Background
Nadi Pariksha (Pulse Diagnosis) is a well-known diagnostic method in Ayurveda where physicians assess a patient's pathological and physiological status through tridosha analysis. The diagnostic procedure is subjective, and there is a need to understand it better.
Objective
This study quantifies the perceptions and challenges of Ayurvedic physicians in performing Nadi Pariksha and its implications for treating diseases.
Materials and methods
The sample for this study comprised 91 Ayurvedic physicians from various regions of India. They were interviewed and asked to complete a series of questionnaires that focused on their difficulties in performing Nadi Pariksha. Hypothesis formulation, validation, and testing were carried out using statistical methods.
Results
A two-sample Mann-Whitney statistical method was used to infer physicians’ perceptions of various hypotheses. The judgements of Ayurvedic physicians with varying experience levels disagreed with the hypothesis of longer diagnostic time (p-value=0.003). However, they reached a consensus on the hypotheses relating to quantification (p-value = 0.609), learning curve (p-value = 0.355), and subjectivity (p-value=0.161).
Conclusions
The study suggests a need for objective characterization of the arterial pulse in concluding a diagnosis. Standardizing diagnostic approaches may enhance accuracy. Technology-based research would make Ayurveda more evidence-based. Moreover, there is a need for a diagnostic tool or assistive device for less experienced physicians to accelerate their learning and gain confidence in concluding a diagnosis more accurately and quickly. This can reduce the likelihood of incorrect diagnoses and unnecessary treatments, significantly enhancing patient outcomes and the overall efficiency of Ayurveda healthcare.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
