Pub Date : 2024-10-04DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115995
Eleanor A Fallon, Sarah B Fisher
{"title":"A chance to cut is a chance to cure.","authors":"Eleanor A Fallon, Sarah B Fisher","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115995","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115995","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"115995"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142456224","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-04DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115998
Kelvin Memeh, Sara Abou Azar, Oluwasegun Afolaranmi, Tanaz M Vaghaiwalla
Background: The benefit of drains remains unclear and variable among thyroid surgeons. This study examines the utility and trend in drain use after thyroidectomy.
Method: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study utilizing a pooled sample of thyroidectomy patients from the 2016-2019 NSQIP. The impact of drain use on outcomes of interest (rate of postoperative neck hematoma (PNH)-primary outcome, and length-of-stay (LOS)-secondary outcome), as well as year-over-year and practice variations were evaluated using inverse-probability-weighted-regression adjustment and multivariable logistic regression analyses.
Results: Of 24,370 patients, 6673(27.4 %) received drains. The average LOS and PNH rates were 27.3 h and 1.87 %, respectively. Drain use increased year-over-year for concomitant neck dissections (OR = 1.08,p = 0.002). Year-over-year odds of drain use trended down across specialties (OR = 0.96,p = 0.005); however, ENT used drains more frequently than General Surgeons (RR = 3.06, 95%CI = 2.91-3.22). Drains were associated with longer LOS (mean-difference = 9.6hrs, 95%CI 8.51-10.62) with no effect on PNH rates (RR = 0.96,p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Drain use is decreasing, but practice variations across specialties persist. Post-thyroidectomy drain use was associated with longer LOS with no effect on PNHR.
{"title":"Practice variations, trends, and outcomes of drain use in thyroidectomy: A NSQIP study.","authors":"Kelvin Memeh, Sara Abou Azar, Oluwasegun Afolaranmi, Tanaz M Vaghaiwalla","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115998","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115998","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The benefit of drains remains unclear and variable among thyroid surgeons. This study examines the utility and trend in drain use after thyroidectomy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This is a retrospective cross-sectional study utilizing a pooled sample of thyroidectomy patients from the 2016-2019 NSQIP. The impact of drain use on outcomes of interest (rate of postoperative neck hematoma (PNH)-primary outcome, and length-of-stay (LOS)-secondary outcome), as well as year-over-year and practice variations were evaluated using inverse-probability-weighted-regression adjustment and multivariable logistic regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 24,370 patients, 6673(27.4 %) received drains. The average LOS and PNH rates were 27.3 h and 1.87 %, respectively. Drain use increased year-over-year for concomitant neck dissections (OR = 1.08,p = 0.002). Year-over-year odds of drain use trended down across specialties (OR = 0.96,p = 0.005); however, ENT used drains more frequently than General Surgeons (RR = 3.06, 95%CI = 2.91-3.22). Drains were associated with longer LOS (mean-difference = 9.6hrs, 95%CI 8.51-10.62) with no effect on PNH rates (RR = 0.96,p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Drain use is decreasing, but practice variations across specialties persist. Post-thyroidectomy drain use was associated with longer LOS with no effect on PNHR.</p>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"115998"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142387353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-04DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115996
Trevor Jones, Maria Christodoulou, Sharona Ross, Tara M. Pattilachan, Alexander Rosemurgy, Iswanto Sucandy
Background
Caudate and posterosuperior hepatectomy are technically challenging resections, especially in a minimally invasive approach. We aimed to analyze the outcomes of isolated caudate resection (ICR), en-bloc caudate resection with right/left hepatic lobectomy (ECR), and posterosuperior segment resection (PSR) using our institutional database.
Methods
Following IRB approval, we prospectively followed 500 consecutive patients between 2013 and 2023 who underwent robotic hepatectomy. Posterosuperior segments include segment 4 A, 7, and 8. The data are presented as median (mean ± standard deviation).
Results
Of the 500 patients included in this study, 19 (4 %) underwent ICR, 65 (13 %) underwent ECR, and 131 (26 %) patients underwent PSR. ECR was associated with significantly longer operative time, increased EBL, and longer LOS when compared with those of ICR and PSR. The patients who underwent ICR had the shortest operation duration, lowest EBL, and shortest LOS compared to ECR and PSR.
Conclusions
Robotic resection of liver tumors located in difficult segments is safe and feasible with excellent clinical and oncological outcomes. With appropriate expertise, a minimally invasive approach to those operations should not be avoided.
{"title":"Caudate lobe and posterosuperior segment hepatectomy using the robotic approach. Outcome analysis of liver resection in difficult locations","authors":"Trevor Jones, Maria Christodoulou, Sharona Ross, Tara M. Pattilachan, Alexander Rosemurgy, Iswanto Sucandy","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115996","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115996","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Caudate and posterosuperior hepatectomy are technically challenging resections, especially in a minimally invasive approach. We aimed to analyze the outcomes of isolated caudate resection (ICR), en-bloc caudate resection with right/left hepatic lobectomy (ECR), and posterosuperior segment resection (PSR) using our institutional database.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Following IRB approval, we prospectively followed 500 consecutive patients between 2013 and 2023 who underwent robotic hepatectomy. Posterosuperior segments include segment 4 A, 7, and 8. The data are presented as median (mean ± standard deviation).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 500 patients included in this study, 19 (4 %) underwent ICR, 65 (13 %) underwent ECR, and 131 (26 %) patients underwent PSR. ECR was associated with significantly longer operative time, increased EBL, and longer LOS when compared with those of ICR and PSR. The patients who underwent ICR had the shortest operation duration, lowest EBL, and shortest LOS compared to ECR and PSR.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Robotic resection of liver tumors located in difficult segments is safe and feasible with excellent clinical and oncological outcomes. With appropriate expertise, a minimally invasive approach to those operations should not be avoided.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"239 ","pages":"Article 115996"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142405917","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-04DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116000
Tal Weiss , Rotem Franko , Lauren Lahav , Guy Lifshitz , Shmuel Avital , Yaron Rudnicki
Background
We aim to investigate the impact of routine cholangiography on asymptomatic patients with percutaneous cholecystostomy (PCC) for acute cholecystitis (AC).
Methods
The study included all patients treated with PCC for AC from 2017 to 2020 at a single academic center. Patients who underwent routine cholangiography within 30 days post-discharge while asymptomatic were compared to patients who were only followed clinically.
Results
The groups (cholangiography group, n = 44, and control group, n = 145) were similar in terms of age, comorbidities, and clinical presentation. The readmission rate for biliary disease in the cholangiography group was nearly half that of the control group (22.7 % vs. 40.7 %, p = 0.05) over an average follow-up of 10.4 months. The time to drain removal, cholecystectomy rate, and time to operation were comparable between the groups (42 vs. 40 days, p = 0.47, 52.3 % vs 53.1 %, p = NS and 69 vs. 82 days, p = 0.17, respectively).
Conclusions
Routine cholangiography can help reduce biliary disease readmissions among asymptomatic patients with PCC for AC without delaying further treatment.
背景:我们旨在研究常规胆管造影对急性胆囊炎(AC)经皮胆囊造口术(PCC)无症状患者的影响:我们旨在研究常规胆管造影对急性胆囊炎(AC)经皮胆囊造口术(PCC)无症状患者的影响:研究纳入了2017年至2020年在一家学术中心接受经皮胆囊造口术治疗的所有急性胆囊炎患者。将出院后30天内接受常规胆管造影术且无症状的患者与仅接受临床随访的患者进行比较:两组患者(胆管造影组,n = 44;对照组,n = 145)的年龄、合并症和临床表现相似。在平均 10.4 个月的随访期间,胆管造影组的胆道疾病再入院率几乎是对照组的一半(22.7% 对 40.7%,P = 0.05)。两组患者移除引流管的时间、胆囊切除率和手术时间相当(分别为42天 vs. 40天,p = 0.47;52.3% vs. 53.1%,p = NS;69天 vs. 82天,p = 0.17):常规胆管造影有助于减少无症状的 AC PCC 患者的胆道疾病再入院率,同时不会延误进一步治疗。
{"title":"The impact of routine cholangiography for asymptomatic patients after cholecystostomy insertion for acute cholecystitis","authors":"Tal Weiss , Rotem Franko , Lauren Lahav , Guy Lifshitz , Shmuel Avital , Yaron Rudnicki","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116000","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116000","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>We aim to investigate the impact of routine cholangiography on asymptomatic patients with percutaneous cholecystostomy (PCC) for acute cholecystitis (AC).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study included all patients treated with PCC for AC from 2017 to 2020 at a single academic center. Patients who underwent routine cholangiography within 30 days post-discharge while asymptomatic were compared to patients who were only followed clinically.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The groups (cholangiography group, n = 44, and control group, n = 145) were similar in terms of age, comorbidities, and clinical presentation. The readmission rate for biliary disease in the cholangiography group was nearly half that of the control group (22.7 % vs. 40.7 %, p = 0.05) over an average follow-up of 10.4 months. The time to drain removal, cholecystectomy rate, and time to operation were comparable between the groups (42 vs. 40 days, p = 0.47, 52.3 % vs 53.1 %, p = NS and 69 vs. 82 days, p = 0.17, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Routine cholangiography can help reduce biliary disease readmissions among asymptomatic patients with PCC for AC without delaying further treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"238 ","pages":"Article 116000"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142387355","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The Gender Equity Initiative in Global Surgery organization launched a mentorship program to address the limited opportunities available in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs). We aimed to evaluate the utility of the virtual program in bridging this critical gap.
Methods: A retrospective review of program surveys containing quantitative and qualitative questions from 2022 to 2023 was performed.
Results: Of n = 193 applicants, 81.3 % (157/193) identified as women, and 69.4 % (134/193) reported no prior mentorship. Applicants were from 41 countries (35 LMICs). The most requested specialties were general surgery (27.9 %, 54/193), neurosurgery (18.1 %, 35/193), and cardiothoracic surgery (11.4 %, 22/193). 55.9 % (108/193) preferred mentors from other countries (United States, United Kingdom, Canada), while 13.9 % (27/193) preferred mentors from their country. Ultimately, 48 applicants were matched with 13 mentors.
Conclusions: Demand for the program surpassed capacity, highlighting a need for mentorship opportunities for women overall, particularly in LMICs.
{"title":"Implementing a global mentoring program: A call to action for mentorship in surgery.","authors":"Joanna Chen, Anisa Nazir, Ayla Gerk, Pedra Rabiee, Isabella Faria, Kaela Blake, Tanaz Vaghaiwalla","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115997","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115997","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Gender Equity Initiative in Global Surgery organization launched a mentorship program to address the limited opportunities available in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs). We aimed to evaluate the utility of the virtual program in bridging this critical gap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of program surveys containing quantitative and qualitative questions from 2022 to 2023 was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of n = 193 applicants, 81.3 % (157/193) identified as women, and 69.4 % (134/193) reported no prior mentorship. Applicants were from 41 countries (35 LMICs). The most requested specialties were general surgery (27.9 %, 54/193), neurosurgery (18.1 %, 35/193), and cardiothoracic surgery (11.4 %, 22/193). 55.9 % (108/193) preferred mentors from other countries (United States, United Kingdom, Canada), while 13.9 % (27/193) preferred mentors from their country. Ultimately, 48 applicants were matched with 13 mentors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Demand for the program surpassed capacity, highlighting a need for mentorship opportunities for women overall, particularly in LMICs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"115997"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142456227","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-03DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115992
Aimee N Di Marco
{"title":"Thyroidectomy outcomes in admitted patients are indeed worse than for outpatents: Providers must now acknowledge and respond.","authors":"Aimee N Di Marco","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115992","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115992","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"115992"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142493095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-28DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115991
Polina Zmijewski, Chibueze Nwaiwu, Hayato Nakanishi, Soroush Farsi, Jessica Fazendin, Brenessa Lindeman, Herbert Chen, Andrea Gillis
Introduction: Racial disparities in surgical outcomes are well described, but a paucity of literature exists examining trends in outcomes of thyroid cancer. We performed a systematic review of studies on thyroid cancer outcomes to better delineate the impact of race.
Methods: A comprehensive search strategy was performed in several academic databases for articles on thyroid cancer and surgical outcomes in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A total of 1771 abstracts were reviewed. Abstracts were screened by two independent reviewers with disagreements resolved by a third. Studies that were based in the United States, included single center, unique data, focused on outcomes of differentiated thyroid cancer, were performed on adults >18 years old, and reported race in their results were included. Chi square statistics with Yates correction were calculated on the compiled data. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022300021).
Results: Twelve studies met inclusion criteria with data on 7,221patients. Among the included studies, our study consists of 67 % White patients, 22 % Black patients, 7 % Hispanic patients, and 3 % Asian patients. Extrathyroidal extension was observed in 8.4 % (n = 13) of White patients. In comparison to White patients, Black (18.4 %, n = 21, p = 0.024) and Hispanic patients (28.3 %, n = 30, p < 0.001) had a higher incidence of extrathyroidal extension, while a similar incidence was observed in Asian patients (14.0 %, n = 8, p = 0.336). Compared to White patients (22.2 %, n = 34), Black (12.4 %, n = 13, p = 0.065), Hispanic (16.0 %, n = 15, p = 0.301), and Asian (18.4 %, n = 9, p = 0.709) patients had a similar incidence of T1a stage. White patients had 10.1 % (n = 54) recurrence rates, and Black (13.5 %, n = 7, p = 0.595), Hispanic (10.5 %, n = 2, p = 1.000), and Asian (11.1 %, n = 3, p = 1.000) patients had similar recurrence rates.
Conclusions: Race is seldom reported in outcomes on studies of thyroid cancer. From our analysis we conclude that non-White patients may have a higher risk of more advanced local disease at presentation. More data with granular detail on race is necessary to better understand racial disparities in thyroid cancer outcomes and how to alleviate them.
{"title":"Racial disparities in thyroid cancer outcomes: A systematic review.","authors":"Polina Zmijewski, Chibueze Nwaiwu, Hayato Nakanishi, Soroush Farsi, Jessica Fazendin, Brenessa Lindeman, Herbert Chen, Andrea Gillis","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115991","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115991","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Racial disparities in surgical outcomes are well described, but a paucity of literature exists examining trends in outcomes of thyroid cancer. We performed a systematic review of studies on thyroid cancer outcomes to better delineate the impact of race.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search strategy was performed in several academic databases for articles on thyroid cancer and surgical outcomes in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A total of 1771 abstracts were reviewed. Abstracts were screened by two independent reviewers with disagreements resolved by a third. Studies that were based in the United States, included single center, unique data, focused on outcomes of differentiated thyroid cancer, were performed on adults >18 years old, and reported race in their results were included. Chi square statistics with Yates correction were calculated on the compiled data. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022300021).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies met inclusion criteria with data on 7,221patients. Among the included studies, our study consists of 67 % White patients, 22 % Black patients, 7 % Hispanic patients, and 3 % Asian patients. Extrathyroidal extension was observed in 8.4 % (n = 13) of White patients. In comparison to White patients, Black (18.4 %, n = 21, p = 0.024) and Hispanic patients (28.3 %, n = 30, p < 0.001) had a higher incidence of extrathyroidal extension, while a similar incidence was observed in Asian patients (14.0 %, n = 8, p = 0.336). Compared to White patients (22.2 %, n = 34), Black (12.4 %, n = 13, p = 0.065), Hispanic (16.0 %, n = 15, p = 0.301), and Asian (18.4 %, n = 9, p = 0.709) patients had a similar incidence of T1a stage. White patients had 10.1 % (n = 54) recurrence rates, and Black (13.5 %, n = 7, p = 0.595), Hispanic (10.5 %, n = 2, p = 1.000), and Asian (11.1 %, n = 3, p = 1.000) patients had similar recurrence rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Race is seldom reported in outcomes on studies of thyroid cancer. From our analysis we conclude that non-White patients may have a higher risk of more advanced local disease at presentation. More data with granular detail on race is necessary to better understand racial disparities in thyroid cancer outcomes and how to alleviate them.</p>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"115991"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142456229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-27DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115994
Janelle Cyprich , Amy H. Kaji , George A. Singer , Alexander C. Schwed , Jessica A. Keeley
Introduction
Adolescent trauma patients are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). It is unclear whether VTE prophylaxis practice patterns differ across trauma center types.
Methods
The ACS-TQP database was queried for patients aged 12-17 admitted to a pediatric, adult, or mixed level I/II trauma center. VTE prophylaxis was compared between center types. Preplanned subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate guideline adherence.
Results
Of 101,010 patients included, 35 % were treated at a pediatric trauma center (PTC), 43 % at a mixed trauma center (MTC), and 22 % at an adult trauma center (ATC). VTE prophylaxis was more common at ATCs and MTCs compared to PTCs (51.0 % vs 24.9 % vs 5.0 %,p < 0.001). This trend persisted in subgroup analyses of patients aged 16–17 (63.8 % vs 40.5 % vs 6.4 %,p < 0.001) and with injury severity score greater than 25 (83.8 % vs 74.0 % vs 35.1 %,p < 0.001).
Conclusion
VTE prophylaxis is administered more frequently to adolescent trauma patients treated at ATCs and MTCs compared to PTCs despite published guidelines. Prospective studies are needed to assess the clinical utility of VTE prophylaxis in the adolescent trauma population.
{"title":"Practice variation in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in adolescent trauma patients: A comparative analysis of pediatric, adult, and mixed trauma centers","authors":"Janelle Cyprich , Amy H. Kaji , George A. Singer , Alexander C. Schwed , Jessica A. Keeley","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115994","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115994","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Adolescent trauma patients are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). It is unclear whether VTE prophylaxis practice patterns differ across trauma center types.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The ACS-TQP database was queried for patients aged 12-17 admitted to a pediatric, adult, or mixed level I/II trauma center. VTE prophylaxis was compared between center types. Preplanned subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate guideline adherence.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 101,010 patients included, 35 % were treated at a pediatric trauma center (PTC), 43 % at a mixed trauma center (MTC), and 22 % at an adult trauma center (ATC). VTE prophylaxis was more common at ATCs and MTCs compared to PTCs (51.0 % vs 24.9 % vs 5.0 %,p < 0.001). This trend persisted in subgroup analyses of patients aged 16–17 (63.8 % vs 40.5 % vs 6.4 %,p < 0.001) and with injury severity score greater than 25 (83.8 % vs 74.0 % vs 35.1 %,p < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>VTE prophylaxis is administered more frequently to adolescent trauma patients treated at ATCs and MTCs compared to PTCs despite published guidelines. Prospective studies are needed to assess the clinical utility of VTE prophylaxis in the adolescent trauma population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"238 ","pages":"Article 115994"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142374891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-27DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115993
Juliet C Dalton, Samantha M Thomas, Akiko Chiba, Ton Wang, E Shelley Hwang, Jennifer K Plichta
Background: Breast atypia increases overall breast cancer risk, potentially necessitating future interventions. This study examines the frequency and outcomes of additional percutaneous biopsies after an atypia diagnosis.
Methods: Adult patients with breast atypia (atypical ductal hyperplasia, atypical lobular hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in situ) at a single institution were reviewed for subsequent core needle biopsies (CNBs) and corresponding malignant outcomes.
Results: Among 432 patients, median age at diagnosis was 54.8 y. Seventy-one (71/432, 16.4 %) patients developed a breast malignancy. During a median follow-up of 7.4 y, 113 patients underwent 149 additional CNBs. Twenty-six patients (26/113, 23.0 %) had >2 additional CNBs. Approximately half (79/149, 53.0 %) of all additional CNBs occurred within 5 years after breast atypia diagnosis.
Conclusion: A considerable number of patients with breast atypia undergo additional percutaneous biopsies, especially within 5 years post-atypia diagnosis. Our study highlights the significant burden of surveillance and the need for tailored follow-up strategies.
{"title":"Subsequent percutaneous breast biopsies after initial atypia diagnosis: The patient burden of long-term follow up.","authors":"Juliet C Dalton, Samantha M Thomas, Akiko Chiba, Ton Wang, E Shelley Hwang, Jennifer K Plichta","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115993","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115993","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast atypia increases overall breast cancer risk, potentially necessitating future interventions. This study examines the frequency and outcomes of additional percutaneous biopsies after an atypia diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with breast atypia (atypical ductal hyperplasia, atypical lobular hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in situ) at a single institution were reviewed for subsequent core needle biopsies (CNBs) and corresponding malignant outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 432 patients, median age at diagnosis was 54.8 y. Seventy-one (71/432, 16.4 %) patients developed a breast malignancy. During a median follow-up of 7.4 y, 113 patients underwent 149 additional CNBs. Twenty-six patients (26/113, 23.0 %) had >2 additional CNBs. Approximately half (79/149, 53.0 %) of all additional CNBs occurred within 5 years after breast atypia diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A considerable number of patients with breast atypia undergo additional percutaneous biopsies, especially within 5 years post-atypia diagnosis. Our study highlights the significant burden of surveillance and the need for tailored follow-up strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"115993"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142379023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}