Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-09-04DOI: 10.1177/08901171251376650
Elise Caruso, Joan M Mangan, Allison Maiuri, Beth Bouwkamp, Nickolas DeLuca
PurposeRisk perception for tuberculosis (TB) and previous receipt of a TB test and/or vaccine were assessed to inform TB prevention efforts.DesignCross-sectional.SettingThe 2020, 2021, and 2022 Estilos survey data.Subjects2837 U.S. Hispanic adults (≥18 years).MeasuresSelf-reported receipt of a TB test and/or vaccine, perceived risk for TB, and demographic characteristics.AnalysisWeighted proportions and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) were calculated. Associations between demographic characteristics and TB questions were assessed using chi-square tests. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine perceived risk for TB among those who received a TB test and/or vaccine vs those who did not.ResultsOverall, 7.2% (95%CI [4.8, 10.5]) of U.S. Hispanic adults reported receiving a TB test but not a vaccine, 15.3% (95%CI [12.5, 18.7]) reported receiving a vaccine but not a test, and 28.3% (95%CI [24.7, 32.2]) reported receiving both a TB test and TB vaccine. Respondents who reported previous receipt of a TB test, with or without previous receipt of a TB vaccine, had a significantly higher odds of feeling any risk for TB than those without previous receipt of a TB test or vaccine (aOR = 2.79, 95% CI = 1.19-6.52 for those tested but not vaccinated; aOR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.11-3.20 for those both tested and vaccinated).ConclusionFindings can help inform education and interventions to raise awareness and encourage TB testing for those at risk for TB.
目的评估对结核病(TB)的风险认知和以前接受结核病检查和/或疫苗的情况,为结核病预防工作提供信息。设置2020年、2021年和2022年Estilos调查数据。2837名美国西班牙裔成年人(≥18岁)。自我报告接受结核病检测和/或疫苗,感知结核病风险和人口统计学特征。分析计算加权比例和95%置信区间(ci)。使用卡方检验评估人口统计学特征与结核病问题之间的关联。使用多项逻辑回归来检查接受结核病检查和/或疫苗的人与未接受结核病检查和/或疫苗的人之间的结核病感知风险。结果总体而言,7.2% (95%CI[4.8, 10.5])的美国西班牙裔成年人报告接受了结核病检查但未接种疫苗,15.3% (95%CI[12.5, 18.7])的报告接受了疫苗但未进行检查,28.3% (95%CI[24.7, 32.2])的报告接受了结核病检查和结核病疫苗。报告以前接受过结核检查的应答者,无论以前是否接受过结核疫苗,与以前没有接受过结核检查或疫苗的应答者相比,感觉有结核病风险的几率要高得多(接受过检查但未接种疫苗者的aOR = 2.79, 95% CI = 1.19-6.52;接受过检查和接种过疫苗者的aOR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.11-3.20)。结论研究结果有助于为教育和干预提供信息,以提高人们对结核病的认识,并鼓励对结核病高危人群进行结核病检测。
{"title":"Risk Perceptions Regarding Tuberculosis Among Hispanic Adults - United States, 2020-2022.","authors":"Elise Caruso, Joan M Mangan, Allison Maiuri, Beth Bouwkamp, Nickolas DeLuca","doi":"10.1177/08901171251376650","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08901171251376650","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeRisk perception for tuberculosis (TB) and previous receipt of a TB test and/or vaccine were assessed to inform TB prevention efforts.DesignCross-sectional.SettingThe 2020, 2021, and 2022 <i>Estilos</i> survey data.Subjects2837 U.S. Hispanic adults (≥18 years).MeasuresSelf-reported receipt of a TB test and/or vaccine, perceived risk for TB, and demographic characteristics.AnalysisWeighted proportions and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) were calculated. Associations between demographic characteristics and TB questions were assessed using chi-square tests. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine perceived risk for TB among those who received a TB test and/or vaccine vs those who did not.ResultsOverall, 7.2% (95%CI [4.8, 10.5]) of U.S. Hispanic adults reported receiving a TB test but not a vaccine, 15.3% (95%CI [12.5, 18.7]) reported receiving a vaccine but not a test, and 28.3% (95%CI [24.7, 32.2]) reported receiving both a TB test and TB vaccine. Respondents who reported previous receipt of a TB test, with or without previous receipt of a TB vaccine, had a significantly higher odds of feeling any risk for TB than those without previous receipt of a TB test or vaccine (aOR = 2.79, 95% CI = 1.19-6.52 for those tested but not vaccinated; aOR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.11-3.20 for those both tested and vaccinated).ConclusionFindings can help inform education and interventions to raise awareness and encourage TB testing for those at risk for TB.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"285-294"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12627901/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144991079","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-07DOI: 10.1177/08901171261419055
Stephanie DeBerry, Ezekiel Kresie, Susan B Sisson, Meredith Scott-Kaliki, Karla Finnell, Erin Schone
PurposeDetermine how Farmers Market (FM) shopping is associated with fruit and vegetable (FV) intake and food literacy scores, and to understand knowledge, barriers, and rationale for FM usage among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participants in Oklahoma.DesignCross-sectional study, online and in-person surveys.SettingSNAP-accepting FMs in Oklahoma.SampleSNAP participants in Oklahoma aged 18-64 years of age.MeasuresSurveys captured self-reported FV intake (cups/day), food literacy scores reflecting knowledge, skills, and confidence related to food, and perceived barriers and facilitators to FM shopping. Sociodemographic information was collected to characterize the sample.AnalysisDescriptive summaries presented with counts and frequencies. FV intake and food literacy scores summarized by means and standard deviations. FM awareness scores summarized with medians and IQR.ResultsFM shoppers had a significantly higher intake of FV (19.1 ± 4.2 vs 16.6 ± 4.2; P = 0.0006) and higher food literacy scores (27.7 ± 4.9 vs 25.0 ± 5.5; P = 0.0025) than non-shoppers. FM awareness did not differ between shoppers and non-shoppers. Most prevalent barrier to FM shopping was "I don't know where any markets are" (31.6%) most prevalent facilitator was "fresher produce" (43.3%).ConclusionFM shopping was associated with increased FV intake. Differences in food literacy suggest improving literacy may increase FM shopping among SNAP participants. Study provides new understanding to tailor and positively impact future interventions.
目的确定农贸市场(FM)购物与水果和蔬菜(FV)摄入量和食品素养分数之间的关系,并了解俄克拉荷马州补充营养援助计划(SNAP)参与者使用农贸市场的知识、障碍和基本原理。横断面研究,在线和面对面的调查。在俄克拉荷马州设置接受snap的FMs。样本来自俄克拉荷马州,年龄在18-64岁之间。调查收集了自我报告的FV摄入量(杯/天),反映与食物相关的知识、技能和信心的食物素养分数,以及FM购物的感知障碍和促进因素。收集社会人口学信息来确定样本的特征。分析用计数和频率呈现的描述性摘要。FV摄入量和食物素养得分总结的手段和标准偏差。FM意识得分用中位数和IQR进行总结。结果fm购物者的FV摄入量(19.1±4.2 vs 16.6±4.2,P = 0.0006)和食品识字评分(27.7±4.9 vs 25.0±5.5,P = 0.0025)均显著高于非购物者。FM意识在购物者和非购物者之间没有差异。最普遍的FM购物障碍是“我不知道任何市场在哪里”(31.6%),最普遍的便利因素是“新鲜农产品”(43.3%)。结论fm购物与FV摄入增加有关。食物素养的差异表明,素养的提高可能会增加SNAP参与者的FM购物。研究提供了新的认识,以定制和积极影响未来的干预措施。
{"title":"Farmers Market Use and Dietary Intake Among Snap Participants in Oklahoma.","authors":"Stephanie DeBerry, Ezekiel Kresie, Susan B Sisson, Meredith Scott-Kaliki, Karla Finnell, Erin Schone","doi":"10.1177/08901171261419055","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171261419055","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeDetermine how Farmers Market (FM) shopping is associated with fruit and vegetable (FV) intake and food literacy scores, and to understand knowledge, barriers, and rationale for FM usage among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participants in Oklahoma.DesignCross-sectional study, online and in-person surveys.SettingSNAP-accepting FMs in Oklahoma.SampleSNAP participants in Oklahoma aged 18-64 years of age.MeasuresSurveys captured self-reported FV intake (cups/day), food literacy scores reflecting knowledge, skills, and confidence related to food, and perceived barriers and facilitators to FM shopping. Sociodemographic information was collected to characterize the sample.AnalysisDescriptive summaries presented with counts and frequencies. FV intake and food literacy scores summarized by means and standard deviations. FM awareness scores summarized with medians and IQR.ResultsFM shoppers had a significantly higher intake of FV (19.1 ± 4.2 vs 16.6 ± 4.2; <i>P</i> = 0.0006) and higher food literacy scores (27.7 ± 4.9 vs 25.0 ± 5.5; <i>P</i> = 0.0025) than non-shoppers. FM awareness did not differ between shoppers and non-shoppers. Most prevalent barrier to FM shopping was \"I don't know where any markets are\" (31.6%) most prevalent facilitator was \"fresher produce\" (43.3%).ConclusionFM shopping was associated with increased FV intake. Differences in food literacy suggest improving literacy may increase FM shopping among SNAP participants. Study provides new understanding to tailor and positively impact future interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"8901171261419055"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146130915","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-04DOI: 10.1177/08901171261421639
Kobi V Ajayi, Samia Tasnim, Ping Ma, Robin Page
PurposeTo examine the association between the social determinants of health (SDOH) and hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, and anxiety and/or depression among adult US women.DesignCross-sectional survey.Setting2022 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).SampleWomen aged ≥18 years (N = 3535) participated from the U.S.MeasureOutcome variable was diagnosis of diabetes, hypertension, heart disease, and mental illnesses. Covariates included sociodemographic characteristics along with food, housing, and transportation insecurity.AnalysisSeparate weighted bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine the unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (AORs) associations between insecurities and chronic conditions, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics.ResultsHypertension (35.4%) and anxiety/depression (33.4%) were the most reported chronic conditions. Approximately 27% of the sample experienced all three forms of insecurity concurrently. Women with anxiety or depression had elevated levels of food, housing, and transportation insecurity (11.3%, 7.4%, 7.5%) than those with other chronic conditions. Adjusted models indicated that all three types of insecurity were significantly associated with chronic conditions. Food, housing, transportation, and any insecurity nearly doubled the odds of reporting any chronic condition (AOR = 2.15, 2.44, 1.70, and 2.20, respectively).ConclusionFindings highlight a strong association between SDOH and chronic conditions among women, necessitating the implementation of targeted policies and interventions to address sex-related health inequities to improve women's health.
{"title":"Investigating the Relationship Between Food, Housing, and Transportation Insecurity and Chronic Disease Among US Women Using Nationally Representative Data.","authors":"Kobi V Ajayi, Samia Tasnim, Ping Ma, Robin Page","doi":"10.1177/08901171261421639","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171261421639","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeTo examine the association between the social determinants of health (SDOH) and hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, and anxiety and/or depression among adult US women.DesignCross-sectional survey.Setting2022 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).SampleWomen aged ≥18 years (N = 3535) participated from the U.S.MeasureOutcome variable was diagnosis of diabetes, hypertension, heart disease, and mental illnesses. Covariates included sociodemographic characteristics along with food, housing, and transportation insecurity.AnalysisSeparate weighted bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine the unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (AORs) associations between insecurities and chronic conditions, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics.ResultsHypertension (35.4%) and anxiety/depression (33.4%) were the most reported chronic conditions. Approximately 27% of the sample experienced all three forms of insecurity concurrently. Women with anxiety or depression had elevated levels of food, housing, and transportation insecurity (11.3%, 7.4%, 7.5%) than those with other chronic conditions. Adjusted models indicated that all three types of insecurity were significantly associated with chronic conditions. Food, housing, transportation, and any insecurity nearly doubled the odds of reporting any chronic condition (AOR = 2.15, 2.44, 1.70, and 2.20, respectively).ConclusionFindings highlight a strong association between SDOH and chronic conditions among women, necessitating the implementation of targeted policies and interventions to address sex-related health inequities to improve women's health.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"8901171261421639"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146117531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-08-27DOI: 10.1177/08901171251370666
Kisa K Harris, Brian D Christman, William B Hillegass, Crystal S Lim, E Thomaseo Burton, Sabahat Afshan, Xiaojian Liu, Shanda W Sandridge, Michael Welsch, Lei Zhang, Ramona Sandlin, Bernadette Grayson, Abigail Gamble
PurposeAssess obesity and cardiometabolic disease risk factors among a high-risk pediatric population.DesignObservational, cross-sectional study using electronic medical records (EMR).SettingThe only academic medical center in Mississippi.SampleData were extracted for children and adolescents aged 2 through 19 years treated in primary care from 2013-2023.MeasuresMeasures of height, weight, blood pressure, lipid profiles, and hemoglobin A1c were categorized to determine the prevalence of obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and hyperglycemia.AnalysesMultivariable regression models were used to establish the association between age- and sex-adjusted body mass index z-score (zBMI) and demographic characteristics. Outcomes were explored by race/ethnicity, sex, age, insurance type, visit year, and rurality.ResultsThe study sample included 38 275 participants (M age = 8.9 years, SD = 5.3; 48.7% female; 45.4% non-Hispanic Black [NHB]). Half of NHB females aged 12 through 19 were either overweight (19.0 %), obese (15.9%), or severely obese (14.9%). Age was positively associated with BMI z-score (P < 0.001). Nearly 40% of all participants with a blood pressure (BP) reading had a measure consistent with elevated BP (17.1%) or hypertension (22.1%). NHB males with severe obesity had the highest prevalence of stage II hypertension (12.3%).ConclusionsThe distribution of mean zBMI values greater than zero indicated that this pediatric population contained a larger proportion of individuals with obesity than the age- and sex-matched reference population. Intervention in NHB females aged 2 through 9 with severe obesity may present the best opportunity for the prevention of severe obesity and hypertension.
{"title":"Obesity and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors Among Pediatric Patients at a Mississippi Academic Medical Center.","authors":"Kisa K Harris, Brian D Christman, William B Hillegass, Crystal S Lim, E Thomaseo Burton, Sabahat Afshan, Xiaojian Liu, Shanda W Sandridge, Michael Welsch, Lei Zhang, Ramona Sandlin, Bernadette Grayson, Abigail Gamble","doi":"10.1177/08901171251370666","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08901171251370666","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeAssess obesity and cardiometabolic disease risk factors among a high-risk pediatric population.DesignObservational, cross-sectional study using electronic medical records (EMR).SettingThe only academic medical center in Mississippi.SampleData were extracted for children and adolescents aged 2 through 19 years treated in primary care from 2013-2023.MeasuresMeasures of height, weight, blood pressure, lipid profiles, and hemoglobin A1c were categorized to determine the prevalence of obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and hyperglycemia.AnalysesMultivariable regression models were used to establish the association between age- and sex-adjusted body mass index z-score (zBMI) and demographic characteristics. Outcomes were explored by race/ethnicity, sex, age, insurance type, visit year, and rurality.ResultsThe study sample included 38 275 participants (M age = 8.9 years, SD = 5.3; 48.7% female; 45.4% non-Hispanic Black [NHB]). Half of NHB females aged 12 through 19 were either overweight (19.0 %), obese (15.9%), or severely obese (14.9%). Age was positively associated with BMI z-score (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Nearly 40% of all participants with a blood pressure (BP) reading had a measure consistent with elevated BP (17.1%) or hypertension (22.1%). NHB males with severe obesity had the highest prevalence of stage II hypertension (12.3%).ConclusionsThe distribution of mean zBMI values greater than zero indicated that this pediatric population contained a larger proportion of individuals with obesity than the age- and sex-matched reference population. Intervention in NHB females aged 2 through 9 with severe obesity may present the best opportunity for the prevention of severe obesity and hypertension.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"157-167"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12483312/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144938878","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-08-05DOI: 10.1177/08901171251365229
Poliana do Carmo Pimenta, Thais Cristina de Aquino Lima, Vitoria Gabriele Souza Geraldine, Fillipe Silva Tourinho, Murilo César do Nascimento, Rômulo Dias Novaes, Lívia Maris Ribeiro Paranaíba Dias
PurposeTo synthesize evidence on the incidence of COVID-19 vaccine-related adverse events across countries by income level.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.SettingStudies published 2020-2025, retrieved from EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Scopus.SampleEleven trials with 7841 participants; seven from high-income and four from upper-middle-income countries.MeasuresIncidence per 100 vaccinated. Countries by income: low (≤$1145), lower-middle ($1146-4515), upper-middle ($4516-14,005), high (>$14,005). Inter-reviewer agreement assessed by kappa (0.684). Risk of bias evaluated with Cochrane RoB 2.AnalysisMantel-Haenszel random-effects models estimated relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity assessed by I2. Subgroup analyses by income and dose.ResultsAEFI incidence was consistently higher in high-income vs upper-middle-income countries, especially after dose 2. Injection-site pain (68.1 vs 26.3 per 100), headache (45.7 vs 14.1), myalgia (42.5 vs 9.2), and fatigue (33.8 vs 11.4) were most common. Meta-analyses showed higher pooled RR in high-income settings: any AEFI after dose 1, RR = 1.83 (95% CI: 1.39-2.42); local, RR = 3.15; systemic, RR = 2.05. After dose 2, overall RR reached 2.94; local, 4.37; systemic, 2.48. All subgroup differences were significant.ConclusionHigher-income countries showed a greater incidence of mostly mild adverse events, particularly after the second dose. mRNA vaccines had the highest rates. Findings reveal income-based disparities and inform equitable post-vaccination monitoring.
目的按收入水平综合各国COVID-19疫苗相关不良事件发生率的证据。设计随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。研究发表2020-2025年,检索自EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE,和Scopus。11项试验,7841名受试者;7名来自高收入国家,4名来自中高收入国家。每100名接种者的发病率。按收入划分的国家:低(≤1145美元)、中下(1146-4515美元)、中上(4516- 14005美元)、高(100 - 14005美元)。通过kappa(0.684)评估审稿人间的一致性。用Cochrane rob2评价偏倚风险。mantel - haenszel随机效应模型以95%的置信区间估计相对风险(RR)。异质性由I2评估。按收入和剂量分组分析。结果高收入国家的saefi发生率始终高于中高收入国家,特别是在第2次剂量后。注射部位疼痛(68.1 vs 26.3 / 100)、头痛(45.7 vs 14.1)、肌痛(42.5 vs 9.2)和疲劳(33.8 vs 11.4)是最常见的。荟萃分析显示,在高收入环境中,合并RR更高:1次剂量后的任何AEFI, RR = 1.83 (95% CI: 1.39-2.42);local, RR = 3.15;系统性,RR = 2.05。剂量2后,总RR达到2.94;本地的,4.37;系统性的,2.48。各亚组差异均显著。结论在高收入国家,大多数轻度不良事件的发生率较高,特别是在第二次接种后。mRNA疫苗的感染率最高。研究结果揭示了基于收入的差异,并为公平的疫苗接种后监测提供了信息。
{"title":"COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Events by Country Income Level: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Poliana do Carmo Pimenta, Thais Cristina de Aquino Lima, Vitoria Gabriele Souza Geraldine, Fillipe Silva Tourinho, Murilo César do Nascimento, Rômulo Dias Novaes, Lívia Maris Ribeiro Paranaíba Dias","doi":"10.1177/08901171251365229","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08901171251365229","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeTo synthesize evidence on the incidence of COVID-19 vaccine-related adverse events across countries by income level.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.SettingStudies published 2020-2025, retrieved from EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Scopus.SampleEleven trials with 7841 participants; seven from high-income and four from upper-middle-income countries.MeasuresIncidence per 100 vaccinated. Countries by income: low (≤$1145), lower-middle ($1146-4515), upper-middle ($4516-14,005), high (>$14,005). Inter-reviewer agreement assessed by kappa (0.684). Risk of bias evaluated with Cochrane RoB 2.AnalysisMantel-Haenszel random-effects models estimated relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity assessed by I<sup>2</sup>. Subgroup analyses by income and dose.ResultsAEFI incidence was consistently higher in high-income vs upper-middle-income countries, especially after dose 2. Injection-site pain (68.1 vs 26.3 per 100), headache (45.7 vs 14.1), myalgia (42.5 vs 9.2), and fatigue (33.8 vs 11.4) were most common. Meta-analyses showed higher pooled RR in high-income settings: any AEFI after dose 1, RR = 1.83 (95% CI: 1.39-2.42); local, RR = 3.15; systemic, RR = 2.05. After dose 2, overall RR reached 2.94; local, 4.37; systemic, 2.48. All subgroup differences were significant.ConclusionHigher-income countries showed a greater incidence of mostly mild adverse events, particularly after the second dose. mRNA vaccines had the highest rates. Findings reveal income-based disparities and inform equitable post-vaccination monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"240-252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144787988","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-07-19DOI: 10.1177/08901171251361470
Marshall K Cheney, Taylor Zingg, Krista M Kezbers, Audrey Montgomery, Catherine M Bain, Nadia Stanley, Summer G Frank-Pearce, Darla E Kendzor, Emily T Hébert, Michael S Businelle
PurposeTo assess the acceptability and feasibility of the Phoenix smoking cessation smartphone app in people who smoke and are not yet ready to quit.Approach/DesignPost-intervention telephone interview.SettingOklahoma and Texas.ParticipantsAdults who were not ready to quit smoking at baseline (71% female, 76% White, mean age 52.6 years).InterventionThis 26-week 3-arm randomized controlled trial examined the utility of the Phoenix app which encouraged and provided support for smoking cessation attempts through twice-daily messages and weekly surveys.MethodsParticipants (100/152) completed an audio-recorded interview that assessed app engagement including benefits, barriers, most useful features, and suggested app modifications. Transcribed interviews were coded and analyzed for themes.ResultsAdults who were not ready to quit smoking experienced few barriers to using Phoenix app content, and reported increased self-reflection, awareness of smoking behaviors, and motivation to quit smoking in response to the tailored messages and weekly assessments. Participants with less control over daily schedules wanted more access to missed messages and surveys. Messages and surveys were helpful, but participants suggested increasing the variety of message and survey content.ConclusionAdults not yet ready to quit smoking are receptive to using mHealth smoking cessation apps to reduce/quit smoking. mHealth applications can increase access to evidence-based smoking cessation interventions and may be an effective tool for reducing smoking disparities.
{"title":"A Smartphone Application for People Who are Not Ready to Quit Smoking: A Post-intervention Qualitative Assessment of the Phoenix Project.","authors":"Marshall K Cheney, Taylor Zingg, Krista M Kezbers, Audrey Montgomery, Catherine M Bain, Nadia Stanley, Summer G Frank-Pearce, Darla E Kendzor, Emily T Hébert, Michael S Businelle","doi":"10.1177/08901171251361470","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08901171251361470","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeTo assess the acceptability and feasibility of the Phoenix smoking cessation smartphone app in people who smoke and are not yet ready to quit.Approach/DesignPost-intervention telephone interview.SettingOklahoma and Texas.ParticipantsAdults who were not ready to quit smoking at baseline (71% female, 76% White, mean age 52.6 years).InterventionThis 26-week 3-arm randomized controlled trial examined the utility of the Phoenix app which encouraged and provided support for smoking cessation attempts through twice-daily messages and weekly surveys.MethodsParticipants (100/152) completed an audio-recorded interview that assessed app engagement including benefits, barriers, most useful features, and suggested app modifications. Transcribed interviews were coded and analyzed for themes.ResultsAdults who were not ready to quit smoking experienced few barriers to using Phoenix app content, and reported increased self-reflection, awareness of smoking behaviors, and motivation to quit smoking in response to the tailored messages and weekly assessments. Participants with less control over daily schedules wanted more access to missed messages and surveys. Messages and surveys were helpful, but participants suggested increasing the variety of message and survey content.ConclusionAdults not yet ready to quit smoking are receptive to using mHealth smoking cessation apps to reduce/quit smoking. mHealth applications can increase access to evidence-based smoking cessation interventions and may be an effective tool for reducing smoking disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"174-186"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144666825","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-08-06DOI: 10.1177/08901171251365366
Akanksha Nagarkar, Gabrielle Martin, Katherine Sadaniantz, Sanjna Iyengar, Hannah C Wisniewski, Mawulorm K Denu, Germán Chiriboga, Sarah N Forrester, Jeroan J Allison, Lara C Kovell
ObjectiveTo examine storytelling interventions as health promotion tools in underserved populations across disease states, including hypertension, diabetes, overall chronic disease, obstetric care, and preventative health to assess intervention design and cultural tailoring and analyze reported quantitative and qualitative health outcomes.Data SourceA comprehensive literature search was performed in PUBMED.Study Inclusion and Exclusion CriteriaStudies were included if they implemented a storytelling intervention to promote health knowledge, behavior change, or health-related outcomes. Excluded studies lacked an evaluated intervention or reported outcomes. Reviews, commentaries, editorials, protocols without outcome data, and duplicate publications without novel findings were excluded. Only English-language studies were included due to reviewer fluency.Data ExtractionTwenty-five studies were included and categorized based on disease focus.Data SynthesisA narrative synthesis and inductive content analysis was performed. Studies were grouped by disease state and analyzed for population demographics, intervention development and delivery, cultural tailoring, storytelling theory, and measured outcomes.ResultsStorytelling, in digital and oral formats, improved health knowledge, self-efficacy, and preventive behaviors. Several methods were employed to culturally tailor interventions. Interventions were based on multiple behavioral theories.ConclusionsWhen culturally tailored and rooted in theory, regardless of delivery format, storytelling can foster behavior change across diverse health conditions.
{"title":"Storytelling for Health Promotion: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Akanksha Nagarkar, Gabrielle Martin, Katherine Sadaniantz, Sanjna Iyengar, Hannah C Wisniewski, Mawulorm K Denu, Germán Chiriboga, Sarah N Forrester, Jeroan J Allison, Lara C Kovell","doi":"10.1177/08901171251365366","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08901171251365366","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo examine storytelling interventions as health promotion tools in underserved populations across disease states, including hypertension, diabetes, overall chronic disease, obstetric care, and preventative health to assess intervention design and cultural tailoring and analyze reported quantitative and qualitative health outcomes.Data SourceA comprehensive literature search was performed in PUBMED.Study Inclusion and Exclusion CriteriaStudies were included if they implemented a storytelling intervention to promote health knowledge, behavior change, or health-related outcomes. Excluded studies lacked an evaluated intervention or reported outcomes. Reviews, commentaries, editorials, protocols without outcome data, and duplicate publications without novel findings were excluded. Only English-language studies were included due to reviewer fluency.Data ExtractionTwenty-five studies were included and categorized based on disease focus.Data SynthesisA narrative synthesis and inductive content analysis was performed. Studies were grouped by disease state and analyzed for population demographics, intervention development and delivery, cultural tailoring, storytelling theory, and measured outcomes.ResultsStorytelling, in digital and oral formats, improved health knowledge, self-efficacy, and preventive behaviors. Several methods were employed to culturally tailor interventions. Interventions were based on multiple behavioral theories.ConclusionsWhen culturally tailored and rooted in theory, regardless of delivery format, storytelling can foster behavior change across diverse health conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"187-209"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12510593/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144793260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-18DOI: 10.1177/08901171251406963
Russell Fulmer
{"title":"Algorithms Leverage Human Biases and Cognitive Miser Tendencies.","authors":"Russell Fulmer","doi":"10.1177/08901171251406963","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08901171251406963","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"256"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145779932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-07-29DOI: 10.1177/08901171251362807
Stephanie M McCoy, Jessica L Bryan, Kristie Rupp
PurposeTo explore associations between adolescent's concern for their body weight/shape/size and engagement in unhealthy weight control behaviors (UWCBs).DesignSecondary data analysis.Setting2022 National Survey of Children's Health.SubjectsAnalyses included 23 357 (51.8% male) adolescents, ages 10-17 years (mean 13.8 ± 2.3 years).MeasuresReported concern for body weight/shape/size, and UWCBs including skipping meals/ fasting; low interest in food; picky eating; binge eating, purging; diet pills; and over-exercising.AnalysisLogistic regression models assessed the odds of engaging in UWCBs by reported concern for body weight/shape/size.ResultsEngagement in UCWBs was low with 21.1% reporting picky eating, 13.5% fasting, 11.7% low interest in food, 5.3% binge eating, and <2% purging, over-exercising, or using diet pills. Compared to adolescents who were not at all concerned about their body weight/shape/size, adolescents who were somewhat or very much concerned had significantly higher odds (P's < 0.05) of engaging in all UCWB outcomes except for using diet pills or laxatives, which was only significant for adolescents who reported being very concerned (OR = 12.74; CI: [19.16, 36.94]). Further, after stratification by gender and age, there was a significant p-for trend (P's < 0.05), in engagement in UWCBs by concern for body weight/shape/size except for using diet pills or laxatives in 10-11- and 12-14-year-olds.ConclusionExpressing concern for body weight/image/size is associated with an increased likelihood of engaging in UCWB in adolescents, regardless of gender or stage of adolescence.
{"title":"Adolescent Concern for Body Weight and Engagement in Unhealthy Weight Control Behaviors.","authors":"Stephanie M McCoy, Jessica L Bryan, Kristie Rupp","doi":"10.1177/08901171251362807","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08901171251362807","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeTo explore associations between adolescent's concern for their body weight/shape/size and engagement in unhealthy weight control behaviors (UWCBs).DesignSecondary data analysis.Setting2022 National Survey of Children's Health.SubjectsAnalyses included 23 357 (51.8% male) adolescents, ages 10-17 years (mean 13.8 ± 2.3 years).MeasuresReported concern for body weight/shape/size, and UWCBs including skipping meals/ fasting; low interest in food; picky eating; binge eating, purging; diet pills; and over-exercising.AnalysisLogistic regression models assessed the odds of engaging in UWCBs by reported concern for body weight/shape/size.ResultsEngagement in UCWBs was low with 21.1% reporting picky eating, 13.5% fasting, 11.7% low interest in food, 5.3% binge eating, and <2% purging, over-exercising, or using diet pills. Compared to adolescents who were not at all concerned about their body weight/shape/size, adolescents who were somewhat or very much concerned had significantly higher odds (<i>P</i>'s < 0.05) of engaging in all UCWB outcomes except for using diet pills or laxatives, which was only significant for adolescents who reported being very concerned (OR = 12.74; CI: [19.16, 36.94]). Further, after stratification by gender and age, there was a significant p-for trend (<i>P</i>'s < 0.05), in engagement in UWCBs by concern for body weight/shape/size except for using diet pills or laxatives in 10-11- and 12-14-year-olds.ConclusionExpressing concern for body weight/image/size is associated with an increased likelihood of engaging in UCWB in adolescents, regardless of gender or stage of adolescence.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"141-148"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144740899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-08-19DOI: 10.1177/08901171251365344
Nathaniel Woodard, Leena Moses, Rachel Deitch, Brit I Saksvig, Hee-Jung Song, Erin Hager, Hannah Lane
PurposeStudents can serve as key advocates for healthier environments in their schools. This study employs the Youth Advocacy for Obesity Prevention Framework to investigate associations between advocacy skills for environmental and policy change and both self-efficacy and health behaviors, and explores applications of advocacy skills for health among 9-15 year-old elementary and middle schoolers.DesignConvergent, nested mixed-methods approach.SettingElementary and middle schools in a mid-Atlantic U.S. state.Subjects457 low-income elementary and middle students.MeasuresValidated questionnaires were administered to 457 students attending 33 elementary or middle schools serving low-income communities in 5 school districts, assessing self-efficacy for physical activity (PA) and healthy eating (HE), PA and HE behaviors, and advocacy skills. Semi-structured interviews with a subset of 199 students explored advocacy applications.AnalysisHierarchical linear regressions assessed associations between students' self-efficacy for PA and HE, PA and HE behaviors, and advocacy scores, accounting for school-level clustering and controlling for student factors (eg, gender, race, and BMI category). Integrated analysis of quantitative and qualitative data explored conceptualizations of advocacy skills.ResultsSelf-efficacy for PA (b = .24; P < .001), self-efficacy for HE (b = .39; P < .001), and engagement in PA (b = .10; P < .001) were associated with higher advocacy scores. Mixed methods findings further operationalized advocacy skills including leadership participation and history, self-efficacy for health promotion, and assertiveness in advocacy.ConclusionPromoting youth self-efficacy for health behaviors may enhance advocacy efforts for healthier school environments. Future research should further explore methods to foster youth advocacy and assess its impact on promoting healthier school environments.
目的学生可以成为学校健康环境的主要倡导者。本研究采用青少年预防肥胖倡导框架,探讨环境和政策改变倡导技能与自我效能感和健康行为的关系,并探讨健康倡导技能在9-15岁中小学生中的应用。DesignConvergent,嵌套混合方法方法。在美国大西洋中部州设置小学和中学。研究对象457名低收入中小学生。方法对5个学区33所低收入社区中小学的457名学生进行问卷调查,评估体育活动(PA)和健康饮食(HE)、PA和HE行为以及倡导技能的自我效能感。对199名学生的半结构化访谈探讨了倡导应用。分析层次线性回归评估了学生自我效能感和自我效能感、自我效能感和自我效能感行为以及倡导得分之间的关系,考虑了学校层面的聚类并控制了学生因素(如性别、种族和BMI类别)。对定量和定性数据的综合分析探讨了倡导技能的概念。结果PA自我效能(b = .24, P < .001)、HE自我效能(b = .39, P < .001)和PA参与(b = .10, P < .001)与较高的倡导得分相关。混合方法的研究结果进一步体现了倡导技能的操作性,包括领导参与和历史、健康促进的自我效能和倡导的自信。结论提高青少年健康行为的自我效能感可以加强对健康学校环境的倡导。未来的研究应进一步探索促进青年倡导的方法,并评估其对促进更健康的学校环境的影响。
{"title":"A Mixed Methods Study to Identify Characteristics and Practices of Effective Student Health Advocates.","authors":"Nathaniel Woodard, Leena Moses, Rachel Deitch, Brit I Saksvig, Hee-Jung Song, Erin Hager, Hannah Lane","doi":"10.1177/08901171251365344","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08901171251365344","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeStudents can serve as key advocates for healthier environments in their schools. This study employs the Youth Advocacy for Obesity Prevention Framework to investigate associations between advocacy skills for environmental and policy change and both self-efficacy and health behaviors, and explores applications of advocacy skills for health among 9-15 year-old elementary and middle schoolers.DesignConvergent, nested mixed-methods approach.SettingElementary and middle schools in a mid-Atlantic U.S. state.Subjects457 low-income elementary and middle students.MeasuresValidated questionnaires were administered to 457 students attending 33 elementary or middle schools serving low-income communities in 5 school districts, assessing self-efficacy for physical activity (PA) and healthy eating (HE), PA and HE behaviors, and advocacy skills. Semi-structured interviews with a subset of 199 students explored advocacy applications.AnalysisHierarchical linear regressions assessed associations between students' self-efficacy for PA and HE, PA and HE behaviors, and advocacy scores, accounting for school-level clustering and controlling for student factors (eg, gender, race, and BMI category). Integrated analysis of quantitative and qualitative data explored conceptualizations of advocacy skills.ResultsSelf-efficacy for PA (b = .24; <i>P</i> < .001), self-efficacy for HE (b = .39; <i>P</i> < .001), and engagement in PA (b = .10; <i>P</i> < .001) were associated with higher advocacy scores. Mixed methods findings further operationalized advocacy skills including leadership participation and history, self-efficacy for health promotion, and assertiveness in advocacy.ConclusionPromoting youth self-efficacy for health behaviors may enhance advocacy efforts for healthier school environments. Future research should further explore methods to foster youth advocacy and assess its impact on promoting healthier school environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"217-228"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144870860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}