Background: MRI and fusion guided biopsy have an increased role in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Purpose: To demonstrate the possible advantages with Bi-parametric MRI fusion-guided repeat biopsy over systematic 10-12-core biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Material and methods: Four hundred and twenty-three consecutive men, with previous systematic 10-12-core TRUS-guided biopsy, and with suspicion of, or diagnosis of, low-risk prostate cancer underwent fusion-guided prostate biopsy between February 2015 and February 2017. The material was retrospectively assessed. In 220 cases no previous cancer was diagnosed, and in 203 cases confirmatory fusion guided biopsy was performed prior to active monitoring. MRI was classified according to PI-RADS. Systematic biopsy was compared to fusion guided biopsy for the detection of cancer, and PI-RADS was compared to the Gleason score.
Results: Fusion guided biopsy detected significantly more cancers than systematic (p < .001). Gleason scores were higher in the fusion biopsy group (p < .001). Anterior tumors were present in 54% of patients. Fusion biopsy from these lesions showed cancer in 53% with previously negative biopsy in systematic biopsies and 66% of them were upgraded from low risk to intermediate or high-risk cancers.
Conclusion: These results show superior detection rate and grading of bi-parametric MRI/TRUS fusion targeted repeat biopsy over systematic 10-12 core biopsies. Fusion guided biopsy detects more significant cancers despite using fewer cores. The risk group was changed for many patients initially selected for active surveillance due to upgrading of tumors. Bi-parametric MRI shows promising results in detecting anterior tumors in patients with suspected prostate cancer.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered the gold standard to reliably diagnose inflammation in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). However, even MRI imaging is dependent on the familiarity of the radiologist with the normal appearance of the TMJ; therefore, new approaches are needed. Our purpose here is to improve imaging quality of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) as a tool to help in the diagnosis of JIA in the TMJ. We have designed and applied a filter (the Stacking Enhancement Filter) over a stock of CBCT images from the TMJs of two patients with JIA. We then made a visual comparison of the results with archival images from MRI of the same patients, to show that the filter substantially improves the visual quality of the image. The work on the image contrast and the increase of the difference of appearance between tissues of different densities (all the anatomical structures that are present within the joint) leads to an improvement of the resulting images of the TMJ without the use of a chemical contrast agent. We conclude that CBCT could be used as a filter tool for the analysis of the TMJs affected by arthritis. Our image processing technique yields images that possible improve the range of use of CBCT.