael J Beran,&nbsp;Audrey E Parrish","doi":"10.1037/com0000316","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000316","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Visual illusions are of particular interest to cognitive researchers because they reflect the active role of the brain in processing the world around us. Yousif and Scholl (2019) recently described a new visual experience, the one-is-more illusion, in which adult humans perceived continuous objects as longer than sets of discrete objects of equal length. In the current study, we investigated this phenomenon in human children (<i>Homo</i> <i>sapiens</i>) and rhesus macaques (<i>Macaca mulatta</i>). Children were presented with a computerized 2-choice discrimination task and successfully selected the longer of 2 images for control trials. On trials in which 2 versions of the same image were presented (identical in length), and one was of a continuous form and the other consisted of 2 or more distinct units, children showed a bias for the continuous object. Monkeys were given the same computerized task and learned to choose the longer of 2 otherwise identical stimuli. However, monkeys did not show a bias to choose the continuous probe images as longer than the discrete images in the critical test trials with equal-length stimuli. These results are discussed in light of developmental and comparative research on related illusory experiences and perceptual mechanisms. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10471708","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Recognition of visual kinship signals in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) by humans (Homo sapiens). 人类(智人)对黑猩猩(类人猿)视觉亲缘关系信号的识别。
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI: 10.1037/com0000327
Hella Péter, Marion Laporte, Nicholas E Newton-Fisher, Vernon Reynolds, Liran Samuni, Adrian Soldati, Linda Vigilant, Jakob Villioth, Kirsty E Graham, Klaus Zuberbühler, Catherine Hobaiter

Associating with kin provides individual benefits but requires that these relationships be detectable. In humans, facial phenotype matching might help assess paternity; however, evidence for it is mixed. In chimpanzees, concealing visual cues of paternity may be beneficial due to their promiscuous mating system and the considerable risk of infanticide by males. On the other hand, detecting kin can also aid chimpanzees in avoiding inbreeding and in forming alliances that improve kin-mediated fitness. Although previous studies assessing relatedness based on facial resemblance in chimpanzees exist, they used images of captive populations in whom selection pressures and reproductive opportunities are controlled and only assessed maternity or paternity of adult offspring. In natural populations, the chances of infanticide are highest during early infancy, suggesting that young infants would benefit most from paternity concealment, whereas adults and subadults would benefit from the detection of all types of kin, including half-siblings. In our experiment, we conducted an online study with human participants, in which they had to assess the relatedness of chimpanzees based on facial similarity. To address previous methodological constraints, we used chimpanzee images across all ages, as well as maternal and paternal half-siblings. We found that kin status was detected above chance across all relatedness categories, with easier kin detection of father-offspring pairs, females, and older chimpanzees. Together, these findings support the existence of paternity confusion in infant chimpanzees and provide a possible mechanism for incest avoidance and kin-based social alliances in older individuals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

与亲缘关系提供了个人利益,但要求这些关系是可检测的。在人类中,面部表型匹配可能有助于评估亲子关系;然而,证据是混杂的。在黑猩猩中,隐藏父权的视觉线索可能是有益的,因为它们的交配系统是滥交的,而且雄性杀婴的风险相当大。另一方面,发现亲缘关系也可以帮助黑猩猩避免近亲繁殖,形成联盟,提高亲缘关系介导的适应性。虽然以前的研究是基于黑猩猩的面部相似性来评估亲缘关系的,但他们使用的是圈养种群的图像,在这些种群中,选择压力和繁殖机会受到控制,并且只评估了成年后代的母性或父性。在自然种群中,杀婴的几率在婴儿早期是最高的,这表明年幼的婴儿将从父权隐瞒中获益最多,而成年人和亚成年人将从所有类型的亲属(包括同父异母的兄弟姐妹)的检测中受益。在我们的实验中,我们对人类参与者进行了一项在线研究,在这项研究中,他们必须根据面部相似性来评估黑猩猩的亲缘关系。为了解决之前的方法限制,我们使用了所有年龄段的黑猩猩图像,以及母亲和父亲的同父异母兄弟姐妹。我们发现,在所有亲缘关系类别中,亲缘关系状态的检测高于偶然,父系后代对、雌性黑猩猩和老年黑猩猩的亲缘关系检测更容易。总之,这些发现支持了幼年黑猩猩中父权混淆的存在,并提供了一种可能的机制,以避免乱伦和在老年个体中建立基于亲属的社会联盟。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Recognition of visual kinship signals in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) by humans (Homo sapiens).","authors":"Hella Péter,&nbsp;Marion Laporte,&nbsp;Nicholas E Newton-Fisher,&nbsp;Vernon Reynolds,&nbsp;Liran Samuni,&nbsp;Adrian Soldati,&nbsp;Linda Vigilant,&nbsp;Jakob Villioth,&nbsp;Kirsty E Graham,&nbsp;Klaus Zuberbühler,&nbsp;Catherine Hobaiter","doi":"10.1037/com0000327","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000327","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Associating with kin provides individual benefits but requires that these relationships be detectable. In humans, facial phenotype matching might help assess paternity; however, evidence for it is mixed. In chimpanzees, concealing visual cues of paternity may be beneficial due to their promiscuous mating system and the considerable risk of infanticide by males. On the other hand, detecting kin can also aid chimpanzees in avoiding inbreeding and in forming alliances that improve kin-mediated fitness. Although previous studies assessing relatedness based on facial resemblance in chimpanzees exist, they used images of captive populations in whom selection pressures and reproductive opportunities are controlled and only assessed maternity or paternity of adult offspring. In natural populations, the chances of infanticide are highest during early infancy, suggesting that young infants would benefit most from paternity concealment, whereas adults and subadults would benefit from the detection of all types of kin, including half-siblings. In our experiment, we conducted an online study with human participants, in which they had to assess the relatedness of chimpanzees based on facial similarity. To address previous methodological constraints, we used chimpanzee images across all ages, as well as maternal and paternal half-siblings. We found that kin status was detected above chance across all relatedness categories, with easier kin detection of father-offspring pairs, females, and older chimpanzees. Together, these findings support the existence of paternity confusion in infant chimpanzees and provide a possible mechanism for incest avoidance and kin-based social alliances in older individuals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10824147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Comparative Psychology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1