We examine the role of soil conservation practices (SCPs) in promoting sustainable agri-food production to achieve food and nutrition security. To this end, we use the endogenous treatment regression model, as it allows us to address the selection bias associated with SCP adoption. Data sourced from the 2020 China Land Economic Survey, collected by Nanjing Agricultural University, China, are examined. First, we analyse the association between the adoption of SCPs and rice yield; we focus on rice as it is the most common staple food globally. Then, we examine the links between SCP adoption and dietary diversity and the consumption of seven specific foods (rice, potato, pork, poultry, egg, fruits and vegetable oil). This allows us to glean insights into how SCPs may affect the dietary patterns in rural communities. The findings show that adopting SCPs is associated with an 8.5% increase in rice yield. Rice yields increase with the intensification of SCP adoption. Disaggregated analysis suggests that low-income farmers receive the most rice yield promotion by adopting SCPs compared with wealthier ones. Meanwhile, among the three SCPs (i.e. soil remediation, commercial organic fertiliser application and formulated fertilisation) considered in our study, only formulated fertilisation increases rice yields. Furthermore, adopting SCPs is associated with higher consumption of protein-rich foods and lower dietary diversity.
{"title":"Promoting sustainable agri-food production to achieve food and nutrition security: The role of soil conservation practices","authors":"Junpeng Li, Puneet Vatsa, Wanglin Ma, Phong Quoc Luu","doi":"10.1111/1467-8489.12598","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12598","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We examine the role of soil conservation practices (SCPs) in promoting sustainable agri-food production to achieve food and nutrition security. To this end, we use the endogenous treatment regression model, as it allows us to address the selection bias associated with SCP adoption. Data sourced from the 2020 China Land Economic Survey, collected by Nanjing Agricultural University, China, are examined. First, we analyse the association between the adoption of SCPs and rice yield; we focus on rice as it is the most common staple food globally. Then, we examine the links between SCP adoption and dietary diversity and the consumption of seven specific foods (rice, potato, pork, poultry, egg, fruits and vegetable oil). This allows us to glean insights into how SCPs may affect the dietary patterns in rural communities. The findings show that adopting SCPs is associated with an 8.5% increase in rice yield. Rice yields increase with the intensification of SCP adoption. Disaggregated analysis suggests that low-income farmers receive the most rice yield promotion by adopting SCPs compared with wealthier ones. Meanwhile, among the three SCPs (i.e. soil remediation, commercial organic fertiliser application and formulated fertilisation) considered in our study, only formulated fertilisation increases rice yields. Furthermore, adopting SCPs is associated with higher consumption of protein-rich foods and lower dietary diversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":55427,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","volume":"69 1","pages":"59-79"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143118752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In 2022, the United Nations (UN) endorsed a resolution to end plastic pollution, with an objective to have a legally binding agreement in place by 2024. The clothing industry uses a significant amount of plastic, which generates plastic pollution through both the mismanagement of clothing waste and microplastics released during the washing of clothes. Consequently, clothing needs to be made without plastic fibres or synthetic chemicals to comply with the UN's resolution and stop contributing to plastic pollution. In this paper, we develop an economy-wide model and impose a tax on the conventional clothing sector or subsidise plastic-free clothing in different regions until all clothing produced is free of plastics and synthetic chemicals. We analyse the impact of these policies on GDP, welfare, output and land use across six policy scenarios. If only some regions tax clothing production and not others, the production of conventional clothing increases in untaxed regions (i.e. there is conventional clothing ‘leakage’). As clothing producers import some of their plastic inputs, increased production of conventional clothing in untaxed regions dampens the reduction in plastic production in regions with a clothing tax. Conventional clothing ‘leakage’ does not occur in the subsidy scenarios, and global plastic production decreases by more compared with tax scenarios. Under both a tax and the subsidy, synthetic chemical and plastic-free clothing production increase global demand for ‘natural’ alternatives such as plant-based fibres, oil seeds, natural rubber and forestry products. This causes significant land use change in the model at the expense of food-based agricultural products.
{"title":"Making a material difference: The impacts of a change to plastic-free clothing","authors":"Dominic White, Niven Winchester","doi":"10.1111/1467-8489.12599","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12599","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In 2022, the United Nations (UN) endorsed a resolution to end plastic pollution, with an objective to have a legally binding agreement in place by 2024. The clothing industry uses a significant amount of plastic, which generates plastic pollution through both the mismanagement of clothing waste and microplastics released during the washing of clothes. Consequently, clothing needs to be made without plastic fibres or synthetic chemicals to comply with the UN's resolution and stop contributing to plastic pollution. In this paper, we develop an economy-wide model and impose a tax on the conventional clothing sector or subsidise plastic-free clothing in different regions until all clothing produced is free of plastics and synthetic chemicals. We analyse the impact of these policies on GDP, welfare, output and land use across six policy scenarios. If only some regions tax clothing production and not others, the production of conventional clothing increases in untaxed regions (i.e. there is conventional clothing ‘leakage’). As clothing producers import some of their plastic inputs, increased production of conventional clothing in untaxed regions dampens the reduction in plastic production in regions with a clothing tax. Conventional clothing ‘leakage’ does not occur in the subsidy scenarios, and global plastic production decreases by more compared with tax scenarios. Under both a tax and the subsidy, synthetic chemical and plastic-free clothing production increase global demand for ‘natural’ alternatives such as plant-based fibres, oil seeds, natural rubber and forestry products. This causes significant land use change in the model at the expense of food-based agricultural products.</p>","PeriodicalId":55427,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","volume":"69 1","pages":"200-231"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143118140","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Biosecurity: A Systems Perspective is a book edited by Susan M. Hester, Lucie M. Bland, Edith Arndt, Sana Bau, James S. Camac, Evelyn Mannix, Raphaël Trouvé, and Andrew P. Robinson. Susan is an associate professor at the University of New England Business School. Lucie is a biological scientist, Edith is a biosecurity research fellow and has worked in the public service, Sana is an environmental scientist, James is an applied ecologist, Evelyn is an artificial intelligence research fellow, Raphaël is an ecologist and statistical modeller and Andrew is a statistician. All the editors work at the Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis (CEBRA) at the University of Melbourne in Australia. This book has twenty-five contributors who have backgrounds in agricultural and resource economics, statistics, environmental science, ecology, public policy and business. The majority of the contributors are from Australia with one contributor from New Zealand and another from Hawai'i. Therefore, the perspectives and examples in this book are mostly drawn from the Australian context.
Globally, the rate at which pests and diseases are spreading within and between countries is alarming. This increased rate of spread of pests and diseases is due to various factors such as climate change and globalisation. Consequently, most countries require a robust biosecurity system to reduce the risk of spread of pests and diseases and ultimately their economic, social and environmental impacts. In this book, the authors recognise that pests and diseases have broad impacts on society. Consequently, the authors define a biosecurity system as “a suite of management activities implemented by a jurisdiction to protect its economy, environment and human health from damaging impacts of pests and diseases” (page 5). The authors also suggest that biosecurity should be viewed from a systems perspective as a complex system of interactions between several actors in recognition that biosecurity systems consist of social, economic and political sub-systems all of which need to be considered when managing biosecurity challenges.
The link between economics and risk analysis is an aspect that is always ill-defined making it difficult for economists to clearly see their role in the field of biosecurity. This book provides four broad areas where economics can be applied to biosecurity. First, the authors suggest that a comprehensive risk assessment should include economic evaluation of the consequences of biosecurity threats. Examples of the economic evaluation methods outlined include benefit cost analysis, partial equilibrium models, computable general equilibrium models and non-market valuation techniques. Although it is unlikely that an economist will assess the risk of entry of pests and diseases, the book outlines how such computations are done using examples. This makes it easier for economists to understand the parameters required to evaluate the impact of
《生物安全:系统视角》是一本由Susan M. Hester、Lucie M. Bland、Edith Arndt、Sana Bau、James S. Camac、Evelyn Mannix、Raphaël trouv<s:1>和Andrew P. Robinson编辑的书。Susan是新英格兰大学商学院的副教授。露西是一名生物科学家,伊迪丝是一名生物安全研究员,曾在公共服务部门工作,萨娜是一名环境科学家,詹姆斯是一名应用生态学家,伊芙琳是一名人工智能研究员,Raphaël是一名生态学家和统计建模师,安德鲁是一名统计学家。所有编辑都在澳大利亚墨尔本大学生物安全风险分析卓越中心(CEBRA)工作。这本书有25位作者,他们在农业和资源经济学、统计学、环境科学、生态学、公共政策和商业方面有背景。大多数贡献者来自澳大利亚,一个贡献者来自新西兰,另一个来自夏威夷。因此,本书中的观点和例子大多来自澳大利亚的语境。在全球范围内,病虫害在国家内部和国家之间的传播速度令人震惊。病虫害传播速度的增加是由于气候变化和全球化等各种因素造成的。因此,大多数国家需要一个强有力的生物安全系统,以减少病虫害传播的风险,并最终减少其经济、社会和环境影响。在这本书中,作者认识到病虫害对社会有广泛的影响。因此,作者将生物安全系统定义为“由一个司法管辖区实施的一套管理活动,以保护其经济、环境和人类健康免受病虫害的破坏性影响”(第5页)。作者还建议,生物安全应该从系统的角度被视为几个行动者之间相互作用的复杂系统,认识到生物安全系统由社会、经济和政治子系统在管理生物安全挑战时都需要加以考虑。经济学和风险分析之间的联系一直是一个不明确的方面,这使得经济学家很难清楚地看到他们在生物安全领域的作用。这本书提供了经济学可以应用于生物安全的四个广泛领域。首先,作者建议全面的风险评估应该包括对生物安全威胁后果的经济评估。概述的经济评估方法的例子包括效益成本分析,部分均衡模型,可计算的一般均衡模型和非市场评估技术。尽管经济学家不太可能评估病虫害进入的风险,但该书通过实例概述了如何进行此类计算。这使得经济学家作为多学科或跨学科团队的一部分,更容易理解评估生物安全威胁影响所需的参数。其次,作者强调了经济学在理解不同监管模式影响方面的应用。本书强调的监管模式包括传统的命令和控制(即,对所有货物进行强制性检查),基于风险的监管(即,根据进口货物的风险情况应用检查资源)和激励监管(即,根据监管机构的目标使用奖励和惩罚措施来诱导行为改变)。大多数国家的资源有限,因此,读者可以探索适用于其环境的最具成本效益的监管方法。第三,经济学在生物安全中的应用在第3节中得到强调,该节讨论了监测系统的成本评估。有不同类型的监控系统,每一种都有自己的成本和收益。在本节中,读者将探讨如何开发一个最佳的监控系统,并评估其成本和收益。第四,这组作者强调,经济学可以用来设计生物安全市场,以提高投资生物安全工作的效率和激励。对于大多数农民和决策者来说,生物安全威胁在进入一个国家之前总是无形的,或者被认为是投机性的。这给政府和其他利益攸关方投资生物安全带来了挑战。因此,在本书中,读者可以探索如何将市场工具应用于生物安全以激励生物安全工作。除了阐明经济学在评估生物安全努力和影响方面的应用外,作者还概述了数据收集的创新方法。书中缺少的是如何利用人工智能或类似方法创新地管理生物安全以降低成本的见解。我们生活在人工智能将被广泛应用的时代,机遇与挑战并存。 生物安全通常涉及对多批货物进行检查,以发现生物安全威胁,导致操作成本高;人工智能可以用来降低一些运营成本。如前所述,本书中使用的例子大多来自澳大利亚的背景。澳大利亚和大多数发达国家一样,拥有比发展中国家更完善的生物安全系统。对先进生物安全系统的投资主要是由国际贸易和市场准入推动的。无论如何,本书中提出的观点仍然与发展中国家相关,因为它们可以用来指导开发具有成本效益和弹性的生物安全系统。我喜欢读这本书。这本书就如何开发和管理生物安全系统提供了宝贵的见解。在我看来,这本书对经济学家的价值在于,考虑到管理生物安全系统需要大量资源,以及与生物安全相关的影响和决策过程的复杂性,如何将经济学应用于生物安全。此外,书中提出的观点表明,管理生物安全威胁需要多学科和跨学科的方法,经济学在资源分配和决策中发挥关键作用。因此,我认为无论是发达国家还是发展中国家的政策制定者和研究人员都会觉得这本书值得一读。
{"title":"Biosecurity: a systems perspective By Susan M. Hester, Lucie M. Bland, Edith Arndt, Sana Bau, James S. Camac, Evelyn Mannix, Raphaël Trouvé, Andrew P. Robinson (Ed.), Boca Raton (USA) and Abingdon (UK): CRC Press. 2024. pp. 272, ISBN: 978 103,218 168 4 (hardback), 978 103,218 169 1 (paperback), 978 100,325 320 4 (eBook)","authors":"Walter Okelo","doi":"10.1111/1467-8489.12601","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12601","url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Biosecurity: A Systems Perspective</i> is a book edited by Susan M. Hester, Lucie M. Bland, Edith Arndt, Sana Bau, James S. Camac, Evelyn Mannix, Raphaël Trouvé, and Andrew P. Robinson. Susan is an associate professor at the University of New England Business School. Lucie is a biological scientist, Edith is a biosecurity research fellow and has worked in the public service, Sana is an environmental scientist, James is an applied ecologist, Evelyn is an artificial intelligence research fellow, Raphaël is an ecologist and statistical modeller and Andrew is a statistician. All the editors work at the Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis (CEBRA) at the University of Melbourne in Australia. This book has twenty-five contributors who have backgrounds in agricultural and resource economics, statistics, environmental science, ecology, public policy and business. The majority of the contributors are from Australia with one contributor from New Zealand and another from Hawai'i. Therefore, the perspectives and examples in this book are mostly drawn from the Australian context.</p><p>Globally, the rate at which pests and diseases are spreading within and between countries is alarming. This increased rate of spread of pests and diseases is due to various factors such as climate change and globalisation. Consequently, most countries require a robust biosecurity system to reduce the risk of spread of pests and diseases and ultimately their economic, social and environmental impacts. In this book, the authors recognise that pests and diseases have broad impacts on society. Consequently, the authors define a biosecurity system as “a suite of management activities implemented by a jurisdiction to protect its economy, environment and human health from damaging impacts of pests and diseases” (page 5). The authors also suggest that biosecurity should be viewed from a systems perspective as a complex system of interactions between several actors in recognition that biosecurity systems consist of social, economic and political sub-systems all of which need to be considered when managing biosecurity challenges.</p><p>The link between economics and risk analysis is an aspect that is always ill-defined making it difficult for economists to clearly see their role in the field of biosecurity. This book provides four broad areas where economics can be applied to biosecurity. First, the authors suggest that a comprehensive risk assessment should include economic evaluation of the consequences of biosecurity threats. Examples of the economic evaluation methods outlined include benefit cost analysis, partial equilibrium models, computable general equilibrium models and non-market valuation techniques. Although it is unlikely that an economist will assess the risk of entry of pests and diseases, the book outlines how such computations are done using examples. This makes it easier for economists to understand the parameters required to evaluate the impact of ","PeriodicalId":55427,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","volume":"69 1","pages":"253-254"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8489.12601","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143117604","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Josiah Cleland, Mario A. Fernandez, Gonzalo Villa-Cox
Milk is a near-universal source of essential nutrients and contributes significantly to global nutrient availability. Global demand for milk continues to rise, driven by population growth, rising household incomes and favourable consumption patterns. Plant-based alternatives (PBAs) to milk seek to cater to the preferences of a share of consumers regarding sustainability, lifestyle or health-related matters (e.g. allergies and lactose intolerance). Though popular, PBAs do not stand as suitable nutritional substitutes for milk. These considerations emphasise the complex relationships between nutritional content and consumer preferences. This paper estimates a demand system for milk and PBAs in the New Zealand (NZ) market. We explore patterns of complementarity or substitutability between standard milk, reduced-fat milk and organic milk, and an aggregate group of PBAs. We use these results to calculate nutrient elasticities and assess changes in nutrient availability in response to prices and expenditure variations. We estimate a Quadratic Almost Ideal Demand System using purchase records for 2460 NZ households in 2021. We find that demand for standard milk does not show any substitutional relationship with PBAs. On the contrary, increases in the PBAs price lead households to switch towards standard milk, thereby increasing the availability of essential nutrients. That is, in the case of price increases, milk effectively offsets the reduction in essential nutrients as households switch away from PBAs, but PBAs cannot offset any reduction in essential nutrients as households do not find them to be adequate substitutes for milk.
{"title":"Balancing the cart: Milk, plant-based alternatives and nutrient availability in New Zealand households","authors":"Josiah Cleland, Mario A. Fernandez, Gonzalo Villa-Cox","doi":"10.1111/1467-8489.12595","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12595","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Milk is a near-universal source of essential nutrients and contributes significantly to global nutrient availability. Global demand for milk continues to rise, driven by population growth, rising household incomes and favourable consumption patterns. Plant-based alternatives (PBAs) to milk seek to cater to the preferences of a share of consumers regarding sustainability, lifestyle or health-related matters (e.g. allergies and lactose intolerance). Though popular, PBAs do not stand as suitable nutritional substitutes for milk. These considerations emphasise the complex relationships between nutritional content and consumer preferences. This paper estimates a demand system for milk and PBAs in the New Zealand (NZ) market. We explore patterns of complementarity or substitutability between standard milk, reduced-fat milk and organic milk, and an aggregate group of PBAs. We use these results to calculate nutrient elasticities and assess changes in nutrient availability in response to prices and expenditure variations. We estimate a Quadratic Almost Ideal Demand System using purchase records for 2460 NZ households in 2021. We find that demand for standard milk does not show any substitutional relationship with PBAs. On the contrary, increases in the PBAs price lead households to switch towards standard milk, thereby increasing the availability of essential nutrients. That is, in the case of price increases, milk effectively offsets the reduction in essential nutrients as households switch away from PBAs, but PBAs cannot offset any reduction in essential nutrients as households do not find them to be adequate substitutes for milk.</p>","PeriodicalId":55427,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","volume":"69 1","pages":"25-42"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143113413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This study enhances our comprehension of the performance of farm businesses in Western Australia by estimating persistent and transient technical efficiency measures in the presence of firm-level effects. The analysis is based on a balanced panel data set of 54 farm businesses from the years 2002 to 2011. We employ Kumbhakar et al.'s (2014, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 41, 321) model to estimate persistent efficiency and firm effects separately, as well as Kumbhakar's and Heshmati's (1995, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77, 660) model where these two factors are confounded. Furthermore, we investigate the factors that influence transient and persistent technical efficiency. Our findings reveal that failing to differentiate between persistent technical efficiency and firm effects underestimates the estimates of persistent and overall technical efficiency. This underestimation may result in misguided policy recommendations for improving the technical performance of farm businesses. We also find that persistent efficiency dominates overall technical efficiency. The significant determinants of persistent overall technical efficiency include the regional rainfall zone where a farm business is located, the managerial competency of the farm operator denoted by their age and off-farm activities. Off-farm income plays a crucial role in determining transient technical efficiency.
本研究通过估计存在企业层面效应的持续和短暂技术效率措施,增强了我们对西澳大利亚州农场企业绩效的理解。该分析基于2002年至2011年间54家农场企业的平衡面板数据集。我们采用了Kumbhakar et al. (2014, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 41,321)的模型来分别估计持续效率和企业效应,以及Kumbhakar和Heshmati (1995, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77,660)的模型,其中这两个因素是混淆的。此外,我们还研究了影响暂时性和持续性技术效率的因素。我们的研究结果表明,未能区分持续技术效率和企业效应低估了持续和整体技术效率的估计。这种低估可能会导致错误的政策建议,以改善农业企业的技术绩效。我们还发现,持续效率支配着整体技术效率。持续整体技术效率的重要决定因素包括农场业务所在的区域降雨区,农场经营者的管理能力(由其年龄和非农活动表示)。非农收入是决定暂态技术效率的关键因素。
{"title":"What drives the overall technical efficiency of farm businesses in the Wheatbelt of Western Australia? Analysis of persistent and transient efficiencies in the presence of firm effects","authors":"Steele C. West, Amin W. Mugera, Ross S. Kingwell","doi":"10.1111/1467-8489.12593","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12593","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study enhances our comprehension of the performance of farm businesses in Western Australia by estimating persistent and transient technical efficiency measures in the presence of firm-level effects. The analysis is based on a balanced panel data set of 54 farm businesses from the years 2002 to 2011. We employ Kumbhakar et al.'s (2014, <i>Journal of Productivity Analysis</i>, <b>41</b>, 321) model to estimate persistent efficiency and firm effects separately, as well as Kumbhakar's and Heshmati's (1995, <i>American Journal of Agricultural Economics</i>, <b>77</b>, 660) model where these two factors are confounded. Furthermore, we investigate the factors that influence transient and persistent technical efficiency. Our findings reveal that failing to differentiate between persistent technical efficiency and firm effects underestimates the estimates of persistent and overall technical efficiency. This underestimation may result in misguided policy recommendations for improving the technical performance of farm businesses. We also find that persistent efficiency dominates overall technical efficiency. The significant determinants of persistent overall technical efficiency include the regional rainfall zone where a farm business is located, the managerial competency of the farm operator denoted by their age and off-farm activities. Off-farm income plays a crucial role in determining transient technical efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":55427,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","volume":"69 1","pages":"137-156"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143113446","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This work investigates the linkages among conventional and organic milk markets in France and Germany using the flexible TVP-VAR connectedness approach. Price connectedness tends to be stronger in the spatial than in the quality dimension of the market network. The bulk of the adjustments to incoming price innovations are completed beyond the 3-month frequency range. Organic milk markets are more likely to be net-transmitters of shocks to conventional markets. Total connectedness has not been increasing. The strength of price spillovers between market pairs varies widely with time; their pattern does not, thus pointing to a fairly stable internal network structure.
{"title":"A time-varying and frequency-dependent network of conventional and organic milk markets in France and Germany","authors":"Panos Fousekis","doi":"10.1111/1467-8489.12596","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12596","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This work investigates the linkages among conventional and organic milk markets in France and Germany using the flexible TVP-VAR connectedness approach. Price connectedness tends to be stronger in the spatial than in the quality dimension of the market network. The bulk of the adjustments to incoming price innovations are completed beyond the 3-month frequency range. Organic milk markets are more likely to be net-transmitters of shocks to conventional markets. Total connectedness has not been increasing. The strength of price spillovers between market pairs varies widely with time; their pattern does not, thus pointing to a fairly stable internal network structure.</p>","PeriodicalId":55427,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","volume":"69 1","pages":"43-58"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8489.12596","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143111965","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Our study investigates the impact of genetically modified organism (GMO) regulations on international agricultural trade, with a specific focus on GMO approvals. We analyse the effects of GMO regulations on bilateral trade through three main pathways: productivity enhancements in the exporting country, regulatory dissimilarities between trading partners and the influence of GMO approvals on demand in the importing country. Using a panel data set on corn trade and employing advanced econometric techniques, our findings reveal that GMO cultivation approvals in exporting countries have the most substantial and consistent positive effect on trade. Conversely, the impact of GMO demand approvals in importing countries is relatively smaller and negative. Additionally, regulatory dissimilarities between any two countries become negligible when accounting for the effects of cultivation and demand approvals. Thus, GMO approval regulations exert more significant multilateral effects on trade than bilateral ones.
{"title":"Decomposing the impact of genetically modified organism regulation on bilateral trade: An application to corn trade","authors":"M. Amine Hedoui, John C. Beghin","doi":"10.1111/1467-8489.12591","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12591","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Our study investigates the impact of genetically modified organism (GMO) regulations on international agricultural trade, with a specific focus on GMO approvals. We analyse the effects of GMO regulations on bilateral trade through three main pathways: productivity enhancements in the exporting country, regulatory dissimilarities between trading partners and the influence of GMO approvals on demand in the importing country. Using a panel data set on corn trade and employing advanced econometric techniques, our findings reveal that GMO cultivation approvals in exporting countries have the most substantial and consistent positive effect on trade. Conversely, the impact of GMO demand approvals in importing countries is relatively smaller and negative. Additionally, regulatory dissimilarities between any two countries become negligible when accounting for the effects of cultivation and demand approvals. Thus, GMO approval regulations exert more significant multilateral effects on trade than bilateral ones.</p>","PeriodicalId":55427,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","volume":"69 1","pages":"157-177"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8489.12591","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143116220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In an ever-more-competitive global beverage market, vignerons compete for the attention of consumers by trying to differentiate their wine from others while also responding to technological advances, climate change and evolving demand patterns. In doing so, they highlight their regional and varietal distinctiveness while keeping an eye on changes in consumer preferences for different varieties. This paper examines and seeks to explain the extent to which winegrape varietal mixes vary across regions and over time within Australia and relative to the rest of the world. It reports changes in indices of similarity across regions and indices of concentration in the winegrape varietal mix within regions. Nationally, the varietal mix has become less differentiated and closer to that of France and the world as a whole. However, individual regions within Australia are becoming more concentrated in their mix of varieties and more differentiated from other Australian regions. We estimate supply response models based on a Nerlovian adaptive profit expectations and partial acreage adjustment framework. These models do not provide insights into many of the variables influencing vignerons' planting decisions, but they help explain recent changes in varietal mixes. The results suggest that changes in varietal mixes are more motivated by expected revenues than by what may work best based on the climate of each region. In the wake of climate change and global wine demand premiumising, some Australian vignerons may find their region is too warm for producing high-quality wine with the winegrape varieties planted there.
{"title":"What explains changes in grape varietal mixes in Australia's wine regions?","authors":"German Puga, Kym Anderson","doi":"10.1111/1467-8489.12594","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12594","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In an ever-more-competitive global beverage market, vignerons compete for the attention of consumers by trying to differentiate their wine from others while also responding to technological advances, climate change and evolving demand patterns. In doing so, they highlight their regional and varietal distinctiveness while keeping an eye on changes in consumer preferences for different varieties. This paper examines and seeks to explain the extent to which winegrape varietal mixes vary across regions and over time within Australia and relative to the rest of the world. It reports changes in indices of similarity across regions and indices of concentration in the winegrape varietal mix within regions. Nationally, the varietal mix has become less differentiated and closer to that of France and the world as a whole. However, individual regions within Australia are becoming more concentrated in their mix of varieties and more differentiated from other Australian regions. We estimate supply response models based on a Nerlovian adaptive profit expectations and partial acreage adjustment framework. These models do not provide insights into many of the variables influencing vignerons' planting decisions, but they help explain recent changes in varietal mixes. The results suggest that changes in varietal mixes are more motivated by expected revenues than by what may work best based on the climate of each region. In the wake of climate change and global wine demand premiumising, some Australian vignerons may find their region is too warm for producing high-quality wine with the winegrape varieties planted there.</p>","PeriodicalId":55427,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","volume":"69 1","pages":"121-136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8489.12594","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143116219","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
We present a simple model of internal and external balance that incorporates key features of resource-rich developing countries (RRDCs). The main result is that ‘government take’—the ratio of fiscal resource revenue to resource output—is a key determinant of the equilibrium real exchange rate (ERER) in these countries. Examining the case of Papua New Guinea, which has grappled with foreign exchange restrictions since 2015, we find that about half of the RER overvaluation estimated at 26% in 2019 would disappear if the current low level of government take was to be lifted to its long-term average. The analysis has two key takeaways for RRDCs. First, changes in the government take require adjustments to the RER and fiscal policy to maintain internal and external balance. Second, economic adjustments to falls in the take are difficult; therefore, policies seeking to stabilise the take over time to promote macroeconomic stability are recommended.
{"title":"A simple model of internal and external balance for resource-rich developing countries","authors":"M. H. Davies, M. Schröder","doi":"10.1111/1467-8489.12589","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12589","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We present a simple model of internal and external balance that incorporates key features of resource-rich developing countries (RRDCs). The main result is that ‘government take’—the ratio of fiscal resource revenue to resource output—is a key determinant of the equilibrium real exchange rate (ERER) in these countries. Examining the case of Papua New Guinea, which has grappled with foreign exchange restrictions since 2015, we find that about half of the RER overvaluation estimated at 26% in 2019 would disappear if the current low level of government take was to be lifted to its long-term average. The analysis has two key takeaways for RRDCs. First, changes in the government take require adjustments to the RER and fiscal policy to maintain internal and external balance. Second, economic adjustments to falls in the take are difficult; therefore, policies seeking to stabilise the take over time to promote macroeconomic stability are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":55427,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","volume":"69 1","pages":"178-199"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8489.12589","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143114398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The frequency and severity of drought has been increasing in Southern Africa against the backdrop of an increase in the population of both humans and wildlife, most notably elephants. This has increased the incidents of human–wildlife conflict (HWC) due to competition for food and water, further complicating both conservation efforts and food security for farmer-households juxtaposed to wildlife corridors. We seek insights into these issues by examining the role of drought in inducing HWC in rural Zimbabwe and investigate the effect of HWC on the food-security status of rural households. We utilise data from the 2023 nationally representative survey of rural Zimbabwean households in this endeavour. To avoid the confounding problem associated with self-selection into a HWC household and taking into account the count nature of our outcome variable, we employ the endogenous switching regression model with count data. The results provide three major insights. First, drought occurrence increases the likelihood of HWC among rural farmer-households. Second, HWC increases rural household vulnerability to food insecurity. Finally, the HWC shock is inconsequential on farmer-household food insecurity if the farmer-household has already suffered the drought shock.
{"title":"The interplay of drought, human–wildlife conflict and food security: Insights from rural Zimbabwe","authors":"Terrence Kairiza, Asankha Pallegedara, Lloyd Chigusiwa","doi":"10.1111/1467-8489.12592","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12592","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The frequency and severity of drought has been increasing in Southern Africa against the backdrop of an increase in the population of both humans and wildlife, most notably elephants. This has increased the incidents of human–wildlife conflict (HWC) due to competition for food and water, further complicating both conservation efforts and food security for farmer-households juxtaposed to wildlife corridors. We seek insights into these issues by examining the role of drought in inducing HWC in rural Zimbabwe and investigate the effect of HWC on the food-security status of rural households. We utilise data from the 2023 nationally representative survey of rural Zimbabwean households in this endeavour. To avoid the confounding problem associated with self-selection into a HWC household and taking into account the count nature of our outcome variable, we employ the endogenous switching regression model with count data. The results provide three major insights. First, drought occurrence increases the likelihood of HWC among rural farmer-households. Second, HWC increases rural household vulnerability to food insecurity. Finally, the HWC shock is inconsequential on farmer-household food insecurity if the farmer-household has already suffered the drought shock.</p>","PeriodicalId":55427,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","volume":"69 1","pages":"232-250"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143110602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}