Anita M. Moorhead RN RM, Lisa H. Amir MBBS, PhD, Sharinne B. Crawford BAppSci(Hons), PhD, Della A. Forster RM, PhD
Background
Women with diabetes in pregnancy have decreased exclusivity and duration of breastfeeding compared with women without diabetes, and their infants are at increased risk of hypoglycemia. Clinicians often suggest pregnant women with diabetes to express breastmilk, and studies have reported increased breastfeeding exclusivity in the early postnatal period for patients who have expressed. Little is known about longer term outcomes. We investigated whether advising low-risk women with diabetes in pregnancy to express beginning at 36 weeks of pregnancy increased exclusivity and maintenance of breastfeeding at 3 months.
Methods
We conducted a multicenter, two-group, randomized controlled trial at six hospitals in Melbourne, Australia, between 2011 and 2015. Women were randomized to either standard maternity care or advised to hand express for 10 min twice daily, in addition to standard care. Women were telephoned at 12–13 weeks postpartum and asked a series of questions about feeding their baby, perceptions of their milk supply, and other health outcomes.
Results
Of 631 women in the study, data for 570 (90%) were analyzed at 12–13 weeks. After adjustment, we found no evidence that women allocated to antenatal expressing were more likely to be giving only breastmilk (aRR 1.07 [95% CI 0.92–1.22]) or any breastmilk (aRR 0.99 [95% CI 0.92–1.06]) at 12–13 weeks postpartum compared with women in the standard care group.
Conclusion
While the practice of antenatal expression for low-risk women with diabetes during pregnancy is promising for increasing exclusivity of breastmilk feeding in hospital, at 12–13 weeks, there was no association with breastfeeding outcomes.
{"title":"Breastfeeding outcomes at 3 months for women with diabetes in pregnancy: Findings from the Diabetes and Antenatal Milk Expressing randomized controlled trial","authors":"Anita M. Moorhead RN RM, Lisa H. Amir MBBS, PhD, Sharinne B. Crawford BAppSci(Hons), PhD, Della A. Forster RM, PhD","doi":"10.1111/birt.12807","DOIUrl":"10.1111/birt.12807","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Women with diabetes in pregnancy have decreased exclusivity and duration of breastfeeding compared with women without diabetes, and their infants are at increased risk of hypoglycemia. Clinicians often suggest pregnant women with diabetes to express breastmilk, and studies have reported increased breastfeeding exclusivity in the early postnatal period for patients who have expressed. Little is known about longer term outcomes. We investigated whether advising low-risk women with diabetes in pregnancy to express beginning at 36 weeks of pregnancy increased exclusivity and maintenance of breastfeeding at 3 months.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We conducted a multicenter, two-group, randomized controlled trial at six hospitals in Melbourne, Australia, between 2011 and 2015. Women were randomized to either standard maternity care or advised to hand express for 10 min twice daily, in addition to standard care. Women were telephoned at 12–13 weeks postpartum and asked a series of questions about feeding their baby, perceptions of their milk supply, and other health outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Of 631 women in the study, data for 570 (90%) were analyzed at 12–13 weeks. After adjustment, we found no evidence that women allocated to antenatal expressing were more likely to be giving <i>only</i> breastmilk (aRR 1.07 [95% CI 0.92–1.22]) or <i>any</i> breastmilk (aRR 0.99 [95% CI 0.92–1.06]) at 12–13 weeks postpartum compared with women in the standard care group.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>While the practice of antenatal expression for low-risk women with diabetes during pregnancy is promising for increasing exclusivity of breastmilk feeding in hospital, at 12–13 weeks, there was no association with breastfeeding outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":"51 3","pages":"508-520"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/birt.12807","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139405398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sarah E. Butler MD, Euan M. Wallace MD, Andrew Bisits MD, Roshan J. Selvaratnam PhD, Mary-Ann Davey DrPH
Objective
To evaluate whether induction of labor (IOL) is associated with cesarean birth (CB) and perinatal mortality in uncomplicated first births at term compared with expectant management outside the confines of a randomized controlled trial.
Methods
Population-based retrospective cohort study of all births in Victoria, Australia, from 2010 to 2018 (n = 640,191). Preliminary analysis compared IOL at 37 weeks with expectant management at that gestational age and beyond for uncomplicated pregnancies. Similar comparisons were made for IOL at 38, 39, 40, and 41 weeks of gestation and expectant management. The primary analysis repeated these comparisons, limiting the population to nulliparous women with uncomplicated pregnancies and excluding those with a medical indication for IOL. We compared perinatal mortality between groups using Chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression for all other comparisons. Adjusted odds ratios and 99% confidence intervals were reported. p < 0.01 denoted statistical significance.
Results
Among nulliparous, uncomplicated pregnancies at ≥37 weeks of gestation in Victoria, IOL increased from 24.6% in 2010 to 30.0% in 2018 (p < 0.001). In contrast to the preliminary analysis, the primary analysis showed that IOL in lower-risk nulliparous women was associated with increased odds of CB when performed at 38 (aOR 1.23(1.13–1.32)), 39 (aOR 1.31(1.23–1.40)), 40 (aOR 1.42(1.35–1.50)), and 41 weeks of gestation (aOR 1.43(1.35–1.51)). Perinatal mortality was rare in both groups and non-significantly lower in the induced group at most gestations.
Discussion
For lower-risk nulliparous women, the odds of CB increased with IOL from 38 weeks of gestation, along with decreased odds of perinatal mortality at 41 weeks only.
{"title":"Induction of labor and cesarean birth in lower-risk nulliparous women at term: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Sarah E. Butler MD, Euan M. Wallace MD, Andrew Bisits MD, Roshan J. Selvaratnam PhD, Mary-Ann Davey DrPH","doi":"10.1111/birt.12806","DOIUrl":"10.1111/birt.12806","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To evaluate whether induction of labor (IOL) is associated with cesarean birth (CB) and perinatal mortality in uncomplicated first births at term compared with expectant management outside the confines of a randomized controlled trial.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Population-based retrospective cohort study of all births in Victoria, Australia, from 2010 to 2018 (<i>n</i> = 640,191). Preliminary analysis compared IOL at 37 weeks with expectant management at that gestational age and beyond for uncomplicated pregnancies. Similar comparisons were made for IOL at 38, 39, 40, and 41 weeks of gestation and expectant management. The primary analysis repeated these comparisons, limiting the population to nulliparous women with uncomplicated pregnancies and excluding those with a medical indication for IOL. We compared perinatal mortality between groups using Chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression for all other comparisons. Adjusted odds ratios and 99% confidence intervals were reported. <i>p</i> < 0.01 denoted statistical significance.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Among nulliparous, uncomplicated pregnancies at ≥37 weeks of gestation in Victoria, IOL increased from 24.6% in 2010 to 30.0% in 2018 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In contrast to the preliminary analysis, the primary analysis showed that IOL in lower-risk nulliparous women was associated with increased odds of CB when performed at 38 (aOR 1.23(1.13–1.32)), 39 (aOR 1.31(1.23–1.40)), 40 (aOR 1.42(1.35–1.50)), and 41 weeks of gestation (aOR 1.43(1.35–1.51)). Perinatal mortality was rare in both groups and non-significantly lower in the induced group at most gestations.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>For lower-risk nulliparous women, the odds of CB increased with IOL from 38 weeks of gestation, along with decreased odds of perinatal mortality at 41 weeks only.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":"51 3","pages":"521-529"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/birt.12806","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139089466","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alex F. Peahl MD, MSc, Lisa Kane Low PhD, MS, CNM, Elizabeth S. Langen MD, Michelle H. Moniz MD, MSc, Bryan Aaron BS, Hsou Mei Hu PhD, MBA, MHS, Jennifer Waljee MD, MPH, Courtney Townsel MD, MSc
Background
We describe variation in postpartum opioid prescribing across a statewide quality collaborative and assess the proportion due to practitioner and hospital characteristics.
Methods
We assessed postpartum prescribing data from nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex births between January 2020 and June 2021 included in the clinical registry of a statewide obstetric quality collaborative funded by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Mixed effect logistic regression and linear models adjusted for patient characteristics and assessed practitioner- and hospital-level predictors of receiving a postpartum opioid prescription and prescription size. Relative contributions of practitioner and hospital characteristics were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient.
Results
Of 40,589 patients birthing at 68 hospitals, 3.0% (872/29,412) received an opioid prescription after vaginal birth and 87.8% (9812/11,177) received one after cesarean birth, with high variation across hospitals. In adjusted models, the strongest patient-level predictors of receiving a prescription were cesarean birth (aOR 899.1, 95% CI 752.8–1066.7) and third−/fourth-degree perineal laceration (aOR 25.7, 95% CI 17.4–37.9). Receiving care from a certified nurse-midwife (aOR 0.63, 95% CI 0.48–0.82) or family medicine physician (aOR 0.60, 95%CI 0.39–0.91) was associated with lower prescribing rates. Hospital-level predictors included receiving care at hospitals with <500 annual births (aOR 4.07, 95% CI 1.61–15.0). A positive safety culture was associated with lower prescribing rates (aOR 0.37, 95% CI 0.15–0.88). Much of the variation in postpartum prescribing was attributable to practitioners and hospitals (prescription receipt: practitioners 25.1%, hospitals 12.1%; prescription size: practitioners 5.4%, hospitals: 52.2%).
Discussion
Variation in postpartum opioid prescribing after birth is high and driven largely by practitioner- and hospital-level factors. Opioid stewardship efforts targeted at both the practitioner and hospital level may be effective for reducing opioid prescribing harms.
背景：我们描述了全州质量合作组织产后阿片类药物处方的差异，并评估了因从业人员和医院特征造成的比例：我们评估了 2020 年 1 月至 2021 年 6 月期间由密歇根州蓝十字蓝盾公司资助的全州产科质量合作临床登记册中的无胎儿、足月、单胎、顶点分娩的产后处方数据。数据采用描述性统计进行汇总。混合效应逻辑回归和线性模型对患者特征进行了调整，并评估了从业人员和医院层面对产后接受阿片类药物处方和处方量的预测因素。使用类内相关系数评估了从业人员和医院特征的相对贡献：在 68 家医院分娩的 40,589 名患者中，3.0%（872/29,412）的患者在阴道分娩后获得了阿片类药物处方，87.8%（9812/11,177）的患者在剖宫产后获得了阿片类药物处方，不同医院之间的差异很大。在调整后的模型中，剖宫产（aOR 899.1，95% CI 752.8-1066.7）和三度/四度会阴裂伤（aOR 25.7，95% CI 17.4-37.9）是患者获得处方的最强预测因素。接受注册助产士（aOR 0.63，95% CI 0.48-0.82）或家庭医生（aOR 0.60，95%CI 0.39-0.91）护理与较低的处方率有关。医院层面的预测因素包括在有讨论的医院接受治疗：产后阿片类药物处方的变化很大，主要受执业医师和医院层面因素的影响。针对执业医师和医院层面的阿片类药物管理措施可能会有效减少阿片类药物处方的危害。
{"title":"Drivers of variation in postpartum opioid prescribing across hospitals participating in a statewide maternity care quality collaborative","authors":"Alex F. Peahl MD, MSc, Lisa Kane Low PhD, MS, CNM, Elizabeth S. Langen MD, Michelle H. Moniz MD, MSc, Bryan Aaron BS, Hsou Mei Hu PhD, MBA, MHS, Jennifer Waljee MD, MPH, Courtney Townsel MD, MSc","doi":"10.1111/birt.12809","DOIUrl":"10.1111/birt.12809","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We describe variation in postpartum opioid prescribing across a statewide quality collaborative and assess the proportion due to practitioner and hospital characteristics.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We assessed postpartum prescribing data from nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex births between January 2020 and June 2021 included in the clinical registry of a statewide obstetric quality collaborative funded by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Mixed effect logistic regression and linear models adjusted for patient characteristics and assessed practitioner- and hospital-level predictors of receiving a postpartum opioid prescription and prescription size. Relative contributions of practitioner and hospital characteristics were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Of 40,589 patients birthing at 68 hospitals, 3.0% (872/29,412) received an opioid prescription after vaginal birth and 87.8% (9812/11,177) received one after cesarean birth, with high variation across hospitals. In adjusted models, the strongest patient-level predictors of receiving a prescription were cesarean birth (aOR 899.1, 95% CI 752.8–1066.7) and third−/fourth-degree perineal laceration (aOR 25.7, 95% CI 17.4–37.9). Receiving care from a certified nurse-midwife (aOR 0.63, 95% CI 0.48–0.82) or family medicine physician (aOR 0.60, 95%CI 0.39–0.91) was associated with lower prescribing rates. Hospital-level predictors included receiving care at hospitals with <500 annual births (aOR 4.07, 95% CI 1.61–15.0). A positive safety culture was associated with lower prescribing rates (aOR 0.37, 95% CI 0.15–0.88). Much of the variation in postpartum prescribing was attributable to practitioners and hospitals (prescription receipt: practitioners 25.1%, hospitals 12.1%; prescription size: practitioners 5.4%, hospitals: 52.2%).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Variation in postpartum opioid prescribing after birth is high and driven largely by practitioner- and hospital-level factors. Opioid stewardship efforts targeted at both the practitioner and hospital level may be effective for reducing opioid prescribing harms.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":"51 3","pages":"541-558"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11214638/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139075940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Massimiliano Lia MD, Mireille Martin MD, Elisabeth Költzsch, Holger Stepan MD, Anne Dathan-Stumpf MD
Background
We investigated possible parameters that could predict the need for obstetric maneuvers, the duration of the active second stage of labor (i.e., the duration of active pushing), and short-term neonatal outcome in vaginal breech births.
Materials and Methods
We performed a retrospective analysis of 268 successful singleton vaginal breech births in women without previous vaginal births from January 2015 to August 2022. Multivariable regression was used to investigate associations between maternal and fetal characteristics (including antepartum magnetic resonance (MR) pelvimetry) with obstetric maneuvers, the duration of active second stage of labor, pH values, and admission to the neonatal unit. Models for the prediction of obstetric maneuvers were built and internally validated.
Results
Obstetric maneuvers were performed in a total of 130 women (48.5%). A total of 32 neonates (11.9%) had to be admitted to the neonatal unit. The intertuberous distance (ITD) (p < 0.001), epidural analgesia (p < 0.001), and birthweight (p = 0.026) were associated with the duration of active second stage of labor. ITD (p = 0.028) and birthweight (p = 0.011) were also independently associated with admission to the neonatal unit, while pH values below 7.10 dropped significantly (p = 0.0034) if ITD was ≥13 cm. Furthermore, ITD (p < 0.001) and biparietal diameter (p = 0.002) were independent predictors for obstetric maneuvers.
Conclusions
ITD is independently associated with the duration of active second stage of labor. Thus, it can predict suboptimal birth mechanics in the last stage of birth, which may lead to the need for obstetric maneuvers, lower arterial pH values, and admission to the neonatal unit. Consequently, MR pelvimetry gives additional information for practitioners and birthing people preferring a vaginal breech birth.
{"title":"Mechanics of vaginal breech birth: Factors influencing obstetric maneuver rate, duration of active second stage of labor, and neonatal outcome","authors":"Massimiliano Lia MD, Mireille Martin MD, Elisabeth Költzsch, Holger Stepan MD, Anne Dathan-Stumpf MD","doi":"10.1111/birt.12808","DOIUrl":"10.1111/birt.12808","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We investigated possible parameters that could predict the need for obstetric maneuvers, the duration of the active second stage of labor (i.e., the duration of active pushing), and short-term neonatal outcome in vaginal breech births.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We performed a retrospective analysis of 268 successful singleton vaginal breech births in women without previous vaginal births from January 2015 to August 2022. Multivariable regression was used to investigate associations between maternal and fetal characteristics (including antepartum magnetic resonance (MR) pelvimetry) with obstetric maneuvers, the duration of active second stage of labor, pH values, and admission to the neonatal unit. Models for the prediction of obstetric maneuvers were built and internally validated.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Obstetric maneuvers were performed in a total of 130 women (48.5%). A total of 32 neonates (11.9%) had to be admitted to the neonatal unit. The intertuberous distance (ITD) (<i>p</i> < 0.001), epidural analgesia (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and birthweight (<i>p</i> = 0.026) were associated with the duration of active second stage of labor. ITD (<i>p</i> = 0.028) and birthweight (<i>p</i> = 0.011) were also independently associated with admission to the neonatal unit, while pH values below 7.10 dropped significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.0034) if ITD was ≥13 cm. Furthermore, ITD (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and biparietal diameter (<i>p</i> = 0.002) were independent predictors for obstetric maneuvers.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>ITD is independently associated with the duration of active second stage of labor. Thus, it can predict suboptimal birth mechanics in the last stage of birth, which may lead to the need for obstetric maneuvers, lower arterial pH values, and admission to the neonatal unit. Consequently, MR pelvimetry gives additional information for practitioners and birthing people preferring a vaginal breech birth.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":"51 3","pages":"530-540"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/birt.12808","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138806816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Implementation of shared decision-making in antenatal care has had limited exploration.
Objective
To assess what is known about shared decision-making in antenatal care.
Search Strategy
Five databases were searched (1997–2022) limited to English language studies from OECD countries.
Data Collection and Analysis
A data collection table was constructed with findings from 32 papers. A narrative synthesis was conducted with subsequent thematic analysis of included papers.
Main Results
Four areas of decision-making were identified with six themes revealing enablers and barriers to shared decision-making in antenatal care.
Conclusion
Implementation of shared decision-making requires continuity, time and personalisation of care.
在产前护理中实施共同决策的探索还很有限。
{"title":"Maternity clinician use of shared decision-making in antenatal care: A scoping review","authors":"Madeline Hawke RN, RM, Julie Considine RN, RM, PhD, Linda Sweet RN, RM, PhD","doi":"10.1111/birt.12805","DOIUrl":"10.1111/birt.12805","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Implementation of shared decision-making in antenatal care has had limited exploration.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To assess what is known about shared decision-making in antenatal care.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Search Strategy</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Five databases were searched (1997–2022) limited to English language studies from OECD countries.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Data Collection and Analysis</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A data collection table was constructed with findings from 32 papers. A narrative synthesis was conducted with subsequent thematic analysis of included papers.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Main Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Four areas of decision-making were identified with six themes revealing enablers and barriers to shared decision-making in antenatal care.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Implementation of shared decision-making requires continuity, time and personalisation of care.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":"51 3","pages":"475-483"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/birt.12805","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138692896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sarah Hjorth PhD, Stina Kruse Skov MSc, Helene Kirkegaard PhD, Jørn Olsen PhD, Ellen Aagaard Nohr PhD
Background
Cesarean birth has been associated with increased risks of short-term mental health problems. Little is known about whether these associations persist in the long term. This study aimed to estimate the associations between mode of birth and maternal mental health in midlife while considering mental health before and during pregnancy.
Methods
Cohort study among mothers in the Danish National Birth Cohort. Birth mode for each woman's entire reproductive history was obtained from Danish national registries. Symptoms of depression and stress in midlife were self-reported using validated scales. Log binomial regression was used to calculate risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between birth mode and depressive symptoms. Linear regression was used to calculate mean difference in stress score by birth mode.
Results
Among 42,872 women, 15.5% reported depressive symptoms at follow-up, where they were, on average, 43.9 years and 11.2 years after their last birth. Compared with women who only ever had spontaneous vaginal births, women who only had cesarean births, or had both cesarean and vaginal births with the last birth by cesarean, reported slightly more symptoms of depression (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01;1.20) and stress (mean difference 0.68 on a 100-point scale, 95% CI 0.10;1.26).
Conclusion
Whether due to the birth experience or underlying factors, depression and stress in midlife were more frequent in women with only cesarean births or whose last birth was by cesarean compared with women with vaginal births.
{"title":"Mode of birth and long-term maternal mental health: A follow-up study in the Danish National Birth Cohort","authors":"Sarah Hjorth PhD, Stina Kruse Skov MSc, Helene Kirkegaard PhD, Jørn Olsen PhD, Ellen Aagaard Nohr PhD","doi":"10.1111/birt.12802","DOIUrl":"10.1111/birt.12802","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Cesarean birth has been associated with increased risks of short-term mental health problems. Little is known about whether these associations persist in the long term. This study aimed to estimate the associations between mode of birth and maternal mental health in midlife while considering mental health before and during pregnancy.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Cohort study among mothers in the Danish National Birth Cohort. Birth mode for each woman's entire reproductive history was obtained from Danish national registries. Symptoms of depression and stress in midlife were self-reported using validated scales. Log binomial regression was used to calculate risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between birth mode and depressive symptoms. Linear regression was used to calculate mean difference in stress score by birth mode.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Among 42,872 women, 15.5% reported depressive symptoms at follow-up, where they were, on average, 43.9 years and 11.2 years after their last birth. Compared with women who only ever had spontaneous vaginal births, women who only had cesarean births, or had both cesarean and vaginal births with the last birth by cesarean, reported slightly more symptoms of depression (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01;1.20) and stress (mean difference 0.68 on a 100-point scale, 95% CI 0.10;1.26).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Whether due to the birth experience or underlying factors, depression and stress in midlife were more frequent in women with only cesarean births or whose last birth was by cesarean compared with women with vaginal births.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":"51 2","pages":"441-449"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138574254","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The COVID-19 pandemic led to changes in the provision of pregnancy and postpartum care. The purpose of this study was to describe changes in access to prenatal and postpartum care over time, from early in the pandemic (July 2020) to mid-pandemic (January 2021) and to explore socioeconomic and COVID-19-related economic factors associated with experiencing barriers to care.
Methods
We recruited two cross sections of women and birthing people in the US in July 2020 (N = 4645) and January 2021 (N = 3343) using Facebook and Instagram Ads.
Results
Three out of four women in the prenatal period and four out of five women in the postpartum period reported barriers to scheduling a visit. The likelihood of not having a visit (OR = 4.44, 95% CI 2.67–7.40), being unable to schedule a visit (OR = 2.73, 95% CI 1.71–4.35), and not being offered visits (OR = 4.26, 95% CI 2.32–7.81) increased over time. Participants were more likely to report barriers attending scheduled prenatal or postpartum appointments over time (OR = 2.72, 95% CI 2.14–3.45). Women who experienced more economic impacts from COVID-19 were older, less educated, and were Black, Indigenous, or a person of color, and were more likely to have barriers to attending appointments.
Conclusions
Certain subgroups are more at risk during COVID-19, and around 9 months into the pandemic, women were not only still facing barriers to care, but these had been amplified. Additional research using other data sources is needed to identify and ameliorate barriers and inequalities in access to prenatal and postpartum care that appear to have persisted throughout the pandemic.
{"title":"Prenatal and postpartum care during the COVID-19 pandemic: An increase in barriers from early to mid-pandemic in the United States","authors":"Nadia Diamond-Smith PhD, MSc, Rachel Logan PhD, MPH, Aliza Adler BA, MPH, Sirena Gutierrez MPH, Cassondra Marshall DrPH, MPH, Jennifer L. Kerns MD, MS, MPH","doi":"10.1111/birt.12800","DOIUrl":"10.1111/birt.12800","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The COVID-19 pandemic led to changes in the provision of pregnancy and postpartum care. The purpose of this study was to describe changes in access to prenatal and postpartum care over time, from early in the pandemic (July 2020) to mid-pandemic (January 2021) and to explore socioeconomic and COVID-19-related economic factors associated with experiencing barriers to care.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We recruited two cross sections of women and birthing people in the US in July 2020 (<i>N</i> = 4645) and January 2021 (<i>N</i> = 3343) using Facebook and Instagram Ads.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Three out of four women in the prenatal period and four out of five women in the postpartum period reported barriers to scheduling a visit. The likelihood of not having a visit (OR = 4.44, 95% CI 2.67–7.40), being unable to schedule a visit (OR = 2.73, 95% CI 1.71–4.35), and not being offered visits (OR = 4.26, 95% CI 2.32–7.81) increased over time. Participants were more likely to report barriers attending scheduled prenatal or postpartum appointments over time (OR = 2.72, 95% CI 2.14–3.45). Women who experienced more economic impacts from COVID-19 were older, less educated, and were Black, Indigenous, or a person of color, and were more likely to have barriers to attending appointments.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Certain subgroups are more at risk during COVID-19, and around 9 months into the pandemic, women were not only still facing barriers to care, but these had been amplified. Additional research using other data sources is needed to identify and ameliorate barriers and inequalities in access to prenatal and postpartum care that appear to have persisted throughout the pandemic.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":"51 2","pages":"450-458"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/birt.12800","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138566618","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ian Koorn MD, MSC, Linda C. Vis MSC, Kim J. C. Verschueren MD, PhD, Ageeth N. Rosman PhD, Thomas van den Akker MD, PhD
Background
Globally, cesarean birth rates are rising, and while it can be a lifesaving procedure, cesarean birth is also associated with increased maternal and perinatal risks. This study aims to describe changes over time about the mode of birth and perinatal outcomes in second-pregnancy women with one previous cesarean birth in the Netherlands over the past 20 years.
Methods
We conducted a nationwide, population-based study using the Dutch perinatal registry. The mode of birth (intended vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) compared with planned cesarean birth) was assessed in all women with one previous cesarean birth and no prior vaginal birth who gave birth to a term singleton in cephalic presentation between 2000 and 2019 in the Netherlands (n = 143,146). The reported outcomes include the trend of intended VBAC, VBAC success rate, and adverse perinatal outcomes (perinatal mortality up to 7 days, low Apgar score at 5 min, asphyxia, and neonatal intensive care unit admission ≥24 h).
Results
Intended VBAC decreased by 21.5% in women with one previous cesarean birth and no prior vaginal birth, from 77.2% in 2000 to 55.7% in 2019, with a marked deceleration from 2009 onwards. The VBAC success rate dropped gradually, from 71.0% to 65.3%, across the same time period. Overall, the cesarean birth rate (planned and unplanned) increased from 45.2% to 63.6%. Adverse perinatal outcomes were higher in women intending VBAC compared with those planning a cesarean birth. Perinatal mortality initially decreased but remained stable from 2009 onwards, with only minimal differences between both modes of birth.
Conclusions
In the Netherlands, the proportion of women intending VBAC after one previous cesarean birth and no prior vaginal birth has decreased markedly. Particularly from 2009 onwards, this decrease was not accompanied by a synchronous reduction in perinatal mortality.
{"title":"Variations over time in mode of birth and perinatal outcomes in women with one previous cesarean in the Netherlands: A 20-year population-based study","authors":"Ian Koorn MD, MSC, Linda C. Vis MSC, Kim J. C. Verschueren MD, PhD, Ageeth N. Rosman PhD, Thomas van den Akker MD, PhD","doi":"10.1111/birt.12803","DOIUrl":"10.1111/birt.12803","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Globally, cesarean birth rates are rising, and while it can be a lifesaving procedure, cesarean birth is also associated with increased maternal and perinatal risks. This study aims to describe changes over time about the mode of birth and perinatal outcomes in second-pregnancy women with one previous cesarean birth in the Netherlands over the past 20 years.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We conducted a nationwide, population-based study using the Dutch perinatal registry. The mode of birth (intended vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) compared with planned cesarean birth) was assessed in all women with one previous cesarean birth and no prior vaginal birth who gave birth to a term singleton in cephalic presentation between 2000 and 2019 in the Netherlands (<i>n</i> = 143,146). The reported outcomes include the trend of intended VBAC, VBAC success rate, and adverse perinatal outcomes (perinatal mortality up to 7 days, low Apgar score at 5 min, asphyxia, and neonatal intensive care unit admission ≥24 h).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Intended VBAC decreased by 21.5% in women with one previous cesarean birth and no prior vaginal birth, from 77.2% in 2000 to 55.7% in 2019, with a marked deceleration from 2009 onwards. The VBAC success rate dropped gradually, from 71.0% to 65.3%, across the same time period. Overall, the cesarean birth rate (planned and unplanned) increased from 45.2% to 63.6%. Adverse perinatal outcomes were higher in women intending VBAC compared with those planning a cesarean birth. Perinatal mortality initially decreased but remained stable from 2009 onwards, with only minimal differences between both modes of birth.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In the Netherlands, the proportion of women intending VBAC after one previous cesarean birth and no prior vaginal birth has decreased markedly. Particularly from 2009 onwards, this decrease was not accompanied by a synchronous reduction in perinatal mortality.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":"51 2","pages":"459-467"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/birt.12803","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138464512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The increasing number of unnecessary cesarean births is a cause for concern and may be addressed by increasing access to midwifery care. The objective of this review was to assess the effect of midwifery care on the likelihood of cesarean births.
Methods
We searched five databases from the beginning of records through May 2020. We included observational studies that reported odds ratios or data allowing the calculation of odds ratios of cesarean birth for births with and without midwife involvement in care or presence at the institution. Standard inverse-variance random-effects meta-analysis was used to generate overall odds ratios (ORs).
Results
We observed a significantly lower likelihood of cesarean birth in midwife-led care, midwife-attended births, among those who received instruction pre-birth from midwives, and within institutions with a midwifery presence.
Conclusions
Care from midwives reduces the likelihood of cesarean birth in all the analyses, perhaps due to their greater preference and skill for physiologic births. Increased use of midwives in maternal care can reduce cesarean births and should be further researched and implemented broadly, potentially as the default modality in maternal care.
{"title":"Systematic review and meta-analysis examining the effects of midwife care on cesarean birth","authors":"Ilir Hoxha MD, PhD, Krenare Grezda MD, Anirudh Udutha MD, Besarta Taganoviq MS, Riaz Agahi PhD, Naime Brajshori PhD, Sharon Schindler Rising MSN, CNM, FACNM","doi":"10.1111/birt.12801","DOIUrl":"10.1111/birt.12801","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The increasing number of unnecessary cesarean births is a cause for concern and may be addressed by increasing access to midwifery care. The objective of this review was to assess the effect of midwifery care on the likelihood of cesarean births.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We searched five databases from the beginning of records through May 2020. We included observational studies that reported odds ratios or data allowing the calculation of odds ratios of cesarean birth for births with and without midwife involvement in care or presence at the institution. Standard inverse-variance random-effects meta-analysis was used to generate overall odds ratios (ORs).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We observed a significantly lower likelihood of cesarean birth in midwife-led care, midwife-attended births, among those who received instruction pre-birth from midwives, and within institutions with a midwifery presence.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Care from midwives reduces the likelihood of cesarean birth in all the analyses, perhaps due to their greater preference and skill for physiologic births. Increased use of midwives in maternal care can reduce cesarean births and should be further researched and implemented broadly, potentially as the default modality in maternal care.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":"51 2","pages":"264-274"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138464511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
María Alejandra Aguilar-Rodríguez MD, Lilia V. Castro-Porras DSc
Background
Often marginalized and disadvantaged by systems of oppression, Indigenous populations commonly face significant barriers to accessing adequate antenatal care (ANC). The COVID-19 pandemic had an unprecedented impact on healthcare systems worldwide, including on the provision of antenatal care; this was especially so for Indigenous communities in many regions. As such, our study aimed to estimate the association between the COVID-19 pandemic and adequate ANC received by Indigenous women in Chiapas, Mexico.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective crossover analysis with data collected between June and December 2021 from Indigenous women who attended at least one ANC appointment at one of two health centers in San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas. We used a multinomial logistic regression model considering the time frame (before and during the pandemic) as the primary independent variable. Adequate antenatal care comprised four dimensions: attendance by qualified personnel, timely first visit, sufficient frequency of visits, and adequacy of the content provided during the visits.
Results
During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a significant drop in ANC adequacy, with 12.7% (95% CI: 8.3, 18.9) of Indigenous women receiving ANC, compared with the pre-pandemic rate of 52.5% (95% CI: 44.7, 60.3), among the 158 participants. The pandemic resulted in a reduction of 75.8% in the adequacy of ANC. Considering the four dimensions of adequacy, we found that having only one dimension was associated with a relative risk ratio (RRR) of 12.45 (95% CI: 6.40, 24.23), while having two or three dimensions was associated with a RRR of 5.23 (95% CI: 2.83, 9.65) when using adequate ANC as the category of reference.
Conclusions
According to our results, Indigenous women's ANC adequacy was negatively affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. In light of these findings, we emphasize the importance of developing healthcare systems that are prepared to adapt consultation schemes by implementing virtual visits and incorporating community health workers.
{"title":"COVID-19 and the adequacy of antenatal care among Indigenous women: A retrospective crossover analysis","authors":"María Alejandra Aguilar-Rodríguez MD, Lilia V. Castro-Porras DSc","doi":"10.1111/birt.12799","DOIUrl":"10.1111/birt.12799","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Often marginalized and disadvantaged by systems of oppression, Indigenous populations commonly face significant barriers to accessing adequate antenatal care (ANC). The COVID-19 pandemic had an unprecedented impact on healthcare systems worldwide, including on the provision of antenatal care; this was especially so for Indigenous communities in many regions. As such, our study aimed to estimate the association between the COVID-19 pandemic and adequate ANC received by Indigenous women in Chiapas, Mexico.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We conducted a retrospective crossover analysis with data collected between June and December 2021 from Indigenous women who attended at least one ANC appointment at one of two health centers in San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas. We used a multinomial logistic regression model considering the time frame (before and during the pandemic) as the primary independent variable. Adequate antenatal care comprised four dimensions: attendance by qualified personnel, timely first visit, sufficient frequency of visits, and adequacy of the content provided during the visits.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a significant drop in ANC adequacy, with 12.7% (95% CI: 8.3, 18.9) of Indigenous women receiving ANC, compared with the pre-pandemic rate of 52.5% (95% CI: 44.7, 60.3), among the 158 participants. The pandemic resulted in a reduction of 75.8% in the adequacy of ANC. Considering the four dimensions of adequacy, we found that having only one dimension was associated with a relative risk ratio (RRR) of 12.45 (95% CI: 6.40, 24.23), while having two or three dimensions was associated with a RRR of 5.23 (95% CI: 2.83, 9.65) when using adequate ANC as the category of reference.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>According to our results, Indigenous women's ANC adequacy was negatively affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. In light of these findings, we emphasize the importance of developing healthcare systems that are prepared to adapt consultation schemes by implementing virtual visits and incorporating community health workers.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":"51 2","pages":"432-440"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/birt.12799","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138464510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号