首页 > 最新文献

Cancer Epidemiology最新文献

英文 中文
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) mortality in Vietnam war era veterans.
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2024.102721
T Bullman, W J Culpepper, Y S Cypel, F Akhtar, S W Morley, A Schneiderman, J C Weitlauf, E Garges, V J Davey

Background: There is concern about the risk of cholangiocarcinoma mortality (CCA) among U.S. veterans who deployed to the Vietnam War theater. A variety of risk factors potentially related to Vietnam deployment may be associated with an increased risk of mortality from CCA. This study assessed the risk of CCA mortality among all Vietnam War era veterans, the first study to do so.

Methods: The Vietnam Era Veterans Mortality Study is a retrospective mortality study of all 2.5 million veterans who served in Vietnam and Southeast Asia (theater) and the 7.3 million veterans who served elsewhere during the Vietnam War (non-theater). Mortality was followed from 1979 to 2019. Hazard ratios (HRs) calculated from Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for sex and age, compared CCA mortality risk between theater and non-theater veterans overall and by branch of service. Branch specific crude rates of CCA were also compared between theater and non-theater veterans.

Results: There were 2410 and 6502 CCA deaths among all theater and non-theater veterans respectively. Overall, there was no increased CCA mortality risk among theater versus non-theater veterans after adjusting for sex and age (hazard ratio, (HR: 1.00, 95 % CI: 0.95-1.04). When stratified by branch, the crude HRs for CCA were no different between branch-theater status groups except in non-theater Marines who had lower risk. A monotonic increase in crude rates for CCA mortality was observed in both theater and non-theater over forty years of follow-up.

Conclusion: There was no increased risk of CCA mortality in theater versus non-theater U.S. Vietnam War veterans, an important and new finding. This study lacked data on environmental exposures and behavioral factors that would further inform analyses of CCA risk. Identification of Vietnam era veterans' specific risk factors for CCA would require alternate methods and data which do not exist.

{"title":"Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) mortality in Vietnam war era veterans.","authors":"T Bullman, W J Culpepper, Y S Cypel, F Akhtar, S W Morley, A Schneiderman, J C Weitlauf, E Garges, V J Davey","doi":"10.1016/j.canep.2024.102721","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2024.102721","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is concern about the risk of cholangiocarcinoma mortality (CCA) among U.S. veterans who deployed to the Vietnam War theater. A variety of risk factors potentially related to Vietnam deployment may be associated with an increased risk of mortality from CCA. This study assessed the risk of CCA mortality among all Vietnam War era veterans, the first study to do so.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Vietnam Era Veterans Mortality Study is a retrospective mortality study of all 2.5 million veterans who served in Vietnam and Southeast Asia (theater) and the 7.3 million veterans who served elsewhere during the Vietnam War (non-theater). Mortality was followed from 1979 to 2019. Hazard ratios (HRs) calculated from Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for sex and age, compared CCA mortality risk between theater and non-theater veterans overall and by branch of service. Branch specific crude rates of CCA were also compared between theater and non-theater veterans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 2410 and 6502 CCA deaths among all theater and non-theater veterans respectively. Overall, there was no increased CCA mortality risk among theater versus non-theater veterans after adjusting for sex and age (hazard ratio, (HR: 1.00, 95 % CI: 0.95-1.04). When stratified by branch, the crude HRs for CCA were no different between branch-theater status groups except in non-theater Marines who had lower risk. A monotonic increase in crude rates for CCA mortality was observed in both theater and non-theater over forty years of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no increased risk of CCA mortality in theater versus non-theater U.S. Vietnam War veterans, an important and new finding. This study lacked data on environmental exposures and behavioral factors that would further inform analyses of CCA risk. Identification of Vietnam era veterans' specific risk factors for CCA would require alternate methods and data which do not exist.</p>","PeriodicalId":56322,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology","volume":"94 ","pages":"102721"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142807368","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Barriers to lung cancer screening.
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2024.102722
Sameer Rehman, Mike Lim, Ranjit Sidhu, Phil Ramis, Eric Rohren

Introduction: Despite efforts to improve national lung cancer screening rates, only 4 % of eligible high-risk patients pursue this opportunity annually.

Objective: The goal of this study was to better understand the system, provider, and patient-level barriers to lung cancer screening METHODS: 300 high-risk patients in the southern Nevada region who met the criteria for lung cancer screening were given a questionnaire during their outpatient visit for low dose chest CT from August 2023 through February 2024.

Results: The most common reported barriers were absence of symptoms (38 %), not wishing to know that they had cancer (30 %), and not having awareness of the eligibility for CT screening (24 %).

Conclusion: A multifactorial approach is indicated to provide education for high-risk patients to clarify the importance of early diagnosis, demonstrate accessibility and low cost for lung cancer screening, and absolve any misconceptions about lung cancer screening.

{"title":"Barriers to lung cancer screening.","authors":"Sameer Rehman, Mike Lim, Ranjit Sidhu, Phil Ramis, Eric Rohren","doi":"10.1016/j.canep.2024.102722","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2024.102722","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite efforts to improve national lung cancer screening rates, only 4 % of eligible high-risk patients pursue this opportunity annually.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goal of this study was to better understand the system, provider, and patient-level barriers to lung cancer screening METHODS: 300 high-risk patients in the southern Nevada region who met the criteria for lung cancer screening were given a questionnaire during their outpatient visit for low dose chest CT from August 2023 through February 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common reported barriers were absence of symptoms (38 %), not wishing to know that they had cancer (30 %), and not having awareness of the eligibility for CT screening (24 %).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A multifactorial approach is indicated to provide education for high-risk patients to clarify the importance of early diagnosis, demonstrate accessibility and low cost for lung cancer screening, and absolve any misconceptions about lung cancer screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":56322,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology","volume":"94 ","pages":"102722"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142796634","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Understanding current trends and incidence projections of prostate cancer in India: A comprehensive analysis of national and regional data from the global burden of disease study (1990 -2021).
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2024.102719
Vijay Kumar, Quazi Syed Zahiruddin, Diptismita Jena, Suhas Ballal, Sanjay Kumar, Mahakshit Bhat, Shilpa Sharma, M Ravi Kumar, Sarvesh Rustagi, Abhay M Gaidhane, Lara Jain, Sanjit Sah, Muhammed Shabil

Background: The study aims to explore the burden and trends of prostate cancer (PC) in India at the state level from 1990 to 2021, using data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 study.

Methods: The health metrics including age-standardised incidence rates (ASIR), prevalence rates (ASPR), disability-adjusted life years (ASDR), and mortality rates (ASMR) per 100,000 for PC were analysed across Indian states and union territories. Join point regression analysis was employed to identify significant changes in these metrics over time. Projection of ASIR were done using auto-regressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model.

Results: The age-wise distribution of PC showed increased in ASIR, ASPR, ASDR, ASMR among older age, majorly in the 75-79 years age group. From 1990-2021, the average annual percentage change (AAPC) in ASIR, ASPR, ASMR and ASDR increased by 157 %, 278 %, 76 % and 58 % respectively. Projections indicate a further rise in ASIR to 9.15 per 100,000 by 2031. The join point analysis showed the highest annual percentage change (APC) between 1992 and 1995 period in all health metrics. Despite Gujarat state showing the highest total percentage change in all health metrics when considering regional variations, Delhi and Kerala still remain the highest overall.

Conclusion: The study emphasises the growing burden of PC in India, highlighting the need for improved diagnostic practices, localized screening guidelines, and targeted public health interventions.

{"title":"Understanding current trends and incidence projections of prostate cancer in India: A comprehensive analysis of national and regional data from the global burden of disease study (1990 -2021).","authors":"Vijay Kumar, Quazi Syed Zahiruddin, Diptismita Jena, Suhas Ballal, Sanjay Kumar, Mahakshit Bhat, Shilpa Sharma, M Ravi Kumar, Sarvesh Rustagi, Abhay M Gaidhane, Lara Jain, Sanjit Sah, Muhammed Shabil","doi":"10.1016/j.canep.2024.102719","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2024.102719","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study aims to explore the burden and trends of prostate cancer (PC) in India at the state level from 1990 to 2021, using data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The health metrics including age-standardised incidence rates (ASIR), prevalence rates (ASPR), disability-adjusted life years (ASDR), and mortality rates (ASMR) per 100,000 for PC were analysed across Indian states and union territories. Join point regression analysis was employed to identify significant changes in these metrics over time. Projection of ASIR were done using auto-regressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The age-wise distribution of PC showed increased in ASIR, ASPR, ASDR, ASMR among older age, majorly in the 75-79 years age group. From 1990-2021, the average annual percentage change (AAPC) in ASIR, ASPR, ASMR and ASDR increased by 157 %, 278 %, 76 % and 58 % respectively. Projections indicate a further rise in ASIR to 9.15 per 100,000 by 2031. The join point analysis showed the highest annual percentage change (APC) between 1992 and 1995 period in all health metrics. Despite Gujarat state showing the highest total percentage change in all health metrics when considering regional variations, Delhi and Kerala still remain the highest overall.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study emphasises the growing burden of PC in India, highlighting the need for improved diagnostic practices, localized screening guidelines, and targeted public health interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":56322,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology","volume":"94 ","pages":"102719"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142787847","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating the quality of prostate cancer diagnosis recording in CPRD GOLD and CPRD Aurum primary care databases for observational research: A study using linked English electronic health records
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2024.102715
Gayasha Somathilake , Elizabeth Ford , Jo Armes , Sotiris Moschoyiannis , Michelle Collins , Patrick Francsics , Agnieszka Lemanska

Background

Primary care data in the UK are widely used for cancer research, but the reliability of recording key events like diagnoses remains uncertain. Although data linkage can improve reliability, its costs, time requirements, and sample size constraints may discourage its use. We evaluated accuracy, completeness, and date concordance of prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis recording in Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD and Aurum compared to linked Cancer Registry (CR) and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) Admitted Patient Care (APC) in England.

Methods

Incident PCa diagnoses (2000–2016) for males aged ≥46 at diagnosis who remained registered with their General Practitioner (GP) by age 65 and were recorded in at least one data source were analysed. Accuracy was the proportion of diagnoses recorded in GOLD or Aurum with a corresponding record in CR or HES. Completeness was the proportion of CR or HES diagnoses with a corresponding record in GOLD or Aurum.

Results

The final cohorts for comparisons included 29,500 records for GOLD and 26,475 for Aurum. Compared to CR, GOLD was 86 % accurate and 65 % complete, while Aurum was 87 % accurate and 77 % complete. Compared to HES, GOLD was 76 % accurate and 60 % complete, and Aurum was 79 % accurate and 70 % complete. Concordance in diagnosis dates improved over time in both GOLD and Aurum, with 93 % of diagnoses recorded within a year compared to CR, and 66 % (GOLD) and 71 % (Aurum) compared to HES. Delays of 2–3 weeks in primary care diagnosis recording were observed compared to CR, whereas most diagnoses appeared at least 3 months earlier in primary care than in HES.

Conclusions

Aurum demonstrated better accuracy and completeness for PCa diagnosis recording than GOLD. However, linkage to HES or CR is recommended for improved case capture. Researchers should address the limitations of each data source to ensure research validity.
{"title":"Evaluating the quality of prostate cancer diagnosis recording in CPRD GOLD and CPRD Aurum primary care databases for observational research: A study using linked English electronic health records","authors":"Gayasha Somathilake ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Ford ,&nbsp;Jo Armes ,&nbsp;Sotiris Moschoyiannis ,&nbsp;Michelle Collins ,&nbsp;Patrick Francsics ,&nbsp;Agnieszka Lemanska","doi":"10.1016/j.canep.2024.102715","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.canep.2024.102715","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Primary care data in the UK are widely used for cancer research, but the reliability of recording key events like diagnoses remains uncertain. Although data linkage can improve reliability, its costs, time requirements, and sample size constraints may discourage its use. We evaluated accuracy, completeness, and date concordance of prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis recording in Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD and Aurum compared to linked Cancer Registry (CR) and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) Admitted Patient Care (APC) in England.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Incident PCa diagnoses (2000–2016) for males aged ≥46 at diagnosis who remained registered with their General Practitioner (GP) by age 65 and were recorded in at least one data source were analysed. Accuracy was the proportion of diagnoses recorded in GOLD or Aurum with a corresponding record in CR or HES. Completeness was the proportion of CR or HES diagnoses with a corresponding record in GOLD or Aurum.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The final cohorts for comparisons included 29,500 records for GOLD and 26,475 for Aurum. Compared to CR, GOLD was 86 % accurate and 65 % complete, while Aurum was 87 % accurate and 77 % complete. Compared to HES, GOLD was 76 % accurate and 60 % complete, and Aurum was 79 % accurate and 70 % complete. Concordance in diagnosis dates improved over time in both GOLD and Aurum, with 93 % of diagnoses recorded within a year compared to CR, and 66 % (GOLD) and 71 % (Aurum) compared to HES. Delays of 2–3 weeks in primary care diagnosis recording were observed compared to CR, whereas most diagnoses appeared at least 3 months earlier in primary care than in HES.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Aurum demonstrated better accuracy and completeness for PCa diagnosis recording than GOLD. However, linkage to HES or CR is recommended for improved case capture. Researchers should address the limitations of each data source to ensure research validity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56322,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 102715"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142743281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Differences in recording of cancer diagnosis between datasets in England: A population-based study of linked cancer registration, hospital, and primary care data
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2024.102703
Emma Whitfield , Becky White , Matthew E. Barclay , Meena Rafiq , Cristina Renzi , Brian Rous , Spiros Denaxas , Georgios Lyratzopoulos

Background

Differences in the recording of cancer case status and diagnosis date have been observed between cancer registry (CR) – the reference standard – and electronic health records (EHRs); such differences may affect estimates of cancer risk or misclassify diagnostic pathways. This study aims to quantify differences in recording of case status and date of cancer diagnosis between cancer registry and EHRs.

Methods

Linked primary care (Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)), secondary care (Hospital Episode Statistics (HES)) and national Cancer Registry (CR) data, were used to identify 14,301 patients with a recorded diagnosis of brain, colon, lung, ovarian, or pancreatic cancer between 1999 and 2018. Agreement in case status between datasets, differences in recorded diagnosis dates, and change in agreement over time were investigated for each cancer site.

Results

Between 84 % (ovary) to 92 % (colon) of diagnoses in cancer registry were also recorded in combined CPRD-HES data. Agreement with cancer registry was slightly lower in HES (78 % (ovary) to 86 % (colon)) and CPRD (61 % (ovary, pancreas) to 72 % (brain)). The proportion of CPRD-HES diagnoses confirmed in CR varied by cancer site (50 % (brain) to 86 % (lung)). Agreement between CR and HES was relatively stable within cancer sites over time. Concordance between CR and CPRD was more heterogeneous between cancer sites and over time. Best agreement in diagnosis date was observed between CR and HES (median difference 0 or 1 days, all cancer sites).

Conclusion

Agreement between CR and EHR data is heterogeneous across cancer sites. Concordance does not appear to have improved over time. Combined data from primary and secondary care may be sufficient to approximate case status in CR in some circumstances, but the date we consider to represent the diagnosis may impact study outcomes.
{"title":"Differences in recording of cancer diagnosis between datasets in England: A population-based study of linked cancer registration, hospital, and primary care data","authors":"Emma Whitfield ,&nbsp;Becky White ,&nbsp;Matthew E. Barclay ,&nbsp;Meena Rafiq ,&nbsp;Cristina Renzi ,&nbsp;Brian Rous ,&nbsp;Spiros Denaxas ,&nbsp;Georgios Lyratzopoulos","doi":"10.1016/j.canep.2024.102703","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.canep.2024.102703","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Differences in the recording of cancer case status and diagnosis date have been observed between cancer registry (CR) – the reference standard – and electronic health records (EHRs); such differences may affect estimates of cancer risk or misclassify diagnostic pathways. This study aims to quantify differences in recording of case status and date of cancer diagnosis between cancer registry and EHRs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Linked primary care (Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)), secondary care (Hospital Episode Statistics (HES)) and national Cancer Registry (CR) data, were used to identify 14,301 patients with a recorded diagnosis of brain, colon, lung, ovarian, or pancreatic cancer between 1999 and 2018. Agreement in case status between datasets, differences in recorded diagnosis dates, and change in agreement over time were investigated for each cancer site.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between 84 % (ovary) to 92 % (colon) of diagnoses in cancer registry were also recorded in combined CPRD-HES data. Agreement with cancer registry was slightly lower in HES (78 % (ovary) to 86 % (colon)) and CPRD (61 % (ovary, pancreas) to 72 % (brain)). The proportion of CPRD-HES diagnoses confirmed in CR varied by cancer site (50 % (brain) to 86 % (lung)). Agreement between CR and HES was relatively stable within cancer sites over time. Concordance between CR and CPRD was more heterogeneous between cancer sites and over time. Best agreement in diagnosis date was observed between CR and HES (median difference 0 or 1 days, all cancer sites).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Agreement between CR and EHR data is heterogeneous across cancer sites. Concordance does not appear to have improved over time. Combined data from primary and secondary care may be sufficient to approximate case status in CR in some circumstances, but the date we consider to represent the diagnosis may impact study outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56322,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 102703"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142743279","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trends in incidence, mortality and survival of gastric cancer in Xiamen, China from 2011 to 2020: A population-based study
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2024.102718
Ahua Wu , Zhinan Guo , Yilan Lin, Jiahuang Chi, Yanqi Lan, Qun Lou, Haixia Zhang, Youlan Chen

Background

Gastric cancer remains one of the most common cancers and the leading cause of death in China. This study aims to describe the incidence, mortality, survival rates, and their changing trends of gastric cancer in Xiamen, China from 2011 to 2020.

Methods

Population-based cancer registry data were used to calculate the incidence, mortality, and survival rates of gastric cancer. The study population consisted of gastric cancer patients diagnosed from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2020, and followed up until September 30, 2023. The relative survival of gastric cancer was calculated using period methods. The change in trends was analyzed using Joinpoint regression.

Results

From 2011–2020, a total of 4716 new cases of gastric cancer and 3520 related deaths were reported. The crude incidence rate and age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) were 21.82/100,000 and 16.74/100,000. The crude mortality rate and age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR) were 16.29/100,000 and 12.30/100,000. The ASIR and ASMR in males (ASIR: 24.71/100,000, ASMR: 18.75/100,000) were both more than those in females (ASIR: 9.6/100,000, ASMR: 6.55/100,000). The observed 5-year survival rate was 25.83 %, with an age standardized survival of 27.60 %. The incidence and mortality of gastric cancer showed a decreasing trend, and the 5-year ARS between 2016 and 2020 (30.03 %, 95 %CI: 28.07–32.12 %) was higher than between 2011 and 2015 ( 24.79 %, 95 %CI: 22.53–27.27 %). Furthermore, the survival rate decreased with increasing age.

Conclusions

From 2011–2020, the incidence and mortality of gastric cancer in Xiamen City have shown a decreasing trend, and the survival rate has significantly improved. Despite improved survival, the 5-year ARS remains low.
{"title":"Trends in incidence, mortality and survival of gastric cancer in Xiamen, China from 2011 to 2020: A population-based study","authors":"Ahua Wu ,&nbsp;Zhinan Guo ,&nbsp;Yilan Lin,&nbsp;Jiahuang Chi,&nbsp;Yanqi Lan,&nbsp;Qun Lou,&nbsp;Haixia Zhang,&nbsp;Youlan Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.canep.2024.102718","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.canep.2024.102718","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Gastric cancer remains one of the most common cancers and the leading cause of death in China. This study aims to describe the incidence, mortality, survival rates, and their changing trends of gastric cancer in Xiamen, China from 2011 to 2020.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Population-based cancer registry data were used to calculate the incidence, mortality, and survival rates of gastric cancer. The study population consisted of gastric cancer patients diagnosed from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2020, and followed up until September 30, 2023. The relative survival of gastric cancer was calculated using period methods. The change in trends was analyzed using Joinpoint regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 2011–2020, a total of 4716 new cases of gastric cancer and 3520 related deaths were reported. The crude incidence rate and age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) were 21.82/100,000 and 16.74/100,000. The crude mortality rate and age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR) were 16.29/100,000 and 12.30/100,000. The ASIR and ASMR in males (ASIR: 24.71/100,000, ASMR: 18.75/100,000) were both more than those in females (ASIR: 9.6/100,000, ASMR: 6.55/100,000). The observed 5-year survival rate was 25.83 %, with an age standardized survival of 27.60 %. The incidence and mortality of gastric cancer showed a decreasing trend, and the 5-year ARS between 2016 and 2020 (30.03 %, 95 %CI: 28.07–32.12 %) was higher than between 2011 and 2015 ( 24.79 %, 95 %CI: 22.53–27.27 %). Furthermore, the survival rate decreased with increasing age.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>From 2011–2020, the incidence and mortality of gastric cancer in Xiamen City have shown a decreasing trend, and the survival rate has significantly improved. Despite improved survival, the 5-year ARS remains low.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56322,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 102718"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142743280","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Updated cancer burden in oldest old: A population-based study using 2022 Globocan estimates. 高龄老人的最新癌症负担:利用 2022 年 Globocan 估计数据进行的人口研究。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2024.102716
Richa Shah, Nicolò Matteo Luca Battisti, Etienne Brain, Freddy H R Gnangnon, Ravindran Kanesvaran, Supriya Mohile, Vanita Noronha, Martine Puts, Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis, Sophie Pilleron

Background: The global population aged 80 years or older is expected to triple by 2050, leading to an increased cancer burden in the oldest population. This study describes the estimated cancer incidence and mortality in 2022 and projections for 2050 in the oldest old, analyzed globally and by world regions and World Bank income levels, for all sexes combined, as well as separately for males and females.

Methods: Using GLOBOCAN 2022 estimates, we reported the estimated number of new cancer cases (excluding non-melanoma skin cancers), deaths, and truncated age-standardized incidence (ASIR) and mortality rates (ASMR) (per 100,000 individuals aged 80 years or older). We also presented the top five cancers by cases and deaths. Additionally, we projected the number of new cancer cases and deaths for each region in 2050, assuming no change in cancer incidence and death rates.

Result: In 2022, an estimated 2.6 million new cancer cases (14 % of all cancer cases) and 2.1 million cancer deaths (22 % of all cancer deaths) occurred in the oldest old, with regional variations. Globally, lung, colorectal, and prostate cancers were the most common cancers diagnosed and leading causes of cancer death. ASIR ranged from 987 in Africa to 2044 per 100,000 in Northern America while ASMR ranged from 981 in Africa to 1769 per 100,000 in Oceania. In 2050, an estimated 7.4 million new cancer cases and 6 million cancer deaths are expected. The greatest increases are anticipated in China, India, and Africa, with increases exceeding 200 % compared to 2022 estimates.

Conclusion: The growing cancer burden among the oldest old poses significant challenges to global healthcare systems, necessitating resource-tailored adaptations. These findings call for the inclusion of the oldest old in the development and implementation of cancer control policies and a better representation in cancer research.

背景:预计到 2050 年,全球 80 岁或以上的人口将增加两倍,从而导致高龄人口的癌症负担加重。本研究描述了 2022 年高龄老年人癌症发病率和死亡率的估计值以及 2050 年的预测值,并按全球、世界各地区和世界银行收入水平进行了分析,包括所有性别以及男性和女性:我们利用 GLOBOCAN 2022 估计数据,报告了癌症新病例(不包括非黑色素瘤皮肤癌)、死亡人数、截断年龄标准化发病率(ASIR)和死亡率(ASMR)(每 10 万名 80 岁或以上老年人)的估计数字。我们还介绍了发病率和死亡率最高的五种癌症。此外,假设癌症发病率和死亡率不变,我们还预测了 2050 年每个地区新增癌症病例和死亡人数:2022 年,估计有 260 万癌症新病例(占癌症病例总数的 14%)和 210 万癌症死亡病例(占癌症死亡病例总数的 22%)发生在最年长的人群中,但各地区之间存在差异。在全球范围内,肺癌、结肠直肠癌和前列腺癌是最常见的确诊癌症,也是癌症死亡的主要原因。ASIR 从非洲的每 10 万人 987 例到北美洲的 2044 例不等,而 ASMR 则从非洲的每 10 万人 981 例到大洋洲的 1769 例不等。2050 年,预计将新增 740 万癌症病例和 600 万癌症死亡病例。预计中国、印度和非洲的增幅最大,与 2022 年的估计值相比,增幅超过 200%:高龄老人癌症负担日益加重,给全球医疗保健系统带来了重大挑战,需要根据资源情况进行调整。这些研究结果呼吁将高龄老人纳入癌症控制政策的制定和实施过程中,并让他们在癌症研究中有更好的代表性。
{"title":"Updated cancer burden in oldest old: A population-based study using 2022 Globocan estimates.","authors":"Richa Shah, Nicolò Matteo Luca Battisti, Etienne Brain, Freddy H R Gnangnon, Ravindran Kanesvaran, Supriya Mohile, Vanita Noronha, Martine Puts, Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis, Sophie Pilleron","doi":"10.1016/j.canep.2024.102716","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.canep.2024.102716","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The global population aged 80 years or older is expected to triple by 2050, leading to an increased cancer burden in the oldest population. This study describes the estimated cancer incidence and mortality in 2022 and projections for 2050 in the oldest old, analyzed globally and by world regions and World Bank income levels, for all sexes combined, as well as separately for males and females.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using GLOBOCAN 2022 estimates, we reported the estimated number of new cancer cases (excluding non-melanoma skin cancers), deaths, and truncated age-standardized incidence (ASIR) and mortality rates (ASMR) (per 100,000 individuals aged 80 years or older). We also presented the top five cancers by cases and deaths. Additionally, we projected the number of new cancer cases and deaths for each region in 2050, assuming no change in cancer incidence and death rates.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>In 2022, an estimated 2.6 million new cancer cases (14 % of all cancer cases) and 2.1 million cancer deaths (22 % of all cancer deaths) occurred in the oldest old, with regional variations. Globally, lung, colorectal, and prostate cancers were the most common cancers diagnosed and leading causes of cancer death. ASIR ranged from 987 in Africa to 2044 per 100,000 in Northern America while ASMR ranged from 981 in Africa to 1769 per 100,000 in Oceania. In 2050, an estimated 7.4 million new cancer cases and 6 million cancer deaths are expected. The greatest increases are anticipated in China, India, and Africa, with increases exceeding 200 % compared to 2022 estimates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The growing cancer burden among the oldest old poses significant challenges to global healthcare systems, necessitating resource-tailored adaptations. These findings call for the inclusion of the oldest old in the development and implementation of cancer control policies and a better representation in cancer research.</p>","PeriodicalId":56322,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"102716"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142741680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Years of life lost due to cancer in Ecuador 厄瓜多尔因癌症而损失的生命年数
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2024.102717
Kevin Ricardo Espinosa-Yépez

Background

Cancer is the leading cause of death worldwide. In the Americas, it is also one of the leading causes of death. In Ecuador, studies on the burden of disease are limited and none analyze or estimate the burden of all types of cancer in a single study. Therefore, the aim of this study is to estimate the years of life lost prematurely due to cancer in Ecuador from 2014 to 2022.

Methods

Cross-sectional observational analysis study. The databases of general deaths from the years 2014 to 2022, population projections from 2014 to 2021 and the population census for the year 2022 of the Republic of Ecuador were used. Deaths registered with ICD-10 code C00-C96 were included as deaths from cancer. The mortality rate and years of life lost prematurely due to cancer were estimated, considering the life tables of the Coale-Demeny West model and a standard time discount of 3 % was implemented without weighting by age.

Results

An increase in mortality and premature years of life lost was observed in the period 2014–2019, but in 2020 a reduction in mortality was seen in several types of cancer. In 2021 and 2022 mortality increased again, reaching the maximum peak of mortality and premature years of life lost in the entire study. Approximately 1,3 million years of life lost prematurely due to cancer were estimated. The types of cancer with the greatest number of years of life lost prematurely were malignant tumors of the stomach (188.180), uterus (117.142), which include both uterine cancer and cervical cancer, and leukemia (107.440). In men, in descending order, these were tumors of the stomach (101.112), prostate (67.624) and leukemia (55.654), while in women, these were malignant tumors of the uterus (117.142), breast (100.217) and stomach (87.067).

Conclusions

The results of this study provide a broader basis for debate on public health policies, efficient allocation of resources, and enable monitoring of cancer and prevention strategies over time.
背景癌症是导致全球死亡的主要原因。在美洲,癌症也是导致死亡的主要原因之一。在厄瓜多尔,关于疾病负担的研究非常有限,没有一项研究能在一项研究中分析或估计所有类型癌症的负担。因此,本研究旨在估算 2014 年至 2022 年厄瓜多尔因癌症而过早丧失的生命年数。研究使用了厄瓜多尔共和国 2014 年至 2022 年的普通死亡数据库、2014 年至 2021 年的人口预测以及 2022 年的人口普查。ICD-10代码为C00-C96的死亡病例被列为癌症死亡病例。根据 Coale-Demeny West 模型的生命表估算了死亡率和因癌症过早丧失的生命年数,并采用了 3% 的标准时间折扣,未按年龄加权。2021 年和 2022 年,死亡率再次上升,达到了整个研究中死亡率和过早死亡年数的最高峰。据估计,因癌症而过早丧失的生命年数约为 130 万年。过早丧失生命年数最多的癌症类型是胃部恶性肿瘤(188 180)、子宫(117 142)(包括子宫癌和宫颈癌)和白血病(107 440)。在男性中,从高到低依次为胃肿瘤(101.112)、前列腺肿瘤(67.624)和白血病(55.654);在女性中,从高到低依次为子宫恶性肿瘤(117.142)、乳腺癌(100.217)和胃肿瘤(87.067)。
{"title":"Years of life lost due to cancer in Ecuador","authors":"Kevin Ricardo Espinosa-Yépez","doi":"10.1016/j.canep.2024.102717","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.canep.2024.102717","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cancer is the leading cause of death worldwide. In the Americas, it is also one of the leading causes of death. In Ecuador, studies on the burden of disease are limited and none analyze or estimate the burden of all types of cancer in a single study. Therefore, the aim of this study is to estimate the years of life lost prematurely due to cancer in Ecuador from 2014 to 2022.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Cross-sectional observational analysis study. The databases of general deaths from the years 2014 to 2022, population projections from 2014 to 2021 and the population census for the year 2022 of the Republic of Ecuador were used. Deaths registered with ICD-10 code C00-C96 were included as deaths from cancer. The mortality rate and years of life lost prematurely due to cancer were estimated, considering the life tables of the Coale-Demeny West model and a standard time discount of 3 % was implemented without weighting by age.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>An increase in mortality and premature years of life lost was observed in the period 2014–2019, but in 2020 a reduction in mortality was seen in several types of cancer. In 2021 and 2022 mortality increased again, reaching the maximum peak of mortality and premature years of life lost in the entire study. Approximately 1,3 million years of life lost prematurely due to cancer were estimated. The types of cancer with the greatest number of years of life lost prematurely were malignant tumors of the stomach (188.180), uterus (117.142), which include both uterine cancer and cervical cancer, and leukemia (107.440). In men, in descending order, these were tumors of the stomach (101.112), prostate (67.624) and leukemia (55.654), while in women, these were malignant tumors of the uterus (117.142), breast (100.217) and stomach (87.067).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results of this study provide a broader basis for debate on public health policies, efficient allocation of resources, and enable monitoring of cancer and prevention strategies over time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56322,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 102717"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142704268","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trends in incidence and survival of the four most common cancers by stage at diagnosis in Cyprus: A population-based study from 2004 to 2017 塞浦路斯按诊断阶段划分的四种最常见癌症的发病率和生存率趋势:2004 年至 2017 年基于人口的研究
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2024.102704
Christiana A. Demetriou , Constantinos Koshiaris , Olivia A. Cory , Constantina Constantinou , Ourania Kolokotroni , Yiola Marcou , Demetris Papamichael , Haris Charalambous , Dimitrios Vomvas , Anna Demetriou , Vasos Scoutellas , Annalisa Quattrocchi

Background

Breast, colorectal, lung and prostate cancers are the most frequent malignancies in Cyprus. This study estimated the incidence rate and 5-year net survival (NS) trends for these cancers, by sex, age, and tumor stage at diagnosis.

Methods

We analyzed data from the Cyprus Cancer Registry for adults diagnosed between 2004 and 2017, with follow-up until 2019. Tumor stage was classified into localized, regional, distant and unknown categories. We estimated the annual percentage change (APC) in incidence rates using Joinpoint regression. NS was estimated using flexible parametric models, adjusting for sex, age, stage and period of diagnosis. Multiple imputation was used to address unknown cancer stage.

Results

During 2004–2017, the incidence significantly increased for breast and lung cancer (APC: 1.1 % and 2.6 %, respectively), mainly among the elderly (70 +). A decreasing trend was identified for prostate cancer only among individuals aged 80 +. No temporal variations were identified for colorectal cancer incidence.
A positive time trend was identified for localized breast cancer between 2006 and 2017 (APC: 2.8 %). Conversely, a significant increase was noted at more advanced stages for lung (APCdistant: 4.1 %) and prostate (APCregional: 7.6 %) cancers.
NS improved for all cancers, ranging between 80 % and 90 % for regional and all stages of breast cancer, localized colorectal cancer, and all stages of prostate cancer, surpassing 95 % for localized breast cancer, localized and regional prostate cancer.

Conclusion

The study observed increased (breast and lung) or stable (colorectal and prostate) cancer incidence and substantial improvements in 5-years NS trends for all cancer types, despite differences by sex and stage. Efforts should be intensified to reduce incidence by addressing cancer risk factors, and to improve survival by implementing and increasing the uptake of screening programs.
背景乳腺癌、结直肠癌、肺癌和前列腺癌是塞浦路斯最常见的恶性肿瘤。这项研究按性别、年龄和诊断时的肿瘤分期估算了这些癌症的发病率和 5 年净生存率(NS)趋势。肿瘤分期分为局部、区域、远处和未知类别。我们使用Joinpoint回归估算了发病率的年度百分比变化(APC)。NS采用灵活的参数模型进行估算,并根据性别、年龄、分期和诊断时间进行调整。结果2004-2017年间,乳腺癌和肺癌的发病率显著上升(APC:分别为1.1%和2.6%),主要发生在老年人(70岁以上)中。只有在 80 岁以上的人群中,前列腺癌的发病率呈下降趋势。2006 年至 2017 年间,局部乳腺癌的发病率呈上升趋势(APC:2.8%)。所有癌症的 NS 均有所改善,区域性和所有阶段的乳腺癌、局部性结直肠癌以及所有阶段的前列腺癌的 NS 在 80% 至 90% 之间,局部性乳腺癌、局部性和区域性前列腺癌的 NS 超过 95%。结论该研究观察到,尽管性别和分期不同,但所有癌症类型的发病率(乳腺癌和肺癌)均有所上升或保持稳定(结肠直肠癌和前列腺癌),5 年 NS 趋势也有显著改善。应加强努力,通过应对癌症风险因素来降低发病率,并通过实施筛查计划和提高筛查率来提高生存率。
{"title":"Trends in incidence and survival of the four most common cancers by stage at diagnosis in Cyprus: A population-based study from 2004 to 2017","authors":"Christiana A. Demetriou ,&nbsp;Constantinos Koshiaris ,&nbsp;Olivia A. Cory ,&nbsp;Constantina Constantinou ,&nbsp;Ourania Kolokotroni ,&nbsp;Yiola Marcou ,&nbsp;Demetris Papamichael ,&nbsp;Haris Charalambous ,&nbsp;Dimitrios Vomvas ,&nbsp;Anna Demetriou ,&nbsp;Vasos Scoutellas ,&nbsp;Annalisa Quattrocchi","doi":"10.1016/j.canep.2024.102704","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.canep.2024.102704","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Breast, colorectal, lung and prostate cancers are the most frequent malignancies in Cyprus. This study estimated the incidence rate and 5-year net survival (NS) trends for these cancers, by sex, age, and tumor stage at diagnosis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed data from the Cyprus Cancer Registry for adults diagnosed between 2004 and 2017, with follow-up until 2019. Tumor stage was classified into localized, regional, distant and unknown categories. We estimated the annual percentage change (APC) in incidence rates using Joinpoint regression. NS was estimated using flexible parametric models, adjusting for sex, age, stage and period of diagnosis. Multiple imputation was used to address unknown cancer stage.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During 2004–2017, the incidence significantly increased for breast and lung cancer (APC: 1.1 % and 2.6 %, respectively), mainly among the elderly (70 +). A decreasing trend was identified for prostate cancer only among individuals aged 80 +. No temporal variations were identified for colorectal cancer incidence.</div><div>A positive time trend was identified for localized breast cancer between 2006 and 2017 (APC: 2.8 %). Conversely, a significant increase was noted at more advanced stages for lung (APC<sub>distant</sub>: 4.1 %) and prostate (APC<sub>regional</sub>: 7.6 %) cancers.</div><div>NS improved for all cancers, ranging between 80 % and 90 % for regional and all stages of breast cancer, localized colorectal cancer, and all stages of prostate cancer, surpassing 95 % for localized breast cancer, localized and regional prostate cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study observed increased (breast and lung) or stable (colorectal and prostate) cancer incidence and substantial improvements in 5-years NS trends for all cancer types, despite differences by sex and stage. Efforts should be intensified to reduce incidence by addressing cancer risk factors, and to improve survival by implementing and increasing the uptake of screening programs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56322,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 102704"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142704269","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Measuring healthy life expectancy and determinants of poor perceived health: A population-based study among a subset of rare and common cancer survivors 衡量健康预期寿命和不良健康感知的决定因素:一项针对罕见和常见癌症幸存者的人群研究。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2024.102706
Eline de Heus , Saskia F.A. Duijts , Jan Maarten van der Zwan , Carla M.L. van Herpen , Matthias A.W. Merkx , Mark J. Rutherford , Isabelle Soerjomataram

Background

As the survival proportions for rare cancers are on average worse than for common cancers, assessing the expected remaining life years in good health becomes highly relevant. This study aimed to estimate the healthy life expectancy (HLE) of a subset of rare and common cancer survivors, and to assess the determinants of poor perceived health in rare cancer survivors.

Methods

To calculate HLE, survival data from the population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry of survivors of a rare cancer (i.e., ovarian cancer, thyroid cancer, Hodgkin lymphoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma) (n=21,376) and a common cancer (i.e., colorectal cancer (CRC)) (n=76,949) were combined with quality of life (QoL) data from the PROFILES registry on a random sample of the rare (n=1025) and common cancer (n=2400) survivors. A flexible parametric relative survival model was used to estimate life expectancy (LE) and years of life lost, and multivariate logistic regression was applied to determine factors related to reported poor perceived health.

Results

Patients previously diagnosed with a rare cancer had an average LE of 8–36 years and were expected to spend ≥67 % of their remaining life in good health. CRC survivors had an average LE of 10 years with approximately 65 % of their remaining life expected to spend in good health. For all cancer types, those aged ≥65 years or with stage IV had the lowest HLE. Low socioeconomic status, advanced stage, and having received radiotherapy only were important predictors of poor perceived health among rare cancer survivors.

Conclusion

HLE can provide meaningful perspective for patients and practitioners for all cancer types, including rare cancers. Yet, data on QoL for rare cancers should be routinely collected, as such will serve as an indicator for monitoring and improving cancer care, and for enabling HLE measurements in cancer survivors.
背景:由于罕见癌症的平均存活比例低于常见癌症,因此评估健康状况良好的预期剩余寿命就变得非常重要。本研究旨在估算罕见癌症和普通癌症幸存者子集的健康预期寿命(HLE),并评估罕见癌症幸存者健康状况差的决定因素:为了计算 HLE,我们从荷兰癌症登记处收集了罕见癌症(即卵巢癌、甲状腺癌、霍奇金淋巴瘤、非霍奇金淋巴瘤)和常见癌症(即结直肠癌 (CRC))幸存者的生存数据(21,376 人)、将罕见癌症(1025 人)和常见癌症(2400 人)幸存者的随机抽样数据与 PROFILES 登记处提供的生活质量(QoL)数据相结合。采用灵活的参数相对生存模型来估算预期寿命(LE)和损失的生命年数,并采用多变量逻辑回归来确定与所报告的健康感知不良有关的因素:结果:曾被诊断为罕见癌症的患者的平均预期寿命为 8-36 年,预计其余生中健康状况良好的时间≥67%。CRC 幸存者的平均寿命为 10 年,预计其剩余生命中约 65% 的时间处于健康状态。在所有癌症类型中,年龄≥65 岁或处于 IV 期的患者的健康生活率最低。在罕见癌症幸存者中,社会经济地位低、晚期和只接受过放疗是预测健康状况差的重要因素:HLE可以为包括罕见癌症在内的所有癌症类型的患者和医生提供有意义的视角。然而,罕见癌症的 QoL 数据应常规收集,因为这将作为监测和改善癌症护理的指标,并可用于测量癌症幸存者的 HLE。
{"title":"Measuring healthy life expectancy and determinants of poor perceived health: A population-based study among a subset of rare and common cancer survivors","authors":"Eline de Heus ,&nbsp;Saskia F.A. Duijts ,&nbsp;Jan Maarten van der Zwan ,&nbsp;Carla M.L. van Herpen ,&nbsp;Matthias A.W. Merkx ,&nbsp;Mark J. Rutherford ,&nbsp;Isabelle Soerjomataram","doi":"10.1016/j.canep.2024.102706","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.canep.2024.102706","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>As the survival proportions for rare cancers are on average worse than for common cancers, assessing the expected remaining life years in good health becomes highly relevant. This study aimed to estimate the healthy life expectancy (HLE) of a subset of rare and common cancer survivors, and to assess the determinants of poor perceived health in rare cancer survivors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>To calculate HLE, survival data from the population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry of survivors of a rare cancer (i.e., ovarian cancer, thyroid cancer, Hodgkin lymphoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma) (n=21,376) and a common cancer (i.e., colorectal cancer (CRC)) (n=76,949) were combined with quality of life (QoL) data from the PROFILES registry on a random sample of the rare (n=1025) and common cancer (n=2400) survivors. A flexible parametric relative survival model was used to estimate life expectancy (LE) and years of life lost, and multivariate logistic regression was applied to determine factors related to reported poor perceived health.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients previously diagnosed with a rare cancer had an average LE of 8–36 years and were expected to spend ≥67 % of their remaining life in good health. CRC survivors had an average LE of 10 years with approximately 65 % of their remaining life expected to spend in good health. For all cancer types, those aged ≥65 years or with stage IV had the lowest HLE. Low socioeconomic status, advanced stage, and having received radiotherapy only were important predictors of poor perceived health among rare cancer survivors.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>HLE can provide meaningful perspective for patients and practitioners for all cancer types, including rare cancers. Yet, data on QoL for rare cancers should be routinely collected, as such will serve as an indicator for monitoring and improving cancer care, and for enabling HLE measurements in cancer survivors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56322,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 102706"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142695799","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Cancer Epidemiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1