首页 > 最新文献

Administrative law and process最新文献

英文 中文
ADMINISTRATIVE AND COMMERCIAL LAW AS A LEGAL BASIS FOR THE FORMATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ECONOMIC FUNCTION OF THE UKRAINIAN STATE 行政法和商法作为乌克兰国家经济职能形成和实施的法律基础
Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.17721/2227-796x.2020.3.01
Zhanna Bernatska
The article is focused on clarifying the place of law norms, which are the basis for the formationand implementation of the economic function of the Ukrainian state within the legal system ofUkraine. The research is based on an in-depth analysis of national and foreign legal literature,primarily German one, focused on the system of law, the grounds for the division of law into publicand private, the system of administrative law as the branch of law, administrative and commerciallaw as the branch of Special Administrative Law.The purpose of the article is to substantiate the idea that administrative and commercial law isthe basis for the formation and implementation of the economic function of the Ukrainian state.The author has separately studied internal structure of this branch of Special Administrative Lawin order to single out new legal entities within its boundaries.System of methods. Generally scientific, special and legal techniques and methods of cognitionhave been used during the research. The historical method of cognition has been used whilestudying the history of the formation of views on the division of law into public and private.The formal and logical method has been used while classifying the criteria for dividing the lawinto public and private. The system and functional method has been used while studying the natureof the legal system and the structure of administrative law as the branch of law. The comparativemethod has been used to clarify approaches to understanding the system of administrative law inUkraine and Germany.Results. The use of the specified methods of scientific cognition made it possible: to state theexistence of the universally recognized theory of the division of law into public and private; tosubstantiate the need for strict adherence to this theory of the division of law while separatinglegal entities within those subsystems of law (branches of law, sub-branches of law and legalinstitutions); to emphasize the need to bring the system of administrative law in line with Europeancounterparts, which provide its inevitable division into General and Special Administrative Law; to single out new branches of law within the framework of Special Administrative Law, takinginto account the functional activities of public administration, as well as administrative and legalguaranteeing of the rights of individuals in the field of public administration.Conclusions. The conducted research allowed us to conclude that the formation and implementationof the economic function of the Ukrainian state is guaranteed by administrative and commerciallaw.The separation of this branch of Special Administrative Law is a logical consequence of: a) theapplication of the theory of law division into public and private to legal relations arising fromthe formation and implementation of the economic function of the Ukrainian state; b) thoroughreform of the system of administrative law of Ukraine, which provides the separation of newbranches of l
法律规范是乌克兰国家经济职能在乌克兰法律体系中形成和实施的基础,本文的重点是明确法律规范的地位。这项研究基于对国内外法律文献(主要是德国法律文献)的深入分析,重点关注法律制度、将法律划分为公法和私法的依据、作为法律分支的行政法体系、作为特别行政法分支的行政法和商法。本文的目的是证明行政法和商法是乌克兰国家经济职能形成和实施的基础。笔者分别研究了该特别行政法分支的内部结构,以便在其范围内挑选出新的法律实体。方法系统。研究中一般采用科学的、专门的、合法的认知技术和方法。历史的认识方法被用来研究法律划分为公法和私法的观点形成的历史。在对公法与私法划分标准进行分类时,采用了形式化和逻辑性的方法。在研究法律制度的性质和行政法作为法律分支的结构时,运用了系统和功能的方法。本文运用比较法来阐明理解乌克兰和德国行政法制度的途径。科学认识的特定方法的使用,使得有可能:陈述普遍承认的法律分为公法和私法的理论的存在;证明严格遵守法律划分理论的必要性,同时将法律子系统(法律分支机构、法律分支机构和法律机构)中的法律实体分开;强调行政法律体系必须与欧洲同行接轨,欧洲的行政法律体系不可避免地划分为一般行政法和特别行政法;考虑到公共行政的职能活动以及对公共行政领域个人权利的行政和法律保障,在《特别行政法》的框架内挑选出新的法律部门。所进行的研究使我们得出结论,乌克兰国家经济职能的形成和实施是由行政法和商法保证的。这一特别行政法分支的分离是以下原因的必然结果:a)将公私法划分理论应用于乌克兰国家经济职能形成和实施过程中产生的法律关系;(b)彻底改革乌克兰的行政法律制度,该制度规定在特别行政法范围内分离新的法律部门;c)使乌克兰接近欧洲行政空间,规定使国家法律体系与欧盟法律体系保持一致。行政法和商法,像任何法律分支一样,由在其边界内形成的小型法律实体组成。我们提议在新机构的基础上扩大行政和商法机构的名单:a)乌克兰经济发展预测和规划机构;B)保护商业实体和消费者权利的制度;C)国家援助工商会的制度;D)在公共经济部门内管理经济活动的制度。
{"title":"ADMINISTRATIVE AND COMMERCIAL LAW AS A LEGAL BASIS FOR THE FORMATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ECONOMIC FUNCTION OF THE UKRAINIAN STATE","authors":"Zhanna Bernatska","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2020.3.01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2020.3.01","url":null,"abstract":"The article is focused on clarifying the place of law norms, which are the basis for the formationand implementation of the economic function of the Ukrainian state within the legal system ofUkraine. The research is based on an in-depth analysis of national and foreign legal literature,primarily German one, focused on the system of law, the grounds for the division of law into publicand private, the system of administrative law as the branch of law, administrative and commerciallaw as the branch of Special Administrative Law.The purpose of the article is to substantiate the idea that administrative and commercial law isthe basis for the formation and implementation of the economic function of the Ukrainian state.The author has separately studied internal structure of this branch of Special Administrative Lawin order to single out new legal entities within its boundaries.System of methods. Generally scientific, special and legal techniques and methods of cognitionhave been used during the research. The historical method of cognition has been used whilestudying the history of the formation of views on the division of law into public and private.The formal and logical method has been used while classifying the criteria for dividing the lawinto public and private. The system and functional method has been used while studying the natureof the legal system and the structure of administrative law as the branch of law. The comparativemethod has been used to clarify approaches to understanding the system of administrative law inUkraine and Germany.Results. The use of the specified methods of scientific cognition made it possible: to state theexistence of the universally recognized theory of the division of law into public and private; tosubstantiate the need for strict adherence to this theory of the division of law while separatinglegal entities within those subsystems of law (branches of law, sub-branches of law and legalinstitutions); to emphasize the need to bring the system of administrative law in line with Europeancounterparts, which provide its inevitable division into General and Special Administrative Law; to single out new branches of law within the framework of Special Administrative Law, takinginto account the functional activities of public administration, as well as administrative and legalguaranteeing of the rights of individuals in the field of public administration.Conclusions. The conducted research allowed us to conclude that the formation and implementationof the economic function of the Ukrainian state is guaranteed by administrative and commerciallaw.The separation of this branch of Special Administrative Law is a logical consequence of: a) theapplication of the theory of law division into public and private to legal relations arising fromthe formation and implementation of the economic function of the Ukrainian state; b) thoroughreform of the system of administrative law of Ukraine, which provides the separation of newbranches of l","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"195 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76946643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
SYSTEMATIZATION OF MILITARY LEGISLATION OF UKRAINE: HISTORICAL AND LEGAL ASPECTS 乌克兰军事立法的系统化:历史与法律方面
Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.17721/2227-796x.2020.4.03
V. Shulgin
The article analyzes the historical, legal and rule-making features of the systematization of military legislation of Ukraine during the IX-early XXI centuries in the Ukrainian lands as an ethnic state and states that influenced its formation, development and current state. In order to effectively systematize the military legislation of Ukraine, which is characterized by imbalance and inconsistency of acts as a result of permanent changes in conditions of political and economic instability, armed aggression and the ongoing special period, a comparative historical and legal analysis of the state and achievements in practical military codification experience that must be taken into account when streamlining the legislation in the field of defense of Ukraine. As a result of the conducted research the tendencies and normative-legal features of each historical period of systematization of the military legislation on the Ukrainian lands are established. It was found that by the XVII century. The provisions of military law were only interspersed with acts of general law; the emergence of a regular army led to institutional systematization in the form of separate military statutes. The only sectoral-targeted systematization of military legislation took place in the form of incorporation and only after the systematization of general legislation through the publication of the Code of Military Resolutions of 1839, 1859, 1869. Systematization of military legislation of XX–XXI centuries covered an even larger area of military-administrative, military-service, military-combat, civil-military social relations, but the rudimentary influence of the Code of Military Resolutions is preserved in the military statutes and military-criminal acts of Ukraine. Sectoral systematization of military legislation in the form of codification (unified Military Code) or intersectoral - in the field of defense (unified National Defense Code) has no short-term prospects due to weak theoretical and legal and practical-applied development.
本文分析了乌克兰作为一个民族国家,在9世纪至21世纪初,乌克兰军事立法制度化的历史、法律和规则制定特点,以及影响乌克兰军事立法形成、发展和现状的国家。乌克兰的军事立法由于政治和经济不稳定、武装侵略和正在进行的特殊时期的条件的不断变化而具有不平衡和不一致行为的特点,为了使乌克兰的军事立法有效地系统化,在精简乌克兰国防领域的立法时必须考虑对国家和实际军事法典化经验的成就进行比较历史和法律分析。根据所进行的研究,确定了乌克兰土地上军事立法系统化的每个历史时期的趋势和规范法律特征。到了十七世纪,人们发现。军事法的规定只是穿插在一般法的行为中;正规军的出现导致了独立军事法规形式的制度化。军事立法唯一针对部门的系统化是以合并的形式发生的,而且是在通过出版1839年、1859年和1869年的《军事决议法典》使一般立法系统化之后。二十至二十一世纪军事立法的系统化涵盖了军事-行政、兵役、军事-战斗、军民社会关系等更大的领域,但《军事决议法典》的基本影响仍保留在乌克兰的军事法规和军事犯罪行为中。由于理论、法律和实际应用的发展薄弱,以编纂(统一军事法典)或国防领域跨部门(统一国防法典)形式的军事立法的部门系统化短期内没有前景。
{"title":"SYSTEMATIZATION OF MILITARY LEGISLATION OF UKRAINE: HISTORICAL AND LEGAL ASPECTS","authors":"V. Shulgin","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2020.4.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2020.4.03","url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the historical, legal and rule-making features of the systematization of military legislation of Ukraine during the IX-early XXI centuries in the Ukrainian lands as an ethnic state and states that influenced its formation, development and current state. In order to effectively systematize the military legislation of Ukraine, which is characterized by imbalance and inconsistency of acts as a result of permanent changes in conditions of political and economic instability, armed aggression and the ongoing special period, a comparative historical and legal analysis of the state and achievements in practical military codification experience that must be taken into account when streamlining the legislation in the field of defense of Ukraine. As a result of the conducted research the tendencies and normative-legal features of each historical period of systematization of the military legislation on the Ukrainian lands are established. It was found that by the XVII century. The provisions of military law were only interspersed with acts of general law; the emergence of a regular army led to institutional systematization in the form of separate military statutes. The only sectoral-targeted systematization of military legislation took place in the form of incorporation and only after the systematization of general legislation through the publication of the Code of Military Resolutions of 1839, 1859, 1869. Systematization of military legislation of XX–XXI centuries covered an even larger area of military-administrative, military-service, military-combat, civil-military social relations, but the rudimentary influence of the Code of Military Resolutions is preserved in the military statutes and military-criminal acts of Ukraine. Sectoral systematization of military legislation in the form of codification (unified Military Code) or intersectoral - in the field of defense (unified National Defense Code) has no short-term prospects due to weak theoretical and legal and practical-applied development.","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76445322","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ON THE ISSUE OF JUDICIAL CONTROL OVER THE DISCRETION OF THE AUTHORITY 试论司法机关对自由裁量权的控制问题
Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.17721/2227-796x.2020.4.06
Mykola Onishchuk
Purpose. The purpose of the article is to define the concept of “discretionary powers”, to formulate conclusions on the limits of discretionary powers of government authorities, to analyze the limits of judicial control over discretionary powers, the correlation between court procedural discretion and public administration discretion. Methods. The theoretical and methodological basis of the study are modern general scientific and special legal methods of scientific knowledge. The formal-logical method and the method of analysis and synthesis are used in the study of doctrinal provisions on the concept of “discretionary powers”. The method of comparative legal analysis is used in the study of foreign models of judicial control over the exercise of discretionary powers. Results. The article defines the concept of “discretionary powers”, considers the types of administrative discretion, approaches to the scope of judicial control over the implementation of discretionary powers in different European countries, givthe criteria for effective judicial control over the exercise of discretionary powers. Conclusions. The attribute of effective judicial protection against illegal activity in the exercise of discretionary powers is the issuance of a court decision that makes it impossible to re-apply to the administrative body or re-resolve the same issue. Based on this, it is concluded that in Ukraine it is appropriate to apply the model of full judicial control, and the recognition of the disputed decision as illegal with the obligation to re-adopt the administrative decision is contrary to the rule of law principle, except the situations when: – there was no real consideration of the issue as such (non-compliance with the decision-making procedure, decision-making by an inappropriate subject); – there is an exclusive competence of the relevant body to make a specific decision (assign a rank, military rank, etc.).
目的。本文的目的是对“自由裁量权”的概念进行界定,对政府机关的自由裁量权的限制作出结论,分析司法控制对自由裁量权的限制,法院程序自由裁量权与公共行政自由裁量权的关系。方法。研究的理论和方法基础是现代科学知识的一般科学方法和特殊法律方法。在对“自由裁量权”概念的理论规定进行研究时,采用了形式逻辑方法和分析综合方法。运用比较法分析的方法,对国外司法控制自由裁量权的模式进行了研究。结果。本文界定了“自由裁量权”的概念,考察了行政自由裁量权的类型,探讨了欧洲不同国家对自由裁量权行使的司法控制范围,给出了对自由裁量权行使进行有效司法控制的标准。结论。在行使自由裁量权时,防止非法活动的有效司法保护的属性是法院判决的发布,使其不可能再次适用于行政机构或重新解决同一问题。在此基础上,得出结论认为,在乌克兰适用完全司法控制模式是适当的,承认有争议的决定是非法的,并有义务重新通过行政决定是违反法治原则的,但以下情况除外:-没有真正审议该问题(不符合决策程序,由不适当的主体作出决策);-相关机构有专门的权限来做出具体的决定(分配军衔,军衔等)。
{"title":"ON THE ISSUE OF JUDICIAL CONTROL OVER THE DISCRETION OF THE AUTHORITY","authors":"Mykola Onishchuk","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2020.4.06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2020.4.06","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. The purpose of the article is to define the concept of “discretionary powers”, to formulate conclusions on the limits of discretionary powers of government authorities, to analyze the limits of judicial control over discretionary powers, the correlation between court procedural discretion and public administration discretion. Methods. The theoretical and methodological basis of the study are modern general scientific and special legal methods of scientific knowledge. The formal-logical method and the method of analysis and synthesis are used in the study of doctrinal provisions on the concept of “discretionary powers”. The method of comparative legal analysis is used in the study of foreign models of judicial control over the exercise of discretionary powers. Results. The article defines the concept of “discretionary powers”, considers the types of administrative discretion, approaches to the scope of judicial control over the implementation of discretionary powers in different European countries, givthe criteria for effective judicial control over the exercise of discretionary powers. Conclusions. The attribute of effective judicial protection against illegal activity in the exercise of discretionary powers is the issuance of a court decision that makes it impossible to re-apply to the administrative body or re-resolve the same issue. Based on this, it is concluded that in Ukraine it is appropriate to apply the model of full judicial control, and the recognition of the disputed decision as illegal with the obligation to re-adopt the administrative decision is contrary to the rule of law principle, except the situations when: – there was no real consideration of the issue as such (non-compliance with the decision-making procedure, decision-making by an inappropriate subject); – there is an exclusive competence of the relevant body to make a specific decision (assign a rank, military rank, etc.).","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"155 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77127627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
MINORS AS SUBJECTS OF LAW: COMPARISON OF THE LEGAL REGULATION IN GERMANY AND UKRAINE (PART 2) 未成年人作为法律主体:德国与乌克兰法律规制之比较(二)
Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.17721/2227-796x.2020.3.04
B. Schloer, K. Kravchenko
This article is devoted to the minors as a subject of law. The aim of the article is a comparative analysis of minors in different areas of law as well as age limits. The article focuses on Criminal Law, Administrative Law, Labour Law, Social Law, and Procedure Law. The article is based on a method of comparative analysis of German and Ukrainian domestic law. The results of the article are following. First, a criminal responsibility of minors in both German Law and Ukrainian Law is analyzed. The question of the age of the criminal majority remains one of the most controversial issues in the field of criminal law for minors. In Germany, the age of the criminal responsibility is fourteen years, while in Ukraine the age of the criminal responsibility is sixteen years. The provisions of Ukrainian Criminal Code on criminal responsibility of minors are outdated today. Those provisions should be changed. The same changes should be made in Administrative law of Ukraine concerning the minimum age limit of administrative responsibility. Second, the comparative analysis of Social law provisions concerning minors allowance in Germany and Ukraine shows considerable differences of the level of State security. Germany has generous systems of social welfare and offers a variety of allowances and benefits for minors. One of the most well-known of these is Kindergeld (also called a Child Benefit). This is an allowance from the German government to help defray some of the cost of raising children. It can run from €219 to €250 per child per month. While Ukraine offers only a lump sum birth payment in an amount of €1234. It is also one of the most complicated issues. Conclusions based on the results of comparative analysis. The authors suggest that the age limit in the area of criminal as well as administrative law of Ukraine should be reduced.
这篇文章专门讨论作为法律主体的未成年人。本文的目的是对不同法律领域的未成年人以及年龄限制进行比较分析。本文的重点是刑法、行政法、劳动法、社会法和诉讼法。本文采用比较分析德国和乌克兰国内法的方法。本文的结果如下。首先,分析了德国法和乌克兰法中未成年人的刑事责任。刑事多数年龄问题仍然是未成年人刑法领域最具争议的问题之一。德国的刑事责任年龄为14岁,而乌克兰的刑事责任年龄为16岁。乌克兰刑法关于未成年人刑事责任的规定今天已经过时。这些规定应予修改。乌克兰行政法中关于行政责任最低年龄限制的规定也应作出同样的修改。第二,对德国和乌克兰关于未成年人津贴的社会法律规定进行比较分析,可以看出国家安全水平存在较大差异。德国有慷慨的社会福利制度,为未成年人提供各种津贴和福利。其中最著名的是Kindergeld(也称为儿童福利)。这是德国政府的一项津贴,用来帮助支付抚养孩子的部分费用。每个孩子每月的费用从219欧元到250欧元不等。而乌克兰只提供1234欧元的一次性出生付款。这也是最复杂的问题之一。结论基于对比分析的结果。建议降低乌克兰刑法和行政法领域的年龄限制。
{"title":"MINORS AS SUBJECTS OF LAW: COMPARISON OF THE LEGAL REGULATION IN GERMANY AND UKRAINE (PART 2)","authors":"B. Schloer, K. Kravchenko","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2020.3.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2020.3.04","url":null,"abstract":"This article is devoted to the minors as a subject of law. The aim of the article is a comparative analysis of minors in different areas of law as well as age limits. The article focuses on Criminal Law, Administrative Law, Labour Law, Social Law, and Procedure Law. The article is based on a method of comparative analysis of German and Ukrainian domestic law. The results of the article are following. First, a criminal responsibility of minors in both German Law and Ukrainian Law is analyzed. The question of the age of the criminal majority remains one of the most controversial issues in the field of criminal law for minors. In Germany, the age of the criminal responsibility is fourteen years, while in Ukraine the age of the criminal responsibility is sixteen years. The provisions of Ukrainian Criminal Code on criminal responsibility of minors are outdated today. Those provisions should be changed. The same changes should be made in Administrative law of Ukraine concerning the minimum age limit of administrative responsibility. Second, the comparative analysis of Social law provisions concerning minors allowance in Germany and Ukraine shows considerable differences of the level of State security. Germany has generous systems of social welfare and offers a variety of allowances and benefits for minors. One of the most well-known of these is Kindergeld (also called a Child Benefit). This is an allowance from the German government to help defray some of the cost of raising children. It can run from €219 to €250 per child per month. While Ukraine offers only a lump sum birth payment in an amount of €1234. It is also one of the most complicated issues. Conclusions based on the results of comparative analysis. The authors suggest that the age limit in the area of criminal as well as administrative law of Ukraine should be reduced.","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83268436","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PECULIARITIES OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL REGULATION OF BUSINESS ENTITIES ACTIVITIES DURING THE QUARANTINE IN UKRAINE 乌克兰检疫期间商业实体活动的行政和法律监管特点
Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.17721/2227-796x.2020.1.05
Liliia Popova
The aim of the article is to investigate the peculiarities of administrative and legal regulation of the activities of business entities during quarantine and to consider possible directions of improvement of such regulation. Methods. The theoretical and methodological basis of the research is modern general scientific and special legal methods and techniques of scientific knowledge. The formal and logical method determines the importance of administrative and legal regulation of the activities of economic entities during quarantine. Formal and legal method allowed analyzing the current legislative and other normative-legal acts concerning administrative and legal regulation of activity of economic entities during quarantine. The structural and logical, comparative and legal methods outline the main directions of improving of implementation the administrative and legal regulation of the activities of economic entities during quarantine. Results. Attention is drawn to the fact that business entities are limited in their actions due to the introduction of quarantine and emergency regime in Ukraine. The article analyzes the legislative and other legal acts adopted to prevent the spread in Ukraine of acute respiratory disease COVID-19 caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, which regulate the activities of business entities. It is noted that the Government of the State, taking into account the important role of economic entities in the economy of the country, makes prudent measures to support them during quarantine. However, there are certain conditions under which business entities face problems that need to be addressed, primarily at the legislative level. Conclusions. The article indicates the expediency of amending the current legislation to harmonize it in connection with the adoption of a number of regulatory acts aimed at preventing the spread of acute COVID-19 respiratory disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in Ukraine and use in the legislation of different terminology related to COVID-19.
本文的目的是探讨检疫期间对商业单位活动的行政和法律监管的特点,并考虑改进这种监管的可能方向。其研究的理论和方法基础是现代一般科学和特殊法律的科学知识方法和技术。形式和逻辑的方法决定了在检疫期间对经济主体活动进行行政和法律规制的重要性。正式和法律的方法允许分析现行立法和其他规范性法律行为,涉及经济实体在检疫期间活动的行政和法律规制。结构方法与逻辑方法、比较法方法和法治法方法概述了加强对检疫期间经济主体活动实施行政法律规制的主要方向。委员会提请注意,由于乌克兰实行检疫和紧急制度,商业实体的行动受到限制。本文分析了乌克兰为防止由新型冠状病毒SARS-CoV-2引起的急性呼吸道疾病COVID-19在乌克兰的传播而通过的立法和其他法律行为,这些法律行为规范了企业的活动。委员会注意到,国家政府考虑到经济实体在国家经济中的重要作用,在隔离期间采取了审慎措施为它们提供支持。然而,在某些情况下,商业实体面临的问题需要解决,主要是在立法层面。该条指出,有必要对现行立法进行修订,使其与旨在防止由SARS-CoV-2冠状病毒引起的COVID-19急性呼吸道疾病在乌克兰传播的若干监管法案相协调,并在立法中使用与COVID-19相关的不同术语。
{"title":"PECULIARITIES OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL REGULATION OF BUSINESS ENTITIES ACTIVITIES DURING THE QUARANTINE IN UKRAINE","authors":"Liliia Popova","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2020.1.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2020.1.05","url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the article is to investigate the peculiarities of administrative and legal regulation of the activities of business entities during quarantine and to consider possible directions of improvement of such regulation. Methods. The theoretical and methodological basis of the research is modern general scientific and special legal methods and techniques of scientific knowledge. The formal and logical method determines the importance of administrative and legal regulation of the activities of economic entities during quarantine. Formal and legal method allowed analyzing the current legislative and other normative-legal acts concerning administrative and legal regulation of activity of economic entities during quarantine. The structural and logical, comparative and legal methods outline the main directions of improving of implementation the administrative and legal regulation of the activities of economic entities during quarantine. Results. Attention is drawn to the fact that business entities are limited in their actions due to the introduction of quarantine and emergency regime in Ukraine. The article analyzes the legislative and other legal acts adopted to prevent the spread in Ukraine of acute respiratory disease COVID-19 caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, which regulate the activities of business entities. It is noted that the Government of the State, taking into account the important role of economic entities in the economy of the country, makes prudent measures to support them during quarantine. However, there are certain conditions under which business entities face problems that need to be addressed, primarily at the legislative level. Conclusions. The article indicates the expediency of amending the current legislation to harmonize it in connection with the adoption of a number of regulatory acts aimed at preventing the spread of acute COVID-19 respiratory disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in Ukraine and use in the legislation of different terminology related to COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89067294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
OPPORTUNITY OF RATIONAL LEGISLATOR IN PRACTICE: LITHUANIA 理性立法者在实践中的机遇:立陶宛
Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.17721/2227-796x.2020.4.07
Darijus Beinoravičius
The legislator, officials of the state apparatus and the lawyers – all those who face creation, application, and systematization of legal acts – are especially interested in the perfection of such technique. Thinking in legislation is the key element in a process in which the legislator – both legal (lawyer) and political – has to choose one of the many solutions that consolidate social compromise. Legislative technique in Lithuanian doctrine is interpreted in a narrow and a broad sense. This article proves the necessity for the purview of laws to be determined by needs of the society and not by the will of authorities; it also explains how the legislator should apply legal sociology for this purpose. Scientific methods of legal sociology in lawmaking have been introduced relatively recently. The impact of law on political authorities in the process of lawmaking is reflected in actual legally consolidated politics. As legal awareness – „the spirit of law“ – has a direct impact on political processes and determines establishment of procedures, therefore politics itself becomes a part of law. Herewith in political processes the law becomes dynamic and politics itself becomes entrenched in law. In this article interpreting the legislative technique in a broad sense, as a set of methods and means used in preparation, publication and systematization of legal acts, one of its goals should be distinguished – to improve the legislative process from a technical point of view. In Lithuania, it needs to be noted that the content of these requirements have undergone positive changes in quality with the changes of legal acts. In addition to general technical – linguistical requirements material content requirements have been set forth, constituting the scope of individual regulation, the relationship with other legal acts, the essential principles of public relations regulated, etc. At the same time, references to the source of official publication were abandoned, and all these changes lead to conclusion, that the legislative technique in this area has become simpler and clearer and it contributes to the development of better lawmaking.
立法者、国家机器的官员和律师——所有那些面对法律行为的创造、应用和系统化的人——对这种技术的完善特别感兴趣。立法中的思考是一个过程中的关键因素,在这个过程中,立法者-法律(律师)和政治-必须在许多巩固社会妥协的解决方案中选择一种。立陶宛学说中的立法技术有狭义和广义两种解释。本文论证了法律的权限必须由社会的需要而不是由当局的意志来决定;本文还解释了立法者应如何运用法律社会学来达到这一目的。科学的法律社会学方法在立法中的应用是近年来才出现的。法律在立法过程中对政治权威的影响体现在实际的法律巩固政治中。由于法律意识——“法的精神”——直接影响着政治过程,决定着程序的建立,因此政治本身也成为法律的一部分。因此,在政治过程中,法律成为动态的,政治本身也成为法律的基础。本文从广义上解释立法技术作为法律行为的编制、公布和系统化的一套方法和手段时,应区分其目标之一——从技术角度改进立法程序。在立陶宛,需要指出的是,随着法律行为的变化,这些要求的内容在质量上发生了积极的变化。除了一般的技术语言要求外,还规定了物质内容要求、构成个别规制的范围、与其他法律行为的关系、公共关系规制的基本原则等。同时,放弃了对官方出版物来源的提及,所有这些变化导致的结论是,这一领域的立法技术变得更加简单和清晰,有助于更好地制定立法。
{"title":"OPPORTUNITY OF RATIONAL LEGISLATOR IN PRACTICE: LITHUANIA","authors":"Darijus Beinoravičius","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2020.4.07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2020.4.07","url":null,"abstract":"The legislator, officials of the state apparatus and the lawyers – all those who face creation, application, and systematization of legal acts – are especially interested in the perfection of such technique. Thinking in legislation is the key element in a process in which the legislator – both legal (lawyer) and political – has to choose one of the many solutions that consolidate social compromise. Legislative technique in Lithuanian doctrine is interpreted in a narrow and a broad sense. This article proves the necessity for the purview of laws to be determined by needs of the society and not by the will of authorities; it also explains how the legislator should apply legal sociology for this purpose. Scientific methods of legal sociology in lawmaking have been introduced relatively recently. The impact of law on political authorities in the process of lawmaking is reflected in actual legally consolidated politics. As legal awareness – „the spirit of law“ – has a direct impact on political processes and determines establishment of procedures, therefore politics itself becomes a part of law. Herewith in political processes the law becomes dynamic and politics itself becomes entrenched in law. In this article interpreting the legislative technique in a broad sense, as a set of methods and means used in preparation, publication and systematization of legal acts, one of its goals should be distinguished – to improve the legislative process from a technical point of view. In Lithuania, it needs to be noted that the content of these requirements have undergone positive changes in quality with the changes of legal acts. In addition to general technical – linguistical requirements material content requirements have been set forth, constituting the scope of individual regulation, the relationship with other legal acts, the essential principles of public relations regulated, etc. At the same time, references to the source of official publication were abandoned, and all these changes lead to conclusion, that the legislative technique in this area has become simpler and clearer and it contributes to the development of better lawmaking.","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84633142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
TRANSFORMATION OF SOVIET ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: UZBEKISTAN’S CASE STUDY IN JUDICIAL REVIEW OVER ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS 苏联行政法的转型:乌兹别克斯坦行政行为司法审查的个案研究
Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.17721/2227-796x.2020.1.08
J. Nematov
Judicial protection against individual and normative acts of the public administration continues to be problematic in Uzbekistan. One central reason for this mischief is the continuing prevalence of Soviet-style ideas and patterns in legal thinking as well as the legal practice. This article describes the problems of jurisdictions face when trying to overcome their Soviet heritage by developing legal protection in administrative matters, and analyses the strategies for the improvement of this situation. Key factors are a comprehensive and harmonised development of administrative procedure and administrative litigation in the field of legislation, and what might be termed a “constitutionalisation” of legal thinking, theory and teaching – i.e. the respect for values enshrined in Constitution such as the rule of law and access to judicial protection against the public administration – in the field of legal science. Uzbekistan is a good example how foreign partners and donors of international legal assistance can help strengthen these factors. This paper explores (1) to what extent Soviet thinking on judicial review over administrative acts has been set aside or to what extent is it still alive in today’s Uzbekistan, and (2) what are the transformation points of judicial review. Overall, I argue that Soviet thinking on judicial review over administrative acts has big change in legislation level under new regime of Uzbekistan, however legal reforms are not still accepted by legal practice, doctrine and legal education. To analyse these statements, the first step is to describe the main characteristics and legal reforms on judicial review over administrative acts taken in Soviet period (part II). Part III and IV analyses the current legal system and judicial practise of Uzbekistan. Lastly, I map out recent steps taken to introduce some reforms in the field of judicial review over administrative acts in Uzbekistan (part V).
在乌兹别克斯坦,针对个人和公共行政规范行为的司法保护仍然存在问题。造成这种危害的一个主要原因是苏联式的思想和模式在法律思维和法律实践中继续盛行。本文描述了司法管辖区在试图通过发展行政事务中的法律保护来克服苏联遗产时所面临的问题,并分析了改善这种情况的策略。关键因素是行政程序和行政诉讼在立法领域的全面和协调发展,以及法律思想、理论和教学的“宪制化”,即尊重宪法所载的价值观,如法治和在公共行政方面获得司法保护。乌兹别克斯坦是国际法律援助的外国伙伴和捐助者如何帮助加强这些因素的一个很好的例子。本文探讨(1)苏联关于行政行为司法审查的思想在多大程度上被搁置,或者在多大程度上仍然存在于今天的乌兹别克斯坦;(2)司法审查的转型点是什么。总体而言,笔者认为在乌兹别克斯坦新政权下,苏联关于行政行为司法审查的思想在立法层面发生了较大的变化,但法律改革仍未被法律实践、法律理论和法律教育所接受。为了分析这些说法,第一步是描述苏联时期行政行为司法审查的主要特征和法律改革(第二部分)。第三和第四部分分析了乌兹别克斯坦目前的法律制度和司法实践。最后,我列出最近为在乌兹别克斯坦对行政行为进行司法审查方面进行一些改革而采取的步骤(第五部分)。
{"title":"TRANSFORMATION OF SOVIET ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: UZBEKISTAN’S CASE STUDY IN JUDICIAL REVIEW OVER ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS","authors":"J. Nematov","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2020.1.08","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2020.1.08","url":null,"abstract":"Judicial protection against individual and normative acts of the public administration continues to be problematic in Uzbekistan. One central reason for this mischief is the continuing prevalence of Soviet-style ideas and patterns in legal thinking as well as the legal practice. This article describes the problems of jurisdictions face when trying to overcome their Soviet heritage by developing legal protection in administrative matters, and analyses the strategies for the improvement of this situation. Key factors are a comprehensive and harmonised development of administrative procedure and administrative litigation in the field of legislation, and what might be termed a “constitutionalisation” of legal thinking, theory and teaching – i.e. the respect for values enshrined in Constitution such as the rule of law and access to judicial protection against the public administration – in the field of legal science. Uzbekistan is a good example how foreign partners and donors of international legal assistance can help strengthen these factors. This paper explores (1) to what extent Soviet thinking on judicial review over administrative acts has been set aside or to what extent is it still alive in today’s Uzbekistan, and (2) what are the transformation points of judicial review. Overall, I argue that Soviet thinking on judicial review over administrative acts has big change in legislation level under new regime of Uzbekistan, however legal reforms are not still accepted by legal practice, doctrine and legal education. To analyse these statements, the first step is to describe the main characteristics and legal reforms on judicial review over administrative acts taken in Soviet period (part II). Part III and IV analyses the current legal system and judicial practise of Uzbekistan. Lastly, I map out recent steps taken to introduce some reforms in the field of judicial review over administrative acts in Uzbekistan (part V).","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"129 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76706947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
SPECIFIC FEATURES OF THE FORMATION OF CITIZENS’ RIGHT TO USE NATURAL OBJECTS OF THE OWNERSHIP RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE OF UKRAINE IN THE XX CENTURY 二十世纪乌克兰人民对自然物品所有权的公民使用权形成的具体特征
Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.17721/2227-796x.2020.4.09
Viktor Branovytskiy
The purpose of the article is to clarify the peculiarities of the formation of citizens’ right to use natural objects of the ownership right of the people of Ukraine in the XX century. Methods. The research methodology consists of such methods of scientific cognition as: systematic and structural, historical and legal, comparative and legal, formal and legal, interpretation, deduction, induction, analysis, synthesis, etc. Results. The author studies in the section “Period of power changes on the territory of Ukraine” the peculiarities of the legal regulation of the rights to natural objects in the period from 1917 to 1920 and finds out that there was no single practice of regulating natural management relations at that time in Ukraine, since it changed depending on the region, the authorities whose sphere of influence extended to it and the year of issuance of the regulatory act. The author studies in the section “Soviet period” the specifics of the legal regulation of the rights to natural objects during Ukraine’s stay in the USSR and finds out that the only form of the ownership to all natural objects was state, the natural management concept was significantly developed, the mechanism of administrative and legal provision for the realization of citizens’ right to use natural objects of state property, an extensive system of legislation were formed. The author emphasizes in the section “Period of Sovereign Ukraine” how the approach to the regulation of the rights to natural objects was changed after Ukraine’s secession from the USSR, especially the ownership right of the people of Ukraine to natural resources and citizens’ rights to use them. Conclusions. The author indicates in the conclusions: when and which regulatory legal acts enshrined for the first time the people’s ownership to natural objects, citizens’ right to use natural objects of the ownership right of the people and the procedure to use them at the legislative level; main features of legal regulation of the rights to natural objects in the period from 1917 to 1920, the Soviet period and the period of sovereign Ukraine; the circumstances depending on guaranteeing this right. Finally, the author formulates a position according to which it is necessary to distinguish land plots and other objects that may be owned by others and those that constitute the exclusive ownership of the people due to their value and significance. Besides, the author emphasizes the need to get back to the method of normative and legal regulation of the rights to natural objects, which was used in 1990–1991, when the people of Ukraine were endowed with independent powers and had a real status of the owner to natural resources.
本文旨在阐明二十世纪乌克兰人民所有权中公民对自然物使用权形成的特殊性。方法。研究方法论包括系统与结构、历史与法律、比较与法律、形式与法律、解释、演绎、归纳、分析、综合等科学认知方法。结果。作者在“乌克兰领土上的权力变动时期”一节中研究了1917年至1920年期间对自然物权利的法律规制的特殊性,发现当时乌克兰没有统一的规制自然管理关系的做法,因为它根据地区、权力范围扩大到该地区的当局和规制法颁布的年份而变化。在“苏联时期”一节中,笔者研究了乌克兰在苏联时期对自然物权利的法律规制的具体情况,发现所有自然物所有权的唯一形式是国家,自然管理理念得到了显著发展,实现公民对国有财产自然物使用权的行政和法律规定机制,形成了广泛的立法体系。在“主权乌克兰时期”一节中,笔者着重论述了乌克兰脱离苏联后,自然物质性权利的规制方式发生了怎样的变化,特别是乌克兰人民对自然资源的所有权和公民对自然资源的使用权。结论。作者在结语中指出:何时何地的规范性法律行为首次明确规定了人民对自然物的所有权、公民对自然物的使用权及其在立法层面的使用程序;1917 - 1920年、苏联时期和乌克兰主权时期自然物权利法律规制的主要特点;取决于保障这一权利的情况。最后,作者提出了一个立场,根据这个立场,有必要区分土地和其他可能属于他人所有的物体,以及那些因其价值和意义而构成人民专有所有权的物体。此外,作者强调有必要回到1990年至1991年期间使用的对自然物权利进行规范和法律规制的方法,当时乌克兰人民被赋予独立的权力,并具有自然资源所有者的真正地位。
{"title":"SPECIFIC FEATURES OF THE FORMATION OF CITIZENS’ RIGHT TO USE NATURAL OBJECTS OF THE OWNERSHIP RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE OF UKRAINE IN THE XX CENTURY","authors":"Viktor Branovytskiy","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2020.4.09","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2020.4.09","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article is to clarify the peculiarities of the formation of citizens’ right to use natural objects of the ownership right of the people of Ukraine in the XX century. Methods. The research methodology consists of such methods of scientific cognition as: systematic and structural, historical and legal, comparative and legal, formal and legal, interpretation, deduction, induction, analysis, synthesis, etc. Results. The author studies in the section “Period of power changes on the territory of Ukraine” the peculiarities of the legal regulation of the rights to natural objects in the period from 1917 to 1920 and finds out that there was no single practice of regulating natural management relations at that time in Ukraine, since it changed depending on the region, the authorities whose sphere of influence extended to it and the year of issuance of the regulatory act. The author studies in the section “Soviet period” the specifics of the legal regulation of the rights to natural objects during Ukraine’s stay in the USSR and finds out that the only form of the ownership to all natural objects was state, the natural management concept was significantly developed, the mechanism of administrative and legal provision for the realization of citizens’ right to use natural objects of state property, an extensive system of legislation were formed. The author emphasizes in the section “Period of Sovereign Ukraine” how the approach to the regulation of the rights to natural objects was changed after Ukraine’s secession from the USSR, especially the ownership right of the people of Ukraine to natural resources and citizens’ rights to use them. Conclusions. The author indicates in the conclusions: when and which regulatory legal acts enshrined for the first time the people’s ownership to natural objects, citizens’ right to use natural objects of the ownership right of the people and the procedure to use them at the legislative level; main features of legal regulation of the rights to natural objects in the period from 1917 to 1920, the Soviet period and the period of sovereign Ukraine; the circumstances depending on guaranteeing this right. Finally, the author formulates a position according to which it is necessary to distinguish land plots and other objects that may be owned by others and those that constitute the exclusive ownership of the people due to their value and significance. Besides, the author emphasizes the need to get back to the method of normative and legal regulation of the rights to natural objects, which was used in 1990–1991, when the people of Ukraine were endowed with independent powers and had a real status of the owner to natural resources.","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84849389","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STATE AND PUBLIC CONTROL OF THE ELECTION PROCESS IN UKRAINE 乌克兰选举过程中国家与公众控制之间的关系
Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.17721/2227-796x.2020.4.02
N. Chudyk
During the years of independence, Ukraine has undergone certain processes that have led tochanges in the relationship between government and society. These changes were not alwayspositive. State power had a high level of authority in the eyes of the Ukrainian people. The majorityof the population does not believe in the objectivity of the results of the people’s will, which, infact, stimulates interest and shows the importance of public control over the election process.The purpose of the article – is to study the correlation of the state and public control over thesuffrage of Ukraine and its influence on the formation and development of civil society.The methodological basis of the study were general scientific and special legal methods ofcognition. Among the general scientific methods used is the method of philosophical dialectics,which is revealed through the methods of analysis and synthesis, ascent from simple to complex,from abstract to concrete, modeling, abstraction, idealization and formalization.Despite the expansion of opportunities to influence the future of the country through the free willof the people, the importance and effectiveness of public control faces a number of obstacles. Forexample, the presence of underdeveloped civil society, the lack of a prescribed mechanism for publiccontrol, political indifference of citizens, the negative impact of bureaucratic manifestations – allthis and many other factors together have a negative impact on the development of civil societyand effective control for the election process. But a rather significant shortcoming in the way ofits development is the lack of scientific research on this issue.As a result of the research, it was found that through election procedures it is possible to bestbalance and reconcile the interests of political elites, social classes, groups of the whole society,to bring the government closer to the needs of the people. The public sector plays a positive role in the processes of stabilization and harmonization of relations in society and the electoral processin particular. Public control as a social phenomenon is impossible without the formation of afavorable environment for its full and effective functioning, ie without a developed civil society.The article concludes that election control can be effective only when it is carried out by anindependent third party, in our case – civil society in relation to public authorities and localgovernments, which are directly involved in ensuring the preparation and conduct of the electionprocess. Many years of international and national experience clearly show that the lack or lowlevel of public control over the electoral process and excessive state control ultimately lead tousurpation of power and falsification of election results.
在独立期间,乌克兰经历了一些导致政府与社会关系发生变化的进程。这些变化并不总是积极的。在乌克兰人民的眼中,国家权力具有高度的权威。大多数人不相信人民意志的结果是客观的,这实际上激发了人们的兴趣,并显示了公众对选举过程进行控制的重要性。本文的目的是研究国家和公众对乌克兰选民控制的相关性及其对公民社会形成和发展的影响。研究的方法论基础是一般科学的认识方法和特殊的法律认识方法。在常用的科学方法中,哲学辩证法是通过分析和综合、由简到繁、由抽象到具体、建模、抽象、理想化和形式化等方法来揭示的。尽管通过人民的自由意志影响国家未来的机会有所增加,但公共控制的重要性和有效性仍面临一些障碍。例如,不发达的公民社会的存在,缺乏规定的公共控制机制,公民的政治冷漠,官僚主义表现的负面影响,所有这些因素加在一起,对公民社会的发展和对选举过程的有效控制产生了负面影响。但其发展方式中一个相当明显的缺陷是缺乏对这一问题的科学研究。研究结果发现,通过选举程序可以最好地平衡和调和政治精英、社会阶层、整个社会群体的利益,使政府更接近人民的需求。公共部门在稳定和协调社会关系的过程中,特别是在选举过程中发挥积极作用。公共控制作为一种社会现象,如果没有形成公共控制充分有效运作的有利环境,即没有发达的公民社会,就不可能实现公共控制。文章的结论是,选举控制只有在独立的第三方进行时才能有效,在我们的情况下,即与公共当局和地方政府有关的民间社会,它们直接参与确保选举过程的准备和进行。多年的国际和国内经验清楚地表明,缺乏或低水平的公众对选举过程的控制和过度的国家控制最终会导致权力的更替和选举结果的伪造。
{"title":"RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STATE AND PUBLIC CONTROL OF THE ELECTION PROCESS IN UKRAINE","authors":"N. Chudyk","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2020.4.02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2020.4.02","url":null,"abstract":"During the years of independence, Ukraine has undergone certain processes that have led tochanges in the relationship between government and society. These changes were not alwayspositive. State power had a high level of authority in the eyes of the Ukrainian people. The majorityof the population does not believe in the objectivity of the results of the people’s will, which, infact, stimulates interest and shows the importance of public control over the election process.The purpose of the article – is to study the correlation of the state and public control over thesuffrage of Ukraine and its influence on the formation and development of civil society.The methodological basis of the study were general scientific and special legal methods ofcognition. Among the general scientific methods used is the method of philosophical dialectics,which is revealed through the methods of analysis and synthesis, ascent from simple to complex,from abstract to concrete, modeling, abstraction, idealization and formalization.Despite the expansion of opportunities to influence the future of the country through the free willof the people, the importance and effectiveness of public control faces a number of obstacles. Forexample, the presence of underdeveloped civil society, the lack of a prescribed mechanism for publiccontrol, political indifference of citizens, the negative impact of bureaucratic manifestations – allthis and many other factors together have a negative impact on the development of civil societyand effective control for the election process. But a rather significant shortcoming in the way ofits development is the lack of scientific research on this issue.As a result of the research, it was found that through election procedures it is possible to bestbalance and reconcile the interests of political elites, social classes, groups of the whole society,to bring the government closer to the needs of the people. The public sector plays a positive role in the processes of stabilization and harmonization of relations in society and the electoral processin particular. Public control as a social phenomenon is impossible without the formation of afavorable environment for its full and effective functioning, ie without a developed civil society.The article concludes that election control can be effective only when it is carried out by anindependent third party, in our case – civil society in relation to public authorities and localgovernments, which are directly involved in ensuring the preparation and conduct of the electionprocess. Many years of international and national experience clearly show that the lack or lowlevel of public control over the electoral process and excessive state control ultimately lead tousurpation of power and falsification of election results.","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81513095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
NOTES ON THE RELATIONS BETWEEN THE EU AND UKRAINE AND THE PROGRESS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ASSOCIATION AGREEMENT 关于欧盟与乌克兰关系以及联系国协定执行进展的说明
Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.17721/2227-796x.2019.2.10
G. Tamburelli
The 2014 Association Agreement between the EU and Ukraine, which replaces the 1994 Partnership and Cooperation Agreement, may be considered the most important result of a cooperation developed since the beginning of 90’s, first in the framework of the European Neighbourhood Policy, then of the Eastern Partnership. This paper analyses in an essential way the evolving relations between the EU and Ukraine, and the progress made by Ukraine in pursuing the objectives set forth in the Association Agreement. The Author considers the main features of the Agreement, and identifies and assesses the principal legal issues arising from its implementation. The Agreement is aimed at deepening political and economic relations between the EU and Ukraine, and to gradually integrate Ukraine into the EU internal market. It is the first of a new generation of EU agreements characterized by comprehensiveness, and democratic conditionality. It requires a broad and detailed work of approximation of the Ukrainian laws to the EU regulations. Reforms are foreseen in a number of key areas. Ukraine has been developing a complex strategy to reorient its legal system towards the EU. According to the 2018 Report on Implementation of the Association Agreement – prepared by the Government Office for Coordination of European and Euro-Atlantic Integration, and the Vice Prime Minister’s Office for European and Euro-Atlantic Integration, based on the outcome of performance of the objectives scheduled for 2018, the Agreement was implemented by 52%. According to the Author, in evaluating the “results achieved” by Ukraine in the approximation of the national legislation to the EU legislation, it must be taken into account the challenging situation of the country. The Government and the Verkhovna Rada have been acting with the aim to pursue the overall objectives of the Association Agreement notwithstanding the difficult political and administrative situation following the events in Crimea, the Donbass conflict, the worsening of the relations with Russia until the termination of the Treaty of Friendship and the temporary adoption of the Martial Law. He highlights the efforts of the EU in financially supporting the process of reform in Ukraine, and of Ukraine towards constitutional and legislative reforms reinforcing the European choice. Ukraine has finally developed an ad hoc institutional framework, and new legislation, including amendments to the Constitution, for the implementation of the Association Agreement. Relevant progress has been made in various sectors of the cooperation, while in various others the actions taken are not yet effective. For example, in the sector of the rule of law, various actions were taken, but modest results were achieved in the fight against corruption; while in the environment sector, which is not considered among the priorities, the Law on EIA might be considered an important achievement. In the whole, the implementation of the Association Agreement w
2014年欧盟与乌克兰之间的联系国协议取代了1994年的伙伴关系与合作协议,可以被认为是自90年代初以来发展的合作的最重要成果,首先是在欧洲邻国政策的框架内,然后是东部伙伴关系的框架。本文从本质上分析了欧盟与乌克兰之间不断演变的关系,以及乌克兰在追求联系国协定中规定的目标方面所取得的进展。作者考虑了该协定的主要特点,并确定和评估了执行该协定所产生的主要法律问题。该协议旨在深化欧盟与乌克兰之间的政治和经济关系,并逐步将乌克兰纳入欧盟内部市场。这是新一代欧盟协议中的第一个,其特点是全面和民主的条件。这需要广泛而详细的工作,使乌克兰法律与欧盟法规相接近。预计将在若干关键领域进行改革。乌克兰一直在制定一项复杂的战略,使其法律体系向欧盟靠拢。根据欧洲和欧洲-大西洋一体化政府协调办公室和欧洲和欧洲-大西洋一体化副总理办公室根据2018年预定目标的执行结果编写的《2018年联盟协议执行情况报告》,该协议的执行率为52%。提交人认为,在评价乌克兰在使本国立法接近欧盟立法方面所取得的“成果”时,必须考虑到该国具有挑战性的情况。尽管在克里米亚事件、顿巴斯冲突、与俄罗斯关系恶化直至《友好条约》终止和暂时通过戒严法之后出现了困难的政治和行政局势,但政府和最高拉达一直在采取行动,以期实现《联合协定》的总体目标。他强调了欧盟在财政上支持乌克兰改革进程的努力,以及乌克兰为加强欧洲选择而进行的宪法和立法改革的努力。乌克兰终于制定了一个临时体制框架和新的立法,包括对《宪法》的修正,以执行《联系国协定》。在合作的各个领域取得了相关进展,但在其他一些领域采取的行动尚未取得成效。例如,在法治领域,虽然采取了各种行动,但在打击腐败方面成效不大;而在不属于优先事项的环境部门,《环境影响评价法》可能被认为是一项重要成就。总体而言,第20届欧盟-乌克兰峰会(2018年7月9日)和第五届欧盟-乌克兰联系国理事会(2018年12月17日,布鲁塞尔)在最高级政治对话中对联系国协定的执行情况进行了积极评价。Аuthor认为,尽管存在各种关键点,但2014-2018年期间通过的众多宪法和立法法案、条例和计划代表了广泛变革进程的重要步骤。他强调,不仅要关注乌克兰法律体系与欧盟法律的正式协调,而且要关注新规则的有效性和效力,以及它们对社会、经济、政治和文化遗产和人民生活的真正影响。
{"title":"NOTES ON THE RELATIONS BETWEEN THE EU AND UKRAINE AND THE PROGRESS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ASSOCIATION AGREEMENT","authors":"G. Tamburelli","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2019.2.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2019.2.10","url":null,"abstract":"The 2014 Association Agreement between the EU and Ukraine, which replaces the 1994 Partnership and Cooperation Agreement, may be considered the most important result of a cooperation developed since the beginning of 90’s, first in the framework of the European Neighbourhood Policy, then of the Eastern Partnership. This paper analyses in an essential way the evolving relations between the EU and Ukraine, and the progress made by Ukraine in pursuing the objectives set forth in the Association Agreement. The Author considers the main features of the Agreement, and identifies and assesses the principal legal issues arising from its implementation. The Agreement is aimed at deepening political and economic relations between the EU and Ukraine, and to gradually integrate Ukraine into the EU internal market. It is the first of a new generation of EU agreements characterized by comprehensiveness, and democratic conditionality. It requires a broad and detailed work of approximation of the Ukrainian laws to the EU regulations. Reforms are foreseen in a number of key areas. Ukraine has been developing a complex strategy to reorient its legal system towards the EU. According to the 2018 Report on Implementation of the Association Agreement – prepared by the Government Office for Coordination of European and Euro-Atlantic Integration, and the Vice Prime Minister’s Office for European and Euro-Atlantic Integration, based on the outcome of performance of the objectives scheduled for 2018, the Agreement was implemented by 52%. According to the Author, in evaluating the “results achieved” by Ukraine in the approximation of the national legislation to the EU legislation, it must be taken into account the challenging situation of the country. The Government and the Verkhovna Rada have been acting with the aim to pursue the overall objectives of the Association Agreement notwithstanding the difficult political and administrative situation following the events in Crimea, the Donbass conflict, the worsening of the relations with Russia until the termination of the Treaty of Friendship and the temporary adoption of the Martial Law. He highlights the efforts of the EU in financially supporting the process of reform in Ukraine, and of Ukraine towards constitutional and legislative reforms reinforcing the European choice. Ukraine has finally developed an ad hoc institutional framework, and new legislation, including amendments to the Constitution, for the implementation of the Association Agreement. Relevant progress has been made in various sectors of the cooperation, while in various others the actions taken are not yet effective. For example, in the sector of the rule of law, various actions were taken, but modest results were achieved in the fight against corruption; while in the environment sector, which is not considered among the priorities, the Law on EIA might be considered an important achievement. In the whole, the implementation of the Association Agreement w","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76774656","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Administrative law and process
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1