首页 > 最新文献

Administrative law and process最新文献

英文 中文
DIRECTIONS OF IMPROVEMENT OF LEGAL REGULATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITY FOR DRIVING OF VEHICLES IN THE STATE OF INTOXICATION 完善醉酒驾驶车辆行政责任法律规制的方向
Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.17721/2227-796x.2022.2.06
I. Pastukh
The purpose of the article is to consider the current state and identify areas for improving the legal regulation of administrative liability for driving while intoxicated under martial law. Based on the provisions of current legislation, achievements of the science of administrative law, it considers the provisions of three draft laws of Ukraine, which amend the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses to strengthen liability for driving under the influence of alcohol, drugs or other intoxicants martial law. A number of research methods are used, due to its purpose and objectives. Statistical – to determine the dynamics of the number of administrative offenses committed with the participation of drivers who were behind the wheel in a state of intoxication. System-structural and functional – to determine the place and role of individual public administration in ensuring the country’s defense capabilities, the comparative law method was used in the study of draft regulations and CAO, which determine the grounds and procedure for confiscation of vehicles, etc. Results. The norms of the draft laws are considered from the point of view of their material and procedural direction. According to the first direction, remarks and proposals were formulated: on the general provisions of confiscation of a vehicle, which consists in its forced gratuitous transfer to state ownership; concerning the range of subjects for whose needs confiscated vehicles are transferred during martial law, excluding the Ministry of Internal Affairs from this list and expanding it at the expense of the National Guard of Ukraine, other military formations formed in accordance with the laws of Ukraine; on the inexpediency of supplementing the Code of Administrative Offenses with a rule that deprivation of the right to drive vehicles is appointed by the court and applies to persons who have such a right legally, as they make it impossible to apply the provisions of Part 2, 3, 6, 7 of Art. 130 of the Code; on the inexpediency of imposing such a penalty as deprivation of the right to drive vehicles for ten years and their confiscation, as they are contrary to applicable law; concerning introduction of temporary detention of vehicles before the decision of the case on the administrative offense provided by Art. 130 of the Code of Administrative Offenses (proposals to Article 265-2 of the Code). Conclusions. The main proposals of the author to the existing draft legislation are reduced to amendments to existing legislation in the following areas: a) temporary detention with a ban on the alienation of such a vehicle before the case judge; b) a reduced period for imposing such a penalty. It is emphasized that the existing projects need significant refinement, the application of a comprehensive substantive approach in order to ensure the implementation of tasks and achieve their goals.
本文的目的是考虑现状,找出戒严下醉酒驾驶行政责任法律规制的完善领域。根据现行立法的规定和行政法科学的成就,本文审议了乌克兰三个法律草案的规定,这些法律草案修改了《乌克兰行政违法法典》,以加强在酒精、毒品或其他麻醉品影响下驾驶的责任。由于其目的和目标,使用了许多研究方法。统计-确定在醉酒状态下驾驶的司机参与的行政违法数量的动态。制度结构和职能- -为了确定个别公共行政在确保国家防御能力方面的地位和作用,在研究条例草案和确定没收车辆等的理由和程序的CAO时使用了比较法方法。结果。法律草案的规范从其实质和程序方向两个方面加以考虑。根据第一个方向,提出了意见和建议:关于没收车辆的一般规定,这包括将其强行无偿转让给国家所有;关于在戒严令期间将没收的车辆转让给其需要的对象的范围,将内政部排除在该名单之外,并以牺牲乌克兰国民警卫队,即根据乌克兰法律组建的其他军事部队为代价扩大该名单;对《行政违法法》补充规定剥夺驾驶车辆的权利由法院指定并适用于合法拥有这种权利的人是不适当的,因为剥夺驾驶车辆的权利使《行政违法法》第130条第2、3、6和7部分的规定无法适用;关于剥夺驾驶车辆的权利10年并将其没收的处罚是不适当的,因为这违反了适用的法律;关于在对《行政违法法》第130条规定的行政违法法第265-2条的案件作出判决之前实行暂时扣留车辆的规定(对《行政违法法》第265-2条的建议)。结论。提交人对现行立法草案的主要建议可简化为对下列领域的现行立法的修正:a)临时拘留,并禁止在案件法官面前转让这种车辆;B)缩短的处罚期限。有人强调,现有的项目需要大大改进,需要采用全面的实质性办法,以确保执行各项任务和实现其目标。
{"title":"DIRECTIONS OF IMPROVEMENT OF LEGAL REGULATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITY FOR DRIVING OF VEHICLES IN THE STATE OF INTOXICATION","authors":"I. Pastukh","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2022.2.06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2022.2.06","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article is to consider the current state and identify areas for improving the legal regulation of administrative liability for driving while intoxicated under martial law. Based on the provisions of current legislation, achievements of the science of administrative law, it considers the provisions of three draft laws of Ukraine, which amend the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses to strengthen liability for driving under the influence of alcohol, drugs or other intoxicants martial law. A number of research methods are used, due to its purpose and objectives. Statistical – to determine the dynamics of the number of administrative offenses committed with the participation of drivers who were behind the wheel in a state of intoxication. System-structural and functional – to determine the place and role of individual public administration in ensuring the country’s defense capabilities, the comparative law method was used in the study of draft regulations and CAO, which determine the grounds and procedure for confiscation of vehicles, etc. Results. The norms of the draft laws are considered from the point of view of their material and procedural direction. According to the first direction, remarks and proposals were formulated: on the general provisions of confiscation of a vehicle, which consists in its forced gratuitous transfer to state ownership; concerning the range of subjects for whose needs confiscated vehicles are transferred during martial law, excluding the Ministry of Internal Affairs from this list and expanding it at the expense of the National Guard of Ukraine, other military formations formed in accordance with the laws of Ukraine; on the inexpediency of supplementing the Code of Administrative Offenses with a rule that deprivation of the right to drive vehicles is appointed by the court and applies to persons who have such a right legally, as they make it impossible to apply the provisions of Part 2, 3, 6, 7 of Art. 130 of the Code; on the inexpediency of imposing such a penalty as deprivation of the right to drive vehicles for ten years and their confiscation, as they are contrary to applicable law; concerning introduction of temporary detention of vehicles before the decision of the case on the administrative offense provided by Art. 130 of the Code of Administrative Offenses (proposals to Article 265-2 of the Code). Conclusions. The main proposals of the author to the existing draft legislation are reduced to amendments to existing legislation in the following areas: a) temporary detention with a ban on the alienation of such a vehicle before the case judge; b) a reduced period for imposing such a penalty. It is emphasized that the existing projects need significant refinement, the application of a comprehensive substantive approach in order to ensure the implementation of tasks and achieve their goals.","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79438753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
IMPLEMENTATION OF ELECTRONIC ADMINISTRATIVE JUDICIAL PROCEDURE IN UKRAINE: PREREQUISITES, ESSENCE AND STAGES OF ESTABLISHMENT 乌克兰实施行政司法程序电子化:先决条件、实质与建立阶段
Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.17721/2227-796x.2022.3.05
K.V. Piatyhora
The purpose of this article is to reveal the essence and content of the concept of “electronic court”, to determine the preconditions for the formation of electronic administrative proceedings in Ukraine, to analyze the main stages of formation and development of “electronic court” in administrative proceedings of Ukraine. The research methodology was formed by a set of general scientific and special methods of cognition. The use of these methods was mostly complex, due to the specifics of the topic of the scientific article. In particular, the systematic method is used in the study of the categorical apparatus, namely in defining the concepts of “electronic court” and “electronic administrative proceedings”. The formal-legal method is also used to clarify the content of legal concepts. The author uses the dialectical method of cognition during the research and systematization of the stages of development of electronic administrative proceedings in Ukraine. The periodization proposed by the author is based on a significant amount of normative material that regulates the functioning of e-justice in Ukraine. Thanks to the methods of synthesis and generalization, the main possibilities of e-justice, which can be used by a participant in the administrative process, have been identified. The results of the study are to define and clarify the concept of “electronic court” based on the analysis of scientific views and current legislation of Ukraine. The concept of “electronic court” in the broad and narrow sense. The preconditions for the emergence of electronic administrative proceedings in Ukraine have been studied and it has been established that the informatization of the judicial system has led to the formation of a new way of administering justice – electronic, ie on the basis of information and telecommunications technologies. The main stages of development of electronic administrative proceedings in Ukraine are highlighted and characterized, and the successful implementation of the e-court project in Ukraine is emphasized. On the basis of the analysis of the current legislation of Ukraine the peculiarities of the functioning of the “electronic court” are determined and the new possibilities of the “electronic court” are singled out, which are given to the participants of the administrative process during their administrative cases. It is concluded that at the present stage of development of the judicial system of Ukraine, electronic administrative proceedings are only at the stage of their formation and require a lot of effort for their full and effective functioning. Emphasis is placed on the success that our judicial system has achieved in implementing this project. Therefore, further research and implementation of this project is one of the main ways to improve the efficiency of justice in Ukraine.
本文旨在揭示“电子法院”概念的本质和内容,确定乌克兰电子行政诉讼形成的前提条件,分析乌克兰行政诉讼中“电子法院”形成和发展的主要阶段。研究方法论是由一套一般科学的和特殊的认知方法构成的。由于科学文章主题的特殊性,这些方法的使用大多是复杂的。特别是在研究分类机构,即界定“电子法院”和“电子行政诉讼”的概念时,采用了系统的方法。形式法的方法也被用来澄清法律概念的内容。笔者运用辩证认识的方法,对乌克兰电子行政诉讼的发展阶段进行了研究和梳理。作者提出的分期是基于大量规范乌克兰电子司法运作的规范性材料。通过综合和概括的方法,确定了行政过程中参与者可以使用的电子司法的主要可能性。研究的结果是在分析科学观点和乌克兰现行立法的基础上,对“电子法院”的概念进行界定和澄清。“电子法庭”的概念有广义和狭义之分。对乌克兰出现电子行政诉讼的先决条件进行了研究,并确定司法系统的信息化导致形成了一种新的司法管理方式- -电子,即在信息和电信技术的基础上。强调了乌克兰电子行政诉讼发展的主要阶段和特点,并强调了乌克兰电子法院项目的成功实施。在对乌克兰现行立法进行分析的基础上,确定了“电子法院”功能的特点,并挑出了“电子法院”的新可能性,这些可能性是在行政案件期间给予行政程序的参与者的。结论是,在乌克兰司法制度目前的发展阶段,电子行政诉讼只是处于形成阶段,需要付出大量努力才能充分有效地发挥作用。重点是我国司法系统在执行这一项目方面取得的成功。因此,进一步研究和实施这一项目是提高乌克兰司法效率的主要途径之一。
{"title":"IMPLEMENTATION OF ELECTRONIC ADMINISTRATIVE JUDICIAL PROCEDURE IN UKRAINE: PREREQUISITES, ESSENCE AND STAGES OF ESTABLISHMENT","authors":"K.V. Piatyhora","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2022.3.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2022.3.05","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to reveal the essence and content of the concept of “electronic court”, to determine the preconditions for the formation of electronic administrative proceedings in Ukraine, to analyze the main stages of formation and development of “electronic court” in administrative proceedings of Ukraine. The research methodology was formed by a set of general scientific and special methods of cognition. The use of these methods was mostly complex, due to the specifics of the topic of the scientific article. In particular, the systematic method is used in the study of the categorical apparatus, namely in defining the concepts of “electronic court” and “electronic administrative proceedings”. The formal-legal method is also used to clarify the content of legal concepts. The author uses the dialectical method of cognition during the research and systematization of the stages of development of electronic administrative proceedings in Ukraine. The periodization proposed by the author is based on a significant amount of normative material that regulates the functioning of e-justice in Ukraine. Thanks to the methods of synthesis and generalization, the main possibilities of e-justice, which can be used by a participant in the administrative process, have been identified. The results of the study are to define and clarify the concept of “electronic court” based on the analysis of scientific views and current legislation of Ukraine. The concept of “electronic court” in the broad and narrow sense. The preconditions for the emergence of electronic administrative proceedings in Ukraine have been studied and it has been established that the informatization of the judicial system has led to the formation of a new way of administering justice – electronic, ie on the basis of information and telecommunications technologies. The main stages of development of electronic administrative proceedings in Ukraine are highlighted and characterized, and the successful implementation of the e-court project in Ukraine is emphasized. On the basis of the analysis of the current legislation of Ukraine the peculiarities of the functioning of the “electronic court” are determined and the new possibilities of the “electronic court” are singled out, which are given to the participants of the administrative process during their administrative cases. It is concluded that at the present stage of development of the judicial system of Ukraine, electronic administrative proceedings are only at the stage of their formation and require a lot of effort for their full and effective functioning. Emphasis is placed on the success that our judicial system has achieved in implementing this project. Therefore, further research and implementation of this project is one of the main ways to improve the efficiency of justice in Ukraine.","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"161 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80158368","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
TERMINOLOGICAL PROBLEMS LAW OF UKRAINE «ON ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE» 乌克兰“行政程序”术语问题法
Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.17721/2227-796x.2022.4.01
R. Melnyk
Purpose. The article is focused on the analysis of the content of determining certain termsformulated in the Law of Ukraine «On Administrative Procedure» with further provision ofsuggestions on their improvement.Methods. The research methodology consists of various methods of scientific cognition, includingcomparative and legal, systemic and structural, analysis, synthesis and others, which allow ussystematically and consistently to solve scientific tasks, to study and compare the scholars’ pointsof view, the provisions of legal acts of the respective countries, court caselaw and to formulate theauthor’s conclusions.The results. The author of the article claims that domestic researchers, including drafters ofregulatory legal acts, are rather superficial and sometimes irresponsible while formulatingdefinitions of the relevant legal terms, which has an extremely negative effect on the efficiency ofadministration of the law. It is due to the fact that the definition contains an abstract model andwhich is compared to the real existing social relations, which are waiting to be regulated with thehelp of an administrative act.The content of the definitions of the following terms «administrative body», «administrative act»,«arbitrary power» has been analyzed in the article. Those terms have received legal wording inthe Law of Ukraine «On Administrative Procedure».Conclusions. Based on the results of the relevant studies, the author has offered to change thedefinition of an administrative body and to understand it as any entity that performs publicadministration functions related to the adoption of an administrative act on a permanent or temporary basis. It has been proved that the legal definition of an administrative act suffers fromits incompleteness, which is manifested in the following: lack of the “link” of an administrativeact to the sphere of administrative and legal regulation; impossibility of extending the effect of anadministrative act to a group of entities, which can be determined on the basis of certain criteria;disregarding the possibility of an administrative act’s existence without an addressee; ignoringthe fact that an administrative act should be limited only by external impact.According to the author’s opinion, the definition of arbitrary power also seems problematic,since the specific features of this category were not taken into account during the process of itsdefinition. The author of the paper suggests to understand arbitrary power as a certain spacegiven to an administrative body in order to make a choice between several decisions permissiblefrom the point of view of law.
目的。本文着重分析了乌克兰《行政程序法》中规定的若干条款的确定内容,并提出了改进建议。研究方法包括比较与法理、系统与结构、分析、综合等多种科学认知方法,使我们能够系统、一致地解决科学任务,研究和比较学者的观点、各国法律行为的规定、法院判例,并形成作者的结论。结果。文章的作者认为,国内研究者,包括规范性法律行为的起草者,在制定相关法律术语的定义时相当肤浅,有时是不负责任的,这对执法效率产生了极其负面的影响。这是因为这一定义包含了一个抽象的模型,并将其与现实存在的社会关系相比较,而现实存在的社会关系正等待着行政行为的规范。本文对“行政主体”、“行政行为”、“专权”等术语的定义内容进行了分析。这些条款已在乌克兰《行政程序法》中得到法律表述。根据相关研究的结果,笔者提出改变行政主体的定义,将其理解为与采取永久性或临时性行政行为有关的履行公共行政职能的实体。实践证明,法律对行政行为的界定存在着不完备的问题,主要表现在:行政行为与行政法律规制领域的“联系”缺失;不可能将行政行为的效力扩大到根据一定标准可以确定的一组主体;忽视了行政行为没有被执行人而存在的可能性;忽视了行政行为只应受外部影响限制的事实。笔者认为,专断权力的定义似乎也存在问题,因为在对专断权力进行定义的过程中,并没有考虑到专断权力的具体特征。本文建议将专断权理解为赋予行政主体一定的空间,以便在法律允许的几种决策中进行选择。
{"title":"TERMINOLOGICAL PROBLEMS LAW OF UKRAINE «ON ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE»","authors":"R. Melnyk","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2022.4.01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2022.4.01","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. The article is focused on the analysis of the content of determining certain termsformulated in the Law of Ukraine «On Administrative Procedure» with further provision ofsuggestions on their improvement.Methods. The research methodology consists of various methods of scientific cognition, includingcomparative and legal, systemic and structural, analysis, synthesis and others, which allow ussystematically and consistently to solve scientific tasks, to study and compare the scholars’ pointsof view, the provisions of legal acts of the respective countries, court caselaw and to formulate theauthor’s conclusions.The results. The author of the article claims that domestic researchers, including drafters ofregulatory legal acts, are rather superficial and sometimes irresponsible while formulatingdefinitions of the relevant legal terms, which has an extremely negative effect on the efficiency ofadministration of the law. It is due to the fact that the definition contains an abstract model andwhich is compared to the real existing social relations, which are waiting to be regulated with thehelp of an administrative act.The content of the definitions of the following terms «administrative body», «administrative act»,«arbitrary power» has been analyzed in the article. Those terms have received legal wording inthe Law of Ukraine «On Administrative Procedure».Conclusions. Based on the results of the relevant studies, the author has offered to change thedefinition of an administrative body and to understand it as any entity that performs publicadministration functions related to the adoption of an administrative act on a permanent or temporary basis. It has been proved that the legal definition of an administrative act suffers fromits incompleteness, which is manifested in the following: lack of the “link” of an administrativeact to the sphere of administrative and legal regulation; impossibility of extending the effect of anadministrative act to a group of entities, which can be determined on the basis of certain criteria;disregarding the possibility of an administrative act’s existence without an addressee; ignoringthe fact that an administrative act should be limited only by external impact.According to the author’s opinion, the definition of arbitrary power also seems problematic,since the specific features of this category were not taken into account during the process of itsdefinition. The author of the paper suggests to understand arbitrary power as a certain spacegiven to an administrative body in order to make a choice between several decisions permissiblefrom the point of view of law.","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80361612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
DISINFORMATION: CONCEPT AND ESSENCE 虚假信息:概念与本质
Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.17721/2227-796x.2022.3.03
O. Samchynska
The purpose of the study is to clarify the essence of disinformation as a threat to the rights and legitimate interests of a person, society, and the state, to identify its main features, and to formulate a clear definition of this concept. Methods. To achieve this goal, the following methods were used: analysis, synthesis, comparative law, abstraction, and generalization. Results. Different approaches to the definition of “disinformation” are considered. The main features of this phenomenon are singled out and generalized. The difference between the terms “disinformation”, “unreliable information” and “misinformation” is established. It is determined that the obligatory signs of disinformation are: intent to create, modify, and/or disseminate inaccurate information, intent to mislead, pre-determined purpose, and violation or the possibility of violation of legal rights and interests of a person or state as a result of such activities. The own approach to the understanding of disinformation in a narrow and wide sense is formulated. It is proposed to enshrine at the legal level the definition of this concept as a purposeful process of creating, modifying, and disseminating information, both inaccurate and reliable, to mislead individuals (groups of persons) to achieve political, economic, or ideological goals, which violate or human and civil rights and/or society and the state may be violated, and take it as a basis for the activities of the Center for Counteracting Disinformation and other public authorities in the performance of tasks related to counteracting and preventing the negative consequences of disinformation. Conclusions. In the digital age, disinformation has reached a “new level” and has certainly become one of the main challenges for both individual, states and the entire international community. Therefore, the development of legal mechanisms to combat this phenomenon has become more urgent than ever. In Ukraine, there is an understanding of the danger of this phenomenon, as evidenced by the definition of disinformation as one of the challenges and threats to national interests at the level of strategic regulations and the creation of a special working body of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine – Disinformation Center. At the same time, there is no definition of “disinformation” in national legislation. The key to the effective implementation of information policy to prevent and counteract the negative consequences of disinformation, protection of national security and interests in the information sphere, and the activities of the Center for Countering Disinformation is to consolidate the concept of “disinformation” at the regulatory level.
本研究的目的是澄清作为对个人、社会和国家的权利和合法利益的威胁的虚假信息的本质,确定其主要特征,并对这一概念作出明确的定义。方法。为了实现这一目标,采用了以下方法:分析、综合、比较法、抽象和概括。结果。本文考虑了对“虚假信息”的不同定义。这一现象的主要特征被挑出来加以概括。“虚假信息”、“不可靠信息”和“错误信息”之间的区别已经确立。我们确定,虚假信息的强制性标志是:意图制造、修改和/或传播不准确的信息,意图误导,预先确定的目的,以及由于这些活动侵犯或可能侵犯个人或国家的合法权益。对狭义和广义上的虚假信息的理解提出了自己的方法。建议在法律层面将这一概念定义为有目的的创造、修改和传播不准确和可靠的信息的过程,以误导个人(群体)实现政治、经济或意识形态目标,从而侵犯人权和公民权利以及/或可能侵犯社会和国家。并将其作为反虚假信息中心和其他公共机构在执行与反和防止虚假信息负面后果有关的任务时的活动基础。结论。在数字时代,虚假信息达到了一个“新高度”,无疑已成为个人、国家和整个国际社会面临的主要挑战之一。因此,发展与这一现象作斗争的法律机制比以往任何时候都更加紧迫。在乌克兰,人们对这一现象的危险有所了解,这一点可以从以下方面得到证明:在战略法规层面上,将虚假信息定义为对国家利益的挑战和威胁之一,并在乌克兰国家安全和国防委员会设立了一个专门的工作机构——虚假信息中心。与此同时,在国家立法中没有对“虚假信息”的定义。有效实施信息政策,预防和抵消虚假信息的负面后果,保护信息领域的国家安全和利益,以及反虚假信息中心的活动,关键是在监管层面巩固“虚假信息”的概念。
{"title":"DISINFORMATION: CONCEPT AND ESSENCE","authors":"O. Samchynska","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2022.3.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2022.3.03","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study is to clarify the essence of disinformation as a threat to the rights and legitimate interests of a person, society, and the state, to identify its main features, and to formulate a clear definition of this concept. Methods. To achieve this goal, the following methods were used: analysis, synthesis, comparative law, abstraction, and generalization. Results. Different approaches to the definition of “disinformation” are considered. The main features of this phenomenon are singled out and generalized. The difference between the terms “disinformation”, “unreliable information” and “misinformation” is established. It is determined that the obligatory signs of disinformation are: intent to create, modify, and/or disseminate inaccurate information, intent to mislead, pre-determined purpose, and violation or the possibility of violation of legal rights and interests of a person or state as a result of such activities. The own approach to the understanding of disinformation in a narrow and wide sense is formulated. It is proposed to enshrine at the legal level the definition of this concept as a purposeful process of creating, modifying, and disseminating information, both inaccurate and reliable, to mislead individuals (groups of persons) to achieve political, economic, or ideological goals, which violate or human and civil rights and/or society and the state may be violated, and take it as a basis for the activities of the Center for Counteracting Disinformation and other public authorities in the performance of tasks related to counteracting and preventing the negative consequences of disinformation. Conclusions. In the digital age, disinformation has reached a “new level” and has certainly become one of the main challenges for both individual, states and the entire international community. Therefore, the development of legal mechanisms to combat this phenomenon has become more urgent than ever. In Ukraine, there is an understanding of the danger of this phenomenon, as evidenced by the definition of disinformation as one of the challenges and threats to national interests at the level of strategic regulations and the creation of a special working body of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine – Disinformation Center. At the same time, there is no definition of “disinformation” in national legislation. The key to the effective implementation of information policy to prevent and counteract the negative consequences of disinformation, protection of national security and interests in the information sphere, and the activities of the Center for Countering Disinformation is to consolidate the concept of “disinformation” at the regulatory level.","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74186538","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
CERTAIN ASPECTS ON THE ORGANIZATION OF TRAFFIC CONTROL 组织交通管制的某些方面
Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.17721/2227-796x.2022.2.03
Yevhen Bakutin
The article is devoted to traffic control with the use of vehicles. Control over road users is a very effective area of activity of the Patrol Police Department, which allows to quickly influence the traffic process and the behavior of its participants. That is, the patrol police directly monitors traffic in Ukraine. The effectiveness of control largely depends on the forms and methods of its implementation. According to most experts, the reduction in accidents is due to a number of national measures, among which an important place is to improve the rules establishing liability for violations of traffic rules. The purpose of the study – the article considers the issue of car – phantom patrol in a more “understandable” aspect, namely: the implementation of specialized police cars without special external control over compliance with road users in accordance with the Law of Ukraine “On Road Traffic”. Methodology. The research is based on the dialectical-materialist method of scientific knowledge of social and legal phenomena, as well as general and special methods of legal science, namely: system-structural, comparative-legal, logical-legal (dogmatic), statistical. The scientific novelty of the study is to prove a particularly acute issue in the fight against traffic safety in the field of specialized vehicles – “phantoms”. Legislation on road safety has played a positive role in the last five years. The state of accidents in the state has stabilized, the level of discipline of road users has relatively increased. However, the problem of traffic safety remains unresolved. Experience with the implementation of traffic policy shows that the implementation of preventive measures is successful when the methods of persuasion are supported by legal norms that establish responsibility, an adequate degree of public danger of traffic violations. Conclusions. Regarding the introduction of fixation of traffic violations by specialized cars – “phantoms”, it should be noted that this should be preceded by extensive outreach among citizens and especially among drivers. Therefore, it is desirable to organize explanatory work of patrol police chiefs in the media. As a result, all this will lead to an atmosphere of understanding among drivers about the need and legitimacy of the use of this form of control in the work of the patrol police of Ukraine. The main purpose of the introduction of specialized vehicles – “phantoms” – is to identify and eliminate from the process of traffic drivers who have committed serious violations that directly affect the occurrence of road accidents. Therefore, timely control is the key to road safety and saved lives.
这篇文章专门讨论使用车辆的交通管制。对道路使用者的控制是巡逻警察部门一个非常有效的活动领域,它允许快速影响交通过程和参与者的行为。也就是说,巡逻警察直接监控乌克兰的交通。控制的有效性在很大程度上取决于其实施的形式和方法。大多数专家认为,交通事故的减少是由于国家采取了一系列措施,其中一个重要的地方是完善违反交通规则的责任规定。这篇文章的研究目的是从一个更“可以理解”的方面来考虑汽车幻影巡逻的问题,即:根据乌克兰“道路交通法”,在没有特殊外部控制的情况下,对道路使用者的遵守情况实施专门的警车。方法。研究的基础是社会和法律现象科学认识的辩证唯物主义方法,以及法学的一般和特殊方法,即:系统结构法、比较法、逻辑法(教条法)、统计法。这项研究的科学新颖之处在于,它证明了在特种车辆领域对抗交通安全的一个特别尖锐的问题——“幽灵”。在过去五年中,道路安全立法发挥了积极作用。该州的交通事故状况趋于稳定,道路使用者的纪律水平也相对提高。然而,交通安全问题仍然没有得到解决。执行交通政策的经验表明,当说服的方法得到法律规范的支持时,预防措施的执行是成功的,这些法律规范确立了责任,规定了交通违规的适当程度的公共危险。结论。关于采用专门车辆- -“幽灵”- -固定交通违章行为的办法,应当指出,在这之前应在公民中,特别是在司机中进行广泛的宣传。因此,有必要组织巡警局长在媒体上的解释工作。因此,所有这一切将导致司机之间对在乌克兰巡逻警察的工作中使用这种形式的控制的必要性和合法性的理解气氛。引入专用车辆——“幽灵”——的主要目的是在过程中识别和消除犯有直接影响道路交通事故发生的严重违法行为的交通驾驶员。因此,及时控制是保证道路安全和挽救生命的关键。
{"title":"CERTAIN ASPECTS ON THE ORGANIZATION OF TRAFFIC CONTROL","authors":"Yevhen Bakutin","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2022.2.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2022.2.03","url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to traffic control with the use of vehicles. Control over road users is a very effective area of activity of the Patrol Police Department, which allows to quickly influence the traffic process and the behavior of its participants. That is, the patrol police directly monitors traffic in Ukraine. The effectiveness of control largely depends on the forms and methods of its implementation. According to most experts, the reduction in accidents is due to a number of national measures, among which an important place is to improve the rules establishing liability for violations of traffic rules. The purpose of the study – the article considers the issue of car – phantom patrol in a more “understandable” aspect, namely: the implementation of specialized police cars without special external control over compliance with road users in accordance with the Law of Ukraine “On Road Traffic”. Methodology. The research is based on the dialectical-materialist method of scientific knowledge of social and legal phenomena, as well as general and special methods of legal science, namely: system-structural, comparative-legal, logical-legal (dogmatic), statistical. The scientific novelty of the study is to prove a particularly acute issue in the fight against traffic safety in the field of specialized vehicles – “phantoms”. Legislation on road safety has played a positive role in the last five years. The state of accidents in the state has stabilized, the level of discipline of road users has relatively increased. However, the problem of traffic safety remains unresolved. Experience with the implementation of traffic policy shows that the implementation of preventive measures is successful when the methods of persuasion are supported by legal norms that establish responsibility, an adequate degree of public danger of traffic violations. Conclusions. Regarding the introduction of fixation of traffic violations by specialized cars – “phantoms”, it should be noted that this should be preceded by extensive outreach among citizens and especially among drivers. Therefore, it is desirable to organize explanatory work of patrol police chiefs in the media. As a result, all this will lead to an atmosphere of understanding among drivers about the need and legitimacy of the use of this form of control in the work of the patrol police of Ukraine. The main purpose of the introduction of specialized vehicles – “phantoms” – is to identify and eliminate from the process of traffic drivers who have committed serious violations that directly affect the occurrence of road accidents. Therefore, timely control is the key to road safety and saved lives.","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"24 34","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91436525","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
UPDATE OF REGULATORY AND LEGAL ACTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE ADOPTION OF THE LAW OF UKRAINE «ABOUT ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE» 更新与乌克兰“关于行政程序”的法律通过有关的法规和法律行为
Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.17721/2227-796x.2022.4.05
Andriy Shkolyk
The purpose of the article is to establish optimal ways of amending the existing normativelegal acts of Ukraine (mainly legislative, but also by-laws) containing separate administrativeprocedural norms, due to the recent adoption of the general Law of Ukraine «On AdministrativeProcedure», which should enter into force at the end of 2023.The methodology used in the article involves the use of scientific methods of documentary analysis,comparative jurisprudence, modeling, as well as the system method.As a result of the conducted research, general conclusions and recommendations were formulated for the subjects of norm-designing and norm-making activities regarding the significant update ofexisting legal acts with different scope of administrative procedural norms in connection with theadoption of the General Law of Ukraine «On Administrative Procedure».First of all, in the above-mentioned activity, the reduction of the number and, in general, theminimization of normative legal acts, which to a greater or lesser extent regulate the administrativeprocedure in Ukraine, are desirable. Such minimization will objectively reduce the existing risks ofconflicts of legal norms and potential legal uncertainty for numerous subjects of law enforcement,both for functionally belonging to the public administration at the central and local levels, and forprivate (natural and legal) persons – participants in administrative proceedings.Secondly, the preservation of special legal regulation in certain spheres of activity of the nationalpublic administration should not be motivated by the mere existence of legislative acts or, moreover,by established traditions of their enforcement, which in practice borders on conservatism. Theonly reason for leaving certain acts of special legislation with the content of administrativeproceduralnorms in force should be a real justification of the feasibility of enshrining certainfeatures, different from the rules of general administrative procedure.Thirdly, in justified cases of preservation of special regulatory legal acts, their provisions shouldbe coordinated not only with the principles of administrative procedure defined by the newGeneral Law, but also with its new terminology and approaches to key administrative proceduralinstitutions.
本文的目的是建立修改乌克兰现有的规范性法律行为(主要是立法,但也包括附则)的最佳方式,因为最近通过了乌克兰“行政程序”总法,该法律将于2023年底生效。本文采用的研究方法包括文献分析法、比较法理学、模型法以及系统法等科学方法的运用。作为所进行的研究的结果,为规范设计和规范制定活动的主题制定了一般性结论和建议,这些主题涉及与乌克兰“行政程序”普通法的通过有关的具有不同行政程序规范范围的现有法律行为的重大更新。首先,在上述活动中,减少数量,总的来说,尽量减少规范性法律行为,这些法律行为或多或少地规范了乌克兰的行政程序,是可取的。这种最小化将客观上减少法律规范冲突的现有风险,以及许多执法主体的潜在法律不确定性,无论是在功能上属于中央和地方一级的公共行政部门,还是私人(自然人和法人)-行政诉讼的参与者。其次,在国家公共行政的某些活动领域中保留特殊的法律规定不应仅仅受到立法行为存在的动机,更不应受到其执行的既定传统的动机,这种传统在实践上接近保守主义。使某些特殊立法行为具有有效的行政程序规范的内容的唯一理由,应该是真正证明其载有不同于一般行政程序规则的某些特征的可行性。第三,在特殊规范性法律行为保全的正当情况下,其规定不仅要与新《通法》确定的行政程序原则相协调,而且要与新《通法》对关键行政程序制度的新术语和新方法相协调。
{"title":"UPDATE OF REGULATORY AND LEGAL ACTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE ADOPTION OF THE LAW OF UKRAINE «ABOUT ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE»","authors":"Andriy Shkolyk","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2022.4.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2022.4.05","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article is to establish optimal ways of amending the existing normativelegal acts of Ukraine (mainly legislative, but also by-laws) containing separate administrativeprocedural norms, due to the recent adoption of the general Law of Ukraine «On AdministrativeProcedure», which should enter into force at the end of 2023.The methodology used in the article involves the use of scientific methods of documentary analysis,comparative jurisprudence, modeling, as well as the system method.As a result of the conducted research, general conclusions and recommendations were formulated for the subjects of norm-designing and norm-making activities regarding the significant update ofexisting legal acts with different scope of administrative procedural norms in connection with theadoption of the General Law of Ukraine «On Administrative Procedure».First of all, in the above-mentioned activity, the reduction of the number and, in general, theminimization of normative legal acts, which to a greater or lesser extent regulate the administrativeprocedure in Ukraine, are desirable. Such minimization will objectively reduce the existing risks ofconflicts of legal norms and potential legal uncertainty for numerous subjects of law enforcement,both for functionally belonging to the public administration at the central and local levels, and forprivate (natural and legal) persons – participants in administrative proceedings.Secondly, the preservation of special legal regulation in certain spheres of activity of the nationalpublic administration should not be motivated by the mere existence of legislative acts or, moreover,by established traditions of their enforcement, which in practice borders on conservatism. Theonly reason for leaving certain acts of special legislation with the content of administrativeproceduralnorms in force should be a real justification of the feasibility of enshrining certainfeatures, different from the rules of general administrative procedure.Thirdly, in justified cases of preservation of special regulatory legal acts, their provisions shouldbe coordinated not only with the principles of administrative procedure defined by the newGeneral Law, but also with its new terminology and approaches to key administrative proceduralinstitutions.","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79110598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
THE NORMS THAT ESTABLISH THE PROCEDURES FOR COLLECTION OF LOCAL TAXES IN THE STRUCTURE OF THE TAX CODE OF UKRAINE 在乌克兰税法结构中确定征收地方税程序的规范
Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.17721/2227-796x.2022.2.05
K. Nedostup
Purpose. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the proposal regarding the placement of legal norms that establish the procedure for collection of local taxes in the structure of the Tax Code of Ukraine. Methods. The quantitative text processing of the text of the Tax Code of Ukraine followed by the interpretation of the results was carried out with the help of content analysis. The formal and legal method was used for the logical processing of legal norms. The comparative method was used when comparing the structure of the code throughout its validity period and the grouping method was used during the division of local taxes and fees depending on the object of taxation. Results. It was substantiated that the legally established definition of the concept of “tax (fee, contribution)” has a tautology of essential features of the direction of mandatory payment. It contains the condition that payers receive a special benefit, which does not correspond to reality, is not fully correlated with rent payments and rent (for land). The words that are not synonyms and have different lexical meanings are identified in the defined concept. The logical definitions of the tax-legal terms such as “tax” and “local tax” which reveal the essence of these mandatory payments were formulated. It was proven that there is no property tax in the tax system. The norms of article 265 of the Tax Code of Ukraine are contrary to common sense – one local tax cannot “consist»” of three local taxes that have different legally established mandatory elements. It was emphasized that today, if business entity has the appropriate property (within the meaning given in article 190 of the Civil Code of Ukraine), it may be a payer of real property tax other than land, transport tax, land tax and parking spaces tax. The object of tourist taxation is not legally established. It was proven that it is a temporary accommodation service received by individual who is a taxpayer in the places of residence (overnight stay), the list of which is given in paragraph 268.5.1 of the Tax Code of Ukraine. It was emphasized that the name and the structure of Section XII of the Tax Code of Ukraine are not consistent with the norms of article 10 and article 265 of this Code. This section of the codified legal act includes the norms that establish the procedure for collection of the tourist tax, which is not taxed on property. Conclusions. The proposed structure of the special part of the Tax Code of Ukraine, which includes the procedures for collection of existing taxes and fees in the tax system, fully complies with the current norms of paragraph 8.1 of article 8, paragraph 9.1 of article 9 and paragraphs 10.1, 10.2 of article 10 of the Tax Code of Ukraine. It provides the opportunity to make additions to the relevant section of the Tax Code of Ukraine in case of the introduction of new national and/or local taxes and fees into the tax system of Ukraine.
目的。这篇文章的目的是证实关于在乌克兰税法的结构中确立征收地方税程序的法律规范的建议。方法。在内容分析的帮助下,对乌克兰税法文本进行了定量文本处理,随后对结果进行了解释。对法律规范的逻辑处理采用形式法和法律法。在整个有效期内对代码结构进行比较时,采用了比较法;在地方税和收费按课税对象划分时,采用了分组法。结果。经证实,法律确定的“税(费、缴款)”概念的定义具有强制性支付方向的基本特征的同义反复。它包含付款人获得特殊利益的条件,这与现实不符,与租金支付和租金(土地)不完全相关。在定义的概念中识别非同义词且具有不同词汇含义的单词。对“税收”和“地方税”等税收法律术语的逻辑定义进行了阐述,揭示了这些强制性支付的本质。事实证明,税制中没有财产税。乌克兰税法第265条的准则违反常识- -一项地方税不能由具有不同法律规定的强制性要素的三种地方税“组成”。有人强调,今天,如果商业实体拥有适当的财产(在乌克兰民法典第190条所规定的意义范围内),它可能是土地、运输税、土地税和停车位税以外的不动产税的缴纳者。旅游征税对象未依法确立。事实证明,这是纳税人在居住地(过夜)接受的临时住宿服务,其清单载于乌克兰税法第268.5.1段。有人强调,乌克兰税法第十二节的名称和结构与税法第10条和第265条的规范不一致。编纂的法律法案的这一部分包括确立征收旅游税程序的规范,旅游税不针对财产征税。结论。乌克兰税法特别部分的拟议结构,包括税收制度中现有税费的征收程序,完全符合乌克兰税法第8条第8.1款、第9条第9.1款和第10条第10.1款、第10.2款的现行规范。它提供了在乌克兰税收系统引入新的国家和/或地方税收和费用的情况下,对乌克兰税法相关部分进行补充的机会。
{"title":"THE NORMS THAT ESTABLISH THE PROCEDURES FOR COLLECTION OF LOCAL TAXES IN THE STRUCTURE OF THE TAX CODE OF UKRAINE","authors":"K. Nedostup","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2022.2.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2022.2.05","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the proposal regarding the placement of legal norms that establish the procedure for collection of local taxes in the structure of the Tax Code of Ukraine. Methods. The quantitative text processing of the text of the Tax Code of Ukraine followed by the interpretation of the results was carried out with the help of content analysis. The formal and legal method was used for the logical processing of legal norms. The comparative method was used when comparing the structure of the code throughout its validity period and the grouping method was used during the division of local taxes and fees depending on the object of taxation. Results. It was substantiated that the legally established definition of the concept of “tax (fee, contribution)” has a tautology of essential features of the direction of mandatory payment. It contains the condition that payers receive a special benefit, which does not correspond to reality, is not fully correlated with rent payments and rent (for land). The words that are not synonyms and have different lexical meanings are identified in the defined concept. The logical definitions of the tax-legal terms such as “tax” and “local tax” which reveal the essence of these mandatory payments were formulated. It was proven that there is no property tax in the tax system. The norms of article 265 of the Tax Code of Ukraine are contrary to common sense – one local tax cannot “consist»” of three local taxes that have different legally established mandatory elements. It was emphasized that today, if business entity has the appropriate property (within the meaning given in article 190 of the Civil Code of Ukraine), it may be a payer of real property tax other than land, transport tax, land tax and parking spaces tax. The object of tourist taxation is not legally established. It was proven that it is a temporary accommodation service received by individual who is a taxpayer in the places of residence (overnight stay), the list of which is given in paragraph 268.5.1 of the Tax Code of Ukraine. It was emphasized that the name and the structure of Section XII of the Tax Code of Ukraine are not consistent with the norms of article 10 and article 265 of this Code. This section of the codified legal act includes the norms that establish the procedure for collection of the tourist tax, which is not taxed on property. Conclusions. The proposed structure of the special part of the Tax Code of Ukraine, which includes the procedures for collection of existing taxes and fees in the tax system, fully complies with the current norms of paragraph 8.1 of article 8, paragraph 9.1 of article 9 and paragraphs 10.1, 10.2 of article 10 of the Tax Code of Ukraine. It provides the opportunity to make additions to the relevant section of the Tax Code of Ukraine in case of the introduction of new national and/or local taxes and fees into the tax system of Ukraine.","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83645102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
THE LAW OF UKRAINE «ON ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE» AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHT OF HUMAN DIGNITY IN THE SPHERE OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION 乌克兰“行政程序法”作为在公共行政领域保护人的尊严权利的工具
Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.17721/2227-796x.2022.4.04
M. Kravchenko
Purpose. The purpose of the article consists in revealing the significance of the Law of Ukraine“On Administrative Procedure” for the protection of the right to human dignity in the field ofpublic administration.Methodology. Research methodology consists of general and special methods of scientificknowledge, and in particular: comparative, systemic-structural, formal-logical methods:deduction, induction, analysis and synthesis. Their use made it possible to analyze the investigatedproblem in the unity of its legal form and social content, as well as systematically and consistentlyapproach the disclosure of the research tasks.Results. The first section of the article describes the normative regulation of the right to human dignityat the level of Ukrainian legislation, notes the special importance of the decisions of the ConstitutionalCourt of Ukraine in revealing the content and role of this fundamental human right in the human rightssystem, and also emphasizes the limitations of its understanding in Ukraine, which as a result leads toto the lack of protection of the right to human dignity during administrative procedures.The second section of the article is devoted to clarifying the essence of the requirement that thepublic administration, when carrying out an administrative procedure, always sees a person as asubject of law. This demand is based on the right of human dignity. It prohibits turning any personinto an object in state procedures, degrading his dignity to the status of a thing. The third section of the article is devoted to the study of the mechanisms of protection of the rightto human dignity, which are laid down in the Law of Ukraine “On Administrative Procedure”.It has been proven that this Law contains a number of provisions aimed at ensuring compliancewith the right to human dignity of a private person in the administrative procedure. In particular,it is about the right to be heard, the requirement for the timeliness of consideration of a privateperson’s case by the public administration, the requirement for proportionality, the requirementfor the openness of the administrative procedure and other ideas that ensure the service of thepublic administration to the person, his needs, rights and legitimate interests.Conclusions. In the conclusions to the article, it is stated that the Law of Ukraine “On AdministrativeProcedure” establishes a qualitatively new legal basis for administrative procedure, which isfocused on the needs of a private person. This novelty is reflected, first of all, in such principles ofadministrative procedure as: guaranteeing the right of a person to participate in administrativeproceedings; timeliness and reasonable term; impartiality (impartiality) of the administrativebody; good faith and prudence; proportionality; openness; presumption of legality of the person’sactions and demands, etc. This Law of Ukraine is focused on the protection of a private person inthe field of public administration, and first of
目的。本文的目的在于揭示乌克兰《行政程序法》在公共行政领域保护人的尊严权的意义。研究方法论包括科学知识的一般方法和特殊方法,特别是比较方法、系统结构方法、形式逻辑方法、演绎方法、归纳方法、分析方法和综合方法。它们的使用,使得对所研究问题的法律形式和社会内容的统一进行分析,以及对研究任务的揭示进行系统、一致的探讨成为可能。文章的第一部分描述了乌克兰立法层面对人的尊严权的规范性规定,指出乌克兰宪法法院的判决在揭示这一基本人权在人权体系中的内容和作用方面的特殊重要性,并强调了乌克兰对其理解的局限性,从而导致在行政程序中缺乏对人的尊严权的保护。文章的第二部分阐明了公共行政在执行行政程序时始终把人作为法律主体的要求的本质。这一要求是建立在人的尊严权利的基础上的。它禁止在国家程序中把人变成物,把人的尊严贬低为物的地位。本文第三节专门研究乌克兰“行政程序法”规定的保护人的尊严权利的机制。事实证明,该法载有一些旨在确保在行政程序中遵守个人的人的尊严权的规定。特别是关于被听取的权利、公共行政对个人案件考虑的及时性的要求、相称性的要求、行政程序公开的要求等保障公共行政服务于个人、个人的需要、个人的权利和合法利益的理念。在文章的结论中,指出乌克兰“行政程序法”为行政程序建立了一个质的新法律基础,它侧重于个人的需要。这种新颖性首先体现在行政诉讼原则上:保障行政参与权;期限的及时性和合理性;行政机构的公正性(公正性);诚信审慎;比例;开放;人的行为和要求的合法性推定等。乌克兰这项法律的重点是在公共行政领域保护个人,首先是保护他的人的尊严的权利,使其不受公共行政的决定、行动或不作为的侵犯。
{"title":"THE LAW OF UKRAINE «ON ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE» AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHT OF HUMAN DIGNITY IN THE SPHERE OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","authors":"M. Kravchenko","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2022.4.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2022.4.04","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. The purpose of the article consists in revealing the significance of the Law of Ukraine“On Administrative Procedure” for the protection of the right to human dignity in the field ofpublic administration.Methodology. Research methodology consists of general and special methods of scientificknowledge, and in particular: comparative, systemic-structural, formal-logical methods:deduction, induction, analysis and synthesis. Their use made it possible to analyze the investigatedproblem in the unity of its legal form and social content, as well as systematically and consistentlyapproach the disclosure of the research tasks.Results. The first section of the article describes the normative regulation of the right to human dignityat the level of Ukrainian legislation, notes the special importance of the decisions of the ConstitutionalCourt of Ukraine in revealing the content and role of this fundamental human right in the human rightssystem, and also emphasizes the limitations of its understanding in Ukraine, which as a result leads toto the lack of protection of the right to human dignity during administrative procedures.The second section of the article is devoted to clarifying the essence of the requirement that thepublic administration, when carrying out an administrative procedure, always sees a person as asubject of law. This demand is based on the right of human dignity. It prohibits turning any personinto an object in state procedures, degrading his dignity to the status of a thing. The third section of the article is devoted to the study of the mechanisms of protection of the rightto human dignity, which are laid down in the Law of Ukraine “On Administrative Procedure”.It has been proven that this Law contains a number of provisions aimed at ensuring compliancewith the right to human dignity of a private person in the administrative procedure. In particular,it is about the right to be heard, the requirement for the timeliness of consideration of a privateperson’s case by the public administration, the requirement for proportionality, the requirementfor the openness of the administrative procedure and other ideas that ensure the service of thepublic administration to the person, his needs, rights and legitimate interests.Conclusions. In the conclusions to the article, it is stated that the Law of Ukraine “On AdministrativeProcedure” establishes a qualitatively new legal basis for administrative procedure, which isfocused on the needs of a private person. This novelty is reflected, first of all, in such principles ofadministrative procedure as: guaranteeing the right of a person to participate in administrativeproceedings; timeliness and reasonable term; impartiality (impartiality) of the administrativebody; good faith and prudence; proportionality; openness; presumption of legality of the person’sactions and demands, etc. This Law of Ukraine is focused on the protection of a private person inthe field of public administration, and first of","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73962415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
SUBJECTS OF INITIATING THE ISSUE OF SECURING A CLAIM BY SUSPENSION OF AN INDIVIDUAL ACT OR NORMATIVE LEGAL ACT 通过中止个人行为或规范性法律行为来发起索赔问题的主体
Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.17721/2227-796x.2022.1.06
V. Kuzmych
Purpose. The objective of the article is to identify problems related to the regulatory establishment of the subjects of initiating the issue of securing a claim by suspending the acts (individual acts or normative legal acts) of subjects of imperious plenary powers and suggest ways to solve them. Methods. A special formal-logical method has been applied in order to study the issue f compliance with the requirements of the principle of legal certainty in the normative consolidation of the subjects of initiating the issue of securing a claim by suspending the acts of the subjects of imperious plenary powers. By means of such general theoretical methods as analysis, synthesis, generalization and modelling, legislative errors in establishing a range of the subjects of initiating the issue of securing a claim have been identified, and suggestions to correct them have been made. Results. The article analyses the provisions of the Code of Administrative Proceedings of Ukraine in terms of the subjects of initiating the issue of securing a claim by suspending the acts of the subjects of imperious plenary powers. Based on the analysis of scientific approaches and case law, the issue of whether the administrative court and all the parties of court proceedings (the plaintiff, the defendant, the third parties and the individuals granted by law to appeal to the court in the interests of others) are actual right holders to initiate the issue of securing a claim by suspending the acts of the subjects of imperious plenary powers has been investigated. Conclusions. It has been proven that the legislator, contrary to the principle of legal certainty, does not provide for all the subjects of initiating the issue of securing an administrative claim. It has been noted that there is a collision between the provisions of part 1 and part 2 of art. 150 of the Code of Administrative Proceedings of Ukraine. This collision lies in the fact that part 1 of this article imperatively establishes that the subjects of initiating the issue of securing a claim are exclusively the parties of court proceedings and the administrative court, whereas part 2 also refers to the subjects of initiating the issue of securing a claim the individual who has not acquired the procedural status of a party of court proceedings (the plaintiff) yet, although may acquire it. It has been substantiated that the legislator, referring the defendant and the third parties who do not declare independent claims regarding the subject of the dispute on the part of the defendant as parties of court proceedings to the subjects of initiating the issue of securing an administrative claim, did not take into account the legal nature of this procedural institution. It has been substantiated that giving the administrative court the right to secure a claim on its own initiative corresponds to the specifics of administrative proceedings. It has been proposed to amend part 1 of art. 150 of the Code of Administrative Proc
目的。本文的目的是确定与通过中止拥有绝对绝对权力的主体的行为(个人行为或规范性法律行为)来发起确保索赔问题的主体的监管设置有关的问题,并提出解决这些问题的方法。方法。采用一种特殊的形式逻辑方法来研究在通过暂停专横的全体权力主体的行为来发起确保索赔的问题的主体的规范性巩固中遵守法律确定性原则要求的问题。通过分析、综合、概括和建模等一般理论方法,确定了在确定一系列发起索赔问题的主体方面的立法错误,并提出了纠正这些错误的建议。结果。本文分析了乌克兰《行政诉讼法典》中关于通过中止专横的全权主体的行为来提起索赔问题的规定。在科学方法和判例法分析的基础上,对行政法院和法院诉讼的所有当事人(原告、被告、第三人和法律授予的为他人利益向法院上诉的个人)是否为发起通过中止僭主权力主体的行为来确保索赔问题的实际权利人进行了研究。结论。事实证明,立法者违背了法律确定性原则,没有规定发起确保行政请求问题的所有主体。有人指出,第1部分和第2部分的规定之间存在冲突。乌克兰行政诉讼法典第150条。这一冲突在于,本条第1部分强制性地确立了发起索赔担保问题的主体仅是法院诉讼的当事人和行政法院,而第2部分也提到了发起索赔担保问题的主体,即尚未获得法院诉讼当事人(原告)的诉讼地位,尽管可能获得诉讼地位。事实证明,立法者将被告和未就被告作为法院诉讼当事人的争议主体提出独立索赔的第三方,指为发起确保行政索赔问题的主体,没有考虑到这一程序制度的法律性质。事实证明,赋予行政法院主动提出索赔的权利符合行政诉讼的具体情况。有人建议修订第1部分。《乌克兰行政诉讼法典》第150条,以便全面巩固提起索赔问题的主体范围,这反过来将改进执行行政索赔制度的程序。
{"title":"SUBJECTS OF INITIATING THE ISSUE OF SECURING A CLAIM BY SUSPENSION OF AN INDIVIDUAL ACT OR NORMATIVE LEGAL ACT","authors":"V. Kuzmych","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2022.1.06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2022.1.06","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. The objective of the article is to identify problems related to the regulatory establishment of the subjects of initiating the issue of securing a claim by suspending the acts (individual acts or normative legal acts) of subjects of imperious plenary powers and suggest ways to solve them. Methods. A special formal-logical method has been applied in order to study the issue f compliance with the requirements of the principle of legal certainty in the normative consolidation of the subjects of initiating the issue of securing a claim by suspending the acts of the subjects of imperious plenary powers. By means of such general theoretical methods as analysis, synthesis, generalization and modelling, legislative errors in establishing a range of the subjects of initiating the issue of securing a claim have been identified, and suggestions to correct them have been made. Results. The article analyses the provisions of the Code of Administrative Proceedings of Ukraine in terms of the subjects of initiating the issue of securing a claim by suspending the acts of the subjects of imperious plenary powers. Based on the analysis of scientific approaches and case law, the issue of whether the administrative court and all the parties of court proceedings (the plaintiff, the defendant, the third parties and the individuals granted by law to appeal to the court in the interests of others) are actual right holders to initiate the issue of securing a claim by suspending the acts of the subjects of imperious plenary powers has been investigated. Conclusions. It has been proven that the legislator, contrary to the principle of legal certainty, does not provide for all the subjects of initiating the issue of securing an administrative claim. It has been noted that there is a collision between the provisions of part 1 and part 2 of art. 150 of the Code of Administrative Proceedings of Ukraine. This collision lies in the fact that part 1 of this article imperatively establishes that the subjects of initiating the issue of securing a claim are exclusively the parties of court proceedings and the administrative court, whereas part 2 also refers to the subjects of initiating the issue of securing a claim the individual who has not acquired the procedural status of a party of court proceedings (the plaintiff) yet, although may acquire it. It has been substantiated that the legislator, referring the defendant and the third parties who do not declare independent claims regarding the subject of the dispute on the part of the defendant as parties of court proceedings to the subjects of initiating the issue of securing an administrative claim, did not take into account the legal nature of this procedural institution. It has been substantiated that giving the administrative court the right to secure a claim on its own initiative corresponds to the specifics of administrative proceedings. It has been proposed to amend part 1 of art. 150 of the Code of Administrative Proc","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"112 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80648766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTRACT IN THE PROCEDURE OF THE UNFORCED EXPROPRIATION: JUSTIFICATION AND ADVISABILITY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION 非强制征用程序中的行政合同:实施的正当性与合理性
Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.17721/2227-796x.2022.1.01
Anastasia Antonenkо
Purpose. The purpose of the article is justification of the concept of the contract of redemption as an administrative contract and proving of the advisability of its implementation in Ukrainian procedure of the unforced expropriation. Methods. The research methodology consists of general and special methods of scientific cognition, including comparative and legal, systematic and structural methods, deduction, induction, analysis, synthesis, etc. Results. Main Features of administrative contracts, which are determined on the normative and scientific levels, are compared with features of the contract of redemption for public needs in the first part of the article. As a result the compliance of the contract of redemption with the requirements for administrative contracts is approved. Certain criteria according to which scholars and courts of European states classify the expropriation contract as administrative-legal are highlighted in the second part of the article. This allowed to further emphasizing the affiliation of the contract of redemption to administrative contracts. The place of the expropriation contract at the system of administrative contracts of certain European states is considered in the third part of the article. It is highlighted one of the features of the expropriation procedure, according to which expropriation contract radically is different from private law agreements and which related to the possibility of concluding a partial agreement. Conclusions. In the conclusions to the article it is summarized that the contract of redemption as an idea, a concept, which is enshrined in Part 3 of Art. 153 of the Civil Code of Ukraine and follows from the essence of the expropriation procedure, belongs to administrative contracts, which is confirmed by the analysis and full compliance of its features with the features of administrative contracts in domestic and foreign theory of administrative law, as well as analysis of regulations, judicial practice and legal doctrine of European countries, especially Germany, Switzerland and Liechtenstein.
目的。本文的目的是证明赎回合同作为一种行政合同的概念是合理的,并证明在乌克兰非强制征用程序中实施赎回合同是可取的。方法。研究方法论由科学认知的一般方法和特殊方法组成,包括比较方法和法律方法、系统方法和结构方法、演绎方法、归纳法、分析方法和综合方法等。结果。本文第一部分从规范和科学两个层面确定了行政合同的主要特征,并将其与公共需求赎回合同的特征进行了比较。由此,认定赎回合同符合行政合同的要求。文章第二部分着重介绍了欧洲各国学者和法院对征收合同进行行政法律分类的若干标准。这就进一步强调了赎回合同与行政合同的联系。文章的第三部分考察了征收合同在某些欧洲国家行政合同制度中的地位。征用合同与私法协议有着根本的区别,它关系到部分协议达成的可能性,这是征用程序的特点之一。结论。在本文的结论总结,救赎合同作为一个想法,一个概念,体现在艺术的第3部分。153乌克兰和遵循民法的征用过程的本质,属于行政合同,这是证实了分析和完全合规的特性与行政契约的特点在国内外的行政法理论,以及规定的分析,欧洲国家,特别是德国、瑞士和列支敦士登的司法实践和法律学说。
{"title":"ADMINISTRATIVE CONTRACT IN THE PROCEDURE OF THE UNFORCED EXPROPRIATION: JUSTIFICATION AND ADVISABILITY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION","authors":"Anastasia Antonenkо","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2022.1.01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2022.1.01","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. The purpose of the article is justification of the concept of the contract of redemption as an administrative contract and proving of the advisability of its implementation in Ukrainian procedure of the unforced expropriation. Methods. The research methodology consists of general and special methods of scientific cognition, including comparative and legal, systematic and structural methods, deduction, induction, analysis, synthesis, etc. Results. Main Features of administrative contracts, which are determined on the normative and scientific levels, are compared with features of the contract of redemption for public needs in the first part of the article. As a result the compliance of the contract of redemption with the requirements for administrative contracts is approved. Certain criteria according to which scholars and courts of European states classify the expropriation contract as administrative-legal are highlighted in the second part of the article. This allowed to further emphasizing the affiliation of the contract of redemption to administrative contracts. The place of the expropriation contract at the system of administrative contracts of certain European states is considered in the third part of the article. It is highlighted one of the features of the expropriation procedure, according to which expropriation contract radically is different from private law agreements and which related to the possibility of concluding a partial agreement. Conclusions. In the conclusions to the article it is summarized that the contract of redemption as an idea, a concept, which is enshrined in Part 3 of Art. 153 of the Civil Code of Ukraine and follows from the essence of the expropriation procedure, belongs to administrative contracts, which is confirmed by the analysis and full compliance of its features with the features of administrative contracts in domestic and foreign theory of administrative law, as well as analysis of regulations, judicial practice and legal doctrine of European countries, especially Germany, Switzerland and Liechtenstein.","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77545076","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Administrative law and process
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1