首页 > 最新文献

Administrative law and process最新文献

英文 中文
PECULIARITIES OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL REGULATION OF THE ACTIVITY OF HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL RESERVES IN UKRAINE 乌克兰历史和文化保护区活动的行政和法律规定的特点
Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.17721/2227-796x.2022.3.02
Anfisa Nashinets-Naumova, Olga Baitalyuk
The purpose of the article is to substantiate the peculiarities of the administrative and legal regulation of the activity of historical and cultural reserves in Ukraine as objects of cultural heritage. Methods. The research methodology consists of general and special methods of scientific knowledge, including comparative legal, systemic and structural, analysis, synthesis, and others, which allow a systematic and consistent approach to the disclosure of the questions posed, to investigate and compare the positions of scientists, the provisions of regulatory and legal acts of Ukraine, to formulate the author’s conclusions. The results. The first section of the article analyses approaches to defining the concept and classification of historical and cultural reserves. In the second section of the article, the legal regulation of the creation of a historical and cultural reserve is analysed, the list of documents that must be submitted in order to make a decision on its creation is determined, and the procedural terms for consideration of a request for the creation of a historical and cultural reserve are determined. The third section of the article analyses the legal features of the management of the historical and cultural reserve, defines the tasks and functions of the administration and the head of the historical and cultural reserve. The fourth chapter of the article defines the peculiarities of the activities of historical and cultural reserves in the conditions of the pandemic and martial law. Conclusions. Having analysed a number of legal acts on the administrative-legal regulation of the activity of historical-cultural reserves, it was established that at the administrative-legal level, the activity of historical-cultural reserves as objects of cultural heritage is regulated at a sufficient level. There is an established mechanism of legal regulation of their creation, management, and activity both in normal conditions and in the conditions of a pandemic of the respiratory disease COVID-19 caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and in conditions of martial law. However, a rather complicated procedure (a number of necessary documents, the need to prove the expediency of creating a reserve, problems with financing, etc.) inhibits the creation of historical and cultural reserves.
这篇文章的目的是证实乌克兰作为文化遗产对象的历史和文化保护区活动的行政和法律规定的特殊性。方法。研究方法包括一般和特殊的科学知识方法,包括比较法律,系统和结构,分析,综合等,这使得系统和一致的方法可以揭示所提出的问题,调查和比较科学家的立场,乌克兰监管和法律行为的规定,形成作者的结论。结果。文章第一部分分析了历史文化保护区概念界定和分类的方法。在文章的第二部分中,分析了建立历史文化保护区的法律规定,确定了决定建立历史文化保护区必须提交的文件清单,并确定了审议建立历史文化保护区请求的程序条件。文章的第三部分分析了历史文化保护区管理的法律特征,明确了历史文化保护区管理部门和历史文化保护区负责人的任务和职能。文章第四章界定了在疫情和戒严条件下历史文化保护区活动的特点。结论。通过对若干关于历史文化保护区活动的行政法律规制的分析,认为在行政法律层面上,历史文化保护区作为文化遗产客体的活动得到了充分的规制。在正常情况下、新冠肺炎疫情大流行情况下和戒严情况下,对其创建、管理和活动都有完善的法律规制机制。但是,相当复杂的程序(一些必要的文件、需要证明设立保护区的便利性、资金筹措问题等)阻碍了历史和文化保护区的建立。
{"title":"PECULIARITIES OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL REGULATION OF THE ACTIVITY OF HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL RESERVES IN UKRAINE","authors":"Anfisa Nashinets-Naumova, Olga Baitalyuk","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2022.3.02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2022.3.02","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article is to substantiate the peculiarities of the administrative and legal regulation of the activity of historical and cultural reserves in Ukraine as objects of cultural heritage. Methods. The research methodology consists of general and special methods of scientific knowledge, including comparative legal, systemic and structural, analysis, synthesis, and others, which allow a systematic and consistent approach to the disclosure of the questions posed, to investigate and compare the positions of scientists, the provisions of regulatory and legal acts of Ukraine, to formulate the author’s conclusions. The results. The first section of the article analyses approaches to defining the concept and classification of historical and cultural reserves. In the second section of the article, the legal regulation of the creation of a historical and cultural reserve is analysed, the list of documents that must be submitted in order to make a decision on its creation is determined, and the procedural terms for consideration of a request for the creation of a historical and cultural reserve are determined. The third section of the article analyses the legal features of the management of the historical and cultural reserve, defines the tasks and functions of the administration and the head of the historical and cultural reserve. The fourth chapter of the article defines the peculiarities of the activities of historical and cultural reserves in the conditions of the pandemic and martial law. Conclusions. Having analysed a number of legal acts on the administrative-legal regulation of the activity of historical-cultural reserves, it was established that at the administrative-legal level, the activity of historical-cultural reserves as objects of cultural heritage is regulated at a sufficient level. There is an established mechanism of legal regulation of their creation, management, and activity both in normal conditions and in the conditions of a pandemic of the respiratory disease COVID-19 caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and in conditions of martial law. However, a rather complicated procedure (a number of necessary documents, the need to prove the expediency of creating a reserve, problems with financing, etc.) inhibits the creation of historical and cultural reserves.","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80900515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
SUBJECT OF REGULATION AND SCOPE OF ACTION THE LAW OF UKRAINE «ON ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE» 法规的主体和行动范围的法律乌克兰«行政程序»
Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.17721/2227-796x.2022.4.02
I. Boiko
The purpose of the research is to find out the subject of regulation and scope of the Law of Ukraine «on Administrative Procedure», as well as the directions of activity where this law does not work. Methods. The research was carried out by means of the method of formal logic, formal-legal analysis, analysis of legal categories and understanding and their correlation, which allowed to give answers to the questions outlined in the purpose of this scientific investigation. Results. The importance of the Law of Ukraine «on Administrative Procedure» to regulate relations between public administration and private person is emphasized. Its European integration essence is underlined. The importance of administrative procedure for public administration is analyzed. The emphasis was placed on the need for law enforcement activities to define the subject of legal regulation and the scope of the law. Analysis of such fundamental provisions of the law on administrative procedure as administrative case, publicity of legal relations, rights, freedoms and lawful interests of the person, duties of the person, administrative body, functions of public administration, administrative act was made. Their essence and meaning is drawn. The position on the possibility of realization and protection in administrative proceeding of legal interests of the person is substantiated. An approach to understanding the administrative body in its functional context has been formulated. Types of administrative acts are given. The scope of the Law of Ukraine “on Administrative Procedure” and the exceptions to it are outlined. Conclusions. The definition of the subject of regulation and scope of the Law of Ukraine «on Administrative Procedure» is important for law enforcement, as it allows to outline the nature of public relations and the spheres of activity that will be regulated by the LAP. The category «administrative body» is characterized by functional purpose, which has a consequence of expansion of the circle of subjects whose activity is subject to regulatory influence on the part of the LAP. With the adoption of the LAP, the realization and protection of legal interests of the person through the implementation of administrative proceedings have received legal regulation. This opens up opportunities for the settlement of administrative cases involving interested persons, which will allow to take into account the interests of all participants of the proceeding and to adopt administrative act that will satisfy public interests and needs of persons. An administrative act should be understood as a decision or legally significant action on granting a person a right, its realization, assigning to a person the duty stipulated by the law, refusing to exercise the right, about early termination of the act, which is carried out by its cancellation, withdrawal or recognition as invalid. The scope of the LAP is public administration, with the exception of the relations established by the
研究的目的是找出乌克兰“行政程序法”的监管主体和范围,以及该法律不适用的活动方向。方法。这项研究是通过形式逻辑、形式法律分析、法律类别分析和理解及其相互关系的方法进行的,这使得能够回答这项科学调查目的所概述的问题。结果。强调了乌克兰“行政程序法”在规范公共行政与私人关系方面的重要性。它强调了欧洲一体化的本质。分析了行政程序对公共行政的重要性。强调执法活动必须界定法律管制的主题和法律的范围。对行政诉讼法中行政案件、法律关系公开、人的权利、自由和合法利益、人的义务、行政主体、公共行政职能、行政行为等基本规定进行了分析。总结了它们的本质和意义。对行政诉讼中相对人合法利益实现与保护的可能性进行了论证。已经拟订了一种在其职能范围内了解行政机构的办法。给出了行政行为的类型。概述了乌克兰“行政程序法”的范围及其例外情况。结论。乌克兰“行政程序法”的监管主体和范围的定义对执法很重要,因为它可以概述公共关系的性质和将由LAP监管的活动领域。"行政机构"这一类别具有职能目的的特点,其结果是扩大了其活动受行政部门监管影响的主体范围。随着行政诉讼法的采用,通过实施行政诉讼实现和保护相对人的合法利益得到了法律的规范。这为解决涉及利害关系人的行政案件提供了机会,这将允许考虑到所有诉讼参与者的利益,并采取符合公共利益和个人需要的行政行为。行政行为应当理解为以撤销、撤销或者认定无效的方式,对授予他人权利、权利的实现、赋予他人法律规定的义务、拒绝行使权利、提前终止行为等作出的决定或者具有法律意义的行为。法律适用范围是公共行政,但法律规定的关系除外。
{"title":"SUBJECT OF REGULATION AND SCOPE OF ACTION THE LAW OF UKRAINE «ON ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE»","authors":"I. Boiko","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2022.4.02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2022.4.02","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the research is to find out the subject of regulation and scope of the Law of Ukraine «on Administrative Procedure», as well as the directions of activity where this law does not work. Methods. The research was carried out by means of the method of formal logic, formal-legal analysis, analysis of legal categories and understanding and their correlation, which allowed to give answers to the questions outlined in the purpose of this scientific investigation. Results. The importance of the Law of Ukraine «on Administrative Procedure» to regulate relations between public administration and private person is emphasized. Its European integration essence is underlined. The importance of administrative procedure for public administration is analyzed. The emphasis was placed on the need for law enforcement activities to define the subject of legal regulation and the scope of the law. Analysis of such fundamental provisions of the law on administrative procedure as administrative case, publicity of legal relations, rights, freedoms and lawful interests of the person, duties of the person, administrative body, functions of public administration, administrative act was made. Their essence and meaning is drawn. The position on the possibility of realization and protection in administrative proceeding of legal interests of the person is substantiated. An approach to understanding the administrative body in its functional context has been formulated. Types of administrative acts are given. The scope of the Law of Ukraine “on Administrative Procedure” and the exceptions to it are outlined. Conclusions. The definition of the subject of regulation and scope of the Law of Ukraine «on Administrative Procedure» is important for law enforcement, as it allows to outline the nature of public relations and the spheres of activity that will be regulated by the LAP. The category «administrative body» is characterized by functional purpose, which has a consequence of expansion of the circle of subjects whose activity is subject to regulatory influence on the part of the LAP. With the adoption of the LAP, the realization and protection of legal interests of the person through the implementation of administrative proceedings have received legal regulation. This opens up opportunities for the settlement of administrative cases involving interested persons, which will allow to take into account the interests of all participants of the proceeding and to adopt administrative act that will satisfy public interests and needs of persons. An administrative act should be understood as a decision or legally significant action on granting a person a right, its realization, assigning to a person the duty stipulated by the law, refusing to exercise the right, about early termination of the act, which is carried out by its cancellation, withdrawal or recognition as invalid. The scope of the LAP is public administration, with the exception of the relations established by the ","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81055780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
THE SYSTEM OF SUBJECTS FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF MINORS INVOLVED TO ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITY 未成年人权利保护主体制度涉及行政责任
Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.17721/2227-796x.2022.1.03
O. Dubina
The purpose of the article is to form an idea of the modern system of subjects of protection of the rights of minors who are prosecuted for administrative offenses. The urgency of the topic is due to the high level of administrative offenses by children and the insufficiently effective level of legal support of their rights in administrative-tort proceedings. The research methodology was formed by a set of general scientific and special methods of cognition. In particular, the rethinking of the role of some subjects of administrative and tort proceedings with jurisdictional powers has been achieved through the dialectical method of cognition. The method of systematic analysis was used in building the system of subjects of ensuring the rights of minors who are brought to administrative responsibility. The sociological survey allowed to find out the attitude of specialists in the field of law to some debatable issues of the functioning of these entities, etc. The results of the study are a certain list of subjects of protection of the rights of minors who are prosecuted for committing administrative offenses, their role in this process. The properties and perspectives that characterize this system of subjects are highlighted: the tasks of protecting the rights of children in administrative-tort relations are implemented by the respective subjects within the framework of judicial proceedings or public administration (management); the obligation of a number of subjects to protect the rights of this category of persons derives from the tasks of proceedings in cases of administrative offenses and is combined with their administrative and jurisdictional powers; juvenile specialization of such participants in proceedings on administrative offenses as a judge, prosecutor, defense counsel – is a necessary condition for effective protection of the rights of a child in conflict with the law and ensuring its best interests in administrative-tort legal relations; in order to provide quality legal assistance, only a lawyer should be a defender of a minor who is brought to administrative responsibility; it is necessary to intensify the participation of scientific, human rights institutions and institutions of local communities in the search for and implementation of effective administrative and legal mechanisms to protect the rights of minors who are held administratively liable. The conclusions of the article propose a generalized version of the system of the main subjects of protection of the rights of minors prosecuted for committing administrative offenses, which are divided into the following groups – subjects: policy of protection of children’s rights in administrative-tort relations; entities that represent and protect the rights and interests of a minor in proceedings on administrative offenses; who must protect the rights of minors during the exercise of administrative and jurisdictional powers in this type of proceedings; who should protect the rights
本文的目的在于形成现代未成年人行政违法被追诉权利保护主体制度的构想。这一问题的紧迫性是由于儿童行政违法的程度较高,而在行政侵权诉讼中对儿童权利的法律支持不够有效。研究方法论是由一套一般科学的和特殊的认知方法构成的。特别是通过辩证的认识方法,对具有管辖权的行政诉讼主体和侵权诉讼主体的角色进行了重新思考。运用系统分析的方法,构建未成年人行政责任权利保障主体体系。社会学调查可以发现法律领域的专家对这些实体的运作等一些有争议的问题的态度。研究结果列出了因行政犯罪而受到起诉的未成年人权利保护的某些对象及其在这一过程中的作用。强调了这一主体制度的特点和观点:在行政侵权关系中保护儿童权利的任务由各自的主体在司法程序或公共行政(管理)的框架内执行;若干主体保护这类人的权利的义务源于行政违法案件的诉讼任务,并与它们的行政权力和管辖权相结合;法官、检察官、辩护律师等行政违法诉讼参与人的少年专业化是有效保护触犯法律的儿童权利和确保其在行政侵权法律关系中最大利益的必要条件;为了提供高质量的法律援助,只有律师才能成为被追究行政责任的未成年人的辩护人;必须加强科学、人权机构和地方社区机构的参与,寻求和执行有效的行政和法律机制,以保护负有行政责任的未成年人的权利。文章的结论部分提出了未成年人行政违法被诉权利保护主体体系的概括,将其分为以下几类主体:行政侵权关系中的儿童权利保护政策主体;在行政违法诉讼中代表和保护未成年人权益的单位;在行使此类诉讼的行政管辖权时,必须保护未成年人的权利;在实施行政处罚或影响措施期间,应当保护未成年人的权利;监督行政违法诉讼的法律实施;防止侵犯儿童的权利和自由,促进恢复这些权利和自由。
{"title":"THE SYSTEM OF SUBJECTS FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF MINORS INVOLVED TO ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITY","authors":"O. Dubina","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2022.1.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2022.1.03","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article is to form an idea of the modern system of subjects of protection of the rights of minors who are prosecuted for administrative offenses. The urgency of the topic is due to the high level of administrative offenses by children and the insufficiently effective level of legal support of their rights in administrative-tort proceedings. The research methodology was formed by a set of general scientific and special methods of cognition. In particular, the rethinking of the role of some subjects of administrative and tort proceedings with jurisdictional powers has been achieved through the dialectical method of cognition. The method of systematic analysis was used in building the system of subjects of ensuring the rights of minors who are brought to administrative responsibility. The sociological survey allowed to find out the attitude of specialists in the field of law to some debatable issues of the functioning of these entities, etc. The results of the study are a certain list of subjects of protection of the rights of minors who are prosecuted for committing administrative offenses, their role in this process. The properties and perspectives that characterize this system of subjects are highlighted: the tasks of protecting the rights of children in administrative-tort relations are implemented by the respective subjects within the framework of judicial proceedings or public administration (management); the obligation of a number of subjects to protect the rights of this category of persons derives from the tasks of proceedings in cases of administrative offenses and is combined with their administrative and jurisdictional powers; juvenile specialization of such participants in proceedings on administrative offenses as a judge, prosecutor, defense counsel – is a necessary condition for effective protection of the rights of a child in conflict with the law and ensuring its best interests in administrative-tort legal relations; in order to provide quality legal assistance, only a lawyer should be a defender of a minor who is brought to administrative responsibility; it is necessary to intensify the participation of scientific, human rights institutions and institutions of local communities in the search for and implementation of effective administrative and legal mechanisms to protect the rights of minors who are held administratively liable. The conclusions of the article propose a generalized version of the system of the main subjects of protection of the rights of minors prosecuted for committing administrative offenses, which are divided into the following groups – subjects: policy of protection of children’s rights in administrative-tort relations; entities that represent and protect the rights and interests of a minor in proceedings on administrative offenses; who must protect the rights of minors during the exercise of administrative and jurisdictional powers in this type of proceedings; who should protect the rights ","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90082448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PECULIARITIES OF QUALIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFENSES IN THE FIELD OF WASTE MANAGEMENT IN UKRAINE 乌克兰废物管理领域行政犯罪资格的特点
Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.17721/2227-796x.2021.2.04
S. Kidalov
The scientific article examines the content and essence of the legal qualification of administrative offenses, considers their features, for which there is responsibility in the field of waste management in Ukraine. The issue of qualification, in particular of certain types of offenses, issues of qualification of misdemeanors for which liability is provided in the field of waste management in Ukraine is studied. The aim of the work was to determine the features of qualification and study the practice of registration of materials in bringing to administrative responsibility in the field of waste management in Ukraine. In order to obtain the most reliable scientific results in the writing of the work used a number of general and special legal, theoretical and empirical methods of cognition, supplemented by the principles of dialectics. The use of these methods was mostly complex. The research methodology is based on a comprehensive approach to the analysis of the qualifications of administrative offenses in the field of waste management in Ukraine, which consists in the use of general and special scientific methods due to the specifics of the scientific article. The systematic method was used in the study of conceptual and methodological problems of defining the concepts: "qualification of an administrative offense" and "administrative offense". The formal-legal method was used to clarify the content of certain legal concepts. With regard to the results of the study, the article, based on the analysis of scientific views, considers the concepts and features of the qualification of administrative offenses in the field of waste management in Ukraine. It is determined that the qualification of acts as an administrative offense in the field of waste management in Ukraine is a comprehensive analysis of the content of the General and Special Parts of the Code of Administrative Offenses or other articles of administrative tort law thus correlate general and special offenses. Also, a study of administrative and legal qualifications in the field of liability for violations of waste management rules in Ukraine was conducted. Based on the analysis of current legislation and opinions of scientists, it is concluded that the key to the correct application of administrative law in the field of waste management in Ukraine is, first, to fulfill the purpose of administrative penalties in the context of the current Code. In particular, education of a person who has committed an administrative offense in the field of waste management in Ukraine, in the spirit of compliance with the laws of Ukraine, respect for the rules of coexistence and prevention of new offenses by the offender and others. Secondly, observance by bodies (officials) of the rights of persons involved in proceedings on administrative offenses in the field of waste management in Ukraine.
这篇科学文章审查了行政违法的法律资格的内容和本质,考虑了它们的特点,乌克兰在废物管理领域对此负有责任。研究了资格问题,特别是某些类型罪行的资格问题,以及乌克兰废物管理领域规定责任的轻罪的资格问题。这项工作的目的是确定资格的特点,并研究在乌克兰废物管理领域实行材料登记的行政责任的做法。为了获得最可靠的科学结果,在写作工作中采用了一些一般的和特殊的法律、理论和经验的认识方法,并辅以辩证法原则。这些方法的使用大多是复杂的。研究方法的基础是对乌克兰废物管理领域的行政违法行为的资格进行综合分析,由于科学文章的具体情况,它包括使用一般和特殊的科学方法。系统地研究了界定“行政犯罪资格”和“行政犯罪”概念的概念和方法问题。正式法律方法被用来澄清某些法律概念的内容。针对研究结果,本文在分析科学观点的基础上,对乌克兰废物管理领域行政违法资格的概念和特点进行了思考。确定乌克兰废物管理领域的行为作为行政犯罪的资格是对《行政违法者法典》的一般部分和特殊部分或行政侵权法的其他条款的内容的综合分析,从而使一般和特殊犯罪相关联。此外,还对乌克兰违反废物管理规则的责任领域的行政和法律资格进行了研究。通过对现行立法和科学家意见的分析,得出结论认为,在乌克兰废物管理领域正确适用行政法的关键是:首先,在现行法典的背景下实现行政处罚的目的。特别是,本着遵守乌克兰法律、尊重共存规则和防止违法者及其他人再犯新的罪行的精神,对在乌克兰废物管理领域犯下行政罪行的人进行教育。第二,各机构(官员)遵守参与乌克兰废物管理领域行政违法诉讼的人的权利。
{"title":"PECULIARITIES OF QUALIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFENSES IN THE FIELD OF WASTE MANAGEMENT IN UKRAINE","authors":"S. Kidalov","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2021.2.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2021.2.04","url":null,"abstract":"The scientific article examines the content and essence of the legal qualification of administrative offenses, considers their features, for which there is responsibility in the field of waste management in Ukraine. The issue of qualification, in particular of certain types of offenses, issues of qualification of misdemeanors for which liability is provided in the field of waste management in Ukraine is studied. The aim of the work was to determine the features of qualification and study the practice of registration of materials in bringing to administrative responsibility in the field of waste management in Ukraine. In order to obtain the most reliable scientific results in the writing of the work used a number of general and special legal, theoretical and empirical methods of cognition, supplemented by the principles of dialectics. The use of these methods was mostly complex. The research methodology is based on a comprehensive approach to the analysis of the qualifications of administrative offenses in the field of waste management in Ukraine, which consists in the use of general and special scientific methods due to the specifics of the scientific article. The systematic method was used in the study of conceptual and methodological problems of defining the concepts: \"qualification of an administrative offense\" and \"administrative offense\". The formal-legal method was used to clarify the content of certain legal concepts. With regard to the results of the study, the article, based on the analysis of scientific views, considers the concepts and features of the qualification of administrative offenses in the field of waste management in Ukraine. It is determined that the qualification of acts as an administrative offense in the field of waste management in Ukraine is a comprehensive analysis of the content of the General and Special Parts of the Code of Administrative Offenses or other articles of administrative tort law thus correlate general and special offenses. Also, a study of administrative and legal qualifications in the field of liability for violations of waste management rules in Ukraine was conducted. Based on the analysis of current legislation and opinions of scientists, it is concluded that the key to the correct application of administrative law in the field of waste management in Ukraine is, first, to fulfill the purpose of administrative penalties in the context of the current Code. In particular, education of a person who has committed an administrative offense in the field of waste management in Ukraine, in the spirit of compliance with the laws of Ukraine, respect for the rules of coexistence and prevention of new offenses by the offender and others. Secondly, observance by bodies (officials) of the rights of persons involved in proceedings on administrative offenses in the field of waste management in Ukraine.","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75100887","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
REGISTRATION AND AUTHORIZATION PROCEDURES IN THE FIELD OF MEDICAL TOURISM 医疗旅游领域的注册和授权程序
Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.17721/2227-796x.2021.2.05
V. Teremetskyi, A. Podzirov
The article is focused on studying such means of administrative and legal guaranteeing as registration and authorization procedures. The purpose of the article is to provide characteristics to authorization and registration procedures as type of administrative and legal means to guarantee the development of medical tourism on the basis of the analysis of the current legislation in the field of medical tourism. The objective of the scientific research is to prepare recommendations for further improvement of the current legislation on the researched issue in the tourist and health care sectors. To achieve scientific objectivity the author has used both general and special legal research methods; the methodological basis of which was universal dialectical methods used to reveal the nature and content of authorization and registration procedures as administrative and legal means of guaranteeing the development of medical tourism. The current regulatory legal acts regulating authorization and registration procedures in the field of tourism operations and health care sector related to medical tourism have been analyzed. It has been stated that the current legislation in the field of tourism operations and health care, regulating authorization and registration procedures, requires further improvement in order to ensure the efficient development of medical tourism, the effective attraction of investment in this area. Thus, the legislation on licensing activities in the field of medical tourism should be improved due to the peculiarities and specifics of medical services as an element of the tourist product, because the activities of travel agents under the current Ukrainian legislation are not subject to licensing, as well as the operations of the companies that are providers of medical services, where licensing of travel agencies’ operations is carried out without taking into account the peculiarities of medical tourism in terms of the content of this activity. Taking into account the conflicting provisions of the current legislation regarding the nature of accreditation of health care institutions, the author has offered to establish their mandatory accreditation at the legislative level, taking into account the risk of medical activities for health and life of consumers of health care services and in order to have real quality staffing, logistical and organizational provision of such services. Visa-requiring procedures need to be simplified in order to ensure the effective development of inbound medical tourism. The formation of the Unified Information Register of Medical Institutions (national and foreign), which have agreements (concluded agreements) in the field of medical tourism acquires special significance among registration procedures.
本文重点研究了登记和授权程序等行政和法律保障手段。本文的目的是在分析医疗旅游领域立法现状的基础上,为医疗旅游的发展提供一种行政和法律手段——授权登记程序的特点。科学研究的目的是为进一步改进旅游和保健部门所研究问题的现行立法提出建议。为了达到科学的客观性,笔者采用了一般和特殊的法律研究方法;其方法论基础是运用普遍辩证方法揭示医疗旅游发展的行政和法律保障手段——授权登记程序的性质和内容。分析了与医疗旅游相关的旅游业务和保健部门的授权和登记程序的现行监管法律。有人指出,目前在旅游业务和保健领域规定授权和登记程序的立法需要进一步改进,以确保医疗旅游的有效发展,有效吸引这一领域的投资。因此,由于医疗服务作为旅游产品的一个组成部分的特殊性和特殊性,医疗旅游领域的许可活动立法应予改进,因为根据乌克兰现行立法,旅行社的活动以及提供医疗服务的公司的业务不需要获得许可。对旅行社的经营活动发牌时,未考虑医疗旅游在其活动内容方面的特点。考虑到现行立法中关于保健机构认证性质的规定相互矛盾,提交人提议在立法一级对这些机构进行强制性认证,同时考虑到医疗活动对保健服务消费者的健康和生命构成的风险,以便为这些服务提供真正高质量的人员配备、后勤和组织。为确保入境医疗旅游的有效发展,需要简化签证手续。在医疗旅游领域签订协议(缔结协议)的医疗机构(国内和国外)统一信息登记册的形成在登记程序中具有特殊意义。
{"title":"REGISTRATION AND AUTHORIZATION PROCEDURES IN THE FIELD OF MEDICAL TOURISM","authors":"V. Teremetskyi, A. Podzirov","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2021.2.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2021.2.05","url":null,"abstract":"The article is focused on studying such means of administrative and legal guaranteeing as registration and authorization procedures. The purpose of the article is to provide characteristics to authorization and registration procedures as type of administrative and legal means to guarantee the development of medical tourism on the basis of the analysis of the current legislation in the field of medical tourism. The objective of the scientific research is to prepare recommendations for further improvement of the current legislation on the researched issue in the tourist and health care sectors. To achieve scientific objectivity the author has used both general and special legal research methods; the methodological basis of which was universal dialectical methods used to reveal the nature and content of authorization and registration procedures as administrative and legal means of guaranteeing the development of medical tourism. The current regulatory legal acts regulating authorization and registration procedures in the field of tourism operations and health care sector related to medical tourism have been analyzed. It has been stated that the current legislation in the field of tourism operations and health care, regulating authorization and registration procedures, requires further improvement in order to ensure the efficient development of medical tourism, the effective attraction of investment in this area. Thus, the legislation on licensing activities in the field of medical tourism should be improved due to the peculiarities and specifics of medical services as an element of the tourist product, because the activities of travel agents under the current Ukrainian legislation are not subject to licensing, as well as the operations of the companies that are providers of medical services, where licensing of travel agencies’ operations is carried out without taking into account the peculiarities of medical tourism in terms of the content of this activity. Taking into account the conflicting provisions of the current legislation regarding the nature of accreditation of health care institutions, the author has offered to establish their mandatory accreditation at the legislative level, taking into account the risk of medical activities for health and life of consumers of health care services and in order to have real quality staffing, logistical and organizational provision of such services. Visa-requiring procedures need to be simplified in order to ensure the effective development of inbound medical tourism. The formation of the Unified Information Register of Medical Institutions (national and foreign), which have agreements (concluded agreements) in the field of medical tourism acquires special significance among registration procedures.","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91102680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
THE PLACE AND ROLE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW OF UKRAINE IN THE PARADIGM OF THE VECTOR OF MOVEMENT TO THE WEST AND NORTH-EAST 乌克兰行政法在向西和向东北运动矢量范式中的地位和作用
Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.17721/10.17721/2227-796x.2021.1.01
V. Halunko
The article clarifies the place and role of administrative law of Ukraine in the paradigm of the vector of movement to the West and North-East. It is proved that the democracy of national administrative law depends not only on the content of the state constitution, but also on the actual content of policy implementation and public administration by the government. The division in this area is as follows. If public authorities do not have the opportunity to influence scholars, but instead use the principles and administrative tools developed by them to ensure the rights of freedoms and interests of individuals and provide administrative services, then this is the administrative law of a democratic state. If the state regime has a practical opportunity to put pressure on the media, civil society and private small and medium-sized businesses, then we are dealing with the administrative law of a totalitarian (authoritarian) state It is concluded that the modern administrative law of Ukraine is progressive and not only in line with European values, but in some respects occupies a leading position in it. It is proposed to export theoretical principles, principles and tools to young scientists and students of Russia and Belarus. Demonstrating the advantages of a democratic system and the dominance of the principle of the rule of law in public administration carry out, both on the example of Ukraine and the member states of the European Union.It is concluded that in the conditions of the hybrid war waged by the Russian leadership against Ukrain e, the struggle for civilized democratic thinking of the citizens of the North-Eastern countries, primarily Russian and Belarusian youth, should be carried out, including by bringing them to European-Ukrainian theory of administrative law examples of its application to prevent corruption, effective protection of the rights and freedoms of individuals from the arbitrariness of officials.
本文从乌克兰行政法在向西、向东北运动矢量范式中的地位和作用进行了梳理。事实证明,国家行政法的民主性不仅取决于国家宪法的内容,还取决于政府政策执行和公共管理的实际内容。这个区域的划分如下。如果公共当局没有机会影响学者,而是利用自己制定的原则和行政工具来保障个人的自由和利益,并提供行政服务,那么这就是民主国家的行政法。如果国家政权有机会对媒体、公民社会和私营中小企业施加压力,那么我们面对的就是一个极权(威权)国家的行政法。结论是,乌克兰的现代行政法是进步的,不仅符合欧洲价值观,而且在某些方面占据了领先地位。建议向俄罗斯和白俄罗斯的青年科学家和学生输出理论原理、原理和工具。以乌克兰和欧洲联盟成员国为例,展示了民主制度的优势和法治原则在公共行政中的主导地位。结论是,在俄罗斯领导人对乌克兰发动混合战争的条件下,应该开展东北国家公民,主要是俄罗斯和白俄罗斯青年的文明民主思想斗争,包括将欧洲-乌克兰行政法理论应用于防止腐败,有效保护个人权利和自由免受官员专断的例子。
{"title":"THE PLACE AND ROLE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW OF UKRAINE IN THE PARADIGM OF THE VECTOR OF MOVEMENT TO THE WEST AND NORTH-EAST","authors":"V. Halunko","doi":"10.17721/10.17721/2227-796x.2021.1.01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/10.17721/2227-796x.2021.1.01","url":null,"abstract":"The article clarifies the place and role of administrative law of Ukraine in the paradigm of the vector of movement to the West and North-East. It is proved that the democracy of national administrative law depends not only on the content of the state constitution, but also on the actual content of policy implementation and public administration by the government. The division in this area is as follows. If public authorities do not have the opportunity to influence scholars, but instead use the principles and administrative tools developed by them to ensure the rights of freedoms and interests of individuals and provide administrative services, then this is the administrative law of a democratic state. If the state regime has a practical opportunity to put pressure on the media, civil society and private small and medium-sized businesses, then we are dealing with the administrative law of a totalitarian (authoritarian) state It is concluded that the modern administrative law of Ukraine is progressive and not only in line with European values, but in some respects occupies a leading position in it. It is proposed to export theoretical principles, principles and tools to young scientists and students of Russia and Belarus. Demonstrating the advantages of a democratic system and the dominance of the principle of the rule of law in public administration carry out, both on the example of Ukraine and the member states of the European Union.It is concluded that in the conditions of the hybrid war waged by the Russian leadership against Ukrain e, the struggle for civilized democratic thinking of the citizens of the North-Eastern countries, primarily Russian and Belarusian youth, should be carried out, including by bringing them to European-Ukrainian theory of administrative law examples of its application to prevent corruption, effective protection of the rights and freedoms of individuals from the arbitrariness of officials.","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88248012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
CONSEQUENCES OF VIOLATION OF THE RULES OF TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION IN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS 在行政诉讼中违反地域管辖规则的后果
Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.17721/2227-796x.2021.4.03
O. Rudenko
Purpose. The purpose of the article is to determine the procedural consequences of noncompliancewith the rules of territorial jurisdiction (jurisdiction) in administrative proceedingsand to make recommendations aimed at improving legal regulation in this area. Methods. Generaland special methods are the theoretical and methodological basis of the study. With the help of theuniversal dialectical method the problems of determining in the procedural law the consequencesof violation of the rules of jurisdiction in administrative proceedings in their complexity andcontradictions are studied, as well as ways to improve legal regulation in this area. The use ofthe special-legal method and the method of system analysis, as well as the logical-legal method allowed to study the content of certain norms of administrative procedural legislation related tothe topic of work in their system connection.Results. It is noted that the territorial jurisdiction of administrative cases determines thejurisdiction between administrative courts of one level depending on the territory to which theirjurisdiction extends. It is proved that under the current administrative procedural legislation ofUkraine violation of the rules of territorial jurisdiction entails two consequences: 1) transfer ofthe case from one court to another in the established jurisdiction; 2) cancellation of the courtdecision at the stages of appellate and cassation proceedings with the referral of the case to thecourt of first instance in the established jurisdiction for a new trial.It is concluded that the existence of grounds for transferring the case to jurisdiction prevents theopening of proceedings. The correctness of the legislator’s refusal from such a consequence ofviolation of the rules of jurisdiction as the return of the claim is argued. It is pointed out that it isinexpedient to set deadlines for applying to the court with a request to transfer the case under theestablished jurisdiction. It is substantiated that consideration by the court of first instance of acase in violation of the rules of jurisdiction cannot be an independent ground for revoking a courtdecision on appeal and in cassation.Conclusions. It is proposed to provide at the legislative level that one of the conditions forinitiating proceedings in an administrative case is the absence of grounds for its transfer toanother court with established jurisdiction, the right of the parties to appeal the decision to refuseto transfer the case under separate jurisdiction. to refer the case under the rules of territorialjurisdiction to another court in case of recognition of the actions of the parties to the case,committed to change jurisdiction, abuse of procedural rights.
目的。这条的目的是确定在行政诉讼中不遵守领土管辖(管辖权)规则的程序后果,并提出旨在改进这一领域法律规章的建议。方法。一般方法和特殊方法是研究的理论和方法基础。运用普遍辩证的方法,研究了程序法中行政诉讼中违反管辖规则后果认定的复杂性和矛盾性问题,以及如何完善这方面的法律规制。运用专门法方法和系统分析法,以及逻辑法学方法,研究了与行政程序立法相关的某些规范的内容与工作主题之间的制度联系。值得注意的是,行政案件的地域管辖权决定了一级行政法院之间的管辖权,取决于其管辖范围的扩大。事实证明,根据乌克兰现行行政程序法,违反领土管辖规则会导致两种后果:1)将案件从一个法院转移到另一个已建立管辖权的法院;2)在上诉和撤销原判程序阶段撤销法院判决,将案件转至已建立的司法管辖区内的初审法院重新审理。结论是,案件移送管辖权的理由的存在阻碍了诉讼程序的启动。本文论证了立法者拒绝接受这种违反管辖权规则的后果,即要求返还的正确性。文章指出,为向法院申请将案件移送到已确定的管辖权下设定最后期限是不妥当的。事实证明,初审法院对违反管辖规则的案件的审议不能成为撤销法院上诉和撤销案件裁决的独立理由。建议在立法层面规定,在行政案件中提起诉讼的条件之一是没有理由将其转移到另一个具有既定管辖权的法院,当事人有权对拒绝将案件转移到单独管辖的决定提出上诉。在承认案件当事人的行为、承诺改变管辖权、滥用程序性权利的情况下,根据属地管辖规则将案件提交另一法院。
{"title":"CONSEQUENCES OF VIOLATION OF THE RULES OF TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION IN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS","authors":"O. Rudenko","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2021.4.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2021.4.03","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. The purpose of the article is to determine the procedural consequences of noncompliancewith the rules of territorial jurisdiction (jurisdiction) in administrative proceedingsand to make recommendations aimed at improving legal regulation in this area. Methods. Generaland special methods are the theoretical and methodological basis of the study. With the help of theuniversal dialectical method the problems of determining in the procedural law the consequencesof violation of the rules of jurisdiction in administrative proceedings in their complexity andcontradictions are studied, as well as ways to improve legal regulation in this area. The use ofthe special-legal method and the method of system analysis, as well as the logical-legal method allowed to study the content of certain norms of administrative procedural legislation related tothe topic of work in their system connection.Results. It is noted that the territorial jurisdiction of administrative cases determines thejurisdiction between administrative courts of one level depending on the territory to which theirjurisdiction extends. It is proved that under the current administrative procedural legislation ofUkraine violation of the rules of territorial jurisdiction entails two consequences: 1) transfer ofthe case from one court to another in the established jurisdiction; 2) cancellation of the courtdecision at the stages of appellate and cassation proceedings with the referral of the case to thecourt of first instance in the established jurisdiction for a new trial.It is concluded that the existence of grounds for transferring the case to jurisdiction prevents theopening of proceedings. The correctness of the legislator’s refusal from such a consequence ofviolation of the rules of jurisdiction as the return of the claim is argued. It is pointed out that it isinexpedient to set deadlines for applying to the court with a request to transfer the case under theestablished jurisdiction. It is substantiated that consideration by the court of first instance of acase in violation of the rules of jurisdiction cannot be an independent ground for revoking a courtdecision on appeal and in cassation.Conclusions. It is proposed to provide at the legislative level that one of the conditions forinitiating proceedings in an administrative case is the absence of grounds for its transfer toanother court with established jurisdiction, the right of the parties to appeal the decision to refuseto transfer the case under separate jurisdiction. to refer the case under the rules of territorialjurisdiction to another court in case of recognition of the actions of the parties to the case,committed to change jurisdiction, abuse of procedural rights.","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89770326","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: FROM THE LAW TO THE COURT DECISION 利益冲突:从法律到法院判决
Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.17721/2227-796x.2021.3.03
T. Anishchenko
The author of the article has studied specific features of normative and legal regulation of the issues of competitive interests in Ukraine. It has been noted that there are still problematic issues of practical application of the norms of current legislation in regard to drawing up protocols by authorized entities and in regard to court hearings in the relevant category at the present stage of development of anti-corruption legislation. The author has separately emphasized on specific features of resolving competitive interest in foreign countries. There is an example of the fact that the most common issues regulated by EU law are the obligation to maintain impartiality and the ban on combining positions, while the issues of gifts, rewards and restrictions on choosing activities after leaving office are almost not raised. Special attention has been paid to studying the Generalizations of Judicial Practice in Cases on Administrative Offenses Related to Corruption; the Methodical Recommendations on the Application of Certain Provisions of the Law of Ukraine “On Preventing Corruption” regarding the prevention and settlement of competitive interests, the compliance with restrictions on the prevention of corruption developed by the National Agency for the Prevention of Corruption in 2021 has become a special achievement of recent years, aimed at forming unified approach to the compliance with the rules for the prevention and settlement of competitive interests, restrictions on the prevention of corruption as an integral part of preventing the commission of corruption and corruption-related offenses. The report on the implementation of anti-corruption reforms in Eastern Europe and Central Asia countries, published by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development on deepening cooperation, has been separately highlighted. This report summarizes the implementation of the Istanbul Anti-Corruption Action Plan and notes that the quality of mechanisms for monitoring the implementation of anti-corruption policies remains low in almost all of the indicated countries; in most cases it is based not on objective indicators and criteria, but on reports from executing agencies.
本文作者研究了乌克兰竞争利益问题的规范性和法律规制的具体特点。有人指出,在反腐败立法发展的目前阶段,在授权实体拟订议定书和有关类别的法庭听证方面,现行立法规范的实际适用问题仍然存在。笔者分别强调了国外解决竞争利益问题的具体特点。举例来说,欧盟法律规定的最常见问题是保持公正性的义务和禁止职务合并,而礼品、奖励和卸任后选择活动的限制等问题几乎没有提出。特别注意研究贪污行政犯罪案件司法实践的概括性;《关于适用乌克兰《预防腐败法》关于预防和解决竞争利益的某些条款的方法建议》,遵守国家预防腐败机构于2021年制定的预防腐败限制已成为近年来的一项特殊成就;旨在形成统一的方法来遵守预防和解决竞争利益的规则,限制预防腐败作为预防腐败和腐败相关犯罪的组成部分。经济合作与发展组织发布的关于深化合作的东欧和中亚国家反腐败改革实施情况的报告被单独强调。本报告总结了《伊斯坦布尔反腐败行动计划》的实施情况,并指出在几乎所有国家中,反腐败政策实施监测机制的质量仍然很低;在大多数情况下,它不是根据客观指标和标准,而是根据执行机构的报告。
{"title":"CONFLICT OF INTEREST: FROM THE LAW TO THE COURT DECISION","authors":"T. Anishchenko","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2021.3.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2021.3.03","url":null,"abstract":"The author of the article has studied specific features of normative and legal regulation of the issues of competitive interests in Ukraine. It has been noted that there are still problematic issues of practical application of the norms of current legislation in regard to drawing up protocols by authorized entities and in regard to court hearings in the relevant category at the present stage of development of anti-corruption legislation. The author has separately emphasized on specific features of resolving competitive interest in foreign countries. There is an example of the fact that the most common issues regulated by EU law are the obligation to maintain impartiality and the ban on combining positions, while the issues of gifts, rewards and restrictions on choosing activities after leaving office are almost not raised. Special attention has been paid to studying the Generalizations of Judicial Practice in Cases on Administrative Offenses Related to Corruption; the Methodical Recommendations on the Application of Certain Provisions of the Law of Ukraine “On Preventing Corruption” regarding the prevention and settlement of competitive interests, the compliance with restrictions on the prevention of corruption developed by the National Agency for the Prevention of Corruption in 2021 has become a special achievement of recent years, aimed at forming unified approach to the compliance with the rules for the prevention and settlement of competitive interests, restrictions on the prevention of corruption as an integral part of preventing the commission of corruption and corruption-related offenses. The report on the implementation of anti-corruption reforms in Eastern Europe and Central Asia countries, published by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development on deepening cooperation, has been separately highlighted. This report summarizes the implementation of the Istanbul Anti-Corruption Action Plan and notes that the quality of mechanisms for monitoring the implementation of anti-corruption policies remains low in almost all of the indicated countries; in most cases it is based not on objective indicators and criteria, but on reports from executing agencies.","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89806616","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
APPLICATION IN THE CONDITIONS OF EMERGENCY ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL REGIMES OF THE DEROGATION MECHANISM REGARDING THE RESTRICTIONS OF CITIZENS ‘RIGHTS TO INPATCHAN 在紧急行政和法律制度条件下适用关于限制公民权利的克减机制
Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.17721/2227-796x.2021.2.06
T. Shynkar
The article states that due to the fact that Ukraine is waging a hybrid war with the RussianFederation, the state is taking administrative and legal measures to restrict the rights of citizensto information in the interests of national security. Such a restriction must take place in a clearlydefined form and meet the requirements of national and international law, ie we can say that thereis an international legal mechanism for restricting human rights. It must, firstly, have a regulatorycomponent (norms of international and national law on the basis of which the mechanismoperates), and secondly, the organizational component (procedure, conditions and procedure forimplementation). The normative-legal component includes international normative-legal acts,which establish the rights and freedoms of man and citizen, including the procedure, groundsand conditions for their restriction. The organizational and legal component of the internationallegal mechanism for restricting human rights in the interests of national security consists of suchelements as: 1) material conditions (exceptional threat to the life of the nation; proportionality;principle of non-discrimination; inadmissibility state of emergency (martial law; respect for otherobligations under international law.); 2) procedural conditions (official declaration of state ofemergency; notification of the Secretary General of the United Nations or the Secretary Generalof the Council of Europe; parliamentary control). Derogation is defined as a situation in whicha law, ordinance, or decision is partially repealed.In acts relating to European Union law, the term "derogation" is used in cases where a Member State decides not to apply a special provisionof a particular agreement or law, in cases such as emergencies and force majeure. In Ukraine,these may include, in particular, special administrative and legal regimes. Derogations are mostpronounced in the introduction of special legal regimes that threaten national security, suchas state of emergency and martial law. It is then that deviations from international obligationsand restrictions on the right to information are most significant. It has been determined thatscholars-administrators speak about the emergence of "hybrid" or "mixed" administrative-legalregimes, which combine the features of special and other special administrative-legal regimes.The derogation in such "hybrid" or "mixed" administrative-legal regimes is partial and cannotbe used in full. In the period of "hybrid" administrative and legal regimes, derogations applyadditional administrative and legal measures in the information sphere, such as, for example,provided for in the Law of Ukraine "On Sanctions". It is concluded that the threat to the Ukrainiannation from the Russian Federation forced the leadership of our state to apply the internationallegal mechanism of restriction of human rights, including in the information sphere.
文章指出,由于乌克兰正在与俄罗斯联邦进行混合战争,为了国家安全的利益,国家正在采取行政和法律措施限制公民获取信息的权利。这种限制必须以明确界定的形式进行,并符合国内法和国际法的要求,即我们可以说存在一种限制人权的国际法律机制。首先,它必须有监管部分(机制运作所依据的国际法和国内法规范),其次,它必须有组织部分(程序、条件和实施程序)。规范性法律组成部分包括国际规范性法律行为,这些行为规定了人和公民的权利和自由,包括限制这些权利和自由的程序、依据和条件。为国家安全利益限制人权的国际法律机制的组织和法律组成部分包括以下要素:1)物质条件(对国家生命的特殊威胁;比例性;非歧视原则;不可接受的紧急状态(戒严法;尊重国际法规定的其他义务);2)程序条件(正式宣布紧急状态;联合国秘书长或欧洲理事会秘书长的通知;议会控制)。克减的定义是法律、条例或决定被部分废除的情况。在与欧洲联盟法律有关的行为中,“克减”一词用于成员国在紧急情况和不可抗力等情况下决定不适用特定协议或法律的特殊规定的情况。在乌克兰,这些特别可能包括特别行政和法律制度。在实行威胁国家安全的特殊法律制度,如紧急状态和戒严法时,减损最为明显。这时,背离国际义务和对知情权的限制是最严重的。学者-行政管理人员谈论的是“混合型”或“混合型”行政法律制度的出现,它结合了特殊行政法律制度和其他特殊行政法律制度的特点。这种“混合”或“混合”行政-法律制度的减损是部分的,不能全部使用。在“混合”行政和法律制度时期,克减在信息领域适用额外的行政和法律措施,例如乌克兰“关于制裁”的法律规定。结论是,俄罗斯联邦对乌克兰民族的威胁迫使我国领导人运用限制人权的国际法律机制,包括在信息领域。
{"title":"APPLICATION IN THE CONDITIONS OF EMERGENCY ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL REGIMES OF THE DEROGATION MECHANISM REGARDING THE RESTRICTIONS OF CITIZENS ‘RIGHTS TO INPATCHAN","authors":"T. Shynkar","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2021.2.06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2021.2.06","url":null,"abstract":"The article states that due to the fact that Ukraine is waging a hybrid war with the RussianFederation, the state is taking administrative and legal measures to restrict the rights of citizensto information in the interests of national security. Such a restriction must take place in a clearlydefined form and meet the requirements of national and international law, ie we can say that thereis an international legal mechanism for restricting human rights. It must, firstly, have a regulatorycomponent (norms of international and national law on the basis of which the mechanismoperates), and secondly, the organizational component (procedure, conditions and procedure forimplementation). The normative-legal component includes international normative-legal acts,which establish the rights and freedoms of man and citizen, including the procedure, groundsand conditions for their restriction. The organizational and legal component of the internationallegal mechanism for restricting human rights in the interests of national security consists of suchelements as: 1) material conditions (exceptional threat to the life of the nation; proportionality;principle of non-discrimination; inadmissibility state of emergency (martial law; respect for otherobligations under international law.); 2) procedural conditions (official declaration of state ofemergency; notification of the Secretary General of the United Nations or the Secretary Generalof the Council of Europe; parliamentary control). Derogation is defined as a situation in whicha law, ordinance, or decision is partially repealed.In acts relating to European Union law, the term \"derogation\" is used in cases where a Member State decides not to apply a special provisionof a particular agreement or law, in cases such as emergencies and force majeure. In Ukraine,these may include, in particular, special administrative and legal regimes. Derogations are mostpronounced in the introduction of special legal regimes that threaten national security, suchas state of emergency and martial law. It is then that deviations from international obligationsand restrictions on the right to information are most significant. It has been determined thatscholars-administrators speak about the emergence of \"hybrid\" or \"mixed\" administrative-legalregimes, which combine the features of special and other special administrative-legal regimes.The derogation in such \"hybrid\" or \"mixed\" administrative-legal regimes is partial and cannotbe used in full. In the period of \"hybrid\" administrative and legal regimes, derogations applyadditional administrative and legal measures in the information sphere, such as, for example,provided for in the Law of Ukraine \"On Sanctions\". It is concluded that the threat to the Ukrainiannation from the Russian Federation forced the leadership of our state to apply the internationallegal mechanism of restriction of human rights, including in the information sphere.","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83283959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
DIGITIZATION OF PUBLIC SERVICES: LEGAL REGULATION IN THE CONTEXT OF EUROPEAN PRINCIPLES 公共服务数字化:欧洲原则背景下的法律规制
Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.17721/2227-796x.2021.1.03
N. Hliborob
The article discusses the problems of digital transformation of public services. The article examines the European principles of digitalization in the public sector. The principles are analyzed: openness, transparency, technological neturality and data portability, user-centricity, inclusion and accessibility, security and privacy, administrative simplification, preservation of information, assessment of effectiveness and efficiency. Methods. Method of analysis and synthesis, generalization and explanation for a deeper understanding of the digital transformation of public services and their features. Special research methods were also used, in particular, formal-logical research of legal support of digital public services and comparative-legal. Results. The necessity of formation of legal regulation of digital transformation in the sphere of public services is substantiated. The development and adoption of a national strategy for digitalization of public administration is urgent. This strategy should take into account the current state of development of digital technologies, comply with the principles and trends that have developed at the EU level. Conclusions. Еlectronic public services are a change in approaches and methods of work, a change in the paradigm of interaction between public administration and society. and man, the final approval of the concept of “human-centeredness” in the activities of public authority.
本文探讨了公共服务数字化转型的若干问题。本文探讨了欧洲公共部门数字化的原则。分析了这些原则:开放、透明、技术中立和数据可移植性、以用户为中心、包容和可访问性、安全和隐私、行政简化、信息保存、有效性和效率评估。方法。通过分析与综合、概括与解释的方法,更深入地了解公共服务数字化转型及其特点。还使用了特殊的研究方法,特别是数字公共服务的法律支持的形式逻辑研究和比较法律研究。结果。论证了在公共服务领域形成数字化转型法律规制的必要性。制定和实施国家公共行政数字化战略刻不容缓。该战略应考虑到数字技术的发展现状,符合欧盟层面制定的原则和趋势。结论。Еlectronic公共服务是工作方式和方法的改变,是公共行政与社会之间相互作用模式的改变。而人,则是公共权力活动中“以人为本”概念的最终认可。
{"title":"DIGITIZATION OF PUBLIC SERVICES: LEGAL REGULATION IN THE CONTEXT OF EUROPEAN PRINCIPLES","authors":"N. Hliborob","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2021.1.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2021.1.03","url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the problems of digital transformation of public services. The article examines the European principles of digitalization in the public sector. The principles are analyzed: openness, transparency, technological neturality and data portability, user-centricity, inclusion and accessibility, security and privacy, administrative simplification, preservation of information, assessment of effectiveness and efficiency. Methods. Method of analysis and synthesis, generalization and explanation for a deeper understanding of the digital transformation of public services and their features. Special research methods were also used, in particular, formal-logical research of legal support of digital public services and comparative-legal. Results. The necessity of formation of legal regulation of digital transformation in the sphere of public services is substantiated. The development and adoption of a national strategy for digitalization of public administration is urgent. This strategy should take into account the current state of development of digital technologies, comply with the principles and trends that have developed at the EU level. Conclusions. Еlectronic public services are a change in approaches and methods of work, a change in the paradigm of interaction between public administration and society. and man, the final approval of the concept of “human-centeredness” in the activities of public authority.","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"57 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91501340","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
Administrative law and process
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1