Pub Date : 2020-08-28DOI: 10.26650/turkjhist.2020.007
A. Özaydın
Buyuk Selcuklu Imparatorlugu’na hizmetleriyle taninan Porsukogullari’nin tespit edilen ilk reisi Porsuk’tur. Emir Porsuk, Sultan Tugrul Bey tarafindan Bagdat sahneligine getirilmis (451/1059), Sultan Alp Arslan ile birlikte Malazgirt Savasi’na katilmis, Sultan Meliksah tarafindan da Anadolu’nun fethine memur edilmistir. 490 (1094) yilinda vefat eden Porsuk’tan sonra ayni adi tasiyan oglu Porsuk da Sultan Berkyaruk ve Sultan Muhammed Tapar’in hizmetine girmis ve Haclilara karsi baslatilan cihad harekâtinda onemli sorumluluklar ustlenmistir. Teldânis’te Haclilara maglup olan (509/1115) ve cok uzulen Porsuk birkac ay sonra vefat etmistir (510/1116). Porsukogullari Selcuklular’in Irak siyasetinde onemli rol oynamislardir. Bu makalede Porsukogullari’nin Selcuklular’a hizmetleri ele alinacaktir.
Buyuk Selcuklu Imparatorlugu是Porsukogullari第一位以其服务而闻名的州长。埃米尔·波尔苏克（451/1059）与苏丹阿尔普·阿尔斯兰（Alp Arslan）、马拉兹吉尔特·萨瓦西（Malazgirt Savasi）和苏丹梅里克萨（Meliksah）一起被带到巴格达特（Bagdat）现场。490年（1094年）波尔苏克去世后，同名的塔西安之子波尔苏克、苏丹别尔基亚鲁克和苏丹穆罕默德·塔帕尔加入了军队，并在Cihad的运动中承担了体面的责任，Cihad比Haclira的Baslatilan更重要。在特尔杜尼斯，他在几个月后去世（509/1115）。波尔苏科古拉里在塞尔库克勒的伊拉克政策中发挥了重要作用。在本文中，Porsukogullari的服务将被带到Selcuklular。
{"title":"Büyük Selçuklular’ın Hizmetinde Bir Aile: Porsukoğulları","authors":"A. Özaydın","doi":"10.26650/turkjhist.2020.007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/turkjhist.2020.007","url":null,"abstract":"Buyuk Selcuklu Imparatorlugu’na hizmetleriyle taninan Porsukogullari’nin tespit edilen ilk reisi Porsuk’tur. Emir Porsuk, Sultan Tugrul Bey tarafindan Bagdat sahneligine getirilmis (451/1059), Sultan Alp Arslan ile birlikte Malazgirt Savasi’na katilmis, Sultan Meliksah tarafindan da Anadolu’nun fethine memur edilmistir. 490 (1094) yilinda vefat eden Porsuk’tan sonra ayni adi tasiyan oglu Porsuk da Sultan Berkyaruk ve Sultan Muhammed Tapar’in hizmetine girmis ve Haclilara karsi baslatilan cihad harekâtinda onemli sorumluluklar ustlenmistir. Teldânis’te Haclilara maglup olan (509/1115) ve cok uzulen Porsuk birkac ay sonra vefat etmistir (510/1116). Porsukogullari Selcuklular’in Irak siyasetinde onemli rol oynamislardir. Bu makalede Porsukogullari’nin Selcuklular’a hizmetleri ele alinacaktir.","PeriodicalId":56176,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of History-Tarih Dergisi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46821242","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-08-28DOI: 10.26650/turkjhist.2020.017
Cezmi Eraslan, Umut Dere
Bu makalede, Osmanli Hâriciye Nezâreti’nin bir asirlik zaman zarfinda devletin dis iliskilerinde kazandigi onem tespit edilmeye calisilmistir. Osmanli Disisleri Bakanligi’nin kalici bir devlet kurumu olma sureci XVIII. asrin sonunda ikamet elcilikleriyle baslamistir. Calisma, 1895-1904 donemindeki olaylar ve yazismalar uzerinden kurgulanmistir. Baslangicta bulundugu baskentte yasanan askeri hazirligi dahi teshis edemeyen elcisi ile anilan nezâretin, yuzyilin sonunda imparatorluk merkezine cok uzak olan Uzak Dogu’daki gelismeleri, cikacak savaslari oncesinden padisaha bildirdigi bir seviyeye geldigi gorulmektedir. Osmanli Devleti, kendisinin oyun kurucu aktor olmadigi bu yuzyilda denge politikalari takip etmistir. Sultan II. Abdulhamid devrinde bilhassa dis siyasetteki her gelisme devlete muhtemel etkisi bakimindan yakindan izlenmistir. Rusya ve Ingiltere’nin olasi ittifâkinin sonuclarini tahmin eden II. Abdulhamid, Cin, Japonya, Cava ve Singapur gibi ulkelerde yasayan Uzak Dogu Muslumanlariyla yakin iliskiler kurmustur. Din kardesligi temasi uzerinden gelistirilen egitim calismalari, bagliliklari kuvvetlendirmistir. Bu baglilik, Osmanli Devleti’nin bolge siyasetinde ihmal edilmemesi gerektigini muhataplarina gostermistir.
{"title":"Sultan II. Abdülhamid ve Osmanlı Diplomasisinin Uzak Doğu Gelişmeleriyle İmtihanı (1895-1904)","authors":"Cezmi Eraslan, Umut Dere","doi":"10.26650/turkjhist.2020.017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/turkjhist.2020.017","url":null,"abstract":"Bu makalede, Osmanli Hâriciye Nezâreti’nin bir asirlik zaman zarfinda devletin dis iliskilerinde kazandigi onem tespit edilmeye calisilmistir. Osmanli Disisleri Bakanligi’nin kalici bir devlet kurumu olma sureci XVIII. asrin sonunda ikamet elcilikleriyle baslamistir. Calisma, 1895-1904 donemindeki olaylar ve yazismalar uzerinden kurgulanmistir. Baslangicta bulundugu baskentte yasanan askeri hazirligi dahi teshis edemeyen elcisi ile anilan nezâretin, yuzyilin sonunda imparatorluk merkezine cok uzak olan Uzak Dogu’daki gelismeleri, cikacak savaslari oncesinden padisaha bildirdigi bir seviyeye geldigi gorulmektedir. Osmanli Devleti, kendisinin oyun kurucu aktor olmadigi bu yuzyilda denge politikalari takip etmistir. Sultan II. Abdulhamid devrinde bilhassa dis siyasetteki her gelisme devlete muhtemel etkisi bakimindan yakindan izlenmistir. Rusya ve Ingiltere’nin olasi ittifâkinin sonuclarini tahmin eden II. Abdulhamid, Cin, Japonya, Cava ve Singapur gibi ulkelerde yasayan Uzak Dogu Muslumanlariyla yakin iliskiler kurmustur. Din kardesligi temasi uzerinden gelistirilen egitim calismalari, bagliliklari kuvvetlendirmistir. Bu baglilik, Osmanli Devleti’nin bolge siyasetinde ihmal edilmemesi gerektigini muhataplarina gostermistir.","PeriodicalId":56176,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of History-Tarih Dergisi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41449189","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-01-01DOI: 10.26650/TURKJHIST.2020.005
Ebru Altan
The four major Crusader States (Outremer), founded in the East by the Latins due to the First Crusade, were called a kingdom, county or principality depending on their ruler’s title. The first ruler of the Crusader Kingdom adopted the title of princeps instead of king. Officially, from the the year 1100, rulers of the Kingdom carried the title of king. In these Latin States with a feudal structure, the nobles who were vasals of the king were designated as lord, seigneur or baron. Also, high officers in the most important administrative units of the Outremer were called seneşal, konnetabl, marşal, çemberlayn and şansölye in a hierarchical order. This paper examines the titles of sovereignty, nobility and office holder used in the Crusader States of the Kingdom of Jerusalem, the Principality of Antioch, the County of Edesa and the County of Tripoli.
{"title":"About the Titles Used in The Crusader States (Outremer)","authors":"Ebru Altan","doi":"10.26650/TURKJHIST.2020.005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/TURKJHIST.2020.005","url":null,"abstract":"The four major Crusader States (Outremer), founded in the East by the Latins due to the First Crusade, were called a kingdom, county or principality depending on their ruler’s title. The first ruler of the Crusader Kingdom adopted the title of princeps instead of king. Officially, from the the year 1100, rulers of the Kingdom carried the title of king. In these Latin States with a feudal structure, the nobles who were vasals of the king were designated as lord, seigneur or baron. Also, high officers in the most important administrative units of the Outremer were called seneşal, konnetabl, marşal, çemberlayn and şansölye in a hierarchical order. This paper examines the titles of sovereignty, nobility and office holder used in the Crusader States of the Kingdom of Jerusalem, the Principality of Antioch, the County of Edesa and the County of Tripoli.","PeriodicalId":56176,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of History-Tarih Dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69061427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-06-01DOI: 10.26650/TURKJHIST.2019.18004
Gökhan Kağnıcı
In this study, we will focus on the illnesses and disabilities mentioned in the Neo-Babylonian Chronicles Series (ABC 1-7 and MC 16-17, 21-26) which were compiled in the second half of the first millennium BC. The information in these records will be evaluated with regards to medical history in the first millennium BC. Particular attention will be given to the details concerning illnesses with fatal consequences for Mesopotamian and Elamite kings who had ruled before the time that the texts were compiled. It is very important to think about why the medical problems in question are included in some of the chronicles since the chronicles speak of accounts of noteworthy political and military events in general. Including information about the medical disorders concerning kings, the chronicles contents can contribute to evaluations of the relationship between the political, religious and traditional aspects of Babylonian historiography. The modern assumption, that Neo-Babylonian and certain other chronicles are “models of historical probity” and impartial texts sharing a historical critique on the records of the kings’ illnesses, will be discussed. This study is related to the historical period between the middle of the third millenium and the end of the sixth century BC. In addition, other chronicles such as the Weidner Chronicle and the Chronicle of Early Kings concerning this period will be referenced considerably as well. Cite this article as : Kagnici, Gokhan, “Tibbi Bilginin Ideolojik Kullanimi Uzerine Okumalar: Yeni Babil Kroniklerinde Hastaliklar ve Babil Tarih Yaziciligi”, Turk J Hist sayi 69 (2019), s.1-36.
在本研究中，我们将重点关注新巴比伦编年史系列(ABC 1-7和MC 16- 17,21 -26)中提到的疾病和残疾，这些编年史是在公元前一千年的下半叶编写的。这些记录中的信息将根据公元前一千年的病史进行评估。特别要注意的是，在编写文本之前统治的美索不达米亚和埃兰国王的致命疾病的细节。重要的是要思考为什么有问题的医疗问题被包括在一些编年史中，因为编年史讲述的是值得注意的政治和军事事件。编年史内容包括有关国王的医疗疾病的信息，有助于评估巴比伦史学的政治、宗教和传统方面之间的关系。现代的假设，即新巴比伦和某些其他编年史是“历史诚实的典范”和公正的文本分享对国王疾病记录的历史批判，将被讨论。这项研究与公元前三千年中期到公元前六世纪末之间的历史时期有关。此外，其他编年史，如《魏德纳编年史》和《早期国王编年史》也将被大量引用。引用本文为:Kagnici, Gokhan，“Tibbi Bilginin Ideolojik Kullanimi Uzerine Okumalar: Yeni Babil kronikleinde hasaliklar ve Babil Tarih Yaziciligi”，土耳其历史研究，69(2019)，第1-36页。
{"title":"IDEOLOGICAL READINGS THROUGH THE MEDICAL RECORDS: ILLNESSES IN THE NEO-BABYLONIAN CHRONICLES AND BABYLONIAN HISTORIOGRAPHY","authors":"Gökhan Kağnıcı","doi":"10.26650/TURKJHIST.2019.18004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/TURKJHIST.2019.18004","url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we will focus on the illnesses and disabilities mentioned in the Neo-Babylonian Chronicles Series (ABC 1-7 and MC 16-17, 21-26) which were compiled in the second half of the first millennium BC. The information in these records will be evaluated with regards to medical history in the first millennium BC. Particular attention will be given to the details concerning illnesses with fatal consequences for Mesopotamian and Elamite kings who had ruled before the time that the texts were compiled. It is very important to think about why the medical problems in question are included in some of the chronicles since the chronicles speak of accounts of noteworthy political and military events in general. Including information about the medical disorders concerning kings, the chronicles contents can contribute to evaluations of the relationship between the political, religious and traditional aspects of Babylonian historiography. The modern assumption, that Neo-Babylonian and certain other chronicles are “models of historical probity” and impartial texts sharing a historical critique on the records of the kings’ illnesses, will be discussed. This study is related to the historical period between the middle of the third millenium and the end of the sixth century BC. In addition, other chronicles such as the Weidner Chronicle and the Chronicle of Early Kings concerning this period will be referenced considerably as well. Cite this article as : Kagnici, Gokhan, “Tibbi Bilginin Ideolojik Kullanimi Uzerine Okumalar: Yeni Babil Kroniklerinde Hastaliklar ve Babil Tarih Yaziciligi”, Turk J Hist sayi 69 (2019), s.1-36.","PeriodicalId":56176,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of History-Tarih Dergisi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45864192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-06-01DOI: 10.26650/TURKJHIST.2019.18010
B. Yildizeli
The British occupation of Egypt in 1882 meant a breakaway from the Anglo-French entente’s control over Ottoman financial system and the end of the Liberal Government’s ‘reluctant’ imperialism. When the Liberal ministry began in 1880, the cabinet immediately focused on foreign policies towards the Ottoman Empire subsequent to Gladstone’s campaign during the Bulgarian Agitation which had already turned out to be a party question. The protection of the Suez Canal as well as the interests of the British bondholders and the prestige of the British Empire was vital, which united the Liberal ministry and the Conservatives under the same purpose. Despite late Ottoman approval, the occupation signified the edge of Anglo-Ottoman alliance during the nineteenth century. This study will analyse why the Egyptian question is important for British party politics and to what extend the Anglo-Ottoman relations was affected with these circumstances. Cite this article as : Yildizeli, Begum, “An Analysis of The British Invasion of Egypt (1882) Through the Lens of Viictorian Party Politics”, Turk J Hist, issue 69 (2019), p.113-134.
{"title":"An Analysis of The British Invasion of Egypt (1882) Through the Lens of VICTORIAN Party Politics","authors":"B. Yildizeli","doi":"10.26650/TURKJHIST.2019.18010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/TURKJHIST.2019.18010","url":null,"abstract":"The British occupation of Egypt in 1882 meant a breakaway from the Anglo-French entente’s control over Ottoman financial system and the end of the Liberal Government’s ‘reluctant’ imperialism. When the Liberal ministry began in 1880, the cabinet immediately focused on foreign policies towards the Ottoman Empire subsequent to Gladstone’s campaign during the Bulgarian Agitation which had already turned out to be a party question. The protection of the Suez Canal as well as the interests of the British bondholders and the prestige of the British Empire was vital, which united the Liberal ministry and the Conservatives under the same purpose. Despite late Ottoman approval, the occupation signified the edge of Anglo-Ottoman alliance during the nineteenth century. This study will analyse why the Egyptian question is important for British party politics and to what extend the Anglo-Ottoman relations was affected with these circumstances. Cite this article as : Yildizeli, Begum, “An Analysis of The British Invasion of Egypt (1882) Through the Lens of Viictorian Party Politics”, Turk J Hist, issue 69 (2019), p.113-134.","PeriodicalId":56176,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of History-Tarih Dergisi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48647230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-06-01DOI: 10.26650/TURKJHIST.2019.19001
Arda Baş
Filistin Uzlastirma Komisyonu, BM catisi altinda Filistin meselesini cozmek amaciyla gerceklestirilen en onemli girisimlerden biridir. Komisyon 1948’de guclu bir sekilde cozum calismalarina girismis, ancak 1952’ye kadar devam eden aktif girisimlerinden bir sonuc alamayinca, Filistin meselesine cozum uretmek konusunda yetersiz oldugunu aciklayarak 1960’li yillarin ilk yarisinda sessiz bir sekilde sona ermistir. Bu calismada komisyonun calismalari, Turkiye’nin Batili ulkeler ile birlikte calistigi komisyon icindeki rolu ve faaliyetlerinin Turk dis politikasi acisindan onemi incelenmis ve komisyonun basarisiz olmasinin nedenleri irdelenmistir. Cite this article as : Bas, Arda, “Filistin Uzlastirma Komisyonu ve Turkiye”, Turk J Hist sayi 69 (2019), s.135-168.
{"title":"PALESTINE CONCILIATION COMMISSION AND TURKEY","authors":"Arda Baş","doi":"10.26650/TURKJHIST.2019.19001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/TURKJHIST.2019.19001","url":null,"abstract":"Filistin Uzlastirma Komisyonu, BM catisi altinda Filistin meselesini cozmek amaciyla gerceklestirilen en onemli girisimlerden biridir. Komisyon 1948’de guclu bir sekilde cozum calismalarina girismis, ancak 1952’ye kadar devam eden aktif girisimlerinden bir sonuc alamayinca, Filistin meselesine cozum uretmek konusunda yetersiz oldugunu aciklayarak 1960’li yillarin ilk yarisinda sessiz bir sekilde sona ermistir. Bu calismada komisyonun calismalari, Turkiye’nin Batili ulkeler ile birlikte calistigi komisyon icindeki rolu ve faaliyetlerinin Turk dis politikasi acisindan onemi incelenmis ve komisyonun basarisiz olmasinin nedenleri irdelenmistir. Cite this article as : Bas, Arda, “Filistin Uzlastirma Komisyonu ve Turkiye”, Turk J Hist sayi 69 (2019), s.135-168.","PeriodicalId":56176,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of History-Tarih Dergisi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42496211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-06-01DOI: 10.26650/TURKJHIST.2019.19014
M. Korkmaz
Two Ottoman warships departed from Istanbul and were incorporated in the fleet in Basra four years before the Suez Canal was completed in 1869. These corvettes, called Izmir and Bursa, reached Basra at the end of the difficult 15-month long trip after sailing through Gibraltar and stopping in Spain, Brazil and Cape Town. For the first time in Ottoman history, sending battleships from Istanbul to Basra and the first voyage of these ships in the ocean were some of the highlights of this course. The aim of this study is to clarify a phase of Turkish maritime history and to explore the journey of two Ottoman corvettes between Istanbul and Basra. Another purpose of the study is to find out the strategic purpose and the effect of sending these corvettes to Basra. The main sources of this article are the memories of Engineer Faik and Imam Abdurrahman Efendi, who were assigned in the Bursa Corvette and the report prepared by Commander and Lieutenant Colonel Ahmed Bey. Although the first two studies are known, the fact that the Colonel Ahmed Bey's report has never been used so far is one of the reasons why this article is unique. This work was also supported by archival documents. As a result of the research carried out in the Ottoman Archives and the Naval History Archives, it was found that there were documents about the preparation of the corvettes and the money needed for repairs and replenishment during the voyage. These sources provided a better understanding of the subject. Cite this article as : Korkmaz, Mehmet, “Istanbul’dan Basra’ya Gonderilen Ilk Osmanli Harp Gemileri: Bursa ve Izmir Korvetlerinin Seyir Gunlugu (24 Eylul 1865-3 Aralik 1866)”, Turk J Hist, issue 69 (2019), p.87-112.
两艘奥斯曼战舰从伊斯坦布尔出发，在1869年苏伊士运河完工前四年在巴士拉并入舰队。这两艘名为伊兹密尔号(Izmir)和布尔萨号(Bursa)的轻型护卫舰经过直布罗陀，在西班牙、巴西和开普敦停留，经过15个月的艰难旅程，最终抵达巴士拉。这是奥斯曼帝国历史上第一次将战列舰从伊斯坦布尔派遣到巴士拉，以及这些战列舰在海洋中的首次航行，这些都是本课程的亮点。本研究的目的是澄清土耳其海事历史的一个阶段，并探索两艘奥斯曼轻型护卫舰在伊斯坦布尔和巴士拉之间的旅程。这项研究的另一个目的是找出将这些轻型护卫舰派往巴士拉的战略目的和效果。这篇文章的主要来源是被派到布尔萨轻型护卫舰上的法伊克工程师和伊玛目·阿布杜拉赫曼·埃芬迪的回忆以及指挥官和中校艾哈迈德·贝伊编写的报告。虽然前两项研究是已知的，但Ahmed Bey上校的报告迄今从未被使用这一事实是这篇文章独特的原因之一。这项工作也得到了档案文件的支持。根据在奥斯曼档案馆和海军历史档案馆进行的研究，发现有关于轻型护卫舰的准备工作和航行中维修和补给所需资金的文件。这些资料提供了对这个主题更好的理解。《土耳其历史》，2019年第69期，第87-112页。引用本文:柯尔克马兹:《伊斯坦布尔- Basra 'ya Gonderilen Ilk Osmanli Harp Gemileri: Bursa ve Izmir Korvetlerinin Seyir Gunlugu (24 Eylul 1865-3 Aralik 1866)》
{"title":"The First Ottoman Warships from Istabul to Basra: The Journals of the Bursa and Izmir Corvettes (September 24, 1865-December 3, 1866)","authors":"M. Korkmaz","doi":"10.26650/TURKJHIST.2019.19014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/TURKJHIST.2019.19014","url":null,"abstract":"Two Ottoman warships departed from Istanbul and were incorporated in the fleet in Basra four years before the Suez Canal was completed in 1869. These corvettes, called Izmir and Bursa, reached Basra at the end of the difficult 15-month long trip after sailing through Gibraltar and stopping in Spain, Brazil and Cape Town. For the first time in Ottoman history, sending battleships from Istanbul to Basra and the first voyage of these ships in the ocean were some of the highlights of this course. The aim of this study is to clarify a phase of Turkish maritime history and to explore the journey of two Ottoman corvettes between Istanbul and Basra. Another purpose of the study is to find out the strategic purpose and the effect of sending these corvettes to Basra. The main sources of this article are the memories of Engineer Faik and Imam Abdurrahman Efendi, who were assigned in the Bursa Corvette and the report prepared by Commander and Lieutenant Colonel Ahmed Bey. Although the first two studies are known, the fact that the Colonel Ahmed Bey's report has never been used so far is one of the reasons why this article is unique. This work was also supported by archival documents. As a result of the research carried out in the Ottoman Archives and the Naval History Archives, it was found that there were documents about the preparation of the corvettes and the money needed for repairs and replenishment during the voyage. These sources provided a better understanding of the subject. Cite this article as : Korkmaz, Mehmet, “Istanbul’dan Basra’ya Gonderilen Ilk Osmanli Harp Gemileri: Bursa ve Izmir Korvetlerinin Seyir Gunlugu (24 Eylul 1865-3 Aralik 1866)”, Turk J Hist, issue 69 (2019), p.87-112.","PeriodicalId":56176,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of History-Tarih Dergisi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43991815","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-06-01DOI: 10.26650/TURKJHIST.2019.19004
Yahya Koç
Şihâboglu emirlerinin yuruttugu Cebel-i Şuf emirligi, Osmanli hukumetinin gozunde Sayda sehrinin kuzeydogusunda yer alan Şuf Dagi ve etrafindaki mukataalarin toplamindan ibaret bir mukataaydi. Şihâboglu emirleri, 18. yuzyilda bu mukataalarin iltizamini Sayda valilerinin elinden almislar ve kendi taraftarlari olan Durzi ailelere yeniden iltizama vermislerdir. Şihâbogullari, bolgede diger yerel guclerle mucadele edip yerel iktidarlarini tesis ederken mukataa sisteminin sagladigi idari-mali statuden bir mesruiyet kaynagi olarak yararlanmislardir. Şihâbogullari bu statu dolayisiyla Osmanli Imparatorlugu’nun burokratik denetim sureclerine dahil edilmislerdir. Cite this article as : Koc, Yahya, “Yerel Iktidar ve Denetim Baglaminda Şihâbogullari ve Cebel-i Şuf Emâreti (1697-1770)”, Turk J Hist, issue 69 (2019), p.51-86.
{"title":"THE SHIHĀB FAMİLY AND THE EMIRATE OF JABAL SHUF IN THE CONTEXT OF LOCAL POWER AND CONTROL (1697-1770)","authors":"Yahya Koç","doi":"10.26650/TURKJHIST.2019.19004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/TURKJHIST.2019.19004","url":null,"abstract":"Şihâboglu emirlerinin yuruttugu Cebel-i Şuf emirligi, Osmanli hukumetinin gozunde Sayda sehrinin kuzeydogusunda yer alan Şuf Dagi ve etrafindaki mukataalarin toplamindan ibaret bir mukataaydi. Şihâboglu emirleri, 18. yuzyilda bu mukataalarin iltizamini Sayda valilerinin elinden almislar ve kendi taraftarlari olan Durzi ailelere yeniden iltizama vermislerdir. Şihâbogullari, bolgede diger yerel guclerle mucadele edip yerel iktidarlarini tesis ederken mukataa sisteminin sagladigi idari-mali statuden bir mesruiyet kaynagi olarak yararlanmislardir. Şihâbogullari bu statu dolayisiyla Osmanli Imparatorlugu’nun burokratik denetim sureclerine dahil edilmislerdir. Cite this article as : Koc, Yahya, “Yerel Iktidar ve Denetim Baglaminda Şihâbogullari ve Cebel-i Şuf Emâreti (1697-1770)”, Turk J Hist, issue 69 (2019), p.51-86.","PeriodicalId":56176,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of History-Tarih Dergisi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47451946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-06-01DOI: 10.26650/TURKJHIST.2019.18016
Vural Genç
Fatih’in Istanbul’u fethetmesinden sonra Islam dunyasina yayilan sohreti, sarayina ozellikle Iran’dan bircok ulema, suara ve sanatkârin gelmesine yol acti. Bunlardan Ma’âli, Kâsifi, Hamidi ve Kabuli gibi sahnameci ve edipler padisah adina eserler ve kasideler kaleme aldilar. Acem’den gelenler arasinda bugun neredeyse hic bilinmeyen ve bu makalenin konusu olan Riyâzi-i Semerkandi, Ma’âli ve Kâsifi gibi sahname turunde bir eser vermese de hamisi Fatih icin yeni bir imaj insa etme yolunda cokca caba sarf etti. Bu makalede Fatih’in himayesindeki Riyâzi-i Semerkandi’nin formule ettigi elkab ve unvan uzerinden padisah icin imaj insasi cabalarina deginilecektir. Cite this article as : Genc, Vural, “Fatih’in Emperyal Imajina Bir Acem’in Katkisi: Riyâzi-i Semerkandi e”, Turk J Hist sayi 69 (2019), s.37-50.
Fatih’in Istanbul’u fethetmsinden sonra Islam dunyasina yayilan sohreti，sarayina ozellikle Iran’dan bircok ulema，suara ve sanatkârin gelmesine yol activi。在这些人中，有圣殿的表演者，和建筑工人，木匠，建筑工人，和木匠。在那些今天从悲痛中走出来的人中，这篇文章的故事几乎是未知的，如果不像里亚齐·塞梅尔坎迪、马阿尔和卡西菲那样大放异彩，很难为法提赫创造一个新的形象。在这篇文章中，法提赫制定的里亚齐·塞梅尔坎迪的形象将以君主制的形式被考虑在内。●引用本文为：Genc，Vural，“Fatih’in Emperyal Imajina Bir Acem’in Katkisi:Riyâzi-i Semerkandi e”，Turk J Hist sayi 69（2019），s.37-50。
{"title":"THE CONTRUBUTION OF AN IRANIAN LITERARY MAN TO THE IMPERIAL IMAGE OF THE MEHMED THE CONQUEROR: MAWLANA RIYAZI-I SAMARQANDI","authors":"Vural Genç","doi":"10.26650/TURKJHIST.2019.18016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/TURKJHIST.2019.18016","url":null,"abstract":"Fatih’in Istanbul’u fethetmesinden sonra Islam dunyasina yayilan sohreti, sarayina ozellikle Iran’dan bircok ulema, suara ve sanatkârin gelmesine yol acti. Bunlardan Ma’âli, Kâsifi, Hamidi ve Kabuli gibi sahnameci ve edipler padisah adina eserler ve kasideler kaleme aldilar. Acem’den gelenler arasinda bugun neredeyse hic bilinmeyen ve bu makalenin konusu olan Riyâzi-i Semerkandi, Ma’âli ve Kâsifi gibi sahname turunde bir eser vermese de hamisi Fatih icin yeni bir imaj insa etme yolunda cokca caba sarf etti. Bu makalede Fatih’in himayesindeki Riyâzi-i Semerkandi’nin formule ettigi elkab ve unvan uzerinden padisah icin imaj insasi cabalarina deginilecektir. Cite this article as : Genc, Vural, “Fatih’in Emperyal Imajina Bir Acem’in Katkisi: Riyâzi-i Semerkandi e”, Turk J Hist sayi 69 (2019), s.37-50.","PeriodicalId":56176,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of History-Tarih Dergisi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44104707","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：